hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Corston Airstrip : It exists, but almost nothing can be said about it.  Even the minimal information in the article is not supported by the sources (the claim "Corston Airfield is commonly used for plane charters around the Orkney Islands" is not supported by the source it is attributed to).  Significant coverage in secondary sources is nil.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Scotland .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per guidance in WP:NAIRPORT that private, unattended airports are usually not notable and 0 coverage I can find.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 15:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per BrigadierG.  tedder ( talk ) 19:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Concur with the above.  Not seeing anything that would suggest it is notable enough to have its own article.  Dunarc ( talk ) 22:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dara Coleman : UtherSRG (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Northern Ireland .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all the roles are bit parts.  The Red Coat in the Mel Gibson movie isn't particularly notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - cannot see how this passes NACTOR or GNG, there is simply not enough substance and depth.  Maybe later...  SeoR ( talk ) 18:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
K32OV-D : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Texas .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It's a bit older than some other HC2/Innovate stations, being previously owned by Mako Communications and starting in 2004, but that doesn't count for much if there are no non-FCC or directory reliable sources and all it's ever been known to air are 24/7 networks.  The article has been around since 2006, but that was a time when notability standards sitewide were much looser than they are now (and keep in mind they were still, at least de facto, much looser in this topic area than elsewhere until relatively recently).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lindelwe Zungu : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found several trivial mentions but no evidence of significant secondary coverage.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 20:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harry Dombroski : No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Of the 6 references, 4 are brief items by his university  (with two being dead links), one (Bloomberg) has no content other than his title.  And the best of the 6 (Ft. Worth) is just an announcement with a short interview.    As a result, the content is just a few resume type items.   (Author is blocked for improper multiple accounts.)  North8000 ( talk ) 19:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only secondary sources I could find were already in the article.  A Bloomberg profile that is only his name and position, and Fort Worth Buisness article that just about him, don't really class as significant coverage.  Shaws username .  talk .  21:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, he likes dinosaurs [3] , with a brief mention here [4] , but these are not useful for GNG here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cynthia Aaron : Not a statewide office, and nothing in the subject's short resume-like article to indicate encyclopedic notability.  BD2412 T 03:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  BD2412 T 03:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I agree.  She doesn't seem to meet WP:JUDGE .  Hannahthom7 ( talk ) 15:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  According to the retirement announcement, Judge Aaron held statewide positions on committees and won a state-wide award for her work.  [29] -- Jaireeodell ( talk ) 13:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't imagine that WP:NPOL is intended to refer to statewide service on committees.  Many states have, for example, statewide bar committees with some members merely selected from the public.  BD2412 T 15:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with BD2412T.  The guidelines for judges and notability are pretty clear.  - Hannahthom7 ( talk ) 17:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article fails WP:GNG , and is not presumed notable by WP:NPOL either.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 21:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angry Grandma : Jamiebuba ( talk ) 05:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 05:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't oppose or disagree with your decision.  The subject only has 1 news article associated with her name and the news source is a local news source, not a national news source.  However, I believe the subject's prominence online would make her a good candidate for an article here.  Lolza81 ( talk ) 06:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete That's not how Wikipedia works.  Articles have to pass through guidelines (namely WP:GNG ), not some vague statement about "the subject's prominence", which is debatable considering they only have ~300,000 subscribers, which really isn't much when dealing in an area that lacks reliable sources.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 09:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Internet ,  and Tennessee .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  There are a surprising amount of angry grandmas online [15] , [16] , [17] , none of which seem to be this person.  "Angry grandma" and "internet" still gets you a few dozen.  Delete for any sort of notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  It seems to be a more appropriate entry on Knowyourmemes than on Wikipedia.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 04:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hong Jin-song : Simione001 ( talk ) 03:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing at all to go on here.  Fails WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
InterTown Series : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Rugby league ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Amateur competition with little to no coverage.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 11:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patron X : The incident does not have lasting significance, and Wikipedia is not news .  Pichpich ( talk ) 19:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Technology ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clear violation of WP:NOTNEWS .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 20:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Antrotherkus 20:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Pichpich.  Thank you for reviewing this article.  The article is not about someone's phone going off at a concert, which happens all the time, but about a conductor stopping the orchestra mid performance because of the phone , and speaking directly to the offender, in front of the entire audience and orchestra.  The incident was discussed far beyond the scope of the concert itself, as it was a remarkable violation concert etiquette, which is quite formal at orchestra concerts.  In terms of the event not having lasting significance, the article cited as reference 4 is from 5 years after the event took place.  Perhaps the article should be improved to demonstrate this more explicitly.  If this still meets AfD criteria, I certainly understand.  Again, thanks for your review.  00ranges ( talk ) 20:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable incident a decade ago, likely used here to shame the person.  Could be a brief mention in the Philharmonic article, under the trivia section.  Even that isn't really notable.  I find no coverage of it 10 or so years after, meaning it doesn't pass our standards, NOTNEWS Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Oaktree b.  I created this article.  It was certainly not my intention to shame anyone at all (Patron X is and remains anonymous), merely to create an article for a notable event in classical music culture that was absent from Wikipedia.  Please see my above reply to Pichpich.  If this does indeed meet AfD criteria, then I support its deletion.  00ranges ( talk ) 22:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fluff coverage at the time of the incident and nothing since; open-and-shut WP:NOTNEWS .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bartosz Źrebiec : Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 12:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Poland .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 12:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Barber (rapper) : All of the sourcing is from local-level sources or questionable sources that look like they lack serious editorial oversight.  No albums that charted, and no two albums on a major record label.  Mz7 ( talk ) 03:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Mz7 ( talk ) 03:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Delete per WP:GNG .  I found coverage in a major newspaper, Chicago Tribune , and a regional newspaper, Evansville Courier & Press .  APK whisper in my ear 04:31, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Chicago Tribune source that you linked says that it is written by a Community Contributor.  Per this explanation , Community Contributors are registered users of TribLocal.com and Chicagotribune.com who have photos, articles, announcements and local events to share with other readers.  This content can be posted online for free using our publishing tools.  Because of this, I would disagree that the Chicago Tribune source is the "major newspaper" coverage you say it is, and a limited amount of local coverage is not sufficient either.  Mz7 ( talk ) 06:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I didn't even see the community contributor part.  That's kind of odd for such a large paper.  APK whisper in my ear 06:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subject doesn't seem to rise to the standard of MUSICBIO. - KH-1 ( talk ) 02:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above, I can't find any coverage besides the two local news articles discussed above.  Most of the cites in the article itself are not WP:RS .  Nsevs • Talk 02:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The clowns behind articles on this wannabe and his fraud mate have long been using Wikipedia as a joke, creating articles based on exaggeration, lies and fake articles and are currently community banned but continue on using a series of throw away socks.  Previously deleted from Michael Barber (musician) .  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sippai : Sent to draft, restored because it's over 90 days old, frequently namechecked as a potential AfD candidate, it's time this 2013 article about a film unreleased in 2013 and since was consigned to the flames of Mount Doom.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NFO and WP:NFF .  APK whisper in my ear 09:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, it's resumed filming again [34] , and about a dozen other stories confirming the same in semi-RS sources.  See the news link above.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's a 2017 story!!! It's taken longer to film - just this time around - than LOTR if we are to take those reports seriously...  There's another lot from 2021.  Given a track record of 10 years of empty reports, why don't we wait until it's actually, you know, released ?  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] IT's still SIGCOV.  This might be like the last Duke Nukem game, vaporware for 20 yrs or more.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete .  You can partly shoot the film, but release it.  Production seems unnotable.  Should have included it in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puthiya Mugam (unreleased film) .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hemant Yadav Murder case Ballia : It happened so recently, that it is difficult to ascertain whether or not this will have any lasting coverage, but as for now, WP:NOTNEWS .  Onel 5969 TT me 12:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Either NOTNEWS or a tragic BLP1E.  Either way it doesn't meet guidelines.  In one section I think there are BLP vios per WP:SUSPECT // Timothy :: talk 21:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : WP:SUSPECT vios Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete