hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Acharya Vishuddhasagar Ji: And pls verify if there is any sock puppets like stuff present in this case, ty - Awful Reader ( talk ) 18:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Buddhism .  - Awful Reader ( talk ) 18:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I actually just nominated this for CSD - there is no indication of importance.  All 'sources' are social media.  Obviously promotional.  In any case, fails GNG.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 18:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Madhya Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Saed Ahmed Bhalli: Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Politics , Pakistan ,  and Punjab .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they didn't win — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while candidates get included only if either  (a) they have some other claim of preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten them an article anyway, or  (b) they can show credible evidence that their candidacy should be seen as a special case of significantly greater notability than everybody else's candidacies.  This shows neither of those things, and is not sourced anywhere remotely close to well enough to claim that he was exempted from NPOL on grounds of passing GNG.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree with Bearcat.  Not elected and nothing notable done outside politics to justify page.  JoinFluffy250 ( talk ) 16:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above, quite to the point, contribution by my honorable colleagues.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Bearcat.  Also, the article creator has been blocked for sockpuppetry.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Muhammad Luqman (activist): The sources on the article does not seem to mention the subject's name.  Fails WP:NBIO Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 06:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 06:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete no source that mentions subject so unsourced BLP; probably self promotion/autobio.  KylieTastic ( talk ) 10:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete In addition to everything User:KylieTastic said, the sources provided don't even mention the subject in question.  Also, one of the sources is a TikTok page?  Fails basic WP:GNG and no WP:SIGCOV .  -- My Pants Metal ( talk ) 13:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delte : I agree that the sources are not reliable,  it subject fails basic WP:GNG and there has been no signficant coverage.  I've also checked claims made in through the process of editing/creating the article, and don't find anything that would change this position.  Klbrain ( talk ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Carlos Parra (singer): Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 05:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 05:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Internet , Mexico ,  and Arizona .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Chalukiya: [1] Gujjars are an ethnic group native to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.  They speak the Gujari language , which is a dialect of Rajasthani.  Gujaratis, on the other hand, are an ethnic group from Gujarat , an Indian state.  They communicate in Gujarati, an Indo-Aryan language.  Gujjars and Gujaratis are not related since they hail from separate locations, speak different languages, and have different customs.  Since Gujarat was once known as Gujaratra , locals are referred to as Gurjars or Gurjardesha residents, despite the fact that the caste referenced in this article belongs to a completely distinct tribe that raises cattle.  By duplicating Chalukya dynasty , inaccurate information is supplied in this article.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 18:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013).  A Textbook of Medieval Indian History.  Primus Books.  p. 28.  ISBN 978-93-80607-34-4.  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 03:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : article creator has been indefinitely blocked, for resumed disruptive editing including blanking Chalukiya being discussed here, a cut-n-paste move of its contents to new title Chalukya clan , and edit-warring to preserve the improper page-move.  Previously blocked for trying to throw another AFD with sockpuppetry, so might well try the same here.  2A00:23EE:1CB8:5F8B:50C7:59FF:FEB3:3107 ( talk ) 05:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Success On The Spectrum: Source 1 doesn't go in-depth at all.  Source 2 seems promotional.  Source 3 and 6 is a mere mention.  Source 4 is marginally fine, seems routine though.  Source 5 is a press release.  TLA (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The original creator of the article, Binawood , is blocked for sockpuppeting.  A G5 case?  Someone please verify.  TLA (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations ,  and Texas .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions .  08:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 08:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Kidprod: I can't find a single reliable source that mentions him.  Also, article is written in a tone like an advertisement in some places, and simply not in an encyclopedic tone in others (like the "Early life") section.  Also, author is kidprod themself.  [8] ‍ Relativity 21:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Bibliographies ,  and Music .  ‍ Relativity 21:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello I created the article and I agree with you.  Maybe you could help improve the parts that you think aren't good.  This is my first article, I don't have any experience.  I genuinely could use your help.  Kidprod ( talk ) 21:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A WP:TOOSOON case.  Wikipedia articles are supposed to be summaries of high-quality coverage in reputable sources independent of the subject.  For musicians that's basically press coverage.  Keep working and sharing your stuff and you'll probably get there.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] so its gonna get deleted?  Kidprod ( talk ) 22:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Kidprod Not necessarily.  You should read Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process and Wikipedia:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!  ‍ Relativity 22:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ok imma do that now Kidprod ( talk ) 22:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ive completely rewritten the article tell me if it still sucks Kidprod ( talk ) 23:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Relativity is my edit ok?  Kidprod ( talk ) 23:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : WP:G11 advertisment.    v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 23:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete due to the fact that this meets G11.  AlphaBetaGamma ( Talk/Report any mistakes here ) 00:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - arguably an A7.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 02:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Stainoff: Does not have SIGCOV.  Mvqr ( talk ) 15:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa .  Mvqr ( talk ) 15:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Worth noting that this is an autobiography.  RetroCosmos ( talk ) 15:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ RetroCosmos : yeah then it definitely needs to be draftified at least.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I wonder if it is possible to remove the statement as false and unsourced and then tag it under WP:A7 ?  Or just tag it under WP:G11 Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This can easily pass G11 in my view RetroCosmos ( talk ) 15:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not a G11 in my view, it isn't a blatant advert.  The relevant speedy criteria would be WP:G3 as a "blatant hoax", but I feel it is borderline.  Many admins would delete it as G3, but some would not.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 15:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - If the first album by an unknown beginner debuted at #1 in a major country, it would make the news.  All this rapper has is the usual social media pages and self-uploads of a few songs that have generated no notice from anyone else whatsoever.  The procedural discussion on speedy deleting above is not really necessary and could actually be a distraction; such an obvious failure of notability can be deleted today or next week.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 16:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Per @ Doomsdayer520 ’s comment.  (My bold isn’t working, I’m editing from mobile currently. It prints as ‘’’.)  User Memer ( chat ) Tribs 17:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Autobiography of a non-notable individual, they even vandalized Nasty C and put their details there moments ago.  dxneo ( talk ) 18:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Shyamal Sylhet: The topic is not wiki notable.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Websites ,  and Bangladesh .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Shyamal Sylhet article have eligibility for Wikipedia .  It's Translated from Bengali Wikipedia .  Mainul Saiman ( talk ) 05:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per nom.  Also it was created by a sock (user:Rnwiki-global).  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 08:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The page creator is not a confirmed sockpuppet.  Please wait for confirmation before tagging articles for speedy deletion on these grounds.  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please see wikidata .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 12:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's May Wrong, I am not known about ( user:Rnwiki-global ).  Mainul Saiman ( talk ) 15:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note I have blocked

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Obi Emeka Chukwudi: If not, this article needs some cleanup to meet WP:MOS Lord serious pig 07:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Lord serious pig 07:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tagged for speedy deletion as G11 since it perfectly qualifies under such criterion.  There was no need for bringing this to AfD.  CycloneYoris talk!  07:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : I added A7 to the G11, there was no need for an AfD.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] speedy delete : per A7.  Nightrises10 ( talk ) 11:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
GP Records: Suggesting SALT if this closes as delete as it has been re-created by the same editor.  Star Mississippi 01:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Indonesia .  Star Mississippi 01:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Recreated article by (suspected) sock.  The reference does not mention GP records at all it is about Universal Music taking over EMI.  This in no way passes WP:NCOMPANY or WP:GNG .  Delete and Salt.  Hughesdarren ( talk ) 01:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note I have semi'ed the article so we don't play whack an IP for seven days.  If someone has a better solution, feel free.  Star Mississippi 01:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] and I've filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MFajarMardiansyah24032000 as the only one blocked is for DE so we're unfortunately not in G5 territory.  Hopefully we will be for the next iteration.  Star Mississippi 01:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Napoli Resturant: No significant sources as far as I can tell.  As of 13:21EST Nov 25 compltetly unsourced as well.  AriTheHorse 18:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and United Arab Emirates .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Tagged to A7 speedy delete , obviously shouldn't need discussion.  Reywas92 Talk 19:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Традиционная одежда Липецкой области.: 64andtim (chat) 21:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Roger Cash: This article was declined at AfC on 8 January for failing GNG, but the editor has gone and published the article directly with no changes.  This man was the father of Cliff Cash and Wiley Cash , but there is nothing in his own existence that makes him notable.  Checks of Internet Archive, Google Scholar, and Google Books, bring up nothing.  A basic Google search locates his obituary , which provides nothing to suggest why Cash should have his own Wikipedia article.  Being the father of two notable people does not make you notable as well.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 20:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  Eligible under criterion A7 and tagged accordingly.  CycloneYoris talk!  20:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Golam Rabby: No indication of significance.  Previous deleted on 21 January 2024.  scope_creep Talk 19:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism ,  and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golam Rabby ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 22:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Heer Kaur: Lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Macbeejack ☎ 14:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Macbeejack ☎ 14:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jharkhand-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Radio Jupiter: Sources don't show notability, redirect to Radio Caroline ?  IgelRM ( talk ) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United Kingdom .  IgelRM ( talk ) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : I don't think Radio Caroline is the right answer.  I think this requires work to show notability, since kt fails WP:NCORP currently.  Draft space is a place to work with little pressure 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Draftify - This article does not speak for itself .   It does not explain to a reader why the station is notable , and Wikipedia is written for the readers.   This has been a contested draftify, so if this article is draftified here, it may not be moved back to article space except via AFC .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete To anyone in 2024, this is a bog-standard Internet oldies station run by who are now older personnel.  This is no different from a known commercial radio station keeping an older staff member on Saturday mornings for listener goodwill so they don't get 'Cruel megabroadcaster fires innocent DJ for being too old' headlines.  The N for Radio Caroline cannot extend to something that was created well after its existence ended as a nostalgia appeal.  Nate • ( chatter ) 18:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Nate - my thoughts exactly.  RobinCarmody ( talk ) 18:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO with no coverage in RS.  This is a different Radio Jupiter [7] , nothing else found.  I don't think the redirect as suggested would help.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , promo piece on a 'radio station' with zero evidence of notability.  Do not draftify, as there has been plenty of time for the necessary sources to be gathered, and if nothing has turned up in the past few years, I can't see that suddenly changing in the next few months.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 10:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete