hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Preethi (disambiguation): The other two entries are WP:TITLEPTMs .  As names they should follow MOS:DABNAME , but with only two entries disambiguation can be handled by hatnotes.  Polyamorph ( talk ) 12:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There is at least one film and one person with "Preethi" in their name.  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 13:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . The film is the primary topic and the name is the WP:ONEOTHER topic. -- T avix ( talk ) 13:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; the non-film entries are partial title matches, which do not belong on disambiguation pages .  Happy to reconsider if anyone can find evidence that the actresses are referred to mononymously as Preethi.  Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 21:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Names aren't WP:PTMs .  It's reasonable for someone to refer to one with the name as simply "Preethi", whether or not they are known mononymously.  That being said, the guidance for names in regards to disambiguation pages is at WP:NAMELIST , which is pretty much "use an anthroponomy index unless you're well known".  This has been done in this case, with the creation of Preethi (name) .  -- T avix ( talk ) 22:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : hatnote on Preethi now points to the one other article, Preethi (name) .  No need for dab page.  Pam D 07:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – unless there's no primary topic between the pages, a DAB page with two entries shouldn't exist.  I'm not entirely convinced there is a primary topic here ( Preethi (name) didn't exist at the time of the RM), but until the absence of a primary topic between these two articles is established, the DAB page should not exist.  Skarmory (talk • contribs) 23:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - @ Polyamorph : , @ Tavix : , @ Extraordinary Writ : , @ PamD : , @ Skarmory : , per my comments below, why would we not redirect the title with history in tact, and why is Preethi (name) separate from Preeti ?  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 23:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Proposal to merge Preethi (name) into Preeti [ edit ] If this page cannot be kept, I would like to propose merging Preethi (name) into Preeti , and redirecting Preethi (disambiguation) to one of those two pages with history in tact.  It has been said that hatnotes should redirect to a title that has "(disambiguation)" in it, in the event that such an article is created at that title.  Would we be able to relist this AFD in order to converse about these possibilities? -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 22:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BookAuthority: All 6 sources are interviews, blogs, routine coverage, business directory listings and trivial mentions.  Not able to find any sources with significant coverage of the company Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 07:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business , United States of America ,  and California .  Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 07:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jacob790 It's this deletion discussion which will decide whether or not to retain it.   I see you arguing on the talk page.    FYI: User_talk:David_Gerard/archive_21#Crunchbase .   Neutral.   Seems to have some staying power.  RudolfoMD ( talk ) 23:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WHoops.  @ Jacob0790 RudolfoMD ( talk ) 23:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Sources found are just subject nominating others; nothing significant found and fails NCORP or GNG.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 11:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have added new sections to present a more objective and neutral picture of the topic and included additional references.  Jacob0790 ( talk ) 22:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The 3 sources you added does not count towards GNG.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 09:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  I can find no significant coverage of the company or the website per WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nels Jensen: After doing a google et.  al. I still fail to find any reason for notability or how they could pass WP:BIO / WP:GNG KylieTastic ( talk ) 18:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I did a quick Google search and found a bunch of things about other Nels Jensens, and an IMDb page which may have to do with him, but for many reasons that's not a great source.  Besides that I couldn't find anything on this specific Nels Jensen that could be used as a source.  Capsulecap ( talk • contribs ) 19:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Engineering ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Maliner ( talk ) 18:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eric Sage: four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT #1, no reason for deletion given whatsoever.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Has a deletion rationale now, still a little lacking when it comes to policies, but the article does not look like anything I'd advocate to keep. .  Geschichte ( talk ) 05:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Not notable for anything tennis related.  As an actor or cover band artist others will need to make that determination.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 08:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on much better sourcing than has been shown.  The only GNG-worthy referencing shown here is human-interest coverage of the "local guy does stuff" variety in the local media of the area where he lives, which isn't enough by itself if he has nothing more nationalized — and otherwise the rest of the article is referenced to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – secondary coverage is WP:ROUTINE (they seem to be stories of the "brief, often light and amusing" variety discussed at that guideline).  A Google search turns up no additional resources to build up the article.  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 02:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vladimír Hirsch: I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Czech Republic .  I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Bandcamp, Soundcloud, his website and the usual streaming sites are what come up in a search.  I don't see anything in RS about this person.  Delete for lack of sourcing, likely also not meeting notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt no SIGCOV in any third party sources.  Looking at the logs, the article was speedy deleted in 2019 under CSD A7 and copyright violation after being recreated.  The original was soft deleted in 2018 as a result of an expired PROD.  Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 01:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2002 Danderyd municipal election: Only sources I find in media archives are articles collating all the election results in Stockholm County .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Sweden .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Wikipedia is not a repository for individual election statistics on municipal level.  It is simply not encyclopedic material.  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , more or less fancruft.  Sjö ( talk ) 07:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Halanna Capri: Even if the promotional content were to be removed, I still have doubts about Capri's notability.  Digital Journal comes across too promotional to me and the website says that you can pay for content on there , which makes me doubt that this is independent journalism.  I can find no mention of her in any reputable WP:RS .  Furthermore, I can't see any evidence of WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN .  The article creator makes the claim that her songs are 'chart-topping' but this claim is unverifiable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Indiana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, not yet notable per WP:MUSICBIO.  It wasn't easy to work out what she actually does for a living, or where she's from, even searching on Google.  Turns out she's an American singer, so I've added that.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable.  I'm not sure the sole news source included is even reliable, which makes this an easy deletion.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 17:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sources beyond artist bios, so those are not reliable independent sources.  Night Gyr ( talk / Oy ) 18:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As I type this, the article says nothing beyond the fact that she's an American singer-songwriter.  It used to have much more content about her apparent biography, and it was uniformly unreliable and self-written garbage that deserved to be removed as unverifiable.  Do the same for the whole article, because Wikipedia is not a promotional service for beginners who have not yet been noticed by the reliable media.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 20:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero sources to support WP:MUSIC notability.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nase Lino: No reliable sources.  Aníbal (Talk) 20:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Aníbal (Talk) 20:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Ecuador .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm unable to find any reliable sources for this person.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 10:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indication of notability.  The page has a suspicious history, btw: a rejected draft that was moved to mainspace and back several times.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KRUM-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Washington .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article is so KRUMmy it doesn't even mention that the programming on 24.1 is Tri-State Christian Television .  There is no coverage, unfortunately.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks WP:SIGCOV with which to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jenny Draper: Idiosincrático ( talk ) 03:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Entertainment , Internet ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I have been able to find no in-depth coverage in any sources.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 09:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] While I agree with your view that this biography doesn't meet the policy requirements, remember that we are talking about a living person here so please try not to sound so harsh towards the subject.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not being harsh, I am merely saying how this subject meets notability requirements.  I have no view on the living person, to suggest otherwise is ridiculous.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not saying you do have a view on the living person.  I'm saying your comment could be read as expressing such a view, especially if the living person concerned is not familiar with Wikipedia jargon.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let it go.  Seriously I've never encountered this in my 16 years in Wikipedia and I've been involved in thousands of AfDs.  It's a deletion discussion not a personal appraisal.  You should know better as an admin.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I know it is not a personal appraisal.  The point is that not everybody who reads these discussions does and we should be careful to avoid giving the impression that it is.  It's never too late to start being conscientious.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let it go.  Seriously.  I don't intend to change how I comment in AfDs because of what you say.  Let it go.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Failing BIO is a statement of fact, similar to failing GNG or ACTOR.  They don't meet the requirements.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Correct.  Thanks Oaktree.  There was zero harsh intent in saying that an article does not meet notability standards.  Same if I said a company article clearly fails WP:CORP , I'm not insulting the company in anyway.  LibStar ( talk ) 14:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable per WP:NBIO .  A search found no significant coverage in reliable sources.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 15:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails in WP:NBIO , nd not have any reliable sources Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Got nothing else to add.  Appears as open and shut case as could possibly be.  Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 07:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3389: C messier ( talk ) 10:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 01:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Technology Transfer Network: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  I may be missing something in Ukrainian or Russian.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Youprayteas ( t • c ) 11:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Youprayteas , can you say more on why you think this article should be deleted?  L iz Read!  Talk!  06:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No references, unclear notability for over 14 years as I see.  Nothing added too.  Youprayteas ( t • c ) 10:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conference on Information Technology, Organisations and Teams: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete entirely unsourced other than archive.org's (partial) archive of the conference website.  No claim of notability and no independent references.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 02:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A search turns up one call for participation and an archived conference paper.  That's it, beyond being listed in acronym lists.  Lamona ( talk ) 09:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hilary Childs-Adams: A google news search yields a small number of hits, and it's mainly her making comments and not indepth coverage of her.  Fails WP:BIO .  Ambassadors are not inherently notable.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations ,  and Canada .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Libya , Lebanon ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete