hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Rchid Bidak : (Additionally, a lot of the article is highly promotional in tone, although that's fixable and deletion is not cleanup)  Most of the tone issues have been fixed.  Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 20:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Morocco .  Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 21:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Tried searching for book reviews in English and French, on . fr and . ma websites, nothing comes up.  Can barely even find online sties for the book.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
QuietRock : Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment :Haven't checked notability yet but the article's tone is definitely not so bad that it needs to be deleted for it.  Mach61 ( talk ) 22:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG , sources are not significant in their coverage or are just product listings or routine PR sources.  Searches find product listings as well.  Promotional in tone and borderline WP:G11 v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 22:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sounds promotional and fails CORP notability The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Araceli Aipoh : Lacks significant coverage.  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Nigeria .  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Blythd920wkw ( talk ) 14:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sockpuppet vote struck by — Trey Maturin ™ 14:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Philippines .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:AUTHOR .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 10:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mardial : Very few sources, for articles of living people.  ▪︎ Fazoffic ( ʖ╎ᓵᔑ∷ᔑ ) 08:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Onel5969 , Ariandi Lie , MbokGalau02 ,  and Ustad abu gosok : This article, simultaneously, is also proposed for deletion on idwiki ( see ) ▪︎ Fazoffic ( ʖ╎ᓵᔑ∷ᔑ ) 08:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let's see WP:MUSICBIO points.  Ariandi Lie Ariandi Lie 08:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This person failed to all notabilities criteria.  FYI: User whose create this article is a sockpuppetry on idwiki.  Ariandi Lie Ariandi Lie 05:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 29 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Indonesia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 20:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Soho Center : Fails the general and organization-specific notability policies as none (or too few) of the references meet all 3 of the golden rule criteria.  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , United States of America , New York ,  and Virginia .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Education .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  As an organisation, its a 50 year old charity and such there is likely to be more coverage available.  scope_creep Talk 17:10, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat / contributions 04:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NGO Mach61 ( talk ) 04:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't find any significant coverage.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish • growths ) 17:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nana Aboagye Dacosta : Nirva20 ( talk ) 02:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Article doesn’t show any evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 13:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perth Ram Temple : The article makes an extraordinary claim ("tallest temple dedicated to Rama ever built in the world"), which should result in more local coverage, but there is no coverage in local media such as The West Australian or ABC News .  Steelkamp ( talk ) 02:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Australia .  Steelkamp ( talk ) 02:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  Kpg jhp jm 07:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete the reason that there doesn't appear to be any local coverage is because nothing has been built yet, so WP:CRYSTALBALL applies.  -- D'n'B - t -- 18:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG.  You would expect at least some coverage in The West Australian , but there isn't.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ara Arush : The films don't have articles.  The references seem to be press releases or official bio blurbs, and not constituting independent, significant coverage per WP:GNG .  Created 10 years ago by account that made no other edits.  Here2rewrite ( talk ) 12:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Armenia ,  and Russia .  Owen× ☎ 13:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Polad Fataliev : Redivy ( talk ) 22:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 24 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 23:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 23:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Azerbaijan .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 00:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article are not WP:SIGCOV, and BEFORE found listings, mill game news, nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 14:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Uchana Amit : Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 12:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists , India ,  and Haryana .  Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO, with no sourcing other than Spotify streams.  This is all I find, but it's basically a PR piece [25] Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Uchana Amit is a notable Singer worked with Badshah here is his instagram ID for reference @theuchana, you can also check YouTube for his songs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parth1221 ( talk • contribs ) 15:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] that's promotional coverage, not valid here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources don't support this person as notable, plus article is written in a highly promotional nature.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 16:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Deleted most of the unsourced and promotional fluff and it really drives home the notability problem.   No WP:SECONDARY sources with WP:SIGCOV of the article subject.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 16:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Armel Oroko : I found passing mentions but nothing close to WP:SIGCOV .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 10:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Central African Republic .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 10:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Clearly fails WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 17:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found Camfoot , but it's only a trivial mention of Oroko.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rita Mayang : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joseph McCabe (entrepreneur) : KH-1 ( talk ) 23:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and Pennsylvania .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 01:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete - I see 2 sources that may be OK 1 and 2 but their reliability is questionable.  We would need a few more to pass him.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 15:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The first source in particular seems more like a blog (they allow readers to create posts on the website).  Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 17:38, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Every source in the article is either non-independent, reads like PR copy or both.   I found [1] on Google which I think is an as good or better source than anything in the article, but it's not enough on its own.   Other hits were clearly not independent.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 21:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ivan Šijak : Article was also created by the subject.  There perhaps could be some Serbian sources I missed, but for now it doesn't seem like the subject passes general or artist-specific notability guidelines.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 13:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists , Arts , Film ,  and Serbia .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 13:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] oppose/keep Sijak ivan ( talk ) 07:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Appears to have been involved in a few projects [33] with video game companies, but nothing I'd use to build an article.  We could revisit if there are sources in his native language, but I can't find any.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi there, here are few links that can relate article to my biography.  http://www.arte.rs/sr/aktuelno/ivan_sijak_gray_matter-11572/1/1/ https://submarinechannel.com/profiles/new-pretty-cool-people-interview-ivan-sijak/ https://fdu.bg.ac.rs/sr-lat/fakultet/nastavno-osoblje/ivan-sijak-70 \ https://www.kcb.org.rs/arhiva_vesti/ivan-sijak-gray-matter-video-instalacije/ Kind regards 87.116.183.29 ( talk ) 19:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi there, here are few links that can relate article to my biography.  http://www.arte.rs/sr/aktuelno/ivan_sijak_gray_matter-11572/1/1/ https://submarinechannel.com/profiles/new-pretty-cool-people-interview-ivan-sijak/ https://fdu.bg.ac.rs/sr-lat/fakultet/nastavno-osoblje/ivan-sijak-70 \ https://www.kcb.org.rs/arhiva_vesti/ivan-sijak-gray-matter-video-instalacije/ https://www.izlazak.com/vizuelna-umetnost/22217-ivan-sijak-izlozba-fotografija-metropolis-revisited-1994 87.116.183.29 ( talk ) 19:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence of significant coverage from reliable sources, mentions which I found° are surface-level or are from member of projects.  Antimargi ( talk ) 16:38, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding significant coverage from reliable sources.  Existing sources in the article failed verification. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Article, above and BEFORE showed nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 14:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dauwa Ahir : Ratnahastin ( talk ) 10:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  15 of 16 sources are poor, unreliable and WP:RAJ era.  One source is reliable by Ravindra K. Jain, a former Professor of Sociology from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India, but this too has no coverage on "Dauwa Ahirs" from the link given.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Notability is missing.  Agletarang ( talk ) 19:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails general parameters for a Wikipedia page.  Based Kashmiri TALK 09:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jacob Johnson (father of Andrew Johnson): While he has been mentioned in several books as a result of his presidential son, notability is not inherited and WP:SIGCOV still applies.  Information currently in this article can and already is included in his son's article .  A previous AfD four years ago ended in no consensus; the mentioned sparse newspaper coverage there of his saving drowning sailors runs into WP:BIO1E problems.  Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , History ,  and North Carolina .  — Karnataka talk 10:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the article title demonstrates the problem.  If we need to know he is the father of Andrew Johnson up front, it is because he is not independently notable.  As notability is not inherited, there should not be an article.  The relevant information is on the Andrew Johnson page.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 19:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge to Andrew Johnson .  Folks have been suggesting making " Family of Andrew Johnson "-type articles in such situations as well, which seems like a very good idea here, so a WP:ATD would be beneficial to preserve history.  — siro χ o 04:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete This is original historical research about a person who does not reverse-inherit the notability of his son .  Mangoe ( talk ) 07:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or delete merge if there's anything worth merging back into the Andrew Johnson article, otherwise delete.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge