hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Spoon Murder 2 : Search reveals IMDb and YouTube but not much sigcov.  To avoid 'to and fro' with draftspace, a discussion is warranted, although it could be a candidate for 'speedy'.  Eagleash ( talk ) 22:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Belarus .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This film is mentioned in Russian-language articles about Belarusian cinema in 2014.  There is an article on kinopoisk (not a wiki format, the administration adds the information) 46.204.76.68 ( talk ) 00:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This film is mentioned in Russian-language articles about Belarusian cinema in 2014.  There is an article on kinopoisk (not a wiki format, the administration adds the information) 46.204.72.10 ( talk ) 23:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2022-11 ✗ R2 -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 20:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from IS RS. ru and be wp's do not have articles on subject.  // Timothy :: talk 10:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV in English.  I attempted to search in Russian and failed to find SIGCOV but recognize my abilities are weak.  If significant sources are found, please ping me.  Jacona ( talk ) 01:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of National Cadet Special Activities : Selectively merge any useful links to the main article and delete this list which provides too much detail.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 17:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 17:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NLIST and GNG.  Every list entry is OR.  // Timothy :: talk 16:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2014–15 NCHL season : No sources to justify notability for the season itself, and given that the league itself was deemed non-notable, I doubt there will be much argument for keeping an individual season of that league.  fuzzy510 ( talk ) 16:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey and Canada .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: NN season of an NN loop just a cut above a beer league, and which was deleted eight years ago.   Good catch.  Ravenswing 17:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: The league fails to meet WP:GNG .  Flibirigit ( talk ) 15:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tolani Alli : See WP:NOTINHERITED .  Nothing stands out as notable.   Previously draftified.  Moved to mainspace immediately after an AFC decline with no changes, so little point in sending back to Draft 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Nigeria .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , coverage looks significant, seems to pass GNG.  Although needs to be cleaned up and categories added. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 03:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : While I am not going to vote, I would say the subject is not notable but having another look, the subject has been awarded with the 5th highest National Honor in Nigeria being Order of the Federal Republic .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 14:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nominator.  The sources are merely passing mentions, apart from news of her appointment here .  Another is an article which i consider PUFF piece in disguise of interview here .  Generally there's no WP:SIGCOV on the subject.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 10:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Coverage is promo or passing mentions, nothing significant.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 23:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simon Bolze : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not seeing GNG in SA newspapers.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sweet Something : The article creator moved the article today from being about an event ("2023 Sweet Something burglary") to being about the bakery, which is a bog-standard local bakery with no non-local coverage.  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 23:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Crime , Companies ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence it meets N:ORG, and the burglary didn't move the needle.  Star Mississippi 03:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I love reading stories like this one - but not in an encyclopedia.  Neither the bakery nor the event have enduring notability.  Owen× ☎ 19:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment As I have to agree with others above.  I'm not sure what guideline was it, but this seems like one of those one-off events and certainly no lasting notability.  -- Whosethose ( talk ) 05:16, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We don't technically have a WP:CORP1E policy, but if you just say "1E", the cool kids will know what you're talking about.  ;) Owen× ☎ 20:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kemar Scott : Unable to find sufficient coverage from reliable, third-party sources.  Fails WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International Civil Engineering Symposium : Googling was a bit trickier, as multiple events of this exact name exist, even in India.  But having gone through all search results I found, there is no RS to support WP:GNG here.  Soni ( talk ) 02:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and India .  Soni ( talk ) 02:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted at AFD, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a non-notable event unless independent coverage is found.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 16:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacking independent coverage to meet GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of ReliaQuest Bowl broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources that is not a dead link per WP:RS ; one is a WP:PRIMARY of one of the teams, three of those are about the Bowl games in general, one is about the BCS National Championship.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the sources provided above fall under WP:ROUTINE and are not effective to complete WP:LISTN .  This is a trivial list and does not withstand the WP:SIGCOV to remain as an article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This doesn't meet WP:LISTN as this grouping is not covered in secondary sources Let'srun ( talk ) 14:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Urdu Globally : HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 16:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marat Sharipov : Being a highly ranked Russian tennis player doesn't inherently mean notability as has been mentioned in the argument against PROD.  Adamtt9 ( talk ) 22:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is the winner of thirteen ITF tournaments, five in singles!  He is among the top-10 Russian men's singles tennis players!  Two-time champion of Russia in doubles (2022, 2023) [1] .  Zboris ( talk ) 23:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What has any of that got to do with WP:NTENNIS or WP:GNG ?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Two-time champion of Russia in doubles (2022, 2023)!!! Zboris ( talk ) 17:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Tennis ,  and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing really notable here.  Winning minor-minor league events against a lot of teenagers is not notable.  If he steps up to the minor league Challenger level tour and wins an event or two, then we can take a re-look.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 09:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC , WP:NTENNIS , and WP:SIGCOV .  Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON .  If he starts winning some tournaments in a higher league, or sets some sort of recognized Tennis record as described in WP:NTENNIS it can always be recreated.  4meter4 ( talk ) 19:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
True Britt : Claim of being " best selling " is not held up.  Contents of the article has no commentary on the book (sales figures, reviews etc) and just has a few quotes, with subjective inferences.
 Current sources are the book itself and a broken link to blogspot.  Only reviews I could find were on GoodReads and such ( NYT review about different book - happens to mention title in headline - that took me a while to figure out) .
 The book may or may not be a valuable source for the Britt Ekland article, but doesn't warrant an article of its own.  -- D'n'B - t -- 13:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women . -- D'n'B - t -- 13:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - a page entirely lacking in independent and reliable sources .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Britt Ekland : It was verifiable that the book is on existence.  I would say the best option is to redirect to the author since it's always with WP:PRESERVE and ATD.  Yes!  There is a problem of SIGCOV and WP:NBOOK , but that shouldn't be a "wake up call" to deletion.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Likewise the nominator, the author is a notable writer or in related field, and so, her book should be a redirect prior to what we see happens in such cases on Wikipedia.  There could be in the future detailed reference to the book.  So, redirecting to the main author is the 'perfect' way to justify this deletion discussion.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  08:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't understand this.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The book was mentioned in the media, but mainly by conveying gossip, so the reliability and significance is questionable.  For the same reason, I don't think it should be redirected.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanain : The lat/long mentioned on each article are just 1 km apart, confirming that they are the same place.  NS-Merni ( talk ) 12:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Armenia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as a redundant duplicate.  small jars t c 01:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Delete dup.  // Timothy :: talk 05:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guy Mutton : Could find no significant coverage under his name or nickname.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Inadequate sources.  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 11:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per the above points.  The sources do not demonstrate WP:GNG , nor is there sustained coverage.  Editing84 ( talk ) 11:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - we almost always delete contestants on reality TV shows, except for win/place/show.  This guy (pardon the pun) came in 9th.  Bearian ( talk ) 13:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all reviewers.  A Newsbank database search failed to find any WP:RSs , with the most recent article being 2013, in the regional newspaper The Gold Coast Bulletin , which fleeting mentions his involvement in a Year 5 school play as a primary school sports teacher (and Australian Idol finalist).  I can't see this meeting WP:GNG , WP:ANYBIO , WP:MUSICBIO , and if it was going to, then it should have by now, some 14 years since his Australian Idol appearance.  Cabrils ( talk ) 01:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Resignation of Lance Hindt : While I have seen the viral video and find the story absolutely wild, Wikipedia is not a newspaper and should not be used as a venue to host local news content.  Novemberjazz 21:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Education ,  and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - it absolutely does not fail WP:EVENTCRIT; it was absolutely a national story.  [32] [33] [34] [35] Reliable sources from around the country are easy to find.  Reducing the notability down to a viral video is an insulting strawman.  Red Slash 22:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:EVENTCRIT : it has no lasting effects and geographic scope is limited to one school district.  Wikipedia is not for writing about news stories.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 00:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete appears to be an attack page; the person would not be notable had the allegations been published.  A non-notable functionary otherwise; it's sad that the person cheated, but that's not notable.  Being a bully isn't notable either.  So we're left with his employment, a run of the mill school board trustee. .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Most sources of the event seem to talk about the legal troubles that happened after the end of employment; it's not a notable legal case either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ... even the most casual reading of the article would've revealed that he was a superintendent, not a trustee.  I'm also unable to figure out what you mean by "the person would not be notable had the allegations been published".  Red Slash 05:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is essentially a WP:BLP1E and is adequately discussed at Katy Independent School District#Lance Hindt , from which this content has been forked without necessary attribution .  No prejudice to a redirect back to the original content.  -- Kinu t / c 20:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The virality made this story television-news friendly.  Without social media this would've remained a localized event.  Let's not make Wikipedia a place to settle old disputes by publicly shaming alleged bullies.  The coverage of this story on the school district article even seems disproportionate.  Yammie2009 ( talk ) 01:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete