hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Solemn Novena: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Northern Ireland .  Owen× ☎ 19:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : While this discussion appears to have no quorum , it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).  Logs : 2006-09 ✗ CSD A7 -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No claim to notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 03:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Jenerators: Its singer is a notable actor but this band only has a brief mention on his article and notability is not inherited.  A web search for the band brings up nothing the exclusively covers the band.  There are other bands with the same name including covers band but I couldn't find anything on the blues band.  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and United States of America .  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Several source searches are only providing name mentions and one-sentence passing mentions.  Does not meet WP:BAND or WP:GNG .  North America 1000 06:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deafhead: A Google search reveals one relevant article , and the other results are mostly regurgitation of this WSJ article.  Relevant info should be folded into Deadhead .  — Ghost River 20:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Disability ,  and Popular culture .  — Ghost River 20:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Visual Component Framework: All the reference provided are dead links and the project seems abandoned since 15 years.  Internet search shows one book (but claims on its cover page to be sourced by Wikipedia article, and mostly blog entries and tutorials.  Christophe ( talk ) 13:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Project activity shows that last update was 9 years ago.  It's not 15 years but still superdead.  Project has a generic name which you would expect from big entities like Microsoft, but it was developed by some random programmer.  No independent (and reliable) sources to show notability.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Woodcar Independent Racing League: Two local news coverage sources with single sentence mentions and a self-published book but appears to fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:SUSTAINED .  lizthegrey ( talk ) 00:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys , Motorsport ,  and United States of America .  lizthegrey ( talk ) 00:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or draftify - with no citations outside of the organization's own website, the article does not even make a claim for notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2008 Toledo vs. Michigan football game: Supported by no reliable sources.  BullDawg2021 ( talk ) 20:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions .  BullDawg2021 ( talk ) 20:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - found this BleacherReport article called Grading the Worst Loss in Wolverines' History and SBNation article called On This Day: Toledo Stunned Michigan 13-10 .  But these are not Reliable Sources, at least I don't think?  Can't say if this article meets the requirements, can't find anything else.  I'll leave that to others - BeFriendlyGoodSir ( talk ) 20:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The first source was published a mere two days after the event, so that source fails WP:PERSISTENCE anyways.  Left guide ( talk ) 21:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Individual games have to be historic to warrant articles, and this contains no claim to historic status.  Seems WP:ROTM .  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG , could find nothing that makes this game notable or even redirect worthy.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 06:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.   Upsets happen all the time in college football and nothing to make this game significant (such as the previous year’s Appalachian State. - Michigan game).   A redirect to this game on the 2008 Toledo or Michigan season page is a reasonable WP:ATD however “ 2008 Toledo vs. Michigan football game” is an unlikely search term.  Frank Anchor 14:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Not historic.  The game can be adequately covered at the team-season level.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 12:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not historic.Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete upsets happen all the time in sport, this doesn't have WP:SUSTAINED coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Liam Brathwaite: JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Barbados .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lesnar–Reigns rivalry: No actual recognition of the rivalry itself by reliable secondary sources.  Also, one of the main facts that these two have starred the most together at Mania main event is factually incorrect, Austin-Rock is another to main event thrice.  BinaryBrainBug ( talk ) 15:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and United States of America .  BinaryBrainBug ( talk ) 15:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topic: Martial arts .  North America 1000 19:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Kindly don't add Wrestling to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Martial arts, it's not related martial arts, it's scripted.  Thank you.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 15:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see any significant independent coverage of this rivalry that is required to show notability.   All the references to event results are irrelevant since pro wrestling is scripted.   That is why wrestlers fall under WP:ENTERTAINER and not WP:NSPORTS .  Papaursa ( talk ) 21:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agreed that this is a niche fan wiki.  Winditaround ( talk ) 20:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rugenio Josephia: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tobi Mohammed: It’s all coming to me till the end of time 13:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears PROMO, the awards also look non-notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Scream All Youth Awards, is a notable African Youth award organized by Scream Magazine, the award appears on multiple reliable source in Nigeria, Namibia and Ghana .  With this sources, it is proven the award meets the WP:NAWARD criteria on notability of an award.  Afí-afeti ( talk ) 19:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , as the subject is not notable for one event but meets the WP:ANYBIO for his contribution to the entertainment industry. -- Afí-afeti ( talk ) 07:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fail WP:GNG can't find any awards, or significant achievement, that makes the topic pass WP:ANYBIO majority of the coverages the topic gets are not independent.  Oloriebi 12:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This one isn’t even a “philanthropist” as well as having a job.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chirp (formerly Cilter Technologies): The coverage of this small company (of perhaps 12 employees?) is the type of "startup receives seed funding" business reporting that is common for any similar business.  What limited coverage does exist relates to the company's previous brand name - to the extent that the only source (connecting the title of the article with the entity discussed in the article) is the org's own LinkedIn page.  If we do not have sufficient reliable/independent sources to even establish that a company of this name exists (and is the same company covered in the other few sources), then SIGCOV is not met.  Clearly WP:TOOSOON .  (Would have PRODed, but the creator of the article moved it to the main article namespace [over DRAFT]. And re-added [at best] quasi-promotional text about the org being "award-winning". Therefore not "uncontroversial".)  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a mission statement, not an article.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  And they can tell whoever runs these things I'm not impressed by the gaming of autoconfirm here.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 12:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A non-notable startup company.  They don't even have a product, vague claim that they will develop something in the future.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 06:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As above, none of the reference meet GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 16:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shofur: "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  In plain English, this means that references cannot rely *only* on information provided by the company - such as articles that rely entirely on quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews, website information, etc - even when slightly modified or reworded.  While there's lots of "coverage", most of it is derived from PR and announcements (fails ORGIND).  Others lack in-depth information about the company.  None of the references listed meet the criteria and I'm unable to locate anything that does.  HighKing ++ 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies .  HighKing ++ 16:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP .   Its like its written for 2008.  Its unbelievable.  I can see about 8 press-release in the first two blocks of 20 refs without opening them.  Its unbelievable.  The references are absolute junk.  We can go through the references if need be, but its heading for the out door.  scope_creep Talk 10:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE as with CharterUP , which was had involvement by the same COI/paid-for editor, and is about a very similar business, it is a corporate puff piece that doesn't establish the notability of the subject.  Pieces like these are a cancer on Wikipedia that need to be brutally excised 10mmsocket ( talk ) 11:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please check your facts @ 10mmsocket .  The edit log on this article will very clearly show that I have had 0 involvement in the creation or edits on this article.  Michellecharterup ( talk ) 14:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Cleary, Mr. 10mm is referring to Mlevy1010 ( talk · contribs ), who was operating with an undisclosed COI for both companies.  Quite a bit of problematic editing and advocacy there.  Sam Kuru (talk) 15:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My mixup I'm afraid - I thought that paid-for editor Michellecharterup was the same person as paid-for editor Mlevy1010 and that the former had done more paid-for work that she had admitted to.  I am happy to admit I was wrong.  10mmsocket ( talk ) 17:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JustGarciaHill.org: 2014 AfD was no consensus due to low participation.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article appears to be the only significant coverage of the website.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are about a dozen mentions of the site in journals but nothing extensive, most just name drops.  This is typical [1] .  It's just not enough for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tbilisi Waldorf School: There may be other sources in Georgian, which I can’t read.  Notability seems very uncertain and we’re long past the 90 day limit for draftification.  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Georgia (country) .  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Weinstein (musician): CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Businesspeople ,  and Martial arts .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet notablity as a martial artist either, as I can't find anything at all.  Probably a vanity page.  Nswix ( talk ) 01:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't seem to pass GNG.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 20:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete