Megan Horvath : Significant coverage cannot be found online.  This exists, but it is practically a primary source with interview from parents, and gives no in-depth coverage to Megan Horvath.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 06:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Florida .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 06:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 19:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Expanded article from sources I could find.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 16:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Significa liberdade.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 18:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Das osmnezz : Significa liberdade did not say "keep", so you can't say keep per them - they just said they expanded the article, and made no argument for or against deletion.  I have looked through the added sources, and this is not sigcov and is paywalled , passing mention , stats page , some coverage but a lot of is primary due to interviewing her parents , passing mention , passing mention , passing mention , passing mention , passing mention .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 06:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify , at worst.  AfD initiated two days after creation and while the article was being improved.  Due to their career's timeframe, online search results might not be indicative of the subject's notability or lack thereof.  Let the editors already working on the article deal with passing AfC instead of failing AfD.  - Socccc ( talk ) 15:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agreed that sourcing is not enough.  NYT, Houston Chronicle, SFGate2, SFGate3, SFGate4, LA Times, and SFGate5 are all passing mentions, SFGate 1 has some content but not SIGCOV.  Nowhere close to GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 02:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  19:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Player meets WP Football Player Notability, which states "Have played for a fully professional club at a national level of the league structure".  This player played in Women's United Soccer Association the first fully professional league for women.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demt1298 ( talk • contribs ) 19:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You mean the WP:NFOOTY guideline which no longer exists, because it was superceded by the requirement to pass WP:GNG ?  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 20:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Media coverage is only quick references and not significant coverage of her.  I vote to delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 21:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - as of now, no coherent has been put forth for keeping the article.  No GNG-providing sources found and NFOOTY has been deprecated and is thus not a valid argument.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 03:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete