hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Bette Lowes: No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Three hits in Gnews in Spanish-language media [22] , but mostly just name drops.  I can't find extensive coverage of this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the vast majority of secondary sources are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  There are two LA Times articles [23] [24] that mention her, but both 'in a local politician does x' way and I'd say they were WP:ROTM .  Shaws username ( talk ) 15:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enhanced network selection: Not clear what the topic really means outside of GSM , not clear that sources exist to show notability JMWt ( talk ) 09:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to GSM I guess?  Seems like an obscure and obsolete feature of old cellular phones used by one particular network during a transition period?  I guess Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia and could cover a topic this obscure, if there were appropriate references, but there don't seem to be.  I just see forum posts and patent applications (which are highly technical and don't explain the term, and are primary sources we wouldn't generally use anyway).  -- Here2rewrite ( talk ) 16:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a generic term.   The article is unsourced, and was presumably written based on a single-source: a description in a c.2005 manual about the GSM protocol.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lori Geary: Also seems to be a decent amount of unencyclopedic cruft.  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Television , Georgia (U.S. state) , New York ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Noting batch nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Emmy-winner, no?  Hyperbolick ( talk ) 07:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Regional Emmys, which can be a bit controversial but don’t generally confer notability.  Also, you might want to sign your comment, User:Hyperbolick .  I’m assuming you made a typo.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 20:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only see articles confirming she's joined a station, then left another station.  Nothing extensive about her as a person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 11:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 SAM Air Cessna Grand Caravan crash: Event doesn't meet the event criteria and the general notability guideline .  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 13:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Indonesia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] • Delete to second this, the article is a stub documenting a disaster, i'd agree with deletion of this article in this sense.  Lolzer3000 ( talk ) 15:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Geeta Khanna: I had PRODed this not realizing the article had been deleted before as a PROD in 2012, and then recreated in 2013.  Jay 💬 07:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Film , Entertainment ,  and India .  Jay 💬 07:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:NACTOR .  I did not find any significant coverage of this dub artist, only passing mentions.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 01:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No SNG, No GNG, why to keep?  Please Delete it.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 16:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tribalism and regionalism in Zimbabwe: On such a sensitive and contentious topic we do not serve our readers properly by having a mishmash of unsourced statements, huge gaps and random factoids.   Most of the sources cited do not deal with the stated topic as a whole but with individual incidents that the creator is weaving together to tell a larger but often apparently OR story.  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions .  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments .  This is very close to TNT.  Is there anything that can be done that can save it?  Bearian ( talk ) 18:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The X KXRX: Even when we were over-presuming notability for radio stations (relying more on an essay than on GNG ), that was never extended to Internet radio stations such as this one.  The sources here are a blog, relate to the "real" KXRX it was named for (supporting material that really belongs at KJAQ ), the websites for shows carried on the stream, and a YouTube video (that is not about the station).  I doubt this meets GNG, or NWEB to the extent it falls under that.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Internet , Websites ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nomination, any significant coverage is about the namesake actual radio station.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 08:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ankur Kalra: Furthermore, the subject appears to be sending paid editors at the page to "improve" it, leaving it a mess of promo and fluff.  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 02:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Medicine ,  and United States of America .  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 02:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article is pretty terrible: mostly a self-promotional mess with only a couple of references that aren’t related to the subject or their place of work.  As for notability, I don’t think the subject meets WP:NPROF even with fellowship in the American College of Physicians and American College of Cardiology, and I could find no other sigcov.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 04:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the highest cited articles where the author is either first or last author are reviews; the highest cited research article where he is a first author has 55 citations.  I think this does not pass WP:NPROF #1; also the article is clearly promotional and would need to be rewritten.  -- hroest 21:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Junya Ito (footballer, born 1998): Created at a time when WP:NFOOTY was enough with an appearance in the J3 League.  Can't find anything but stats pages for this player, and he's barely made a mark on Japanese football.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 20:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Japan .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 20:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Maybe not retired , but still a player with no accomplishments whatsoever and consequently no coverage.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per Geschichte .  Svartner ( talk ) 01:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 21:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  per nom -- Devoke water 19:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vodien Internet Solutions: The article relies on routine business listings and primary sources.  There is some independent coverage on the company getting acquired, but that is considered to be trivial coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH .  None of the references provides significant coverage of the company.  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 03:50, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and Singapore .  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 03:50, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only "coverage" I found was the acquisition .  I would say redirect to the parent company, but it doesn't have an article.  SWinxy ( talk ) 21:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Menzel: The notability of this individual is not established independently of his company, the Hollywood Critics Association .  All the coverage he has received is in context of a series of related controversies involving his company.  In fact, about 70% of the content on this page is copied from the company's Wikipedia page.  Notability is not inherited, please see WP:INVALIDBIO , WP:BIO1E and WP:PSEUDO .  Beyond these controversies, there is very little biographical information and that is cited to low-quality sources such as Muck Rack , alumni sites, and the 'about' page of a primary source.  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 22:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Film .  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 22:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, the page should be deleted as the notability of this individual is not established independently of his company, the Hollywood Critics Association/Hollywood Creative Alliance.  AnneNonnyMouse ( talk ) 01:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Internet , New Jersey ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 05:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd for deletion, supposedly by the article subject, so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daurr: /in-depth coverage.  ROTM coverage like this is not enough to meet GNG.  Not every TV drama aired on TV channels inherently get a WP page.  In Pakistan, we only have TV dramas, nothing else, so we don't need an article on each one of them based solely on some ROTM or paid/PR coverage.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 15:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete - Couldn't find anything substantial on Google search.  Sources listed are unreliable majorly.  Sameeerrr ( talk ) 09:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Ruttan: As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to show significant reliable source coverage supporting substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, significant effects their leadership had on the development of the community, and on and so forth.  But the bulk of the content here is background biographical trivia that isn't evidence of notability, while his mayoralty is summarily dispatched as "election result, the end" -- and for sourcing, there's one hit of verification of the election results, three primary sources that aren't support for notability, and one book that doesn't cover the subject at all, but is here to tangentially "verify" background information about his ancestors , and fails to even really do that because it contains the surname Ruttan but was published in 1869, and thus obviously fails to name John Ruttan at all for the purposes of properly verifying that he's actually a descendant of any of the Ruttans covered in that book.  And even if that were somehow more verifiable than it is, that still wouldn't help to support John Ruttan's notability anyway, since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED .  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much more sourcing and substance than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of sustained coverage that isn't news or primary sources in my BEFORE.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 15:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lloyd Berryman: As always, the notability test for a mayor is not passed just by minimally verifying that he existed, and instead requires significant coverage and analysis in reliable sources with which we can write a substantial article about his political impact: specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  But this just basically backgrounds a bit of biographical trivia before dispatching his entire political career with one sentence, and doesn't cite nearly enough sourcing to claim that he would pass WP:GNG or WP:NPOL -- and even his military background still isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of sufficient sourcing to pass GNG.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have significantly better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Not seeing a claim to notability outside of being the mayor of Burlington.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL for simply being a mayor and fails WP:BIO more broadly.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Geetha (2022 film): There are these reviews: [17] although they are not notable (the second one if from a blacklisted site so I had to comment it out).  There is a video review from NTV here (don't think it counts towards notability).  The issue is that there is not enough (at least two) reliable reviews seven from The Times of India or 123telugu that review so many films.  All the production sources just say that the film is releasing [18] [19] (from OTTplay ).  The issue with the second source is that a lot of the information is about other films: Earlier this year, another protege of VV Vinayak, Vassishta, debuted with the fantasy drama Bimbisara starring Kalyan Ram, Catherine Tresa and Samyuktha Menon in lead roles.  The film emerged a blockbuster at the box office.  Meanwhile, VV Vinayak is gearing up for his Hindi cinema debut with the remake of Prabhas, Shriya Saran starrer Chatrapathi, originally helmed by SS Rajamouli.  The latter’s father Vijayendra Prasad has reworked the story for the Hindi version.  Bellamkonda Sai Sreenivas and Nushrat Barucha are the leads in the untitled film that’s expected to hit screens later this year or early 2023.  A Google search brings up nothing.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 09:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete No Notable reviews found.Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (films) -- Monhiroe ( talk ) 19:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete