hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
WQAW-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Maryland .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete : This is one of the few HC2/Innovate stations that in theory should have "more" to talk about, being once part of the Una Vez Más group of Azteca América affiliates.  In practice, though, it still has a thin enough history that it wound up another technical survivor of last year's bulk nomination , and if the Azteca version of the station attained no significant coverage , it's a safe bet the HC2/Innovate version hasn't and won't.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to prior bundled AfD .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom, fails GNG and NCORP.  No WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BEFORE found routine mill news, nothing that meets SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 17:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kelly Lorencz: The PPC is very much a 4th place party in Canada, being associated with it doesn't bring much to notability (as would any party functionary).  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unsuccessful election candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, and regional party functionaries do not get Wikipedia articles just for being regional functionaries, but the article is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all and features none of the reliable source coverage about him in real media that would be necessary to establish that he passed WP:GNG for anything.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Poorly sourced and as stated, unsuccessful candidates are not automatically eligible for articles given the routine coverage they would receive.  SportingFlyer T · C 16:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to People's Party of Canada.  Moondragon21 ( talk ) 20:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL with a complete lack of secondary sources.  User:Let'srun 22:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Centre for Asian Strategic Studies-India: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 01:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and India .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Terrorism , Economics , Africa ,  and Asia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Do gole kože: Charsaddian ( talk ) 17:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kalavida (2021 film): No independent notability/reviews.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 21:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:56, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 21:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lake Zamkaft: Even the solitary source cited in the article (which is a dead link to an unreliable source) doesn't mention it.  I'm leaning towards "deliberate hoax" on this one.  〜 Festucalex • talk 16:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Geography .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Perhaps it is not supposed to be a physical place.  I posted a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam .  Perhaps someone who knows more about Islam will be able to clarify this.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Eastmain : I am a Hafiz , and yet I have never heard of anything even close to this.  I hope someone from the wikiproject knows something about it.  If it isn't a hoax, it's probably some poorly-attested thing from an obscure Sufi tariqa .  〜 Festucalex • talk 17:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree that this is a hoax.  Article body mentions a body of water, using some "Barak", flying... none of these things are mentioned at Isra' and Mi'raj .  Can't find sources either.  Snowmanonahoe ( talk · contribs · typos ) 17:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : This article is a hoax.  Hoaxes aren't allowed on Wikipedia at all.  CastJared ( talk ) 19:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have been hearing traditional stories of Isra and Mi'raj from religious scholars since my childhood days and I have never come across this name.  I tried to find an Urdu-language equivalent but miserably failed.  I am not sure if anything exists in Arabic language.  fwiw, this does not meet the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia.  If anything helpful comes up, I would support a redirect to Isra' and Mi'raj as an ATD.  Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 04:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ TheAafi : I can easily tell you that "Zamkaft" ( Arabic : زَمْكَفْتْ؟؟؟؟؟ ) isn't Arabic.  〜 Festucalex • talk 09:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Festucalex , I am aware of that much Arabic and have studied it to that level.  I am talking about that my searches don't bring any result but I am not sure either of something existing on this topic.  I am not either saying the word is an Arabic one but I mean to say "the coverage about it".  There's apparently nothing that I could find.  ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sergey Ulyanov: No google books hits, article is a CV likely written by the subject.  Kges1901 ( talk ) 13:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Businesspeople ,  and Russia .  Kges1901 ( talk ) 13:21, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete wikipedia is not linkedin.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment CV-like article, but was he a professor, and therefore does he meet WP:NPROF ?  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 18:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC , as Ulyanov does not have a named chair or similar.  His contributions are surely significant in some niches, but not to his discipline at large.  Akakievich ( talk ) 20:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marcelo Altamirano: A Chilean source search yields mostly social media and an empty ESPN profile page.  He has a few namesakes in sports, who don't seem notable either, but may confuse you if searching.  The man described in Uno Entre Ríós is a PE teacher from Argentina born in 1988, so cannot be the same person as this Chilean goalkeeper.  Likewise, the man described in El Esquiú was a vice president of a federation back in 1980, so it's impossible for him to be the same person as this Altamirano.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Chile .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Brief career, not notable enough .  -- Bedivere ( talk ) 00:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 18:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 06:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anton Kind: Sources in article have no information about the subject, so this is an unsourced BLP.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and in-depth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 23:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olatunji Adeola: I have searched all combinations of Olatunde/Olatunji Adeola Waidi, including changing the name order, and found no useful coverage.  All I can find is the same Sky Sports article already used.  It's a passing mention so does not comply with WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 09:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nominator's rationale.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No claim of notability as the texts aren't verifiable.  No source for WP:SIGCOV .  Doesn't meet any criteria at all per WP:ANYBIO or WP:THREE which may serve as a good case for WP:ATD .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
E-Dyario: No references found from GNews, GNews Archives and GBooks.  Note that there might be Spanish language sources that I can't read/found.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 04:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Basic search revealed nothing with SIGCOV.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 04:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Delete : The corresponding spanish article have three independent citation which shows it is likely notable but I can't find it passing WP:SIGCOV .  GAGIWOR ( talk ) 04:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gay.co.nz: In a web search and investigation of available newspapers, only two potential sources were found: a survey output which did not discuss the website, but did include it in a list of websites when asking gay men about their use of various websites ( PDF ), and a guide book with only the line “Provides travel information aimed at gay, lesbian and bisexual visitors, and vets businesses for standards of service and hospitality.” (see in book search: [21] ).  Personally, I do not see this as sufficient to meet “significant coverage”.  For comparison, a similar site, gaynz.com, did at some point at least gain coverage in NZ media: [22] — HTGS ( talk ) 03:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sexuality and gender ,  and Websites .  — HTGS ( talk ) 03:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Traumnovelle ( talk ) 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jason Ebanks: I can find no coverage of this player online or in Cayman Islands media.  It seems he does not meet GNG.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , Football ,  and United Kingdom .  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Urbain Andriamampionona: No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simon Lauru: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 14:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 14:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Monash Student Association: Mainly mentioned in passing (student association president comments, etc.) in news articles about the university.  WP scatter t / c 05:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  WP scatter t / c 05:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:26, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete coverage seems to be about someone saying something on behalf of the organisation, but no WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agreed, this is PROMO.  Non-notable organization.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Or redirect to the university I suppose.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Division I FBS broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS that is not a dead link; tem of those are WP:PRIMARY to teams, two of those are 404 and two are staff roster pages; two of those are about announcers and one leads to a home page.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this nor have anything to with this list.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment radio is not TV. - UCO2009bluejay ( talk ) 03:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Radio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete