Sack of Wiślica: (Note: Ruthenian raid on Poland (1135) was renamed to Sack of Wiślica on 3 June 2024‎ by agreement between NLeeuw and Piotrus on the talk page, so this could be regarded as a 2nd nomination of Ruthenian raid on Poland (1135) ).  Rationale: WP:NOPAGE ; fails WP:SIGCOV for WP:GNG for a stand-alone page, and the sources used so far create WP:POV issues as well.  It is one of several dubious articles written by now-blocked User:SebbeKg (previously we agreed to delete SebbeKg's article Bolesław II the Bold's expedition to Kiev (1076–1077) on 27 May).  Editors seem to agree that the event took place, but nothing for certain can be said about in detail, as all the sources cited are either WP:PRIMARY (Kadłubek, and in the case of Długosz someone who wrote centuries later and added details that are not historically credible), or WP:USERGENERATED & WP:POV (in the case of KWORUM), or WP:SELFPUB (in the case of Dawne Kieleckie).  Everyone agrees that the only substantial WP:RS is Benyskiewicz (2020), and that this source alone is not enough.  The disagreement is that User:Piotrus would like to keep a stand-alone page based on RS that are yet to be found, and that someone else should find and add these yet-to-be-found RS (citing WP:BEFORE ), whereas User:Marcelus and I think that this event could easily be summarised in 1 to 3 sentences in Wiślica#History by reference to Benyskiewicz (2020), at least for now.  Alternately, Marcelus and I think the current article could be draftified for now, but Piotrus has declined my offer to adopt it as a draft, citing having too little time to do it himself, and proposing to add Template:Sources exist to motivate other users to do it instead.  However, the template does not allow such usage (see also Wikipedia:But there must be sources! ).  I have argued that the present situation of keeping the article in the mainspace as is, is not acceptable either, because it evidently is not ready for the mainspace (if it ever merits a stand-alone article at all).  So, if nobody is willing to adopt the draft, Marcelus and I are proposing to redirect Sack of Wiślica to Wiślica#History until an editor (Piotrus or someone else) finds enough material, based on WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS , written with an WP:NPOV , for a stand-alone page, and has written that page.  I already created such a redirect WP:BOLDly , which was BOLDly reverted by Piotrus, and that is fine per WP:BRD .  But if there is consensus in this AfD to create a redirect, this may not be reverted BOLDly again until the conditions above for a stand-alone page are met.  Other than that I would like to say that I have generally enjoyed cooperating with Piotrus on this topic amicably.  But a formal decision seems to be necessary to break the deadlock on the future of this article, and Piotrus has suggested that taking it to AfD a second time might settle the matter, so here I am.  Good day to everyone.  :) NLeeuw ( talk ) 06:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Poland ,  and Ukraine .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 06:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Poland .  Owen× ☎ 12:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  As I said on article's talk page, we have one in-depth academic source already, and indications that more sources exist (but are hard to access due to being Polish and not digitized well): "BEFORE search in GBooks in Polish strongly suggests other sources exist. Ex. this book by Gerard Labuda mentions keywords "Wiślicy" "1135" (together) on five distinct pages (but sadly I can only get snippet view for two or three). That book is a bit old (1962), but here for example is a more modern one, from 2006, that mentions those keywords together on 15 (!) pages (seems reliable, published by an academic organization, and the writer is a historian associated with Jan Kochanowski University , no pl wiki article yet). I could look for more sources, but I don't have time & will and I think this shows that we can reasonably assume sources on the sack of Wiślica in 1135 exist and the topic is notable."  The article needs to be expanded from those academic seconday sources (it is trye much of what we have is PRIMARY), but WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP .  The topic seems notable.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and good summary of my position by the nominator Marcelus ( talk ) 09:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and/or userfy - we cannot keep indefinitely an article without reliable modern coverage.  - Altenmann >talk 23:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 02:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Indeed you are right the article should be written in a few sentences I would propose this : In 1182, Casimir was involved in disputes over power in Halicko-Wlodzimierska Rus'.  In that year, Casimir's army attacked Brest, with the intention of installing Svyatoslav Mstislavovich, son of Agnes, daughter of Boleslav the Wry-mouthed and Salomea of Berg, on the throne there.  Svyatoslav's candidacy was opposed by Agnes's younger sons, with whom Prince Vsevolod of Bełsk set out for Brest, along with reinforcements from the principalities of Vladimir and Halych, and the Yotvingians and Polovtsians.  Casimir eventually won a victory over the reinforcements coming to Brest's rescue, and also captured the city itself.  He achieved his political goal, and installed his chosen prince Sviatoslav on the throne.  The 1182 expedition to Brest was thus his complete success.  This state of affairs did not last long - after a short time the established prince was poisoned.  The exact date of this event is not clear; it probably happened as early as 1183.  Casimir did not fail to act, and installed his other nephew, Prince Roman Mstislavovich of Vladimir, on the throne Source Józef Dobosz : Kazimierz II Sprawiedliwy .  Poznań: 2014, p. 153-155.  Mistrz Wincenty (tzw. Kadłubek) : Kronika polska .  tłum.  i oprac.  Brygida Kürbis, Wrocław: 1992 s.  ks.  IV, chapter 14, p. 217.  Birczenin ( talk ) 20:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect