hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Michal Janiga: Article was created by User:ServareManere , the name of the organization that commissioned his supposed masterpiece.  Hm.  — Biruitorul Talk 20:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no sources showing notability, plus COI issue as mentioned above.  Broc ( talk ) 16:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sources I've checked are either trivial mentions (a sentence or two), non-independent self-published websites (such as the subject's resume on their own web site cited multiple times) or both.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 17:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
M.K Varghese: Mccapra ( talk ) 21:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Local officials are not automatically notable, and I don't see the kind of news coverage needed to satisfy GNG either.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 06:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He is mayor of a metropolis city and we keep mayors of metropolis in US so why not we keep of India.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  04:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It’s a district capital and mayors of district capitals in the U.S. are not generally notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment BottleOfChocolateMilk is correct about the standard our community uses to judge local elected officials.  We want to see coverage of how a local elected official action impacts their community, especially with a retrospective perspective.  What is interesting in this case is that the subject has received a lot of coverage for his praise of BJP leader Suresh Gopi and speculation about the mayor's political future.  I wonder if that coverage is regional or national in nature, and to what degree this is a WP:BLP1E flurry of coverage.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 16:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Local politician who seems to have a bigger head than his notoriety.  Speculation is nothing.  Lauding, endorsing, or supporting other political figures is not inherited notability.  Insufficient coverage per WP:SIGCOV .  Bearian ( talk ) 02:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : does not pass WP:NPOL .  Youknow?  ( talk ) 15:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roces: Editor10293813 ( talk ) 22:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Absolutely delete.  There's nothing there.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Fails GNG.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 12:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete. per nom -- Devoke water 18:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zach Mecelis: Any GNG sources in the article are about the company, not the individual; they don't provide the significant coverage required to meet the standards of WP:GNG or WP:BASIC for a biographical article.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 12:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 12:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Lithuania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep satisfies WP:GNG there are personal bits (not just mention in passsing) if you search foor his full Lithanian name: Žilvinas Mecelis .  - Altenmann >talk 21:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in the article are mentions and an interview, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth , NOTINHERITED applies.  BEFORE, including searching "Žilvinas Mecelis" turned up sources similar to the articles, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV, the keep vote provides no sources to eval.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 14:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails GNG and all sources are not notable to have its own BLP.  Additionally, there is a lack of reliable sources to meet SIGCOV and if there are any, they represent companies instead of the subject of this BLP.  -- Wesoree ( talk · contribs ) 17:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ringback tone advertising: Iljhgtn ( talk ) 21:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 21:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found no significant coverage by reliable secondary sources.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 22:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since this is just a personal essay about the "ringback tone advertising" and not an actual article.  No material is reliably sourced and I could not find any reliable sources within the page history (most sources are long dead and all of them appear to be primary since they were actually trying to sell this service).  The subject does not appear to be notable in any way.  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 07:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JSmooth: No assertion of notability, no third party references, tagged since 2019.  Sandstein 16:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Sandstein 16:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sign of notability.  I could not find any proper coverage.  Unreferenced duffs like these should either be improved or be nuked out of the orbit.  I highly doubt anyone can come up with a minimum of 3 sources that'd help establish its cause of notability.  [This AFD has been relisted once, and so far no other participation. It'd be a shame if this goes without a consensus.] X ( talk ) 19:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable software.  Zero independent sources.  Jfire ( talk ) 03:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Max Bartos: Only SigCov is a single piece interview in local news from 2019.  Article created with COI.  No hard feelings to the author who will probably read this, I think they made a good faith to write an article with COI while following Wikipedia's policy, and the quality of the prose and formatting is nice.  I hope they consider contributing to other, more notable topics that they do not have a conflict of interest with.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 20:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bands and musicians .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 20:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre , New York ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ BrigadierG Appreciate the feedback on drafting.   I have added in news sources as there is SigCov in multiple articles from NY Times, local newspaper, and national magazines.   Also added context of Max as a producer and director, and more from times during COVID.   His role as Darren was a principal role along with the roles of Brendan, Raphina, and Conor.   Disclosed COI because it is the right thing to do, but do not believe this merits deletion since the materials are all sourced and accurately cited and quoted.   Also added reference to his work with Tali Golergant as she featured on one of the songs on his album and she is now a ESC finalist.   I also appreciate the suggestion to edit other articles and will definitely start to do that.   I respectfully ask that the page mark for deletion be removed.  Lawhawk 13 ( talk ) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC) @ Lawhawk 13 [ reply ] Delete .   I had to reorganize this article to figure out what was going on here.   This is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON .   This young actor appeared in a supporting role in an off-Broadway show that was Broadway-bound but never got to Broadway because of the COVID-19 pandemic.   He has not had any significant further theatrical roles.   He has produced and directed a couple of amateur shows.  He had previously had bit parts in several films in his teens, and a leading role in a YouTube short film, playing Young Shane Dawson , when he was 11.   He has released two non-notable albums of folk music and played in bands.  Does not pass NACTOR, and most of the refs in the article (certainly the ones in national press) are about the show, not the actor.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 04:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per the above, doesn't meet NACTOR yet.  Niafied ( talk ) 04:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leke adeboye: Appears to be simply a working pastor.  No sources found beyond confirmation of the works of charity the person has done.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Christianity ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:18, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 13:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No notability, fails WP:GNG.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prince Ludwig of Wettin: Louis Frederick of Saxe-Hildburghausen is listed as his father, but that article says he was childless.  He is listed as being made a cardinal but none of the lists of cardinals created between 1741 and 1830 list his name.  He is listed as an archbishop of Olomouc but List of Roman Catholic bishops and archbishops of Olomouc does not mention him or have any gaps during his lifetime.  The German Wikipedia article that text is apparently copied from is about a different person.  I cannot find him mentioned in the online copies of either of the article's references.  Various Google / online book searches only turn up text from this article and unrelated princes called Ludwig.  Mgp28 ( talk ) 22:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Royalty and nobility ,  and Religion .  Mgp28 ( talk ) 22:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a misreading of sources or a hoax.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , Austria ,  and Czech Republic .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No citations.  Contradicts other articles that say his supposed father was childless.  Probable hoax.  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 08:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence of notability.  And the contradiction with other articles is not really helping.  Keivan.f Talk 13:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as hoax.  Article creator only made 4 mainspace edits.  C 679 06:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Freudian Corduroy: This in particular only has 4 pages in Gsearch, most of which are where to stream it or buy it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - All mentions of it on the web are just streaming/purchase sites (like mentioned in the nom) or user generated review sites like RYM.  ULPS ( talk ) 19:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The album has a brief review at AllMusic (already cited), which helps a little, but I can find nothing else to indicate that the album was noticed by anyone else in the music media.  Do not redirect to the band because they may also be deleted; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ist (band) .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The band's article has now been deleted after the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ist (band) .  Under most interpretations of WP:A9 , if the band is not notable than neither are their albums.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marija Goranović: Not to be confused with the Paralympic athlete , law student , or quiz competition winner , all of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and North Macedonia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable without sufficient sources.  Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 18:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simulated reality in fiction: I like how the introductory sentence says it shouldn't be confused with VR, only to have countless entries that are blatantly about VR.  It just shows the inclusion criteria for this indiscriminate list make no sense.  Anything that might actually be sourced can be easily included in simulated reality (although I am concerned that article itself may be WP:SYNTH , and it has an ongoing merge discussion, so we'll just say simulation hypothesis instead).  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , Popular culture ,  and Lists .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  98% unreferenced OR.  As often, it's possible this could be written well - if someone started with sources from scratch.  This list cannot be salvaged: WP:NOTTVTROPES .  PS.  Virtual reality in fiction is the other side of this mess.  It has some prose content but that's pure OR again.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As a casual user I found the list very interesting 89.241.78.141 ( talk ) 17:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The contents are an incoherent mix of various ideas, ranging from actual simulated reality and virtual reality to intricate illusions and what is apparently described as a great lie.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 09:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per reasons above.  Most of the article are just unsourced/ WP:OR .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 11:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per reasons above.  Mostly unsourced additions to a confusing list.  Sciencefish ( talk ) 19:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ekene Emigo: This hasn't always been unsourced.  It's previously had the unreliable WP:TRANSFERMARKT as well as a link to National Football Teams , although the profile linked has no confirmation of his cap or even his DOB.  He definitely existed because I found trivial mentions in Modern Ghana and RSSSF but none of this is even close to WP:SIGCOV .  This article has existed for 16 years without a decent source so, if we can't find one, it needs deleting.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Govvy ( talk ) 15:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Major based on nominator's rationale.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article for clean up, but clean up is down when it meets WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSBIO for this article.  I don't seem to find sources if not trivial per nom.  No option for ATD.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Rational Academy: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per WP:GARAGE .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 22:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete