PROS (company) : No evidence of notability.  Previously deleted and salted at PROS * Pppery * it has begun... 16:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Travel and tourism ,  and United States of America .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 16:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  That's odd.  I would normally expect a company listed on the New York Stock Exchange to have lots of coverage.  Perhaps the problem is that hits are being masked by other uses of the word Pros.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 16:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , just barely This company may have the worst search-optimized name of all time, complicating any BEFORE search, but I am having a hard time finding independent, secondary, reliable sources providing significant coverage to meet WP:NORG .  Examples: Reuters (already cited in article; trivial coverage); the three Houston Business Journal pieces already cited (trivial coverage); and an additional Reuters story (trivial coverage).  However, I can identify an additional Houston Business Journal story and two scholarly book mentions ( here , here ).  I think it just scrapes under the line, but it's close.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 18:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Updating my view to "keep" based on the analyst reports identified by Cunard below.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources .  From Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Publicly traded corporations (my bolding): There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable.  Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case.  However, sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies , so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above.  Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports .  Analyst reports https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/PRO/price-target/ Internet Archive contains a list of analyst reports available under a paywall: Date Brokerage Analyst Name Action Rating Price Target Upside/Downside on Report Date Details 3/4/2024 Needham & Company LLC Reiterated Rating Buy ➝ Buy $40.00 +11.23% View Report Details 1/12/2024 KeyCorp Upgrade Sector Weight ➝ Overweight $43.00 +24.46% View Report Details 12/4/2023 Robert W. Baird Boost Target Outperform ➝ Outperform $40.00 ➝ $47.00 +20.20% View Report Details 5/24/2023 Craig Hallum Boost Target $32.00 ➝ $37.00 +32.47% View Report Details 5/3/2023 Stifel Nicolaus Lower Target $36.00 ➝ $34.00 +28.54% View Report Details 4/19/2023 Oppenheimer Initiated Coverage Outperform $37.00 +36.94% View Report Details 3/4/2022 Morgan Stanley Lower Target Equal Weight $35.00 ➝ $33.00 +5.74% View Report Details 12/14/2021 JPMorgan Chase & Co.  Upgrade Underweight ➝ Neutral $37.00 +10.02% View Report Details 12/17/2020 Northland Securities Boost Target Outperform $56.00 ➝ $61.00 +25.49% View Report Details 10/30/2020 Royal Bank of Canada Downgrade Outperform ➝ Sector Perform $33.00 +5.06% View Report Details 2/12/2020 Bank of America John King Reiterated Rating Buy $80.00 +53.73% View Report Details 7/26/2019 Nomura Securities Boost Target Buy $77.00 ➝ $79.00 +7.98% View Report Details 5/23/2019 DA Davidson Boost Target Neutral $50.00 -6.94% View Report Details 5/10/2019 JMP Securities Reiterated Rating Mkt Perform ➝ Market Perform View Report Details 6/29/2017 Pacific Crest Boost Target Overweight $30.00 ➝ $35.00 +29.06% View Report Details 5/3/2017 Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Boost Target Buy $35.00 +37.42% View Report Details 2/13/2017 William Blair Reiterated Rating Outperform View Report Details 8/25/2015 TD Securities Lower Target Speculative Buy C$0.35 ➝ C$0.30 View Report Details 4/8/2015 Dundee Securities Initiated Coverage Buy View Report Details 2/28/2014 Jefferies Financial Group Downgrade Buy ➝ Hold $47.00 ➝ $37.00 -9.89% View Report Details There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow PROS to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria , which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".  Cunard ( talk ) 10:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources identified by Cunard.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 16:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Per the sources by Cunard.  They prove GNG.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep