hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Paulin Basinga publications : Since a PROD was contested, it has to go to AfD (perhaps speedy delete).  This page should not be merged to Paulin Basinga as a long list is not useful in a BLP.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 12:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 12:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : it's odd that the article about the person isn't linked, but they have one.  This list isn't needed, and I have my doubts the individual is notable either.  Most ref's in their article seem to be interviews in Nigerian media, none from his home country.  Suspect more "pay to publish" notability...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I've also nominated the article on Paulin Basinga for deletion, does not appear notable either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Medicine ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , WP:NOPAGE ; the publication list is on Scopus and other databases, linked from Paulin Basinga , and doesn't warrant a separate page.  I agree that a merge is unwarranted, as the content is no needed on that page (MOS).  Klbrain ( talk ) 18:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom and Klbrain.   Suprised there isn't a speedy criteria for this, but after the declined PROD, this (and not merge) is the right choice.   If the author wants access to it to improve the Paulin Basinga page they should draftify/user-space it now.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 00:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Klbrain.  hinnk ( talk ) 04:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alun Rees : JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Wales .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only one match for Cardiff and 3 for Dragons, no significant coverage and unlikely to change.  RodneyParadeWanderer ( talk ) 14:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 21:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 01:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with deletion, the article lacks sufficient coverage of the Welsh rugby player to meet notability guidelines.  Waqar 💬 18:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bestshoring : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 11:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:DICTIONARY The is lifted from a Hillary Clinton opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, which is also under External Links.   A Google search of the term results in the exact same wording, but nothing else.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Neologism, and not one that seems to have caught on.   It's a whitewash of offshoring , for which we have an article, so this article strikes me as a pointless POV fork.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
House clearance : Boleyn ( talk ) 22:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - This would seem to be a variation of both Recycling in the United Kingdom and Garage sale .   However, the article is completely un-sourced.  — Maile ( talk ) 03:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Garage sale .  This is an unsourced vintage 2011 creation that leans close to being a how-to guide.  Garage sale is the same topic, just the American English word for it.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 04:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as below. -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't think this is the same as a garage sale.  A house clearance is "clearing items and household waste from a property, including sheds and garages." (I would probably just call this "house cleaning" or "house cleanup" in America.) I don't see any reasonable redirect target, so I recommend deletion.  The research of Annebelle Pollen e.g. [1] looks like good sourcing, but it's not enough to write an article around.  I couldn't see other sourcing that would make me want to keep this.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 18:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hm, fair enough.  I'll strike my redirect suggestion.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Pollen, Annebella (2022-12-09).  "Emptying the Wardrobe, Clearing the House: A Microcosmic View into the Creation and Destruction of Clothing Value" .  JOMEC: Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies Journal .  17 : 34–54.  ISSN 2049-2340 .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Monika Bytčánková : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Slovakia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hélder Reis : Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 06:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless someone can find significant prose coverage of this person in reliable, independent sources.  Database entries are insufficient to establish notability per WP:NATHLETE .  Cullen328 ( talk ) 07:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Full name is Hélder Sancho da Costa Reis.  This, and the Portuguese word for fencer, esgrimista, might help identify sources about the subject and not the (more notable/recent) Hélder Reis, a television presenter.  What I have found is a Portuguese TV report about the fencer winning the national final in 1973 .  It seems he was inducted into a fencing Hall of Fame or similar in 2022 Portuguese fencing website report .  Kingsif ( talk ) 00:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: For an opinion on Kingsif's findings above… Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We can WP:V him but he has no significant coverage apart from maybe that film.  We can always re-create if that's incorrect.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Godwin Mathumo : He has no significant achievements on BWF and his career prize money of $41.25 doesn't give me confidence that Mathumo is a notable professional sportsperson.  The best that I can find are passing mentions in CSC and Mmegi and I'm not even convinced that the former source is WP:RS .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Botswana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Had it been over $50, but alas...  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  48JCL 13:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malina Pardo : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This is a good piece, but is not independent as it's from her school's newspaper.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Puerto Rico ,  and North Carolina .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  WP:TOOSOON .  Pro-club academy player who's still playing as a college graduate; injured in college play in 2021 and national team play in 2022, redshirted 2022.  Might become notable, might not.  - Socccc ( talk ) 15:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Separately, student-run media are considered WP:RS (specifically WP:RSSM ) if editorially independent in content, which Niner Times appears to be via its student-run editorial board.  That linked piece isn't an athletic department press release.  A more relevant guideline against notability is in RSSM: "A topic which can be sourced exclusively to student media, with no evidence of wider coverage in mass market general interest media, is not likely to be viewed as notable." - Socccc ( talk ) 15:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Student-run media are absolutely not considered independent of topics related to their school .  See the unanimous consensus here .  I've clarified this at RSSM.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , sourcing does not establish GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Old LA (Highland Park) Farmers Market : No indication it meets WP:GNG or WP:NORG ARandomName123 ( talk ) 05:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and California .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 05:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No reliable sources or indication of notability.  Kpg jhp jm 07:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My city has well over a dozen weekly farmers markets in different neighborhoods, and it would take a lot to show this is more than a run-of-the-mill one.  Reywas92 Talk 14:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This borders on WP:SPEEDY since the only source is the marketing material for the article's subject.  Last1in ( talk ) 22:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fayse Goh : I also searched up the name, and it appears to plagarize his youtube channel's description.  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 20:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Malaysia .  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 20:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2024-04 ✍️ create -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 01:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I find youtube, twitter, instagram then off into the ether...  Lack of sourcing, what's given now is primary.  Nothing for notability found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NEO CANDO : To me it reads like an essay imported from elsewhere (I've not been able to find a source) but it is such a skipfire that it needs WP:TNT until someone can completely rewrite it from scratch with proper referencing.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and Ohio .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing for this "group"?  found (I'm unsure what to call them).  I get hits on the Neo Bank and other things using the term "neo", nothing about this entity.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries , Education ,  and Websites .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's a G12.  I'm not going to CSD as it's already here, but here's the source of most.  I'd imagine the rest is from a prior version of that page and their own site.  Star Mississippi 18:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of names of the Ottoman Empire : WP:NOTDICTIONARY Pepper Beast (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Turkey .  Pepper Beast (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT and WP:LIST .  Here is another list of names of something, numbering in the dozens, but with only seven (7) citations.  If you want to keep it, you had better find a lot more coverage .  Bearian ( talk ) 21:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muhannad Yousuf Ozair : Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and United Arab Emirates .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article uses only sports blogs and a player profile page as sources.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 14:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dewi (2009 TV series) : Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Lots of promo, database listings.  // Timothy :: talk 13:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as nommed.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 12:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NeDi : This article also doesn't appear to meet notability requirements.  A previous discussion was had about deleting this article and no action despite a delete consensus.  Garsh ( talk ) 18:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 7 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article was deleted in 2008 but re-created.  Sourcing amounts to two blog articles and a forum post... doesn't sufficient to establish notability.  -- Here2rewrite ( talk ) 19:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The InfoWorld and CIO Magazine sources are not blogs, but they are the same article that also appears to have been published on ComputerWorld .  (They share the same publisher and thus are not independent of each other.)  I see a few WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in scholarly publications but no additional WP:SIGCOV beyond the IW/CW/CIO source to get to WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 02:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Han Qianxi : Stvbastian ( talk ) 15:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment torn on this nomination, WP:SIGCOV is a factor but appears to meet WP:GNG and lack of coverage in Western media for a notable Chinese Badminton player is not unexpected.  Suspect this will never be more than a stub.  W C M email 07:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This BLP is a tricky decision, for the reasons mentioned by Wee Curry Monster.  In the end, I'm mostly swayed by the achievements being for junior tournaments and occurring at least 3 years ago.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found Sohu but it doesn't really address Han Qianxi in sufficient depth Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete .  She was in an Uber Cup winning team but played no match.  Her achievements are same as before when this article was deleted three years ago.  zoglophie 13:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Gobbe : None of the sources are WP:SIGCOV about this person.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is just a blatant advertisement.  It’s not blatant enough for g11 but it’s still pretty blatant.  As I’ve said before we are not SoundCloud.  This person has no notability and has not been notable in the past.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I could not find any secondary coverage outside of a passing mention in an interview with someone else.  Out of the cited sources, I think only the InTheMix review could contribute to notability, so we're plainly failing WP:GNG .  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  14:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Promotional article of a non-notable musician.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 20:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not a notable, clearly fails GNG.  Poor coverage and lack of reliable source.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 14:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete