hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jite Agbro: The subject fails WP:NBIO with lacking significant coverage WP:SIGCOV .  Lekkha Moun ( talk ) 14:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Nigeria ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The “Selected exhibitions” section clearly helps understand how this pass NCREATIVE 4b.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 20:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It is TOOSOON for this artist to have an encyclopedia article because they do not yet have the professional track record of reviews, articles about their work, chapters in art history books, museum or national gallery collections, etc. that is required.  The work is beautiful however all of the exhibitions are at non-notable venues, except the Bainbridge Island Museum, which is a small regional museum.  Fails both GNG and NARTIST, and does not meet NCREATIVE 4b criteria at this time; perhaps in a few more years after more critical attention is received.  A "significant exhibition" would be at a venue like the Venice Bienniale, Whitney Biennial, Documenta, the Carnegie International.  In the previous deletion discussion, WomenArtistUpdates provided an excellent source assessment summary table why this does not meet GNG.  It does not seem like much changed in the article since then other than formatting.  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions .  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:ARTIST .  Nice stuff but WP:TOOSOON .  See source assessment table created July 1 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jite Agbro .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 00:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ WomenArtistUpdates : Would this article help at all?  It has quotes from the artist, but I'd also say that it provides a review of the exhibition to some degree.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 04:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Significa, I know you are addressing WAU, not me, however I wanted to chime in that yes, the PBS article you linked helps, it's significant coverage.  Netherzone ( talk ) 13:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samuel (footballer, born July 1989): According to Soccerway , his Brazilian football career was very brief and we only seem to have the 1 cup appearance while playing in Japan, which is a very weak notability claim.  My own searches yielded only Gekisaka , a very brief transfer announcement and Veertien , which is neither significant nor independent.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Brazil .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It fails WP: GNG and there is no enough reliable sources to establish his notability.  Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Refrigerate after opening: No footnotes, two not very reliably looking external links, tagged as needing more sources since 2012.  If nobody can improve this, WP:ATD-R target to consider could be Food preservation perhaps?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Biology ,  and Medicine .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect This is a term used on food labels like "Made with real fruit".  Im struggling to see this as an encyclopedic subject.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 21:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .   I think this is a likely enough search term to be worth redirecting.   After reviewing associate articles I think Shelf life is probably the best target since it is mostly relevant content and could easily be expanded by a couple of sentences to mention this phrase explicitly.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Eluchil404 Sama author created now-deleted shake well :) Any ideas where to redirect that one?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not really.   On the surface Food packaging seems the most relevant but doesn't really cover the relevant issues.   A look at Outline of food preparation shows that we don't have any articles on sifting or mixing as they apply to cooking.   At least that I can see.   Somewhat surprising, but, as the saying goes, Wikipedia is WP:NOT a cookbook.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 03:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there are three different target articles suggested to Redirect this article to.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , an unreferenced personal essay that doesn't say anything that doesn't relate to food preservation in general.  It's not worth redirecting as it's just an ordinary use of the English language.  We might just as well redirect Permits entry of light to Window .  Elemimele ( talk ) 13:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all the above, this sorry and unsurprisingly uncited essay has no place on Wikipedia; the topic of food preservation is sufficiently covered already, and this wouldn't be a sensible redirect.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 15:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as wholly unreferenced and lacking any evidence of notability .   — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shore Acres, Mamaroneck: Only thing I can find out about the place is that a 2021 trench collapse that killed a worker occurred there, but I doubt that alone would pass the notability criteria.  Procyon117 ( talk ) 15:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Procyon117 ( talk ) 15:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is the best that I could find.  Appears to mostly be important to the Shores Acres Point Club.  Supporting Delete given lack of available sources or obvious notability, and it got moved to mainspace after being rejected by the AFC process.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 07:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of important publications in computer science: Previously survived AfD in 2006 when those policies weren't enforced I guess.  * Pppery * it has begun... 22:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies , History , Science , Computing ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Without clearly defined criteria for what "important" means, this article is as OR as it gets.   The three criteria listed are subjective and (more damningly) unsourced.   Only reference 11 approaches a treatment of this subject as a whole, and it's based on an informal survey conducted by somebody at Penn who made the results into a personal webpage.   That's pretty weak.   Other sources are all primary and don't discuss the topic of the list as a group, so this is a failure of WP:NLIST and grossly OR.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Very much a violation of WP:OR to create a topic this way.  Even with that aside, you'll often get some listing somewhere (course material, reviews in annals, etc.) describing seminal papers that may be required or important reading for those purusing advanced degrees in a specific field.  That generally would not satisfy WP:NLIST and at most would just be a secondary source in the main article (in this case computer science ) at best.  This isn't a useful redirect either, so this comes across as a pretty unequivocal case for deletion.  KoA ( talk ) 15:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fractal Records: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , can't find any sources discussiong label in detail, only albums it distributed Mach61 ( talk ) 00:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claim or references for indep notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 15:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no citations and I could not come up with anything in Google.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 00:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tanvi Rathod: Seemingly won an unremarkable pageant 2 years ago and no indication they are notable for this or anything else.  Contest is not significant enough even for subject to pass WP:ANYBIO .  Declined at AfC and drafted several times, but reverted by creator, so needs community consensus.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 06:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Fashion ,  and India .  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 06:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=TAz2Pvik6M8 | https://watchgujarat.com/general/tanvi-rathod-of-gujarat-in-mrs-universe-competition/ | https://westerntimesnews.in/news/159923/ | https://www.newsaaspaas.com/2021/11/gujarats-pride-mrs-tanvi-rathod-will-represent-india-at-international-beauty-pageant-mrs-universe-2021-at-south-korea/ Please Check here i can see few articles for notability 103.85.8.207 ( talk ) 14:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] All that relates to the single event that this person is apparently only known for and are just different sources of the same thing already in the article.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 16:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP1E (and that 1E is not notable).  // Timothy :: talk 08:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, nothing approaching notability.  She won and that's about all there is to her story in the media.  Nothing for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tom Lucy (comedian): I declined an WP:A7 on this article back in 2016 and improved it a bit, then forgot about it.  It was then edited extensively by a relative of the subject, who I assume didn't have the experience of writing neutral biographies on Wikipedia, despite me warning them not to where it was deleted per WP:G11 .  I don't think that applies as CSDs are only applicable if all revisions meet the criteria.  However, I'm not sure what to do with the article, and erring on the side of caution for BLPs, I think an AfD is best to see whether we should have this article or not.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and England .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I think he's notable in Scotland mostly, I find this [7] but I can't find anything else about him.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  21:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I found some interviews and reviews of his show at Edinburgh Fringe, but nothing that really goes into much detail.  May be a case of WP:TOOSOON .  -- Random person no 362478479 ( talk ) 02:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard W. Abbe: Not a statewide office, and nothing in the subject's short resume-like article to indicate encyclopedic notability.  He was born, served in the war, got an education, was a deputy attorney general (but not actually attorney general of the state), was district attorney of a county, served on regional trial and appellate courts, retired, and died.  He had a famous sister.  That's all there seems to be to say.  BD2412 T 15:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  BD2412 T 15:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amritha Meera Vijayan: Has blink and you miss roles in some movies.  Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG due to the dearth of references from reliable sources .  Created by a single purpose editor who has since been blocked for having a promotional username, probably indicating that the article is a paid one.  Jupitus Smart 18:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , India ,  and Kerala .  Jupitus Smart 18:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : My searches did find these two sources but the first is just about her debut and the second seems to be an indiscriminate database of sorts, so I still think this fails WP:GNG .  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 00:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Malayalam Wikipedia article doesn't seem to have any good sources either.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 00:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I also could not find any reliable sources.  Not notable enough.  Shadow 345110 (talk) 22:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Krzysztof Pawlikowski: Panamitsu ( talk ) 11:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, Could I be given 2 months for updating my page in Wikipedia, please?  I'm retired a Professor Emeritus because of health problems and had not been aware that my webpage needed updating.  My health is better now but I’m currently travelling in Europe.  I will be able to update my page after I’m back in New Zealand in mid September.  Please see the recently updated university page: https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/engineering/contact-us/people/krys-pawlikowski.html I could submit the latest version of my CV if it wold nbe helpful.  Kind regards, Krys ———————————————————— Krzysztof (Krys) Pawlikowski UC Professor  Emeritus Dept.   of Computer Science and Software Eng.  University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand http://www.csse.canterbury.ac.nz/krys.pawlikowski/ ———————————————————— 2A02:A312:C447:5380:B8CF:239:2040:A911 ( talk ) 07:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not a resume or CV hosting service.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 18:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:AUTOBIO concerns.  Fails WP:PROF .  LibStar ( talk ) 17:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I agree Wikipedia is not a CV hosting service, and that the subject should not be updating his own page.  However, the page itself was created by an unconnected user and does not appear to have been subject to WP:COI edits from a review of the history.  He appears to be notable per WP:PROF#C1 (see Google Scholar results ) and I would argue is notable per WP:PROF#C5 (in Australia and New Zealand 'professor' is equivalent to distinguished professors in other countries, meaning that #C5 is met; "an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon").  Cheers, Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 23:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs ) 01:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
FIFA World Cup All-Time Team: It doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG , either.  It's just a team posted by FIFA in 1994, does not merit an article for me.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 04:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 04:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article is very basic with not much notability.  Much work would be needed to improve.  Article also lacks context, and could have been made up for all I know.  Sources are very few and the whole thing looks very unprofessional.  Pablothepenguin ( talk ) 16:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Pablothepenguin - This is not made up unless you are accusing RSSSF of faking information - https://www.rsssf.org/miscellaneous/wrldallt.html .  You probably should withdraw the nomination since you did not look through the sources before nominating.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 16:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - You have to look in multiple languages for this article.  While we might call this the FIFA World Cup All-Time Team, it's also known as the "Equipo Histórico de la Copa Mundial FIFA", the "Tim Sepanjang Masa Piala Dunia FIFA", the "Seleção de Todos os Tempos da Copa do Mundo FIFA" and the "ဖီဖာ သမိုင်းတစ်လျှောက်အသင်း", amongst other names in every other language.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 15:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG .  Content could be merged to FIFA World Cup , History of the FIFA World Cup or FIFA World Cup records and statistics if appropriate.  Stevie fae Scotland ( talk ) 21:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Radio Frontier: Completely unsourced with a decade-old WP:COI tag.  〜 Festucalex • talk 21:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Switzerland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 22:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete