hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2012 Scottsdale mayoral election: Okmrman ( talk ) 22:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Okmrman is indef-blocked for sockpuppetry.  [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Arizona .  Owen× ☎ 23:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notwithstanding a deletion rationale I don't entirely understand, the article is just a simple re-telling of the election result in a medium-sized American city.  I could see it maybe being kept if it were somehow exceptional in any way, including regional coverage, but that's not what's here.  SportingFlyer T · C 04:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , Scottsdale is large enough, being one of the 100 largest cities in the United States that its elections are almost certainly notable.  I'm not sure how someone can argue the politics of a large city like this one aren't at all notable.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 18:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For failing WP:GNG ?  There's only one source, the election results, and mayoral elections are classic WP:MILL fare.  SportingFlyer T · C 00:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Having one source is an issue that could easily be fixed by seeking out additional citations, that's not what AFD is for.  This isn't WP:MILL either, its a large enough city that it's elections ARE important.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 18:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Then find a source other than a local paper which reports on it.  SportingFlyer T · C 18:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:MILL .  No reason to not confine this to the biography about the mayor.  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Constant Okello-Obura: I do not think that the subject meet the notability criteria for academics either.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Uganda .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It appears this article was created and avoided AfC.  It would not have passed normal AfC, not close to NPROF.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 03:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unclear how any criteria of academic notability are met.  A few papers with 3 digits citations but not enough to claim criterium 1 is met https://scholar.google.com/scholar? hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Constant+Okello-Obura&btnG= JamesKH76 ( talk ) 11:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Xconfig: Not a notable element of the Linux kernel.  It has existed since 2005, and has had a sourcing issue since 2009.  No reliable significant sources have been found in 18 years, and I doubt any will turn up soon.  Some sources do exist that mention xconfig, but it is a passing mention that confirm it exists ( EXIST ), and it is certainly not the focus of them.  WhoAteMyButter ( 🌴 talk │ ☀️ contribs ) 04:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  WhoAteMyButter ( 🌴 talk │ ☀️ contribs ) 04:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If we're gonna have an article for every config and makefile in the Linux kernel, we'll be here for a long time.  Considering that even . bashrc , init.el , and . vimrc don't have their own own articles despite being some of the most edited config files in Linux is telling.  〜 Festucalex • talk 05:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lady Slim: User requested undeletion so here we are.  Here is the original deletion rationale copied over from last AfD - References are non-English so this was tough.  I went through them with Google Translate and the only source I see as reliable is BBC.  With that said, I found nothing reliable in English and also asked for assistance ] at WikiProject Azerbaijan but the only response(s) was from this ] SPA (named Dragqueen Lady Slim coincidentally) and this new account with only three edits.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello , recently this article was soft deleted and after contact the article was restored .  Further, one of the admins on Wikipedia removed the afd template from the article.  Not even a day has passed, but again the article is nominated for deletion.  This article is about Azerbaijan's first and only drag queen, which already makes the topic of the article unique to Wikipedia, but most importantly, the topic of the article can be useful for learning about LGBT topics and rights in Azerbaijan.  Futurolog21 ( talk ) 11:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Hi Futurolog21 so this topic is "unique to Wikipedia" but it isn't notable and has no coverage from notable publication that's why it was nominated for deletion.  Lililolol ( talk ) 22:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are notable publications and I have cited them in the article.  But not just English-language sources.  I found sources about Lady Slim in Azerbaijani, Ukrainian, Russian, Moldovan and even French languages and mentioned them in the article.  Futurolog21 ( talk ) 05:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subject of the article doesn't have any feats that show notability, being "unique" isn't an argument, UPE/SPA issues are also seemingly present.  - K evo 3 2 7 ( talk ) 07:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] i understand your comment, Armenian friend!  Futurolog21 ( talk ) 06:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023–24 PSL Reserve League: No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Also per wp:not regarding a stats only article.topic.    A stats only article with data on a season of a reserve league.   Per SNG these are not presumed notable and require GNG sourcing.   Does not have and highly unlikely to exist.  North8000 ( talk ) 12:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Clearly fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - reserve league not presumed notable and with no evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 18:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing GNG Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete like most reserve leagues in the world, there isn't enough coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 12:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dana KCM: Created 10 years ago by an account that did nothing else on Wikipedia, no content edits or inbound links have been made since.  The references are two old, deleted newspaper articles simply repeating the foundation's press release.  It really doesn't seem like the sort of coverage we'd need to write a decent article on this subject.  Searching for other sources I just get social media hits suggesting this foundation might not have been active past 2015.  Here2rewrite ( talk ) 13:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There used to be one book reference, but I just deleted it because it didn't actually say what the article said that it did (it was just the authors of a study thanking the foundation for a grant in 1 sentence, and non-significant) Mrfoogles ( talk ) 14:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Malaysia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I've conducted a search in books and news sources and couldn't find anything of value to justify inclusion per WP:NORG .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Susannah Montgomery: Fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 23:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations , Africa , Slovakia ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 2 gnews hits says it all.  Otherwise it is primary sources, fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DYKC-TV: Perhaps a redirect to Radio Philippines Network might be an WP:ATD ?  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, redirect, and SALT : Fails GNG, so delete, but is also a frequent UPE farm target, so redirect and SALT.  UtherSRG (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajagun Olusegun Peter: No evidence of established notability.  Sources are WP:ROTM and WP:ROUTINE coverages, some being dependent on the subject.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 14:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 14:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesnt meet WP:NACADEMIC .  Sources appears to be his appointment to a non notable organization in Abuja, Nigeria.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  15:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Turbo Lance II crash: No likelihood of lasting effects or prolonged coverage.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 22:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Tennessee .  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 22:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom.  - ZLEA T \ C 22:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and per nom.  Plane crashes are not inherently notable, and Wikipedia is not a repository of news stories.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 01:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom, WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:LASTING .  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 16:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Allen H. Greenfield: Neither the subject nor any of his books are notable.  Skyerise ( talk ) 19:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: on attempting to notify the article creator, I discovered that the article was originally written by a sockpuppet of banned puppetmaster Ekajati .  Skyerise ( talk ) 19:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: As far as I can tell, both IllumiNet Press and Luxor Press are imprints of the subject.  Searching for his books on Amazon and Google Books will reveal that they are really Lulu.com published.  Skyerise ( talk ) 20:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] More detail: this seems to be an independent and complete up-to-date list of the subject's works.  This site has conscientiously labelled them all "Independently published".  Skyerise ( talk ) 18:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Might have a shot under AUTHOR, there are several books showing up in Gscholar.  If they're all vanity press publications, likely nothing for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Taxila Business School: Was declined twice before moved by page creator.  Toadette Edit!  09:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 09:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is fact does NOT meet NCORP.  References are not reliable.  I also did a BEFORE and found that all the press is NEWSORGINDIA so likely an attempt to game the system through paid media.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 03:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NCORP no reliable sources, Majorly WP:NEWSORGINDIA citations.  Grabup ( talk ) 06:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tommy McCafferty: Nswix ( talk ) 19:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Ireland .  Nswix ( talk ) 19:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as fails WP:GNG .  MartyTheArty ( talk ) 14:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search found no evidence that he meets WP:NKICK or WP:NMMA .   I didn't find any evidence of a top 10 world kickboxing rank and his highest MMA ranking was #306.   I also didn't find significant independent coverage to show WP:GNG is met.   I found fight results and listings in databases, but nothing to show GNG is met.  Papaursa ( talk ) 00:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of California Institute of Technology trustees: Fails WP:NLIST and WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Education ,  and California .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Every university has a Board of trustees, this usually doesn't need a standalone page, especially not to just list non-notable names.  Reywas92 Talk 17:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Reywas.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Great Affairs: Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Tennessee .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  The article has been expanded since the AFD nomination but unfortunately, additional sources supporting notability were not included in this update.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - band is not notable enough and article sounds like an advertisement.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 16:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gajol Haji Nakoo Muhammad High School: Fails WP:GNG .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 12:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 12:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose : unless nominator is able to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media.  (I note that the local language is not English ).  This is a weak nomination and should be opposed on the basis of WP:BEFORE, and the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability unless that can be demonstrated.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] conducted concentrated searches in* Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I checked ProQuest and Nexis for print sources.  The school's website was entirely in English when it was live and as LibStar notes, there are only English sources cited in the Bengali Wikipedia version.  I think that's enough due diligence, but if significant independent coverage in non-English sources subsequently emerges then the article can be recreated; I don't think that's a good argument for keeping a poor-quality article based on insufficient English-language sources in the meantime.  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 15:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm satisfied these searches are sufficient for WP's policies.  Delete is a legitimate, albiet sad outcome.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 18:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You will need to strike out your "oppose" above.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only primary sources provided (same in Bengali version of this article).  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete another private school with no SIGCOV.  AryKun ( talk ) 04:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete