hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ryan Mingachos : Joeykai ( talk ) 22:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 01:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTBASIC , WP:SIGCOV .  Open and shut.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - appears to be all-amateur, non-professional, non-Olympics soccer player, one of millions .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - he does not have too much coverage.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 02:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 12:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gond Mahasabha : Sources are scarce as the event or conference is not a notable one.  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and India .  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Youssof Altoukhi : Doesn't satisfy GNG - no claim to notability.  Despite claim in article, the subject delivered a TEDx talk, not a TED talk; pretty much anyone can organise and speak at the former.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  09:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  09:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - was very commercial-looking crypto-flavoured spam before I cleaned that out, leaving very little else - David Gerard ( talk ) 13:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly not notable and of promotional nature.  Aintabli ( talk ) 16:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
French Week : Spinixster (chat!) 11:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media ,  and France .  Spinixster (chat!) 11:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No independent WP:RS sources that indicate notability.  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 11:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 07:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Youth Coalition for Organ Donation : Fails WP:GNG .   - UtherSRG (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New York .  UtherSRG (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to meet WP:NORG / WP:SIRS .  Jfire ( talk ) 01:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One failed measure which was enough to garner local, regional, and national news still meets Wikipedia’s notability standards, but in this case, there was an additional, successful piece of legislation passed in partnership with The YCOD.  Meets notability standards.  Evanroden1 ( talk ) 16:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Symbiant (company) : Sources in article fail to provide sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH .  GNews search shows nothing better.  I did remove some sections I thought weren't needed, along with their references, but I don't believe they satisfy the notability criteria.  They're either written by the CEO, or a single short review.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  20:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London : Sole source is government list.  Article on an individual office of the IOM which simply states it exists and its location.  Fails WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG .  Nothing to merge and an implausible search term.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Organizations ,  and United Kingdom .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't think this is a good merge candidate because there's not even enough information to work out if any of the content is even still true.  It does seem to still exist from a Google search, but it's certainly not notable outside of its parent article.  Redirect not especially good idea other as is not a likely redirect BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator rationale.  Local units of larger organizations are not notable unless there are substantial reliable source coverage of it.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG and WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International Organization for Migration as WP:ATD .  There are 195 incoming links to this page and although most are likely from {{ Diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom }} it is WP:CHEAP ER to redirect than to identify and adjust the links.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose a redirect, this is an utterly implausible search term.  ATD doesn't mean we can literally never delete anything nor does it eliminate other parts of the deletion policy such as WP:DEL-REASON : see #8 "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP, and so forth)" are suitable for deletion.  Incoming links appear to be from the template.  A redirect is also undue as this office is not mentioned at International Organization for Migration (nor should it be).  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with above, I oppose redirect too.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ivan Sviridov : There are no non-primary sources about this athlete that I could find.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 14:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Football ,  and Kazakhstan .  Fermiboson ( talk ) 14:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:SPORTSBASIC .  Only sources found are databases, that goes for Kazakh-language sources as well, failing basic criteria as noted above.  Tails Wx 16:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  NATH does not exist for footballers.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:SPORTSBASIC . -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Meyer Swanepoel : All I found were routine transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG as coverage is mainly team announcements and transactional stuff.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of suicides in fiction : The few sources don't concern the subject matter at large, but specific pieces of fiction listed.  Zanahary ( talk ) 23:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A completely indiscriminate, poorly sourced, example farm.  Actual prose information on the topic of depictions of suicide in fiction could very likely be developed, either under the "Social and Culture" section of the main Suicide article or even potentially as its own article.  But this list would not be useful at all in that endeavor since, as pointed out in the nomination, it does not actually include any sources on that topic, just a handful of specific examples, mainly just sourced to the pieces of fiction they are from.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Rorshacma.  The topic is WP:INDISCRIMINATE , besides being badly sourced.  The subject of this article cannot practically built or maintained in a way that meets our policies.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 16:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a gigantic collection of indiscriminate information that could easily include a significant portion of every single fictional work ever created.  Furthermore, the vast majority of it is completely uncited .  It is simply impossible to maintain this type of list.  ― Susmuffin Talk 21:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Odd and seemingly random, it's totally unencyclopedic and poorly sourced.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WJPW-CD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and West Virginia .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems to have mostly rebroadcast other stations.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 04:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No separate notability from either of its parent stations, one of which was itself deleted as non-notable .  Another remnant of how loose the inclusion "standards" were in this topic area in 2006.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mediterranean Basketball Association : No reliable, independent sourcing or sustained impact meriting coverage; orphaned article.  lizthegrey ( talk ) 06:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Basketball , Middle East ,  and Europe .  lizthegrey ( talk ) 06:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Israel , Lebanon , Qatar , Bulgaria , Cyprus , Greece , Serbia ,  and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:23, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It was an idea that was debated, picked up by independent papers that wrote long articles, sufficing the WP:GNG .  Thus, if it almost happened and last minute was canceled, I'd support a keep.  Since the debate was very early on, not.   I think that, while the GNG is met, this article gets into the general sphere of WP:NOT .  Also, cool that it was considered, yet a Lebanese team playing games with Israel, how realistic nowadays is that?  gidonb ( talk ) 13:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bryant Arroyo : And therein lies the problem.  The primary sources for the article were "Medical Veritas: The Journal of Medical Truth" (see also: Badger's Law), and a rebuttal in Quackwatch, which I regard as reliable but others don't.  This was a minor cause célèbre among ANTIVA, but I don't see any evidence of lasting coverage in reality-based media.  His campaign activities as an inmate activist might pass WP:1E but here, again, the level of coverage is minimal and fundamentally about the campaign, not the man. I don't think we have enough here for a WP:BLP : a routine crime, a bit of woo-monger conspiracist BS, and some reporting of involvement in a prisoners' campaign.  Guy ( help! - typo? ) 14:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Environment ,  and Puerto Rico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't seem to pass crime notability, coverage I find is all from a site called "Workers World" in Gnews.  Kudos for the coal plant thing, but I don't think that gets you an article here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Workers World is the Communist Party newspaper for the USA, which implies bias.  I can't find coverage in any RS otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete falls short of WP:GNG by the looks of it. - KH-1 ( talk ) 01:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ibrahim Iyal Gafai : No sources found, links in the article are a Google search and some non-RS looking websites.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, was unable to find any sources that would support this article.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Islam ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC .  None of the info in the article demonstrates notability.  The article is written in a promotional tone and the sources cited in the article are not reliable.  It also appears that the page creator is the subject himself.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  16:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
GITEX Impact : 🔥 Yes I'mOnFire 🔥 ( ContainThis Ember? ) 14:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   First of all, this is an advertisement, not an encyclopedia article.   Second, see WP:FUTURE .  Third, see the second for a first time future event – none of the information can ultimately be separated from sources connected to the event.   If this is to be published at all, it should be after the event occurs, but not before.  Ira Leviton ( talk ) 20:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  About 3/4 of the sources all share a similar wording style, something like "largest global event on climate investment" and "bringing in a spectrum of stakeholders", to a point where it can't possibly be a coincidence.  And the rest are promotional, trivial mentions or entirely unrelated.  Searching the term only returned more trivial mentions.  Even if the event would be notable in the future, the sourcing on the current article is so terrible that editors might as well just start over from scratch.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 02:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it is not relevant for Wikipedia.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 13:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oxford University Wine Circle : There are passing mentions on the page and some primary sources.  Other sources exist but I don't see much that could be considered more than a passing mention of the subject.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and England .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The sources already in the article are either passing mentions or primary sources; I cannot find anything further myself which would meet the requirements of WP:GNG .  WJ94 ( talk ) 13:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Decanter article is a short promotional post.  The Daily Telegraph story pertains to another subject and does not provide any significant coverage.  All other references cited are not reliable.  Multi7001 ( talk ) 21:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bart le Roux : The most I found were three sentences here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A few team announcements and a bit of transactional stuff, but not enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete