Ehsanul Haque : No in-depth coverage, only passing mentions and stats.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 02:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 02:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and Bangladesh .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep International cricketer that featured in a World Cup and had a strong domestic career.  It is highly likely that sourcing exists offline given the time of his career, or in non-English language sources.  I'm sure other cricket editors will be able to find sourcing on him.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The guidelines are very clear, he must have at least one source providing significant coverage, which I was unable to find anywhere.  Maybe other editors can find sources on him, but if there are none, then he certainly fails WP:SPORTSPERSON , WP:GNG , and WP:SIGCOV .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 02:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I really don't think you understand the level of the game at which he has played...  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 21:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I do understand that he has played at a high level.  But that does not make him notable.  As I said before, he must have at least one reliable source providing significant coverage , which he does not, and therefore fails WP:SPORTSPERSON , WP:SIGCOV , and WP:GNG .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 17:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The fact he has played Test cricket and in the cricket world cup makes him very notable.  Whilst English language sources might be lacking (particularly as his international career came to an end just when the internet really took off), there will be plenty of Bangladeshi written sources for him - he made 134 appearances at the highest domestic level of cricket in Bangladesh alongside his international career (of which, Test cricket is the highest level of the game).  We are not Anglopedia.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 20:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  A nomination beyond stupid.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 20:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep no WP:BEFORE has been done, and this nomination appears not to have looked for non-English language sources, of which I would expect there are many given that he played at a Cricket World Cup, and had a long domestic career.  I've added one piece of significant coverage based on a 2 minute search, so it seems very likely that more exists if people look for it rather than blindly nominating this as non-notable.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello @ Joseph2302 .  When I nominated I did look for non-English and English sources (though not very thorougly), and found nothing.  I just finished another more in-depth search, and found at least 3-4 sources, which I will soon add to the article.  I will conduct another search soon.  I am now considering withdrawing this nomination.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 01:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawing nomination : Enough WP:SIGCOV found to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSPERSON .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 02:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep