hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Baakghost: " A hoax? Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 06:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A note that I have just nominated this for speedy deletion, even the IMDb doesn't exist for this "film".  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 06:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aranmanai 4 , unless this version differs significantly.  See my comment on TP (where I contested G3) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC) (Comment edited after I removed the CSD tag from the page) [ reply ] Good catch, I also support redirect .  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aranmanai 4 .  The fact that the film was partially reshot (small percentage) with two different actors is entirely unsourced (till release).  See List_of_multilingual_Indian_films#Partially_reshot_films .  An attempt to recreate Baak (Telugu Film) .  @ SenthilGugan : Mostly dubbed films do not get separate articles.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 05:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Baakghost is incorrect; it is Baak .  Kailash29792 (talk) 07:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, that is right, I forgot to mention that; but the content/subject being the said film, I find it is fairer, so as to be able to keep page history and credits, to rename after it's kept as redirect, than to plainly delete.  That's what is generally done when the title of an Afded article appears to be incorrect.  But thanks.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It looks like just a copy-edited version of Aranmanai 4 ; Just an unnecessary content fork .  Redirecting is pointless as not even the Google recognizes the name.  See here 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ ) 14:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All Google Search results are related to the Assamese folklore creature ; and nothing about the film.  𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ ) 15:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article is totally unnecessary.  Grabup ( talk ) 15:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , but move the poster to the other article if possible.  Looks cool.  ( 141.132.22.10 ( talk ) 08:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Steel City FC (Illinois): The only coverage I could find was [6] , which is both local and borderline coverage of the team itself.  Midwest Premier League is a viable redirect target.  ~ A412 talk!  20:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Illinois .  ~ A412 talk!  20:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Midwest Premier League#Current teams per nom.  Left guide ( talk ) 22:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bayan Mahmoudi: JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Iran .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 21:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect The Persian version also does not have more than 1 citation.  Yolandagonzales ( talk ) 09:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Freddie O'Connell: Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  The Tennessean Interview ✘ No Ballotpedia ?  No consensus at RSN ?  Unknown Election results ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Tennessee .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2023 Nashville mayoral election I'm not finding any significant coverage.  Most of what I find is brief mentions within articles relating to the election as a whole.  Redirecting seems appropriate for now, with no prejudice against recreating an article if he wins.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 16:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete currently fails GNG, WP:TOOSOON in the event he wins, will fail WP:NPOL if he loses.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and/or redirect .  People do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in future mayoral elections — the notability test at NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one.  But this is doing absolutely nothing to establish that he would pass NPOL #2 as a Metro Councillor, either — at that level of office, the notability test is not passed by minimally verifying that he exists, but by writing and sourcing a substantive article about his political impact: specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his time in office had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  But that's not what's on offer here.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation after September 14 if he wins the election, but nothing here is already enough to already earn him an article a month in advance of the election.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting to 2023 Nashville mayoral election ?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 12:52, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2023 Nashville mayoral election as suggested above.  It's clear that at best, the article was created a bit WP:TOOSOON although maybe nominating for deletion should have waited a few weeks to see if the candidate would then pass WP:NPOL .  I think a redirect serves well for two reasons; that recreation by reverting the RD can be done easily if they are elected (with suitable sourcing), and that they already seem reasonably well associated with the election that it's a useful redirect target regardless.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 09:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Måltid: It has been redirected to the band multiple times, but was reverted on the grounds that "according to WP:NALBUM AllMusic is considered reliable", which is untrue.  The guideline does say, however, that "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography", which is the outcome I am requesting.  – brad v 13:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seeing nothing aside from AllMusic.  Same goes for the band so I also started Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samla Mammas Manna .  If that ends up kept then redirect this there instead.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 15:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks to Julle 's work, this already looks far more promising.  This could turn into a WP:HEY if someone had access to those older newspapers mentioned below.  And given the same work done for the band article, that's certain to stay now.  Redirect for now until more coverage is located.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 19:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Pretty certain this would easily pass if we had proper access to non-digitized sources.  For example, it's one of the pieces of Swedish culture which w:sv:Tusen svenska klassiker ranks as one of the "1 000 Swedish books, films, albums and television shows from 1956 to 2009" the authors considers to be classics; this particular entry written by w:sv:Jan Gradvall .  It's mentioned in the newspaper archive I've got access to ( w:sv:Mediearkivet ), but all the proper reviews are of course fifty years old and not digitized.  / Julle ( talk ) 17:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that references do not have to be available on line.  If you have legitimate references, you can feel free to add them even if they are only available in paper form in libraries or archives.  Klausness ( talk ) 16:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Redirect .   Band is clearly notable.  Keep if album meets criteria in WP:NALBUM (and it sounds like it probably does), otherwise redirect to band page.  Klausness ( talk ) 13:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yasin Meo Degree College: The only reliable source (the JSTOR one) has bare mentions of the college.  Recommend redirect to Gurugram University .  A previous PROD was contested .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 08:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , India ,  and Haryana .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 08:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Finding mentions of its predecessor school, Brayne Meo High School.  At minimum redirect to the University it's affiliated to or to Nuh (city) , where it's located — unsure which is best at present taking into account its roots.  Not ruling out keep either.  The college claims importance to the Mewat region of Haryana as the only minority college in Western part of the country; presumably referring to the Mewati language , though it's not altogether clear.  [33] Needs a further look.  Rupples ( talk ) 18:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Here is another source I found which mention's Brayne Meo High School and how today it has been renamed Yasin Meo Degree college.  [34] Do read and inform whether it is a valid source to confirm the notability of the subject...  Ah507 ( talk ) 03:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, the Brayne Meo School is mentioned but I'd find it difficult to expand the article on the College from this source, which mostly concentrates on Meo relations with Hindu adherents in 1920–33.  I didn't see a mention of the College, but may have missed this.  The evidence I'm finding from sources is there may be sufficient material to support an article on Chaudhri Yasin Khan, after who the College is named.  He is the father of Tayyab Husain , the College's founder.  What's needed is independent confirmation of the College's claims found in the history section of its website.  I don't think proof that it derives from the Brayne Meo School is enough.  Rupples ( talk ) 07:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] did you see check this source?  [35] It has mentions of Chaudhary Yasin Khan and the formation of the college, which confirms the colleges origins and existence, historically speaking.  The college is also mentioned on government websites.  This is the government website for the Nuh district in Haryana, India which mentions the existence of the college.  [36] This source also mentions the college.  [37] Ah507 ( talk ) 05:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources on Google or Scholar rather than an article from The Times of India but it is a mention.  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 10:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ha Jung-won: Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Always tough with North Korean footballers, however I suggest redirection to 1966 FIFA World Cup squads , where the name is listed.  Regards.  Govvy ( talk ) 08:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – as already established in other AfD regarding North Korean players without any WP:SIGCOV .  Svartner ( talk ) 11:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1966 World Cup squads page as mentioned above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 19:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wondering, is there any North Korean athlete that would qualify under the current notability criteria?  Seems a bit unfair since they have no real media...  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 22:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Jong Il-gwan , Jong Tae-se Simione001 ( talk ) 22:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with the sentiment here, even though, of course, there are a few examples that would pass current standards.  I sincerely think there is a WP:BIAS issue with WP:GNG standards, at least as far as footballers are concerned.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They're at a disadvantage for sure, but they still have a reasonable number of accessible media outlets.  Mass media in North Korea , Category:News media in North Korea .  Not to mention foreign coverage of them.  Also some NK athletes have been discussed pretty heavily by the South Korean media during warmer periods in relations, but less frequent nowadays.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 03:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DXNG-FM: Was restored without a single in-depth source about this station.   Searches show mentions, but no in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources.   Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 09:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect to Nutriskwela Community Radio An ITEXISTS source is not enough to return this to an article.  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:47, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect as per above.  All the cited sources are either trivial mentions or primary source.  Lacks enough coverage to justify a separate article.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Book Rights Registry: Doesn't feel appropriate to have an article about something that doesn't exist, even if the text were to be updated.  Perhaps best replaced with a redirect to an existing article covering Google's history, to where a condensed version of the article facts could be relocated?  CapnZapp ( talk ) 08:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Internet .  CapnZapp ( talk ) 08:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't feel strongly, but would suggest a redirect to Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc. #Google_Book_Search_Settlement_Agreement where this project/idea is already mentioned in its correct context.  Any information lacking there could probably be merged from here.  Elemimele ( talk ) 12:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. #Google Book Search Settlement Agreement per nom.  and Elemimele.  If needed, merge any relevant content there Sal2100 ( talk ) 14:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: FWIW, I found article confusing, especially regarding the history.  For instance, the lede uses future and present tense.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Vortex Media: signed, Rosguill talk 16:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect (and merge) to Vortex Comics#Vortex Words + Pictures , where the company's film venture is treated and where it can be covered more concisely and clearly. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 18:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That seems like a good suggestion.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Mushy Yank as a good WP:ATD-R option.  - 2pou ( talk ) 22:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arab Media Forum: There is not much coverage by independent, reliable sources of this UAE state initiative.  The coverage is all by involved outlets and by state-owned media.  If there is anything worth keeping, it can be merged with Mass media in the United Arab Emirates .  Thenightaway ( talk ) 12:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and United Arab Emirates .  Owen× ☎ 14:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dubai Press Club as ATD.  Mccapra ( talk ) 15:32, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
St. Therese – MTC Colleges: Hariboneagle927 ( talk ) 10:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was not able for find any coverage, so the subject does not demonstrate notability.  Perhaps there is some Filipino language coverage, but I am unable to do a search as I don't speak that language.  Bradelykooper ( talk ) 08:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect can't find sources in GNews, GNews Archives and main GSearch.  Alternatively , redirect to List of universities and colleges in Iloilo .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bradelykooper and Hariboneagle927 : Would you be fine with a Redirect to List of universities and colleges in Iloilo as per WP:ATD ? -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of universities and colleges in Iloilo .  Fails WP:NSCHOOL per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 06:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Velký Lót: AugustusAudax ( talk ) 23:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions .  AugustusAudax ( talk ) 23:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , or if delete , so it is not need to have a special page.  Dušan Kreheľ ( talk ) 09:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC), Dušan Kreheľ ( talk ) 12:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Veľké Lovce , where the history is discussed.  Djflem ( talk ) 10:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Vel'ké Lovce , as Djflem said, or delete.  I don't care which.  AugustusAudax ( talk ) 11:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ' Redirect is fine. Bearian ( talk ) 17:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Veľké Lovce as AtD per above. // Timothy :: talk 14:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Without a citation there's no evidence that this is a valid place name. Mangoe ( talk ) 21:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Veľké Lovce . Lightburst ( talk ) 18:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect