Odd Crew : No reliable secondary sources to illustrate they meet WP:BAND .  ThaddeusSholto ( talk ) 14:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Bulgaria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Encyclopedia Mettalum used as sourcing is not a RS. I can't find mentions of this group online in RS (or in much of anything really.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Found no evidence of notability.  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark These Words as to why no AtD.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 18:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] More references added.  Xray321 ( talk ) 10:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They aren't reliable sources .  I had to remove some for being WP:USERGENERATED , WP:DISCOGS and WP:IMDB .  The remaining appear to be random blogs that simply repeat press releases.  ThaddeusSholto ( talk ) 13:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment there is independent coverage available online including news and reviews with significant coverage - see for example: Prog Rock Journal Ghost Cult Mag Velvet Thunder Radio Tangra Metal Heads Forever Magazine RAMzine Devolution Magazine rockfreaks.net metal.de This is specialist music genre, and these are specialist online magazines.  Some of these sources do appear fairly reliable - but input from editors with greater knowledge of the sources could be beneficial.  Resonant Dis tor tion 16:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: For evaluation of the sources provided above.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : ResonantDistortion : When posting links, please omit any that are clearly promotional, particularly when they use the same press release.  Prog Rock Journal, Ghost Cult Mag, Metal Heads Forever Magazine, RAMzine: Mostly PR copy [1] Velvet Thunder: Possibly neutral and independent, but the website has no editor credits, code of conduct information, only has a single email POC, and PR copy is posted under the "News" category without being labelled as such.  Radio Tangra: Author appears to be Bulgarian musician Stefan "Stiff" Yordanov, who was in turn of the millennium bands Insmouth and Redrum.  Expert, and possibly neutral/independent, but the site has only an advertising POC, and no editorial policy or code of conduct.  Devolution Magazine: The reviewer (Jo Wright) appears to have performed 100+ reviews for the magazine, also has a longer interview article with the band.  Website has editor listed, but not an editorial policy or code of conduct.  "Work With Us" section states "We are always on the look out for brands looking to advertise, contributors, stockists and affiliates/partners to work with on exciting opportunities" - unclear as to what disclosure is provided.  rockfreaks.net: Looks reliable [2] .  AZ is former reviewer Bulgarian Alexander Zafirov - large number of reviews [3] metal.de: Looks reliable.  Reviewer is a regular.  [4] [5] There's at least a marginal level of coverage in English Language sources, this is a band that has survived for 20 years under two names, and it is all but certain that there'd be more coverage in Bulgaria and probably elsewhere given their touring [6] (the rollingstone.bg article hasn't been archived, and it's tricky to tell what sources in the bg-wiki article are reliable).  But the current article quality is terrible, and appears to have had significant connected contributions .  I'm somewhere between a Weak Keep if someone cleans it up properly , and a Draftify/ WP:TNT delete if not (yes, WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP given consideration).  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 11:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus