hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Karkhimachli : Only used by Malkani.  No secondary sources.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lythronaxargestes ( talk | contribs ) 21:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Haider Mehdi : HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 16:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ShakeDeal : The article relies on company announcements and press releases, which are insufficient to pass the WP:NCORP threshold.  Maduant ( talk ) 22:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Websites ,  and India .  Maduant ( talk ) 22:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This "start-up" is 6 years old now and the only coverage we have is funding announcements.  If they haven't gotten critical notice in that time, there are likely no RS. I can't find anything beyond retailer PR websites and funding discussions.  It's not even a start-up at this point.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a B2B company, originally created via AfC.  The article and its references largely concern service proposition and funding announcements, which are insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH .  A couple of start-up industry awards are listed but these do not appear notable in their own right.  Searches find a company founder being quoted in articles about wider economic prospects ( [1] , [2] ), but I am not seeing the coverage about the firm itself needed to demonstrate notability here, nor is there an article on Vora Ventures which could provide a redirect alternative .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Maduant Improve the Article : Appreciate your feedback and believe that additional sources could strengthen the article's credibility and meet the WP:NCORP threshold for notability.  As the article was created in 2020 via 'AFC' template, and noticed that the information/citation may have become outdated.  Instead of nominating for deletion, Addition of new sources can improve the article's notability.  Niclepo ( talk ) 07:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject sources and BEFORE fails GNG and NCORP.  // Timothy :: talk 11:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP -- Devoke water 19:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anne Hurley : cited only to a database.  fails general notability guideline .  ltb d l ( talk ) 05:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Basketball ,  and Canada .  ltb d l ( talk ) 05:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure it is enough, but there is coverage of her outside of game summaries at least in the Hamilton Spectator and Montreal Star .  Rlendog ( talk ) 15:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mostly brief mentions in various period sport reports [21] .  I can't see keeping this, lack of extensive coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fahad Al-Malki : No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  It looks like he only played one professional season.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeremy Kaplan : The major claim to notability here seems to be the blog that he contributed to.   However, the blog's nominations would seem better summarized at PCMag instead of an article about one of the magazine's editors.  NinjaRobotPirate ( talk ) 03:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable personally, fails WP:GNG , very promotion in nature.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's an LGBTQ piano teacher with the same name that has more coverage than this person.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Journalism ,  and Technology .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above Andre 🚐 01:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sekolah Global Indo-Asia : The school have some passing coverage based on a WP:BEFORE search such as celebrations of 25th birthday, but none of the sources showed the notability of the school.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Indonesia .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 03:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kalnadan-e Pain : Source is dead.  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Random link to an .xls file doesn't make it notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Reference #2 is the official Census of Iran .  If a town is listed on their spreadsheet for this region (#01), then it's officially recognized per WP:GEOLAND and therefore notable.  @ Hongsy , is Kalnadan-e Pain listed?  Checking references is part of WP:BEFORE .  Thanks, -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ A. B. - Please note abadi are excluded from GEOLAND.  FOARP ( talk ) 11:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  FOARP , thanks for letting me straight about abadis and Hongsy , thanks for your work cleaning up this mess.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leadstart : References are all about the books, not the publisher.  Others fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and are sponsored references (which is what brought me to the page to begin with).  CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Companies ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Sponsored articles are not reliable at all WP:SPONSORED .  Grabup ( talk ) 06:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE : All the references cited are disclaimer articles non notable company trying to get notable with PR.  AnkkAnkur ( talk ) 20:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) — AnkkAnkur ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Parrivaar : PROD'd and restored.  Elevating to AFD.  Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 12:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Easily fails WP:NTV Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Damani Horton : Does not appear to have played for a club after university.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bahamas .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Woolly Farms : WP:BEFORE turns up nothing proving notability.  Seawolf35 T -- C 23:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , India ,  and Karnataka . Seawolf35 T -- C 23:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not appear to meet WP:GNG .  I am unable to find significant coverage in multiple reliable sources .  -- Kinu t / c 23:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  It sounds like a great idea for a small company that can take advantage of ONDC but that's not part of the criteria for establishing notability.  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 13:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is interesting but there's no evidence that it meets our notabilty requirements.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohit Bharatiya : Doesn't appear to have won any elections and majority of sources appear to be promotional/puffery.  jellyfish ✉ 21:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and India .  jellyfish ✉ 21:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NPOL as well GNG.  BLP require strong sourcing to satisfy GNG.  Saqib ( talk ) 21:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:NPOL , WP:GNG .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 15:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL .  The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician and businessman is not enough to warrant a page on the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : the current article fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  However, many sources exist on the subject, so editors can still enhance its credibility and notability.  -- AstridMitch ( talk ) 01:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Boccia at the 2023 ASEAN Para Games : No indication of notability under GNG or SNG.     A stats-only article with the stats for one type of game at that event.   The only source is those stats.  North8000 ( talk ) 13:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Basketball ,  and Cambodia .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails GNG and is basically a collection of stats.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 19:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oga Amos : Sources, with a partial exception of The Nation, are all paid puff.  Sources from BEFORE are also paid puff.
 See source analysis below; Currently on the article; Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://thenationonlineng.net/comedian-oga-amos-wins-best-skit-maker-in-ghana/ ~ Even though the "win award" is true, this is paid promotional puff ~ Ditto ~ Partial https://pmnewsnigeria.com/2024/02/25/from-content-creation-to-philanthropy-inspiring-journey-of-oga-amos/ paid promotional puff Ditto ✘ No https://leadership.ng/oga-amos-from-anambra-roots-to-lagos-stardom/ paid promotional puff ("Oga Amos’s commitment and talent haven’t gone unnoticed, earning him well-deserved awards that acknowledge his substantial contributions to the dynamic world of online entertainment.", really? Only one non-notable award?) Ditto ✘ No https://pmnewsnigeria.com/2023/01/27/oga-amos-one-of-nigerias-leading-content-creators/ Ditto Ditto ✘ No https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/11/oga-amos-floats-charity-foundation-to-transform-lives-of-his-fans/ paid promotional puff WP:NGRS , paid promotional puff ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  From BEFORE: Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://newtelegraphng.com/oga-amos-cheers-content-creators-for-incredible-creativity/ ~ ~ Even though WP:NGRS , this is still dependent on the subject This is not about him directly ✘ No https://tribuneonlineng.com/oga-amos-floats-charity-foundation-to-transform-lives/ paid promotional puff Ditto ✘ No https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2023/11/05/oga-amos-floats-charity-foundation-to-transform-lives-of-his-fans Ditto Ditto and WP:NGRS ✘ No https://guardian.ng/news/oga-amos-floats-charity-foundation-to-transform-fans-lives/ Ditto Ditto ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As the charts show, lots of wording for not much substance for notability.  It's all either long fluff pieces or just what reads as SEO spam.  I can't find anything that isn't a puff piece either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MyLead : Google News search gives zero results, general google search reveals only sponsored blogs, rankings and other SEO fluff.  Article sources also all belong in the former two category.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 05:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies , Websites ,  and Poland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NCOMPANY .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Crayons (film) : The entire article is balancing on a single Deccan Chronicle article.  The other Marunandan Malayalee source may be notable but given that the company who wrote that page's article was deleted, it is not clear it that page is notable.  The Deshabhimani source simply lists the film's cast and crew.  Nowrunning, which reviews many Malayalam-language films, did not review this film.  There are no reliable reviews for this film.  The only other thing that could make this film notable is the fact that it was considered for a national award.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 00:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Deccan Chronicle article is in-depth and SIGCOV, GNG met easily Jack4576 ( talk ) 01:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 03:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete article doesn't meet WP:GNG and there is no reliable critic reviews.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monhiroe ( talk • contribs ) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Need multiple sources to meet GNG, otherwise fails WP:NFILM .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HMDW Architects : Not quite enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Companies ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because, unfortunately, conservation architects rarely create anything original themselves and there's very little evidence of any significant coverage about HMDW Architects (who appear to have recently changed their name).  The awards seems to be minor.  The BBC article about the refurbed cinema doesn't even mention the architects.  Sionk ( talk ) 13:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete