hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Solar eclipse of February 11, 1804: There are also no references or sources to be found for this article and it has attracted zero media attention.  Though the idea of a zero-second eclipse is nice and all, there's really no evidence for this article's notability and by WP:NOTDATABASE it should probably just be redirected to List of solar eclipses in the 19th century .  I also think it would be good to look through other historic eclipse articles that may not be notable and consider redirecting those as well, but that's a topic for another discussion.  Thank you!  P o x y 4 ( talk ) 21:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Astronomy , Africa , Europe ,  and Brazil .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 19th century .  This is an entirely calculated eclipse with no record of observations— not terribly surprising given the era and track.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 19th century , since the article fails the notability criteria for events .  Most of the sources about this eclipse are primary and do not consitute notability .  InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 18:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'm somewhat neutral on this one.  Based on the path of totality it was certainly observed in eastern European cities and other locations, even though there were no published journal articles on expeditions.  There are a couple of boilerplate web sites on the event, but it isn't showing up in any books.  I'd say it is of questionable notability, so no objection to turning it into a redirect or just keeping it.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 18:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 19th century as per InTheAstronomy32 .  Samoht27 ( talk ) 20:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aurat (TV series): Owen× ☎ 22:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_DD_National#Drama_series (and add one of the refs I added; notable cast; mentions exist; probably more, so not opposed to K) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 18:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_DD_National#Drama_series .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Paper Faces: Fails the general and band-specific notability requirements.  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , United Kingdom ,  and England .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Adam Blake or Stuart Price , who are well-sourced.   For this partnership I can't find anything beyond Discogs and Myspace, already cited.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 20:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Two redirect targets have been proposed, and it isn't clear which one is best...  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  01:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different redirect targets suggested.  And I think you meant Adam Blake (musician) as Adam Blake is a disambiguation page.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  We need a decision about what article this one should be Redirected to.  It shouldn't be a matter of a closer flipping a coin and I don't think a No consensus closure is appropriate.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] propose redirecting to Stuart Price , as it covers more of the subject and is well sourced altogether.  NotAGenious ( talk ) 12:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dapdap: The only source here ( [41] ) mainly speaks of a landmark in the barangay , and does not thoroughly discuss the barangay itself.  Possible failure to comply WP:GEOLAND .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 08:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 08:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tarangnan § Barangays , restoring current content when better sources are found .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 09:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tarangnan § Barangays per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Damián van der Vaart: It seems that most of the news stories about him are due to him being the son of Rafael van der Vaart .  Black Kite (talk) 21:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Netherlands .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rafael van der Vaart#Personal life , where he is already mentioned extensively, per ATD and CHEAP.  This is a youth player in all his clubs.  gidonb ( talk ) 22:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  We should probably shift to write articles about footballers that have accomplished something within the sport, so as to avoid newspaper articles based on pure speculation.  The latter sources come naturally with young players, especially children of former players.  Geschichte ( talk ) 05:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per gidonb.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draft 17 year-old footballer who has yet to start his career.  Best served in draft space, if he does play, then he plays and has his own coverage.  Redirecting would just hide him, draft is a better of the choice.  Also if people goto the article, they can then see there is an article to work on in draft space.  Can't be worked on if it's a redirect!  :/ Govvy ( talk ) 09:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Due to famous father, likely to be searched and then re-created when a redlink comes up.  A redirect removes that risk to some degree.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – And the alternative to redirect is also plausible.  Svartner ( talk ) 03:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes GNG with significant coverage. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 12:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eddie Tyler: A detailed study is here .  Per that article, Seamheads, the authoritative database for Negro League stats, will be corrected "probably within the next month or two" and their stats will be merged.  This article could be merged into Roy Tyler simply for redirect purposes if people feel that's better.  Dennis C. Abrams ( talk ) 19:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Baseball .  Dennis C. Abrams ( talk ) 19:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Roy Tyler cause people may still be looking for the other name.  Spanneraol ( talk ) 19:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wait for seamheads to update their database, then merge the two together leaving this page (Eddie) as a redirect.   No need really for AfD, but doesn't matter.   Rgrd.  -- Bison X ( talk ) 03:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Should perhaps merge both articles together, or move some of this info into the actual person's article as above.  The fact that the two people got confused in the historical record for so long also adds to the story, so should be (at least briefly) documented here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge or Redirect.  Though both retain article content in the page history, we close these two outcomes differently.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Roy Tyler ; there isn't a lot of information to merge that hasn't already been added.  Hatman31 ( talk ) 16:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Roy Tyler .  Carrite ( talk ) 03:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shogo Koumoto: Fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Anime and manga ,  and Japan .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Princess Tutu .  This is the most notable work of those mentioned on his page.  - Knowledgekid87 ( talk ) 12:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of mosques in Nagorno-Karabakh: As an WP:ATD , I'd also support a redirect to the Azerbaijan list.  Dan the Animator 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Religion , Islam , Armenia ,  and Azerbaijan .  Dan the Animator 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment You don’t need to bring this to AfD.  See WP:BLAR .  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sometimes you do due to it being contested/likely to contested.  An AfD outcome to redirect for example would be a binding consensus.  As to the nom itself, I support a redirect to the Azerbaijan article.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 08:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mosques in Azerbaijan , per nom.  – Epicgenius ( talk ) 00:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Agree that you should redirected the article.  If that failed then you could AfD.  Zakaria ښه راغلاست ( talk ) 00:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mosques in Azerbaijan : With the dissolution of the Republic of Artsakh , there isn't much defining aspect (de-facto borders etc.) left of the region and this list.  No prejudice to recreation of a similar but sourced list for Azerbaijani provinces.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Had to be redirected in the first place.  REDISCOVERBHARAT ( talk ) 05:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I added sources and pics to all items in the list.  Plus I added more items to the list.  And there are more items to be added.  Technically speaking, I would support redirecting, since NK Republic has been dissolved.  If the consensus will be "Redirect", I will move the content as well.  Otherwise, I will extend the article.  Aredoros87 ( talk ) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Algeria at the 2022 World Athletics Championships: Note relating AN/I thread .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've struck out the 1993 one, as it is already at AfD in a seperate nomination, and the 2022 one, which I accidentally included despite being this discussion's title.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 08:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 20 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to Algeria at the World Athletics Championships : The subject matter is notable but these aren't ready for main space yet.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Hey man im josh : I should have mentioned this in the nomination statement, but some of these articles were draftified, but were immediately returned to mainspace by their creator.  Draftification is likely not the best route here.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 23:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've gone ahead and changed my vote to delete or redirect.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all .  Unlikely a drafting would make these articles better.  A redirect to Algeria at the World Championships in Athletics is not ideal, as that article is sourced by one reference.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 12:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete or redirect : I would suggest draftification, but I don't know if that would help in this situation.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 13:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Noting here that the creator has now been indef blocked from article space per the ANI thread linked above.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 23:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all .  They are unsourced or poorly sourced.  How could you find all of the intricate information the articles provided without sources to back all of this up?  HarukaAmaranth ( talk ) 16:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Algeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all .  It would not be impossible to source these, so preserving history seems like a good idea, unless there is concern that the same editor will return and restore without sourcing.  In that case I would ! vote delete all — siro χ o 08:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sorry You're Not a Winner/OK Time for Plan B: Either of the songs may be notable, but the single doesn't appear to be.  UtherSRG (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to album.  Virtually devoid of sourced content, not a noteworthy chart performance.  Sergecross73 msg me 12:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Take to the Skies as {{ R from song }} per WP:ATD .  ✗ plicit 14:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
My Little Pony: Pinkie Pie's Party: Doing a WP:BEFORE search brings nothing reliable and significant besides the IGN review.  The game's Metacritic page is also a ghost town of critic reviews.  Sparkl talk 22:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Toys .  Sparkl talk 22:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We can probably do a good merge to My Little Pony (let me know if there's a better target).  Otherwise, given the 15 years that have passed, I lean towards a keep due to the in-depth IGN review as well as a mix of nontrivial-but-short passing mentions.  — siro χ o 02:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge IGN appears to be the only review for this game, so it doesn't pass WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge This is a pretty cut and dry merge.  One non-trivial independent source falls short of general notability.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 12:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment My Little Pony (2003 toyline)#My Little Pony: Pinkie Pie's Party (2008) would be a better merge target.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 09:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I support that marge target.  — siro χ o 11:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, and recommend this redirect target.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 21:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Awesome Mix Tape vol. 6: Additionally posted my concerns to the talk page in an attempt to get sources added so I'm assuming WP:GNG fails.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 22:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 22:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I found this blurb and this review, the latter after just searching for Awesome Mix Tape .  A few sources (likely unreliable zines but might be worth checking) used Awesome Mix Tape #6 or just Awesome Mix Tape 6 instead, so it's probably worth a deeper search with that in mind.  A lot of 1980s/'90s punk albums like this one slipped under the radar for major publications, but that doesn't mean there's nothing out there for them.  And I wouldn't rely too much on article talk pages for seeking out sources for something since the only editors who will see that are those who have the page on their watchlists, which could be nobody.  Fortunately, AfDs are made to get a lot more eyes.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 04:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning Keep , at minimum redirect.  Reviewed in Melody Maker , Daily Herald , Regina Leader-Post , The Morning Call , The Press of Atlantic City (surprisingly long), The Indianapolis Star , The San Diego Union-Tribune .  Don't have full access to everything, but many of the other hits seem to be mentions in show previews/show reviews.  Caro7200 ( talk ) 16:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would agree on a redirect here.  Is there a way you could provide links to the sources here?  If these sources have good WP:DEPTH I would be more than willing to change my mind.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 22:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 01:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Okay, apparently it exists, but nothing in this article indicates any notability whatsoever.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Convicted in Life: Single source is a has nothing, BEFORE showed database and promo, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.  // Timothy :: talk 19:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Brazil .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the parent album, Dante XXI .  The song's video received an award but that is not particularly a source of robust information with which to build an encyclopedic article.  The award is already mentioned at the album's article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dante XXI as {{ R from song }} per above.  ✗ plicit 23:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
St. Michael's School B zone unit: No reliable sources found online, does not meet WP:NORG .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 10:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and West Bengal .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 10:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is this the same as St. Michael's School, Durgapur ?  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 19:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect