Battle of Kashmir (1814): This page requires deletion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Festivalfalcon873 ( talk • contribs ) 23:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 6 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 23:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Afghanistan ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Three of the sources are WP:RAJ which can be removed as they are only passing by sources attributed by other secondary sources.  Not sure what you're referring to as unreliable sources here, would be nice for you to identify, because historians like Hari Ram Gupta are more then WP:RS .  Also pages 124-126 clearly show the expedition was a failure and an Afghan victory: [11] .  Noorullah ( talk ) 01:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Further adding from the source: "It took Ranjit Singh four years to overcome his defeat and disgrace suffered in the Kashmir expedition of 1814." [12] (page 128) Noorullah ( talk ) 01:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only the sources from WP:RAJ mention any defeat occurring and are clearly required for the final result of this article but do not pass the standards of Wikipedia.  Historians that you noted such as Hari Ram Gupta are specific on page 125 that , “Aghar Khan joined Ruhullah Khan. They spread the rumour that the Sikh army had been defeated.”  There was no battle against Wazir Fateh Khan mentioned as noted in this article nor any defeat in battle against Wazir Fateh Khan.  The article itself is littered with errors as it mentions this is the third campaign or invasion of Ranjit Singh.  This is incorrect as there was no campaign in 1812 as noted by Hari Ram Gupta and in 1813 the campaign was a joint collaboration with Wazir Fateh Khan where the former was to give a tribute.  Festivalfalcon873 ( talk ) 23:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The expedition ended in failure, Hari Ram Gupta made this clear on page 126 [13] when he clearly identifies it as a Sikh defeat.  The WP:RAJ sources can be removed as I said because they are only passing references while attributed by other secondary sources (such as Hari Ram Gupta).  Also the article is being cleaned up, and thus can stay per WP:HEY .  Noorullah ( talk ) 19:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The initial issue of the outcome of this so called battle is not being referenced correctly is still present & or the outcome is using WP:RAJ source which doesn’t meet requirements of Wikipedia.  Two WP:RAJsources are still there in the article in order to present a victory which are not reliable.  Therefore it is factually incorrect to say it is passing by reference.  The expedition ended in failure, but Gupta makes it clear that any battle taking place was just a rumor on pg 125 that , “Aghar Khan joined Ruhullah Khan. They spread the rumour that the Sikh army had been defeated”in book History Of The Sikhs Vol.  V The Sikh Lion of Lahore and does not mention any battle taking place.  The author G.S Chhabra you referenced on pg 115 does not mention any direct defeat or battle by Azim Khan either , neither has it been referenced that the losses were heavy.  Any mention of any battle taking place in the article is unreliable , Captain Amrinder is not a historian but a politician is thus not a Wikipedia:Reliable sources .  So to point out that the article has significantly improved is inaccurate as the initial concern is not fixed and no improvements have been done to fix it.  Festivalfalcon873 ( talk ) 19:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no WP:RAJ sources on the page as per your most recent comment.  Gupta clearly states Ranjit Singh was defeated as mentioned above.  Noorullah ( talk ) 22:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note to closer: The above vote is the AFD nom himself, so it should be discarded.  Keep :  Sources are relatively reliable and the article is decently written.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 17:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 11:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete found nothing in sources for specific "Battle of Kashmir".  Only two scattered lines mention the first Kashmir expedition by Ranjit Singh.  Clearly not much coverage, it could be merged in any of the parent articles but doesn't need its own standalone page.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 09:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  One of those many Indian WP:SYNTH battle pages.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: There is plenty of coverage on the expedition.  [14] [15] [16] Retitled to "Kashmir expedition (1814) so that it can also stay per WP:HEY . Noorullah ( talk ) 15:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Article has also been significantly expanded to constitute remaining under WP:HEY with numerous other sources also being added. Noorullah ( talk ) 16:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] pinging to @ RangersRus and @ Based Kashmiri per above. Noorullah ( talk ) 16:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Noorullah21 I'd not oppose moving it to the "Kashmir expedition" or "First Kashmir expedition" as per sources.  However the issue of WP:SIGCOV is refraining me from striking my vote.  Also the third source [17] doesn't appear to be reliable, as Shashikant Nishant Sharma is not a historian and the publisher is also questionable.  The rest of the sources don't have significant coverage.  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 10:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please do not move page while AfD is open.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 05:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus