hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Delroy Fraser: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wonderland, California: GNIS no longer lists it, and newspaper results only get "Feather River Wonderland" which refers to the county as a whole.  I can't even verify the location - Post office records put it near 40°25′58″N 121°20′51″W ﻿ / ﻿ 40.43282°N 121.34763°W ﻿ / 40.43282; -121.34763 , but this map places it about a mile to the southeast.  Without anything to verify it being a settlement, I don't think this passes WP:NGEO .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 03:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 03:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :This is clearly unnotable settlement according to Wikipedia general notability guideline .  Morekar ( talk ) 04:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Your coördinates being in the wrong county should have been a red flag.   That's Tehama.   You've mixed up east and west of Mineral.   Nonetheless, I can find no documentation of this claimed settlement, only of an early to middle 20th century post office.   This is unverifiable.  Uncle G ( talk ) 15:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the note - I've corrected my typo in the coords.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 17:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable per WP:GEOLAND .   GNIS and a post office don't count for notability and we don't even have those, just a mention in a questionable place-names guide.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The entry has been dropped from GNIS and whatever Durham says, the original author had a history of misrepresenting him.  If it was a resort, it wasn't a notable one.  Mangoe ( talk ) 23:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing to be found at all.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GEOLAND -- Devokewater | (tαlk) 11:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Artistic swimming at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games – Qualification: This is a contested draft move.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 04:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and El Salvador .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 04:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Colombia , Costa Rica , Cuba , Guatemala , Mexico , Panama ,  and Puerto Rico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  There are no independent reliable sources showing significant coverage addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Sources in the article are primary, database, BEFORE found nothing that show this meets guidelines // Timothy :: talk 14:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 09:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence that these were ever addressed in detail by independent, reliable sources Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 13:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hanno Essén: An associate professor with an h-index of 15 ( WoS ), and a single high-impact paper with 1390 citations coauthored with Richard Bader .  The paper is about atoms in molecules theory, Bader's forte.  Essén's second most highly cited paper only has 52 citations.  His involvement in E-cat cold fusion controversy does not seem very notable either, but could be mentioned on the E-cat page.  Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 09:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Science ,  and Sweden .  Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 09:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The article is probably designated around him being a skeptic in the public debate, rather than an accomplished academic.  He was also active in arguing against the existence of electromagnetic hypersensitivity .  I did search the Swedish Mediearkivet, and didn't come up with the most compelling pieces, although the Mediearkivet isn't complete either.  The "controversy" did get lots of coverage, but understandably more focused on Andrea Rossi with Essén as a side figure.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What is the best you could find in the Mediearkivet to satisfy WP:NBASIC ?  Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 14:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A single well-cited paper and retired associate professorship aren't going to be enough to pass WP:PROF , leaving only his work both debunking and pushing fringe topics, for which we would need WP:GNG notability.  The two sources in the article aren't convincing: they both merely discuss Essén's role as an observer in someone else's experiment, and I don't think New Energy Times can be used as a reliable source, especially in a BLP (see RSN ).  The best other sourcing I could find was a Fox News piece on constant-force roller coaster design , but it barely name-drops Essén rather than having significant coverage of him.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 01:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Habibullah Khan Swati II: — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7 or G11.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nom. -- Ameen Akbar ( talk ) 23:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete - Appears to be an WP:AUTOBIO with WP:NON-SIGCOV .  Google search also doesn't provide anything substantial.  Sameeerrr ( talk ) 11:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet ) [ reply ] But google search provides many pictures of him from different pages along with mention of well known Tribal chief and information about his father and grandfather from newspaper and many blogs have mention of his name as a Khan of Garhi Habibullah.  Most importantly, He and his father are mentioned tribal Chief on Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's website.  Hazarewal333 ( talk ) 18:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Celebrity Agency (Artistes Management Mediacorp): Search only finds routine business reporting and passing mentions.  Has been previously draftified, but moved back into the main space, hence here we are at AfD.  Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and Singapore .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was hoping that there would be more news, beyond the usual news of artistes leaving or joining, about this arm of the organisation to appear so that it meets the prevalent notability guidelines before moving to the mainspace.  But thus far there have been no such articles, even in historical context.  After the deletion, I suggest a recreation of the initial redirect and locking it up until there are orgcrit sources because there will be editors being overly enthusiastic in developing articles for the Singapore TV industry while ignoring the norms of enwiki.  : – robertsky ( talk ) 15:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT , agreed with Robertsky.  CastJared ( talk ) 19:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Failed GNG per above comments Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk ) 02:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This article shouldn't be delete.  Who know how make this article not to be delete.  Wikipedia is free for any to create and edit article.  This article is regarding an artiste management in Singapore, more this artiste management is well-known in Singapore.  Happygirl1976 ( talk ) 14:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Happygirl1976 : Current sources notwithstanding, can you provide three best independent, third-party, and in-depth/significant coverage sources to sustain the notability of the article?  – robertsky ( talk ) 16:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mustapha Ali Busuguma: Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:ANYBIO as lawyer.  Sources are basically passing mentions of the subject.  Per WP:NPOL being a private secretary to a governor does not confer notability .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 08:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Nigeria .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 08:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 17:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe Webster (writer): Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete via WP:G11 , probably.  Also something to note: this article mentions (but doesn't link?) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-1 Auto Transport (2nd nomination) .  The A-1 Auto article was (re-)created just half an hour before this one.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Riverdale, Mendocino County, California: I do not think this location passes WP:GEOLAND as there is little evidence it was ever really a populated recognized place; the sources cited are either not reliable (GNIS), or trivial passing mentions that establish existence but not notability.   From what I can gather, this seems to have been the site of a resort: [30] mentions "Riverdale Resort...in the city of Leggett", and this site: [31] can sell you a vintage postcard from said resort, specifically labeled as being in Leggett, California.   A satellite view of the coordinates shows a couple of houses along the river, but not much else.   The vast majority of references to Riverdale (even in the Mendocino County press) are to the Riverdale in Fresno County, so I think a redirect to Leggett, California would be potentially confusing and not useful to the average user; I think this article should just be deleted in the absence of more evidence that this was a populated place.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not appear to have either legal recognition or significant coverage to meet our notability standards.  Looks to be a former resort area, Streetview shows a few occupied homes, but nothing noteworthy.  – dlthewave ☎ 17:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:Geoland#Settlements and administrative regions states that only legally recognized places are presumed notable.  Non-legally recognized places such as Riverdale, must meet WP:GNG in order to be considered notable.  In particular Riverdale fails Wikipedia:Notability#SUSTAINED , I also believe that previous discussion indicates that Riverdale fails WP:NRV as well.  policy guidance given in both WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND are that such articles should be merged into the article that covers the notable administrative area that contains it, but this appears to not be or never was a populated place so nothing to merge.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tositsa Baron Museum of Metsovo: I would reconsider if someone can find sources in Greek.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG and WP:ORG .  CastJared ( talk ) 00:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Museums and libraries ,  and Greece .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : the museum's name in Greek is Λαογραφικό Μουσείο Μετσόβου (Αρχοντικό Τοσίτσα).  It has no hits that I can see on Google Books , and certainly no WP:SIGCOV (as far as I can tell, most of those 'hits' mention Metsovo and another folk museum somewhere else).  Greek Wikipedia is usually pretty good at having at least something on archaeological matters, and doesn't seem to have an article on this museum; it's only mentioned in passing in their article on Metsovo itself.  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 12:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Failed to find any significant coverage of the subject.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lauren Aspinall: Only primary sources provided and a highest ranking of 97.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources."  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 12:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I searched online to find any RS but I failed.  Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE Charsaddian ( talk ) 17:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agree.  Clear failure to satisfy WP:GNG Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 06:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
White Oaks Mall (London, Ontario): History6042 ( talk ) 21:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Canada .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 21:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it gets a lot of local routine coverage in CTV News London.  But fails WP:CORP as per WP:SIRS .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Agninshalah Collins: Stood for a position that doesn't appear to be notable, and lost.  Sources have some quotes from her; none of the sources are actually about her.  Black Kite (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not even any plausible claim to notability is advanced here.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 23:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete very thin claim of notability, but none of the sources are in-depth, not could I find anything in a Google search to support a claim of notability.  Alansohn ( talk ) 01:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No sight of notability Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 07:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete even if Collins had won, county legislators fall short of WP:NPOL .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southern Suburbs SC: Seems like a minor league soccer team which merged with Box Hill United SC more than a decade ago.  If there is anything from this page which can be salvaged and WP:VERIFIED with RS, it could be merged to a history section on that page.  JMWt ( talk ) 07:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Australia .  JMWt ( talk ) 07:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pekon Gayam: No results on google maps, and coordinates formerly included in the article (5°47'S 105°41'E) are unhelpful.  I'm also can't seem to find a searchable database of indonesian census results.  I'm willing to withdraw this AfD if there's a source proving that this is legally recognized or meets WP:NGEO , but I haven't found one yet.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  22:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article looks like it was made by someone not familiar with Indonesian topic and definetly lost in translation.  South Lampung is not a province, Pekon is an administrative term for village in certain parts of Lampung, and Penengahan is a district, not a sub-district.  I assume they meant Gayam village, which exist and in South Lampung.  But with so much of the article is wrong/misleading, there's no part to salvage and just better to delete it.  Nyanardsan ( talk ) 00:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Second the above.  No references and many inaccuracies. - SimonP ( talk ) 20:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete