Maan Abu Taleb: After reviewing it, I'm gonna agree with him.  The only sources I can find of this guy are, a Vice interview (not enough) and coverage of his magazine (sexual misconduct allegations, mostly) The magazine he founded, Ma3azef, may have a case for notability despite being a redlink, but this is not WP:INHERITED (and additionally, fails WP:AUTHOR 3.).  Then there is the matter of his book, the english translation of the book seems to have gotten no coverage whatsoever and frankly, the fact that it was only longlisted for a rather niche prize (the Banipal, which is awarded to english translations of Arabic books), seems to only strengthen the case here.  Given that this article has had this sourcing issue for at least four years, it seems to suggest that nobody else can find sources either.  Hence, this likely fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR / WP:NEDITOR .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 17:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Jordan ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Numerous and diverse secondary sources emerge on a Google search.  The English translation of his first novel was published by an academic press, and it appears he's active in the Arabic diaspora.  I assess that the subject is notable and the page is marked as stub quality for lack of volunteer editors contributing to expand it.  I've done some work and will add more soon.  -- Deborahjay ( talk ) 09:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] User:Allan Nonymous , when you took a look at the article - did you look at the subject's Wikidata item , which was created back in 2019.  In particular, on 13 December 2020 a contributor added the Google Knowledge Graph ID which has a wide amount of interesting information available at a click and waiting for further editing of the page by future volunteer editors (such as myself).  Basing your judgment on the content of a stub page is a weak argument, and I write this as a Good Faith editor with a lot of work in Wikidata under my belt.  In evaluating a page to nominate as AfD's, this would be my advice.  -- Deborahjay ( talk ) 13:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Deborahjay that article is made of paper, the numerous sources are only 2, I can't believe it when my Noam Bettan article had 22 sources. Furthermore, the first is an autobiography of a blog, if the article does not make it relevant, it lacks too much content for it to remain here, it seems like a mirror article, that article could very well be on another free website where it does not matter. ask for too much information like in FANDOM. Acartonadooopo ( talk ) 14:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Sock comment struck.-- Bbb23 ( talk ) 15:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply : Acartonadooopo , you fail to show understanding of Wikipedia guidelines relevant to new page creators: notability, biographies of living people, reliable sources, stub article.  Your 22 sources for the Noam Bettan page were from Israeli popular music platforms and websites, not mainstream media.  I found them inadequate and agreed with the Deletion recommendation.  This page you've proposed for deletion is a stub for notable person, an author with listings in the US Library of Congress and the National Library of Israel (and Canada, Japan and others, besides his ID included in the Virtual International Authority File .  This is evinced by his Wikidata item .  Considering how little experience you have in the EN WP, it's not too soon for you to learn the consensus on best practices of this collaborative effort before you criticize from your own point of view .  -- Deborahjay ( talk ) 15:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikidata shoudn't be used for notability here, it's user created, so just any old person can go create a profile there.  It's really only useful to us for cross-platform linking of topics, it has its own set of standards that don't apply here either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't think we have notability.  I can't find book reviews and this is the only RS [104] , but it's more of an interview.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Maybe a redirect to the red-linked magazine he founded, the Ma3azef, might work.  There's some coverage around that.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would agree, that's why I mentioned it as an option given that Ma3azef is probably notable.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 17:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment it has come to my attention that the user here who suggested the nom was a sock.  I have struck the portion of the comment referring to him, but I think the nom is still sound here (despite the rather unsavory way this was brought to my attention).  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 03:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  12:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete