hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
War crimes by unconventional weapons: The "war crimes" were either not War crimes at the relevant time or were conducted by countries that were not signatories to the relevant international convention(s).  This selective retrospective application is non-encyclopaedic and does not belong here.  We already have a detailed page on War crimes and specific pages for various events and countries, where all relevant events should be listed.  Mztourist ( talk ) 04:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Mztourist ( talk ) 04:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:POVFORK .  Quite an effort really, not one actual war crime in the whole article.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Reads like list of military operations I dislike .  There seems to be no evidence that the vast majority of incidents were actually war crimes.  Googleguy007 ( talk ) 15:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as both POVFORK and BIAS.  Intothat darkness 17:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per pretty much all of the above.  There is really no way I can see to salvage anything here.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 21:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep 1- According to Wikipedia:Guide to deletion : “A failure to conform to a neutral point of view is usually remedied through editing for neutrality” So, with respect, if there is a POV, it is not a reason to delete the article.  2- I agree that events have a specific page and specific pages and I tried to list all of these on one page.  We can change the name of the article to The list of uses of unconventional weapons.  M1nhm ( talk ) 11:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Its not just your POV, its the fact that these events are/were not war crimes.  Mztourist ( talk ) 03:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] These events have happened in history and This list tries to collect them.  even if this not be war crime, we can change the name of the article to fix the problem, I did not understand why the article should be deleted.  M1nhm ( talk ) 07:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Just WP:SYNTH / WP:OR .  Jacona ( talk ) 17:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jillian Michaels (voice actress): This article was previously deleted when the only citation was to IMDb .  Now, almost all of the citations are to behindthevoiceactors.com , which appears to contain user-generated content .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 16:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Television , Video games ,  and Canada .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 16:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Behind the Voice Actors is apparently a reliable source (green per sourcetool), but it's simply a listing of works she's voiced.  No other coverage of any kind; Gsearch is straight to her website, which appears to copy the wording from here...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unfortunately this is not notable on the basis of WP:NACTOR .  As with WP:GNG there needs to be significant coverage about Michaels' work by reliable secondary sources, which currently doesn't exist in the article.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 22:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep While most of her roles are minor characters, she would seem to pass WP:NACTOR due to her major roles.  Namely, as Shippo, who is one of the main characters of Inuyasha - which she also played in numerous Inuyasha movies, and Lloyd Garmadon , a main character of Ninjago.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 07:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We still need SIGCOV even if she meets NACTOR.  Is there any that you know of?  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 16:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Urbana, North Dakota: And according to Origins of North Dakota Place Names , that was always the case: the station was built and got a post office, and a town was platted, but nothing ever came of it.  So just another NN rail spot.c Mangoe ( talk ) 21:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and North Dakota .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  From that source referenced in nom, it sounds like a potential redirect/merge could happen, though I don't know what the right target is.  There's value in covering the history of the railroads in the United States in a variety of different ways, and a list of verifiable defunct stops that had infrastructure is a nice idea, perhaps broken out by state or line.  — siro χ o 22:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:V / WP:GEOLAND given the lack of any reliable sources to verify the subject's existence.  There isn't any point in a merge, the article just says that the subject is an unincorporated community which we don't think is true.  Hut 8.5 07:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Urbana , Mangoe if there is sufficient evidence these were once named places why not just redirect to the township or county (probably the county) without an Afd?  fiveby ( zero ) 17:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have opposed this sort of redirect because we end up with lists within these articles which aren't true (that is, list of "communities") or the redirects go to places that don't tell you about this place.  Mangoe ( talk ) 23:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That makes sense, useless to redirect the reader if there is no county history section mentioning the place, and worse than useless to imply it's an existing community.  fiveby ( zero ) 04:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per Mangoe.  fiveby ( zero ) 04:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Mwe di Malila: Typical self promotion, as evidenced by private details and picture upload.  The TV appearance is on one episode of a scripted TV show.  The art show lasted two days at a room-for-rent gallery.  The article had been prodded before, hence the AfD.  Minderbinder ( talk ) 11:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO.  Non-notable artist with no references from RS found.  Many hits on the various parts of his name in gnews, but nothing for this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Democratic Republic of the Congo ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Self-promotion WP:SPIP -- Ben Ben ( talk ) 11:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kaagada: No hits on Google during my BEFORE except for a 2017 film .  Does not demonstrate notability at GNG or NFILMS.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I made necessary changes Haribly ( talk ) 19:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment one of the linked cast members died in 2011 .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 18:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Corrected Haribly ( talk ) 19:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 23:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : Fails WP:NFF .  Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk ) 13:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Star Wraith (video game): The problem is that, since the fall of the space combat genre, games of this genre have been minimally covered, and Star Wraith is no exception.  I am forcing users to review this article, as well as all others about other games in the Star Wraith series, which also suffer from the fact that they appeal only to niches in gaming.  The series, nonetheless, seems notable enough that its article may be kept.  Eurogamer ran a feature about Bower's 30-year-plus efforts to deliver space sims.  Some of the individual games may be notable enough to keep their articles, particularly some of the Evochron games.  Komputer Świat had an in-depth article about Evochron Renegades , and Rock Paper Shotgun interviewed Bower about his Evochron Legends .  The articles of games like these should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.  The rest could be merged into the Star Wraith series article.  Free Media Kid$ 06:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Free Media Kid$ 06:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I simply can't find sources about this game at all.  Non-notable, fails WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 07:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chennai Public School: Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frame (journal): Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources.  Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG .  Randykitty ( talk ) 17:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions .  Randykitty ( talk ) 17:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Netherlands .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  We have no evidence of passing WP:GNG , the controlling notability guideline, and my searches didn't find any.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Student-generated journal.  There are many of these.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Aziz (trader): Fails WP:GNG .  US-Verified ( talk ) 00:17, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I removed KT and Forbes (was a profile page, not a paid source really), and added few recent rs.  Should meet Wikipedia:NAUTHOR , having two independent rs.  Thanks for the ping.  Singularitywiki ( talk ) 00:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: - one of the author's books is listed at Articles for deletion/How to Day Trade for a Living -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 02:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Iran ,  and Canada . Skynxnex ( talk ) 05:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG , currently article has no sources that fulfill needs see table below. — siro χ o 08:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: prepared by User:siroxo Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG ? business insider bio ~ largely interview ~ WP:BI ~ Partial [87] marketwatch very little about subject, it's about trading ✘ No himalayan times ~ quote attributed to subject's expedition leader, photo credited to subject ~ Partial style.yahoo gobankingrates ~ ✘ No business insider books ~ WP:BI snippet about a book ✘ No yahoo finance money experts interview gobankingrates ~ ✘ No Investopedia coursees ? ~ about course ✘ No yahoo finance day trading via benzinga ~ mostly quote ? not ABOUT subject ✘ No gobankingrates 100 ? gobankingrates ~ ✘ No gobankingrates 100 at yahoo ? gobankingrates ~ ✘ No business insider Career tips ~ references other BI article ~ ✘ No gobankingrates 3 things ? ✘ No Money Times mostly interview ~ mostly interview ✘ No SSRN paper by subject ? ? ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table }} . Delete per siroxo's fantastic source assessment table. I don't count interviews towards SIGCOV, so the Himalayan Times and Business insider bio sources fail in my books. JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 10:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete thanks to Siroxo's source examination. -- SouthernNights ( talk ) 12:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ken Popove: As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to have significant reliable source coverage enabling us to write substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  As written, however, this is strictly on the level of "Ken Popove is a mayor who exists, the end", and features absolutely none of the type of content that an article about a mayor needs to show -- and for sourcing, it's citing purely run of the mill verification of his election victories, with absolutely none of the ongoing "in office" coverage that's required.  Chilliwack is a large enough city that its mayors would be eligible to keep substantively written and well-sourced articles that met WP:NPOL #2, but it is in no sense large or significant enough that he would get an automatic notability freebie on an article that's this inadequate.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Sources are heavily from one news outlet, thus fails notability guidelines.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 23:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KIJR-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adriana Font: All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2015 , 2016 , 2022 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Puerto Rico .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thato Mofolo: Tagged with {{ Notability }} and {{ no significant coverage (sports) }} as it fails WP:GNG , WP:NSPORTS and WP:ANYBIO .  Yes, she scored a brace and so on, there's no WP:SIGCOV , and BLP is a very delicate subject which requires strong and adequate sourcing.  dxneo ( talk ) 04:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , Football ,  and South Africa .  dxneo ( talk ) 04:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Fails WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can't find anything better than the sources already in the article, which fall way short of SIGCOV Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article currently lacks substantial coverage from independent sources to justify its presence on Wikipedia.  Waqar 💬 16:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aero Composite Technologies: Searching for them bring no useful results (note there is a separate but similarly named company in Malaysia), and sources about the Quikkit Glass Goose only mention them in passing.  -- LCU A ctively D isinterested « @ » ° ∆t ° 14:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Pennsylvania . -- LCU A ctively D isinterested « @ » ° ∆t ° 14:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wholly unreferenced, scarcely even verifiable.  This sort of article might have flied (no pun intended) back in 2005, but in 2024 it falls well short of our standards.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 02:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Henri Boshoff: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , South Africa ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect (no list for Zimbabwean internationals currently exits) per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete