hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sophia Khousadian: I can can't seem to find any other sort of actual coverage of the subject.  I removed a section on apparent awards but was only supported by a press release.  I could find nothing else to support any notability as per WP:ANYBIO .  McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 17:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors ,  and Education .  McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 17:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note The article was nominated for G11 as I was writing this up so I am good either way but will leave this up in case the G11 doesn't hold up.  McMatter ( talk ) / ( contrib ) 17:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Some known SEO sources removed.  The remaining "shoutoutla" is likely more vanity nonsense.  Note that there is a tremendous number of blackhat SEO blogs and publications out there that have advertorials for this person.  It's very hard to pick out anything that's actually reliable since there's been an extensive effort of self-promotion.  For transparency, I've blocked the article creator until they can utilize the proper paid disclosures - this was based on prior articles they created that were clearly paid spam.  Sam Kuru (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can find no coverage in independent reliable sources.   There's plenty of press releases though.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 18:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article has been moved to draft for revision by editor Significa liberdade .  After some time, the author of the article moved the article back to the main space without significant revisions.  As for the article itself, I did not find any WP:RS Bulklana ( talk ) 19:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - definitely not notable.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 19:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IPrice Group: BoraVoro ( talk ) 06:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Malaysia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : according to the reason provided by the nom.  Charlie ( talk ) 04:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Esqyr: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Education ,  and Minnesota .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is the former president of Esqyr, and yes, it should be deleted.  At the time, it was notable: it was the first public benefit corporation focused on test prep, and served a dozen schools across the country.  We donated thousands to orgs that helped reform certain ABA policies, which was also notable.  Still, the bar exam will change soon and our little effort was a nice footnote in how bar prep changed over the past 10 years.  It shouldn't be a separate entry, however.  Chris hhh99 ( talk ) 03:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Atlas Energy: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 13:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Pennsylvania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A.D. Hopkins: One of which was already deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Reed ) This article has the same issues.  It exists to promote an Imbrifex Books author and subtly makes it look like it meets WP:AUTHOR with a slew of references.  The problem is the bulk of the references are articles written by Hopkins himself and not about Hopkins.  The only references that appear to be about Hopkins are two articles about Nevada Press Association honors he received.  I don't think those two are enough for WP:AUTHOR .  ThaddeusSholto ( talk ) 19:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism , Florida , Nevada ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete While he won an award, I do not think it is major enough to establish notability.  Most of the references that are from reliable sources are the subjects own articles.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 11:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chicago Torture Justice Center: It has already, under another name, been nominated for speedy deletion.  The problem with it is that it's extremely contentious, but lacks any inline citations.  I'd have no problem with the creator incubating it properly in draft space or their own space and putting proper references, but to dump this uncited into main-space is completely wrong.  I don't know if it should be speedied, draftified, or discussed properly, so we're here.  Elemimele ( talk ) 21:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Illinois .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and nuke it from orbit and start over, whether it's notable or not, it's basically an unfinished homework assignment and makes no sense.  GRINCHIDICAE🎄 22:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NOTESSAY and WP:OR .  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 03:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as this is currently written.  WP:NOTESSAY and WP:OR apply as well.  User:Let'srun 15:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : per G11.  This article includes background information about what lead to the creation of the organization and then a pitch for the organization itself.  Even if this does meet NORG , the prose is not worth saving and I would vote to TNT this.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 02:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 13:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete should be speedy, G11, but we're here.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 14:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and creation protect .  Besides still being so poorly written that it needs to be deleted outright , it smacks of an opinionated essay , which is untenable in 2023.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guinwa Zeineddine: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Nevada .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsure of the quality of these sources: [46] and [47] .  Second is trivial coverage; not seeing GNG or BLP as being met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Histology Group of Victoria: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  This article has been here since 2006.  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Science , Medicine ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unreferenced and could not find any coverage to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agree with LibStar that this does not meet WP:ORG .  Kazamzam ( talk ) 12:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If it didn't have it's home page as an external link I'd be tempted to slap a speedy on it.  Not notable.  TarnishedPath talk 02:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lost Gravity: Couldn't really find reliable sources, including on Newspapers.com and British Newspaper Archives.  Based on the page creator's username, and the fact that the article was created the same year the band started, this seems like a case of a COI/PR-written article of a non-notable group.  - Whisperjanes ( talk ) 01:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and England .  Whisperjanes ( talk ) 01:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hittman: Biggest claim to fame was coattailing more notable artists on Aftermath .  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 19:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] At the very least redirect to 2001 (Dr. Dre album) .  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kartik Research: Lordofhunter ( talk ) 04:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business ,  and India .  Lordofhunter ( talk ) 04:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion ,  and Delhi .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Most sources in this article focuses more on the founder and does not focus the company itself in detail, and so WP:SIGCOV cannot be achieved.  Google search results shows news relating to its "FW23" as well as a 2024 festival in Paris, but not that deep.  While an entry on fhe founder can be created, I believe that the article will also be brought up to AfD for notability issues.  Fails notability gutdelines.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 08:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NORG .  Coverage talking about the company's founder.  Lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Macbeejack ☎ 12:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per Nom.  Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roman Savchenko (footballer): I did several searches in both English and Ukrainian, and only a hockey player came up.  This could be a potential WP:TOOSOON situation.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AirDee: Can't find any in-depth coverage about them in reliable, secondary, independent sources.   Fails WP:GNG .   Already been deleted twice in the last 3 years through AfD.  Onel 5969 TT me 12:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There’s is other coverages.  The reason it was deleted in past was due to the confusion with “ArrDee” the UK rapper.  This one is AirDee from South Africa.  He is one of the legendary producers in Africa and we feel he deserved a spot this time.  However thank you for the review, this page was moved from draft to article because we were hoping to get it revised by some of the best on here.  Thank you PenJuluka ( talk ) 12:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT this time as well.  Contrary to what the person above said, all three nominations are for the same person, the South African producer/singer AirDee, as can be seen via mentions of his work with Locnville .  This guy's articles have already been deleted twice because as a producer, he only ever appeared in the credit lists of other people's works, which is a curse that producers face.  This time, his status as a behind-the-scenes and non-notable producer has not changed.  He has since moved into creating his own music, but his one solo song so far has not attracted significant notice and has only been hyped at unreliable sites that reprint his management's promo announcements.  This should also be salted to prevent yet another unneeded recreation of the article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 19:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promo BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article is are promo, and BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 06:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jebel el Gharbi: I am in the middle of listing major Lebanese mountains.  el.ziade ( talkallam ) 14:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions .  el.ziade ( talkallam ) 14:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A peak by the same name seems to exist in Libya, but not in Lebanon.  Mooonswimmer 16:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Live XXX TV: I'm not sure if it's worth AtD by redirecting to Digital Spy .  Ben Azura ( talk ) 17:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We wouldn't redirect it to an industry source merely describing its existence that has no relation otherwise to them; otherwise it's yet another non-notable Sky adult channel lessee, and this is about one of the most embarrassing and poorly-written channel descriptions (undoubtedly one-handed) I've ever read.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per Ben and Nate.  I couldn't dig up any SIGCOV either.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lacks significant coverage.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 00:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Annie Méndez: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV of the subject that I found in my searches was this , which is eight sentences of independent coverage (by my count).  Other than that, there was this short interview and a couple of other passing mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Puerto Rico .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: No evidence this subject meets the WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSBASIC .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Survey & Ballot Systems: ULPS ( talk ) 23:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per above.  No indication of meeting WP:NORG .  Jmertel23 ( talk ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Minnesota .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Note there is also a Draft:Survey & Ballot Systems , containing the same unreferenced promotional text.  AllyD ( talk ) 06:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Uncited; no attempt to comply with WP policies on sourcing.  Kablammo ( talk ) 11:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A COI article whose draft should have been left to await AfC review.  Leaving aside the promotional nature of the present text and its lack of references, the AfD on the previous instance was 14 years ago so this merits a fresh look.  The previous AfD discussion indicates that some sources had been found at that time, however, now even more than then, the requirements regarding pages on companies are strict, and searches are not finding evidence that this firm has attained notability here.  AllyD ( talk ) 12:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Even if the article was significantly re-written to comply with WP:NPOV , I am still not convinced that it would meet the WP:ORG notability guidelines for a company.  JoshuaGrayy ( talk ) 17:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   I searched the online archives of the Star Tribune to see if there was any coverage, and I found only one or two articles that mentioned the company to any significant extent.   -- Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG -- Devoke water 14:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete GNG aside, this type of conflict-of-interest article creation is required to use AFC.   The article clearly does not meet their standards, and there is a separate copy of the article which is already a draft.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 23:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete