hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Melbourne City FC 8–1 Brisbane Roar FC: More than enough to mention it on a record list.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Australia .  CptViraj ( talk ) 10:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Other "highest goalscoring records" articles exist, both in the A-League (eg. Central Coast Mariners FC 2–8 Newcastle Jets FC ), and outside of the A-League ( Liverpool F.C. 9–0 AFC Bournemouth ) More information can be added to the article which can bring it up to a similar quality of these articles, as much more information about the subject exists.  Milkk7 ( talk ) 15:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an invalid argument.  Also you can't compare the English Premier League to other leagues, be it in terms of viewership, publicity or generated coverage.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – There could be integrated into the articles as of A-League records and statistics or Soccer records and statistics in Australia .  Instead of creating a dedicated article for each match, a section for matches with a large number of goals could exist.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fine to mention on respective club articles, but does not justify a separate article.  Swan505 ( talk ) 03:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree with initial comment by Geschichte , that it is enough to include on a record list.  Spinifex&Sand ( talk ) 00:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Regular season games are generally not notable.  Nothing about this one tells me that it is.  Tar nis hed Path talk 13:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophia Muetterties: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Puerto Rico ,  and Pennsylvania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I won't contest this.  Subject remains, regrettably, a bit of nobody.  Danish Ranger ( talk ) 00:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Republic of Pelau (micronation): While I don't have access to Micronations (Ryan et al. 2006), the CBS News article doesn't mention Pelau at all.  A quick WP:BEFORE doesn't give anything either, except, when the term "micronation" is removed from the search, a lot of misspellings of Palau .  Even assuming the 2006 book does indeed mention Pelau, a single book mentioning it (along with many other such micronations) isn't enough for GNG.  Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 20:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as a hoax.  The Micronations book is accessible through the Internet Archive ( [14] ) and Pelau is not mentioned anywhere.  Astaire ( talk ) 21:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks a lot!  Looking at the page range given (pp. 90–93), the book appears to talk about the "Principality of Vikesland" and the "Great United Kiseean Kingdom", but no mention of Pelau at all.  Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 21:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly a hoax as stated above, plus the page creator had a similarly-named page (misspelling of another country) speedy deleted a month ago: [15] .  I would say speedy delete if an admin hadn't already removed the CSD tag.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 03:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete G3.  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Both sources fail WP:SIGCOV .  Numberguy6 ( talk ) 16:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete likely a hoax; no evidence for the existence of this micronation in cited articles.  Regardless, fails SIGCOV.  Note that Muhammad Luqman, allegedly an LTA, has made several other hoax articles on Wikipedia about different micronations before which were all speedied.  Incidentally he has been banned from MicroWiki 53 times for the same reason of repeatedly creating hoax articles.  ❧ LunaEatsTuna ( talk ), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 11:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment note ongoing sockpuppet investigation .  This page and Muhammad Louqman have had consistent issues with sockpuppeting before.  This should be speedy deleted imo 104.232.119.107 ( talk ) 05:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:G3 .  It's a hoax.  Get rid of it.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 08:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of MotoGP broadcasters: Of the sources: most of the sources are news announcments about securing rights, four of those are primary sources.  WP:NOTGUIDE applies here.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  This article seems like excessive information that is not encyclopedic for Wikipedia.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 12:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Motorsport ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 12:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:LISTN as the nom describes, not finding anything that would help this qualify either.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – per the nominator's rationale EnthusiastWorld37 ( talk ) 19:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kalyana Paravaigal: Kailash29792 (talk) 05:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suzanne Pierre: The 'selected publications' seems to be all publications.  There is evidence of grants (one in the form of the award), but none seem to sufficient to meet the prize criteria of WP:NBIO .  Klbrain ( talk ) 16:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women , Science , California , New Jersey ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   I think that it's far WP:TOOSOON for NPROF for this 2018 PhD, although the citation record is a reasonable start.   The scholarships and grants do not carry much weight for notability, although they may help the subject eventually become notable.   Little sign of GNG; I thought there might be some coverage of the national geographic connection, but it looks like this is mostly (only?) another early career award/grant.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 10:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  SPA-created fanpage.  Subject has H-index of 4 on 70 total citations.  128.252.210.4 ( talk ) 16:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Gliere: BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 16:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Article needs work - I tagged it as a stub.   But she performed for Pope Francis.   That makes her notable IMHO.  BostonMensa ( talk ) 16:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a total of six hits in Gnews, most from OperaWire, rest are concert listings.  Gsearch is about as barren, RateMyProfessor, LinkedIn, nothing we can use for RS to meet GNG, MUSIC or much else.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:07, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No reliable citations found on this one.  It can't pass GNG.  CastJared ( talk ) 19:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article has no compelling claim of notability.  128.252.154.2 ( talk ) 19:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Seigle Knight: All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Jamaica .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Stifle ( talk ) 10:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I, too, couldn't find any sources that would meet WP:SIGCOV .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perry Crossing, Indiana: As far as I can tell, it is the road of that name crossing the railroad tracks, though I can't get anything that says that.  Even before I took steps to exclude the shopping center on the outskirts of Indianapolis, hits were down in the clickbait range; most are real estate hits, especially for an "at Perry Crossing" complex which is actually a mile or so west.  Book hits are all either fed gazetteer stuff, other fed pubs, or chance juxtapositions.  Maybe this is a locale, but I have nothing.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If it doesn't appear on maps until the 60s, it was likely an informal local term that somehow got added to a map, then into GNIS, then here, where we have invented a nonexistent community.   Nothing found.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 13:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Local papers leave it clear this just a road called "Perry's Crossing".  It doesn't actually cross the tracks, because that road on the other side is a different later road.  It does however cross Silver Creek, and is probably named for whoever owned the land that the crossing was on.  Way back, when Some guy with the last name Perry probably built a toll bridge across the creek.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above.   Not a community.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 03:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KSquirrel: Previous AfD in 2009 ended with no consensus, and none of the links provided in that discussion seem like suitable sources.  External searches did not yield suitable sources as well.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : In the previous AfD , the following sources were found: 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 .  Admittedly I'm not familiar with software-related journalism, but those coverage do look like software download pages or one of the countless "# of best software for X" lists.  Honestly I want to know what the community think of this article Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG , WP:NSOFT , and WP:NORG .  This is churnalism, this is trivial, finally this and this are nothing more than a brief description on a download page; none of those show notability for the article's subject.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 02:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Comparison of image viewers .  It makes sense that it would have been kept in 2009, because it was relatively current then, but if it hasn't been maintained in 15 years and there's been no continuing coverage then it's not really notable (I used KDE for a while and I've never heard of this program).  jp × g 09:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't think a redirect to the comparison article would do much, as the inclusion criteria seems to be having a Wikipedia article.  SWinxy ( talk ) 08:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Independence Building: The rest are various kinds of buildings named Independence, i.e. partial matches.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:PARTIAL Only one entry contains the word "building".  "Independence" is a common word and not determinate by itself.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above - only one title listed here is actually called "independence building".  WJ94 ( talk ) 09:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eric Chiryoku: I posted the following review on the article's talk page: Taking a look at the Chinese version of the article did not reveal relevant sources.  Google Books has a text that is a set of articles written by a Korean music columnist in which Chiryoku is mentioned a couple of times, but not on pages available in preview ... and the text is in Korean, making it rather less accessible.  There appears to be no content in...  Internet Archive (texts as opposed to web) Newspapers.com the Gale subsets 'gale ebooks', 'general onefile', 'news', 'the times digital archive' NewspaperArchive An internet search via DuckDuckGo revealed many references, none of which could be considered reliable sources.  There are potentially South East Asian sources that contain reference to this artist, but I do not have much comprehension or access to those.  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions .  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 01:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We've got these passing mentions , and a questionable and likely unreliable source regarding the artist, which, of course, don't have significant coverage of Chiryoku and thus do not count towards passing GNG .  Don't see anything else and the nom states nothing else across other sources.  And by the way, Ceyockey , if I'm not mistaken, you don't need to translate the subject's name to Malaysian (which apparently according to Google was one of the main languages in Singapore)–it's still written in it's original subject's name!  Just need to Google up "Eric Chiryoku Singapore"!  Tails Wx 02:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Found no significant coverage of the subject.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 04:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Midwestern Marx Institute: Its journal appears to be self-published.  If this article is anything other than self-promotion, it needs to demonstrate notability with reference to reliable sources.  Patrick ( talk ) 17:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals , Philosophy , Organizations ,  and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Insufficient secondary sources to establish notability.  I checked for other references and do not see significant references to the Institute nor its journal in major media.  WmLawson ( talk ) 13:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : only mentions I could find were articles by members of the institute, so no coverage in independent reliable sources.  Shapeyness ( talk ) 16:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  My BEFORE sadly does not suggest they meet WP:GNG or such ( WP:NORG , etc.).  Outside of the article in counterculture.org , there are just few mentions in passing about them in niche outlets.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yudister Narayan: The attempted notability claim here is an unreferenced list of various awards, but not every award that exists on earth is an automatic notability clincher -- the extent to which any award constitutes a notability claim depends on the notability of the award , meaning that the award itself also has to be able to pass GNG on reliable source coverage about the award as well.  But other than the bulletpointed award list, the only other content here is of the "he is a person who exists" variety, and that isn't referenced to GNG-worthy citations either: two of the four footnotes are duplicated repetition of his own self-published press release on two different press release distribution platforms, one is a short blurb on a WordPress blog, and one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in coverage about somebody else.  Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding enough on an online search to substantiate the notability per WP:NARTIST , WP:NMODEL nor buisness people per WP:GNG .  What aI do find are things like social media and what looks like paid placement native advertising neither of which are relevant for an encyclopedia article.  Netherzone ( talk ) 00:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My WP:BEFORE search does not turn up reliable sources on the the subject.  asianewsnetwork article throws up security warning.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete