hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sack of Bhatner fort (1398): The infobox mentions that Dul Chand fought for Delhi sultanate however the Siege section mentions him as a ruler/king of a different kingdom and it has no mention of Delhi sultanate.  Moreover there are no cited sources mentioning the event as Sack of Bhatner fort (1398) .  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 07:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Rajasthan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this tidal wave of rubbish really is exhausting.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rahil Ahmad Fourmoli: No evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC #5 being met, which is the bare minimum requirement.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , bro passes WP:GNG by a long shot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:E915:1201:D442:BCBD:AF58:F56B ( talk ) 10:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please can you provide at least two reliable sources showing in-depth coverage of 'bro'?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Despite the player's 4 appearances for the Afghanistan national team (which suffers from a lack of coverage), nothing further can be determined.  Fails in WP:V .  Svartner ( talk ) 06:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kowshik Saha: It was created by an account with a possible COI.   The sources used in the article are terrible and demonstrate an absolute lack of coverage in reliable sources.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 22:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Bibliographies , Bangladesh ,  and India .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 22:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some good sources like allmusic.com and edm.com which is a top media house for music were used.  Are they not reliable?  Brosnan21 ( talk ) 03:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom — MdsShakil ( talk ) 22:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG.  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 13:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christ Jyoti Convent High School, Chiplun: Maliner ( talk ) 17:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Christianity ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced for 10 years and no significant coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kanak Dhanai: Was never elected into a political office that makes one inherently notable, the listed sources are mostly statistical websites on election and stuff like that.  No GNG pass here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 06:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , India ,  and Uttarakhand .  Owen× ☎ 07:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Based on my check, I found that the subject fails to meet WP:GNG due to a lack of in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources.  Additionally, the subject does not meet WP:NPOL criteria, as he was never elected as an MLA or MP.  The fact that his father was an independent MLA does not confer notability to the son.  Grab Up - Talk 08:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL .  The degree of significance of the subject and role as politician, author and policy researcher is not enough to warrant a page on the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Antibes Yacht Show: The only sources I found find were from yachting/boating media, lacking independent sources to meet GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:08, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Yes, one could conduct a variety of searches , but I do not see much of significant coverage in reliable sources .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian ( talk • contribs ) 18:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of career achievements by Gary Gait: Let'srun ( talk ) 19:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists ,  and Canada .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, pretty clear violation.  Also, the more important info already appears in Gary Gait so doesn't need a merge.  grungaloo ( talk ) 22:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Franklin Castellanos: Joeykai ( talk ) 22:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Honduras-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If he had appeared for the first team, I'd have voted another way, but this clearly fails WP:GNG —only semi-pro, reserve, or youth appearances and no WP:SIGCOV to supersede it.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm no expert, but consensus has been that semi-pro players do not reach notability , nor does playing for literally a few minutes .  If I'm wrong, factually, please ping me.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Namadingo: As seen in the sources available on the entry, it is filled with "he said..." which makes them non-independent.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 04:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Africa .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 04:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  I bet there is more about him out there to be found, but this version does not show notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 22:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ecology Summit: I do not think a redirect to Richard_Stromback#World_Leader_Summits makes sense as A BEFORE identified several possible ecology summits and a red link would encourage creation.  Star Mississippi 00:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Environment .  Star Mississippi 00:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sto. Tomas Integrated High School: GSearch only provided directories and social media sites.  GNews, GBooks and GNews Archives did not turn any substantial sources either.  Normally I would suggest redirect to Calauan per WP:ATD but there's no Educational institutions section there to point to.  - Lenticel ( talk ) 00:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 00:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced for over 5 years and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel Butler (Irish politician): In the time since, some attempt has been made to demonstrate notability.  However, I’d argue that he still fails notability under WP:POLITICIAN .  The references added show no more than would be the case for anyone who happened to by mayor or cathaoirleach of a council (local coverage of their election, welcoming reports, expressing condolences), but none of which amounts to WP:SIGCOV of the individual themselves.  A WP:BEFORE search of "Daniel Butler Limerick" returned only similar information.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 11:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, WP:NPOL and WP:SIGCOV .  Or, failing that, redirect to Mayor of Limerick (as an AtD ).  In terms of NPOL, the role of chair/mayor of Limerick council isn't an "international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office".  In terms of SIGCOV, the only sources in the article (and seemingly available) represent the same type of coverage that we might expect for ANY local councillor or political candidate.  The sources and coverage, for example, which were added alongside the dePROD , are either the very definition of trivial passing mentions or mentions in coverage of activities (like opening books of condolence) that anyone in the same job would have undertaken (ie: coverage relevant to the role rather than the biographical subject).  Except for the fact that this subject is a candidate for the planned/upcoming 2024 Limerick mayoral election , there is nothing material to differentiate the subject from other councillors/candidates.  Neither role affording inherent notability (and candidates for office also not being inherently notable)....  Guliolopez ( talk ) 12:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've not sure how necessary it is to consider ATD here.  The article was published relatively recently, so I doubt there are many external links pointing here.  I don't think we'd consider redirects for all the other mayors of Limerick who don't have articles.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 17:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:NPOL .  A local politician who gets the usual mentions in the local news.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 12:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Ireland .  Owen× ☎ 13:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it is the third-most populous region in Ireland, so I think it would be easier to show he has outsize influence for his role, but that is not the case yet here.  SportingFlyer T · C 04:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note The article's author, and one of the main contributors, are both socks of the blocked user

Discussion outcome: delete
PlinkArt: Not sure it is sufficient to merit a standalone article.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Many, many high-quality sources, including Telegraph , Reuters , Financial Times , The Guardian , LA Times , Forbes , Fast Company , CNET , and TechCrunch , but as the nom points out, they are all about the acquisition.  I am unable to find any coverage before or after the acquisition, so this fails WP:SUSTAINED .  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 19:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Don't see any good place to redirect.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ellie Rodriguez (journalist): Lone ref is a 2010 biography published by her then-employer, and I am not finding much significant chatter about her in the time since.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Television ,  and Florida .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conalep Ing. Bernardo Quintana Arrioja: The first and second sections are a WP:COATRACK of the engineer it is named after, Bernardo Quintana , and of the COVID pandemic, respectively.  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 10:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Mexico .  NoonIcarus ( talk ) 23:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2022 outstation murder-suicide: duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events ,  and Australia .  Owen× ☎ 13:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A murder suicide is rather routine.  I'd expect more coverage of the aftermath, where it's mentioned that the police didn't release much info about the event, but even that barely has a mention in media.  Two years on and I can't see much of a lasting impact from this event.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per WP:EVENTCRIT "Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance".  Tar nis hed Path talk 11:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as True Crime, per NOTNEWS.  My condolences to the families and friends of the victim.  Carrite ( talk ) 03:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eastwick College: Greenman ( talk ) 08:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Greenman ( talk ) 08:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  While it may be possible to pull together an article at some point, this is definitely not it, and the history prior to draftifying is not promising.  At this point, the sources are not sufficient, the article reads like marketing copy, and the COI mentioned in nom seems to be confirmed.  — siro χ o 09:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Education ,  and New Jersey .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Sorry to say but my attempts to find appropriate supporting materials to cite has been generally unsuccessful.   One thing is that the mutliple entities are rarely considered together as a single unit.   Further, the 'main campus' and the Hackensack colleges are really separate and distinct things - the former being a nursing college, the second a college of mortuary studies.   I'm not saying that one could create a persistent article on either of these, though.   Generally lacking in coverage overall.  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 15:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Boinga: Fram ( talk ) 15:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Bangladesh , India ,  and Assam .  Fram ( talk ) 15:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If it is verifiable, it is dictionary, not encyclopedic content: a word etymology and senses.  Cnilep ( talk ) 03:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This looks and sounds like a WP:HOAX .  Chaipau ( talk ) 21:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Reza Moradi Ghiasabadi: Existing sourcing is mostly to self-published material.  Jprg1966 (talk) 23:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Archaeology ,  and Iran .  Jprg1966 (talk) 23:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete clearly fails WP:NPROF and he does not seem to have a substantial impact on the academic discourse.  The few mentions of him in the academic literature describe him as a freelance researcher in a local University journal.  Nothing in the article indicates notability.  The only coverage I could find was this single article [1] about ancient board games that were discovered, which is pretty short and not really about him but about the discovery he made.  -- hroest 21:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete