hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Maria Lourdes Heras-de Leon: No indication of notability.  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Philippines .  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Largely a professional profile .  WP:NOTLINKEDIN — siro χ o 18:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Challenged for notability and promotional tone for a decade -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a case of inherited notability.  "Oh, she's the president of Company X, which has its own Wikipedia article."  This barely even mentions her name and is the only source I could find.  Tarantula TM ( speak with me ) ( my legacy ) 06:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jang Sok-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 02:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Louise A Jackson: Happy for others to argue for retention - but the references would need to be fixed.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 17:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I tried hard to find evidences about the subject on the internet and could find none.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 12:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:SPAM .  First off, we have undisclosed paid editing, and as usual , such work is sloppy and reckless - random similarly named living persons are included , typos, and other hallmarks of a hit-and-run spam job.  By 2023, everybody knows that we are not a free web host .  Badly fails WP:SIGCOV by a mile.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:AUTHOR .  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 18:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anamor: Southati ( talk ) 12:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and Women .  Southati ( talk ) 12:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It seems she signed with Universal Music at one point [39] but there's nothing about her otherwise.  Even in Italian news, I can only find photos.  delete for a lack of sourcing, likely not meeting notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
XSpot Wealth: However, the coverage all clearly falls into categories that are not suitable for use in establishing notability, the announcements of personnel changes and new offices, interviews, "they wrote an article for us", etc.  I've not been able to find anything useful through TWL or Gale either.  Unfortunately, it seems unlikely there will be sufficient coverage to meet WP:ORGCRIT unless something substantially changes with the company.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 06:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Greece .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 06:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Coverge is not in-depht and by secondary reliable sources.  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 10:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kevin Manno: Most of the existing references are about his relationship/marriage with Ali Fedotowsky , falling afoul of WP:NOTINHERITED .  The rest are announcements about his job changes or not independent, and I can't find anything better.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 17:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I didn't realize I had nominated this guy last year, to minimal participation.  Still, once more unto the breach.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 17:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  The only article I can find about him about him that's not actually about his wife Is this short announcement [1] about him starting at WRVW in 2023.  Tserton ( talk ) 12:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phil Hawksworth: The current version of article is just a stats stub stating his streak of win in the National championship which is the only claim of notability for this article.  It is also mentioned in New Zealand National Badminton Championships .  Moreover there are no sources found which would be essential for passing the general notability guideline.  zoglophie 11:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and New Zealand .  zoglophie 11:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't even find mention of him on any . nz websites.  What's used in the article now is trivial coverage.  Delete for lack of sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject fails WP:GNG .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dubner's conjecture: There are no results at all for "Dubner's conjecture" in Google Scholar ( the same search without quotes returns a variety of unrelated stuff), and the original paper by Harvey Dubner only has a grand total of three citations .  I made this article into a redirect to List of unsolved problems in mathematics#Prime numbers shortly after I came across it due to these issues, as well as due to the issue that most of the article was unsourced and could have well been original research .  Some time later, OwenX restored it with the edit summary "likely non-notable" is not reason enough to get rid of a sourced article.  Please take to AfD if you believe we're better off without this article .  I still think that this conjecture is very non-notable, so I think we should still redirect it to List of unsolved problems in mathematics#Prime numbers as before.  Duckmather ( talk ) 21:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  Duckmather ( talk ) 21:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Thank you for bringing this here, Duckmather .  I don't feel strongly about the article either way, although if changed to a redirect, a better target may be Goldbach's conjecture , where it is already mentioned in more detail than it is in List of unsolved problems in mathematics .  Owen× ☎ 22:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete List of unsolved problems in mathematics is supposed to be for unsolved problems that have articles unto themselves, or at least problems about which there is a lot to say.  Otherwise, it would balloon beyond all possibility of management.  If this article shouldn't exist, then List of unsolved problems in mathematics shouldn't mention it.  The term "Dubner's conjecture" is too obscure to even serve as a redirect.  The basic idea isn't even due to Dubner .  (To indicate the obscurity of the topic: Richard K. Guy's Unsolved Problems in Number Theory notes the existence of that paper (p. 107), but it doesn't discuss the paper's contents. ) We can possibly say something about this at Goldbach's conjecture#Related problems , but the text currently there needs rewriting, and it shouldn't be called "Dubner's conjecture".  XOR'easter ( talk ) 22:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think, having looked at who cites Dubner and Zwillinger, that XOR'easter has it right.   This isn't an acknowledged named conjecture in its own right.  Uncle G ( talk ) 15:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NECOBELAC Project: Fails considerably on WP:GNG , only references of WP:PRIMARY , no coverage from reliable sources.  Chiserc ( talk ) 17:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science , Italy , Spain , Argentina , Brazil , Chile , Colombia , Costa Rica , Cuba ,  and Ecuador .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Portugal , United Kingdom , Mexico , Peru , Uruguay ,  and Venezuela .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nom.  Artem.G ( talk ) 07:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : all sources are primary sources, don’t meet the notability criteria FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 19:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shayna Richardson: The article has always relied on rumour and forum gossip, which was tidied up to some extent five years ago.  However, much of the content, which is critical of those involved, is uncited and likely unverifiable using reliable sources.  The page has seen repeated BLP violations - I just deleted an edit from earlier this year that made unsupported personal allegations.  This survived an AfD in 2005/6 after being earlier deleted as a libellous copyvio under another title, but times have changed.  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shayna Richardson Fences & Windows 18:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  Fences & Windows 18:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Missouri .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Initial blast of coverage in 2005-2006, then nothing turns up in my searches.  BLP1E does apply.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per BLP1E.  Astaire ( talk ) 21:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : clear-cut BLP1E.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 06:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree that this is a clear cut case of WP:BLP1E .  A cursory search didn't come up with any sustained coverage.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 01:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in accordance with WP:BLP1E GuyBanks ( talk ) 20:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Counsman, California: No sources found indicating this place is or ever was populated, thus fails WP:GEOLAND .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Tried a search through the Wikipedia Library, no hits on newspaperarchive.  I would have preferred to also search newspaper.com, but we don't have access to that as of now.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  12:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alex McCurry: KH-1 ( talk ) 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , crypto spam - David Gerard ( talk ) 18:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for PROMO.  I think this is about the same person (who is aged 19 in this article): [NetNewsLedger - Who is Alex McCurry? Inside With the 19-year-old Thats Rocking the Digital World] for some reason it won't let me copy the url...  Click the "news" above, it's second from the top, rest are all as fluffy.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete don't see how it meets WP:NBIO or WP:GNG .  - Kj cheetham ( talk ) 08:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Florida .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Muttpop: Not really sure if its even still active at this point.  GamerPro64 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Companies .  GamerPro64 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Concur that what we have is not good enough for mainspace; fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG , also WP:V Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Imran Noshad Khan: Would be happy with draft space, but creator is not willing to wait for AfC so we're here.  Star Mississippi 20:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan .  Star Mississippi 20:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ' Note to closer , discussion with the creator at Talk:Imran Noshad Khan and flagging their keep opinion so it's not missed. Star Mississippi 21:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E . Sources unrelated to the Pepsi incident are all WP:PASSING . 〜 Festucalex • talk 06:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:PASSING is just a passing mention in the article while having been quoted along with a statement must be different from that. IBuNeriPK ( talk ) 04:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG . Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chapman Television Channel: The page itself is a copy of the Chapman Entertainment page with the dates and years changed.  The page was created by an IP editor in 2020 and i'm surprised such a thing hasn't been taken down.  Luigitehplumber ( talk ) 01:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Companies ,  and England .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete suggested I don't see that SPEEDY has been tried, but it's definitely an article from a fantasy TV vandal, and that it should've been deleted in draftspace.  I'm not going to apply the SD tag myself, but if someone else would like to, I'd support it.  Nate • ( chatter ) 16:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It appears the only reason this ended up in mainspace to start with is because

Discussion outcome: delete
Taumangyang: Nagol0929 ( talk ) 16:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 16:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete GNS is notoriously unreliable about areas that are poorly documented, and the location given is in the middle of a featureless forest.  There's no evidence that the UK source is any better, and it is inaccessible anyway.  IF good information does become available, someone can recreate the article, but there is no reason to keep an unverifiable article in hopes that we could eventually show that it is true.  Mangoe ( talk ) 18:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : attempted to find this place on General Administration Department map of Chipwi Township.  Official 2019 map has no mention.  Nearby Injanyang Township map also has nothing.  I'm inclined to believe that this village no longer or does not exist, or at least not in the location cited here EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 17:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As it isn't mentioned in Burmese in the MIMU township PDF.  ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-verifiable.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 15:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete