Zara Zarib : No evidence of further film participation or notability from existing credit.  Fails WP:NACTOR .  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 06:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bangladesh .  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 06:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  They do not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) .  Qcne (talk) 08:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I wouldn't say "unremarkable", although he might not pass Wikipedia's guidelines for notability.  He did win a national film award in the eighth most populous country in the world.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 18:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not seeing anything that would suggest this person is remarkable or otherwise noteworthy, as you latterly note.  I guess the outcome of this would determine if we should look at other actor articles on that list also.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 20:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I think the question should be asked as follows: does Bangladesh National Film Award for Best Child Artist meet WP:ANYBIO 's criteria?  I'm not sure.  Deckkohl ( talk ) 14:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment We have articles about every recipient of an Academy Juvenile Award .  Even those, like Ivan Jandl and Vincent Winter , who have little or no sourcing beyond an obituary saying they won it.  This suggests that the community believes that award meets WP:ANYBIO .  Is the Bangladeshi award different?  Notability is not temporary , so if they're notable for a performance as a child actor, they needn't continue to act or continue to receive coverage.  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 22:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This person has received well-known and significant award in the field of film in Bangladesh.  Please see WP:ANYBIO . ≈ Farhan «Talk» 05:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting because I think some of these comments here are advocating Keeping this article without stating that opinion in BOLD font.  The discussion seems to rest on the question, is winning Bangladesh National Film Award for Best Child Artist enough to establish GNG?  Looking over the list on that page of previous winners, my guesstimate is about half of them have Wikipedia articles, likely based on future accomplishments.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP : My thinking is that if an award is notable, then those receiving the award are notable.  Particularly in the arts where future contributions from the subject seem likely.  CaseArmitage ( talk ) 14:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 07:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I would suggest that every category from the most important film award in any country with a "llywood-type" film industry would go toward the criteria.  I can't really see how picking and choosing which countries or which awards from the most prominent awards in a country would be NPOV on Wikipedia's part.  (Are choreographers more or less notable than sound designers, is Nollywood more or less notable than Dhallywood, for example...).  The only possible criteria I can imagine would be how many years the award has been given, but this one would surpass any reasonable cutoff at 40+years.  — siro χ o 07:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus