hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of FA Cup broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; one is a Twitter post; and the rest are merely announcements, some are WP:PRIMARY .  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 12:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and England .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 12:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  If sources are found to prove this meets WP:LISTN , please ping.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Govvy ( talk ) 15:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTTVGUIDE.  Georgethedragonslayer ( talk ) 18:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Disease resistance in fruit and vegetables: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 18:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 18:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unless parts can be cited and merged.  ~ Argenti Aertheri (Chat?) 04:19, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article is entirely unsourced, so it wouldn't be a candidate for merging with Plant disease resistance .  Either it's entirely WP:OR or creating content without citing sources as a variation of plagiarism, so even if the redirect term was to be used, the article would need to be deleted first anyways.  I don't see a strong need for a redirect term though given it's a bit longer and not as likely to be used compared to others in a search.  KoA ( talk ) 15:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Big Fury: Sources in article are two database records, one of which is about another ride, and two blog posts, again one of which is about another ride.  BEFORE found mill news about its removal, nothing meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 18:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — Not notable.  There were more than 200 of these portable Pinfari Zyklon coasters manufactured.  The coaster is mentioned on the Six Flags Great Adventure wiki page and that is all it needs.  There will never be enough material to justify a dedicated page.  — JlACEer ( talk ) 03:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alister De Bellotte: This manager is covered in passing mentions only, failing the WP:SIGCOV guideline.  I only found mentions such as this , and of course databases.  Several/most biographical details are in the dark.  Being a name in a list at Grenada national football team#Coaching history should suffice.  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Grenada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Given the number of blank spaces and the almost total lack of reasonable sources, this fails almost every standard.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Grenada national football team#Coaching history , regards.  Govvy ( talk ) 10:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found a trivial mention in R7 but nothing better.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It is my understanding of the longstanding consensus that managers, owners, coaches, trainers, and other staff persons of notable teams are not automatically notable .  Without good sourcing , this fails.  Bearian ( talk ) 21:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 19:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shreyan Chattopadhyay: This article lacks quality in-depth references.  Mercenf ( talk ) 14:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dolvoaua, Nebraska: The name might be spelled incorrectly.  The only reference is a Wikimapia page that has been deleted.  Aerial photos show a big cylinder or circular pool at these coordinates but no obvious settlement.  Google and Bing searches don't reveal anything helpful.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 07:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Nebraska .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 07:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Likely hoax.   Nothing in satellite images, nothing in any USGS topo map, and not even anything in GNIS: [53] .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 13:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I thought this might be an OCR failure with the odd spelling, but I'm leaning hoax also.  No GNIS entry is a bad sign.  Nothing in a books search that might scrape up old references to a community that no longer physically exists.  Filtering out Wikipedia, mirrors, and shady sites that clearly scrape data from here, literally all I can find is the 2020 report of Humanities Nebraska , which includes Dolvoaua in a graphical list of Nebraska community names.  Since this article has existed since 2015, there's a real chance that HN used Wikipedia to create that list.  Lubal ( talk ) 14:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as a hoax.  Nothing on newspapers.com, nothing on Google that doesn't seem to be scraped from this wikipedia entry.  The only available USGS small-scale topographic map shows what I think is the symbol for a windmill here.  This is either a hoax or something that is so obscure that somehow no locatable mention of it can be found.  Hog Farm Talk 01:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bhagyavidhaata: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , India ,  and Bihar .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reliable sources and a simple search does not show any reliable sources with significant coverage and reviews by critics on the serial.  The page fails WP:GNG and WP:NTV .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IBLA International Competition: No references outside its own website in external links (note: single footnote to a NYT article seems to be a red herring, as that article doesn't mention this competition) since the article was created over 15 years ago.  My BEFORE does not suggest this event meets WP:GNG or (failed but useful as a sanity test) WP:NAWARD .  There are few mentions in passing that confirm this event exists, but nothing to suggest it is important enough to merit an encyclopedic article.  No Italian interwiki.  Lastly, the text in the article reads like it was copied from the organization's marketing brochure: " the IBLA Foundation has been dedicated to discovering new talent from around the world. ... Throughout the years the IBLA Grand Prize winners have received the opportunity to be presented in such prestigious venues... IBLA winners have received worldwide critical acclaim with praises ... " Etc.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Awards ,  and Italy .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2008 Memorandum between the Chinese Communist Party and the Indian National Congress: Merely an allegation launched by the opposition party of India against another party without any basis.  The creator of this article was also blocked years ago.  Capitals00 ( talk ) 14:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , China ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Previously discussed under a different name at this AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 INC-CCP MoU The decision was “keep” — A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SOAPBOX .  Appears to be a debunked allegation from a political party against another political party.  [24] desmay ( talk ) 21:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Pinging Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 INC-CCP MoU participants: Roci xu ( talk · contribs ), Eastmain ( talk · contribs ), and TimothyBlue ( talk · contribs ).  Cunard ( talk ) 09:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Desmay.  Clear-cut WP:SOAPBOX .  CharlesWain ( talk ) 16:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tully (app): Several are interviews with the app's co-founder/promoter, Joyner Lucas, who is a notable musician, but notability is not inherited from him.  Other sources appear to be either PR-based; press releases reposted onto other websites.  A few passing mentions.  No in-depth coverage in reliable sources, particularly if HNHH is not considered reliable.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 21:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Business ,  and Computing .  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 21:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software , California ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Press releases do not reach WP:GNG .  Jontesta ( talk ) 23:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KMAC (FM): No secondary sources.  Fails WP:GNG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and Oklahoma .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with a possible redirect, if this is ever created, to Oklahoma Catholic Radio .  This network of stations owned KMAC and probably ran it as a rebroadcaster of their statewide service.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 02:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : At the very least, there's virtually no way this station garnered its own significant coverage .  (I doubt the Oklahoma Catholic Radio network in general had much of any either, but that's probably another matter.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : No evidence that OP has exhausted the steps set forth by WP:BEFORE .  - Neutralhomer • Talk • 11:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's not a good faith rationale for keep.  I have looked for sources, and found nothing.  I did find a Taco Bell franchise of the same name which seems to be more notable than this station.  I presume you looked as well?  AusLondonder ( talk ) 22:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Neutralhomer, and maybe others knowledgable about the radio industry can look at the recent spurt of prods of radio stations by the nominator, thanks.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 12:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zahrisaurus: Only used by Malkani.  No secondary sources.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 18:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angelfish software: Written like a promotion.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: Previous nomination: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelfish (software) , apparently unrelated to Angelfish (browser) that is based on Chromium (web browser) .  Boud ( talk ) 11:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage in Gnews for the company, many hits on the fish in general.  Not seeing NCORP as being met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Article has been updated with content & refs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frozenpizza ( talk • contribs ) 21:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Frozenpizza : I don't see any reliable independent sources: 35 Amazing Web Analytics Tools that Rival Google Analytics 60 Best Google Analytics alternatives: The Complete List Websites like these do not constitute WP:SIGCOV .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 07:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was hoping for an AtD in the form of a redirect to the maker of this product, but the company isn't notable either, and we rightfully don't have an article for it.  Owen× ☎ 15:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  The sources in the article are either primary or unreliable.  I was unable to find significant coverage in independent, reliable sources on this software.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Seven: I see it was deleted from trwiki as non-notable as well.  When searching for sources it's possible to get results for a singer with same name, but there is really no SIGCOV for this journalist at all, all my attempts to find failed.  Tehonk ( talk ) 07:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Journalism ,  and Turkey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not pass WP:NJOURNALIST .  Aintabli ( talk ) 16:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Noel Elmowy: Not sure if this page passes elibility criterion Ortizesp ( talk ) 06:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A number of unreliable sources such as Facebook provided.  1 hit in gnews and only 1 article links to this.  Fails WP:MUSICBIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is all I find [21] , trivial coverage.  What's used in the article isn't helpful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Immortal Ashwatthama: Upcoming film that has, of course, not received sufficient coverage for a standalone article.  I can’t figure a best WP:ATD-R and Draftify would not be a bad idea.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 05:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Film , Entertainment ,  and India .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 07:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources with only one has a mention of talks with actor Allu Arjun but nothing has been confirmed.  The film is not even in post production which fails to warrant a page as of now.  This is a case of way WP:TOOSOON .  I would not even consider to Draftify this page until it reaches post production.  Page also fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Memphis Villarreal: Failure of WP:GNG due to lack of WP:RELIABLE sources.  Anything I could find in my WP:BEFORE is just WP:ROUTINE .  Best case scenario this is several years WP:TOOSOON .  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 21:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Motorsport ,  and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lacks SIGCOV in reliable sources.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - cannot find significant coverage from reliable published sources marking the subject of the article as notable.  pinktoebeans (talk) 12:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete