hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ammar Nemo: In a WP:BEFORE search, the only significant coverage I could find was the WDIV-TV source cited, from local television news.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Michigan .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Martial arts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ammar Nemo has some pretty significant roles such as Tommy Tom-Tom in Dashing Through the Snow, Sam from BMF, and Tick Tock in Revenge Of The Mask.  LionelTechTips ( talk ) 03:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC) — Note to closing admin : LionelTechTips ( talk • contribs )  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD .  [ reply ] Comment Article creator has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.  Their current user page, and subsequent talk page posts, declare a conflict of interest.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If not for G5, person is not notable enough with only minor coverage.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 14:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search found no evidence that he meets the notability criteria for martial artists ( WP:MANOTE , WP:NMMA , or WP:NKICK ) or actors ( WP:NACTOR ).   Several small roles fail to show WP notability.   I also didn't see significant independent coverage in multiple reliable sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO .   An interview with a local TV station certainly isn't enough.  Papaursa ( talk ) 20:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Relies on a single source was a prompt to find source and all I could find were Databases like IMDb, Movie Databases, etc.  No WP: SIGCOV.  Fails WP: GNG .   All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 22:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Haven appeared in few films while not are not LEAD roles.  Per WP: NACTOR , needs more to attain notability.  Can be notable in the future!  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 22:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing reliable I could find online, per above 🍪 Cookie Monster 15:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akshat Sharma: Having non-RS Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , India ,  and Delhi .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi The article is written with proper references.  Its about one of the prominent slide guitarist in the field of Indian Classical Music.  References are given from the news articles and from book written by award winning author.  I see that one reference from Twitter was marked as unreliable source but would like to clear that it was from the official handle of a leading news channel.  It was not an individual opinion or something.  Would like to request that article should be kept.  AKSF01 ( talk ) 03:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  as per nom Worldiswide ( talk ) 06:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What is the reason for deleting an article which is written as per norms and proper references AKSF01 ( talk ) 16:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ AKSF01 whats ur connection with akshat?  Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The provided sources are sponsored content, and I couldn't find anything on Google to establish notability.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's strange that news articles published by well known Newspapers are looking sponsored content.  It's how articles are being written for musical artists.  And such sources are only used in Wikipedia for musical artists.  Links to all the press coverage are shared because all the content is not there on google or in soft copy format.  And a person notability is not ascertained by simply doing a google search.  AKSF01 ( talk ) 13:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tanmoy Roy: NoobThreePointOh ( talk ) 12:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  NoobThreePointOh ( talk ) 12:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Completely unsourced newly-created BLP .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 13:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ CanonNi That isn't a criteria for speedy deletion, as far as I know.  There's a credible claim of importance so not WP:A7 and it doesn't appear to have anything negative to make WP:G10 apply.  WP:BLPPROD could have been used (although AFD is a fine choice too).  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I initially tagged the page for BLP PROD during NPR, which was later removed in this edit .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 13:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah.  Sorry I missed the history.  I still believe it doesn't qualify for speedy deletion under A7 or G10; although perhaps G5 depending on the outcome of the SPI.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non-notable per WP:CREATIVE, WP:BIO and WP:GNG.  No significant coverage found in RS, either English or Bengali (তন্ময় রায়).  He directed Sesh Chithi , for which notability per WP:NFILM is also unclear, though it had some notable actors in the cast.  Sockpuppetry is also evident: see linked SPI.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 13:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and West Bengal .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources on the page and a simple search does not display any result on the director.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I am not seeing any coverage on this person.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 15:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No WP:RS references.  We're also approaching a WP:SNOWBALL close at this rate.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 21:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the others and possibly Wikipedia:Snowball clause also.  Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 01:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article lacks sources and fails to demonstrate the director's notability.  Also agree with referring to WP:SNOW .  Waqar 💬 16:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment From this edit the page creator may be engaging in block evasion.  TornadoLGS ( talk ) 21:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tshegofatso Seoka: Two indifferent references fails to show any notability.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and South Africa .  Velella Velella Talk 09:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are so many crap articles here but of course, you are blind enough to see that.  Ehat is notability to you??  This person and article is notable to us as South Africans, not for you!  There are need to really decolonize this Wikipedia and false European narratives as well as agendas.  We will write this is in our own African languages...  Juat to see how this will sit with you, or Piss you more off MollelwaFahaSaBasotho ( talk ) 02:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and History .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 10:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So whatever Wikipedia bully.  MollelwaFahaSaBasotho ( talk ) 02:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Cut it out - that's not how we talk to each other.  WP:AGF.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Its sad you never engage or even want to answer my simple question, thus proving your biasness on African content!  More reasons to dicolonise Wikipedia with such editos — Preceding unsigned comment added by MollelwaFahaSaBasotho ( talk • contribs ) 03:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article doesn't meet WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG .  Lefcentreright Discuss 22:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enea Jaupi: The only sources I'm able to find are passing mentions of transfer news or match appearances / squad inclusions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found News Rimini which is not a stats site, however, it only trivially mentions Jaupi.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Choe Hyon-u: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sources found.  Ping me if there are sources.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 01:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced.  Citadeol (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Revolver bond: Shellwood ( talk ) 09:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Merge content into whatever article exists for the Bond (Financial instrument).  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 11:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or merge?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as WP:OR .  The only uses of this term that I am able to find are derived from this page.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 02:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
California Republican Assembly: UtherSRG (talk) 13:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , United States of America ,  and California .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with California State Assembly Republican Caucus , which seems to be more up to date on its content.  — Maile ( talk ) 14:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -  OR.  Completely un-sourced, and may have been one person's viewpoint of this organization.   No way of telling.  — Maile ( talk ) 12:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] — Maile ( talk ) 22:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral comment This organization does not have any direct affiliation with the GOP Assembly Caucus and organizes the state party in general.  Nate • ( chatter ) 18:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for mentioning that.   I changed it.  — Maile ( talk ) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No comments since last relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 00:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I found numerous references in newspapers going back to the 1930s, but the ones I checked had limited depth.  Allegedly there’s a book on the subject ( [36] ) but it’s not online.  There’s a copy of Ronald Reagan’s speech to it, but arguably that’s not independent.  Overall I couldn’t prove or disprove notability.  Barnards.tar.gz ( talk ) 22:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RocknRollDating: None of the sources I looked at discuss the subject in sufficient depth to qualify for WP:NORG * Pppery * it has begun... 16:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Sexuality and gender , Canada , United States of America ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete None of the references I can find meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 11:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Victor Wei: Geschichte ( talk ) 12:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , South Korea ,  and Belgium .  Owen× ☎ 13:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find anything substantial in Korean either.  Maybe someone can find something in French?  toobigtokale ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of stars more luminous than any closer star: SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 09:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No citations in the article.  Cannot be verified.  killer bee 09:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astronomy and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As the first person to recommend AfD, I can attest to WP:NOTSTATS in addition to WP:SYNTH .  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stars larger than any closer star is very similar, and could have been bundled with this one.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 13:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is pretty cool.  Whether this is OR/SYNTH is a bit fuzzy, but it is definitely pushing up against WP:CALC : Comparisons of statistics present particular difficulties.  Editors should not compare statistics from sources that use different methodologies.  If not OR, might not pass NLIST but could possibly be merged.  I wonder if it can be transwikied somewhere in Wikibooks.  I might ask like to userfy to attempt that at some point.  — siro χ o 18:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:SYNTH .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 23:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to lack of coverage in reliable sources as well as WP:SYNTH and WP:NOTSTATS .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 07:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the above reasons, and because it is dependent on the current accuracy of measurements.  The more distant the component, the less likely the information is to be valid.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 17:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , because no sources have been cited, and is practically useless.  Atlantlc27Lol ( talk ) 14:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Soraca Jonin: WP:NOTINHERITED .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 06:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Religion ,  and Ireland .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 06:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Non-notable.  Scolaire ( talk ) 09:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The entire article appears to be based on a single 17th century inscription/plaque in Ross Errilly Friary .  The suggested familial connection to Charles Edward Jennings (born a century later) is weak, questionable and largely irrelevant.  Cannot see any justification (relative to any applicable NBIO or GNG criteria) to retain this title.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 12:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  For good order, I have added the (scant) sources, that I found in my own WP:BEFORE , to the article .  And updated to at the very least attribute some of the speculation the article contains.  So it is clear(er) who is/was doing the speculating.  As noted above, the only sources I can find ALL relate to the inscription in Ross Abbey.  And involve speculation from the antiquaries/writers (who observed the inscription) as to who the subjects of the inscription might have been.  This kind of "coverage", in all honesty, would seem to erode (rather than contribute) to notability.  As it emphasises that no substantive biographical sources appear to be available.  Which we would expect to find (even in the 17th century), if the subject was notable...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not a notable figure.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 13:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nigel Douglas: References are mostly worthless, and the highest level of rugby he played at appears to be Scottish National League Division One .  Uhooep ( talk ) 23:17, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Sportspeople , Martial arts , Rugby union ,  and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Insufficient notability.  Most of the references are tenuous or not even relevant at best.  Coldupnorth ( talk ) 19:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, looking at the history/page creator its arguably Wikipedia:Autobiography .  Coldupnorth ( talk ) 19:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete He is mentioned in some newspaper coverage of a tech company that he was chief executive of, when it was looking for and then secured some substantial investment.  The Scotland on Sunday article had his name in the article title and described him as a serial entrepreneur, but I couldn't find much other coverage of him beyond the articles related to his role at GSI.  Other links relate to participation in sports, or family members.   I don't see that notability has been established here.  Drchriswilliams ( talk ) 07:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete "Nigel played sport at a high level. He is a black belt at judo".  Vanity page.  doesn't meet sports bio notability and WP:GNG .  Lekkha Moun ( talk ) 10:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Besides the COI/autobiography issue, there is no evidence of him being notable for either judo or rugby.   I found a business database entry for the company he co-founded and it says there are only 11 total employees.   There is nothing that shows he meets any WP notability criteria.   He has family members that seem more notable than him, but WP notability is not inherited.  Papaursa ( talk ) 01:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete