hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Portuguese in North Macedonia: The article is padded out with information on trade between the two countries, NATO, etc., presumably to make up for the lack of in-depth coverage of the topic in reliable sources.  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 07:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , North Macedonia ,  and Portugal .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 07:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete for similar reasons as given at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2023_September_22#Portuguese_in_North_Macedonia .  There's no evidence this is a notable category of people, and most of the sourcing (for the narrow claim that this is a notable thing) is based on primary sources and thus WP:OR Oblivy ( talk ) 07:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Template style article creation along with others (Portuguese in xxx) with very little substantive content to justify the article.  Possibly redirects to Portuguese xxx relations but quite probably ultimately not worth the effort.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 10:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per arguments made at all the other "Portuguese in wherever articles".  AryKun ( talk ) 15:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gbenga Adeku: The sources cited are not enough to to satisfy WP:N and are merely passing mentions of the subject.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 09:19, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists ,  and Nigeria .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 09:19, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there are a number of publications that discussed the artist beyond passing mentions.  Please see this [1] and this [2] though it is an interview, I read that if the introductory paragraphs before the interview excerpt is up to two paragraphs the source can be used in an article.  This [3] also count and many others that have not been cited here.  Capoof ( talk ) 11:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ "A Tale of Shared Values Between a Father and His Son… - THISDAYLIVE" .  www.thisdaylive.com .  ^ Saint, Ekpali.  "FROM PLASTIC WASTE TO A WORK OF ART" .  Fairplanet .  Retrieved 21 July 2023 .  ^ Mirror, The African (30 November 2022).  "Gallery: Three visual artists in Nigeria are turning trash into impressive valuable artworks" .  The African Mirror .  Delete - WP:BEFORE shows most of the coverage is quasi-promotional, back-patting for upcycling.  The subject fails WP:ARTIST .  Not in any collections or noteworthy exhibitions.  WP:TOOSOON -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 10:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It's WP:TOOSOON for this young emerging artist.  Maybe in a few years after there is more coverage, but at this time there is not enough to pass WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST .  Netherzone ( talk ) 05:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Maine (restaurant): The sources mentioned seem like PR (matbe paid) rather than serious articles.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 04:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies , United Arab Emirates ,  and Maine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lorenzo Netteb: A web search finds short articles but nothing amounts to WP:SIGCOV .  The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 20:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Netherlands .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I concur there is a lack of significant non-database sources.  Barnards.tar.gz ( talk ) 20:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Skies & Scopes: Sources seem like churnalism based on pieces of the site's content, rather than being about the site itself.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 17:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astronomy , Internet ,  and Websites .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG .  It doesn't seem to have a significant coverage and it lacks reliable sources .  You would hardly find a reliable secondary source on the subject, to even try to expand on it.  ZyphorianNexus ( talk ) 23:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Analogue Bubblebath IV: However an IP restored the content, claiming that WP:NALBUM doesn't apply to EPs (it does), and invoking WP:OTHERSTUFF .  So now we have to come here.  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 00:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 00:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly fails WP:NALBUM , and the rationale the IP used "Also if you delete this article there has to be consistency with other EP/single articles, inc others by Aphex Twin." is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and irrelevant.  Donald D23 talk to me 00:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Clearly fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 10:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Schuler: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Weak Keep provided a few more sources could be found to further establish his notability.  Upon reflection, I hereby change my vote to Delete as per nomination.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: User:TH1980 , I'm confused, you said you provided new sources but no editing has been done to this article since its nomination and you don't mention any sources here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That was simply my vote at the time.   I did not say I'd found any sources.  Upon reflection, I'm also changing my vote to "Delete".  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I certainly wish Mr. Schuler the best, but I'm not seeing anything encyclopedic here, and in particular nothing that even gestures in the general direction of WP:NBASIC .  -- Visviva ( talk ) 00:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pari Bishnoi: microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 21:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Internet ,  and Rajasthan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I already moved it to draftspace before, but the author recreated it.  Also deserves to be deleted as per the nom.  – Pharyngeal Implosive7 (talk) 01:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTINHERITED and I'm unable to find sources that would help the subject meet WP:GNG on their own, even though there is some coverage about her wedding.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 03:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't find anything that suggests notabilty -- Devokewater | (tαlk) 11:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I am dubious of the claim that she is a state official, but if true, then she would pass WP:POL .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alba AR5: Sources present in the article are nowhere near strong enough to suggest notability; racingsportscars should only be used as a last-resort source for race results only (i.e. it should not be used to confer notability.) A comprehensive BEFORE brings up nothing significant.  This seems to be a continuation of Davism's habit of creating sports cars that don't have any notability, such as March-BMW M1/C .  X750 .  Spin a yarn?  Articles I've screwed over?  08:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Motorsport ,  and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No coverage found in Wikipedia Library (general search) or ProQuest.  Supercars.net also has an entry for the Alba AR5 (including a photo and a few sentences), but like RacingSportsCars, the site should only be cited with great care as a source on Wikipedia, and does not count as a reliable source establishing notability per Wikipedia guidelines including WP:GNG .  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 09:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Obe (Soups): Few appear to even approximately support the content they are supposedly being cited for.  And as far as I have been able to determine, 'obe' is simply a generic Yoruba word for 'soup' and/or 'sauce'.  If properly sourced, an article on Yoruba cuisine might well be a legitimate topic, but such an article would have to describe, using appropriate sources, what made it distinctive.  Having a word for something doesn't in of itself make a topic notable.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 13:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Africa ,  and Nigeria .  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 13:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's no strong ground on notability on this one.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 14:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Interior Design Masters series 3: Mostly original research .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 06:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 06:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 02:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
X Neural Switcher: Seems unlikely to be encyclopedic WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk ) 07:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 07:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 06:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; no independent sourcing.   I could support a merge, but do not see any plausible merge targets; X Window System is far too broad.   Perhaps a new article merging it with the other two at Category:Keyboard layout software could be possible.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 14:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WOIL-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence that this meets GNG; I cannot find any sources which would suggest otherwise.  WJ94 ( talk ) 14:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to list.  There's local programming but not as much local coverage as even WJOS had.  There is coverage of a bankruptcy in 2000 in The Daily Home , but nothing else that really talks about the station at length.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 21:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete : I really only say that because any station with local programming can be potentially notable, which is certainly a step above the numerous (HC2 or otherwise) nothing-but-diginet LPTVs we're finally weeding out as well.  But our notability standards are nonetheless much tighter than they used to be — and GNG looks for significant coverage , not passing mentions (alas, I think that bankruptcy article falls under that category — if the headline is any indication, it was really about the station's then-parent entity, Church on the Rock, and not (what was then) WOIL-LP specifically).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Flower (arcade game): Shellwood ( talk ) 00:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable with nearly no sources at all, much less valid ones.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  08:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Warren Franklin: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Businesspeople .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - He's done cool projects, but there's no evidence of notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: WP:PROD declined in the past, so ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Complex / Rational 17:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article makes a number of unreferenced claims.  Lacking sources to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PW van Vuuren: JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete While there is this I'm struggling to find anything else GNG worthy.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Skillpointe: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 04:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Websites ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 10:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- I could't find independent sources except perhaps this one .  The site does have editorial supervision but it's possibly pay-to-play.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 14:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Plenty of paid media but nothing I can find that would meet WP:ORGCRIT . -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John M. York: Not a statewide office, and nothing more than typical local judicial offices.  Being presiding judge of a municipal court is not an office of encyclopedic significance.  BD2412 T 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  BD2412 T 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete