hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Germain Dirksz : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from independent sources, thus failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom, most helpful outcome for the reader.  Also the best outcome for the project: it's highly likely that Aruban sources exist that just aren't readily accessible, so we'll be doing future editors a favor by preserving the content for future restoration.  Notability is about whether we should have an article on a subject, not about whether we should have any coverage at all, so where a reasonable target exists it isn't a sufficient basis for deletion.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 03:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Josh Kiszka : It doesn't show much notability separate from the band, apart from his anouncement of his same sex relationship, picked up by Billboard and Rolling Stone .  Suggest the article is redirected to Greta Van Fleet until he does something notable outside of the band.  Sionk ( talk ) 16:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] See also : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Kiszka , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Kiszka .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Michigan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect Much of the content is about the band's activities, not him in particular.  Reywas92 Talk 14:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Greta Van Fleet .  We went through this exact process back in 2018, as there were separate articles for all three of the Kiszka brothers and the consensus was that those articles merely repeated info about the band as a whole.  All three articles were recreated by the same user a few weeks ago, and that user is probably unaware of those old events.  But once again the articles simply repeat info about the band's history with a few non-notable snippets about musical influences.  Josh is a possible exception because he got some news coverage for his personal life, but that can be mentioned at the band's article and does not justify yet another repeat of the band's general history.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, TLA (talk) 19:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gabriel & Dresden (album) : QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 11:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 11:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Their second album, The Only Road (album) has an article as well.  That one looks much more comprehensively researched.  Perhaps this article just needs some additional work.  MannyMammal ( talk ) 05:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why are we discussing the other album on this AfD?  Note that: Notability of the performers (and of their previous works) has nothing to do with that of this subject.  dxneo ( talk ) 11:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to the performer(s): Cannot find anything in RS, only Discog and primary sources.  Please ping me if sources are presented.  dxneo ( talk ) 12:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Forgot to say above but I also support redirecting.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gabriel & Dresden per above.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 14:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Stereotype (Karl Wolf album) : CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lebanon and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The article was de-prodded by an editor who claimed there was enough coverage that notability could be presumed , but the article is entirely unsourced as of writing this, and most of the artist's albums I've spot-checked are just redirects, so I'm not entirely sure what they were alluding to by that comment.  Sergecross73 msg me 00:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support non-notability claim .  Article does not cite any sources, no attempt was made to properly develop the article.  Mburrell ( talk ) 02:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect No reason for deletion.  Just keep the categories and add {{ r from album }} ― Justin ( ko a v f ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 02:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I would also be open to a redirect.  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 07:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] support Pdubs.94 ( talk ) 17:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Karl Wolf : Found no coverage.  Seconding koavf on keeping the categories and adding {{ r from album }} .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 10:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Darling ( talk ) 15:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Karl Wolf : User review which I cannot read on Allmusic , mostly interview quotes here , and passing mention on Billboard .  Couldn't find charts, certification, or award/nom.  dxneo ( talk ) 12:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bright (American band Bright album) : Fails WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage.  That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per WP:NALBUM : Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography Polyamorph ( talk ) 10:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Polyamorph ( talk ) 10:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bright (American band) as has already been done at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bells Break Their Towers .  This could have been done boldly for all of the band's albums with little controversy and no need for this lengthy process.  This 1996 album picked up a little support at AllMusic but that notice did not seem to last.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, but note I brought these albums to AfD after your suggestion here .  Polyamorph ( talk ) 16:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bright (American band) .  Fails WP:NALBUM .  Mooonswimmer 23:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ehraam-e-Junoon : ROTM coverage like this , and namechecks like this is not enough to meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - A WP:NTV series that meets WP:GNG , substantial sources, free images available on Google search.  Rather than WP:AfD , should have been tagged for "Additional Citations".  Sameeerrr ( talk ) 10:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] Sameeerrr , NTV is an essay and you have to provide WP:THREE best coverage that you believe is sufficient to meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't understand your approach of providing "THREE" best references.  If we were supposed to provide the only three best references, then I wonder Wikipedia would have limited it WP:References section "To add Three Best sources" only.  There's many citations available on search to improve the article.  Sameeerrr ( talk ) 15:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 7th_Sky_Entertainment#Current_programmes - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Albert Dauchez : Only source in the article is an Olympedia source which is not in-depth coverage, and does not satisfy notability guidelines.  A BEFORE search doesn't show anything promising either.  Tails Wx 03:24, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Olympics ,  and France .  Tails Wx 03:24, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment it apears the person was of some notable in the early 20th century, the article exists in several languages but I do agree that more sources must be added and more that the article at its current state is poor.  At its current state I think you're right.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 17:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing in Newspapers.com or ProQuest.  We can't assume everyone got sustained SIGCOV.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 00:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to France at the 1908 Summer Olympics#Archery per WP:ATD if no further sources can be located -  that would require a proper search of French newspapers of the period, which it appears has not so far taken place.  Ingratis ( talk ) 07:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to France at the 1908 Summer Olympics#Archery as an ATD.  Fails GNG and NBIO.  BEFORE showed database results, nothing that would indicate there is WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 15:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kadima (youth group) : Fails WP:NORG .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 01:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to its immediate parent organization, United Synagogue Youth .  From what I can find, Kadima has recently changed its name to USY Gesher.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] USY and Kadima/Gesher are separate organizations under USCJ, per their website .  Plus the USY page should also be merged/redirected to USCJ, but that's for antoher day.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 03:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with United_Synagogue_of_Conservative_Judaism .  Since this group seems to be affiliated with United_Synagogue_of_Conservative_Judaism , it would be better if the article is merged.  killer bee 05:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Judaism ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to United Synagogue Youth since that is where there is a mention.  Per WP:ATD-R , this unnotable org will be nigh impossible to source, especially with all the Kadima false positives.  No need to merge since there is nothing worthwhile to be kept that is not there already.  Stony Brook babble 20:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Superintending Surveyor : Contested PROD.  I don't think a redirect is the way to go, since "superintending surveyor" seems like a generic position.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  17:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  17:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 17:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Surveyor general appears to be the generic position, see [7] ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Survey of India , where the position is already mentioned, merging any content in if necessary.  * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Survey of India as WP:ATD suggested in my deprod rationale.  Doesn't seem to conflict with surveyor titles used outside India.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I now have no opposition to a redirect to Survey of India .  I thought this was a generic position, but I guess I was wrong.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  15:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mehboob Aapke Qadmon Main : All I could find is some ROTM coverage and announcements/press release based coverage like this and this , and pieces by freelancers in RS like this all of which isn't sufficient to establish GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Hum_TV#Horror_or_supernatural_series : listed there.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 05:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Beverly Miles : No apparent notability and coverage outside of her unsuccessful candidacy in the Democratic primary.  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 21:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women ,  and Illinois .  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 21:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Medicine , Indiana ,  and Mississippi .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No credible claim of notability.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or restore redirect.   Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 02:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 Illinois gubernatorial election as a WP:ATD .  Subject does not pass the WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  User:Let'srun 19:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per User:Let'srun -- Mpen320 ( talk ) 01:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 Illinois gubernatorial election .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yoraidil Pérez : I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions, pretty consistently ( 2004 , 2007 , 2015 , 2020 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Panama .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 20:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Wu Wikipedia : Fram ( talk ) 19:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and China .  Fram ( talk ) 19:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Wikipedias per previous nomination.  Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DayxDay : A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Zella Day .  toweli ( talk ) 06:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  toweli ( talk ) 06:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 11:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Zella Day : per nomination.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rock 2.0 : Perhaps redirect to Dial Global Local ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ladies' Night (novel) : Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG .  Perhaps redirect to Jack Ketchum ?  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to author.  I am not seeing any sources that would pass GNG or NBOOK.  The entire article is plot summary and there is no evidence of notability.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect seems ideal in this case.  Couldn't see any worthy reviews.  scope_creep Talk 07:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect