Brazilian Film Festival of London: I couldn't find enough to show it meets WP:N .  This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; I hope it can now be resolved.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events , England ,  and Brazil .  Owen× ☎ 19:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Move Redirect to Inffinito as was more or less decided last time.... For explanations about this, please see previous Afd.  Also see below.Thanks. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 10:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Out of courtesy, notifying @ Mccapra and Atlantic306 : .  Doncram had suggested to expand the page as Inffinito, but was unfortunately not able to do it.  I might do it myself with the sources he presented, when I have more time.  Best. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 10:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi I must admit I can’t entirely make out the case in Doncram’s lengthy explanation about why this article about this film festival should be merged into an article about …. .  a different film festival but I’ve no objection to that if someone understands the point better than me and is willing to do it.  Mccapra ( talk ) 10:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, in fact BRAFF (State festival) and Inffinito (Private prod company) are not connected, I'm afraid.  Will try to improve the article as BRAFF, rapidly to help warrant a Keep but I have little time to do so.  Best, - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In fact, my bad, their Twitter account shows they are connected: https://x.com/BRAFFLondon/status/585412661598380032? s=20 .  So it can easily be renamed Inffinito and expanded with the other versions (Miami, etc) of the festival.  Best, sorry for the contradictory input.  Doing this in a rush.  Best,- My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and move to Inffinito with extra content regarding the other versions of the festival which together should pass WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary im my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 20:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm open to changing my mind, but I'm unconvinced at the moment.  I've (mostly) read the prior AfDs, and I'm seeing claims about how if the BFFL is merged into an "Inffinito" article that the sources from the various connecting festivals would meet GNG, but I'm not seeing substantiation of that claim and I can't find much myself.  I'm seeing a lot of "this festival exists" / "we endorse this festival" / "this festival showed XYZ film" / "come to this festival at XYZ date" sources both at BFFL and Inffinito, but nothing that gives any SIGCOV or commentary on the festival itself.  There isn't an existing article to merge into, so I think the best outcome is deletion and if an editor actually decides to create "Inffinito" and they really want the sources currently present here at BFFL, any administrator can be asked to retrieve them.  — Sirdog ( talk ) 03:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless someone wants to take the time to expand this into a well-sourced article on Inffinito.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I said I might try, out of consideration for Doncram's work.  But I'd rather wait for the move (and keep, for that matter).  All right, I'll create the page first then, - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) .  Done [ reply ] @ Mccapra , Atlantic306 , Sirdog , Llajwa ,  and Liz : .... but then this happened...  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inffinito ....   - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 07:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom and Sirdog's eval, fails GNG and NEVENT.  No WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BEFORE found routine mill news, promo, nothing that meets SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 17:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete