hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nelly Ramírez: The subject has earned at least two caps for the El Salvador women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:36, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and El Salvador .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:36, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 10:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Secure Islands: It cites better-looking sources and is written in a less promotional tone, but the sources all seem to rely on information provided by the company and fail WP:ORGIND * Pppery * it has begun... 15:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Israel .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mergers and acquisitions by Microsoft .  Consider protection to prevent redirect hijacking.  – Tera tix ₵ 15:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mergers and acquisitions by Microsoft seems like the best option as per WP:ATD , topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing ++ 11:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cogfog: As such this is definitely not appropriate content for Wikipedia, WP:!  .  If we were to start to include topics like this then we would have to add the (more notable) faculty meetings and weekly seminars in academic departments around the world.  We should not do this, Speedly delete Ldm1954 ( talk ) 23:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 23:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Organizations , Psychology ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Refbombed to high heaven, but as far as I can tell only references 2 (a PowerPoint on a Wordpress site) and 3 (a listing of the lab's alumni) mention "Cogfog" at all.   Blatantly promotional and unsupported by RS.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most of the citations are to the group's webpages or publications by the group's leaders.  Beyond that all I could find were general acknowledgements to cogfog members.  No evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Mgp28 ( talk ) 21:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Robert A. Bjork per the Feburary proposal by Klbrain, and the fact that it's mentioned there already.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 05:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or Redirect to Robert A. Bjork , as per the arguments I've made at Talk:Robert A. Bjork#Merge proposal ; I agree that the group itself doesn't have notability.  Klbrain ( talk ) 08:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arjun – Prince of Bali: M S Hassan ( talk ) 12:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails all notability guidelines.  While the before search turned up nothing useful, the existing four sources in the article are not reliable.  The first source in the article which does not appear reliable is just two short paragraphs and it is about a game developed to popularise the the series.  The other three sources are from a single publisher with lengthy quotes from the producers themselves without an independent review.  Piscili ( talk ) 13:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and India .  Owen× ☎ 13:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Redirect to Chhota Bheem and the Throne of Bali for example if sources on the page are not judged sufficient, and for example, also see https://www.afaqs.com/news/media/44417_game-for-disneys-new-show-arjun-the-prince-of-bali ; ( https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tv/chhota-bheem-gets-musical/articleshow/63977507.cms (brief mention));  3 years on Disney Channel...  Opposed to deletion - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Green_Gold_Animations#Television .  Per nom.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Green Gold Animations#Television : per nom, no WP:SIGCOV C F A 💬 16:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not sure why editors are voting to "redirect per nom" if the nom doesn't appear to be proposing a redirect?  Relisting for further input.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  04:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I believe  the subject is not significant enough and doesn't meet the notability guidelines.  EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 14:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Madukuro train crash: That's it - the sum total of this thing.  That's yer lot.  Delete with absolute surety that this event does not trouble notability in any way whatsoever.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Indonesia .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete redirect as below.  While I think WP:RAPID is sage guidance for accidents in general, this is a very minor event already a few days int he past.  So, WP:DELAY seems the right guidance at this point.  — siro χ o 07:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , reluctantly.  I was all set to recommend merging but the obvious target, list of rail accidents in Indonesia , doesn't exist and I've not found anywhere suitable that doesn't already mention it (e.g. List of rail accidents (2020–present) ).  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That latter list would be fine as a redirect target.  I'm fine with that ATD — siro χ o 08:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure how useful that redirect would be, but I have absolutely no objections to it, although it should go to either the 2023 section or an anchor for the specific incident.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thinking again, redirect is actually the best way forwards here.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 12:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list mentioned above by Thryduulf.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 22:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of rail accidents (2020–present) per above.  S5A-0043 Talk 01:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as non notable accident, No one died and the one injury was a result of the person jumping out after the crash, Fails SIGCOV and GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 19:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Thomas Butler of Cahir: UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Royalty and nobility ,  and Ireland .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to Butler dynasty .  Barnards.tar.gz ( talk ) 11:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as this individual is not a notable member of the family.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra ( talk • contribs ) 17:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Butler dynasty - per WP:GNG , WP:ANYBIO , WP:NOTGENEALOGY and WP:ATD .  Subject has no independent notability.  There are insufficient refs (both in the article and returned in my own WP:BEFORE ) to support even the basic facts (birth/death/etc).  And all we seem to be able to say about the subject is that they lived, had children and those children had children.  A name being passed along.  This is about as far below the notability bar as it is possible to get.  Existence is not notability.  I'm personally unsure what content there is to merge...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 15:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Freedom and Justice (Poland): Found [5] , but seems to be unrelated.  Article on plwiki was deleted in 2021, see pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2021:01:01:Wolność i Sprawiedliwość (Polska) .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  14:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  14:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Easily fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG .  As the polish version of the article was also deleted, its evident that the organization is not notable.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 15:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For the record: pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2021:01:01:Wolność i Sprawiedliwość (Polska) .  Yes, pl wiki AfD failed to find sources.  I will see if I can provide more commentary later (we have some sources here, that the nom did not review).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Added a couple of citations, so at least the article isn't completely unreferenced now.  The problem with secret underground organizations is that information about them is difficult to find (by design), but there seems to be more discussion of Freedom and Justice recent years.  In fact, this journal article was published in 2021 , probably after the Polish AfD discussion.  There is also this 2022 article .  These are brief mentions at best, but I don't have time to do a more comprehensive search right now.  (The key seems to be to search for both "Wolnosc i Sprawiedliwosc" and "WiN" together.)  A possible alternative to deletion might be to redirect to Cursed soldiers where this group is mentioned.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 06:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Any thoughts on Cielquiparle's comment?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  16:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1635 in Quebec: BangJan1999 19:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Canada .  BangJan1999 19:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Timeline of Quebec history (1608–1662) .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 22:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into 1600s in Canada (or heck, list in both this and the one above.  At least the Champlain one - the other one seems to be trivial.  Nfitz ( talk ) 00:16, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That would be the wrong target as it relates to 1600-09.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 19:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just Redirect to Timeline of Quebec history (1608–1662) where the content already appears.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 19:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1994–95 Chelmsford Chieftains season: No notable content so no need to salvage information with merge.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 16:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Ice hockey .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 16:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (a summary) to a higher level article.  I agree there isn't a need for a standalone article, but straight deletion will not benefit readers.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 17:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please specify a Merge target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chelmsford Chieftains , per much the same rationale as given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Invicta Dynamos season , and per indication there that the club article is an acceptable target, at least for the interim.  Also noting that 1987–88 Chelmsford Chieftains season was redirected to the same target back in Feb 2021 for much the same reason.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 10:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
E! Entertainment Radio: Let'srun ( talk ) 12:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge any material that can be sourced into E!  , otherwise delete .  A satellite radio channel devoted entirely to running the audio of E!'s television programming does not seem likely to be independently notable of E! proper.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to E!  – No indication of standalone notability under WP:GNG .  I don't think we should merge any of this content given that it's completely unsourced.  A redirect seems fine, though.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 10:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Borusa: I feel it's possible for him to keep his article, but he needs additional sources that I just don't think exist.  As of right now, he doesn't meet SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep There's an attempt at secondary coverage here, so I think this should have the opportunity to be built up or at least merged elsewhere.  U-Mos ( talk ) 17:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters .  I don't see the attempt at secondary coverage User:U-Mos notes - no reception or analysis section, just plot summary all the way through (backstory, appearances...).  Fails WP:GNG .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect per Piotrus. I also don't see enough WP:SIGCOV to write a meaningful reception/analysis section. Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Once again, List of Doctor Who characters can't be a redirect target as it is a redirect. Another suggestion? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 01:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Doctor Who villains (maybe that's what people meant?) The work done on the article is impressive but from the sources I am able to access I would have to agree that they do not clear the WP:SIGCOV threshold that no original research is needed to extract the content . I would say mentions in plot summaries that are then strung into a story of the character are in, or at any rate uncomfortably near, OR territory. -- Visviva ( talk ) 03:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment List of Doctor Who villains is a reasonable redirect target.  The target can also be revisited through editing.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 01:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Makiling, Calamba: Unsourced barangay (administrative ward/village) article since the article was created in 2014.  See also Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive 47#Are barangays notable?  (can we please have a consensus now?) .  At the most closest alternative, redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays .  AfD is created to provide a strong basis for redirection.  There is no inheritance of notability of Mount Makiling to this obscure barangay article.  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 02:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 02:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays as an WP:ATD .  HueMan1 ( talk ) 04:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays as an WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jakarta Activation: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of sourcing, and unverified content shouldn't really be merged.  Drmies ( talk ) 18:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete no notability demonstrated by independent sources.  - Altenmann >talk 18:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jakarta EE : the API is verifiable and is already mentioned at the target, but doesn't qualify for a standalone article.  Owen× ☎ 16:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Man-E-Faces: 🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 11:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 11:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reliable evidence of WP:NOTABILITY .  Jontesta ( talk ) 23:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Man-E-Faces per WP:ATD .  Lacks notability for a standalone page.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Article pretty clearly fails notability. -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 10:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to his section on the character list.-- PanagiotisZois ( talk ) 17:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters .  A sensible medium-term alternative to Delete, and an article that can be patched up on and improved.  Should sources for GNG be found it can always be returned to standalone.  Comment I know next to nothing about MOTU and care about it even less than that, but this flood of near-identical nominations would give anyone with the knowledge to put together a Keep vote far too much research to do.  This is yet another case of eschewing a potentially constructive discussion on talk pages that could genuinely improve articles and Wikipedia by selectively merging salvageable material to a strong list instead being turned into someone yelling "BALEET!" because it's easier.  I used to wonder why so many articles are neglected.  Now I know it's because passionate editors get tired of being at the mercy of lazy rubbish like this.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 10:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect