hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jesse Porter : The provided sources do not focus on the character much, and the article fails WP:GNG DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 11:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because of the discussion below @ Piotrus and TheBeachBro : : [ reply ] Sam Axe ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Fiona Glenanne ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Madeline Westen ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Michael Westen ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 11:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I will continue looking for reliable sources.  TheBeachBro ( talk ) 11:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let me know if anything else needs to be added/taken away.  TheBeachBro ( talk ) 11:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Burn Notice characters unless sources are found to show reception/analysis/etc.  Right now this fails WP:GNG .  PS.  Right now even articles on main characters from this series are in similar plot summary only format, and merit redirecting (after discussion here, or perhaps just a PROD, I guess).  Sigh.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand, do what you have to.  I am just happy to help.  TheBeachBro ( talk ) 03:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Help is welcome.  If you can improve any of the related articles, great.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Okay, thank you.  TheBeachBro ( talk ) 12:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject lacks independent notability .  A Redirect would be a not unwelcome act of mercy.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 13:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Million Market : No primary sources, no reliable sources.  There is one article about this label signing a part with SM Entertainment, but that alone doesn't subject to notability.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 08:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 08:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to SM Entertainment .  My searches turned out nothing worthy of independent WP:SIGCOV .  See also Talk:Million Market .  -- Викидим ( talk ) 08:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to SM Entertainment .  ditto above.  No sign of independent notability.  Evaders99 ( talk ) 00:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jarosław Florczak : Non-notable security functionary (lt. col) who died in a high-profile crash.  Pl Wikipedia article is a bit longer but also has nothing suggesting notability (coverage is at obituary level at best).  A posthumous award of Order of Polonia Restituta , likely mass-awarded to everyone who died in said tragic event (~90 people) is not enough.  WP:ATD-R would be to redirect this to List of casualties of the Smolensk air disaster .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Poland .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Redirect : Not notable because the only few sources are obituaries.  NicolausPrime ( talk ) 04:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Endure Pursuivant : Other than mentions in databases of heraldry, I'm not seeing the level of RS needed to show that the standards of notability have been met.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Clan Lindsay - no citations, ineligible for merging.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 10:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Clan Lindsay - not notable for standalone article Coldupnorth ( talk ) 08:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Remington Centre : This mall/development was never built and w and apparently the developer cancelled it.  I don't think this would warrant inclusion in Wikipedia if it was never built in the first place.  If you visit the proposed site around Steeles and Kennedy in Markham today, all you'll find is an empty patch of land.  It is next to Pacific Mall.  You may want to search on Google- there are complaints about people who bought condos as part of this development that was never built.  Wikipedia should not host articles about proposed developments that didn't get off the ground.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 17:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Market Village : Could be a brief mention there, not notable otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Market Village Another one of these vague 'Chinese marketplace malls' that seem to only exist to horde land (re: Northridge Mall ) and never actually broke ground.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ultra Jhakaas : There is no independent coverage to meet WP:ORG Lordofhunter ( talk ) 04:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Business .  Lordofhunter ( talk ) 04:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television , Entertainment , Internet ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to Ultra Media & Entertainment .  I also don't see independent coverage, and I note that there's no articles on non-English wikis either, so I don't think we're just missing foreign-language sources. — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dave Thompson (wingback) : unable to find sources on newspapers.com or Google.  Therapyisgood ( talk ) 01:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Ohio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to either List of players who appeared in only one game in the NFL (1920–1929) or List of Cincinnati Celts players (no preference between the two) per nom.   I am willing to reconsider if WP:SIGCOV is made available so please ping me.  Frank Anchor 16:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of players who appeared in only one game in the NFL (1920–1929) .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 14:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Parul Institute of Medical Science and Research : Should be part of the university's article, maybe under constituent colleges section.  It's also unclear whether the college's name is still the same, I have seen it mentioned somewhere as "Faculty of Medical Science and Reaserch - Parul University", I'm unable to find the college in any UGC / MCC lists so couldn't check.  Anyways, It doesn't have any offline notability, too, it's just on paperwork like degrees, otherwise only "Parul University" is being used.  CptViraj ( talk ) 05:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , India ,  and Gujarat .  CptViraj ( talk ) 05:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Parul_University#Affiliated_Colleges : I could not find any in-depth coverage from multiple independent sources, which is needed to prove notability.  It would be better to redirect.  Grab Up - Talk 07:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Parul_University#Affiliated_Colleges .  Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support delete or redirect , as above for notability, not in depth coverage, and somewhat promotionally.  It had a copyvio which I discussed off-wiki for RevDel request.  My real namm ( 💬pros · ✏️cons ) 15:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Parul University .   As of this time it seems not notable enough for a separate Wikipedia article.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Parul_University#Affiliated_Colleges : No notability for this affiliated college at this point.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Parul_University#Affiliated_Colleges .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Internet Childhood : Fails the general notability guidelines , and the subject-specific NALBUM .  λ Negative MP1 06:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and Internet .  λ Negative MP1 06:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Living Tombstone : as a WP:ATD since I found no adequate sourcing for this album.  Schützenpanzer (Talk) 17:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 09:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Living Tombstone :  ATD per Schützenpanzer , not enough sources to meet WP:NALBUM .  Was considering nomination myself for this and Zero One, but you took care of them for me; thank you NegativeMP1 .  PantheonRadiance ( talk ) 21:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kab Mere Kehlaoge : — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet GNG.  Sources are show listings and a nomination for a non-notable award.  S0091 ( talk ) 15:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital#Long_format/Soaps - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Anderson, Forster and Wilcox : Google books has some mentions but nothing indepth.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 23:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Companies .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 23:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Holborn Circus , where the architects are mentioned as designers of the Daily Mirror building.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WP:ATD-R , though wouldn't oppose removal, too.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 06:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yekutiel Ravayev : Israeli martyr.  He has a memorial on an Israeli Ministry of Defence website, presumably because of his relationship to Yekutiel Adam .  Schierbecker ( talk ) 20:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  Schierbecker ( talk ) 20:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't Delete .  He was killed in a battle while protecting his home village.  That's not the definition of a martyr (as far as I know).  In particular, in the “Arab Battle” section, sources were cited and neutral terms were used.  There is no reason to delete this article.  He was the grandfather of Yekutiel Adam , a former IDF chief of staff.  Ravayev is also mentioned on this page.  If we have sources, why don't we use them to create a page so people have more information?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OctoGreeko ( talk • contribs ) 20:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hashomer , the organization Ravayev was a part of when he was killed, pending additional RS, which I do not currently see.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Yekutiel Adam , where the history of Yekutiel Ravayev is justifiably mentioned at sufficient length (hence do not merge).  Yekutiel Ravayev is not individually notable by WP:NEXIST (meaning that I actively looked for sources out there).  Hashomer is not a good redirect destination as for outgoing links and, strictly speaking, Revayev should be deleted also from there if not kept in the AfD.  In the intro, I would not make the following assumption: He has a memorial on an Israeli Ministry of Defence website, presumably because of his relationship to Yekutiel Adam.  Any Israeli soldier, security personnel, or terrorism/war victim can have a bio at the general Yizkor site.  Exactly why we can use such data but not source notability from here.  The same Ministry of Defense operates multiple museums that carefully curate data of people of greater notability, battles, operations, methods, systems, etc. gidonb ( talk ) 00:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Post-close note for the record (in case we're back here again in the future) - the article's author,

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ștefania Donica : Not to be confused with the "relationship expert" of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Moldova .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 08:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 20:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Portland and Western 1801 : The article contains no claims that this specific locomotive is notable.  One source provides some extended coverage, but only discusses a paint scheme that was applied.  All other sources (including one SELFPUB) only mention subject in the context of a list of many locomotives to be scrapped or upgraded.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 15:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Oregon .  Pbritti ( talk ) 15:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per the nomination.  Fails WP:GNG .  Unsigned response from TarnishedPath ( talk ) 21:01, 19 November 2023‎ (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (a summary of)( the parts that can be verified to Portland and Western Railroad#Locomotive fleet .  There is no evidence of independent notability, but equally there is no reason this cannot be included as part of the broader article per WP:PRESERVE .  Thryduulf ( talk ) 13:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks like someone

Discussion outcome: redirect
Anna Eliza Williams : Notable only for having been the oldest known person for 11 months.  Died in 1997; outcome of second AFD in 2017 2018 was to delete.  My speedy nomination db-g4 (even fewer sources than the 2017 version) was declined by an admin in favour of redirect to List of the verified oldest people , but the redirect was reverted 6 days later.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 02:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 02:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , England ,  and Wales .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find coverage about this person.  I don't see how being the oldest person for 11 months is notable.  Bio information here is minimal.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] or redirect is fine.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of the verified oldest people , where she is already listed.  I was the admin who declined the G4 nomination, as the article changed too much since the previous AfD.  Thank you for bringing this here, Wikishovel !   I agree that the article fails NBIO, but see no reason to eliminate it as a redirect.  Persistent attempts to ressurect it as a standalone article can be reverted with a reference to this AfD.  Or if needed, the redir can be page-protected until someone establishes notability.  Owen× ☎ 13:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect would be fine by me.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 13:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the nomianter just has to do a quick google search and I'm sure he'll find plenty of sources that are reliable article should be kept as the reason why it's a stub is cause no one has bothered to check for socures....  again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwew345t ( talk • contribs ) 02:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You dont even have the date of the last afd correct nor have you seemed to have checked if there are socures for her furthermore just case she died in 1997 doesn't mean she isn't notable?  Wwew345t ( talk ) 02:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Typo corrected in nomination  thanks.  And yes, I made a WP:BEFORE search before nominating, and couldn't find better sourcing than what's here already.  If you can find better sources that I'd missed, I'd be grateful.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments .  We have to get to a consensus on whether being the oldest person alive is notable.  There tends to be coverage in popular media.  Bearian ( talk ) 21:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect