hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mustapha Gajibo: Fails WP:BIO 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete for now, pending an analysis of the sources.  The article does not speak for itself and explain why the individual passes general notability .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 21:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – A detailed check of the references shows that this short article has been reference-bombed with low-quality sources, several of which appear to be biographies of the subject that have all probably been reworked from the same input by the subject's flack.   There do not appear to be any independent references.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 infomediang.com Appears to publish articles for Nigerian businesspeople, and so similar to press releases No Yes ?  No 2 naturenews.africa Appears to be another outlet for publishing press release like material No Yes ?  No 3 reuters.comn Interview with subject No Yes Yes No 4 youtube.com YouTube No Yes No Probably not 5 legit.ng An article about his buses, reads like advertising No No, passing mention ?  No 6 refinedng.com Another article in a medium that appears to publish publicity material No Yes ?  No 7 punchng.com A long interview with subject No Yes ?  No 8 leadership.ng Appears to be another medium that publishes articles by PR people No Yes ?  No 9 www.africanews.com Another article on the subject that appears to be by PR people No Yes ?  No 10 www.technologyreview.com Another interview No Yes Yes No 11 refinedng.com Same as 6 No Yes ?  No 12 ynaija.com Another article that appears to be by the subject's PR people No Yes ?  No 13 newscentral.africa Another biography that appears to be by same flack No Yes ?  No 14 dailytrust.com Interview with subject No Yes Yes No Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Robert McClenon 's analysis above.  I was taking my time going through sources little by little, and not preparing a chart.  Thanks for doing all this work, Robert!  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 18:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per Robert McClenon 's source analysis.  clearly 0 reliable sources, and clearly not notable.  DrowssapSMM ( talk ) 21:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As per above analysis by Robert McClenon; poor sourcing.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 13:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
3BG Supply Co.: Coverage is mostly routine (funding, acquisitions); or a listing without significant coverage .  There's a single source I would consider borderline, a profile in an industry publication (Industrial Distribution), but that seems like it.  ~ A412 talk!  01:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Indiana .  ~ A412 talk!  01:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails notability guidelines; all sources on Google shows up routine news coverage with nothing indepth.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 15:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO tional article with no meaningful history.  Drowssap SMM 01:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of invitees for AMPAS Membership (2004): SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Film .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all - If they're notable, Wikipedia probably already has an article.  Not sure why we need these lists — Maile ( talk ) 20:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "A candidate for membership must be sponsored by two members of the branch for which the individual qualifies. One sponsor should initiate the sponsorship process on the Academy Member Portal. Please review your branch’s requirements before submitting a candidate for consideration. After the two sponsors have completed the online process, the proposed candidate will receive an email requesting additional information. Once completed, the Member Relations and Awards Department will be in touch if any additional information is required. Membership reviews take place once a year, in the spring.  The current cycle deadline is Monday, November 27, 2023 at 5pm PT. Each candidate who receives a favorable endorsement from the appropriate Branch Executive Committee will be submitted to the Board of Governors for final approval and invitation to membership." [24] Delete all per WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  It looks like the membership consists of nearly ten thousand members , and reporting additions to that membership seems to just be routine news coverage.  I think it's more appropriate to keep the "Voters" section at Academy Awards updated with the latest numbers and statistical breakdown (e.g., by demographics) over time.  Erik ( talk | contrib ) ( ping me ) 16:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Germany, Indiana: I tried looking for this in Baird's history of the county, but there are over a thousand occurrences of the word, so that was hopeless.  Mangoe ( talk ) 15:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Baird [7] was very unimpressed with this place, as am I, see pg 86.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Needs more policy-based discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 19:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of hispanophones: Extremely incomplete list.  There are ~530 million Spanish speakers in the world, this list could potentially contain millions of entries.  Broc ( talk ) 11:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Language ,  and Lists .  Broc ( talk ) 11:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obviously far too broad and vague, not a useful page to be told that someone from Spain speaks Spanish.  Reywas92 Talk 15:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 17:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Apart from the objections already raised (with which I agree) the article doesn't define Spanish-speaking people : does it just mean people with Spanish as their mother-tongue?  Or people whose home language is Spanish?  Something else?  I speak Spanish (badly): does that make me a hispanophone?  Apart from anything else, it doesn't seem to list notable Spanish-speaking scientists, but there are plenty of those (especially in Spain, Mexico, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay).  Athel cb ( talk ) 17:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 04:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nagendra Rai: 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The phrase "nephew of Lalu Prasadh Yadav" can be found in almost every source's title.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime , India ,  and Bihar .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 18:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep , examination of the sources in the article demonstrates SIGCOV well beyond relationships.  There are multiple events with SIGCOV.  This not BLP1E and it doesn't fall afoul of WP:CRIME , because they are known for multiple criminal events, not just one.  There may still be BLP issues to clean up.  — siro χ o 21:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , though sources are not sufficient, yet it is a notable topic. - Admantine123 ( talk ) 18:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject fails WP:GNG .  This is about yet one more run-of-the-mill criminal, whose sole claim to infamy are lame reports of his arrests and bookings.  These are never enough as notability criteria : Otherwise, Wikipedia would be choking up with biographies of every criminal under the sun.  Thankfully, Wikipedia is neither a directory nor a criminology journal .  And we certainly do not post up random information !  Finally, it is telling that contributors to this AfD admit we dot have sufficient sources, yet they still assert this is a notable topic .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 00:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - Seems to qualify WP:SIGCOV; I am not in favour of deletion!  Ekdalian ( talk ) 13:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; fails WP:CRIME , specifically in that the victim is not notable, and the motivation or execution of the crime was not unusual.  ~ T P W 17:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stuart Bell (figure skater): Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases.  Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Skating ,  and England .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of passing NSKATE or GNG.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 20:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , was about to ! vote in the old AfD but was too late.  @ Doczilla I don't know if it would have changed your close if I had asked you to reopen the previous AfD so I could ! vote, but I thought I should ping you here.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 02:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nope, I would not have reopened.  Reopening AfD should be under more serious circumstances and not commonplace because they have to end.  Some already seem to go on forever.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Talisman Desktop: I was unable to locate any sourcing online and could only locate one print source where the name of the software is mentioned briefly in passing.  ~ Liance talk 21:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  ~ Liance talk 21:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Basir Kamrani: Article currently sourced only to a database source, which is woefully inadequate in terms of notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of GNG-passing coverage.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:34, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guram Kavtidze: Not finding any significant coverage to demonstrate WP:GNG being met.  Primefac ( talk ) 09:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Rugby union , France ,  and Georgia (country) .  Primefac ( talk ) 09:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  I'm not really seeing enough to suggest a pass, although there may be coverage in French sources that I've not seen.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Le Progres might help with notability if anyone can access it, that is. I'm not really seeing much else, though.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE showed nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Source in article is database record, source above is about a game.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 23:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mirko Uhlig: References are questionable as for meeting the golden rule .  Fails the general and musician-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Germany .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC .  No significant coverage in reliable sources.  Jfire ( talk ) 01:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Filipino supervillains: Non-notable entries, no context, no evidence of notability, doesn’t even need to be a list if it was notable, etc.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 09:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Comics and animation , Lists ,  and Philippines .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Do we even have a single article about a member of this group?  There is definitely no associated category, possibly because there are fewer than five of them.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 19:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing particularly notable about this concept.  Falls under WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 19:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Absolutely trivial and not truly encyclopedic.  Dympies ( talk ) 04:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:INDISCRIMINATE per nom.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 04:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article has very few links to articles about Filipino supervillains so is not a valid list article.  Category:Filipino superheroes shows there are enough superheroes to make a list for the superheroes.   Someone could take Category:Filipino comics characters and make a list of all Filipino comic book characters.  D r e a m Focus 07:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Acting Ka Bhoot: It also fails all the criteria according to notability guidelines for films .  Whatever coverage I could find is either press-release, or user generated content.  The film has been in production limbo since 2021.  This article was created by a user who was blocked for creating promotional articles/adding promotional content.  High chances of this article being a result of UPE.  —usernamekiran (talk) 07:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  —usernamekiran (talk) 07:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Three of the sources referenced in the article are interviews, and the other two are routine updates on the film's status that cannot satisfy GNG or NFILM.  Google also turned up nothing.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:10, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Colin Vancao: The current references are obvious databases failing significant coverage .  Google Books and Newspaper.com (both archived and non-archived version) have a few hits, 1 , 2 , 3 , but they are obvious non-SIGCOV single hit trivial mentions.  Moreover, Vancao's roles for the films are minor instead of being significant/major to meet NACTOR, and all sources covering his roles are just bare mentions or databases.  I also don't think a redirect to any of the films are beneficial given this being a mostly unlikely search term given Vancao's extremely minor parts played; and don't think this topic has much potential for drafting.  This was previously tagged as A7 by CycloneYoris but declined by Espresso Addict , so taking to AfD is the next logical step.  VickKiang (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  VickKiang (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I had a cursory search after declining the A7 but could not find substantive coverage.  He seems to have had a long career with multiple roles in very notable properties but in-depth coverage isn't obvious in the usual online places; perhaps someone else will have more luck.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 08:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I am also not seeing any coverage on this person.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 23:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete