hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Voluntas necandi : Uncited for 14 years.  I can't find any significant coverage discussing this concept (quite a few very brief mentions).  I would prefer a merge (amounting to a mention given the article is two sentences) and redirect but I can't think of where to.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 09:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Law .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 09:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge without prejudice to animus nocendi , where it is already discussed.  The term is used in Italian books that seem to be discussing the intention to commit homicide [34] [35] (see especially the section heading on pages 726 and 1679 respectively).  Cf the expression "animus necandi" which certainly means the intention to commit homicide [36] [37] ).  I think it would probably be a good idea to add "animus necandi" (which seems to satisfy GNG) to the article as well.  We do not presently have an article on voluntas [38] .  James500 ( talk ) 23:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am apparently stupid, because I somehow did not notice that article existed (despite the fact this one links to it...).  Yeah that's a great target.  Should I withdraw this then?  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 00:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no objections to you doing that if you wish.  I have no objections to you immediately merging the article if you wish.  James500 ( talk ) 01:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Kevin Brown (defensive tackle) : No significant coverage.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and American football .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG with no WP:SIGCOV .   Willing to reconsider if coverage is made available so please ping me.  Frank Anchor 15:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Changed to keep per sources added by Alvaldi.  Frank Anchor 18:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete never made it past a practice squad so never had an NFL career.  ArcAngel (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per source improvements.  ArcAngel (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:GNG with sources from his college career.  Found this on Newspapers.com [24] , then couple of articles in the Los Angeles Times covering him, Brown Tests Well but Aims Higher , Brown’s Working His Way Back In and one from the Orange County Register .  @ Frank Anchor : @ ArcAngel : , what's your take on them?  Alvaldi ( talk ) 10:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per sources found by Alvaldi.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Alvaldi's sources.   Admittedly they are a little light individually.   But the LA Times coverage counts as one source for GNG purposes and put these two articles together, not to mention additional minor coverage from the LA Times I found on newspapers.com and the LA Times seems to have given him significant coverage.   So that is 2 sources with significant coverage plus what I would call intermediate coverage from the Orange County Register, and I think he just clears the GNG bar.  Rlendog ( talk ) 19:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Pavel Šulc : Despite the corresponding CZ Wikipedia article being longer, from what I can read, the secondary sources listed there only contain brief mentions on Pavel Šulc himself; nothing in-depth to pass WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG .  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 09:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Czech Republic .  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 09:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , unquestionable notability.  The player had a breakout season this year, and is covered week after week after week (examples from one news outlet).  Who has time to sift through it all?  I started making some additions as to how the player had made his mark.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Currently the top scorer of the 2023–24 Czech First League season, member of Czech Republic national football team .  This nomination is a bad joke.  FromCzech ( talk ) 10:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Per above.  Apparently mistaken appointment.  Svartner ( talk ) 12:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article could certainly be improved, but the player is clearly notable now, [33] , [34] , having played for the national team, etc.  Govvy ( talk ) 14:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Very surprising nomination.  This is a clearly a notable subject.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as above, obviously notable, awful nomination.  Giant Snowman 17:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I agree with everything that has been written above apart from the nominator's statement.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ontario Express : No significant coverage found when searching for the company.  Article has been unsourced since December 2009.  Retracting my nomination.  Sources have been tracked down, thanks to Sunnya343.  Many thanks!  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 18:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Travel and tourism ,  and Aviation .  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 18:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I found sources in the ProQuest database by searching "Ontario Express" "Canadian Airlines" .  Here are some examples: [4] , [5] , [6] .  Sunnya343 ( talk ) 22:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you.  I'm unable to access these, unfortunately.  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 23:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I altered the links if that helps.  [1] is a Toronto Star article about the airline ending flights to Hamilton, [2] is a piece in The Globe and Mail about them buying new aircraft, and [3] is an Ottawa Citizen article about the airline beginning operations.  Sunnya343 ( talk ) 19:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] By the way you should have access to ProQuest through the Wikipedia Library if you meet these requirements .  Sunnya343 ( talk ) 19:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah, okay!  I didn't even realize the Wikipedia Library was a thing - I'll get that set up!  Once I can get those sources in, I'll retract my nomination.  Thank you so much!  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 21:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Muriel Frost : Does not meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ray Ashcroft : I did a BEFORE to see if I can add or cite anything, but I can't find any sources published about the subject himself.   From what I can tell, WP:NACTOR is also a reach, as most roles linking here seem to be guest starring appearances or supporting/minor roles.   The more significant ones only appear to possibly be Truckers (he's a bit further down the IMDb credit list, so not sure there) and Birth of the Beatles (maybe?).   If you find anything, please ping me, as I'm happy to withdraw if my search was simply insufficient.  2pou ( talk ) 18:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ 2pou : His roles in The Bill, in the Beatles biopic as Ringo Starr, for example, can be called significant.  Added a few other things.  And will add more.  Honestly, he seems to meet fairly the criterion for actors.  Best,- My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  2pou ( talk ) 18:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Added a few sources for verification.  Can be improved but I think he meets WP:NACTOR , as having "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows". - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Theatre ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the additional information and sources provided by Mushy Yank.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 02:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - withdraw - I withdraw my nomination thanks to some of the work above.   We still need to remove his unsourced birthday, but that's easy.   - 2pou ( talk ) 08:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Elephant Community : I'm not sure this is notable.  - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 17:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 17:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Guatemala .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Can you clarify what you mean when you say the sources appear to be cherrypicked ?  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The party just won two seats in the parliamentary elections in Guatemala.  Of course it's notable.  Number 5 7 07:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- the sources already in the article are sufficient to meet GNG.  Nom's claim that the sources are "cherry picked" makes no sense.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 12:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WITHDRAWN .  I nominated this unable to find articles myself.  I realized that it's likely due to my locale settings, and just because I couldn't find sources doesn't mean sources were cherrypicked.  I jumped to a rash conclusion, likely because I had dealt with other nonsense articles the day I nominated this so I was still in that headspace.  - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 18:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
The Casino (film) : Source 4 is a personal blog about movie reviews, which is not created by a well-known movie critic.  日期20220626 ( talk ) 22:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  日期20220626 ( talk ) 22:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Added a few references from reliable sources.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets requirements. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Since sources have been added, I withdraw my request for deletion and the administrator can close this discussion.  日期20220626 ( talk ) 22:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Shibata Takumi (fund manager) : No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Basic business person resume/CV.   Of the 4 references, 3 are brief appointment announcements and one is a brief database type description.  North8000 ( talk ) 15:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Finance ,  and Japan .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Obvious Keep I wonder if North8000 did a WP:BEFORE search including sources in Japanese .  We're talking about the former CEO of a company with $250 billion under management.  [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] (and yes, I realize some of these are short but keep in mind Japanese is a much more concise language .  These results are just from the first couple of pages of results in a quick Google search btw.  DCsansei ( talk ) 10:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How about picking/pointing out 2 that cover him in depth.  North8000 ( talk ) 12:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep/withdraw The creator has increased it from 4 references up to 27 references.   They've also asked me to take a look at those/the article as they are away on vacation/holidays.  (IMO this mostly means analyzing all of the new references and finding the GNG-best ones per my request above).... happy to help someone enjoy their vacation/holidays and I did.   Most of the best looking ones are behind paywalls, but as a minimum there are many near-GNG references by top tier sources.    They have also expanded the article substantially with enclyclopedic content, also indicative of the addition of in-depth references.   While I can't vouch for the most rigorous-interpretation  GNG compliance, I have decided to switch to "keep/withdraw".   Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 11:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Early life of Mao Zedong : Coddlebean ( talk ) 09:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment can you please clarify the deletion rationale?   There are other articles that detail early lives of historical people.  Like Stalin , Cleopatra , Samuel Johnson , and Joseph Smith Oblivy ( talk ) 10:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- No valid deletion criterion provided, which is no surprise as clearly none applies.  Subject is clearly notable.  Mao's stature would probably support separate articles for each year of his adult life.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 11:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  No valid deletion rationale.  Even just Category:Early lives by heads of government (of which the article under discussion is a member) holds 43 articles across all subcats; this one isn't special.  Folly Mox ( talk ) 12:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  SK1, no intelligible deletion rationale.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : SK1, no valid rationale for deletion.  Not only is this a valid page split, it also outright passes WP:GNG as Mao's early life is very well covered.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep as no valid deletion rationale.  I tried to give the nominator a chance to explain, and I'd reconsider my vote if that opportunity is taken up.  Oblivy ( talk ) 02:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Neutral atom quantum computer : While the topic might become suitable for a page, it is too soon .  As yet there is no evidence of extensive citing or other secondary results (beyond science blogs).  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 10:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 10:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This page is still valid without the 2023 results.  Neutral atom quantum computers were proposed in the late 90s .  Vtomole ( talk ) 15:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : the term is well established in academic literature, including the prestigious Nature journal .  Current sourcing can be improved, but existing SIGCOV already establishes notability.  Owen× ☎ 15:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep it is clearly one of the main competing quantum computing architectures availables.  See people like QuEra Computing Inc. who have been working on that for a while.  The article is not the best but it can be improved.  Edit: This implementation can also be found in many textbooks. -- ReyHahn ( talk ) 23:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The Review paper has almost 3000 citation; the 2023 Nature article has 40 citations.  Johnjbarton ( talk ) 23:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am withdrawing my nomination as others feel it is notable.  Keep Ldm1954 ( talk ) 23:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Garib Mammadov : The subject is not a notable academic.  The subject heads the State Land and Cartography Committee (Azerbaijan) but it does not appear to be a cabinet-level position in Azerbaijan.  The page appears intended to promote the subject.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 13:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politicians ,  and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : It's extremely buried among all the other crap in this article, but the subject passes WP:NPOL as he served in the National Assembly (Azerbaijan) from 1995 until 1998 ( source ).  Curbon7 ( talk ) 20:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I missed that.  I agree that the article should be kept as he meets the notability reqs for a politician.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 16:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Deputy of the first convocation of the Milli Majlis of the Republic of Azerbaijan.  Atakhanli ( talk ) 15:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Gideon (film) : I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 13:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 13:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , found this [31] , under its Danish title.  Donald D23 talk to me 19:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , also found it listed as one of the top 10 Charleston Heston films at In Session [32] Donald D23 talk to me 19:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is also a review in Variety and one on TV Guide . — MY, OH, MY!  (mushy yank) — 21:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I speedy withdraw per Variety and TV Guide reviews.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 21:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep