hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Keyton: Even inside Fujian Motors Group sources are low quality.  I couldn't find better sources ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk ) 12:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and China .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Delete per WP:ROTM and WP:GNG and no RS found.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pulse CMS: Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : all I could find in independent sources is a one-line entry here .  Owen× ☎ 16:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not seeing any significant or reliable sources -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 00:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or WP:TNT , reads too much like advertising.  Jothefiredragon ( talk ) 03:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jambu Maharishi: Google search brings up nothing.  No second reliable review.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 07:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Done.Kindly please put in draft.  Monhiroe ( talk ) 08:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 09:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lacks sources, significance and notability.  Neutral Fan ( talk ) 13:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Take_Diversion , My Dear Lisa these pages existent with 1 reviews.  It may also be live.  Comment - 2 reliable reviews is not necessary when you have in-depth/multiple production sources from reliable sources such as The Times of India , etc. which this article is lacking.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 10:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
EvoWorld.io: No sources in article, BEFORE showed only promo.  Game had a name change and I checked under the previous name and didn't find anything except promo.  Draft:EvoWorld.io already exists but also lacks sources and submission was declined on 22 March 2023.  CSD doesn't apply to cross name space dups.  Based on the similarity between this article now [38] and the declined draft, its obvioius this is a recreation of a declined AfC submission.  Creator has created a cross namespace redirect from the draft to mainspace.  [39] // Timothy :: talk 13:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find any WP:RS coverage or reviews Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources, entirely promotional.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 17:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I saw this in WP:NPP and was pondering a PROD as I broadly concur with the nom statement, however no problem if we look at the WP:AFD route instead.  Coverage seems limited to promotional material only and not what is necessary to suitably assert notability.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 17:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTPROMO applies.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete G11.   Non-notable UPE spam.  Uhai ( talk ) 05:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because of the lack of sources.  Might be promotional, but I'm not sure.  RteeeeKed 💬 📖 22:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable, but WP:TNT applies even if good sources are found.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I did not find RS.  Lightburst ( talk ) 01:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andy Houts: Small voice acting roles and some behind the scenes work.  Was created and kept almost 20 years ago, when Wikipedia was a very different place.  A WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing meaningful.  Wikipedia is WP:NOTMEMORIAL .  Newshunter12 ( talk ) 04:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Pinging all none perma-banned participants of the original AfD: @ Soundoflolllermania , @ Andrew Lenahan , @ dryguy , @ Musaabdulrashid , @ Tychocat , @ Jacqui , @ rootology , @ Mailer Diablo .  Newshunter12 ( talk ) 04:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Comics and animation , United States of America ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral - It all depends on how one interprets the job title of Production assistant and Production coordinator , which were this person's main contributions.  The kind of background person who often carries the production on their shoulders while the stars and directors get the credits.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find nothing to support the accolades in the article.  The only place I can find him mentioned is in IMDB where he is mainly listed as "additional crew" on a number of television shows.  He also did some voice work, as listed there.  But I didn't find sources about him, and definitely nothing that would support the current article.  I did search the LA Times archive which is about as good as I can get for entertainment news, and the general ebsco stuff.  Lamona ( talk ) 04:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ankit Kayal: The sources are not reliable MaximumRespect!  MrFixer200 ( talk ) 20:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  MaximumRespect!  MrFixer200 ( talk ) 20:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep 2409:4073:95:7E50:0:0:857:A8AC ( talk ) 20:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7, G11, G5, take your pick.  It's spam for an unremarkable physician, by this week's sockpuppet of Btw Santhosh, and larded as usual with Santhosh's dire news-skinned blogs.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 20:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Wikishovel , please kindly check newly added References !!  and please close Articles for deletion/Ankit Kayal if its meeting wiki guidelines द्वारा ( talk ) 11:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Rajasthan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:GNG .  Youknow?  ( talk ) 07:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] kindly check https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934280/ द्वारा ( talk ) 11:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] kindly check newly added References !!  द्वारा ( talk ) 11:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .   No knocks against him, but he's not a notable physician, academic, or person.  Ira Leviton ( talk ) Delete : From what I can see, most of the references provided are promotional and/or are self-published (you can clearly see from the last and first names of research articles) that are not independent of the subject.  Haruka Amaranth 02:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as nom and points made above, certainly not notable as yet.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 07:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Donde Stars: No obvious WP:ATD .  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NBAND .  Got some minor local coverage but never more than that.  Jfire ( talk ) 20:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amos Omeje: I can find nothing other than database sources like Playmaker Stats and a stats-only scorecard like ABC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  I can't also find less or any coverage about him.  Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP: SIGCOV Otuọcha ( talk ) 04:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Per Criteria 5 , I believe it's far way from meeting it since they are sports database and an article from Goal.com .  Well, it clearly states, "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. It is not a requirement for notability...".  Besides, the article was not independent of the subject.  So fails all WP: ATHLETE .  From another perspective, the article clearly lack sourcing and much can't be related from the Internet.  Hence, it fails WP: GNG .  Otuọcha ( talk ) 04:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Clearly fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 23:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above.  Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chang Gum-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and WP:ATHLETE .  While it may be true there’s not much coverage due to the player being part of North Korea this does not matter due to WP:CRYSTAL .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 11:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Nagol0929 .  History6042 ( talk ) 13:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 05:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC) Delete: Without additional WP:SIGCOV , this subject fails all notability guidelines.  User:Let'srun 00:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable (fails WP:ATHELETE ).  ~~ 2NumForIce ( speak | edits ) 21:36, 16 September 2023 (UTC) (edited 21:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC): close parenthesis) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Barry (jailor): No more sources found in online which can pass GNG.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  02:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police , India ,  and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per above.  Not notable enough.  killer bee 05:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'm curious as to why the nominator does not think that the five sources currently in the article are enough to pass WP:GNG .  –– Formal Dude (talk) 05:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As a far as I can see the article does not indicate anything other than his occupation as a jailer at Cellular Jail and thus no  notability aside from that.  This would not seem to be enough notability for a stand alone article.  An alternate possibility would be to redirect to Cellular Jail .  Dunarc ( talk ) 23:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quixote's Cove: Boleyn ( talk ) 20:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Companies .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 23:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seems like a lovely bookshop but it doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG .  Jfire ( talk ) 02:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not too much coverage to meet notability.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 22:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kitsch (magazine): It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Journalism ,  and Literature .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , with a little regret because this article has more "to" it than I'd expect given that this is a student magazine.  Nonetheless, I can only find two secondary sources (both in the article itself, [19] and [20] ) -- which are both also student publications, and questionably independent given that both are from universities whose students contribute to Kitsch.  I don't see GNG coverage here.  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 23:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ray Mueller (politician): The notability claim here is as a city and county councillor, which is not a level of office that guarantees "inherent" notability to every holder of it -- politicians at the local levels of government have to pass NPOL #2, where the notability test hinges on writing and sourcing a substantive article about their political impact (specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their work had on the development of the city/county, etc.) rather than just verifying that they exist.  But as written, this effectively just states that he exists and verifies his local election results, while containing absolutely none of the type of content that is actually required to establish the notability of a local councillor, and is referenced to a mix of primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, and community hyperlocals within the county being cited only to verify that he campaigned for and/or won election to the job rather than analyzing his work in the job.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to be written and sourced more substantially than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:POLITICIAN - Vapid credentials, in the claim that he's won some low-level elections, but I can't find anything in the way of accomplishments.  For instance ( https://www smcgov.org/district-3), "We are working every day to improve the quality of life for all San Mateo Residents".  Like what?   What is he doing?   Article was created by an IP's only contribution to Wikipedia.  — Maile ( talk ) 19:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Delete per the nomination and editor comments above.  Minor official who fails WP:NPOL guidelines.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 13:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete his local office is not inherently notable and he doesn't seem to have any other claim to notability.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Neither the office nor the office holder are notable.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 12:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdil Ceylan: It is possible that it was once notable, but not anymore.  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 15:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 15:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:10, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trimayne Harris: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete