hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2023 IIHF World U18 Championship Division I: Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON , and so should be draftified, but that is no longer an option.  Onel 5969 TT me 10:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan , South Korea , Kazakhstan , Austria , Denmark , Estonia , France , Hungary , Italy , Poland , Slovenia ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  This article is part of a big series of articles.  See Category:IIHF World U18 Championship Division I .  Maiō T. ( talk ) 18:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Let's see if I understand this; this is a significant international championship due to be played in two weeks, and the nom couldn't find a single reliable source discussing it?   AfD is not cleanup, and I have trouble believing that the nom was unable to find a single source prior to filing this .  Ravenswing 18:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: I added [41] , [42] to the article which both give some significant coverage.   For what it is worth, once the 'A' tournament is played passionhockey.com will have a detailed article (in French) on that tournament because they do every year.   It may seem like a challenge to find sources because there are not english speaking countries involved and there is some variety in what writers may call the championship; search engines will generally fail unless you are creative.  I hope this helps.  18abruce ( talk ) 21:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per 18abcruce.  Kante4 ( talk ) 20:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep another disruptive and short sighted nomination for deletion from the nominator.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Marlese Durr: Limited coverage in reliable sources, other than the college's own publications.  Creator has self-moved from Draft space, so would support draftifying (if that is a word), to allow creator to continue work.  Mdann52 ( talk ) 05:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Mdann52 ( talk ) 05:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Social science , Michigan , New York ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails wP:Prof .  Small cites in GS in a high cited field.  WP:Too soon .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 06:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Keep .  Citation counts are low but that may be because of the field, and she still does have two triple-digit counts, making a weak case for WP:PROF#C1 .  Two edited volumes with three published reviews each make a weak case for WP:AUTHOR (weak because edited rather than authored).  President of two bluelinked academic societies could be a double pass of PROF#C6.  A bluelinked national-level award (and another major award from another society but not bluelinked) could be a pass of PROF#C2.  And if the SWS award is not counted towards notability directly, the SWS web page congratulating her and containing in-depth coverage of her career is therefore secondary (because it is only primary and non-independent if it is about the award) and counts towards GNG, as does the JBHE story, giving her a case for WP:GNG .  Each individual claim to notability here is arguable, but there are enough varied ones that I think they add up to a keep.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per David Eppstein above, plus, this subject passes WP:NPROF#5 .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I think being awarded the Jessie Bernard Award is enough for this article to stay.  Wolverine XI ( talk to me ) 15:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
John Kingsmill (actor): Boleyn ( talk ) 12:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You have this in The Sydney Morning Herald . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Austlit has 13 works about his works including in the Weekend Australian, the Sydney Morning Herald, the Age and the Canberra Times.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 23:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Yes, there are book reviews and more on WP:LIBRARY and the link above from

Discussion outcome: keep
Karthik Raj: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Tirishan ( talk ) 17:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Tirishan ( talk ) 17:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep satisfied WP:GNG , Led actor in many movies and received awards.  PARVAGE talk!  05:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , found sources: [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Vladyslav Yakubovskyi: Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 16:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article says that the businessperson did bad things, but everything seems to be referenced.  I don't think that this is a BLP violation.  The corresponding Ukrainian article has basically the same content.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article is translated from the Ukrainian Wikipedia.  It contains many non-authoritative sources that have also been transferred here.  -- Mantan Kali ( talk ) 09:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - no BLP violations, everything seems to be referenced?  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  21:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The problem is in non-authoritative references.  -- Mantan Kali ( talk ) 09:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm the admin who declined speedy deletion the second time, and advised that deletion should be through AFD.  I also said that I took a random sample of references and saw that they were fine.  I've had another look, and found references that, whilst backing up the text of the article, do not mention Vladyslav Yakubovskyi at all.  This gives the impression that (at best) this is WP:OR .  I have no problem with keeping the article, but a thorough check of all references needs to be undertaken.  The section I am referring to is Correspondence of Lev Parnas Stephen!  Coming... 11:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there is disagreement over sourcing and whether or not there exist BLP violations.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - no specificity in what the BLP violations are.  Sourcing seems adequate for the most part, although I would agree that the section around Parnas is potentially a reach in terms of what is relevant.  But AFD is not cleanup.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 21:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Lauren Senft: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Canada .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Subject meets the WP:GNG with [ [50] ] and [ [51] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - Excellent coverage in The Province and OK coverage in The Winnipeg Sun in the above links.   The latter is much thinner and seems to slightly focus on her partner, but it does turn towards her later, so I lean to find that sufficient to show that enough WP:NEXISTs to meet GNG vice NSKATE, despite the dearth citations to RS in the article itself.  - 2pou ( talk ) 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Museum of Foreign Debt: It does not even have a building of its own (note that the photo is the University, not the museum).  This page (an official page of Argentina and its topics) lists Argentine museums, and this one is not listed in it.  Cambalachero ( talk ) 17:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions .  Cambalachero ( talk ) 17:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Economics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Many hits in Gnews searching for the Spanish name of the museum, I'll have to look over them further, but most look ok Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This talks about the museum [22] as does this [23] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- There is a ton of significant coverage of this museum in reliable sources, as I discovered from my initial gscholar search.  In particular see: University, socio-economic history and identity: The Museum of Foreign Debt, a museum without a collection  by MARÍA DEL CARMEN MAZA & GRACIELA WEISINGER CORDERO in University Museums and Collections Journal Volume 5 – 2012.  https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/18578/fulltext.pdf? sequence=2#page=73 Nunca Más (Never Again).  The Museum of Foreign Debt by Finnegan, Brian in The Public Historian.  Santa Barbara Vol.  28, Iss.  2,  (Spring 2006): 113-117.  https://www.proquest.com/openview/3fcecce5062781529d45469df6b107ce/1? cbl=49186 Central and Adams ( talk ) 15:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: per forementioned reasons above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Dan Levenson (musician): Unref BLP.  Boleyn ( talk ) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Arizona ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A book was written about him, and he has written a book books about banjo playing.  I have started adding references, but I need to take a break now.  Stony Brook babble 22:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:HEY ; per WP:GNG —we have WP:SIGCOV from the independent and reliable St. Petersburg Times , from a trade journal and from the book written about him (and these refs barely scratch the surface of what is out there on this elderly prolific artist and educator—after taking another break I will look for more); and per WP:ARTIST #1 (cited by peers as an authority in his field) #2 (renowned for implementing popular field workshops for beginners all around the world) and #3 (large body of highly acclaimed instruction books).  Stony Brook babble 12:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 15:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP I think being the subject of a third-party book should qualify as notable.  True, McFarland are niche publishers, but it is nonetheless third-party coverage.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) keep with new sources added by @ StonyBrook this article should pass notability through WP:ARTIST #1.   Agree the Stern and Brooks book should weigh heavily.  Oblivy ( talk ) 01:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
À partir de maintenant: Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and France .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep covered in a book and others, as referenced in the Fr wiki article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The French article has a couple of reliable sources, also [27] , [28] , [29] .  Regards, Comte0 ( talk ) 14:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The album has been certified Gold for 100,000 units.  Europe22 ( talk ) 18:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Centre d'Etudes Diplomatiques et Stratégiques: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Education , Schools ,  and France .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly notable.  Clearly passes WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:GNG .  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as an accredited postgraduate school of national importance.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Stolen (Armstrong novel): No independent sources.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 20:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 20:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The inside cover [2] of one of Armstrong's other novels, Exit Strategy , contains excerpts from reviews of Stolen by the New York Times , Quill & Quire , the Toronto Star , Toronto Globe and Mail and London Free Press , which would mean it easily fulfills WP:NBOOK #1.  The Quill and Quire review is available online.  [3] Unfortunately, the archives of the other newspapers are all behind paywalls, so I can't verify them myself (but anyone with a Toronto library card should be able to access the Star and Globe and Mail ).  We shouldn't consider a book non-notable just because it was published before the modern Internet.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 12:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Reviewed by Kirkus among others.  Insufficient BEFORE.  pburka ( talk ) 13:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Patricia Quinn (disambiguation): Users can hardly know of its existence since it is not even hatnoted atop Patricia Quinn , where the hatnote only states, "For the American scientist, see Patricia Quinn (atmospheric chemist) . For similar names, see Pat Quinn (disambiguation) ."  If preferred, instead of deletion, Patricia Quinn (disambiguation) can simply exist as a redirect to the Pat Quinn dab page.  — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 17:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Lists of people ,  and Disambiguations .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question - When I started this DAB page there were three people named Patricia Quinn ( Patricia Quinn (Northern Irish actress) , Patricia Quinn (American actress) , and Patricia Quinn (scientist) ).  It looks like this was changed about a week ago and the set of names has changed.  Was there a reason for this?  Or can we shift the page back to its prior state?  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 18:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It was decided that the British/Irish actress was the primary topic, and the American actress would be better called "Pat Quinn".   So this page might be unnecessary, but we do have the two "see also" entries.  PatGallacher ( talk ) 18:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm leaning towards the view that these "see also" entries are not enough to justify having this page.  PatGallacher ( talk ) 18:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't really have strong feelings either way, but I am still a little confused.  What happened to Patricia Quinn (American actress) ?  She was lost entirely.  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 18:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh wait - I see, the American actress is now Pat Quinn, under the see also.  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There is no reason to exclude Patricia Quinn (American actress) from this page, merely because the subject also fits on another page.  "Pat" is her common name, "Patricia" is her given name.  BD2412 T 19:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Pat Quinn (American actress) 's name is Patricia (and the IMDB entry is in that name [20] ): there are three entries on the page. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I did a little digging at newspapers.com and discovered that Patricia Quinn the American actress wanted to be called Patricia, but the producer of her first hit movie didn't like the name and insisted she be called Pat. To me that's enough reason to keep all three names listed on a dab page. [1] DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 02:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Kleiner, Dick (1970-03-01). " 'Watermelon' turns sour" .  The Journal Times .  p. 16 .  Retrieved 2024-05-13 .  Keep several valid entries.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
J. N. Lummus: Sources only cover his political decisions.  iMahesh ( talk ) 05:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Politicians .  iMahesh ( talk ) 05:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There are books, photos, online articles, news stories, family archives, first-person narratives that all equate him in stature to Carl Fisher and John Collins regarding Miami Beach's development.  Modrums ( talk ) 21:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Lean keep - I'm finding several books that cover Lummus with more than a passing mention, though they are all focused on South Florida / Miami Beach.  He also seems to have had some notability in business as a banker.  Plenty of contemporaneous newspaper coverage.  Little national coverage, but sufficient that I think a short article is appropriate per WP:GNG .  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 13:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I started a discussion on the talk page as I have access to some sources but they might fall under the original research policy .  I'd like some guidance before I try to expand the article myself.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 20:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets GNG per above.  ~ EDDY ( talk / contribs ) ~ 13:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep