hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Exotic India Art : MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Alas, the unforgiving rule of 'SIGCOV' compels me towards deletion.  However abundant, the sources lack reliable character.  Thus, we find ourselves, tragically, abetting the erosion of obscure, yet worthy knowledge.  Such are the sacrifices we make to policy, inadvertently undermining the very spirit of our noble enterprise.  A regrettable turn, indeed.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 08:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It would be more appropriate to consider implementing a disambiguation practices for this article, as certain aspects of its content may lack reliability .  Simply executing or deleting the article would negatively impact the valuable contributions made by our well-researched contributors.  I eagerly await any feedback I can receive regarding my opinion.  Kartikguide ( talk ) 05:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
How Do You Live? : I suggest moving How Do You Live?  (novel) to the " How Do You Live? " main title and add a hatnote in the article to point readers to the film.  Explorer09 ( talk ) 04:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support —valid rationale; non-controversial.  ツ LunaEatsTuna ( 💬 )— 17:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dev Rathour : The sources mostly seem unreliable, and the ones that appear reliable look more like paid promotional pieces than genuine editorial articles.  GSS 💬 06:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and India .  GSS 💬 06:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Himachal Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with nominator - highly suspect sources, (especially the IANS and FirstIndia.co.in (and that one explicitly says it's a press release...)) and there's nothing that would show WP:NMUSIC is met.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 14:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Sources are not reliable.  @ Ravensfire : , see this for the Borok Times reference used here which is what led me to this page and ultimately this AfD.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 10:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bolesław II the Bold's expedition to Kiev (1076–1077) : Even the sources that I think might be WP:RS enough seem to WP:FAIL consistently in confirming what the article claims, e.g. Bolesław making all of Kievan Rus' a tributary state of Poland and collecting taxes.  Although some sort of Polish military action in Kievan Rus' seems to have taken place in 1077, there is no reason to believe king Bolesław II the Bold was personally participating in it, nor was there a siege of the city of Kiev (Kyiv).  If anything, there was fighting over Chernigov.  By far, most details appear to have been made up by Polish chronicler Jan Długosz writing 400 years later.  (I've added some information in the lead section about that).  It is plain that the entire article is not really about the dynastic succession crisis that happened in Kievan Rus' at the time; instead, there are all sorts of fanciful tales about excessive celebrations of victory and sexual immorality within the Polish army (immorality that is blamed on the Rus'/Ruthenians that they allegedly conquered) that are not historically credible as narrated.  Pretty much all of this information appears directly or indirectly based on the unreliable chronicle of Długosz.  Moreover, User:SebbeKg created this article on 19 February 2024, 3 days before he was blocked indefinitely for Adding poorly sourced content, false accusations of vandalism.  Judging by User talk:SebbeKg , several other of his articles (beginning on 17 December 2023) have been PRODded or nomination for deletion for that reason, but so far, it appears none have actually been deleted (unlike several templates that have been).  I think this one should go.  It is full of original research and bad sources.  The little factual value there may be, is probably not enough for a stand-alone article ( WP:NOPAGE ), and can be better incorporated in related articles about the members of the dynasties involved.  (It might be necessary to critically review SebbeKg's other articles as well, but that's for a follow-up discussion).  NLeeuw ( talk ) 18:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Poland ,  and Ukraine .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 18:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , there was a lot of such articles written lately, mainly concering Polish-Ukrainian relations.  What's worrying they are in the most part based on the primary sources, which makes them OR.  Marcelus ( talk ) 07:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Sources are too old WP:AGE MATTERS , the article is not ready for mainspace.  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 14:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Greece : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are nonexistent.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Greece .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Almost reads like a directory.  Lorstaking ( talk ) 09:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia isn't a TV guide.  This fails to meet the WP:NLIST .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matej Kopecký : I also couldn't find any evidence of notability or significant coverage regarding this football player.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 12:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is no evidence of notability and the sources presented are totally inadequate.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Justin Benn : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abaali : Finding sources for any of the numerous, essay-like claims in this has been difficult given that there is not consensus on which name to use.  Given that there is a substantial population who speak Ibaali and can probably be defined as an ethnic group, this topic most likely warrants an article but this article is a mess and almost none of it can be verified.  Scrap it and start over.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 20:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Kazamzam ( talk ) 20:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] TNT -- I am not convinced with the nom's suggestion that there is an article to be written here, but I am in 100% agreement that, even if there is, this is not the basis for such an article.  This is an essay at best , and the sources, um, source-singular does not support an encyclopaedic treatment of the subject.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 17:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kudakwashe Munyede : JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete in absence of suitable redirect There is This , but that would only be one source, so still a WP:GNG fail, and no suitable redirect, so weak delete for now.  If anything else is found ping and I'll reconsider.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roosevelt College Quirino : Hariboneagle927 ( talk ) 11:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Philippines .  Hariboneagle927 ( talk ) 11:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find good sources.  GBooks and GNews Archives just produced one passing mention -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Bear in mind the change of name from "Roosevelt Memorial High School".  There appear to be more mentions under that name, although I haven't yet found more than passing mentions.  Still plenty to look through though.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 08:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete One of its faculty was co-author on a text book, mentioned on the back cover, but I couldn't find anything more than directories other than that, under either name.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 22:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aleksandra Satler : A Google News search only yields squad listings.  Likewise, further searches of Kazakh sources only give us Kaz Football 1 , Kaz Football 2 and Vesti , all of which are mere squad listings too.  I did see some hits in the Kazakhstan Football Federation website as well but that is not an independent source per SPORTBASIC and the hits were only squad listings.  Squad list mentions are not significant coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Kazakhstan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brian Aungst : See rationales presented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Hibbard - routine coverage by a single local media entity wasn't enough there and it seems to not be enough here.  Further, the article reads like a puff piece and has since its creation.  PriusGod ( talk ) 17:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  PriusGod ( talk ) 17:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete per nom.  The precedent set at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Hibbard is very relevant.  I would also say that once all the promotional material is removed, there's not much left in the article anyway.  Only a weak delete as there appears to be plenty of coverage, albeit in local sources and almost all is routine coverage.  I would need more convincing that this meets WP:GNG .  Willbb234 18:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I find nothing outside of the St Petersburg Times, and one local source reporting on a local city mayor does not arise to GNG.  I note that this fellow is back as an appointed, interim mayor of that same city (Clearwater), but again I'm not finding anything except routine news.  The article is promotional and leaves off criticisms of him, also from the same newspaper.  That said, his name appears almost daily in the local news (making it very hard to sift through for non-routine info).  If another source of information about him is found this might be salvable, but the article would have to be re-written to be faithful to all sides of the story.  Lamona ( talk ) 18:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
N.V.R Educational Institution : Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  The WP:NSCHOOL criteria have been made much stricter since the previous deletion discussion.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 02:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Odisha .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 02:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Although, (1) its plausible this entry is or may one day be of value to local Rayagada Wikipedians, (2) the claims contained in the article are supported by reliable sources, and (3) retaining this entry would assist in addressing WP's systematic deficiencies in covering some locations... ... the lack of coverage, both in-depth, and assessed collectively means that this entry doesn't meet GNG or SNG SIGCOV requirements.  Sadly, this is an instance where applying guidelines requires deletion, irrespective of other considerations; including collateral detriment to this website's wider mission and purpose Jack4576 ( talk ) 04:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't pass WP:NSCHOOLS ; I disagree that this would help improve representation of Indian topics, since random private schools with zero notability are a dime a dozen in India and are probably the least worthwhile way for us to cover.  AryKun ( talk ) 12:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Snowball Delete : As above and nom.  User4edits ( talk ) 10:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only a primary source provided.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Christian Unions in the United Kingdom : The only sources in the article are from UCCF , the umbrella organisation for most Christian Unions in the UK; I can't find any independent reliable sources which would establish notability for this list.  Does not aid navigation, since almost none of the groups listed have their own articles (each group listed just links to the university/college at which it is based).  Fails WP:NOTDIR and WP:LISTCRIT .  WJ94 ( talk ) 14:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Christianity , Lists ,  and United Kingdom .  WJ94 ( talk ) 14:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - obviously not notable in my opinion.  Student societies are unlikely to be notable, lists are therefore even less so.  WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk ) 15:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - when the first sentence tells you the list is derived from a single website, it's a pretty big clue the list fails WP:NLIST .  Clearly WP:NOTDIR .  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 16:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Slight merger -- The article claims that its list is derived from one produced by UCCF .   That primary list does not appear in the "see also" items in the UCCF article, which instead relies on this articles.  The article is trying to reproduce a directory, but there will be no person who will certainly maintain the list, which thus is at risk of getting out of date, whereas UCCF are likely to maintain their own list.   I support the work of UCCF financially, but like most student societies individual Christian Unions are inherent NN, with the possible exception of the Oxford and Cambridge ones.   As a matter of information, UCCF is the umbrella organisation for University and College CUs, but there are also school CUs, whose umbrella organisation is Scripture Union .  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 16:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure what we would merge into the UCCF article.  Including a list of all the UCCF affiliated Christian Unions at the UCCF article would violate WP:NOTDIR just as much as having a separate list would, so I would oppose including this list there.  WJ94 ( talk ) 09:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with the above deletes.  History person 2 ( talk ) 14:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pronunciation of "www" : The whole page seems to be predicated on a quote from Douglas Adams, which might bare a sentence on other pages, but is not a subject covered in multiple reliable secondary sources in its own right.  The page is poorly sourced, and has WP:OR on it.  This is not an encyclopaedic treatment.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 14:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 14:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  — Sean Brunnock ( talk ) 14:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable.  Just because some author said a funny quote doesn't mean it needs an article.  See WP:OR and WP:NOTDICT .  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 18:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : it does not need a page, any useful content should be moved to World Wide Web#Nomenclature .  Bendegúz Ács ( talk ) 20:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks.  Looks like the Douglas Adams quote (and some other stuff) is already there.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 20:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as trivia and possibly add to WP:DAFT .  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it can easily be merged ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 23:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: if it were merged somewhere, the page would be kept to maintain attribution.  That is, of course, not a reason to keep the article absent such a merge.  Cnilep ( talk ) 03:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Might be something about the quote, but then proceeds to list every language outside of EN, so doesn't seem notable.  More of a list of pronunciations than any sort of encyclopedic article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – This is a funny and cool article but it's Wiktionary-type stuff, it would probably be near-impossible to find a reason to deem this notable.  Any scraps can be left at World_Wide_Web#Nomenclature .  TLA (talk) 04:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete