Egov.Press: The campaigns for which the site garnered attention were notable, but no case has been made that these happened because of Egov/Alash's petitions.  Nor is there any other claim to notability.  Sourcing is generally unreliable and not independent of the site.  Accepted in good faith through AfC by an established editor who is on board with this AfD and therefore this could not be draftified but if folks think this can be improved by someone without a COI, I have no objection to draftification.  NB: Appears headed for deletion in de wiki de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/16._Februar_2024#Egov.Press whose notability standards are less strict,  was  speedied on IT Wiki Star Mississippi 23:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Websites , Kazakhstan ,  and Russia .  Star Mississippi 23:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Without independent sources, there's no claim for NCORP or GNG.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and this .  ‍ Relativity 01:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and the canvassing of users (that I personally experienced) both on- and off-wiki, even after being chastised about it, gives the impression that this is being done for publicity's sake rather than out of any encyclopedic virtue.  — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Star Mississippi If the author of the article is directly to blame for disseminating the message and other illegal actions, then what does the article with sources have to do with it?  Having studied the whole situation, it seems to me that you have a personal dislike for the author.  2A0D:B201:10E0:BD44:CCBC:9A01:BC92:77A9 ( talk ) 07:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:This user has made no other edits on Wikipedia.  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the following facts need to be taken into account when making a decision.  These Kazakh news portals completely or partially devoted an article to the petition site as a separate topic.  https://spik.kz/1775-peticii-na-sajte-alash-online-prakticheski-ni-na-chto-ne-vlijajut-tak-li-jeto.html https://liter.kz/petitsii-v-kazakhstane-rabotaiut-no-ne-tak-kak-my-schitaem-1643696504/ https://aikyn.kz/181297/petitsiya-aytar-datym-bar https://zhanaqorgan-tynysy.kz/pdf/19612-14-8518-19-apan-2022-zhyl.html https://informburo.kz/kaz/elaynasy/qazaqstanda-onlain-peticiya-nege-natize-bermeidi http://rmebrk.kz/assets/pdfjs2/web/viewer.html? file=/journals/7972/2619.pdf https://massaget.kz/basty-zhaalytar-438/87994/ These resources criticized the petition site.  https://astanatv.kz/ru/news/66308/ https://www.inform.kz/ru/pora-sdelat-oficial-nuyu-ploschadku-dlya-peticiy-grazhdan-zhurnalist-yuriy-masanov_a3893841 https://baigenews.kz/kazakhstanskiy_zhurnalist_obvinil_sayt_petitsiy_v_nakrutke_126317/ https://adilsoz.kz/monthly-monitoring/narusheniya-svobody-slova-v-kazahstane-iyun-2023-goda.html In addition, the site’s petitions are mentioned many times in various foreign news reports.  Wikipedia's rules state, When assessing the significance of web content, consider whether it has had any significant or demonstrable impact on culture, society, entertainment, sports, economics, history, literature, science, or education.  I don’t care about the article, but having studied the situation, I think that the article should be revised and left.  This is up to the administration.  2A0D:B201:10E0:BD44:F1B5:49DF:C11B:D812 ( talk ) 08:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:This user has made no other edits on Wikipedia.  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As it turned out, articles in Spanish, Kazakh, Uzbek and Kyrgyz Wikipedia.  Removed from Russian, Italian and French Wikipedia.  217.76.76.165 ( talk ) 08:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You have forgotten about an entry in German.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 18:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, cross wiki spam, blatant promotion.  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry, but the anonymous person’s arguments need to be fully verified, even if he didn’t make any edits.  217.76.76.165 ( talk ) 09:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] — 217.76.76.165 ( talk ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Star Mississippi 12:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, still need to check all the arguments.  They seem to be justified.  85.117.101.20 ( talk ) 15:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and also piped the link to dewiki deletion discussion.  No sources found in English, if at least, and so fails notability guidelines.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 18:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding additional statements, the article in all other languages are exactly identical, using the same set of pictures and sources.  The eswiki article has a maintenance tag that is the same as our {{ COI }} tag.  Otherwise it is apparent that this article should be deleted in the other 5 languages, but this is not possibles because wikis have different policies, especially on notability.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 18:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also adding that the article was deleted in an additional 5 wikis according to the history of the Wikidata item associated with the topic, (The wikis are frwiki, itwiki, ruwiki, simplewiki, and ukwiki.) in addition to that the page was deleted once here on enwiki according to there.  I am sure that this article should be deleted as a clear example of "cross wiki spam" which was the reason behind the locking of all involved accounts.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , also maybe worth noting that dewiki is also having a deletion discussion.  Shaws username .  talk .  19:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for that insight (and for linking de wiki).  I knew they disappeared from the sidebar but wasn't sure how to track that.  I'm not certain it has previously been deleted here, just moved all over the map for capitalization/transliteration reasons.  Star Mississippi 20:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep delete .  I don't see any cross-wiki spam.  Many translations of the wiki article is not spam.  The author wishes to translate his article into different languages to talk about the online petitions in Kazakhstan.  The article has enough sources.  The article is of low quality, that's right.  I recently corrected one author's error, replaced a false nonsensical source with a relevant one, see

Discussion outcome: delete