hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
InstallJammer : The three sources provided in the article are solely from the official website of the software.  I was unable to locate credible sources that provide comprehensive and in-depth coverage of the topic, which are necessary for a standalone article.  Barseghian Lilia ( talk ) 19:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the bank page.  Moem-Meom ( talk ) 11:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 19:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPRODUCT .  I'm not sure what "the bank page" means in terms of a redirect.  If there is a suitable redirect, I would support that.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 01:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iligan Computer Institute : Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 15:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Philippines .  Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 15:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No good hits on GNews and GNews Archives.  No good alternative redirect target as well.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Electronix corporation : Can we move it to the draft or delete?  Tanhasahu ( talk ) 17:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Feel free to Delete, the company is no longer in business 76.192.65.129 ( talk ) 18:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Non-notable company.  Fails WP:ORG .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 10:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hmm.  I've found one source, Tilly, Chris; Carré, Françoise J. (2017).  Where bad jobs are better: Retail jobs across countries and companies .  New York: Russell Sage Foundation.  pp. 42, 62–63, 65–67, 94, 97, 108.  ISBN 978-1-61044-870-3 .  which seems reasonable.  Usually what we do for these older, poorly sourced articles where pretty much nobody would even know has been draftified is to reduce it to a stub of a few sentences, basically what can be verified to the sources and which tone would not be a problem, and then tagg it with the relevant Wikipedia:Maintenance tags.  Would this be acceptable to the two of you, Tanhasahu and Sgubaldo ?  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't have access to that book, but if that's the case, then sure.  The only mentions in the books I can find are very brief.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 15:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This doesn't establish notability as defined as WP:ORG .  Even doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Deletion will be better.  Tanhasahu ( talk ) 16:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, I'm having trouble finding anything else, might bump it to ARS though to see if they have any more luck.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 09:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Nevin (diplomat) : Fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 22:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Iceland ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I nominated quite a few of the diplomat articles I previously created for deletion, but I left this one out as there was coverage of his time in Malawi in the Nyasa Times and other Malawian sources.  : [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] [62] .  May be more available.  Unsure if this fails GNG.  Heavy Grasshopper ( talk ) 09:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the sources quoted above are merely Nevin making comments and not WP:SIGCOV about him.  He fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hugo Horn : Shinadamina ( talk ) 05:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Rugby league .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 05:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Single citation, fails notability.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 09:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahnaz Angury : Most of the coverage is articles written by her and not WP:SIGCOV about her.  Out of the sources supplied 2,3 and 6 are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Journalism .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Afghanistan and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete as it seems WP:TOOSOON in her career, although there is one feature article about her in The Chronicle (which quotes her but also includes some editorial prose which was presumably fact checked).  Happy to reconsider if another article is found, but at the moment the content itself also seems thin.  Draftification could be another option.  No prejudice if this article is recreated again in the future once there is more independent secondary coverage about her.  Doesn't satisfy WP:NJOURNALIST as I'm not seeing evidence that her work is widely cited (via Google.com.au and Wikipedia Library).  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 09:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's this brief mention [1] .  Plenty of mentions in the Daily Mail, which isn't an RS.  Hasn't met GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Re: Daily Mail , in this case the problem is that she wrote articles for them as well.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 18:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 05:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:JOURNALIST seems WP:TOOSOON .  Maliner ( talk ) 07:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:TOOSOON makes one think that in the future the article could be re-created, for which a history would be useful, but there is nowhere to redirect, I suppose.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 12:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TOOSOON Karnataka ( talk ) 22:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shervon Jack : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Caribbean .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - played international football and has significant GNG coverage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbo online ( talk • contribs ) 19:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Where are those sources?  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 22:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  I would also like to see the sources "Jimbo online" loosely referenced above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
VFX Festival : TLA (talk) 10:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Computing ,  and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andean new-age music : The only non-stub this article could develop into is a WP:COATRACK .  Mach61 ( talk ) 21:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Peru .  Mach61 ( talk ) 21:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not really a topic by itself.  Certainly there are Andean influences heard in some new-age music, but this stuff is not its own genre.  Binksternet ( talk ) 22:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Idiosincrático ( talk ) 12:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Archi & Meidy : GamerPro64 02:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Indonesia .  GamerPro64 02:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect to Yohanes Surya .  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 02:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:BOOKCRIT ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 16:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Ayurveda Company : All of the sources are press releases and routine coverages, which are not considered independent coverage.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 12:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources are mostly press releases and fluffy interviews, nothing reallly significant.   Hard to find other sources because of the company's generic name.   I would change my mind if someone could find something else.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is the only reference remotely close to meeting WP:ORGCRIT .  There are also some content farm pieces I removed from the page.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage except for one article in The New Indian Express.Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Colin Charles : We even delete Olympic competitors, and this beach volleyball player did not even reach that level.  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Dennis .  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edward Esene : The sources available (which you can go through) are PR and press releases.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 03:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 03:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Wholly promotional article about a person who doesn't passes the [[[WP:GNG]].  Sources are either passing mention, not even mentioning the subject or wholly insignificant coverage-wise.  Literally no citation to establish notability.  Originally moved to draftspace by nominator but was later moved back to mainspace by creator without going through the AfC process which was presumably the essence of the draftification.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 17:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Sporting Clube da Praia players : Let'srun ( talk ) 15:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Football .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  The player base from most of the club's history is completely impossible to verify , the list is utterly impossible to maintain and the vast majority of entries on the list would be amateur footballers that fail WP:GNG individually.  People that do meet GNG individually, and whose playing for SC Praia we have verified, can be collected in a category.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per similar AfD ( CD Travadores players ).  Svartner ( talk ) 22:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redundant list filled with unsourced materials and non-notable players.  X ( talk ) 18:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alhaqeqa Aldawlia : No independent secondary sourcing at all that I can find; the sources in the article are either database sources (Lyngsat, Jordanian government databases) excluded for notability by WP:ORGCRIT or fail verification entirely.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 18:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The editor who created this article has declared a conflict of interest with this subject so we must be especially vigilant to validate notability here.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 18:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Jordan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP .  Jake Wartenberg ( talk ) 18:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A TV channel that doesn't meet the general notability guidelines .  There is absolutely nothing to demonstrate notability and significance.  The four sources [3] , [4] , [5] , and [6] are vagues that doesn't even say anything credible or a handful about the station.  If not already in discussion or have exceeded the time, it could have been speedy deletion (A1).  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  17:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Glendora Historical Society : My WP:BEFORE brought up only passing mentions in newspapers and books (mainly event listings or credits for providing images).  Not opposed to merging/redirecting to Rubel Castle , which is notable.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 21:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and California .  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 21:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Docus : AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Companies , Technology , Armenia ,  and United States of America .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and improve - While I agree that the article reads a bit like an advertisement, I also believe that with a bit of an overhaul, the article can be made into a decent stub.  I found articles discussing the achievements of the company on Forbes and USA Today , so I don't think WP:N is an issue here.  Regards, Archives908 ( talk ) 01:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't check the USA Today article due to it being blocked in the EU, but the Forbes article is written by a contributor which is considered to be self-published.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 07:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Used a VPN to check, the USA Today article is also written by a contributor without editorial oversight.  Neither of these articles are relevant for asserting notability from my reading of them.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : sources are either not reliable, written by contributors or has no named author, and are clearly PR puff pieces.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete – There is sourcing, but I'm feeling WP:NEWSORGINDIA , and some of them anyway just basically quote directly quote via an interview.  USA Today/Forbes do not work here per WP:RS/P .  TLA tlak 00:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete