The Defiant (band): I tried, but couldn't find significant coverage in third-party reliable sources.  A Google News search yielded some sources, but they mostly consist of passing mentions or routine coverage.  IMO, it fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:NBAND and is a possible case of WP:NOTINHERITED .  GSS 💬 07:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and United States of America .  GSS 💬 07:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:BAND#C6 , coverage in the Boston Globe and Phoenix New Times .  Mach61 08:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I doubt these sources discuss the band in detail; rather, they likely provide routine coverage.  GSS 💬 08:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GSS why are you writing this as if you haven't actually read the linked articles Mach61 17:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's your assumption; nothing else.  Could you explain how the sources you mentioned above satisfy WP:INDEPTH ?  GSS 💬 17:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GSS The New Times piece is over 1000 words long Tangential:INDEPTH links to WP:Notability (events) , which is obviously not applicable in this case.  Perhaps you caught a case of WP:UPPERCASE ?  Mach61 18:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ⁤I agree that the article is lengthy, but it seems to lack sufficient independent focus on the band itself.  ⁤⁤Throughout this article, the band's name is mentioned only five times, excluding the title and image description, and often in passing.  ⁤⁤It's quite normal to receive such attention in the media when the subject is linked to notable people.  ⁤⁤However, as of now, since the band was formed, it hasn't achieved anything notable.  ⁤⁤They have released a few single and only one album, and that too on a non-notable label.  ⁤⁤While the band has garnered some attention because of its notable founding members, this doesn't establish independent notability.  Therefore, I would say it's too soon for an independent article until the band becomes independently notable.  GSS 💬 04:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GSS Your statement that Throughout this article, the band's name is mentioned only five times, excluding the title and image description, and often in passing } is nonsensical, the term "passing mention" refers to coverage 1-2 sentences long in an article.  Obviously, an article about the band is not a passing mention of them.  Your statement that the band hasn't "achieved" anything notable is just an opinion; I've already shown two sources covering them in detail Mach61 23:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NMUSIC #6 and #12 (featured on Jimmy Kimmel Live).   I don't think the Boston Globe article meets SIGCOV because it only really states the band has formed and the members; the rest of it is about Barrett and the Bosstone's.   However, the Phoenix New Times does meet SIGCOV with a nice overview of their debut album which in combination with the other criteria, gets it over the hump for me.  S0091 ( talk ) 15:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep