hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Josh Brown (figure skater): Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and England .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 08:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - does not meet criteria for notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : NSKATE requires winning a medal at an international senior-level event or at a World Junior Figure Skating Championship.  Securing the 23rd spot in 2016 isn't even a marginal case.  The appearance on Ice Stars doesn't add notability.  Owen× ☎ 19:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2019–20 FC Petrolul Ploiești season: Team playing on the second tier of Romania, with less significant coverage than the first tier gets.  No significant coverage sources in the entry.  This season is not a piece in a complete series; there is no article on the previous nor the next season.  It's also the only entry about a Romanian second-tier team in 2019–20.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Romania .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It could potentially pass GNG, but does not "on its face".  I don't care enough to do a before search.  SportingFlyer T · C 08:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agree with others.  The article is not useful and is not shown to have received significant coverage from independent sources.  C 679 07:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yann Hubert: The best coverage I could find was a paywalled match report covering his only professional football appearance - which appears to be routine coverage.  A sticky PROD was removed without adding any reliable sources that would plausibly contribute to WP:SIGCOV .  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:07, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jessica Falkholt: Had minor TV roles, posthumous lead in a minor film which flopped big-time.  Orange Mike | Talk 18:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources are fine, but it appears she only had a minor role for a few months in the program.  The film role doesn't appear that notable either.  I'm not seeing ACTOR met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nothing sustained much past the events of the investigation into her death, last coverage is from 2018, and it's only about the events of her passing.  No critical discussion of her work or much of anything else.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete has minor roles failed WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elie Ndisanze: Gsearch goes straight to social media sites, with nothing written about the person in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Rwanda .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , sources are non-notable, before steps also indicate that this doesn't meet WP:NBLP .  Karnataka ( talk ) 20:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jason Dennis: We even delete Olympic competitors, and this beach volleyball player did not even reach that level.  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Charles .  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Les Éditions CEC: Page appears like a LinkedIn profile; zero reliable sources; WP:ROTM .  Fails WP:NCORP .  Cabrils ( talk ) 04:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete most sources are its own website.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there is no good media coverage (required for organizations).  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 10:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sandra Bloodworth: Australian search engine Trove only comes up with 1 line mentions.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , History ,  and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- PeaceNT ( talk ) 02:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Visible from Space: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fernhag: There are no reliable sources to prove it.  The only accurate sentence is the first one, but it doesn't contain a lot information.  And there is not really more information, even the German wikipedia hasn't an article about it.  Furthermore, this village could also mentioned in the article Scheyern , which is the article for the municipality of Fernhag.  958s ( talk ) 16:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why do I spend hours to write accurate and well researched articles that get deleted without discussion here at enwiki while nonsense like that needs to be discussed instead of the obvious speedy deletion?  -- DerMaxdorfer ( talk ) 21:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was not sure if this article meets the criteria for speed deletion, because the first sentence is technically correct, but it doesn't contain a lot of information. 958s ( talk ) 20:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete The first sentence is technically correct but incomplete. The rest is unsourced POV. -- MB-one ( talk ) 07:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No POV, but obviously complete fiction.  -- DerMaxdorfer ( talk ) 12:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Of course the nonsense should be removed, but what is left is hardly worth a redirect to Scheyern , the municipality this vollage belongs to.  — Kusma ( talk ) 11:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Scheyern , after Deleting the page.  I did rm the nonsense, but it should be deleted as a hoax or attack.  // Timothy :: talk 11:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
European Universities Debating Championships: Boleyn ( talk ) 12:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Education ,  and Europe .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : all sources are primary and most of them just say what country is hosting.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  16:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Welco Corners, Illinois: My BEFORE search returned nothing that described this as a community, much less an officially-recognized one, and sources primarily use it as a landmark ("The highway was repaved from Welco Corners to the county line") which isn't sufficient to establish notability.  – dlthewave ☎ 17:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois .  – dlthewave ☎ 17:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Google Earth shows this as another intersection in an area of sprawl in Metro Chicago.  The Interstate exit sign says "Joliet Road", not Welco Corners.  Today, there's nothing distinctive about this location.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 11:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . There is no sourcing for this article and there is no reason to believe this place is notable enough to warrant an article.-- Mpen320 ( talk ) 04:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Earl Thomas with Paddy Milner & the Big Sounds: Seems non-notable Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sourcing found, no critical reviews, hardly anything found for the band either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kanpur Se Katas Tak: BEFORE showed promo and database listings, nothing that meets significant coverage from independent reliable sources addressing the subject directly and in-depth.  // Timothy :: talk 05:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article has coverage same like an average Pakistani drama and has a notable cast.  Muneebll ( talk ) 13:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A notable cast is not a criterion for notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Having a notable cast doesn't necessarily mean passing WP:GNG or other notability guidelines.  All the cited sources are trivial mentions, so are the other coverage I found as well.  Unless someone can provide sufficient coverage (even the ones in Urdu), the current article shouldn't really exist.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  I would reconsider if someone provides in-depth coverage in Urdu.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HLSW: toweli ( talk ) 06:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software .  toweli ( talk ) 06:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant coverage to be found.  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 21:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I too, couldn't find any sigcov on the topic from reliable sources.  MK at your service.  11:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I did some searching too, and couldn't find any credible information to back this up.  Deletion seems like the right call.  Waqar 💬 17:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dilly Braimoh: The BFI source which would have been useful returns a 404 error.  The other from IMDB is unreliable.  Searches reveal very little, certainly nothing that adds to notability.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Here is the archived version of the BFI dead link.  Lubal ( talk ) 19:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the comment.  However, having seen the source, it does not actually add anything to notability.  Velella Velella Talk 21:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Radio , Television ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This book briefly confirms that he grew up in foster care.  This news article briefly says he attended Croydon College (not in the article) and did "Dilly Dines Out" (not cited in the article).   Overall, I'm not finding many sources.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: A prior AfD discussion ended in soft delete, so I would like to get a bit more input and get firm consensus to delete or keep the article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 14:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG , article stand on only one source!  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 11:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sady Salinas: All I found were passing mentions ( 2014 , 2015 , 2018 , 2019 , 2021 , 2022 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Paraguay .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - clear WP:BEFORE has been done.  Despite a lengthy career by the looks of things, she seems to be completely unheralded.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Verrell Yustin Mulia: Stvbastian ( talk ) 06:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This article was created when the guideline (N:BAD) was lenient and now since the revision of that guideline to include just BWF Super Series and BWF World Tour, this subject is no longer fit for inclusion until and unless they reach a final of aforementioned tournaments.  Moreover this article fails WP:GNG as no good sources were found by a Google search.  zoglophie •talk• 19:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naser Parvani: Sources are mainly press releases / WP:SELFPUB profiles.  TLA (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry ,  and Iran .  Shellwood ( talk ) 01:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 01:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anjali Bansal: BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is about the best I could find that wasn't a PR piece [7] .  Sourcing used in the article isn't helping notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete