EcoCute (Japan): The outcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EcoCute in February was to merge it to Air source heat pump .  They should be re-merged absent a changed consensus to split the content back out into its own article, such as via a WP:SPLIT discussion or WP:DRV .  SilverLocust 💬 18:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  SilverLocust 💬 18:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Engineering ,  and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment We just did this one and it's back again.  ! Merge as suggested less than 6mths ago.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I mentioned my position/opinion is on Talk:EcoCute (Japan) , please refer. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 07:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Note that previous AfD was closed as merge despite the fact that it appears one editors were advocating for keep, one (nominator) for merge, and one for delete: it seems more like no consensus to me.  Appears to have some international coverage from fiz-karlsruhe.de that's already cited in the article.  ja:エコキュート has lots of coverage including from Yomiuri , Mainichi , Kyodo , NHK , and more including an award from ja:発明協会 .  I also found this magazine featuring it.  I would also rename to get rid of the parenthetical per WP:PARENDIS .  DCsansei ( talk ) 10:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Re-creating a page that was closed as merge, now with a spurious disambiguation, is not constructive.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 05:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand the procedural point but that this AfD should still be evaluated on its own merits .  I don't think a prior AfD with 3 ! votes advocating for 3 different positions should prejudice this discussion.  DCsansei ( talk ) 12:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I started the previous discussion but have only just now become aware of this one.  Also Wikiproject Energy was on the previous article but until now this article had no Wikiprojects on this talk page.  Is there any way you could automatically notify people who were watching the previous article?  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 07:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : EcoCute is trademark with millions of units used in Japan, some number of units also used in oversea, hopefully more number in area other than Japan.  Installations, Japan and oversea case study list Article context and external link shows reality.  I had created article EcoCute in July 2008‎, in January 2024, nominated for delete , then merged to, but eliminated section EcoCute in Air source heat pump thereafter.  EcoCute (Japan) is based on number of units used/working in Japan, so that this is eligible to be an article in fact with (Japan).  As Generic trademark , no one nominate trademark Coca-Cola merger into Coke nor Jeep into automobile, neither Wikipedia® registered trademark neither.  EcoCute is registered and generic trademark.  I shall repeat once again: Once an article A deleted and marge to another article B, even A redirected to B, anyone can edit article B include word A in context of article B, but long term in future, it is possible/happen the word A may disappear from B due to number of editing by many editor/user.  No one able to guarantee such sad thing if article A is worthful.  This is my understanding.  This comment is in My opinon on 12:46, 7 February 2024 .  If this nomination be resulted as merge back to Air source heat pump again, or other, merge or delete nomination will be happened again and again.  Independent article EcoCute (Japan) is much safer from delete/merge, and contribute CO 2 reduction with implemented efficiency.  -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 11:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : As I argued previously, if I remember right, nowadays this is not sufficiently different from other air source heat pumps to merit a separate article.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 07:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question : As I have only now added projects to the talk page will they still be automatically notified of this discussion?  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 07:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, again : History of EcoCute merged after discussion in to Air source heat pump as section, then section deleted/eliminated without any talk, then ECoCute (Jpapan) created.  Now EcoCute (Japan) is on AfD/ Merged again.  If resulted to mereged in this discuss again and again, can anyone garantee protect/not be eliminated section EcoCute or EcoCute (Japan) by Banners like SfD (Section for Detele) for discussion, KS (Keep this Section) or something else.  Following step  1) - 4) is the editing history.  1) EcoCute, First AfD - EcouCute AfD Discussion resulted as merge on 17 February 2024  2) Then deletedm and merged into Air source heat pump EcoCute deleted, merged as section and redirected on 18 February 2024  3) Sudden Deleted section EcoCute on 27 March 2024 from Article Air source heat pump without any talk/discuss.  4) EcoCute, redirect to Fresh article EcoCute (Japan) on 25 April 2024 -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 11:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)-- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 12:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] While I agree with keep, note that you only get one vote so you should consolidate your argument into one section or re-label one of them as a comment DCsansei ( talk ) 12:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As far as I know nobody can guarantee that a merged section would not be deleted.   I agree with @ MrOllie that the section was too lengthy and only covered one product.  However as this seems to have been very ahead of its time I believe it should be covered briefly in the air source heat pump article along with some other companies and/or products.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 13:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I deleted the section because it was a WP:UNDUE problem and looked like an advertisement for one company's product in that context.  MrOllie ( talk ) 13:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pls See section of talk page of EcoCute (Japan), '''Manufactures of EcoCute in Japan. '''  EcoCute is not one company’s products, all mfg. /vender, equally competing in market with named EcoCute, product type of Air source heat pump , as article said, to identify, not confused with other type of Air source heat pump by both seller and customer.  I would like all you here to review for my long opinions on other page/section. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 15:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a registered trademark.  Whether they are manufactured directly by that company or under license from that company is a distinction without a difference .  MrOllie ( talk ) 15:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Number of companies produce variety number of models, size, performance and sell/buy price and others.  Minimum requirement is both Refrigerant is CO 2 and making hot water, it is named as EcoCute in fair markets.  Telling/ display/ indication of word EcoCute in sales promotion is no advantage, it just shows merely type of heat pump, not such as gas nor electric heating. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 05:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If some other companies and/or variety of products put on market in future, and is comparable or superior, than or equal capability to EcoCute reduce CO 2 / emission and Greenhouse gas , that will be a time to merge these as one type of heat pump in Air source heat pump sections. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 07:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and specifically Do not merge .  Either it is notable enough for a standalone article or it isn't, and if it isn't it definitely should not be dumped into a general article - Wikipedia isn't a catalog, we should not be writing about individual product offerings in generic articles like that.  - MrOllie ( talk ) 13:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Top wording changed/edited today.  As ( The EcoCute is an energy-efficient , type of Air source heat pump and only for water heating as the single hot water supply system, not use for air conditioning or alike. ) Millions units sold EcoCute use Air source heat pump , air conditioner use Air source heat pump as well, Refrigerator use Heat pump .  Car use Engine .  Even trade mark Coca-Cola and Jeep , all these has an article on Wikipedia here. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 05:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : and SALT both this and EcoCute for six months.  It is clear that the title-gaming author has no intention of abiding by the result of a merge in this AfD any more than they did in the previous AfD .  Any additional attempts to circumvent consensus by title-gaming should be handled with a topic ban.  Owen× ☎ 21:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep + Comment : As of article version 05:15, 19 May 2024, JIS JIS C 9220：2018 in section “EcoCute machine basics”, it should be noted that no equivalent total system, EcoCute is 1: heat pump air sourced + 2: hot water storage tank + 3: supply with CO2 Refrigerant.  Air source heat pump is describe step 1: only and functional usage is for air conditioner, bathing, underfloor heating and etc., and any conceivable use connecting to room air conditioning unit or to water unit or any unit for purpose.  JIS C 9220 standards clearly defined/request associated hot water tank mandatory as single system.  I am not sure standard for air source heat pump is, but sure that it may not defined/request associated hot water tank.  My “keep” position is rationally with/based reasons, facts and differences. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 09:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You've already ! voted above.  Owen× ☎ 09:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for quick advice.  Noticed the rule. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 09:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Many air source heat pump systems in Europe include hot water tanks.  Certainly Ecocute should be mentioned in the Air source heat pump history section as it was so ahead of its time.  It was a great pioneer but nowadays others have caught up.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A brief mention would not be amiss (like, one sentence), but making more than 1/3 of the article about Ecocute is far too much.  MrOllie ( talk ) 13:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] TNT/redirect and consider topic-banning Namazu-tron from this topic due to apparent undisclosed COI.  DCsansei has found some references that do include significant coverage of the subject in major Japanese publications such as NHK [17] and Yomiuri Shimbun ( [18] ).  However, this coverage is exclusively negative, and the state of the article as written by Namazu-tron does not even begin to incorporate this information.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I, too, get the clear sense we're dealing with a COI/UPE here.  The tendentious, unrelenting  recreation/reversion pattern and the promotional tone suggest, at the very least, a strong POV.  Rosguill , please ping me if you take this to AN/I or such.  Owen× ☎ 16:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Archived NHK and Yomiuri Shimbun site are dated almost 10 years ago.  Capable Japanese mfg. seems solve the problems, and no social topics on TV nor Newspaper nowadays, and I’m no intention to hide these topics for edit.  My edit thinking/idea for “basic”section seems almost dried up now.  I’m seeing Japanese EcoCute (エコキュート) has section health hazards　(健康被害） and etc. (その他), and my plan has to be to add these topic as next step in edit, and I will edit for problem/negative/positive topics by taking time or days. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 05:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  There appears to be a consensus not to keep, but there's no consensus yet for delete, merge, or redirect.  A topic ban is not a valid AfD outcome ; that discussion should be had at AN or ANI .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, voorts ( talk / contributions ) 16:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I do think that the past coverage I dug up constitutes sufficient significant coverage of the subject to pass the GNG but I've edited my vote into a comment.  I think merge is the best outcome here given the state of the article.  DCsansei ( talk ) 13:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Do not merge : We do not publish product brochures or sell sheets, but that's what IMHO this pagespace best resembles.  For the purposes of this discussion, nothing in this article should be used in a Wikipedia article on air pumps without a critical screening.  The behavior of User:Namazu-tron in this process is a separate (but not unrelated) issue.  BusterD ( talk ) 14:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I have created a report at the COI noticeboard where User:Namazu-tron might explain their fierce loyalty to these two pages.  BusterD ( talk ) 15:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Replied to created a report , Thank you.  -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 05:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Initial version EcoCute in 2008 has full of section “history”, and Air source heat pump did not have section “history” before marge EcoCute into Air source heat pump version 27 January 2024 which keeps afterward section history with almost full content from merged EcoCute nowaday, this is my pleasure in editing.  JIS in 2011 revised in 2018 Standards issued with titled C 9220：2018 “Residential heat pump water heaters (家庭用ヒートポンプ給湯機)”, which illustrated requisite be to heat pump and water heaters storage tank as the single of heat pump unit + water heater unit with storage tank as a whole.  This is new and innovating type of product, named ECoCute though, placed in market in 2001, and record cumulative 9 million units by 2023.“Residential heat pump water heaters” is not a part of Air source heat pump .  It is the product appeared consequence of technical/engineering innovation day by day.  ISO has not issued standards equivalent to JIS C 9220：2018 yet, hopefully they issue in future in coming years.  ISO: Heat pump water heater for hot water supply Wikipedia should accept new product as the article as the internet encyclopedia , when term EcoCute deleted or merged then disappear, it brings reader is hard to find out that term, such consequence is not the purpose of existence of Wikipedia.  Articles quality is important, also user friendly/usability is important as donation based entire Wikipedia/Wikimedia system.  We don’t want to see/hear that AI and/or GPT indicate/speak term/word neither “EcoCute” nor “Residential heat pump water heaters” in Wikipedia. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 08:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ISO standards added, reference only. -- Namazu-tron ( talk ) 08:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete