hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sahla Parveen: Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 12:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Exactly two hits in Gnews, the ones used in the article from the Indian Express.  One is by the Lifestyle Desk, so very much a PR piece.  No suitable sourcing we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I understand your rationale behind nominating this particular article for deletion.  It may fail WP:GNG and let's wait for others opinions on this issue.  Abishe ( talk ) 16:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Most of the article discussing information that is not notable aside from the authorship of her first book, "The Beauty Purpose in Life," which would need further evidence to prove notability.  Dazzling4 ( talk ) 16:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Authors ,  and Businesspeople .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Abishe did an excellent job by writing this article.  But I must say that we can't keep it for now.  As I am from Kerala, I did some research about her and tried to discover sources.  As a matter of fact, she is a well-known motivational speaker.  But we all know that popularity has little to do with establishing notability.  I did a google search about her in Malayalam (സഹല പർവീൻ, സഹ്‌ല പർവീൻ).  The outcome was disappointing because I was only able to obtain one source, which is an interview.  Because of that, for the time being, she does not meets our GNG standards.  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 08:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sikh Soudhan Wars: Here, we have something called apparently the "Sikh Soudan Wars", or the "Sikh Sudhan Wars", or the "Sikh Sidhnuti War".  The section for the "First Sikh Sudhan War" has one source [4] which doesn't mention Sudhan, Soudhan, or Sidhnuti.  The Second War, about "Pindi Kahota, the main gate of Sudhnuti" being bombarded and so on, is sourced to [5] , which doesn't mention Kahota, and this , which also doesn't mention Kahota.  In fact, there are apparently no sources at all for Ranjit Singh taking an army of 40000 to Pindi Kahota [6] [7] nor for the same with "Pindi Kahuta", which I suppose is what was meant.  Basically, what we need is two or so good sources actually naming and discussing the "Sikh Sudhan Wars" as such.  Without this, this is some fabrication at worst, or at best reframing some actual events into a new narrative.  Fram ( talk ) 09:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Jammu and Kashmir .  Fram ( talk ) 09:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, pretty clear the writer resorted to the AfC trick of spamming references to show notability, except in this case it's spamming refernces to show verifiability without having to assign a claim to a given citation.  I suppose a full BEFORE search ought to be by someone who speaks Punjabi and/or is familiar with the military history of the region, but given the lack of understanding by the writer of basic PAGs , and the low quality of the prose, I'm fine with presumptively deleting this.  Mach61 ( talk ) 00:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Serious WP:V problems and elevate risk of being a hoax/spam.  As users familiar with the subject appear, it may be recreated later but for now it seems to be a case of WP:TNT .  Svartner ( talk ) 14:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Animes Roy: Just beacuse the person featured on Coke Studio Bangla doesn't guarantee an automatic wikipedia article.  Most of the cited sources on the article talks about Coke Studio Bangla.  Also all of the sources are primary, either interview or passing mentions.  Unable to see any significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  Article fails WP:GNG , WP:ARTIST .  (Note that It is most likely a "Paid-article". See this facebook post , where the subject thanks someone called "Md Younus Shepon" for creating this article and also recommend others to contact him if they need a wikipedia article. I can see article creator allready blocked for sock-puppeting.) আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 19:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Another note: After creating this Afd, it looks like they deleted that facebook post.  -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 20:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Bangladesh .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  → Tanbiruzzaman 💬 19:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , more spam PROMO.  I can't see any charted singles or music awards in my search.  The paid editor doesn't help either, it's a red flag.  If you're notable, ask for your article to be created, for free!  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obviously, after observations made in the nomination re: the paid editor, this page is a misuse of Wikipedia ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 21:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable yet.  Kashem overflow ( talk ) 04:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable yet. - Nazrul Islam Nahid ( talk ) 16:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thyago Moraes: I find that strange because usually you would at least find his name on sports info, betting websites and so forth.  But nothing.The so-called external links are not helpful either, to say the least.  The article was tagged 3 times for speedy deletion.  As it is, I propose this article for deletion as an unsourced BLP without evidence of notability Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 00:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Brazil .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 00:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – In WP:BEFORE I didn't find anything relevant about the athlete, I didn't even find a profile on ogol.com. , of the sources presented in the article, one is for a video on YouTube, one for an image on a blog, and two are inaccessible.  I believe that in this case WP:GNG clearly failed.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet GNG.  My guess is that he goes by another name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I also can't find anything to indicate they are notable.  KylieTastic ( talk ) 13:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with notability concerns.  I haven't been able to find any reliable sources like news articles or independent reviews to support the notability of this subject.  Waqar 💬 18:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mellodee: Was rejected in draftspace and the author who happens to have a WP:COI and has moved it to mainspace after being advised to submit through WP:AFC .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and South Africa .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero sources for this singer.  One archived link from a decade ago I can't open, as sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Single source cited is about someone else entirely, no mention of subject of this article.  A WP:BEFORE search finds nothing better.  Promotional, COI, does not meet any notability criteria.  Melcous ( talk ) 21:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 00:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources found.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 01:48, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find any sources either, therefore fails GNG.  I also can't conjure any other notability criteria by which this topic would be worthy of encyclopedic attention.  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 14:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non notable musician - Xclusivzik ( talk ) 12:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aung Kyaw Htwe: is what WP:SPORTBASIC tells us is a requirement for any footballer to have their own article.  I can find no evidence that this footballer meets the above guideline as I could not locate WP:SIGCOV in Burmese or English.  The only relevant hits that I can get are database sources like Soccerway , which specifically does not confer notability per above.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 00:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phon Martdee: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Here 's the 2010 Muay Siam profile piece mentioned in the article.  It's interview-based but quite in-depth.  Searching variants of his name in Thai doesn't turn up anything else substantial online.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 17:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Tagged since 2016.  The Muay Siam piece is not a significant source.  Subject does not meet criteria notability WP:KICK as a competitor and also as an instructor and promoter.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 12:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't appear to meet any SNG.   I don't see significant independent coverage in multiple reliable sources that would meet WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 23:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tatevik Manukyan: I was barely even able to find mentions of the subject.  Not to be confused with the politician of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Armenia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NBLP .  Being listed on a statistics page does not count as a notable source.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 05:00, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KHDT-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Colorado .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elite Two Championship 2023–2024: Mn1548 ( talk ) 11:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and France .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely orphan, it is only possible for someone unfamiliar with the scope to understand that it is a rugby tournament in France looking at the categories.  It is a case for WP:TNT .  Svartner ( talk ) 22:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Soma Bhadra: Can't see how this is notable in any way.  Also fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 23:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Engineering , Environment , West Bengal , California ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is one local newspaper mention: https://www.valleycenter.com/articles/water-board-to-seek-re-bids-on-reservoir-liner-project/ OmegaMantis ( talk ) 22:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the subject is notable enough, as she is a CEO of a company and has been mentioned by multiple sources.  OmegaMantis ( talk ) 16:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: User:OmegaMantis , I assume your are arguing to Keep ?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, sorry for not being clear enough.  OmegaMantis ( talk ) 01:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find any independent sources with more than a passing mention of the subject, either in the article or elsewhere.  Doesn't seem to me that the article meets WP:GNG .  Tollens ( talk ) 10:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search has also not found support for WP:BASIC notability.  She is quoted in Smithsonian Magazine in 2017; a preliminary research proposal she made to  the Valley Center Municipal Water District (VCMWD) board is briefly reported in the local Valley Center news in 2014; she was the 2021-2022 San Diego section winner of the CWEA Member Awards ( Select Society of Sanitary Sludge Shovelers ); CWEA also announced she joined the 2022-23 CWEA Board of Directors on their website.  She has a profile at the Women's Media Center WMC SheSource ( bio page ) but I have not found secondary coverage of her writing.  She has an established career, but the independent and reliable secondary coverage needed to support an encyclopedic article according to the notability guideline does not yet appear to be available at this time.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 06:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battles of Kazerum: Other sources at best make a passing mention of some skirmishes in Kazerun and other places, without info on the role of Josef Pousette (not Puosette) or any of the other details found in that one source.  The whole "first battle" section, being the most important of the encounters, is sourced to this , which doesn't mention this battle.  Perhaps someone can find some better sources to verify the information here, but otherwise we shouldn't have an article on this.  Fram ( talk ) 20:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Iran ,  and Sweden .  Fram ( talk ) 20:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete it then Dencoolast33 ( talk ) 20:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Topic should be covered instead on Shiraz expedition .  No need for a redirect there, since "Battles of Kazerum/n" isn't used as a term to describe these events.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nomination.  Riggwelter ( talk ) 07:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hawker Siddeley HS 138: I cannot find much of anything about this design, so I do not see how an article can be sustained on it.  If there are sources I am somehow missing please let me know.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 18:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 18:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Aviation .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Not enough published info to pass WP:GNG .  Also, much of what is given here is not backed up by the existing source s , even conflicts with one or two other snippets I have found, so a merge of any kind is not worth considering.  — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk ) 20:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [updated 01:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)] [ reply ] Delete - cannot find any substantial coverage.  Does not appear to have ever risen from the pages of a speculative newsletter.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 10:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lego Junkbot: A search in gnews yields 2 hits.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The game has a dearth of independent, reliable sources that limits its notability.  I have sadly not found any additional sources online or from the Internet Archive.  As a comment, whilst this problem is not particular to legacy Flash games, they do seem to often receive little online coverage due to their type and medium of publication.  It's a shame greater attention wasn't directed to them.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I completely agree with Blocks Magazine being used unreliably.  There are no other sources I could find.  Tarantula TM ( speak with me ) ( my legacy ) 15:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 03:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete