hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Social-liberal conservatism: I'm only seeing passing mentions with a before search and the references in the article.  Just i yaya 01:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Just i yaya 01:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support - The sources so far are abysmal.  Additionally, the article was created by copying a declined draft and putting it into article space.  ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 05:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism , Economics ,  and Social science .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - As noted by User:Flux55 , the author has also created a draft, Draft:Social liberal conservatism .   If the article is deleted, the draft will still be in draft space for possible improvement of sourcing.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 18:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Most sources (if not all) don't mention the term the article is about.  Two citations are the article's own draft .  The penultimate one Politic-Ed.com, redirects to a porn site, despite the citations supposedly having been added within the last 24h.  Amazing.  Cortador ( talk ) 22:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Huh.  It doesn't redirect there for me.  Although even that isn't much of an improvement as the site is just a thinly-veiled political blog.  ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 06:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lesley Harris: Moreover, can't seem to find any credible source to establish notability.  zoglophie 20:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Canada .  zoglophie 20:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If this is deleted, Lesley Harris (netball) should be moved to this page.  A redirect from Lesley Harris (badminton) could also go to the page most useful to those looking for her, 1977 IBF World Championships – Women's singles .  I thought when I created it being in a world chamionships was enough, but I haven't found anything to be able to dispute the comments above.  Boleyn ( talk ) 08:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 21:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  To be fair, simply being present as a competitor in a world championship was considered an automatic inclusion freebie in and of itself at the time this page was created — but sports notability standards have changed since then, so now she would have to be shown to pass WP:GNG .  But the only footnote here glancingly acknowledges her existence while failing to be about her in any non-trivial way, which isn't enough.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As noted, the sports notability guidelines have been modified and this article does not appear to qualify under GNG anymore.  It should be deleted.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 10:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniela Guzmán: Fails WP:COMPOSER; she signed with Universal Music, and later BMG, but composed nothing, to my knowledge.  She also fails WP:GNG.  Nothing here is notable, at all.  IncompA 02:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians .  IncompA 02:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Subject has one album with a short AllMusic review [25] , as well as an album as a member of a band [26] , and a couple composer credits [27] [28] .  May be possible to pull more out from that.  — siro χ o 05:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Ecuador .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:04, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The subject had minor career success between 2006 and 2008 and nothing else since.  Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPOSER and does not meet WP:BASIC .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 00:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:01, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sylverina Damilola Olaghere: Mccapra ( talk ) 05:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Education ,  and Nigeria .  Mccapra ( talk ) 05:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've removed a rather large copyright violation from the page.  The rest of the article doesn't pass any notability standards, a quick search for her name on Google doesn't show any WP:SIGCOV .  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 06:00, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, thank you for your contribution.  I have noticed your take.  However, I can guarantee a google search of her name brings up some results.  Sylverina Damilola Olaghere here are the results.  Abba Attah ( talk ) 00:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete Per nom and

Discussion outcome: delete
Archana (actress, 1970s): Citadeol (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Marginal actress (career consists of 3 movies) that fails WP:NACTOR but more crucially doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG .  Pichpich ( talk ) 22:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There was a woman on Big Boss with this name, nothing for this individual found.  The single source used in the article isn't RS per sourcebot.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ORCA Grant: No secondary sources.  Previously deleted by PROD and re-created.  An example of the over-coverage of Brigham Young University topics.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - all primary sourced, and I cannot find any additional refs to indicate notability.  Lots of universities seem to have ORCA grants for various versions of the acronym (and many orcas in the sea are being studied too).  This one doesn't stand out in terms of coverage or significance.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 17:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  NN.  Desertarun ( talk ) 08:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of American Thomas & Friends video releases: Practically unsourced.  No sources verify home releases are actually notable, especially those which are specific to the American region Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Lists .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete indiscriminate trivial niche information Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator.  Magical Golden Whip ( talk ) 01:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paddy Toland: Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Ireland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet notability or GNG.  (Also note ISKA isn't a major title, they give them out to hundreds of people.)  Nswix ( talk ) 19:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Issues with tone or inline refs are WP:SURMOUNTABLE .  Deletion isn't cleanup .  As part of my own WP:BEFORE (undertaken before any AfD contribution) I found and added a number of refs .  And addressed the main tonal issues.  While I'm personally unsure (even after those BEFORE efforts) if SIGCOV is definitively met, I don't think that tone (or the number of ISKA titles awarded to other people) is especially relevant to AfD...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Guliolopez : The article read like a puff piece which is unecyclopedic and I could have phrased that better.  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as fails WP:GNG .  MartyTheArty ( talk ) 14:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raboama Koloti: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  I found examples like this and this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He is a player of a nation’s national team.  That is notability enough.  Even if it’s a stub.  Amaekuma ( talk ) 19:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Which notability guideline does this relate to?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Amaekuma.  Young player with ongoing career.  Article needs improvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 23:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  "Playing on a national team" is not a valid AfD rationale, and it is tendentious for an editor who knows this after ! voting in hundreds of sportsperson AfDs to continue using that argument over and over.  No GNG sourcing has been identified, and I didn't come across anything beyond routine match recaps [11] [12] and transactions [13] in Lesotho media.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 05:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG ; I couldn't find anything except routine coverage or press releases from his employers/competition organizers.  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage.  Notable modern day athletes from english speaking countries, such as Koloti, generally have significant online sources.  Koloti, who may or may not have an active career (no sources support that fact), seems to have only participated in one national team game so maybe it is not so surprising that there are no indications that he gained any notability for his football career.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 13:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Delugan Meissl Associated Architects: TLA (talk) 00:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Companies ,  and Austria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 01:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alessandra Bolchini: Two sources contain significant coverage, but I believe they may be primary sources (Calci Femminile Italiano).  Further, the sources merely state she joined the team, then had an injury.  The other is a sports profile with her stats (not significant coverage).  A quick Google search did not prompt better sources, though they may be available in Italian.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 16:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  The routine news pieces are not significant.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis and my BEFORE search of Italian-language sources.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lacrima Dairy: Original version was highly promotional, and there's a previous history of this from a blocked account a year ago: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LÀCRIMA DAIRY , and the accompanying article and draft history.  Rather than bother with a SPI, it seemed better to clean it up and take it to AFD, but there's no real sign of notability here.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Business ,  and Bulgaria .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Same as the last two deletions, lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NCORP .  I found no evidence of significant coverage in secondary sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 1, Jalandhar Cantonment: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kvno1jrc jalandhar cantt .  Since then notability of schools is much stricter.  This one is unreferenced for 14 years and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 20:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Punjab .  LibStar ( talk ) 20:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as unsourced article with no claim to notability.  Mdann52 ( talk ) 08:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously at AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the article doesn't refer to anything at all, not a single source. -- Saul McGill ( talk ) 23:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Riku Fryderyk: Redtree21 ( talk ) 03:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and England .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I really would not be surprised if they become notable in the future, but I can't see evidence they're notable at the moment.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 13:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Thanks to the editors for marking the article for deletion, a quite reasonable suggestion as the previous version was agreed to be deleted.  I advocate for "keep" on the grounds of notability; by all means an adult writer with this limited output would fail a notability test, but a writer this young is more notable when assessed against their peers.  Nankai ( talk ) 06:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] further, I mean more like ^steadily increasing notability, especially compared to at the time of the previous version Nankai ( talk ) 06:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I agree with Nankai.  Being a published author at that age is itself notable, I would say.  Grutness ... wha?  09:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Grutness , at WHAT age?  The article doesn't state how old they are or their birth year.  There are very few details here.  L iz Read!  Talk!  05:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] 12 years, 9 months, and 14 days, as it clearly said in the references (and as has now been added to the article).  Writing and publishing a 60,000-word book at that age seems pretty notable to me.  Grutness ... wha?  05:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I thought I looked at all of the references and didn't see any age mentioned.  Thanks for the information.  L iz Read!  Talk!  05:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG .  Edwardx ( talk ) 10:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Found no reviews of the books in reliable sources.  @ User:Nankai : Please provide evidence of this steadily increasing notability .  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 10:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : First source is a book of records, and provides no notability.  2nd is their publisher page and 3rd is an interview, both of which are not independent.  Last one is just a listing on Audible, with no text prose.  GNews search turns up nothing.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  13:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gracie Gallegos: No sources found that come remotely close to showing notability.  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politicians , Women ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No notability found.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 05:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The vast majority of secondary sources are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN and there's nothing to pass WP:CRIME either.  Shaws username .  talk .  13:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete