Pulses per quarter note: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the "Pulses per quarter note" article in Wikipedia needs to be expanded a little bit, in my opinion this page should not be deleted as it tells information about time division in midi files.  192.68.163.180 ( talk ) 17:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources .  Müller, Meinard (2007-09-09).  Information Retrieval for Music and Motion .  Springer Science & Business Media.  ISBN 978-3-540-74048-3 .  The article notes: "The number of pulses per quarter note (PPQN) is to be specified at the beginning in the so-called header of a MIDI file and refers to all subsequent MIDI messages."  Sweetwater (1997-12-09).  "PPQN (Pulses Per Quarter Note, sometimes Parts Per Quarter Note)" .  Retrieved 2023-11-28 .  The article notes: "The timing resolution of a MIDI sequencer. PPQN indicates the number of divisions a quarter note has been split into, and directly relates to the ability of the sequencer to accurately represent fine rhythmic variations in a performance, or to recreate the “feel” of a performance. Older sequencers were capable of 96 PPQN (sometimes even less), which often resulted in a stiff “quantized” feel to the music (even if it hadn’t actually been quantized). Current versions can reach 768 PPQN or even higher resolutions, which is more than adequate for most musical applications. Note that the resolution of the sequencer is especially important at slower tempos. If your sequencer is limited to a lower resolution, one trick is the double the tempo of the song, then perform the parts in half time. This effectively results in a doubling of resolution."  Loops and Grooves: The Musician's Guide to Groove Machines and Loop Sequencers .  Hal Leonard Corporation.  2003.  ISBN 978-0-634-04813-5 .  The article notes: "If a sequencer has a limited number of steps, which was always the case with analog and digital hardware sequencers, the concept of resolution becomes an important factor. In this context, resolution means the number of steps used to represent a note or measure. Resolution is a numerical value expressed as pulses per quarter note or ppqn."  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Pulses per quarter note to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline , which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 04:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I've added citations to three books, two of which (Anderton and Rumsey) have enough information that they should be considered SIGCOV.  I have some concerns that the main body of the article (the long 2nd paragraph discussing feel ) is basically original research, whose ideas are supported by the texts but not really in those terms.   That notwithstanding, there's sufficient mention of this concept to merit inclusion.  Oblivy ( talk ) 00:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge so it seems there is value in having this content remain.  Does it make sense to merge with MIDI beat clock or roll up into MIDI ?  Pdubs.94 ( talk ) 16:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 17:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as article has been around since 2009 and barely squeaks by WP:SIZERULE guidelines.  could easily be covered under MIDI beat clock Pdubs.94 ( talk ) 02:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with MIDI beat clock .   Changing my vote.   I've made the argument for keep but the merge target is really a good option.  Oblivy ( talk ) 02:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge