Battle of Bandanwara: The title is a fabricated one, which contradicts the criteria for creating an article about a military conflict.  The article does not meet the notability WP:GNG , as the sources merely mention it as a military conflict, without dedicating even a single page completely to it.  Moreover, there is no record of a battle called the "Battle of Bandanwara" in the specified year mentioned in the article.  Imperial [AFCND] 08:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Rajasthan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep , and suggest withdrawal .  The nomination seems flawed, and fails perhaps both WP:SK #1 and #3.  The OP's issue seems mainly with the name, which can be addressed elsewwhere From the History of Mewar , p.324: On receiving intelligence of his march, the Maharana decided to intercept him on the border of Mewar.  For this purpose he despatched a large army headed by the Chiefs, Chauhan Devabhan (Kothariya), Rathor Suratsingh, Sanga (Devagarh), Dodiya Hathisingh, Gangadas (Bansi), Jhala Sajja (Delawara), Rathor Jaisingh (Badnor), Samantsingh (Bambhora) etc, In an engagement held at Bandhanwara Ranabaz Khan together with his chiefs were slain and the Maharana succeeded to retain the paraganas in his possession .
 These events are dated to February/March I711.  So at least one historian mentions it by this name (give or take an 'h'!) and considers the date correct.  Suggesting a military engagement isn't a battle of some kind seems a bit of a stretch.  And frankly, suggesting that this is fabricated could be interpreted as an aspersion , as it suggests a deliberate hoax.  Which is clearly not the case.  Other sources also discuss the battle in the context of military and political history (e.g. The Grenadiers, a Tradition of Valour , Mewar and the Maratha Relations, 1735-1818 A.D. , Pratap, the Patriot: With a Concise History of Mewar ), and even culturally (e.g. Paintings from Rajasthan in the National Gallery of Victoria etc).  I'm afraid this nomination makes some curious claims, claims which are directly contradicted by reliable sources .  ——Serial Number 54129 14:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello @ Serial Number 54129 .  Could you please provide the source that explicitly mentions the name "Battle of Bandanwara"?  It's important to note that these are only Google snippet notes, which are often available even for minor skirmishes.  The battle must be thoroughly described in reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG .  If the event meets the GNG as mentioned above, we could consider renaming the article or merging it with one of the parent articles.  If you could develop the article so that we can submit it for review through WP:HEY , and if it meets the GNG, we can move it to the appropriate title.  The current status of the article does not meet the standard requirements.  Imperial [AFCND] 16:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ImperialAficionado, thank you; I have been here a while now, so I flatter myself.  I have some small understanding of the deletion process.  Firstly, the name.  If you have an issue with the article title, that does not mean it is a hoax or that it must be deleted.  Spellings and linguistic cultures and traditions change over time, and the only difference I can see is that occasionally, sources insert an 'h' or possibly an 'n'.  Neither of those is egregious enough to claim that, therefore, it does not exist.  If you think the title needs adjusting, start a talk page discussion, go to Requested Moves or even be bold and move it yourself; redirects are cheap , especially redirects from misspellings .  Again, if you wish to dispute that a battle was really a skirmish, fine: but again, that is merely a content dispute and can be resolved through our usual consensus-building processes .  As for Google snippets, that depends on where you are in the world and what Google will let you see.  It varies with jurisdiction, so what you might see, I might not, and vice versa .  Apart from demanding other work to improve it per HEY, etc., perhaps address the actual purpose of AfD, which is to demonstrate a lack of notability ; your nomination fails to do so convincingly.  Indeed, it is procedurally flawed: titles and minor errors are not grounds for deletion.  A thorough reading of WP:BEFORE explains what is expected of a nominator.  Fundamentally: WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP .  ——Serial Number 54129 14:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I would expect a "speedy keep and suggest withdrawal" response to have extremely good sourcing, but I'm not seeing that here.  Is that quote supposed to be significant coverage?  It's two sentences!  So, that doesn't help us show notability.  What about the others?  I don't see any sigcov in that snippet from The Grenadiers , and what I do see suggests that all we'll get from that is the place name and a year.  I could go pull it from the library and check it, but it's only the one hit, so that doesn't seem promising.  Likewise, I could go order up Mewar and the Maratha Relations , but the snippet I can see on google books doesn't fill me with optimism; I tried searching from another angle and it appears to be about a sentence there also.  What I can see of Pratap, the Patriot suggests the result is a false positive, since it's talking about Bhim Singh of Mewar .  I get nothing from a journal search of my library, effectively nothing from google scholar, and this sole result from JSTOR (someone less blind than I am will have to find the references to "Battle of Bandanwara" on pp 4 and 5).  -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep From the sources cited here, Pratap, the Patriot is not a false positive. It is not referring to Bhim Singh of Mewar , but referring to Bhim Singh (Bhimsi) Kothari of Begun, who took part in this battle. Har Bilas Sarda had written about the same Bhim Singh Kothari [ here ] who took part in this battle. I can add these sources as well on the page. History quester ( talk ) 15:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Aha, thanks for the clarification. I'll go check on Pratap, the Patriot at the library, then, to see if there's significant coverage there. Regarding the source you found, the closest it comes to naming a battle is The next morning, when the two armies met on the banks of the Khari river . It doesn't even seem to give a date, beyond the regnal years of Maharana Sangram Singh II. It looks like this is indeed the same battle, going by the details in the wikipedia article, so I think we have one good source now, which isn't enough for a WP:GNG pass yet, and additionally raises concerns about the title of the article. I'm not seeing "Bandanwara" anywhere anywhere in this source you've found. Did I just miss it? -- asilvering ( talk ) 16:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It’s not the case as initially raised that there is no record of this battle, or it is not referred by this name.  This request doesn't qualify for WP:AFD .  There are more than one source which have mentioned this battle or have references to it.  There are sources already added on the main page, listing down other sources here, which I am adding to the main page.  RV Somani’s book History of Mewar .  From the sources provided by Serial Number 54129 ,this battle is mentioned in the below sources.  Pratap, the patriot Har Bilas Sarda mentioned the same events of Pratap, the patriot in his book Speeches And Writings Har Bilas Sarda , giving details about Kothari Bhim Singh, who was killed in this battle.  The Grenadiers , a Tradition of Valour mentions the battle of Bandanwara (1711) on the state colours of Mewar Bhupal Infantry, which was later merged into Indian Army.  K.S. Gupta, Mewar and the Maratha Relations Paintings from Rajasthan in the National Gallery of Victoria History quester ( talk ) 13:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  A source analysis would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus