hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Diogo Gama : Fails WP:SPORTBASIC Shinadamina ( talk ) 07:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Portugal .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 18:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Suggest a procedural keep as no rationale for deletion has been presented.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep : WP:CSK#1 applies as no deletion rationale has been presented.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I apologize, I have added the rationale now.  Shinadamina ( talk ) 07:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2007 Rugby World Cup squads#Portgual Featured at a World Cup and for a minor nation, struggling to see suitable sourcing but there maybe more offline.  Redirect a suitable WP:ATD for now.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  A week has not passed since the rationale was added.  It should have been there the moment the AfD was posted, not tagged on later.  This should have been closed immediately for lack of rationale.  The original lack of rationale suggests WP:BEFORE issue.  The lack of rationale other than noting lack of sources, including failure to discuss notability, still suggests WP:BEFORE issue.  Do we know anything about the individual covered by the article?  Did the nominator "take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources"?  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I have searched google and unable to find proper news articles on this individual.   If you can find any, please post here.  Shinadamina ( talk ) 18:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, X ( talk ) 09:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 11:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2007 Rugby World Cup squads#Portgual per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Louie the Laker : Okmrman ( talk ) 23:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ CactusWriter Parts of it seem to be directly copied https://web.archive.org/web/20110515133533/http://www.gvsulakers.com/genrel/012103aad.html Okmrman ( talk ) 23:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It was copied, but the copyvio has been removed and revision deletion applied.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 03:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Grand Valley State University#Mascot . -- Whpq ( talk ) 03:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Wael William Diab : Existing references are to: 1/3/7: primary source bios 2: a list of WP:PATENTS , which does not contribute to notability.  4: a press release 5/8/9: WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in non-independent sources 6: self-authored material WP:BEFORE search does not turn up any significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 13:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering , Technology , California ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 : It is verifiable that he chairs the organisation.  The article doesn't WP:GNG and so, redirect since he won am award that was unverifiable but I a certain it should be.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  06:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As nominator I'm OK with that AtD.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 13:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Digital electronic computer : PROD was declined.  SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Shaws username .  talk .  17:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Computer .  Unnecessary content fork.  Jfire ( talk ) 17:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge & Redirect to computer, might have some good information in its own section there.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 18:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Computer : Redundant - just describes normal computers except for when it says (item) is not a digital electronic computer.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A digital electronic computer is what people think of when you tell them the word "computer" in 2024.  This appears to have started out as some fork that got abandoned.  Would be better suited in a discussion about computer history, Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace and the like.  This is basically Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Are there even non-digital electronics?  A power source can only have ON and OFF, ones and zeros are that.  This makes no sense.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Does too.  Analogue electronics .  Analog synthesizers .  For instance.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 21:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Analog_computer#Electronic_analog_computers -- PaulT2022 ( talk ) 21:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tagging @ Oaktree b so he can come see.  Thanks @ PaulT2022 .  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 21:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One more thing, don't confuse digital with discrete , see digital signal . -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 21:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or Redirect to Computer#Digital computers .  (One would think that #Modern computers would be a more suitable target, but there's something odd with how the target article is structured, describing ENIAC and Colossus before #Modern computing and Turing machine.)  PaulT2022 ( talk ) 06:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Computer#Digital computers .  The term electronic computer can encompass both purely electronic and electromechanic variants.  After all, electromechanic computers which are used to describe explicitly Zuse's Z series work with electronic principles at core.  VectorVoyager ( talk ) 10:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Virtually all this information exists in other articles on wikipedia Mr Vili talk 04:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Computer#Digital computers : not necessary, article's content is encapsulated in the computer article Password (talk) (contribs) 07:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WOCW-LD : Article was part of a bulk AfD last year that closed as no consensus but there isn't much to show this meets the notability guidelines on its own.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and West Virginia .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Established broadcast channel.  Standards for source frequency on articles about media outlets should be much looser since media doesn’t tend to cover media.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 03:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or possibly redirect to WQCW .  The argument above has fallen way out of favor, including at an RfC.  WHCP had issues getting its signal into Charleston, yet there is no coverage even mentioning this translator for some reason in Charleston newspapers.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 04:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : its pre-2015 history as a WQCW relay is a bit more than your average DTV America/HC2/Innovate station, but not much (since that incarnation would not have been independently notable), and of course the supposedly-limited operations since then are the usual national networks, no local content, and no significant coverage — but it's barely enough for me to at least consider retaining the page history behind a redirect.  It's another technical survivor of a bulk nomination from last year .  As for the notion of media outlets having looser standards: we tried that, and the eventual result was a 2021 RfC that pretty much confirmed that the GNG is the notability barometer, not NMEDIA .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pretty sure that discusion ended without a clear consensus.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 11:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  Its notability as a WQCW translator is easily noted in that article, but as Gray sold it for a pittance knowing that DTVA wouldn't come close to being a competitor, and the station's low sale price is truly the only thing of note.  Gray likely knew that the station's viability once it moved the WQCW transmitter to WSAZ's stick would be nil to none (this was before they started programming subchannel networks of their own), and DTVA wouldn't be competitive at all since it can only serve Charleston proper due to the area's geography.  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sicknature : No indication of passing WP:BAND , and not one source supports WP:GNG .  Perhaps there are some Danish sources I haven't come across Mbdfar ( talk ) 00:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Denmark .  𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘮𝘈𝘺𝘩𝘢𝘯07 02:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The article was deleted before for a reason.  S on O f T he D esert ( Talk ) 13:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What reason would that be?  You need to provide a valid reason and not refer to something like that as a reason.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 00:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there is enough coverage and he meets WP:MUSICBIO .  He is also part of producer group Snowgoons so check news coverage on that as well.  Check 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 .  Royal88888 ( talk ) 00:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Royal88888 : there is absolutely not enough coverage.  You just posted a bunch of junk links.  One of them is about a bicycle - did you even read them?  Snowgoons seem notable, Sicknature is not notable outside of the group.  Sicknature does not qualify for their own article unless you can find WP:RS (check WP:RSP ) that directly cover Sicknature themself in depth (independent of Snowgoons).  Mbdfar ( talk ) 02:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry didn't mean to add that one and one was a duplicate...I have removed 3 and added 2 different ones.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 05:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Snowgoons , the only sourcing available on Sicknature specifically is clearly unreliable and as such he fails WP:GNG , but the group he is a part of seems notable.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 04:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KPFW-LD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 23:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : the nom may have failed to provide any explanation, but this DTV America/HC2/Innovate station — only marginally older than the stations actually started by the company — has the usual lack of significant coverage (or prospect of any) to meet the GNG .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mvcg66b3r : It would help if you provided a rationale for deletion.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 05:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Subject does not meet the GNG.  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hits Now! : Perhaps redirect to Westwood One ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dial Global Local may be a better alternative to deletion here.  (This service is mentioned there, whereas the Westwood One article has not contained much information about its 24/7 music formats

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Tyrant (House) : This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid.  In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 01:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aintabli ( talk ) 02:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to House (season 6) , where the episode is listed.  CycloneYoris talk!  23:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Handily delete as utterly failing WP:V & WP:N .   — Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Girls' Greater Catholic League : Written like an advert as well.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 00:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity , Sports ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Since I haven't seen any, I'm going to assume that it's unlikely there is any SIGCOV of the subject outside of routine local coverage.  It's an intradiocesan youth sports league, so there's no presumed notability.  If anything is salvageable, it should be merged to articles on the schools.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 06:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to OHSAA Southwest Region athletic conferences#Greater Catholic League .   Very little significant coverage exists.   This is an appropriate target as (per that article) The [Greater Catholic League] was restructured in 2013, as the Girls' Greater Catholic League was merged into the conference .   The proposed target has a list of the Girls' schools in the league.  Frank Anchor 13:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : per FrankAnchor.  Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as a standalone subject.  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Frank Anchor.  Not notable for a page.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 11:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  There's really nothing but ROUTINE.12:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WDKT-LD : Let'srun ( talk ) 04:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and North Carolina .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to WGGS-TV A diginet coatrack that used to just be a translator for something else.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jelano Cruden : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  No evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WSDI-LD : Article was part of a bulk AfD last year that closed as no consensus, but that was more about other articles in the bundle than this one.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : another run-of-the-mill HC2/Innovate station started in the 2010s without anything local to note, no significant coverage (nor much prospect for any), and so on.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Topic is a part of a subset of obscure (but encyclopedic) information about an obscure subject.  If we are to delete this page, it will create a hole in that subset of information.  So either merge this (and all of the other pages in that subset that are effectively no different from this) into some larger page, or keep MNewnham ( talk ) 20:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  The obscurity and recency of the subject, in this particular topic area, guarantee it will not meet the WP:GNG .  A redirect at least ensures there is some sort of entry for it somewhere.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 04:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tin City : Maybe some information about this plaza could be included in the naples, florida article Matthew is here zero ( talk ) 20:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and Florida .  Matthew is here zero ( talk ) 20:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Standard Floridian tourist trap site, nothing that meets N. Nate • ( chatter ) 20:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing of WP:GNG value here.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 00:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for now, maybe a redirect to Naples, Florida in the future if the area attractions section is expanded.  – The Grid ( talk ) 16:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Naples, Florida#Area attractions .  It seems to already have some coverage there, and local sources seem to acknowledge it as something that may be more than run-of-the-mill.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Naples, Florida#Area attractions would be the wisest choice.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect