hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Math-O-Vision: There is a brief description in a book titled Effective Digital Learning Environments [33] , as part of a list of random educational websites, and other than that I could only find very brief mentions, mostly in the context of Alan Alda .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 03:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and United States of America .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 03:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events , Education ,  and New Hampshire .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I keep missing sources during my searches...  An article here [34] provides significant coverage.  I might stop doing these nominations for now.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 06:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Yimnashana hamulata: Hongsy ( talk ) 05:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 05:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Taxonomy is a little confused due to synonymy and subgenus ( Tinkhamia hamulata , Tinkhamia hamulata hamulata , Yimnashana (Tinkhamia) hamulata hamulata ...) but appears to be valid, and present in the sources we usually take as reliable [24] [25] [26] .  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 07:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and China .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I have no idea why Hongsy claims it doesn't have a valid name.  As the BioLib entry makes clear, it was first described as Tinkhamia hamulata and then transferred to the genus Yimnashana , where Tinkhamia may be treated as a subgenus.  Peter coxhead ( talk ) 08:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've now added information from the original paper that transferred the species from Tinkhamia to Yimnashana .  Peter coxhead ( talk ) 09:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Clearly meets WP:NSPECIES with a valid name/sourcing, especially after Peter coxhead's edits.  KoA ( talk ) 14:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - notable.  Meets WP:NSPECIES -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Bradley Porteous: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Crearly fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  Not enough sources online to establish notability. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 22:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - SIG , COV exists.  He has played the highest level of South African domestic cricket.  -- JP ( Talk ) 07:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Appears to be other WP:GNG passing sourcing in a simple search such as this along with what JP has found.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Has played at a sufficient level, making enough appearances, plus there are sources to satisfy WP:GNG .  AA ( talk ) 10:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Sandy Beasley: Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 00:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Olympics ,  and Canada .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 00:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In addition to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram feature story ( [13] ), there's also sigcov from The Vancouver Sun , Hood County News , and the Delta Sports Hall of Fame .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 00:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This one looks pretty clear.  Would you be willing to withdraw this, @ InvadingInvader : ?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 00:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, hopefully you can expand it (which I'm confident you can) Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 00:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Arikomban: Terribly written NPOV violation.  Withdrawn.  Drowssap SMM ( talk ) ( contributions ) 18:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Asia , India ,  and Kerala .  Drowssap SMM ( talk ) ( contributions ) 18:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] AFD is for deciding whether administrators should exercise the administrator-only deletion tool.   It is not for things that you can quite easily deal with yourselves with the tools that you have, such as by reverting to Special:Permalink/1159804585 and trying to develop the article from there again.  Uncle G ( talk ) 20:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Proquest has 254 hits for the name, seems likely to meet GNG.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 23:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Nomination reason seems ridiculous.  Is nominating for deletion is the procedure to deal with articles having NPOV issues.  I don't think it is.  Use appropriate tags instead or try to clean the mess up.  The subject has received coverage from international medias such as BBC and CNBC [8] .  Why should BBC cover about a rogue elephant from India if it is not that much important.  This elephant is the subject of an upcoming Malayalam movie which is under pre-production.  This itself implies the importance of this elephant.  Besides there are plenty of coverage to meet Wikipedia's notability standards.  111.92.124.104 ( talk ) 04:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - extensive media coverage is available; but by all means roll this back to a non-embarassing state.  The version suggested above by Uncle G seems reasonable.  There seems to be a year-long three-sided skirmish going on at the article about who can add the most cringeworthy POV material, that has to stop.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 08:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Moshe Berent: If no one steps up to address these major issues in response to this nomination for deletion, the article should go.  Patrick J. Welsh ( talk ) 16:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Israel .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , History , Politics ,  and Social science .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Not my field but GS seems to show quite healthy citations (152,77,64,46,42).  A search in JSTOR shows a number of meaty comments suggesting possible notability.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 21:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Scholarly record strong for this low-cited field.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 21:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Comment: "Burnett" or "Barnett" is used as Berent's last name in some translations.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Xxanthippe 's analysis plus a review of translated versions of the the refs in this article plus the Russian and Hebrew Wikipedia's. I did not find any article profiling Berent but there are many reports on the stir he's created, attacking his fellow academics for not supporting Benjamin Netanyahu. Lack of inline citations is a problem to fix but not a reason to delete. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep extensive reviews of his work available, which include significant biographic details (eg review of A Nation Like All The Nations ).  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 01:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Per all above.  Plus, nomination in defiance of WP:NEXIST .  Plus WP:SNOW .  gidonb ( talk ) 06:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Berent is quite notable in Israel, especially online.  When initially creating this article by translating it from Hebrew, I skipped reworking the lengthy external links section into references.  I hoped somebody more footnote-experienced would eventually do it, in either the original or the translation.  Guybas ( talk ) 07:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Rodania: Unless someone can find more information in Swiss or Belgian publications I think this might not be notable.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 02:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Switzerland .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 02:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Rodania seems to be a place name, so coverage is hard to find.  I have this in Belgian news [29] , [30] .  Will continue to look.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:47, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This as well [31] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There seems to be more coverage in Belgian than Swiss outlets, but the brand itself seems to be have quite a bit of local lore around it [32] .  Superboilles ( talk ) 19:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There are enough sources to support the subject's notability .  E.g. La Voix du Nord "La voiture Rodania disparaît du paysage des courses belges" ; Paris Match "Rebonjour, Rodania" ; Le Soir "Les montres Rodania redeviennent belges" & "La marque de montres Rodania change de mains" ; etc.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 12:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Akshayapureeswarar Temple: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  How on earth would a 14C building not be notable?  In any country with a decent heritage listing system this would definitely be listed and meet WP:GEOFEAT .  It's unfortunate it's in India, which doesn't, but it's still covered by WP:SYSTEMIC .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination Necrothesp is right, I was too focused on the sourcing rather than the overall picture.  Happy to be corrected.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Raquel Evita Saraswati: It's possible that this issue might arise again in 2023.  This AfD might have occurred at some point anyway, given the nature of the topic.  I think she has now achieved sufficient notability, and we can write based on what reliable sources say, regardless of the subject's wishes.  In my research, I found numerous in-depth references in reliable sources such as The Intercept , Philadelphia Magazine , Philadelphia Inquirer , USA Today , and The Juggernaut .  Skeus ( talk ) 16:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I think Intercept and USA Today give clear GNG; subject is not a private figure and quite regularly participates in public events and speaks to the media.  That said, we should be quite careful about the other sources, like the Metro, in the article with clearly biased headlines.  I think there may be something to say about stubbifying the article.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 16:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that I asked you to submit this as a draft, not move it to mainspace and then nominate it for AFD yourself.  331dot ( talk ) 16:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think draftspace submission is obligatory.  Skeus ( talk ) 17:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's not the point.  I said that you had the option of deletion review or running the draft through AFC to establish that things had sufficiently changed since the last AFD.  I undeleted it on the condition that you use AFC.  An AFD that you started yourself is improper because you don't want it deleted.  331dot ( talk ) 17:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Close as the nominator doesn't want the article they wrote deleted.  331dot ( talk ) 17:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender , Islam ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Afsar Ali Ahmed: 06:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  PARVAGE talk!  06:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per WP:POLITICIAN .  Mehedi Abedin 07:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  Ahmed served in the Sangsad , which makes him notable.  〜 Festucalex • talk 10:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ali Bilgin: Any sources online were just statistics.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Germany ,  and Turkey .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I would recommend withdrawing this nomination.  The player had a long career in professional football, players of this calibre don't fail WP:GNG .  I found two usable German newspaper articles through a quick web search and added them to the article, I'm sure there's more in Turkish.  Coverage from before 2010 is likely to be found through offline resources.  Kind regards, Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's definitely stuff here, mistake on my part, and I will withdraw this.  I think I made a typo that may have affected my search.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 10:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I would be very surprised if someone who made 60+ appearances  including Champions League for one of the best supported teams in Turkey would not be notable, and that doesn't seem to be the case here.  For instance [18] [19] [20] came up very early in the source search - the UEFA link isn't really sigcov, but his transfer was important enough to be on the UEFA website, for instance.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Sex and the Other Man: I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   Per WP:NEXIST , the sources have to be “suitable” and none of the sources are suitable or reliable enough.   I did a WP:BEFORE and found one suitable and reliable review from TV Guide .   Needs one more suitable and reliable review in order to be eligible.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 08:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 08:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Added sources to the page, including TV Guide mentioned above.  See for yourself. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 08:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Excellent work, User:Mushy Yank .   I speedy withdraw this nomination.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 08:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
TKP/ML Reconstruction Organization: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 18 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 22:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Indian Computer Emergency Response Team: I searched for sources using all alternatives: "CERT," "CERTIN," and "CERT India," but couldn't find anything that satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH.  Dafydd y Corach ( talk ) 07:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  It appears to be a government agency, not a company.  Article needs some cleanup, but I don't think it's worthy of deletion.  Gottagotospace ( talk ) 14:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Five Minutes to Love: I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 00:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 00:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , found a review at DVD Talk, under the name "The Rotten Apple" [36] Donald D23 talk to me 00:54, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:GNG .  Also seems to meet WP:NFO #2.  This has plenty of coverage in contemporary zines and related books, eg: There's a full review by Erich Mees in Ecco Magazine issue 19, page 18, 1993.  Ecco has a masthead with editor and copy editor listed.  Good size review in The Phantom of the Movies' Videoscope: The Ultimate Guide to the Latest, Greatest, and Weirdest Genre Videos , Joe Kane.  2000.  p. 505.  Short capsule review in Famous Monsters of Filmland , Issue 200, May 1993, p 109.  Magazine has a full masthead.  — siro χ o 01:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I've added an external link to the AFI (American Film Institute) page for the film's original title "The Rotten Apple".  There's a great lot of information about this film at AFI: History, Details, Credits Synopsis, Genre, etc.  On the one hand, this movie is a sort of testament to what a leap upward Rue McClanahan made to the Golden Girls.  On the other hand, it's in league with a lot of low-budget films of that era.  — Maile ( talk ) 20:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I withdraw this nomination per consensus.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 21:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep