hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Limey (band): CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:NBAND#C5 with two albums on RCA, so notability is presumed, and thus we need verifiability.  We have sufficient WP:verifiability via AllMusic to keep a stub.  This includes including some stuff that can be incorporated into the article, such as the fact that B.J. Cole appeared on an album [32] [33] and the fact that Jim Rodford and Bob Henrit appeared on one album [34] .  Given that this was pre-digital era it's quite likely that a good bit more will be verifiable as sources are discovered to expand the article.  — siro χ o 06:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I've expanded the article and added a few sources.  Album releases and coverage are sufficient for notability.  There was coverage during the time of the band's existence, although it will be in print sources, so some of it may be hard to find.  -- Michig ( talk ) 13:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as there is enough reliable sources coverage for a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Pre-internet press may be hard to find, but meets wikipedia keep criteria by having multiple releases on a major label, although they don't appear to have been particularly successful or noteworthy.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 20:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Marilynne Paspaley: Fails the general , actor , and biographical notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople ,  and Australia .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In 2008 she received an Order of Australia so immediately satisfies WP:ANYBIO #1.  The Paspaleys are a notable Australian family.  I will endeavour to add more to the page but as noted, it already meets notability criteria.  Cabrils ( talk ) 08:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but not because of the AM as it is lower on the list of Australian honours ( nice summary ), but based on coverage.  National Library of Australia has a book of Biographical cuttings on Marilynne Paspaley, actress, containing one or more cuttings from newspapers or journals ] and articles such as this .  Cosic, Miriam (5 October 2000), "Pearl Queen - Marilynne Paspaley and the making of a Top End empire - Family jewel", The Australian Magazine is 3104 words and gives lots of details.  Caccetta, Wendy (16 May 2010), "Queen of the Kimberley", STM Gloss Magazine is 1966 words, has lots of direct quotes but still good.  Stage shows include God's Best Country which received 4 articles of coverage and more more the next year.  And Falling From Grace which got 4 reviews plus this .  this and this might be useful too.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 07:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources supporting subject's notability , as already related above.  Meets WP:GNG head on.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jackson Fear: Also fails WP:NOLY .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] del ; confirm nom's findings.  - Altenmann >talk 02:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Newspapers.com has a very limited amount of Australian newspapers.  Despite this, enough coverage to pass WP:GNG is able to be found on Fear, see for example Sydney Morning Herald feature , full-page The Age article , some more Morning Herald coverage , and then some more from The Age , among others .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 22:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per BeanieFan11.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 23:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 01:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep thanks to the SIGCOV found by BeanieFan11.  Clear GNG pass and then some.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:45, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jayne Fenton Keane: No coverage to meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:BIO .  Articles that link to this are mainly "List of ..."  LibStar ( talk ) 02:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Poetry ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  We have enough for WP:BASIC In-depth biography (~800+ words?) in The Facts on File Companion to World Poetry by R. Victoria Arana, [21] In-depth review of work including SIGCOV of the subject in Australian Women's Book Review [22] .  Additionally, this subject seems to be highly regarded and awarded for multi-media poetry over several years, including an ATOM award in 2003, a Newcastle Poetry Prize in 2019 and more.  — siro χ o 06:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the sources located by Siroxo .  Jfire ( talk ) 14:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
X-Arcade: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If by dubious gaming magazines you mean Pcmag and IGN both have been deemed reliable by wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources .  I’m not sure if that is enough to keep the article but thr sourcing appears to be fine unless I’m missing something . -- 67.70.101.104 ( talk ) 18:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - In addition to the 2 reliable sources already in the article, there's an additional 2 reliable source reviews by Joystiq (now hosted by Engadget ): [44] and Nintendo World Report: [45] -- Mika1h ( talk ) 20:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep combining the sources in the article plus the ones added in this discussion means we have four wources deemed reliable by the wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources which should be enough to avoid deletion.-- 67.70.101.104 ( talk ) 20:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Lukáš Jánošík: The only news website I found regarding him is an injury , but something tells me that it's more of a trivial mention.  Using the keyword "Lukáš Janošík" on Google, even with "site:.sk", my search results only came up with database, club websites, passing mentions, and *facepalm* random namesakes.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Over 130 first-tier games over a 9-year period, 2016–17 league champion as well as one stint playing abroad - usually doesn't look like a deletion candidate.  I haven't had the time to look for sources yet.  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Some quick links, assessment later.  [26] [27] [28] [29] Geschichte ( talk ) 19:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added two references and expanded the page past stub status.  If nominator @ CuteDolphin712 : agrees these count as "in-depth coverage to meet GNG" I would request an early close here.  C 679 11:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The only possible GNG material is Mladá fronta Dnes, which you added on "MSK Žilina" sub-heading (first and second paragraph).  The rest of additional sources are routine announcements.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 12:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources presented here which show notability.  Giant Snowman 07:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Some more: [30] [31] [32] [33] (paywalled) Geschichte ( talk ) 09:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Hi, he is still playing Slovak first division for Michalovce https://www.transfermarkt.com/lukas-janosik/leistungsdaten/spieler/403298 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svk fan ( talk • contribs ) 19:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - @ GiantSnowman : , Per above.  Clearly signficant figure in Slovak league football with over 100+ appearamces and ongoing career.  Article needs improvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 23:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Per @ Geschichte and @ Cloudz679 sources.  There is much more coverage than a simple mention of an injury, enough to establish WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 03:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Cooper's (bakery): PARVAGE talk!  06:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Bangladesh .  PARVAGE talk!  06:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I agree that the sourcing on this one is a little patchy - but Bangladesh's Daily Star is pretty much it for English language media there and the rather purple tone of its journalism is about the standard.  The nominator clearly has faced many CIR issues, including a current indefinite block, so there's that, too.  And yet a 50-odd-branch chain of bakeries employing 500 people in Bangladesh would be analogous to something like Gregg's in the UK.  So I'm going to IAR a little and propose this (also a mildly charming story) is kept.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Is there any non-English coverage which would put this one beyond a reasonable doubt?  SportingFlyer T · C 20:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I found one more source, SportingFlyer , and sort of wish I hadn't (it was the death notice for Sufia Cooper)...  Came up a blank with my Google Translate attempts at Bengali...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep without prejudice given situation with nominator.  — siro χ o 10:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Rusich Podolsk: After searching, unable to find in depth reliable sources.  Article was created on 16 July 2011 JoeNMLC ( talk ) 01:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator - article now has sufficient content to establish notability.  Thank you for improving this one.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 13:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Ice hockey ,  and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - third level of Russian ice hockey is covered extensively in the press there, but unfortunately these newspapers are not accessible online.  -- Hockeyben (talk - contribs) 18:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Cannot find substantial coverage, and there is no Russian-language Wikipedia article for this team to look for sources.  Flibirigit ( talk ) 11:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There was a series of books published by A. Serebrennikov, covering hockey in Russia up to 2000 (unfortunately, the author has yet to make it further).  The third level competitions were included in these, with numerous newspaper citations.  This level of hockey received significant coverage in the Russian press, same as the ECHL does here in America.  It's just difficult to find given the lack of online newspaper archives in Russia.  -- Hockeyben (talk - contribs) 19:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I added a few sources and expanded the article a bit. -- Ymblanter ( talk ) 08:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Saukko: A simple hatnote would apply.  Llammakey ( talk ) 13:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - it's three things (a person and two ships).  I reinstated a vessel that had been deleted.  Mjroots ( talk ) 13:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep three's a crowd.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above, seems like a valid disambig page.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 15:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
UIC Skyspace: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atomicdragon136 ( talk • contribs ) 03:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 26 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 04:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Architecture ,  and Illinois .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 05:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the sculpture and fountain are a part of a major college campus (University of Illinois) in Chicago, and honor a developer of that campus.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 12:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - 10 minutes of looking revealed multiple independent secondary sources with in-depth coverage of the topic.  Those are now in a rudimentary general references section.  This artwork is part of a series, and other series members have been developed into decent little articles.  Let me see what I can do to this one in an hour.  -- DontCallMeLateForDinner ( talk ) 02:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I retract my nomination for deletion given the sources that were added recently. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 17:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . The article states that UIC Skyspace is an art installation. There are not explicit guidelines for art, but compared to other artwork like Cloud Gate the sources do not demonstrate how this art is more notable than other art that rises to GNG. Multiple parts of the sourcing added are efforts to mask notability . For example, the statement Earl Neal Plaza, the site of the installation, is the site of the former Maxwell Street Market, home of the Chicago specialty, the Maxwell Street Polish. The broader development of the campus has faced criticism for continuing gentrification in the area. Contains an amount of fluff related to the unrelated creation of the Maxwell Street Polish and the broader development of UIC.-- Mpen320 ( talk ) 04:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Brighton & Hove Coaster routes: - The Sunday Times 'I went on 'world's most scenic' bus route just an hour from London and it's everything you'd want from a journey' - MyLondon Brighton to Eastbourne bus route named one of UK's best - The Argus #AYearOfBuses 12: Coaster Brighton – Eastbourne - Transport Designed Article should be improved, not deleted.  Garuda3 ( talk ) 14:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have added to the article, mainly using sources kindly provided by Garuda3 , showing praise it has recieved for its scenery.  harrz talk 21:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  I think the sources presented here show that the Coaster routes (or at least route 12) does meet WP:GNG beyond routine coverage.  Having a title "the best bus route in the world" evaluated by a national mainstream paper like The Times and noted as one of England's "most scenic" by another national mainstream paper like The Guardian [26] isn't something you see on your everyday bus route (unlike route 6 which is indeed non-notable).  S5A-0043 Talk 02:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Heart of God Church: KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 10:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Religion ,  and Singapore .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi King of Lettuce, I hear your considerations.  Most parts of this article was written some years back by multiple editors, reading it now I do agree that it could be edited to sound more impartial.  Perhaps an edit instead of a deletion.  As for the sources, it would be difficult to conclude that the sourcing is threadbare.  A majority of the citations in the article are from reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, such as Singapore’s longest running and most widely circulated daily newspaper.  Jchang457 ( talk ) 06:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately most (all) of these citations do not establish notability.  If, for instance, there was an ST piece which had HOG as the main subject, that would be a different story.  Numerous trivial mentions do not "stack up" to establish significant coverage .  No doubt this "church" is famous enough but we shouldn't conflate fame with notability either.  While I'm also trying my best to assume good faith, your only edits have been to this page (the same can be said for the article's creator)--if you have any undisclosed affiliations with HOG, you should probably disclose them and refrain from further editing the page.  KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 08:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 12:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  This article has a lot of promotional cruft in it that needs cleanup, but I think its notability can be reliably established.  Here are three sources that pass the bar for independent, reliable, secondary, significant coverage under WP:NORG: Straits Times , Christianity Today , and Channel News Asia .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 14:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep in view of the reliable sources coverage identified above, particularly the Christianity Today piece, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is what we mean when we say "clean up is not deletion."  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  12:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Philip Conkling: Created by a SPA in 2007.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 22:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , United States of America ,  and Maine .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 22:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I moved this article after creating the AfD, as the person may not use his middle name.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 22:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - was doubtful but seems to have enough coverage including 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , etc. to suggest notability.  There is more but I stopped looking.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 04:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , appears notable per the sources found where the subject received significant coverage.  Noneate ( talk ) 17:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep notable scholar and academic with significant contribution to Island Studies .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 11:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A quick google search reveals a few sources that support notability, such as 1 , and 2 Seawolf35 ( talk ) 15:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep