hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Emily Matson: Also, her only notability comes from her suicide, which in itself I do not believe to be a notable event.  AriTheHorse talk to me!  00:08 (updated 13:23), 21 December 2023 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Television ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - to the nom, did you do a BEFORE?  There seems to be a lot of coverage of her death in the American press.  Netherzone ( talk ) 02:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I did.  There is a lot of coverage of her death, but I do not think that this necessarily qualifies her for a biography as per WP:1E .  Suicide on its own, I do not believe is a "significant event", and  had she not commited suicide, none of those sources about her would have been written.  AriTheHorse talk to me!  05:11 (Updated 05:20), 21 December 2023 (UTC) Keep .  Press coverage nevertheless indicates basic notability. -- Ipigott ( talk ) 12:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't think she passes BIO, the journalism awards appear minor.  Rest of what we have is a basic resume, worked as a journalist, was hit by a train and passed away.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Some policy-based arguments would be helpful in coming to a consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Amilcar Ferreira: Sources are mostly dependent and passing mentions.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 18:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Economics ,  and Paraguay .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep - Its not just mentions, its entire interviews on national newspapers that are considered reliable sources here on Wikipedia.  Jeanette la Perdida Martin ( que? ) 21:00 3 May, 2024 (UTC) I humbly disagree with your take.  Interviews by him on reliable sources do not count towards WP:GNG because they are not independent of the subject.  -- Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 21:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] comment - a click here : https://www.google.com/search? q=amilcar+ferreira+economista&rlz=1CAUFPX_enUS1089&oq=amilcar+ferreira&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j35i39j0i22i30l3j69i60l3.5623j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1 confirms he is notable, while a click on news here shows no links but only because it searches for "Amilcar Ferreira - Wikipedia".  Jeanette 20 years inventing nicknames Martin ( que? ) 22:48 3 May, 2024 (UTC) Delete : BLP.  Fails GNG and NBIO.  The sources in the article and above do not meet WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth , interviews are not independent and do not demonstrate notability.  BEFORE found name mentions, interviews, nothing that meets SIRS from independent non-promotional sources addressing the subject indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 09:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We should keep this article.  From the page and sources I would say this person should have an article, but maybe there is sense in requiring more sources that are independent as mentioned by the user Timothy.  O.maximov ( talk ) 11:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  09:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Wheels (TV series): Tagged for notability since 2010 PROD removed with "deprod; has run since 1998", but nothing added to prove notability.  Donald D23 talk to me 02:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Motorsport ,  and United Kingdom .  Donald D23 talk to me 02:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Delhi .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 04:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The show won 'Best Magazine Format Show' at the Asian Television Awards in 2000, and the host Niret Alva won 'Best Current Affairs or Infotainment Programme Presenter' in 2002, not sure if that was soley for hosting Wheels or through multiple programs.  Foreign language sources aren't easiest to search if you don't know where to look, and stuff from 20 years ago even harder.  All I found was a Newsbank article (“Spin Doctor.”  The Economic Times, 2002.) that mentioned both of these awards.  Going to look for more sources but I'd probably lean keep.  WikiVirus C (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 10:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Kevin Manno: The only edits by creator User:Tvmediamanager are on this article, so WP:COI seems highly likely.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Television .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Illinois , New York ,  and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep Found a followup in Chicago Tribune & a feature in Illinois Entertainer which might be enough for WP:GNG.  Flurrious ( talk ) 18:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Simfy: It's little bit confusing because it died, then what was left was called Simfy Africa, but now if you Google it, it's completely different, not related to music subscription service.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : does not demonstrate sustained coverage by independent and reliable sources WP:GNG.  The available references primarily cover business transactions and partnerships, which do not establish the long-term significance of the company within the industry (WP:CORPDEPTH).  The liquidation of the company and the redirection of users to Deezer suggest that Simfy Music's impact was limited and transient.  Article also lacks comprehensive coverag that would indicate the service had a significant influence on music streaming or cultural impact (fails WP:SIGCOV) Cray04 ( talk ) 05:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Non-business transaction non-partnership SIGCOV: [38] Next couple from dewiki: [39] [40] [41] Treating Simfy Africa as the same entity: [42] [43] , [44] .  Notability is not temporary , and in any case widespread coverage across close to a decade indicates non-transient impact.  ~ A412 talk!  06:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per A412.  I also found [45] by Mybroadband, published 10 days earlier than the one A412 found.  Plenty of significant coverage here.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 18:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Sultan Masood Dakik: It had been created by a notorious sockpuppeteer, whose sock now has recreated this article.  See [34] for more information.  Although Sultan Masood Dakik has allegedly received Germany's Federal Cross of Merit (cant access the cited source to verify it), I still fail to see how thats enough to warrant having an article.  HistoryofIran ( talk ) 00:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The source confirming the award [35] can be accessed freely, just select "RP Basic" on the subscription options screen.  That said, the award may require confirmation in an official source, as this article alone feels insufficient.  However, if the subject has indeed received the Federal Cross of Merit, then it may be enough for them to have an article on Wikipedia per WP:ANYBIO .  — kashmīrī TALK 01:07, 15 July 2023 (UTC) The subject has received the lowest class of the Federal Order which, being distributed en masse (several per day), per discussion below does not translate into automatic notability for Wikipedia.  Edited: — kashmīrī TALK 13:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note I have just blocked the account that recreated this article as a sock of

Discussion outcome: no consensus
ChinaCast Education: However, no information can be found on Chinese search engines, and in fact, the media does not continue to focus on this for-profit learning organisation, which is in line with Wikipedia:Notability .  Zhuo1221 ( talk ) 04:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Zhuo1221 ( talk ) 04:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Isabella Pajardi: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Italy .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Sean Michel: InDimensional ( talk ) 14:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Arkansas .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources including Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources such as here , here , and here .  Also there is coverage at the Hindu here and The Baptist Press here so that together there is enough coverage to pass WP:GNG in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don’t believe there has been enough RS coverage or indications of notability to justify an article.  I vote delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
English Language School, Dubai: The only existing reference in the article is to the school's website.  The school's names make it difficult to search for, but if there is WP:SIGCOV it ought to be findable.  I don't think it meets WP:GNG , WP:NCORP or WP:NSCHOOL .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I added some references that appeared in two English-language newspapers published in Dubai.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Sourcing seems improved.  Searching for its former names I see some further potential sources.  -- Here2rewrite ( talk ) 16:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It would be helpful to get another opinion about sources added.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Xe-NONE: Only source is random interview posted to defunct site.  Zim Zala Bim talk 02:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The corresponding article in Russian at ru:Xe-NONE has several reviews and other articles listed as references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Russia .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and translate per Eastmain, assuming those refs are good.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
NASCAR on television in the 1970s: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent NASCAR fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced, consists of announcments, centrally those about the seasons, WP:PRIMARY , mostly dead and redirected pages, TV schedules, those centrally about the season with the broadcasting being merely mentions and most of those being YouTube posts; none of these helping this list to assert notability.  An WP:ATD will be to merge to NASCAR on television and radio .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 18:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Motorsport , Lists ,  and United States of America .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 18:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a valid split from NASCAR on television and radio , alternatively merge to that target.  Splitting individual decades keeps the parent article from becoming too cluttered and unreadable.  See WP:SIZESPLIT and WP:NOMERGE .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Valid split?  ...which is made of YouTube links.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  02:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Per GhostOfDanGurney.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Shallipopi: No sourcing found beyond what's in the article, which isn't RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is coverage of him, for some fraud event.  That doesn't help notability and can be seen as an attack if we were to source it here.  Not meeting notability for criminals either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] :His stream is very much notable as he is listed on top music charts in his country with good rankings, Turntable charts and Apple Music and i added the independent links for each Tobiladun ( talk ) 10:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Sock strike.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 20:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:BASIC for having wide news coverage.  Naomijeans ( talk ) 17:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - sources are not great but enough coverage to suggest notability based on his existing material and likely to increase over time.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 21:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Legend Saravanan: Article fails WP:NACTOR and doesn't meet WP:GNG Monhiroe ( talk ) 12:31, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Lead in a film with plenty of coverage.  Didn't perform at the box office, but still got media attention.  ACTOR is met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Saravana Stores : The person do not have significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.  Fails WP:NACTOR.  All the sources about the movie that he produced and acted in the lead role.  Fails GNG 116.68.101.209 ( talk ) 10:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Bold third relist for more input.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  The film isn't enough for WP:ACTORBIO , but it seems that he just squeaks by on WP:GNG .  I'd prefer a redirect to Saravana Stores or The Legend (2022 film) over deletion.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Article previously existed under different title: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saravanan Arul .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus