Doreen Kyazze: Firstly, I saw there were good sources as though a reviewer will do.  I now checked the sources and almost a good percentage weren't reliable per WP:RS .  Religion of sources and lack of WP:SIRS definitely defined this type of article.  In second checking for confirmation, I discovered so many sources lined her perhaps a single line other quote while addressing her as a worker at Penal.  I would have said this should be redirected to the organisation page but didn't see any advocacy worthy enough for WP:ATD .  Another subtle was drive by the award nomination.  This cannot be called WP:ANYBIO since it was once nominated and wasn't won (it's is also a lesser award, thus not major like ANYBIO.  I've therefore brought this to the table proper discussion.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  19:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law , Africa ,  and Uganda .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  19:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The award from the EU seems notable [8] and [9] .  I'm ok with the sources given.  At least enough for BASIC Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b , EU human rights award is nothing but a less major award.  Though must have come from a notable form EU, but the article bearer was a nominee and was only once.  How does that satisfy WP:BASIC ?  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  21:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I find coverage [10] , [11] , [12] and [13] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ User:Oaktree b , the sources you listed all were independent of the Ugandan academic Spire or nearer to that.  However, one nominated award is never enough for a career that isn't established.  For example, a writer that has written extensively and appeared in reaserch paper may be considered even with the writing and more when nominated for an award like this.  In this context, however, the article doesn't meet GNG of her career or any significant impact or SIGCOV of her advocacy ad work.  Arguing about an award that is not even won is likely biased for me.  It's simply a reminder!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  23:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: A review of newly found sources would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 21:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : From the source presented, I don't see how this person won this award.  She seem to be a runner up which didn't mean she won a significant award or has been invited for it many times (stated in WP:ANYBIO ).  While the sources listed by Oaktree b is about the announcement of the award, source 3 and source 4 still were about Dr. Spire who won the award, and little coverage of the runners up.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom, and nom's further comments.  I find I can add nothing to those 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete