hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Left Front (Bharat): What was founded in 1977 where the Left Front (West Bengal) and Left Front (Tripura) , no nation-wide alliance.  The notion that the now-existent Left Front has merged into INDIA is factually incorrect.  Soman ( talk ) 13:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Change that information which are wrong.  NO NEED TO DELETE IT.  I had created it as being a prominent alliance in India there is no specific page for Left Front.  As mentioned in Class 10 NCERT political science textbook Chapter 5 it was one of the three national alliances in India.  George Simon Ohm ( talk ) 15:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've corrected the informations as you have mentioned.  Please go and check them.  George Simon Ohm ( talk ) 15:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The problem is that the wrong information is that a national alliance called "Left Front" existed.  And if we remove this factoid, what remains?  Clearly you as the creator of the article tried to by-pass the existing AFD outcome for " Left Front (India) " by using "Bharat" in the article title.  So I'd say the burden is upon you to argue against the previous AFD outcome.  -- Soman ( talk ) 15:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I thought there was something suspicious about this article.  Number 5 7 11:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete : I would have nominated it for speedy deletion.  Both as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left Front (India) and the fact that this is just an umbrella term for all the Left Fronts that have existed on state-level.  I saw that the user added in the previously closed discussion and even after seeing it is still arguing on why this article full of misinformation should be kept.  Shaan Sengupta Talk 11:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Of relevance to this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electoral history of the Left Front (India) .  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 20:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete recreation of deleted article + WP:SYNTH . Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 15:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alrick Toney: There is no evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC and the one tournament that he was runner-up in is below the requirements for WP:NBAD .  This article is lengthy but it's almost entirely just a listing of his youth results, which don't confer notability.  My WP:BEFORE search found nothing better than Barbados Advocate , Guyana Chronicle and QN Sports , all of which are passing mentions of Toney.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and South America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PDC World Youth Championship: Has existed for over a decade without single independent reference.   Searches do not show any in-depth coverage from independent sources.   Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 CDC Tour series , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 PDC Players Championship series , and several more.  Onel 5969 TT me 01:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Sports ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Statsmodels: I can't find anything on the talk page or the edit history that justifies recreating this article.  Independently, this article should be deleted because it doesn't meet WP: N .  I found some self-published tutorials that use statsmodels for a particular purpose, but this does not meet the standard for reliability.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 21:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you clarify for me the standard by which, say, scipy meets notability?  Gumshoe2 ( talk ) 16:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How is that relevant to the discussion for this AfD?  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 16:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just as an example so I can understand better the standards by which notability for a software package might be determined in general.  By at least some standards it seems to me that statsmodels is certainly notable, for instance the Seabold-Perktold article "Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python" has been cited on Google Scholar almost 5000 times.  Gumshoe2 ( talk ) 16:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I generally try to follow Wikipedia:Notability_(software) -- that paper wouldn't establish notability because it's written by the authors, but its citations might.  If you can find citations that are independent of the author and discuss the library in-depth (as opposed to a simple mention of "we have X problem and we use the statsmodel library to solve it"), please add them to the article, and I'd be happy to withdraw the AfD.  If an AfD results in the improvement of an article, I have no issue with that.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 17:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, just a note that Soft Deletion is not an option here Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Did a quick Google search, didn't find any significant coverage.  Niafied ( talk ) 04:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Github and their own website are about the best sources I can pull up, nothing which is useful for notability.  There are no software reviews or any kind of coverage.  Delete for lack of coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zielony Gaj, Mrągowo County: There is no village, or place of any kind, with this name listed in Mrągowo .  The location given in the article is simply an empty field .  On the same day Kotbot generated this article, it generated 1,254 other articles .  Fails WP:V , WP:GEOLAND , WP:NOTAHOAX .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The place described is Zielony Lasek , but there's nothing to merge and this would not be a useful redirect as it's the wrong county (probably because the coordinates in the source lacked precision and put it the wrong side of the boundary).  Peter James ( talk ) 21:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Peter James.  I tried looking it up and thought it existed, only to find, as above, that the place is Zielony Lasek.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 22:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article cites pl:TERYT as a source, but there is no such place in Teryt , which only links Zielony Gaj, Giżycko County and Zielony Gaj, Sokółka County .  We cannot accuse mass-work bots of creating HOAXes, so I guess we can chalk it up to some data error... (not the first non-existent location we would have an article for, oh, 15 years...).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that this is not an intentional hoax, but the effect is ultimately the same.  FOARP ( talk ) 09:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Antioch Pizza: Entirely primary sources and no independent coverage.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 20:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies , Florida , Illinois ,  and Wisconsin .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Inclined to Wikipedia:Draftify instead.  It's fairly new, and a quick search turned up articles from the Chicago Tribune, among others (new to this, unsure if external links are allowed here).  I think this could be notable, just needs a little more time in the oven.  TJS808 ( talk ) 21:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your feedback and suggestion regarding the article on Antioch Pizza.  I have taken note of your suggestions to consider moving the article to Wikipedia:Draftify for further development.  I will review the guidelines and requirements for drafts to ensure that the article receives the necessary attention and improvements.  Ms.Aloisia ( talk ) 22:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete The Tribune article is the only source of good GNG to satisfy WP:NCORP , the Milwaukee Business Times is unknown in its reliability as a source (though willing to change if proven).  Besides if there are more sources published, Wiki is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL ; this article can be recreated.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 22:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your feedback.  I am trying to research more about the topic and find some good articles to cite.  I kindly request to not delete the article for now as I am in the process of researching more about this topic.  Thank you.  Ms.Aloisia ( talk ) 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete The citations presented are not enough.  Yolandagonzales ( talk ) 21:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for reviewing the article.  I will take your feedback into consideration and work on enhancing the article by adding more credible citations from reputable sources.  Ms.Aloisia ( talk ) 22:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company and we need multiple sources that meet GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  The sources must include in-depth independent information about the company.  Sources that regurgitate company announcements or focus on the opening of an individual outlet usually omit any in-depth analysis/opinion about the *company* and fail the criteria.  HighKing ++ 10:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a run-of-the-mill article about a small pizza chain.  I appreciate that Ms.Aloisia has added 3 additional references since the article was AFD'd, but reading through they all seem to be fluff pieces that can't satisfy WP:NCORP WarpdriveEngineer ( talk ) 14:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lika O: The 1 source is not a reliable source that verifies notability.  It is a forum like site for local community, which serves as self published blog.  http://ruhollywood.com/2018/11/12/miss-russian-united-states/ 4 source is a self published interview on an ads website, not reliable secondary source at all.  http://www.spektrummagazine.com/fashion/getting-to-know-lika-osipova/ 6 source is an article on a gossips site about dating life of a Russian media person, barelly mentioning the figure of the Wikipedia.  https://www.eg.ru/showbusiness/66399/ Sources 7 and 8 are different links to the same poster to the city of the city.  It is rather a primary sourse not a secondary source to verify notability.  https://www.weho.org/home/showdocument? id=26793 Source 9 - a link to the so called LAF.It is not a film festival, it is a monthly paid competition, not recognized in media or the professional community.  The link only mentions name of the person, and does not provide any evidence to verify notability.  https://www.lafilmawards.net/single-post/june-2021 To summarize- 6 out of 9 sources used for the page do not meet even closely any possible notability verifications.  The figure has barely any professional credits, zero recognition in American or Russian media beyond a self proclaimed pop star status.  Grab Up - Talk 05:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Russia .  Grab Up - Talk 05:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Based on my review, I found no in-depth coverage from multiple independent, reliable sources.  Most of the cited sources are unreliable or fail to establish notability due to their lack of detailed coverage.  I also searched for sources but found nothing that meets the criteria of WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 06:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As per @

Discussion outcome: delete
Rota (rapper): Kadı Message 18:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Turkey .  Kadı Message 18:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not appear to pass WP:NSINGER .  Aintabli ( talk ) 19:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO.  Sourcing used in the article is about the person being or not being detained by police (Gtranslate is wonky), which doesn't seem to meet criminal notiability.  Short articles regardless and I can't find anything we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : - Lionel Cristiano ?  00:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vladyslav Kosov: No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC being met and nothing found from reliable, independent sources in Ukrainian except for database sources like the ones already used in the article, which fail to establish notability per SPORTBASIC, which says Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karlshrue College: Best I found was Janta Review which has no meaningful info.  Article has been unsourced since 2005 and tagged for improvement since 2009 so an AfD is well overdue here since I can't find a way of bringing this up to even the minimum standard.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Sri Lanka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The article's title may include a spelling mistake.  The city in Germany is Karlsruhe .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I thought the same although I think the school is derived from Karlshrue Place in Colombo, which may well be itself a corruption of Karlsruhe, Germany.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete School closed in 2010 and I can only find mentions of a schools in the German town of Karlsruhe.  Nothing for this school.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails the requirements of WP:NSCHOOL - lacks any reliable secondary sources.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 03:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rolling Hills, Clark County, Indiana: Mangoe ( talk ) 19:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions .  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 19:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator's rationale.  I find no reference to this before the mid-20th century; it does seem to be at best just a neighborhood or subdivision.  ╠╣uw [ talk ] 09:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This Subdivision.  Local papers have few mentions.  1-2, here is an example [2] James.folsom ( talk ) 23:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of countries by car imports: Note how the value for Belgium on the other list, List of countries by car exports , is nearly identical, and much higher than the value of the actual car production in Belgium.  Countries like Belgium (and Canada for that matter) have much more car exports than e.g. Italy or France?  Lists sourced only to a Wordpress site, so if we want this, WP:TNT would apply.  Also nominated is List of countries by car exports .  Fram ( talk ) 16:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics , Transportation ,  and Lists .  Fram ( talk ) 16:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Import would imply they are staying in the country, simply transiting through a port towards another country isn't an import.  Some strange OR or misunderstanding of the terms I think.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete both .  Strong case of original research here as WorldsTopExports appears to be a self published sourced based on independent/educational research.  Also WP:NOTSTATS , content is already out of date by 2 years.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 22:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Startups in Goa: The article reads like a news report and isn't properly cited.  There's a quotation about "reliable internet providers", but the source itself has nothing to do with internet providers or startups.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 02:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Economics , Technology ,  and Goa .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Citations taken are from credible sources.  This is an important issue, more so from the perspective of an Indian Wikipedia reader, and if there are any shortcomings, I feel the page could be improved, rather than censor the same.  Fredericknoronha ( talk ) 03:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Noting that this is the article creator, so words like "important" are from an obviously slanted perspective.  An AfD isn't censorship.  You've had more than five and a half years to improve this article.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 03:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with Fredrick.  Lets improve the page with the citations and sources instead of deleting it.  Jervisap ( talk ) 05:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  It would be helpful to get an assessment on content added to the article since its nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The newly added cites do not add into the cause of keep significantly.  Also Times of India is not reliable per WP:TOI and the other added sources got a very promotional tone.  From 'an Indian Wikipedia reader's view', the page is a collection of random topics and hence, do not warrant a standalone article currently.  Another note to the closer: Jervisap sounds WP:MEAT for Fredrick after having a look at their contributions and userpage.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I do not see evidence that this topic (if it is even well-defined enough to be called a "topic," rather than an amalgam of "startups" and "Goa") meets the GNG .  Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 02:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete