hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Artha Woods : Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Women , Georgia (U.S. state) ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I found some coverage for her [1] [2] .  She seems notable and I'm sure there's more sources for her in Newspapers.com.  MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk ) 01:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The obituaries [3] [4] and this article [5] are significant reliable secondary sources for WP:GNG .  Flurrious ( talk ) 23:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GNG per sources provided  by MoviesandTelevisionFan and Flurrious.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 16:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 17:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Industrial Fasteners Institute : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Engineering ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Slacks (disambiguation) : Clarityfiend ( talk ) 00:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination .  I'm just going to boldly redirect there.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 01:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
L. K. Samuels : The references are generally passing mentions, and not always directly to the subject, and are with frequency neither independent of him nor reliable.   This is, in short, an autobiography of a non-notable person.  Beyond My Ken ( talk ) 21:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn.  Beyond My Ken ( talk ) 21:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Eden (Korean musician) : Sources are mostly unreliable per WP:KO/RS#UR or primary sources.  Could not find more sources in WP:BEFORE search in Korean and English.  Lightoil ( talk ) 02:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Korea ,  and South Korea .  Lightoil ( talk ) 02:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment/Question .  Is this subject actually one of the main producers for both Ateez ?  If so, they would probably meet WP:PRODUCER .  However the editor that created this article added that information to those articles, so I am not sure if it's over-represented.  — siro χ o 03:40, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Siroxo : He is the main producer for Ateez but I could not find any sources about him if you could I will withdraw this nomination.  Lightoil ( talk ) 04:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks.  Being the producer for such a group is a strong signal, but if there's no reliable verification then it will be tough.  For an SNG like WP:PRODUCER , we don't need the full WP:GNG , just enough reliable coverage to verify.  — siro χ o 05:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose, A quick search on Naver returns 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , and 7 , which should be sufficient as reliable secondary sources.  ⇒ Luminous Person (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Akshat Tyagi: I cannot find reliable, independent coverage of the subject and his company.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 07:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 07:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:G5 .  A sock of someone created the article, but I can't for the love of me remember who it is.  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 16:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just remembered who I was thinking of -

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
SCH Phase Display: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as CSD:G12.  The text seems to have been lifted off a 2007 textbook .  Owen× ☎ 15:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete for copyright violation.  The textbook was published in 2005, the passage was added here in 2007, so it's clearly a copyright violation rather than citogenesis.  DFlhb ( talk ) 13:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete: per WP:G12 .  Clearly a copyright violation, while it may be possible to have something here on this subject it'll have to come from a WP:TNT .  User:Let'srun 22:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
2023 Cricket World Cup 1st semi-final: Typically, World Cup semi-finals don't warrant a separate article from the parent article, this is no different.  Besides which, it goes on about a match from 2011, between two cricket rivals (which warrants greater notability).  Only the final should be covered in any greater detail.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 21:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Sports ,  and Cricket .  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 21:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree with the nom, not notable in its own right.  Not opposed to a redirect though if there's a good target.  Jenks24 ( talk ) 21:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing is here to suggest that this meets WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a semi-final match in a major tournament is generally not independently notable unless something very notable or unusual occurs within the game, which does not seem to be the case here.   I oppose a redirect because “2023 Cricket World Cup 1st semi-final” is an unlikely search term.  Frank Anchor 22:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Pakistan , India ,  and New Zealand .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Obvious delete .  This is an obvs fork and unnecessary.  Blue Square Thing ( talk ) 06:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
CI4thePro (Record Producer): No sources found; what's used in the article are youtube videos and a Google search result (neither of which prove notability).  Gsearch goes straight to social media and streaming sites.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Teleperformance Albania: Teleperformance Albania is a subsidiary of Teleperformance which already as its own article.  Gnkgr ( talk ) 00:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Albania .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable part of the main business, no sourcing found in RS.  What's given is primary or non-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not in line with WP:NOTABILITY and WP:ADVERTISING .  Teleperformance Albania started with an initial capacity of 100 workstations, and we grew exponentially by roughly doubling that number every six months .  We?  I have never seen an Wiki article saying "we" in wikivoice.  Ktrimi991 ( talk ) 00:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, "we" should have read NPOV before creating an article about themselves.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No indication of notability and page is basically written like an advertisement .  Kpg jhp jm 04:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Also notice that the page creator is a sockpuppet of a blocked account, and that User:Teleperformance Albania has contributed to this article.  Suspicious.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 12:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  Tagging it for G11, G12 of the profile posted at "best places to work for", no need to spend 7 days on this.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 09:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Omar Jamal Al-Omar: I got fed up with looking at the references; as the identical titles suggest all thosse I looked at were mirrors of the same content.   Which is spam flavoured, and is not about the subject of this article.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 14:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi TheLongTone, thanks for raising this.  You're right that press releases often share similar titles, and that can be frustrating when searching for references.  However, in this case, the references we have come from credible sources.  For instance, the OJO Group website lists Omar Jamal Al-Omar as their Chairman and details his role within the company.  URL: https://ojogroup.net/chairman-message .  Additionally, the University of Notre Dame's Kroc Institute website showcases Omar's work as their Program Coordinator for the Peace Accords Matrix.  While the titles might be similar, the content itself should provide distinct information about Omar's accomplishments and experience.  If you'd like some help evaluating the references or finding additional ones, feel free to ask!  We can work together to ensure this Wikipedia article is well-sourced and informative.  Khushboojain191 ( talk ) 15:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions .  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 15:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There are no sources present which can be considered reliable, third-party sources to support notability, because literally every source here is a press release.  Although some of the venues that opted to publish these press releases may produce their own content and have that content deemed reliable, press releases never establish notability .  Lubal ( talk ) 17:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete under WP:A7 and WP:G11 .  No independent refs and horrifically promotional.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Jayden Jordan: Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music .  Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this iteration of the article only narrowly escapes another A7 speedy with the "famous album" claim.  Unsourced autobiography.  WindTempos ( talk • contribs ) 00:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and given the previous history (their last speedy was not even an hour ago), I'm not giving any benefit of doubt.  Not sure if it even escapes A7 given the "credible" part of "credible claim".  Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 00:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps my interpretation of "credible" is overly generous.  Anyway, it looks like we're done here for now.  WindTempos ( talk • contribs ) 00:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails ANYBIO, no sign of meeting any criteria of MUSICBIO 94rain Talk 00:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Ankita Mallick: Macbeejack ☎ 13:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Macbeejack ☎ 13:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
2024 UK Independence Party leadership election: Fails WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:GNG .  This is a very minor party with no elected representatives and only a couple of thousand members.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and United Kingdom .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wait , leaning on keep .  WP:TOOSOON .  Give it a bit more time and more sources and we can probably keep it.  Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib. ) 17:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:TOOSOON is an argument for why an article should not exist...  AusLondonder ( talk ) 01:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , decidedly minor political event.  TOOSOON applies to articles and not to nominations that come "too soon".  The event is currently covered with two sentences in the UKIP article, and may be expanded to 9-10 sentences there.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly non-notable, no reason to warrant its own article, any more than for leadership elections of the continuing SDP .  Anything on this page can by covered on the UKIP page.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 17:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Lil Dakes: B. Sources include WP:CIRCULAR , WP:MEDIUM , WP:YOUTUBE , and ones that don't even mention this rapper (or barely).  TLA (talk) 16:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've requested G5, just to save the busy AfD debating what is now essentially WP:SNOW .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 20:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Bedtime Prompts: Fram ( talk ) 13:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Spirituality .  Fram ( talk ) 13:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a genuine publication sold on Amazon.  I have Copyright and ISBN number.  The product is a finalist for Innovation Awards 2023.  Pallaviprasadgv ( talk ) 14:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The issue is that there is no critical discussion of the book, published book reviews or articles about the book.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for PROMO.  No coverage of any kind in RS, barely any hits in Gsearch at all.  Non-notable book.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A new product needs time for PR.  But it still remains a product, just like books?  Pallaviprasadgv ( talk ) 14:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Do we do A7 for books?  (guess not)  Wikipedia isn't a free place to advertise, please do so elsewhere.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is not an advertisement or promotion.  This is a real self-help tool.  I have complied my 15 years of expertise into a pocket-size power hack.  This may not be a book.  But it is a publication.  Pallaviprasadgv ( talk ) 16:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Blatant self-promotion and the publication is not notable by any stretch of the imagination.  Should have been speedied.  Deb ( talk ) 16:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and include CSD template .  This is blatant promotion, and the creator deleted the previous CSD template before it got reviewed.  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  16:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] P.S. this article got recreated only 13 minutes after it god CSD deleted.  I'm definitely reporting the account.  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  16:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I am all for self-help, but it's pushing it too far if you just blatantly advertise your product when it's against the guidelines.  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  16:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Balto IV: Wolf Destiny: All sources are either IMDB , or from the director.  The only exception is a casting call.  I have searched for sources and can only find listings about the original series (this article is about a fan-made film), some other wikis mentioning the project, and some paperback books.  - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 19:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Film .  - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 19:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fan-made fanfiction; unless Amblin/Universal has suddenly given the rights to the Balto franchise to some random person to post their sequel on YouTube, this seems fake (the actual trailer is just RenderForest crud).  Nate • ( chatter ) 20:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no evidence of notability.   The casting call is also from the director, so not independent.  Squeakachu ( talk ) 20:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:SNOW Speedy Delete I’m having trouble not saying something unnecessarily mean about this, but come on.  It’s a fan fiction.  For a minor film franchise, which only had one notable sequel.  This is practically a WP:HOAX and definitely a case of WP:NOTMADEUP and should have been PRODded or even Speedied.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Trust me, I'm being kind when I say "Render Forest crud" and could've gone low.  I was ready (and very thankful not to have) to blast whichever editor decided to move this from draftspace...only to find the creator just created it straight off in articlespace (though this mess from the creator got tossed to draftspace).  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Completely non-notable, and probably non-existent, fan film.  I suspect a WP:SNOW closure on this one.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Lazzy Jazz: I found no decent sources in my own searches.  No evidence of WP:NMUSICIAN either (the article claims that he is signed to Warner Music Group but I can't find evidence of this).  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete