hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Cinéaste One Student Film Festival : The article claims that it's one of Pakistan's most important film festivals, but fails to provide any properly referenced verification of that -- except for one news article about the 2013 event, this is otherwise referenced entirely to the festival's own self-published content about itself.  The article, further, has not been updated with any content about the festival ever taking place again after 2013, and a Google search failed to find any significant coverage to suggest that any post-2013 events were overlooked -- and the article appears to have possibly been created at least partially to drive traffic to streaming copies of short films that were screened at it for promotional purposes, as the 2012 "featured shorts" section included an offsite link to Vimeo for every film listed in it until I stripped those just now as WP:ELNO violations.  There's just nothing here that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have a lot more than just one hit of third-party coverage.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events ,  and Pakistan .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cinéaste One , where it is mentioned. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cinéaste One#History where it's mentioned.  A. Randomdude0000 ( talk ) 18:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Milo Nqoro : JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of South Africa national rugby sevens players Looks to fail WP:GNG .  Redirect is a suitable WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Standing Committee of the Tenth National People's Congress : May be a notable topic as noted in history but has no sources and should not remain published in its current condition.  To avoid further 'move-warring', a discussion is now warranted.  Naive search did not reveal additional SIGCOV.  Possible merge to Standing Committee of the National People's Congress .  Eagleash ( talk ) 09:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge – thank you for moving this AfD; fully concur with the nom.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 09:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and China . Shellwood ( talk ) 09:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Merge or delete? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . The article is a stub, but it's about a national legislature. All the standing committee's members are individually notable as members of a national legislature, and the names can probably be found on the website of the National People's Congress. Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 16:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Standing Committee of the National People's Congress pending creation of 10th Standing Committee of the National People's Congress which is the correct title. There's more than adequte materials to satisfy this in terms of both WP:NLIST and the WP:GNG : novel forms of electoral outcomes for the standing committee ( 10th People's Congress and After ), decisions of the committee in relation to the Hong Kong Basic Law , general coverage of reports of the standing committee at the 10th People's Congress. Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 22:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of Delta State Statesmen in the NFL draft : Can at most be merged to Delta State Statesmen and Lady Statesmen#Football if this is deemed of some importance after all.  As can be seen at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 420#DraftHistory.com , there are concerns about the source anyway, so new creations based on this source should probably be stopped.  Fram ( talk ) 08:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists of people , Education , American football ,  and Mississippi .  Fram ( talk ) 08:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are multiple sources in regards to Delta State football players being drafted ( [90] , [91] , [92] ), though I agree that a lot of the lists should be expanded upon (which myself and a lot of others are very much trying to work on), and turned into FL's.  In regards to this list, I would not be completely opposed to a merge / redirect , but for now I just view it as a Stub.  KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs ) 17:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What's required for list notability is reliable secondary sources doscussing the grouping, not the members of the group.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 22:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN due to a lack of secondary sources.  The sources cited here along with the one in the article are all primary.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  LISTN asks that "Delta State Statesmen in the NFL draft" be discussed significantly in IRS as a topic in itself ; separate sources on individual Statesmen in the draft are not sufficient.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 05:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom does not meet WP:LISTN .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge largely per nom; the sources from KingSkyLord are machine-generated.  There is an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument based on articles in Category:Lists of National Football League draftees by college football team , but many of those articles can/should also be deleted or merged.  That said, I see no reasons this information couldn't be included at Delta State Statesmen and Lady Statesmen#Football .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I don't have a particular stance on this, but I thought I'd mention that everything from the source in question can be easily replaced with links to Pro-Football-Reference.com.  This link verifies the content in the article, but it of course does not provide any SIGCOV for the matter.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Top Secret (House) : This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid.  In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 01:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to House (season 3) , where the episode is listed as an WP:ATD .  CycloneYoris talk!  00:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of football clubs in Wallis and Futuna : Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 02:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football , Lists , France ,  and Islands .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just WP:BOLD redirect it to Football in Wallis and Futuna .  Reywas92 Talk 13:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Or redirect to Football in Wallis and Futuna .  Svartner ( talk ) 15:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as collection of random information, and also purge the template "List of association football clubs in Oceania".  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Football in Wallis and Futuna as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jack (Tekken) : None of the sources can be found that talks about him besides listicles or passing mention.  Sources elsewhere are only trivial mentions in Tekken 8 announcements like this [2] "JaCk was inTroDuced with bIg raIl gUn, amazing".  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 21:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 21:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 21:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  Listicles do not a notable character make.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per reasons above.  2001:4455:61D:DB00:4184:9335:4EB4:685F ( talk ) 12:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] IP has only three edits, all on AFDs.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 16:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  // Timothy :: talk 13:16, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Article is unsourced cruft and niche reception ("best PlayStation robots").  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 15:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Harasimowicze-Kolonia : The only difference is that it is a sołectwo and has a sołtys and a council.  However, I think this information is better suited for a table on the gmina's page (with the other sołectwa) per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOPAGE .  Ilawa-Kataka ( talk ) 01:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka if as suggested in the nomination it is better linked to a table there.  There appears to be little content available to support a separate article.  Rupples ( talk ) 09:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Rupples I have created that table now Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka#Sołectwa .  Ilawa-Kataka ( talk ) 15:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Also, the official spelling has no hyphen.  Ilawa-Kataka ( talk ) 15:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Harasimowicze , of which this is a part of.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: We have two different Redirect target articles suggested and we need to get that down to one. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 06:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Concur with Piotrus regarding redirect to Harasimowicze (part of, and local, makes much more sense in terms of any sort of searching). -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 12:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Radiator Springs : BEFORE is not helpful - the academic paper that appears on top of GScholar mentioning this in its name uses this just for, well, name - in the text this is mentioned ~2 in passing (SIGCOV fail).  Any analysis I see (based on sources in the article) boils down to a single sentence that "Many characters and places in the film are directly inspired by real Route 66 places and people."; note "many characters in places" - this is not even specific to this fictional location but to the movie itself.  While there is a bit of fan trivia about which Route 66 locations (in and outside Radiator Springs) can be seen in the animated movie, this is fandom-level fancruft, I fear.  At best this can be redirected to the movie, per SOFTDELETE and ATD.  PS.  Note the 2008 AfD already concluded as delete and redirect , so this is technically a speedy-qualifying restoration of deleted content...  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Film .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If deemed insufficiently notable per se , redirect to Cars (franchise) (where it is repeatedly mentioned, obviously) as the nominator himself mentions. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cars (franchise) If a town exists one day based on this, the it can have its own page.  Also, since it wasn't developed by the same editor, I don't think it qualifies for speedy.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cars (franchise) per nom.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 18:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cars (franchise) - The current article is just plot summary and a whole lot of trivia.  Searches do not demonstrate that the town has any notability on its own - its the setting of a notable franchise and thus is mentioned in sources discussing that franchise, but does not have the kind of coverage that would warrant an independent article.  Its a plausible search term, so redirecting to the franchise page makes the most sense.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 20:05, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ayutha Ezhuthu (TV series) : Karnataka ( talk ) 17:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sangarsha (TV series)#Adaptations .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 09:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 02:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Méhkeréki SE : But something tells me the football team of a village populated by 2,085 people is not notable.  This article has two sources one of which is a general Hungarian football directory and the other is the team's official website.  I don't think this football team is notable.  Super Ψ Dro 00:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find much in the way of published sources about this team, at least in English.  FPTI ( talk ) 00:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Hungary .  Super Ψ Dro 00:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nemzeti Bajnokság III as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 14:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nemzeti Bajnokság III : Plausible redirect target.  Drowssap SMM 18:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nemzeti Bajnokság III .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Topic isn't listed on Nemzeti Bajnokság III , so we appear to have a WP:RASTONISH problem with the suggested redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, asilvering ( talk ) 03:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nemzeti Bajnokság III per above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Yes, but DO NOT REDIRECT TO Nemzeti Bajnokság III , football teams gain promotions and relegations and should never be redirected to a league page.  This is a floored redirect and should never be done.  The redirect should be and always be to the article about the Town Méhkerék for which the football is from, plays it's home games and is associated too.  Govvy ( talk ) 07:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gordon P. Giampietro : I am not opposed to having this article redirected to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies , where his WP:BLP1E is listed.  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law , United States of America ,  and Wisconsin .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies per other similar cases.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies#List of unsuccessful federal judicial nominations per nom and Indefensible.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 19:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
10 Years in the Life : Charsaddian ( talk ) 10:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 10:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Brian Transeau : Sources on page (including Resident Advisor which is a message board post, archived here ) are unreliable.  The only additional coverage I could find is this article in Vue Weekly , and while it's good coverage, the article can't stay if it's the only good coverage available.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 11:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Brian Transeau .  One dead link, two unreliable sources and an Amazon listing.  BoxxyBoy ( talk ) 05:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] QuietHere and BoxxyBoy , Brian Transeau is a redirect.  So are you arguing to redirect to the same target that it directs to?  L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes.  Apologies for not checking that.  The target is the same guy under an alias so that should be perfectly fine.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 05:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Apologies.  Redirect to BT (musician) BoxxyBoy ( talk ) 06:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mr. Nilsson : A BEFORE doesn't seem to turn up much directly talking about the character outside of his role in the books, which can be easily covered by the main Pippi Longstocking article.  There just doesn't seem to be enough substance here to justify a separate split.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 20:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Literature .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 20:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Does not have nearly enough SIGCOV, but it could probably be redirected somewhere.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 20:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As nominator, my personal suggestion would be to the Pippi Longstocking article, given that he's discussed as a supporting character there, and there surprisingly isn't an article for the whole series on English Wikipedia.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 04:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pippi Longstocking .  If I remember these stories at all, this character is very much a sidekick to the main character so the redirect to the character is a good option regardless.  — siro χ o 04:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect seems like a sensible editorial decision.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 07:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pippi Longstocking : Already mentioned at this target, and provides a decent WP:ATD-R for what can reasonably be seen as a valid search term.  - 2pou ( talk ) 18:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect