hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Channel Nordica: UtherSRG (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Finland .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom: Found no coverage.  Neither band appears to be notable at a glance either so neither seems a favorable redirect target.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 16:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only thing I could find is a short but extremely scathing review by the Finnish music magazine Soundi [65] .  I'd also be happy with a redirect to Waltari as an alternative, even if that too ends up at AfD eventually.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 07:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Modern Bathroom: (The founder apparently " worked with " HGTV, there's not much about it.)  The sources are all PR material and I cannot find much in the way of third-party discussion of the company in reliable sources, beyond listings in seller websites, and promotional-type interviews or blog postings.  ... disco spinster talk 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  ... disco spinster talk 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the creator is also a blocked sockpuppet.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NCORP .  I was unable to find significant coverage of this company in reliable secondary sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 14:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of traditional armaments: Klbrain ( talk ) 06:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Someone from Wikipedia:MILHIST should be pinged.  Pinging @ User:Master z0b , @ User:Dellant , @ User:ladymacbeth9 per relevant member list.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 06:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Firearms ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  There seems to be no inclusion criteria here, and given the vague title (what's a 'traditional armament'?) I don't see how there could be.  The fact that this list includes cricket bats and golf clubs as 'traditional' weapons as well as a 'Oddities/Hard to classify' section is a good indicator of how useless the article is.  Nick-D ( talk ) 07:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  We already have the category.  Srijanx22 ( talk ) 12:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, ill-defined, WP:ORish "traditional" criterion and weird joining of weapons and armor.  Lists of weapons does a much better job.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 13:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Category exists, and list is poorly-defined and essentially useless.  Intothat darkness 13:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shunde, China Furniture Wholesale Market: I appreciate it is difficult to come by sources for Chinese places, but it lacks reliable secondary sources.  An attempt to find sources when translating into Chinese has also turned up nothing notable.  Nonovix ( talk ) 23:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  Nonovix ( talk ) 23:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and Geography .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 01:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per WP:GNG .  I've also tried to find sources, but nothing turned up that wasn't them talking about themselves.  Hasn't had any substantial contributions to fix the glaring issues with the promotional tone and lack of sources.  I am aware that it is not warranted to delete an article just because it is badly written, but this one also has little to no sources.  You can't polish a turd; no matter what, it'll still look icky.  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 03:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Runs right up to the line on WP:PROMOTION , and doesn't meet notability anyway.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 01:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Needs independent sourcing, which appears to be absent.  Kathlene Smoot ( talk ) 00:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malik Sanchez: HadesTTW (he/him • talk ) 16:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Alread PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks promotional.  This article does not and will not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria .  Delete this article.  Purely a mystery that how this article even moved from AfC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheProEditor11 ( talk • contribs ) 17:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep SINGLEEVENT notwithstanding, there's a fair amount of references there.  I think expansion/cleanup rather than deletion is the best course for now.  Royal Autumn Crest ( talk ) 18:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  BLP1E, other than the incident I don't see how anything in this BLP meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BLP1E.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leigh Kilton-Smith: All of the secondary sources cited, and all of the secondary RS I could find in a WP:BEFORE search, mention her only in passing.  She seems to have quite a successful career, and has worked with many notable actors, but notability on Wikipedia is WP:NOTINHERITED.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 11:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and California .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 11:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DJ Darkzone: No significant coverage of the artist on the web apart from a brief mention in a Complex article "The Best Licensed Songs Used in Video Game Commercials".  The talk page suggest that the article was written as a class assignment.  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Germany .  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't see anything about this performer.  Discogs, Soundcloud, the usual streaming sites.  The link mentioned in the comment above mine is all I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barnes Street: Crookesmoor ( talk ) 09:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 26 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 01:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 03:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 03:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources or claim to notability.  Reywas92 Talk 13:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Its an OS settlement [33] so may be considered to be legally recognized but could be merged with Golden Green.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 18:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Golden Green - The Ordnance Survey is not evidence of legal recognition.  The OS is essentially a map which is barred from proving notability under WP:GEOLAND .  Being listed as a "other settlement" by the OS does not confer any kind of legal power or change on the "settlement" concerned of the kind that would provide coverage from which an article could be written.  We might also ask what exactly "other settlement" actually means?  Anyone asking to merge this article needs to explain what could possibly be merged from an article that is not sourced at all - even the location indicated in the article is an empty field.  FOARP ( talk ) 13:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete as questionable settlement.  I also note that the Golden Green article claims this place to be a neighboring hamlet.  Mangoe ( talk ) 13:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ani Adjimanova: I even searched in Macedonian (Ани Аџиманова) but with no success.  No evidence of WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  I created this article in good faith under a presumption that significant coverage would exist but I have failed to find evidence to support my weak presumption.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and North Macedonia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Tried making online search only found few statistics sources, nothing to establish notability.  Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 06:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  -- Whosethose ( talk ) 13:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Galin Bogdanov: The best sources that I could find in Bulgarian searches were Vitosha News , passing mentions in results listings, Gong , a single passing mention, and Blitz , a squad listing.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eric Loiselet: The article makes no claim that he ever held any NPOL-passing office, asserting only that he was a candidate for one -- but unelected candidates do not get articles just for being candidates, and get into Wikipedia only if they either  (a) have some other claim of notability besides the candidacy, or  (b) can show credible grounds to treat their candidacy as a special case of significantly greater notability than most other people's candidacies.  Neither of those have been demonstrated here, however.  It should also be noted that an article about him previously also existed on the French Wikipedia, but was deleted on the same grounds -- but if even French editors can't find enough to salvage the notability of a French political candidate, then he surely can't somehow be more notable in the anglosphere than he is in France.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and France .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete as long as the article is not extended or properly source then it should be deleted.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 16:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Just a politician who was never elected to any office.  Jmanlucas ( talk ) 18:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant press coverage and non elected politician.  Fails WP:NPOL .  Atighot ( talk ) 01:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeff Ifrah: Besides that, I cannot find any significant coverage about the subject, rather than by the subject.  Adjunct professor doesn't count for NPROF, and nor does citations in general media rather than scholarly works for the bibliometric criteria.  I cannot identify any other additional criteria that Ifrah may pass.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 15:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Law ,  and New York .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 15:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is promotional biography.  Sources in articles are name-checks, brief quotes from article subject, interviews, and firm profiles.  Google Scholar appears to have nothing of substance and his articles are not widely cited.  Agree he doesn't meet NPROF or GNG, and hard to see another guideline that would apply.  Oblivy ( talk ) 15:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very PROMO, the only article about this person is 16.  Might have a brief mention in "gambling laws in the USA" or something along those lines, just not enough coverage about the person.  Most articles are about the legalities of sports betting, not about this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree #16 is probably SIGCOV.  It's a regional newspaper which might reduce its weight but that's just quibbling.  Oblivy ( talk ) 01:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the analyzed sources do not help to establish fulfilment of WP:ANYBIO or general notability.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 06:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The FuMP: StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 19:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment https://www.vulture.com/2015/12/2015-the-year-comedy-music-broke.html treats it in more than passing, but less than detail.  As noted in the article, they won a Parsec Award twice.  And they're still releasing new music, 16 years down the line.  -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 02:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Infant Jesus Church, Selliampatti: All sources cited are affiliated with the church or diocese and thus not independent.  A WP:BEFORE search turns up no additional sources to support notability.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 14:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Christianity ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sin Tae-song: Simione001 ( talk ) 01:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bits and Mortar: Unable to find reliable sources where this entity has received significant coverage.  Hitro talk 06:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Organizations .  Hitro talk 06:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Tentative keep - I found at least two independent sources with information about the topic (added to article) and I think there are others worth digging for.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 12:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please keep us with your WP:THREE .  I'm not currently seeing WP:SIGCOV in the article as is, so I'm having a hard time seeing what you're referring to...  Sergecross73 msg me 18:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Kazamzam there are also sources on the article's talk page but maybe only the ICv2 article would be an RS. 8.37.179.254 ( talk ) 19:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Source 4 is identified as a RS, but it's trivial (others used in the article aren't).  All I can find is this trivial mention [19] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I haven't been able to locate sources for it to meet the GNG, can't tell what the sole Keep vote is vaguely pointing to .  Sergecross73 msg me 13:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blackwood Town Cricket Club: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 22:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Single source article that doesn't really meet WP:RS .  Can't really find anything else to justify this article.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 01:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete