hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sher Shah Interchange: Reywas92 Talk 17:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment see previous AfD discussion (bundled, no consensus after minimal participation).  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 23:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 23:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Just a basic flyover MNewnham ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MadgeTech: Broc ( talk ) 17:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Engineering ,  and United States of America .  Broc ( talk ) 17:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and New Hampshire .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Bduke ( talk ) 23:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Non- WP:INDEPENDENT sources.  TLA (talk) 04:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yuri Agapov: Only sourced to databases.  Non database coverage is only this routine namecheck that has one sentence about him and player roster listing .  Kges1901 ( talk ) 15:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Kazakhstan ,  and Russia .  Kges1901 ( talk ) 15:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Agapov had two useful seasons in the Russian second division with FC Fakel and one good season in Kazakhstan with FC Shakhter, but I couldn't find any in-depth coverage (the sports.kz article linked above and a sovsport.ru article make very brief mentions, and there are several match reports with even less coverage).  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matthew Dobson: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete There is this and a couple of other bits from his time in England.  Personally don't think there is enough for a WP:GNG pass although close, and no suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as the Delete vote is a weak one Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adarsh Gramin Inter College: No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Thank for nom; we need a lot of such nominations Category:Intermediate colleges in Uttar Pradesh .  5.42.92.163 ( talk ) 16:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no references to support notability or quality.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 16:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ximena Solís: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2018 , 2019 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Peru .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andre Jackson (disambiguation): However, since the nomination resulted in " no consensus ", this dab page should be deleted per WP:ONEOTHER .  The entries for Andre Jackson and Andre Jackson Jr. already have hatnotes pointing to each other, thus making the dab page superfluous.  — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEOTHER .  — siro χ o 19:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Unless there becomes another Andre Jackson to receive a wikipedia article, this isn't needed.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEOTHER .  SWinxy ( talk ) 00:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  No hesitation or doubt from me, as I'm now seen a frustrating trend here on WP about the rush to create DAB pages with only 2 current entries.  Should a 3rd come later, no one will doubt.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Piala Belia: The only reference is from February 2023 and states that the tournament is scheduled.   That doesn't make it notable.   Mostly this article reports unverified scores of games.  Verifiability in Wikipedia is necessary; it is not a nice-to-have.   This article has already been moved to draft space twice, and so should not be moved to draft space unilaterally a third time, and besides there are now two copies, one in draft space and one in article space.   The article should be deleted from article space and left in draft space.   The Heymann criterion is to provide real up-to-date sourcing rather than just move-warring .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 22:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Football ,  and Malaysia .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 22:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Devoke water 18:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sober & Lonely Institute for Contemporary Art: Nearly all of the references are either deadlinks or do not mention the subject.  The "official" website leads to an online gambling site.  Both of the individuals mentioned appear to be (non WP:N) artists.  Cl3phact0 ( talk ) 16:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Organizations .  Cl3phact0 ( talk ) 16:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - has been tagged for notability for ten years.  WP:NCORP , WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST fail.  Netherzone ( talk ) 19:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wix site, a tumblr blog and not really much else for this "institute" found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The people mentioned in the article appear to be the artists Dr Robyn Cook and Lauren von Gogh .  Whether either meets WP:BIO criteria in their own right (in any context and enough to merit a stand-alone article), I can't say, however, the Sober & Lonely Institute for Contemporary Art (abbreviated as S&L by Dr Cook in the above) does not appear to pass any WP:N criteria, and I stand by the AfD nomination.  -- Cl3phact0 ( talk ) 09:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the current domain is a site about online gambling that dates back to 2021.  As recently as 2020, www.soberandlonely.org was a broken link .  This article dates back to 2014.  So in addition to notability concerns, this organization appears to be abandoned.  Crystalholm ( talk ) 18:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cherokee Trail Arboretum: Nothing much found which could be considered against the notability criteria.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Greetings!  I created this article many years ago.  As I don't live anywhere nearby, it must have been based on something in books or Internet, but just now I've done a quick hunt and can't find anything relevant for this article.  Perhaps someone that lives closer can add references?  Anyway, I agree with the points that you've made.  with best wishes, Daderot ( talk ) 11:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Geography .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The WP:BEFORE search brought up so little, including in local newspapers, that I'm not even sure the article's title is the correct search term.  SportingFlyer T · C 01:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahalevakanda: Low effort article with no notability.  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails verification per WP:V .  The only source provided in the article is a very general link to the Sri Lankan office of statistics.  It is not at all clear where you are supposed to look on that very extensive website in order to find information about the subject.  After clicking through a number of windows I tried downloading the 2011 Housing and Population survey from the website but it failed to open, and I also note it is described as being based on a 5% sample which makes me wonder if it really will contain any information about this supposed village as apparently only 5% of Sri Lanka was surveyed.  The location given in the article is a random location in the village of Kawudupelella .  From experience, this article was probably created based on data from GEONet Names Server, which is an unreliable source for this purpose .  FOARP ( talk ) 09:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 362#GEOnet Names Server (GNS) Thanks for this link.  very helpful Hongsy ( talk ) 12:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ FOARP Thanks for going through each nom in detail.  Is there really a need to nominate the other Iran villages, one by one, or can we ask admin to bulk delete?  Hongsy ( talk ) 12:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The issue is that whilst it was easy to get consensus to delete the unpopulated abadi , and the abadi with names that clearly indicated that they weren't villages, the remaining ones are harder to get consensus to delete.  For the location articles sourced only to GNS in e.g., Sri Lanka, the objection is always going to be that some of them may be improvable, despite many, many of them failing verification.  FOARP ( talk ) 13:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shalkal Carty: 6 Google News hits from really non-notable sources, and that's it.  A desperate attempt to raise the profile of the subject.  Fred Zepelin ( talk ) 03:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music .  Fred Zepelin ( talk ) 03:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Bands and musicians , Dance , Jamaica ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , only primary sources located.  Mach61 ( talk ) 04:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, There seems to be more than enough references to keep a posting about Shalkal Carty.  I think that the page certainly is within the realm of the spirit of Wikipedia.  Feerfox ( talk ) 15:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please check the sockpuppet discussion involving this voter.  Fred Zepelin ( talk ) 21:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Feerfox has been confirmed as a sockpuppet.  I feel confident that striking that vote is in order.  Fred Zepelin ( talk ) 01:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , The article has been written in a neutral point of view and needs citation for the points that lack them.  It should be have been tagged with need for verification rather than asking for deletion of the page.  Showergirl ( talk ) 16:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, The article satisfies all Wikipedia guidelines and meet requirements for notability.  It should be kept for future improvements by editors Augmere40 ( talk ) 14:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Constitutional Pentumvirate of Kaz: 2003 LN 6 22:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No coverage I can find BrigadierG ( talk ) 22:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found no evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG .  Please ping me if good sources are identified.  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 19:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  I comment only to salute the amazing name of this real truly not fake country. -- Milowent • has spoken 16:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baku International Humanitarian Forum: It was re-created by a new account in one of their first edits in 2018.  There is nothing that indicates that this is a notable forum.  There is no independent reliable sourcing of this initiative by the Russian and Azerbaijani states.  The only coverage is by Russian and Azerbaijani state outlets.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 11:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Azerbaijan .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with nom, most of the article refs fails WP:IS, the remaining refs are questionable based on NPOV.  There are two routine mill news stories, #1 appears to be the only ref meeting guidelines, but the sources for the information the article is based on fail WP:IS.  If I'm wrong, ping me with clearly WP:IS sources with NPOV WP:SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 04:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Soft deletion is not an option here so I hope for more participation.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails NORG.  Owen× ☎ 22:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hugo Pingray: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and can be argued this is a WP:BIO1E .  Nothing notable here.  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per UtherSRG.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 10:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oscar Gualdoni: Article does not meet WP:SPORTSBASIC or WP:GNG and there does not appear to be WP:SIGCOV on the subject.  Highest level of success appears playtime at the second level of the Chilean system and third level of the Argentine system.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Argentina .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  However, saying it is unreferenced is not correct.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete