hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri : Fram ( talk ) 08:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Religion ,  and India .  Fram ( talk ) 08:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (partial) to Shoolagiri , as this seems a prominient feature of the place.  Djflem ( talk ) 11:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : based on the limited sources to help it meet notability, I agree with the suggestion to merge.  Rublamb ( talk ) 20:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge properly sourced material to Shoolagiri .  Fails GNG and NGEO for a stand alone article.  // Timothy :: talk 04:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Yummy (company) : Refs are routine business news.  scope_creep Talk 16:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to parent company IDN Media .  It's hard to evaluate the Indonesian sources, and there's a lot of cross-reporting between the IDN media properties, but [9], [10], and [12] are probably independent.  Are they based on anything other than an IDN press release announcing the app though?  Based on their content, probably not.  ~ A412 talk!  07:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to IDN Media – I noted that there's a lot of circular referencing in the earlier nomination from IDN Media properties.  As A412, the independent content might just be churnalism.  However, because I'm not familiar with the Indonesian language, I might be missing something so I'm okay with a weak keep as well.  TLA tlak 03:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
SCSI standalone enclosure services : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 06:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I couldn't find any sources at all, everything web search shows appears to be based on this article.  Merge into SCSI Enclosure Services , see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCSI Enclosure Services .  NicolausPrime ( talk ) 11:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with merging.  DFlhb ( talk ) 05:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into SCSI Enclosure Services per above.  Mooonswimmer 23:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per NicolausPrime .  Owen× ☎ 00:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Palace Entertainment : 90% of the source is already rehashed at the target.  The question here is NOT NOTABILITY so there is no need to delete Palace Entertainment or to look for sources!  RATHER, the question is that of information governance.  Thank you all for considering how each one of our articles could become sensible to carry so articles won't overlap and insult the intelligence of the reader! gidonb ( talk ) 16:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding that Palace Entertainment , while probably still operational as an intermediate holding company, has been fully integrated into Parques Reunidos .  For example, there is no longer separate  web presence for Palace Entertainment .  gidonb ( talk ) 17:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Spain ,  and United States of America .  gidonb ( talk ) 16:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions .  gidonb ( talk ) 16:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This really ought to be a proposed merge as described at WP:MERGEPROP rather than a deletion proposal Garuda3 ( talk ) 23:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the Palace Entertainment page's notability is justified due to its historical value and long list of property ownership with dozens of tourist properties having their own Wikipedia pages.  The issue with multiple reliable citations is still there and the continent is not easily verifiable.  However, the chance is that some books, magazines, etc contain the necessary information.  If merging, much information should be removed due to lack of sufficient reliable citations.  Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 08:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , I saw this on the WP:APARKS tab.  It may be more appropriate to start a discussion via WP:MERGEPROP rather than WP:AFD per the nomination.  AFD's are usually for deleting articles not meeting our notability criteria .  If there is a belief the subject has notability but possibly a lack of information it should either be improved or merged if indeed the subject is the same as the target article.  I would suggest closing the AFD and starting a discussion on the talk page if that was the intention.  Adog ( Talk ・ Cont ) 04:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : per nom.  This should have been proc closed and taken to PAM, but we're here, so...  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 05:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom per ATD.  HighKing ++ 14:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Uttara Cricket Club : They played only first division cricket league and haven't ever been promoted to Dhaka Premier Division Cricket League .  The only mentions are in a match report, which says that the team had won a match in the first division league.  Couldn't find any independent coverage about the team to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NORG Robo Cric Let's chat 14:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  Robo Cric Let's chat 14:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Uttara Sporting Club which seems to be the main club, this just seems to be a random offspring that has played non-notable matches for the same club, in the same way a Second XI does.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Rugbyfan22.  AA ( talk ) 19:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Otomate : Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 19:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies .  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 19:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Idea Factory .  Possible search term.  TarkusAB talk / contrib 19:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect to Idea Factory .  More appropriate as a subsection there.  (There's hardly a subsection's worth of info in the article anyways.)  Sergecross73 msg me 21:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Idea Factory per others due to lack of notability/content.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 02:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Idea Factory per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Battle Cat : 🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 11:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and Comics and animation .   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 11:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Battle Cat / Cringer , it does not appear standalone notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect to Battle Cat's section on the character list.  The only things from the article that seem worhty of transplanting there is the "Origin" section as it provides some details on the character's creation. -- PanagiotisZois ( talk ) 19:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect per PanagiotisZois.  There are some very limited reliable sources about the origin that can be WP:PRESERVEd .  But much of this article is unsourced, making it inappropriate for an article of its own.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Battle Cat / Cringer per the above discussion.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 23:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Bihar Times : It Fails WP:NMEDIA and WP:GNG .  Furthermore, the initial website that was mentioned in article 'bihartimes.in' redirects to an unknown spam link, casting doubt on its legitimacy as a reliable news portal.  Saurabh {Talk} 00:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , India ,  and Bihar .  Saurabh {Talk} 00:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment At first I thought this was going to be a no-brainer delete, but their official website appears to be Bihartimes.news , not bihartimes.com or bihartimes.in.   It's real, now we need to see whether it's notable.   EDIT: Okay, I checked around and it looks like a newspaper called Bihar Times has been around since 1894 but fell into disrepair in recent years: [20] But according to the Wikipedia article's current sources, these might be two different publications [21] .   This one's complicated.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 14:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I found this link to a more reliable Bihar Times Site: https://www.bihartimes.news PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 03:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There may have been a newspaper called "Bihar Times" in the 1990s.  However, recent news websites like "Bihartimes.news," etc., are not the same publication and appear to be unreliable.  Apart from that, no sources have been provided in the article to claim the news portal as unbiased and reliable.  Saurabh {Talk} 03:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Media in Bihar § Internet , which currently has a mention, as WP:ATD-M .  — siro χ o 07:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Merge.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Aydoh8 ( talk ) 04:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge not that notable news portal.  Citadeol (talk) 10:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Tucker Carlson Network : Esolo5002 ( talk ) 19:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Tucker Carlson .  In future it might have the notability for an article but I don't think it does at the moment.  The coverage is either the launch announcement, or mentioned as part of his Vladimir Putin Interview .  It's worth merging to Tucker Carlson in my opinion but is too soon for it's own article.  Shaws username .  talk .  20:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Tucker Carlson for reasons given above.  Doesn't really have an identity independent of Carlson at this stage.  Jbt89 ( talk ) 21:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Tucker Carlson per nom.  and Jbt89.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect per above; this simply is not a 24/7 television network and should be written currently as if it is one.  This is the 'one guy with a podcast and a website' type of network that should not be using WP:TV templates.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not worth it spreading the Russian propaganda Kasperquickly ( talk ) 05:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect with Tucker Carlson - WP:TOOSOON , it could possibly warrant a its own article in the future if it really blows up.  However, no way to know that right now.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 03:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Tucker Carlson : it's not "not" notable,  but it's only notable within the context of tucker carlson.  per above, WP:TOOSOON .  Password (talk) (contribs) 20:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Visitors to Israel during the 2023 Israel–Hamas war : This war is hugely important but not everything necessarily needs a spin off.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 22:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Travel and tourism ,  and Israel .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war per nom.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 23:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war would be sufficient, given the content and sources.  I strongly agree with nom that not everything necessarily needs a spin off .  gidonb ( talk ) 10:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war per Gidonb.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 13:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war per above, doesn't appear to warrant a standalone article.  Alextejthompson ( Ping me or leave a message on my talk page ) 18:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment So, International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war is now a redirect and I think the proper target article is International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war .  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If this AfD is closed as "keep", please move this page to Visitors to Israel during the Israel–Hamas war , per Talk:Israel–Hamas war#Requested move 12 January 2024 .  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 04:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war Leaky.Solar ( talk ) 20:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This article can't be Merged or Redirected to International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war as this page is a Redirect.  L iz Read!  Talk!  08:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war — The Anome ( talk ) 09:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is not close to Wikipedia-worthy.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war per above.  A one paragraph stub is an unneeded fork of other articles.  // Timothy :: talk 06:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Z800 3DVisor : Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect or redirect to eMagin but it currently hasn't been considered notable enough for a mention in that article.  This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 14:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Article had poor sourcing.  Nominator should have done a better research.  I have added 7 new sources including CNET and PC MAG.  Bikerose ( talk ) 20:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] CNET: Situational (per WP:RSP ) PCMAG: Reliable (per WP:VG/S ) New Atlas: (Presumed) reliable (per RSN archive 375 ) Don’t see anything about SimHQ, oled.com.  The rest are probably primary sources.  Based on the sources @ Bikerose gave, I’d lean Weak Keep .  However, CNET can be replaced with a better source.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 00:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to eMagin ; the article on the company is very short, and this is the only product by the company for which we have an article; there is no need for separate pages.  BD2412 T 01:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Sportscenter AM : As it shares the same name as certain editions of SportsCenter , I oppose a redirect.  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Sports .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a sentence or two to SportsCenter § Other editions , which already covers radio programming.  This avoids nom's concern about similar names because SportsCenter:AM is also covered in that article.  (I just set up that redirect after investigating this article, the coverage was already there).  — siro χ o 23:44, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to SportsCenter § Other editions and redirect to SportsCenter : in terms of whether there should be a redirect or not, the ambiguity with the similarly-titled SportsCenter:AM TV program (which some sources actually refer to as SportsCenter AM as well), which is why the redirect should not necessarily be to a separate section (the TV version is covered in SportsCenter § History instead) is all but canceled out by the fact that neither program has any truly separate notability from the wider SportsCenter franchise anyway.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2017 Gwadar labourers shooting : No WP:LASTING coverage to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge /redirect (partially) to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017 .  If there is later coverage it likely isn't in English so this is difficult to evaluate.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017 .  No apparent sourcing beyond reporting as it happened.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 18:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Oskeladden Rock : No reason to think that a named rock in Antarctica is notable.  JMWt ( talk ) 16:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 16:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What do you think, Aymatth2 ?  Wohlthat Mountains ?  Uncle G ( talk ) 12:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Aymatth2 has a fairly good handle on sorting out Antarctica, from prior AFD discussions, so I go with xem in this case.  Uncle G ( talk ) 07:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Probably to Humboldt Mountains (Antarctica) , which are the westernmost portion of the Wohlthat Mountains.  To Nordwestliche Insel Mountains#Oskeladden Rock .  I can do that.  The subject does not deserve a stand-alone article, but the information is valid as part of the description of the parent.  Aymatth2 ( talk ) 13:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .   I looked through various geological and environmental databases and could not find any direct mentions for this rock.  There is nothing scientifically notable about this rock.  Paul H. ( talk ) 20:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge