hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Partners In Leadership: Doesn't meet WP:ORG ' WP:GNG . Boleyn ( talk ) 17:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: This article seems curated mostly by editors with a vested interest in the organization. It has no secondary sources listed at all. There's nothing to indicate it might meet WP:GNG . signed , Willondon ( talk ) 17:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - couldn't find any sigcov in secondary sources, I don't believe this meets NCORP or GNG. I'll note the book, same discussions had in the last deletion discussion. microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 15:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Sources are press releases, and lack of any actual SIGCOV. TLA tlak 04:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Etian: Was requested to be undeleted by its original creator in 2015 after a 2011 PROD (see User_talk:Just_Chilling/Archive_9#Etian ).  User provided no sources, made unsubstantiated accusations that the article was deleted because of "bias", and has never edited a single other page aside from this one.  I was not able to locate any reliable SIGCOV that suggests this is a notable name.  Normally I would simply turn this kind of page into a disambig to famous people who have the name, but no articles exist with this string in the title, so that's not plausible.  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 19:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and China .  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 19:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wiktionary we aren't.  There is no sourcing other than people having this name.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The title seems to be an unusual spelling – the pinyin transliteration of 倚天 is Yitian, not Etian.  — Mx.  Granger ( talk · contribs ) 20:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete factfiles on non-notable names are unneeded for an encyclopedia — Karnataka talk 17:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mike Mathetha: Sources found are routine sport reports (announcement or results) which can NOT contribute to the notability for GNG and not ranking world top 10 in mixed martial arts (WP:NMMA]] or world top-10 in K-1 or Glory (kickboxing) or Lumpinee or Rajadamnern champion.  Cassiopeia talk 00:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Zimbabwe .  Cassiopeia talk 00:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non notable.  Doesn't meet WP:NKICK and WP:GNG .  He's just Izzy's friend HeinzMaster ( talk ) 03:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Coverage appears to be databases and fight results, which are not sufficient to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO .   His highest MMA ranking at fightmatix.com was #510 which isn't close to meeting WP:NMMA 's requirement of a world top 10.   I also didn't find any evidence to show he meets WP:NKICK .   He had only 1 fight with Glory and he lost that.  Papaursa ( talk ) 02:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ajith Vinayaka Films: The references currently included are primarily routine announcements about the company's upcoming/past productions Akshith manya talk 11:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , India ,  and Kerala .  Akshith manya talk 11:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jason Tanamor: Statements like “will appeal to Twilight fans” are clear evidences of these.  I considered editing the page, but a large percentage of it just advertisement.  Bulls123 ( talk ) 09:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 04:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Philippines ,  and Oregon .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT .  It's possible that the subject is notable, although I'm still unsure, the the article needs to be re-written entirely if that is the case.  The reliable sources appear to be hyper-local to his hometown of Rock Island, Illinois and along the lines of "local man writes book".  Other refs include Wordpress sites, at least one deadlink, and other unreliable sources.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 11:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
How Strategy Shapes Structure: See comments on User talk:Surfdachsie (clearly a COI editor), where the PROD was declined even though there was absolutely no credible evidence of notability.  Drmies ( talk ) 18:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Book report, not notable or encyclopedic.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 19:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete summary of a non-notable article.  GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 19:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 14:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Double Bubble Bingo: ~ A412 talk!  06:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Games ,  and United Kingdom .  ~ A412 talk!  06:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to Gamesys as WP:ATD .  Agree it is promotional and fails NCORP.  Jumpytoo Talk 08:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Jumpytoo Talk 08:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: "Delete and redirect" is not an ATD as it results in the deletion of the article.  Would a straight Redirect work?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to Gamesys .   No indication of notability, and this is purely promotion. -- Gronk Oz ( talk ) 08:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eni Malaj: Despite searching for a while, I can't find anything other than database sources about his football career, which is unsurprising given that he had a brief career in the 2nd tier of Albania and little else.  His career seemed to stop after he was arrested, along with 24 others, for drug trafficking offences.  Gazeta Shqip is the source that confirms Malaj's arrest and that he was a former goalkeeper for Tirana but gives no further coverage.  Malaj does not seem to meet WP:GNG from his playing career or otherwise and the coverage of the crime is way short of the requirements listed at WP:PERP for a stand-alone article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nom explains it rather well.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zainab Kapanda: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Noel McNamara: I don't consider getting the Medal of the Order of Australia means inherent notability, as 605 of these are given out every year.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article is only supported by primary sources.  I removed another source that was purely promotional.  My searches found that his son is more notable than he is for a WP:BLP1E incident.  Tar nis hed Path talk 13:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dilwala(2023 film): IMDB, which is an unreliable source, says that it is upcoming.   IMDB also has an incomprehensible summary, which was copied into this article, but which I have removed as copyvio.   (The IMDB contributor apparently is not fluent with English.)  This article was in mainspace, but was moved into draft space, citing paid editing and sockpuppetry.   It was then declined, with the instruction to add reviews when the film was released.   It has now been moved back into article space without the reviews (because it hasn't been released).   Either the cast listing can be moved into draft space until the film is released and reviewed, or it can be blown up , and started over when the film is released and reviewed.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 16:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 16:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete See Dilwala (2023 film) ; trying to evade the constant speedies there by taking it to a slightly different-named article title.  Enough, get some sources with an actual byline from an actual person who typed said source, and I'm completely against draftifying this.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - User:MrSchimpf - Another attempt at the gaming of names , omitting the space to look different.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 02:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and salt .  I don't see why an AfD is even needed.  Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 05:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as a violation of WP:G4 .  Partofthemachine ( talk ) 00:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC) Delete as an attempt to game the system , but this technically does not qualify for G4 speedy deletion because it has not been subject to a previous deletion discussion, as pointed out below.  Partofthemachine ( talk ) 20:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question - I don't see a previous AFD under any spelling.   Am I missing something?   I see repeated submissions, but I don't see an AFD, and I think that this AFD is required.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There were no previous AfD noms; it's been speedied each time its come up for either sockpuppetry or pay-for-play, so I do think this nom should go the full seven to solidify that consensus.  Nate • ( chatter ) 18:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Devin Oosthuizen: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Stock photos, match reports and an ESPN profile are all I can find for this person.  Not meeting notability requirements due to a lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A few bits and pieces, but not enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nils Wetterholm: zoglophie •talk• 10:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Music ,  and Sweden .  zoglophie •talk• 10:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fundamental Analysis Software: This is unreferenced and original research at best and I think should be deleted.  Sargdub ( talk ) 09:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It's just a list of software features devoid of context or sources.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 15:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kate Badoe: Shellwood ( talk ) 10:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  On the evidence shown, she does fail WP:CREATIVE .   Unlike some, I am ready to consider recent prices realized as evidence of notability, but $ 2,000 is well below that threshold - $25K might do it.  Johnbod ( talk ) 13:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've found that high sold prices for an artist's work is a half-decent indicator of notability, however, low prices do not indicate non-notability.  There are probably hundreds (or thousands) of notable artists on Wikipedia whose work sells for under $1000, especially artists whose work has fallen out of favour but they still merit an article based on the sourcing.  Curiocurio ( talk ) 12:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd doubt that - for paintings of any size - prints and even drawings of course are different.  But this price was produced as though leading evidence of notability.  Johnbod ( talk ) 13:52, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benjamin Saunders (rugby union): No indication of wp:notability under GNG or sng.   References were all data/database types except this one https://tiebreakertimes.com.ph/tbt/ben-saunders-set-for-ntt-docomo-osaka-return-in-rugby-league-one/229244 which was a few paragraphs on when he has played.  North8000 ( talk ) 00:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , Japan ,  and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Coverage that I can find seems to be limited, however he has had a considerable career, the majority of which in Japan, where sources are more difficult to find due to the language issue and them being offline, so there may well be more coverage.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Antimetal: scope_creep Talk 11:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the provided sources are a WSJ article about AI in cloud services more generally and only briefly mentions Antimetal, and a TechCrunch article ( RSP entry ) that reads like a lightly edited press release.  Searching online, I was able to find blogs and churnalism coverage, but nothing significant; nothing on Google Scholar or Books; I searched for terms like "Antimetal" tech , "Antimetal" AI , "Antimetal" company to avoid the many results about "antimetal" in other contexts.  signed, Rosguill talk 13:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - as per nom; article also feels slightly self-promotional.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 13:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing I find meets WP:ORGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unable to find RSs besides the WSJ and TechCrunch ones.  SWinxy ( talk ) 21:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG/NCORP and only serves as promotional at this stage, TOOSOON.  HighKing ++ 14:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not much notable coverage.  Salsakesh ( talk ) 22:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete