Evan Roden: See source assessment below.  Jfire ( talk ) 23:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  "WNY College Activists Hope to Change New York State Organ Donation to Opt-Out"  Roden is not mentioned ✘ No "NYS Assembly Bill Search" Primary source ✘ No "Opt-Out Organ Donation" Primary source ✘ No "The Ins and Outs of Organ Donation" ~ Blog from medical institution Roden is not mentioned ✘ No "College Students Push for More Organ Donations" Only a quote from Roden ✘ No "New York State Legislature Passes Living Donor Support Act" Press release ✘ No "Students push to change organ donor registry in hopes of saving more lives" Only a quote from Roden ✘ No "Youth Coalition For Organ Donation Strives to Save Lives" Press release ✘ No "TEDxTulane" TEDx Talk by Roden ✘ No "WNY Teens Nominated for American Red Cross Award" Nomination for non-notable award ✘ No "Former Erie County Executive Joel Giambra receives new kidney" Roden is not mentioned ✘ No "Loyola team wins honorable mention in the global “Students Reinventing Cities” competition" University press release ✘ No "ODAC: Voices Amplified Fireside Chat with Evan Roden" Podcast with Roden ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Health and fitness , Politics ,  and New York .  Jfire ( talk ) 23:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll leave supporting sources out of this, so skip things like the bill text and citations for references to NY's lower relative rate of donor designation, only focusing on significant coverage of Roden (me; COI already declared, but I'll use third person here).  If there's an issue with a small number of sources, tags may be more appropriate, including the autobiog tag.  I've only been at this for a few years, so feel free to share any guidance as I work through objecting to this change.  The first piece, "WNY College Activists Hope to Change New York State Organ Donation to Opt-Out'" is a video about the group Roden formed, a bill Roden authored, and interviews Roden starting at 0:52, and is the largest of the interviewees.  The second, "College Students Push for More Organ Donations," includes an extensive interview with Roden , along with an attached article with quotes from him and descriptions of his background.  The third, a press release from Waitlist Zero, supports the claim that Roden was directly involved with the bill.  The fourth, "Students push to change organ donor registry in hopes of saving more lives," which also includes a correlate article with a quote from Roden , spends the bulk of the included news reel on an interview with him , starting at 0:31.  The fifth, a Tedx Talk by the subject, is significant, notable coverage .  The sixth, "WNY Teens Nominated for American Red Cross Award," covers a notable award given to Roden by an arm of an international non-profit.  The seventh, "Former Erie County Executive Joel Giambra receives new kidney," includes a discussion of the former politician's involvement with Roden's non-profit during the included video interview.  The Eighth, "ODAC: Voices Amplified Fireside Chat with Evan Roden," is a long-form interview of Roden , again, meeting the Significant Coverage bar.  Evanroden1 ( talk ) 01:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:SIRS per the source assessment table.  Interviews generally fail SIRS as they are not independent ; we don't care what the subject says about themself, we care what others have written about the subject.  UtherSRG (talk) 01:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Source table is very clear-cut about the reliability of the sources and their contribution towards notability.  It may also be stating the obvious, but I think User:Evanroden1 might have a COI in advocating for this article to be kept.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 03:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the ref table.  Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:SIRS .  Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself or your endeavors.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No independent reliable sources.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 18:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : clear WP:AUTO FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 19:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete