hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Relyon: Even doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Tanhasahu ( talk ) 17:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Web Application Distribution Infrastructure: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jurijs Baranovs: The best example of coverage cited thus far is this coverage in Latvian , but it does not make a case for GNG in itself; I was unable to find additional independent coverage other than interviews, database entries, and trivial mentions in match writeups, having searched in English/Latvian and also Russian.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , Latvia ,  and Russia .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Coverage on the subject seems to be limited in online searches, however there may well be coverage in offline or difficult to access non-English language sources, but for now weak delete.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophie Nyweide: Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Beyond two movie reviews in the NYTimes, no coverage found.  Delete for lack of sourcing, BLP is not met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   NYT and other reviews are mostly bare mentions without significant coverage.   I also found [13] but it's a single source, basically just an interview, and framed as a local human interest story, all things that could be counted against it as an RS for notability purposes.   More coverage is needed for a BLP.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 23:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CITYpeek: Passing mentions in local sources only.  – Tera tix ₵ 16:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Travel and tourism , Websites ,  and Maryland .  – Tera tix ₵ 16:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Neither in the cited sources nor anywhere else that I have seen is there any substantial coverage in independent sources.  JBW ( talk ) 11:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously brought to AFD, not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : For an article to meet WP:BASICS , it needs to have a strong context supported with reliable sources per WP:RS or then, we aren't arguing.  GNG must be met before looking at WP:NCORP , an adittional criteria for various SNGs.  The product isn't notable.  Pls delete!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  10:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shirzad Peik Herfeh: - car chasm ( talk ) 15:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Philosophy ,  and Iran .  - car chasm ( talk ) 15:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have corrected the article to say that the subject is an assistant professor, not a professor as it previously claimed.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 08:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A few hits in Gscholar [6] , all in Iran.  Seems to only have been cited by 2 papers.  Not seeing notability for PROF. Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: As stated, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A-1 Auto Transport: Lacking the demonstrated notability required for corporations.  Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk 23:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk 23:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete via WP:G11 , probably.  Also something to note this article is mentioned (but not linked?) by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Webster (writer) .  This article, A-1 Auto, was (re-)created just half an hour before Webb's was created.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 18:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Largest Data Breaches of United States Citizen Data: I don't see significant independent coverage of this specific categorization.  While List of data breaches clearly passes LISTN, and a theoretical List of data breaches in the United States might pass LISTN, I don't think this one does.  While the sourcing is good, they're all about specific data breaches, not this grouping.  ~ A412 talk!  01:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and United States of America .  ~ A412 talk!  01:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- Викидим ( talk ) 06:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , noting as well that the calculation of breaches as being "largest data breaches of US citizen data" appears to be pure OR--the listed entries are described in sources as affecting US-based companies/customers, but at no point do they attempt to quantify the amount of US citizens affected by the breach.  signed, Rosguill talk 13:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, this category does not meet the WP:LISTN and WP:CROSSCAT criteria.  Dejaqo ( talk ) 01:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Effortel: scope_creep Talk 08:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to have been a poorly sourced, promotional piece since its creation in 2010.  No evidence that the company is notable.  2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk ) 08:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Belgium .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per WP:RUNOFTHEMILL there doesn't seem to be any indication that this is more than just a regular non-notable company.  Darron4 ( talk ) 10:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with Darron4 and 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 above.  This article's only citations are internal, no evidence of it being noteworthy, an most substantive editing has been done by someone with a COI.  RFZYN SPY talk 18:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CreditWise Capital: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It exists, has raised funds and makes loans for two-wheelers.  Sources are based on press releases with little independent analysis so do not satisfy WP:ORGIND .  Coverage falls well short of that required by WP:ORGDEPTH .  Rupples ( talk ) 13:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have blocked the nominator for spamming, but I believe this nomination should be considered on its merits.  MER-C 14:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conquest of Mandaran: it relies heavily on Non- WP:RS sources.  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 09:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military and India .  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and West Bengal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Reviewed all the sources before they were removed and all are poor and fail WP:HISTRS like a source where N.K. Sahu is an editor of a book that was contributed by William Wilson Hunter , WP:RAJ and sources by Nitish K. Sengupta who was an IAS officer in 1957 and served as the Revenue Secretary of the Government of India.  No source has a paragraph enough to give depth on the Conquest of Mandaran Page fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 23:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , concerns that don't raise to the level of HOAX but seriously concerning stuff in regards to notability, NPOV, and wikipuffery that mean this article is not encyclopedic.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 20:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment based on the sources (and their very limited descriptions of this battle), I would like to vote to merge this; but where?   There is nothing to be said beyond Under Ruknuddin Barbak Shah , Shah Ismail Ghazi sieged and conquered a fort near Gar Mandaran in 1464 , everything else seems to be WP:SYNTH .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  Worldbruce ( talk ) 23:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Šilas (supermarket): Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 20-30 stores in a country of a size of Lithuania doesn't sound like that many.  Marcelus ( talk ) 12:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A store with only 20 locations and no significant coverage is definitely not notable.  Also, there is no secondary sourcing; the only two sources are not independent from the subject.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 03:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above, + lack of sources TLA (talk) 04:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tree of Peace Memorial Plaque: Biruitorul Talk 00:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages: Friend of Peace ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Memorial Medal of Tree of Peace ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Slovakia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I do not think we have enough secondary RS for a stand alone article and I cannot think of a target for a WP:ATD-R .  Lightburst ( talk ) 04:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, I'd like to see more opinions here since this is a bundled nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hamed Tariverdi: Sports2021 ( talk ) 22:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Sports2021 ( talk ) 22:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Udom Jokrob: No indication of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC being met.  My own Thai searches led me to Blog Gang , however, this is only a passing mention followed by an image caption.  In addition, this seems to be WP:USERGENERATED so would not meet WP:RS standards anyway.  There are more blog posts by the same user here and here that also mention Jokrob in passing but, in any case, even if this were an acceptable source, we would need the coverage to be significant and addressing Jokrob in detail, which isn't the case.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Thailand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Source in article is primary and dead, I searched for Udom Jokrob and อุดม จอกรบ, I tried Udom Chokrob thinking this might be an alt, but BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 22:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lance Hayward at the Half Moon Hotel, Volume 2: Found several mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 14:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2023-04 move to → Draft:Lance Hayward at the Half Moon Hotel, Volume 2 -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 07:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulaziz Al Yazidi: The best that I can find is Yemeni Communities , which trivially mentions a goalkeeper of the same name.  Given that the subject of this AfD is allegedly a Qatari midfielder, we can presume that this is just a namesake.  It wouldn't be enough for notability anyway.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The only source present in the article is Soccerway.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence of notability.  TheBritinator ( talk ) 16:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Chilia: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 14:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 14:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ambry Moss: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  Lots of passing mentions from his college and int'l career, but nothing substantial.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bahamas .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete