hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Seward, Oklahoma : CoolieCoolster ( talk ) 12:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Oklahoma and US .  - CoolieCoolster ( talk ) 12:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , We usually consider all populated places to be notable , regardless of how small their population may be.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Oklahoma .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep If there are 26 people living there, it passes WP:GEOLAND .  SportingFlyer T · C 22:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] merge content to Logan County, Oklahoma as census tracts and unincorporated places are not legally recognized and need to meet GNG.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It's a small community, but it's recognized as one by the U.S. Census Bureau, which means it passes WP:GEOLAND .  It also wasn't too hard to find significant coverage of it in regional newspapers: [9] [10] .  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation keep We have consistently kept towns represented by CDPs.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep Seward is a community officially recognized by the U.S. Census and a well-recognized geographic location among central Oklahomans.  There are also numerous locations with smaller populations that are still considered notable, so that is not a valid criterion for deletion.  162.129.251.104 ( talk ) 16:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment CDP are not designated by the Census Bureau, but by local authorities.  So they are technically not officially recognized by that organization, the locals define them and the census gives the the statistics for them.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To become a CDP, a populated settlement has to satisfy criteria that is enough to justify notability.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 13:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Seward is listed here (look at page 866) so it satisfies WP:GEOLAND .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 13:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Bob Bottom : History6042 ( talk ) 19:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism ,  and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:BASIC .  Clicking the "books" link in the nomination template we can readily find SIGCOV.  Multiple pages of SIGCOV in [7] Multiple pages here [8] A paragraph of coverage in [9] We can check google news, proquest, and elsewhere for more sources to verify and expand the article, but this is sufficient for WP:BASIC .  Based on what I see in these secondary sources, this subject seems to meet WP:NJOURNALIST .1 for work in exposing organized crime ultimately affecting the legal landscape.  The article itself needs some copyediting to improve the flow and the tone, and help the reader understand what about the subject is notable in particular, but it isn't written at all like the promotional articles we see regularly.  — siro χ o 20:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Important anti-corruption crusader.  The NSW govt changed the aged of consent laws to imply that he had committed some sort of crime. -- Grahame ( talk ) 08:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep . Sails past WP:GNG , WP:ANYBIO , WP:AUTHOR . Also, keep per WP:HEY -- I have added numerous RSs.  Cabrils ( talk ) 23:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Guy St. Clair : After searching Google though, this article is the first thing to come up, and other sources that may be about him (not the Australian one, for which there are a few obituaries) are personal blogs or thing by him.  -- NotC hariza rd 🗨 07:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  -- NotC hariza rd 🗨 07:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Virginia . Shellwood ( talk ) 09:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and New York . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . I did some digging and found that he has won several awards for his work in knowledge services, a branch of library science. I added these to the page. Satisfies WP:NPROF . Qflib ( talk ) 23:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep -- received the highest award (the "John Cotton Dana Award" of the Special_Libraries_Association ) in librarianship from an organization that is over 100 years old, with 75 national and 55 regional chapters.   I'll add the link to the organization's homepage, because the nominator was right to notice that the only current reference for the award is from a publicity blog post by his employer.   With the award verified, this is a definite keep.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 01:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:NACADEMIC .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niafied ( talk • contribs ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Atlantic Collegiate Baseball League : There is no indication of independent coverage beyond routine game coverage.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball , United States of America , New Jersey , New York ,  and Pennsylvania .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Unlike some of the other collegiate summer leagues that have been nominated for deletion, the ACBL has a long and distinguished history dating back to the 1960s and has received tons of coverage, more than enough to pass WP:GNG .  A search of Newspapers.com turns up more than 11,000 hits.  E.g., this , this , this , this , this , here , here , here , here , here , here , here , here .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 15:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aidan721 : Some of the other noms appear to have merit, but (as shown above) this one does not.  Would you consider withdrawing this one so that we can place effort into more meritorious cases?  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep pr sources mentioned by Cbl62.  Spanneraol ( talk ) 21:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Multiple sources noted here by Cbl62 constitute more than enough WP:SIGCOV needed.  User:Let'srun 03:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Sources provided above by Cbl62 provide WP:SIGCOV for WP:GNG , many times over.  Suggest including newspapers.com in most WP:BEFOREs , would save everyone else a lot of time.  Jacona ( talk ) 00:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Koli Taal : 10:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  PARVAGE talk!  10:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The film has more than 15 full-length articles which also include reviews by the leading newspapers & magazines of India.  And it was also mentioned as the Top-13 Kannada films of 2022 by the Film Companion.  And Film got released on streaming platform recently after the festival run.  So, the number on IMDb votes are less.  It will increase as the day goes.  And there are sufficient coverage for this film to keep the article.  TridentWiki1289 ( talk ) 12:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This meets WP:NFILM with two full-length reviews already cited that meet WP:ICTFSOURCES [51] [52] .  There's other coverage beyond that, but those are sufficient.  — siro χ o 11:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets NFILM with multiple reviews from significant news sites.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 15:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above passes WP:NFILM with multiple reviews.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:NFILM .  Maliner ( talk ) 06:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jackie Kessler : Insufficient RS.  Article seems more like a resume rather than an encyclopedic overview.  BEFORE found little discussion of this author in mainstream sources, mostly blogs and niche websites.  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 17:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Science fiction and fantasy .  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 17:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New York .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Yes, the article needs more citations (which I'll work on adding in the coming days).  However, the author has an entry in Baker & Taylor Author Biographies along with multiple reviews in Publishers Weekly (see examples 1 , 2 , is 3 ), is described as one of her publisher's "rising stars" in this Publishers Weekly article , and also has a number of reviews in Booklist , Library Journal , The Daily Telegraph (see Wikipedia Library for all these).  All of that is enough to prove this person meets our WP:AUTHOR notability guidelines. -- SouthernNights ( talk ) 13:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Once you add these, I'll be happy to withdraw the AfD. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 20:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep as per SouthernNights, plus other reviews in School Library Journal , VOYA (magazine) , etc. Lady of Shalott 14:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . Would appear to meet WP:GNG per above comments. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - at her Internet Speculative Fiction Database page, more reviews are listed, e.g. for her novel Rage , there is a Realms of Fantasy review [6] ; for her co-authored novel Black and White , there is an Interzone review [7] ; for her co-authored novel Shades of Gray , there is an Analog Science Fiction and Fact review [8] .  She is also known as Jackie Morse Kessler; with this name, I found four reviews online at Kirkus Reviews [9] and a review at the NY Journal of Books .  Based on existing sources identified in this discussion, WP:AUTHOR notability seems well-supported by reviews of her collective body of work.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 00:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The reviews discussed above support that WP:NAUTHOR is met.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Sean Fingleton : All sources are primary.  I found one substantive independent RS that could be used: https://www.donegaldaily.com/2019/10/06/a-special-sean-fingleton-art-collection-opens-at-lyit-picture-special/ - but this is, right now, a directory entry, and I don't see how to make it more than that.  Maybe others can find some actual sources, rather than catalogue entries?  Guy ( help! - typo? ) 16:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Ireland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:ARTIST 4(d), having works in major collections, as I already stated ten years ago when I unprodded this; my unprod edit summary appears not to have been noticed by the nominator.  Creation by an SPA is not a valid deletion criterion.  From the article: Two of his works are in the collection of the Irish Museum of Modern Art.  His painting, Coastal Scene, is part of the European Parliament art collection in Strasbourg.  The source links have gone stale but searching his name on their sites verifies these claims.  Additionally, the resulting page on the European collection site [29] provides in-depth material about the subject.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:ARTIST , also member of Aosdána and previously received a GPA Award - A l is o n talk 18:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:ARTIST (both exhibitions and awards) and above comments - and as a member of the national academy, Aosdána (a few hundred from thousands of Irish artists).  Can use improvement, sure, but I see no good grounds for deletion.  SeoR ( talk ) 00:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:ARTIST per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Amanda Ross (equestrian) : A search in Google news only found equestrian related sources which are not third party.  LibStar ( talk ) 18:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Olympics ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 18:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : A few articles about her [1] , here [2] and an interview with background info here [3] .  Not a slam dunk, but more info than we typically see for Olympians here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The sources from Oaktree b seem to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The articles and interview provide good background information and seems to meet the notability guidelines WP:GNG .  Waqar 💬 15:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ibrahim Babangida (footballer) : Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib. ) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib. ) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He won the 1993 FIFA U-17 World Championship .  Don't delete the article.  186.176.235.73 ( talk ) 11:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That has no relevance to SPORTCRIT or GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] An ATD is to merge/redirect to Tijani Babangida where he is currently mentioned, not least since Tijani was in the same car crash.  Another alternative to deletion would of course be to find sigcov in the Netherlands.  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He play at the Eredivisie and won the Nigerian Premier League in 1992.  201.206.42.68 ( talk ) 01:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I think there's enough coverage of his death, including pieces like this , which show notability.  He had 50+ games in the Dutch professional leagues, the issue is searching is skewed to just reports of his death.  Giant Snowman 12:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per GiantSnowman.  Player with sources and pro career including 50+ appearances in fully pro Dutch league and definitly has more offline sources.  Article needs improvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 01:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Won the 1992 NPL.  Sources about this entity are PROBABLY offline plus the sources presented by GiantSnowman.  Best, Reading Beans 13:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep —Easy keep here.  Clearly meets WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tando Jan Mohammad : Boleyn ( talk ) 07:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft keep - there's something at those coordinates with this name that shows up on google maps.  This PDF refers to "RHS Tando Jan Muhammad", although I'm guessing as to what the RHC means (regional health clinic?) and the Asian Development Bank was doing a project at the Tando Jan Muhammad grid station .  Maybe it's a spelling issues M o hammad vs. M u hammad?  Do these back up the claims?  Not really.  Should we keep it because something is there that has notability?  Probably but I'm not thrilled about it.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 14:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Advanced search for: " ٽنڊو جان محمد " In books/documents Google Books Internet Archive · WorldCat In the news Google News: recent · archives Free English newspaper archives In academic/legal journals and reference works Google Scholar: academic · legal The Wikipedia Library Oxford Reference · JSTOR PUBMED Central Internet Archive World Wide Web pages Google Web Search · Advanced Search Searx 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 Bing · DuckDuckGo · Startpage Yahoo Images (free) Google · Flickr Anyone willing to try checking for sources using ٽنڊو جان محمد ?   Google Maps when I tried it takes me straight to the place at 25°04′13″N 69°12′48″E ﻿ / ﻿ 25.070227532132545°N 69.21344574421661°E ﻿ / 25.070227532132545; 69.21344574421661 ﻿ ( ٹنڈو جان محمد ) , with five schools, a police station, a post office, and two colleges, all with pins.  RHC means Rural Health Centre  (

Discussion outcome: keep
Roboquest : Lack of notability indicated by no WP:VG/S review sources, either in the article or doing a WP:BEFORE , which only yielded mention in one WP:OFFLINE source from the Dutch magazine Gameplay .  Reviews for two situational sources: TechRaptor and Gaming Age , although source discussions for neither seem particularly positive and both authors, whilst having a few reviews under their belt, have no experience or presence outside writing for their respective websites.  Absent more reliable sources being found, seems like coverage is mostly confined to primary sources, non-reliable indie blogs and game guide type articles.  Mindful this is a little closer to borderline than usual so welcome thoughts.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Honestly, expected to ! vote the other way before digging in here.  I did find an in-depth preview article at Jeux Video ( [7] ), a reliable French video game website which is listed on WP:VG/RS , along with a completely random but seemingly WP:RS review from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette ( [8] ).  These articles combined with the TechRaptor and Gaming Age hits put it over the edge into keep category for me.  Nomader ( talk ) 18:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:NONENG comes through!  I'll keep open for a second opinion but that's looking better.  Shame about the WP:NEXIST on Gameplay but good find on the Arkansas paper, for whatever use it is, it is obviously significant coverage.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 01:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per JV, Gameplay, the Inven source from the article, and the smattering of other publications.  I guess the English-language publications just missed this one, considering the breadth of other coverage.  ~ A412 talk!  02:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nominator withdraw on the basis that the found sources have since illustrated that notability has been comfortably met, supported by participants, making the need for a discussion moot.  thanks to @ Nomader : .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 02:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep