Midnight.works: Contested PROD.  There is not really much secondary coverage on the company.  The purported notability is on the AppStore success of one title, Hashiriya Drifter .  Sources in the article are primary or have a WP:PROMO feel, with this source even inviting readers to become part of the team.  A very quick WP:BEFORE only finds some coverage from Nintendo Life about a allegations of the conduct of the studio making 'scam' games.  None of this seems to cumulatively provide evidence of sustained, significant coverage about the studio that would warrant an article.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Moldova .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have prepared a draft of an article for the next upload to improve its quality.  This company resembles 11bit studios , which developed Frostpunk and other games, but not everyone is familiar with Frostpunk.  VollyM ( talk ) 09:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I am unable to locate anything meeting the criteria.  BBC pointed to an article in #diez , but on review of the original ( google translate ) it appears to also clearly fail ORGIND (the BBC coverage does not really go beyond that the article exists).  It seems unlikely we'll be able to locate sources meeting the criteria beyond doubt.  I'm not sure what VollyM means by their comment, if they want to keep working on a draft, I'm happy to support that (it can be requested at WP:REFUND if not closed that way), but in my judgement it is unlikely for eligible sources to exist.  I would recommend making use of the draft review process if that is the path embarked upon.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe that they were kicked of the Playstation store sometime earlier this year (see [1] [2] [3] ) and appear to be publishing more games under a bunch of different labels (see [4] and this comment in particular ), though i'm unsure if that's enough to meet notability guidelines but figured I post this here (first time posting in these deletion discussions by the way so apologies if I did something wrong.) Knockknock987 ( talk ) 19:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not at all!  Deletion discussions are for everyone and it's important everyone shares their views in the context of the deletion policy.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 03:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nothing wrong at all.  Welcome to the discussion and thank you for caring about trying to do this correctly.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Vrxces and Alpha3031 make a good case for deletion, and my own search uncovered nothing new.  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 20:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet GNG and NCORP.  Dowrylauds ( talk ) 11:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of evidence or even clear assertion of notability, plus lack of secondary sources for the article.  Google search produces very few online mentions at all.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete