hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nixor College: Fails WP:SIGCOV .  BookishReader ( talk ) 12:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : unless nominator is able to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media.  This is a weak nomination and should be opposed on the basis of WP:BEFORE, and the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability unless the above can be demonstrated Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:VAGUEWAVE .  BookishReader ( talk ) 21:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] •DELETE- I did a search & no reliable sources come up.  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 19:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Did you search local sources, including a reasonable search for local offline sources ?  Jack4576 ( talk ) 08:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you are local then you basicaly have no true say & should not be editing the page because you have a WP:CONFLICT_OF_INTEREST .  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 16:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Being a local to an area, makes someone conflicted for writing entries about subjects in one's own local area ?  That is manifestly absurd.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 17:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and ORG.  Sources in the article are primary promo, keep vote provides no sources and multiple editors BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 08:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nina Barnett: No significant coverage.  2 of the 4 sources are her own website.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and South Africa .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:ARTIST .  The article is stale, but there in no way to update with reliable sources.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Spanova: Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Japan .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  IncompA 18:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raphael Roettgen: The subject is not inherently notable for being a space entrepreneur.  The first and third sources [14] [15] are Q&A interviews of the subject, containing mostly trivial information.  The fourth source [16] doesn’t even mention the subject or his companies.  The rest of the sources [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] are mostly just profiles.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 12:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Businesspeople .  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 12:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails NBUISNESSPERSON and his company E2MC would probably be more notable than himself Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Germany and Brazil .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sourcing is largely PROMO or first-person.  Perhaps could redirect to the company.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fatuntele Tunde: Does not meet WP:IS .  Nswix ( talk ) 13:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Nswix ( talk ) 13:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete He creates social media accounts for companies?  That's not notable, rather routine these days.  Sourcing is promotional.  Nothing to differentiate him from anyone else in his position.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 23:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Extensively sourced to multiple major Nigerian papers of record , with absolutely no evidence presented that the sources are paid journalism.  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional article and sources, fails GNG.  Avilich ( talk ) 22:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Obi Maduegbuna: Was previously draftified, but creating editor insists on publishing.  Only non-RS sources cited, and a search finds nothing better (there are a couple of passing mentions, here and here , but they're clearly based on publicity materials as the wording is almost identical).  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Nigeria ,  and United Kingdom .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It should have been left in draft, now it's likely deleted.  Non-notable bit parts and small web videos aren't the stuff of notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No RS SIGCOV I could find.  Only passing mentions I could find.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject fails WP:NACTOR .  He has not had a major role in any notable film and is best known for playing the lead role in a film that is either not notable or borderline notable.  It is simply WP:TOOSOON for the subject to have a stand-alone article.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  19:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dove Dance School: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This article has been in Wikipedia for almost two years, but I don't see that there have been any attempts to source it, much less to provide significant coverage from independent reliable sources per WP:ORG .  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Be careful not to fall afoul of WP:NOEFFORT BrigadierG ( talk ) 07:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional article for local business.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The page has 0 sources and I couldn't find any reliable sources for the school for notability.  CourtseyDriver ( talk ) 23:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found one measly source https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/1998/05/02/group-worships-with-dance/62282994007/ but I have low confidence about this place mweeting GNG.  Graywalls ( talk ) 00:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as no evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 19:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a typical promotional page for another non-notable school.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 19:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on others' ref searches.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 20:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adam J. Bass: Fails wp:sigcov as substantiated on interviews, business/alum pages, trivial mentions.  Vanity Fair article is wp:blp1e if that and a cursory News search found his commentary in a Law.com article on "'Generational Changes,' 'Emphasis on Culture' Drive Buchalter, Leader Says" .  Bleak SunnyLetO ( talk ) 22:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople .  SunnyLetO ( talk ) 22:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, especially lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Appearing on a list of 500 top kinds of people in one metro area is the very definition of common .  I add in that he fails my own test for lawyers .  Managing a law firm can make you well-off, but not notable .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the Reuters source is a good one, but still cannot pass WP:THREE .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 21:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just an article of a business executive that lacks SIGCOV.  Appearing as "500 Most Influential People in L.A." is not a major award for WP:ANYBIO and the listed company is nowhere near WP:NCORP .  For now, the sources doesn't meet reserving or telling us what he has done especially the last one talking about "charting" which is not even a majority for WP:ONE EVENT .  Delete till it meets WP:GNG !   All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 12:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2025 Mitsubishi Electric Cup: Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This article was moved to Draft space but even there, it would probably have been deleted in six months because there is no additional information to add to it in 2023.  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There will be no 2025 cup.  The AFF Championship has been held every two years since 1996.  For sponsorship reasons, the 2020 AFF Championship was called the "AFF Suzuki Cup", and the 2022 AFF Championship was called the "AFF Mitsubishi Electric Cup".  Mitsubishi Electric will also sponsor the 2024 cup: [12] .  Sponsorship hasn't been agreed yet for 2026.  Article creator has prior form for creating theoretical tournaments: see WP: Articles for deletion/2024 Suwon JS Cup , and their user talk page.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Colombia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A search for this page only brings up the 2022 AFF Championship as well.  HawkAussie ( talk ) 01:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Much, perhaps most, of the editing by the editor who created this article consists of posting material without sources, and for which no confirmation can be found by searching.  In some cases there are false references to sources which don't support the content to which they are attached.  In at least some cases the information is certainly false.  JBW ( talk ) 09:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulrahman Najr: Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Saudi Arabia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article uses only sports blogs for sources.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 14:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Air Dravida: Their rationale follows: Fails to meet WP:GNG.  Even the website of the promoter Zircon International which is included as an external link draws a blank.  This article did survive that prior AfD from 2010 (and a contested PROD before that), but both of the "keeps" from then warned that the article needed to be significantly improved to avoid renomination.  It has since been tagged as a potential WP:CORP failure—which might be the more relevant guideline here—since 2019.  All that being said, my involvement is mainly procedural and I have no real opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Travel and tourism , Aviation ,  and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This talks about the airlines in general at the time it was to launch [6] , but that seems to be the extent of coverage.  Delete for a lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : it was just a project which died before the launch.  Charlie ( talk ) 04:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CCgroup: Pepper Beast (talk) 18:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 18:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I could not locate much about this company beyond its website and social media accounts.  With all due to respect to CCgroup, it is not notable enough yet to merit a Wikipedia article.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Non- WP:INDEPENDENT sources.  TLA (talk) 04:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Okeke Chika Jerry: In a WP:BEFORE search, As a politician, there is only routine coverage of his candidacy for governor in 2021, along with opinion pieces by him about how he would govern.  As an author, his name is mentioned in passing in a few books, such as inclusion in a list of novelists in the appendix of this book , but there isn't the level of substantial coverage of his work yet to meet WP:NAUTHOR.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Politicians ,  and Nigeria .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  None of the subject's literary works have been discussed in reliable sources.  A Google search of him doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources.  Per nom, the subject fails WP:NAUTHOR.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  17:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No NPOL pass here.  No comment on NAUTHOR.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:NPOL .  23.156.104.104 ( talk ) 05:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 23:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails NPOL.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SYNTH - notable neither as a writer nor a politician.  21:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC) Delete : well, it's not utterly not reliable sources, but the writer's work is only published in subsections of articles.  thus fails notability for writers.  fails WP:NPOL as coverage is routine as a political candidate.  She was a fairy 00:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tejaswini Jadhav: Other than FirstIndia and Ahmedabad non of these are looking good sources.  Syed Aala Qadri ( talk ) 20:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Syed Aala Qadri ( talk ) 20:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article about a non-notable model.  Sources are PR/PUFF pieces.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 13:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
H. B. Garlock: Lack of in depth coverage in reliable independent sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Liberia .  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ghana and New Jersey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 09:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I prodded this as it appears to have no notability.  I still believe this to be the case and the article fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 19:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Nothing in here establishes notability.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rebecca Podio: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Wyoming .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable individual with a cousin who reports the news.  There are only 3 sources in Gnews, lists of participants in the pageant.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agreed.  Non-notable.  Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 06:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete