hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Banir: Absolutely nothing in an independent, reliable source about the settlement came up in my WP:BEFORE .  No evidence of legal recognition, nothing beyond it being a location on Google Maps for which automatic content has been produced on weather/hotel-rental websites and so-forth.  FOARP ( talk ) 11:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions .  FOARP ( talk ) 11:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I could find no SIGCOV of this town beyond it being a location on google maps.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment From what I see this probably is an actual village by this name, to the point where if you search for it in GMaps, it is given borders.  I suspect one of the Malaysian sources would confirm this, but I cannot read Malay.  But we ahve to have some documentation beyond looking at GMaps (or GNS).  Mangoe ( talk ) 00:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is already notified to the Malaysia watchlist so if any of the people on that project want to chip in they can.  Typically a lot of the official stuff for Malaysia is often in English so it would be found in a Google search if it was accessible online.  There just isn’t anything.  I know some of the people on here think that simply having a postal address, school, or clinic is sufficient for a WP:Geoland pass but this makes no sense because it would be effectively giving automatic notability to schools/hospitals/anywhere with a postal address simply for existing.  EDIT: also it really has to be emphasised that Google Maps is filled with errors and is based in large part on WIkipedia.  FOARP ( talk ) 03:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This geo db states, "Railroad station - a facility comprising ticket office, platforms, etc. for loading and unloading train passengers and freight", [53] This fits with other mentions I saw that associate sujbect with the railroad.  I don't see any evidence that this is a legally recognized place, and I don't believe it is a town, but simply poeple living near the station working or providing services to it.  The same geo db also has an entry for "Banir Estate, Perak, Malaysia" [54] states, "Estate(s) - a large commercialized agricultural landholding with associated buildings and other facilities" If someone can find RS that this meets NGEO/GNG I'd ! v keep, but there are none atm; unless someone finds sources I'm Delete // Timothy :: talk 06:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zmiivka (disambiguation): (This means that readers looking for the second topic are spared the extra navigational step of going through the disambiguation page.)  HappyWith ( talk ) 05:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Ukraine .  HappyWith ( talk ) 05:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Forgot to specify this explicitly in the original nom: The Ukrainian version of the page doesn't have any other links on it other than the two on the English page, which likely confirms these are the only villages named Zmiivka.  HappyWith ( talk ) 05:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support .  The relative size of the Ukrainian articles also confirms the one is likely the primary topic.  — Michael Z .  12:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – clear WP:ONEOTHER situation, and there's already the needed hatnote as Zmiivka .  There does appear to be a species listed on , but I suspect that's just a translation, and nobody would be searching enwiki for Zmiivka to find it... though I have no clue which species it actually is, search results aren't helpful.  (Those search results also support the current town in Kherson Oblast at Zmiivka being the primary topic.)  Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Email deliverability index: Notability is not established at all.  While I could not check all the cited sources, it's likely they do not mention the concept at all (that seems to be the case for The Complete Guide to E-mail Marketing How to Create Successful, Spam-Free Campaigns to Reach Your Target Audience and Increase Sales ), and probably the others too judging Google Books search.  MarioGom ( talk ) 10:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  MarioGom ( talk ) 10:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:22, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and rename Email deliverability (currently redirected to cold email ) which is a notable topic though the index, if it exists, isn’t.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the article if it contains original research or unverified content, which violates Wikipedia's  no original research policy.  Wikipedia requires all information to be verifiable and sourced from reliable, published sources.  -- Loewstisch ( talk ) 15:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — I disagree with the keep & redirect !vote in that doing so implies that the term is a potentially notable one.  Certainly, you can create such an index, but it isn't among the more established email metrics which are alluded to but not well fleshed out in the 1st and 2nd editions of Chad White's work which is the first citation. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 19:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indah Setyani: Fails WP:BIO 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Television ,  and Indonesia .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm just trying to improve articles from Indonesia because there are very few articles there, please cooperate to be revised.  thanks Tomboyprida ( talk ) 16:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Tomboyprida your unilateral move of this article to mainspace has triggered this deletion discussion.  It was not ready to be an article.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] so let's revise or add sentences that are worthy of being the main article.  Tomboyprida ( talk ) 16:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I hope that is achieved.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] thanks my friends to revised it althoght the few sources Tomboyprida ( talk ) 16:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Tomboyprida has been blocked as a sock of the blocked article creator.  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete pending a possible analysis of sources.   This article does not speak for itself and establish biographical notability .   Work of a now-blocked editor and sockpuppets.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 03:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no evidence of notability.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Rohilkhand: I have checked the sources and nowhere I found a thing related to this event, clearly a WP:HOAX article.  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 11:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a hoax or at best nonsensical SYNTH.  the creator has produced a run of dodgy Indian military history articles.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A search for sources provides zero results on Internet Archive for "Battle of Rohilkhand" or "Battle of Katehar".  The only battle of Rohilkhand I am aware of is the 1794 one in the Second Rohilla War .  Sources used in the article don't appear to actually discuss the topic.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 19:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sumqayıt (album): Found no RS discussing the album, the corresponding page in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia also has no sources.  ULPS ( talk ) 23:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Azerbaijan .  ULPS ( talk ) 23:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nomination.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 11:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I was going to suggest redirecting to the band's article as is common procedure, but that might be a problem because Sumqayıt is also the name of a city in their country.  The album itself has no reliable notice from the media, at least under the two different spellings given in the article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and relevant SNGs.  Unlikely that significant offline coverage exists.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 12:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jul (Korean Bow): Prodraxis ( talk ) 22:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Prodraxis ( talk ) 22:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Possibly a mistranslation / misspelling of 절 on Wiktionary ?  Shazback ( talk ) 22:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , but not for that reason.  This doesn't appear to be a WP:HOAX , as it's just a misspelling of the Korean word for bow .  The article for bowing already exists, and this article is just giving advice on how to bow.  Crystalholm ( talk ) 00:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced article, probably not notable for a separate article, and not a plausible redirect.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 20:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Bowing .  On the Bowing page, there is a sub-section called 'In China', the Jul article could become a sub-section called 'In Korea'.  三葉草 San Ye Cao 05:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge which was an opinion recently suggested.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unless someone writes something sourced on Bowing for us to redirect to (in which case, do ping me).  This is completely unsourced and so is not suitable for merging.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2022 Eastern Eagles football team: Lacks WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources.  This is not even a varsity team.  It's a "club" team that played three games against " junior varsity " squads from three small colleges, losing two of those games.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 03:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Honestly don’t remember making this, but it definitely is not notable under any circumstance.  Especially with a Division III school.  Thetreesarespeakingtome ( talk ) 03:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is just a mirror of website content.  killer bee 04:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of independent WP:SIGCOV .  User:Let'srun 17:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eastern Eagles football unless SIGCOV is found.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 16:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Skobelevka: It has also been deleted from Azerbaijani Wikipedia.  Redivy ( talk ) 23:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete More worthless mass-produced junk from User:Carlossuarez46 .  Reywas92 Talk 21:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , WP:G3 , WP:HOAX .  Aintabli ( talk ) 23:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  It has no official source and it was deleted from Azerbaijani Wikipedia.  Also in my opinion, there is lack of significance.  Zohrab javad ( talk ) 19:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Noah Khyle: There are two copies of this BLP , one in article space and one in draft space.   The BLPPROD can be removed from the article, because it now has a reliable source, but the reliable source is a passing mention.   The other reference is IMDB.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 Newsweek Episode summary with a passing mention of Noah Khyle Yes No.   Passing mention.  Yes.  Yes.  2 IMDB A database entry Yes No.   A database entry.  No.  Sort of.  There is nothing in this stub that refers to significant coverage .   The draft can be left in draft space, because the actor may satisfy acting notability in the future.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 18:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 18:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe this article should be published — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgold79709 ( talk • contribs ) 22:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - A source has been added, so I am updating the source analysis table.   The source is another passing mention.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 Looper.com Episode discussion, with a passing mention of Noah Kyle's character Yes No.   Passing mention.  Probably No. 2 Newsweek Episode summary with a passing mention of Noah Khyle Yes No.   Passing mention.  Yes.  Yes.  3 IMDB A database entry Yes No.   A database entry.  No.  Sort of.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 07:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom and above source evaluation.  // Timothy :: talk 18:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG - this is a BLP with three less than reliable sources .  Even if arguendo you can argue that at least one of them is reliable, there s less than significant coverage .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Radiant (software): UptonSincere ( talk ) 02:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  There are two inexperienced editors here, I'd like to hear from others who have participated in other AFDs.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Couple sources, haven't evaluated reliability: https://cmscritic.com/radiant-cms-review https://web.archive.org/web/20220505204305/http://www.rubyinside.com/radiant-a-rails-cms-diamond-in-the-rough-52.html Japanese book off Gbooks: https://www.google.com/books/edition/%E5%85%A5%E9%96%80Radiant_CMS/feS9QhxUVdUC? hl=en&gbpv=0 A412 ( Talk • C ) 08:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  I wouldn't expect that the sources that signify its significance as required by WP:NSOFT can be found, and it's likely that the available sources won't meet WP:GNG either.  This was one of the first libraries based on Ruby on Rails to appear, and has many trivial mentions as such, but libraries of this kind, offering trivial functionality on top of Rails itself like Radiant did, generally didn't get much traction in the Rails world.  Radiant wasn't an exception and the project eventually died without leaving legacy apart from blog coverage in the early days of Rails.  PaulT2022 ( talk ) 02:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Access Yea Community Education Program: According to my online research, there are not enough reliable, independent sources, WP:NRV , that cover this program in detail.  Chiserc ( talk ) 23:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Australia .  Chiserc ( talk ) 23:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete Nothing in gnews, and just 1 hit in Australian search engine Trove.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose Because the claim above that "This education program appears to have a very regional focus, only in a specific region in Australia" is contradicted by the article itself saying "AYCE is statewide..."  HiLo48 ( talk ) 00:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] it fails GNG regardless.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I couldn't find information that the program was indeed a statewide program with national impact and it's more like "a state-funded high school program in Victoria, Australia".  Chiserc ( talk ) 00:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have seen this program in operation, but I have no ownership or investment in it.  It's just that you made your "very regional" claim a major part of your case for deletion, and it's not "very regional" at all.  The main operations of the program occur around 90 km away from the township of Yea, in metropolitan Melbourne , a city of over 5 million people.  It's open to kids from anywhere really, and Victoria is Australia's second most populous state.  Maybe you need to reframe your case HiLo48 ( talk ) 23:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I agree with you, the article along with many other public institutions, are not notable enough to sustain Wikipedia's notability criteria.  Ⓒ𝕝乇тᵉⓇ ( α ɯσɾԃ? ) 15:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I couldn't find any RSs other than the mention in the single 2006 The Age article.  Fails WP:GNG , WP:NCORP .  Cabrils ( talk ) 23:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Not enough significant coverage.  Be ica verra verra ]] talk 18:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Florian Tausendpfund: Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 09:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Germany .  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 09:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 19:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete