Huston Huddleston: 1) The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities; or  2) The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event.  Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role.  I would contend that neither of these conditions is met.  I don't think there's any argument that the motivation or execution of the crime itself was unusual or of historic importance, or that the victim was a renowned individual.  While it was stated at RFUD that the subject is a high-profile individual, coverage since their fall from grace (i.e. post-2018) is extremely limited, and that which does exist ( [27] ) suggests that the subject is intentionally avoiding the limelight and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.  Following the guidance at Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual , I would conclude that Huddleston is a low-profile individual at this time.  Even before the indictment, significant coverage in RS is limited to the context of Hollywood Sci-Fi Museum ; if we had an article on that topic (or if the biography of his father Floyd Huddleston , made any mention of Huston and/or we had a source to back up that claim) a redirect outcome would be appropriate, but we don't at this time.  signed, Rosguill talk 14:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Crime ,  and California .  signed, Rosguill talk 14:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Floyd Huddleston does mention Huston: "On December 30, 1965, Huddleston married Nancy Adams, a commercial jingle singer, at the First Baptist Church chapel in Memphis, Tennessee. Huddleston died from a heart attack on September 27, 1991, at a hospital located in Panorama City, Los Angeles. Huddleston was survived by his wife Nancy, his son, Huston, and his mother, Hettye T. Huddleston."  Miri1966 ( talk ) 17:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Please also note that Huston Huddleston has not been avoiding limelight and has been making independent films (hiring underage actresses) which he has posted about on his own social media.  It does not seem relevant to include in the article but it is in context for why the article should remain.  Miri1966 ( talk ) 17:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please read WP:NOTINHERITED .  Angryapathy ( talk ) 17:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I didn't say his notability is due entirely to being Floyd Huddleston's son, only that it is not true that Floyd's biography fails to mention him.  His notability is anchored in his own activities as a writer/director which are ongoing; the museum project which has had numerous news articles and financial campaigns; his conviction which merits documentation as he has continued to work in both listed areas.  Miri1966 ( talk ) 19:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep added a couple articles I don't think this guy deserves an article but he is attempting to open a museum for kids as a convicted pedophile.  This is a developing situation in the media with a lot of coverage . Since it is in the public interest and ongoing , I vote keep.  Bigwombat ( talk ) 07:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a perfect example of WP:ONEEVENT .  The news stories picked it up for a news cycle, and then immediately didn't care about him.  He wasn't notable before or after the short flurry of news coverage.  Angryapathy ( talk ) 15:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This has been an ongoing event for years between 2018 and 2024 and there are additional news sources that I can provide - additional information may still be pending.   This information being captured here has been critical.  Miri1966 ( talk ) 17:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 18:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I know AfD is not cleanup but in its current state this article is so incoherent that there is no credible claim to notability (basically what others have said above), which makes assessing sources for GNG kinda irrelevant.  The two ! votes to keep are unconvincing – the first doesn't seem to be based on policy at all, while the second says I don't think this guy deserves an article (not sure if that's argued on grounds of morality or notability) and seems to be taking a RGW perspective.  Toadspike [Talk] 19:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete