hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Phanes Press : Was purchased 20 years ago, no coverage before or after.  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 04:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If they're an imprint, merge to Red Wheel Weiser Conari .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 04:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Companies , Religion , Spirituality , Massachusetts ,  and Michigan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Red Wheel/Weiser if that can be confirmed.  Redirect only would be problematic as this is not currently mentioned at destination article.  Jclemens ( talk ) 06:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Red Wheel/Weiser and add mention of Phanes Press on this article.  Phanes Press does appear to be an imprint of Red Wheel/Weiser, see [25] .  The article itself does not meet notability guidelines at WP:ORGCRIT - most web results for it are on the websites of online book retailers.  Redtree21 ( talk ) 07:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Davidson Centre : As always, sports venues are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on reliable source coverage about them, but this cites no sources at all and has been tagged as such since 2012.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unable to find any sources that aren't WP:PRIMARY or aren't a business directory.  grungaloo ( talk ) 22:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find no useful sources covering this centre other than a brief construction industry mention of a planned 2010 expansion: https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/others/2010/01/expansion-planned-for-davidson-centre-gymnasium-in-kincardine-ontario-dcn037301w Meters ( talk ) 19:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Berian (below).  Should have done that myself.  Meters ( talk ) 19:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Merge and redirect .  I have smerged images and a small amount of text into the main article Kincardine, Ontario .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Binocular dysphoria : Pepper Beast (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete so I did find some passing mention of this in peer reviewed articles but the statements are made in passing and are not cited.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 18:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , for lack of WP:MEDRS sourcing.  The article itself states "At present there is no peer reviewed evidence of this condition."  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Stereoscopy : while not an actual medical condition, plenty of mentions in both technology ( [4] , [5] ) and mainstream ( [6] , [7] - I know; sorry) media means we can't just sweep this under the carpet as "someone's pet neurological hypothesis".  By this point, it is a notable neurological hypothesis, if nothing else.  As such, MEDRS doesn't really apply, and we need to go back to GNG.  Owen× ☎ 23:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Oral reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada : There are no WLs (signifying that none of these cases are particularly important or notable).  There are only 3 years, signifying that this is a project someone started and never finished.  Ultimately, we do not have any sourcing which would indicate why this list is significant or notable.  The mere fact that the SC can decided cases in this way does not mean that we need to have a list of all the times they did so.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Canada .  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  The editor who started this ages ago has made some edits recently so this is possibly the best option for now for this in-progress list.  — siro χ o 02:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no issue with moving to a draft, but the last substantive and productive edit to this page (by anyone) was in 2006.  Highly unlikely anyone is going to pick back up where they left off, and even further, I do not see what this list adds to anything.  There is no indication that being decided orally is of any significance that would give rise to a standalone list.  16:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 23:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ex tempore decision , which appears to be the parent topic, and merge the first paragraph of the lead (but not the list).  Oral judgments of the Canadian courts is certainly a notable topic [9] , but the article would probably need to be extensively rewritten to cover it.  Supreme court cases are likely to satisfy GNG, but there is no explanation why oral decisions of the court should be listed separately from reserved decisions, and I cannot think of one.  The page is a plausible redirect, and draftification never results in improvements.  James500 ( talk ) 06:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist to decide between Draftification or a Redirect/Merge combo.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
VR privacy concerns : Any valid information is in the article for Virtual reality or can easily fit there.  D r e a m Focus 18:41, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:51, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Virtual reality .  I don't think it merits more than a section in the Virtual reality article.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect for now to Virtual reality .  I was able to access most of the sources in the article, and they do not seem to mention virtual reality, as such, I am concerned about WP:OR .  It seems very likely that the topic is notable (super quick dump: [41] [42] [43] [44] ).  If it can be verified that what's here is not OR, and is just poorly referenced, keep is fine.  — siro χ o 19:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] All of those are the same.   They mention that information can be gotten by monitoring someone's eye and hand motion.   This is already mentioned at Virtual_reality#Privacy .  D r e a m Focus 11:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Virtual reality#Privacy -- The parent article could use a little more beef, but there is no GNG (yet) for this topic as a standalone article.  It lacks WP:SIGCOV completely, especially if you attempt to find sources specific to the security/privacy vis-à-vis VR in general.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Don't oppose redirect, though.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Camp Manitou-Lin : Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and Michigan .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Middleville, Michigan .  There's a fair share of verifiable info out there, but I do not see SIGCOV.  — siro χ o 05:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2010 Pacific Rugby League Tests : CONCERN: Information here has now been merged with International rugby league in 2010 .  Pacific games don't need there own page, especially how small it is per size split policy .  Please also see deletion discussion for Pacific Rugby League International .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 17:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Oceania and New Zealand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Merge with International rugby league in 2010 .  No need for a separate page.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 09:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Ebarat I : All that is known is basic geneological facts, sources mention the name in lists, however there is nothing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  No objection to a consensus redirect target.  // Timothy :: talk 08:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Iran .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Automatically notable, because he was a king.  See Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Politicians_and_judges , which can also be reached at WP:POLITICIAN .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Presumed does not mean automatically.  Likely doesnot mean always.  The opening section of this SNG states, "People are likely to be notable..."  Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Additional criteria The presumption in this case is false, this semi-historical figure does not meet GNG or NBIO, or even have verifiable basic biographical information.  Having a name in a list does not meet notability.  The presumption this is likely notable has been challenged and sources with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indpeth are needed, otherwise a redirect is appropriate if possible target finds consensus.  // Timothy :: talk 09:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ebarat I is the principal character of P.Steinkeller article (quoted in the artcicle), and the central figure for understanding the relations between Ur III and Shimashki dynasty rulers.  I am not sure what is GNG criterion - coul dyou please explain?  Thanks, YX Ykhramov ( talk ) 22:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : WP:ATD is a redirect/merge to Shimashki Dynasty .  WP:NOPAGE seems to apply.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 09:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Kings are clearly notable.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep : should be classed as notable as a king, although a lot more work needs to be done.  Azarctic ( talk ) 23:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Kings or Rulers are definitely notable.  188.240.216.10 ( talk ) 16:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet of

Discussion outcome: merge
2017 Pacific Rugby League Tests : CONCERN: Information here is just a copy of International rugby league in 2017 and has no unique information.  Pacific games don't need there own page per size split policy .  Please also see deletion discussion for Pacific Rugby League International .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 17:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: England and Oceania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Merge with International rugby league in 2017 .  No need for a separate page.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 09:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Arab Canadian identity : WP:SYNTH + WP:REFBOMBED issues where the article just references random articles with the phrase "Arab Canadian" or "Arab-Canadian (identity)" in it.  NLeeuw ( talk ) 08:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 08:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : More than enough study of this cultural identity [18] , [19] and multiple papers such as [20] , [21] .  This is also a book review on the subject [22] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Arab Canadians , which doesn't have a lot of prose; this content could improve the parent article.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge to Arab Canadians per above.  Aldij ( talk ) 18:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There are many sources on this identity.  The article should be expanded, not deleted.  Brat Forelli 🦊 01:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Arab Canadians , which covers the same topic.  Ethnic group articles X do not typically have a separate article for "X identity".  signed, Rosguill talk 13:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Nelson family : I would agree that the main source, [30] , a family member's own work building a family tree, is not independent or adequately reliable.  The other sources are about individuals, not the family as a whole.  The notable members are several generations apart and likely did not know each other, so this is really just a non-notable genealogy page rather than a cohesively notable family discussed together.  Reywas92 Talk 01:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure if I'm allowed to nominate a template here, but also nominating Template:Nelson family .  The people listed here are merely distant cousins of each other so a navbox is not warranted.  Reywas92 Talk 01:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Reywas92 Talk 01:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Failure of GNG and NOTGENEALOGY.  Depending on your definition of a list, failure of WP:NLIST as well.  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 01:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of United States political families (N) I'm not seeing any sources that establish the notability of the family to warrant a separate article.  Since many of the members were politicians, I think that merging to this list of other political families is a valid ATD.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 12:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The notable ones were second cousins of each other, not sure that belongs as a "political family" where most listed are more closely related.  Reywas92 Talk 14:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looking at the proposed merge target and other letters, there are several people listed whose relationship is given only as "cousin" (no indication of to what degree of kinship).  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 18:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not really evident that the Nelson family has formed a cohesive unit (passing down resources, influence etc.) except in the strictly genealogical sense.  Choess ( talk ) 18:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to determine whether to Delete or selectively Merge.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively to either Polycarpus Nelson or perhaps List of United States political families (N) .  Best to use an ATD here to save history because many of the minor (verifiable) details could be useful an across a variety of biographies.  — siro χ o 03:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Farnborough International Airshow Radio : It seems like this radio station may be defunct (its website is unavailable) but suggest a merge of any information which can be properly sourced into the article about the airshow itself.  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Aviation , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – Not really notable in its own right, and it can be easily accommodated in the Farnborough International Airshow article (those parts that can be sourced, as currently none is).  -- Deeday-UK ( talk ) 11:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Subject fails for a stand alone article, is an unneeded CFORK which only serves to make readers chase links.  // Timothy :: talk 07:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom, although it doesn't look like much of it is referenced anyway and I suspect it will be difficult/impossible to source retrospectively - so in effect, delete .  W a g ge r s TALK 13:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2023 Christiana Mall shooting : Any details about the shooting can be covered in a section of the shopping mall article.  Dough 4872 03:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose : SIGCOV exists through the collective coverage provided by CBS, Fox, and Yahoo Sports, already linked.  Merging the full details of this shooting to the Christiana Mall article would cause undue weight issues Jack4576 ( talk ) 04:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Why would we care about coverage of a mall shooting from...Yahoo Sports ?  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Although the article does meet notability guidelines as it stands, it's not that notabile with only a few sources, and really could be covered by a short paragraph or two in the main mall article without losing any detail.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 04:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:LASTING , WP:GEOSCOPE , etc.  News reports during or shortly after the incident are not WP:INDEPTH and do not amount to significant coverage.  The mall's main article is an acceptable place for a few sentences about this.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 06:44, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unless this event takes on wider significance, it seems like a textbook WP:NOTNEWS .  -- Tserton ( talk ) 13:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete More NOTNEWS from the 'every firearms discharge in public deserves an article' side of en.wiki.  Mention of it in the mall article in a short summarized form is appropriate and a redirect is fine, though not required.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge