World Team Carcassonne Online Championship 2021: I attempted to search for sources online in English, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese, and French.  In my searches, I did not come across anything suggesting that they or their organizers would meet GNG if considered in aggregate.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  signed, Rosguill talk 15:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as clearly failing WP:GNG .   That said, a brief summary of the fact that these competitions exist, using the available primary sources, arguably could be added in a section at Carcasonne , without all the excessive detail of tables full of non-notable competitors, which is not encyclopedic information ( WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE , WP:NOT#DATABASE ).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Carcassonne (board game)#World Team Carcassonne Online Championship .   There's no obvious need to delete the page history, even though I don't think these events need separate pages.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 19:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect per WhatamIdoing.   Please ping me if more sources that would count toward WP:N are found.  Hobit ( talk ) 17:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as there are not enough sources at the moment but I think that together notability would be met.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 14:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  It seems like, aside from Deletion, there are opinions to Redirect or Merge but I'd like to see a more conclusive consensus before taking action on a bundled nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Per Liz's last relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I would agree with a merge but there seems like a whole lot of non-notable detail which would make the target somewhat lopsided WP:UNDUE if this was done with every competition year.  Redirect also seems a bit pointless if there is little/no content at the target.  Maybe if there were a few/poor sources but when there’s nothing I think the onus is on interested editors to justify why there should be even be a redirect JMWt ( talk ) 05:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WhatamIdoing is fine as ATD, but we shouldn't delete history here, some of it could be useful to expanding (post-facto merge) or a future split of the broader (not annual) topic from the Carcasonne article (eg.  I could imagine a future Competitive Carcasonne article covering § Tournaments and World Championships and more.  — siro χ o 05:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect