Avi Weinroth: Looking at Google Books, Internet Archive, Newspapers.com, Gale resources, Oxford reference, the internet at large, and NewspaperARCHIVE.com.   I did find mention of his involvement in several cases in Israel, but insufficient info to support notability.   He is mentioned in a couple of legal repositories, such as the Martindale-Hubbell International Law Directory and an archived page from Bloomburg; these are based on submitted info from those listed, however.  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 23:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Although (1) its plausible this entry is or may one day be of interest to Isreali Wikipedians, or those with an interest in law, and that (2) it appears from what Ceyockey has written above the article could plausibly be re-written to make claims referenced by sources; ... the lack of coverage, both in-depth, and assessed collectively means that this subject doesn't meet SIGCOV requirements of GNG or an SNG Sadly, this is an instance where applying guidelines requires destruction of a knowledge source, irrespective of other considerations; including collateral damage to this website's wider mission and purpose.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 05:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  You can sea many titles he authored in Hollis search ( Harvard Library ).  Tzahy ( talk ) 13:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can see that, but that alone isn't enough to meet the SIGCOV or NACADEMIC requirements.  Do any of the books meet the criteria in those guidelines?  I'd rather keep this entry if possible Jack4576 ( talk ) 14:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I apologize, I'm not familiar with the requirements and I'm not sure I will have enough time to answer.  Tzahy ( talk ) 15:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's okay.  The requirements are awful and have a bias toward destroying knowledge on non-Anglospheric subjects.  You can still copy-paste this article's contents to the website everybodywiki.com though, it won't get deleted over there.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 16:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not having info on WP is not "destroying knowledge".  The internet is vast.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 18:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "The internet exists" does not make deleting information not deleting information Jack4576 ( talk ) 07:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To ignore the fact that Wikipedia is the primary point of access for most people to access tertiary sources is pretty obtuse.  Deleting knowledge from Wikipedia makes that knowledge less accessible.  This description really isn't up for debate.  What you think of the normative aspects is a separate issue.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 07:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Jack, as I've told you before, feel free to create your own online encyclopedia with any notability criteria you choose.  You could even be the sole admin and have final say on deletion of any articles.  LibStar ( talk ) 08:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And I'm fine with that constructive editing can include removing information.  Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_on_discussion_pages#Meta-reasoning makes sense to several Wikipedians you may encounter.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 08:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no significant coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 08:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete