Independent Student Movements of Greece: I am unable to identify where the collective subject of the page is discussed sufficiently to meet the GNG.  This part makes up the introduction of the page.  In this section, the article cites to a primary research paper and a master's thesis and then a bunch of primary sources of student organization websites or interviews with organization members about upcoming elections.  Then the article moves to a list of student organizations by section.  I doubt this would pass as a WP:NLIST .  It variously fails to cite specific things about each student organization from primary sources.  It cites at one point the view count from a YouTube video.  The final section is a timeline specific to the "Youth Communist Liberation" organization, not the subject of the page itself.  I want to be clear here, I'm not making an WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP argument here .  I'm saying that the contents of this page don't meet the threshold of encyclopedic, it's just WP:SYNTH style OR and that the purported subject of the page, i.e. the topic of Independent Student Movements of Greece , presently fails collective notability and is dressed up by the OR and does not presently meet WP:N I was in the process of maintenance tagging the article, but combined with the NPOV concerns and the above, I don't presently believe this article is siutable for mainspace.  This page has a history of being draftified.  I'm not opposed to a draftify ATD.  But an approved article should ensure that the contents of the article represent the subject of the article, and that it meets our WP:V , WP:NPOV , and WP:OR policies.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 14:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Author’s explanations: Addressing misunderstandings regarding sources: -Sources 1-2 are indeed research.  - Source 3 is the only available database (at least as far as I am aware of) that covers all years starting from 2004.  - Sources 4-6 are not student websites, these are legitimate (and reasonably popular) Greek news sites!  (See “notability part” for more details).  - Sources 8-9 shows that two very popular outlets (See “notability part”) were discussing about the video that the movement posted.  Source 7 is the video itself, so that the reader can access it.  - Source 10 proves that the YouTube account that is mentioned in source 11 is indeed the official account of the New Democracy student wing, and source 11 proves that its most popular video has 52,000 views at the moment.  (One has to click on “popular” to see it.) - Source 12 shows the election results for that specific department, and it is visible that the movement was labelled as “other right wing”.  - Source 13 shows that the other independent party got media attention for getting the 1 st place in their department elections.  It is a valid news website, not a student website.  - Sources 14 and 15 prove that no elections took place in 2020 and 2021.  I see a “failed verification” near source 6.  That should not be the case; if someone clicks on the screenshots of that website, he/she should be able to see their agenda.  It says “10+1 ΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΜΑΣ”;  there are a couple of screenshots there that mention everything I have included.  The timeline is not about the Youth Communist Liberation!  It only uses their election database because it is the only available source!  The timeline is about the independent movements, like the rest of the article.  Beginner question: Could/Should I add Facebook photos as primary sources about the movements?  That should clear any doubts.  Regarding notability: - There is 1 article from Luben.tv (~1,500,000 monthly users) and 1 article from Neopolis.gr (~760,000 monthly users) about the first movement.  [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luben.tv and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neopolis.gr for membership evidence.] - There was 1 article from neolaia.gr and 1 from e-reportaz.gr about the second movement.  These are legitimate news sites in Greece.  I do not know the exact number of views they have, but other Greek Wikipedia members can confirm that these sites are legitimate.  - There was 1 article from alfavita.gr regarding the third movement.  According to this source, alfavita.gr is one of the most popular news sites in Greece ( https://www.e-tetradio.gr/Article/22316/ta-20-koryfaia-enhmerwtika-site-toy-ellhnikoy-internet ) But in any case, it is definitely a legitimate news site.  - There was 1 article from neolaia.gr about the fourth movement.  All of these articles were written in different years.  Apart from this, pages about other university parties already exist in Wikipedia.  Like this one, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLOCO With the same line of argumentation, shouldn’t the Independent Movements have a page as well?  After all, their performance in the elections is consistently better than that of Bloco, their real impact is higher.  I am not claiming that this article is a super important piece of information, but still, it fills in a gap.  It adds to the knowledge base.  It could be useful for those who are interested in Greek university elections.  Regarding neutrality: - I only listed these 4 specific parties because these are the only ones that have received media attention so far.  (Or at least I am not aware of any others that have received media attention. Feel free to add more to the list.)  I am by no means trying to promote these 4 movements in particular.  - Regarding the potentially most viewed video, I am just stating facts.  The official YouTube account of the New Democracy student wing has no video with more than 52,000 views, while one of the independent parties has a video with 63,000 views.  This is an objective statement, I think.  -Regarding the best result up to date (29.9%), I checked the entire database, and I was not able to find any better result.  If anyone else is aware of a better result, I will be happy to be corrected.  - The database I am using is the one of the communist student wing.  The only reason I am doing it is because there is no other database available though!  As far as I am aware of, this is the only database with detailed results since 2004.  Regarding original research: - The introduction relies on published research.  - The information about each one of the 4 movements comes from reliable media.  - The only “original research” I did was summing “other left”, “other right” and “other” to calculate the total percentage in the Timeline section.  Everything else is documented.  These are my 2 drachmas!  ( I mean… cents!)  I am happy to be corrected, and I am also more than happy to hear suggestions for improvement.  In any case, thanks for taking the time to read the article!  (PS: As the author, my opinion is to KEEP the article.)  ArchidamusIII ( talk ) 16:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I gathered some data about the media I mentioned: According to this source https://www.moneyreview.gr/society/13952/kathimerines-ekdoseis-kai-neolaia-gr-mazi/ ,  neolaia.gr had 1,000,000 monthly visitors and had published more than 110,000 articles in 2021.  According to this source, neolaia.gr has 900,000 monthly visitors and 4,500,000 page views in May 2014.  https://www.advertising.gr/advertising-2/paramedia/rekor-episkepseon-gia-to-neolaia-gr-55244/ Regarding alfavita.gr, this source ranked it 5th in 2020: https://edessaikoskosmos.gr/eidisis/poia-einai-ta-megalytera-eidiseografika-site-se-episkepsimotita-stin-ellada/ I am not claiming that these sources are 100% reliable and that the numbers are 100% accurate, but we are definitely talking about serious media that have an impact in Greece.  There are not student websites, these are serious nationwide media.   (The same applies to Luben.tv and Neopolis.gr as explained earlier.)  ArchidamusIII ( talk ) 21:25, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics , Education ,  and Greece .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 18:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : "While relatively rare" and the fact that they gather less than 10% of the vote isn't notable here.  Could put a brief mention in an article about the political process of Greece, but most of these Movements seem to come and go fairly regularly.  The sourcing is simply confirming their existence at a point in time.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom toweli ( talk ) 14:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete