hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ecumenical Catholic Church of Christ: Most of the sources are self-sources and those who are not don't justify an article on Wikipedia.  I move for deletion Karma1998 ( talk ) 13:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity ,  and United States of America .  Shaws username .  talk .  14:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I motion to keep , because it is referenced in The Detroit News , the Archdiocese of Detroit , and Aleteia .  These news articles provide the argument that this group is relevant, despite its size.  At that rate, some U.S. settlement articles which have only less than 100 residents should be culled by that same measure; they won't, however, because despite their seeming irrelevance, they are properly sourced through the U.S. Census Bureau.  Only 2 sources are self-sourced in this article.  TheLionHasSeen ( talk ) 14:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per significant coverage in the following sources: "Rebel priest strikes out on his own" .  The Modesto Bee .  2014-07-06.  pp.  G2 .  Retrieved 2024-02-22 .  (this was a syndicated article that appeared in many US papers) "Church merger brings leaders to city" .  Niagara Falls Review .  2007-10-27.  p. 17 .  Retrieved 2024-02-22 .  Terek, Donna.  "Unusual church in no-man's land welcomes everyone" .  The Detroit News .  Retrieved 2024-02-22 .  "I did not want to live a lie, says former Catholic priest who opted to marry" .  Nation .  2020-06-21 .  Retrieved 2024-02-22 .  Jfire ( talk ) 17:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , Some notability is implied by it being a historical landmark: "Cathedral of St. Anthony" .  Historic Detroit .  Retrieved 2023-06-29 .  -- Panther999 ( talk ) 18:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a historical landmark and the coverage detailed in this discussion, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . The building may well be notable, but that doesn't mean the organisation that occupies it is notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
KTYJ-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Idaho .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is a ton of coverage in two newspapers (the Idaho edition of The Spokesman-Review and the Coeur d'Alene Press ) for the 1994–1997 period.  The station had a very bumpy early history that included an illegal transfer of control, Seattle Mariners baseball games, and a bankruptcy filing, even though it drops off the radar hard after becoming KTYJ.  Reasonable WP:BEFORE in Newspapers.com would have avoided this outcome.  And if Newspapers.com lacks the city you need, given that we are dealing with LPTVs, ask me and there may be coverage in NewsBank.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 17:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Per Sammi Brie's rewrite of the article with sources.  mer764 KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions ) 18:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per WP:HEY as the article has been improved with content referenced to multiple reliable sources that together show a pass of WP:GNG in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 18:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Colin Bunyan: Links mainly point towards biography profiles and/or programme pages.  Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs ) 21:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, do not agree with nomination statement.  J97736 ( talk ) 16:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Music , Radio ,  and England .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Missed getting sorted into deletion sorting lists and minimal participation.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep : There are independent sources here, not great ones (the picture of the presenter preparing a meal is irrelevant and the stuff about the takeaway feels WP:REFBOMBy ) but they exist all the same.  I've added a new link to information about the presenter's programme ending.  I'm on the fence with this one, so may be swayed to change my ! vote.  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seems to fail WP:GNG , the individual does not have any real sufficient notability.  The sources are also mediocre and as stated by Funky, point toward biography channels or program pages such as the BBC ones.  Noorullah ( talk ) 02:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There is no issue with notability as he has been active in local radio for nearly 50 years, and there are now several independent references.  Rillington ( talk ) 02:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  radio presenter for over 50 years and long serving BBC staff member.  J97736 ( talk ) 15:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Aaron Pollock: The one reference is a database entry, and so is not a secondary source .   If a source that provides significant coverage can be found within seven days, that will be a Heymann result.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and California .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are already two RS with sigcov in the article, if not used very well.  Kingsif ( talk ) 21:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  Seems to weakly pass GNG with the two sigcov pieces in the article.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 00:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : In addition to the two SIGCOV sources already in the article, this source probably meets sigcov, although I can't tell for sure because it's paywalled.  — SamX [ talk · contribs · he/him] 01:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relevant excerpt here: The PAC is a popular training center where Moore and Pollock have trained at since graduating.  Pollock spent two years on the San Diego State rowing team before moving to Philadelphia.  Aside from the week stay in Tampa, he and other oarsmen spend the winter months preparing for the day they can take to the water.  "In the fall, we row and do a lot of aerobic and (weight) lifting training," Pollock said.  "In the winter we train indoors focusing on working with weights. Then it's back in the water and we de-emphasize weight training and incorporate high intensity aerobic workouts."  Not really SIGCOV in my estimation, but contributes to a body of marginal coverage.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 13:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep per the evidence provided above by other editors.  Although the article does still need to be expanded a bit.  CycloneYoris talk!  23:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above discussion.  Expansion of an article is not a reason to delete.  Bearian ( talk ) 13:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Outlook festival: We've deleted it at AfD before, many years ago, but it has been re-created with slightly different capitalisation in the title, thereby accidentally bypassing the warnings and not showing in the logs.  Please will the community authorise deletion of this content?  — S Marshall T / C 08:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  — S Marshall T / C 08:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outlook Festival . — S Marshall T / C 08:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , because the festival is notable.  It may not have been in 2009, when it was only a year old, but it certainly is now.  Here are some sources which aren't just routine lineup fodder: Minamore, Bridget.  "Ten Years in, Who Does Outlook Festival Serve?" .  Vice .  Retrieved 13 July 2023 .  Rowlands, Mark.  "Croatia's capital of bass" .  TimeOut .  Retrieved 13 July 2023 .  "DJs show us around the Outlook site" .  Mixmag .  Retrieved 13 July 2023 .  Coldwell, Will.  "Croatia cranks up the festival volume" .  The Guardian .  Retrieved 13 July 2023 .  There was a hefty police raid at the 2017 edition which got some news coverage [21] [22] The festival is also mentioned in several books such as Anderton, Chris (2018).  Music Festivals in the UK: Beyond the Carnivalesque .  and Mazierska, Ewa; Győri, Zsolt (2019).  Eastern European Popular Music in a Transnational Context: Beyond the Borders .  , as well as many Croatia travel guides.  – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 08:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Seems notable based on what's given above.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This is a notable festival.  WonderCanada ( talk ) 10:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Wolfgang Butzkamm: Newbamboo ( talk ) 01:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Oh dear.  I don't think it's fair to call this an "advertisement".  It's just very 2008 Wikipedia.  It looks like he's written a habilitation and a frequently used course text (Lust zum Lehren, which has at least a second edition), so surely a WP:NPROF pass.  But some tidying might be in order... -- asilvering ( talk ) 01:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep but you're welcome to rewrite! asilvering has hit the nail on the head ( hat den Nagel auf den Kopf getroffen ), spot on.  It's just an over-deep, over-enthusiastic essay on the man's work, but the man and his work do qualify for notability, and the material could be reigned-in to a sensible article, so deletion's not the right approach.  Elemimele ( talk ) 05:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:40, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Appears to have held an established chair, so meets WP:NPROF #5.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Nothando Hlophe: No mentions in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Africa .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Royalty and nobility ,  and Christianity .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as all of the sources refer to her singing career. .  only one source recalls her marriage to a minor royal.  She is most notable for being a gospel singer.  Is her husband even famous?  He doesn’t have a Wikipedia article.  Seems like a strange claim to make. .  — Willthacheerleader18 ( talk ) 02:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment an article in the Times of Swaziland , titled NOTHANDO HLOPHE ADDED TO WORSHIP ENCOUNTER 3 is about her work as a singer.  This article in Mpumalanga News , titled Praise with Khululugcobo , is about her career (she is the lead singer of the praise and Khululugcobo).  This this article in Eswatini Observer is entirely about her return to the stage after taking a two year hiatus due to the covid-19 pandemic.  This article in the The Herald , titled Swazi gospel singer Nothando Hlophe promotes new album on PE visit , is entirely about her music career.  Are these newspapers not reliable sources that mention her notability as a singer?  -- Willthacheerleader18 ( talk ) 13:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Seems like a notable singer who is generating significant coverage in the news.  CT55555 ( talk ) 02:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion such as national newspapers including the Swaziland Observer that together show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Sofia Steinberg: An online search turned up no reliable secondary sources unconnected to the subject that could be used to improve the article.  CurryTime7-24 ( talk ) 21:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Fashion , Israel ,  and Russia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough coverage.  What's given isn't RS, this is all I can find [1] , trivial coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't look like there's enough for notability.  Tehonk ( talk ) 02:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There is plenty of coverage in Russian: Forbes : [2] Komsomolskaya Pravda : [3] Article reports that she apparently won some kind of "Model of the Year" award.  Novaia Sibir : [4] This also covers her winning that award.  Gazeta.Ru : [5] NGS : [6] FashionUnited : [7] Vogue cover (Russian edition): [8] There are others but I believe this should be enough to show notability.  Ostalgia ( talk ) 08:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article can be improved per Ostalgia to meet notability, therefore meets the standard for keep (but as of now, poor quality should be improved) FortunateSons ( talk ) 12:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per Ostalgia, sufficient significant coverage in Russian.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 09:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Found this as well.  Not able to evaluate whether the articles found above are PR fluff, so weak keep .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 20:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Sources presented by Ostalgia can be implemented and would make this article a good pass.  A model (albeit illustrated) being on the cover of Vogue is helpful.  TLA tlak 02:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Belo Horizonte overpass collapse: No lasting effects or impacts to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation ,  and Brazil .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Despite a thorough search I also have not been able to come up with any sort of lasting coverage, and only found sources published at the time of the collapse.  I abstain from providing a suggestion as to whether the article should remain or not, I am aware of WP:LASTING , I suppose it's pertinent and appropriate, I'm just not at the point where I fully internalised it yet.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 06:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is WP:LASTING coverage in Brazilian sources [41] [42] [43] , including a scholar article about it [44] . Skyshifter talk 12:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment. Well if You take Brazilian sources! Kudoz! -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 20:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sources can be from anywhere and written in any language.  What matters is whether this topic has significant coverage in independent reliable sources, without further qualification.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 18:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the sources found by Skyshifter, especially as it is the subject of academic coverage (which as far as I'm concerned is the gold standard for event notability).  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 01:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources above which show notability.  Giant Snowman 11:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep More than enough on the net and around for me.  Article could be improved and more sources added for my liking know, but the essence is there and that passes GNG.  Govvy ( talk ) 11:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Progressive_utilization_theory: The article should be deleted or merged and redirected to Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar's page.  The issue with the earlier review is that it is inconclusive due to the idea that this theory was being used or implemented, however this is not the case.  It's a obscure theory from over 50 years ago with and hasn't been used since.  Perhaps, at most it's a social movement started by Sarkar, all the more reason to have it be on his page.  Similar to social credit, but as far as I can tell unlike social credit no government aligned with this movement has been in power which brings into question it's notability.  This is a theory that isn't used either in economics or in any polity.  This article isn't notable enough to have its own page and needs to be reviewed.  Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 04:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Economics ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , possible WP:CSK#3 .  Meets GNG with the independent references in article, even if we don't consider Sarkar independent.  Friedman and Crovetto in particular have several pages of SIGCOV each.  These references are from within the past 15 years, and even that hadn't been the case, WP:NOTTEMPORARY .  A quick search of Google Scholar finds more.  — siro χ o 05:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] FWIW, the bar for AfD submission is pretty low, the nomination raises notability issues, I wouldn't consider this a no rationale CSK.  Quality of reasoning is different from absence of reason.  Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk ) 22:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Quality of reasoning can fall under CSK criterion 3.  Absence is CSK 1, and you are correct that would not apply.  There is indeed effectively no bar for AfD submissions.  — siro χ o 23:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Most of the google results are either pages selling Sarkar's books, foundations based on Sarkar's work, or articles based on this page.  So not many independent sources.  I don't see why this needs to be separate from Sarkar's page.  The issue is that a reasonable edit of this page would make it a stub.  Imitationsasquatch ( talk ) 03:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I'm sympathetic to where the nomination is coming from given the contents of the article in its present state: far too reliant on sources lacking in independence of the subject.   That said, AfD is not clean up.   However, concur with

Discussion outcome: keep