List of Aerolíneas Argentinas destinations : iMahesh ( talk ) 02:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  iMahesh ( talk ) 02:43, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: There are Multiple articles with the same lists on the Wikipedia, should I go ahead and include them on this AfD discussion?  Or if any consensus is arrived at this discussion We can proceed for CSD#G4 .  -- iMahesh ( talk ) 02:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The reason given for deletion is flawed - this is not a recreation of the deleted article "List of TUI fly Netherlands destinations" as claimed - it is concerned with an entirely different airline and has been in existence since 2005.  While many similar articles have been deleted recently, lets frame the discussion properly - this article does seem to be better sourced than many of these destinations lists, so there is probably more that warrants preserving.  Nigel Ish ( talk ) 08:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The rationale here is flawed as stated by Nigel Ish, so that should not be a reason considered in this case.  As for the airline destinations itself, I checked through Google, and did find a few articles that discuss some destinations ARG serve [4] [5] [6] [7] , so it seems to pass WP:NLIST .  While there is a "needs updating" tag on the list section (dating back to 2021), WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP .  There are some well-maintained lists of airline destinations that exist ( List of Singapore Airlines destinations is an example), and I believe this article has the potential to be well-maintained as well (provided someone does it).  Since the above-mentioned AFD lists a particular discussion on WP:VPP , personally I think this is a limited consensus as the discussion is not particularly active (only around 20-25 users participated in a period of 1 month) and the relevant Wikiprojects (eg WP:AIRLINES ) were not informed  properly, thus I'd personally not be convinced that the VPP is a good rationale.  There was also a DRV that came after another AFD involving the SIA article, which eventually closed as keep.  I also don't think this fails WP:NOTTRAVEL which was also mentioned in the discussion above.  Lists of destinations are not the same as travel guides, because they only provide the destinations without the flights between each one of them.  Taking the first few airports on the list as examples, is there a flight between Bahia Blanca and Catamarca?  Is there a flight between Cordoba and El Calafate?  A travel guide would tell me a definitive answer as to yes or no.  This list, however, does not, and without the exact flights it is practically useless for travel information.  This probably would be more of a concern if the airline operates flights out of only 1 hub (such as the SIA one which flies out of Singapore only), but with 2 hubs and domestic flights I don't think this is the case.  S5A-0043 Talk 11:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Argentina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep as the nomination rationale is entirely incorrect, this article has never been subject of a deletion discussion in the past.  Jumpytoo Talk 20:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn Per S5A-0043 .  -- iMahesh ( talk ) 00:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep