hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Triple Crown College Baseball League : There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:58, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball , United States of America , Kansas ,  and Missouri .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:58, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  My searches did not turn up WP:SIGCOV of the type needed to satisfy WP:GNG .  Please ping me if SIGCOV is found.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: A lack of secondary sourcing is present here to meet WP:GNG .  User:Let'srun 02:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kenny Mims : Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Alabama .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - He has had a long career as a producer and session musician, but he's one of those behind-the-scenes types who is clearly appreciated by his colleagues but never appears in anything beyond the list of credits for other people's works.  There is simply not enough significant coverage to inform an article here.  He was also briefly a member of the band Bonepony and could be redirected to them, but I'm not sure if that's a good idea because it was only a minor tidbit in his history and theirs.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 19:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gosfield North Communications Co-operative : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and Canada .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ri Pyong-chol (footballer) : Simione001 ( talk ) 00:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, there is a source, but no sigcov .  Ping me if there are sources.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 01:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * other Brachy 08 (Talk) 01:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of West Coast Conference women's basketball tournament finals broadcasters : Let'srun ( talk ) 19:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television , Basketball ,  and Lists .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per failing WP:LISTN .  Did a quick search and only found press releases, certainly not fitting as a group for this WP:LISTCRUFT .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 19:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Conyo14.  Also WP:NOTTVGUIDE and WP:LISTCRUFT .  As with sourcing, not to forget WP:PRIMARY .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No reliable coverage.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 02:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Lost : Only source is a database listing.  Cannot find any independent sources.  Article has been tagged for additional references since 2012.  Johnj1995 ( talk ) 19:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see sufficient awards/reviews/etc.  to warrant a pass of WP:NBOOK .  - Kj cheetham ( talk ) 12:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable book.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 20:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alen Harbas : Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - could only find significant coverage from primary sources, which does not pass GNG.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  Maybe if he gets a top tier professional career he would be notable but not now.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Take My Muffin : Search throws up nothing obvious; cites are less than convincing.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 15:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing I find is strictly to crypto or animation blog sites, none of which are useful for notability.  What's also used in the article is not in RS either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and Cryptocurrency .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The articles on AnimationMagazine and CoinIdol seem significant.  The claim that it was the 1st series created with the support of a cryptocurrency community is backed  for ex by.  https://medium.com/@kat123/what-is-take-my-muffin-c734f48266c6 and https://medium.com/@chinedukalu66/take-my-muffin-a-blockchain-based-nft-animation-project-with-the-potential-to-revolutionize-the-e73b125a8484 ; also see https://www.awn.com/news/new-episode-take-my-muffin-hits-youtube , https://thevrsoldier.com/bluelight-aims-to-gamify-the-take-my-muffin-animation-series-betting-on-the-strong-degames-trend/ and the claim itself might add some kind of notability to the production.  A redirect to the only creator who has a page, if really that is considered insufficient, maybe?  (I think it meets GNG, though) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Medium is not a reliable source and the VR soldier is a press release.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, which leaves us with Animation Film Magazine and some sources on the page, and a claim at notability backed by some sources.  Also a redirect to Pavel_Muntyan#Filmography should be considered, so that I take advantage of this comment to indicate I am opposed to deletion. :D - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above Traumnovelle ( talk ) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - plain lack of WP:SIGCOV .  One good source makes this WP:OR .  Bearian ( talk ) 14:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Miller (West Virginia politician) : No in-depth coverage outside of his gubernatorial campaign, no real claim to notability.  All campaign-related coverage of him is fairly WP:ROTM stuff that you would expect of someone running for governor.  Now that his campaign is over, I can't imagine very many people will be searching for him.  I'd support a redirect to 2024 West Virginia gubernatorial election .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and West Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Lean delete .   His unsuccessful candidacy for the Republican nomination for governor is not all that notable, although his ownership of several automobile dealerships (not just Kia) has made his television ads rather ubiquitous (and somewhat amusing, IMO) throughout the region for a number of years.   I doubt that there is enough coverage in the news besides his political candidacy to demonstrate notability, however.   I'm not certain of this, and would be perfectly satisfied if anyone can produce additional evidence of notability.   But just owning the dealerships and having thrown his hat into the ring for the Republican nomination (in a particularly nasty campaign season in West Virginia) does not seem like enough.  P Aculeius ( talk ) 10:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect : as a West Virginia resident myself, I can attest to the fact that Chris Miller has not gained hardly any notability even in his own state; let alone on a scale sufficient for a Wikipedia article.  I would support deleting and adding a redirect to 2024 West Virginia gubernatorial election .  West Virginia WXeditor ( talk ) 18:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Follow up: the only thing about Chris Miller that MIGHT be in any way notable (on a local/regional scale mind you) is those Dutch Miller commercials that are constantly on the airwaves all over the state.  But even then; it’s the company (Dutch Miller Automotive) that might be notable in that case; not necessarily the person running it (Chris Miller).  I still reiterate my support for deletion here.  Although I wouldn’t be opposed to someone creating an article about the Dutch Miller car dealerships though.  West Virginia WXeditor ( talk ) 05:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bharsaiyan : It also fails WP:GNG to be kept as a standalone article.  The only source, which is cited there is also a WP:RAJ era source, which is not considered WP:RS for caste related articles. - Admantine123 ( talk ) 06:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 06:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless someone can persuade me otherwise.  I have tidied up the single reference.  I think it valuable to have coverage of 19th century Indian tribes castes and descriptions of them at that time but this needs to be put in a reasonably current context and not solely from an imperial point of view.  I think this article does not succeed.  It also seems the coverage is insufficient in notability terms.  Thincat ( talk ) 08:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete falls significantly short of meeting the standards set by GNG.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 09:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 FIFA Women's World Cup seeding : This is covered adequately in 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup#Draw , and there is no need for a separate article.  Just delete this, or redirect to 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup#Draw if people think this is a plausible search term (I don't personally think it is a sensible search term).  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Australia ,  and New Zealand .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This could be a valid WP:SPLIT but at the moment is needlessly duplicative.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:46, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just showing information which is covered by the main article and not too big there.  Kante4 ( talk ) 13:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the main article already covers this sufficiently Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Redirect to 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup#Draw .  The article just duplicates information already found in 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup .  TarnishedPath talk 10:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Information is not significantly different from what is provided 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup#Draw .  Demt1298 ( talk ) 14:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yunarys Ramírez : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No good option to redirect: she's not mentioned on the relevant pages and the article is an orphan.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Terrence Keeley : Also reads like a resume.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not finding the sources for GNG.  I find either routine business news (X took on/left Y position) and those all seem to be reprints of press releases.  He did get a lengthy review of his book at "Pensions & Investments" but that does not seem to be a major publication.  There was another book review in the National Review .  I suppose we could consider NAUTH (book was published by Columbia Business School) but I still think it's thin.  One book, two reviews.  Lamona ( talk ) 02:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Lamona fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I wonder why this article has nominated for deletion.  He has featured in an independent secondary reliable sources with a significant coverage.  [ [19] ] CNBC , [ [20] ] Bloomberg , [ [21] ] Fordham University News, [ [22] ] Business Insider and [ [23] ] Wall Street Journal are enough to establish notability.  Again the position held as former BlackRock Executive and books he published can highly quantify him to have notability.  Monoclinicva ( talk ) 14:5, 26 July 2023 (UTC) The articles you list have short quotes of him.  (Although I can't see the WSJ article so maybe that has more.)  We need at least two independent substantial articles ABOUT him - which means not interviews.  I only find one book by him, so if you have found more please post a link.  Lamona ( talk ) 16:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This has pass general notability of living person.  Considering NAUTH This article has pass GNG Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We're equally split between keep and delete.  Relisting for more discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 12:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A resume entry of someone who has written a few op-eds.  No secondary coverage, non-notable WP:BLP .  SportingFlyer T · C 13:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A lot of independence sources.  His publication as an author can qualify this article.  102.91.5.57 ( talk ) 22:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Agnes Awuor : Subject of the article is not notable per WP:GNG and WP:NPOL Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time 10:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7.  Unsuccessful political candidate, not otherwise notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete search for sources, all what I found was passing mention but unfortunately couldn't find any to support it notability.  Epcc12345 ( talk ) 22:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nokia Cityman 100 : 19:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology .  •C y b erw o l f• talk?  19:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Violation of WP:ONESOURCE and fails WP:GNG .  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 17:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete