hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Stephen Barth: Lack WP:GNG -style direct and in-depth coverage.  DepreciateAppreciate ( talk ) 21:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 21:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Law ,  and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Businesspeople .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I lean toward delete ; but I'm wondering if his textbook "has made a significant impact in the area of higher education" per WP:NACADEMIC #4 (although the discussion under that bullet point suggest that meeting notability through that path requires " several books that are widely used as textbooks").  This is an area of academic law not within my experience, so I will refrain from an actual ! vote .  TJRC ( talk ) 00:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  We are thankful to the kamikaze account who created and posted up this text, just as we're thankful to Mr Barth himself for supplying his photographic portrait.  If only the text could be worthy of inclusion!  It is not, due to our subject's notable lack of independent notability .  We check the article and we search for sources but, alas, nothing of substance do we manage to scare up.  All we catch are routine listings in trade media, such as this ; online brochures , such as this ; a bunch of expired links , e.g. here , here , here ; and a few advertorials .  And WP:NACADEMIC is spectacularly failed.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not pass WP:NPROF by any stretch of the imagination.  An academic doing what academics do, but not notably.  Qflib ( talk ) 19:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Our article lists two books coauthored by him, but I only found one published review of one of them [1] .  If both had multiple reviews, we would at least have a weak case for WP:AUTHOR (weak because both coauthored), but one review of one book is definitely not enough.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree with above editors.  very weak news coverage.  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 16:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Srinwanti Chakrabarti: Promo BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found promo, interviews, nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 07:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Dance , India ,  and West Bengal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NENTERTAINER .  I was unable to find significant coverage of this dancer in reliable secondary sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 17:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion, relisting to establish clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 07:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my previous PROD and nom.  Also should be SALTed.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 18:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zandré Jordaan: All I found was a few sentences here and this press release.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A few squad announcements etc, but not really enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Rodriguez (writer and podcaster): Of the sources present in the article, 1 and 2 are brief mentions, and 3 is a book from a self-publishing source so is not reliable.  While the name is relatively common, I did run searches with several permutations of words related to the Beatles and the name of the podcast to narrow it down, and still cannot find sufficient reference material about this subject to indicate notability .  Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Music , Radio ,  and History .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He's (and his podcast) have been the subject of three Forbes articles.  https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamjeakle/2019/12/09/podcast/? sh=167e5f076ba1 https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamjeakle/2021/12/16/how-a-niche-podcast-landed-the-best-interview-with-beatles-get-back-director-peter-jackson/? sh=6b0e05c67727 https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamjeakle/2022/01/28/as-the-beatles-get-back-moves-to-theaters-director-peter-jackson-talks-next-steps/? sh=289eb3695295 2600:1008:A011:426B:2C21:5B4:7F7E:789E ( talk ) 15:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Those, I'm afraid, are by "Forbes contributors" , and as such are generally considered self-published and not reliable.  Also, two of them only briefly mention Rodriguez.  I did run across those while searching, but they wouldn't help toward notability.  Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Needs more to attain notability.  Analysing the sources per WP:THREE , the first source [1] gave nothing except talking about the Beatles which the Chicago tribune [2] also analysed.  The two sources were centered lessly on "his" podcast which did not pass WP:PODCAST .  Most of the books were self published and per WP: AUTHOR , doesn't confer notability.  The second source was from Google book link which is neither a reliable source but just a primary reference and the books also doesn't seem to cross WP: NBOOK .  The sources were few and the subject isn't notable!  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 00:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – WP:FORBESCON doesn't work, the Chicago Tribune article is direct quotes, a self-published book won't work, and the "The Beatles in Masculinity Study: Male Fandom Sustaining the Beatles' Success and Longevity" piece only cites work by this article's subject.  WP:SIGCOV is the issue here.  TLA tlak 14:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
G Square Housing Pvt Ltd: The main issue is that the sources are all press releases, none of them are independent, and the main editor seems to have a serious WP:COI and the article is far from neutral (e.g. the unsourced "pivotal moment" section).  Whether the company is actually notable is hard to tell due to the proliferation of paid-for "articles" in even many of the best Indian news sources, but in that case a WP:TNT scenario would be best, where a neutral editor creates the page based on independent sources.  Fram ( talk ) 08:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Fram ( talk ) 08:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello @ Fram , I hope you are doing well!  I'm new to Wikipedia article writing, and I want to ensure that I adhere to the guidelines, specifically avoiding any WP:COI with any company.  I'm currently working on creating a Wikipedia page for a real estate company based in Chennai, India.  I initially encountered some challenges with the title due to confusion surrounding the company's legal name.  In my attempt to gather information, I used Google as a source.  I later realized that adding press releases might not be appropriate.  However, I observed that many government department pages use press releases in PDF format as sources.  This led me to include press release sources in my initial draft.  I want to assure you that I am committed to rectifying any issues with the article myself.  If I cannot find reliable sources, I will refrain from including the content.  I appreciate your guidance in this matter.  Thank you!  Ramesh Chattrerjee1998 ( talk ) 08:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I've trimmed back the garbage press releases; one of them in a black-hat SEO "news" site.  I've looked for other sources, but this is a company that heavily buys paid placement; everything seems to be similar puffy advertorials.  I would usually say move it to draft, but it's been moved around before.  Sam Kuru (talk) 02:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] hello @ Kuru yes there are many promotional activities has been conducted by that company through PR, still there are n number of reliable sources too, i have  gathered them and i will  try to cite them instead.  Thank you for your contribution.  Ramesh Chattrerjee1998 ( talk ) 06:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Editor appears to be aware of COI and PE practices, yet does not submit articles through AfC.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 17:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lex Friedman: Most online results appear to be typos of the homophonous podcaster Lex Fridman signed, Rosguill talk 21:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Technology ,  and Pennsylvania .  signed, Rosguill talk 21:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable, as no sourcing found about this person.  Yes he hosts a podcast [10] , but the sources used are simply name drops.  The Hollywood Reporter source simply mentions he brokered a deal, talking about another unrelated thing.  Being mentioned, once, in a story about something different isn't notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That euronews.com source is in error: the podcaster who has AI-translated podcasts available on Spotify is Lex Fridman , not Lex Friedman ( source ).  I know, it confused me too.  Jfire ( talk ) 02:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Radio ,  and Advertising .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing any significant coverage.  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 02:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Earwolf is a podcast interview.  Verge and THR pieces are reliable, but passing mentions don't meet WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 02:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Alcácer do Sal (1191): All the sources that are cited mention (in passing) that the Almohads captured Alcácer do Sal and that's it.  Everything else in the article is WP:OR and fluff.  M.Bitton ( talk ) 18:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Spain .  M.Bitton ( talk ) 18:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , i.e., turn into a redirect.  No basis for a standalone article at present and sources for expansion have not been provided.  Srnec ( talk ) 23:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Martin Suchý: Under the keyword "Martin Suchý", search engine results almost come up with other men of that name, including an author from Denník N and another footballer from FK Přibram .  Without evidence of him even being an author and playing for FK Přibram, these cases clearly fail WP:V .  Sources that came up in my search regarding the AfD target were trial in Příbram , an interview by Deník , injury update , and another interview by SME that covers his current life .  In my opinion, none of them are independent coverage that signal WP:GNG .  Corresponding articles in other languages are unsourced stubs (I checked and translated them).  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 12:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Page fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib. ) 13:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and those above.  BD2412 T 13:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dynamite Obinna: Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NBIO .  GSS 💬 15:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  GSS 💬 15:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and nothing else to talk about here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per nom.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 18:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The first source says "This Account has been suspended." and the creator is now UPE/sock blocked which is indicative of the various issues with this article.  S0091 ( talk ) 18:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can’t find sources to establish notability.  The company he founded does not meet the general notability guidelines .  Best, Reading Beans 13:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pharma Medica: These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals.  The guideline, among other things, is meant to address some of the common issues with abusing Wikipedia for advertising and promotion.  As such, the guideline establishes generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article.  Pursuant to the above, the sources I gathered were all company announcements: no significant coverage.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 03:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Canada .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 03:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Originally a WP:SPA article in 2015, and substantially unchanged since, despite various IP edits, etc.  The given references are routine listings, announcement of the company purchasing software, and several items around the announcement of the opening of a Missouri site which appears to have subsequently closed: none of these are substantial coverage under WP:CORPDEPTH .  Searches also find some coverage of a legal action, but nothing to demonstrate notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 16:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
OrfeoGPL: GraziePrego ( talk ) 03:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Doesn't appear to be any significant coverage.  No references cited and the only links are to those behind the software.  Possible conflict of interest ?  User who created the article has no user page and their only contributions are to this article.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Pittsburgh Pirates home run leaders: We cannot realistically extend this to every other MLB team with every other stat (RBIs, wins, putouts, etc.).  Songwaters ( talk ) 02:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Baseball ,  and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; also delete List of Toronto Blue Jays home run leaders .  List of Major League Baseball home run leaders by team would be okay.  [20] Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTSTATS .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 23:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I suggest adding teams to List of Major League Baseball career home run leaders , then delete this.  Reywas92 Talk 13:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Any editor wanting to take suggestion to Merge content from this article to a list?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I mean, there's a story to be told about each team and these stats, just having a list of names doesn't cut it.  With no critical discussion around what the numbers mean, they're useless.  Delete is fine.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Laldingngheta: I found a squad list mention on Inkhel and then trivial mentions in New Indian Express , Sportskeeda and ISN .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Mizoram .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WebGain: 日期20220626 ( talk ) 04:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet , Software ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I am also not seeing any coverage on this company.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 23:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete