hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Hitler's Grave: There simply isn't any major media coverage for this movie.  RteeeeKed 💬 📖 20:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  RteeeeKed 💬 📖 20:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Quick googling of "Hitler's Grave" shokof and ""Heaven's Taxi" shokof" , didn't get anything glaringly useful. Daryush Shokof looks iffy too. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 08:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, the director of the film looks sketchy too, so Delete that page as well. RteeeeKed 💬 📖 16:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You're the one who nominated the article for deletion, so the nomination itself is essentially a "vote" to deelte.  You can't be double-counted.  Zaathras ( talk ) 20:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok, sorry.  RteeeeKed 💬 📖 00:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per WP:GNG , no Significant coverage , no Reliable sources .  Nobody ( talk ) 07:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ISeleb: Useless references.  As written fails WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] i just to revised and repair the article of Indonesian programs Tomboyprida ( talk ) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To be accurate, @ Tomboyprida , you made an unwise unilateral move to mainspace of an article that required work as a draft.  That move triggered this deletion discussion 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Tomboyprida has been blocked as a sock of the blocked article creator.  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete pending possible analysis of sources.   This article, which is the product of a now-blocked editor and their sockpuppet, does not speak for itself and so does not establish corporate notability .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 03:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KFRE-CA: Let'srun ( talk ) 02:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : We no longer do articles sourced solely (whether directly or, seemingly in this case, implicitly) to FCC records — we need significant coverage .  (The lack of any known programming information is a red flag — I suspect this was probably a rebroadcast of another station or 24/7 service, but again, we have nothing to go on here.)  A remnant of the much looser "standards" of 2006.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This station's legal history seems to have been a mess—and a non-notable one at that!  It definitely was rebroadcasting KBFX-CD (then KBFX-CA) at one point, as Pappas owned it.  I have one 2004 article from the Bakersfield Californian talking about transmitter issues with 58 and suggesting tuning to 27, even calling it "Fox 58 and 27".  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 16:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Crying Wolf: Donald D23 talk to me 16:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , Environment , Idaho , Montana ,  and Wyoming .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom, fails WP:NFILM .  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 17:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  I could not find coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources.  The film does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline .  Cunard ( talk ) 09:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Stetson: The only substantive notability claim here is that he's had modelling jobs, which is not automatically enough in and of itself, and the referencing is entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all (directory entry, magazine cover appearance meta-referenced to itself rather than third-party coverage about it, etc.) with absolutely no evidence of WP:GNG -worthy media coverage about him shown at all.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Producer Bazaar: Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A quick search of the website shows nothing notable.  In fact, traffic is so low to the website that their social media accounts appear first before their official website.  Hadal1337 ( talk ) 15:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Added references are nothing but paid pieces.  Yasal Shahid ( talk ) 05:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Kill the blockchain with fire .  The sources there are all very promotional and praise crpyto and Producer Bazaar.  SWinxy ( talk ) 18:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Kong-il: His 'claim to fame' is one friendly match against Vietnam with this source confirming that it was only an 8 minute cameo.  This stats stub should be deleted unless someone can provide evidence that Kim meets GNG.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and North Korea .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom. Svartner ( talk ) 06:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jhang Polytechnic Institute, Jhang Sadar: Can't find out the size of the College.  No basis on which to regard it as a major educational establishment in Jhang District.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 18:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Pakistan ,  and Punjab .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of sourcing.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced for 10 years.  Fails WP:ORG .  Not a degree awarding institution like a university.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Engineering .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom. -- Ameen Akbar ( talk ) 17:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Grendel R31: Appears to be mentioned in The Gun Digest Book of Guns for Personal Defense, but I can't access that.  My guess is that even that mention is a brief aside, but even granting it substantive coverage that's only one source.  Rusalkii ( talk ) 08:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions .  Rusalkii ( talk ) 08:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can't seem to find any secondary, reliable sources.  Doesn't meet WP:NPRODUCT .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
European National Front: Preliminary Google search shows that this is unnotable .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 13:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Europe ,  and Italy .  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 13:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 18:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Lots of hits on Google Scholar and Google Books. This chapter contains a moderate amount of discussion fo the group. Josh Milburn ( talk ) 10:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy link: European National Front on Google. -- Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 16:51, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, TonyBallioni ( talk ) 21:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
George E. Walker: Only thing is that he was related to the Bush's which does not qualify.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 13:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there is some material in the sources (but not used here) which may be of use in a Bush article , but this isn't it.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and New Jersey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED .  He appears, by the very few accounts cited in the stub, to have been an ordinary farmer who contributed a tiny fraction of his DNA to two future presidents.  That's not sufficient for inclusion.  I am for inclusion of notable ancestors, and all parents, of United States Presidents, but this is a different story.  I would not oppose a redirect or selective merge to the Bush family .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per WP:BIO .  This guy, by himself, is not notable.  He is worth a line or two, maybe a paragraph, in the Bush family article, and that's about it.  Ted52 ( talk ) 01:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of songs about Madras: The list fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE , WP:LISTN and WP:OR .  There is little to nothing worthwhile in this list, be it content or context.  The only sourced entry has its own page with a very questionable notability.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the consensus of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about Ahmedabad also applies here; very similar article with the same issues.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 15:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  The page does not meet notability guidelines WP:FAILN .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article is based on a newspaper feature that mentioned a whopping six songs, and apparently someone thought that was interesting enough to type a bare list of titles into Wikipedia.  But it is not a viable list of encyclopedic items per WP:NLIST , and it is just plain uninformative for any reader who happens to come across it.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails notability Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ivan Dimitrov (figure skater): Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Bulgaria .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NSKATE #2 requires gold in national championship.  My deprod was in error.  Apologies.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There are a whole bunch of similarly deficient nominations.  Really, such blanket nominations without evidence of WP:BEFORE and consideration of WP:ATD should be all procedurally kept as WP:SKCRIT#3 given lack of a valid deletion rationale as WP:NSKATE is indicative that sigcov is likely, and is not presumptive/determinative, so someone could meet none of the NSKATE criteria but still meet WP:SPORTCRIT for some reason.   And ! votes relying only on NSKATE are likewise invalid.  That said, it's quite possible that most of these should be delete or redirect results.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 01:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am unable to find any sources that would lead to a GNG pass.  No sources in the article.  Fails WP:NSKATE .  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 15:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sergei Magerovski: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Russia .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - This is a misreading of WP:NSKATE .  Subjects can still be notable if they separately meet WP:GNG as is potentially the case here.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No independent sources at all, certainly nothing containing SIGCOV.  Meeting or not meeting NSKATE is irrelevant here.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 00:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find the necessary WP:SIGCOV from independent RS for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dwayne Johnson-Cochran: There is one in-depth source in the Chicago Tribune I found but on closer examination it is a press release.  There is also content on the page (some of which I removed) which is not supported by the references provided.  Lots of bold claims as well which I cannot verify from a reliable secondary source.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete No significant coverage, couldn't verify a few claims in the article His film Love and Action in Chicago has received some critical attention and is borderline notable, but I'm not sure it's enough for him to fulfill WP:CREATIVE .  Mooonswimmer 15:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mnet (peer-to-peer network): BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : nothing found for this piece of software, only deep-learning neural networks.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Glenbert Croes: Subject scored 5 international goals for Aruba but I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question : how is this Glenbert Croes related to Betico Croes , in Aruba "the father of the nation"?  The name Glenbert runs in Betico's family.  While that can't be a coincidence, to name the footballer under Betico's family we will need more than logical inference! gidonb ( talk ) 23:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : You're on the right track, because that Glenbert Croes is the minister of Labour in Aruba as of 2021, and should with this Glenbert Croes the footballer.  Ivan Milenin ( talk ) 19:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, Ivan Milenin !  It's unfortunate that we do not know the relationship because it would be a fair mention in the article on Betico Croes .  It doesn't have to be now.  If someone reads through this page in the future and can source the relationship, do it add Glenbert Croes the footballer to the article on Betico! gidonb ( talk ) 00:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete