hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Valentine Ngaham: The one citation provided is a trivial mention .  In my own searches, I found nothing better than a YouTube video and a passing mention in Essex Alliance League , which covers the 11th to 16th tiers of English football...  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cameroon .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 15:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO, BEFORE showed stats, name mentions, nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Only source in article is 404, so this is essentially an unsourced BLP. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 03:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Terry James: As a local elected official, they are not considered inherently notable and the coverage that I'm finding all appears to be fairly routine.  This person also has a shortened term (4 months) compared to most mayors because they were appointed to the position to finish out the term of the retiring mayor and then lost re-election.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's still a reminder that all Mayor are not notable except in a case of verifiable significant coverage.  Here, the sources if not all were just the "appointment".  Nothing much here!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete routine coverage and does not meet WP:BIO .  Sources 6-9 are not significant coverage of him.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For clarity, I oppose redirect, as Terry James is a common name.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Basically WP:ROUTINE here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep however I propose, if "Delete" wins, the page is instead redirected to List of mayors of Cairns like what happened with Amy Eden Totallynotarandomalt69 ( talk ) 22:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gabriele Bernasconi: In my searches, I found Urner Wochenblatt , which is just an image caption, and Chalcio .  The independent content in the Chalcio article is just (translated) With Gabriele Bernasconi – the least beaten goalkeeper among those in the six rounds of the category ...  Raised in Lugano as a footballer, our (Photo AC Taverne) made it all the way through the Juventus youth academy and three years in the first team.  The rest is just pure Q&A and quotes.  Even if this article were considered acceptable, GNG and SPORTBASIC require multiple sources showing significant coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Switzerland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of most prolific porn stars: I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Lists of people .  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is really no usable definition for what constitutes "most prolific" in a field where there are no strict definitions of what constitutes an individual work.  BD2412 T 00:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Arbitrary, meaningless criteria for a list.  Zaathras ( talk ) 00:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  These kinds of lists are almost by definition OR.  No objection to replacing it with a List of people identified as most prolific porn stars in reliable sources .  pburka ( talk ) 00:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per User:Zaathras .  – City Urbanism 🗩 🖉 08:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NLIST .  A quick googling shows a handful of individual performers being described as "one of the most prolific porn stars" , but little coverage of the topic as a group or set .  The current list is pure WP:OR based on WP:USERGENERATED sources anyway.  — Sangdeboeuf ( talk ) 10:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC) edited 08:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As BD2412 indicated, we don't actually have any usable definition for "most prolific".  This is clear OR and it fails WP:NLIST .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  I am sure this list is of interest to many, but there's no way i see it fitting into wikipedia with this lack of sourcing.   Interestingly, the only "most prolific" article I found that we currently have is related to a redirect for Most prolific serial killers ; nothing for non-pornographic actors.   So no real precedent for it even with sourcing.   According to Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by article count only 164 wikipedians currently have written more articles than pornographic films Yui Hatano has allegedly appeared in (3,129).   Slackers. -- Milowent • has spoken 20:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shaheen Vocational Training Institute: Fails NCORP as well GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 18:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 18:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baedalwang: I'm not seeing anything else which could be considered JMWt ( talk ) 08:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find anything that would establish notability.  Bendegúz Ács ( talk ) 10:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
High Frequency Economics: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Companies , Economics ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Madhuchhanda Sengupta: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : sources now used in the article are all primary or non-RS.  There are none that I can find in Gnews, not much of anything found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Millen Sisters: Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bands and musicians .  Pepper Beast (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lack of reliable sourcing, the NYT is ok-ish.  Rest are yellow per sourcebot.  This is all I find [21] .  I wouldn't consider it extensive coverage of the duo.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : what's a sourcebot?  Where can I get one - sounds handy for AfDs!  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 01:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is, but for the life of me I can't remember how I installed it.  I'm digging around, let me come back to you with the info.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] User:Headbomb/unreliable.js ?  and User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter ?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, those are the ones, I asked over at the help boards, feel free to click on the links have have them installed.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  And even the NYTimes coverage is really about the Got Milk campaign rather than this duo.  I suppose a redirect to Got Milk would be merited, but I seriously doubt this subject is even important enough to justify that .  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 02:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant coverage in the NYT report.  It talks about milk, not the sisters.  Just like @ Oaktree b , the only source I could find was from San Diego Reader .  The article is barely notable.  Tarantula TM ( speak with me ) ( my legacy ) 05:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SinemArt: Sources fail to meet WP:ORGCRIT .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Is there any independent verification of this?  I couldn't find many sources with a Google search, and the award source is connected to the subject.  Gedaali ( talk ) 08:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Gruhn: Doesn't meet GNG.  Refbombed with sports statistics and primary refs to the subject's school.  Only decent looking ref is a DL to a NatGeo piece I can't find.  Nswix ( talk ) 16:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Martial arts .  Nswix ( talk ) 16:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not notable as a coach or competitor, the jiujitsutimes references used in the article describe him as academy owner and instructor.  Lewolka ( talk ) 11:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ,Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 13:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notable.   He has competed nationally and internationally.   Has instructional videos on BJJ Fanatics.   Is coach to multiple notable fighters.  Mmareg ( talk ) 12:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability is not inherited .  Also having a couple instructionals on BJJFanatics and "competing nationally and internationally" doesn't prove notability unless you're a world champion in a competition like ADCC or IBJJF .  Nswix ( talk ) 18:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see anything that shows he meet he's more notable now than he was at the previous AfD.   He doesn't appear to meet any SNG and he seems to lack the significant independent coverage that meets WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 23:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benjamin Cupid: This was probably the best I could find.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thanasis Kaproulias: — Iadmc ♫ talk 17:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Further info Note that he goes by Novi_sad so don't confuse with the city in Serbia .  Still little under this moniker though.  Also note the two sources in the article are either dead or fail verification.  I forgot to PROD this article.  Sorry about that!  Sources do exist for Novi-sad: Sedition Art , again , Bandcamp , Discogs , eBay , lpdr , Horizons Music .  But these are really promo sites or sites for selling the music.  This is about the only thing that might help with nobility as all other sites for " Thanasis Kaproulias " are bios on IMDb, Discogs, AllMusic or the like.  Not enough coverage in truly reliable sources so fails WP:GNG (especially WP:SPIP ), WP:SINGER and WP:NBLP .  — Iadmc ♫ talk 04:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is clearly not enough coverage to meet the GNG.  I would say this is a case of WP:TOOSOON , but this article has existed since 2008 and is largely unchanged since 2010.  Toadspike [Talk] 15:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Relief Project: Only their website is provided as a source, but it seems to be no longer working.  No evidence of sufficient notability to warrant a standalone article.  CycloneYoris talk!  07:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CycloneYoris talk!  07:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find any secondary sources, so the articles fails WP:V .  Bendegúz Ács ( talk ) 10:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Larkrise Primary School: AusLondonder ( talk ) 11:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and England .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 11:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All the independant coverage I could find was either WP:ROTM or not significant about the school, not enough to help it meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL Shaws username .  talk .  12:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Likely delete.  There is coverage, largely in the Oxford Mail but I don't think it amounts to a GNG pass.  Sewage spill incident [19] , a teacher at the school was featured in The Guardian re Brexit [20] , local report on an Ofsted inspection [21] and letters about homelessness [22] .  Primary schools do not normally have their own article and I don't believe this to be an exception.  The school's teachers look to have been taking some kind of sociopolitical stance which has been being picked up in the local press and elsewhere, but no real evaluation or criticism.  Possible redirect to Donnington, Oxfordshire , but not advocating.  Rupples ( talk ) 13:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - like all primary schools, has received the usual run-of-the-mill random coverage but nothing that would lead us all to imagine the school itself is notable.  It might possibly be worth a one-line mention at Donnington, or more likely not.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 16:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, WP:MILL , and my own standards .  Bearian ( talk ) 19:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Grayson Hoffman: Sgubaldo ( talk ) 20:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and Florida .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 20:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article cites only one source, which is an interview with Hoffman.  Of four external link in the article (one in body), two are broken links to FashionTV.  The other indicates that he's a member of American Society of Media Photographers , which doesn't denote notability.  A quick Google search doesn't bring up any secondary sources.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 21:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Georgia (U.S. state) .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete