hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Little Caesars Pizza Bowl broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS that is neither a YouTube video or a dead link; one is a WP:PRIMARY of one of the teams, three of the ESPN articles is about the Bowl or BCS games, not exclusive to this and the rest is about the games itself with the broadcasting element being given a passing mention.  The rest is about the games itself, far less for the broadcasting of this game.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and Michigan .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per above nom.  I see no encyclopedic value or reason for this list.  Also, the editor who created it is now a blocked sock.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 15:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Fox (American businessman): Forbes is a piece the subject wrote.  Nothing found otherwise we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment this is a promotional article about a self-promoter, and many of the sources are not usable.   Apart from Page Six (a piece that seems to be him trying to manifest his desires into reality), the coverage is just about "Charge Enterprises".   Which, despite being a "NASDAQ listed company", has very minimal coverage.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 23:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have the same results as Walt Yoder - very low quality mentions, the occasional highly pulpy article.  None of which provide an actual biography, only platitudes.  Lamona ( talk ) 20:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable by WP:Notability standards.  Only mentions are self promotion not RS secondary coverage.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 05:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is a lot of PROMO in this (and the article is clearly written by a UPE); no SIGCOV in the NYT or WSJ (or other major American paper), that would be important for proper notability.   Lots of PROMO pieces in Forbes etc.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 18:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Accident of birth: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Herbert Spiegelberg found something to say about J. S. Mill 's use of the concept, in discussing egalitarianism .  [1] The English term seems to have been introduced by Mill and Herbert Spencer .  [2] John D. Caputo found something to say when discussing Heidegger.  [3] Ágnes Heller took it as a starting point.  [4] Suggests to me that the concept is probably notable.  Cf.  WP:BEFORE .  Charles Matthews ( talk ) 12:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If the references above and now in the article are being taken in the sense of WP:GNG as trivial mentions in the sense of WP:SIGCOV , then I have to say I disagree.  Charles Matthews ( talk ) 04:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm going to suggest userfy the article.  It is not in good shape now, clearly, but also I think deletion would be harsh.  Charles Matthews ( talk ) 19:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I commend on your enthusiasm, but you just was well can restart it in your user space.  There is nothing to salvage from article history. - Altenmann >talk 04:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Your comments below do not add up to a reason to delete under policy.  The article can be fixed up by normal editing; the nomination for deletion here of such articles is problematic.  AfD is not a cleanup mechanism, and should not be used as such: try PROD.  I'd like to have the article userfied so that I can do a proper job of researching it, rather than trying to get it over some nominal bar in a sprint over a few days.  The OED reference to Algernon Sidney 's Discourses is to a work that gets 40 page references in the index to Blair Worden 's Roundhead Reputations ; so is worth amplification.  Charles Matthews ( talk ) 11:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is OR about a concept which does not have significant coverage in secondary sources.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete without prejudice for recreation.  The definition is dubious OR.   But the phrase does have reasonable refs.  - Altenmann >talk 04:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nuria Sheikh Farah: Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time 12:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Kenya .  Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time 12:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 03:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elisabeth P. Montgomery: François Robere ( talk ) 09:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  François Robere ( talk ) 09:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Authors , Women , China ,  and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No relevance under WP:NPROF as far as I can tell - Fire in the Lake is her thesis, and I can't find Thirty Years of China's Economic Reform in my (very extensive) library catalogue at all.  I don't see significant independent coverage of her in the references either.  Do ping me if I've missed something there, thanks.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Please take care that we're referring to the correct article, so that we don't accidentally delete the star of Bewitched !  :) Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  I was unable to find significant coverage in my searches for sources.  The subject does not pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline or Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria .  Cunard ( talk ) 05:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Boury: Mooonswimmer 17:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Arkansas .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 19:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kristína Panáková: The closest thing to SIGCOV is 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Slovakia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniela Salguero: The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this interview from 2019.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bassline Boys: Binksternet ( talk ) 18:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Binksternet ( talk ) 18:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CDK Company: Article has had puffery issues in the past.  Doesn't really seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY outside of a singular viral moment that got a modicum of coverage.  Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 18:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Dance .  Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 18:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies ,  and Netherlands .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not meeting WP:NORG .  This is spammy also at articles that lead to the page so a thorough cleanup along with the deletion is much appreciated.  gidonb ( talk ) 14:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alan L. Cohen: References are profiles, interviews, PR, press-releases and clickbait.  scope_creep Talk 15:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pennsylvania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Once again, this is clearly a motivated desire from the nominator to delete every page I have written.  Just look at two of the references (REF1 [1] alone is enough), or REF16 [2] calling him notable from the NY Times.  Stravensky ( talk ) 22:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG and the creating editor was fishy.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 11:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Servtrans: Darron4 ( talk ) 16:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Romania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lorne Maxime: JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of soccer clubs in the Marshall Islands: They are only teams that happened to be registered with that name, and seemingly never operated at any capacity outside of amateur tournaments that took place years ago.  Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 15:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete look like a WP:HOAX .  HadesTTW (he/him • talk ) 19:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I wouldn't say hoax- there are supporting sources at RSSSF , this is just not notable at all.  Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 19:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see, I was mistaken.  I thought that when you said "legitimate clubs" that you meant they didn't actually exist.  HadesTTW (he/him • talk ) 22:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Lists ,  and Oceania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No, these teams aren't hoaxes, but this sounds more equivalent to your local softball league sponsored by taverns and breweries in the United States more than a group of even semi-pro teams and they're there for fun, not glory.  Nate • ( chatter ) 20:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Or redirect to Football in the Marshall Islands .  Football is completely incipient there, just like Niue, FS Micronesia or Palau.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I would consider this as village club teams that do not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , While these clubs do exist, they are too insignificant for coverage.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 15:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Football in the Marshall Islands as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing notable about this list.  Looks like a list of friendlys.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raffaele Buranelli: The first source is an advertising website, the second provides no significant coverage, the third is mostly an interview which doesn’t contribute towards notability as a primary source (the website also appears to be unreliable).  The fourth source again lacks significant coverage, and the fifth appears to be unreliable.  A WP:BEFORE turned up virtually no reliable coverage, such as the FilmFreeway forum source and only brief mentions in books.  I could see no particularly viable redirect targets per WP:ATD .  The Night Watch (talk) 01:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Theatre , Advertising ,  and Italy .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Commission on Police Reform: Articles relies only on academic papers, which judging by the articles do not refer specifically to the reform, but to police reform in general.  NoonIcarus ( talk ) 21:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Police ,  and Venezuela .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Reads more like a newspaper or a news article .  Kaseng55 ( talk ) 02:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dennis Maina Macharia: While there are a few sources, they only give a passing mention of the subject, and I'm not even sure if they're reliable.  Thus, the article doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, WP:GNG and WP:NBIO .  GSS 💬 18:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Kenya .  GSS 💬 18:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The first source is an interview, the second is a press release/PR and none of the awards are notable.   A Google search comes up with the same.  S0091 ( talk ) 15:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC) S0091 ( talk ) 15:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt per above and WP:SALT , and consider a ban for the creator.  Besides the poor sourcing , it has several indicia of spam ; see User:Largoplazo#Telltale_signs_of_candidates_for_deletion .  In 2007, a marketing executive or salesperson could have gotten away with this; in 2024, it is untenable because everyone knows we are a charity and not a social media website nor a free web host .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Champions Soccer Radio Network: Let'srun ( talk ) 16:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Sports , Football ,  and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't see how this meets the notability guidelines.  The station's own website is defunct and there is probably very little information out there.  PearlyGigs ( talk ) 06:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete