hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Propel (PHP) : A user (who is now indefinitely banned) reversed the PROD.  The edit history nor the talk page actually gives a reason for the PROD.  I still don't think this article meets notability guidelines, and I can't find any sources that would make it meet these guidelines.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom, no indepedent sources found.  Quuxbazbarfoo ( talk ) 17:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect : I am not finding evidence of attained notability .  It has a line entry in List_of_object–relational_mapping_software#PHP so an ATD redirect to there could be an outcome.  AllyD ( talk ) 21:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Noble Cause Foundation, Bangalore : Non-notable organization.  SL93 ( talk ) 02:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India .  SL93 ( talk ) 02:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Education .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Organization fails notability with no significant coverage.  Only 2 sources on the page and that are poor and unreliable.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arab Media Watch : Seems to pretty obviously fail WP:CORP .  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 14:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and United Kingdom .  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 14:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - whilst there are mentions, even in academic journals, of this organisation I am not seeing the comprehensiveness needed to meet the GNG.  There are a fair number of bits and pieces about Sharif Hikmat Nashashibi so maybe a section on that page should be fleshed out a bit and possibly have a redirect.  JMWt ( talk ) 19:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raddle (website) : Its only reliable source is a single Vice article remarking on its creation back in 2017, the other cited sources are from the website itself.  I tried searching for other sources but found nothing, so it apparently doesn't meet the notability criteria of being covered by multiple, independent reliable sources.  If it were notable, surely it would have received more coverage in the past 6 years?  Grnrchst ( talk ) 21:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 21:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Couldn't find any other reliable sources (not even trivial mentions!!) other than that Vice one.  Doesn't look notable, and I don't think it could be redirected or merged (where to?).  OutsideNormality ( talk ) 01:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only mention of them was a reddit thread, saying this was launched as an alternative to reddit.  I can't even find mentions of the website.  Long way from GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's a Zoom clone with more coverage than the website [5] , using the same name.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Raddle has little real coverage in reliable sources.  ― Susmuffin Talk 08:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:WEBCRIT and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pseudorandom index generator : A web search suggests there is no systematic use of the term “Pseudorandom index generator” outside of that source and connected pages ( WP:NOR ).  Moreover, the username of the article's author coincides with the username of the corresponding github page [6] ( WP:SELFPROMOTE ).  Nikita Medved ( talk ) 18:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Neither the general concept nor the specific algorithm are referenced to a reliable source , and WP is not the appropriate forum for original research.  Hqb ( talk ) 19:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Aintabli ( talk ) 19:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A section on General Concept including a specific algorithm instance has been added. (User: RondeSC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RondeSC ( talk • contribs ) 21:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BEFORE only returns a handful of entries in known predatory journals such as WASET as well as one self-published book.  The lone source (Hackaday) used in the Wikipedia article does not even mention the concept of a PRIG, and even if this subject did pass muster for notability (it does not), I would be wholly in favor of WP:TNT , as literally the entire article constitutes original research .  Is there a vote for 'Move to Wikibooks'?  TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 21:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naxeex : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator.  No notability and a search for sources turned up nothing, so this could very much be promo.  λ Negative MP1 18:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Reeks of WP:COI .  Press releases ain’t passin’ WP:GNG for me.  TLA (talk) 04:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hi!  Article creator here.  While I am sad that the article got nominated for deletion, I can understand why.  I initially thought of making an article for the company because it was a pretty popular developer during my childhood days and i actually thought that was enough for it to be notable.  So I made it.  However, there was massive revisions courtesy of the Naxeex founder making a wikipedia profile and making edits, removing some of my references, and turning it into a big fat ad.  I agree that now I can see that making it was a bad idea.  I sincerely apologize.  Bulls123 ( talk ) 14:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: no need to apologize, totally makes sense.  Seems like the article has WP:COI after your creation.  TLA (talk) 00:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ ChrisGultieri : Partially related but you edited sourcing about Naxeex in this edit on Battleboarding .  Any comment or was that scoop.it ref reliable?  IgelRM ( talk ) 04:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shahzad Sidhu : No indication of significance.  Nothing on social media.  Own site is only half-built.  scope_creep Talk 13:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there's also evidence of self-promotion in the primary editor's editing history.  Paywalled cited sources appear to be primarily about Sidhu Moosewala .  signed, Rosguill talk 13:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pakistan .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom, self promotion and refs do not support the article.  M.Ashraf333 ( talk ) 17:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeffrey Spieler : Mooonswimmer 14:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  GSS 💬 15:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing notable.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 03:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Seeing hardly any secondary sources, and I'm pretty sure that his position is unnotable as well.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ana Trutić : The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found was this 2020 piece which provides a few sentences of coverage after she scored an impressive goal in the Serbian Women's Super League .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Montenegro .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oratory Athenaeum for University Preparation : JMWt ( talk ) 08:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only 1 primary source provided.   Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing WP:NHSCHOOL and GNG overall since no secondary sources or independent analysis seem to exist.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baba Sarvjeet Giri Memorial College : Only a directory listing provided as a source.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Shellwood ( talk ) 07:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unable to find GNG-level sources for this school.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL . - Imcdc Contact 14:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can only find database sources like iCBSE , which don't confer notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elisania Torrico : All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2015 , 2017 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shoun Handirisi : The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was a pair of sentences here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG fail, and with no lists for Zimbabwean cricketers there's no redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Inactive local player, who fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG .  Robo Cric Let's chat 15:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Craig Kaplan : Probably WP:G11 .  User:Emlevyy is basically a copy-paste of this; they should both be deleted.  RoySmith (talk) 13:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  RoySmith (talk) 13:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's a computer science professor with the same name that should have an article based on the hits, not this fellow.  Promo'ed out the wazoo and written like a bio.  Non-notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I didn't find sources, and so much of this BIO is un-sourced that it's obviously not based on independent information.  I note, also, that the main source, Hashtag Multimedia, is his own publication so those are not independent.  Yes, that interesting-sounding computer prof is what turns up with a name search.  He might be worth researching for an article.  Lamona ( talk ) 04:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Flamingo creek : I can find a bunch of sources announcing construction of the project, but nothing that counts as WP:SIGCOV , and was unable to even verify whether the development was completed as expected in 2011, which is really saying something.  The previous AfD was closed as keep without pointing to any sources at all.  * Pppery * it has begun... 01:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As Yet Another Speculative Dubai Subdivision That Went Nowhere ® , and even barring that it would be just as non-notable in Dublin, Ohio as it would be in Dubai as real estate WP:PROMO .  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:39, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Nate.  Obviously fails WP:GNG , and I don't know how this the first AfD in 2013.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Uncompleted project proposal.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 10:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jats in Rajasthan politics : See WP:FANCRUFT .  None of the cited sources give any importance to the caste.  There is also blatant violation of BLPs across this article because as per WP:CASTEID it is necessary for the subject to state their caste in their own words.  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 07:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Rajasthan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lead of this article promotes this caste and fails to meet encyclopedic standards and other information violates BLP policy per WP:CASTEID .  Based on the current content of the article, it appears that the intention behind creating this article was solely to glorify a particular caste.  This is not the first time TheSlumPanda has done this; they have previously promoted caste here .  Looking at their editing history, it seems they have mainly focused on caste-related articles.  I am worried they might not be familiar with WP:NPOV , WP:V and WP:GSCASTE .  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've notified them of WP:GSCASTE and WP:ARBIPA .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 16:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Taluka Hospital Sakrand : I don't see it passing WP:ORG either.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of UEFA Europa Conference League broadcasters : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Contextes are there to claim 'channel x' brought out the right to coverages in 'country x', not to assert notability.  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Europe .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 09:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Eadie : The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this short piece from The Edinburgh Reporter with maybe five sentences of coverage, most of which is just repeating her own words.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete