hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Adam Sinn : Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe that a businessman who is capable of acquiring a $100+m house should be considered notable OliverBrown1 ( talk ) 00:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's not how WP works.  ArcAngel (talk) 00:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Puerto Rico , Illinois ,  and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Hasn't said or done anything remotely notable.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 16:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Looks like a promotional piece with nothing in reliable secondary sources to suggest notability per WP:BASIC .  Looking at the sources,  (a) he donated money to Texas A&M and the school wrote some PR material about it,  (b) he bought an expensive house, and  (c) he was involved in some litigation.  This is hardly the type of content upon which to base a WP:BLP .  -- Kinu t / c 15:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Latvia : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  I also advise Fandom for them if they want to save it so much.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Latvia .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No merit under WP:NLIST BrigadierG ( talk ) 10:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete just a directory.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Oklahoma school districts by county : Most - if not all - other states only have one article in the form of List of school districts in XXXXXXX Epluribusunumyall ( talk ) 00:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Oklahoma .  Epluribusunumyall ( talk ) 00:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Duplicate article of List of school districts in Oklahoma .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 01:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Ajf773.  Dympies ( talk ) 17:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per duplicate article as mentioned by Ajf773.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 13:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Duplicate article.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 20:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of AFC Championship Game broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced, the majority of those are sources are from forums, also WP:PRIMARY , Youtube and dead links.  The only reliable sources is about the announcer, not much else; none of these helping this list to assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and United States of America .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per failing WP:LISTN as a WP:LISTCRUFT for trivia purposes.  It could probably be merged to AFC Championship Game with removal of the WP:OR .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN due to a lack of sources from RS.  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frontis Archive Publishing System : Project is dead.  So, no expectation to reach notability Mfixerer ( talk ) 08:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Cannot find any actually significant coverage.  popo dameron ⁠ talk 21:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can't find any source that meets SIGCOV.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Takuya Kondoh : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Japan .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This user has nominated 49 different figure skaters for deletion within approximately 30 mins which leaves me doubting that a WP:BEFORE search has been conducted, let alone one that includes native language sources .  DCsansei ( talk ) 12:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nominator comment: As stated in the nomination, these were all PRODs that were deprodded in rapid succession.  My work on these nominations took place before the PROD, not last night when I sent them to AFD.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural keep -- Nominator regularly bypasses WP:BEFORE searches (see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , etc. within the past week) and fails to address WP:GNG in his nominations.  Regardless, 50 AfDs in 30 minutes is wholly inappropriate.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, a comment for Procedural Keep is not an argument to Keep.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found one interview , but not enough sources to meet GNG.  Fails WP:NSKATE .  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 15:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG , there is no corresponding article on ja.wiki.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to failing WP:GNG 104.7.152.180 ( talk ) 14:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Colton Eastman : Majority of cited sources are transaction logs and other WP:ROUTINE coverage that does not establish WP:GNG .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 22:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Baseball ,  and California .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 22:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Dropping a couple of sources from his college days.  Cal State Fullerton pitcher Colton Eastman could help lift team past slow start , Timely Return: Rested and eager, Eastman strengthens Titans Timely Return part 2 , A Three-Pronged Strategy for Draft , Eastman could have tough choice , Tough choice part 2 , Ex-Central standout Eastman pitches no-hitter .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with the nom here.  Not really a notable baseball player.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only coverage is routine transaction reports any player of this level receives.  No WP:SIGCOV is available for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Western education (disambiguation) : Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- Konanen ( talk ) 18:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Makes no sense as a disambiguation page.  Sadustu Tau ( talk ) 19:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't think wikipedia currently has the articles someone would be looking for if they were searching for western education.   I can see what the DAB page creator was going for... education about the west from the east, but a language school and European studies doesn't really fit the bill, and European studies... well, it's about the foundations of western culture, but you can't really say Europe is the entirety of the west but rather a subset of it.    And a single school that teaches languages is undue weight.   An article about Western Education itself might be useful, contrasting with Confucianism .   An article about how information about the west is communicated in the East would be interesting.   But I just don't think we cover these things, likely due to the inherent WP:SYSTEMIC bias that comes from being written by volunteers who are, themselves, western (myself included).  Fieari ( talk ) 23:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ron Beilke : This might be something but I don't believe it meets the threshold of notability.  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 04:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Crime ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG , possibly unsourced BLP (unless someone else can open the source.) SportingFlyer T · C 10:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most of the secondary sources are all fairly WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  The criminal activity [68] [69] [70] also seems to fail WP:CRIME and not notable either.  Shaws username .  talk .  20:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Panju railway station : The station seems to have been demolished since If we can't even state a single definitive fact about this train station, it certainly should not have an article.  Half of the article does not discuss its supposed subject.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 07:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Both of the two cited sources are more focus on the overall rail line instead of this particular station.  Found no significant coverage of the station, does mot seem to pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 17:28, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Six Flags Hill : However, I couldn't find the sources to confirm this or WP:GNG .  Boleyn ( talk ) 06:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Georgia (U.S. state) .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is unverifiable.   At best it's an undocumented TV reporter's nickname back in 2006 for some hill, whose true name the reporter didn't know, somewhere in the Sweetwater Creek State Park , whose geology is in that article.   We don't know even what hill from the article because it's a random mish-mash from other editors trying to be helpful and do cleanup.   The coördinates added later cannot be anywhere near the right place, for example, because they aren't on a hill and are on the wrong side of the theme park according to the article.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 09:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can only find one brief mention of this hill anywhere in an RS - [54] .  The reference in the article isn't even for this feature.  It is for a different hill in Missouri.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 19:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not only does the article subject not appear to meet GNG, I'm concerned that the whole "Buford Uprising" paragraph is a hoax.  Lady of Shalott 13:09, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Curse of Bob Short : For example, the ESPN source [23] doesn't even mention Bob Short, while the first source, Defector [24] doesn't mention a "curse".  Looking for better sources gave only 6 Google Hits in total [25] (!), which for such a high profile sport in the US is ridiculously low.  Fram ( talk ) 08:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball and Texas .  Fram ( talk ) 08:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a lack of reliable sources demonstrates there is no notable topic for a "curse of Bob Short".  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 14:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The Rangers are the very definition of an 'okay' baseball team and the 2011 team needed better pitching in that Game 6 situation; it has nothing to do with their former owner or the move of their franchise, and this is all fanlore.  It's more like 'the curse of mediocre ownership through decades' (and really bad contracts ) than one guy's curse.  Nate • ( chatter ) 16:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] After close comment two months later Even if there was proof of the curse, it now no longer applies ...did I un-curse the Rangers?!  😂 Nate • ( chatter ) 04:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Historical subject : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 14:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE - WP:DICTIONARY , a short philosophical definition of the term "historical subject".  No sourcing.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia is not a dictionary .  Unsourced article not needed on Wikipedia.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 04:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
B. Andreas Bull-Hansen : Search brings up nothing but more self-published sources.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 00:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Sportspeople , Internet ,  and Norway .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage for this person, even in Gnews there are only about two stories in the native language, then on to other things.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NAUTHOR .  I can't find significant coverage in secondary sources of the subject or their works.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zoop (company) : Mereutza ( talk ) 11:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  Mereutza ( talk ) 11:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Delhi .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have blocked the nominator blocked for spamming and sockpuppetry.  I wish to leave this discussion open for consideration though.  MER-C 19:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:ORGCRIT .  Reliable sources may not be enough to establish notability.  If more sources reliable per WP:RS , please ping me.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrey Voronin (psychologist) : Infinity Knight ( talk ) 17:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Health and fitness , Law , Psychology ,  and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Reference 17 is the only one that's green per sourcebot and it doesn't even seem to be about this individual when I translate it.  I can't find sourcing, the name seems to be rather common.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abbas El-Akkad Experimental Language School : Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 15:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Egypt .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:CCOS , GNG and NORG.  Bgv.  ( talk ) 08:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  18:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , nothing in the article is a unique detail of the school.  I am not sure how to find more sources due to the language barrier but the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia at most gives only one more.  ✶Qux yz ✶ 19:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete