hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Clint Eastwood at the 2012 Republican National Convention: There is an article about the Political life of Clint Eastwood so I wouldn't have a problem with merge, although I think we should delete.  Desertarun ( talk ) 09:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Events , Politics ,  and Florida .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Of course it wasn't a speech, but he certainty made the news afterwards.  He was there for his entertainment value.  It was an Eastwood performance, what he does so well, this time at a political convention.  It was possibly more remembered than anything else that happened at the convention that night.   As such, he did what he was hired for, and had people talking about it for a long time afterwards.  We're discussing it now.  It's part of a series on Eastwood, and should remain as such.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep a very notable appearance which is still discussed years later.  Lightburst ( talk ) 19:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : WP:NOTNEWS is definitely a consideration, but there are sources from after the event: this one from over a year later , for instance.  Also discussed in a biography of Eastwood here , and in a 2013 book looking retrospectively at the 2012 campaign here .  To me, that's clear evidence that the notability of this event is more than that of a news story, even leaving aside the huge number of 2012 sources in the article.  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 20:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: per Lightburst Jack4576 ( talk ) 01:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep this is definitely a WP:LASTING event that is still mentioned today, 11 years later.  The 1st AfD from 2013 already looked at it as beyond WP:NOTNEWS .  – The Grid ( talk ) 01:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  If NOTNEWS, then why is it being discussed on the national stage 10 years later?  [14] .  Here's [15] a mention about it in 2020.  This in addition to coverage in later presidential election cycle years.  [16] , [17] I would support renaming, maybe to Clint Eastwood's empty chair speech .  Jacona ( talk ) 14:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm going to Withdraw this one.  Desertarun ( talk ) 14:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Pseudoneuroterus mazandarani: it doesn't have a taxonbar.  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  That someone hasn't added a taxonbar or wikidata yet isn't a reason for deletion, that's a WP:FIXIT situation.  The species clearly meets WP:NSPECIES having a valid name and in reliable sourcing, so this isn't even one we'd normally be debating.  KoA ( talk ) 14:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article could use some work but is properly sourced; this is a recognized species.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep No indication of invalidity.  @ Hongsy : would you please stop with these bad nominations?  Some understanding of what constitutes a valid name is required before wading into this area.  This is getting disruptive.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 15:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - notable per WP:NSPECIES -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 16:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep (or speedy keep ?) for all the sensible policy-based reasons above jengod ( talk ) 22:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Taygete citranthes: Hongsy ( talk ) 14:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Clearly meets WP:NSPECIES with not just a valid name in published sources but additional description.  It's not clear why these pages are being nominated at AfD.  KoA ( talk ) 14:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep seems well-sourced enough to pass WP:NSPECIES .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep No indication of invalidity.  @ Hongsy : would you please stop with these bad nominations?  Some understanding of what constitutes a valid name is required before wading into this area.  This is getting disruptive.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 15:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - notable per WP:NSPECIES -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 16:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  All species are notable and pass WP:NSPECIES .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Iris Wildthyme: While she seems notable in the fictional universe, she doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Literature .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Babu Karam Singh Bal: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unionrow ( talk • contribs ) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 20 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , India ,  and Punjab .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Can someone link the first nomination here?  Or is this the first AfD for this subject?  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 09:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Abraham Solomonick: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Withdraw nomination , my error.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Marullus (prefect of Judea): Not close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk ) 13:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 18 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , History , Israel ,  and Palestine .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - One of a series of notable Romans being nominated for deletion by this edtor.  See my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gessius Florus .  Undoubtedly notable.  AfD is not for article cleanup.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 14:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Automatically notable as a senior government official.  People will use this series of nominations as evidence that AFD is broken and that some people are more interested in deleting articles created by others than in building an encyclopedia.  I urge the nominator to withdraw these AfDs.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 15:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with you AfD is broken.  But I don't think I should be the example here.  I was more than enthusiastic to build an encyclopedia here, but that was soon crushed by the same reasons you are stating here.  I was simply trying to maintain consistency to some of the ludicrous deletions of people who I viewed as notable but admins just want WP:GNG met.  Heck many articles I created got deleted without the people caring.  But trust me I'm not doing this in any bad faith.  Serrwinner ( talk ) 15:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep Improper nomination.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 22:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep for the reasons already stated by Sirfurboy and Eastmain.  P Aculeius ( talk ) 23:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Obviously notable.  popo dameron ⁠ talk 00:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly notable.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Melki Sedek Huang: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 21:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Indonesia .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 21:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - appears to be a notable activist [15] with enough citations available to support SIGCOV.  Meets GNG.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 21:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep No indication that the nominator has reviewed the existing sources on the page or performed any other WP:BEFORE activities.  Jfire ( talk ) 23:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Law .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per WP:GNG, plenty of sources and coverage.   SIGCOV applies.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 07:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Mojtaba Abdollahi: I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the  article that contains the list of governors in Iran.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs ) 13:27, June 10, 2024 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Iran .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 14:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reformatted to add the missing article name by Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 14:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Each governor is automatically notable, so there is no reason to delete the article.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 14:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed .  Keep AlexBobCharles ( talk ) 18:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  I suggest we merge it to the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general if not delete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs ) 14:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment you don’t need a deletion nomination to achieve a merge.  In any case we have many other articles about Iranian governors, and saying you’d prefer a merge isn’t a deletion rationale.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I know.  That's why I suggest merge if not delete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs ) 14:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion has been offered, and the subject passes GNG.  Mccapra ( talk ) 17:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : Applications of WP:SKCRIT #1 and #3.  The nominator has failed to provide an accurate deletion rationale and has also failed to give intelligible grounds for content deletion.  The subject itself passes the general notability guideline .  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 17:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clearly notable per WP:NPOL .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 12:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Dirt (1979 film): QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Motorsport ,  and United States of America .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've added some references - the film received a national cinema relese it deserves an entry.  Britfilm ( talk ) 13:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or draftify - the sources at the moment demonstrate notability, and the fact that more have been added shows how the article is improvement and can be improved further.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 15:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Cisco Bradley: None of the sources in the article are independent.  From what I could find on google, nothing seemed to be totally independent or reliable.  Note: article creator is an editor who has declared a COI.  ––– GMH MELBOURNE 03:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Music ,  and Montana .  ––– GMH MELBOURNE 03:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Work has not made an impact through citations.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 03:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Book citations in musicology are extremely hard to find - what sources did you consult for this?  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The claim that "book citations in musicology are extremely hard to find" needs a source.  A look at GS for "Musicology" shows many references with well over 100 citations.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 01:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Keep Seem to meet WP:AUTHOR for authorship of some notable books.  Here's some reviews: The Legacy of Shaykh Da’ud bin ‘Abd Allah al-Fatani in Mecca and Southeast Asia Sevea, Teren.  Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde 172, no. 4 (2016): 545–48.  [31] Bruinessen, Martin van.  Journal of Islamic Studies.  Jan2018, Vol.  29 Issue 1, p103-106.  [32] BROWN, JARROD W, Southeast Review of Asian Studies Volume 39 (2017), pp. 159–87 [33] Fogg, Kevin W. Journal of Asian Studies.  Nov2018, Vol.  77 Issue 4, p1131-1132.  2p.  [34] ) Eric Tagliacozzo Volume44, Issue3.  Special Issue: Biblical Translating and Interpreting.  September 2018.  Pages 344-345.  [35] Universal Tonality: The Life and Music of William Parker Benjamin Barson, Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation, Vol.  15, No. 1, [36] Henry, Lisa,  Universal Tonality: The Life and Music of William Parker.  Library Journal, 03630277, Jan2021, Vol.  146, Issue 1 [37] Dietrich, K. R. Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries.  Nov2021, Vol.  59 Issue 3, p458-458.  1/4p — siro χ o 09:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- three books by two of the top presses in their respective fields (Duke for Jazz studies; UH for East/Southeast Asian studies), with significant numbers of reviews for the books that have been out long enough to have reviews found by Siroxo.  Definitely above the Average Professor test as a significant music researcher. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some of the above reviews and some others to the article.  I agree they're enough for WP:AUTHOR .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets our guideline for WP:AUTHOR Lightburst ( talk ) 14:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Bharatiya Janata Party, Mrghalaya: Title doesn't make any sense.  — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 11:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Meghalaya .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - WP:RfD might be the better venue.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Slappy and the Stinkers: Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM .  I cannot find any independent significant coverage of this movie.  (Article was deleted in 2008 by WP:PROD .)  Schazjmd (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator , and my thanks to the editor(s) who added the refs to the article.  My before obviously fell short in this case.  Schazjmd (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Schazjmd (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hmm.  Was reviewed in the New York Times , in Variety , in TV guide , by Roger Ebert, etc!  Sources about production and release abound.  So Strong Keep.  .  Will add(ed) those sources to the page but a withdrawal of this nomination would be appreciated and save other contributors' time, I should think.  Thank you. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 00:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per NFO #1, two nationally known critics, Ebert and Van Gelder.  Agree with @ Mushy Yank this AfD is a time-waster.  Oblivy ( talk ) 02:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:HEY .  As it turned out, the nomination was both sloppy and a stinker.  (I gamble that you have some self-deprecating humor on this.)  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Historiography of Indigenous genocide: This is sort of an essay, the contents of which is just describing what approximately 10 different sources said about Genocide of Indigenous peoples , there is no real distinct topic here.  IMO a merge into that article should be done although the material to merge would be commentary by ~10 sources on Genocide of Indigenous peoples and the sources themselves.  North8000 ( talk ) 01:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and North America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  This is specifically about historians writing about the genocide as opposed to the genocide itself.  Instead of deleting this or merging this into the 300K byte main article Genocide of Indigenous peoples , the historiography material there could be merged into this article.  Yuchitown ( talk ) 14:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Yuchitown [ reply ] Keep I'd like to withdraw this nomination.    Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 12:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
St. Kateri Tekakwitha Catholic Secondary School: TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 02:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator .  @ Eastmain added sources.  TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 02:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Christianity ,  and Canada .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Understandable, I just kind of assumed all high schools had a page because all of them seem to :) CommieKarlovy ( talk ) 02:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some references.  The school passes WP:NSCHOOL .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Whew, thanks!  I will see how can I retract this AFD nom.  TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 02:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator .  @ Eastmain added sources.  TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 02:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep