hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
The Twilight Kingdom: Does not meet the general notability guideline.  Heavy Grasshopper ( talk ) 12:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Radio .  Heavy Grasshopper ( talk ) 12:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unless someone can show that this got independent coverage, it doesn't need its own article.  Even if someone does, this can likely be included in the Doctor Who article under spin-offs or another appropriate section.  Cortador ( talk ) 12:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures .  It exists but nothing in the article suggests it meets WP:GNG .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of educational institutions in Amaravati: Two of these institutions are in Vijayawada, one is in Mangalagiri, and of the three actually in Amaravati, two don’t event exist yet, leaving just one.  In any case this is an unnecessary fork of List of institutions of higher education in Andhra Pradesh .  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Lists ,  and Andhra Pradesh .  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy redirect to Amaravati#Education .  This list is useless, but most logical outcome is to redirect to the parent article and appropriate section.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  // Timothy :: talk 16:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect WP:CHEAP Lightburst ( talk ) 18:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eubians: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:39, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Other than the books they appear in, there appears to be no discussion of this group of people.  Not meeting notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Saga of the Skolian Empire which has some coverage, as WP:ATD — siro χ o 21:56, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to target above.  Fails GNG.  Unreferenced.  Ping me if better sources are found (unlikely).  I did BEFORE too and no luck finding anything useful on my part, I fear.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 00:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BEFORE didn't reveal any suitable sources.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I searched newspapers.com and found some references to the Eubian Gulf and Eubian goats, but nothing about Eubian people.  Delete Jacona ( talk ) 20:38, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 18 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 03:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Science ,  and Oregon .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into University of Oregon#Knight Campus .  There are actually a fair few RS reporting on this campus, but they're almost all focused on the donation the University received to construct it.  It might one day be notable in its own right, but for now it doesn't look like it.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 14:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe someone can handle the merger if it happens?  Wiseoleman17 ( talk ) 15:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect into University of Oregon#Knight Campus .  It's a highly specific search term, so at least it's not a problematic redirect.  I don't really see any content that's screaming "merge me" into the target article though.  Doesn't really have standalone notability though.  KoA ( talk ) 13:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KSKJ-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Another LPTV with mostly national programming and little-to-no significant coverage to speak of, which is of little surprise for an eventual HC2/Innovate station.  A remnant of the looser inclusion standards of 2006, and yet another nominal survivor of a bulk nomination of many HC2/Innovate station articles from 2023.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect. .  another station to become a redirect. .  -- Danubeball ( talk ) 00:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
One Night in Malibu: The first two sources are about the "digital experience" video event rather than the album, and one of those, uDiscover Music, is a news site owned by Universal Music Group .  It received no reviews from notable outlets (the one on the article is a college student reviewing the album, not a professional music critic, and the only other source I found through Google is a WordPress blog ), and didn't chart, so I think it should be redirected to OneRepublic discography as it's still a valid redirect.  Ss 112 19:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : One mention in American Songwriter [8] is all I could find.  Not enough for an article here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : if the decision is not to keep this article, it could be redirected to OneRepublic discography#Live albums instead.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 22:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to OneRepublic discography#Live albums per above.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aras Baskauskas: Not notable for every other activities he did, like releasing just one album, operating one clothing brand, and reappearing in Survivor: Blood vs. Water with his bro.  WP:PAGEDECIDE should apply if neither WP:BLP1E nor WP:BIO1E does.  Must be redirected to Survivor: Panama (alternatively, list of Survivor (American TV series) contestants if more suitable) George Ho ( talk ) 23:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Music , Television ,  and California .  George Ho ( talk ) 23:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Survivor (American TV series) contestants .  Don't oppose the other redirect option, too.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
IBC Balita Ngayon: Recommend Redirect to List of programs previously broadcast by Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 02:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Philippines .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 02:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Couldn't find any WP:GNG passing sources.  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 08:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Robbie Williams: Live at the O2: – Davey 2010 Talk 23:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Robbie Williams discography tagged with {{ r without mention }} .  Found no notability either.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 05:24, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seems to fail WP:NALBUM as per nomination, I can't find any reviews/coverage of the album or any evidence of it charting.  InDimensional ( talk ) 12:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Robbie Williams discography , fails WP:NALBUM .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 17:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Button station: Literally just a post along the tracks with no significant coverage to establish notability.  – dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  – dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Like other flag stop stations that are today only a signpost, this was probably a staffed building 90 years ago in an era when more people were needed to run a railway.  I can't easily confirm this, but I suspect that this is a case of "Once notable, always notable".  Even if the present-day appearance is unimpressive, it probably was once notable.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think thats likely, flag stops on VIA Rail are literally flag down the train .  Jumpytoo Talk 04:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] These flag stops are in the middle of goddamn nowhere in the Canadian tundra.  There never were settlements or much of anything.  These speculative and assumption-filled comments really aren't helpful.  If it's notable, can you present even a single shred of evidence?  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 23:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train as WP:ATD Jumpytoo Talk 04:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect seems sensible.  I do understand once-notable, always notable, but sometimes an individual article isn't the  best way to present information to our readers.  If there is nothing to say about this stop except that it exists, we can do that more efficiently in the form of a list at the main railroad's article.  I'll change my view if anyone finds interesting stuff to say about it.  Elemimele ( talk ) 06:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - please see the very lengthy station-by-station analysis of stations on this line that I posted previously at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Silcox station .  I spent hours researching this line.  This location is a signpost in the middle of deep forest.  It’s kilometers from any settlement.  It serves the occasional hunter or trapper.  Look at it on satellite imagery and you can see there was never anything there.  — A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 13:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Morrison Ranch, Agoura Hills, California: Broc ( talk ) 14:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Broc ( talk ) 14:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Agoura_Hills, California#Geography , where this neighborhood is briefly mentioned, and appears on a map, and per the previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Agoura, Agoura Hills, California .  The one source in the article does mention the neighborhood, but it's really mainly about a goat farm.  That content would be better used in the paragraph about the neighborhoods.  Redirects are cheap.  Firsfron of Ronchester 15:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Agoura_Hills, California#Geography or Delete , This one is not like the others and the newspapers mention it, and that it is in the "Highland" area.  The mentions are related to it being a housing development.  So I think, but can't be sure that it's not a real community either.  SEE User_talk:Arspickles17#Agoura_Hills_Neigborhoods and judge for yourself.  James.folsom ( talk ) 02:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Coruscant Nights: Possible ATDs are merge and redirect, or just redirect, to Michael Reaves .  I think a merge would unbalance the article on Reaves.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Michael Reaves : I found a few passing mentions and listicles , but nothing else exists.  ― Susmuffin Talk 05:41, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Michael Reaves - I am not finding much in the way of reviews on any of the individual books or the trilogy as a whole.  What few I am finding appear to be on fansites, that would not count as reliable sources.  As  the books are already listed on the author's article, and there really is no sourced information here to merge, simply Redirecting there would be appropriate.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Earth is Flat: Tales from the Flat Earth and Elsewhere: Cannot find a single review.  Redirect to author?  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tanith Lee bibliography#Tales from the Flat Earth with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  I did not find any coverage in reliable sources of the book.  I support a redirect to the author's bibliography, where the book is already mentioned.  The book currently is not mentioned in the author's article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 07:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sounds good to me.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 07:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Cunard.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 16:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Oswald Martyn: It seems his only known time playing cricket is playing in one first-class match and getting dismissed with a score of zero.  Tartar Torte 18:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Cricket ,  and England .  Tartar Torte 18:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - intriguing name, intriguing spelling.  There must be something that we can find about this individual from easily-obtained sources.  Bobo .  21:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is some stuff about him on BNA.  He was a schoolmaster and was charged with offences against 5 boys, though I am unsure of the nature of those charges as I still haven't got my BNA access back.  He can definitely be expanded.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 22:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Someone must be able to access it...  I can't help but think this means the nominator didn't do much work in order to find new information...  Bobo .  09:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd drop a note on the project talk page, a couple of people on there have access to the BNA.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 20:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Essex County Cricket Club players While there appears to be some coverage in the BNA here, I'm not sure there will be enough for a GNG pass still.  If someone can access and then expand the article then excellent, however redirecting in the meantime saves the page history until that time comes.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above per the long established consensus that this is what we do if we can't find anything.  A note can be added to the article summarising what we do know as well.  Blue Square Thing ( talk ) 11:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sandrine Kouadio: The subject played for the Ivory Coast women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  Just passing mentions like 1 , 2 and 3 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Ivory Coast .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 08:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 08:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WCKV-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 06:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Tennessee .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 06:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in Tennessee#LPTV stations : a 25-year-old station is probably more likely to have the required significant coverage , but this topic area's inclusion standards are no longer based on existence and the mere possibility that there are sources — they require SIGCOV and the definitive existence of same.  Unless better sourcing emerges than directories, FCC records, and non- independent sources, an {{ R to list entry }} as an alternative to deletion is the best that can be done.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Subject has enough coverage to meet the WP:GNG , including [ [41] ][ [42] ] Let'srun ( talk ) 01:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to state list That's not SIGCOV.  That's mostly regurgitated press releases.  About the only substantive fact I learned was that this was once a FamilyNet affiliate.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 23:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect