hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jamia Mosque Al-Kauser: The two sources are about a mosque of the same name in Malaysia.  AmateurHi$torian ( talk ) 11:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 23 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Islam ,  and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I suspect this needs WP:TNT until someone can verify the details.  There seems to be a level of confusion on the page (would we expect a Malay name for a mosque in Hyderabad?) - and searching brings up various mosques in the city with similar names.  Generally I'd think that a large religious building would have sources to show notability but I can't find them.  Maybe the exist, maybe this is a hoax.  So I think we need to delete until someone does the prerequisite work to show that they exist and that the subject is notable.  JMWt ( talk ) 12:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rithika Pandey: Single exhibition.  Fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:ARTIST .  Effectively starting out.  UPE.  scope_creep Talk 10:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Visual arts ,  and India .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ghana , Nigeria , Maharashtra , Uttar Pradesh ,  and Wales .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Simply fails WP:GNG or any related WP:NARTIST .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per nom.  failed WP:GNG or any related WP:NARTIST .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 22:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As the article says, "an artist of growing note having completed her first exhibition."  Maybe an article in the future.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 21:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:21, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Spycatcher (band): Music is one of those areas where self-promoting wannabes routinely try to game our rules by falsely claiming to pass NMUSIC criteria that they don't really pass, so passing NMUSIC doesn't hinge on the claim nearly so much as it hinges on the sourcing that can or can't be shown to verify that the ciaim is true -- but while this makes claims to passing NMUSIC's radio airplay and touring criteria, it's referenced almost entirely to primary sources , like the band's own social networking profiles and the self-published websites of non-media companies directly affiliated with the claims, that are not support for notability at all -- the only attempt at citing media coverage just footnotes the name of a magazine that purportedly published content about the band once in a listicle, while failing to provide the date on which that listicle was purportedly published. But even if it can be recovered, it still takes more than just one blurb in one listicle to pass WP:GNG anyway. As I don't have particularly good access to archived British media coverage from a decade ago, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to such resources can find enough improved sourcing to salvage it -- but nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have better sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom .  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kurkaj: From WP:GEOLAND : Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran .  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stages Cycling: Sources in the body text are hardly what you call reliable third party sources.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Colorado ,  and Oregon .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Live with Moeed Pirzada: Page relies mostly on what I  safely can call [unreliable sources].  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 21:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 21:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 22:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  86.130.244.141 ( talk ) 00:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elijah Everett: Google and Google News searches do not support widespread coverage in any reliable sources and the subject does not hold any FIDE titles BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 17:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Games .  BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 17:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Germany and Wales .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Note: Elo is a surname, not an acronym.  ELO is a band.  An Electric Light Orchestra rating of 2233 is not notable, that will get you into the world top 7000 if you count only active players.  No notable chess achievements.  MaxBrowne2 ( talk ) 09:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with @ MaxBrowne2 above.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harihar Temple: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A thorough BEFORE check failed to find anything but passing mentions, and temple do not get presumptive notability under NGEO.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 20:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luke Rossouw: All that comes up in my searches are trivial mentions in match reports and lineup announcements.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A reasonable amount of coverage, but not enough to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen Tedja: In my Arabic searches, I found Al-Sharq , a trivial mention, Kooora , which is no better, and this transfer announcement , which contains no significant detail.  No sign of any WP:SIGCOV or even a passing of WP:SPORTBASIC #5.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Nigeria ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:SPORTSBIO .  Minimal fail!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  14:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 21:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it not only fails WP:SIGCOV , but it is just a simple stub that has nothing notable about it.  It also has just a single sentence that describes this player, with no other info to add.  NoobThreePointOh ( talk ) 10:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RC Spartak Trnava: Broc ( talk ) 11:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Rugby union ,  and Slovakia .  Broc ( talk ) 11:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , no suitable redirect here either per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ritu Nanda: User4edits ( talk ) 09:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , India ,  and Maharashtra .  User4edits ( talk ) 09:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The subject of the article Ritu Nanda does seem to have enough coverage in the press and does have a few newsworthy articles.  I think she passes basic WP:GNG .  We Are All Here talk 07:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 00:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : She owns an insurance agency, not a large national or international insurance company.  A small business owner is rarely notable.  Sourcing is largely obituaries, nothing before that.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : sources are an interview, a press release, a brief mention and a brief notice about her death.   Several of her family members are notable but notability is not inherited.  S0091 ( talk ) 18:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tridhya Tech Limited: Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology , Software ,  and India .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Gujarat .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article on an IT Services firm, supported largely by press items about some longstanding employees being given company cars.  (For context, the Mint item lists other companies which have done the same.)  There is also text and announcement-based coverage of takeovers of a couple of other IT Services / web development firms, which falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH , as does the current IPO.  A company going about its business, but I am not seeing evidence demonstrating attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daisy A. Robinton: Forbes listing is.. .  a Forbes listing.  Eddie891 Talk Work 19:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  TSventon ( talk ) 15:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Article in Nature that's been cited 1300 times [21] , but I'm not sure how that stacks up overall.  Doesn't seem notable otherwise, with little to nothing in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I wish people would ensure that they had proper pages (Google Scholar or similar) on their publications.  There are enough name similarities that it is hard for me to know what her citations really are, beyond that they look modest.  A good start, but I think WP:TOOSOON , particularly as she only has junior awards.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 00:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2022–23 Cheshunt F.C. season: Number 5 7 11:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks sufficient coverage from other sites, does not appear notable.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All sources within the article are primary, and I can’t find much in terms of secondary sources from elsewhere.  If anyone is able to find some reliable secondary sources with significant coverage, then please let me know.  However, I can not find evidence of notability.  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 06:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article subject matter appears not to be very notable unless the reader is from Cheshunt.  As such, article should be deleted.  Cheshunt FC aren’t generally followed internationally and that matters.  Pablothepenguin ( talk ) 16:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That may be a good indication that it's not notable - but it really means nothing.  It comes down to GNG sources.  Though there are no independent sources in the article.  Nfitz ( talk ) 03:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carlos Jerónimo: Joeykai ( talk ) 22:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 07:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No WP:SIGCOV and very bad article to boot.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The subject fails WP: SPORTSBASIC .  Unreferenced have prompt to Google news search and nothing was found including the low football stats to confer a bit qualification per WP: NFOOTBALL wasn't found.  Fails WP:SIGCOV and were found in databases!  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 00:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Devoke water 11:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing online other than basic sports database logs, not Significant Coverage 🍪 Cookie Monster 15:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vandana Rao (actress): Youtube used for sourcing doesn't help the notability case either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - TOI is unreliable per WP:ICTFSOURCES , fails to meet WP:NACTOR .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete