hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Robert A. Fletcher : It has been tagged as needing more citations since 2007.  It looks as if it was proposed for WP:SPEEDY in 2007, for copyvio and promotionalism, but survived.  The sources I have added are from local papers and I do not think this person meets WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 23:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Visual arts ,  and New York .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 23:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete This article about a Silent Generation US veteran, small business partner, and painter in the industrial and landscape styles was apparently written by his grandson .  That same local obituary claims that his collection of 21 military paintings was "highly acclaimed by the military and government officials", yet I couldn't find any mention of this in reports from the time it happened, or any wider notice of his art outside of these 2 entities.  His art was displayed in his hometown of Warwick, New York , where it was featured in town hall, and where he was name-checked as a member of its art league.  Even if more substantial confirmation of the US Capitol displays can be found, I'm not sure the obit claim, or his few illustrated books, satisfy WP:NARTIST #3 or 4b, or WP:ANYBIO #1 or 2.  Stony Brook babble 12:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Coverage is local from the Warwick Advertiser .   and the Warwick Dispatch (Warwick, NY).  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Newshouse : JoeNMLC ( talk ) 15:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my checking, I found nothing about this news paper, the subject totally fails WP:GNG .  It require multiple in-depth covarage from Independent reliable sources to establish notability.  Grab Up - Talk 16:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : but I find it super funny that it says child appropriate articles.  48JCL ( talk • contribs ) 18:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CarReg UK : KH-1 ( talk ) 00:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation , United Kingdom ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I've fixed the citation issue.  A before search on Google reveals that "CarReg UK" meets the WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV especially within the English world.  Consider keeping this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zazi Culze ( talk • contribs ) 10:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it stands - rests on primary and WP:GUNREL sources.  Google hits are not a measure of notability, please review WP:NCORP - David Gerard ( talk ) 09:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are occasional articles about personalised number plates which quote the company founder, such as those referenced in the present article and this BBC item .  These don't provide the depth of coverage about the company needed for WP:CORPDEPTH ; the most detailed that I can see is a 2021 "London Post" item ("CarReg Private Number Plates Celebrating 33 Years!" - link blocked here) but that is advertorial in tone.  Overall, fails to demonstrate notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 15:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
D-No Entertainment : The sources don't establish the company itself as notable; i.e. they lack significant coverage beyond mere mention.  Now, I note that most of the sources are permanently dead, but from what I could find, there just isn't enough here.  CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!  ⚓ 01:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Companies .  CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!  ⚓ 01:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a relatively briefly active production partnership company.  While some references have become inaccessible online, they appear to have been announcement-based rather than in-depth coverage about this company itself.  Searches find an at-launch piece describing the firm's backers and aspirations [58] but I don't see sufficient coverage to demonstrate that the company attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 12:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Glo music : FMSky ( talk ) 10:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with trap music , which needs some work but is at least fairly well-sourced and comprehensive.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] its not mentioned anywhere in that article (other than the link that the glo music article creator added to the infobox).  -- FMSky ( talk ) 16:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete couldn't find any use of the term in WP:RS.  Probably could be redirected somewhere... - KH-1 ( talk ) 06:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  15:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Seems to be mentioned in Nigerian news sources [1] , [2] , neither one is extensive coverage, but it exists.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yet another sub-sub-sub genre of Chicago house; no significant coverage.  JSFarman ( talk ) 16:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Plant-based Culture Media : Could be merged into culture media or enrichment culture but unclear if topic is notable and deletion may be best.  Mdewman6 ( talk ) 19:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete seems to be a term that is only used in a handful of papers coming out of Nabil Hegazi 's lab (and I'm not sure he's notable either).  The article describes it as "sole use of plant material as a microbial culture media"; the sources discuss preparing culture media by mixing liquified or dried plant material with agar .  While the red algae sources of agar could be considered plants, the cited sources don't seem to be doing so.  The topic appears to be a non-notable form of an enrichment culture.  Plantdrew ( talk ) 22:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Single work-group approach without sufficient coverage.  Incidentally, yes, artfully sidestepping the nature of agar seems a bit of a stretch.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 07:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guy Spigelman : Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 20:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - For future reference, completely unsourced (i.e. not even external links) BLPs should be tagged using {{subst: prod blp }} .  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 07:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a completely unsourced BLP.  I don't have visibility to hebrew sourcing due to not knowing the language, but at least in English I'm not seeing anything notability-establishing based on a cursory search.  Please ping me if further sourcing is found.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 07:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me ) 08:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable, as stated above.  Fails guidelines for biography requirements and has no WP:RS citing.  Kierzek ( talk ) 21:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  We don't do "an" IDF spokesperson unless they otherwise rose to fame.  We only do "the" IDF spokesperson.  gidonb ( talk ) 14:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Y.O.U.N.G : No reliable sources or any successful releases by them upon WP:BEFORE .  Rydex64 ( talk ) 13:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Rydex64 ( talk ) 13:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just looking at the sources, appears to be press/blogs, external links and nothing better.  @T.C.G. [talk] 18:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2020 Myanmar National League statistics : Unnecessary WP:NOTSTATS article.  Excessive listing of stats in addition to 2020 Myanmar National League , which is already significant enough on its own in terms of stats and we do not need any more stats articles on this subject.  This article exhaustively lists every single goal scorer, assist and clean sheet in the entire season, which is too much in my view.  For seasons of other leagues, the agreed standard is to have a separate section of the main season article dedicated to stats and only listing the goal scorers and clean sheets above a sensible cut-off point.  See 2019–20 Premier League#Season statistics and 2019–20 Serie A#Season statistics as model examples of how this should look.  2020 Myanmar National League is fine as it is and this redundant extra stats article can just be deleted as there is no consensus that these are necessary.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Lists ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete same reasons as the 2023 one, and can we delete List of 2022 MNL statistics too?  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that that one is also unnecessary.  I have put a PROD on that one.  It'll need a separate AfD if anyone wants to oppose that one.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOSTATS.  Govvy ( talk ) 13:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of equestrians that competed in more equestrian disciplines : What next?  List of authors who wrote more than one type of book?  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:57, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Olympics .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:57, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-encyclopedic.  This is also like having "List of pool players who play in more than one pool discipline" like eight-ball and nine-ball; and so on.   For many of these sorts of pro and semi-pro competitors, competing in more than one discipline is rather expected.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like trivia to me.  Kante4 ( talk ) 13:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Trivia.  Nigej ( talk ) 06:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yüksel Yılmaz : Also tagged there.  Fails WP:GNG as far as I can tell.  Tehonk ( talk ) 01:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Sportspeople , Philosophy , Politics , Economics , Martial arts ,  and Turkey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am appalled that this article has existed for over a decade without getting deleted.  I can't find any WP:SIGCOV .  Most of the sources in the article are not independent from the subject.  Aintabli ( talk ) 13:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Subject doesn't pass notability guidelines.  Failed WP:AUTHOR .  Yolandagonzales ( talk ) 17:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anchordown : Zim Zala Bim talk 16:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Christianity ,  and Nevada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced and unverifiable.   I couldn't find anything with a cursory web search, save for the usual non-usable primary sources like Bandcamp and Youtube.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 20:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ruby Jagrut : Previous AfDs mentioned sources in Deccan Herald and NIE; these seem to be magazine interviews and not necessarily independent of the subject.  All other sources are about the festival/organisation itself with barely a passing mention.  No evidence of artist inventing any notable work, only a potentially notable organisation.  Article has remained in promotional tone for years, because the only sources on the person are inherently promotional.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 12:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Businesspeople , Women ,  and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I removed the uncited information and random list of links.  Fail WP:ARTIST .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 23:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:ARTIST not met and many promotional additions by SPA with suspicious similar username.  ParadaJulio ( talk ) 10:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV .  No indication of being notable.  scope_creep Talk 16:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Watchara Buranakruea : Only WP:ROUTINE match reports can be found about him (in Thai), so it does not have SIGCOV.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 13:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Thailand .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 13:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- Florentyna ( talk ) 17:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Based on what sources?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Best I can find are trivial mentions in Badminton Thai Today and Nation TV .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Cleary not enough sources nor content to pass GNG.  CycloneYoris talk!  22:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sinkha : BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 21:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Comics and animation ,  and Computing .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 21:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: previous debate (in 2008!) seems to have been an easily delete but article was recreated soon afterwards.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 21:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per last time, and maybe salt.  Johnbod ( talk ) 21:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, let's remove niche projects like Sinkha, it's just useless information wasted on mighty Wikipedia Kaminari ( talk ) 13:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nothing whatsoever wrong with niche projects or useless information, providing they have some sort of secondary sourcing.  This does not seem to be the case, as most of the links seem to be to websites with a COI, and next to none of the material is sourced; all-in-all it's had a good run.  Just being snarky doesn't help that, sadly; do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion?  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 14:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find reviews on Metacritic, and BDtheque in French is user-generated, so of no help.  There are no reviews that I can see.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Utamo : Draftified by User:AntiDionysius as promotional and advertising .   Moved back to article space by its originator.   The text of the article is about what the Saudi government says about the planned resort, not about what third parties have said about it, so that it does not speak for itself .   A check of the references shows that none of them are independent sources .   They are all either publications by the Saudi government, or press releases by the Saudi government to news media, and so it does not satisfy general notability .  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 www.neom.com Announcement of establishment of NEOM No Yes Yes No 2 www.neom.com Announcement of plans for UTAMO in NEOM No Yes Yes No 3 www.arabnews.com Reads like a press release from the Saudi office developing NEOM and UTAMO No, a press release Yes Yes Sort of 4 www.spa.gov.sa.  Saudi Press Agency States that it is a press release No, a press release Yes Yes No The project is probably too soon for independent secondary coverage.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 21:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Saudi Arabia .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 21:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : problem of promotional language remains, and all the sourcing reasons for deletion laid out here make total sense.  I think at this stage it will be difficult to find any source that isn't almost all PR fluff - - AntiDionysius ( talk ) 21:51, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment by nominator: This is the first of four articles about parts of NEOM , a grandiose Saudi commercial, industrial, and recreational development: Utamo Leyja Trojena Oxagon Robert McClenon ( talk ) 07:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability .  And no surprise there, as it doesn't exist yet.  Maproom ( talk ) 18:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete