hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Arshad Adnan : This was speedy deleted in March for not properly sourcing a strong notability claim, and was then recreated just over a week ago -- but the notability claim isn't stronger or better-sourced than the first time.  Two of the eight footnotes are just redundant reduplication of two of the others, so there are really only six distinct sources -- but four of them are just here to verify his family relationships to other notable people, rather than to demonstrate his notability, and of the just two sources that link him to film , one just briefly namechecks his existence without being about him in any non-trivial sense.  Which leaves just one source that's actually contributing any WP:GNG points, but that's not enough.  As always, neither actors nor film producers get automatic notability freebies just because their work exists -- and notability is not inherited , so he isn't automatically entitled to an article just because of who his parents are, either -- but the article claims nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable at all, and isn't sourced anywhere near well enough to get him over GNG.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bangladesh .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Don’t think he is notable for now.  Sources are just passing mentiones and not claiming notablity.  Grabup ( talk ) 06:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 20:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Confused A search finds his name in some reliable sources.  However, there are discussions about his films or dramas , rather than about him personally.  Ontor22 ( talk ) 07:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: He might meet Wikipedia's notability requirement under Socialite Category and Sustained Category.  Crampcomes ( talk ) 00:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  There is some mentions but i don't see any WP:SIGCOV .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 15:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LoginRadius : References do not meet WP:ORGCRIT and I was unable to find anything better in a WP:BEFORE search.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Was thinking of simply redirecting this to founder Deepak Gupta (researcher) but I have concerns with notability of that page as well.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - coverage that exists is either not in-depth, not independent, or not reliable.  No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBUSINESS that I can find.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 20:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sankar Natesan : Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 00:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 00:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only possibility of a pass is WP:Prof#C1 , but GS cites of less than 900 in this very highly cited field are not sufficient.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 00:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete .  Registrar is generally a more senior post at Indian universities compared to the west, basically the chief administrative officer reporting directly to the president/vice chancellor, so it's possible that being a registrar might lead to more coverage.  That said, I don't see sufficient sourcing for GNG and I don't see him clearly passing any of the NACADEMIC criteria.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology , Medicine , Singapore , Tamil Nadu , Illinois ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:PROF .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2012 Uzbekistan Futsal League season : This article has had no substantial prose since 2012 and I am not convinced that there is sufficient coverage from independent sources (see WP:IS ) for this topic to have its own article.  Uzbek and Russian Wikipedia only cite primary sources.  I see no reason why this needs a separate article when Uzbekistan Futsal League summarises the top 3, which is enough.  Wikipedia is not a free web host for every single league table of every single sport in existence, especially if the only other places hosting the table are non-independent sources like Futsal Planet and Uzbekistan Football Association .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Uzbekistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luis García (footballer, born September 1993) : It can be verified that he played 46 minutes for Barcelona in Ecuador , which is nowhere near enough for an encyclopedic article.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Ecuador .  Owen× ☎ 12:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  46 minutes in professional football speaks for itself.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anil Vasave : One of his claims of notability is reaching Everest Base Camp (not Everest, which is itself no longer sufficiently notable).  Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milasha Joseph where stories are generated in the Indian media (per WP:NEWSORGINDIA ) but the inherent event(s) that are the foundation of the BLPs notability are clearly not notable.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 12:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 12:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources are fleeting promo that are likely non-independent.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 05:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
August Cinema : No independent reliable sources about the company, only passing mentions in routine coverage about films.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 12:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , India ,  and Kerala .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 12:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mileah Kromer : nf utvol ( talk ) 17:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I do admit the Baltimore Magazine article might be okay depending on whether it is a RS and not considered an interview, but fails WP:GNG and written promotionally.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  TJMSmith ( talk ) 01:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saad Al-Shurafa : My Arabic searches found nothing of any value.  This is a trivial mention on an article covering a reserve fixture, this article states that he is increasing his intensity of training under the guidance of his father, and nothing else, and, finally, this article mentions him once in a reserve fixture match report.  The article about increasing his training intensity is the only thing even close to WP:SIGCOV but, on its own, it falls some way short.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vukile Sofisa : JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  Lots of coverage but I'm not sure there's enough to deem a pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bundoora Secondary College : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Channapatna : It contains irrelevant content, forcefully stretching the article.  The relevant sources cited in the 'Battle' section provide only passing mentions, such as "In 1759 it was surprised by the Mahratta army under Gopal Hari, but was speedily released by Haidar Ali" and "The Maratha leader attacked Bangalore and seized Chennapatnam, and Haider countered the attack by sending his favorite officer."  It's concerning how these articles can be constructed with such minimal coverage, often just two lines.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 05:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , India ,  and Karnataka .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  wP:SYNTH page.  Snippets used here from sources that do not help with coverage and others fail verification, and one source used in the battle segment is by Benjamin Lewis Rice who falls under unreliable WP:RAJ source as a British in the Mysore civil service during British occupation of India.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Antonia Gallegos : I could not find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Chile .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 08:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not meet WP:NGYMNAST criteria and fails WP:NSPORTS without independent coverage.  Sources in article are limited to competition results and a profile in her alma mater's publication (thus non-independent).  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing beyond trivial or non-independent coverage.  No hits on PQ (for the gymnast at least).  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peter the Sinner : There is apparently though zero evidence that he is known as "Peter the Sinner", that he is venerated anywhere by anyone, or that he has anything to do with the international day against homophobia.  Fram ( talk ) 15:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , History , Sexuality and gender , Religion ,  and Spain .  Fram ( talk ) 15:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as subject doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV or the WP:NVICTIM thresholds.  While I wouldn't go as far as the nom (in using the term "hoax"), the only material sources do not connect the names "Pere Cirera" or "Peter the Sinner" with the person named "Mahoma Mofar".  (In The Death Penalty in Late-Medieval Catalonia: Evidence and Significations (2019; Routledge) by Flocel Sabaté, for example, there nothing about the person converting to Christianity or changing their name or similar. ) The reliance on non-reliable sources (including another Wikipedia article and the author's own YouTube channel) is also a significant concern.  Even if we moved the article to "Mahoma Mofar", as the name used in the sources, if the subject is only materially known for their death, how would WP:NVICTIM not apply?  Guliolopez ( talk ) 09:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , regardless of whether this is technically a "hoax" or not it fails WP:NBIO .  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 18:07, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anthony Bart Appiah : Searching online, I was able to find one more substantial source of questionable value: [2] .  Normally wedding announcements are considered routine press and do not contribute to notability, but this article offers an unusual amount of biographical depth.  Still, it suffers from the same promotional tone, likely lack of independence, and questionable framing of a marriage to an elected politician in a republic (Panama) as if it were a political union of significant import.  Overall, I think we fall short of the amount of credible, independent coverage needed to justify an article.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Royalty and nobility ,  and Ghana .  signed, Rosguill talk 15:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Nothing on Scholar, nothing on GBooks, nothing on JSTOR.  I've removed claims that he initiated the Ghanaian government initiatives The Year of Return and Beyond the Return , as the cited source does not mention those and actually says only that he gave an online master-class on "Black Stories Matter" – which appears to be his only claim to fame.  Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 20:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional profile with nothing to suggest notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] still don't understand how he is related to ghana nobility or royalty needs a ton of fixing but i don't wish to disrespect the person that created this page thanks Briannemartindale ( talk ) 23:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Twilight Struggle References : I suggested merging to Twilight Struggle, but the editors at the talk page there do not seem to feel there is anything worth salvaging.  Courtesy pinging participants CohenTheBohemian , Literally_Satan , and VQuakr .  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 21:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games , History ,  and Lists .  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 21:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I find the list mildly interesting, but this is something that should be on Fandom or something of that nature.  It's over-detailed for an encyclopedia.  VQuakr ( talk ) 21:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete .  Trivial WP:FANCRUFT to the nth degree.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 23:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as fancruft.  Thanks for the ping.  CohenTheBohemian ( talk ) 02:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No independent sources, doesnt pass WP:GNG , could potentailly be considered promotional Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The very definition of non-notable trivia.  I concur with the editors on the talk page that the material here would not be appropriate for merging.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 05:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor quality violation of WP:NOTTVTROPES .  Fails WP:NLIST / WP:GNG /etc.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] obviously delete fancruft. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 20:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:LISTN Lightburst ( talk ) 13:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete