hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Rhead Story : Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 22:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and New Mexico .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 22:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't find any coverage of this person and this is simply a basic biography, not really indicating why they're notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  I will also note that there is a lot of information included in the article not relevant to the subject (such as the result of the general election after his failed primary in an effort to mask lack of notability . -- Mpen320 ( talk ) 00:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES and WP:NOTINHERITED .  We rarely keep BLPs of unsuccessful candidates.  Much of the wall of text and citations is not directly about this person.  Bearian ( talk ) 13:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Inocentrus : (See [67] )  Ta-tea-two-te-to ( talk ) 00:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and History .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete following OP.  The only available instance of the thesis in question appears to be fragmentary, so it's hard to figure out what exactly is presented there, but the assertion of [68] that there exists no valid description seems to be borne out by the paucity of mentions anywhere else.  There are a couple publications by one author from the 90s that refer to the species [69] [70] , but that's it.  On balance of available material, this taxon does not seem to have a solid enough background for an article.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 08:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I got full PDF of that thesis, and it describes about this taxa well but still it is invalid, same situation as "Styginetta" etc.  Ta-tea-two-te-to ( talk ) 13:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Add: This record also indicates a doubtful status.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 08:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not formally published so it doesn't meet the presumption underlying WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES .  Plantdrew ( talk ) 16:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eren-Verdi Asrin : TLA (talk) 09:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Sportspeople ,  and Canada .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Mesourouni : And most of the sources are football related not independent.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of LSU Tigers football recruiting history : A deletion discussion for a similar article has already passed a year ago and its conclusions are very good.  KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs ) 04:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , American football , Lists ,  and Louisiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the article title doesn't make sense and the content is likely not notable enough to warrant a standalone list.  Some of the relevant content can be merged into LSU Tigers football .  Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete does not pass WP:GNG , is more "fan-related" details than content for this encyclopedia. -- Paul McDonald ( talk ) 18:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cache (Clothing) : Bringing it here for the community to decide.  Netherzone ( talk ) 17:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls , Business , Fashion ,  and New York .  Netherzone ( talk ) 17:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is no widespread substantial coverage on its operations, impact, or history.  Its history has the claim of it popularizing high-end fashion in the United States.  This, however, was later shown to be a claim made by the company itself.  Thus, there is no verified substantial coverage.  Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 14:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Badr Rhazi : Subject doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG .  Sources, which include YouTube, are unreliable.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Morocco .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; unfortunate the editor opposed draftify.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 13:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I guess none of the sources provided in this article are reliable.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 20:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Famous content creator and chef, but doesn't meet WP:BASIC .  Mooonswimmer 18:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brain Bowl (MIT–WPI) : My WP:BEFORE search didn't find anything.  Article has been tagged for lack of sourcing since 2018 with no improvement having been made.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 20:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 21 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 21:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: This rivalry has seemingly had some passing coverage over the years across multiple sources, but mere mentions don't lend to the subject meeting the WP:GNG .  I'm happy to reconsider my vote however if sources are proffered, so please ping me if any are found.  User:Let'srun 02:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – passing mentions at best, which fail SIGCOV.  Both prestigious schools and I'm sure there's some campus pride when they play one another, but not enough coverage in RS to justify a Wikipedia article.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 20:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Animaker : -- Beland ( talk ) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Beland ( talk ) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] USNews lists it as "Best Basic Web-Based Animation Software", which is something, I guess Aaron Liu ( talk ) 11:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find tutorials on how to use the software, nothing about critical reviews or discussions in RS.  None of the sources in the article now are RS, some appear to be PR items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Catholic Bishops' Influence on Eastern European Literature : For example, this source only mentions bishops once, about a letter condemning sexual abuse, and doesn't seem to mention "literature" or "literary" at all, but is still used as a reference for their "influence on literary themes".  Perhaps an article on Catholic influence on Eastern European literature can be written, but when both the title and the contents need to be checked and rewritten completely, it makes little sense to keep this article instead of just starting from scratch.  Fram ( talk ) 16:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , History , Religion ,  and Europe .  Fram ( talk ) 16:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete topic is not notable.  Super Ψ Dro 08:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sounds like original research.  Renata • 3 01:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Energising India : Not clear how WP:NFILM has been met JMWt ( talk ) 09:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and Germany .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't find any relevant coverage BrigadierG ( talk ) 10:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jyoti_Sarup#Director : listed there.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 15:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, I found nothing that makes this film notable.  The film totally fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NPOL .  There is no in-depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, and no critical reviews have been found.  Grab Up - Talk 15:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom fails WP:GNG .  I do not find any coverage or reviews on the documentary.  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rina Yasutake : Combination of wp Notability events and wp:not news.   Story of a lady who died and the family kept the body in the house.  Two of the three sources were the news reports on it the third says that is is providing the Wikipedia data on the topic.   Tagged by others for sources and notability since December.  North8000 ( talk ) 17:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Japan ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Should really be an article about the "death of Rina Yasutake".  As a person, she isn't notable, the circumstances surrounding her demise seem to be, there are at least 4 BBC stories that pop up in Gnews and some in other news outlets...  But I'm not really sure that is enough for an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Even if you changed it to an article about her death, one could argue that all the family members are living persons and are thus entitled to WP:BLP protections.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 13:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No notability for the person, the events surrounding her demise could perhaps be written NPOV, but I don't see enough sourcing to do so.  A story could be told I suppose.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable death, not heard of it until this AfD.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdul Ghaffar Mauwi : It should have been sent back to AfC for improvements with respect to notability.  The sources cited do not help. ─ Aafī (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India .  ─ Aafī (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources and mostly unreliable with no notable coverage on the subject.  The subject does not seem to warrant a biographical page because of no significant, interesting, or unusual enough coverage to deserve attention or to be recorded.  Per nom fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not even close to meeting WP:GNG with absolutely no significant coverage.  Sources just make passing mentions in questionable sources.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CSSTidy : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 17:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , another article creation during a time of little scrutiny.  Searching reveals almost entirely mirror websites for downloading code and some forum posts, though no independent WP:SIGCOV of the product or anything that would assert notability.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 17:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Soft delete maybe?  Unable to find significant coverage.  Google returns packages downloads or indexed CSS pages that used it mostly.  Nothing in either News section.  It's mentioned in a lot of books on Google Books but mainly as a passing "This can minify your CSS. Moving on." type of way.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 01:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Faithbooking : This looks like a very serious book, and I think it is, but according to google books it contains the word "faithbook" nowhere.  I can't find a copy of "100 Creative Activities for Sabbath" but it was written by an author who seems to churn out list-of-activity books.  Doesn't seem particularly reliable.  I also can't find a copy of Pages of Faith: The Art of Spiritual Scrapbooking where this neologism no doubt originates, but this article also seems to have been created pretty shortly after the book was published.  In summary, I think this fails WP:NOTNEO BrigadierG ( talk ) 17:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- per nom.  No RS discuss this term, only random blogs.  NOTNEO is exactly the right reason to deep six this fluff.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 20:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with both of the above, and the article is furthermore loaded with WP:OR .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 20:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I tend toward inclusionism and even I can't find a shred of reason for this article to exist.  It ticks boxes for all the greatest hits: NN, NEO, OR and maybe PROMO.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 18:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Devoke water 10:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Casiano Mba : I was unable to find anything remotely resembling WP:SIGCOV .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 09:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 09:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect He didn't really do much, but he scored a goal at in the 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (CAF) , for which he is noted.  So my suggestion is to redirect to the tournament he was noted in.  Regards.  Govvy ( talk ) 10:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I see what you're saying, but there is just nothing here.  There's a total lack of WP:SIGCOV , and scoring in the qualification for a major tournament, in my view, is not enough to supersede that.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 16:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No source whatsoever.  Finding only database and blogs.  If any source (three) is found, ping me!   All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 17:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajmal Selab : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajmal Selab Whpq ( talk ) 19:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Afghanistan .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 19:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , without draftification this time.  He has not held any role that would constitute an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL , but has not been shown to pass WP:GNG on the sourcing either.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Do not Delete He is a significant politician in Afghanistan.  and most of Afghan peoples knows him.  He held the position of head of Afghan vice president during Karzai administration.  also He is a well-known lawyer over the country.  please do not delete the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parwiz ahmadi ( talk • contribs ) 20:05, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Most of X peoples knows him" is not a Wikipedia notability criterion, because anybody could say that about anything if they didn't actually have to prove it.  Notability is not a question of the things you say , it's a question of the quality and depth of the sourcing that can or can't be shown to support the things you say, and the sourcing in this article isn't cutting it as it isn't about him at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think Notability has been proved in various links.  2407:AA80:314:94CD:247B:8580:C461:D76F ( talk ) 11:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability is demonstrated by significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.   The only source provided that even comes close to aiding in establishing notability is this one .   All the others are brief mentions, or just quoting what he is saying about something else, or doesn't even mention him.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 11:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree with Whpq not enough notability.  Only one source has WP:SIGCOV The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete