Deepankaj Poonia: Declined five times at draft for same reasons, and speedied twice as spam, for which another single-purpose account was eventually indefinitely blocked for advertising.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Rajasthan .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] what's your problem ?  , every time you nominate for deletion, are you taking any personal revenge or you didn't get paid for this article creation.  103.206.172.223 ( talk ) 05:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please log back in.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] so what's your problem ?   if   he did minor roles, at least he is doing his job, and trying very hard to make his name , people like you don 't support it, you just keep deleting , because you didn't get paid for that and getting jealous , you just support nepotism indefinitely blocked for advertising - Because some fellow people created his articles so that so people like you delete it later as spam.  this time gave mentioned valid references , and it should be not deleted .  103.206.172.223 ( talk ) 06:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please don’t pass unnecessary comments, be polite and follow Wikipedia guidelines Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 06:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have provided valid references.  It doesn’t matter if someone did small roles or big , we need to appreciate it .  And help to create articles for them .  Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 06:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please understand that as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia isn't intended to document every actor who's ever appeared in a film : that's the job of film databases like IMDB.  There are notability guidelines and policies for Wikipedia, which in this case include notability of actors , notability of people and the general notability guidelines .  Articles on Wikipedia aren't meant to help someone or something become notable, but rather to document people and things which are already notable.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not enough mentions in RS (hardly any), not meeting notability.  I can only find what's used in the article, none of which prove notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "The Google Knowledge Panel, IMDb links, and movie articles are enough for it as its first project. Also, it was not a minor role, but a significant one, showing a guest role. It is better not to delete the article and to support it."  Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 16:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "If there is a mistake in the article, it's better to correct it rather than appeal to delete it. It doesn’t make any sense."  Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 16:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is a mistake, but I can't correct it as using IMdB is not a reliable source, the Google knowledge panel is not a reliable source and the movie links are trivial coverage.  We require stories about the person, not a laundry list of things they've done.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For stories news articles wants huge amounts of money to publish, and there is no connection with them , if you have any you can give and ask to publish stories or I can connect you with the actor, you can ask the details and create an article.  there nothing I can do it now , if you want to delete article then delete , I’m done with this , this so frustrating, gonna delete my account too , not gonna use Wikipedia though good bye Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 15:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ole Aale .  That seems to be the first movie he was in, so it would make sense, even though the article is very weak.  71.246.78.77 ( talk ) 12:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Checkuser blocked.  Queen of Hearts talk 23:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Articles about a person's first movie serve as important historical records of their career's beginning.  They provide context and background that can be valuable for understanding their professional development and trajectory over time.  Deleting these articles would erase critical early documentation of their work and contributions, which could be of interest to fans, researchers, and industry professionals.  Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 16:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "It's better to delete the previous articles but not this one. If the article is very weak, try to help and make it stronger."  Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 16:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the subject lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources and thus fails WP:NACTOR , WP:BIO , and WP:GNG .  Let me also comment on someone's statement above that "if the article is very weak, try to help and make it stronger."  Without significant coverage in reliable sources, there is nothing to make stronger, and any attempts to do so would still fail to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Wikipedia is not a platform for documenting and promoting individuals who have not yet met the notability criteria.  Zingarese talk · contribs (please mention me on reply; thanks!) 03:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Don’t delete @ Oaktree b @ TheChronikler7 @ Wikishovel @ Zingarese He is not only an actor; he is a model too.  Check his work; he has collaborated with many brands.  Attached are a few links to his work.  This article is not to be deleted.  According to Wikipedia guidelines, a person may be considered notable if they have had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.  He has achieved this through his work in film and his extensive modeling projects with various brands.  This version includes the guideline reference and provides context for his notability.  https://cooldown.co.in/products/72-orange-mens-sando https://watch.plex.tv/person/deepankaj-poonia https://www.filmiforest.com/celebs/deepankaj-poonia/biography.html https://www.lavanguardia.com/peliculas-series/personas/deepankaj-poonia-4426303 https://www.gadgets360.com/entertainment/ole-aale-movie-123077 https://rangmarathi.com/tag/ole-aale-movie-booking/ Deepankaj Poonia https://g.co/kgs/nc1R26p Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 14:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails to meet WP:NACTOR .  TheChronikler7 ( talk ) 10:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] *Dont delete - here are few articles about him.  https://starsgazette.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 https://www.livenewsviews.com/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films-81782431190430385 https://malaysiantalks.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 https://thewitnessdaily.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 https://suratkhabar.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 https://starjournals.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 https://buzzingasia.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 https://dailyinsidescoop.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 https://enterhollywood.com/news/deepankaj-poonia-a-rising-star-shines-bright-in-modeling-and-films/0455978 Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 02:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Wikishovel @ Oaktree b @ TheChronikler7 @ Zingarese @ kindly close the discussion and remove deletion from article.  as now given sources.  Editorharpsweetrolls ( talk ) 01:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's all the same article multiple times and it's a press release, which is not a reliable source.  None of these are helpful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR and obvious UPE target. -- Ponyo bons mots 16:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete