hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Human Age: The sourcelist is comprised of the browser game's site and other host sites with no reliable secondary sources or evidence of actual commentary on the game.  Lack of publisher information and the potential for WP:NONENG sources to be out there makes it difficult to find anything on this title for a WP:BEFORE .  Thanks in advance for your help.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 04:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 04:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Oh joy, they really picked a fantastic name to search for without other stuff popping up.  Honestly, this is WP:TNT regardless of whether it is notable.  There isn't a single reliable source.  If the game is notable, it needs to be rewritten and go through AfC.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 05:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: It should probably be disambiguated immediately afterwards, as things like Anthropocene and Ages of Man are also equivalent primary topics for this term.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 12:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  A disambiguation page would be useful but it would need to be created separately at Human age .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 21:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Weak River (disambiguation): Weak River has a hatnote directing to Ruo Shui .  Leschnei ( talk ) 21:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Leschnei ( talk ) 21:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - unnecessary per nominator's comment - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 16:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and add hatnote on Ruo Shui pointing to Weak River (mythology) .  Folly Mox ( talk ) 16:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stress (card game): The online source cited is not a WP:RS nor are the others that I could find which look like circular references.  Unless we can find RS to support the article, it should be considered for deletion.  Bermicourt ( talk ) 09:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I looked into sources for this when rewriting the rules a few years ago and couldn't find any strong ones.  -- Belbury ( talk ) 09:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
.CSO: Needless to say, I am not  convinced this file type is notable.  It appears to be one of those "fly under the radar" type articles due to its sheer obscurity.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Computing .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - nowhere near meeting the WP:GNG .  This is an extremely niche tech subject that simply has not, and will not, ever receive mainstream coverage.  Sergecross73 msg me 14:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Some talk of the format on Microsoft forums, but nothing else we can use for sourcing.  Nothing found otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christian Connections for International Health: It is known that notability is not inherited , and just because notable organisations are connected to this one, it doesn't mean this organisation is notable.  Hence due to a lack of reliable sources, this fails WP:NCORP and the general notability guideline .  — Matrix(!) ( a good person! ) [ Citation not needed at all; thank you very much ] 11:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Religion ,  and United States of America .  — Matrix(!) ( a good person! ) [ Citation not needed at all; thank you very much ] 11:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Christianity , Medicine ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  I also tried Google Books, but can still only find passing mentions.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or move to draft give it a time, it could be well sourced. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 20:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:COPYVIO , WP:SPAM , WP:SOAP , and WP:SIGCOV .  In my mind a copyright violation is an automatic delete, period, but we need to address additional issues.  It reeks of spam and soapboxing.  There are no secondary sources.  Draftifying it won't resolve these issues.  Bearian ( talk ) 16:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bally Haly Golf & Curling Club: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports , Golf ,  and Canada .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muzi Dlamini: No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per my BEFORE search.  There is a lot of routine coverage like this match report , and the best thing I found was an Times of Eswatini article that primarily consists of Q&A with the subject (and lacks secondary coverage).  Additionally, I reviewed the sources identified in the 2015 AfD and don't believe any of them constitute SIGCOV as they are routine, don't cover the subject directly, or don't go into sufficient detail (three sentences doesn't cut it).  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dermot FitzGerald: NewspaperArchive.com and Newspapers.com turned up zero results, while ProQuest turned up an unrelated real estate agent, soccer player, and photographer.  Seems to be an obituary, likely written by a family member or friend.  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  17:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  17:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Unsourced, and the name in Ireland is about as common as Smith is elsewhere.  Anyone and everyone pops up in a search.  No sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG .  A search for sources to support the main "claims to fame" (Involved in diving? Partner at PWC? Liquidator of a company that was a defendant in a court case? Associated with an assisted living facility?) do not return anything substantive.  The subject is barely mentioned in relation to the court case for example.  Far far below a SIGCOV threshold.  And I can find nothing at all in relation to diving or elder charities.  About the only thing that might contribute to notability is the claimed entry in Who's Who in Ireland: The Influential 1000 .  However, while I don't have a copy or immediate access to one, this work is billed as a "directory".  And, at barely 230 pages and seemingly containing 1000 entries (averaging perhaps 5 entries per page), it seems unlikely that it contains more than a few lines on the subject.  The WP:NOTGENEALOGY , WP:NOTADVOCACY and apparent WP:COI overtones (associated with the article's creation) do little to help.  Am frankly kinda surprised this article has not been deleted before now...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, Fails WP:GNG .  Spleodrach ( talk ) 08:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tamara McKay: Only 3 sources cited on the page: Ballotpedia, the state party's own website, and a candidate Q&A from when she ran for state senate.  I can't find anything much better than that on Google.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 23:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women ,  and Hawaii .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - BLP which fails GNG, NPOL.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Failed election candidate with no significant coverage to demonstrate notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 14:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No WP:SIGCOV outside of her election to the Hawaii state GOP chair.  Though that leaves me curious; is there any in-depth discussion or guidelines about the notability of state party chairs?  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Safiétou Kolga: I found some quotes here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Basketball ,  and Ivory Coast .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 21:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gwynn Valley: Meteorname ( talk ) 16:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  Meteorname ( talk ) 16:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I could not find any sources online other than the camps own social media and website.  Appears to be an advertising page.  GeorgieL ( talk ) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I've tried to find sources too, but no luck.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 19:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I've tried to find sources too, but no luck.  Delete - None of the sources showed any kind of notability.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of watermills in the United States .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 15:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Favi: The sources available are not independent and thus this individual does not meet the general notability guidelines .  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 09:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 09:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  Doesn't pass GNG either also not notable singer.  Doesn't have independent sources.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 23:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Note that draft articles for this singer have already been rejected three times due to attempted promotion (see here ), while someone created the mainspace version here anyway.  Upon reading the sources, I suggest that young Favi break all ties with his attention-hungry manager OVO.  Said manager has gotten announcements about Favi's songs all over the Nigerian gossip media, but those sources are entirely unreliable sites that repeat promo announcements.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications.   Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk ) 00:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , Good day Editors, I consider everyone here as unbiased Wikipedia editors I understand Favi was listed on Articles for deletion but the article was not written on any personal connection.  In fact, Favi has been featured in multiple news, newspapers, and magazine publications that meet up with Nigerian Wikipedia standards for notability and importance or are we forgetting what WP:NGRS [1] said for Nigerian sources all the citations used were all following Guidelines for Nigerian notability and many of these newspapers featured him because he is among the pioneers of Afro-trap in Nigeria anyone can make research on that.  That said I do not see any reason the article should be deleted if it meets up with Wikipedia standards for notability according to WP:NGRS.  Regards Digitalageohio ( talk ) 07:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Nigeria/Nigerian_sources The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muni Mohjit Vijayji: Only one in-depth reference – a 2003 press article in the Gujarati language (a copyvio scan is on Commons ); all the remaining references are at best passing mentions of the subject.  The disciples / religious community he left behind doesn't appear too numerous or active, either, at least judging from its Facebook page .  All in all, this looks like one of a myriad of gurus found across India at any time who preach to their small following; and not a person with an encyclopaedic notability.  — kashmīrī TALK 20:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and India .  — kashmīrī TALK 20:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Poor and unreliable sources.  One or two reliable source do not have coverage to warrant notability.  Sources that cover younger generation or an IITian who gave up their career for Jain vow of renunciation does not help either.  The religious figure is minor to unknown even in media and simple search on Google.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, Soft Deletion is not an option here due to a previous AFD on this article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments .  The sourcing is all over the place - some good, some terrible.  It's almost enough for WP:TNT .  Bearian ( talk ) 23:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Based on my checking, I found nothing but unreliable sources and some reliable ones that lack the in-depth coverage needed to establish notability.  The subject fails to meet WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 16:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Volkswagen Golf Variant: OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Transportation .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - just a bodystyle of the Golf, doesn't really even need a redirect.  100% duplicate material and nothing that doesn't fit better in the generational Golf entries.  Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I didn’t even know this article existed.  Best to redirect it to the Volkswagen Golf article.  750h+ | Talk 03:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] By that logic we should also create and redirect Ford Escort (Europe) estate and Toyota Camry estate to their respective models?  This model wasn't notable for anything so therefore I see no reason why a redirect needs to exist? ....  – Davey 2010 Talk 00:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Redirect.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no need for a redirect, or we would set ourselves up for redirects for every single bodystyle ever created of every car out there.  Mr.choppers | ✎ 17:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Evangeline Wiles: BD2412 T 20:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 20:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Technology ,  and Nigeria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can only find press releases saying she's running this panel or other.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Speaker at xyz event, is about all there is for coverage about this person.  One line stub that we can delete.  Vaguely PROMO, not enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subject lacks GNG as most of the sources available online are just press releases, not enough to establish notability.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Having a single source violates both WP:OR and WP:SIGCOV , thus violates WP:BLP .  Bearian ( talk ) 18:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tasty 168: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Canada .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete