hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jonathan Pedley: I have carried out WP:BEFORE and not found references to add.  I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO .  I wondered whether being a Master of Wine made him notable, but the discussion I found about this from 2010 did not reach consensus.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Food and drink , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Far from my area, but a review of Pedley's Good Housekeeping Wine Book , says "Jonathan Pedley is a Master of Wine and many will no doubt know him as the star of Keith Floyd's programmes on Channel 5." ( The Herald 26 Jan 2002: 8).  As he seems to have (co)written at least two books, he might be eligible as an author?  This [41] appears to confirm the date of his wine mastery, though the bio appears self-written.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Pedley is a published author and a former TV personality.   He is notable for these things alone.  RE: I wondered whether being a Master of Wine made him notable There are 28 other people in Masters of Wine category.   Do you propose deleting their pages and the category as well?  Unknown Unknowns ( talk ) 08:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, if they fail the test of verifiable notability .  For more, see here .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 11:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Online search brings on almost nothing.  And neither does text in books.  The Keep comments are, so far,  variants of "But he is famous!" , "Surely, everyone knows about him!" , and "There's other stuff on Wikipedia like that... .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 11:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As per The Gnome .  Supercat9906 ( talk ) 06:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : for lack of sourcing, this is about the best I can find [42] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Doesn't even seem to have book reviews, anything for him as an author is a link to buy his books.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bethel Christian School (Jefferson Davis Parish, Louisiana): Zero secondary sources.  Fails WP:GNG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Louisiana .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable at all.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 16:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Christianity .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom.  Fails GNG.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 17:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nomination.  Fails GNG and NORG.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 19:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jefferson Davis Parish, Louisiana as it seems to be NN according to current rules.  I tried looking for sourcing on Newspapers.com but had no such luck.  I'll check Newspaperarchive.com but not sure if I will succeed WhisperToMe ( talk ) 23:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure a redirect is necessary given it is an unlikely search term with the disambiguation.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 03:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Anyhow, it seems the only way to salvage or undelete the article would be to find coverage in Jennings Daily News which is non-routine.  Indeed, newspapers don't have all of their archives publicly online.  Unfortunately, the other newspaper services I see don't seem to carry this paper.  WhisperToMe ( talk ) 01:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To establish notability, we need to see coverage in multiple reliable sources.  Multiple articles in the same newspaper is considered one source.  What would the second source be?  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 23:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL .  I wasn't able to find anything showing notability online, and I don't think it's a viable search term that would warrant a redirect.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 15:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No claim to notability and no evidence of notability .  Only two sources and searches (at least in Europe) yield nothing better.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 22:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Teufel & Cie Photogerätebau: Attempts at finding significant coverage have been made.  toweli ( talk ) 15:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Companies ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – no significant coverage (no coverage at all, in fact) found.  -- Maddy from Celeste ( WAVEDASH ) 15:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olympic Primary School: A search for sources only turned up primary sources or unreliable sources such as databases etc.  The guardian article listed in references, is not enough for GNG and NORG.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Kenya .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Previously linked in the article: https://kenyacradle.com/olympic-primary-school/ is a wikipedia mirror, which literally copied the article to it.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Werner: Not sure if he meets the WP:GNG but there are a decent amount of sources.  (Don’t seem reliable though, citehighlighter is highlighting a lot of them orange and red) 48JCL TALK 02:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Seems to be a well-written résumé, but doesn't impress me as anything else.  It has a self-aggrandizement tone throughout.  The large section "Early life and education" is irrelevant to notability.  In a nutshell, this individual has been a successful career business man.   But that usually means getting a good education and making the right connections to rise to the top.   However, I don't find where he meets WP:ANYBIO , and he would not match any other criteria.  — Maile ( talk ) 03:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Technology ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree that it does not meet WP:ANYBIO .  Also, I am suspicious that this may be a case of WP:AUTO (e.g. the headshot picture is uploaded by johnkellogwerner ).  A significant number of the sources are problematic, with some being press releases, personal blogs, local pieces, and the subject's alumni magazine (the info from which likely comes from the subject himself).  Manyyassin ( talk ) 05:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kwesi Paul: JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Grenada .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rock Around the Blockade: Unsourced article and no reliable sources online.  Ap m h 13:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Cuba .  Ap m h 13:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Some coverage in what look like Cuban expat websites for advocacy against the blockade, nothing we'd use for RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Brussels (1830): It confuses two different things -  (i) the outbreak of the Belgian Revolution in a series of riots in Brussels on 25 August 1830 and  (ii) a genuine "siege" (or at least a battle inside Brussels) in mid-September 1830 known as the "September Days".  Given the lack of sourced content and the basic confusion about scope which prevents improvement, I propose that deletion of this article seems the most straightforward way to remediate.  — Brigade Piron ( talk ) 08:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the article isn’t even about a siege.  It’s just “stuff that happened in Brussels in 1830” and us mostly generic background anyway.  All of this is properly coved in Belgian Revolution anyway.  Mccapra ( talk ) 09:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , Belgium ,  and Netherlands .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Seems well-intentioned but, as the nominator and commenter above point out, inaccurate and actively confusing. — Moriwen ( talk ) 16:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all above.  gidonb ( talk ) 22:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jaspa's Journey: The Great Migration: the articles creator has only only one edit, with it being the creation of this article.  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I have been unable to find any kind of coverage or reviews on either this book or the series it is a part of, meaning it would appear to fail WP:NBOOK .  Even the section for reviews on the official site for the series only lists user reviews from places like Amazon and Goodreads, making me doubt that it got any coverage in reliable sources.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 03:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:NBOOK and frankly this article reads very promotional, especially that section about the educational value of the book Claire 26 ( talk ) 03:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gladiators – Heroes of the Colosseum: Most relevant online sources I've found are primary sources (museums/exhibition organiser) or opinion pieces largely from Nine Entertainment ( WP:RSEDITORIAL , WP:BOMBARDMENT ).  Fork99 ( talk ) 08:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note - There seems to have been quite some coverage of the Jönköping exhibit in local newspaper Jönköpings-Posten and in the local TV and radio stations.  [21] [22] [23] .  Not sure on my vote yet though.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 10:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christopher Chung (footballer): Simione001 ( talk ) 22:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  We should look for sources first, or put it into draftspace, before deleting anything.  RossEvans18 ( talk ) 05:26, 12 April 2023 (BST) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - @ GiantSnowman : , Per RossEvans18.  I also found [55] besides the sources in the article.  Article needs improvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 19:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and BIO.  Source eval (article and above): Nothing about subject ::  1.  "南區或再提拔青年軍 復賽班底戰新季".  Apple Daily.  Archived from the original on 18 October 2020.  Retrieved 17 October 2020.  (in Chinese)  Database record ::  2. ^ "Christopher Jhen-hoong Chung".  HKFA.  Retrieved 18 July 2019.  Database record ::  3. ^ Christopher Chung at Soccerway :: Above Interview with subject, fails IS RS :: https://www.offside.hk/interview/interview-with-chris-chung-the-hkpl-deserves-more-attention-then-it-gets/ BEFORE showed nothing but promo and database records.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 00:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  05:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Offside does not provide any detailed analysis of the subject from a third party and there is nothing else to suggest he might meet GNG.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Alvaldi ( talk ) 10:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Atta Soja: Sources are database entries, press release with the same images, paid articles posted without bylines etc., Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 09:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople ,  and Uganda .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 09:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails to meet WP:NBOX , WP:ANYBIO , or any other notability criteria.  Wanting to be a champion is hardly unique or notable and notability isn't inherited from your coach or who you train with.  He's not even mentioned in some of the references.  Papaursa ( talk ) 12:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 15:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
From Nsukka With Love: Gjs238 ( talk ) 23:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Nigeria .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 00:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Perm nom, and listed sources are some weak "download/listen" links which clearly does not pass WP:RSMUSIC .  ihateneo ( talk ) 02:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note - See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son Of The Sun , another release by the same singer and created by the same WP editor, who has done nothing outside these articles and a draft article for the singer.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That other album article has now been deleted. --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 22:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This EP has only been noticed by the usual Nigerian self-promotion sites that repeat publicity announcements from managers.  I can find no reliable coverage or reviews.  At the time of this writing, the same WP editor is in the process of getting a draft article for the singer reviewed: Draft:Mofizzay .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shine Screens: The references currently included are primarily routine announcements about the company's upcoming/past productions.  Akshith manya talk 15:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Telangana .  Akshith manya talk 15:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Companies .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adam Bond: Finding Jesus: Faith, Fact, Forgery appears to be his only major role.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 04:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and England .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 04:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charlos Gary: BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 11:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Comics and animation .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 11:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per source assessment table.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 13:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  African American literature book club Biography ?  ✘ No Self authored book ✘ No Creators ?  ?  ✘ No Official blog of Charlos gary ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete