hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
ChoCo1: No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.  As it says  "ChoCo1" is a "trainee" group created by internet IP company "ChoCo entertainment" and the article lists their electronic releases.  References are basically notices of this with no GNG/SNG suitable references about the band included.     Tagged by a different reviewer for this since June 2023.  North8000 ( talk ) 02:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seems mostly like an advertisement.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 03:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darío Ramos: JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wayne Hugo: Theroadislong ( talk ) 19:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 19:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I draftified this in its early stages in the hope of improvement and demonstration of notability.  Searches revealed nothing of merit but I had hoped that some local sources in Southern Africa might emerge.  The author restored article to mainspace with no RSs.  Nothing here supports WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 12:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He appears to be a different person from Wayne Hugo Green, a well-cited child psychologist.  I couldn't find enough citations for WP:PROF and although the article claims he is also a book author I couldn't find the reviews of them needed for WP:AUTHOR .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : possibly an attempt to do self promotion, like they did here with Woodgrove Retirement Village .  zoglophie •talk• 10:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not pass WP:NPROF ].  Qflib ( talk ) 20:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thomas Dacre (knight): This 2007 version shows 5 sources: A user-contributed genealogy website A site my browser security warns me away from The contributing editor's own research Looks good: but the Dacre mentioned was active in 1349-1350, wrong period Dead link An added complication is that the article on his father, Thomas Dacre, 6th Baron Dacre (1387-1458), says that his eldest son, Thomas "was living in 1453 but predeceased his father" - but this Thomas is shown with a precise death date of 15 January 1448.  The article seems to have been created from  unreliable family history sources, and should have no place in our encyclopedia unless someone can find more reliable evidence of his life and dates, and of something beyond his existence which makes him notable.  I'm not a historian, just someone working on the unreferenced Cumbria articles as part of the WP:FEB24 unreferenced articles backlog drive, so someone else may well be able to improve this article.  Please do so.  Pam D 20:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Pam D 20:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Jstor has a few "name drops" of this individual, but nothing we'd consider extensive coverage.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing reliable to merge and the only clear redirect target for this term is the disambiguation page Thomas Dacre because both the 2nd and 4th Lord Dacres were knights.  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 10:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hilde Vanhove: Fails WP:BIO , WP:SIGCOV .  No indication of significance.  scope_creep Talk 20:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Belgium .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sourcing found for notability; even in . be sources, we simply find confirmation of various performances given as part of a musical group.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per forementioned reason above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The first few paragraphs discuss that she shared a stage with notable jazz artists and that's fine.  But also that she was voted the best jazz vocalist, "she was awarded a government medal" and it's all supported by this source: [27] .  But I don't see any of this there.  What goverment medal subject has recevied?  Maybe any of those: Orders,_decorations,_and_medals_of_Belgium ?  Need to find out.  Due to the fact that jazz art is not intended for a wide audience and therefore cannot, with rare exceptions, pass criteria #2, #3, we should entirely rely on expert reviews, if there was any.  It could be criteria #10 or #12 here, because of "In November 2015, she sang a gala concert for National Serbian TV in Novi Sad with the Aleksandar Dujin Orkestra."  Whether it was substantial or not is not clear, because both sources are YouTube.  Roxy177 ( talk ) 14:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; notability only seems to be from working with other musicians.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 19:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WKNI-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khul Ke: Sohom ( talk ) 21:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can simply find press-releases, nothing discussing the software.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not relevant for wikipedia, not enough sources to establish notability.  -- Javierel ( talk ) 14:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yatai City: Ordinarily I would say that the information should be merged, but none of the unique info on the page is referenced.  Zygmeyer ( talk ) 05:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Myanmar .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - From a WP:NPLACE perspective, there may be enough for this housing development to meet WP:GNG but it's misleadingly written as a city, when it is an important but still legally-unrecognized neighbourhood in Shwe Kokko .  Agreed that no need to merge as no referenced info on here isn't on She Zhijiang's page or on the Shwe Kokko page.  Suggest possibly turning into a redirect to Shwe Kokko's Yatai New City section.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 14:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of career achievements by Hakeem Olajuwon: BrigadierG ( talk ) 14:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unneeded WP:CONTENTFORK packed with WP:UNDUE , indiscriminate, trivial stats minutiae.   Major, defining achievements should be captured in the main bio.  The basic stats are already at Hakeem Olajuwon § Career statistics .  Also fails WP:NOTSTATS : Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing As most of this page is unsourced, there's no opportunity to merge either. — Bagumba ( talk ) 08:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with Bagumba.  The important accomplishments should already be in the main Hakeem Olajuwon article.  This article has too many overly-specific statistics that won't realistically be maintained over time.  I quickly found one stat that is out of date (Olajuwon currently ranks 7th in career defensive rebounds, not third: [15] ).  I'm sure there are more problems like that, but I don't think it's worth anyone's time to try to fix that stuff.  Other websites can handle this stuff more effectively.  Zagal e jo ( talk ) 00:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
5 Taian Dao: Has been in CAT:NN for two and a half years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Business ,  and China .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete .  Building is a building.  The article links to the List of tallest buildings in China , but this falls far short of qualifying for that list (or even a hypothetical List of tallest buildings in Tianjin ).  Absent sources that are beyond routine reporting of the construction of any commercial building, this does not, ahem, rise to the requisite level of notability.  BD2412 T 18:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sheila Scribner: LonelyBoy2012 ( talk ) 21:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Bands and musicians , Egypt ,  and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I couldn't find anything on Newspapers Extended.  BBQ boffin grill me 23:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment from nominator : Since according to the article, she is (or was) primarily active in Arabic-speaking countries, perhaps someone who can read Arabic should check to see if there are usable sources in that language that refer to her.  I’ve been scouring the Internet for days and have found very little in English (none of which meets WP:RS standards).  LonelyBoy2012 ( talk ) 00:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Additional nominator comment : There is also an Indonesian-language version of this article, which has even fewer sources and does not claim that she died.  Rather strangely, no Arabic-language article exists despite the fact that she was primarily active in Arab countries.  Given what I’ve managed to find on the Internet, it’s clear that the subject of this article really existed (I couldn’t find anything verifying that she died, although all her social media accounts have been inactive for years).  But she doesn’t seem to pass the notability threshold.  In any case, if this article is deleted, the Indonesian version probably should be too.  LonelyBoy2012 ( talk ) 01:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well I find obituaries, but that's all the coverage there is.  Career appears non-notable.  Sources used in the article aren't helpful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HD Pentax-D FA 645 35mm F3.5 AL (IF): PROD was contested claiming WP:SIGCOV in cited source , but I'm not seeing it.  * Pppery * it has begun... 23:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 23:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : One product review isn't notability.  All I can find now are blog posts and stuff from the manufacturer.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Cannot find any SIRS sources.  Ping if sources found.  Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 02:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaurav Dewasi: Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources available on web per WP:ICTFSOURCES apart from the three listed  in article C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂 ) 14:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article already deleted 4 times (3 for lack of notability, one for sockpuppet creation) Draft version also deleted 4 times under this title, and 6 more times under 5 other titles (details here ).  Appears to have done nothing in the last 4 years to alter the lack of notability.  Draft was "Extended Confirmed create protected 16/12/2022"- request "Extended Confirmed create protection" of article as well - Arjayay ( talk ) 12:59, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Article creator User:Malwarevoc has been globally locked for "Undisclosed paid editing" - Arjayay ( talk ) 21:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG , WP:NBASIC , WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR . — Alalch E. 17:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kyrgyz art: The text consists mostly of vague generalities and there are no inline citations.  The four general references given are bogus, as far as I can tell: the two books don't appear to exist, the two links are broken.  Kyrgyz art is certainly a notable topic, but this version of the article doesn't contain anything worth retaining .  – Joe ( talk ) 07:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Central Asia ,  and Kyrgyzstan .  – Joe ( talk ) 07:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete if not speedy delete per G3.   Looks like an LLM all right, with the vague and roundabout phrasing, and the nonexistent references are a dead giveaway.   No place for this on Wikipedia.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Culture of Kyrgyzstan .  Agree with nominator that this is a notable topic but nothing as written is of value.  I think a redirect will point interested parties in the right direction and is thus more useful than an outright deletion.  I'm aware the Kyrgyz people and the population of Kyrgyzstan don't overlap completely, so I understand if people would prefer to simply delete.  Moonreach ( talk ) 16:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm neutral on whether we leave a redirect or a red link behind, but either way I think the current history should be deleted first, given the potential copyright issues with LLM-generated text.  – Joe ( talk ) 18:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete then redirect to Culture of Kyrgyzstan .  There's nothing worth keeping and deleting sidesteps the potential copyright concerns.  Pichpich ( talk ) 19:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom's findings.  As for the redirect, I think it's better to keep this red as per WP:REDLINK -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ronald Asamsum: The article is currently nothing more than a stats stub and my own searches yielded only Metrobanjar , a squad list mention, Banjarmasin , a trivial mention, and Viva , another trivial mention.  Soccerway and other stats sites have his name as 'Asmsamsum', which also yields no good results.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Several searches literally brought up nothing at all beyond a loose reference in Football Manager 17.  Fails WP:SIGCOV at the very least.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nnamdi Chife: Current sources do not count towards GNG and a BEFORE makes no difference.  Wikipedia is not a soapbox , or a vehicle for advertising and showcasing.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG .  Yet another text that's well put together but gets posted up here for all  the wrong reasons, vanity and promotion .  The plethora of citations is meant to impress though it's full of irrelevancies.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 11:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Lack of SIGCOV.  The article in The Nation is arguably okay, but much of it is based on an interview.  Article in Naira Metrics is almost plainly an interview, failing independence.  TLA tlak 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee inclusion in Wikipedia — the notability test for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one and losing, and on and so forth — but the referencing is based almost entirely on Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself in the first person and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things, not substantive WP:GNG -worthy coverage about him.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are WP: LOTSOFSOURCES .  None can't relatively talk about the subject.  Clearly fails WP: SNG , WP: NPOL . .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 07:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 21:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete