Cláudio Costa Neto : Referenced books do not seem to exist or are not present in any databases under these English titles.  He has a page on the IFRJ website , but I don't think it meets WP:PROF .  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 21:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 21:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I've found both books.  Vila Rosário ( PDF ) and Organic analysis .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Another site with "Organic analysis" book.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also I've found some paper PDF , there is Cláudio Costa Neto as one of the authors.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Respectable cites on scholar passes WP:Prof#C1 Did the nominator (who has been editing for less than one month) look at GS? .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 21:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] I will admit that I missed pt:Cláudio Costa Neto , but I wasn't able to find this professor on Google Scholar.  Is this the same Claudio Costa-Neto as in the article?  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 22:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  A quick look at the Portuguese Wikipedia article, pt:Cláudio Costa Neto , shows he's a titular member of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences .  [12] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 22:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I missed this; I assume that the biography is from when his last name was Airoldi.  This is pretty embarrassing on my part, as I wasn't able to find any of this information.  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 22:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Another mistake in my comprehension - the Portuguese article cites the wrong Claudio in ABC, but he is a member of the organization.  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 22:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I realize now that I was hasty in proposing this article for deletion.  I came across the article in the cleanup listing as a page with one edit in 5 years to add a 'no references' template, and in my search to find supporting evidence I found none and multiple persons that shared his name in similar fields.  I am certain there is plenty of material to use to make it better, though I have been having a lot of difficulty finding it anywhere on the Internet, for example the document regarding his creation of "Projecto Xistoquímica" in 1976 under the journal (book?) Energia do Brasil .  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 00:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Does that mean you would like to withdraw the nomination?  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 05:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would like to withdraw the nomination, though I am concerned that there is very little record of his published papers despite the evidence that they exist, in addition to the confusion with other people in similar fields and geographic location that share or have a very similar name.  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 14:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Engineering .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: keep