hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Katy Deacon: Person's claim to fame is winning 2 awards.  Both awards are minor pro-diversity titles focused on encouraging women in STEM rather than being het result of a specific outstanding achievement.  These received some coverage including a short profile in the Independent and some local press, but I don't think this coverage is significant or sustained enough to warrant an article.  A BEFORE turns up that she has continued her career as a civil servant but has not reached any elected positions.  There was a previous nomination which closed as no consensus.  My take on the existing coverage is that:  1. Although the outlets are independent and reliable, I don't think the coverage was significant (they are short, uncritical profiles in Katy's voice without any secondary commentary) or sustained.  2. I don't think the awards in question meet the bar of "well-known and significant award or honor".  Although the awarding bodies are large in both cases, the actual awards are nothing like the degree of prestige required for WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NARTIST .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Engineering ,  and England .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I agree the awards aren't really notable, and seem early career.  There is some independant coverage, but not convinced it's quite enough for WP:GNG (but I could be convinced otherwise.) Doesn't meet WP:NPROF .  - Kj cheetham ( talk ) 11:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  We could use a few more opinions here!  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPROF and WP:SIGCOV .  The narrative of the article is disjointed and extremely weak as a result.  Indeed, it is rather unclear what this person did to deserve a standalone article—lots of "has worked in [ field ]" and "worked with [ general description of a massive technology ], etc.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Desroy Findlay: JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Table Plus: Fails WP:NCORP , WP:SIRS scope_creep Talk 17:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I see no evidence of this meeting NCORP.  Note: I came by intending to close this as "soft delete", but the article has been deprodded previously and is thus ineligible.  Vanamonde ( Talk ) 18:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi there.  Im really sorry but I am not an expert user and don't know what these terms mean.  "soft delete" "deprodded".  I dont understand what is ineligible.  Please could you explain what the issue here is.  Thank you.  Martin Martinneame ( talk ) 20:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Martinneame : If you're a reader of this article, it's nothing you need worry about; it's procedural stuff.  See WP:SOFTDELETE and WP:PROD .  The article was proposed for deletion ("PRODed") in 2009; the tag was removed, which is part of that process; as such this discussion could not simply be closed with minimal participation, per WP:SOFTDELETE .  Hope that makes sense.  Vanamonde ( Talk ) 20:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank  you for your reply.  Does that mean that this article is safe and will  not be deleted?  Martinneame ( talk ) 20:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Vanamonde.  Agree with his analysis and am in the same boat.  TonyBallioni ( talk ) 19:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi there.  Im really sorry but I am not an expert user and don't know what these terms mean.  "soft delete" "deprodded".  I dont understand what is ineligible.  Please could you explain what the issue here is.  Thank you.  Martin Martinneame ( talk ) 20:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ivana Ivaštanin: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Montenegro .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of language histories: Remsense 诉 22:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Lists .  Remsense 诉 22:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - also redundant with Template:Language histories --// Replayful ( talk | contribs ) 22:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kompella Madhavi Latha: Grabup ( talk ) 13:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Grabup ( talk ) 13:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nomination of a subject into a political party is not notable.  Politician is not notable, significant, who has received any great attention to be recorded.  Fails WP:NPOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Bhartya Janata Party candidate for the upcoming election.  If successful, he will automatically meet NPOL qualifications.  If not his significance will need to be demonstrated through multiple R/sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sk1728 ( talk • contribs ) 10:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Y Keep - Passes WP:GNG criteria.  Plenty of sources discussing her biography in detail with her being the main topic.  -- Manasbose ( talk | edits ) 10:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I respectfully disagree with your assertion.  The primary focus of these sources appears to be the nomination for the election, rather than solely on her.  Grabup ( talk ) 13:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify so that the article can return to articlespace if she wins.  Perhaps some of the references at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Kompella_Madhavi_Latha&oldid=1218871643 could be restored.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 16:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 16:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article should be removed.  According to the guidelines outlined in WP:NPOL , the individual has not been elected to any political position or taken on any political responsibilities.  Obtaining an election ticket or receiving media coverage does not automaticallycooferr notability on an individual.
 The subject may meet the "general notability guidelines" ( WP:GNG ), as it has received significant coverage from reputable sources.  It is worth noting that there has been an unexpected surge in media attention following her BJP nomination.  Despite her two decades of involvement in charity work, she has also been associated with Triple Talaq and fighting for the cause of women, which has received little attention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buddingboffin ( talk • contribs ) 16:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sherbaz Pathan: Yasal Shahid ( talk ) 12:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police , Politics , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Yasal Shahid ( talk ) 12:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete District President of Chandpur, Bijnor or a Member of the Municipal council Chandpur, Bijnor is not a role that confers notability.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 14:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zhansaya Koziyeva: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Kazakhstan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zingisa April: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gene Gomes: No indicia of encyclopedic notability.  BD2412 T 18:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  BD2412 T 18:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hari Chandana Dasari: microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 19:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , India ,  and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Failed WP:NPOL nor the WP:GNG , also created by a 'Digital Media Company' so there are high chances that this article has been made with paid.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 19:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nikol González: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found was this , which are mostly quotes from the subject.  Otherwise, it's all passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Venezuela .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  killer bee 05:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elyse Iller: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Caribbean ,  and Florida .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Dushanbe: I asked @ HistoryofIran who is familiar with sockpuppeteer on article talk page [10] and they said it's likely not notable.  This sockpuppeteer has done some sneaky vandalism and demonstrated using fake references, misusing sources with their edits multiple times.  So I feel this might have verifiability issues, even if it doesn't, it's probably not notable for a seperate article.  Tehonk ( talk ) 19:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Central Asia , Tajikistan ,  and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- HistoryofIran ( talk ) 19:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cem Sevim: A WP:BEFORE didn't even find database entries.  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 14:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 14:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obvious lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no notability.  Tehonk ( talk ) 01:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Found nothing here.  Per nominator, the article fails WP:GNG & WP: SPORTSBASIC S!  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 00:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clint Hames: As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to have significant reliable source coverage enabling us to write substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  As written, however, this is mainly just background biographical trivia that has nothing to do with establishing notability, and features absolutely none of the type of content that an article about a mayor actually needs to show -- and for sourcing, it's citing a mix of run of the mill verification of his election victories and primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all, with absolutely none of the ongoing "in office" coverage that's required.  Chilliwack is a large enough city that its mayors would be eligible to keep substantively written and well-sourced articles that met WP:NPOL #2, but it is in no sense large or significant enough that he would get an automatic notability freebie on an article that's this inadequate.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – I heard that mayors have to pass gng, but this fails notability guidelines as sources are exclusively mentions or results except this (with matches for the subject's name) .  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Active Training and Education Trust: Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Celine Loader: Seems to violate Wikipedia: Notability .  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 22:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Women ,  and Nigeria .  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 22:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  Not notable person.  Doesn't pass GNG.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 23:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Communications director for a bank is very much non-notable.  Rest reads like a resume.  Delete for not meeting NBIO.  So many of these non-notable articles about people seem to come from Nigeria or India lately, something's afoot.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete - not notable.  Doesn't even come close.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 01:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : Not notable.  I don't care.  CastJared ( talk ) 09:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Not notable.  Athel cb ( talk ) 10:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete