hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Barry Zoeller: Fails the general and journalist-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism , United States of America , Iowa ,  and Missouri .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khoshaba Lawo: Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the only detailed (but very brief) English source I found about him was a WP:BLOG .  I tried looking for Arabic sources.  There was barely any RS, and I doubt much of them were about him, since some were Assyrian grammar books and similar material unrelated to soccer.  Aintabli ( talk ) 03:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Madhabpur Model High School: BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 04:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Bangladesh .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This is disappointing.  I can't find reliable sources references either, but nobody would say "This is a school like any other in Nebraska".  The current standards for notability of schools tend to exclude most schools in places like Bangladesh except for a handful of schools for children of the rich, while American high schools are usually notable because of extensive coverage of scandals, high school sports and murders.  :-( People might not have fully realized this during the 2017 discussions about school notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 05:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply: no offense is meant.  You are right.  I live in a country like Bangladesh where poverty is sadly commomplace and, as you say, schools do an effective enough job without the types of cost-intensive activities that might bring media and other attention.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 05:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Indeed, Eastmain 'tis a grave concern that such sterling institutions, as these apparently reputable schools, find no place in our esteemed annals.  Ought we not to question the rule that stifles these voices, thereby enforcing a lamentable Anglospheric bias?  I urge my fellows to consider: does this not belie our mission to bestow knowledge upon the world, unabridged?  A reconsideration of these guidelines would strike a blow for global equity, and thus, I humbly suggest, elevate the dignity of our collective endeavour.  As it stands, a delete vote is inevitable for its alignment with our lamentable inclusion policy.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If it had a Bengali article with sources I'd reconsider.  But as it stands it fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NSCHOOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historical Heritages of Bihar ( talk • contribs ) 18:14, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dauki Union , the community where it is located, per WP:ATD .  It is one of three secondary schools there (the others being Bademaju Badal Smrity Academy and Bashira Malik Dawki Secondary School).  [23] Listing them there could improve the union article.  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 14:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG , if someone wants to redirect it, they can add it to the community article (since it is not mentioned there), and create a redirect.  Onel 5969 TT me 19:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SELEX Galileo (Saudi Arabia): WP:BEFORE turns up routine coverage of the company's set up in Saudi Arabia.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 13:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Saudi Arabia ,  and Italy .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 13:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Searches find routine announcement-based coverage confirming continuing commercial activity by Selex ES Saudi Arabia Ltd then Leonardo SpA but neither these nor the corporate website provide strong indication that this subsidiary has attained specific notability .  A redirect to Leonardo S.p.A. or Selex ES might be an alternative outcome but this old name seems relatively remote and lacking history worth maintaining.  AllyD ( talk ) 13:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of notability.  15:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Chittorgarh (1544): Instead, it focuses more on unrelated events such as the other conquests of Sher Shah and the Battle of Harmoda (1557).  While some sources briefly mention Sher Shah's attention towards Mewar in 1544, there is no substantial coverage of a proper siege of Chittorgarh in these sources.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 05:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , India ,  and Rajasthan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello!  Here are a few sources mentioning the SIEGE OF CHITTOR 1544 A.D. As the nominator mentioned:The sources regarding the title/heading of article will be:- Quotation :- 1544 A.D. by offering his nominal submission to Shershah the Maharana averted a siege of Chittor .  [38] pg.169  I hope nominator have examined the article thoroughly and than questioned about its context?  I have attached around 14 sources for the article completely dealing with the context of the article completely For further assistance I am attaching a few more sources so that nominator can easily get the context.  [39] Pg.181 [40] Pg.A53 [41] Pg-529 [42] Pg.76 [43] This article neither contains any unreliable source nor dealing with any unrelated topics.Battle of Harmoda,As mentioned above is completely related to the topic.The commander Haji khan and Shams khan were left by Sher shah  to face the Udai singh that must be mentioned and the aftermath should also being mentioned.  Kemilliogolgi ( talk ) 06:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) —

Discussion outcome: delete
Damien Dernoncourt: Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no in-depth coverage in independent, reliable sources to be found.  There are some mentions in PR, which aren't sufficient to meet WP:GNG or any other notability standard.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 13:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marat Kenzhebulatov: He's also a 'world champion' in the master division of a tournament that appears to have given out gold medals to dozens of entrants.  Nswix ( talk ) 23:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Kazakhstan .  Nswix ( talk ) 23:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE - Not enough for BJJ notability as an athlete or a coach.  As an athlete he would need to have medalled at adult black belt level (not Masters) at an elite international competition (IBJJF Mundials , Euros , Pans or Brasileiros ) none are listed here .  As a coach he would need to have coached more than one notable athlete or introduced a notable technique or training method.  I also could not find any coverage of his book by reliable sources.  Lewolka ( talk ) 12:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable BJJ athlete.  Sourcing Lacks independent, in-depth coverage in both English and Russian.  Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 14:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Coverage fails WP:GNG and his successes do not show WP notability.   His two SJJIF world championships both came in senior (aka master) divisions where he was the only entrant.   His European bronze medal was in a senior purple belt division.  Papaursa ( talk ) 16:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tyrone Pandy: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV whatsoever anywhere.  Questionable notability.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chadwick Russell: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bahamas .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pardi (lecturer): B-Factor ( talk ) 08:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators ,  and Indonesia .  B-Factor ( talk ) 08:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are five sources I haven't included that could prove he's notable.  It's just that I'm feeling lazy at this moment, maybe could u move it to draft first instead of immediately deleting it?  SoilMineo39 ( talk ) 08:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SoilMineo39 , if you can demonstrate notability, then now is the time to do so.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 13:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NPROF and WP:BIO.  Not yet notable, but best of luck to him with his commendable charity work.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is any support for Draftification.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Little sign of WP:NPROF .   The sources listed in the article have passing mentions, but little more; I also have concerns about the reliability of the publication venues.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 10:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Red Crescent Rupayan Tower: M.parvage ( talk ) 10:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It will be or is the second-tallest building in Dhaka so I am very surprised that it would not be notable, but I can't find clear GNG sources on it in English.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Even if you find a link on it, This info should be putted in the List of tallest buildings in Bangladesh and List of tallest buildings in Dhaka .  Not an individual page.  M.parvage ( talk ) 13:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Circa 2013 it was promised to be 35 stories high, but as of July 2022 it was planned to be only 15 stories.  [33] If construction ever begins (it was still awaiting planning approval), enough may be written about it to make it notable, but for now it's WP:TOOSOON .  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 19:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Boxford Rovers Football Club: Of the references, only this is an independent, non-database source (the Nayland & Wiston site cited does not mention the club, just the location if plays at).  I will leave it to the closing admin to decide whether the deprodder needs a good trouting.  Number 5 7 00:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Beyond the Suffolk News article I couldn't find any coverage in sources that weren't databases or closely related to the club.  ULPS ( talk • contribs ) 03:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could it be covered in the Boxford, Suffolk article.  Personally I've never heard of this team even though I know Boxford well.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 19:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Caravaggio to Canaletto: This is not evident from the text.  Furthermore, the article gives no independent, substantive coverage.  I think therefore that the topic fails wp:gng Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 03:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hungary and Italy .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 03:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Museums and libraries .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment' I found a handful of reviews but not sure they're enough as they're contemporary with the exhibit and like the non said, don't demonstrate lasting impact.  The article itself is almost certainly copypasta from the museum's english website, although the page isn't in any of the internet archives to cross check.  Star Mississippi 14:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 04:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as a routine temporary exhibition such as every gallery and museum holds, all the time.  All such exhibitions get press mentions at the time (otherwise no one would know to go to them!) and some get passing mentions in other contexts from time to time afterwards, but for a stand-alone article we need some in depth sourcing.  Elemimele ( talk ) 07:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding reliable sources to show why this particular show is notable.  There is more coverage about the catalog than the show. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 02:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Percy Cup: No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Stats only article.   The only sources are results/scores of games.   The only text is just factoids that it existed.  Tagged by others for notability since June 2023.  North8000 ( talk ) 14:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are hundreds of articles about the cup in the Australian newspapers (trove.nla.gov.au) going back to its establishment in 1923, but almost all are in The North Western Courier, the regional paper, and mostly these are only fixtures/match reports, from which it is difficult to determine the level of notability.  The Courier probably never thought it necessary to publish an in-depth article on the history of this reserve/second-grade competition as the local people would be familiar with it, and other than brief mentions in The Sun and The SMH nobody else seemed interested.  EdwardUK ( talk ) 16:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Rugby league ,  and Australia .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Obviously no relevant hits on Google.  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 07:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails WP:SIGCOV per EdwardUK's comments above.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 08:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
UniLang: I have also been over to the forum recently and it looks like it has lost popularity in the linguistics community.  It is not even popular now let alone notable.  Marsbar8 ( talk ) 01:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Websites .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only independent source provided is intended to prove this website's placement in an information and communication technology competition, the Stockholm Challenge.  Unfortunately, the Stockholm Challenge has since gone defunct and its website has been taken over by a trail running competition, thus making it seem as though the subject is supposed to be a competitive athlete rather than a website.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : WP:Notability is not temporary .  If the community/web site/resource was notable at some time, that satisfies WP policy for notability.  That said, I see no evidence of such notability in the current article.  Cnilep ( talk ) 23:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with it not being notable.  Hadal1337 ( talk ) 08:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Burger Schoeman: JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete no independent coverage.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 15:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete