hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kathiababa Ka Sthan,Vrindavan: Fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Hinduism , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  UtherSRG (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It reads like an advertisement, and all the provided sources consisting of routine updates.  Additionally, there are numerous sentences in the history section that clearly violate the NPOV.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The Wikipedia article is a machine translation of a Bengali-language Wikipedia article , which also exists on Hindi-language Wikipedia ; they have the same citations - the English-language version has them in the same places as the Hindi-language version - the Bengali-language version has them in different places.   None of the nine citations explicitly support any of the content they are cited for in the English-language version of the article.   The topic of the citations is the Vrindavan Kumb Mela - which is sort-of the topic of Section 3 of the Wikipedia article - though it is difficult to relate the content of Section 3 to the content of the articles cited.   Maybe there are good sources on the temple in Bengali or Hindi, but clearly whoever wrote the Bengali and Hindi versions of the article did not find any.  The best available English-language source I found was user-generated content in Tripadvisor , which confirmed that the temple exists, said what it is like and gave its address.   We cannot base the article on that.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
O.D. (musician): Shellwood ( talk ) 08:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As far as I can tell (and I could be mistaken), there's basically no biographical information available in decent sources; I only seem to find passing mentions of his work in articles on Velcra.  We can't build articles on nothing.  / Julle ( talk ) 10:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm unable to locate any decent sourcing.  It's possible that I'm missing something because the name is quite difficult to search for, but hypothetical sources don't count .  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 07:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , or possibly Redirect to Velcra but the name "O.D." is so generic it may not work as a search term.  For the musician, it appears that he either wants to be anonymous by never revealing his birth name, or mistakenly gave himself a hideously unsearchable stage name, and either way there is not enough independent info to build an article here.  Via targeted searches I can find nothing about him outside of the band.  I also question the notability of his bandmate Jessi Frey but that is a separate discussion.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andre Loader: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 13:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BiFest: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 13:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Sexuality and gender ,  and United Kingdom .  Owen× ☎ 14:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I can't find anything online and the events maxing out at 150 attendees makes it seem unlikely it would have enough coverage in offline sources to sustain an independent/notable article.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 20:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Schwinghammer: No substantial coverage of fishing; no ability to tell if any of the other "Paul Schwinghammer" search results are about the same person; no credible claim that any of his fishing tournament results are important.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 16:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Minnesota .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 16:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is not a notable individual, semi-pro angler.  No coverage in any sources, reliable or not.  What's given now in the article is simple names in a list.  The name is rather common and you'll find anything and everything about this person.  Not seeing notability as being met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Kablammo ( talk ) 11:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This seems like a case of mistaken identity.  There's nothing here to show this is a particularly noteworthy angler compared to others with the same name.  Waqar 💬 09:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charles Soong Yocklunn: Given the period when he lived, it was difficult to find sources.  Small mentions come up in google books and Australian database trove.  But nothing indepth to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , China ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I've read this a few times and I'm still not sure why he's notable.  Got a vegetable cart, involved with a church and passed away.  Seems too local to be kept, reads like a biography from a local museum somewhere.  I don't see notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with Oaktee B that this article seems to be an orphan article, and most of the attention and reliable sources are from obituaries.  The decision to delete or merge Wikipedia articles is usually made based on established deletion policies and guidelines, ( WP: GNG ), reliable sources ( WP: RS ), and verifiability.  If the article does not meet these criteria, the only link will not directly lead to the described reason.  The scarcity of reliable sources leads to unreliability.  Yangpeifu ( talk ) 04:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree.  I read the article.  Didn't really see his popularity from the article.  His contributions are also not documented in the article and the sources of information about him are not detailed.  Rachel.zrq ( talk ) Rachel.zrq ( talk ) 04:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southern Pacific 4404: Feather River Rail Society is the operator of the Western Pacific Railroad Museum, which formerly held the locomotive in its collection.  A bill of sale is a primary source which also does not contribute to notability.  The Diesel Era source is not enough to meet GNG.  This should at best exist as a redirect to the museum.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 21:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 21:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very few individual locomotives have sufficient individual notability to pass GNG.  This is not one of them.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : It’s obviously notable but very underrated 27.33.233.138 ( talk ) 10:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC) — 27.33.233.138 ( talk ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Delete and Salt Fails GNG and the IP responsible for this has demonstrated that they are willing to manipulatively try and resurrect articles using wiki processes.  Refer to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Australian railroad IP .  TarnishedPath talk 08:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Another non-notable train REFBOMBed through AfC.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 03:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Balloon Brothers: I was unable to find any coverage in reliable sources demonstrating notability.  Waxworker ( talk ) 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Waxworker ( talk ) 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment See vgmrips.net for the Japanese company East Technology.  See YouTube for a 33-minute video of the arcade game.  2603:6011:8241:6E00:1CBC:91A:F597:2B20 ( talk ) 07:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already been PROD'd.  Not eligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 22:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The three refs used are of no use and outside of them all I could find were gameplay vids and forum stuff.  No apparent sig cov in English.  This shouldn't go without consensus.  X ( talk ) 04:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : could not find evidence of significant coverage by multiple reliable sources.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 17:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michal Risian: No RS discuss him in any detail Mach61 ( talk ) 04:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I checked news, the news archive, books, scholar, and the Wikipedia Library.  For news, I get 5 hits, with only 1 discussing Michal specifically and it fails the GNG criteria.  I get no hits in the news archive, no hits on the Library, and a single parsable hit on scholar that discusses an entirely different free diver.  I even tried searching with Michal Rišian .  — Sirdog ( talk ) 05:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Czech Republic .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emmanuel Kwasi Debrah: As seen [ here ] and  [ here, ].  There are even cases where the sources directly came from the subject as seen [ here ].  Apart from that, most of the sources are not Reliable and are not Independent Ibjaja055 ( talk ) 13:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Journalism , Poetry ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All these anomalies are corrected Gyanford ( talk ) 10:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I read the article and checked some of the refs.  He doesn't appear to have led a notable life, we're even below 1E.  Desertarun ( talk ) 12:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kendriya Vidyalaya Bamrauli: The sources that i could find are either primary, or school/college databases.  A previous PROD was contested .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 04:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 04:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I haven't found good sources, too.  Deckkohl ( talk ) 17:21, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it please.  Only passing mentions on Google books.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 05:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 17:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of the United States, Abidjan: The only bit that’s actually about the embassy, about the new building, is already mentioned at Ivory Coast–United States relations .  The rest duplicates that article.  Biruitorul Talk 20:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Ivory Coast ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 21:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unnecessary content fork.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and put a serious halt to the long series of embassy spam.  Almost nothing in the article is about the physical embassy, and there is no indication yet that such a topic would be viable.  ~~ The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ilgar Nabiyev: The best that I could find was Milli , which is just a Q&A with no independent analysis at all.  In any case, one source is not enough for GNG or SPORTBASIC.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:BLP .  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 05:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bharwara Sewage Treatment Plant: I've done a bit of news search and there doesn't seem to be anything spectacular or of note regarding this plant, other than it opened on the birthday of a city/government official.  It may have been the largest STP in Asia at one point.  Still, I can only find 2 articles that mention that, one in 2014 (and even that article is mostly hidden behind a paywall) and one saying that a scheduled STP in Delhi would surpass it in all areas.  Lindsey40186 (talk) 03:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 17:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gilbert Tilus: JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shri Munjaba Tample, Ukkadgaon: No reliable sources have been added and I was not able to find a single source that could verify if this location exists.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 20:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I could not find any proof of notability the temple (Shri Munjaba Temple), which this page is about.  The village seems to exist though, based on some sources: [9] , [10] , [11] Bendegúz Ács ( talk ) 22:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , definitely does not have “significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources” required per WP:NBUILDING .  A possible hoax, as added Google Maps link does not return the temple and I can’t find any sources.    ~ Politicdude ( About me , talk , contribs ) 23:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to Ukkadgaon as WP:ATD and add sources found by Bendegúz Ács .  The article already covers the village and the only information about the temple in the article is its name.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE .  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete