hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sadou Bah: No major roles in notable films or television shows and sources are spammy.  DanCherek ( talk ) 02:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  DanCherek ( talk ) 02:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Africa and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See this for some information regarding a potentially falsified source in this article.  DanCherek ( talk ) 19:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Absolutely no evidence of notability per Wikipedia standards.  A web search finds nothing but self-promotional fluff, and the source noted above was clearly forged.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 15:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Same content is also at Draft:Sadou Bah by same editor.  If mainspace is deleted, I recommend nuking draft as well.  When a good-faith editor feels like writing about it, they're welcome to do so.  DMacks ( talk ) 15:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per others.  It was already declined at draft, and then the same editor simply created it at mainspace.  DMacks ( talk ) 16:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Most of the sources cited in the article reek of "pay to publish" placements.  Roles and coverage don't support notability under WP:NACTOR , nor is there sufficient coverage for WP:GNG .  (Oddly, the article makes no mention of Bah being a poultry "entrepreneur", which is mentioned in many of the sources. It also misgenders Bah in the lead.)  Schazjmd (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I think it would be appropriate to point out here that the page's creator is blocked for misrepresenting sources.  Deckkohl ( talk ) 13:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tinatin Gongadze: I can't find any coverage of the footballer of this name in any language, although there are a few namesakes, including a translator and a medical doctor.  The best that I found on the footballer was Nakrebi , a database source.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Georgia (country) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 05:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Does not meet WP:GNG .  Demt1298 ( talk ) 15:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brady Daniel: None of the sources in the article suggest significant coverage either Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , United States of America ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the subject has not received sufficient in-depth coverage to meet GNG.  The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches were transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet GNG.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maksim Mosin: The Russian version should probably also be deleted, as it has basically the same sources, unfortunately, I do not know Russian.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A minor athlete without substantial coverage in reliable sources.  The Russian version might hold some value, the language barrier makes verification a bit difficult.  Leaning towards deletion.  Waqar 💬 17:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angie Phillips: The subject is an ordinary weather presenter doing her job and fails WP:BIO .   A WP:BEFORE failed to reveal any new sources for me.   The existing sources are not useful in establishing notability.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Television .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete insufficient sourcing and nothing better found.  Star Mississippi 16:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some celebrity-type articles covering her mentioned in the first AfD; same level of things still talking about her now.  She showed up to work wearing the same blue dress as another news anchor [7] .  Nothing I'd use for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andy Symanowski: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some behind the scenes of making the movies, but nothing extensive about this person [4] and [5] .  I don't see notability from the sources used in the article either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and United Kingdom .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 05:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Greg Brooks (artist): Not seeing sufficient coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article.  gobonobo + c 21:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  gobonobo + c 21:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   Looking at incoming links, he didn't seem to win any awards, and according to the archived ComicBookDB , he wasn't a consistent contributor to any titles other than the short limited series already highlighted before he... had to be replaced.  I'm guessing this was created due to him going to prison for allegedly murdering his wife in 1988 .  I think that this falls under WP:ONEEVENT , and that event was not even significantly covered.   It took me a while to dig up that link up somewhere outside archived forum posts.   Recommend deletion.  - 2pou ( talk ) 01:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I find his name listed in descriptions of individual comics issues and arcs that he worked on, but nothing about him, minus the mention that he killed his wife.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bolixo: Just an advertisement which does not belong to Wikipedia.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet , Software ,  and Websites .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:SPA -created orphaned unsourced spam.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Snobar: However, it seems that this region doesn't receive the adequate attention or recognition it deserves.  For instance, in the city of Ramallah alone, you can find more than 90 bars, not to mention other cities.  It appears that it's not as famous as it should be, as it's neither the first nor the last bar in Palestine.  When compared to the number of other restaurants and bars, it seems not to attract many visitors.  Even the available sources are outdated and don't provide much information about the essence or significance of the place.  Overall, it can be said that the topic of the article points to an unjustified bubble.  Osps7 ( talk ) 21:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions .  Osps7 ( talk ) 21:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't say I fully understand this nomination – are you saying that the  subject is unnotable?  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 21:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, unnotable Osps7 ( talk ) 22:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Palestine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Only passing mentions in the New York Times and The National articles cited in the article.  I searched and couldn't find additional WP:SIGCOV .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 22:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shoji Yamada: Searching in Japanese, I can only find coverage of the musician of the same name.  I've had a look at Japanese Wikipedia but none of the sources there show WP:SIGCOV .  Similar case to Yuki Toma and Kei Hirata , which were created by the same editor.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as what the nomination says.  By the way, Spiderone , I kinda like the fact you're referring to corresponding article on the subject's original language in AfD!  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] CuteDolphin712 in fairness, Japanese Wikipedia articles for footballers tend to be of a very high quality in my experience so it tends to be a good indicator on whether the en.wiki article is worth having.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 09:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no sources Waqar 💬 17:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Information Professionals Association: No indication of notability under GNG or SNG.   There is absolutely zero coverage or even mention of them in the references except by themselves.   Of the references, 3 are their own website, one is their linked in page and the remaining reference does not cover or even mention them.   In a search I could not find any independent sources.   Tagged for wp:notability by others since November.  North8000 ( talk ) 18:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Created by a one purpose COI account.  Their userpage explains it all.  The subject of the article lacks notability, and only lists primary sources, including from LinkedIn.  Cursory google search doesn't come up with suitable results.  X ( talk ) 19:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete advert with no independent coverage.  - Altenmann >talk 22:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per all the above, a promotional page for an organisation with no evidence of notability, nor even any attempt to demonstrate notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per all that is already cited above.  Promotional.  TLA tlak 08:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KKGU: AusLondonder ( talk ) 19:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and United States of America .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 19:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I stand by my seconding of the since-contested PROD — this is a remnant of how loose the inclusion "standards" still were in this topic area in 2019, which were still seemingly based more on being (or at least having been at some point) a licensed station (notwithstanding that this only establishes existence, which is neither notability nor proof of notability ), without much regard as to there being anything more to verifiably say (and the odds for a newer radio station such as this one getting the required significant coverage are long enough as it is).  Our list of radio stations in U.S. territories is one that only includes operational stations, so there's nothing to redirect to or any other plausible deletion alternative.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already been PROD'd.  Not eligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 22:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable radio station.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Defence Authority Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed College: Fails WP:GNG .  BookishReader ( talk ) 12:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : unless nominator is able to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media.  This is a weak nomination and should be opposed on the basis of WP:BEFORE, and the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability unless the above can be demonstrated Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:VAGUEWAVE .  BookishReader ( talk ) 22:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] if you ! vote keep in an unreferenced article, I expect you've found sources to support a keep outcome and can list them.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As per the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability the onus is on the nominator to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media.  In the absence of that a Keep is appropriate Jack4576 ( talk ) 08:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] •Delete- No reliable sources can be found PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 19:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced and no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only found trivial mentions of the subject in the news.  Unless supporters of keep can provide can give sufficient sources, delete seems to be the reasonable action (I mean, that's kinda how AfD is supposed to work. "Unsourced material may be challenged and removed" actually means something).  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 00:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disagree that was the outcome of how AfD is supposed to work following RfC on secondary school notability .  SIGCOV is not a requirement for an entry.  Its satisfaction merely gives rise to a presumption of notability.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 08:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Insufficient coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no SIGCOV; Jack4576 , you really need to stop with your non-policy based opposes.  Most subcontinental newspapers, even ones in regional languages, are on the internet and you don't really need to conduct print searches through each newspaper.  Most schools here are random private, for-profit schools with no notability or coverage.  AryKun ( talk ) 04:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Knowledge Engineering and Machine Learning Group: 日期20220626 ( talk ) 02:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Spain .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Engineering .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ 日期20220626 - there are a number of citations to journal articles in the References section.  How do they factor into your notability analysis?  Also, there are additional refs in the Catalan ( Grup d'Enginyeria del Coneixement i Aprenentatge Automàtic ) and Spanish ( Grupo de Ingeniería del Conocimiento y Aprendizaje Automático ) versions of this article.
 Thanks, -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] These references are not intended to introduce the laboratory itself. 日期20220626 ( talk ) 04:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks like a small program; our article's inbox states: Staff:2 postdoctoral researchers Students: 8 doctoral students Alumni: 47 -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for now; I'm not seeing much so far.  Ping me if something significant turns up.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article contains many promotional content like explaining what this group teaches.  🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！ ) 08:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete