hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
KBBV-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in California#LPTV stations : with a history of only carrying other stations or full-time national services (despite the Class A television service designation that requires some local programming), I doubt much significant coverage exists for this station.  A PROD was contested with more-or-less this alternative to deletion being suggested; it does seem that an {{ R to list entry }} is the best that can be done here.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shah Ruknuddin: No sign of independent notability.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 16:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh , India and Islam .  -- Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 16:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shah Kamal Quhafah , as the subject is mentioned there.  𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk ) 15:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
W30EG-D: Let'srun ( talk ) 16:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Tennessee .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of over-the-air HSN affiliates .  A network subsidiary owns this LPTV.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 00:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of over-the-air HSN affiliates : like most Ventana Television stations, it has only ever existed to carry HSN or HSN-associated networks (including QVC's networks as well more recently — the only exception is that random carriage of Dabl on 45.6, which happens at a few other Ventana stations as well), undoubtedly without much of any significant coverage .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arat (The Walking Dead): four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep if more sources are found, otherwise merge to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters .  BOZ ( talk ) 17:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect would be better suited.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , sourcing is not sufficient to justify a standalone.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge as WP:ATD .  Article doesn't have WP:SIGCOV and should be part of the main topic.  Editing can sort out the right amount to cover, if anything should be WP:PRESERVED at all.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 21:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Education in Baton Rouge, Louisiana: 777burger user talk contribs 03:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  777burger user talk contribs 03:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Baton Rouge, Louisiana#Education .  Left guide ( talk ) 11:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Baton Rouge, Louisiana#Education .  Page was created as a content fork without need under forking guidelines nor consensus.  I suppose an argument might exist for List of schools in Baton Rouge, Louisiana , but with the content already existing in the mother article, that seems like a better job for a category.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 04:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
John D. Howard: Purpose of this article is to just act as a resume which is in breach of WP:NOTCV .  Article creator seems to be WP:SPA to advertise Yale Alumni.  Imcdc Contact 09:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Finance .  Imcdc Contact 09:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Irving Place Capital .  He doesn't have any independent coverage.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 19:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Serenity Rose: Did not find in-depth reviews or other significant coverage of the subject.  No change to the citations were made when deproded.  Does not seem to pass WP:GNG Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 17:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and United States of America .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 17:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] An interview at Comic Beat and a working CBR link are out there, though the page and the comic are work of a self-promotionalist and the rest of Google is bringing up mindless spam.  Would propose Redirect to Slave Labor Graphics to cover for the unlikely event of a boom in third-rate Emily Strange knock-offs.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 18:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Muthazhagu (TV series): Recreated under disambiguation by sock and G5 removed by other user.  Tagged since March for additional sources and none added.  Search for additional sourcing found nothing but WP:NEWSORGINDIA , mentions, or otherwise unreliable sources.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Devatha_-_Anubandhala_Alayam#Adaptations : if REALLY a series that has >500 episodes on a notable network can be considered non-notable... - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 10:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, there's no inherent notability for having 500 episodes.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] 705, now. (:D) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 22:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Devatha_-_Anubandhala_Alayam#Adaptations .  Poor sources.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Ball of Letters: The attempted claims of notability here belong to the tour , not to the DVD record of it -- number of people who attended the performances, an award for the performances -- but are still not supported by sources, and there's no particular claim that the DVD has any standalone notability as a film at all.  There's just nothing here that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt the DVD from having to have any WP:GNG -worthy coverage in reliable media sources.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Colombia .  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Likely PROMO, I'd just redirect to the article about the comedian.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Andrés López Forero where “pelota de lettras” is mentioned.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lyudmila Borsuk: Aydoh8 ( talk ) 23:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect —suggest redirecting to Athletics at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Women's long jump , but to an anchor added as entry 23 in the first table.  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Strong Tower Radio: Let'srun ( talk ) 13:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Television , Christianity , Illinois ,  and Michigan .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Catfurball ( talk ) 17:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Three Angels Broadcasting Network affiliates , where the stations of this network are listed. -- Tdl1060 ( talk ) 19:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Three Angels Broadcasting Network affiliates : while that might be a relative surprise with regard to the network itself, four of its stations have their call signs redirect to this article as it stands and those would be valid {{ R to list entry }} redirects to the 3ABN list (four others do have their own articles, at least for now).  In any event, this article was created at the tail end of the era where we were a bit looser on broadcast station/network notability than we are today.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to 3ABN as above: there are quite a few of these articles for religious radio networks in the United States which, like this one, do not offer any rationale for inclusion.  This may the first of several that needs to go.  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above, as not independently notable at this time, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ali Hisseine: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 01:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 01:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Chad international footballers as an WP:ATD ; found no WP:SIGCOV in a before, just database entries and rsssf.org mentions (which don't count per WP:SPORTBASIC 5) and a few hits for track athlete Ali Hissein Mahamat.  ミラP @ Miraclepine 12:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 14:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Chad international footballers as an WP:ATD .  BLP.  Fails GNG and BIO.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 04:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Viva Flamenco!: Promotional lead copied from label's website.  Fails NALBUM.  The external links are related to the artists and not this album, and they do nothing to establish notability.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:07, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Narada Productions : Found no additional coverage.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 21:20, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:53, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per QuietHere.  The Narada Productions article didn't mention this album or its friend until just now, but I have added them to the list of compilation albums there.  IMO if these are redirected it would be ideal to merge the refs -- I have not done so yet, however, to avoid any appearance of short-circuiting the outcome of this discussion.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 04:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Da Game of Life: Chris Troutman ( talk ) 02:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 02:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Totally Insane as a {{ R from album }} , then move the edit history to Da Game of Life (album) without leaving a redirect so that Da Game of Life (film) can move to Da Game of Life .  Steel1943 ( talk ) 05:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that this album isn't notable, but I have doubts that film/video is notable either.  It's been asserted that sufficient {{ sources exist }} (without providing any), but I can find quite little: https://www.avclub.com/da-game-of-life-1798197403 https://www.vice.com/en/article/rdzd3y/the-most-comprehensive-list-of-the-best-and-worst-rapsploitation-films-ever SilverLocust 💬 09:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Totally Insane .  Da Game of Life (film) can be addressed in its own AfD.  162 etc. ( talk ) 16:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DXIP: No clear redirect target.  MarioGom ( talk ) 19:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 19:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The third source is just an aircheck.  The rest of the sources are secondary and talk about the station's programming.  That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG .  ASTIG 😎 🙃 10:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What sources exactly do you see with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth ?  Just to be clear what you think is SIGCOV.  Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument.  Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 23:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Southern Broadcasting Network#Radio stations ; all four of the references in the current version fail WP:GNG for one reason or another: #1 name-drops the station once in a series that includes three other stations (fails WP:SIGCOV ), #2 mentions the station twice in passing with absolutely no detail or context about the station (also fails WP:SIGCOV ), #3 is a WP:UGC since it's a YouTube video authored by "Dante's Enigmatic World", who has no meaningful and established journalistic reputation, and #4 is a WP:BLOG .  Left guide ( talk ) 00:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Southern Broadcasting Network#Radio stations , clearly fails GNG, NCORP.  Source eval: Comments Source Nothing about subject.  Mentions station merger, but no details, nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth  1.  Vice guv to be back soon, daughters say Interviews that mention the name of the station, no details, nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth  2. ^ FAST BACKWARD: Media in time of Covid-19 Primary  3. ^ DXIP Davao Sign-Off 1988 Mentions an interview from the station, nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth  4. ^ ANAD PARTYLIST STANDS PAT THAT DAVAO CITY IS NOT PEACEFUL BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth // Timothy :: talk 17:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
CsUnit: Has one ref from a predatory journal .  -- Wiki Linuz ( talk ) 04:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I don't know enough about the sources to assess the quality of the journal sources and whether the nominator would say they are predatory, but there appears to be sufficient scholarly coverage of this subject.  However, my lack of knowledge prevents me from ! voting.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 00:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I couldn't find anything significant.  The one ref I was talking about is this , which is inactive (it's also a low-quality journal so fails RS).  -- Wiki Linuz ( talk ) 02:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  International Journal of Research in Computer Science has indeed been identified as predatory.  [38] Topic is not notable and article lacks valid sources.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#. NET : where it is already covered in as much detail as is warranted by the limited sources.  Owen× ☎ 12:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of unit testing frameworks : The framework is notable enough to be frequently mentioned in online and literary sources from the early-mid 2000s (e.g., [39] , [40] ), but not in any depth, and certainly not with any greater coverage than its contemporaries.  It should be redirected to preserve the edit history, regardless, and sources used to back up its entry at the list article, where a short description would be plenty considering the lack of detailed coverage.  Recon rabbit 16:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect