hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Radix DLT : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  No claim to significance in the wider technological or financial community.  Lack of WP:RS , the majority of sourcing is either blogspam or press releases.  Principal contributor has only edited this article, and nothing else.  Likely WP:PROMO , potentially in support of a pump-and-dump effort as cursory research indicates a recent promo push.  Possibly undisclosed WP:PAID .  Mel ma nn 11:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it clearly has no claim to notability .  OhHaiMark ( talk ) 13:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Coverage in Finyear, Cryptonews and other non-RS sites are what I find, this is not a notable subject for wikipedia.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  What's used in the article is of the same quality...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency , Organizations ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The project has blog articles going back many years, and has had peer reviewed academic papers published, unlikely to be pump and dump with that history.  2A02:C7C:F118:D600:8CE:2581:B679:4325 ( talk ) 10:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Blog articles are really useless for notability as they have no editorial oversight.  See Wikipedia:Verifiability for more info.  Could you show us some of the peer-reviewed academic sources covering the cryptocurrency?  OhHaiMark ( talk ) 12:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is a Forbes article covering the company.  Forbes is a reputable source.  https://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2019/01/09/this-hermitic-engineer-is-plotting-the-death-of-blockchain/ Marepy ( talk ) 14:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But that's only one source.  We need three to make this article notable enough to stay.  OhHaiMark ( talk ) 14:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, are you the IP who noted the blog articles.  If so, you'll need to edit exclusively logged-in so people won't think you're socking .  OhHaiMark ( talk ) 14:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not sufficiently notable.  I have seen so-called academic papers on the underlying algos written by Radix staffers.  That does not count as an academic source, not least because it was not peer reviewed.  MarcGarver ( talk ) 15:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Correction.  The Cerberus Paper has been peer reviewed Source: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6h427354#author 2A02:C7C:F118:D600:8CE:2581:B679:4325 ( talk ) 15:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of GAC vehicles with joint venture : Nobody at NPP has wanted to mark it as patrolled, and I suppose it would be possible to go through all the claims in all the fields in the table and look for sources, but nobody has volunteered to do that.  Meanwhile we have an effectively unsourced article in mainspace, which doesn’t seem satisfactory.  Not sure what to do with it so bringing here for consensus.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Transportation , Lists ,  and China .  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless massively improved.  An effectively unsourced list is not acceptable in mainspace, especially without any evidence that it meets WP:NLIST .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject lacks the necessary elements to meet the WP:NLIST .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Obaseki : All of the 20 sources cited are primary sources and are unreliable.  Ednabrenze ( talk ) 07:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Nigeria .  Ednabrenze ( talk ) 07:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Law .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with the nominator.  The subject did not meet WP:GNG Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Black (music manager) : Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 23:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Business .  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 23:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails NBASIC, particularly the intellectual independence requirement.  Mach61 ( talk ) 01:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Seems that the creator of the page has a close connection to John Black which appears to be only promotional and probably getting paid to do so.  Punk Rock London ( talk ) 15:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTRESUME .  Mr. Black has been mentioned in some reliable sources, but these are typically in the form of brief statements in articles that are actually about his companies, without any background info to indicate that his career and biography are of interest.  Meanwhile, the article is clearly an attempted promotion written by himself or an employee, not even trying to appear neutral.  No, he did not pioneer the design of musician websites in the 1990s, and his recent app is not the first that ever offered a rewarding listening experience.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom and everyone else.  ( WP:NOTPROMOTION , WP:NOTRESUME , WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY ).  JSFarman ( talk ) 16:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as violating WP:NOTRESUME , given absence of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 05:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete very much WP:ISNOT .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 19:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023–24 I-League 3 : WP:NSEASONS doesn't seem to indicate that this sort of thing is presumed notable, and I'm unable to find WP:SIGCOV of this season after conducting an online search.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://khelnow.com/football/2023-06-indian-football-aiff-league-committee-meeting It will be updated soon as competition starts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.190.165 ( talk ) 15:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, non-notable season for low-level competition.  Giant Snowman 18:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] this is 4th tier competition and national level.  so it's not going to be semi pro.  and league is going to be started by this year so the details everything will get updated on the page 103.249.7.210 ( talk ) 19:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Auxilium ISC School, Kottiyam : Database sites like Careers360 and Hello Bhai lack WP:ORGDEPTH .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
All-American Amateur Baseball Association : There is no indication of significant independent coverage of the organization.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball ,  and Pennsylvania .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , United States of America ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as this isn't even a league, it's just an organization that holds an annual tournament.  Spanneraol ( talk ) 21:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not pass WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG .  User:Let'srun 03:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Bodycombe : Sources currently in the article are not independent.  A WP:BEFORE search found this piece in the Guardian.  Note that it's a blogpost and therefore insufficiently reliable to establish notability; see WP:RSPSS .  Claims of his credits are insufficient to establish notability and unsourced; establishing notability requires verifiable evidence.  This is not relevant to notability, but we should be aware of it during the discussion: The Twitter/X account @lateralcast, which is ostensibly run by Bodycombe , has previously canvassed followers to prevent article deletion of a different article here .  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 17:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Radio ,  and United Kingdom .  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 17:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He was asking people to make the article better, so it wasn't deleted.  He was not telling people to participate in the deletion discussion.  History6042 ( talk ) 13:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edwin Mayberry : Fram ( talk ) 06:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Military ,  and Massachusetts .  Fram ( talk ) 06:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Mztourist ( talk ) 08:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per WP:NOTMEMORIAL .   Yet another faceless private who died of disease before ever getting overseas; there's nothing here providing any basis for notability whatsoever.   This is a pretty startling gaffe (as is the one for the co-namer of the town legion hall) from someone with the creator's edit count, and might warrant a look into their other creations.  Ravenswing 08:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Magnolia677 ( talk ) 11:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a brief section into his hometown's article, he's got the Legion post named after him.  Rest is nothing notable, dying from the Spanish Flu would be considered routine.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A non notable building by a private organisation is named after him and one other, no reason why this building or this soldier should be included in the town article per WP:UNDUE .  Fram ( talk ) 14:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ... and merge what, precisely?  Ravenswing 12:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL .  I agree that a brief section would be WP:UNDUE as well.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 17:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete outright on account of failing the notability criteria and without any merging.  Text unsupported by sources should be deleted and not dumped elsewhere.   - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:54, 22 September 2023  (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harmony Hill, Pennsylvania : It does not even fulfill the "legal recognition" requirement of WP:GEOLAND .  It's just a road called "Harmony Hill Rd".  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 00:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 00:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is not a road.   It is, which should come as no surprise, a hill.  The GNIS record says that it had to involve some geologic maps to account for the name.   On the old topographic maps, "Harmony Hill" always labels the 485 feet (148 m) hill.   Most of them put the name above the hill, except for some which put it to the bottom-right.   And through a GNIS comedy of errors this apparent unexplainable labelling of a cross-roads had to be accounted for, by the database importer who did not see the hill next to the letter "H".

Discussion outcome: delete
Weekly Economic Times : Fails the general and organization-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Organizations , Business , Companies ,  and Bangladesh .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
José Dávila : No evidence of notability.  The closest to WP:SIGCOV I found was a few sentences here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Peru .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 01:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 08:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Temisan Emmanuel : Sources are paid, WP:PROMO and regular Run of the mill .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Nigeria .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Literally per nom.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 20:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Television ,  and Advertising .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Trivial role in Glamour Girls, rest of their work is as an influencer.  Typical fluffy language used, sources I find are celebrity gossip [2] , [3] .  I don't see how this isn't PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per the nom.  Fails WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 04:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Far way to notability.  NACTOR & SIGCOV problem.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 21:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I see sources but these sources does not satisfy the general notability guidelines .  They are majorly interviews and press releases.  Probably, too soon for an encyclopaedic entry .  Best, Reading Beans 10:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, can't find any notability  -- Devoke water 16:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bernard Whiteside : Routine coverage here fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 20:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete References do not support notability, although in this case there may be more references to be found.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please see WP:NEXIST .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 23:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Bilateral relations , Moldova , United Kingdom ,  and Ecuador .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The best sources I could find were a listing of the ambassadors to Moldova ( https://regatulunit.mfa.gov.md/en/content/history-embassy ) and a short interview by what looks like a Moldovan tourism company ( https://www.welcome-moldova.com/articles/british_ambassador.shtml ), but no significant coverage per WP:GNG -- DannyS712 ( talk ) 03:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO for lack of significant coverage.  Danny's search shows this is the case.  LibStar ( talk ) 13:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Under Kos : Search results show nothing about this street, and I couldn't verify if it even exists (or if it's some kind of hoax).  CycloneYoris talk!  20:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a (somewhat amusing) literal translation, it looks like the street is called Pod Kosom .  It's not immediately obvious if the translation is even correct, as the etymology isn't listed.  A google search finds nothing of particular significance.  The street was mentioned in a single recent Slobodna Dalmacija article apparently, based on the eponymous tag (in Croatian) .  If the city district of Meje, Split had an article, this could be redirected there perhaps.  Most of the present article content is actually just about Marjan, Split .  -- Joy ( talk ) 23:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , Transportation ,  and Croatia . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just a normal street on Marjan, fails GNG, doesn't deserve its own article. Note a BEFORE search should be for Pod kosom as noted above. SportingFlyer T · C 00:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Most of the article is copied from Marjan, Split . — Diannaa ( talk ) 14:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails notability guidelines without any available sources. Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 15:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above. Consider salting if recreation is repeated again. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 09:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Statuska : Current sourcing is churnalism and the section on the wearable device reads like an advert.  (well actually the rest of the article also reads like an advert though perhaps not as strikingly)  Pichpich ( talk ) 21:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Websites ,  and Israel .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing but press releases to be found.  Amusingly, the article itself explains why: it's tiny for a social media platform, having only thousands of users .  ~ A412 talk!  22:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines, this article lacks sources to demonstrate the subject's notability.  Dejaqo ( talk ) 21:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources provided are PR type and from reliable.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 21:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all above.  No objection to draftifying, would there be such a request.  gidonb ( talk ) 16:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete