hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Poseidon (fictional ship) : Neocorelight ( Talk ) 09:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Literature ,  and Film .  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 09:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - seems like this is not independently notable, but please ping me if good sources are identified.  Maybe some of the content could be added to The Poseidon Adventure (novel) , although that article is currently only sourced to the book itself.  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 21:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the commonality between the stories varies wildly so this seems relevant Sansbarry ( talk ) 01:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What do you mean?  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 01:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The only content present is simply brief plot summaries for the book and each of its adaptations, all of which are already covered better at each of their respective pages.  Even that extremely small bit of "real-world" information regarding the production of the first movie is already included in that film's article.  I am not really finding anything covering the fictional ship as a topic on its own where it would make sense to have a separate article on it, rather than just covering the relevant plot elements on each of the respective articles.  I don't really see this as a likely search term at all, but if people would prefer a redirect, I would suggest having the target be the Poseidon (disambiguation) page, where the book and all of its adaptations are already listed.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Rorshacma.  This doesn't have enough WP:SIGCOV for a separate article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 16:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Simply plotcruft and nothing more.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rachel Walkingshaw : The She Kicks and Daily Record references already in the article are the closest to WP:SIGCOV I could find, and they each have just a few sentences of routine coverage.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Todd Cahoon : fails notability i believe.  Password (talk) (contribs) 05:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - does not meet WP:NACTOR with single starring role in syndication, nor WP:GNG .  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 23:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  "Rich Young Actor" and the like roles to not rise to the level of notability for actors.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simon Kenton Council : Hyper-local branch of a larger organization.  WP:BRANCH .  I suggest delete, and re-direct to target if suitable one can be found.  Graywalls ( talk ) 16:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Scouting , United States of America , Kentucky ,  and Ohio .  Graywalls ( talk ) 16:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree .  Delete or redirect.  Bduke ( talk ) 23:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kay Hartzell : Furthermore, she doesn't seem to have a strong claim to notability, although I'll admit I'm not knowledgable about the Coast Guard to say this for sure.  ForsythiaJo ( talk ) 19:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Military ,  and United States of America .  ForsythiaJo ( talk ) 19:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The so-called "obituary" ostensibly from the Washington Post is clearly a paid death notice: [17] .  Therefore I am going to fix the citation.  I have no firm opinion as yet about notability, but that needed to be stated, as it currently is one of the only two citations in the wiki article.  Persingo ( talk ) 05:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  We can't use the paid death notice (classified ad reposted on Legacy.com ) as a notability reference (see my Comment above).  I've done Google searches under both her full name and her name without the middle name, and the only thing I come up with is either isolated repetitions of the same sentence "LT Kay Hartzell became the first female commanding officer of an isolated duty station when she took command of LORAN Station Lampedusa, Italy"; a three-sentence death notice in a college alumni magazine; and a couple of non-noteworthy passing mentions.  Persingo ( talk ) 09:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Mztourist ( talk ) 08:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Feature Story News : The only coverage of the subject I can found was listing and short descriptions, does not seem to pass WP:GNG Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and United States of America .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't find any options for this article to remain either.  Rodgers V ( talk ) 12:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulkadir Isse Ahmed Salah : Only info available is that he is "the current Sultan of the Ugar Saleban sub-clan of the Majeerteen itself a sub-clan of Darood in Somalia ."  One reliable site ( [34] ), the rest are mirror sites which are identical.  Nirva20 ( talk ) 05:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility , Islam ,  and Somalia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above.  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 09:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RRLS ICT Academy : Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 02:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Philippines .  Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 02:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Claim for notability is that it is TESDA accredited.  However, accreditation is mandatory and just requires routine paperwork and orientation from TESDA.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Master ad Vitam : Could be a redirect to Scottish_Rite#Degree structure , but doesn't have the notability for a separate article.  Fram ( talk ) 07:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and United States of America .  Fram ( talk ) 07:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - In general articles on Masonic degrees are sorely lacking on Wikipedia to the point where it isn't a very good source of information on Freemasonry.  Even the basic ritual structure is hard to figure out from the Wikipedia articles, which are in sore need of revisions.  Also instead of having these giant articles with poor structure and organization, I am hoping to craft smaller pieces to try to clear up the issues, but it is going to take a while.  Scottish_Rite#degree structures is a big part of the problem - It has about 60+ different degrees smashed into a chart that is hard for anyone to understand.  Full disclosure, I'm both a member of the Scottish Rite and a Freemason - But the current slate of articles needs a larger organizational revision in some places.  Jjazz76 ( talk ) 14:39, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But that doesn't address the basic issue, that this degree doesn't seem to have the necessary attention from non-Masonic sources to warrant an article here.  If no one else has taken such an outside interest in these degrees, then we shouldn't be the first to do so.  Fram ( talk ) 14:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is plenty of stuff on Wikipedia that doesn't have much if any "outside" interest.  Pretty much most religious topics are relevant in for that religion but other folks outside would say "who cares."  Again I'll wait for the discussion to conclude, but there is plenty that has been written on this degree.  Just look at the cited sources as a start.  Instead of trying to delete Wikipedia, which seems to be your long term strategy, how about actually build it out?  Do the work instead of critiquing others.  Jjazz76 ( talk ) 19:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete on account of evidently insufficient independent notability.  Arguments to the effect that "other such stuff also exists here" do not cut it; neither do assertions that "we need to expand coverage on this" .  Still, we could graciously merge what in terms of sourcing can be salvaged to the article Supreme Council, Scottish Rite, Northern Jurisdiction, USA .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, – Joe ( talk ) 13:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lorainis Cruz : All I found were passing mentions such as 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
S. P. Sailaja Telugu Songs : According to S. P. Sailaja article, she sang over 10,000 songs.  A full (and unreferenced!) list of them is completely unwarranted.  Broc ( talk ) 09:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason: S. P. Sailaja Tamil Songs ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) S. P. Sailaja Kannada Songs ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) S. P. Sailaja Malayalam Songs ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) S. P. Sailaja Hindi Songs ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Broc ( talk ) 09:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to S. P. Sailaja - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Lists ,  and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for ALL .  No sources on this page.  It is just a simple listing without showing encyclopedic merit.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All - The previous voter and nominator are correct, as these are simple lists without encyclopedic value or evidence of notability.  Also, since nobody ever caught the fact that the articles should have "List of..." in their titles, they have probably gone unnoticed by readers looking for knowledge in Wikipedia.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All others related pages also as per the nomination.  223.123.10.196 ( talk ) 01:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all This type of database should not be hosted here.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 07:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kelly Rissling : Rlendog ( talk ) 14:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Ice hockey ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Another of the many hundreds of cases of WP:CREATEDBYDOLOVIS that we're likely going to need to be cleaning up yet another decade from now.   Obvious failure of all pertinent notability criteria.  Ravenswing 22:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Nothing to justify the presence of this article on Wikipedia.  It fails WP:GNG Rodgers V ( talk ) 12:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : This fails WP:GNG .  Agreed with all editors involved.  CastJared ( talk ) 16:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , can't find any evidence of notability, thus failing GNG .  // 🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  09:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bethany Convent School, Prayagraj : There was an AfD discussion in 2013, which closed as keep, before the RfC on secondary schools that reached a consensus that they are not inherently notable.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 00:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Christianity , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 00:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All of the sources cited are primary.  Need SIGCOV in independent secondary sources.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete another one that fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:50, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dylan Young : Their username is the name of the subject, and the article fails WP:NPOV , as it is not written from a neutral point of view.  The article has a small number of independent references, but the majority are from the website of the subject and the article also fails WP:NMOTORSPORT , as the subject has only competed in championships of minor notability without much success.  Sizewell ( talk ) 13:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  Sizewell ( talk ) 13:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  In addition to the WP:SPA and the WP:COI concerns, most of the sources are primary or exclusively local, which doesn't exactly satisfy for widespread, reliable coverage in secondary sources.  GuardianH ( talk ) 13:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all the above.  The article looks like pure advertising by someone who is hoping for fame.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 17:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elizabeth Tarimo : It’s all coming to me till the end of time 18:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Tanzania .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All of the cited sources are either passing mentions or blog posts.  There does not seem to be any significant coverage of the subject, even in Swahili sources.  With being just a regional beauty champion, the subject does not seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable beauty contestant, with no significant coverage.   Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 19:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Criollo Project : The title is so bad that a redirect is not recommended.  The article is also very new.  gidonb ( talk ) 02:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering , Transportation ,  and Poland .  gidonb ( talk ) 02:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  There is only passing mention in a few trade internet sites and nothing from any major, reputable source to indicate notability.  I added multiple tags in May during new page review to encourage the editors to improve it.  They removed much of the peacock and advertising (it was OK to remove my old tags recently) but have not done anything on notability plus all the images have been removed due to copyright violations.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 10:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete