hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Skimmer (band): Possible redirect to List of Peel sessions , but not sure if that is helpful.  Boleyn ( talk ) 09:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] P Delete Promo, no claim to notability Llajwa ( talk ) 20:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wally Scharold: Theroadislong ( talk ) 14:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 14:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear to have serious coverage, and page plastered by "cn" comments.   Although, looking at the article history, I think you mean "contested prod" rather than "restored after prod deletion".  PatGallacher ( talk ) 18:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No PatGallacher ... the article was restored after being deleted [22] .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 23:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Improvements to citations are ongoing.  Please allow some additional time to provide acceptable citations.  Thank you.  AimlessIdler ( talk ) 19:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Over a dozen citations added.  One is to a bandcamp page which is the only record found for Scharold's membership located.  If in violation of bandcamp spam policy it can be removed.  The "cn" comments remain, will source these ASAP.  Thank you.  AimlessIdler ( talk ) 20:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All "cn" comments resolved with citations.  AimlessIdler ( talk ) 22:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding 6 x YouTube videos is not helful, it is not a reliable independent source.  Theroadislong ( talk ) 23:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : None of the sources are independent or discuss the subject in any capacity beyond mentioning him as a performer/arranger/composer/producer.  Recon rabbit 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] On what basis are you claiming none of the sources are independent?  This seems to me to be an over-generalization of all the sources provided.  Could you please provide evidence that supports this?  Thank you.  AimlessIdler ( talk ) 23:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024–25 Young Lions FC season: Govvy ( talk ) 11:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Singapore .  CptViraj ( talk ) 11:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : don't draftify.  We need to discourage this type of wikisquatting on a likely future title to show up as the article creator.  A stub is fine, but this isn't even that.  Owen× ☎ 16:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As Owen× said.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , a form of Wikipedia editing that should be promptly discouraged.  The "article" is copied and pasted from 2023; all the transfers occurred in 2023.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See also: 2024–25 Selangor F.C. season 2024–25 Albirex Niigata Singapore FC season 2024–25 Balestier Khalsa FC season 2024–25 Lion City Sailors F.C. season 2024–25 Johor Darul Ta'zim F.C. season 2024–25 BG Tampines Rovers FC season 2024–25 Tanjong Pagar United FC season 2024–25 Hougang United FC season Delete WP:TOOSOON .  Articles should only be about the men's 1st team.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 10:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above.  The other similar articles should be nominated separately.  Giant Snowman 11:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all above - anyone that wishes to put the other articles to the sword as well has my full support Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Belgian Pro League broadcasters: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Belgium .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with the premise of the AfD.  Also, what a weird list!  Hardly any core and almost everything out of scope.  Also by SPINOFF/SPINOUT (information governance) logic, the article doesn't fly.  gidonb ( talk ) 15:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International Quran News Agency: Koopinator ( talk ) 16:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I cannot find anything other than a few primary sources (all on its own site).  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 16:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jason Raubenheimer: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does look to fail WP:GNG as significant coverage is limited.  No suitable redirect here given he's played for 2 major teams.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saudi Seasons: There is nothing to indicate that this is notable.  It has not been covered by reliable sources.  It has solely been covered by sources that are not independent of the Saudi government.  This Wikipedia article appears intended to promote a non-notable subject.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 14:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a fine example of client journalism.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  I was unable to find significant coverage in sources independent from the government of Saudi Arabia.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 21:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Random Encounters: There are three redirects here ( AJ Pinkerton , CG5 (YouTuber) , and NateWantsToBattle ), but if none of those are notable enough for their own pages (though Nate might be given the coverage his music has been getting lately) then surely they aren't notable enough to get profiles on an article that itself isn't notable.  And as I said in my PROD, I see no apparent claim to notability here.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 00:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Internet .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 00:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All sources are youtube or un-RS.  Non-notable web series, the article looks like a fan site rather than a wiki article.  Way too long of a list for every episode and not much critical discussion of the thing being mentioned in the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It has the one source that discusses it in the title of the article, but other than that, it doesn't seem to have the same level of attention.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 14:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some articles cover multiple related subjects.  If any of the subjects is notable, the article is a keeper.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This page is here to cover one series, not every person who happens to being involved in it.  Those subjects should get their own articles to be judged independently for their own notability.  And even if they are notable, notability is not inherited .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mike Hall (musician): Large majority of sources are interview-based.  Some of the sources also seem quite promotional, so they may be press releases of some kind.  TLA (talk) 10:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The creator's contributions are solely based on Mike.  Likely an undisclosed WP:COI or fan.  TLA (talk) 10:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New Jersey .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of revisions and sources of 'Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad': The entire article is explicitly WP:OR , with the research method described in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the lede.  The article is almost suitable for speedy deletion (A11), except that the topic is potentially important (even if invented).  A merge to Timeline of United States military operations or similar was considered but there doesn't seem to be sufficient background material to warrant this.  Klbrain ( talk ) 10:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Lists ,  and United States of America .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 10:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm utterly baffled why this would be worthy of an article here.  I see no indication why anyone should care when this report has been updated and revised.  Like, obviously it would be like many CRS reports.  Are the individual changes actually significant?  Has anyone independently taken note of them?  This is weird.  Reywas92 Talk 13:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ok, so the report exists, but why is it notable?  This would be suitable in some military website, not here.  I don't see notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Timeline of United States military operations .  I deprodded this because the nom said the topic is potentially important and I assume by this they meant the Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad report was important and I assume it is.  But although Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad redirects to Timeline of United States military operations and there are claims in the history of Timeline of United States military operations that a merge was performed, I see no mention of Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad in Timeline of United States military operations .  So I suggest the first two lead paragraphs of this article could be merged there.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This appears to be heavily based on WP:OR and does not meet the WP:NLIST .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete what is this?  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 10:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NOT .  Besides being a hot mess, we are not a bibliography of primary sources.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Denis Shnitov: I am not convinced that this passes WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG and the current article only uses database sources, which fail to confer notability.  The best Russian sources that I could find were Redyarsk and FCDM , both of which were only passing mentions of the subject.  Given that he seems to have disappeared, I don't think notability in the near future is that likely either.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 13:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not sure if it could pass notability criteria then either.  NavjotSR ( talk ) 07:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Helen Marlais: All of the sources listed in this article are primary, and I could find almost no secondary coverage on her JooneBug37 ( talk ) 02:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  JooneBug37 ( talk ) 03:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  JooneBug37 ( talk ) 03:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:NAUTHOR .  There are no sources to establish any kind of notability and was created by a WP:SPA .  Newshunter12 ( talk ) 22:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NMUSICOTHER .  — CurryTime7-24 ( talk ) 04:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Haby Baldé: All I found were passing mentions ( 2020 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Senegal .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 21:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clayne Robison: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Idaho .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - sufficient sources have been added (though not yet cited in footnotes).  Skyerise ( talk ) 13:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  19:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , while its a fairly close run-thing, I do not believe Robison passes WP:GNG .  The Deseret News article is a pretty clear puff piece that largely takes the form of an interview in any case, and the academic sources cited are a bit hard to analyse but seem to only provide passing mentions of Robison.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 12:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  It would be nice to see some assessment of changes made since the nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete per Devonian Wombat.  I don't see enough to hang an article on here.  Even if we accept the Deseret News article without qualifications, there don't seem to be any other sources that wouldn't require OR to extract the content, which means we're still short of WP:NBASIC .  To the extent it might be a borderline case, it seems to me WP:BLP and the associated privacy considerations would weigh pretty strongly against inclusion.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 01:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete