hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Matthiew Araya: I'm struggling to even find routine coverage.  No evidence that this complies with WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC and the current database sources are unacceptable on their own.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Costa Rica .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – With only database source listed, article obviously fails GNG.  What a waste of talent!  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Academic history: Conceptually an "Academic history" may exist but is it even notable?  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 07:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals and History .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 07:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unsourced since 2007.  As "academic" and "history" and even the combination "academic history" are very common terms, I don't even see how one could search for sources.  And as the nom says, this reads like "an opinionated essay".  Unless some history specialist knows of some sources that show the notability of this concept, we should get rid of this.  -- Randykitty ( talk ) 10:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unsourced and appears to just have flown under the radar.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 10:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing GNG for lack of RS and V. Tagging for 16 years has not led to additional sourcing and OR remains after 14 years of tagging, so Draftify and other AtDs do not appear to be viable options.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This demonstrates more the uselessness of such tags than the non-notability or -verifiability of the article.  Srnec ( talk ) 18:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's an unsourced essay, not an article.  Banks Irk ( talk ) 17:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The topic of academic history—i.e., history as taught and practised in academia—is a notable topic.  This article is such a poor start, however, that WP:TNT applies.  Delete .  Srnec ( talk ) 18:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : In agreement with Tooncool64 , Randykitty , and Banks Irk , it is currently an unsourced essay, doubtfully one that can be fixed.  XxTechnicianxX ( talk ) 20:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- I agree with views expressed above.   There is a variety of history (or perhaps historiography ) that is more about discussing and reviewing the ideas of historians than about recounting what happened.   However that is not he subject of this article.   Possibly redirect to historiography .  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 11:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Foundation for Middle East Peace: Current sourcing is pretty bad (all SPS), and a WP:BEFORE turns up no WP:SIGCOV of the organization.  Only routine WP:NOTNEWS coverage of the org signing statements or listed affiliations of its personnel, which does not establish WP:GNG .  Tag for WP:V have been on the page for 10 years.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 03:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Organizations , Politics , Israel , Palestine ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Did my own research yet nothing to add to nom.  gidonb ( talk ) 13:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harold Finch (Person of Interest): The article is a victim of fancruft, solely describing the character in an in-universe style, and worst of all, it has no reception, which is a necessary part of WP: Notability (fictional characters) .  ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 19:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Reads like a fandom article.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 19:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It even is a Fandom article.  A note at the bottom says that "As of this edit, this article uses content from "Harold Finch" [at Fandom]", with "this edit" pointing to the very first edit, i.e. article creation.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing is sourced, except to the show itself.  I can't find any RS that discusses the character at length...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Not even any coverage for the show past 2016; what's found are all articles discussing a particular episode, nothing about the character.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't find WP:SIGCOV for this character.  Mostly the show or the actor.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 13:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : only mentions.  reads like a fandom as mentioned above, and not WP:SIGCOV per Shooterwalker Password (talk) (contribs) 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Government Degree College Phool Nagar: Testeraccount100 ( talk ) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete looks like an advert and fails WP:ORG .  Would reconsider if there are Urdu sources but there is no Urdu version of this article.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KUCL-LD: Let'srun ( talk ) 20:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Utah .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this article should have never been created to begin with.  Catfurball ( talk ) 19:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Omar Al Hamwi: The Psyrianp source has a quote from him and, other than that, just confirms his age, position and former club.  On its own, this won't be sufficient, especially since quotes directly from the player are not considered to be WP:SIGCOV at AfD, by consensus.  Aside from that, I found Al Rai , which is only a trivial mention.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Georges Mvoue: I found nothing under "Georges Mvoué/Mvoue" or "Georges Emvoue".  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cameroon .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahou no Sekai: Or rather there is a thing on Amazon that is being promoted, but it is masquerading as a Japanese light novel series when it isn't.  Even if I'm wrong and it's genuine, it is not notable.  — Xezbeth ( talk ) 16:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions .  — Xezbeth ( talk ) 16:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; this doesn't seem to be a hoax (at least based on the retailer links, not sure if it's actually Japanese though) but it definitely fails WP:NBOOK .  I found nothing but said retailer links in a search in both English and Japanese (based on the name provided).  Link20XX ( talk ) 16:39, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found no sourcing, fails WP:NBOOK .  Possible WP:PAID article.  Jumpytoo Talk 23:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - article is little more than a plot summary and a list of characters.  Seems to possibly be promotional editing, as well.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elti Fits: Possible WP:ATD is merge or merge/redirect to Karl Burns , though it could unbalance that article and I am not convinced he is that notable.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Being on a national BBC broadcast like the Peel Sessions ("The band did a session for John Peel on 4 September 1979 followed by a roadshow in 1980.") is an argument for notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find anything in RS or any news, please ping me if sources are presented.  dxneo ( talk ) 02:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Source eval: Comments Source database  1. "discogs - Elti Fits".  Discogs.  3 September 1980.  Retrieved 12 July 2010.  database  2. ^ "Rare Punk Music to Share".  21 June 2007.  Retrieved 12 July 2010.  404  3. ^ "Notice Board".  Retrieved 12 July 2010.  Tour annoucement  4. ^ "U2 gigs".  9 October 1980.  Retrieved 12 July 2010.  Poster  5. ^ "Poster of gig 28 July 1979".  9 April 2009.  Retrieved 12 July 2010.  Nothing found found in BEFORE or mentioned above meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 08:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Latt Wai Phone: Looks to be a clear case of failing WP:SPORTBASIC #5 and the consensus within the community is that such articles should be deleted, especially if a BLP.  Best sources in my searches were GNLM and Myanmar Digital Newspaper (translated) , both of which only mention him once, so are blatantly not WP:SIGCOV .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; no evidence of any flavour of notability.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 10:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:SIGCOV .  Onel 5969 TT me 00:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator and above.  Fails WP:SIGCOV and no sources found are sufficient to help establish notability.  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 07:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nonexistent/very weak SIGCOV.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 09:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 13:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 15:42, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Menthogen: Created by a user with almost no edits outside the article , and who uploaded an image stating that they own copyright to the same image on the company's website, suggesting possible undisclosed COI.  Citation 1 is primary, 2,4,5,6 are broken, and 3 is irrelevant.  DDG news turns up no results, and DDG search is filled with Amazon and other storefronts only.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 14:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Medicine .  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 14:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all sources are either not independent of the subject, or are about subjects other than Menthogen.   Nothing else found.   This is a better-than-average attempt to make a promotional article appear well-sourced and neutral, but it still fails.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I would treat this as a commercial product line needing to meet WP:NCORP , which it does not.  BD2412 T 14:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michelle Rodgers: Let'srun ( talk ) 01:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Kentucky .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Due to WP:BIO1E .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Petr Brdičko: Sourced only to Youtube videos.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 05:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and Czech Republic .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 05:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete vanity article ( [13] ), no indication of notability or secondary sources.  – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 08:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - vanity/promo.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 08:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -This does not meet notability standards for creative professionals .  Jdweikler ( talk ) 09:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Vejvančický ( talk / contribs ) 11:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly not notable.  FromCzech ( talk ) 06:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amir Alipoor: Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 21:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Iran .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 21:17, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments - probably delete International career in Mini football??? I don't even know what that is. I am not sure this is passable for English wikipedia.  Govvy ( talk ) 14:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 21:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Skye Aurelia: Speedied G11 three times Draft:Skye Aurelia , but this one isn't eligible for speedy.  WP:BEFORE search turned up passing mentions for modelling credits in WP:RS, but no significant secondary coverage - the best I can find is the Harper's Bazaar Serbia softball interview cited here, but an interview is a primary source.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople ,  and Women .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The most I can find is various fashion shoots.  Non-notable individual.  If the draft was deleted 3 times, that's a good hint that it's not notable.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Created by a sock of User:Abbasshaikh124 but I untagged it so its fate could be determined here in this discussion.  L iz Read!  Talk!  04:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable biography .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 04:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Involution (film): I did a WP:BEFORE and found a link from Bloody Disgusting .   Needs more coverage in order to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 23:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 23:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Review (at Nocturno (magazine) [ it ] ) and here .  At least. — MY, OH, MY!  ( mushy yank ) — 14:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources given don't meet SIGCOV, was unable to find anything more promising.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Additional : You also have a review on Cineclandestino (It).  And this (Fr) Screenings at various festivals ( Sitges Film Festival ) ( [2] ); Fest [3] ) and Soho Horror Fest [4] ).  The trailer has attracted attention from Bloody Disgusting, as The Film Creator explains, but also from other media . — MY, OH MY!  ( mushy yank ) — 21:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 21:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : doesn't meet the requirements of SIGCOV 1keyhole ( talk ) 05:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete