hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Una Mamea Park: Wikipedia should not be used as a vehicle for promotional activities, and at the same time the controversy itself does not rise to the level of being worthy of describing by the encyclopedia.  Joy ( talk ) 20:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions .  Joy ( talk ) 20:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Geography .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clear from Jutarnji this is not actually a park but looks to be some sort of a scam.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Štrbački buk , which is the site where this guy has declared a park.  This "weird local controversy" could maybe be an addition to that article, but not at this point one of its own.  -- D'n'B - t -- 17:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The problem with describing this on par with everything else there is that it would likely give WP:undue weight to the topic. -- Joy ( talk ) 19:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Certainly, adding anything to the target article would have to be done with care.  Redirecting without making any addition would also do just fine.  -- D'n'B - t -- 19:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Colayer: Previous AfDs resulted in delete (2007) and no consensus (2009).  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and Switzerland .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous AfD's, so not eligible for soft-deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 18:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The two keep votes in the previous nomination cite an IP that arguably improved the article by removing promotional material, and that Once Wave will be released later this year, there may be more coverage.  I guess the essay WP:TOOSOON didn't exist then, as it was made in 2010, but it certainly applies here.  In any case I do not see any sources to confirm the 2009 AfD speculation.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 19:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Archived sources: some don’t load anymore, some are based on press releases, others are passing mentions, and the last two seem to be WP:SELFPUB .  TLA (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anda Ka Kasam: None have shown the notability of this subject.  Karnataka ( talk ) 16:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Karnataka ( talk ) 16:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raagini Sutradhar: A WP:BEFORE search turns up no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, just routine syndicated movie promotion, and a few brief articles about her wedding to a director.  This Times of India article cited says she was cast in Lage Prema Nazar in 2021, but I can't find a reliable source to verify that she appeared in the released film.  Unsourced claims about her early life (now removed) and improperly sourced promotional photo suggest undisclosed paid editing.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India , Odisha ,  and West Bengal .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . The actress is not regarded well-known who has played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work that has been the primary subject of multiple independent articles and reviews.  Fails notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Failed WP:NACTOR , even WP:BASIC .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 17:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Tehonk ( talk ) 18:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hakeem Nisar Ahmad: Sh eri ff | ☎ 911 | 12:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Pakistan .  Sh eri ff | ☎ 911 | 12:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  --— Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 12:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing any significant coverage except for press releases about his part in running for elections to which he did not win. Fails WP:NPOL as not having won any seat-- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : [19] Did not win his election so no WP:NPOL pass, and there does not appear to be WP:SIGCOV of him beyond routine campaigning releases.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 04:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they didn't win — but this makes no claim that the subject has preexisting notability for any other reason.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emmanuel Adeyemi: The sources rather based on the company which doesn't still meet WP:ORGCRIT .  Lacks minimum sourcing, and here isn't the case of clean up, it is not MILL either but haven't attain notability.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Africa ,  and Nigeria .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Not seeing any notability-qualifying coverage.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 03:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Jihami (marketer): There might be better sources but I didn't find them on a WP:BEFORE .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 15:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : He won an award yes, but it's a trivial item [9] .  This is PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete still fails WP:NBIO.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Jihami . - KH-1 ( talk ) 02:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Victory Cup: Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is clearly not the primary topic for Victory Cup .   As far as having an article at all: the one source is too dubious.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carmen Polanco: I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG , instead finding only passing mentions ( 2012 , 2014 , 2015 , etc.).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 06:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lobster Records: music/band notability #5 is not a consensus approved method of evaluating record label business category and preliminary before AfD check revealed a mention level coverage in LA Times and inclusion in directory entries in books showing that this is a PO BOX based business.  Fails WP:SIGCOV Graywalls ( talk ) 00:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Entertainment , Business , Companies ,  and California .  Graywalls ( talk ) 00:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As stated in another AfD, NMUSIC5 applies to performers, not labels.  I cannot find anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete as the history behind the label may be notable with not online sources possible available. -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 08:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
FK Partizan Momišići: After searching, unable to find sources to establish notability .  Created on 1 March 2007; was Proposed deletion 25 May 2023 and Deprod on the same day JoeNMLC ( talk ) 20:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Montenegro .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I sent notifications to: Created by - User talk:Sideshow Bob; Prod - User talk:Chidgk1; Deprod - User talk:Ortizesp.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 20:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Did not find any coverage of the subject in either English or Montenegrin.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence club meets club notability , also unable to find any sources to expand article.  Demt1298 ( talk ) 17:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
November 2011 Myanmar earthquake: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Myanmar .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT .  A merge isn't appropriate because it doesn't even qualify to be included in List of earthquakes in 2011 .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 17:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – WP:INDISCRIMINATE Dawnseeker2000 18:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This was a minor earthquake, with no long-lasting effects.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yaghob Eissa: Searching in Arabic (يعقوب عيسى) did not yield any WP:SIGCOV and all I can find were the database sites Kooora and Soccerway, both already cited.  It would appear that this footballer fails WP:SPORTBASIC #5 and should be deleted.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:SPORTBASIC criterion 5, I could find no interviews, articles or other material that can provide WP:SIGCOV for the subject aside from basic statistics on their performance.  The Night Watch (talk) 17:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clearly fails general notability criteria and WP:NSPORT .  -- Tserton ( talk ) 20:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 12:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patebari Gaon: It is missing information to show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria.  The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth.  Created on 1 November 2013.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 18:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Assam .  Karnataka ( talk ) 18:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Getting nothing on this.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The place does not possess sufficient notability to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia.  It fails WP:GNG and WP:PLACE .  According to my recent Google search, the only notable entity related to this place is the NGO called Patebari Rural Development Society .  Surprisingly, the NGO is situated in Makhibaha , Nalbari District , as mentioned in the "about us" section of the aforementioned website.  Hence, I began to suspect the existence of the place.  Saurabh Saha 17:26, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: here's what I've done for similar Indian towns and villages: Look for it on Google Earth to see what's there.  Google "Indian census"+Assam.  Go to the page for the state census from 2011 (or 2021 if available).  Download the huge spreadsheet that lists all the villages and their individual statistics.  This will take awhile - the server is slow, sometimes even unresponsive.  Look for Patebari Gaon in the Nalbari district .  If it's listed, it's considered officially recognized and meets WP:GEOLAND .  (Note that GEOLAND mentions " census tracts " - that's not what these villages are).  Also, spelling can vary between our articles and the census due to differences in transliteration from the Assamese language .  I'd do this myself expect I'm in an area with sketchy internet access for several days.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 20:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
World's safest banks: It is not covered by reliable sources to any meaningful extent and is not use by academics as an estimate of bank security.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 22:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Lists .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  One magazine's opinion doesn't amount to much.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 21:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lack of suitable sources, questionable point of view.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 21:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of paintball leagues: Merko ( talk ) 10:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Lists .  Merko ( talk ) 10:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete list of almost entirely redlinks, because none of these leagues appear notable.  Doesn't meet any of the suggested criteria of WP:NLIST .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Just a list of non-notable sports leagues.  And even the two articles that exist in Category:Paintball leagues don't appear to pass WP:GNG either.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 19:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed, PRODded both.  Merko ( talk ) 20:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahira Miyanji: N-Peace Award alone may not confer WP:N — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 15:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 15:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Education .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 19:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ginter Smuts: JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Quite a lengthy bio here.  Would love one more obvious source, but playing at the highest level still so opportunity for more.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm afraid, this "lengthy" bio is no more than a typical listing about a rugby player in a rugby magazine.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Plenty of match reports on . za (South Africa) websites, but I don't see anything about this player by himself.  Not enough sourcing for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A single routine profile of unknown independence is not enough to meet GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 22:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:RU/N .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete