hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jonnie Sánchez: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Nicaragua ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sepo (band): I can only find coverage on punkglobe.com, and it's unclear if this is a reputable source given the outdated appearance of their website.  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and United States of America .  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable band.  There is almost no independent coverage in reliable sources about the band and its members or their music.  If it was indeed founded in 2012, you'd expect some online coverage, of which there is almost none.  Mooonswimmer 04:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above and WP:NBAND , but also WP:RS - there are no reliable sources about the band.  Having a song in a film is rarely enough to make a band automatically notable , unless it is nominated for an Oscar.  Bearian ( talk ) 16:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brewing alcohol in Colditz: The prose is bad, and this could easily be cut down and mentioned in Olflag IV-C Oflag IV-C , which it is.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  19:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  19:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To clarify about the timeline, I did not notice that the original creator had edited the article one minute before I added the {{Story}} tag as there was an edit conflict I didn't see.  I also did not notice that they had edited it after I placed that tag when I nominated it here.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  19:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : Presumably the nominator is referring to Oflag IV-C ; a typo appears to have generated a redlink.  No opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Wcquidditch , thanks!  I made the typo and attempted to fix it but broke it more haha.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  13:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , History ,  and Military .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not encyclopedic material, almost seems like a joke, with prose including "rustle up luxurious prison made concoctions", "The lads were not taking the mick naming the wine", "Green was self-deprecating;[9] either a great lad, or a sadistic shithouse", "The mess lads argued with the gobshites", "The vindictive gobshites were good lads".  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
XDC Network: a) created by sockpuppet User:Corrugateboard and User:Ghostfishing and  b) moved to Mainspace while failed many times on Draft:XDC Network .  It is suspicious.
 Both sockpuppets hard tried to get passed by Draft on Mara and XDC Network but failed.  Nice try by the way.
 To check: Mara (technology company) , Draft:Mara (technology company) , Draft:XDC Network , XDC Network , Xinfin .  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency , Companies ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Indiana's Football ( talk ) 18:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It wasn't actually added there.  * Pppery * it has begun... 19:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt I declined this at AfD some time ago as lacking depth of coverage.  There are a bunch more sources in the current article than the abandoned Draft:XDC Network , but they don't seem very independent or are just passing mentions.  Stuartyeates ( talk ) 10:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 5 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Singapore .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: User:Stuartyeates , could you link to any previous AFD for this article subject since you mention this in your opinion?  I can't find one related to this article title and it can impact whether or not this discussion can be closed right now.  Or did you mean to write "AFC", not "AFD"?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry, I meant I declined it at AfC not AfD.  See: Draft:XDC Network .  Stuartyeates ( talk ) 23:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WLLS-LP: The only source is an FCC license.  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pennsylvania .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nomination.   -- D'n'B - t -- 09:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. No sources, no article. -- Danubeball ( talk ) 14:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Non-notable television station.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article seems to be missing reliable sources to back up its claims.   Additionally, the topic itself isn't well-known enough to qualify for Wikipedia.  Waqar 💬 17:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Barton (actor): 〜 Festucalex • talk 15:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  〜 Festucalex • talk 15:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Theatre ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I was unable to find credible independent sources for the citations.  However, would not oppose moving to Draftify.  CaseArmitage ( talk ) 15:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: as there is the lack of reliable sources verifying the information provided.  Heavy reliance on "[citation needed]" tags, suggests that the information provided is not supported by reliable, third-party sources.  My own research on reliable sources was not successful.  This undermines the verifiability of the content and potentially its neutrality.  Thus, my recommendation is to delete the article.  Bash7oven ( talk ) 15:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 12:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaia Foundation: Many databases prove the organizations existence, but there's no SIGCOV here.  NotAGenious ( talk ) 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  NotAGenious ( talk ) 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Gaia Foundation remains an important international environmental group operating out of London.   It's Brazilian counterpart under Jose Luzenberger (Ex Minister for the environment) has played an important role in preservation of the Amazon, and the Australian counterpart was important in the preservation of the native forests of Western Australia, through the work of Vivienne Elanta.  Regards
 John Croft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.12.202.49 ( talk ) 01:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That is an admirable goal for sure.  But, we're looking at whether the company meets Wikipedia's notability criteria .  NotAGenious ( talk ) 05:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree: it's admirable, but not notable.  Lambtron talk 04:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since there's no indication of notability.  Lambtron talk 04:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find anything which counts towards GNG.   They definitely exist , and there are various mentions of their existence on e.g. the webpages of related charities, but I haven't found any in-depth independent coverage which counts for notability.  Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk ) 10:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thomas Henyey: -- Beland ( talk ) 06:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  Beland ( talk ) 06:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A few hits on similar names in Gscholar, but they could be anyone.  I don't find much else for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As Oaktree alludes to, sourcing seems pretty sparse to contribute to notability.  They don't appear to pass the "average professor test" described over at WP:NPROF .  KoA ( talk ) 14:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vanilla Beer: The awards are not verified but I don't believe they are major enough to meet WP:ARTIST .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I have made GNews, Google, and Newspaper.com searches and found no reference to this artist.  No SIGCOV Jack4576 ( talk ) 05:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST .  She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akuressa Maha Vidyalaya: My searches in English and Sinhala didn't yield anything that was clear significant coverage.  The best that I could find was Dinamina (translated) but this isn't enough on its own.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Sri Lanka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Neither this nor the arzwiki article have any sources.  Looking online I could not find anything using either Akuressa Maha Vidyalaya or අකුරැස්ස මහා විදුහල other than a couple of Facebook pages, some directory listings, and a mention of a school website that no longer works; the archived version doesn't provide any jumping off point for any reliable sources either.  The article fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG .  - Aoidh ( talk ) 18:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Maliner ( talk ) 18:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LoLiWin: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - only source provided is primary.  Unable to find anything significant or more than a brief mention.  I checked French and English Google.  This seems to be a running problem with software articles here.  -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 22:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kendra Haylock: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Honduras .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non notable sportsperson.  I was unable to find significant in-depth coverage.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 18:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Campo de Lorenzo Skypark: Fails WP:GNG and (assuming it is inhabited) WP:NPLACE .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 23:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 23:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Public-use airstrips are not inherently notable per WP:NAIRPORT and this one clearly fails WP:GNG .  At best, this could be listed on List of airports in Baja California .  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 09:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Numberguy6 ( talk ) 17:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The place exists and can be found in Google Maps.  However, I agree that the place failed WP:GNG due to non-existence of third-party reliable sources that discuss the place.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 20:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WSSS-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Ohio .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hard to imagine any significant coverage of a low-power station only known to have carried The Box and MTV2.  A remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Madhukar (author): Not certain there's an article in here which can be saved.  Searching for the author's name turns up zero independent sources, unless I've missed something.  Probably issues with COI (see the rights information of the image in the article in context of the promotional nature of the article) though possibly that's a reach?  Nonetheless, doesn't seem to belong here.  Warrenmck ( talk ) 03:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Spirituality .  Warrenmck ( talk ) 03:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:46, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry, after nominating this I realized the results of the prior discussion was delete but the article wasn’t deleted.  This can be CSDed, I believe.  Warrenmck ( talk ) 06:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I added G6.  But also delete WP:NOTCV — siro χ o 10:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For a supposedly notable German-born author, there is no biographical information regarding his name previous to "Madhukar", although the German language sources listed in the article are inaccessible or opaque.  Could this "Madhukar" be Berthold Madhukar Thompson ?  - LuckyLouie ( talk ) 13:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In answer to my own above question: no.  According to a cult education forum , the deceased German spiritual teacher Berthold Madhukar Thompson who went by the name "Madhukar" is sometimes mistaken for another (living?) German spiritual teacher Bernd Jürgen Merkle who goes by the name "Madhukar".  And blogs about him are highly critical .  In any event, the subject of our article clearly does not pass WP:NBIO , so delete .  - LuckyLouie ( talk ) 17:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blaze of Sweden: Can't find any reliable sources on google search or news.  There are two references on the page; one to the company's website (not secondary), and one that seems to only mention the company in passing.  Capsulecap ( talk • contribs ) 02:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion ,  and Sweden .  Capsulecap ( talk • contribs ) 02:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found a slighly better source, (Bergsten, Jan. "Manga samsas med mode", Norrländska Socialdemokraten 5 April 2016), when looking through an archive of Swedish newspaper articles, but it still doesn't give us enough foundation to be able to build an encyclopdic article.  / Julle ( talk ) 10:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete that seems to be the extent of Swedish media coverage.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 16:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete