hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ayotunde Bally: Most sources are just passing mention.  This link from Nigerian Tribune seems to be a press release.  PS: Article was previously moved to draftspace by AirshipJungle but was moved back to mainspace by creator.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since there's no indication of notability, everything here seems to simply be self-sourced or short mentions.  DCsansei ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 07:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This [13] is about the best, but it's the person talking about why they joined the company.  Gnews only has six hits total, all about the same as this one.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 22:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Toni Mumford: Unfortunately, this means she fails WP:GNG and a lack of google scholar cites means she doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC either.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 18:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Management , Spaceflight ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Undisclosed COI by the creator?  Looks like they work together.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vibe Hotel: Not to be confused with a similarly named hotel in Australia.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and California .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Unsourced article and I cannot find anything on it elsewhere.  No specific claims to fame in the text, seems to have been just a hotel.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 03:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - was unable to find any independent or sigcov to pass NCORP microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 15:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Danny Cole: The text doesn't indicate any major gallery shows, there are no citations for the one minor show, and the majority of the citations are from publications that aren't notable enough to have Wikipedia pages themselves.  Link from Rolling Stone is a photo caption of a party report, link from Converse doesn't resolve.  The work referred to is not comprehensive enough to hit any of the criteria for WP:AUTHOR.  Ctbeiser ( talk ) 22:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST .  He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums.  WP:TOOSOON .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 23:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jorge Planas Ribó: SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 16:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Medicine ,  and Spain .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 16:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – passes criterion 2 of Fails WP:NPROF .  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 06:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:NOTRESUME .  -- LibStar ( talk ) 01:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:NOTRESUME . -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of battles in Algeria: Follow-up to List of battles in Belgium (deleted recently).  NLeeuw ( talk ) 22:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Algeria .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 22:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment We do not categorise battles by location per WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 13:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update List of battles in Albania has been deleted for the same reason.  NLeeuw ( talk ) 16:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Where are all of our AFD regulars?  We need more AFD discussion participants.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pinging @ Marcocapelle and HouseBlaster : due to their involvement in related CFD discussions about "Battles in X".  Liz requested more participation.  NLeeuw ( talk ) 22:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom, plus the purpose of this list would seem to be better achieved with a category as per WP:AOAC , WP:DOAL and WP:LISTPURP .  Bgv.  ( talk ) 22:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MATRIX Architects Engineers Planners, Inc.: Article is 15 years old and a speedy delete request was declined in 2009.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 21:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 21:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - had a look to see if I could find other coverage in local newspapers or architectural industry publications, but nothing in-depth found, just a couple of very brief mentions.  No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBUSINESS that I can find.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 20:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shine Screens: Undeletion requested by now blocked sock who moved to the main space.  Looking closer, this needs to meet WP:NCORP and falls short based on the references not meeting WP:ORGCRIT .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The sources make the page short of notability because I did not find any that address the subject of the article in depth.  It is just routine announcements on what film was produced under the subject banner and that is not sufficient for a notable attention.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria apply, none of the references meet the criteria.  HighKing ++ 11:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dejan Trajkov: Subject doesn't appear to pass WP:NPROF .  I am not sure being the ex-director of the Institute of Immunobiology and Human Genetics makes them notable but, at the very least, there should be reliable sources to substantiate his notability, which there currently isn't.  Hence, their notability status is debatable.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators ,  and North Macedonia .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete His GS profile indicates one single highly cited paper which doesnt mention him by name as author (rather a consortium).  I dont see how this would  merit passing WP:NPROF #1; and NPROF#6 is also not applicable with the directorship of an institute.  -- hroest 19:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep his profile, this archived link (the link is currently dead) from the Institute for Immunobiology and Human Genetics in 2021 cites him as the Director of the Institute which fulfils NPROF#6.  He is also one of the few people that practice Immunology in North Macedonia.  Ivanavram ( talk ) 21:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ivanavram : I thought the directorship might meet NPROF#6, but the institute is part of a university, not independent, so it is not met.  Therefore, I am advocating to delete .  Quuxbazbarfoo ( talk ) 14:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I'd agree that the citations of the position paper are not discriminatory in this context, which leaves top citations 85,62,60,52,49 -- respectable but probably not sufficiently exceptional in a relatively high-citation field.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 21:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see evidence of either WP:PROF or WP:GNG notability.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and NBIO, NPROF.  I didn't look into the institute/position, because NPROF states, "any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources , are notable." and the article and BEFORE didn't turn up anything that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth to substantiate it, so NPROF is out due to lack of sources.  BLPs require strong independent sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 01:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Montenegro–Peru relations: The topic of these relations does not receive significant coverage in multiple sources.  Relations don't include aspects that typically add to notability like embassies, state visits, significant trade or migration.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Montenegro ,  and Peru .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, I added some information from other sources, I would appreciate it if you could take a look and let me know if this will suffice for this and the Macedonian articles.  Cheers.  180app ( talk ) 20:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Not seeing evidence of WP:SIGCOV of this topic, either.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 23:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe Aston: Also is an WP:ORPHAN .  Swan505 ( talk ) 05:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG .  However, as the page creator is, I think, topic banned from AfD, in the interests of balance, I'll report his view.  I placed a notability banner on this in October and he removed it with an edsum: there is clearly no notability issue, clearly GNG is met by the significant coverage of this subject provided by the independent publications Crikey and the ABC through MediaWatch .  I did not take to AfD because the journalist had a column that appears to have been notorious enough that Mediawatch wrote an article about him on his departure calling him "the notoriously acerbic man-about-town who writes Rear Window for The Australian Financial Review."  I disagree that this is sufficient to meet WP:N .  It is not clear what we can say in a BLP about the subject from this, and a mention in Australian Financial Review would be more appropriate if the column was so notorious, but a couple of articles expressing relief that he has gone do not show WP:SUSTAINED coverage, and are themselves primary sources.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 09:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with Sirfurboy.  Being featured on Mediawatch is not sign of being notable or meeting WP:JOURNALIST .  LibStar ( talk ) 15:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete also agree with Sirfurboy.  Journos talking about other journos generally is not a sign of being notable or meeting WP:JOURNALIST .  Tar nis hed Path talk 14:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Spillage of classified information: Delete or merge into classified information .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Politics .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Trivial and highly technical definition, cited to a primary source.   Subject isn't covered in Classified information (and to do so would be pointless, as this is a highly specific term), so I don't see any point in a merge.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:39, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amanda Pennekamp: Let'srun ( talk ) 12:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and South Carolina .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Hardly any sourcing at all found, not meeting GNG.  Only one story about a murder, likely with a different individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Orchha (1635): Sources don't have pages cited, and upon searching the topic, I found no mention of the "Siege of Orchha (1635)" in any sources which makes it fall under WP:OR [13] gives no account of Siege of Orchha (1635) only has passing mentions around this event.  [14] just spun around "Rebellion of Jhujhar Singh" but author's OR makes it "Siege of Orchha (1635)".  [15] this is not even covering this event but a different Mughal campaign in 1580 and just mentioning the Orchha city.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 17:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Madhya Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the tidal wave of Indian battlebollox is very troubling indeed.  Either we’re providing readers with reliable information or we’re not.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, How these articles are even accepted for wikepedia ?  Not a single mentioning of how seige went.  It does not passes WP: GNG Rawn3012 ( talk ) 08:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Coastal Television Network: Let'srun ( talk ) 11:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 11:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JT McCormick: References are PR.  scope_creep Talk 09:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Ohio ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The coverage almost entirely consists of puff pieces and PR, no independent and secondary articles.  He is the CEO of a non-notable company and I couldn't find any reviews of his book ( I Got There: How I Overcame Racism, Poverty, and Abuse to Achieve the American Dream ).  Mooonswimmer 14:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He is no longer their CEO, there were a number of articles about him earlier this year around his fraud and embezzlements.  There are also pieces about him in CNN, Bloomberg, and Forbes.  It would seem that some of these articles just need more references and improvements but they have all just been flagged for deletion instead.  Stravensky ( talk ) 16:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you share some of the articles covering any fraudulent activities?  CNN : 1 , 2 Bloomberg : 1 Forbes : 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 No independent, secondary coverage here.  These are all either passing mentions, interviews, or articles written by the subject.  Mooonswimmer 16:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I remember reading more on the fraud somewhere.  On searching now I am mostly seeing stuff from Biz Journals (not sure if that's notable enough).  I can keep looking.  [50] https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/news/2023/05/30/scribe-media-shuts-down-and-lays-off-90-employees.html Stravensky ( talk ) 19:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Max fired himself from the CEO role in 2016 and named to the position JeVon McCormick, previously president of Headspring Software."  The only mention of McCormick in the article.  That is far from significant coverage.  Mooonswimmer 18:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Last time the article appears to have been created by a now blocked sock.  Was deleted as the non-notable CEO of a company with 29 people, neither of which helps this time around.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a somewhat puffy piece [51] ...  Forbes contributor piece used in the article, rest are also non-RS or PR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete