hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Erick Morikawa : Billytanghh ( talk ) 13:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Billytanghh ( talk ) 13:06, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Youtube video and an online learning platform aren't exactly reliable sources.  The only news reporting I can locate is this Spanish article , in which the subject was merely referenced in passing.  Does not appear notable enough to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NBIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 02:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harold Gardner : Trivial press coverage on this basis.  Otherwise utterly mundane life.  Previous AfD in 2005 was kept based on non-policy arguments around his being one of the last surviving WWI vets, of which there are now none at all.  BD2412 T 22:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 22:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bart Versieck , Dbiv , Durova , Endomion , Flyboy Will , Jeffrey O. Gustafson , JJay , KillerChihuahua , MisterHand , Moriori , Orbframe , Quarl ,  and Xoloz : - courtesy pinging participants from the 2005 discussion.  BD2412 T 22:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering , New York ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The "Doughboy for a Day" article is fine, but I don't find other sources in books or news about this person.  Hasn't really done anything else other than being in the army for a day.  Likely not enough to build an article with.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's unclear what the basis for notability is supposed to be.  Reywas92 Talk 14:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it sounds like Gardner may not have even been formally inducted into the Army, and possibly if he was it was after the armistice was signed (aka the war had ended), so even the “last veteran claim is dubious.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 03:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alfredo Rojas (Chilean footballer) : Largely unsourced article on footballer with no evidence of notability.  No sources found in my own search to satisfy WP:GNG .  Mbdfar ( talk ) 00:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Chile .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GiantSnowman : some sourcing has been mentioned.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 04:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No sources have been presented.  It's no good saying they exist.  Giant Snowman 12:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Then I would consider changing your wording from "found" so you don't get erroneously pinged.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 16:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A simple Google search showed several articles on reliable news media.  I'm on the phone so I can't link them right now, but searching "Alfredo Rojas" "San Marcos de Arica" provides articles from La Tribuna, a newspaper from Biobío, and Soychile.cl, of El Mercurio, among many others, which in my opinion suffice to assert notability.  Bedivere ( talk ) 15:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Bedivere.  Extensive pro career in professional Chilean football with may sources.  Artilce needs imporvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 00:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It's not sufficient to simply do a Google search (or worse yet to rely on someone else's Google search) and base a claim of notability on seeing a number of hits.  We actually need to review the sources, and when I did, I found them wanting.  A La Tribuna article was the best source I could find which is a routine transfer announcement that includes more than just routine coverage of his career.  This is not enough by itself to show compliance with the GNG.  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  Someone needs to actually write and document this before it goes up on Wikipedia.  As it is, it shouldn't be up.  Llajwa ( talk ) 22:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes GNG. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 09:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrés Makin : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Keep : The player seems notable as the first time I heard about him was in this New York Times article .  He is a notable player on the Belize national football team .  I can see his profile on reputable sports websites like ESPN , World football.net , and more.  ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 03:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Makin is mentioned once in the NY Times article as one of several players offered a bribe to fix a match.  It is not SIGCOV.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 14:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Can't read NYT but on its own it won't be enough.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carol Baumgartner : Some non-RS coverage exists for her Miss Brazil USA victory but even if RS was available WP:BLP1E would apply.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants , Brazil ,  and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure why this is tagged Germany.  LibStar ( talk ) 11:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : She does not meet the WP:GNG , lacks cover from credible sources.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 13:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Miss Brazil USA does not seem to be a notable competition.  Fails GNG more broadly.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Braves–Phillies rivalry : The entire article is just content that already exists in other articles.  Rivalry articles should only exist if there's a long history that's reliably sourced.  These are just two teams in the same division who have only played each other in the postseason 3 times the past 30 years.  The two paragraphs dedicated to the rivalry at the Atlanta Braves article is sufficient.  Nemov ( talk ) 02:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions .  Nemov ( talk ) 02:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Georgia (U.S. state) and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : All of the sourcing in the current version of the article appears to be run-of-the-mill sports journalism .  In terms of sources that exist , this article by ESPN is probably the strongest piece of coverage for satisfying WP:GNG .  There are others like it, but unfortunately, most that I can find falls under one or more of the following issues A) recent, not before 2023, B) unclear reliability, or C) primary sources.  Left guide ( talk ) 04:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for pointing that out.  I had not noticed that there was already a paragraph on the rivalry on the Braves page, as I was mainly referencing the Phillies page, which does not have its own paragraph on it.  Your points for deletion of the article are valid, and I offer no objections.  However, I would suggest that a paragraph be added about the rivalry to the Phillies page.  Wildcat7176 ( talk ) 16:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to Major League Baseball rivalries#Atlanta Braves vs. Philadelphia Phillies .   Ifa  redirect is created, I suggest expanding the content at that target to a few paragraphs, similar to what is currently in the Braves article linked above.   Not enough SIGCOV to pass GNG for a standalone article.  Frank Anchor 20:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't even think the rivalry on the main rivalries page stands to any recognition.  It's all recency bias because of two consecutive meetings and FANCRUFT.  Personally, new rivalries ought to be at least five years old before getting a mention on the main rivalries page.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Castilho International Legal Corporation : No results from a WP:BEFORE search.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 16:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Companies ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have already put the title into namespace, however the redirect was removed and recreated into mainspace.  The draft is still there though.  TheGreatestLuvofAll ( talk ) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails the WP:SIRS test, so fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Also, it was created by a UPE.  UtherSRG (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jimmy Chin (sport shooter) : Chris Troutman ( talk ) 22:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Malaysia .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 22:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; fails GNG.  No reliable, independent sources with significant coverage of the subject in a BEFORE search.  Tails Wx 01:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iulia and Delia : Not much to discuss here.  — Biruitorul Talk 18:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Sportspeople , Women , Finance , Technology , France , Romania , England , Massachusetts ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per WP:NCLIMBER there is zero mention of these people in any mainline climbing media, and yet their main notability claim is climbing.   They have tried to get an article here before but it was declined, but I see they have returned with a much higher quality article (from a production point of view) which I suspect is a professional WP:UPE to 'manufacture' notability where there is none.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 09:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see that the article's creator User:CharlesBNB has now been blocked as a UPE, along with several other linked accounts, and their other UPE articles are being deleted.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 09:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is nothing notable about twins climbing mountains.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 18:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete They spent a lot of money to climb some standard high elevation routes, but they are not notable mountaineers.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 18:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCLIMBER and the sources do not substantiate a WP:GNG pass.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lots of rich people climb mountains.  Lots of rich people pay other people to make Wikipedia articles on them , apparently.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wallflower (band) : Searching for refs is difficult as there is a more successful band called "The Wallflowers", but even after including band members names into the search it seems like they received no coverage.  Nothing in the article writeup suggests Wikipedia notability.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I’m the original article author.  Happy to have article deleted.  Band came to an end in 1998 with little notable activity.  ( talk ) 13:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and England .  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malawi–Poland relations : The relations lacks things that typically contribute to bilateral relations such as state visits, embassies, significant trade and migration.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and Poland .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Two passing mentions means this fails WP:SIGCOV .  I doubt this content is valuable enough to be merged somewhere, but if anyone has an idea for ATD, go head, and ping me and I'll revise my vote.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per user Piotrus. killer bee 05:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- The trend to build a standalone article for every combination of two nations, no matter how insignificant their connexion may be, is a bit out of hand.  The source presented are WP:PRIMARY , and I can find no scholarly treatment of this relationship nor mentions in reputable journals.  There is no info particularly worth merging and, more importantly, nowhere to merge such info.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 20:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Valeriy Zhoholko : The article is currently a footballfacts.ru stats mirror and I can't see any significant prose coverage available about this footballer.  Does not seem to pass WP:SPORTBASIC .  Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.  Best source I can find on him is Chernigiv Future , a local source that mentions him once in the text.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Blue1 destinations : WP:NOTTRAVEL is also relevant and also failed here.  EDIT:  A subsequent AN discussion concluded that these articles should be AFD'd in an orderly manner with a link to the original RFC discussion and that it should be taken into account in any close .  In addition this article is a clear failure of notability standards, as the only sources cited appear to be a PR website, the Tampere Convention Bureau, and a 404 link to the Anna Aero website.  None of these are independent, reliable sources.  My WP:BEFORE failed to find any sources that would remedy this even if the WP:NOT and RFC problems were over-come some how.  In reality, even if WP:NOT were overcome, in order to meet notability standards sourcing would have to pass WP:CORP and extend beyond specialist/industry press.  FOARP ( talk ) 13:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Finland .  FOARP ( talk ) 13:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Blue1 Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Jack4576 - For a merge to be appropriate, these destinations would have to be reliably sourced.  FOARP ( talk ) 15:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] {{cn}} can be added, would be a shame to just delete this work Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No point keeping stuff that isn’t reliably sourced and can be deleted at any time.  We already had an RFC on this content.  FOARP ( talk ) 20:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not seeing the point of merging, agree this is WP:NOT Dronebogus ( talk ) 00:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per above, this list is essentially useless.  Handmeanotherbagofthemchips ( talk ) 00:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 07:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Duke Joachim Ernst Memorial Badge : — Biruitorul Talk 20:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards , Royalty and nobility ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the Mitteldeutsche Zeitung coverage does appear to be reliable and independent, but one source alone isn't sufficient, and the others are unreliable or non-independent.  Can't find other coverage.  Marginal, but no strong evidence of notability.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 15:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shenelle Henry : All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2013 , 2016 , 2018 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Trinidad and Tobago .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete