hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Daniel Kokotajlo (AI researcher) : There are no profiles of him or his research, and I can't find any info that he won any major award or led a major team, etc.  Wikipedia is not a news site, and I think that the policy says exactly this: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Subjects_notable_only_for_one_event and Wikipedia:What BLP1E is not .  Artem.G ( talk ) 08:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Companies ,  and Computing .  Artem.G ( talk ) 08:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:BLP1E .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete Was one of a number of openAI folks to leave the company, but I don't find any sources that are substantially about him.  He gets name-checked or briefly cited, that's all.  He has authored some articles but they aren't cited to a degree to meet NACADMIC or NAUTHOR.  Lamona ( talk ) 05:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nicolò D'Amico (rugby union) : All I found was routine transfer news ( 1 , 2 , 3 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Italy .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete A few bits here and there that could just make a GNG pass, but a minor career at the top level.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Routine transactional news does not contribute to GNG, and I'm not seeing anything beyond that.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 01:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeff Fonda : Edit.pdf ( talk ) 09:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to Draft This deserves more research, in order to get better secondary sources.  These don't currently exist, so I believe it must be deleted for now.  PickleG13 ( talk ) 09:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  06:09, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , but I would actually like to see a stub for The Literate Earth Project allowed instead as it has a few references such as https://www.proquest.com/docview/1534166536/1248D9073E0E4E47PQ/11 , https://www.proquest.com/docview/2620225139/1248D9073E0E4E47PQ/1 , and https://www.proquest.com/docview/1830522095/1248D9073E0E4E47PQ/9 to support.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 22:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ken Schwartz : Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Theatre ,  and Canada .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is about all I find [20] , confirmation he's working.  Not seeing GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Rosscreekcentre ( talk · contribs ), the user who both created the file and uploaded the photo, likely had COI issues before being blocked.  The photo should be considered for deletion as well.  Mind matrix 18:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that would be appropriate after the article is deleted.  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage and analysis about him , but this is referenced entirely to a mixture of primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, which is not what it takes.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marcin Trębacki : Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases.  PROD removed without explanation.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Skating ,  and Poland .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per similar previous cases.  Based on my Google search ("Marcin Trębacki łyżwiarz figurowy"), news sources are limited to marriage and passing mentions; nothing clear that he meets WP:GNG .  Corresponding article on Polish Wikipedia likewise does not provide significant coverage in secondary sources.  No news have been released on Trębacki over 20 years either.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tara Patkar (social activist) : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt – Per WP:G4 .  Svartner ( talk ) 15:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I had declined the G4 with comment remove G4, it was earlier deleted for promo, new version has updates on Roti Bank and new section on Demanding separate Bundelkhand state .  Jay 💬 16:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as an article on this subject has already been considered at a previous AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt promotional article on a non-notable subject.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yaroslav Kysil : On his own, nothing but match reports and routine coverage—far short of WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment He got a transfer to FC Mynai and has made 11 more appearances in the Ukrainian Premier League, which makes his career somewhat less pathetic, but my limited ability with searching his name in Ukrainian brings up nothing but this transfer in February, so I soft lean Delete .  Unknown Temptation ( talk ) 20:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Esta Livio : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pakistan .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:54, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:BAND .  Insight 3 ( talk ) 14:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Searches in Urdu did not find any useful sources.  The band has no entry on a number of music sites.  Lacks sufficient coverage to keep the article.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References include links to the official BBC Radio website and Radio FM91 website.  The statement that only references are YT and FB is incorrect.  Esta Livio ( talk ) 10:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note I've checkuser-blocked the nominator for socking. -- Ponyo bons mots 20:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:NBAND .  BookishReader ( talk ) 02:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Keith Cooke : Minimal acting credits thereafter and article sourced only with a single interview since 2014.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 18:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Martial arts .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 18:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Minimal acting credits.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 08:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails in WP:GNG nd not have any reliable source Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahathir Mohamad's defamation lawsuit against Far Eastern Economic Review : It's not really a merge, more a single line mention in the Mahathir Mohamad article.  So delete.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , News media , Politics ,  and India .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I think I'm not understanding the proposal.  The single line mention is merely a link to this article.  No?  So deleting this article would immediately lead to removing the single line mention.  But you seem to be supporting a single line mention.  Thincat ( talk ) 09:27, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Alexandermcnabb Which "India's prime minister"?  Are you trying to say 'Malaysia''s prime minister?  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  15:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You are quite right, my bad.  Type in haste, regret at leisure...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Clearly not remotely notable as a standalone article.  Merits a single sentence in the article for Mahathir Mohamad at best.  Arcahaeoindris ( talk ) 09:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom merits a a single sentence in the article for Mahathir Mohamad at best as noted above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vikrant Adams : Can’t see them passing any of these.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 06:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Politics ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Have searched, cannot find any independent coverage of this person.  Mentions are only in the blurbs for his books, Linked In, press releases.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rayyanza Malik Ahmad : Child's notability is solely attributed to their parent, and it's highly unlikely for a two-year-old to have achieved notable accomplishments.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 09:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kailash Sirohiya : The main claim of notability stated here is that he exists, which isn't "automatically" notable in the absence of WP:GNG -worthy coverage about him and his work, but two of the four footnotes here are a directory entry and his company's own contact information on its own self-published website, neither of which are support for notability -- and the other two are both dead links whose former content is unverifiable for the purposes of figuring out whether they supported notability or not, and even those were just jengastacked onto a statement of his existence rather than being used to actually expand the article with content .  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to say more than "he exists", or having to cite more and better sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Nepal ,  and India .  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  3 of 4 sources are failed links and one is a source with stock value and this is not enough to pass general notability guidelines.  Simple search did show couple of sources but they are about questions on his "two citizenship certificates", a "press statement made in response to the allegations made by Rastriya Swatantra Party President Rabi Lamichhane" and these are local political problems, and these allegations or incidents are not noteworthy.  The subject is not well known and materials are not relevant to the person's notability.  Fails WP:BIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel Travis : He has only one significant role in Open Water.   Needs two or more significant roles in order to be eligible.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 23:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 23:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete He hadn't played any significant roles.  I couldn't find any references on Google.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bluegrass (Sirius) : Let'srun ( talk ) 00:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Television .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:33, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North America-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asrar-ul-Haq Mian : Fails WP:GNG .  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 22:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Obvious delete.  Completely fails WP:NLAWYER .  41.97.58.27 ( talk ) 20:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable with SIGCOV not met.  Fails NLAWYER too.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  Correct title is Mian Israr-ul-Haq.  Geo TV [4] and The Express Tribune [5] covered his election.  103.65.140.93 ( talk ) 10:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of U.S. state aromas : There doesn't seem to be any point to having this article.  A PROD was contested due to having "no valid reason for deletion".  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 01:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists , United States of America ,  and New Mexico .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 01:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Nothing about NLIST requires a group or set to have more than one member.  With 2 RS references, GNG is met.  Also, PRODding within the hour of creation and nominating for deletion one week after come across as aggressive.  Jclemens ( talk ) 01:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  One item does not make a list.  Content about the only entry, New Mexico, can appear in that state's article.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 02:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Ajf773 - The single existing entry can be (and already is) easily included in the infobox for New Mexico.  Obviously if other states begin to adopt their own state aromas, then it might be a valid option to recreate a list, but when there is only one entry and no others on the horizon to be added to it, its simply too soon.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 03:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of New Mexico state symbols#Other .  One item is not a list and this should absolutely not be an article, but the information is also there so a redirect may be reasonable.  Reywas92 Talk 03:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of New Mexico state symbols#Other , this fails WP:NLIST .  CastJared ( talk ) 04:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even with only one entry, I don't really think the redirect makes sense.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is my opinion as well.  I saw the redirect ! votes, and I was going to say something but then I got distracted.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 00:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per sportingflyer.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 18:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Taqi Al Abduwani : — Karnataka talk 12:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin Mccapra ( talk ) 21:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesnt pass WP:NPROF .  -- hroest 18:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tomas Morkunas : Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  None of the sources mention the subject as a member of parliament, the other sources i see are interviews or more like PR which is not WP:RS .  Another WP:ROTM .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 19:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Lithuania .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 19:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - Wikibusines spam .  MER-C 14:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete