hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Student Politics in Pakistan: A Celebration, Lament & History : Appears to fail WP:GNG .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 13:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals , Politics , Education ,  and Pakistan .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 13:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  According to GScholar this paper has been cited a grand total of 12 times , which is miles from what could be notable.  -- Randykitty ( talk ) 13:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The low number of citations suggests that this paper has not had a significant impact in its field.  Although we don't have a specific notability guideline for academic journal articles, the closest we have ( WP:NJOURNAL , WP:NACADEMIC and WP:NBOOK ) all look for evidence of significant impact in the relevant field; if we applied a similar standard here, the article would fail.  The article is also unsourced and I can't find anything myself, so this also fails WP:GNG .  Wouldn't oppose a redirect to the author.  WJ94 ( talk ) 09:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Herefordshire Primary Care Trust : Shellwood ( talk ) 11:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wye Valley NHS Trust , which is the current health body for the area.  Herefordshire Primary Care Trust and Hereford Hospitals NHS Trust were merged to create the Wye Valley NHS Trust.  I've redirected Hereford Hospitals NHS Trust to the Wye Valley article.  This is Paul ( talk ) 12:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wye Valley NHS Trust , per This is Paul.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 19:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect per above.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:19, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rubio Connor : One appearance for the Aruba national football team .  No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No SIGCOV.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Wilhelm Blechschmidt : Google search come up with silly, random namesakes.  Corresponding article on Czech Wikipedia is also an unsourced stub.  Interestingly, it states that this athlete "was a bobsledder of German nationality" but there is no statement whether he is dead or has/had German ancestry.  The article even doesn't cite his place of birth!  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 13:44, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Czech Republic .  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 13:44, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Czechoslovakia at the 1936 Winter Olympics#Bobsleigh .  Fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG.  FromCzech ( talk ) 09:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rogue Squadron : No reception section, no scholarly analysis, nothing.  Well, there is a one sentence "Cultural impact" with trivia about references to this in another work of fiction.  My BEFORE failed to find anything that is not a plot summary.  Maybe an ATD could be a redirect to Star Wars: Rogue Squadron (series) ?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as redundant to other plot summaries.  Not enough WP:SIGCOV to establish this as a separate article.  A redirect would be fine.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Star Wars: Rogue Squadron (series) per above as an alternative to deletion.  Fails GNG as stated above.  Tails Wx 18:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do : Not good per WP:EVENTCRIT either, though perhaps WP:NBOOK can be seen as more relevant.  Redirect/Merge to Gaylor Swifties#Gaylor .  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 23:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Women .  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 23:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Sexuality and gender , United States of America ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You probably meant to suggest Swifties#Gaylor as the redirect target.  Jfire ( talk ) 00:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Correct and thanks.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 07:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per rationale in nomination.  Way too soon to determine if this is a notable work of journalism and no reason to think it’s inevitable.  108.41.198.35 ( talk ) 00:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge per nom.  Georgethedragonslayer ( talk ) 09:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge to Swifties#Gaylor .  This is a technical vote just to help build consensus, and a merge is not entirely necessary because the NYT article is already mentioned there sufficiently.  The nominator and previous voters have argued correctly and I agree, especially per WP:EVENTCRIT .  Meanwhile, look at what Swiftyism has become: obsessive articles criticizing obsessive journalists reporting on obsessive fans.  Keep us out of it.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge to Swifties#Gaylor , although I think the scholarship from the page should remain and be expanded.  In the coming years I expect there will be more academic scholarship on the Gaylor community that more firmly delineates it as a conspiracy theory separate from the Swiftie community but I don't think we are there just yet.  It took quite some time for Larrie scholarship to start appearing after the buzz from it had died down.  Computer-ergonomics (he/him; talk ; please ping me in replies ) 15:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Swifties#Gaylor as a WP:SUSTAINED fail.  I think the coverage there is satisfactory to the point that a merge isn't really necessary.  All the best, Schminnte [ talk to me ] 16:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Swifties#Gaylor as per comments above.  ℛonherry ☘ 21:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above; merging is not necessary.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 19:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per DOOMSDAYER520.  dxneo ( talk ) 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Suicide of Chester Bennington : Not seeing that this meets GNG.  It's a part of his story, but not a story alone.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Events ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chester Bennington .   There is nothing earth-shattering about this particular suicide to warrant it having its own article.  Onel 5969 TT me 21:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chester Bennington – All of the content is already in Bennington's article.  The Suicide of Kurt Cobain has more depth, coverage, and context given it was more complex, controversial, and mysterious than Bennington's death.  -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 01:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Honestly, I'd be fine Merging it with Chester Bennington , but preferably, I'd keep it.  Unlike what Oaktree b said, the articles weren't really blurbs (excluding the TMZ one [3] ), most of them were full length articles that were: Reliable Secondary Gave significant coverage of the event detailed Independent of the subject So while I don't see the need for deletion, I understand why one would delete it.  That's just my 2 cents.  AugustusAudax ( talk ) 12:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chester Bennington ...  IF the title is a likely search term.  If not just delete .  In either case, this particular article simply repeats almost word-for-word the text that is already in the "Death" section at Bennington's main article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chester Bennington unneeded CFORK.  // Timothy :: talk 10:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
TnFOX : There are no independent sources Mdggdj ( talk ) 14:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Fox toolkit : no independent notability.  Owen× ☎ 16:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are no valid references at TnFOX so you will not be able to move any content.  A redirect to a page where there is no mention of the redirected article will be confusing.  Mdggdj ( talk ) 09:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirection doesn't involve moving any content.  To be included in a list on an existing article, all you need is verifiability , not notability .  The existing sources are sufficient for that.  Owen× ☎ 15:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sri Hansa Bhagwan : Fails WP:GNG .  Perhaps redirect to Nimbarka Sampradaya .  - UtherSRG (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I support the redirect call.  Chronikhiles (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] (1st choice) Delete , (2nd choice) redirect to Nimbarka Sampradaya#Sri Hansa Bhagwan .   This is an article that has existed for two years.  It consists of a lead and six sections.  Section 1 is not in English.  The article is so badly written that there appears to be no relationship between the lead and the sections.  The article's main source is a book called: Srimad-Bhagavatam by A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada published by the International Society for Krishna Consciousness ; [24] this is a modern interpretation of the Brahma Sutras (and therefore has POV issues ).  There are some other sources, but the Wikipedia article does not give their titles.  The section on Sri Hansa Bhagwan in Nimbarka Sampradaya does not have any citations.  So I am a bit worried that it might be deleted, and then we would be left with a redirect to an article that did not mention the topic of the redirect.   Because of this, I think deletion would be a better option than changing to a redirect.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Joel Indergand : -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk ) 17:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 15 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Non-notable athlete with a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  I was unable to find any coverage at all on Google or Newspapers.com.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of curlers#France .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of curlers#France .  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 16:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nathan Winograd : Onel 5969 TT me 10:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , United States of America ,  and California .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 12:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Out of the 22 cited sources, 14 are self-published contents (1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21); 6 have no or trivial mentions of the subject (2, 3, 5, 7, 16, 22); and two are interviews (11, 16).  Searching for the subject online, I found a lot of times when he was mentioned in passing or just quoted once.  In the rare cases where he did receive significant coverage, like in this Atlantic article , the content would read more like narratives than any objective reportings.  Lacks sufficient coverage from RS and IS to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 02:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect article.  Not enough reliable sources.  Redirect to Redemption: The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America .  Psychologist Guy ( talk ) 20:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Of the 4 sources, 3 don’t exist/work at all.  The other one is an Amazon link.  This clearly fails GNG.  - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 01:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Clyde Donovan : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCHAR .  List of South Park characters already exists.  Previous merge requests on the talk page rely on WP:ITSIMPORTANT .  -1ctinus📝 🗨 22:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Television ,  and Comics and animation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of South Park characters#Clyde Donovan , nothing found that shows this character meets WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth; unneeded fancrufty CFORK of target.  // Timothy :: talk 15:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Redirect to List of South Park characters#Clyde Donovan for reasons note above.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mike Clancy (politician) : No news attention outside of routine campaign-related coverage.  Get this guy out of here.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Law , Indiana , Massachusetts , Pennsylvania , Virginia ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Could also be redirected to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia#District 10 , but I feel like that might be getting a bit too pedantic, and he also ran in 2022.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 06:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] yeah a redirect makes sense KchTheWikiKid ( talk ) 20:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect >>>> 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia#District 10 Djflem ( talk ) 07:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia#District 10 , all the sources that apear in a search are just WP:ROTM for an election candidate and I can't find anything to meet WP:GNG either.  Shaws username .  talk .  13:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia#District 10 : Subject lacks the necessary WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] a redirect makes the most sense or if you still want to delete it just put it into draft space instead KchTheWikiKid ( talk ) 20:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete campaign spam for now.  Fine with a redirect.  SportingFlyer T · C 10:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of airports in the Republic of Artsakh : Most of the useful content here is already covered/duplicated in the main Republic of Artsakh article under the Transportation section and in the Stepanakert Airport article.  Dan the Animator 01:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A list of one thing?  I don't see the utility.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails on NLIST, fails on CLN per above.  // Timothy :: talk 05:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Republic of Artsakh#Transportation as ATD.  There's also a few minor pieces of information that could be merged if someone likes.  — siro χ o 06:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Republic of Artsakh#Transportation so that the relevant information can be saved and so the article has the possibility of being recreated in the future one day.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 07:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : No objection to Redirect to Republic of Artsakh#Transportation as ATD.  Sourced information is already present in target, information here is unsourced, so nothing to merge.  // Timothy :: talk 06:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ștefan Tarasov : Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) ( Talk ) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Romania .  Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) ( Talk ) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tarasov competed at at least four World Championship rowing tournaments in addition to the Olympics, including a top-5 finish at the 1967 champs [20] .  Proposed WP:ATD : Redirect to Rowing at the 1968 Summer Olympics – Men's coxed pair , so as to preserve the page history.  -- Habst ( talk ) 15:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rowing at the 1968 Summer Olympics – Men's coxed pair , as per WP:ATD .  Ingratis ( talk ) 13:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect