hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Coalition to Reduce Spending: This one seems to be sourced with sources controlled by the founder, and is beyond saving.  Any independent coverage is mostly about the founder.  It doesn't even seem to be around anymore, per the web site.  A merge and redirect looks to be the best path.  See earlier deletion discussion, with a similar suggestion, where sources were equally poor but standards seemed to be lower.  Ticoeditor ( talk ) 21:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Ticoeditor ( talk ) 21:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Virginia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism and Finance .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it fails WP:NCORP .  - Amigao ( talk ) 03:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional for an (apparently defunct) group.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Venetian Village, Naples, Florida: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Delete This seems like the AfD for Tin City recently.  It's been in a purgatory state since its creation in 2007.  I would say a redirect to Naples, Florida , but it looks like it was already shoehorned into the POI list.  I think a delete is ok, as it's not noteworthy.  This is a shopping plaza in the downtown area of Naples.  Nothing unique to write home about from what I remember...do they still have a Ben and Jerry's there?  lol – The Grid ( talk ) 12:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] both the tin city and the venetian village pages are in almost the same state none of them have enough info to make a complete article, unless you want to mention every restaurant and shopping there.  also yes the ben and jerry's is still there Matthew is here zero ( talk ) 15:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 💬 Comment- If the article is kept it should be moved to The Village Shops on Venetian Bay due to that being the official name.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 14:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the offical name of the place is irrelevant per Wikipedia:COMMONNAME .  However, since there seems to be no sources...  I doubt that'll matter anyways.  Industrial Insect (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Village Shops on Venetian Bay is also the Common Name(More results appear when searching it) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 15:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That is beyond the scope of this AfD.  – The Grid ( talk ) 16:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cambridge School (Kandivali): Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Maharashtra .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ABM Yunus: AriTheHorse 22:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC) (Updated 22:42) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Bangladesh .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A few respectable cites on GS but really not enough for WP:Prof .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Hello, The article ABM Yunus has been edited with authentic source from the official website of BSMMU.  Please review it and approve it.  Jmnabil ( talk ) 06:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Citation counts look far short of WP:NPROF ; no sign of any other notability.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 08:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Whilst I'm convinced it's a real person, I'm not convinced it's a pass of WP:NPROF for any of the criteria, or WP:GNG .  - Kj cheetham ( talk ) 11:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Cannot meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG .  Azuredivay ( talk ) 07:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TMSN Records: Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 08:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 08:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guillermo Pineda: Whether as a businessperson, an academic or as a political adviser, I am not seeing evidence that the subject has attained biographical notability here.  The Prensa Libre Q&A item (2011) is closest to a 3rd party source on his teaching role, and I don't see inclusion in a 30-under-30 list as sufficient.  There are a couple of academic papers (as LGP Rodas) but these appear insufficient to demonstrate academic notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 11:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Businesspeople ,  and Guatemala .  AllyD ( talk ) 11:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Advisor to the Deputy Minister of xyz is not a notable position.  This is a resume for a political staffer, basically a regular office job.  I'm not seeing notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I dont see notability per GNG and there is no evidence for notability per WP:NPROF .  -- hroest 10:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Salem Al Shamsi: Sources in article and found in BEFORE fail WP:SIRS, nothing found addressing the subject directly and indepth meeting WP:SIGCOV.  Source eval: Comments Source Government About page, fails WP:SIRS  1.  "UAE Embassy in Abuja-About the Ambassador".  www.mofa.gov.ae.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Mill news about official presenting credentials, fails  WP:SIRS does not address subject directly and indepth for WP:SIGCOV  2. ^ Jump up to:a b "United Arab Emirates Ambassador Presents Credentials to President of Nigeria".  African Business.  2023-08-25.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Mill news, fails  WP:SIRS does not address subject directly and indepth for WP:SIGCOV  3. ^ "FCT Minister, Wike receives UAE ambassador, urges swift reversal of visa ban on Nigerians".  ThisNigeria.  2023-11-13.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 02:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Nigeria ,  and United Arab Emirates .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete coverage is routine and not indepth for meeting WP:BIO .  Amabassadors are not inherently notable.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdul Karim Ahmad: While he did serve as the chair of the local ulema council at one point, this appears to be the extent of his notable contributions.  It is likely that his recognition is primarily limited to his local region.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 22:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 23:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Islam .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability not found.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 02:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete.  Per WP:NSUBPOL : Members of local/municipal bodies or members of bodies without law-making powers have generally been denied presumed notability (see WP:POLOUTCOMES ); that is, members of bodies only capable of enacting subordinate (secondary) legislation are not presumed notable under the criteria established in WP:POLITICIAN.  YordleSquire ( talk ) 02:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per lack of notability.  TunGunPun ( talk ) 07:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of notability.  2A01:799:2E3:C500:556:815E:86C2:7DB1 ( talk ) 15:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The Legend of Lokotim ( talk ) 09:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : does not meet NBIO or any of the SNG.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 15:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Remember that not existing in other Wikimedia project like Indonesia wiki is not a criteria for WP: N All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 20:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The subject meets no notability.  Same as it was deleted per discussion at previous AFD .  Fails WP: GNG .  The article was based on WP: BIOFAMILY and the cited sources were directly to discuss Family which fails WP: SIGCOV and WP: ANYBIO .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 20:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Fiesta Bowl broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; one is about the BCS games in general, not just this, one is a 403, three of those talk about the BCS and Bowl games in general
 one is a TV schedule listing and one is about one of the announcers in general, not the boradcasting of this game.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and Arizona .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charlene Rajendran: A Google search does not return results that prove notability.  Thus, this article fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO .  Spinixster (chat!) 02:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women , Malaysia ,  and Singapore .  Spinixster (chat!) 02:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  Bridget (talk) 00:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This, I think it's the same person [33] , several hits in local newspapers found by clicking on the "newspaper" link in the infobox for deletion.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It could be.  Although she seems to have long hair in this, and based on Google images, she has short hair, so I'm not sure.  Spinixster (chat!) 02:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find useful sources, article should be deleted.  I'll revisit if the article I linked in my other comment is the same person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joshua Tomar: The appropriate category is WP:ENT, not Creative.  Subject meets inclusion standards by a comfortable margin.  He has appeared in a notable amount of high profile video games and shows and has working relationships with a notable amount of prominent people within his industry.  He also co-owns an animation studio which has been involved with many major projects.  He has received an award relevant to his industry that is only given to one person per year.  He is a longtime member on a well-established and influential youtube channel.  Many of the acting credits are verified through the IMDB citation, which Wikipedia lists as an acceptable source.  His roles are also verified through other databases, as well as specific citations on particular roles, which is why there are citations of passing mentions of him with regard to specific roles.  The article should be kept as the subject qualifies under WP:ENT and the overall sourcing is acceptable; if there are issues with individual sources that could be handled in Talk or through the removal or addition of sources instead of a page deletion.  KEP95 ( talk ) 04:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 23 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Pennsylvania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Comics and animation , Engineering , Computing ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources don't show notability.  I would say redirect to Studio Yotta , but that doesn't look notable either.  IgelRM ( talk ) 15:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER , no significant roles in any major productions.  "Member of the Year Tanky Award" is not a notable award.  Also unlike the user said above, IMDB is not an acceptable source in Wikipedia, see WP:IMDB .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 07:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - doesn't meet ENT or CREATIVE.  Largely minor roles or just an "extra".  As noted above, the sole keep stance is mistaken - IMDB is not a usable source per WP:IMDB .  Sergecross73 msg me 17:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Political AI (Artificial Intelligence): Fermiboson ( talk ) 06:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  First of all, I cannot find anything notable about this subject on Google and second, the article is promoting what their "milestones" are; which is against WP:SOAPBOX .  This article is clearly not fit to be here.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 08:20, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  An " Artificial intelligence in politics " article might be warranted, but I couldn't find any coverage of "political AI", and the cited article's only mention of the term is: With this in mind, we propose six milestones that will herald a new era of democratic politics driven by AI.  All feel achievable—perhaps not with today’s technology and levels of AI adoption, but very possibly in the near future.  What makes for a political AI milestone?  Mooonswimmer 12:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject fails WP:GNG and appears to be a case of WP:PROMO .  User:Let'srun 01:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jon Man-ho: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSPERSON .  No significant coverage of him at all.  — Young Forever (talk) 22:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Organisation of Serbian Students Abroad: It has little more than 2 articles (thus failing WP:GNG ) covering the society and even these seem hardly more than rehashes of routine meetings and press releases.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 19:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 19:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gabrijel Savić Ra: No indication of notability.  Fails WP:NARTIST .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists ,  and Serbia .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources.  2/4 external links only have a passing mention of Gabrijel.  I'm Serbian, and I don't know anyone who's heard of him.  Not that that's important.  Still fails WP:GNG .  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  10:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I removed the 2 external links that were passing mentions.  Of the remaining two, one is a paid listing, the other is dead.  I am not finding any reliable sources for the article.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ashwinder Singh: A Google search brings up more such paid PR publications.  Bakhtar40 ( talk ) 15:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Bakhtar40 ( talk ) 15:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not seeing much independent coverage and agree with nominator about paid articles.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 14:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete