Murree rebellion of 1857: As well as some of the sources being a bit iffy.  Slatersteven ( talk ) 15:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  Slatersteven ( talk ) 15:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Pakistan , India ,  and Punjab .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with you that more sources should be added, maybe also an infobox to sum everything up since it's a pretty long article.  However I could find multiple reputable sources with a quick google search such as articles by the University of the Punjab, the Pakistan Perspective, the United Service Institution of India, and a book titled Murree Rebellion of 1857 by Barnabas Crist Bal.  I think it's important that we expand on this article instead of deleting a piece of history.  Thomas Preuss Harrison ( talk ) 18:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes the article needs improvement but the event recorded was not an insignificant one in the context of the chaotic developments of 1857.  Saul David's 2002 history The Indian Mutiny records the concern expressed by Sir John Lawrence as "disaffection and mutiny spread" during August of that year and that this included the Muslim tribal unrest in the Murree Hills.  Buistr ( talk ) 07:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor, unreliable sources and many fails verification.  Some of these unreliable sources are WP:RAJ era and primary sources.  The event was not significant and if reliable sources with coverage is to be found, it can very well be merged to Indian Rebellion of 1857 .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Murree#History .  As noted by source #3 in the current article, ...Murree had played a small and insignificant role [in the Indian rebellion of 1857 , and goes on to detail minor disorganized skirmishes. This seems appropriate to mention in the location's history as its local, minor participation in a major historical event (and it already is mentioned there), but it doesn't seem to be DUE for more than a sentence at Indian rebellion of 1857 and currently isn't mentioned there at all. signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Indian Rebellion of 1857 as that is the event it is directly related to.  There doesn’t seem to be significant coverage of the subject to warrant a standalone article.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 03:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's essentially no information about events in Murree at that page, whereas there is coverage of the 1857 rebellion at Murree#History.  What's your reasoning for preferring the 1857 rebellion page as a target?  signed, Rosguill talk 13:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Murree#History : Searched for sources but could not find any that can make this event as notable and keep the article.  Hence, there are two options for redirecting: the first is Indian Rebellion of 1857 , as this event was part of the Indian Rebellion of 1857, but that article does not mention anything about the ‘Murree rebellion,’ nor does it mention Murree even once.  Therefore, I support the second option, Murree#History , proposed by Rosguill, which mentions the event.  Grab Up - Talk 14:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect