hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
FXGT: The company won "Best Hybrid Broker 2022 at the Ultimate Fintech Awards", and "Best Broker Award 2023 by AtoZ Markets", awards of unclear notability from what I can find about them online.  Sources cited for the company are press releases, an interview, reviews on sites of unknown reliability, and routine inclusions in listings.  There's plenty more of that online, but no significant coverage that I can find in reliable, secondary sources.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Companies .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Africa and Asia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing used is press releases or primary things...  Non-notable awards won.  What I find is PR about a new website, then into the crypto promo sites...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agreed, does not appear to be notable.  Sargdub ( talk ) 23:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : article creator moved this article to Foreign Trading Gross Experience , and nominated it for speedy deletion db-author.  I've reverted the move, and declined the speedy deletion nomination, as it's ineligible by WP:CSD#G7 .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shaun MacDonald (rugby union): JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete There is this but struggling to see anymore that isn't from one of his clubs.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khan Khel (disambiguation): Hatnotes are already placed on each article pointing to each other, so there's no apparent need for this dab page to exist.  CycloneYoris talk!  21:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Everything else I can find with the term in the title seems to be a WP:PTM .  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 17:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrin Netzer: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  I found transfer announcements like this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Europe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anna Halkidis: I couldn't find enough secondary resources WP:SIGCOV .  The alumni newsletter of her university doesn't justify as reliable source, "independent of the subject".  Probably, if there is any kind of reliable information, that can redirected into Parents.com .  Chiserc ( talk ) 09:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Journalism , United States of America ,  and New York .  Chiserc ( talk ) 09:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, i couldnt find anything even close to meeting general notability .  begocc questions?  10:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Washington International Diplomatic Academy: A search does not uncover any further SIGCOV in independent sources.  Organisation seems unlikely to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 22:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Schools ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 22:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources all go back to the organization itself (eg a New York Times op-ed authored by the org's executive director).  No sources support WP:ORGCRIT .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Art Muscle Magazine: JJLiu112 ( talk ) 14:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Wisconsin .  JJLiu112 ( talk ) 14:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Justin Welborn: Working actors, but not the significance of roles needed.  Also currently an unref BLP.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No news coverage.  Does not satisfy WP:NACTOR .  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Articles that have been proposed for deletion are ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 15:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : With roles as "guy at cafe" and "angry cop" as examples, he's very much not notable.  Character actors usually aren't notable unless you have extensive biographical articles about them that we can use for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Body moment: Even if it does exist, the term itself is too obscure to have a page of its own.  [1] Rebel1602 ( talk ) 16:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:56, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDICT .  Just a definition of a ubiquitous physics concept.   A redirect to some broader physics page such as mechanics might also be appropriate.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 19:14, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or possibly redirect.  Completely redundant with Moment (physics) .  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We already have Moment (physics) , and the title "body moment" is so oddball that I can't see how it would be a helpful redirect.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 14:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ https://dbpedia.org/page/Body_moment The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Borderline Records: No google hits except Wikipedia mirrors.  I think this may be a hoax.  -- Viennese Waltz 15:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Record store in Philadelphia with the name [37] nothing found about a record label.  delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Coert Cronjé: JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barbara Roymans: The biography covers a non-notable contestant in a non-notable pageant, Miss Exclusive .  The article's single source is not a RS; see WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources which indicates world360news.com, which dubiously titles itself "Chhattisgarh News" aka chhattisgarh.news, is probably SPS.  ☆ Bri ( talk ) 18:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Belgium .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Plenty of coverage in Belgian sources, in the Dutch language, but I'm not qualified to judge which are RS.  They seem to cover her win.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Here's the link for Belgian sources: [8] .  The headline news one looks promising, but it's a simple annoucement.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  Bri , it seems that Miss Exclusive might be an alternative name for Miss Earth Belgium , not that this makes a significant difference to the AFD discussion.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:39, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on lack of extensive coverage for this person, beyond confirmation of the win, which is trivial.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peter Carter (diplomat): I don't believe the routine coverage here passes WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 21:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Bilateral relations , Estonia ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO for lack of significant coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 13:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mirelly Taylor: Article completely lacks any non-passing mention source.  Googling reveals almost all hits are derived from her notable husband, Brian Tee .  I am unable to find any independent coverage.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and United States of America .  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , If anyone reviews Taylor's article at this very moment, it is noticeable that multiple sources have been added since the message above.  I believe deleting Taylor's article is now pointless.  Fox Guardian ( talk ) 18:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The NYT article is a passing mention and IMDb is not reliable.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 23:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NACTOR .  Available sources are just passing mentions, I did not find any signicant coverage.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I also could not find any significant coverage.  Any sources specifically related to her are just IMBd and other databases.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 01:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programmes broadcast by CITV: Clearly violates WP:NOTTVGUIDE , the few original shows are already discussed at CITV#Programming , so there is nothing to merge.  No objection to a redirect to parent.  // Timothy :: talk 07:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I know this is probably going to be kept because of ITSNOTABLE editors will go on and on about why this should be kept and overwhelm policy arguments, but this is a lousy list, badly formatted (with odd detours about other unrelated things), its sourcing is terrible, to a bare-bones listing site that only sources things fourteen days out (thus it does not have the sources now), along with a competitor to ITV.  It also contains films, which are never a part of any list of network article because anyone can buy any movie to air at any time.  It's also a regular protection target because of IP vandalism; this list is better served by the category system.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT – There's a reasonable chance to build a proper list for this topic.  However, in its current state, it's too difficult to sort original or first-run programming (worthy of inclusion) from acquired programming/reruns (not worthy of inclusion).  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 00:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aviareps: Sources are primary or routine coverage.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 19:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Aviation ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ●Keep- https://www.visitorlando.com/media/press-releases/post/visit-orlando-names-aviareps-for-international-global-trade-representation/ PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 21:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ PaulGamerBoy360 : , surely a press release is both a primary souce and routine coverage?  Jdcooper ( talk ) 21:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] there are many news articles focusing on this company, I provided the link to one of the more reliable sites, i will list the other links in the article.  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 22:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Essentially a brochure to advertise the company.  Fails WP:NCORP .  WP:DEL14 scope_creep Talk 21:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - a company of this size is generally notable in my opinion.  There are some paid industry reports on it https://digitgaps.com/report-store/aviareps-ag-company-profile-financial-and-strategic-swot-analysis-mergers-and-acquisitions-partnerships-and-investments-news-key-profiles-and-competitors-report/ , https://www.creditsafe.com/business-index/en-us/company/aviareps-ag-de00830355 .  A lot of business deal articles too, although some might be press releases.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 04:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ●Delete- Although this company evidently is large & has many partners, the only coverage we can find is Routine Coverage.  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 22:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lots of press releases and 'soft' interviews with management and connected parties.  Haven't seen much independent comment/evaluation of the company, so don't think there's sufficient independent coverage to satisfy WP:NCORP .  The first source listed by User:Indefensible may help towards notability.  Don't see how the second source, a credit report does.  This in the article may also help [15] , none of the other references IMO do.  Needs more independent coverage to pass WP:ORGIND .  Rupples ( talk ) 23:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frederic Scheer: Routine mentions/coverage, fails WP:GNG .  US-Verified ( talk ) 00:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  By provided sources does not meet GNG or WP:BIO .  Also citations in this article are somewhat deceptive, frequently citing corporate homepages inline.   — siro χ o 05:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: prepared by User:siroxo Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  moneyshow by subject ?  ?  ✘ No L6NRG subject's company ~ ✘ No patents.justia.com primary (patents) ✘ No InvestorsHub, advfn ?  UGC forum ?  ✘ No BPI subject's org ?  ✘ No owler ?  crowdsourcing & polling involved ✘ No PRINT magazine coverage is just a quote ?  ✘ No ZDNET largely interview not about subject ✘ No phys.org largely interview not about subject ✘ No microgrid knowledge, "Cutting fossil fuel use with bioplastics" mostly an attributed statement ~ does not seem to be about subject ✘ No LA Times ~ routine near-trivial mention ~ Partial LandGate.com ?  ?  no mention, also what is this source meant to provide ✘ No PRWeb "L6NRG announces..."  PRweb PRweb ✘ No Alercell another of subject's companies used as a source ✘ No markets.businessinsider.com PRESS RELEASE PR Newswire ~ ✘ No https://scheerfoundation.info/ another of subject's companies used a a source ✘ No AccessWire "The Scheer Foundation announced today ..." ?  ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as this article is not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thank you for the source analysis.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or perhaps redirect to Allercel.  I can only find press releases about the company.  Nothing individual for this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Accessible Boating Association: Could not find coverage.  Nothing in gnews, JSTOR.  1 passing hit in gbooks.  Sources provided are all primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Organizations ,  and England .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Found no significant coverage of the subject.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 04:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subject is not notable per GNG or ORG.  Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 20:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete