hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Cry of the Justice Bird: Can't find any reviews, not even in PW/Kirkus/Booklist afaict.  Please ping me if coverage can be found.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  03:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  03:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to its author, Jon Haylett .  A preliminary GNews + ProQuest lookthrough uncovered nothing for this 2007 title.  Nominator made the right call in this case.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 20:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  I found only a one sentence mention in an EBSCO resource stating the book won an award - "Jon Haylett's Royal Society of Literature prizewinner Cry of the Justice Bird."  Still no sigcov.  Maybe add that it won the award to Haylett's page?  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 20:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hm, a prize from the Royal Society is the kind of thing that makes me think it should be notable.  ...But actually I think that might be a mistake, and it was one of his short stories that won a prize, per this interview ?  Per the Royal Society site, his short story won in 2005 but I can't find evidence of other wins.  In which case, still no hints of notability.  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 03:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Purple Giraffe: A note in TV Critic alone does not suffice: they write up everything.  An internet search shows that there is no other relevant secondary material available.  Drmies ( talk ) 14:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment An WP:Alternative to deletion would be redirecting this to How I Met Your Mother (season 1)#Episodes (an WP:Anchor could also be created to link directly to the relevant place in the list).  TompaDompa ( talk ) 21:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to How I Met Your Mother (season 1)#ep2 .  References are currently too thin to support an article, but episode titles are reasonable search targets.  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 01:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Naranpanawa Kandegammedda: No reliable source.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Sri Lanka .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Naranpanawa .  Naranpanawa Kandegammedda is in the 1901 census (population 109) and 1911 census (146).  [26] It was one of six villages bracketed together with Naranpanawa in their names.  Also listed under Naranpawa in A gazetteer of the Central Province of Ceylon [27] .  Unable to locate Naranpanawa Kandegammedda on current maps.  The GNS lists it as a separate place, but gives same co-ordinates as Naranpawa.  Name may no longer be in use?  Rupples ( talk ) 17:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] REDIRECT , concur with the points raised by Rupples .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 06:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lisun Institute: Might not be notable.  Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 20:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Philippines .  Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 20:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no reliable ref hits on GSearch, GNews and GNews Archives.  Alternatively, redirect to Liloy#Education per WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Liloy#Education seems like an appropriate WP:ATD .  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 15:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bridgar station: – dlthewave ☎ 03:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation .  – dlthewave ☎ 03:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train : each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is.  Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ishak Mohammed: Three appearances for the Cook Islands national football team .  No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  Full name is "Ishaq Nazeem Mohammed" or some variation thereof.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 12:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per my BEFORE search. Jogurney ( talk ) 17:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I'm not convinced that someone searching 'Ishak Mohammed' will definitely be searching about this footballer, therefore deletion seems like the best route, given GNG is failed.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Granite Bay Hilltop Seventh-day Adventist Church: BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 05:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 05:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Noting that the creator claims on their user page at User:Lets.Custodio to have been WP:PAID to write the article.  This should have gone through AFC rather than being created in mainspace.  Belbury ( talk ) 12:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] They've now removed this claim .  Their explanation of their paid editing is a little confusing.  -- Belbury ( talk ) 15:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe this page no longer needs to be deleted, as in agreement with the client (who paid me to make general contributions to wikipedia, without asking me specifically which page I should contribute to), I will deliver another contribution in its place.  This makes the contribution to the Granite Bay Hilltop Seventh-day Adventist Church page an unpaid contribution.  For this reason, I removed the paid contribution specification from my profile.  Lets.Custodio ( talk ) 17:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry, but you cannot retroactively declare paid editing to no longer be paid.  If the client said "make me 12 Wikipedia articles" and you initially created this article as one of those, going on to say "actually, I'm no longer counting this as one of the 12, which means it isn't paid" is nonsense.  2600:1700:87D3:3460:3183:BC1D:FFEB:CE57 ( talk ) 21:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Routine coverage, non-notable structure not listed in the NRHP.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect to Amazing Facts .  The church, in and of itself, fails specific and general notability criteria.  It's not an unreasonable redirect term to Amazing Facts, but there's no need for a standalone article.  — C.Fred ( talk ) 19:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect to Amazing Facts per C.Fred.  This is one of a series of paid content additions involving some sort of ChatGPT experiment.  See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Lets.Custodio making paid/ChatGPT edits ( permalink ) .  Also note that Commons is discussing deletion of the images as copyvios.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 20:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 10:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect as above.  Mathglot ( talk ) 16:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Maria Sakhinova: I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Everything that came up in my searches were passing mentions in squad lists and match reports ( 2018 , 2021 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Armenia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above or to Armenia women's national football team (it's a little bit more informative with her birth date).  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Northlands Park, Ontario: – dlthewave ☎ 04:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gauthier, Ontario#Northlands Park -- papageno ( talk ) 04:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Double House (manga): The article only relies on primary sources (the own manga volumes).  Xexerss ( talk ) 04:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan .  Xexerss ( talk ) 04:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article fails to meet WP:N, and I was only able to find one non-primary source  about this manga.  Alexcs114 ( talk ) 08:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  Waxworker ( talk ) 08:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nanae Haruno#Works ; does not meet WP:NBOOK / WP:GNG .  Link20XX ( talk ) 00:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Link20XX.  pburka ( talk ) 04:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ryan T. McAllister: Lack of secondary coverage.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The source for section "Schoharie County Judge" says "In unofficial polling, Ryan McAllister of Cobleskill got 9,996 votes to become the next Schoharie County Judge, Surrogate and Family Court Judge."  Judges are not seated through "unofficial polling ".   Trump nominated him to be a judge, but he was rejected by the United States Senate.  Justia site still lists him as a lawyer.  A Google search doesn't bring up much else.  — Maile ( talk ) 22:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to existing Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies per suggestion below.  This makes perfect sense.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is a dearth of secondary coverage and this article will not stand the test of time.  Unless McAllister becomes noteworthy through other career advancements, he is not WP:Notable as defined.  I vote to delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 00:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Same as a failed political candidate, didn't make it to office and notability isn't apparent otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Alternative proposal : Merge all otherwise non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees into a single article along the lines of Unsuccessful Donald Trump judicial nominations .  We can preserve a truncated form of the data in one place, without reaching individual notability concerns.  BD2412 T 21:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think a redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies makes more sense, seeing as there is already a description of the WP:BLP1E for this nominee and the other non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees, along with details about specific dates regarding the nomination process and why the nomination ultimately failed.  As it is, the list of otherwise non-notable judicial nominees for Trump is fairly small and I don't think there is the needed SIGCOV.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for pointing out the existing article.   I've changed my selection/support to the redirect.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Moorabbin Kangaroos Football Club: Searched in gnews, gbooks and Australian search engine Trove.  No significant coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports ,  and Australia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 06:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to Southern Football Netball League#Division 4 .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG .  I couldn't find any sources for the page either.  I'm going to have a look into if other clubs in the same competition are notable, as some of them could probably be PRODed.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 06:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Southern Football Netball League#Division 4 .  Not independently notable based on a lack of SIGCOV.  Frank Anchor 17:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Juan Geerman: Two appearances for the Aruba national football team .  No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No SIGCOV.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sasural Ke Rang Anokhay: — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Angeline_Malik#As_a_director : creator+director - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:TVSeries , broadcasted in Pakistan on Hum TV as Sasural Ke Rang Anokhay and in India on Zee Zindagi as Yeh Sasuraal Bemisaal .  A series broadcasted in 2012 is likely notable as most of the Pakistani newspapers remove that much old coverage.  Libraa2019 ( talk ) 17:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Libraa2019 , Please avoid WP:ATA and provide coverage that you believe is sufficient to meet GNG.  Also - WP:TVSeries is an essay, not even a guideline.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 18:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Its not necessary to reply every comment & editor who oppose your views.  The history at mutiple AFD's indicates that i provide sources and you reject them [21] so please leave some things to others.  Libraa2019 ( talk ) 18:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Libraa2019 , You've consistently voted to keep based on ROTM coverage, Trivial mention as well as unreliable sources, so it's crucial to counter your argument.  And just because an AFD closed in your favor doesn't mean my nomination wasn't legit.  Don't forget, several of my AFDs were closed as deleted despite having keep votes, including yours.So let's set that aside and focus on discussing this AFD.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 18:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No i only voted to Keep which are initiated by you as you copy pasted the same rationale for almost dozens of nomination.  Right now, many AFD's are live [22] but i have not voted Keep because other editors do research before initiated AFD's but i am doubting such research is done at your side or not.  Libraa2019 ( talk ) 19:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
XM Music Lab: Perhaps redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Defunct channels ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Defunct channels , where it is mentioned; this is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable pre-Sirius merger XM channels (if not associated with another notable parent entity).  Its listing there isn't really much less than what's in this article (actually, in a sense, it has a bit more — the list entry notes that it continued as an online channel for two more years after being pulled off the satellites), which is just as well given the lack of separate notability.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as an ATD.  ArcAngel (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect