hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mobin Rai : No evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG and my Indian source search was unsuccessful.  The article also contains incorrect information as Soccerway , as well as other stats sites, states that he never played a game at the top level.  The best coverage that I can find is Kathmandu Post , which mentions him twice, and Sikkim Express , a single passing mention.  None of that is even close to significant and this BLP is not justified unless anyone can find anything better.  I found stuff about him on Facebook and Blogspot but we can't use these sources as they are self-published.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Sikkim .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no reliable sources found till now Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Gasparilla Bowl broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS , this game gets a brief mention, the rest are TV schedules.  In all, not doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and Florida .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 15:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 TCAS incident over Somalia : The only articles talking about the incident are aviation websites with basically no mainstream news sites talking about the incident.  I seriously have doubts whether this incident will result in any changes as it happened over Somaliland.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 10:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Aviation ,  and Somalia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not the first recent WP:NOTNEWS contribution from this editor, if we had a page on every averted aviation incident, we'd be taking over Bitcoin's servers for space.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 13:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A trivial incident, of no great significance, and not having received significant coverage.  An aircraft was directed onto a flight path fairly close to that of another aircraft, so both pilots were given an advisory notification as a precaution.  The flight paths did not bring the aircraft close enough to cause any significant risk, or to necessitate any change of course, and they passed one another safely.  That's it.  The first reference is a blog post, and the others don't look much more significant.  JBW ( talk ) 15:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Routine news event with no significant and sustained coverage.  There are many near misses like this involving aircraft, and pilots are warned to reroute once a potential collision might be possible.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 08:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aviationwikiflight as you correctly point out, WP:AIRCRASH is an essay and failing or passing it has absolutely no relevance in AfD's so please do not use it.  There is also no requirements that the coverage comes from mainstream news sites, a significant coverage can come from a subject specific site (sport related news from a sport website for instance).  That said, while I'm not putting any judgement on the publications of the sources aside from the blog ( Aviation Week Network and Flightradar24 might be reliable), this seems to have been a minor incident with the coverage in the article coming from a period of a few days with no indications of continued coverage and thus little hope of it having WP:LASTING effects or having the WP:SUSTAINED coverage to pass WP:GNG .  So Delete unless someone can point to more sustained significant coverage of the incident.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 15:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very much with JBW's argument above.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 21:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raju Debnath : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - clearly fails GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Firm Foundation Christian Academy : Sources in the article and found in BEFORE are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 06:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Christianity ,  and Zimbabwe .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was not able to find any sources outside the school website.  I don't see how this school is notable and the major societal impacts it's having.  (A school can talk about not doing drugs but's another thing to attribute them as a cause for major drug use reduction.) ❤History Theorist❤ 05:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Created reasonably recently so don't want to soft-delete, relisting to establish clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 07:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not able to find any information about this school online.  From the information I see, fails WP:NGO .  Would be happy to be proven wrong, but right now that's what I see.  RetroCosmos talk 01:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Game of Life/Yahtzee/Payday : Also checked print sources, only to find brief mentions of it in a couple Nintendo Power magazines.  Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 22:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yeah, I'm stumped here.  It seems decidedly non-notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't believe that the GameSpot review wasn't cited – and then realized it was only a single user review.  Very telling in terms of coverage.  The Nintendo Power mentions I found are... not exactly coverage ( [7] ).  Firm ! delete here.  Nomader ( talk ) 18:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Game Boy Advance games as an alternative to deletion .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 20:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Spirit of Metal : Tagged for COI creation since 2014.  Valereee ( talk ) 15:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Valereee ( talk ) 15:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous WP:PROD .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 15:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing for this webzine, only sourcing using the phrase to describe other things.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 21:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the article doesn't provide sufficient notability and a WP:BEFORE search didn't bring up sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 17:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks sources fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Narendra Bhooshan : More WP:SIGCOV is required to support his notability.  Macbeejack ☎ 06:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  Macbeejack ☎ 06:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This would not be discussed if it were an American civil servant.  However I am not familiar enough with the Indian media landscape to locate sources of improvement.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable functionary, reads as PROMO.  Sourcing is simply discussion of things the person is involved with or discussion of promotions.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daren Usher : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and United Kingdom .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kurumin : As far as I can tell the Portuguese article is also not sourced.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 13:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Brazil .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 13:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is Spanish Wikipedia article which has some sources, but they are either primary or from distrowatch.com which I think is user-generated (if you make your own Linux distribution, you can propose to list it there).  Quick Google search showed some random dead blogs and merchandise.  I believe that this Linux distribution is not notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I, too, couldn't find any independent sources.  Owen× ☎ 17:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete typical WP:MILL distribution.  - C HAMPION ( talk ) ( contributions ) ( logs ) 23:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programs broadcast by TV 2 Zebra : Unsourced and most programming appears to be acquired programming (and not original).  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists , Television ,  and Norway .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Effectively an abandoned article barely updated since edit #1 in 2012 (and most of those updates are likely involving false shows).  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A clear-cut case of WP:NOTDIR .  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerry Wemple : Unsure if 'won significant critical attention' ( WP:POET ) is covered by the Naomi Long Madgett Poetry Award and the Pushcart Prize nomination - Rich T | C | E-Mail 19:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Poetry ,  and United States of America .  - Rich T | C | E-Mail 19:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment unsure of the awards, perhaps not notable.  Would being the editor of an anthology book (that's been reviewed) fix notability issues: [18] ?  He's listed here as a notable anthologist [19] Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:26, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Confirmation of one of the awards mentioned [20] and some talk about him here [21] but I can't open both items in my location due to Google not liking my location.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Hope for more participation here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I would concur that the "Naomi Long Madgett Poetry Award" isn't notable as searches almost exclusively lead to the prize's namesake.  The Pushcart prize is a little more ambiguous, however I'm also inclined to say that it doesn't fulfill "significant critical attention" as most coverage I've been able to find is about the prize itself and not the winners.  And, for what it's worth, the user that created the page has a username that is shared with the article subject.  That, combined with the fact that the only edit on its history is the creation of the page makes me question if the editor has any WP:COI - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 16:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amélie Chekroun : Their articles and books are not widely cited and there is no available significant coverage in independent secondary sources.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 13:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women , History , Islam , Africa , Ethiopia ,  and France .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly fails NACADEMIC (it seems she is not a professor, let alone one of the special types that is presumed notable), and a web search found no significant coverage, independent or otherwise.  Toadspike [Talk] 14:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Her citation record is not yet strong enough for WP:PROF , I don't see any books that could pass WP:AUTHOR , and her position (chargée de recherche au CNRS) is still pretty junior.  Directrice de recherche (the next level up) would be more likely to be notable, although still not something that leads to automatic notability.  (A note, though, re the previous comment "not a professor": the French system separates academic researchers from academic teachers more than the US or UK ones do, and she is on the research track. "Professor", in the French system, is the top teaching-track position. But our notability criteria favor research over teaching. So it is entirely possible that she may become notable in a few years despite not being so now.) — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tim Schofield : Fails GNG.  JohnmgKing ( talk ) 15:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and England .  JohnmgKing ( talk ) 15:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO as it stands, seems unlikely that can be addressed with additional research.  Royal Autumn Crest ( talk ) 15:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I added a reference to the Civic Award that he and some other people received, but it's probably not enough.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Precentor is not a sufficient role to amount to notability.   I doubt that a civic award changes that.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 19:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malika Mahat : Remsense 诉 22:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Nepal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete "soft" per WP:TOOSOON .  By all accounts, even assuming everything is true , this is a minor starlet.  She does not inherit notability because she appeared in a couple of music videos and had a few supporting roles in films.  If she had won an award as "best supporting actress" in her sector of the industry, then that would be a different story.  In 2024, everyone knows, Wikipedia is not a place to post a page about your favorite up and coming actress .  19:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete