hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
MPM Govt High School, Adavimallanakeri: The references do not indicate that the subject passes the general notability guideline or the notability guideline for organizations , and a quick search for sources turned up nothing to disprove that.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Karnataka .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : None of the sources meet WP:SIGCOV , and the single sentence of article barely makes grammatical sense.  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 06:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No sources found (outside the ones provided by the article).  No prejudice towards a redirect to Advimallanakeri as well.  Sohom ( talk ) 19:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No reliable sources have been found to establish the notability of this government school.  Generally, there is limited reporting on government schools in India, except in some special cases.  Grabup ( talk ) 08:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Again, this page too has poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Andesikuteb Yakubu: H-index on G Scholar is 7 and 6 since 2018.  Creator disputed DRAFTIFY process.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 12:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 12:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 22:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  ミラP @ Miraclepine 01:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not appear to pass WP:PROF and no evidence of special prominence in Nigerian society that would counter that.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 16:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Kakande: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: My instinct is to support deletion, though a single by the subject was in the top 50 in Italy in summer 2006, which makes me wonder if a dedicated editor could scrape together enough sources.  Without assessing reliability, here are some Italian-language sources I found in a few searches if anyone would like to attempt a salvage exercise: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 .  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 20:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing found is Soundcloud, Rate Your Music, MySpace, Last.fm...  None of which are RS or useful here.  No coverage for this musician.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Liam and Me: Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , United States of America ,  and Pennsylvania .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: This has been recreated multiple times after speedy deletions and the "previous AfD" is a comment objecting to one of the earlier deletions, so I'm treating this as not eligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Salt No indication of significance.  Streaming and social media links are non-existant.  Don't seem to have any fans originally.  Just a small obscure band some fans want preserve the memory of them.  Wikipedia is not the place for it.  Discogs doesn't even list their album, which never went anywhere.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 07:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Social media and other primary sources do not count toward notability, and this group doesn't even have that.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 22:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete couldn't find any sources to indicate notability.  Sources in the article do not count towards GNG.  Willbb234 23:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simpplr: WP:CORP does not appear to be met.  SmartSE ( talk ) 17:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Software ,  and California .  SmartSE ( talk ) 17:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carmen Laura García: In CAT:NN for 14 years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Spain .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Nothing found meeting WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE found name mentions and promo, nothing meeting WP:SIRS.  // Timothy :: talk 03:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree.  Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Himalaya International School: Database listings in Uniapply and Justdial are the best sources that I can find, which prove existence but not notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Madhya Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 14:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Normal school.  Fails GNG and ORG.  BEFORE showed this is a normal school and has normal school news, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 04:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ethan Clark Marshall: The article says nothing about significant coverage , and the references do not show significant coverage, because the first three of them do not appear to refer to the subject by name.   The fourth and last reference could not be viewed because it was flagged as unsafe, which means that it is definitely a different type of unreliable source.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 skysports.com About the league competition - Did not find mention of subject Yes No ?  No 2 swfc.co.uk About the team - Did not find mention of subject Yes No ?  No 3 gtfc.co.uk Did not find mention of subject Yes No ?  No 4 www.bostonunited.co.uk Web site detected to be unsafe due to malware ?  No No No There is also a draft.   The draft can be left alone when the article is deleted.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable player at this point in time -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 14:48, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify , a 2007 that's already on the fringe of playing will get coverage in no time. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 20:41, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ramón Mendezona Roldán: Boleyn ( talk ) 21:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: as non-notable.  Agree with nominator.  After I tagged it for sourcing earlier I watchlisted it.  I thought about PRODDING but I certainly support deletion.  Nirva20 ( talk ) 21:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 23:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism , Radio , Military , Politics , Spain ,  and Argentina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hariyo Party: It was recreated again without sources.  A WP:Before search produced nothing.  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , without prejudice against recreation if and when it's sourced properly.  Political parties can have articles that show passage of WP:ORGDEPTH through WP:GNG -worthy reliable source coverage about them in real media, but are in no way "inherently" notable enough to get automatic inclusion freebies without adequate sourcing — and that goes triple for newly-founded political parties that don't even have any legislative representation in the relevant legislature at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Nepal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've struggled to find any sourcing in English or Nepali to even confirm the party's existence.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 01:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per above.  Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 20:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karizan-e Sofla: Hongsy ( talk ) 08:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran .  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] From WP:GEOLAND : Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tałty SHR: There is simply no evidence that this is a real thing, or even what SHR might stand for.  No such entity is included in the Polish regulation on place-names.  There is no corresponding PL Wiki article.  It appears to be just the name Tałty plus three random letters.  There is reliably sourced here to merge, and no reason to redirect either.  Fails WP:V , WP:GEOLAND FOARP ( talk ) 15:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  SHR is what is described at pl:SHR ; this is somewhere in Tałty (or it was), but I could not find anything about its status as a settlement.  Peter James ( talk ) 13:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Okay, so this was a state farm.  FOARP ( talk ) 18:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nice job decoding what SHR was.  TL;DR it seems to have been a company located in or near the real village of Tałty .  It does not seem notable.  No pl wiki interwiki.  It does not exist in pl:TERYT .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New Shah Faiz Public School: No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  33ABGirl ( talk ) 17:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yubaraj Khatri: Of course, the PROD was removed by the article subject, so here we are.  According to the relevant ANI thread (which is how I found out about that page), the article has one possibly reliable source and zero reputable sources .  If the subject is notable, it might be worth TNT -ing the article.  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 04:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Nepal .  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 04:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  As someone who was also born in an ordinary family , it's quite disappointing to see.  But it must be done.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 06:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedied .  Promotional autobiography.  Bishonen | tålk 08:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Badun: - UtherSRG (talk) 00:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Denmark .  UtherSRG (talk) 00:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I successfully PRODed this article after I couldn't find any sources showing NMUSIC was met.  As the sources added after undeletion consist of a wordpress blog and discogs listings, I remain convinced of that.  Mach61 02:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : this page appears to be the pet project of the editor Janusnovak.  Janus Novak also happens to be the name of Badun's drummer, so we may have an undeclared COI here.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 23:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Julia McNamara: Spinixster (chat!) 12:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 12:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I couldn't find any sources, bar potentially one book, which is nowhere near enough to constitute a whole article.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J.A.M. Awards: Sources include dead links and 404 errors.  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 19:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions .  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 19:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Music .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , appears to have been a single year concert.  With the periods, I don't see this as helpful redirect to the artist, but wouldn't oppose one if consensus forms.  Star Mississippi 02:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Little Rock Indian School: Nothing to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Karnataka .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Other than routine coverage, no other sources found that are NSCHOOL-worthy.  Tails Wx 03:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pere Egbi: Acting notability requires two major roles.   He has had one in The Perfect Arrangement .   His other roles have not been major.   One of the references is blocked by antimalware software, and so was not checked, but can be inferred to be unreliable.   Two of the references are reviews of the movie in which he acted.   They are significant as to the film, but not as to him.   One of the references is a vanity site that displays celebrity biographies.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 legit.ng A celebrity bio web site Probably not Yes ?  No 2 ideaslane.com Online community for students, may be providing biography hosting Probably not Yes ?  No 3 www.thefamousnaija.com Blocked by antimalware software ?  ?  No No 4 premiumtimesng.com Review of The Perfect Arrangement (film) Yes Not about the subject Yes Yes 5 www.pulse.ng Another review of The Perfect Arrangement Yes Not about the subject Yes Yes 6 pmnewsnigeria.com Announcement of nomination for an award Probably not Yes Yes No There is also a draft that is the same as this article.   The draft can be left alone and possibly improved.   The article can be deleted.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 05:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Ice hockey , Nigeria ,  and United States of America .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 05:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources.  He has only starred in one notable film and I do not think that alone is enough to warrant a stand-alone article.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  16:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Baedeker on nom source evaluation.  Sources in article and before showed nothing with sigcov.  // Timothy :: talk 20:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete