hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
James Gaines: Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG .  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Hawaii .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unsourced BLP fails WP:NACTOR / WP:NBASIC / WP:GNG .  At least two accounts and probably 1 or more anon editors appear to be the subject.  Although IMDB is a junk source and probably also self edited the list is for small parts often un-credited.  The article claims "Arguably the most well-known movies Gaines appeared in were The Last Hunter " which IMDB lists as "Deserter(uncredited)".  I can't find any indication of any nobility.  KylieTastic ( talk ) 16:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as Wikipedia doesn't allow biographies of living people that don't cite any reliable sources.  Everyone has been trying to look for sources such as newspaper or magazine articles about James Gaines, but we aren't finding any.  (And no, we can't really cite IMDb as a source, either.)  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 17:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm getting unrelated James Gaines even when using Philippines as a modifier in GNews Archives.  He has a mention in this book but that's about it in my GBooks search.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agreeing with the above opinions - merely being in a number of films is not innately notable.  There are no apparent references to establish notability, including in book searches.  IMDb is a reference source for facts but does not establish notability.  WmLawson ( talk ) 03:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roger Wiley Cash Sr.: The big ugly alien ( talk ) 00:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, the two obituaries are all I can find.  Being a pharmacist alone and the father of a famous person doesn't get you a wikipedia article.  Not meeting any sort of notability requirements.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To be honest, the son doesn't look that notable either, he had a number one album on Apple music charts, which doesn't get him at notability requirements here either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IRA Memorial, Killarney: No indication that subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD .  Even a generous reading of the concepts discussed/raised around the notability of artworks doesn't indicate notability.  The structure (a war memorial) is one of many thousands such structures in Ireland (and millions globally).  Unlike some others in the area, it is *not* included in the Record of Protected Structures as maintained by Kerry County Council (and so fails NBUILDING/ GEOFEAT ).  It hasn't even been surveyed under the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage program (for even *potential future* protection).  A search in other sources doesn't return any significant sources (to the extent that we can't even seem to say when it was erected, who sculpted it, etc).  All I can find are passing mentions alongside other pieces of public art in the area.  (I also note that WP:G5 might apply - as article appears to have been created by a SOCK of user who was then under a block/ban...)  Guliolopez ( talk ) 15:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 15:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 16:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm amazed there isn't something for this memorial, the one in Ballyseedy is all over Irish newspapers.  Nothing found at all.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b's decision.  CastJared ( talk ) 16:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Apart from a brief mention in the parent article on Killarney , delete per nom.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 17:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Oaktree B. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 03:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Breaking News Network: reads like ad copy.  ltb d l ( talk ) 03:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and New Jersey .  ltb d l ( talk ) 03:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elena Petrovska: All I found was passing mentions and this transfer news.  Not to be confused with the writer / activist of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and North Macedonia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only found the subject mentioned in sport databases.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 23:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Her Macedonian Wikipedia article is likewise unsourced and very short.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 16:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lack of notability- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 16:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Neeraj Tripathi: Theroadislong ( talk ) 14:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 14:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN , announced for election doesn’t make a person notable, same like Kompella Madhavi Latha .  Grabup ( talk ) 18:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Way too soon as currently there are no sources online to establish WP:NPOLITICIAN . -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 22:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  There are plenty of sources on the internet to cover him.  Joshiaditya728 ( talk ) 08:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Then please add them to the article!  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As i understood WP:NPOL and WP:GNG , this candidate of BJP is not notable until he is victorius.  TheChronikler7 ( talk ) 15:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If he wins the elections he’ll get one as per WP:NPOLITICIAN AnkkAnkur ( talk ) 20:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) — AnkkAnkur ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG  Too soon.  RationalPuff ( talk ) 06:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nomination of a subject into a political party is not notable.  Politician is not notable, significant, who has received any great attention to be recorded.  Fails WP:NPOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barbara Salopek: Might be a case of WP:COI .  Please also see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinco (company) Macbeejack ☎ 13:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Norway .  Macbeejack ☎ 13:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Croatia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet ANYBIO / GNG.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 14:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tyrone D. Bland: Of the sources in the article, the first, from Variety, actually is likely a reasonable source, but one does not notability make.  The second is from an employer, so not independent.  The third just briefly quotes him, but has nothing in-depth.  The fourth is from an employer, so not independent.  The fifth is a press release.  A search for additional sources finds some blogs and the like (as well as some sources which mention a "Tyrone Bland" who lives in Australia and is not related at all to this individual), but nothing more substantial with which to write a biography.  Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Politicians .  Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, fails WP:BIO and GNG.  I couldn't find SIGCOV in reliable sources either.  He seems to have played college football for UC [13] , but I can find nothing to suggest that he meets WP:ATHLETE either.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Variety is fine, but there are no other sources.  Gnews has PR pieces confirming the person was named to a board of directors, which is nothing notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Variety is fine, but not in and of itself enough : being a government relations lobbyist for a talent agency is in no way an "inherently" notable role that would guarantee an instant free inclusion pass, so it takes a lot more than just one valid piece of reliable source coverage to get a person into Wikipedia for that — but all the rest of the footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bender Machine Works: The article's lead suggests it is about a company (which does not seem notable, no hits on GScholar).  Much of the body seems to discuss some of their product or products ("Bender Washer/Releaser").  Then there is a big EL farm to their patents.  At best I can say this is some historical WP:OR and sadly I doubt anything here can be rescued (GScholar returns zero hits for this "Bender Washer/Releaser").  At worst, this looks like a possible WP:HOAX , although AFD I lean towards ye old OR.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Wisconsin .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This subject does not appear to meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability.  I agree that it should be deleted.  -- FPTI ( talk ) 00:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a lengthy article, what in particular about Wikipedia's criteria for notability does it not meet?  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz Errr, are you serious?  From GNG: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."  Now, are you seeing, well... sources?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I don't think this is a hoax... looking through the page history I think it's just a few different inventions/ patents from this one guy, and the title of the article is misleading.  I did a newspaper archive search but the few results are in passing and don't seem to all be about the same subject.  Unfortunately I think this is either too obscure to pass GNG, or the actually notable parts of the article are sufficiently obscured by other elements of it.  Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 03:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Animals of Farthing Wood (disambiguation): MirrorPlanet ( talk ) 12:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Literature ,  and Television .  MirrorPlanet ( talk ) 12:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : there are actually three, but one redirects back to the primary topic, so it's probably a WP:ONEOTHER situation.  Not ! voting yet as I haven't looked for other potential targets, but if nobody finds any I guess this is a soft delete ! vote.  Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  13:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All three are related and described in the main article, so this dab page has no purpose.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Clarityfiend.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 20:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arya Igami Tarhani: Black Kite (talk) 21:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Am I misunderstanding?  Appears that Albirex Niigata Singapore FC is a professional club and he joined them for the season that started about a week ago and he just played a match with them according to this ...  DCsansei ( talk ) 23:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I missed that.   However a player that has played one professional game doesn't seem at all notable to me, coverage seems routine.  Black Kite (talk) 07:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes but that game was a couple weeks ago and his new professional career just started so an odd time to delete when he's likely to get coverage over the upcoming season.  I agree with draftify for now.  DCsansei ( talk ) 19:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – WP:TOOSOON .  Svartner ( talk ) 02:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Played two games and counting, notable as a Japanese-Iraqi haafu professional footballer.  かぴさん Kapisan ( talk ) 02:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Moxiie: All of her songs are self-published and appear to have received very little attention from reliable sources.  Search results for her stage name are almost exclusively the songs themselves or her social media, and results for her legal name largely pertain to her career as a makeup artist.  Majora4 ( talk ) 23:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The two archived MTV sources (both a small paragraph each) are about all there is. I can't find anything now, 10+ years later.  I don't think the singer made any critical waves; no album reviews, no charted singles.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this article is a mess.  Fireandflames2 ( talk ) 12:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pondicherry urban area: ( talk ) 20:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 20:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article's content is already covered in the Pondicherry article.  HarukaAmaranth ( 話 ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Is the urban area defined by the central government or its statistics agency?  In the United States.  individual metropolitan statistical areas are notable and the topic of articles.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete already covered in Pondicherry as noted and it appears completely unsourced.  Should not preclude the possibility of recreation if someone puts the work into a better GNG-passing article.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eilidh Begg: The Perthshire Advertiser piece already in the article is the closest to WP:SIGCOV I was able to find.  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 13:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Javis Jones: Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON , as he is just 17 years old with two international caps, but fails GNG nonetheless.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete