hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Güven Çavuş: There is a good amount of routine coverage such as contract and injury news or match previews and reports, but nothing in-depth that could be WP:SIGCOV .  This from Voetbal International is typical; a match report that briefly mentions he scored a goal.  PROD was contested many years ago when the now-deprecated NFOOTBALL was in effect.  Jogurney ( talk ) 13:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Turkey .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found Batman Çağdaş but it's mostly just a quote from him and contains very little independent coverage of him.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The royal crowns of the Maldives: Of the 4 sources, 3 don't even mention the topic and the 4th is a twitter/X post.    Plus I couldn't find any sources.   Tagged by others since December 2023.  North8000 ( talk ) 00:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reliable citations.  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 10:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 11:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Imprisonment of Eddie Núñez: There's been no sustained coverage of this story as of yet, and it's too soon for an article; Wikipedia is not a news site .  Additionally, although this is not an attack page and it states clearly that the charges were dropped, we should be wary of an article containing serious allegations involving child exploitation, anti-semitism, and bomb threats.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 18:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime , Schools , Judaism , Peru ,  and United States of America .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 18:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There were 150+ bomb threats, police arrested the wrong guy, then dropped the charges and released him.  The proper article should be 2023 bomb threats against Jewish institutions .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 00:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as this article strikes me as being a serious BLP problem, and coverage should be at 2023 bomb threats against Jewish institutions or a similar title.  Alextejthompson ( Ping me or leave a message on my talk page ) 18:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I disagree this particular coverage should be there; this person got caught up in something that had nothing to do with them and I think including it there would be a BLP problem as well.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That said, I think an article on 2023 bomb threats against Jewish institutions would be notable, but Núñez's name should not be included in it, maybe just one sentence about how police in Peru wrongfully arrested someone and leave it at that.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dhruv Pandit: I find nothing for this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and India .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unambiguously fails notability guidelines, despite the 7 sources for a single sentence that reads like the beginning of a curriculum vitae.  Agentdoge ( talk ) 21:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -  individual of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references.  Refs are either non-RS PR pieces, incidental mentions, written by the subject, or quote the subject.  With only a few independent RS sentences about this individual, there is no basis to establish notability.  Article was created by an editor blocked for Undisclosed paid editing, so probably promotional.  Dialectric ( talk ) 19:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Some of these sources look slightly better than others, yet those ones don't provide SIGCOV.  The rest seem promotional.  DFlhb ( talk ) 19:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ofelia Hernandez: Completely unnotable mayor of a small city, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL , no secondary sources found.  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California .  CptViraj ( talk ) 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I searched and could not find any meaningful in-depth coverage about this individual.  Left guide ( talk ) 06:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing in-depth from a reliable source that isn't WP:ROTM , doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL Shaws username .  talk .  13:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 03:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Son Of The Sun: 15:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom rationale.  Article author also seems to have attempted to create a page for the artist, which was rejected at WP:AFC for lack of notability/coverage, so there’s some precedent here.  The Kip 19:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - For Nigerian singers we've learned that managers have perfected the art of blitzing unreliable gossip sites with promotional announcements.  So this singer does appear in some online sources, but read them and you will notice shameless weasel words and other unreliable shenanigans.  This singer has not risen above that scheme and the album under discussion here has never been described or reviewed in reliable media.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 12:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] From Nsukka With Love , another EP article for the same artist created on the same day by the same person.  Gjs238 ( talk ) 23:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : creator seems to be obsessed or rather connected to the artist as there are other article(s) which are not notable and connected to this one.  ihateneo ( talk ) 02:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ante Pavelić (disambiguation): The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Croatia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and per WP:TWODABS .  BD2412 T 02:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delte Hatnote, seems better Dawid2009 ( talk ) 06:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The reason we're here is because Ante Smith Pavelić got removed from the list.  Nothing in the English Wikipedia currently mentions that person, though there's many references to them in a Google Books search.  -- Joy ( talk ) 10:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Then I suppose it's not helpful to readers of English Wikipedia unless an article is created to warrant that entry. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 16:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Another way to look at this might be to examine whether there are any actual references to Smith Pavelić as just Pavelić? IOW was he actually eligible for inclusion in that list in the first place. -- Joy ( talk ) 21:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The point is the entry of Ante Smith Pavelić can't warrant a different topic with the same article Ante Pavelić (1869–1938) , regardless of MOS:DABRL .  It won't be more complex to depict multiple topics from the same article with hatnote, even if the entry of Ante Smith Pavelić is warranted per MOS:DABRL .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 06:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure I understood the first sentence, can you rephrase please?  -- Joy ( talk ) 17:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK, agreed, if and when anything is written about Smith Pavelić, we can then see if it's legitimate to add them to the hatnote. ( Delete ) -- Joy ( talk ) 10:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEOTHER .  – Vipz ( talk ) 18:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kristine Y. Lee: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Hong Kong .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Unimprovable sub-stub on an obscure figure skater.   Utter failure of the GNG.  Ravenswing 00:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find more than some passing mentions, and as such, this subject does not meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Please ping me if any significant coverage can be found or if the SkateToday article can be archived as I currently can't access it.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: as per User:Let'srun.  -- Wish for Good ( talk ) 04:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Not War Nor Peace: StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 22:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , History , Military , Albania ,  and North Macedonia .  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 22:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Book was published a good few years ago already, in Macedonian cyrillic.  Tried searching for reviews, references or mentions but come up empty for the author or the book, both using Latin as well as cyrillic script.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 08:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NBOOK is one of the lowest notability bars we have.  This book doesn't make it.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - unable to find any coverage or reviews to satisfy N concerns.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 16:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lama Gonpo Tseten: No reliable sources, references personal affiliates, and the most of the article can be attributed to a self-published blog by the editor who created and wrote most of the article.  Student reports in the article are completely unreliable/unsourced and have dubious claims.  Could not find reliable independent sources when searching.  FutureFlowsLoveYou ( talk ) 12:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Religion , Buddhism ,  and China .  FutureFlowsLoveYou ( talk ) 12:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , with WP:TNT .  I admit I looked only very briefly for sources, finding nothing but places that copied from Wikipedia, but I strongly doubt that most of the article in its current state can be verified by wikipedia's WP:RS standards.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 01:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Velvet Hammer Music and Management Group: Article also has apparently severe CoI issues and would likely need an overhaul anyway.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Management ,  and California .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2007-07 ✗ CSD G11 -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of tractors built by other companies: Emerging consensus to delete on talk page RM.  ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Engineering ,  and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a rather random collection of information.  Rebadging and outsourcing of tractor manufacturing should appear in the model article, when available.  Not combined in a list.  gidonb ( talk ) 04:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced and not particularly useful.  162 etc. ( talk ) 18:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   The lack of sources and context makes the article very hard to understand.   And even with the explanation on the talk page which clarifies the scope I still can't really understand what each entry is trying to convey.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:TNT .  lack of sourcing makes this near-impossible to maintain, especially as this would be great for promotion.  Password (talk) (contribs) 20:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marion Evans: Flounder fillet ( talk ) 20:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Authors , United Kingdom ,  and Wales .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 20:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 20:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I am also not seeing much coverage on this person.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 16:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Citations can be incorporated into the articles on the towns where relevant, but not sufficient external notice for PROF or Author.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This author has been published by a rather niche publishing house: in major bibliographic databases, like Open Library, and Worldcat, the total number of titles hovers around 100.  That in itself is not a problem but I cannot find reviews of the books nor articles about the author other than this one: Carmarthen Journal (Carmarthen, Wales).  2024.  “Porthyrhyd & Llanddarog Pensioners Society,” March 20.  https://research-ebsco-com.ezproxy.sfpl.org/linkprocessor/plink? id=65b6eed4-eede-3b99-b276-4e4d8558e31c , which apparently (I don't have access to it) reports on a meeting where Evans was present.  Unfortunately, the article was created by an editor named "Roy Duke Evans" so I assume a COI.  If there are good sources of information in Welsh publications we would need someone with access to those.  So far we have nothing about her.  Lamona ( talk ) 02:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pyae Phyo Thu: Sources cited don't come even close to establishing notability, and a search finds only the usual match stats and profiles, plus some social media.  Previously draftified for lack of notability, but was published again, so here we are.  Fails WP:GNG / WP:SPORTCRIT (and WP:NFOOTY no longer applies, whether or not this would have met that).  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - best I can find is Thanh Nien , which is a mention in a squad list for a youth fixture; not sure how anyone would consider this footballer notable enough for an encyclopaedia article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stacy Paetz: Beyond the promotional tone, the article does nothing to establish notability and no further SIGCOV was unearthed in a WP:BEFORE (although the book was!)...  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 11:58, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Television , Sports , United States of America ,  and Indiana .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 11:58, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : She won an award from her post secondary institution and was let go by Fox Sports Indiana, a few other routine mentions then nothing in Gnews.  Nothing for notability found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you please clarify?  Are the sources inadequate to support WP:GNG or is the bio too short?  Stella8358 ( talk ) 22:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you please clarify?  Are the sources inadequate to support WP:GNG or is the bio too short?  Stella8358 ( talk ) 06:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sourcing found is too short and doesn't support GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete