hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
K. Victor Chow : Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justwatchmee ( talk • contribs ) 16:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : would feel better about this if the nominator or any of the participants described attempts to find evidence of notability.   As-is, the nominator incorrectly attempted to PROD the article, then when multiple editors indicated that there was or might be some notability through academic papers, and that this would at least have to be addressed at AFD, immediately nominated it for deletion, without any explanation besides "Fails GNG".   The only other comment literally copied that, and the person who left it didn't bother to sign.   This nomination shows all indications of being rushed and perhaps ignoring WP:BEFORE .   At a very minimum the nominator needs to make some attempt to investigate whether the subject could be documented through Google Books and Google Scholar, and describe the results in a non-perfunctory way here.   Otherwise this nomination should fail, and the result would be keep .  P Aculeius ( talk ) 13:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I agree that this is weak nomination.  Chow's Google Scholar profile (linked in the article) reports 2800 citations and three articles cited more than 100 times, which would typically indicate a pass of WP:PROF#C1 .  His work in statistics seems particularly widely covered; a search for "chow-denning test" gives many hits.  – Joe ( talk ) 14:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He's also holds a Distinguished Professor chair at West Virginia University , passing WP:PROF#C5 .  – Joe ( talk ) 14:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:PROF#C5 and #C1.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:PROF#C1 and WP:PROF#C5 .  Maliner ( talk ) 19:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep distinguished professor whose contributions are explicitly noted.   Pass of WP:PROF -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
North East Rugby League Regional Division : Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 17:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Page is a mess - Redirect to North East Rugby League Premier Division and rename North East Rugby League .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Canberra Choral Society : Fails WP:NBAND , WP:NORG , and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Organizations ,  and Australia .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Plenty of news coverage about this group, both local and national: Limelight [22] [23] , Australian Broadcasting Corporation [24] , Canberra Times [25] .  There is also the book Canberra Choral Society: A Capital Choir for a Capital City ISBN 9780958155304 , a commemorative history book published by a small non-fiction press, but it has been cited in a few scholarly articles.  I can provide more sources if needed.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 20:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sources listed above (Limelight, Canberra Times) book appear to confirm WP:NBAND#C1 .  I couldn't get a glimpse of the listed book, so for my own certainty I found SIGCOV in a different book as well [26] .  — siro χ o 05:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Renault Grand Prix : Speedy deletion was rejected for some reason, no idea why, as it's obviously a hoax.  91.82.169.36 ( talk ) 18:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 15 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is clearly a hoax and also, even if it somehow wasnt, i couldnt find any sources.  Begocci ( talk ) 19:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : a plethora of schematics and models for sale suggest that this may not necessarily be a hoax at all ( [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] ).  That is not to say this is a notable or encyclopedic car model, just that it seems to have existed, and the article can't be speedied based on CSD:G3.  Owen× ☎ 19:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete appears to want to describe Renault's car in the 1906 French Grand Prix as OwenX indicates above, but that car doesn't pass WP:GNG .  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 19:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I stand corrected, per HBP below; clearly didn't do enough BEFORE.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 04:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Unclear how or why this is a WP:HOAX .  The article should be moved to " Renault AK 90CV " or something to that effect, but the subject is fairly clearly notable, and a basic WP:BEFORE search for the actual name of the vehicle quickly returns plenty of evidence that this meets the WP:GNG ( the Independent and the Telegraph , for example).  HumanBodyPiloter5 ( talk ) 21:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and rename per sources found by HumanBodyPiloter5 .  Owen× ☎ 22:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no notability guideline for topics related to the automotive industry.  WP:NVEHICLE is exclusively for locomotives and ships, WP:NCAR redirects to North Carolina's Wikiproject, and WP:NCARS does not exist.  - 91.82.169.36 ( talk ) 06:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Miroslav Hýll : He has played hundred of career games in total and even appeared for his national team, but fails WP:GNG due to lack of in-depth coverage.  I'm struggling to find enough sufficient sources as this article has been written terribly with possible dubious stories for years, so does corresponding Slovak Wikipedia, which would help copy over English article otherwise (I already checked and translated it).  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I don't see the problem here.  He played on a reasonably high level for many years, and the multitude of sources clearly chronicle what he achieved during his career, which was far from negligible.  Dubious stories are subject to cleanup and not a matter for AFD.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – I don't understand Slovak to give an opinion, and the article in English is the best developed in relation to cs and sk, but the athlete appears to have good coverage in the local media.  Svartner ( talk ) 03:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Have you once tried translating the corresponding article for such footballers?  I found a lot of them to be far well-written from English article.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article clearly needs additional cleanup and sources, but six international caps, high level football suggests there is far more to add.  Govvy ( talk ) 07:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - sufficient sources and a strong claim to notability.  Giant Snowman 10:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep —Clearly meets WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jazz–Nuggets rivalry : Fram ( talk ) 09:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports , Basketball , Colorado ,  and Utah .  Fram ( talk ) 09:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GNG .  There are several sources speak of this as a rivalry throughout the decades, such as Jazz-Nugget rivalry to be renewed tuesday (The Daily Utah Chronicle - 1985), Jazz-Nuggets rivalry may get kick-start (The Salt Lake Tribune - 1994), Nuggets turn corner to renew rivalry with Jazz (The Daily Spectrum - 2004), Nuggets finally admit the obvious.  They’ve got a rivalry with the Utah Jazz.  ] (The Denver Post - 2021) Alvaldi ( talk ) 09:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes GNG per the sources provided by Alvaldi.   The nominator brings up having a small number of postseason meetings.   However, frequent playoff matchups is not a requirement to be a “rivalry.”  Frank Anchor 11:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the sources by Alvaldi.  I also agree with Frank Anchor.  When it comes to rivalries, frequent playoff matches don't always mean there is a rivalry, similar to how there might still be a rivalry despite no playoff matches.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ag Against Hunger : Boleyn ( talk ) 09:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 09:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The current website link is a content farm... see the archive page instead: [32] .  The news tab, [33] , has a bunch of sources, all the external links there seem broken+unarchived though.  Note, this website has gotten a huge number of IA saves, 1053 total.  However, with [34] , [35] , [36] in addition to the Western Farm Press news piece in the article's EL section, this meets WP:GNG in my opinion.  The article needs to be pruned down to sourcable information.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 13:59, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Organizations .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep As per Darcyisverycute, there are a wealth of quality reliable newspaper sources about this organisation (although I'm not sure about linked sources 3 and 4 as they seem to be primary sources).  Either way, with those, the Western Farm Press article, and this article from the American Journal of Transportation , I think this passes GNG.  pinktoebeans (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - But this may need to be updated to reflect change in org structure.  I fixed the dead link to their website to what looks like the current one.  I think that was confusing people.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 00:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
John Paul (scientist) : Most of the existing sources are unreliable and not independent of the subject.  The individual also has no significant coverage.  N niyaz ( talk ) 14:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Scotland .  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 15:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – After being appointed to a personal chair, Paul was appointed director of a cancer institute and then during his tenure the research capability was transformed with the Beatson becoming an internationally acclaimed organisation.  He was awarded an honorary Dsc.  The obituary published in the Independent included that "During his most productive years his publications were among the 1,000 most-cited scientific papers in the world".  Clearly meets WP:PROF and WP:GNG .  Drchriswilliams ( talk ) 12:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- a hint: when someone gets an obituary in the top journal of their field, they have made a significant impact on their field.  Also with an obituary in The Independent, etc. speedy keep. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In addition to the above he passes WP:AUTHOR through multiple published reviews of multiple books.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , supporting/agreeing with the comments above.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 19:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Elvir Melunović : Also has no reliable sources Brachy 08 (Let’s Have A Kiki, I Wanna Have a Kiki) 02:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Brachy 08 (Let’s Have A Kiki, I Wanna Have a Kiki) 02:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Serbia , Switzerland ,  and Yugoslavia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per COMMONSENSE and the fact that the nominator doesn't know what they are talking about (why mention WP:LEAD?! entirely irrelevant to notability) and they haven't done a BEFORE.  A quick Google search brings up thousands of results, including this which confirms over 170 games in the Swiss top division, plus multiple cup and continental games.  The topic is clearly notable; needs improving, not deleting.  Giant Snowman 21:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per above.  I found [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , and [64] , among many many more sources.  Defitneolty has offline sources also, having played over 170 games in the Swiss Super League in extensive pro career.  Article needs improvement, not deletion .  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 21:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: @ Brachy0008 , you might find this guideline useful when nominating articles for deletion: WP:BEFORE .  We judge whether to keep articles based on their WP:POTENTIAL to be improved, not their current state.  Cheers!  – Vipz ( talk ) 07:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I’m gonna keep it Brachy 08 (Talk) (Contribs) 09:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
NS25 : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I don't see the issue.  Disambiguation pages usually don't need citations.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I can't see any record of a previous deletion.  Have you got a link to any previous deletion discussions or PROD rationale?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I saw Peviously deleted message on Special:NewPagesFeed .  iVickyChoudhary ( talk ) 13:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , as a disambiguation page that is serving the purpose of disambiguating the term.  BD2412 T 14:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment citations are not allowed on disambiguation pages.  So, this deletion nomination is faulty.  What was previously deleted?  Was it a disambiguation page or some other topic?  Was it a ship article?  -- 65.92.247.66 ( talk ) 14:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - It's a disambiguation page, no need for citations.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 17:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  You don't need to add citations to disambiguations.  176.33.241.125 ( talk ) 19:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the above.  Left guide ( talk ) 23:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What do you mean previously deleted?  I don't see it.  @ InterstellarGamer12321 : promoted it from an anonymous draft to main space recently.  -- Joy ( talk ) 08:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, this was an AfC draft and I accepted it to mainspace because it seemed like a good and potentially valuable disambiguation page.  To the nominator: disambiguation pages are not meant to have inline citations.  Therefore I think we should keep this disambiguation page.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 08:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kirk Farmer (American football) : Joeykai ( talk ) 08:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per @ Spiderone Brachy 08 (Talk) 01:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article is badly written currently, but he did play quarterback at a Power Five program, appearing in 31 games with 2,812 passing yards and 26 passing touchdowns.  Power Five QBs almost always receive SIGCOV, and Farmer is no exception.  E.g.,  here ( part 1 / part 2 ), here , here , here , here , here , here , here , here , here .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 11:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep More than enough coverage for sigcov.  Themanwithnowifi ( talk ) 15:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Al Gromer Khan : Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Authors , Bands and musicians ,  and Germany .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per NBAND#5 .  This musician has dozens of recordings including four on New Earth Records which has been around for 30+ years and also features Terry Oldfield and Prem Joshua among others.  New age is a niche style and New Earth Records is even more niche than something like Windham Hill, but they have a very long track record of releases.  I can see how this artist is marginal on notability, particularly given the state of the article, but it would be helpful if the nominator could indicate the specific rationale for saying it fails notability, particularly since this artist has a long career with many releases.  Oblivy ( talk ) 04:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I could not find RS or SIGCOV about him, though perhaps others are better at searching.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 16:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I found enough reliable sources to prove notability including entries about him in the All Music Guide: The Best CDs, Albums & Tapes (1994, page 1229) and The Crack in the Cosmic Egg: Encyclopedia of Krautrock, Kosmische Musik & Other Progressive, Experimental & Electronic Musics from Germany (1997, page 97).  I also found a number of reviews and coverage of his music on AllMusic and in various new age and mental healing books.  One of the weirdest examples is The Tao of Music, Sound Psychology: Using Music to Change Your Life by John M Ortiz, where on page 253 the author said listening to Khan's music helped someone achieve an orgasm in lovemaking.  That alone has got to prove notability!  -- SouthernNights ( talk ) 20:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep