hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ivan Misner: Some poor quality sources e.g. state he was called the “Father of Modern Networking” by both Forbes and CNN but I can't find any coverage from either Forbes or CNN which would support that.  SmartSE ( talk ) 11:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  SmartSE ( talk ) 11:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California , Pennsylvania ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Forbes contributor piece [14] and typical fluffy PR pieces are all I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abhishek Kumar: No significant coverage and sources thereby, failing WP:SIGCOV as well.  Imsaneikigai ( talk ) 19:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] NOTE- Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Abhishek Kumar is regarding a different subject that goes by the same name, so please don't confuse between the both.  Imsaneikigai ( talk ) 19:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Punjab .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect : to Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 17 where he is mentioned.  Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ManaliJain ( talk ) 13:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vladimir Anisimoff: Aza24 (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Science .  Aza24 (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 00:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and Philosophy .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The Russian Wikipedia doesn't seem to have an article for this person, but it has articles on other people with this name who might be notable by English Wikipedia standards.  See ru:Анисимов, Владимир Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , though the article was created 10 years ago, there are zero reliable sources not connected to Anisimoff himself, and I can't find any in Russian.  Artem.G ( talk ) 12:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Very Weak Keep if the article can provide reliable sources (per WP:RS ), and be re-written to read like an advert ( WP:NOTADVERT ).  If not, delete.  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 08:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have gone through the article and reworded a lot of it to sound less biased and impartial.  It would be appreciated if other editors could go through and help make it neutral.  Mjks28 ( talk ) 08:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for your efforts, but these neutrality issues aren't really a concern for AFD.  As you mention, it's the sources that are the defining factor here.  Aza24 (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There are no RS on the page about the person except his own publications.  My very best wishes ( talk ) 17:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tirioro Willie: Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 04:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Oceania .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 04:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would expect one of the newspapers in Kiribati would have published something when one of their most prominent athletes died at age 22.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 04:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the athletes from the smallest countries compete on quotas, which unfortunately doesn't change the fact that they are not accomplished athletes - having recorded results that are probably matched by several thousand 16-year old boys all over the world every year - resulting in a lack of significant coverage.  The ideal would be a merge to athletics in Kiribati or Kiribati at the World Athletics Championships .  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Unable to find the requisite coverage for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lilophoto: Only links I find are  PR items.  From what I can see, the Russian language ones appear promo as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 1682: The claim that It has been extensively researched by NASA isn't supported by the citation given, which is a database maintained by NASA, and is WP:OR /personal opinion of the Wikipedia user.  C messier ( talk ) 14:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 15:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  - Parejkoj ( talk ) 19:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baajaa Gaajaa: Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Events ,  and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Small Worlds (presentation): A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Raph Koster .  toweli ( talk ) 18:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  toweli ( talk ) 18:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to blatantly fail WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No coverage.  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 20:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'm not sure this topic meets WP:GNG .  I haven't seen it covered in any reliable sources.  Waqar 💬 15:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - GamerPro64 06:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abby's Pizza: The current references are trivial and/or repeated from press releases and I can find nothing else.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  15:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Oregon .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete local business which doesn't really pass WP:NORG .  SportingFlyer T · C 17:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I looked for some less-than-trivial mentions in newspapers.com but I am coming up empty.  An article on "Willamette Valley-Style Pizza" might have better traction, actually.  It's been written about quite a bit.  I'll look a bit more but I don't think this could pass WP:NORG .  Valfontis ( talk ) 05:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MontageJS: Searches on Google result in either Yellowpages-style listings or Githubs.  Books return in trivial mentions in author biographies.  The fact that the author was SPA on this topic does not help.  For these reasons I believe it fails GNG.  Good day— RetroCosmos talk 04:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering , Technology , Computing ,  and Software .  Good day— RetroCosmos talk 04:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just looked at their website.  Copyright 2017.  Another framework that didn't get off the ground.  — Sean Brunnock ( talk ) 14:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Solid Waste Association of North America: Note, the reason it appears to be an A7 is CV, which was addressed.  The issue is the lack of sourcing upon which to build an article.  Star Mississippi 15:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies ,  and United States of America .  Star Mississippi 15:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and Caribbean .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Maliner ( talk ) 19:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable since it doesn't satisfy WP:AUD .  All of the SIGCOV is by publications named "Waste News 360" or similar.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 14:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already made a trip to AFD so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not pass WP:ORG due to a lack of needed sources.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rhonard García: I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG ; all I found were passing mentions in both English- and Spanish-language media.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete One international appearance and an unknown number of club appearances doesn't supersede WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG standards, unfortunately.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 16:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm not an expert, but playing one game (with no goals) is not sufficient to pass WP:FOOTY .  De minimis non curat lex .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails SIGCOV and NSPORT.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 11:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daily Thread: WP THREE?  Rodgers V ( talk ) 12:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have blocked the nominator for spamming, but I believe this nomination should be considered on its merits.  MER-C 14:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The current sources are the company's own about page, a local news site and a press release.  I've looked and have not found anything better.  Does not meet and is unlikely to meet WP:CORP .  Jtrrs0 ( talk ) 14:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Like I stated, Soft Deletion is not an option here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Lack of notability.  Kinopiko talk 10:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:NCORP as coverage is limited to local announcements of the store opening and closing locations at malls.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joseph Yagil: Written as an advertisement.  MrGnocci ( talk ) 10:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Finance ,  and Israel .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I wouldn't say advertisement, as the entry is not trying to sell a product or service.  It's PEACOCK and easy to clean.  AfD is not clean up.  Also, he was a founding faculty dean.  Can someone check how he ranks as an academic?  gidonb ( talk ) 04:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He has one well-cited joint publication ("Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study") but then the rest drop off so rapidly that I don't think there is a pass of WP:PROF#C1 .  His cv [20] lists three books but I didn't find the reviews that would pass WP:AUTHOR .  And his work as an academic administrator is not at a high enough level (head of an entire university) to pass WP:PROF#C6 , unless one counts presidency of the Carmel Academic Center as being head of a "major academic institution" (I don't think it is one).  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 07:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  After more research, decided that he does not pass the bar as an administrator, academic, or otherwise.  The article can be cleaned up, just there is no reason why.  gidonb ( talk ) 00:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ken Todd (businessman): Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Notability here seems to hinge on WP:NACTOR , but I don't know enough about the 2 or 3 realty shows he has more than 1 appearance on to say one way or the other.  Agree BIO is otherwise not met.  — siro χ o 02:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The creator is currently the subject of an SPI ; the sockmaster was responsible for an earlier copy of this page which was deleted at the 1st AfD, and another attempt from another sock that got draftified to Draft:Ken Todd (restaurateur) .  Belbury ( talk ) 06:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Navayuga Engineering Company Limited: Charlie ( talk ) 16:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 16:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Syed Akhtar Ahsan: Pepper Beast (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find anything in English and Urdu.  Appears to fail WP:GNG .  No indication of WP:NACADEMIC , and not even a slight indication towards passing WP:ANYBIO .  ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ilford and District Football League: In recent news, I can't find anything better than Guardian Series , which mentions the league once in passing.  Searching in the British Newspaper Archive yields a few relevant hits but these are all just basic results listings with no meaningful prose about the league.  The previous deletions linked above clearly show that this sort of coverage isn't enough, especially when it's in hyper local newspapers like Tower Hamlets Independent and East End Local Advertiser and contains nothing that we can actually build an article from.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete These leagues are low down the ladder and although there are local newspapers that use to cover the teams, there never really was the coverage that sustained notability.  There maybe a way to cover leagues in a list article, but this way.  Not so such.  Certainly doesn't pass WP:BASIC .  Govvy ( talk ) 12:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete