hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Madawa Macrada: Two appearances for the Chad national football team .  No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 19:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nominator.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nationalisms Across the Globe: While individual books and authors might be notable (as shown by reviews, citations, and scholarly coverage), there is nothing to indicate that this is notable as a "book series".  This stands in contrast to for example The Cambridge History of the British Empire , which is covered by RS as a notable book series.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 16:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, or as anATD redirect to series editor Tomasz Kamusella .  AFAIK the consensus at WP:NBOOK was that book series that are written as a series did not need series-wide coverage if the individual books were notable (and in fact it may be better to cover them as a series by default).  However this appears to be that type of publisher monograph series where the individual books don't form a cohesive whole (which did not count for that), so it would need series wide coverage, which does not seem to exist.  At least a few of the individual books are likely notable though but there's not really any useful content on them here anyway.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It's a series of academic journals/volumes, not a series of books.  The four refs don't support notability.  Desertarun ( talk ) 18:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Naname De Magic!: For a Japanese exclusive game it also having no Japanese article seems very indicative there is no notability to the game.  GamerPro64 18:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan .  GamerPro64 18:34, 23 Novemberj 2023 (UTC) Delete I only see Wikipedia mirrors and no reliable independent sources in English.  Prepared to reconsider if any good Japanese sources are found.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It appears that Naname De Magic!  (ななめでまじっく！) was covered twice in Gamest magazine (by different writers, on only 1 page in both issues) according to this website: http://www.netlaputa.ne.jp/~dummy/gamest/game/h_n.html , although I have no idea if these issues have scans online, and thus how significant the coverage is. toweli ( talk ) 16:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] One of the issues (no. 119) is available on the Internet Archive: https://ia902505.us.archive.org/10/items/gamest0119/gamest0119.pdf (page 182 in the magazine, page 194 in the .pdf).  toweli ( talk ) 16:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This really would require someone who can read Japanese text to figure out what they're even saying.  GamerPro64 05:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You can just point a cell phone with Google Translate in camera mode at your computer monitor, and you can get a rough GTranslate version of the text.   It's not super-deep (i.e. it's not "games journalism" like Wikipedia prefers it written in a sober voice about strengths and weakness, but rather a for-kids style explanation of the plot and game mechanics.  SnowFire ( talk ) 17:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Atlus games .   This game clearly exists and was from a major publisher per links above, but it is probably best covered as a simple list entry, perhaps with a paragraph.   (Maybe a spin-off article like "List of minor Atlus games" or something?  Title is not great, but idea being a place to merge games worth a section of coverage but not a full article.)  SnowFire ( talk ) 17:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - F-Zero#Plot .  List of Atlus games as an alternative.  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pdftotext: SL93 ( talk ) 22:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  SL93 ( talk ) 22:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am wondering if this could usefully be merged somewhere.  BD2412 T 01:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] List of PDF software ?  Rjj iii ( talk ) 05:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That is probably the best bet.  A section could be added on conversion software specifically, or on miscellaneous PDF software.  It is mentioned in passing in a row in the "Linux and Unix" section of that list.  BD2412 T 20:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Add to List It seems to be one of those handy utilities.  I see lots of references and I would not be surprised if there isn't more than one bit of software with this obvious name.  Lamona ( talk ) 16:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Poppler (software) .  The Poppler fork of pdftotext is version used in most linux distros, like Ubuntu .  This particular tool is far from notable, but would serve as a useful redirect.   — BillHPike ( talk , contribs ) 00:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I think this is another good option.  Lamona ( talk ) 18:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We have 2 different Merge/Redirect target articles now suggested Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Poppler (software) for now, although I'm far from convinced the table on that article it's currently mentioned in should exist either - List of PDF software is one of those lists whose criterion for inclusion should be having a standalone article or else it violates WP:NOTDIR and hence a redirect there makes no sense.  * Pppery * it has begun... 16:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Poppler.  pdftotext is already mentioned briefly at List of PDF software, in the row for Poppler.  This isn't ideal, since it seems to be used elsewhere as well, but it can always be changed in future if someone cares enough.  Toadspike [Talk] 22:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rushaniya Safina: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2010 , 2018 , 2021 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uzbekistan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 11:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Criteria already adopted in others similar AfD.  Svartner ( talk ) 17:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chicago / Midwest Emmy Awards: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Awards , Illinois , Indiana ,  and Wisconsin .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Emmy Awards#Regional as a proper ATD; by design its only source pops are going to be either its own or station/network press releases about winners.  I would also support the other awards there listed being redirected (only the Los Angeles article has any extended content and it's just an unsourced list of personnel).  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Emmy Awards#Regional .  There's nothing here.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hector the Bulldog: Erpert blah, blah, blah... 12:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Comics and animation ,  and Animal .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Comment (redirect as fall back, definitely not delete) even if occasionally this character has a different name in some appearances, that isn't a reason to delete the most common and acceptable name.  It maybe means there should be a bit of disambiguation at some Spike-character location.  As for why (weak) keep, admittedly are a bit thin but they're widespread; here's a few He's used as an example in books about dogs ( [17] , [18] ), as an example in books about physical education [19] , poetry [20] , mentioned as debuting 60 years ago [21] , face used in religious artwork replacing baby Jesus's [22] .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC) 13:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Skynxnex WP:SIGCV is an issue, I don't think the cited examples meet our treshold of more than a passing mention?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Piotrus : My reply was somewhat in hope that based on what I did find that WP:EXISTS was true in this case and it'd be found by others.  Seems somewhat less likely now so changing my vote to be mostly neutral since I know my opinion that non-BLP, but verified and culturally well-known and widely mentioned, should be kept is not the predominate position currently.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with the recurring characters section of List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 16:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list.  No indication of notability shown.  The multiple names can likely just be redirected to the given section, with whatever name is the most used (In this case, likely Hector) being the primary one.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 03:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list.  Optionally merge what little can be verified.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
10 Out of 10 (Oliver Heldens song): Refs are promotional, primary.  BEFORE showed nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Source eval: Instagram ::  1.  "This has been my absolute dream gag fantasy bucket list of artists to have a song with".  Instagram.  6 March 2023.  Retrieved 9 April 2023.  Promo ::  2. ^ "Got a collab coming up with 1 of them, who do you think it is?".  26 March 2023.  Retrieved 9 April 2023.  Twitter ::  3. ^ "Drum roll please..."  Twitter.  29 March 2023.  Retrieved 9 April 2023.  Youtube ::  4. ^ Heldens, Oliver (1 April 2023).  "Episode 457".  Heldeep Radio.  Archived from the original on 6 April 2023.  Retrieved 1 April 2023.  Promo ::  5. ^ Vigil, Dom (6 April 2023).  "Oliver Heldens Drops New Track, "10 out of 10" With Kylie Minogue".  Prelude Press.  Retrieved 9 April 2023.  Promo ::  6. ^ Cihak, Lennon (5 April 2023).  "OLIVER HELDENS TAPS POP ICON KYLIE MINOGUE FOR INFECTIOUS SINGLE, "10 OUT OF 10"".  edm.com.  Retrieved 9 April 2023.  Stats ::  7. ^ "Official Singles Downloads Chart Top 100".  Official Charts Company.  Retrieved 10 April 2023.  Nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  No objection if a consensus for redirect to Oliver Heldens .  // Timothy :: talk 02:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak redirect , for now, to Oliver Heldens .  However, since it recently landed in the top 20 of a British singles chart... -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 03:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Oliver Heldens discography#As lead artist .  As Slgrandson suggested, though, this could be going somewhere big on the charts.  I'm considering this a case of possible TOOSOON rather than a guaranteed  non-notable.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Netherlands and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Split to Oliver Heldens discography and Kylie Minogue singles discography .  Brachy 08 (Let’s Have A Kiki, I Wanna Have a Kiki) 00:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shahram Poursafi: Only known for one event and being covered in the news for a brief period in 2022.  YRhyre ( talk ) 10:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Iran ,  and United States of America .  YRhyre ( talk ) 10:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: A pretty classic case of WP:BLP1E : John Bolton is the place for this.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 10:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to John Bolton#IRGC murder plot , where the subject is duly referenced.  Per nom, subject fails WP:GNG and this is a case of WP:BLP1E .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 18:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Singing to the Sky: Bedivere ( talk ) 14:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Stefanie Joosten : Only additional coverage I could find was a review from Uncut .  No charting in her home country and seemingly unlikely to have done much elsewhere.  Already has a solid paragraph in the target article so there's not really anything to merge.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chris Williams (metal drummer): 162 etc. ( talk ) 18:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Article should be merged to Control Denied .  162 etc. ( talk ) 18:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and United States of America .  Shaws username .  talk .  18:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Keep this article with plenty of references.   If it cannot be kept, it should be merged to Control Denied .  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 23:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Per WP:BANDMEMBER , "Members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability."  What has Chris Williams done outside of Control Denied that is notable? 162 etc. ( talk ) 18:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] See also WP:LOTSOFSOURCES . --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Control Denied .  The previous voter clearly did not read those many sources and may not have even read their titles, because they are all about Williams's notable bandmate Chuck Schuldiner , and some don't even mention Williams at all.  Those that do mention him only have a brief listing of his presence in Control Denied.  Williams's only other accomplishments were with non-notable local bands and he was only in Control Denied for a year.  Nowhere close to independently notable per the WP:BANDMEMBER guideline.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Control Denied , I couldn't find sufficient evidence of notability for a separate article. Suonii180 ( talk ) 14:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect --no evidence of independent notability.  Drmies ( talk ) 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Minor characters in Bloom County: We don't even have list of characters in Bloom County .  I suggest redirect, maybe a slight merge to Bloom_County#Other_characters .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bloom County#Other characters - After a quick look at both this article and the target section, it looks like all of the characters that were reoccurring enough to warrant being mentioned on the main article already are, and the rest are very minor characters that only showed up a couple times, but the history of this list will be preserved if there are any others that should be moved over.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough evidence of notability, and does not meet WP:SIGCOV .  A redirect doesn't make sense as this is an unlikely search term.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Is it not feasible to move this to List of Bloom County characters ?  Barring that, I'd rather keep the redirect to preserve the edit history, should anything be merged or someone want to salvage something.  - B RAINULATOR 9 ( TALK ) 02:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Brainulator9 We could move it, but would the resulting article meet NLIST/GNG?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Piotrus : I think so, given that WP:CSC references List of Dilbert characters as a case of "every entry in the list fails the notability criteria".  - B RAINULATOR 9 ( TALK ) 19:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Brainulator9 In general, it can be argued that character lists for many things pass NLIST (a bit more difficult for books than for TV series/vide games...).  If you'd like to rescue this by adding non-minor characters and moving, I'd be ok withdrawing this nom.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fernando Pedroza: No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  Some media coverage, though it is all WP:ROTM city going-ons.  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , most of the secondary sources are WP:ROTM for any local politician, and the misuse of city funds trial [22] [23] doesn't meet the WP:CRIME standards.  Overall not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  Shaws username .  talk .  12:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mayors of Lynwood, California Shaws username .  talk .  18:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to very good ATD >>>> List of mayors of Lynwood, California Djflem ( talk ) 19:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mayors of Lynwood, California per Djflem .  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 23:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect