hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Michael Kovach: Plus, Anime News Network is a situational source (see WP:ANIMENEWSNETWORK ), so it probably shouldn't be referenced here.  I propose restoring this page back to this revision , where it was a redirect.  Jurta talk 19:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Ohio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  In this case, I support the OP's decision to return this to a redirect.  So, the page doesn't need to be deleted, just changed to a redirect to List of Hazbin Hotel and Helluva Boss characters#Hazbin Hotel .  I just don't see enough sources to support Kovach getting a page currently.  Perhaps one day there will be sources, but tweets are most of the sources.  While links to the notoriously unreliable ANN Enyclopedia like this and this , don't fly, I'd say Behind the Voice Actors is good, as are the articles in ANN and Animation World Network , but they are NOT enough to justify this being a page.  The same can be said for sources like this , this , and this .  It should be a redirect instead.  Historyday01 ( talk ) 20:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : restore to redirect per nom.  // Timothy :: talk 10:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
A Teenager's Dream: Why Do Fools Fall in Love: Merge to Jimmy Merchant (as it is a memoir)?  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with the nom; there doesn't seem to be any critical notice of this book.  No reviews, no mentions in RS (or any media), other than what's given in the article.  Sourcing used are sales listings and one media item that talks about it; neither of which helps notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair enough.  Inajd Inajd0101 ( talk ) 02:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I don't know what to say, but if it isn't notable enough.  I guess it is MOST LIKELY to be deleted.  However, I added some secondary source for the article but I don't know if that's enough.  Inajd Inajd0101 ( talk ) 02:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect per Cunard: Fails NBOOK, found nothing on ProQuest/Google.  At first glance, the tremg.info source added by Inajd0101 doesn't seem reliable.  Other sources on article are not independent or are customer review sites.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  02:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Changed to redirect ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  18:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jimmy Merchant , the author, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  I did not find significant coverage about the book in my searches for sources.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 08:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Oaktree b ( talk · contribs ), Inajd0101 ( talk · contribs ), and ARandomName123 ( talk · contribs ), would you support a redirect to Jimmy Merchant per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion ?  PARAKANYAA suggested a merge in the AfD nomination.  Cunard ( talk ) 08:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Cunard : Yes, a redirect would be fine.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  18:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jimmy Merchant : I believe that his memoir should be redirected since there are no secondary source that leads to notability when it comes to its own article, which is fair enough unfortunately.  Inajd Inajd0101 ( talk ) 12:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gema Zúñiga: The subject has appeared for the Nicaragua women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Nicaragua .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 10:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep since subject has appeared in their national team and played in the country's top division.  These attributes alone give her a pass even though WP:GNG might not be easily met.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 11:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ The Gnome : Note that NFOOTY is no longer in use as of 2022.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Invoked WP:FOOTYN .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 18:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers - WP:FOOTYN is an essay and has no official standing.  In fact, this is a direct quote from FOOTYN: The player section of this notability guidance has been superseded by WP:Notability (sports), and is included below for information only as a record of the previous guidance that the Footy project came up with.  The guideline that supersedes FOOTYN is WP:NSPORT , relevant section being WP:SPORTBASIC which requires... significant coverage, that is, multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject .  Zúñiga does not have significant coverage and nobody is arguing that she does.  Redirect.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as above Yoblyblob ( talk ) 14:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , per lack of meeting GNG and SPORTSBASIC.  Essays have zero weight here.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).   No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Genuitec: ~ T P W 14:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  ~ T P W 14:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to MyEclipse as WP:ATD-R , which has a bit of coverage of the company, and seems to be the only related topic that may be notable.  — siro χ o 02:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Rascals (producers): This should probably be redirected to Leon Thomas III since his article mentions the group multiple times and includes all the same credits.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 10:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 10:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Leon Thomas III .  It turns out that the duo was nominated from a Grammy Award ( [18] ), though that seems not to have generated significant media coverage.  I agree with the nominator that most of their media mentions are in articles about Leon Thomas, while his partner Khris Riddick-Tynes seems not to have done much outside of the partnership.  It can all be described at Thomas's article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I had a feeling they would have a Grammy nod given the popularity of the artists they work with, but Grammy.com's search function broke recently so I couldn't find it there.  Saw that article, but I must've missed the words "Grammy-nominated" in it.  Thanks for the catch.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 13:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 12:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Leon Thomas III : I could have said merge but there is not much to merge.  The article is majorly sourced from All Music that doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Paani Puri (TV series): Donald D23 talk to me 21:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non notable TV series.  It also does not meet WP:GNG .  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 00:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per two sources: [1] and [2] .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 18:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Would not be shocked if it's kept but what about a redirect to Star One (Indian TV channel)#Comedy series ? - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , can't see how it would meet WP:NTV.  — kashmīrī TALK 16:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please evaluate new sources and consider Redirect option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , as nominator I support a redirect as detailed above.  Donald D23 talk to me 23:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Despite the addition of new sources, it still falls short in establishing notability.  Also, it's worth noting that WP:NTV is more of an essay and not an official English Wikipedia notability guideline.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , although previously voted keep, rather than delete I feel a redirect would be better as proposed above.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 06:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Valore (company): Nik ol ai h ☎️ 📖 19:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Education , Websites ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge content as appropriate to wiki pages of acquiring companies.  Frigyes06 ( talk ) 22:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All but one source are primary and/or not independent of the company.  A single secondary sources does not constitute significant coverage .  Nothing to merge except one source.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Cited sources include press releases and no WP:RS that demonstrate SIGCOV.  Formatting is poor.  PD Slessor ( talk ) 00:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Follett Corporation#Acquisitions , the company which now owns Valore and where it's already mentioned, if notability cannot be established.  Sources in the article don't show notability under WP:SIRS criteria.  There's a bit on the company here: [3] but otherwise I've found only press releases etc.  Rupples ( talk ) 09:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
S/2019 S 18: See this precedent as well.  🎄Cremastra 🎄 ( talk ) 13:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : most of the information is listed on the table at Moons of Saturn#Confirmed .  Praemonitus ( talk ) 14:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are about 10 of these articles, so maybe we could deal with them together.  Andre 🚐 07:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Is that the only one or more?  Since I found some notability to some 63 new moons of Saturn on this website: [2] Ladesh88 ( talk ) 08:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I also said this here Ladesh88 ( talk ) 09:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] At this point, the moons S/2004 S 21 , S/2004 S 28 , S/2004 S 31 , S/2004 S 36 , S/2004 S 37 and S/2004 S 39 should be deleted as well.  They're not notable, yet have their own articles.  Ladesh88 ( talk ) 13:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Moons_of_Saturn#Confirmed : until it is independently notable.  Owen× ☎ 14:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Moons of Saturn#Confirmed per Praemonitus.  Double sharp ( talk ) 16:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Moons of Saturn#Confirmed until it becomes notable or an article that takes all the minor moons of Saturn appears.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Maesycwmmer F.C.: SlimyGecko7 ( talk ) 10:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football ,  and Wales .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Maesycwmmer .  Giant Snowman 19:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  The team is mentioned at the target page.  Geschichte ( talk ) 17:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1278 and 1530 AM West Yorkshire: The article is about "1278 and 1530 AM West Yorkshire was a temporary name used for the AM sister station of The Pulse of West Yorkshire", the "The Pulse of West Yorkshire" redirects to "Pulse 1".  This might be a redirect to Pulse 1 or 2 if there is a consensus.  Temporary names of ORGs do not merit stand alone articles and are not encyclopedic content.  There is no sourced mateial in the article that could be merged.  // Timothy :: talk 02:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : Merge with Pulse 2.  Rillington ( talk ) 09:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No objection to Merge if sources can be found for the content to be merged; unsourced content cannot be merged into other articles without violating WP:V which is policy.  Right now the only source in the article is an air check, merged material needs to be properly sourced and pass V. Without sources for the merge, it should just be be redirected.  // Timothy :: talk 11:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I found a source about the 1997 changeover from the closing GYG to GWR's service, though no provisional brand is ever mentioned.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 18:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd still suggest that you add the source so that, if the article is merged rather than redirected, the source can be included in the Pulse 2 article.  Rillington ( talk ) 15:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Rillington I added the source to Pulse 2 itself.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 00:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pulse 2 .  Like Sammi Brie, I can't find any reference/source for this specific name having been used, which means a merge wouldn't be viable.  Fails WP:GNG per nom.  Flip Format ( talk ) 17:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A local radio station on air as a one-month temporary fill-in station would, at best, struggle to get anywhere near passing the Wikipedia notability test no matter how many independent references were located.  Given that User:Sammi Brie and Flip Format have both reported that they have been unable to find any independent references, I am happy to change my vote from Merge to Redirect .  Rillington ( talk ) 23:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pulse 2 , its successor.  Fails WP:BCAST in its own right.  Some of the stuff can be included in the target article.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 06:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Earl Cole: However, I am concerned that he's notable for only winning that Survivor season, not businesses that he established, endowments he made, appearances in other TV shows, or any other.  Sources verifying (existences of) this person's businesses, including one about his appearance in Shark Tank , seem to be promoting the businesses, which is against WP:NOTPROMO policy and WP:SPIP , but I could be wrong.  The sources also briefly mention him only as a founder of one of businesses rather than significantly cover the founder and Survivor winner himself.  Unsure whether producers' re-inviting him makes him notable as well; I doubt it.  In summary, violates WP:BLP1E , and should be redirected to Survivor: Fiji .  George Ho ( talk ) 07:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Television ,  and Kansas .  George Ho ( talk ) 07:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nom's expanded comment - Almost forgot: being the first African-American male to win Survivor may not be sufficient to save this article (from being redirected, deleted, or whichever else) after all.  George Ho ( talk ) 07:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nominator brought good point in expanded comm.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 23:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It contains material that is written like an advertisement.  Wikipedia is not a promo site too.  CastJared ( talk ) 08:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
J. T. Thomas (Survivor contestant): To be known for how his gameplays led to his elimination in two subsequent seasons is potentially borderline violation of WP:BLP , IMO, especially without reliable third-party sources verifying his notability outside his Tocantins win.  Even using the primary source CBS to verify his "notability" for making a "dumbest move" on Heroes vs. Villains is discouraged by WP:GNG .  In the article's current state, the whole biography consists of his Survivor gameplays.  There might have been sources about his past romantic relationships, but such inclusion would go beyond limits of WP:BLPGOSSIP .  George Ho ( talk ) 04:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Television ,  and Alabama .  George Ho ( talk ) 04:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list of contestants seems fine, not much coverage outside of Survivor and even with that's there, it's minimal coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hmm...  Why not redirect to Survivor: Tocantins , the season that he won?  -- George Ho ( talk ) 17:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect