November 2021 English Channel disaster: Firsttwintop ( talk ) 22:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC) — Firsttwintop ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , France ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep (at least for now) - I could be wrong but it being the most deadly of these reported incidents makes it notable right?  Maybe in the future if (heaven forbid) something else happens that may not ring true but right now it is. 2406:5A00:CC0A:9200:F885:F46D:3F46:5787 ( talk ) 06:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The main article notes the incident properly : "On 24 November, the deadliest incident on record occurred. An inflatable dinghy carrying 30 migrants capsized while attempting to reach the UK, resulting in 27 deaths and one person missing. The victims included a pregnant woman and three children.".  It would therefore fortify the request for it to be deleted simply because it lacks notability and it is not news .  It is not appropriate in the context of the main article to create a standalone article for this one incident.  Firsttwintop ( talk ) 21:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] Merge to English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present) .  This information isn't useless, but it belongs in the article about the main subject.  There's no reason to split off random pieces of the topic into their own articles.  Firsttwintop , did you create an account just to nominate it for deletion?  There's no rule against that, but it's unusual.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 23:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The information is already on the article, but I support the gist of the proposal.  Firsttwintop ( talk ) 00:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep 27 is a significant number of deaths.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No consensus.  As an aside, it's interesting that this nomination (originally a PROD) was one of this editor's first edits.  How did you even know about AFDs?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep .  This appears to be a well-referenced and not-insignificant disaster.  BD2412 T 00:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The references are more than adequate to justify keeping this disaster and its consequences as a separate article.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Merge to English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present) .  The article is one separate event of a series of migrant crossings that have been going on for years.  It may be overtaken in the future by a higher number of deaths.  There is no reason for individual events of this series of migrant crossings to have their own page when they can be properly accommodated in English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present) .  Mariawest1965 ( talk ) 17:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] Keep : This incident is notable not just from the large loss of life, but also because the level of public interest in that led both to the revelations about how the boat traffic was being treated by "rescue" services, and to some political/policy changes.  That meets WP:EVENT and needs the more detailed record that this generally-well-referenced article provides, rather than shoe-horning just a brief summary into the main article.  - Davidships ( talk ) 00:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present) : the event is just another event of the migrant crossings, not justifying the separation of the single event from the main article, and could possibly be displaced as being the most deaths in migrant crossings in the future.  MonsterRacer1 ( talk ) 11:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC) — MonsterRacer1 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] MonsterRacer1 , how did you find this AFD on your first edit?  L iz Read!  Talk!  02:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I was reading the article and saw that it had been nominated for deletion; then I read the main article and found the information on the main article too, so I thought I would join in the discussion.  MonsterRacer1 ( talk ) 15:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: So far, no one has supported the nomination with a specific delete ! vote, but the ! votes are divided between keep and merge.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  05:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see the point of this AfD nomination.  This clearly fulfills WP:NEVENT given the sheer amount of coverage it has received.  The article is well written and sourced, so no major cleanup needed either.  This article counts 1300+ words, and the proposed merger would include most of its content into a page that has less than double the amount of words, giving WP:UNDUE weight to this single event.  Keep is in my opinion the only possible option.  Broc ( talk ) 08:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Article addresses a notable subject; 27 deaths (a large number) and the deadliest incident recorded by the IOM in the English Channel.  Article also has multiple citations, so it is well researched.  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 00:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I propose to modify the discussion so that the deletion discussion be simultaneously interpreted as a merge discussion to English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present) .  I still think the points I have made are relevant and others have shared similar views.  It is already in the article so merging it would effectively achieve the same outcome, but I do not think it deserves its own wholly separate article, for something so insignificant in a huge series of migrant crossings.  Firsttwintop ( talk ) 17:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC) — Firsttwintop ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] That would be inappropriate, I think, and would muddy the water.  The points being made and due weight to be given to them can be easily handled by the uninvolved closer in due course.  - Davidships ( talk ) 21:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Notable event, covered in multiple books as well as all the media reporting in the article.  E.g. [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] .  Without a doubt a notable event with lasting significance.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 17:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This fulfils WP:NEVENT .  Cambial — foliar❧ 18:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Please note that Firsttwintop ( talk · contribs ) and MonsterRacer1 ( talk · contribs ) have been blocked as block-evading sockpuppets.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 03:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep