hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Darcy Breen: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Australia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Career never really kicked on to bring extended coverage, so not really enough to pass WP:GNG here.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  Only 1 game for Waratahs.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Babu Shiv Bahadur Singh: Fails GNG and NBIO per previous AfD discussions.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babu Shiv Bahadur Singh (2nd nomination) // Timothy :: talk 01:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, agree.  .  This also seems to be part of DrhSR 's collection of articles related to Kohra Estate and similar subjects.  Delete .  AriTheHorse talk to me!  16:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akshay Bam: Another case of a politician who got involved in the upcoming election and withdrew or defected to another party and stuff like that.  Sources are mostly WP:ROUTINE and WP:RUNOFTHEMILL , some are unreliable.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL .  The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician and entrepreneur is not enough to warrant a page on the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Again another article created solely for the general election which fails of WP:BLP1E .  It also fails WP:NPOL , as he was never elected as an MLA or MP, nor does he meet WP:GNG because the sources are not significant.  These sources cannot establish notability.  Grab Up - Talk 12:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Madhya Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kill the Scientist: The reviews are all for a split seven-inch record they did with three other bands.  That is not significant coverage.  Back at that time, you could get reviews in these type of publications by simply mailing them a copy of your release.  It is not indicative of anything beyond that.  Just Step Sideways from this world .... .  today 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Just Step Sideways from this world .... .  today 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only Maximum Rocknroll out of the four sources cited seems to be qualified as WP:RS .  However, it is still a brief review of one of the band's albums and does not demonstrate their notability.  I did some online searches, but nothing related to the band comes up.  It doesn't even qualify for WP:GNG . — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 20:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Reviews are just trivial mentions, not even close to SIGCOV.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 00:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Reviews are brief mentions in mostly unreliable sources not cited properly and I could find no other coverage.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Serena Cowdy: PatGallacher ( talk ) 13:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , Journalism ,  and United Kingdom .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only significant coverage on Cowdy I can find is around the affair.  Her political activities seem restricted to being a local councillor.  As above, this seems to be WP:BLP1E .  pinktoebeans (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Local council is not a level of government that confers an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just for existing, but we would have to see coverage about her work on council , not her sex life, to bestow passage of NPOL #2.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jaaga Study: Very Average Editor ( talk ) 09:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Technology ,  and Karnataka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 13:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nancy Flagg Gibney: Fails the general and author-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Women , United States of America ,  and New York .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBIO .  Available sources are mostly primary or passing mentions.  Her obituary can be found in the New York Times, but that is not enough to demonstrate notability.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage and the obituary in the New York Times alone is not enough to meet WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 14:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hamad Nazzal: Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 01:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 01:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Jordan .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Can we get some more opinions here?  This article has been PROD'd several times so is not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find any sources that might satisfy WP:GNG Waterfelt ( talk ) 06:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pyae Sone Naing: I found Duwun , which was the best Burmese coverage in my searches.  English-language coverage was limited to trivial mentions in ASEAN Football , FAS and Jakarta Globe .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails both WP:SIGCOV and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 16:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rodeo Dental & Orthodontics: In a WP:BEFORE search, the only coverage I could find in secondary sources was inclusion in a Fortune "Impact20" list [63] , press releases, puff pieces on dentistrytoday.com (for which I can't find evidence of editorial oversight ), and a "sponsored content" piece on a local FOX affiliate [64] .  The inclusion on the Fortune list, along with the local magazine awards for "Top Dentist" in Fort Worth, is about it for reliable, independent, secondary coverage so far, and I don't think that alone brings it up to WP:CORP or WP:GNG.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Medicine ,  and Texas .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  It's always a concern when the author creates an account for the sole purpose of adding a single article MNewnham ( talk ) 22:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with MNewnham , very strange for a new account to suddenly create a page in one go.  As for the sourcing, it is limited with one reference directly from Rodeo & another that is a press release.  Another two references only highlight awards/recognition.  Not enough comprehensive coverage from third party references. -- Porcinipal ( talk ) 17:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Niyameddin Musayev: Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Older topics like this are harder to source given pre-internet sourcing, doubly so Azerbaijani pre-internet sourcing.  That said a blog post from a now defunct blog from 2008 probably isn't enough.  On a topic like this (pre-internet) I would be happy to recommend keep with at least 1 reasonable source of any kind but right now I couldn't call for keep.  BHC ( talk ) 22:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Azerbaijan .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The text has been up since 2010 without any improvement in sourcing .  The lack of sources in even the subject's native-language Wikipedia is telling.  This is no more than a fan's page about a non-notable artist.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I disagree with the respected @ The Gnome that the artist is non-notable; however, the article is in a disastrous condition.  Someone has to give it a new life with the proper content and sourcing.  Villon411 ( talk ) 09:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Though a negative (my "no sourcing") is rather difficult to formally prove, it is trivially easy to disprove.  All one needs is the proferring of sources.  Simple assertions "this is notable" won't do.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 11:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - or perhaps draftify?  I can't find anything, but maybe the sources are not in English.  It would be nice if someone found something in a non-English language which met the GNG - and whilst I accept that there has been a lot of time for someone to do that, I'm open to draftify for a while to give another try.  JMWt ( talk ) 07:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Francisco Gómez (footballer, born 1967): Article created by a blocked sockpupeteer evading a salting of Francisco Javier Gómez .  Cites no sources containing significant coverage.  * Pppery * it has begun... 23:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Mexico .  Owen× ☎ 23:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : After some searching, I see nothing amounting to significant coverage.  Can't view the deleted old page, but going by what Pppery is saying, I doubt it had anything extra to offer.  ULPS ( talk • contribs ) 03:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1995–96 Tigres UANL season where he is mentioned numerous times.  Geschichte ( talk ) 17:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 02:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes GNG.  See 1 , 2 , 3 amongst others @ GiantSnowman : . -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 16:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sources 1 and 2 appear to be the same?  Coverage is brief.  Giant Snowman 17:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources mentioned as SIGCOV above are interviews or summaries of what he said in interviews, there is no secondary analysis.  Fails GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 22:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The keyword "Francisco Gómez" on Google finds other men with the same name instead of this Mexican soccer player, failing WP:V too.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 09:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Parlevliet: She did not even complete the individual event.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Olympics .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find the Olympic site for her [37] .  Nothing else.  No sources found in . au news sites.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:NSPORT -- Here2rewrite ( talk ) 20:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG for this subject.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Haritha Gogineni: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Unsure of the quality of the sources found [6] is basically a paragraph with lots of photos, typical of other sources.  This is listed [7] in Gsearch, but the website only returns html code, looks like a coding error.  How do we feel about the other sources out there, they are flowery, but do mention her role as producer in several items?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 13:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on what I've seen, I don't think this person is covered in RS that we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , quick search shows some sources that would be better suited for the subject matter based in india.  This one, this , and this .  Iljhgtn ( talk ) 16:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] These are all either paid promotion, or indistinguishable enough from it that they might as well be; see WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 04:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my response immediately above.   PR-type sources can't be used to establish notability.   "Most trusted astrologer" award?  Really?   Other than a couple claims of receipt of this award over the last couple years, I can't even verify that this is a real thing.   Who awards it?  What are the selection criteria?  If an astrologer casts a horoscope in the forest, but there's no one around to read it, is it still bunk?  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 04:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lots of hits, all with ridiculous titles that cast massive doubt on reliability.  No evidence of any other attention given by any third party.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 16:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - None of the sources seem reliable enough to establish notability.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 18:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – If Wikipedia started listing every such fantasist, there'd be no end to it.  MisterWizzy ( talk ) 08:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kyaw Swar Linn: Only sources found are Transfermarkt, FBref, Soccerway etc. which SPORTBASIC asks us to disregard for notability purposes.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Stanley Cup playoffs broadcasters (Original Six era): Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent NHL fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced, consists of nothing but YouTube posts; not helping this list to assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Ice hockey , Lists ,  and North America .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete listcruft.  OP might want to stop using the same message for all of his AfD's since the NHL is obviously not NASCAR.  -1ctinus📝 🗨 19:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Okay, this was an error.  I didn't know I was tired after a day from work.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 22:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Ugh, this is desperately obscure, and obviously fails LISTN; I'd challenge anyone who demurs to find a single source -- contemporary or otherwise -- discussing pre-expansion playoff broadcasters.  Ravenswing 00:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources are lacking from RS for this to meet the WP:LISTN .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete