hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
1950 Philippine Air Lines DC-3 disappearance: I quote: "This would be peculiar due to the lack of info, with only airframe records mostly available. Currently I have not been able to find more info on the flight itself."  I have been unable to find any coverage at all in secondary sources; all sourcing in the article is from databases.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Transportation ,  and Philippines .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per notability issues.  Although an unfortunate incident, the disappearance does not show any notability outside the event itself.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Meshal Al-Hamdan: Best sources appear to be a squad listing in Alyaum and a youth camp call up announcement in Sport KSA .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Capture of Kanchangarh: The ongoing issue with poorly documented Indian 'Wars,' 'Sieges,' 'Battles,' and 'Captures' articles needs to be thoroughly reviewed.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 08:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Karnataka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:SYNTH .  3 sources.  One is unreliable publisher Xlibris.  I cannot verify the source by M.P. Mujeebu Rehman and the last is not written by Abdul Khader but uploaded by him but has no coverage on the Capture significant enough to warrant a full fledged page.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as Indian battlebollox.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gloria Balamus: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  IncompA 02:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guillermo Rishchynski: Ambassadors are not inherently notable.  Article based solely on primary sources.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Canada .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Panama-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Full Throttle Theatre Company: No significant coverage found in gbooks or Australian search engine Trove.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre , Companies ,  and Australia .  Kpg jhp jm 06:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No national coverage.   See WP:MILL .  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 16:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elliot Omose: While several of the sources cited are primary sources the others only gave a passing mention of the subject.  See the primary sources: [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] .  This source does not mention the subject at all [44] These sources only gave passing mention to the subject [45] [46] This here [47] is interview and does not count for notability.  Noneate ( talk ) 07:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Nigeria ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the comprehensive analysis of the nominator.  Have done before search to determine if there are sources that could improve the notability of the subject but the result returned negative.  Almost all sources cited in the article are primary to the subject or their close affiliates.  Cray04 ( talk ) 16:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Business Day is the only reliable source there.  Sadly, the article is a press release that cannot establish notability.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 09:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Liechtensteiner films of 2014: No sources, just a IMDb external link which is useless.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Lists , Europe ,  and Liechtenstein .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this entry stems from a "need" to make set of lists about everything, even when the country has not spawned enough items for a list.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hardly a list at all, without any sources to boot.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kazu Shigenobu: Joeykai ( talk ) 04:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails notability guidelines as per WP:SPORTCRIT .  Only one of the three references in the article is not from a database, and even then, not much detail is given in this source about the subject and it is on the website of the team the subject plays for.  Redtree21 ( talk ) 06:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:SIGCOV and approaches failing WP:SPORTBASIC .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Feng (program): Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  It also might be possible WP:COPYVIO , but I'm not sure.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nom.The server doesn't seem to be used much and has no impact in the multimedia streaming field.  killer bee 12:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:45, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nomination.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Automated bid managers: This article isn't needed.  Zim Zala Bim talk 14:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeffrey Revell-Reade: Only known for his fraud so WP:BLP1E applies.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Crime , England ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:ONEEVENT .  He and his accomplice committed fraud.  Both were convicted and went to prison.  There's not anything else to this article, except how much his house cost.   There are only three sentences in the article.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  TarnishedPath talk 04:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dario Seixas: Fails WP:MUSICBI and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Brazil .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as they don't seem to meet the notability criteria, and it's doubtful that that will change anytime soon (given that they've had a page tagged with the issue since 2010) Mason ( talk ) 19:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article fails WP:GNG , WP:MUSIC , and since the article's been tagged for notability since May 2010, that's unlikely to change.  IncompA 20:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nayef Al-Rodhan: The subject does not appear to meet the criteria for WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR .  The page is a lengthy promotion for the subject and the main contributors to the page (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Globjulia ) have engaged in WP:REFSPAMming to promote the subject across Wikipedia.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 23:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politics , Medicine ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:AUTHOR .  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 15:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Did you check Scholar before nominating?  he's well cited in both philosophy and neuroscience so he meets WP:PROF .  He also meets WP:NAUTHOR for his book "Meta-Geopolitics of Outer Space" which appears to have several reviews.  - car chasm ( talk ) 15:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] These are not significant citation counts given that Al-Rodhan has spammed his publications into the lead of a vast number of Wikipedia articles where they remained for more than a decade.  For example, his most-cited work, "Definitions of globalization: A comprehensive overview and a proposed definition" is a self-published manuscript that he WP:REFSPAMmed into prominent places of Wikipedia articles, such as the first sentence of the Wikipedia article on Globalization [49] where lazy academics found it and cited it for a definition of globalization.  It's a bizarre version of WP:CITOGENESIS where the academic places his non-notable research prominently into Wikipedia articles, academics find it on Wikipedia and lazily cite it for basic terms, and the citations themselves become an indication that the subject is actually notable.  As for the reviews of his book, I could only find one in Space Policy , which says "this is a somewhat curious book: it claims to look at space power in a new way, but doesn't clearly produce any new insights".  [50] Thenightaway ( talk ) 16:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 00:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aruzhan Abdrazak: Seems non-notable Charsaddian ( talk ) 11:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Sports .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 11:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 11:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 11:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nom.  Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject and does not meet criteria for WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSPERSON .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 11:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Event cascade: Couldn't find sources using the term in the programming sense used here.  Doesn't seem notable.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 01:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 01:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - From a quick search, I found [29] which has several paragraphs on "event cascade" from Martin Fowler which might pass muster by WP:EXPERTSPS , but nothing else.  ~ A412 talk!  01:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to event-driven programming .  I also found a mention [30] in a textbook, but it doesn't amount to more than a definition.  ~ A412 talk!  01:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete what even is there to merge?  the entire article is three sentences long, and doesn't have any sources.  -- Licks-rocks ( talk ) 13:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : These unsourced permastubs are not needed, if no one has updated the article in 20 yrs, I don't know what we're expected to do with it.  Delete and it can be properly re-created if interested.  I don't see usage of the term other than simple name drops or DICDEF.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Beyond Records (Norway): Geschichte ( talk ) 11:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and Norway .  Owen× ☎ 12:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - this record label didn't last long, but it certainly did field a roster of noteworthy artists, some of which charted substantially in Norway.  Can we get someone who has facility with Norwegian to look for in-language literature?  My instinct is to default to a weak keep here as the label seems close to meeting WP:MUSIC 's sense of one of the more important indies.  Chubbles ( talk ) 22:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment ; WP:MUSIC is not a guideline for labels Geschichte ( talk ) 19:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, I don't see why we would reject subject-specific material in a guideline, and it certainly makes more sense for music experts to be assessing label notability than corporation experts.  I actually proposed a set of guidelines at WP:MUSIC for labels a few years back; I should probably resurrect that conversation.  Chubbles ( talk ) 02:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's something you ought to address in relevant talk pages or Village Pump.  Graywalls ( talk ) 08:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP without significant coverage in multiple, completely independent, reliable sources of broad audience interest.  I agree with OwenX Geschichte that NMUSIC is not applicable here simply because the institution/organization/company is of music related field.  Graywalls ( talk ) 13:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I merely added the discussion to a few deletion sorting lists.  I don't have strong feelings about the article either way.  Owen× ☎ 14:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I attributed to wrong user.  Disregard.  Graywalls ( talk ) 23:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Happy to share that I found one good source .  That's not enough for a keep.  It should also be noted that article is extremely short.  Leaning delete for now.  If someone finds another good source, ping me. gidonb ( talk ) 02:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Now that we have one good source, I checked options for merger.  There is an American group this is somewhat affiliated with, known as Beyond Collective or as Beyond the Music.  We have Beyond Music and that is something else.  As is the UK music label.  Without a merge target this should default to delete.  gidonb ( talk ) 01:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete