hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Óli á Hrauni: Donald D23 talk to me 21:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to ÍNN , Fails GNG and tv notability.  I could find no sources online at least with English searching.  If reliable sources are found I will reconsider.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 21:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to ÍNN , the TV station it was broadcasted on, as a possible search term and redirects are WP:CHEAP .  Despite the TV station definitely being notable and the host possibly being so, I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV in Icelandic sources about the show itself, just alot of mentions.  @ Nagol0929 : , would you mind a redirect?  Alvaldi ( talk ) 09:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No not at all I’ll change right now Nagol0929 ( talk ) 11:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This looks adorable and I want there to be an article on it, but my albeit brief attempts to find sources or commentary to establish its cultural significance have come up with nothing.  I also find it telling that the Scandinavian language Wikipedias don't have an article on this subject either, so we can't mine them for sources.  Given this, I concur with the Redirect above.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 14:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nilar Win: I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Myanmar .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Myanmar women's national football team per nom.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 00:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.: Notability is questionable as the sources are press releases / announcements / WP:ROUTINE .  Couldn't find anything online, so I doubt this meets WP:GNG .  Regardless, WP:TNT .  TLA (talk) 01:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Computing , Software ,  and New Jersey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Network_Automation,_Inc._v._Advanced_Systems_Concepts,_Inc.  IgelRM ( talk ) 17:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per above.  Looks like a good idea for time being.  Article can be restored at any time, when new sources are found.  Pavlor ( talk ) 06:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Emergency Preparedness Operational Command Unit: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All I could find were sites that scrape Wikipedia content and the one cited source, which is not independent.   Completely non-notable.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Merge to Central Operations .  No reason to delete the info.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Central Operations : Fails GNG and ORG.  Unreferenced, one official link, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 23:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Embassy of the United States, Ashgabat: The little that it does say, in the final sentence, can be covered at Turkmenistan–United States relations , although I question the wisdom of writing that something is scheduled for completion in 2018, when it’s almost 2024.  Biruitorul Talk 08:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  None of these embassies is independently notable.  Cortador ( talk ) 09:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Turkmenistan ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unnecessary content fork of bilateral relations.  Another article created in a spree of non notable embassy articles.  LibStar ( talk ) 12:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Turkmenistan–United States relations as a valid ATD.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 19:19, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Idol series in Greece: I suggest a redirect to the page mentioned, Idol_(franchise)#International_versions .  Spinixster (chat!) 14:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Disambiguations .  Spinixster (chat!) 14:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep no policy-based deletion rationale articulated.  Feel free to start a merge discussion on the talk page.  Jclemens ( talk ) 09:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's reasonable, but considering that the page I mentioned has basically the same content, a merge would probably not be needed.  I do not know if people would agree with me, thus this AfD.  Spinixster (chat!) 09:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This title is descriptive, which is usually not a good match for disambiguation.  It seem rather unlikely that an average English reader would type in the whole phrase "Idol series in Greece" in the search field and expect to be navigated quickly.  It should either be a broad concept article, or redirect to one, or be deleted.  -- Joy ( talk ) 10:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Title change and conversion of the page into a disambiguation would be better.  NavjotSR ( talk ) 13:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Idol_(franchise)#International_versions .  I see no need for this page; both Greek Idol and Super Idol (Greek TV series) have hotnotes.  Reywas92 Talk 16:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – This is set up to be a disambiguation page, but as noted by Joy , the title doesn't really work for that.  The difference between the two is already covered at Idol (franchise) and in hatnotes on the articles.  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 02:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Washington News Desk: If sources can be found to prove existence, I'm open to a redirect and/or merge to Pat Robinson .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Christianity .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : While I don't actually have any opinion at the moment regarding what should be done or if there is any reason to retain (I'll leave it to others to try to find sources for this one), I did want to note that a more-valid alternative to deletion here would appear to actually be a redirect to Pat Robertson , not the Pat Robinson disambiguation page.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Pat Robertson : assuming that sources can be found during this discussion, otherwise Draftify .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 22:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Charles II Henri van de Werve, Lord of Schilde: I have searched Google Books and Google Scholars for references to this man and have found no indication of significant coverage.  The name "Charles II Henri" appears to be entirely invented .  WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy says that Wikipedia is not a genealogy website.  Surtsicna ( talk ) 15:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Royalty and nobility ,  and Netherlands .  Surtsicna ( talk ) 15:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Keivan.f Talk 20:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Potential WP:ATD is a redirect to his entry in House van de Werve .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 22:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions .  gidonb ( talk ) 01:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect into House van de Werve .  Delete is an overkill, merge an underkill relative to the necessary action.  Thanks nom for the AfD and Curbon for suggesting an ATD.  gidonb ( talk ) 07:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
J.Williams: For example, the first link is about the funeral of Zac William's sister "Sammy Williams", and the birth name turns up no results at all for famous musicians.  Feels like it may be a CSD candidate but it's possible I missed a detail here.  Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 12:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 12:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.   None of the sources are about J. Williams.  S0091 ( talk ) 15:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as nonsense.  Relevant at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cacaonw999 .  Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 17:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nonsense article.  This same content was repeatedly readded (replacing the existing disambig) at J. Williams by a bunch of accounts who I assume are socks.  C F A 💬 01:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt.  Long term abuse (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Japansonglove ) trying to create this hoax article.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  12:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.   I almost wonder if this is something generated by an AI, and we know how they like to invent stuff... -- Gronk Oz ( talk ) 13:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Snow delete not a hope of this being kept: WP:PROMO, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOPAGE, WP:AUTO all apply to varying degrees, sufficient unto the day to warrant TNT.  That's not even taking into account the behavioural disruption, which includes WP:SOCK, WP:SPAM.  WP:HOAX, WP:IMPERSONATE.  ——Serial Number 54129 13:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all above, salt , and redirect to DAB page J. Williams as {{ R from other spelling }} and {{ R from ambiguous term }} .  Narky Blert ( talk ) 13:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Embassy of the United States, Chișinău: Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Moldova ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : to Moldova–United States relations .  Fails GNG.  Material with sources appears already in the target article, I don't see anything properly sourced for a merge.  // Timothy :: talk 00:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Per timothy.  Chekidalum ( talk ) 11:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yaare Nee Mohini: A WP:BEFORE found no better references.  Attempted a redirect as an WP:ATD but it was restored by an IP.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Yaaradi Nee Mohini (TV series) .  Everything of interest in this article can be summarized in a section of the original series noting that a remake was made.  BD2412 T 18:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zee_Kannada#Drama_series : I am aware that the target I suggest has also been Afded (and is currently discussed but the channel is notable).  I find this unfortunate.  Anyway, opposed to deletion (coverage,  more than 800 episodes: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/kannada/daily-soap-yaare-nee-mohini-completes-800-episodes/articleshow/77260404.cms ) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Not opposed to the redirect and merge suggested above by BD2412.  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Paul Lewis Abrams: The sources in the article are all primary, and a search failed to find the WP:SIGCOV needed to establish notability.  Recommend a redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies .  Let'srun ( talk ) 10:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 10:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies : Per nomination, I couldn't find any sources on the article or elsewhere that were WP:SIGCOV .  Subject is non-notable by himself.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies as article creator, per the nomination.  Safiel ( talk ) 20:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable.  Internet sources do not yield enough results to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV and meet WP:GNG .  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 08:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tessa Edwards: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2010 , 2011 , 2012 , etc.) No evidence of notability.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Canada , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Indo-European smith god: The first source cited actually says, "The argument for a single mythical prototype is not strong." (West, 2007:156).  As the page notes, there are many smith gods in the daughter linguistically-defined groups that speak indo-european languages, but it failed to mention what the sources say, that smiths are also found in most non indo-european cultures too (I have added that now).  One major issue that this page fails to grapple with is that proto-indoeuropean culture is a proto culture that groups descend from, going back well before the iron age, and in some cases to before the bronze age (copper age).  It is not clear that a smith god associated with iron (the magic of removing metal from a rock in very high heat) would be in any way related to a god of bronze or copper working.  The fact that there is no commonality of gods in daughter cultures lends strength to this reasoning.  Yet if there were a god, there is almost nothing that can be said about it, and so a wikipedia page is not possible.  This is already fully covered in [46] and I am not convinced a redirect is required as it doesn't seem like a plausible search term - but I don't object to redirect if others feel it is.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 11:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , History ,  and Mythology .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 11:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the proposed target.  Not implausible as a search term IMO and it leaves the article history intact in case there is anything useful to merge.  (Edit: I considered a rename to something like "Indo European smith god hypothesis" but it does not seem to be notable even as a hypothesis/theory and there is very little info on Google Scholar).  ( t · c ) buidhe 08:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with Buidhe.  Srnec ( talk ) 21:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or delete per the nomination and buidhe.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 20:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Booting process of Windows NT: While Booting process of Windows is possibly notable, the NT article suffers from similar problems to Vista - namely, lack of notability .  What we have is de facto a WP:HOWTO unencyclopedic guide based mostly on other guides, majority of which come from Microsoft.  Per WP:ATD-R , we can consider redirecting this to Booting process of Windows ,  maybe even a slight merge (although the Vista article was simply deleted).  Pinging participants of that other AfD: User:Fram , User:MicrobiologyMarcus .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Now I've seen it all, a how to article about how to do something.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Booting process of Windows per nomination.  DigitalIceAge ( talk ) 05:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Booting process of Windows (and redirect).  The article contains enough non-how-to content to warrant being merged into the broader Booting process of Windows article while removing the overly how-to style parts.  In contrast with Booting process of Windows NT Setup before Vista , the article covers notable content relevant to all recent Windows versions, so it should not be outright deleted.  – Brandon XLF ( talk ) 22:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect