Women's Premier Soccer League Canada: It fails notability requirements for a football league ( WP:FOOTY/Notability ) I am wordsmyth ( talk ) 15:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  I am wordsmyth ( talk ) 15:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It does appear to be mostly dead.  But it would be a shame to lose the material, which surely does have some relevance to this history of womens' professional soccer in Canada.  I wonder if the material could be distilled down to a paragraph or two and placed in Women's soccer in Canada#Club soccer or Canadian soccer league system#Women .  At the same time, there isn't a page for Project 8, which does seem to be gaining traction, with 3 clubs now announced.  Nfitz ( talk ) 22:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . Passes WP:GNG as there was significant news coverage of the proposed league. Apparently there's a slightly different proposal now being considered (Project 8 / WPSL PRO). We can consider merging with that topic in the future. pburka ( talk ) 12:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Is it slightly different though, User:Pburka . Completely different organization, and the Project 8 league would operate on a higher level than the WPSL proposal. Meanwhile there's nothing precluding WPSL moving ahead with something later. I'm not arguing against - I really don't know what the best option is. Nfitz ( talk ) 20:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm just speculating about the future. But the best option right now is to keep this page since the proposal is notable. pburka ( talk ) 21:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Does WP:FUTURE on product announcements apply here? "Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable."  If all we have is an announcement and reactions to the announcement, even as significant and notable coverage, does that warrant an article? For instance, WPSL PRO, which also has some SIGCOV but few confirmed details, is listed on Women's Premier Soccer League rather than its own article — that seems appropriate. - Socccc ( talk ) 16:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect per Nfitz. Giant Snowman 19:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Defunct or not, the coverage is sufficient to meet WP:GNG . MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep, Merge or Redirect? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 23:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 17:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above passes WP:GNG . Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep