hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of international marriages among Olympic and Paralympic competitors: It's weird that the marriages have to be transnational.  Why?  it's also weird that the marriages have to be on an Olympic or Paralympic level.  Why are FIFA World Cup players or other World Championship competitors excluded, not to mention Big 4 leagues etc.?  Geschichte ( talk ) 12:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists of people ,  and Olympics .  Owen× ☎ 13:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   This is a weird intersection of categories, a topic of only niche interest, and there doesn't seem to be anything about this group as a notable group.  WP:NLIST is failed all around.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 19:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, clearly falls foul of NLIST.  Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 10:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete although "not a desirable topic" is arguably equally IDONTLIKEIT, this very clearly fails WP:LISTN .  No one is treating this subject as a group.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Snow delete per NLIST and also WP:SALAT ("Lists that are too specific are also a problem.").  "Weird intersection" pretty much sums it up.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The list criteria seem completely arbitrary, as outlined in the nomination.  Feel free to ping me if evidence to the contrary emerges.  TompaDompa ( talk ) 17:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Completely arbitrary, fails WP:NLIST .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per all above.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Cheap Seats (American TV series): Let'srun ( talk ) 04:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Baseball ,  and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed.  The show is mentioned in the articles for Chris Rose , Brian Wilson , etc.  This article doesn't really provide any additional information.  Lack of reliable sources confirms it's not notable.  Fnordware ( talk ) 16:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Minerva in the emblems of educational establishments: PROD contested with I think the article text does a decent job of making an argument that as the goddess of wisdom Minerva would be relevant to symbolism of higher education , which is not how list notability works at all - the article itself requires sources to prove the list's merit, not people's analysis of unsourced text, and I'm not even sure what they're referring to * Pppery * it has begun... 15:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mythology , Education ,  and Schools .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find several articles by individual institutions explaining the significance of Minerva in their logos/seals, but I can't find anything discussing the topic in the aggregate.   As nom said, this is a failure of WP:NLIST .   It's also mostly unsourced and the few sources are mostly about individual entries in the list.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively and redirect to Minerva#Universities and educational establishments as WP:Alternative to deletion .  As WeirdNAnnoyed stated, sources for examples can be found, a very few are in the article now, and there is some brief commentary here and there, like here .  Like that, the list is preserved in the history in case anyone would like to use that to start a search for sources or the like, and the mentioned paragraph at Minerva is not quite left hanging.  Daranios ( talk ) 15:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:LISTN , largely unsourced and USA-only.  The Banner talk 07:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It is a far cry from USA-only, but it's closer to trivia-only.  The reason I don't support a merge is that I would rather see the subsections at Minerva trimmed or removed.  "Public monuments, and places" - listing every Minerva statue in the world is trivial and violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edilma: There are no Wikipedia articles about people with this name, and it has no WP:SIGCOV , so therefore fails WP:NNAME .  I can't find sufficient reliable sources establishing notability, either.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 01:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The one source cited is one of those automated statistics-regurgitating WWW sites, and does not even support the claims in the article in any case.   The source says nothing about Greek, for example.   The earlier completely different article content that went through AFD the first time was challenged as false after standing unsourced for 7 years in Special:Diff/469708490 .   I can find no good supporting source for either form of the article.   As far as I can tell, the article is false in both forms that it has had in its 18 year history, and I cannot find a good source for anything true to say about this subject.   I don't trust Bruce Lansky's book because I do not think that it is either expert-written or expert-sourced.   If the claim were true, classicists would have documented this name for centuries, and they have not.  Uncle G ( talk ) 10:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Greece , Spain ,  and Latin America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Just a given name.  The claim that ‘The origin of the name Edilma is Greek and means “Remains Young”. Edilma comes from the Greek Edelia’ doesn't seem true/or verifiable; and I don't know (I am Greek) of any Greek name "Eledia", ancient or modern, or any other meaning "Remains Young".  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 07:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Wikipedia is not a dictionary of names so fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE , and no current bearers of the name in Wikipedia per Special:AllPages/Edilma .  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
K23LB-D: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and North Dakota .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A six-year LPTV that only operated for six years in the 2010s does not exactly suggest the existence of significant coverage ; another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" in this topic area pre-2021.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Station was only notable on a local level (if that).  Also, Wikipedia is not a directory of TV station that once broadcast.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deniz Haimerl: And yes, of course he's still young, but a year of sporadic play for Augsburg II doesn't really scream imminent Bundesliga breakthrough to me - and even if it did, WP:CRYSTAL and all that.  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 12:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Germany .  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 12:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ri Kwan-myong: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: North Korea and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The athlete, despite having played in the Russian League, has not made any appearances according with the own article.  He only played one game for North Korea, a team that has problems with clear information about its players in general.  Svartner ( talk ) 15:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly fails WP:GNG .  Angelo ( talk ) 22:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shayde: While some behind the scenes info may exist in physical media, I don't believe that would be enough to justify this article's existence separately.  Not sure whether there would be a good target to merge with or redirect to, though list of doctor who supporting characters does list him, so that might be a decent place.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the first result is a beauty company, which seems far more likely to be notable than an obscure non-TV doctor who character.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 12:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources in the article, and no good sources have been found on the internet.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no reliable sources to pass WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaboro (rapper): During a WP:BEFORE the best I could find was an around 175 word announcement here about their newest release.  Fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:ANYBIO Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 16:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Sweden .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 16:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no coverage in Swedish media, not mentioned in Svensk gangsterrap.  The only articles I could find were published by Dopest.se Draken Bowser ( talk ) 07:32, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't appear to have any coverage and likely doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Darron4 ( talk ) 16:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I deleted it as it's blatant block evasion of User:Dealer07 .  Canterbury Tail talk 17:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amy Thomas: Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and only primary sources provided.  LibStar ( talk ) 21:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Handball ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 21:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there's no participation-based guideline for handball players and I can't find any WP:SIGCOV .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rohan Adnaik: All I found were passing mentions ( 2016 , 2018 , 2019 , 2022 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mourad Badra: PROD was removed after adding a single Q&A interview from foot-national.com which contains very little independent, secondary coverage.  I was only able to find one other source (a paywalled article from Paris-Normandie) that I cannot evaluate, but certainly would be insufficient SIGCOV without something else.  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  No, the article isn't paywalled.  Registration is required, but once you have registered, there's no charge to access the article.  "Badra, retour aux sources"  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 16:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and France .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alex Hammond: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Journalism , Television , Horse racing , United Kingdom ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Too many primary sources.  User Memer ( chat ) Tribs 23:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Quentin X ( talk ) 11:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If anyone is interested in looking further for sources, I've found an article ( alternate link ) in The Times and one from The Daily Telegraph , both from 2018, and a 2021 career update from Broadcast magazine.  Bridget (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Renate Da Rin: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion; see edit summary in Special:Permalink/587416055 , which restored the article per WP:REFUND /as a contested PROD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I couldn't find any significant coverage in WP:LIBRARY , Google Books, Google Scholar, or general web searches.  Fails WP:BIO / WP:GNG .  Jfire ( talk ) 02:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Youtube, various coaching websites, social media links.  I don't find sourcing we'd be able to use for an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
One Fourth Labs: Charlie ( talk ) 18:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Technology ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Serve Georgia: Contested on reason of "came 2nd in election in the table so clearly very notable" Party is a miniscule part of a massive Georgian political coalition, and that coalition came in second.  The party has zero presence in national parliament.  Current referencing and anything I can find shows a complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT .  Reminder that organizations are not inherently notable nor do they inherit notability from a notable person associated with it (ie. the single person in a regional government currently elected while affiliated with the party.) IceBergYYC ( talk ) 12:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Georgia (country) .  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 12:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The party does not have a member in parliament, meaning this is PROMO.  Small political group.  I can't find overage of them, some things from the State of Georgia in the USA.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rainer Walter Kühne: The only possible claim of notability is via the Atlantis theory.  But it barely seems influential enough to satisfy NPROF#1, as he is not a professional historian and the Antiquity article has only 19 citations according to the Google Scholar.  It is also somewhat dubious whether his theory really motivated the excavations, since it is not discussed in the peer-reviewed articles, Refs.  7-9.  In Wikipedia, his theory is covered by Atlantis location hypotheses#Andalusia , which seems like WP:DUE coverage.  Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 16:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Science , Archaeology ,  and Germany .  Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 16:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete