hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Michael C. Mentel: Local politicians and judges are neither inherently notable or inherently not notable.  There is nothing in coverage found on Google or in newspaper searches that would put Judge Mentel into "notability" .  Biographical information found is from campaign websites (primary sources) or run of the mill coverage of a countywide campaign.  Mpen320 ( talk ) 18:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions . -- Mpen320 ( talk ) 18:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions . -- Mpen320 ( talk ) 18:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions . -- Mpen320 ( talk ) 18:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Delete: These guidelines may be helpful, specifically Such judges are not inherently notable, but holding such a position is strong evidence of notability that can be established by other indicia of notability. In particular, state courts of appeals judges who serve for a comparatively long time, who preside over important cases, or whose opinions are often cited by higher courts in the state, by federal courts, or by state courts in other states, are highly likely to be notable. It may be WP:TOOSOON since they've only been in office since 2020, but they may be notable at a later date. TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 19:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply . I should have addressed those guidelines in my official "declaration."  I usually check against Wikipedia:Academic (did they teach?) and use Bearian's notability standards for attorneys as a jumping off point to see if GNG can be established.-- Mpen320 ( talk ) 21:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete badly sourced BLP who held a non-notable political position.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He has not served at any level that would confer "inherent" notability under our inclusion standards for either politicians or judges, but the article is not reliably sourced anywhere near well enough to make him a special case of greater notability than the norm for those offices.  Bearcat ( talk ) 00:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prince Samolah: JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -Per nominator and GiantSnowman.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 23:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kang Kuk-chol (footballer, born 1999): Simione001 ( talk ) 00:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Ping me if sources are found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of communities served by Comcast: Rusf10 ( talk ) 04:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Business , Internet ,  and United States of America .  Rusf10 ( talk ) 04:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Many many many companies on Wikipedia list their service area(s).   Perhaps not to the level of the city/town licenses which is what actually grants Comcast its service area.  i.e. One canneot get XFINITY outside of city/town licensed to allow offer it.  But should a company's service area be listed on Wikipedia is the better question?   Many banks list the states they're in as they're licensed on the state level.  Verizon lists their FiOS area markets.  Charter Communications lists its markets.   The satellite providers which are all in the same sky list their service areas.   Radio/TV stations list the area/markets they're licensed to serve.  Mobile companies list the states they are licensed to operate in.  There's LOTS of DIR on Wikipedia.   For example: List of countries with Burger King franchises .   To that logic wouldn't people just goto BK.com and look up what Burger Kings are nearby?  CaribDigita ( talk ) 07:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB .   No analysis or summary is offered; the article is just a long bulleted list.   Anyone searching for this information would just get it from Comcast, who would have a more up-to-date list anyway.   Consensus has been that standalone lists of airline destinations are not encyclopedic enough for WP, and I think this article is very similar in concept to that.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTDIR and minimal coverage of the topic ( this is about as good as secondary coverage gets).  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 01:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTDB .  Unencyclopedic content.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jurven Koffy: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 07:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of electronic cigarette and e-cigarette liquid brands: M.Bitton ( talk ) 23:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Products .  M.Bitton ( talk ) 23:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom, this is just a list of non-notable brands with a promotional angle.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 07:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Category:Electronic cigarette brands only shows four entries.   I see no point in this list.  D r e a m Focus 21:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with TheInsatiableOne .  History person 2 ( talk ) 22:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails LISTN and CLN/AOAL.  // Timothy :: talk 07:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Hardly any blue-linked entries and mostly sourced by primary sources (i.e. official websites).  Fails WP:NOTDIR .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdul Samad Dawood: scope_creep Talk 08:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources in the article are about routine business dealings.  This was all I could find [21] , a trivial mention.  Non-notable individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of career achievements by Dennis Rodman: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Lists .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment For reference, there's recent NBA-related AfDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Larry Bird , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Dwight Howard , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Carmelo Anthony , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Chris Paul . — Bagumba ( talk ) 03:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unneeded WP:CONTENTFORK packed with WP:UNDUE , indiscriminate, trivial stats minutiae.   Major, defining achievements should be captured in the main bio.  The basic stats are already at Dennis Rodman § NBA career statistics .  Also fails WP:NOTSTATS : Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing As most of this page is unsourced, there's no opportunity to merge either. — Bagumba ( talk ) 15:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a content fork of the biography.  P.S. It's hard enough for the stats people to keep things updated in one centralized place, let alone if every player starts getting a biography page and a stats page.  Carrite ( talk ) 16:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Billie Sparks: I can't find any in-depth, indepdenent sources aside from this image.ie article .  Clear friend a 💬 19:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Law ,  and Ireland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non notable person, fails WP:GNG .  Spleodrach ( talk ) 06:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NPOL doesn't apply (and, even if it did, wouldn't be met).  WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV are also not met (apart from the single image.ie article , the only sources - which deal with the subject as a primary topic - are the same less-than-independent "job announcement / press release" materials we see in the article).  I might be wrong, but it seems to me that WP:G5 could also potentially apply here.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 10:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Graydancer's Ropecast: QuietCicada - Talk 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada - Talk 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Internet .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just another one of millions of podcasts out there, no evidence to suggest this one is particularly notable beyond a couple of passing mentions in the press.  Flip Format ( talk ) 14:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because it doesn't pass WP:NPODCAST or WP:GNG .  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 01:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per all forementioned reasons above.  Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  -- 12:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Morgan Brody: Devoted to a secondary character on CSI, most of the article provides information about plot regarding the character.  A quick Google search did not provide sources proving greater notability from reliable sources (mostly fandom cites).  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 04:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, just redirect it to List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters .  Thanks!  Suite1408 ( talk ) 04:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as a single source (after 12 years) does not an article make.   — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to insufficient WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 14:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blindspot (company): The best coverage is of the Times Square billboard incident, but it's really not about the company, it's an action by its co-founder, and notability is not inherited .  ~ A412 talk!  17:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies , Korea , United Arab Emirates , Romania , United States of America ,  and New York .  ~ A412 talk!  17:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , corporate spam.  — Biruitorul Talk 20:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cha Dong-hoon: Searching in Korean and Japanese, I was only able to find FC Gifu , which is not an independent source, and a bunch of database sources.  I can't find anything that would meet WP:SPORTBASIC #5.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and South Korea .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't seem to meet WP:SPORTBASIC , much less WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination; Korean Wikipedia is also a stub.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 15:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hein Potgieter: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Could only really find this .  More needed for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dr Ajay Kumar Singh: Subject isn’t inherently notable based on NPOL nor passes any of the other basic and general criteria.  Sources are either routine converses or dependent on the subject.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and India .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPOL , becoming an Mayor does not pass NPOL.  Sources are not strong and in-depth so fails WP:GNG .  Also I question the reliablity of LiveHindustan.  Grab Up - Talk 16:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Mayors are not "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to be shown to pass WP:NPOL #2 on the amount of substance that can be written and the amount of sourcing that can be shown about their political impact — but this amounts to "he is a mayor who exists, the end", and is not referenced anywhere close to well enough to get him over the bar.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mayor of an area with a population of 700,000 plus people suggests notability, but I don't find coverage of this person.  If sources can be located, willing to revisit my ! vote.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPOL , becoming an Mayor does not pass WP:NPOL .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 06:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Ajay Kumar Singh (Uttar Pradesh politician) : The mayor seems to be the same person as the member of the 17th Legislative Assembly of Uttar Pradesh.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 10:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] On the other hand, Dr Ajay Kumar Singh is apparently some kind of doctor, and the member of the state parliament doesn't claim to be.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 19:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL .  The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician is not enough to warrant a page on the subject.  There is no in-depth significant achievement notable.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete