hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Robert Montano: Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 22:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment An earlier version [21] has more details (incl. filmography), but the credits appear to be mainly bit parts.  Some coverage for his latest play - "Small" [22] [23] .  Not sure if that's enough though. - KH-1 ( talk ) 00:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 18:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Theosophical Society in the Philippines: The article is built from primary references, which may be all that exist Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 23:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Philippines .  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 23:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I found this source: [9] but I don’t think it is enough to establish notability.  Ping me if you found one (not primary source).  On a side note, the article seems a tad bit promotional, so blowing it all up can be an option if kept.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 02:09, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find good sources from GNews, GNews Archives (There's a hit for a meditation class by a former president of the org), and GBooks (There's a hit but it's a primary source).  From Google Scholar: page 171 of the article I think this is the strongest ref I found so far but it only says that they have a presence in the country since the 1920s.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NORG per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 01:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darren Curovic: Shellwood ( talk ) 12:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I nominated this 12 years ago and it was deleted.  Still not seeing anything to meet WP:BIO .  Most of the sources provided are kickboxing related and not independent.  2 small mentions in gnews.  Nothing in Australian search engine, Trove.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I actually voted to keep this article in the original discussion, but criteria and my experience have changed substantially since then.   His IFMA medals were for amateur events which are now specifically excluded from showing WP notability by WP:NKICK .   In addition, I'm not seeing multiple instances of significant independent coverage to show that WP:GNG is met.  Papaursa ( talk ) 22:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ntokozo Vidima: The most I found were a few sentences here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Quite a bit of coverage, but not really enough to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maryam Momen: NameGame ( talk ) 12:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  There seem to be inline citations in the article.  I don't read Farsi, so could the nominator elaborate on why these fail WP:RS ?  pburka ( talk ) 22:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Pburka Greetings.  its related article has been deleted many times on fa:مریم مؤمن (it happened the same on its another word spelling: fa:مریم مومن ) the page fa:مریم مؤمن has been locked from creating for another time.  the used references from websites such as: namnamak, topnaz & photokade in my viewpoint are advertisements and about lifestyle, they maybe are like MailOnline , notice that they are not even Newspaper.  mojnews says here : It was registered as the first private news agency in Iran, with an official license from the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance .  mosalasonline here says it was started since 2009 and it seems to be private.  persianv.com is a public portal of Persian entertainment, cinema news, fashion & lifestyle.  Regards.  -- NameGame ( talk ) 23:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, – Joe ( talk ) 10:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - based on the contribution from NameGame above, and the lack of reliable sources in English.  Pleease ping me if good sources (in any language) are identified.  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 09:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Liliana Barba: Not enough to pass WP:BIO or WP:GNG .  Has been in CAT:NN for over 13 years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Barzeh car bombing: One death and a few injured is not global news.  So I recommend deleting.  Dl.thinker ( talk ) 18:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Article should stay up though be removed from current events page 71.184.221.103 ( talk ) 22:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] i personally feel the page should not be deleted as it is an attack within the capital which are considered rare ever since the government was able to claim back the city from rebels in 2018.  Dubstar44 Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Terrorism ,  and Syria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTNEWS .  Ecrusized ( talk ) 08:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete These events are common in Syria, even in government-held towns.  An event that may be considered rare as it is in SAA-controlled territory is still common for the country.  Although it is a saddening event as in the conflict overall, it still doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEWS .  Cutlass Ciera 13:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per WP:EVENTCRIT , news stories generally shouldn't have articles unless they have a lasting effect over a wide area.  This would be more appropriate for List of Islamist terrorist attacks or a similar list of bombings in Syria.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 16:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not particularly uncommon or significant.  AryKun ( talk ) 04:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm afraid to say, but it's all too common.  Even in the United States, attacks with fewer than four fatalities are considered not notable.  " What a piece of work is man ."  Bearian ( talk ) 15:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3053: Also, having an observed supernova in the galaxy is trivial.  C messier ( talk ) 07:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : it shows up in a few studies, but there isn't a significant amount of coverage.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 12:57, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniele Filippi: Joeykai ( talk ) 04:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Italy and Sweden .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -  No notability as of December 2023.  Do not cover WP:GNG.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 16:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bond markets in East Asia and South East Asia: Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable in itself.  I am not an expert but nowadays don’t they talk about individual countries like ‘panda bonds’ and so on?  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : While this discussion appears to have no quorum , it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).  -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not a manual .  The article is entirely unsourced, and reads like original research, and it seems like a very promotional tone.  I cannot find any information about this topic that isn't routine news coverage or how-to manuals.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 09:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:31, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] • Delete It seems almost like a guide/press release to me, if it could be significantly rewritten it could maybe qualify (but from a source look-up I am not sure there is enough), but for now it seems like a lost cause.  Geardona ( talk ) 03:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rameumptom: There are no apparent independent reliable sources that cover tge topic in depth.  This seems like an unlikely search term for the book of mormon, so I don't believe a redirect would be appropriate Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 04:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Christianity ,  and Latter Day Saints .  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 04:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per WP:PAGEDECIDE , which guides that there are times when it's better to cover a topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic .  For readers, Rameumptom would be more usefully described in the wider contexts of the plot/setting/theology of the Book of Mormon; there is not an amount of coverage that would justify a separate article.  Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits ) 06:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Hydrangeans' comments.  Trevdna ( talk ) 14:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Open government in Azerbaijan: This is purely sourced to Azerbaijani government sources or sources that are not independent of the Azerbaijan government.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Politics ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Effectively a puff piece for an authoritarian government (which is not surprising when one looks at the edit history of its creator).  Number 5 7 12:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per WP:NOTADVOCACY .  This is primary sourced government propoganda.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 21:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nylon Pink: QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and California .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Most sources are now unavailable, and the band's notability is completely questionable.  Svartner ( talk ) 05:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Libertarian Party (Spain): The only source cited in this article is the party's own FAQ section on its website.  Searching around, I can't find any reliable secondary sources that have given the party significant coverage .  The Spanish Wikipedia article es:Partido Libertario (España) was also deleted this year as having no relevance to the encyclopedia.  As this organisation appears to fail our general notability guidelines I propose this article be deleted.  Grnrchst ( talk ) 18:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Libertarianism , Organizations , Politics ,  and Spain .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 18:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet GNG.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Murat Kılıç: KH-1 ( talk ) 02:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Turkey .  KH-1 ( talk ) 02:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Clearly not notable enough.  Aintabli ( talk ) 04:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -  Fails CREATIVE, notability is not established.  Source failed verification, the subject did not win awards from L’Oreal and Just for Men as read in the article.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 12:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Veer Teja Vidhya Mandir School: WikiAnchor10 ( talk ) 18:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  WikiAnchor10 ( talk ) 18:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Rajasthan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Almost little to nothing has been updated or expanded since this article's creation 11 years ago.  Also, when the article was created, there was a mass deletion of promotional content so the article was likely made to promote the school.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 07:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Been Like This (disambiguation): Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 22:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Dab is unneeded since there's only one other song named "Been Like This".  𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 19:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redundant disambiguation as there's only one related title.  X ( talk ) 19:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Poshtgar-e Shah Babek: Abadi are not notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jiangnanwenshuyuan: I cannot find it on the map.  The original author has made similar contributions that were speedily deleted a decade ago.  The style of writing in first person ("my neighborhood") is not encyclopedic.  Most importantly, I don´t think this urban housing development is notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 00:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 00:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not meeting WP:NBUILDING .   The property development is called 江南文枢苑.  From searches I see no indication of special social, cultural, architectural importance.  The cites are basically broken/spam links.  Oblivy ( talk ) 01:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Water jet (recreation): Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hard to find significant coverage on this particular niche device, but the statement "it is also used in agriculture" suggests the author of the article wasn't exactly splitting hairs.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to water cannon , this subject is basically a subtype.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as wholly unsourced (for 16.71 years!) without any evidence of improvability.   — Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete