Akasya Durağı : It consists of a one-paragraph overview, and a long cast list in an infobox, in which a majority of the entries are red links.   There is nothing about what third parties have said about the show.   (Maybe it has been reviewed, and maybe it hasn't.)  It has been tagged as having no sources since 2015, and still has no sources eight years later.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Turkey .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Turkish article only has 2 Youtube cites and one dead cite Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kanal_D#Programs_broadcast_by_Kanal_D .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 15:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] --->changing to Keep in the light of the sources presented by Kadı below, and that prove the series was important nationally. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This television series was very famous and popular in Türkiye.  Here are some sources, 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 .  -- Kadı Message 16:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Chidgk1 , @ Mushy Yank : Could you evaluate the sources given above?  Kadı Message 16:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the notification. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No sorry I don't think I am competant to do so as I am not a native speaker.  You could use them to cite the Turkish article and see whether anyone there objects.  If they are accepted there I withdraw my delete vote.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The entry is in poor shape, but I agree that the series was very popular.  Not exactly strong evidences of notability alone (Kadı has already shared several links for that), but the series was mentioned in academic works like this and this .  I believe the article could easily be expanded with good sources.  Aintabli ( talk ) 22:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Suggest you cite the Turkish article to those sources - if they are accepted there I withdraw my delete vote Chidgk1 ( talk ) 08:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Chidgk1 , which Turkish article?  Do you mean the Turkish Wikipedia?  Why would that be relevant?  Aintabli ( talk ) 00:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes that is right the Turkish Wikipedia - they would know whether the sources are reliable or not Chidgk1 ( talk ) 05:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah I see now your sources are in English but by Turkish academics.  So now I have no idea.  I will stop commenting on this.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 05:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  02:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus