Can You Duet : A merge to a page of lists List of programs broadcast by CMT was suggested, but that is simply a page with a list of articles...it does not have details on any of the articles within its paramaters.  Therefore, I do not feel it is an appropriate target for a MERGE.  I did REDIRECT the page there, but that was reversed.  I would only support a MERGE if there was an appropriate page to add any info to, but currently I can not identify any.  Therefore, a deletion of the article is the only outcome, unless independent notability can be established.  Donald D23 talk to me 20:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Television ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 20:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The show ended in 2008, so whatever sources were listed in the last AfD are probably all you'll find.  They're ok, not super-extensive, but enough to prove notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] or merge a relevant section in the network's article, I'm not fussed about it.  I don't think it should be deleted, we seem to have enough sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : As per the above, this show aired 16 years ago, so granted the majority of sources are likely dead-linked or no longer exist on the web, but the show was definitely notable at the time of the page's creation and produced several country acts with varying success, had a panel and hosts who were reputable insiders in the industry, and was a program aired on a prominent TV station.  It's also bizarre that there was considerable discussion surrounding keeping at least some of the information on this show and merging it onto another page, but instead of anyone doing that, someone hastily took matters into their own hands months later and just blanket-deleted the whole page.  I also see a lot of content listed on the page that could (and should) easily have sources added to it that just... isn't there for whatever reason.  CloversMallRat ( talk ) 06:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Here's a Common Sense Media review [3] and one discussion of a performer [4] .  It's not a slam dunk, but Common Sense review is a RS.  The rest help too; Common Sense, Variety and Billboard should be enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And here's one about the winner: [5] .  We have enough for at least a basic article about the show and the winners.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you!  The article doesn't need to be big and grandiose to remain on Wikipedia.  There are enough sources to make it notable and relevant, but the show aired 16 years ago and the Internet doesn't just keep articles around forever.  I remember when it aired, it was quite an ordeal at the time in the country music sphere.  I'm sure it would've been sourced out the wazoo if we had the resources we have now with how much media content is all over now vs. back then.  People were barely even using Facebook in 2008.  But we can't go back in time.  I do think the article needs cleaned up a bit, I will say that.  There's definitely a way to make some of the content read better, i.e. CloversMallRat ( talk ) 18:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure how the discussion veered off onto a talk page, in a addition to the one here, but the last discussion had the sourced discussed by Ten Pound Hammer.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  Jake Wartenberg ( talk ) 15:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep