hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Miniloft : Created in 2012 by an account whose only edit is this article.  Likely promotional, only references are a link that goes nowhere and the hotel's own website.  Fritzmann ( message me ) 22:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Fritzmann ( message me ) 22:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some references.  The awards seem to establish notability.  When I google Miniloft Berlin, I get articles about Frizz23 , which seems to be a related project that might include the second Miniloft building, but I'm not sure of that.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:45, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , even though my knee-jerk reaction was non-notability.  The architectural nominations alone would clear WP:N ... if someone can source them, please?  Last1in ( talk ) 20:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep per sources currently cited.  I am annoyed by the tendency of what look like good sources to turn out to be 404s or moribund Flash sites, and I suspect but cannot verify that the Berliner Architekturpreis was an honorable mention (Auszeichnung) rather than a prizewinning finish.  But the important thing is that it seems like we have enough to build a reasonable article from, satisfying the GNG.  Of course there is still the matter of sorting out the subject matter.  FWIW I understand Frizz23 to be the same as Miniloft Kreuzberg (so to speak the "third" Miniloft building, after Slender and Bender in Mitte).  That raises some questions in my mind whether all three of these buildings really represent enough of a cohesive thing that we should be dealing with them in the same article, but I suppose there's no particular harm in starting out that way and splitting if sources become sufficiently numerous.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 02:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This article has the tragic problem of probably being architecturally notable, but sourced primarily with hotel reviews.  There's only one GNG qualifying source in the article itself, and the article only alludes to more.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Carter Efe : Quote from previous AFD: Subject seems to appear on news majorly because of his clash with Beri over split percentages which resulted in the removal of the song from some streaming platforms, other than that, nothing better seems to be found out there that makes him notable.  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Nigeria .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , the coverage on the page already looks significant and there's obviously tons of coverage in Nigeria after a quick BEFORE. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 06:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 23:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per above reasoning Yoblyblob ( talk ) 23:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: More input is definitely needed for keeping...  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  02:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Cited coverage appears to pass WP:SIGCOV .  Additionally, the subject has a charting song so passes criteria 2 of WP:MUSICBIO .  4meter4 ( talk ) 02:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Sourcing uses the over the top language we've come to expect from Nigerian sources (subject is releasing a sex tape soon!), but they're in RS, so it's fine.  Charting also helps notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 11:54, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Berezove, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast : Onel 5969 TT me 16:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This entry does not meet GNG or an SNG as worded.  Regrettably, an impartial application of existing guidelines requires that this page be deleted, irrespective of other considerations Jack4576 ( talk ) 17:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Appears to be a separate, recognised settlement and thus meets WP:GEOLAND .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep has a post office acto GMaps, and it's obviously a settlement of some sort.  I'm uncomfortable with the nominations of these Ukrainian settlements which are plainly there; we have held US and UK places to much lower standards, and it's known that some important Ukrainian sources are off line due to the war.  Mangoe ( talk ) 05:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 10:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  See here , first settlement under "Hromada composition" (Ukrainian: Склад громади ) - Berezove is listed, and is thus recognised, as a settlement within the Velykomykhailivka rural hromada.  Mupper-san ( talk ) 21:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Thanda Private Game Reserve : The only in-line source, is to a travel agency advertising this game reserve.  Under External links, there are five more travel sites.  Everything about this one, is put together like an advertisement.  — Maile ( talk ) 16:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions .  — Maile ( talk ) 16:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.   I prodded this rather than nominating it myself out of a sense of caution, but with more time to try to identify sources I am still coming up empty.  ~ T P W 13:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I found a few sources from Gbooks and TNT'd the article.  There might be more.  SWinxy ( talk ) 04:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per the work of SWinxy in removing PROMO and locating additional sources Jack4576 ( talk ) 05:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - WP:HEY .  Thanks SWinxy !  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 16:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep thanks to the work of SWinxy ULPS ( talk ) 17:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the work of SWinxy , at least it meets WP:HEY .  -- Wesoree ( talk · contribs ) 16:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Khalid bin Mohsen Shaari : 48JCL TALK 16:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I don't believe this should be deleted under BLP1E.  While BLP1E conditions 1 and 2 apply, condition 3 does not seem to be met.  The event was significant, and the individual's role was both substantial and well-documented.  See WP:What BLP1E is not .  Manyyassin ( talk ) 06:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A totally unusual record.  Scheridon ( talk ) 17:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 17:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think this article should be kept as articles for other record setting individuals still exist and arent being deleted I refer you to this list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heaviest_people Most of those people still have articles that arent being deleted 192.0.146.27 ( talk ) 01:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] the fact khalid weighed as much as he did and lost all of that weight makes him notible since he did the impossible 192.0.146.27 ( talk ) 01:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Omni Broadcasting Network : Let'srun ( talk ) 02:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some coverage of the company here [33] .  I think it'd be a miss for the encyclopedia to having nothing on this topic, so I'll recommend a partial merge of a paragraph or two to KSSY-LP as it was verifiably the sole station owned by this company, and the company is therefore part of that station's history.  — siro χ o 05:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I'm the original author of this article, and found significant coverage of the subject in Variety , Bloomberg , and David Blevins' 2006 book on US and Canadian television networks , three sources which are independent of the subject.  Additional sources come from the company's own FCC filings and significant newspaper coverage (multiple states).  That the company is defunct is of no import: subjects are presumed notable due to media coverage, not whether they are still in operation.  Firsfron of Ronchester 05:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I do have their points with the fact there was sufficient information that can be considered reasonable for the article existence.  And given that there was some decent information found, despite the fact this network no longer exist, it should be kept.  20chances ( talk ) 01:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Notable enough to be relevant.  TheBritinator ( talk ) 11:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Agamee Prakashani : M.parvage ( talk ) 10:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage of this article.  CastJared ( talk ) 10:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This is a premier publisher in Bangladesh.  Has a WP:BEFORE been done on it.  The current references are very poor, but I think this is probably notable as its on the same footing as similar premier publishers in any country like for example, Penguin in the UK.  scope_creep Talk 13:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes wp before done.  But probably your example is not suitable for this.  M.parvage ( talk ) 13:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The first mention that I found of it, mentioned that it was one of the premier publisher's in Bangladesh.  It had published more than 3000 books.  That is a major publisher.  Its been going for 37 years which means its publishing on average,  more than 80 books a year.  That is a major publisher in anybody's book, making it notable.  scope_creep Talk 17:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There is some coverage of the firm in relation to book fairs [26] , I don't think it's extensive.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Has received Bangla Academy Literary Award , the most significant literary awarded by Bangla Academy .  The award is almost always given to individuals so an award to a publication house indicates it has some significant contribution to Bengali literature.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 15:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Has received Chittaranjan Saha Smriti Award in 2013 and 2022 for publishing the highest number of books on subject and quality.  The award given by Bangla Academy .  ~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: prepared by User:m.parvage Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  Source 1 ?  Some words from an interview ✘ No Source 2 ✘ No Source 3 ~ A recognized newspaper just a summary ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  M.parvage ( talk ) 04:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This publishing house has received Bangla Academy Literary Award .  This is a notable and significant award.  Passes WP:ORG .  -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 14:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, —⁠Scotty Wong ⁠— 05:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Made expansions with sources.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 12:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Disney Sing It: Family Hits : If anyone finds something else substantial from a RS then I might say weak keep, but I'm not convinced of its notability right now.  QuietCicada ( talk ) 14:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Disney .  QuietCicada ( talk ) 14:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Found more reviews.Newsday [22] + The San Francisco Examiner [23] Timur9008 ( talk ) 18:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep With the print sources found, it appears to pass WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I went ahead and added the sources.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 16:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I've also found a (surprising) coverage review in Inlander (newspaper) [24] , Jeuxvideo.com (it has a slightly different title for the French region) [25] .  Undoubtedly passes WP:GNG .  Jovanmilic97 ( talk ) 18:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Full reviews from IGN , Slant (magazine) , San Francisco Chronicle, and Inlander (newspaper) are IMO independent, SIGCOV, and reliable.  The Newsday is one paragraph and too short for SIGCOV in my opinion.  However, overall, the four full reviews are more than enough for a GNG pass.  VickKiang (talk) 01:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Steve Barnard : Was draftified, where another source was added (the Vive Le Rock), a review of his self-published album, and then returned to mainspace.  Onel 5969 TT me 12:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Doesn't he meet the criteria for having drummed in at least 2 notable ensembles.  "Weak" because his significance in some of the ones listed is, well, weak...but criteria is criteria.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 20:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Besides the criteria mentioned by ShelbyMarion, it has significant coverage in several publications, like The Hamilton Spectator, Vive Le Rock, Rhythm.  Wayaguo ( talk ) 07:26, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Basically, per above ShelbyMarion and Wayaguo.  Manzzoku ( talk ) 11:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on current coverage, and being in 2 notable ensembles.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 02:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kristy Kiernan : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I have added multiple reviews of multiple books.  There is additional information about Kiernan in interviews, while this does not contribute to notability the added information would provide context in the article.  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 10:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:HEY , as the new citations show notability and there are more sources that can be added to expand the article.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 19:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Covered in profiles from multiple newspapers and with reviews of her books in multiple periodicals, I think sufficient coverage is demonstrated to show notability.  Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits ) 09:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Olesha (disambiguation) : The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep the nom cannot count: there are three valid topics.  - Altenmann >talk 01:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tractate : This article was previously deleted in 2005 and then recreated.  - car chasm ( talk ) 19:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Philosophy .  - car chasm ( talk ) 19:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Convert to dab page .  The word "tractate" has a specific meaning in reference to the Talmud; I imagine most people who type "tractate" into the search bar (note that the article averages 800 visitors p/m) are looking for the article Masekhet .  But that isn't the only meaning of the term, so a straight redirect to that title wouldn't be appropriate.  Per WP:NOPRIMARY , I think tractate could be a two-item dab page linking to treatise and masekhet , as well as retaining the current "see also" links.  This would be of more service to our readers than deletion.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 05:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions .  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 05:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is redundant with the linked article treatise.  Adler3 ( talk ) 00:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disambiguate per Sojourner in the earth.  Although it does effectively mean a treatise, the point that them make is very valid.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as disambig useful for navigation.  -- Jahaza ( talk ) 16:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disambiguate per Sojourner in the earth. -- Chefallen ( talk ) 03:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:GNG Justwatchmee ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 19:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
In the Twilight : Nothing found in a BEFORE Donald D23 talk to me 00:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 00:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Nintendo Entertainment System models : Grandmaster Huon ( talk ) 03:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Products .  Kpg jhp jm 06:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The nominator's statement suggests that they're attempting to open a merge request , for which AfD is not a proper venue.  Apart from this, a deletion discussion is closed based on a determination of the notability of the subject, not what has been done in other articles .  jp × g 08:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep OKFORK, NLIST, GNG — siro χ o 09:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Clearly notable subject, passes GNG.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep