hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Robert Thomas Brudenell-Bruce : No indication of notability.  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 20:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Military ,  and Royalty and nobility .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 20:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Bruce was previously recorded in the article as being a Royal Navy commodore.  This seems to be a result of confusion over the shortened rank "Comm." which in this case referred to commander, Bruce's rank upon retirement.  As such it's very unlikely that his military career will provide any notability.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 20:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No credible claim of significance .  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elisa Heinsohn : Boleyn ( talk ) 20:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Theatre ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  notability as an an actor is not defined by acclaim, fame, pardon the pun , or even talent.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG Robertjamal12 ~🔔 14:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC) -- [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaylors : There isn't even a Swifties article, so this is incredibly unneccessary.  The whole article can be summarised in one or two sentences within Taylor Swift , if it needs to be.  — Peterpie123rww ( talk ) 14:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music .  Peterpie123rww ( talk ) 14:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only good sources per the bot are Buzzfeed and People mag.  Rest are iffy or not useable.  I can't find mentions of this topic in RS.  I'd be ok with a selective merge if needed.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep What about Jezebel, Cosmopolitan, Them, and Rolling Stone?  Elttaruuu ( talk ) 15:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please note that Elttaruuu is a sockmaster who used the account

Discussion outcome: delete
Patsy (Monty Python) : A search yielded very few additional results, and the current article is so small that I don't see a need for it to exist separately from other Monty Python articles.  All notable reception can be covered by Spamlot's article, if it isn't already.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 23:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Film ,  and Theatre .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 23:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This fictional character is not notable.   All encyclopedic information about him should be given in the film and musical articles to the extent appropriate per WP:DUE .  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 02:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect . Not seeing how the article even tries to estabilish notability, and my BEFORE just gave few mentions in passing. Ping me if SIGCOV coverage that goes beyond plot summary is found. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a minor character in Monty Python and the Holy Grail , barely more important than Sir Not-appearing-in-this-film.  Why should he have an article when there isn't (and shouldn't be) even a King Arthur (Monty Python) ?  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Such a minor character fails GNG; should be deleted without any doubt!  Ekdalian ( talk ) 13:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass the standard for WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 14:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Subject fails GNG.  Bobherry Talk My Edits 01:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Portuguese in Estonia : Cordless Larry ( talk ) 17:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Estonia ,  and Portugal .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 17:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there's a few stats (e.g. number of Portuguese people studying in Estonia in a given year) but no actual significant analysis of this as a topic.  Not every xx people in yy country is automatically notable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is no useful information in the article (except for a single insignificant economic fact in the Remittances section).  If they ever do appear, it would be better to create a full-fledged Estonia-Portugal relations page (currently it is a redirect to Foreign relations of Estonia ).  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Speed Racing Ultimate (video game series) : ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article's source list is deceptively shallow, heavily relying on listings from databases.  These sources may as well be primary sources as they tend to be scraped from the app listing.  None offer meaningful or independent information about any of the games.  Vrxces ( talk ) 05:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete none of the sources are reliable.  Most are databases, primary sources, or self-published.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 03:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siti Atiqoh Supriyanti : Being the wife of a Governor or the wife of a presidential candidate does not automatically mean you're notable.  Notability requires verifiable evidence as it is not an inheritance .  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Indonesia .  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Cursory search showed up nothing relevant.  Notability is not WP:INHERITED , doesn't pass WP:JOURNALIST as a journalist either.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Expanded since nomination, further evaluation would be beneficial.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Non-notable as a journalist, and notability is not inherited.  The only claim to notability might be the fact that she is a recipient of the Satyalencana Wira Karya, but I am unable to determine how distinctive the award is.  Mooonswimmer 15:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raktabeej 2023 : Patently unready for mainspace.  WP:ADMASQ .  Fails WP:NFILM 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Film .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] draftify or delete not ready for mainspace, unformatted/unstyled, left in a PROMO state.  — siro χ o 09:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  Tintinthereporter226 ( talk ) 09:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : not ready for mainspace.  141 Pr { contribs } 15:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - This draft or article is about an unreleased film.  The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:  1. Planned films that have not begun production ( principal photography or animation).  These planned films do not satisfy film notability  .  2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released.  These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage .  Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.  3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.  This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production. .  The draft may be resubmitted, with Reception information, after the film is released.   If it is resubmitted again before release (fill in the blank).  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 16:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:NFILM .  -- Mikeblas ( talk ) 16:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Class of '09 (video game) : This game is an absolute WP:N failure in every regard.  Additionally, it was moved to draftspace due to the zero sources present, but was moved back into mainspace by the creator anyways.  λ Negative MP1 18:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  λ Negative MP1 18:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No reliable sources exist, like at all.  The best I could find was one review on some random person's blog (the one singular review on Metacritic I might add).  The lack of inline citations or really any citations at all makes this an original research nightmare.  -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 20:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure if this is what you were refering to, but the review on Metacritic does not appear to be a personal blog .  Regardless this article will probably need a complete rewrite at least (and there are few sources, even thought it has blown up recently) but I think this should be noted.  Totalibe ( talk ) 17:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No substance to suggest general notability at all.  One of the most impressively excessive cases of WP:GAMECRUFT I've seen in a while.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 08:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems to fail WP:GNG .  Even if a review from a reliable source randomly came up, that still wouldn't be enough, it's simply far too minor for Wikipedia.  Wikipedia isn't an advertising tool.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only RS mention I could find was one brief post from Pocket Gamer .   It seems like the game actually did fairly well, but visual novels tend to not get much RS coverage, so I'm not particularly surprised by the lack of sources.  CurlyWi ( talk ) 22:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Even if it passes WP:GNG I will just recommend completely WP:TNT -ing it.  OceanHok ( talk ) 15:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Koegathe Rabithome : The only information we have about this footballer is from statistical databases; we don't know when or where he was born or what he did during his footballing career besides playing less than 20 minutes in a single international match.  Sticky PROD was removed without adding any plausible SIGCOV.  Jogurney ( talk ) 12:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and South Africa .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - despite the cameo for Botswana, this article comprehensively fails WP:SPORTBASIC #5 Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, I also have a question, is there not a list of capped players for Botswana for a redirect?  Govvy ( talk ) 23:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no such list.  I suppose a redirect to the Botswana national football team article might be a reasonable outcome (although I'm skeptical this person is a likely search term).  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd rather delete than redirect to the national team as he isn't mentioned at the national team, so the redirect would confuse the reader.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Botswana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amro El Jawich : Current citations are primary sources.  dxneo ( talk ) 15:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports ,  and Lebanon .  dxneo ( talk ) 15:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:NCHESS .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I am the author of this article.  I agree with you.  History6042 ( talk ) 14:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Since the author History6042 fully agrees with the nom, I think speedy deletion should be applied.  dxneo ( talk ) 16:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chess World Cup 2023 or delete.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 15:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Teleena MVNE : Previously deleted and salted as Teleena * Pppery * it has begun... 19:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Netherlands .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The nominator stands correct.  Since the current article is under the wrong title and Teleena is not mentioned at Tata Communications , into which it dissolved, DO NOT redirect.  gidonb ( talk ) 04:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Travis County Republican Party : Fails WP:ORGCRIT .  Most of the sources at the article are not secondary sources, those that are are not specifically about this organisation.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Texas .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 14:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Delete per nom and WP:ORG .  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 14:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lothian Schools Strathspey and Reel Society : Neither of them is from a reliable published source, however.  This orchestra looks run-of-the-mill to me and I do not think it meets WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 23:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Dance , Music , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 23:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I did a bit of searching, and could find no news sources mentioning the topic, and the two sources already referenced in the article in no way make the topic notable.  2G0o2De0l ( talk ) 00:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I managed to find a mention in a pretty solid source, but there's too brief a mention there to claim any notability: [1] .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Young Sinatra (mixtape) : Only able to find something about The YS Collection compilation, which is not this mixtape.  I found this review from Sputnikmusic , but it only critiques the mixtape and offers no further insight to the mixtape apart from surface-level coverage.  Regardless, one source isn't enough for notability.  Locust member ( talk ) 13:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No source(s) to indicate notability nor to establish WP:SIGCOV .  @T.C.G. [talk] 22:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programmes on TVNZ 2 : Fails GNG and NLIST, NOTDIRECTORY.  // Timothy :: talk 07:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and New Zealand .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Already covered in List of programmes broadcast by TVNZ which covers all channels in that network.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2027 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election : Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it.  Should be recreated closer to 2027 when we have actual sources discussing the election.  Soni ( talk ) 07:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , India ,  and Gujarat .  Soni ( talk ) 07:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ATD-R : Gujarat Legislative Assembly .  Too early Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 08:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:TOOSOON .  Way down in the future for year 2027 and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it a collection of unverifiable content.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not ready for mainspace this early.  Based Kashmiri TALK 10:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete