hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ishq Nachaya: Tagged for notability since 2016.  PROD removed with zero improvements.  Donald D23 talk to me 21:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan .  Donald D23 talk to me 21:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Previous PROD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources found are limited to passing mentions.  [8] , [9] , [10] DareshMohan ( talk ) 21:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:50, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bapari: CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Haiti and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There are several good citations papermag , Rarepeace (interview, but has a good intro that can be used towards notability, 2 writeups in Resident Advisor RA1 , RA2 .  RA is a well known publication for EDM artists.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 02:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The references you cite are the exact issue here.  The first two are interviews, the second two are mentions and from an unreliable sources.  Please see WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:BLPSOURCES .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The interviews both have an intro which contribute towards overall notability per WP:BASIC which states if there are not enough in-depth articles, they can be combined to demonstrate notability.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 23:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  The sources listed above come the closest to meeting guidelines, but they fail Source eval: Promo interview >> https://www.rarepeace.com/post/exploring-music-producer-bapari-and-the-brand-new-single-fusion Promo interview >> https://www.papermag.com/bapari-no-sesso-nyfw-2020x-2640307739.html Promo review for a song, nothing meets SIGCOV for the artist >> https://ra.co/reviews/33713 Track listing, nothing meets SIGCOV for the artist >> https://ra.co/features/3951 BEFORE and article found sources are either promotional or off-topic mentions.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 19:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  The lone keep vote was rendered irrelevant by the pointing out of the fact that the sources are just interviews, or mentions in unreliable sources.  Zaathras ( talk ) 14:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Off-wiki canvassing for this topic.  - here .  Zaathras ( talk ) 14:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Johnnie Walker RV: Only claim to fame appears to be having once been featured in a tv episode.  Pepper Beast (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Business ,  and United States of America .  Pepper Beast (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is all I can find [6] .  Non-notable car/RV dealership.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV as it stands.  User:Let'srun 16:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Petrus Kilian: Article contains 1 citation and would seem unlikely to have others.  Appears WP:1E .  Fails WP:GNG , WP:ANYBIO .  Cabrils ( talk ) 03:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ralph René: Of the sources given, two are from subject's own website, three are IMDB TV listings, and two are patent sheets.  No secondary sources.  Rift ( talk ) 07:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The IMDb listings are a bit misleading; I think the editor who added the citation to The Truth Behind the Moon Landings: Stranger Than Fiction intended to cite the documentary itself, not its entry on IMDb.  However, René's appearance in a documentary is not independent coverage of him, and the same goes for an appearance on Penn & Teller.  My BEFORE search yielded mentions in two articles, both of which appeared in numerous publications: 1 and 2 .  I would argue that they are both passing mentions, as neither cover René in particular detail or with any attention beyond briefly presenting his views as an example of moon landing conspiracies.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 09:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Reading the article, it's clear that almost the entire thing is based on the subject's self-promotion.  Sources confirm does not meet WP:BASIC — siro χ o 11:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  They placed a reflector on the moon, and we have photos from orbit of the landing sites.  This appears PROMO, but he's been deceased for over a decade now, may he rest in peace.  I see no sourcing we can use, beyond proof he was on TV a few times.  Heck, I've been on TV.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] While I very much agree that the moon landing was not staged, I don‘t think that directly affects notability of this individual.  You know, even if it turned out that the moon isn‘t real, that wouldn‘t make them notable.  I guess.  [ FBDB ] Actualcpscm ( talk ) 16:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Deleting for lack of any coverage in RS is the reason.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lucylena Martínez: All that my searches produced were passing mentions ( 2011 , 2012 , 2015 , 2018 , 2022 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 21:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Women's football in Cuba is not something that will, under almost any circumstance, appear significantly in media sources available to the rest of the world.  A dozen national team caps and at least six references, in my view, should be sufficient evidence of notability given the context of the article's subject.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Passing mentions as the nom indicates.  [1] is typical.  Searching . cu websites brings up 8 articles, all match/team reports, where she's mentioned but not described beyond a mention.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roma Italian School of Algiers: The Italian version of this article and searches by its Italian name don't yield much.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 14:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Algeria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Europe ,  and Bosnia and Herzegovina .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my rationale in my previous nomination, literally irredeemable list.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia is not a TV guide.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kennedy, Ontario: – dlthewave ☎ 02:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada .  – dlthewave ☎ 02:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  There was some prospecting activity in the township, I think, but I don't know if there was ever a mine.  The Algoma Central Railway must have had some reason for locating a station here, but I can't tell what it was.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see anything about a station, I assumed "railway point" just referred to the siding.  – dlthewave ☎ 01:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's a dot on a map, where trains can sometimes be found.  It's named only because there is a siding there and some prospecting was done, but nothing these days.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It's just a railway siding, not a community with buildings or residents for the purposes of being able to pass WP:GEOLAND , and is referenced entirely to WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (maps and directory entries) rather than notability-building reliable source coverage about it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence that this is anything more than a railway siding, and there is no reliable sourcing to establish notability.  Fails WP:GEOLAND .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 17:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election: Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it.  Should be recreated closer to the election, once actual sources start discussing it.  For similar recent AfDs, see - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Next_Goa_Legislative_Assembly_election (July 2022), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Goa Legislative Assembly election (2nd nomination) (2 April), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Goa Legislative Assembly election (19 May), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election (19 May) There are some sources that vaguely talk about this election, but they're all in passing or in context of other elections - [19] [20] [21] Soni ( talk ) 13:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  Soni ( talk ) 13:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Next elections pass WP:CRYSTAL .  I'm not sure what makes this one different.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There will be a number of duplicate comments on this given how 5 different AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read).  So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation of NCRYSTAL and similar on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Assam Legislative Assembly election instead of replying the same things 5x.  I'll keep finding sources or replying about sources in each specific AFD.  Soni ( talk ) 23:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not ready for Mainspace, it's WP:TOOSOON .  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 07:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:TOOSOON .  Way down in the future and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it a collection of unverifiable content.  RangersRus ( talk ) 11:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WFKB-LD: This technically survived a bulk AfD earlier this year but there is a lack of sourcing to show this meets WP:N .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Michigan .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Surviving that 140-plus article AfD was a mere technicality, since it that intermingled a handful of potentially-indeed-notable stations with, for instance, the numerous DTV America/HC2/Innovate stations that may have only actually been licensed for ~five years and barely operated even in that timeframe before the license was turned back in.  This station falls under the latter category .  I cannot imagine that the requisite significant coverage exists here.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of American scientists: We have much more selective categories (by field by century, by field by state,...), there is no need for this overarching list.  Broc ( talk ) 06:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Science , Lists ,  and United States of America .  Broc ( talk ) 06:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Split article into a list of lists, specific to scientific categories, per nom.  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 06:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mjks28 this is an alphabetical list, how do you propose to split it?  Broc ( talk ) 06:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would propose to split the article into different subsections of science; i.e. one for psychologists, one for biologists, one for chemists, etc, and make this article a list of those lists, sort of like Lists of celebrities .  Mjks28 ( talk ) 06:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This would be an effort completely unrelated to the existing page, as it would not be a simple WP:SPLIT but would require a complete re-evaluation of all entries in the list.  Creating lists by topic could be done by simply using categories as a starting point, without needing the existing list.  In my opinion the suggested "split" is not feasible.  Broc ( talk ) 09:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see.  In that case, I'd agree with deletion.  Mjks28 ( talk ) 10:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , for much the same reasons as for deleting the List of British scientists just above.  Athel cb ( talk ) 08:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete While creating new lists for American chemists, etc. may be an appropriate narrowing of topics, I see no need use the existing list in any way.  Recreating it as a "Lists of" or other navigation page is welcome, but again it's not necessary to use any of the current page as a starting point.  Reywas92 Talk 15:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexi Áñez: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this eight-sentence story about her Achilles injury.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 14:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 21:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International Youth Soccer in Niigata: No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   A youth soccer tournament.    Refs look to be self-coverage by the association plus results/stats of games.   Text is just "it exists" factoids.  North8000 ( talk ) 20:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Football ,  and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt non notable youth event.  This is the 2nd AFD for it, so WP:SALTing seems like a decent idea to me.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 22:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT - per previous AFD.  Giant Snowman 22:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per previous arguments.  Doesn't passes WP:GNG .  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 10:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  And I support salting.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete