hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Josh Fusitua: JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and New Zealand .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Think there's just about enough when sourcing snippets are combined, such as this , this , this among others.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For future reference, a database profile and two primary sources do not come close to meeting GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per JTtheOG, can't see any thorough coverage of this person.  David Palmer aka cloventt ( talk ) 02:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is a young player at the beginning of his career and he is playing regularly for the Blues now.  There are already more sources available about this player than used for this stub and it is foreseeable that there will be more written about him in the future.  Ruggalicious ( talk ) 23:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ruggalicious : Which sources did you find?  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It would be helpful to get a review of sources establishing GNG.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
2024 Pakistani provincial elections: Saqib ( talk ) 11:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Lists ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with nom, plus we have separate election articles for each provincial assembly.  Sh eri ff | ☎ 911 | 12:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It seems like a useful disambiguator to me?  SportingFlyer T · C 16:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We have Template:Pakistani general election, 2024 .  -- Saqib ( talk ) 17:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We also have functionally the same page at 2018 Pakistani provincial elections . SportingFlyer T · C 10:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It's a useful DAB article and something to point {{ Pakistani elections }} to. Number 5 7 09:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There are 4 internal links in page, which are already in Template:Pakistani general election, 2024.-- Ameen Akbar ( talk ) 17:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep –This article serves as a valuable disambiguator, given that every Pakistani provincial election has one.  Moreover, it addresses the limitation of templates like {{ Pakistani elections }} not displaying on the mobile version.  Ainty Painty ( talk ) 05:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a useful DAB page, per Number 57 and Ainty Painty.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 17:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  "It's useful" is an argument to be avoided in AFDLand.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
My Summer As A Salvation Soldier: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 01:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Subject passes WP:GNG with significant coverage in the Icelandic media such as these [5] [6] [7] [8] .  Alvaldi ( talk ) 09:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 06:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Around the world (card game): Shellwood ( talk ) 11:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land mine (drinking game) .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Carolinas Sports Entertainment Television: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Basketball , North Carolina ,  and South Carolina .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Outright deletion does not seem necessary, since this could at least be a redirect to one of several articles (like Charlotte Hornets , where the network is already discussed in the media coverage section).  The basic facts of the network's existence are easily verifi able by a quick look in Google Books.  I suspect that this article  does have potential beyond a redirect, since the network served a major media market and carried an NBA team, albeit briefly.  Zagal e jo ( talk ) 01:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There appears to be enough coverage to support a standalone article on the subject, such as [ [1] ], [ [2] ], [ [3] ], [ [4] ], and [ [5] ] just for starters.  I'd say this meets the WP:GNG , but at the very least this should be redirected.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:00, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 22:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Cinta yang tak Sederhana: Fails WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 22:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Refresh Bolivia: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Not much info available, doesn't meet WP:ORG .  Spagooder ( talk ) 16:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I created the paper some years ago.  I made a quick search and found sources like [10] , [11] , [12] .  I suggest keeping the article in light of the mentioned sources.  -- M h hossein talk 16:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 13:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Anthonios Yaqu'b: Search for sources (string: "anthonios yaqub") turns up nothing.  — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Christianity ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: The sources have been fixed to not be dead; the first is of unknown authorship and the second doesn't discuss Yaqu'b in depth (though "Yaq'ub" gets name-dropped a fair bit).  — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Diocesan bishops of major denominations have generally been held to be notable.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you point me to a specific policy or discussion that supports that position? Bear in mind WP:BLP also applies here! — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES illustrates the consensus. BLP is irrelevant as to his notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I don't know much about Syriac Orthodox Church but heading a Metropolice  of a major city Manglore satisfies WP:CLERGY .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  06:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Yevhen Kholoniuk: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ukraine .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bgsu98 , don't WP:NSKATE favour collaboration per criterion 3.  I can reasonably see collaborations which yield winning a German Championship.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  01:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  02:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
The Venture Bros.: The Music of JG Thirlwell: I could only find one review and it seems to only be noteworthy in the context of being the soundtrack to a popular show.  Sources listed are primary or just a listing.  I think a redirect to The_Venture_Bros. #Soundtrack_CD would be appropriate.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 02:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 02:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Plenty of significant coverage of this release: " JG Thirlwell Explains How He Brings Villains and Comedy to Life in the Music of 'The Venture Bros' " " Meet JG Thirlwell, the Musical Genius Behind ‘Venture Bros.’ " " Sounds Heard: The Venture Bros.—The Music of JG Thirlwell " " The Venture Brothers: The Music of JG Thirlwell (2009) " Two interviews about the music and two reviews of the set is enough to pass WP:GNG .  — Torchiest talk edits 02:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 11:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department: Doesn't have in-depth secondary coverage, by notability for organizations and companies ; sources are just the fire department, news reports on the lightbulb (which has its own article), and run-of-the-mill local news coverage of the fire department.  Also see run-of-the-mill .  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 17:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 17:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I did find [ this ], but I don't think it qualifies for an article.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 17:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : I don't care if this is notable.  This is run-of-the-mill too.  CastJared ( talk ) 08:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The article on the Fire Department provides a splash page for anyone reading on the Centennial Lightbulb.  I do agree that the article overall is bland...but I think we could definitely do some work on it.  After all, the page for one of Pleasanton's high schools is a featured article.  BLITZKRIEGCAT ( talk ) 03:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
John Maizels: The notability tag has been on this page for 10 years, and since then, he doesn't seem to have grown notable at all (I performed the preliminary search, nothing covering this individual in depth).  The article is also written like it's meant to advertise the work of this individual, rather than cover an actually notable individual.  Jaguarnik ( talk ) 20:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Raw Vision magazine.  This person isn't notable; all coverage relates to his involvement with the magazine [1] , [2] , [3] .  It's always John from the magazine, never anything about him as a person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Visual arts ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  WL Ebsco search appears to show at least one mainstream review of his book Raw Creation: Outsider Art and Beyond in The Atlantic (Adams, Phoebe-Lou. Atlantic. Nov96, Vol. 278 Issue 5, p121-122.) and Proquest is coming up with a short review of L'Art Brut in Le Monde (L'ART BRUT, de John Maizels Le Monde; Paris. 05 Dec 2003: 3.), so possible notability as an author, if a couple of other reviews could be found?  At very least could be redirected, retaining history, so that if someone does uncover sufficient book reviews &c it can be reconstructed.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 03:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Redirect to Raw Vision .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Jamil Kusiima: Theroadislong ( talk ) 12:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Uganda .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Cebrenii: ltb d l ( talk ) 08:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  ltb d l ( talk ) 08:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Also called Kebrenioi .  And you have to search "Cebrenian(s)" as well.  Enough independent mentions and mentions in RS to merit a short article.  Srnec ( talk ) 00:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] After some looking, this could be merged with Cebrene or Cebrenia .  We have three articles are closely related topics.  Srnec ( talk ) 00:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  09:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 09:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Merdeka Memorial Clock Tower, Kulim: No sources to describe the significance; two news sources provide evidence in cursory coverage that it was constructed but no detail to constitute WP:SIGCOV .  WP:BEFORE search turns up no additional evidence of notability.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 00:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Plenty of hits about the clock tower in the Singapore National Library, such as [27] , but it seems you need to open them on-site in order to be able to read the articles.  I've been able to pull these up [28] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for looking at this @ Oaktree b .  There are actually numerous merdeka (aka "independence") towers/monuments in Malaysia, and this article is specifically about the one in Kulim.  The searches you linked are for other cities' merdeka towers.  A search adding "Kulim" brings up just the one cursory result already sourced in the article, see here .  Just sharing in case this info changes your ! vote; thanks!  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 02:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ● Keep - Found a few more sources to establish notability.  https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model/ce1b4842-51cd-4107-891f-94cb820ff093/Merdeka-Clock-Tower-kulim-kedah https://www.pressreader.com/malaysia/the-star-malaysia-star2/20180825/281513637011166 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 14:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Your first source is just a 3D model of the building.  What makes you think this is a reliable source or provides significant coverage?  What does this add to the article?  Reywas92 Talk 15:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Both sources each have a paragraph about the place.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 18:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think what @ Reywas92 may be getting at is that that 3D model page is user-generated content .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 19:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If found non-notable/deleted, it could be copied entirely into Kulim District .  CMD ( talk ) 07:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there is still no consensus.  Is the last comment advocating a Merge to Kulim District ?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus