hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
NBC SportsTalk: Let'srun ( talk ) 21:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No notability on this show.  Sports shows rarely get the WP:SIGCOV for an article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 22:20, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to NBCSN#Original programming , which mentions this program.  This alternative to deletion is probably the best that can be done for a supposed "flagship show" that only lasted a year-and-change; without significant coverage , what can you say about a general sports talk show that likely didn't look much different from any other ?  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with above, doesn't meet stand-alone notability, Redirect to target identified above.  Likely redirect.  JackFromWisconsin ( talk | contribs ) 21:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Wcquidditch.  Redirects are cheap , so a redirect is the best option here.  Spinixster (chat!) 08:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per User:Wcquidditch makes sense.  Jacona ( talk ) 15:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alan Jackson (The Sarah Jane Adventures): I did a search, but outside of one book reference, I don't see enough potential sources for this article to meet either GNG or SIGCOV, and is currently functioning off of one review as its entire reception section.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Sarah Jane Adventures .  Character from a relatively minor spinoff, we are not Tardis Data Core.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Sarah Jane Adventures .  The series is relatively recent and if non-blog and non-fansite coverage was available it would be evident.  I can only find one Digitalspy article about this character.  Sionk ( talk ) 16:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect There is a consensus that third-party sources for this cannot be found, and this fails WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tatiana Terezón: The subject has made at least three appearances for the El Salvador women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and El Salvador .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : My search found only passing mentions, fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 05:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' as above.  Giant Snowman 15:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Estadio Zapote: * Pppery * it has begun... 17:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 27 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Football ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to C.D.S. Tampico Madero#Stadium .  Not independently notable.  Giant Snowman 09:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Per above.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 17:35, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dil, Diya, Dehleez (TV series): — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Yasir_Nawaz#Television_serials : or to the novel that the series adapts.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alternative versions of Invisible Woman: References are 100% comic books (primary fiction sources).  The topic fails WP:GNG and is nothing but a plot summary.  At best, we can consider SOFTDELETE by redirecting this to Invisible Woman (no objection to merging a bit of plot summary if anyone thinks it is relevant).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge very selectively to Invisible Woman#Other versions .  This is not even close to meeting LISTN.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Invisible Woman#Other versions in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 14:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or selective merge, per QuicoleJR.  Does not pass WP:LISTN or WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
La Perouse station: – dlthewave ☎ 04:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per the above is the best idea for this page.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train : each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is.  Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
K33LN-D: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Minnesota .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : this station actually has a longer history than your average HC2/Innovate station, but that prior history was pretty much entirely as a 3ABN-owned station.  I doubt that incarnation ever got any significant coverage or anything vaguely resembling notability (even the old pre-2021 standards discouraged articles on those, but we were even looser in 2006); it's hard to imagine that situation will change anytime soon with the current incarnation.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I forgot my usual note that this is yet another technical survivor of a bulk nomination from last year .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  .  per above fails GNG and NCORP, nothing found with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from WP:IS WP:RS.  // Timothy :: talk 13:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Thom Park: There is nothing obviously notable about it.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 10:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Copied from a (misplaced) TFD notice, Special:Diff/1223786218 .  Primefac ( talk ) 14:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Primefac ( talk ) 14:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Newhaven lad @ Primefac Page creator here.  I was confused by the templates for deletion discussion, but just redirect to Gresham,_Oregon#Parks_and_recreation .  Not worried about it.  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Prasanth Varma Cinematic Universe: The second film in the universe had its trailer released in 2022 and has not been released yet.  The series should be dratftified or deleted till the next film releases.  My verdict for the information on this page is that the universe information should be mentioned at Hanu Man#Future .  A clear case of WP:Too early .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 00:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Citing the failure of of the Dark Universe for the Universal Classic Monsters ; let's make sure the other films come out before we look like an embarrassment detailing multiple projects forever in development hell .  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Film , Hinduism ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:FILMSERIES .  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 08:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hanu Man#Future : While the forthcoming installments of the franchise will no doubt come, given the success of the progenitor, none have entered the filming stage.  So keep it as a redirect till at least a third installment enters production.  Kailash29792 (talk) 10:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Redirect to Hanu Man#Future : The production of the second installment Aadhira has started and the team has already released the promotional video [58] .  The third installment Jai HanuMan has been confirmed by Prasanth Varma in many interviews [59] .  SonaMani1 ( talk ) 13:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hanu Man#Future .  This article is probably WP:TOOSOON , but the history should be preserved for future use in the spirit of WP:AtD .  Daranios ( talk ) 19:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Photograph (Ariel Rivera album): I can't verify its Gold album claim as PARI doesn't have this record.  Alternatively, redirect to Ariel_Rivera#Albums -- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 03:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 06:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The project was rated 1 and half out of 5 (3 out of 10) by Allmusic and there's also a review from stuff here , other than that I could not find anything.  WP:AtD , redirect to the performer, please ping me if sources possibly from archives are presented.  dxneo ( talk ) 12:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ariel_Rivera#Albums .  Fails WP:NALBUM per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 00:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Like the Linen: 🌺 Cremastra ( talk ) 15:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  🌺 Cremastra ( talk ) 15:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thao Nguyen : Found no significant coverage.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 15:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thao Nguyen : little hope of finding SIGCOV to establish notability for a standalone article.  Owen× ☎ 17:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mansfield Road FC: Its only reference is to a profile on its league site (not independent or significant) and I can find nothing significant online.  This is a tier 11 club and I don't believe they participated in the FA Vase or Cup.  I would have used PROD, but it would only be removed, so might as well save some time and take it here.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 14:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football , United Kingdom ,  and England .  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 14:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - longstanding consensus at WP:FOOTY is that clubs that have never competed in any sort of national competition do not reach the required level of notability unless they have received significant in-depth (non-routine) coverage, and I can see no evidence that this one has -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 17:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Oxfordshire Senior Football League as we have done previously for similar low-level, non-notable clubs.  Giant Snowman 18:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Oxfordshire Senior Football League - we are not a directory for non-notable football clubs such as this one.  Redirect because it's a plausible search term.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
British Animation Film Festival: TLA (talk) 10:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events ,  and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete None of the sources used meet WP:GNG , and I can't find anything better after searching.  Only brief mentions on unsuitable websites.  Thebookstamper ( talk ) 13:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Contested soft deletion at WP:REFUND .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for relisting and restoring the British Animation Film Festival page.  I have added more secondary/tertiary citations to the page with new information and images as well as redirecting the URL website link due to previous links being discontinued because of website and Film Festival Guild rebranding.  I hope this helps and many thanks again.  Chaddy711 ( talk ) 12:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] May I suggest a redirect to List of international animation festivals ? - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Mushy Yank.   Most of the sources added are blogs or other non-RS so not helpful.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pre-Celtic Europe: The article attracts edits about linguistic theories, migration theories etc, that are all treated in better articles, such as Yamnaya culture , Bronze Age Europe , etc., and the only thing distinguishing this from any of these is the term "Celt", but the article is about the time before the Celts, so it is not actually about that.  Note that this nomination is not saying pre-celtic history is not notable.  For the avoidance of doubt, it certainly is.  The European bronze age and earlier are all very notable topics.  The nomination is saying the treatment of the subject in this format, with this specific framing, is redundant (and perhaps contradicts better articles).  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 14:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Archaeology ,  and Europe .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 14:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bronze Age Europe This is not really a standard term, and the article is rather confused.  It was just slightly better in 2013 .  It is mostly about the arrival of Celtic languages , not what was there before.  Johnbod ( talk ) 14:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bronze Age Europe per Johnbod.  – Joe ( talk ) 10:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2019–20 Adanaspor season: A single section with a single primary source.  Fails WP:GNG .  Sakiv ( talk ) 00:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Sakiv ( talk ) 00:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Unless if the article undergoes the necessary improvements.  Svartner ( talk ) 06:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Adanaspor .  Giant Snowman 12:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, I don't see the need to redirect.  Only the top league in Turkey should be allowed season articles.  Govvy ( talk ) 22:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Melissia Elie: All I found were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) No evidence of any activity in the sport past her late teens.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Caribbean , South America ,  and New York .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 20:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect