hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Mongolian films of 1938: Single entry list, entry is does not have an article.  No sources showing this has been discussed as a group meeting NLIST, or has a nav purpose meeting CLN // Timothy :: talk 13:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – single entry list (as noted), already covered by Lists of Mongolian films (which should itself be changed from a list-of-lists to a regular list) Dan ● ✉ 15:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : this one is even worse than the WP:Articles for deletion/List of Mongolian films of 1936 I just started.  Owen× ☎ 16:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Lists ,  and Mongolia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Listed at Lists of Mongolian films , baffled why this would need to be a separate page.  Reywas92 Talk 20:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , another venue for such material could be 1938 in Mongolia - neither it or the film in question have articles currently.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The standard process here is that a country gets one base List of Mongolian films first, and separate lists by year get spun off only when the omnibus list has come to contain hundreds or thousands of films that need to be chunked out for size management purposes.  The base list already exists, however, and it isn't nearly long enough yet to need splitouts.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Mongolian films , per WP:ATD-R .  BD2412 T 13:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eital Bredenkamp: JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leigh-Taylor Smith: Let'srun ( talk ) 13:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not seeing coverage in RS, only in this [32] , does not appear RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Not seeing GNG sources anywhere.  Kalethan ( talk ) 14:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MyPhoneExplorer: popo dameron ⁠ talk 22:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Computing , Software ,  and Austria .  popo dameron ⁠ talk 22:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not appear to have any significant coverage.  Just websites that relist downloads.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Diario Democráticamente: Xx236 ( talk ) 12:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Being unsourced is not a valid reason for deletion.  Did you make sure to look for sources before nominating for deletion?  Industrial Insect (talk) 17:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Did you make sure it is not a hoax?  Xx236 ( talk ) 10:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The author has removed the invitation from his Talk page.  Xx236 ( talk ) 10:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media , Companies ,  and Paraguay .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the best I was able to ascertain is that it probably exists.  From that to notability is a long way.  Owen× ☎ 16:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Salem el-Masri: I can find no hits on google that aren't wiki-mirrors, nothing on google scholar.  -- Boynamedsue ( talk ) 19:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Sudan ,  and Afghanistan .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't the subject passes WP:GNG .  Searching for his name in English returns nothing while searching for his name in Arabic only returns hits on the Syrian actor Samer al-Masry .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 01:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, it is almost certainly not even his name.  It follows the pattern for takfiri terrorist noms-de-guerre, [name]-el-[demonym], in this case "Salem the Egyptian".  Boynamedsue ( talk ) 21:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Agavi: There are no independent sources Mdggdj ( talk ) 13:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of notability.  Greenman ( talk ) 14:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : for the same reason it was deleted in 2007, 2008 and 2009.  The version before the last delete had a lot more information, as does the German language version of the page today, but no independent sources to establish notability.  Owen× ☎ 17:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet WP:NSOFTWARE or WP:GNG – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 11:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raakh (unreleased film): None of sources are current and give no indication as to why this unreleased film is notable.  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 20:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Two unreliable sources and two reliable from bollywoodhungama has one with no reference to film and other from 2005 that talks about replacement of an actress.  Films that have not yet been released should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines.  Fails WP:NFILM .  RangersRus ( talk ) 11:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Announced 20 years ago, there are not much sources found, no need to keep it anymore, fails WP:NFILM .  Grabup ( talk ) 18:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and WP:HAMMER .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment film is not released but if the film is shot I think the article can be kept that too needs source, now coming back to why; Because it starred veteran Indian actor Mithun Chakraborty AnkkAnkur ( talk ) 20:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) — AnkkAnkur ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hasan Raza Pasha: HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 22:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock [ reply ] Delete per nom MNewnham ( talk ) 19:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per MNewnham.  Fails WP:GNG .  41.100.198.103 ( talk ) 20:35, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per above.  Not notable.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Etix: Some announcements, CEO interviews, etc., but nothing significant.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and North Carolina .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Originally a WP:SPA article, which raised concerns still visible on the Talk page.  Searches confirm this as a company going about its business, dealing with event ticketing, but I am not seeing evidence of attained notability .  (Also worth distinguishing the distinct Etix Everywhere data management company.)  AllyD ( talk ) 07:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Sources on page are either self-published or carry little to no mention of the company itself, can't find anything significant online.  Tollens ( talk ) 07:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Mentions of a data centre, the CEO returning and the like, it's all PR stuff that's found in Gsearch.  Nothing we can use for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cherokee cultural citizenship: Talk page consensus was there was no content justifying a merge or redirect.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 23:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 23:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and talk page.  No way to source it because it's WP:OR .  Someone's essay.  - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:48, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Original research .  As CorbieVreccan says, it is an essay of unclear purpose.  - Donald Albury 13:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom.  Fails GNG several ways (SIGCOV, obviously), and appears to hit NOR and NOTESSAY.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 02:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  This isn’t a thing.  The term does not appear in published literature and is completely original research / opinion.  Yuchitown ( talk ) 04:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC) Yuchitown [ reply ] Delete - The stuff is purely WP:OR !  The subject is hardly notable; content seems like an essay.  Simply unencyclopedic!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekdalian ( talk • contribs ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dr. Johnny Wildside: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Kindly don't add Wrestling to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Martial arts, it's not related martial arts, it's scripted.  Thank you.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 15:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No significant coverage or appearance in major company.  BinaryBrainBug ( talk ) 17:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant independent coverage.   Not close to meeting WP:BIO or WP:ENTERTAINER (which is the criteria for pro wrestlers).  Papaursa ( talk ) 01:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Morgan Day: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This was what I found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Puerto Rico ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  W C M email 07:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I believe I accepted this before the NSPORTS overhaul and at the time "plays for a national team" was a valid acceptance criteria.  I do agree now, however, that there is insufficient coverage to keep the article.  Primefac ( talk ) 08:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Korean ruling class: toobigtokale ( talk ) 23:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; it's also essay-like and seems like original research.  jengod ( talk ) 06:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for not being encyclopedic.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
100 Ways to Write a Book: Delete for not meeting GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete U5.  I've added tag.  Cursory search doesn't show any RS.  This or related articles have been declined by AFC twice at least, and there also seems to be a COI.  — siro χ o 04:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The citations are only about the contributing authors, not the book itself.  Doesn't satisfy WP:NBOOK .  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 06:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK .  I haven't checked all of the references, but a random click-through seems to show that most sources don't even mention this book.  Quality>Quantity.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 02:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vinay Ratan Singh: Being the National President of an organization alone doesn't establish notability.  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 09:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless someone is able to show decent non-English sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra ( talk • contribs ) 10:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources available on google which establishes the notability, only the news of surrendering to the police, release from the jail and welcoming by the supporters.  -- QuadriSyed Sahab ( T · C 09:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sinhgad Public School, Lonavala: Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Maharashtra .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced and does not meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Newport Cricket Club: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  There is nothing at the moment suggesting that they are anything other than a bog standard, dime-a-dozen, local cricket club.  All the sources I could dig up were extremely local news, which suggests a failure of SIGCOV in particular.  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 03:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not meet WP:GNG on any significant level.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 01:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Danielle Coney: Let'srun ( talk ) 13:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Beauty pageants and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Nothing found meeting WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE found name mentions and promo, nothing meeting WP:SIRS.  // Timothy :: talk 04:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Goes nowhere near to satisfying WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 13:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines WP:GNG Waqar 💬 15:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete