hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Basic Latin characters: We already have Basic Latin (Unicode block) which has a more complete list.  Given this encyclopedia is intended for English readers, we generally only put non-English names of things on the article about that thing.  That's also where we put interwiki links to articles about that thing in different language.  So normally I would have removed the German, French, Spanish, and Latin columns from the tables in this article, but that would leave it as 100% redundant to the other article.  So perhaps it's better to delete or redirect there.  -- Beland ( talk ) 00:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Computing .  Beland ( talk ) 00:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Basic Latin (Unicode block) as a duplicate article.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 01:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Basic Latin (Unicode block) .  This article basically has full WP:OVERLAP with that one, except the unexplained blue highlighted rows, which are characters that aren't basic Latin.  It's not entirely clear to me what the author intended by these lists or why the languages listed were chosen.  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 20:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move : The intent of this article is to present the common names and pronunciation of the printable Basic Latin characters in English and four other languages.  The inclusion of Latin and the three other languages are there to illustrate the evolution of the "Latin characters".  Basic Latin (Unicode block) does not include the common names and pronunciation.  Perhaps this article needs a better name to emphasize the common names and pronunciation such as the List of common names and pronunciation of Basic Latin characters .  Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 23:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've added documentation to this article to explain the evolution of the Latin alphabet from Classical Latin through its integration into modern languages and its codification in the Basic Latin Unicode block.  Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 15:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect I agree with the above statements.  History person 2 ( talk ) 14:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WODK-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Missouri .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Another run-of-the-mill 2010s-started DTV America/HC2/Innovate station without any local content, significant coverage , or any expectation of any change to that.  (Even its Telemundo affiliation originates at a separately-owned station that doesn't even have an article.)  Like many articles on similar stations, this article was a nominal survivor of a bulk nomination from 2023 .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Subject does not have the necessary WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  The current sources (FCC databases and RabbitEars) are primary, and I don't see anything better.  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Patchogue-Village Transit: Beyond confirming they exist, there is no coverage for this firm.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Patchogue, New York#Transportation , where a brief mention is present, as a logical alternative to deletion.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Patchogue, New York#Transportation where it is briefly mentioned as a WP:ATD : redirects are WP:CHEAP and preserve the page history better than deletion.  No WP:SIGCOV from online sources to establish notability per WP:GNG .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 17:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested above.  gidonb ( talk ) 17:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Anjeza Rexhepi: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Kosovo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : No sigcov on Google, no hits on GNews.  Fails WP:NBIO / WP:NSPORT .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  21:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Michaud Affair: Seems almost entirely based on self-published primary sources.  Has POV issues, and no clear evidence that this is a notable event beyond a news cycle.  Wikipedia is not a newspaper or place to post personal interpretations.  Zim Zala Bim talk 14:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination , Events , Politics ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Yves Michaud (politician) (where this is already addressed in a more succinct way).  This is notable enough to be covered somewhere in Wikipedia, but it isn't of enough enduring significance to have its own standalone article as a separate topic from the MNA who was implicated in it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  02:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : as suggested seems fine, this "affair" isn't really notable outside of the individual's notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Carter family (EastEnders): The 2019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carter family (EastEnders) discussion was closed based on rationale that "The single niche award" - in this case Inside Soap 's 2014 award .  The discussion was closed with the participation of only a few editors.  To my mind, a second WP:AFD may well be a better way to assess whether this meets the requirements for a Wikipedia article.  OK, let's start this off.  Reasons for a keep outcome [ edit ] the article created in 2013 and deleted in 2019 via WP:AFD - the AFD was based on a quibble about an award the 2023 version of the article now contains new references that the article deleted in 2019 lacked a number of other users have in good faith edited the article - their opinions should be considered before outright speedly deletion Reasons for a delete outcome [ edit ] all the new references pre-date the 2019 AFD - has anything changed since 2019?  the article deleted in 2019 was created in 2013 by a now blocked user AngieWattsFan - has anything changed since 2013?  As always, more happy than happy to be proven wrong.  Shirt58 ( talk ) 🦘 10:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Television ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list of characters; seems like GNG failure to me.  No section on reception/analysis/cultural significance.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect This is a non-notable grouping of characters who may or may not be notable individually.  The family itself has little notability.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
OSAMI-D : The Google search showed that there are no other reliable sources.  I'm not sure that the specified sources are independent and whether or not it is sufficient to establish the notability.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Germany .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to OSAMI or delete, depending if the OSAMI article is deleted or not I know that this article isn't notable enough for this Wikipedia, maybe the OSAMI one is okay, but this one definitely isn't.  Toketaa talk 15:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eureka_(organisation)#Significant_projects : the organization running the project.  Not enough notability for a standalone article.  Owen× ☎ 16:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rewired (demoparty) : Walsh90210 ( talk ) 05:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Computing ,  and Belgium .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 05:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties as an WP:AtD .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 10:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
International Union of Anarchists : A lot of the claims in this article, like it having chapters in almost a dozen countries, are dubious and unsourced.  Its only coverage in independent sources has been about a 2012 demonstration in Volgograd, followed by some arrests in 2013.  Nothing since then.  Its website has been dead since 2013 and sources suggest it has been defunct since 2014.  Given this appears to have been a very short-lived splinter group, with only one notable action, I propose this be redirected to Revolutionary Confederation of Anarcho-Syndicalists#Criticisms and divisions .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 18:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics , Russia ,  and Ukraine .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 18:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom as a suitable alternative to deletion since the standalone topic lacks in-depth coverage .  The ruwiki article was deleted in 2021.  No content to merge.  czar 04:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nominee and others.  Chess ( talk ) (please mention me on reply) 01:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sirius XM Weather & Emergency : Let'srun ( talk ) 19:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  The article fails WP:GNG and there are no references.  The external links seem to be borked due to the radio channel being shuttered 12 years ago.  IncompA 01:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  (ETA: or redirect , I forgot that we also had a list that this could be redirected to.)  Sirius XM channels can be independently notable if they're the subject of sufficient reliable source coverage and analysis to pass WP:GNG , but are not "inherently" notable enough for their own standalone articles in the absence of any GNG-building coverage.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels as WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP .  Jumpytoo Talk 06:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect per Jumpytoo Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 23:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Statue of Elvis Presley (Seattle) : I sadly cannot find any other coverage of this online.  Generalissima ( talk ) 04:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions .  CptViraj ( talk ) 04:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, I looked into it as well and can find no other coverage.  FPTI ( talk ) 04:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not a single scrap of coverage in The Seattle Times about this specific statue, only other Elvis statues.  The article's contents can easily be merged into List of memorials to Elvis Presley .  Sounder Bruce 05:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Page creator requesting speedy redirect to List of memorials to Elvis Presley , per SounderBruce.  @ Generalissima : Does this work for you?  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That works! Generalissima ( talk ) 05:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Great! I've added a row to the memorials list for Seattle and I've converted this article into a redirect, if an admin can close this discussion. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WWBK-LD : Article was part of a bulk AfD earlier this year that closed as no consensus but there is nothing to indicate this one passes the notability guidelines.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Virginia .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp. as an ATD, certainly not passing or sourceable otherwise.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
AI video upscaler : WP:JUNK StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I wonder if there's a good redirect target to either video scaler or image scaling .  ~ A412 talk!  00:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Ai-written article about AI programs?  I'm surprised there aren't sources about this, I don't see any sources, other than perhaps articles where it's briefly mentioned in hardware reviews for example.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , can't see value in redirecting versus BLOWITUP.  Article is oddly similar to a "10 Best" blog post at the Cyberlink website, about products which claim to use AI for video scaling.  I can't find SIGCOV in secondary sources about the use of AI in video scaling sufficient for a separate article, just product pages.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge if sourced properly Redirect to Video scaler#AI upscaling – Rings bells of AI written, but AfD is not for cleanup.  While not specifically written as "AI video upscaler", searching AI video upscaler on Google News gives us titles like Adobe unveils AI-driven Project ResUp for video upscaling , This YouTuber Upscaled a Scene From an 1895 Film to 4K 60FPS Using AI , others of that sort.  Redirects are cheap, and this is a valid redirect in my opinion.  TLA tlak 11:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If not that I suggest renaming to AI upscaler .  TLA tlak 11:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I suggest cleaning up and convert to a section in an "AI upscaler" article.  Hym3242 ( talk ) 14:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Hym3242 , there is no AI upscaler .  Video scaler and Image scaling are the targets that have been mentioned in the discussion.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Video scaler : per TLA .  - Master of Hedgehogs ( converse ) ( hate that hedgehog! ) 14:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, I'm questioning the wisdom of merging content that is suspected of being AI-generated.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect, do not merge to Video scaler#AI upscaling .  - I added some (human generated) text, so now it's mentioned there.  ~ A412 talk!  21:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, human.  TLA tlak 20:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect, don't merge —this seems like a sensible solution.  This article adds absolutely nothing of value to the 'pedia, or the world.  — Tom Morris ( talk ) 15:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shiritsu Horitsuba Gakuen : Unable to find any RS coverage.  Fails WP:NBOOKS .  A previous PROD was contested in 2017.  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 12:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions .  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 12:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment French wiki article has no sources, Japanese one has some, unsure of how RS they are.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] All ja-wp sources are primary.  Charcoal feather ( talk ) 16:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on the Ja-wiki source explanation.  I can't find anything we can use for sourcing either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Clamp works#Short works per nom; this title doesn't seem to have any non-primary coverage.  Link20XX ( talk ) 19:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge this is more of cdrama collections that Tsubasa article of discography already has collected — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintor2 ( talk • contribs ) 15:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WWTJ-LP : Redirect conversion reverted by IP.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and New York .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and/or restore redirect to List of radio stations in New York : any time a BLAR is contested for such a non-notable entity, it reduces the value of publicly retaining the page history any further.  This is the type of radio station article (LPFM, started within the last decade or so) that, after the 2021 RfC that finally abolished the previous, more existence-based and non- GNG inclusion standards in this topic area, we have been (very) slowly trying to purge when they are remnants of the previous standards — this 2023-created article isn't even that.  We need actual significant coverage — the FCC, the station itself, and Radio-Locator aren't enough anymore.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've had to warn this user about creating non-notable radio station articles.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 04:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect