hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Lerato Mahole: This is from her university and this is from her prep school.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I cannot find a reason for notability.  -- Loewstisch ( talk ) 08:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of countries and dependencies by area in 1989: A very arbitrary article that just picks a certain moment in history.  The year before the fall of communism and as it states in the first sentence "This is a list of countries by area in 1989, providing an overview of the world population before the fall of the Iron Curtain."  There could be plenty of articles about some period in time when borders and land area of nations changed.  Such as the end of European colonization in Africa, Asia, or even earlier when Spain lost it's former territories in Latin America.  Also there is no source for what makes this notable on it's own and we have something based on original research.  All the notes and references listed are the same or if not the same can be or are used in the original article.  I think this also falls under No stats as this is some random information at a random point in time.  WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 17:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 17:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  This seems to be just an idea somebody had, which is explicitly not what Wikipedia is for .  Just Step Sideways from this world .... .  today 19:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is something to look up in the 1989 edition of the World Book , not for a current-day online encyclopedia.  Nate • ( chatter ) 20:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Weird that population is mentioned only in that lead sentence!  —Tamfang ( talk ) 20:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Falls within the existing List of sovereign states in the 1980s , and I don't think we want to expand that article series to individual years and intersect that with area.  CMD ( talk ) 07:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There is also the population equivalent List of countries by population in 1989 .  TompaDompa ( talk ) 13:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think this could be encyclopaedic, we just need some evidence that it's not WP:OR .  The year isn't arbitrary.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  There really is not much of a point in including lists of past states and countries by size from arbitrarily-picked years.  ArkHyena ( talk ) 21:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above and WP:TNT .  This list is bordering , pardon the pun, on arbitrary and capricious .  I can't believe someone went through all this work.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alan Read (activist): The sources are all primary and mostly not significant coverage.  The obituary cited is by the organisation he was involved in so it's not independent.  Article worked on by an editor with same surname.  LibStar ( talk ) 13:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Environment ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No notable information.  A similar article could be written about just about anyone.  Athel cb ( talk ) 14:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 16:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LeverX: Sourced to lists of system integrators, SAP vendors, and trivial coverage of the company moving to Miami.  ~ A412 talk!  19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software , California ,  and Florida .  ~ A412 talk!  19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Good coverage from editorial staff from editions of the American City Business Journals .  Needs cleanup, for sure.  TLA (talk) 04:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "Good coverage" is not a criteria for establishing notability and the reference from American City Business Journals is a profile provided by the company.  Hard to miss as it even says it is "in their own words".  Fails ORGIND.  HighKing ++ 21:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Google and ProQuest search results are routine coverage (moving headquarters, press releases, etc.).  American City Business Journals is local coverage so fails WP:AUD and all I found what routine anyway.  S0091 ( talk ) 17:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  While I appreciated the information about this company when I stumbled upon them months ago in course of my professional work, searching for sources and references I cannot get past the thought that it is just another software company.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 04:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 21:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dimitris Rizos (architect): Generally, the online sources did not pass WP:GNG as an notable person and/or as an architect.  There is minimal independent press coverage for his work.  Chiserc ( talk ) 17:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Architecture ,  and Greece .  Chiserc ( talk ) 17:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No in-depth coverage by reliable sources.  BTW the Greek WP article on him has been deleted for lacking notability ( see discussion [in Greek]; the present article el:Δημήτρης Ρίζος [Dimitris Rizos] refers to another person by the same name, a former Greek MP).  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 18:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Double Hope Films: I tried to source it myself before bringing it here but came up with nothing.  Does not satisfy WP:NCORP or WP:GNG .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 11:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Companies ,  and United States of America .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 11:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I checked the company for adding news article as well.  and i would like to say that it does not have any good amount of coverage about itself just trivial mentionings it fails - WP:NCORP and WP:GNG - Syed Sadique Hussain ( talk ) 11:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prem Kumar Rai: Onel 5969 TT me 13:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nepal .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] At least this nomination has led to me learning something about the government of Nepal.  It seems that "Home Secretary" is a civil service position in that country, rather than the senior cabinet role that goes under that name in some others, such as the UK.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 09:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE show no IS RS with SIGCOV.  Subject is listed on government websites, but nothing IS.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 07:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Crazy Bus (video game): 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 19:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Venezuela .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Feels like it ought to be notable, but alas.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 20:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:GNG .  One of the few prominent video games developed in Venezuela.  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 22:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are no sources that count towards notability in the article so please elaborate where the sources that prove it is "prominent" are.  Otherwise this is a WP:LOCALFAME argument.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don’t see this being prominent as a game developed in Venezuela, it was supposedly someone’s coding demo project that was compiled and packaged in a Sega Genesis cartridge.  This would change if it was covered by a reliable source though.  𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 23:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This game doesn't seem notable at all; I am open to being proven wrong but I cannot see any viable sources in the article that count towards GNG.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's also a Nintendo Switch game with the same name, I don't see coverage of this game.  The one RS per Source Highlighter (Source 5) is but a brief mention.  I don't see coverage for this game we'd use for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Felt obligated to at least point to this source by GamesRadar+ .  It doesn't cover WP:GNG / WP:SIGCOV / WP:THREE but I thought I should mention this anyhow for documentation purposes.  I did also see a Giant Bomb review for the game but I don't think it was made by one of the editorial staff, but I'll mention it anyways.  Captain Galaxy 15:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you link to the review?  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 21:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it's this one .  Skyshifter talk 00:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Obvious user review Geschichte ( talk ) 09:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Although the article has a Giant Bomb review (as mentioned by CaptainGalaxy and sourced by Skyshifter), and a Game music of the day mention at GamesRadar+, The article does not seem to meet neither WP:GNG nor WP:THREE .  MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk ) 06:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ByteDefender: The references are just how-to-guides from malware-removal companies, which will presumably publish such guides for every bit of malware to come to their attention, but this seems very run-of-the-mill to me.  Yes, this is an indictment of society, but it is what it is.  * Pppery * it has begun... 14:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 16:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to suggest this particular malware is notable.  Just some articles about how to remove it and forum mentions.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Polarities of Democracy: No evidence of wp:notability.    Appears to be a neologism created by one person (Benet) and all of the real coverage in the sources  is him and his institute.  Tagged by others  for source issues since December 2023.  North8000 ( talk ) 00:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 16:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Georgi Damyanov (footballer): I, instead, found hits about namesakes in basketball and judo.  The only coverage that I found for this footballer in Bulgarian searches was weak; a passing mention in Blitz and two mentions in TV Shumen , a match report.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is a Bulgarian version of the article, but it adds nothing of value.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 12:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Farid Mammadov (state official): Sura Shukurlu ( talk ) 15:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unless he performed at Eurovision [8] , which I don't think he did, there is no coverage of this individual.  Primary sourcing is used for the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : In Azerbaijan, he is the head of the subsidiary institution within the main institution, and this does not make him encyclopedic.  Also there are almost no references and sources.  Redivy ( talk ) 20:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom and Oaktree.  GNG not met.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023–24 CD Alcoyano season: Not playing in professional division, does not appear to meet WP:SIGCOV under WP:GNG , not being regularly maintained Crowsus ( talk ) 20:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Spain .  Crowsus ( talk ) 20:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  A single file summarizing the CD Alcoyano seasons is enough.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I respect that semi-pro seasons can sometimes be notable but I'm struggling to see how this would be one of the rare few.  As above, a line or two about the season at CD Alcoyano would be more than sufficient.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSEASONS .  Govvy ( talk ) 19:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a potentially viable article, but does not currently pass GNG on its face.  Can be draftified and improved if anyone wants to.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bubang Techron Co.: only source in article is completely unrelated to the subject (and looks like spam).  search brings up databases.  ltb d l ( talk ) 07:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and South Korea .  ltb d l ( talk ) 07:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : could not find anything on Google or Scholar beyond WP:ORGTRIV .  — Matrix(!) { user - talk?  - useless contributions } 13:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kylie Kofoed: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Idaho .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  Article fails WP:GNG and both references in the article are passing mentions.  After a quick search, a couple of results for her and her image pop up but the rest were different people with the same name.  In other words, there's a severe lack of coverage.  IncompA 03:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : i haven't waded into beauty pageant AFDs in a few years, but i will note she wasn't just a contestant, she was a winner, she was Miss Idaho 2010.    I'd redirect there as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Sandison if there's not enough to keep. -- Milowent • has spoken 17:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree with the above.  Fails WP:GNG Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 08:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bathroom remodeling: One source is a how-to article, another is an "idea" article, and another is about trends in bathroom remodeling.  WP:NOTHOWTO ‍ ‍ Helloheart ‍ ‍ 03:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Violates WP:NOTHOWTO .  Safiel ( talk ) 03:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agreed, violates NOTHOWTO.  Don't see how we can write an article on this subject without doing so either.  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As WP:NOTHOWTO .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:NOTHOWTO , and culturally blinkered, without any recognition of that bias.  What about places where remodelling the bathroom starts with digging a new septic pit?  Not encyclopedically neutral.  Delete as per WP:NOTHOWTO .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 11:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Safiel, MaxnaCarta, Hey man im josh, and Suonii180.  Wikipedia is not the place for how-to guides.  Liamyangll ( talk to me! ) 01:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete