hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
United Party of Canada (2009) : McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 03:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada .  McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 03:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough reliable sources EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 14:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bader Al-Fadhel : Simione001 ( talk ) 03:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Warbeat : Binksternet ( talk ) 18:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Binksternet ( talk ) 18:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Caemorgan : Pretzelles ( talk ) 19:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions .  Pretzelles ( talk ) 19:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk ) 20:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete If roads do not inherit notability from buildings that lie along them, they surely do not when it isn't even clear that building is notable.  This is just a road for which no claim of notability is really made.  Plus the coordinates are way off, which makes me suspect GNS as a source.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Its an OS settlement rather than just a road or individual building.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 18:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes - according to the historic ( c. 1900 ) and contemporary maps in the List of Historic Placenames it would appear that Caemorgan is a settlement.   It should be noted the article was originally started about the village , but an IP subsequently changed it to a road : diff .  Resonant Dis tor tion 18:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We need more than a name on an OS map, though.  If someone can find some other corroboration I'd be quite happy.  Mangoe ( talk ) 21:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A handful of neighbors that live on a short street does not make a notable village.  Would need substantive sources to establish notability.  Reywas92 Talk 02:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joementum : Recent usage has no connection to Lieberman's original usage, but the current President having the same first name.  Equivocation of terms separated by 14-17 years MacAddct1984 ( talk | contribs ) 22:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Politics , United States of America ,  and Connecticut .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Meets the notability guidelines by virtue of having been documented in WP:RS used in (1) 2004, (2) 2006, (3) 2008, (4) 2020, and (5) 2023.  The fact that the last two usages were for a different Joe than for the usages in 2004 and 2006 is irrelevant, as there is a clear connection.  The 2008 usage is a mockery of the 2004 usage.  Where is Matt?  ( talk ) 01:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDICT .  What we have here is a portmanteau of "Joe" and "momentum" that can be applied to more than one Joe.  This is a clear delete under NOTDICT which is policy.  Regarding the citations given in the article, yes, these are all reliable but they are all WP:PRIMARY .  See particularly WP:PRIMARYNEWS if there is any doubt about that (there shouldn't be).  Per WP:BASIC , Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.  So there is no notability for this term, and NOTDICT rules it out anyway.  An acceptable WP:ATD would be to redirect to Joe Lieberman .  Merge is not required as the mergeable content is already on that page.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 21:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Sirfurboy said it better and more efficiently than I can.  I would quibble on whether there is any reason to redir, however, but that idea doesn't bother me so much as it seems like a waste of time.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 20:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ernst Stapelberg : Three sentences here was the best I found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Quite a lot of coverage that actually names him in the lead, but still don't think any of it would qualify for WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bernard Glincosky : I’m the creator of this page but after editing I realized subject does not have as many sources as I thought they may have had.  I’ll leave it up to you guys whether you think it deserves an article or not.  HeroicWarriors ( talk ) 11:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Coverdale, Louisiana : Mangoe ( talk ) 03:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Louisiana .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No source, no article.   And there are no sources that aren't SEO spam.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 03:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A zero-source creation by the sock-puppeteer who ran Hissrap18 ( talk · contribs ) and Futurewiki ( talk · contribs ) is not worth our time with all of the effort of fixing everything about a lazy 1-sentence zero-information stub, one of many by the sock-puppeteer, some of which are already deleted.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 13:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I couldn't find any sources, and agree with Uncle G on the value of saving this in any case.  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation 19:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sitting volleyball at the 2023 ASEAN Para Games : No indication of notability under GNG or SNG.   Basically a stats-only (other than 1 sentence saying that it occurred) article about a particular type of volleyball at a particular set of games.  Refs have no coverage other than scores/results.  North8000 ( talk ) 02:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
GrillGrill : Sources 1 and 3 are dead.  Source 4 is a blog.  Fails WP:MUSICBIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 19:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Denmark .  LibStar ( talk ) 19:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Pitchfork (website) isn't a blog, it's a reliable website source for music as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources , imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  A bot repaired the sources, but 1 doesn't even mention the band, just the witch house music genre, and the others are passing mentions with no WP:SIGCOV so fails WP:GNG .   Searches on Newspapers Extended only turn up cooking and barbecuing results, although that's music to my ears.  BBQ boffin grill me 00:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   The sources appear to be a combination of blogs and passing mentions, and a couple quick searches didn't bring up anything significant.  LittlePuppers ( talk ) 19:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tolu Okojie : Has received minimal media coverage in reliable media.  Only three notable media articles about him exist and of the three, one is interview [22] which does not count for notability leaving only two which is still below minimum requirement for WP:BLP .  Ednabrenze ( talk ) 06:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria .  Ednabrenze ( talk ) 06:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Food and drink .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] del insufficient independent coverage for GNG.  - Altenmann >talk 16:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just not enough coverage for this person.  [23] , somewhat RS, this is an interview [24] and this in a local newspaper [25] .  I don't think have sufficient coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kathy Buchanan : Does not meet WP:JOURNALIST either as a journalist or author.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No ongoing activity for author, official site is now a dead-end.  MNewnham ( talk ) 18:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is all I can find, I think it's a different person [3] .  Delete for lack of sourcing but willing to reconsider if we find more.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The references used in the article are insufficient and do not establish WP:NBIO.  [NB: Cathy Marie Buchanan is a different person.] -- Cl3phact0 ( talk ) 10:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV and Goodreads is unreliable.  No GNG met.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Secuestro : The only attempt at a notability claim here is that it won awards from student film competitions -- but our notability tests for films only care about film awards that can be reliably sourced as significant , and don't just indiscriminately accept every single film award that exists.  Otherwise, this is written rather more like an advertisement than a proper encyclopedia article, and isn't citing any reliable or WP:GNG -worthy sourcing for anything else either.  Bearcat ( talk ) 03:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Dominican Republic ,  and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 03:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claim to notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 23:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anandamayi Kali Temple, Brahmanbaria : Fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 02:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Hinduism ,  and Bangladesh .  UtherSRG (talk) 02:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Sree Sree Anandamayee Kali Mandir" spelling:

Discussion outcome: delete
Effingham-Teutopolis Christmas Classic : LibStar ( talk ) 00:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Illinois .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
P-17 (Dubai) : The sources the article currently cites, while they may have been acceptable by 2009 standards, are not significant coverage by 2023 standards as they read like routine announcements.  Title is admittedly hard to search for, but the only source I can find is this , which may not even be about the same project.  * Pppery * it has begun... 01:35, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , couldn't find any suitable sources.  I don't think the Gale article is the same project considering it contradicts the article here with details and dates.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 08:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vladimir Cojocaru : The football player only came up in databases when I did a WP:BEFORE .  However, that does not count as WP:SIGCOV .  It's been tagged as {{ BLP one source }} since May 2020, so I'm doubtful that any other sources could be found.  – MJL ‐ Talk ‐ ☖ 05:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Moldova .  – MJL ‐ Talk ‐ ☖ 05:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly fails GNG.  My before search only brought up statistical directories.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 13:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails by every measure.  Easy delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adarsh Liberal : Ratnahastin ( talk ) 02:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Internet celebrity .  Although, that seems to have a potential move afoot to rename it "Influencer".  IMO, "Influencer" and "Adarsh Liberal" have a lot in common - they're both flash terminology of the moment, used to define any number of personalities.  — Maile ( talk ) 03:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Popular culture , Internet ,  and India .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article cleary fails WP:GNG .  Written in POV and fan voice.  च҉न҉्҉द҉्҉र҉ ҉व҉र҉्҉ध҉न҉ Message 12:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I wouldn't merge, the term is too area specific to be known outside the area.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep The term gained some traction online [40] and [41] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable term from social media and memes.  WP:DICDEF .  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The term  has gained traction in the mainstream media and passes WP:GNG News Laundry , Hindustan Times , India Today , BBC , The News Minute , The Indian Express , Deccan Herald , The Economic Times , NDTV , Scroll , News18 .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Apparently, all of the sources listed above come from the same time when the meme was trending .  No evidence of lasting coverage.  CharlesWain ( talk ) 06:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : as per Pharaoh of the Wizards, passes WP:GNG .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 05:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you point out a couple of sources that ensure the subject meets WP:GNG ?  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 06:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Still no consensus yet.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sustaining coverage, just another Twitter war only cared about by a small group of people who need to go outside.  Nate • ( chatter ) 20:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Whistleblowers Australia : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all but 1 of the sources are its own website.  Fails GNG and WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete