hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Valeri Chupin (footballer, born 2002) : Coverage is limited to extremely brief mentions in match writeups (e.g. [11] ), and coverage put out by his former team, Valmiera FC .  Initially I had attempted a BLAR to the article on his grandfather ( Valeri Chupin (footballer, born 1961) ), although on closer inspection, that article and the one on his father ( Yevgeni Chupin ) may also have notability issues.  Reviewing User talk:Mish-FCTM , this appears to be the 9th time (more or less) since September 2022 that Mish-FCTM has objected to a BLAR or PROD without identifying appropriate sources, with what appears to be a 100% deletion rate when the discussion is ultimately brought to AfD.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  signed, Rosguill talk 17:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matt McNamara : Spinixster (chat!) 11:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 11:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I also couldn't locate any sources for this guy, and given the article already lacks sources, it doesn't seem to meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ben Leeds Carson : Does not meet: WP:COMPOSER or WP:MUSICBIO .  Suspect to COI editing.  Resume style article with primary sourced content.  Maineartists ( talk ) 00:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the one LA Times article discusses this person, rest are in non-RS.  Otherwise, all I find are USC news articles, which are primary sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music Maineartists .  ( talk ) 02:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this promotional mess is sourced almost entirely to student newspapers and other unreliable sources.  Even the LA Times article mentioned above does not contribute to notability, as its coverage of Carson amounts to a mere paragraph.  Clear WP:GNG failure.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 12:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In fact the LA Times coverage of Carson amounts to a mere sentence.  The other half of the two-sentence paragraph is about a different musical piece by someone else.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 07:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raffaella (musician) : I can't find mentions of this person in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep as does have a staff written AllMusic bio here and coverage in The Current and Consequence of Sound referenced in the article, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:52, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All of the sources in the article are promotional or interviews, and the Allmusic bio also sounds promotional.  WP:RSP also states about Allmusic that "Some editors question the accuracy of these websites for biographical details and recommend more reliable sources when available.".  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 05:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Most music editors consider AllMusic a reliable source and the bio does not seem promotional to me Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article are promo and mentions, nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BEFORE showed promo, database style listings, nothing with SIGCOV.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 01:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sovereign House of Nicaea : In particular, Google has never heard of the "Sovereign House of Nicaea" and the article contains no references to sources discussing the house.  The refs, if we can call them refs, are excerpts of various documents that support the idea that the House of Nicea collects the inheritance of the Empire of Nicaea but don't provide anything like third-party significant coverage of the house.  Pichpich ( talk ) 22:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marquess of Ephesus .  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 06:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the revision @ Pichpich !  I apologize for being new to WP, therefore I didn't know how to properly sustain the article with sources that DO NOT raise doubts on the existence of the House.  I really need your support and guidance to avoid deletion, as the aim of this page is to respect the purpose first and foremost, and to provide people knowledge about this institution.  My question is: would an article (in English), a document, written by the "Consiglio Araldico Italiano" (Italian Heraldic Council, you'll find many references on Google) be deemed as a reliablie source, since it is a subject matter expert third party on the claim?  The Council has edited books in the past, too ( [16] ).  Moreover, how much time do I have before you really need to complete deletion?  Marchio Ephesi ( talk ) 08:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Articles for deletion debates are open for at least a week.  If there's no clear consensus on what to do with the article or there hasn't been sufficient participation in the discussion, the debates can be extended.  If there's still no consensus to delete, the articles are kept by default, although they can be resubmitted for deletion after some time has elapsed.  Pichpich ( talk ) 23:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as fanboy nonsense.  Mccapra ( talk ) 10:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not pass GNG.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 20:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rodney Mupfudza : The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Removed from "Women".  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Zimbabwe Twenty20 International cricketers as a valid WP:ATD .  Doesn't look to currently meet WP:GNG , but as a current international player, he might do in the future, in which case then and only then should a separate article for him be created.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Zimbabwe Twenty20 International cricketers as per WP:ATD as per Joseph2302, suitable WP:ATD and saves the history when/if coverage increases.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - a redirect is no longer suitable as the Zimbabwe matches at the African Games have now been stripped of T20I status .  -- JP ( Talk ) 11:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Then I now support delete . That article explains that he isn't a T20I player anymore, and probably explains why there's not much coverage of him, as he was really just playing for a Zimbabwe B team there. Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 23:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the matches played by Zimbabwe have been stripped of T20I status, so he is no longer a T20I player (redirect doesn't apply therefore). Couldn't find any substantial coverage about the player, fails both WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG . Robo Cric Let's chat 15:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As potential notability stemmed from being a T20I, which can no longer be said about him. -- Brunnaiz ( talk ) 22:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Forrest W. Breyfogle III : The dude seems to have published a few books but I find very little in secondary coverage.  Maintenance tags since 2017.  Qcne (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Missouri .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete CSD G5.  Sock puppeteer blocked in Jan 2017.  Article created by their sock in March 2017,but socking was not discovered until later.  Graywalls ( talk ) 23:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD ( Forrest Breyfogle ), ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All I find is this [1] and one other article in Quality magazine.  Nothing for BLP or GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dawn Best : No independent sigcov to establish notability.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 13:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Authors , Women , Comics and animation ,  and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It appears it was created as a COI entry several years ago after the first attempt at an article was deleted.  Has been edited by SPA's.  An online BEFORE reveals, social media, user-submitted content, an interview (primary) but nothing in the way of SIGCOV in Reliable Sources.  Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG , seems to be a run-of-the-mill illustrator that does not meet WP's criteria for notability.  Netherzone ( talk ) 19:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 14:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Becca (decedent) : Fails WP:GNG , WP:PSTS , and WP:Verifiability .  Even if sources are located to pass GNG; this is a strong candidate for WP:TNT given the OR issues involving a sensitive topic.  4meter4 ( talk ) 03:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New Mexico .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry but I don’t feel it is necessary to delete this page especially as it’s about such a mysterious and major case of an unidentified decedent.  Judging from the reasons you have given, it sounds like changing sources from ones that are primary to ones that are NOT primary would fix the issue.  Ellissten ( talk ) 14:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ellissten Assuming secondary sources exist, the material would have to be completely rewritten which is why WP:TNT applies.  Given the sensitive nature of this topic and out of respect for the person who died, I don't see how we can allow an article built entirely from original research to remain in main space.  We aren't allowed to interpret primary sources like law enforcement websites on wikipedia per policy at WP:No original research and WP:NCRIME .  That said, at AFD we require evidence of significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources to be produced in order to keep an article under WP:GNG policy.  WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES arguments which speculate that sources exist without producing them is listed at Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions § There must be sources .  Best.  4meter4 ( talk ) 16:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sad story, but there doesn't appear to be much written about her.  The one CBS source is fine, but it's not enough to build a wiki article.  I don't see much of anything else in a Gsearch.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:44, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ' Delete No indication of being notable, as not indication of significant coverage. scope_creep Talk 09:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Loren Ligorio : Non-notable.  Broc ( talk ) 11:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Croatia .  Broc ( talk ) 11:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's at least been several Slobodna Dalmacija articles on him.  Could pass GNG.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do you have some links?  -- Broc ( talk ) 18:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As well as a 2006 documentary about him.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 13:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ARTIST .  He not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums.  https://arhiv.slobodnadalmacija.hr/? showSubscriptionModal=1 is behind a paywall.  https://www.matica.hr/vijenac/366/Prodajte%20svoje%20tijelo/ is a passing mention.  Croatian Wiki article isn't cited well.  Nor is Serbo-Croatian wiki.  No reliable source for exact dob.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conductive Education School, Kuwait : JMWt ( talk ) 16:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per WP:N , we cannot include every single school just because we feel like it.  Schools have to be notable for inclusion into the wiki, just like every other article.  I also did a search and there was no source except for the school website.  Let me know if I'm wrong about anything.  The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 (The Garage) 17:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability and Education .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSCHOOL , no references so can't establish notability in the article.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish • growths ) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per forementioned reasons above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anoop Trevedi : The main sources available on the subject are social media sites.  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 08:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 08:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources at all, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV .  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  10:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Delhi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete meets the standard of WP:PRODNOM , Fast deletion recommended.  PARVAGE talk!  06:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete

Discussion outcome: delete
Healthcanal : I couldn't find any reliable source to prove some kind of WP:NME or WP:WEB .  Chiserc ( talk ) 09:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Health and fitness , United States of America ,  and Ohio .  Chiserc ( talk ) 09:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe these type of platforms themselves receive less coverage but it is widely cited in Wikipedia and acceptable source in the medical field.  G19US ( talk ) 11:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sourcing is the website staff, the Forbes Council and various PR items.  I can't find sourcing we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 13:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Judy Clendening : Not a province-wide official, and not remarkable in any encyclopedic sense.  BD2412 T 04:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Canada .  BD2412 T 04:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject just doesn't meet the GNG.  User:Let'srun 15:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete