hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jobbykrust: The main claim of notability on offer here is that they existed, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of WP:GNG -worthy reliable source coverage about them -- but the article is referenced entirely to primary source directory entries that aren't support for notability, with absolutely no evidence of any reliable or GNG-building coverage shown at all.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Northern Ireland .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - confirmed nothing in Wikipedia Library or Rock's Backpages .  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 20:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Page has been moved to Jobbykrust (1990-1997) by the creator.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of NMUSIC or GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - for reasons given.  David notMD ( talk ) 02:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC .  History appears to be mostly WP:OR .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No charts, fails WP:GNG , WP:BAND , not much coverage in RS found.  All i found was 3 books.  TheGreatestLuvofAll ( talk ) 14:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The three sources are not reliable per WP:RSPS .  Last.fm is deprecated same as Rate Your Music.  Discogs is not reliable but per this discussion i consider using it per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_55#Discogs_and_45cat.com_should_be_acceptable_sources_when_Allmusic_has_gaps TheGreatestLuvofAll ( talk ) 14:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I actually nominated it myself, not noticing that this discussion was underway due to the removal of the deletion discussion template; the sources aren't there for GNG, the band clearly does not meet NMUSIC, so notability isn't there.  Girth Summit (blether) 17:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to establish WP:GNG here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of notability per above comments.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 14:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gary Chirimuuta: JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in the absence of a suitable redirect Looks to fail WP:GNG , and with no lists for Zimbabwean cricketers, there's no suitable redirect either.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG .  Robo Cric Let's chat 16:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Devon Roberts: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Grenada .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TextMagic: Fails WP:CORP .  SL93 ( talk ) 20:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Estonia ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a firm with a corporate SMS product, which has changed hands a couple of times, most recently with a share offering on Nasdaq Tallinn .  In its current state, the article references concern its share offering, which falls under trivial coverage .  An earlier article version had this Small Business Trends piece (2015) as a reference, but that is effectively a company Q&A.  There is also a 2023 item on a company acquisition but that is announcement-based coverage.  A company going about its business, but I am not seeing coverage to demonstrate attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 13:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom └ UkPaolo / talk ┐ 18:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Miss American Beauty 1963: Let'srun ( talk ) 03:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Beauty pageants and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete .  Generally this would be something to redirect.  But Miss American Beauty was speedy deleted in 2009 and has never been properly created, and I don't think there's any broader series of pages like e.g. Beauty pageants in 1963 .  — siro χ o 03:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd (twice) so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Per a request on my talkpage, I'm reverting my closure and relisting the AFD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This beauty pagent is obsucre, lacking established notability.  TH1980 ( talk ) 04:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG per the nom, as well as WP:NEVENT .  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This subject fails WP:GNG as another user states.  -- Artene50 ( talk ) 12:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
We Do Not Negotiate with Terrorists: Both references are dead, and I have been unable to find any in-depth coverage.  I have found one interview but no indication that WP:BAND is met.  — Kusma ( talk ) 21:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Sweden ,  and United Kingdom .  — Kusma ( talk ) 21:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : A search in a Swedish media archive gives zero hits, for what it's worth.  / Julle ( talk ) 22:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Plenty of hits on the phrase, nothing for a band.  I can't find any mention of them.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I'm not sure this is enough to keep, but I rescued both the broken references in the article (the Internet Archive is a very useful thing) and added some more.  There's a nice brief review at http://wonkysensitive.blogspot.com/2012/10/we-do-not-negotiate-with-terrorists-big.html but that probably counts as a blog.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 00:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete almost no coverage.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 07:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BAND .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , due to lack of enough proper sources.  I've failed to find enough to build an article on.  / Julle ( talk ) 12:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Potestio: Does not meet notability criteria.  Broc ( talk ) 00:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada .  Broc ( talk ) 00:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Notability not found for WP:Prof .  Will have to be found elsewhere.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 00:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  I found four reviews of four books, one each: doi : 10.1353/ces.2011.0014 , ProQuest 215637942 , ProQuest 1293141411 , JSTOR 25143307 .  But the first three are all in the same journal and the last two are of edited works, so really for his authored works we have one review each of two books, both in the same journal.  This falls a little short of WP:AUTHOR for me.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 07:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Tenor Wore Tapshoes: I've searched multiple sites for reviews of the book, including Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, Google Scholar, JSTOR, Trove, The New York Times, and others without finding any references to the book.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 01:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 01:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was unable to find any reviews to indicate it passes WP:NBOOK .  Thanks, Significa liberdade , for looking through sites from the previous AfDs.  Happy new year!  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  03:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ERTICO: While the organization has developed partnerships with other European organizations and has sponsored some international events, there is a lack of WP:ORGCRITE .  Most available sources are not independent and not with much depth of coverage.  Chiserc ( talk ) 16:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Belgium .  Chiserc ( talk ) 16:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete mostly per nom and WP:PRIMARY , as there appears to be a lack of sources proving this subject's notability.  Cheers, atque supra !  Fake scientist 8000 16:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Night of the Living Dead (album): It didn't make any top charts nor did it gain other notability.  One fan site ( https://www.stlyrics.com/songs/j/jackyl4589.html ) doesn't even list it as an important or relatively good album from the band.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 22:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 22:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Korte Company: There are some routine announcements like this https://wgel.com/news/2023/03/carlisle-expansion-project-set-to-begin/ but it won't help BoraVoro ( talk ) 12:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Companies , Illinois , Missouri , Nevada ,  and Oklahoma .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mody Kidon: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 17:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : A previous AfD seemed to determine that there was enough WP:SIGCOV in Hebrew language outlets to keep this article.  Did you check such outlets before nominating this article for deletion?  @ Clarityfiend Let'srun ( talk ) 19:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Israel .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 19:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply .  Well, no, but: It was a 2-1 lvote, and the Hebrew sources that one of the keep lvoters promised to add never materialized, and that was 10 years ago.  If he's so well known, there should be some English-language sources, and I wasn't able to find any.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 01:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  My research did not convince me that Kidon passes the WP:GNG .  As there is no good ATD target, I support Clarityfiend's motion to delete.  If indeed deleted, please also remove the links to the article from his school and town.  gidonb ( talk ) 00:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Od Mene Se Odvikavaj: I don't see a good redirect target, but no objection if a consensus target exists.  // Timothy :: talk 02:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Serbia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Speech Prof: JSFarman ( talk ) 15:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's not a useful source in the article for notability with some blatantly unreliable such as LinkedIn, Bored Panda and The Social Strategy which is an influencer agency.  S0091 ( talk ) 18:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arizona and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep As a good faith, i can see the subject passes WP:BASIC .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeltPees ( talk • contribs ) 03:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] BASIC still requires reliable independent secondary sources with non-trivial coverage which is not met.  S0091 ( talk ) 13:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  See related AfD (same article creator, MeltPees) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayathri Vivekanandan — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only Google News results are for the same event + one paragraph for a different event, and I don't think the outlets are reliable either.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 16:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find any sources which meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 16:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A community college instructor is extremely unlikely to pass WP:PROF , and we have no independent evidence that he even is a community college instructor, leaving only WP:GNG as a possibility.  But dubiously-reliable coverage of a single event isn't good enough for that either.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indications of notability for GNG or PROF. Only sources I could find are trivial or primary, and it's difficult to nail down anything about this person that is actually reliable even when it comes to fact-of statements.  nf utvol ( talk ) 16:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Looks more like WP:TRIVIALMENTION -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 15:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As others have said, there aren't any good sources.  I know this for a fact because I created this draft ( Draft:The Speech Prof ) back in October and determined there weren't enough sources for a good page.   It appears that MeltPees has copy-pasted a few of my drafts into the main space without any changes--some of which, like this one, don't meet GNG.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 18:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Minamoto Takahito: It also was a total puff piece, written by someone who may be a COI editor who's playing ignorant.  Drmies ( talk ) 13:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - not notable and quite likely self-promotional or at least connected promotion.  Canterbury Tail talk 13:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Speedy Delete , 2 out of 3 of the sources are either his company's page, or his own website.  - I.R.B.A.T ( yell at me ) ( The IRBAT Files ) 14:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No objection to speedy, but waiting out the normal AfD period would foreclose process objections.  BD2412 T 22:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just noting here for posterity or a pending SPI that although the accounts involved in creating this page have gone silent, a Japan-based IP attempted to remove the link to the deletion discussion with the edit summary Removed unsourced information .  Dekimasu よ!  07:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TD Thomas (wrestler): I would tag this as WP:G5 if not for the edits by other users.  (Are those edits "substantial"?)  And I can't see the deleted article to say whether this is WP:G4 .  SilverLocust 💬 15:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  SilverLocust 💬 15:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and Michigan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ,  but a speedy deletion would work better.  -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 10:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Please watch for any new editors commenting on this deletion request. We've already caught one sockpuppet of the banned user. -- Yamla ( talk ) 10:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard Jeremiah Walsh: One of four investors in a secondary soccer team is not sufficient, and there seems no other ground at all.  Further, >70% of the article is about the investment play on the football club, with almost nothing on the apparent subject at all.  Searches do not suggest any better grounds for an article.  SeoR ( talk ) 20:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Football , Ireland ,  and Lithuania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to FC Stumbras .  Respublik ( talk ) 21:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Does not need a redirect.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I don't think any of the material in article merits a merge.  Neutral on redirect.  // Timothy :: talk 08:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete