hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Percy the Small Engine: After a search of I could not find anything that would pass GNG.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 18:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect to List of characters in The Railway Series#Percy (NWR 6) : it does not appear that the notability (or lack thereof) here has changed appreciably since the last nomination.  We might need stronger protection than pending changes, though: this appears to be the fourth contesting of this redirect since the first AfD.  (I do get the impression that this is another one of those topics that should be notable in a perfect world, but the actual significant coverage is too lacking, among other factors, to allow for this.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure any further protection is needed.  This can just be redirected without going through another AfD, on the basis of the last AfD.  I would support re-redirect and speedy close.  Jclemens ( talk ) 19:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect .  No need to salt/protect this; there is always a chance for new sources appearing or being located and this being written up properly, with reception, academic analysis, and like.  What we have for now is again fancruft, sadly, so redirect and WP:TROUT the author.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I don't believe an AfD was merited in this case; nothing has changed to indicate the article is notable.  But I still believe it should  be redirected per nom.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 17:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect per consensus.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
A&B Productions: All I found on the web is some ROTM coverage, but nothing significant or in-depth Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 07:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 07:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Companies .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Asif Raza Mir - the coverage is mostly related to its founder Asif Raza Mir so redirect for now.  Fails WP:NCORP due to trivial coverage.  202.47.46.115 ( talk ) 11:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for redirection.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Asif Raza Mir , I agree...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 22:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Asif Raza Mir : It is sometimes difficult to find the notability of film or related production company if not finding sources that trivially mentions them.  In this cases it isn't different and most times, we would term them inherited (from the film being produced or produced from the company).  Following that's the article doesn't meet WP:ORGCRIT as it's lacking many information to ascertain notability, hence redirect to the founder until  reasonable sources that meets WP:RS are found.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  07:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Asif Raza Mir as WP:ATD .  HighKing ++ 20:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of Skal vi danse? participants: Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Norway .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Dance .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or redirect to Skal vi danse?  as preferred WP:ATD .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Georgia Dorotheou: She competed at the 2004 Summer Olympics but didn't medal.  Could be redirected to Handball at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Women's team rosters or Greece at the 2004 Summer Olympics .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 15:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Greece .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 15:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Handball .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the subject fails relevant notability guidelines.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 11:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Handball at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Women's team rosters .  Fails WP:NOLYMPICS as she did not win a medal.  Also fails WP:SPORTBASIC which requires "at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources."  Cbl62 ( talk ) 02:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dewan people: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 20:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Nepal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Disambiguate Since it's a name for two ethnic groups, both of which have articles, we can turn the page into a disambiguation page for both of the ethnic groups.  EternalNub ( talk ) 00:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
S.D. College Kaler: Sohom ( talk ) 03:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Bihar .  Sohom ( talk ) 03:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Magadh University .  According to this Times of India article , S.D. College Kaler is a constituent college of Magadh University.  Mooonswimmer 14:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Magadh University , the above seems to be correct.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 20:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Magadh University .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chak 15 DNB: Non-notable village.  Article is completely unsourced, and there isn't any evidence of notability either.  CycloneYoris talk!  01:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  CycloneYoris talk!  01:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have added the GPS coordinates from Google Maps.   The place does exist (and has buildings), but I can't find any good online sources about the location.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , without other sources than a map, it is not an encyclopedic article.  Looking at the category, there is no precedent to create individual articles about the chaks in the district.  If anything, they could be covered in a list.  Geschichte ( talk ) 03:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bahawalpur as an ATD.  Only one of the villages in this category has sources, so a separate list seems inappropriate.  Better to redirect them each to the main article until the subjects draw sourcing requiring their expansion.  BusterD ( talk ) 07:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I have boldly redirected two (both wholly unsourced) of the four village articles in the category as I've asserted above.  I have left Channan Pir alone because it seems to have some sourcing.  In the event this page is deleted, I propose to redirect the pagespace as I've suggested above.  BusterD ( talk ) 07:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is anyone concerned these redirects are not mentioned in Bahawalpur ?  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 16:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It isn't in the city of Bahawalpur; it's in Yazman Tehsil (where it is mentioned) in Bahawalpur district.  A redirect to the tehsil would be appropriate.  Peter James ( talk ) 20:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Winning Eleven Online: I haven’t been able to find any sources that would help establish notability.  However, if anyone is able to find any sources that would help the article to pass GNG, I would be willing to withdraw this AFD.  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 20:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 20:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and South Korea .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pro Evolution Soccer per nominator's rationale.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 07:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pro Evolution Soccer .  I can find an article confirming it exists?  [3] But... that's about it.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Per above.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 16:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pro Evolution Soccer per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fatma Hatun: No name.  WP:GNG is very far away.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 15:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , History ,  and Turkey .  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 15:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment And Lowry, Heath (2003).  The Nature of the Early Ottoman State .  SUNY Press.  s.  73.  mentions her by name, the name mentioned being Fatma bint-i Osman.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 18:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 19:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I would expect the Turkish Wikipedia to have more but its article is also a stub with the same reference: tr:Fatma Hatun (I. Osman'ın kızı) .  Ping me if someone turns up more.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 22:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I was able to find several sources in Turkish that mention Fatma as the daughter of Osman, @ A. B. , but none delve into the specifics of her life.  Here , it writes that Fatma was only mentioned on a deed of endowment, which suggests any further search for more content will be futile.  I am not against draftification, but if this article is deleted, it won't be difficult to recreate it given the small amount of content.  Aintabli ( talk ) 07:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aintabli , if that's a good source, consider adding "only mentioned on a deed of endowment" at Osman_I#Daughters .  Since there is no other Fatma Hatun on en-WP, I guess we could also redirect to that section.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 08:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, will do.  Aintabli ( talk ) 10:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thinking about it some more, I think Redirect to Osman_I#Daughters is a better choice.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 14:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
James Pittaway: BEFORE showed nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  User:Ortizesp has contested this statement.  I endorsed deletion after searching BNA and finding no relevant hits; all I found was local news about namesakes, announcements about petty crimes, adverts, weddings, police witness statements...  Nothing about a footballer from West Brom.  WP:SPORTBASIC requires multiple sources showing detailed coverage.  I oppose redirecting to List of West Bromwich Albion F.C. players as he is not notable enough to be on that list.  Is he even the most notable person by the name of "James Pittaway"?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1889–90 West Bromwich Albion F.C. season where he is mentioned.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to season article per above.  It's a reasonable search term.  His surname got namechecked playing and scoring for West Brom's reserves that season; in those days, reports rarely used given names.  cheers, Struway2 ( talk ) 15:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 15:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1889–90 West Bromwich Albion F.C. season .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
David Kennedy, 9th Marquess of Ailsa: The new sources added are not independent (COSCA) or provide significant coverage of the subject (Burke's Peerage and the 3 obituaries of his brother).  See also the previous deletion discussion for an assessment of the existing sources.  Pilaz ( talk ) 13:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  Pilaz ( talk ) 13:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - minor aristocrat who wasn't notable in 2022 and is still not notable in 2023.  Largely unmentioned except in directories of the nobility.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Do not think the subject has notability other than the title and so an individual article is not needed, but could conceivably be searched for so a redirect to Marquess of Ailsa would seem a good way forward.  Dunarc ( talk ) 21:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Marquess of Ailsa per Dunarc .  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 07:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Marquess of Ailsa per above with no bias against an article being re-created per WP:SUMMARY should sufficient reliable sources be found.  W a g ge r s TALK 08:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2016 EBSA European Under-18 Snooker Championship: All refs are affiliated.  Under 18 sporting events are rarely notable and this one fails WP:GNG searches revealed next to nothing.  Velella Velella Talk 22:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Cue sports ,  and Europe .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Only coverage is snooker related.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to EBSA European Under-18 Snooker Championship – The main article has some WP:GNG , but the separate events don't.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to EBSA European Under-18 Snooker Championship - the 2016 edition does not appear to be independently notable.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 17:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DYGM-TV: Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD ?  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Oldest station in Bacolod, otherwise redirect!  210.23.167.94 ( talk ) 06:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect (or merge if possible) to GMA Network .  Agreed that GNG is failed.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 09:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
I'm Glad We're Friends: Attempted to redirect to Thank You, I'm Sorry , but this was contested.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thank You, I'm Sorry , fails WP:NALBUM Karnataka ( talk ) 19:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the aforementioned page.  The only reference isn't RS.  Deckkohl ( talk ) 12:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect