McKenzie Buckley : JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the folllowing article as he is a member of the same team ( St Helens R.F.C. ) who also fails to meet WP:SPORTBASIC : Ben Lane (rugby league) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 01:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and England .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Professional rugby league footballer who has played football at the elite level.  5 sources related to his football career.  Fleets ( talk ) 17:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 11:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 18:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't appear as if he is currently playing, one pro aperance isn't sufficient.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Only routine coverage aka signings and game reports, WP:SPORTBASIC .  Other keep votes here should be discounted for making no mention of source depth.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - Five sources, even if none of them are specific to the subject, and the fact that most other team members have their own articles as well.  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 01:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] GNG requires in-depth coverage.  Mere mentions in sources do not suffice.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm well aware, but if you want to be strict with that an AFD should be made for George Delaney , Ben Lane (rugby league) , and other members of the St. Helens team as many only have passing or list mentions.  Buckley and others have their only specific mention on the rugby league project website , which isn't very in-depth as you said.  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 01:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, yes they should.  If you fling 100 non-notable stubs onto Wikipedia, you can't then also defend them from deletion by pointing out that the other 99 still exist.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Bundled the two others I mentioned who fall under the same deletion criteria with this AFD.  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 01:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Did you do a WP:BEFORE search?  Articles should probably be nominated individually anyways, which I was reminded of two days ago .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, though looking at that previous AFD I'll retract the nomination for Delaney for now as he seems to have slightly more content than the other two, though still nothing in-depth.  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 02:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You need to use the additional nominations template or else it messes up the closure process.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 02:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's there right below the initial nomination.  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 02:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For what it's worth, I was also unable to find any coverage of Ben Lane.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural Keep for Ben Lane per WP:BUNDLE .  Nominating another article after several editors have already commented in this AfD is not appropriate.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 12:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of meeting SPORTCRIT.  The Ben Lane AfD should occur separately but I'd ! vote delete there too.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete