Gopal Snacks : WP:PROMO .  Charlie ( talk ) 07:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 07:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Coverage of listing on the stock market, including from major national newspapers, indicate notability.  Per WP:LISTED "sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports."  Examples  include Fortune India , Economic Times newspaper , Business Today magazine including analyst comment , Mint business newspaper , another Economic Times article .  These are just a handful of examples I found in a few minutes.  The article is not irredeemably promotional.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am not sure if there are any reports from independent analysts available yet since the company was just listed recently (48 hours ago).  Also, this company being listed alone might not meet the criteria set by Wikipedia for notability.  When we examine the references provided, they appear to be same IPO news repeatedly published in multiple Indian media outlets; WP:CHURN , WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  Charlie ( talk ) 05:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Gujarat .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - all coverage is based on press releases around IPO, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGTRIV .  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 22:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  In plain English, this means that references cannot rely *only* on information provided by the company - such as what seems to be the case here where most of the references are cut-and-paste jobs from the company's IPO prospectus and the rest is mere commentary on their stock market performance with no in-depth "Independent Content" *about the company*.  Perhaps in the future some analysts might publish something as suggested above, but I cannot locate anything on this company that meets GNG/NCORP.  HighKing ++ 18:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Highking lacks in depth coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete