hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Karen Bishko: No significant coverage to meet WP:GNG Sabih omar 07:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Music ,  and United Kingdom .  — Karnataka talk 07:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I looked but didn't find enough to establish notability.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 13:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - all citations are mentions of her, so there is o deep coverage.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 00:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found many primary sources, but no IRS.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 04:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patrick Burgoyne: Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 22:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 22:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New Zealand .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment only played club rugby in New Zealand so nothing notable to add from an NZ perspective.  NealeWellington ( talk ) 08:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jovan Brkljač: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Serbia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Youprayteas ( t • c ) 11:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Goettems (surname): First of all, the name fails WP:NNAME .  More importantly, almost nothing comes up when I google anything with "Goettems" or "Goettems family" in it.  The sources seem to be lists and mentions, nothing substantial or establishing notability.  Several assertions throughout the article make me think that it could have been created by a family member (no solid evidence for this, of course).  Just seems like a totally unremarkable family tree.  I could probably write something similar about my own family and make it as verbose.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 00:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , History , Germany ,  and Brazil .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   Improve as necessary, don’t delete.  The purpose of an encyclopedia should be to provide information, not to withhold information.   I think the major problem with all of these similar deletion nominations is with the policy itself.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 07:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If you want to change the policy, you have to do so in the right venues.  Article creation should not precede such a change.  Every one of your arguments so far is invalid.  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd point to this policy WP:IAR since I think the other rules that are being cited here are bureaucratic, legalistic, and are getting in the way of maintaining a quality encyclopedia.  If the information is accurate and backed up with a reference, an article really should not be deleted.  It should definitely be improved upon as additional sources are found.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 13:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply You think notability guidelines are bureaucratic?  I cannot find any sources online about this family.  It is a random family tree possibly created by a member that does not belong on Wikipedia.  Accurate, referenced, and notable , which you have omitted, are the basic critera.  I don't know why you think notability doesn't matter.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 23:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the article fails WP:NOTGENEALOGY .  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and NNAME.  If there's nobody significant by that name, then the article has no basis for existing.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 20:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Americus, Colorado: Maps show a railroad siding with no connection to nearby roads.  – dlthewave ☎ 17:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Colorado .  – dlthewave ☎ 17:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found.   Looks like another low-effort "article" based on an entry in GNIS, which does not establish notability.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 22:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Various books on railways confirm that it is indeed a station on the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad the next station along from Buena Vista , and is not a community, incorporated or otherwise.   All of the categories and half of the (two) sentences in this article are falsehoods.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 00:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on cursory search of Newspapers.com, which mainly returns coverage of Americus, Georgia even when you try to restrict results to Colorado.  However, there was an Americus mining company that operated in Colorado in the early 1900s, and hence several references to Americus mines.  But that isn't this article.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 04:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SNOW and my own long-used standards .  Bearian ( talk ) 00:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zoram: Looks like a minor character who had a page created for completion purposes.  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 16:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Christianity ,  and Latter Day Saints .  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 16:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think this is accurate, what about the sources listed in the further reading section?  ( t · c ) buidhe 01:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Buidhe : from what I can see those are either non-independent or have passing mentions of the subject(s?) but no significant coverage.  Horse Eye's Back ( talk ) 02:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I'm not seeing significant coverage in independent sources of either the name Zoram or any of the three Book of Mormon figures so named.  Horse Eye's Back ( talk ) 02:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , with no prejudice against recreating as a DAB page for articles like Zoram Nationalist Party and Zoram People's Movement as well as First Nephi .  This article is three Zorams in a trenchcoat.  Two of the Zorams are answers to Sunday school trivia questions.  They're only here to fill out the trenchcoat, and aren't actually relevant to the main Zoram topic.  There could be an argument that the main Zoram is notable under GNG, but thanks to the rest of the notability guideline after the first part, we don't even have to have that argument.  Listen: More or less the same Zoram content already exists in First Nephi .  WP:NOPAGE , which is part of the notability guideline, suggests that when we have a choice like this we should consider presenting information to readers in broader context where possible, and WP:NNC , which is also part of the notability guideline, teaches us that we need not argue about the notability of contents within an article.  So this is a rare occasion where we can productively skip the traditional GNG/do-sources-contribute-to-notability headbutting, because the best outcome here for readers is to ditch the three Zorams in a trenchcoat and use any appropriate sources to improve already existing content about the main Zoram elsewhere in the encyclopedia, where it is already presented in a broader context.  Optional bonus: we can help our readers and improve Zoram-related navigation with the most likely search term as the title of a DAB page.  Indignant Flamingo ( talk ) 05:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Belhe Zaimoğlu: Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE found interviews, name mentions, promo, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 13:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Levi Stewart: Possible WP:ATD of merge/redirect to Kanab, Utah , but could unbalance that article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Founder of Kanab is sufficient to justify an article.  The article could certainly use improvement - right now, the content leans more toward name-dropping other notables than elaborating Stewart's own notability - but that's not a reason to delete. -- Michael Snow ( talk ) 05:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is devoid of sources so I did a bit of digging.  I found one book mention that could source the statement that he "settled Kanab" and told the story of his wife's death (in more detail than the bit about him).  Another brief mention .  The name "Levi Stewart" turns out to be not unusual so it takes some effort to sort through them.  In the end, however, I think it would take a deep dive to find enough sources to keep this article.  It may be possible to get one sentence into the Kanab article (using the first link I gave) saying that Levi Stewart is credited with founding the town.  Lamona ( talk ) 04:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per Lamona.  Founding a smaller town is not enough to establish notability unless there is serious referencing behind it.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 18:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WJES (FM): With a WP:BEFORE , I am seeing no evidence to suggest this station is notable.  There is a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 20:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 20:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to list.  I asked the contributor, who reverted my move to redirect this page to the Georgia state radio list, to please justify why this station met the GNG.  That sourcing has not come and frankly is highly unlikely to be out there.  List of radio stations in Georgia (U.S. state) can and should have this as a line item and nothing more.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 20:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Our notability standards for broadcast stations have tightened considerably in the last five years or so, if not since the two years following this RfC .  (Which was a correction — this topic area in general has not exactly been the gold standard for compliance with certain policies and guidelines.)  There may still be people who think having a license is enough to give a station "notability", based on past versions of the NMEDIA essay (not guideline) and BCASTOUTCOMES — but notability actually requires reliable sources , just as it does anywhere else on Wikipedia.  (I'm always wary of proposing any redirects as an alternative to deletion because of how easy it is — even for editors who don't have the ability to actually create articles yet — to revert against consensus.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I couldn't find any refs that would prove notability.  I also searched for "Nelson Rodriguez"+radio+christian with no luck (Rodriguez is the station owner).  There is one lengthy reliable source - a dispute involving the FCC and interference from another radio station , but I don't think it establishes notability.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BCAST per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 07:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BCAST and WP:GNG per nom.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khar-polis: Zero citations for 16 years.  External link is a YouTube video called "KHARPOLICE 2" purporting to show "Iranian men playing Kharpolis" at Cachuma Lake, California, in 2010.  (And the only comment on the video is "CHINCHE AL AGUA" which I guess is supposed to verify that the Mexican game is the same as the Iranian game.)  Either this is WP:OR or possibly even WP:HOAX .  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 20:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Iran .  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 20:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Previous AfD in 2008 addressed only WP:NOTGUIDE accusations and did not address the lack of sourcing.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 03:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, the only edits by the creator were to create and crosslink this article at 17:25, 29 September 2008.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 03:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment one can find pictures of this game online, such as at [14] , so I would exclude a hoax.  I assume reliable sources, if they exist, would be only available in Farsi language.  Broc ( talk ) 15:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 20:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not a WP:HOAX , but since there are no sources, this fails WP:GNG and looks like WP:OR to me.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Garagiste Festivals: Any truly notable material can easily be merged into similar articles.  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 05:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wine and California .  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 05:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frost Great Outdoors: Let'srun ( talk ) 14:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found but passing mentions, no SIGCOV.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've never heard of it.  And that's a bad sign.  Even for a bottom-of-the-barrel diginet, this is obscurity incarnate.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 07:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per everyone else.  This network was so low-profile, even for a low-profile network, that I'm not sure redirecting to Get After It Media (one of the network's partners) would be worthwhile despite a mention there.  (That its other partner, a cutlery manufacturer that is probably the "Frost" part of the network, does not appear to warrant an article is another potential strike, but in and of itself means nothing .)  National distribution (albeit on very minor stations) does not always lead to significant coverage .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Rodeo Boys: None of the members are notable enough to have pages, and they effectively played bar gigs for most of their existence, a very standard fair that is hardly qualifying for notability as a band.  Further, the article does not have a single citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeacockShah ( talk • contribs ) 27 June 2023 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Utah .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nomination and also due to the multiple issues TAG on the main page.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 11:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete - See the recent AfD for an article on one of this band's individual members: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Scrivner .  While voting in that one, I looked into the whole band and found that they achieved some local feature articles: [17] , [18] ; and some local album reviews: [19] , [20] .  That's the only useful coverage I can find on them, then and now.  Their coverage is purely local and they were not noticed outside of Salt Lake City, but they may barely (and I mean BARELY) squeak past #1 and #7 at WP:NBAND .  However I don't think that coverage qualifies as "significant" at the more general WP:SIGCOV guideline.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 22:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andre (Businessman): four sources are reprints of the same thing, whereas others have no mention.  can only find profiles — Karnataka talk 09:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Philippines .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete