hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
MrBeast videography : The notability guideline for lists states that for a list to be notable it [needs to be] discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources , and MrBeast's videography as a whole hasn't been discussed by any reliable and independant sources.  Besides, an indiscriminate selection of the most viewed videos and all the videos MrBeast has uploaded divorced from any sort of context via words is simply not useful to a reader.  — Matrix(!) ( a good person! ) [ Citation not needed at all; thank you very much ] 20:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Entertainment .  — Matrix(!) ( a good person! ) [ Citation not needed at all; thank you very much ] 20:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A selected list of "standout videos" is a red-line WP:PROMO violation.  Either list all their videos (which his YouTube page already does) or none at all.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only one link has an article, another is just a redirect.   Not enough to be a valid navigational list.   Some of his videos have enough media coverage to have articles made for them.   Maybe in the future enough will be made that this list becomes valid.   Any news media covering his videos as a whole, are talking mostly about him.  D r e a m Focus 04:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too promotional it is.  Orientls ( talk ) 05:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Could be notable but fails to have sources establishing GNG.  Most references are primary.  Also WP:NOTDIR .  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ólafsfjarðarvöllur : Only source is permanent dead link.  "Capacity of 2100" is more than twice the town's population.  Claims to be the home field of Knattspyrnufélag Fjarðabyggðar , which was in a completely different part of Iceland.  Numberguy6 ( talk ) 00:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Iceland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 12:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added several references.  For the capacity, https://www.nordicstadiums.com/olafsfjardarvollur/ says total capacity of 2,100 but only 150 seats, which is consistent with the photos in the references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 15:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I normally suggest redirecting non-notable stadiums, but this is not mentioned at either the club ( Knattspyrnufélag Fjarðabyggðar ) or the locality ( Ólafsfjörður ).  Giant Snowman 20:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to lack notability in full.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not a hoax.  Fjallabyggð and Fjarðabyggð are two separate teams, and someone picked the wrong one hence the confusion.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sarah-Marine Rouffanche : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and France .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject fails WP:GNG and is not saved by WP:NCREATIVE .  An ice dancer who qualified for the World Junior Championship's free dance competition and finished  15th: an achievement truly admirable by this humble servant, but insufficient for a Wikipedia article.  Whence the required numerous, independent sources ?  - The Gnome ( talk ) 13:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vaasa FM mast : — Karnataka talk 21:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Definitely not notable enough for its own article.  I wouldn't even bother redirecting as the other towers at List of tallest structures in Finland without an article don't have redirects either.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 09:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Freeze Lounge : Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business , Companies , India ,  and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG . — TheWikiholic ( talk ) 07:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per failing WP:GNG and WP:NORG .  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Giovanna Dionicio : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This was the most I dug up.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Dominican Republic ,  and Connecticut .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kledis Hereki : I can't find any decent coverage in Albanian and the one provided Greek source is trivial coverage, with only part of one sentence about him.  The only other Greek coverage that I can find are stats pages like Epsana , which SPORTBASIC says does not confer notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 07:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edouard Masengo : IMO fails the WP:GNG.  Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 19:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trent Cameron : As usual, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- the notability test doesn't vest in listing acting roles, it vests in showing that they've received WP:GNG -worthy coverage in real reliable source media outlets about them and their performances.  But this is completely unreferenced, and even the roles posited in the intro as his "best known" performances were still supporting or bit parts rather than leading roles.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on the sourcing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage of this actor, all I find are social media and various PR sites.  We have no sourcing in the article.  I don't even think the roles listed are significant.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He had one major role - that of John Lee Malvo - but that is not enough to overcome WP:GNG .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lilian Muli : The sources I find were rather sensationalist, fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST as far as I can see.  Tehonk ( talk ) 01:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find gossip/tabloid stuff about her, mostly about her looks, about how her ex has a new partner or a combination of both.  [42] , [43] Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Television ,  and Kenya .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Creepers series : I have looked for reviews on Kirkus Reviews, Booklist, and Publishers Weekly, as well as a general Google and Google Scholar search.  I found the chapbooks on ISFDB , but it did not list any reviews or awards for any of the books.  I would generally WP:BLAR , but the series has two authors, so it doesn't make sense to redirect to one author and not the other.  Further, the page previously highlighted a Creepers book series by Edgar J. Hyde.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 23:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Paranormal and Australia .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 23:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Appears to fail at this moment in time the guideline Wikipedia:Notability_(books) .  Many of the possible references seen in a Google search appear to be the result of circular referencing to this article ( WP:CIRCULAR ) and the article therefore is serving as promotion.  Republish when it passes WP:BK .  5Q5 | ✉ 14:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Isiac McAllister : The links in the article are mostly WP:EASTEREGGs or not verifiable to McAllister.  In searching for "Isiac McAllister", "Samuel Isiac McAllister", "Samuel McAllister", and " Isiaac Squared" (the purported band), it is evident it is not close to WP:GNG or the musician notability standard.  The band does exist, but it has performed at a very local level, like a local pub (Charlie's Pub in Fayetteville WV).  Mvqr ( talk ) 14:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and West Virginia .  Mvqr ( talk ) 14:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT and the arguments stated in the nomination.  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 15:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and note about potential promotional editing.  Unable to find the article subject's date of birth openly published and it is not in the cited source.  It's a common basic information that is often provided to article authors by third party.  The kind of false sources are a rather common public relations editing tactic.  Graywalls ( talk ) 21:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Looks like the creator might have tried to post fake sources, such as the last one with the title ""Isiac McAllister Admitted to Hospital Following Collapsed Lung" that only links to CBS.com and when you search Google nothing comes up about it.  Naomijeans ( talk ) 03:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I must admit that the fakery in this article is rather impressive, especially the blue links that go to irrelevant WP locations and the references containing titles of news articles that don't exist.  He did not make the Billboard chart and was not profiled in that magazine, he did not collaborate with Reba, and those are only a few of the hoaxes in this article.  If only this much energy could be put into getting the kid a gig.  Also, sorry about the collapsed lung and all, but I've been in the hospital a few times too and that doesn't get me a Wikipedia article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thrash or Die : Fails both WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 12:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Florida , Music ,  and Bands and musicians .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 12:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - They've been around for a long time and some of the members' stage names are kinda funny, but they simply have not generated any reliable coverage in the music media.  Even their hometown media appearances are just gig announcements, and otherwise they are only visible in the usual directories and self-upload sites.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 19:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WPRQ-LD : Onel 5969 TT me 11:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Mississippi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Certainly not notable on its own as a Cozi passthrough; I'm proposing we merge this, WHCQ-LD , and WEBU-LD into one article titled Ellington Broadcasting , but the problem is the company's entire history involves passing through subchannel networks, and not a minute of original broadcasting from a studio in Mississippi.  I'll listen to others to see what they think if the merge is strong enough.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As I was unaware of the heavy self-promotion through these pages and COI, switch to delete .  And feel free to add those other two articles to this nom or in their own nom.  Nate • ( chatter ) 20:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For what it's worth, Mvcg66b3r ( talk · contribs ) has already nominated WHCQ-LD and WEBU-LD for deletion over the same GNG and COI issues being raised here.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A station largely serving as a pass-through for national programming probably won't get over the GNG hump.  Any merger into a single Ellington Broadcasting article probably wouldn't fix that — and it certainly would not rectify the COI issues the stations' articles have — the original creator back in 2007 was Dellington ( talk · contribs ) (and that original revision noted David Ellington as the station owner), and a key contributor in recent years has been Whcq ( talk · contribs ) — when one of the stations is, indeed, WHCQ-LD .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obvious GNG fail.  Diginet coatrack.  The only appropriate ATD would be a redirect to list.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 04:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frank Ori : The most I did find was a few sentences here , which is not totally unsurprising considering he was a replacement player who played three NFL games .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football , Illinois , Iowa ,  and Minnesota .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find mentions of his playing career in newspapers or a Gnews search.  I don't see notability based on a lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I couldn't find anything either on Newspapers.com.  NewsLibrary used to have a lot stuff that wasn't on Newspapers.com but you have to pay now to even search for stuff.  Hopefully, someone else has better luck but I'm not hopeful since he's an offensive lineman.  Pre 2022, I would normally just vote Keep since Ori is someone who played in real games, not just preseason or practice squad.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 01:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I'm thinking that this guy may have been a replacement player who played as a result of the 1987 NFL player's strike?  If so, that could explain the lack of coverage for him.  Ejgreen77 ( talk ) 11:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  The three games he played in were the three games during the strike.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 21:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:SPORTBASIC , prong 5: "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources."  Cbl62 ( talk ) 12:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A number of passing mentions and brief things of course – I could probably write a decent start-class article but I'd likely be wasting my time...  An article on the 1987 Minnesota Vikings replacement players , with biographies of everyone (and the same for all teams) we deem non-notable would probably work.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MVP Disc Sports : This poorly written article feels more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic entry.  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 09:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Sports ,  and Michigan .  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 09:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete