hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jamie D'Souza: The vast majority of sources cited in this article are Q&A interview/podcast interviews and thus ineligible to count toward notability as primary sources.  There are a handful of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in sources like this and two Chortle reviews for D'Souza's Fringe performances.  We would need to see additional WP:SIGCOV for this to clear the bar, and a BEFORE search did not turn any up.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 15:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 20 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Entertainment ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deroy Rhoode: All that came up in searches were trivial mentions ( 1 , 2 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mumbai Gullies: A recent revision reads like an advertisement.  A revert today by another editor has the text as a stub.  Although it has references, I am not sure this makes it notable (per WP:PRODUCT ).  Further the subject was supposed to be finished in 2021, there seems to be no further update.  The production company is not notable enough to have a WP page.  I propose deleting this page, and will also make the same case for the 2 other games linked.  Master Of Ninja ( talk ) 07:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's non-notable currently and lacks reliable sourcing and significant coverage, given all the sources mention it trivially.  Also WP:TOOSOON for an unreleased game.  Could draftify if more sources are found.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 08:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] .  Delete .  Lack of reliable sources.  RomanRaju ( talk ) 10:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify As probably WP:TOOSOON .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 12:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom does not meet GNG.  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 00:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kapsaon: Not mapped.  Additionally, whilst "Kab-" is a prefix denoting place, "Kap-" is not a Kalenjin prefix, and its various words for for "loud" and "sound" do not pertain.  kencf0618 ( talk ) 01:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions .  kencf0618 ( talk ) 01:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I cannot verify this place even exists.  SportingFlyer T · C 22:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Val Jobara: Few minor roles, but no real claim to fame.  Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 21:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Sweden .  Pepper Beast (talk) 21:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Theatre , Italy , California ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   He has had a couple of bit parts in movies.   No reviews of his theatre roles.   Very non-notable.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 21:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable enough.  His most prominent role in Kick-Ass (film) isn't even the main cast of the film.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As of 2023 not notable enough.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 09:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maharashtra Premier League: Even if it did, this article is utter junk (it lists an auction in 2017, despite apparently being founded in 2009, and defunct that year too according to List of regional T20 cricket leagues in India ) and should be deleted per WP:TNT Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 16:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Cricket , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 16:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , could not find sources which clearly confirms the dates of the seasons, and the existence of this league.  RoboCric ( talk ) 17:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  StickyWicket ( talk ) 23:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Looks to fail WP:GNG .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tony Edeh: Of the eight sources in the article, two are primary sources from the awards received by the subject while three sources (number 6- TheCable, 7-Sahara Reporters, and 8- Premium Times) are about an unrelated Tony Edeh (The Chairman, Eha-Amufu and Fulani Communities Peace and Reconciliation Committee) according to the sources 6, 7, and 8, reviewed.  Supposing the Tony Edeh mentioned in those three articles are the subject of this article, he still falls below notability guidelines because he received only passing mentions.  The only  source that tends to count towards notability is the one from the Guardian (Nigeria) but that is not enough to establish minimum notability.  LocomotiveEngine ( talk ) 16:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  LocomotiveEngine ( talk ) 16:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Has a long way to go in passing WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep or Draftify - per WP:BASIC Found this [19] , [20] , [21] .  Otbest ( talk ) 00:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable business executive and wonder how this remained in this encyclopedia for this long.  It does not come close to notability.  Piscili ( talk ) 12:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phil Hobden: His production company Modern Life?  also seems non-notable.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Bundling production company into AfD officially: Modern Life?  ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views )  Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hobden might be notable as producer for the 2 notable (with a WP page, that is) films he produced .  Hence weak keep .  But it's either him or the company, I'd say.  And the page needs some serious clean up. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am doubtful whether the two films that you mention are even notable, but would have to do more analysis on them.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 15:44, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly not notable and not worthy of his own article.  This seems to be an easy delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 16:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not notable for an entry.  Search performed did not yield needed result.  Noneate ( talk ) 17:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found no WP:SIGCOV , don't see how it meets WP:GNG nor any other WP:N guideline.  Jacona ( talk ) 19:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Top Dutch Joint Solar Array: By using TopDutch as the primary economic brand for initiatives and networks, the campaign supports northern ambitions and the northern ecosystem.  According to this article , The "Joint Solar Array" was apparently  part of a promotional campaign to attract businesses or investors to the area.  See for example this tweet they made directed to Elon Musk: https://twitter.com/TopDutchCom/status/960592776927809536 It never was a real solar farm, only a promotional campaign.  One of the many they may have done.  The campaign seems to have ended and there is no longer any mention of it on the TopDuch website.  It is difficult to find other sources even talking about it.  I am not really convinced a promotional campaign like this needs a wikipedia article.  It is definitely not a solar farm like the article currently says.  Jexio ( talk ) 16:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Netherlands .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is about as close as I can find [39] , appears to be an unrelated project.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a misleading promotional article.  Thank you for nominating, Jexio ! gidonb ( talk ) 23:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Technology .  gidonb ( talk ) 23:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
This Window: Theroadislong ( talk ) 13:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Bands and musicians ,  and Arts .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 13:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I cannot find any RS (or really any independent sources) on this band, and they seem to be very obscure.  From all that I can tell, fails GNG and NBAND.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LandFighter: Flounder fillet ( talk ) 12:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Europe ,  and Netherlands .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 12:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] At the very least, Draftify.  : The external links section only has a dead-link to the website of the brand.  Article also only has 1 source at the time of me posting this.  Shadow311 ( talk ) 15:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Brand folded without leaving an impression.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anotopterus sp. (2008): The article cites only one reference, and it's a dead URL.  However, an archived version of it does exist on the Wayback Machine: ...And nowhere in the archived source does it say it's a new species.  Nor are there any papers from around that time period on Google Scholar about the discovery of a new, as-of-yet-undescribed species of Anotopterus .  In fact, the picture given in the article/source is identical to the one FishBase uses for Anotopterus vorax , which already has a page.  Please nuke this page from orbit.  It's 16 years overdue.  — Kodiak Blackjack ( talk ) • ( contribs ) 18:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 24 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  An editor read the cited article and erroneously though it was an undescribed species, when it was a specimen of Anotopterus vorax .  Nurg ( talk ) 05:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete , see above comment.  Thank you for bringing this to my attention; I was led by an online news article (secondary source) to believe it was one of the species discovered by the team that wrote the PDF (primary source) linked here.  This is a prime example of why secondary sources are less trustworthy than primary.  I'm actually amused at my naive mistake here, since I would have written that stub a few years before I was introduced to actual scientific journal articles.  Bob the WikipediaN ( talk • contribs ) 02:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joseph Williams (music producer): Subject does not appear to be notable enough for standalone article.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST .  CycloneYoris talk!  04:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Music .  CycloneYoris talk!  04:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anas Hussain Rizvi: In a WP:BEFORE search I can find only passing mentions of him in English, and even less in Urdu.  He's from a notable political family, so maybe someday he'll get elected to office, but until then notability is WP:NOTINHERITED.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 14:56, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Pakistan .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 14:56, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He is very famous in Pakistan.  only being ignored from news because of political victimization by Government of Pakistan.  Saad Arshad Butt ( talk ) 14:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If there’s no reliable SIGCOV sources then he’s not notable.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 15:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very short article with no significant coverage, at least for now.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 18:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , inclined to agree here that WP:NINHERITED is applicable and as the premise of the article asserts the subject as a politician, he fails WP:NPOL .  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 22:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jiwanawatta: No reliable source.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Sri Lanka .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unable to locate on current maps or in latest census.  Mentioned in snippets in one or two documents, but nothing really to write about.  Rupples ( talk ) 15:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hasan Doğan (politician): Assyrtiko ( talk ) 06:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Turkey .  Assyrtiko ( talk ) 06:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I'm not familiar at all with Turkish politics...  But he is the Chief of the Cabinet of the president, this should only mean that he passes the SNG for politicians .  Ap m h 14:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : "Chief of the Cabinet" seems to be a mistranslation of this office , which translates more accurately as private secretary or chief of staff.  Not sure this is an WP:NPOL -conferring position, but may still pass by WP:GNG , as there appear to be several sources providing WP:SIGCOV , including (but not limited to) this and this .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He is not the "Chief of the Cabinet of the Turkish President".  The Turkish term is Özel kalem müdürü , which is nothing close to the "chief of the cabinet".  It's basically the "manager" of the president, in other words someone who plans the president's schedule, the events the president attends, etc.  He is not notable.  I don't think the biographical articles on the given news sites above would suffice for "significant coverage", since you can find plenty of such entries for people whose Wikipedia articles would easily get deleted for notability issues, if they had one.  Aintabli ( talk ) 17:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete