hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of historical separatist movements in South America: Entirely unsourced.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 17:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and South America .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : unsourced and apparently unsourceable.  Could find nothing that could support notability.  -- Otr500 ( talk ) 07:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Created recently so not suitable for soft-deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 18:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The article is abandoned, it only contains information about Brazil and Colombia, with Brazil indiscriminately mixing real historical movements such as the Farroupilha Revolution with modern separatist movements, which sound more like internet protests against tax increases or the federal government itself.  For me it is a clear case of WP:TNT .  Svartner ( talk ) 17:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per all of the above.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamad Jaafar: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nick Koudis: No reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject.  Tails Wx 17:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Australia ,  and New York .  Tails Wx 17:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The page has the potential to meet GNG (given the subject is a photographer with 20+ years experience and this page seems pretty dated with little work since its creation in 2005--authored by the subject himself) but presently I don't see any WP:RSs .  Cabrils ( talk ) 02:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Cabrils.  Appears to have been a promotional WP:AUTOBIO created during the earlier days of Wikipedia that has skated by for years despite not meeting notability standards.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 18:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Liquid Sky (band): Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , United Kingdom ,  and England .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to a previous proposed deletion .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 19:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of significance.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 07:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Listed on Reverbnation and metal-archives, among other sites, but these appear to be UGC and/or primary.  No significant independent coverage.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 22:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Piper (author): Nothing much on the page offered to suggest why this author is particularly notable or meets the inclusion criteria on en.wiki JMWt ( talk ) 10:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Youprayteas ( t • c ) 11:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Finance .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Horne: Kept at AfD in 2008, before we became more stringent about WP:GNG .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 16:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Kentucky .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 16:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass NPOL and not otherwise notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional tone, about a candidate who never even won a primary election.   No claim of importance or significance other than as a candidate.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 18:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is inappropriate due to its promotional nature and the individual is not notable in any case.  Every candidate in every race is not worthy of their own article.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 08:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kang Jong-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christina Ellington: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Insufficient in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Algeria at the 2011 Arab Games: Unnotable.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Algeria .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Qatar-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of people who have lived in Hampstead Garden Suburb: This has been {{ cn }} tagged for 2 years, and there is no indication that "living in Hampstead Garden Suburb" is a notable concept (as opposed to a thing that some people happen to do).  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 22:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United Kingdom .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 22:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , obviously.   A ridiculous and non-encyclopaedic article which may even breach privacy for the people it lists in the present tense.  RobinCarmody ( talk ) 19:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article seems more like a personal opinion piece than an encyclopedia entry.  Waqar 💬 17:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , does not look salvageable.  In principle, such a topic could be viable as a split off of X or Y Place#Notable people .  Geschichte ( talk ) 01:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zayn Khan: No indicator of wp:notability under gng or sna,   2 sentence Stub content reflect this including lack of GNG sources.  North8000 ( talk ) 00:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Theatre ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough.  killer bee 09:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable, fail to pass General notability criteria.  Kkb091 ( talk ) 10:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple television and films.  Masood Anil ( talk ) 14:55, 14 December 2023 (UTC) — Masood Anil ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  JM ( talk ) 00:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment no clear indication, I don't see it passing GNC by any proper source except some mentions of name, needs further citations حقائق کا پتہ لگانے والا ( talk ) 14:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , meets WP:NACTOR and is a rising star, already worked in popular serial in a significant role.  Masood Anil ( talk ) 18:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC) — Masood Anil ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  (striking duplicate vote L iz Read!  Talk!  00:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, it would help to get an assessment of the sources instead of information-less "Not notable" or "Meets WP:NACTOR ".  Please be specific.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep He has done several roles in Romantic comedy Heer Maan Ja , Parde Mein Rehne Do and Huey Tum Ajnabi .  ( 223.123.105.164 ( talk ) 06:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC) — 223.123.105.164 ( talk ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  JM ( talk ) 12:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  JM ( talk ) 12:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - References available do not show how this person meets NACTOR or GNG.  Likely created by a sock, see this .  Not surprised with SPA voting either.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per all arguments above.  Although there are matches for "Zayn Khan" on Google news, I can conclude that it is a different person.  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 19:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rufat Abbasov: My search of Azerbaijani sources didn't yield any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  At first glance, Sportline looks decent but it's, in fact, almost 100% quote content so doesn't actually contain any independent analysis of Abbasov.  Baku Plus was just two passing mentions in a match summary on a reserve fixture.  If he becomes notable later, this can always be recreated but we shouldn't be writing articles on footballers that haven't reached that level yet.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – WP:TOOSOON .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Source in article is a database record, as noted above the interview fails WP:IS, BEFORE found name mentions/listings, but nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 02:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Disavowed: Sourced to crowdsourced sources.  Valereee ( talk ) 15:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Netherlands .  Valereee ( talk ) 15:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Note that the article is outdated, as the final sentence says that a "new album" was due in 2020.  That actually happened, and I found a lengthy review of that album here: [23] .  However, that is the only in-depth media source of any kind that I can find on the band for any point in its history.  They have brief listings at directory sites like Spirit of Metal, which are not encyclopedic, and they sometimes get mentioned as a historical tidbit in articles about other bands that this band's members were in previously or later.  They have historical connections but are too many degrees of separation from notability.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, User:doomsdayer520 , and my own research.  gidonb ( talk ) 22:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Connolly (footballer): Unclear notability.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ireland .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  In my own WP:BEFORE , I cannot find sufficient sources to support even the basic/scant facts that the article contains.  Not to mind sufficient sources to establish WP:SIGCOV or WP:NBIO .  (Note: In the 1950s, Bohemians were an amateur club, so even the [now defunct] "NFOOTY" criteria wouldn't have applied. Can't see any case for retaining title...)  Guliolopez ( talk ) 15:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No source with no notability anywhere.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 15:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I had no luck in my search for "a" source as well, which is just the beginning when it comes to the subject's lack of notability as pointed out by Guliolopez.  Aintabli ( talk ) 15:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – per above.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Craig Coakley: Does not meet criteria for WP:NKICK .  Being signed to ONE Championship is not sufficient to warrant a page.  Passing mentions and event results are not sufficient to meet WP:GNG .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 12:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Ireland .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search found no evidence that he meets WP:NKICK nor did I find significant independent coverage that shows he meets WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 01:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just because he got signed by ONE does not mean he passes basic WP:GNG .  Event results are also not notable.  I could find no sources outside of passing mentions.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 15:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wealth of Scarsdale: MrOllie ( talk ) 02:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Um, hard to see how it can be a fork if the content is NOT now at Scarsdale .  Whether it's encyclopedic is a different question.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 11:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To quote WP:POVFORK : In contrast POV forks generally arise when contributors disagree about the content of an article or other page.  Instead of resolving that disagreement by consensus, another version of the article (or another article on the same subject) is created to be developed according to a particular point of view.  This second article is known as a "POV fork" of the first, and is inconsistent with policy: all facts and major points of view on a certain subject should be treated in one article.  As Wikipedia does not view article forking as an acceptable solution to disagreements between contributors, such forks may be merged, or nominated for deletion.  MrOllie ( talk ) 12:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Blatant POVFORK, and an unusual one at that.  Any content here could be included at Scarsdale, New York if consensus was built, and all of it likely breaches undue coverage.  The affluence of Scarsdale is not notable independent of Scarsdale itself any more than it would be for say, Atherton, California .  The only "Wealth of X" page we seem to have is Wealth of Donald Trump , where it's clear that the particular topic is independently notable.  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 18:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete