Studios Hergé: While the namesake of the studios, Hergé , is undoubtedly notable, I don't see how these studios are.  When I conducted a WP:BEFORE search, most of the sources were about Hergé and not the studios themselves, and/or do not have WP:SIGCOV of the studios.  The article has been tagged as requiring additional sources since 2014, and most of the sourcing is unverifiable (the two book citations do not have a page number, or ISBN, making the claim violate WP:PAGENUM , and the other is an interview with a link to an insecure website).  As an WP:ATD , I'd be fine with a redirect to the Hergé Foundation , which appears to be notable, since the Foundation is the successor to the studios.  Bandit Heeler ( talk ) 10:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation , Organizations ,  and Belgium .  Bandit Heeler ( talk ) 10:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , plenty of sources giving attention to the studios, their role in the creation of the later Tintin stories, the many famous artists who worked here (most famously Bob de Moor , Jacques Martin and Roger Leloup probably, what happened to it after Hergés death, ...  Plenty of reliable and indepth information from even English-language sources like this book (note, one or two of the pages listed are about the older advertising Studio Hergé had on the thirties, not the actual Studios Hergé, but most are about this one), this book , this one , ...  And plenty more in French language books like this one discussing the Studios at length.  Fram ( talk ) 10:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And I would object to a redirection, because while technically the Foundation is the successor, their role was completely different: the Studios were a creative groupn making new comics and new drawings (for ads and so on), while the Foundation was an exploitative group, reusing existing images for new uses (e.g. clothing) but not creating things.  Fram ( talk ) 10:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Notability has been demonstrated now.  The French article also has some additional sources.  Cortador ( talk ) 12:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Both Hergé, Son of Tintin and The Real Hergé: The Inspiration Behind Tintin (linked by Fram above) offer significant coverage that demonstrates notability.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 17:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  No notability problem whatsoever.  Also the length of the article is sufficient.  The article does need more inline references, already covered by a warning.  Nomination is a clear NEXIST failure.  AFDISNOTCLEANUP and SNOW apply.  gidonb ( talk ) 01:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The studios have received sufficient sig coverage throughout their run.  X ( talk ) 09:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep