hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
The Traveling Awareness Bears: Pepper Beast (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Organizations .  Pepper Beast (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Basically nothing in the way of media coverage as far as I can find, and the organisation seems to have shut down anyway.  ― novov (t c) 03:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the article is based too closely on the organisation’s own claims about itself.  There is some third party coverage (I didn’t find any more than is in the article) but that seems to just recycle what the organisation says about itself.  There’s nothing really substantive there.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 13:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dear Friend: The Three Bachelors: No good hits from GSearch, GNews and GNews Archives.  Redirect to Dear Friend (TV series) as per WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 05:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some coverage of the show [27] , but it's a trivial mention.  I don't find any other sourcing we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
O Hyok-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the only sources I could find were player profiles which were all similar to each other and didn't go into enough detail to pass WP:GNG .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3031: C messier ( talk ) 07:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Coma Berenices as WP:ATD .  Broc ( talk ) 09:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure if this is a good redirect target.  C messier ( talk ) 15:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it is non-notable.  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 12:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Vulcans (band): ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  14:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  14:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is potential to meet WP:NMUSIC #10 with several appearances on national television series hosted by notable persons.   However I'm unable to verify this in reliable sources, or indeed find much about them to provide evidence beyond videos of their appearances on Youtube [13] .   Their Musicbrainz record is virtually empty, I can't find them on Allmusic, and the EL to their website is a deadlink.   The article itself is unreferenced.   Unless someone can find any WP:RS coverage, I agree with the nom: Delete .  Resonant Dis tor tion 13:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tourism in Antalya: This is a short article that doesn't have much scope for expansion as a stand alone article.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Turkey .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Many book references are available on this topic.  Лисан аль-Гаиб ( talk ) 09:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Such as?  WP:MUSTBESOURCES .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I mean, I'm sure tourists travel there, but coverage isn't strictly about that.  [33] or [34] are vaguely about the concept.  We'd need OR to bring the article together, which isn't notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/delete Antalya#Economy should be expanded to have a tourism section that can include a list/description of major destination and split when necessary.  This is just bullet points of coastal municipalities in the city.  Reywas92 Talk 14:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  06:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect - it may be that an article could be written on this topic, but the current stub isn't any sort of attempt at that, and it says nothing that isn't now available at Antalya .  Delete with possibility of re-creation.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Christie: zoglophie 13:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Scotland .  zoglophie 13:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NHS Barnet: Shellwood ( talk ) 11:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shiv Ram Singh Inter College: Unreliable sources used.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No significant coverage from independent sources in the article.  I couldn't find anything significant from a quick search - Imcdc Contact 12:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Also did not find significant coverage.  Hogo-2020 ( talk ) 11:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough to support the article.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Osborne, Nipissing District: – dlthewave ☎ 04:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable, no information found.   Furthermore, the citations in the article (except for the map) do not refer to this location, only to Osborne Township.   No WP:SIGCOV or coverage of any kind, really.   I could make the exact same argument about all the other railroad siding nominations below.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen Jacob Jimbangan: Fram ( talk ) 09:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Malaysia .  Fram ( talk ) 09:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No need for deletion due to this person is a literally a notable person from Sabah and this wiki page has approved Source and references for the wikipedia: Link 1: https://pru.sinarharian.com.my/calon/4175/stephen-jacob-jimbangan Link 2: https://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news/158899/can-jimbangan-create-an-upset-/ Link 3: https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/amp/category/bahasa/tempatan/2022/12/11/bekas-pemimpin-bersatu-sabah-sertai-pgrs-kini-hanya-cerita-di-kedai-kopi/ Link 4: https://www.astroawani.com/berita-politik/stephen-jimbangan-sahkan-sudah-hantar-surat-letak-jawatan-sebagai-presiden-gagasan-rakyat-404130 ?  J4CKKGT ( talk ) 02:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, this was just deleted via AFD a month ago, how can it have been recreated so soon?  DId it not qualify for CSD G4?  We need to hear from more editors than the nominator and the article creator.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article is different enough in form from the first version that I wouldn't have invoked G4 if I had come across this before the nominator did, but it admittedly isn't markedly different in substance.  He still has not held any role that would confer an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL , and the article still isn't sourced anywhere close to well enough to claim that he would satisfy WP:GNG instead of having to pass NPOL.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete perhaps I'm mistaken, but he simply appears to be an unelected candidate, which colours the media coverage of him.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abcde: Source #1 is dead (though I've fixed the article to include an archive).  Not too much merit here.  Dawnbails ( talk ) 19:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women .  Dawnbails ( talk ) 19:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Interesting, surprising, and some may think alarming, but this doesn't come anywhere near to being notable in Wikipedia's terms.  JBW ( talk ) 15:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  The article is very limited and cumbersome, but it is not very important.  -- Wyndhan Han ( talk ) 11:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  The article does not meet anthroponymy standards on Wikipedia AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 16:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Failure to comply with WP:GNG .  JTZegers ( talk ) 17:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frank W. Gaskill: Basically a CV.  WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  Pepper Beast (talk) 14:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 14:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is bordering G11, it can go.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 18:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I came across this in the orphaned articles tag.  It doesn't seem like it's near to meeting any notability criteria.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 04:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enzo Fortuny: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 12:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obscure bit-part actor.  Couldn't find even a single interview.  Fails WP:NACTOR , WP:SIGCOV .  Been on the CAT:NN list for more than a decade and never been updated.  No Gbook except passing mentions in cast lists.  No reviews.  scope_creep Talk 14:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A Spanish language source lookup may help.  He seems to have been in the industry for donkeys, starting at age 9.  scope_creep Talk 15:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Natalie Plain: It was authored by a blocked user, and only two out of the five sources used are considered unreliable.  Unfortunately, the article lacks the required in-depth coverage from reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as outlined in the General Notability Guideline Akshith manya talk 15:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and California .  Akshith manya talk 15:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  non-notable, orphan, created by blocked ed, etc. 128.252.210.3 ( talk ) 18:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Was once prodded and then de-prodded due to malformed, which may or may not make it eligible for soft deletion; relisting just to be safe.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 20:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The NZ Herald is the only reliable source there is.  Rest I find are tabloids, so nothing for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brahmrishi Bawra Shiksha Niketan Senior Secondary School: The WP:NSCHOOL criteria have been made much stricter since this article was created.  PROD was contested .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 02:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Punjab .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 02:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Comment - The school has been mentioned by various newspapers Hindustan Times , The Indian Express and The Tribune for their performance in the Jammu and Kashmir State Board of School Education in 2016 and 2017.  -- Sohom Datta ( talk ) 20:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] (edit, I don't feel strongly about the keep vote on this one, so striking) -- Sohom Datta ( talk ) 00:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is no neutrality, and the writing is purely one-sided.  The source is insufficient to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 09:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paco Lala's: Tagged for additional sources in 2011, but no improvements were made.  Could also be redirected to Cada mañana where the subject is mentioned, though I personally prefer deletion .  CycloneYoris talk!  00:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and Mexico .  CycloneYoris talk!  00:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Fails WP:ENT and the one source only makes a passing mention as a picture-caption and doesn't demonstrate notability.  Utopes ( talk / cont ) 04:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment found a couple of articles ( [74] , [75] ) about some legal troubles he has been having; not sure if that is enough to establish notability.   I also don't know anything about the reliability of that second publication (Univision I presume is reliable).  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 22:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I checked these sources, and while it talks about the problems he was facing, from my point of view this does not establish notability as an entertainer/TV personality.  While Univision I'd agree seems to be a reliable source on its own right, it talks mainly about the scandal and not about Paco Lala's career.  Neither of those two links back up Paco Lalas' notability, nor can I find reliable sources that do, so the background of "panelist on one show" does not seem to be enough.  Utopes ( talk / cont ) 02:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG, tagged for sources for too long; clearly cannot be considered as a notable.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 07:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete