hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Levicar : This is the older article, but it is inaccurately named and features less citations and information.  I propose that this article be deleted, and any relevant information (as well as any links on other pages to this article) be migrated to the other article.  Alternatively, this article can be made into a redirect to the other article.  TKOIII ( talk ) 18:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This discussion page was created without the {{ afd2 }} tag and not transcluded to a daily log.   Fixed now--I have no further opinion on the nomination itself at this time.  -- Finngall talk 18:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete could probably even speedy del as a duplicate.  The "Ford Levacar Mach 1" article is much more complete than this (but still not very extensive) and largely duplicates this one.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The sourcing here appears to be a PR or primary item, which has some value but doesn't help notability requirements.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as it is ineligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  I did not get into who is right or wrong, only into the use of two different names.  Both were used so one article should point to the other.  gidonb ( talk ) 02:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ford Levacar Mach I : as an ATD.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sandra Hanington : I've done some searching and I can't easily find the full list of recipients, there's no category for it on Wikipedia, and so I'm gonna venture that perhaps it's not a notable enough award to meet this criterion.  She doesn't meet WP:NPOL as this was an appointed role at the mint.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jack.org (the charity she co-founded).  All references to this person in Canadian media are about the charity, where she's mentioned.  The Mint position is basically a civil service position.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Canada .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jack.org .  As per the reasoning of Oaktree b .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gerrick McPhearson : Was drafted but never played.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 14:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Maryland .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 14:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesnt meet WP:NSPORT Nagol0929 ( talk ) 14:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Maryland Terrapins in the NFL draft per nom.  A before search only shows routine coverage/stats and coverage related to a different Gerrick McPhearson.   As a player selected in the NFL draft, his name is a reasonable search term.  Frank Anchor 16:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also okay with Zech McPhearson#Personal life as a redirect target.  Frank Anchor 01:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Best chance of finding significant coverage on him, if there is any, would be on Newspapers.com and from his college years.  I may take a shot at it later.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 16:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My search only found one piece of sigcov: [13] .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect for now as an ATD - I didn't find any additional SIGCOV when searching.  The target suggested by Frank Anchor works, although Zech McPhearson#Personal life is another possibility.  Hatman31 ( talk ) 20:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Zech McPhearson#Personal life where the subject is mentioned, and tag as {{ R from relative }} .  CycloneYoris talk!  21:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
This New Day (BBC Radio Ulster) : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see the sources that show that this mid-morning radio show is notable.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to BBC Radio Ulster since there's no meaningful independent coverage of this show.  Left guide ( talk ) 10:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Matt Weinberg : Nothing's changed since last AfD.   To quote that nom, "Non-notable former minor performer; lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG."  Onel 5969 TT me 14:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect Not even mentioned in most of the articles on films he's had roles in.  Exactly 1 secondary source relating to his acting career—younghollywood.com—it doesn't focus on him, and I can't find any more.  Snowmanonahoe ( talk ) 15:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore Redirect as ATD or delete per previous AfD consensus.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom and above.  // Timothy :: talk 12:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Treehouse Trolls Forest of Fun and Wonder : I observe the prod contest rationale, but don't accept a reason to keep on the basis of it being someone's acting debut.  I considered whether a redirect could be implemented, but could not determine a suitable target.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 23:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 23:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to GoodTimes Entertainment with a note mentioning it is Rachael Harris first contribution to the industry. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC) (NB I am the one who deproded the page back in time for that reason) [ reply ] I did consider this target as something to redirect to before raising the AfD, but I decided against it as I thought to mention this title, and not others, would be WP:UNDUE , especially as they were just the distributor of the home media.  There are numerous actor/actress articles where their debut role is linked to a non-article.  I don't think there can be any inherited notability on that basis.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 19:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to consider whether it would be better to Delete or Redirect the article (or some other resolution).  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above, but no objection to a conensus delete.  Fails GNG.  Treehouse Trolls Birthday Day was deleted [1] and now this article is the sole entry at Treehouse Trolls , if deleted this DAB (that already doesnt dab) won't have any entries and should be deleted/redirected.  // Timothy :: talk 17:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lost It All : Sources in the article are more about the albums that the song on which it was included.  Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 20:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 20:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Doesn't seem that either Nightmare or Diamonds in the Rough mentions the song any more than the other so neither is a better redirect target.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 22:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Fails WP:NSONG .   References are all either about album in which the track appears, listings of album contents, or chart listings in minor charts.  Only one cite actually discusses this track, and that's in a review of the entire album.  -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nightmare (Avenged Sevenfold album) - Although it does appear in the reissue album, I think it makes the most sense to redirect to its original release album as an WP:ATD .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 16:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nightmare (Avenged Sevenfold album) per above.  // Timothy :: talk 14:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
That's My Job (Philippine TV program) : GBooks, GNews and GNews Archives did not provide substantial results.  Alternatively , redirect to List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 03:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 06:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Winfield D. Ong : All sources found regarding the subject are primary or namedrops.  Let'srun ( talk ) 09:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Indiana .  Let'srun ( talk ) 09:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies as we're starting to do with these.  We have lawyers statements, and some relatively trivial coverage like [34] but nothing that amounts to SIGCOV as far as I can see.  — siro χ o 09:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The reason I'm not proposing a redirect is that there isn't much to suggest that Ong was a controversial nominee, and his WP:BLP1E isn't covered in that article, as seen by his passing through the Senate Judiciary Committee by a voice vote with the support of both Indiana senators.  It appears that he simply never received a vote before the end of Obama's 2nd term, and I don't see any other possible redirect targets.  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as article creator.  However, am open to the alternatives above, if they are pursued.  Safiel ( talk ) 17:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Rayagada : Sohom ( talk ) 22:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Schools , India ,  and Odisha .  Sohom ( talk ) 22:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
P. V. K. N. Government College : Boleyn ( talk ) 22:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Andhra Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chittoor#Education where the college is listed and where a bit more detail could be added.  Haven't found sufficient sourcing to pass the GNG/NORG.  Rupples ( talk ) 05:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , it's a stub article right now but more sources definitely are needed.  🐲 Jo the fire dragon 🐉 ( talk | contributions ) 09:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Chittoor#Education .  Not enough sourcing for a stand alone article, fails GNG and NORG, (a dead link, a mill news story, a name mention).  This is enough for a merge, if future sourcing develops it can be split.  // Timothy :: talk 04:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Brendan Guraliuk : I found this and three sentences here , which would not be enough.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Canada .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or draftify This is one where I'm not sure an AfD was the way to go - he plays for a top-level club in a country where hockey is popular, and has national representation.  With football, that's more than enough to be considered notable.  Should we treat hockey the same as football in that regard?  Anyway, he has not yet made a senior Olympics debut (only a 10th place Youth Olympics finish and the Canadian team qualifying for 2024): it will be easier to judge GNG notability after that and so the article should at least be draftified (not deleted and not content-removal redirected yet) for this purpose.  Kingsif ( talk ) 10:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He did make a senior Olympic debut, he played at the 2020 Summer Olympics.  Parwa104 ( talk ) 13:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soccer needs to meet GNG, even if they play for a top club.  I am sure the same notability standards apply for field hockey.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 13:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All I can find is coverage of him from his hometown - Delta Optimist only - like [33] .  SportingFlyer T · C 13:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Article was created when WP:NOLYMPICS had a looser criteria.  I cannot find anything to indicate WP:SIGCOV .  I don't think drafting would work, as coverage is unlikely to improve in the short term.  I suggest a redirect to Canada at the 2020 Summer Olympics#Field_hockey as a WP:ATD .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsfan 1234 ( talk • contribs ) 13:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Canada at the 2020 Summer Olympics#Field_hockey - WP:ATD - per User:Sportsfan 1234 .  Ingratis ( talk ) 10:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Countdown to Nowhere : Fails WP:NALBUM .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , United States of America ,  and Illinois .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom, the article fails WP:NALBUM .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Allister : found no evidence of notability beyond limited coverage in article.  The album isn't even listed on AllMusic despite them having reviews for three other albums by this band, and that can't be a good sign.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 04:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Allister .  Fails WP:NALBUM for standalone article.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
100% Footy : Suggesting reverting to redirect.  Just i yaya 14:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football ,  and Australia .  Just i yaya 14:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WCQT-LD : PROD was declined with the suggestion that this page be redirected or merged to a page that does not currently exist now (although it did at the time), and I don't see any other possible targets now.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to merge/redirect to.  Does not have SIGCOV .  Drowssap SMM 14:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in Alabama#LPTV stations : it is listed there, so an {{ R to list entry }} seems like a valid-enough alternative to deletion to me. I can't exactly oppose outright deletion either; in any case, if there's no significant (or any real) coverage to speak of, we can't have an article.  (That the only known programming is an equally-non-notable network can't exactly be a good sign, though just as notability is not inherited , non-notability probably also isn't a given in that scenario.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in Alabama#LPTV stations as WP:ATD .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 23:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shri Raosaheb Ramrao Patil Mahavidyalaya : No evidence of wp:notability.   College affiliated with a university.     I'm normally pretty lenient regarding GNG sourcing for schools but this one has zero independent sources much less GNG sources.  And I couldn't find any.  North8000 ( talk ) 18:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shivaji University to which it is affiliated.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect