hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sotiris Argyrou: Sims2aholic8 ( talk ) 18:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cyprus .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify – WP:TOOSOON .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SPORTBASIC .  Just being on a team is not enough to be article worthy.  I think the article would stay in draft mode long enough that it would be better to just recreate once this person is actually notable.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 04:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found some brief coverage like 24Sports but nothing that would count towards WP:GNG .  I'm not convinced that he is likely to be notable in the next 6 months so I don't see draftspace being effective.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Draco Foundation (NZ) Charitable Trust: Article orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 23:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 23:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Searching is tricky due to the other Draco but various combinations of "Draco charity", "Draco foundation", "Draco NZ" don't bring up anything except the court case (which is not notable and does not confer notability).  The article was created by the organisation's secretary.  Nothing here to suggest it should stay.  Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 09:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no obvious coverage by reliable sources to support notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 00:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't seem to find any coverage either.  The article is also written terribly.  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  10:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NORG / WP:COI .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 17:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dylan Nobiraki: Source eval: Comments Source Primary, database page  1.  "Dylan Nobiraki".  So FC.  Retrieved May 23, 2023.  Database  2. ^Jump up to:a b Dylan Nobirakiat Soccerway Primary  3. ^Jump up to:a b c "Kaya FC-Iloilo Bring in Foreign Reinforcements".  So FC February 16, 2023.  Retrieved May 23, 2023.  Database entry in article, no SIGCOV  4. ^ "Sapporo Otani High School soccer team OB who will compete in the 2023 season" . sapporo -otani.com.Retrieved 23 May 2023 .  Routine sports news, nothing SIGCOV about subject  5. ^ Jump up to:a b "[Asia] Dylan Nokai, our support player, signs with Kaya FC, the leader of the 1st division in the Philippines! From college soccer to ACL stage! ! ". europlus.jp.  Retrieved 23 May 2023.  Database page  6. ^ "Player introduction! No.37" .  dsoccer.nuhw.ac.jp .  Retrieved 23 May 2023 .  Game results, nothing about subject  7. ^ "Match result".  Japan Football Association.  1 January 2023.  Game results, nothing about subject  8. ^ "Match result".  Japan Football Association.  1 June 2022.  Primary  9. ^ "Kaya-Iloilo 2-3 Dynamic Herb Cebu" .  So FC February 19, 2023 .  Retrieved May 23, 2023 .  Routine sports news, nothing SIGCOV about subject  10. ^ "Kaya fires four past Mendiola, Cebu stumble against Stallion".  pfl.org.ph.  Retrieved May 23, 2023.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 20:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG . Jogurney ( talk ) 12:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asifcroco: Only used by Malkani.  No secondary sources.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lythronaxargestes ( talk | contribs ) 21:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clarksdale, Indiana: Searching is masked by the place in Mississippi but turned up nothing.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Though it appears as a named point on topo maps [33] , there's nothing actually there except an unremarkable intersection, and I see no sign of it on any historical maps.  ╠╣uw [ talk ] 13:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The Brown County Democrat mentions it once.  Coverage goes back to 1914.  It doesn't appear in the book "From Needmore to Prosperity : Hoosier place names in folklore and history" either.  Something was probably there at one time, but I don't know what it was.  James.folsom ( talk ) 22:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Jasiqi: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Searching Google, Google news, WP:TWL , books, and scholar results in nothing that would support WP:GNG .  — Sirdog ( talk ) 04:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No indication of notability, couldn't find sources on Google search Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 07:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karen Liot Hill: There is not much significant coverage on the subject and she has not held high enough office to warrant an article.  GoldMiner24 Talk 02:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] hi!  I rewrote this article because Liot Hill is running for Executive Council of New Hampshire , along with Mike Liberty , another page I created at the same time.  The NH executive council is a big deal here as it acts as a check on the state's governor, as featured in this recent Boston Globe article .  Both are serious candidates in upcoming 2024 New Hampshire Executive Council election .  I do understand that at this point they are only candidates.  H0n0r ( talk ) 02:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Being a candidate for office does not make you notable.  I would advise the editor who created this page to read WP:NPOL : "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability" BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Women , Radio , France , New Hampshire ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Previously deleted, not there on GNG grounds, and candidates for office are not inherently notable as their notability is not lasting.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marcello Ruta: Although he is highly cited in a highly cited field, he has no remarkable achievements.  His profile: [35] Broc ( talk ) 14:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Science ,  and Italy .  Broc ( talk ) 14:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .   I don't think that paleontology is such a high citation field: looking at other paleontologists, this is a solid citation record.   The article is a stub, but at least not overly promotional, primary sourced, etc.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 16:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 19:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - here's his University of Lincoln profile -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  We have done this before.  Except in very rare cases, associate professors are not notable .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is yet another example of WP:TOOSOON to fully meet WP:NPROF .  Probably will be notable in the fullness of time, but not yet.  Qflib ( talk ) 18:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Measured quantity: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 15:03, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Completely useless WP:DICTDEF .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject completely lacks sources, and WP:NOTDICTIONARY also seems to apply here.  User:Let'srun 01:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Canuck Eats: As the article indicates, the business primarily operates in small cities, making most coverage local.  The non-local coverage consists of PR reprints, with a couple sentences in Financial Post as an example of a type of service being the only exception.  ~ A412 talk!  18:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada .  ~ A412 talk!  18:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Misleading, this is the most well known surviving successor (millions of impressions on google search per year) to the now defunct Feastify (which had doordash buy out its old name Dash Delivers) operations that spans to 100 cities in Canada, which is my next project to create a page for.  Canada as a G7 country has no articles pertaining to its delivery industry, I'm taking initiative to change that.  Wt2024 ( talk ) 23:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there is literally nothing meaningful in the way of coverage and the idea (per the creator of the article) that Canada is somehow under-represented is a patent lie and laughable.  Aside from that, there is maybe one single article of dubious origin that could be considered in depth and nothing else.  GRINCHIDICAE🎄 02:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails NCORP by the looks of it. - KH-1 ( talk ) 04:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Found more coverage by Pattison Media and Best Startup Canada Magazine, not researching doesn't mean it doesn't exist.  Wt2024 ( talk ) 00:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails NCORP, promotional.  Tehonk ( talk ) 06:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - @ Tehonk IF you decide the referenced text is not necessary, why delete the entire original reasoning written?  Wt2024 ( talk ) 06:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Natuna Malay: I'm afraid much of this doesn't make a whole lot of sense.  I wouldn't say that any regional language is regulated by Badan Bahasa (there's actually little support for these in Indonesia), but that's a minor nitpick.  The dialects section is very questionable, looking like an amalgamation of random sources that happen to discuss (or mention) variation within the language.  As it stands, this is better off removed or rewritten.  Semmiii ( talk ) 17:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Indonesia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - per G5, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jellywings19 .  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 06:21, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wendell Roche: Does not meet criteria for WP:NKICK .  Passing mentions and event results are not sufficient to meet WP:GNG Lethweimaster ( talk ) 09:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Caribbean .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE : Could not find any significant coverage only event results, no mentions of him on sheerdog , article fails Wikipedia:Notability (sports) Lewolka ( talk ) 09:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search found no evidence that he was ever ranked in the world top 10, which is the requirement for WP:NKICK .   I also found no significant independent coverage of him in reliable sources.   There were plenty of fight results, but nothing that showed WP notability.  Papaursa ( talk ) 23:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Litany (Divine Worship): Fram ( talk ) 09:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Sources cited are almost all about the Anglican Ordinariate generally, not about this specific prayer. — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - it's certainly interesting to me, but there are not enough in way of secondary sources to count as significant coverage .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete insufficient sources to support a separate article.   It could be merged into a more general article on The Litany as found in Anglican prayer books but we seem not to have one of those.   The only one I could find is Exhortation and Litany which is about the original 1544 version and barely mentions later adaptions.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 08:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophie Richardson: Pinging @ Narutolovehinata5 , W9793 , MaranoFan ,  and AirshipJungleman29 : .  Laun chba ller 12:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Laun chba ller 12:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only one source fulfills the criteria at WP:GNG ; everything else is either non-independent or lacking in WP:SIGCOV .  Thus, WP:NBIO is not met.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 12:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : She's published opinion pieces, but that's all I can find.  Source 5 is a RS per the Highlighter tool, but I don't see much else we could use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support deletion if no further RS can be identified to fulfill WP:SIGCOV .  W9793 ( talk ) 16:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] She's done some interesting work but the lack of SIGCOV means I would say Delete .  Fritzmann ( message me ) 15:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women , Politics , California , Ohio , Pennsylvania ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of the United States, Bamako: Biruitorul Talk 20:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]: Embassy of the United States, Bogotá ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Santo Domingo ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Santiago ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Muscat ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa , Oman , Chile , Colombia , Dominican Republic ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all created in a spree with no consideration for notability, and all are unnecessary content forks.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect all to their respective X-United States relation pages.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 22:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete