hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Global Connections: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  For the record this is not the same company as Global Connection which was previously deleted and salted.  * Pppery * it has begun... 04:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Advert for organisation that appears to fail WP:ORGCRIT .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 12:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unreferenced, promotional with no GNG met.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 19:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khalifa Gul Nawaz Teaching Hospital: I don't see it passing WP:ORG either — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Medicine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree, delete .  Crosji ( talk ) 04:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pickle Entertainment and Media: "I'm not sure this is a notable organization. All the notability asserted is inherited from the films it's either producing or distributing (which is a big difference)."  AShiv1212 ( talk ) 09:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  AShiv1212 ( talk ) 09:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per reasons provided by nom.  Llajwa ( talk ) 13:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
World Piece Tour: HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 18:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 18:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 11:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 02:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable tour that fails WP:GNG and WP:NTOUR .  Aspects ( talk ) 03:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NTOUR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robomagic: MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Companies ,  and United Kingdom .  AllyD ( talk ) 11:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:14, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elena Palmer: A BEFORE search only shown her self-published profiles.  Additionally, her only claim to notability, a book which criticized Peter III, has no sources documenting it.  ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 07:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 07:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women , Journalism , Germany ,  and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - before this article was nominated for deletion, a source from Welt in the External links section references the book: Kiel bekommt ein Denkmal für den umstrittenen Zaren Peter III.  (21.02.2014) "„Peter III war ein progressiver Herrscher, der durch wirtschaftliche und soziale Reformen das feudale Russland aus seiner mittelalterlicher Starre in die Moderne bringen wollte“, sagt die Journalistin Elena Palmer. Am Rande: Auf Basis ihres Buches „Peter III." (Google translate: "“Peter III was a progressive ruler who wanted to bring feudal Russia out of its medieval rigidity into the modern age through economic and social reforms,” says journalist Elena Palmer. By the way: Based on her book “Peter III." ). There also appears to be a source in sh:z about Palmer and her work/book: Wer war Peter III. wirklich? (07.06.2013) but this is subscription/payment-blocked. Beccaynr ( talk ) 17:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - there is also a section on the article talk page opened in 2020 with a list of suggested sources, including Volksstimme (17.06.2014), mentioning "Um diese jüngste Bewertung des Zaren aus Kiel hat sich vor allem die Autorin Elena Palmer mit ihrem Buch "Peter III. Der Prinz von Holstein" verdient gemacht." (Google translate: The author Elena Palmer made a great contribution to this latest assessment of the Tsar from Kiel with her book “Peter III. The Prince of Holstein”.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 17:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: as non-notable at this time.  Maybe in the future.  Fails GNG .  Nirva20 ( talk ) 22:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete google news search comes up with namesakes and no WP:SIGCOV .  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lechitel: Couldn't find any more information about it after searching online, and no sources are listed on the article.  TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can only find their website, and back issues at Issuu, nothing else for notability.  Nothing in the Bulgarian wikipedia.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It is possibly notable (exists since 1991 and is kind of popular among older people) but I can't find good sources.  -- Nk ( talk ) 06:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Parkruns in France: See also List of Parkruns in Australia ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Parkruns in Australia ) and Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 April 1 , in the latter discussion, the NOTDIR concern was raised by several experienced editors.  If anyone wants a directory of French Parkruns, they can visit parkrun.fr; there is no reason for Wikipedia to mirror this list.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Lists ,  and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy ping - to users who requested this go to AfD following completion of DRV @ Hobit : , @ Jclemens : , @ Robert McClenon : , & @ Stifle : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per list of Parkruns in Australia.  Clearly WP:NOTDIR .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 18:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is the sort of thing where people should be directed to the official source like https://www.parkrun.fr/events/#geo=5.19/46.582/2.859 rather than Wikipedia maintaining a copycat directory.  Reywas92 Talk 18:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per Wikipedia is not a directory and not satisfying list notability .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 21:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY , none of the lists pass WP:GNG or WP:NLIST .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  On top of NOTDIR and NLIST add other WP:NOTs .  Wikipedia is not a free web host for an organisations event listings.  Is not a mirror of primary content.  Is not a link farm.  Is not a means of promotion.  WP:PRIMARY , Do not base an entire article on primary sources.  (see also a source used, "Parkruns in France – parkrun Car Hire Discount") duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Clear WP:NOTDIR violation.  Stifle ( talk ) 08:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dwiragaman: At least half of the citations come from broadcasters.  This has been redirected and back a few times so I think an AfD is needed to determine consensus.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 21:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 21:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - This serial is very popular serial of Zee Bangla channel.  The source I added to this page passes WP:GNG .  Nilpriyo ( talk ) 9:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep Notable television series in Zee Bangla channel.  Xegma (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom, fails WP:GNG and WP:TVSERIES .  Source eval: Promo/primary "Full Episode Watch Online"  1.  "Dwiragomon 7th January 2015 Full Episode Watch Online".  Watch Live.  Retrieved 5 March 2015.  Promo/primary "Bengali TV Show Watch Online""  2. ^ "Watch Dwiragomon (Zee Bangla) Bengali TV Show Watch Online".  ibollytv.com.  Archived from the original on 26 February 2015.  Retrieved 5 March 2015.  Database style listing, fails WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV  3. ^ "Dwiragaman-Zee Bangla Serials".  SerialZone.  19 August 2014.  Database style listing, fails WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV  4. ^ "Dwiragaman".  Promo "Diragamon goes on air on August 18 on Zee Bangla at the 9 pm slot."  5. ^ "Small screen explores tu-tu-main-main with sis-in-laws in Diragomon".  The Times of India.  15 August 2014.  Primary/promo  6. ^ Anonymous (20 February 2015).  "Dwiragomon Launch On ground Event Pics".  Zee Bangla.  Archived from the original on 24 April 2015.  Retrieved 5 March 2015.  Primary/promo  7. ^ "Dwiragaman".  Zee Bangla.  Retrieved 5 March 2015.  Primary/promo  8. ^ "Zee Bangla breaks free from the usual 'saas-bahu' saga with – 'Dwiragaman'!".  Zee.  TV channel promo  9. ^ "Bijaylakshmi Chatterjee: বিরতি কাটিয়ে আবারও ধারাবাহিকের মুখ হয়ে ফিরছেন বিজয়লক্ষ্মী".  TV9 Bangla.  3 February 2022.  Subject does not meet WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BEFORE found plenty of promo, database style listings, nothing that meets SIGCOV from WP:IS.  Fails WP:N.  // Timothy :: talk 23:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Şanlıurfa Belediyespor: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harrison King: The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Professional footballer who played 34 games in the 2022–23 season. -- Echetus X e 12:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 30 of those appearances were in the non-professional seventh tier of English football.  But it's irrelevant, what counts is whether the article meets WP:GNG.  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 12:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify , player just made his debut in a highly covered league. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 05:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - doesn't yet have WP:SIGCOV from independent sources Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  20:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Molly Reeve: Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to a lack of notability, as it does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines for biographies. -- Welcome to Pandora ( talk ) 10:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 EAFF E-1 Football Championship: Fails WP:SIGCOV , was created WP:TOOSOON .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : Per Wikipedia:CRYSTAL , this is not well documented in reliable sources, and as such should not be an article for now.  This is bound to come up in the future, so we can move it to mainspace after more reliable sources provide coverage of this.  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 22:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] FYI, the result of the previous AfD was draftify and that draft still exists .  Not sure what this means in practice from a logistics/closure perspective.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 23:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing has changed from 1 month ago, when the previous AFD was closed (possibly WP:G4 applies).  The draft from the previous AFD still exists, so move to draftspace isn't needed.  Please also salt the article space name, so it can't be repeatedly re-created.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I looked at G4, but since the outcome was draftify, not explicitly delete, I figured it didn't apply.  I support salting.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , China , Hong Kong , Japan , Korea , Mongolia , South Korea , Taiwan ,  and Vietnam .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - still WP:TOOSOON as per previous discussion.  Keep the draft, delete this.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no change since last AFD.  Giant Snowman 18:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete - new user has been creating articles and adding information about fictional and very marginal sporting events.  User should also be banned as WP:NOTHERE .  Nfitz ( talk ) 05:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Especially given this article about a competition that, according to

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Jerusalem unrest: Per WP:NOTNEWS : "Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion" AusLondonder ( talk ) 20:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Israel ,  and Palestine .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 20:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There was concern something might happen this year with the war, but nothing significant actually happened in Jerusalem.  Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) ( talk ) 06:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Improper WP:SYNTH of 3 non-notable events.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree WP:NOTNEWS applies here.  Rupples ( talk ) 19:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Homifax: AntiDionysius ( talk ) 18:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Promotional article, cites are a collection of press releases and apparent paid content.  The article author did the bare minimum to get autoconfirmed by copy and pasting ChatGPT output into articles.  This is a likely case of undisclosed paid editing.  - MrOllie ( talk ) 18:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I removed the blackhat SEO and junk blogs.  Nothing else comes up in searches, other than SEO from the usual places.  Sam Kuru (talk) 14:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Winston Utomo: BoraVoro ( talk ) 12:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Indonesia , Singapore , California ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of independent notability from significant coverage ; I would not oppose a redirect to IDN Media .  Bearian ( talk ) 14:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete