hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
David Clarke (businessman): LibStar ( talk ) 01:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Australia .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect : Such coverage as can be found places the subject relative to the firm he co-founded and chaired until 2017.  There is a paywalled profile piece on the subject ( Australian Financial Review (2005) ) but that appears unlikely to establish individual notability .  A redirect to Webjet could provide an alternative outcome .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Would a redirect cause confusion with David S. Clarke ?  LibStar ( talk ) 07:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair point, both people are in business, and a redirect would look weird with a hatnote to that other person on the target article.  AllyD ( talk ) 11:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : based on the content of the actual AFR article, which goes into depth about David Clarke and is not an interview; SIGCOV is met and it is appropriate to keep this article.  AllyD I'm surprised at your vote, given you weren't able to assess or evaluate the AFR article.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] AFR is an interview with the subject.  // Timothy :: talk 00:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Source eval: Comments Source Interview, fails IS  1.  "LATE STARTER".  Australian Financial Review.  13 October 2005.  Retrieved 15 May 2023.  Quote from subject, fails IS  2. ^ O'Sullivan, Matt (5 January 2010).  "Webjet is just the ticket".  The Sydney Morning Herald.  Retrieved 15 May 2023.  Fails V, 404  3. ^ Odi, Teresa (20 January 2008).  "Webjet chief's relief at missing out on Travel.com".  The Australian.  Retrieved 4 May 2012.[dead link] BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV.  Keep vote failed to provide any sources.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 00:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rajeshree Singhania: Sources offer only passing (or no) mentions, plus a couple of works authored by the subject, and a search finds nothing better.  Fails WP:GNG , and nothing to suggest WP:NACADEMIC or similar notability either.  Was draftified, but author moved straight back to mainspace, so here we are.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Women , United Arab Emirates ,  and India .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very clear fail of WP:GNG, a very straightforward 'per nom' from me.. .  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not seeing anything here that speaks to encyclopedic notability under either PROF or AUTHOR.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 21:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Looks as if it may have been created as part of a student course or editathon: the first substantial version is a layout template.  The comment " Always cite your sources! No original research! " was in the References section of article until I removed it a moment ago.  Pam D 07:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sabbatical (TV series): While this did get broadcast as a one-off special despite its failure to get picked up to series, that isn't an automatic free notability pass in and of itself -- it would still have to be shown to have WP:GNG -worthy reliable source coverage about it to establish its significance.  But the only sources shown here are a single "pilot in production" press release from the producers and a Blogspot blog that isn't a reliable or notability-assisting source at all, and I can find absolutely nothing else on a WP:BEFORE search except glancing namechecks of its existence.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt a failed pilot from having to have much better sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gospel Light International Ministries: Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 14:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 14:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Christianity .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notifications made at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Evangelical Christianity , Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion/New religious movements work group and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Charismatic Christianity .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE : page needs better secondary sources, sources do not establish notability. I was unable to find anything relevant in search. This page seems at best a tool for recruitment. See WP:SOAPBOX Jollyjalopy ( talk ) 20:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Felix Omobude . This church is probably not notable but its pastor, Felix Omobude definitely is (notwithstanding the inconvenient fact that his article is, for now, also at AfD ) -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting to Felix Omobude ?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 20:10, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per G5 .  The article's author is a sock of

Discussion outcome: delete
John Bosco Group of Colleges: Sources WP:PRIMARY .  Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 01:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Tamil Nadu .  Pepper Beast (talk) 01:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I have noted before that it can be very hard to find sources for Indian schools, and we may struggle to find sources for schools there that would easily pass GNG in the US, UK or similar.  However, in this case the page is not about any particular school or college but a grouping of unspecified colleges.  In terms of writing an encylopaedic article, we shouldn't be starting from here.  The domain for the grouping has, in any case, expired and the lack of sources means there is really nothing we can say here.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 21:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Nothing here to indicate the GNG is met.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Lochmus: Refs are passing mentions, profiles.  scope_creep Talk 15:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please review nominator's history the past 5 weeks of systematically deleting any page I have submitted the past 6 years.  This is obviously deliberate and personal, and not based on notability.  This is a power move and nominator's actions on the past deletions should be looked into.  Stravensky ( talk ) 02:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources provided are largely unreliable, including IMDb as a "source".  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 03:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alisa Khachatryan: No evidence of national team debut, despite multiple bench appearances.  No GNG-level coverage.  BlameRuiner ( talk ) 06:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete : I'm unsure whether a football player needs to have actually have debuted for the national team to be notable.  Surely having been signed is enough.  In any event, there aren't enough sources here to establish much.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 07:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Armenia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - if someone can find evidence that she actually played for Armenia then she should be added to List of Armenia women's international footballers and this can be redirected there.  If we can't evidence her actually playing then I would say delete per failing WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Rostered, but the only uncapped player in a 2007 match against Croatia .  Listed in a 2009 callup , a 2011 WCQ callup in 2010 , in a 2011 WCQ callup in 2011 ; an unused sub in all of those matches ( SLO , POR , POR , FIN , FIN , ITA ).  Otherwise, only U19 appearances: yellow carded vs. Latvia , yellow carded vs. Poland .  Seems likely that any other coverage would be in Armenian-language resources or archived web content considering that her international football career appears to have ended around the 2011 WCQs.  - Socccc ( talk ) 21:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 22:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hus Gallery: It appears that the enterprise was short-lived and I couldn't find any sources discussing it in depth, other than a 3-minute advertorial video .  The article has been tagged for notability for 5 years.  PaulT2022 ( talk ) 20:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Visual arts .  PaulT2022 ( talk ) 20:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark and England .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Companies .  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This gallery appears to have renamed as 10 Hanover , judging from the two archived versions of their Gregor Gleiwitz show: [3] , [4] .  Under the name of the title of this article, it should be distinguished from the Paris-based Galerie Hus / Hus Gallery.  AllyD ( talk ) 10:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only one of the references is marginally relevant to ascertaining notability, but aside from that seems to fail WP:GNG .  -- Uhooep ( talk ) 14:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am not finding evidence that this art dealership attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 09:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LOL SUPERMAN: microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 20:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 20:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I went and tried to find something to support this article but wasn't able to.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article is completely unsourced, and most of the information appears to either be original research or "information" from social media or other non-reliable sources.  Searches did not turn up any actual coverage in reliable sources on this.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It seems pretty much established that the video itself is a hoax and I don't see much evidence that it is a notable hoax.  Pichpich ( talk ) 18:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Whatever this is, I've not found anything about it...  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to zero sourcing provided to back the article's claims.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No sourcing, definitely seems to be a hoax.  The only outside link provided claims it came from a poster on 4chan, which is a notoriously unreliable website.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete --   "LOL Superman" lacks reliable, verifiable sources to establish the notability of the alleged video ( WP:RS, WP:V ).  The content is based on hearsay, forum posts, and social media, which do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable information.  The subject is also potentially a hox (WP:HOAX) and fails to meet the genseral notability guideline ( WP:GNG ) due to the absence of significant coverage in independent and reliable secondary sources.  (none)  Cray04 ( talk ) 04:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom "LOL Superman" lacks reliable, verifiable sources to establish the notability of the alleged video ( WP:RS, WP:V ).  The content is based on hearsay, forum posts, and social media, which do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable information.  The subject is also potentially a hox (WP:HOAX) and fails to meet the genseral notability guideline ( WP:GNG ) due to the absence of significant coverage in independent and reliable secondary sources.  (none)  Cray04 ( talk ) 04:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Glitched, and wasn't showing vote.  Struck out the duplicate vote.  Cray04 ( talk ) 04:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mmesoma Ejikeme: Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A pretty definitive WP:BLP1E case.  Her "fame" is a result of one minor event.  Joyous!  Noise!  20:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This fits all 3 criteria of BLP1E, unless the event turns out to somehow become a significant event in some way.  — siro χ o 22:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP1E as explained, she scored highly on an exam, but has done nothing outside of that mundane event that makes her notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nomination and above votes.  This is a clear case of BLP1E.  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per BLP1E.  Best, — Nnadigoodluck █ █ █ 02:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per BLP1E.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roman Aramian: It appears that he did win contend for some international title fights according to his BoxRec profile (BDB International Middle, EBU European Super Middle, WBA Inter-Continental Super Middle), but don't know how notable those are.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He didn't win an EBU or WBA title, although he did fight for them.  Papaursa ( talk ) 00:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Whoops, thanks, struck and edited.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Boxing , Armenia ,  and Germany .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Keep - Some of those awards are notable (especially the European Super Middle).  I'd support a soft keep if the article could be improved/expanded further with other notable information.  Archives908 ( talk ) 21:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NBOX says to be notable a boxer must be ranked in the top 10 in the world.   Aramian was never close, the article says he was 174th.   He lost every round and finally had to retire from his fight for the EBU Super Middle title--and even if he'd won it wouldn't show WP notability.  He did win the inaugural EBF middleweight title, a much more minor title that he never defended.   He also won (and lost) some BDB (German Professional Boxer Association) title bouts, but those are also minor.   The only sources I can find are either fight reports or database entries, so WP:GNG doesn't appear to be met.   There might also be COI issues given that the creating editor only made a total of 8 edits to WP.  Papaursa ( talk ) 00:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not finding extensive coverage about him, one match recap in Gnewspapers, this [5] is a passing mention.  I don't think we're at notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Synovus Centre: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 19:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Finance , Law ,  and Business .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anannyaa Akulaa: Notability not established.  All sources are passing mentions.  The greatandhra source about Ajastos sounds like an ad and is unreliable: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines on sources .  Best to redirect to Hostel Days .  Also, WP:TOO EARLY .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 21:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As the original creator of the article, I would like to recommend Strong Keep , as I believe this new age of actors and upcoming film makers would become more and more relevanth with digital age and media, hence if the concensus reaches delete, i would rather have it drafted than merged to any other article.  bɑʁɑqoxodaraP ( talk ) 06:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as TOOSOON : Have appeared on basically two films per WP: NFILM doesn't signify WP: NACTOR .  This is clearly WP: TOOSOON and may meet notability in the future.  The sources were not significantly treating th subject and almost if not all dependent on the film Hostel Days and if possible, Redirect . All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 05:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ‘’’Delete’’’ : Too soon to be here in Wikipedia.  Fails WP:BIO & WP:NACTOR .  DI V I N E Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there is a divergence of opinion.  If his was Redirected, what would the target article be?  Thanks.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't currently pass WP:NACTOR .  Suonii180 ( talk ) Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete