God Sent Me : Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Law , Education , Christianity ,  and Science .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : the Skeptical Inquirer review is sigcov, so it's untrue that there's none, but if that's it then it would fail notability.  It needs at least two.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 00:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ PARAKANYAA : There's a review in The Atlanta Jewish Times on pg.  34 of this issue .  This would normally be enough, but there's an interview with the author directly above the review, so I don't think this would be independent enough to count towards NBOOK.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  00:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Per the above, a very weak keep .  Without knowing more about that organization's processes, the independence may be up in the air, but they look like a reputable newspaper and strictly speaking I don't think interviewing the author is a sure sign that it's non independent, they could have simply sought it out.  But yeah I won't die on this hill PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 14:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources .  Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Criteria says: A book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources , at least one of the following criteria: The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself.  This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews.  This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy , or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.  Sources Jacobs, Michael (2016-10-21).  "Time for a Disclaimer" .  The Atlanta Jewish Times .  Vol.  91, no. 41 .  Retrieved 2024-07-01 – via Issuu .  I consider the review to be independent of the subject as it contains negative content.  The review notes: "Selman's book is exhaustive and exhausting in its details on the struggle against the sticker, especially in the extensive use of court testimony. Even if he's right, however, Selman is hardly an objective source. His book is not, and does not pretend to be, a dispassionate history. As he says repeatedly, he wants to wake up Americans to the threat of theocracy, but he risks putting some readers to sleep by emphasizing advocacy over information. Still, Selman has created, if not a textbook, an invaluable resource for anyone who wants a reminder that science and religion can coexist, but not in the same classroom."  Branch, Glenn (September–October 2015).  "A Textbook Case in Georgia Remembered" (PDF) .  Skeptical Inquirer .  Vol.  39, no. 5.  pp. 59–60.  Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-07-01 .  Retrieved 2024-07-01 .  The review notes: "Selman also understates the role of Kitzmiller v. Dover in forcing the school board to settle. ... God Sent Me is self-published, and the lack of a firm editorial hand is intermittently detectable. Generally following a straight chronological narrative, Selman’s writing is serviceable and often engaging, although there are occasional patches of purple prose: for example at one point he writes, somewhat ridiculously, “The life I was living was in a comfortable but contaminated Petri dish where the leprosy of theocracy was threatening to break out and become epidemic” (17). Fans of Leo Rosten will be amused by Selman’s pervasive use of expressions from Yiddish, accompanied by helpful glosses, although “farblondjet” is oddly spelled as “fablunjet” (175). There is no index and no bibliography, and references appear variously in footnotes and in running text, which is mildly frustrating."  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow God Sent Me: A Textbook Case on Evolution vs. Creation to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline , which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  Cunard ( talk ) 09:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep