hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Father Brown episodes: Possible WP:ATD would be merge/redirect to Father Brown (2013 TV series)#Episodes , but would probably unbalance that article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is an extremely common type of page that is used very widely on Wikipedia for television series with many seasons' worth of episodes.  There's no way to establish that the concept "episodes of the program" is covered in reliable sources, as separate from the program itself.  It's a notable show, and this is an ordinary split that keeps the article on the show at a reasonable length.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 20:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , if a show is notable (and this one is), then it is perfectly acceptable and allowed to split off the episodes into their own page if them being on the page of the show makes it too large to navigate...which I feel like you are saying when you say that a merge would "probably unbalance that article", which it would.  Donald D23 talk to me 21:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I see you first tried to delete this page a couple of times, and were reverted.   I have a little bit of experience in this area with both American and British television shows.  I've made it my goal to source those episodes where I can find the sourcing.  And I agree with the advice given above - if a show is notable, the episodes are split off, and often without sourcing.   These types of lists go way back to early television, where sourcing is often extremely hard to find.  But that doesn't mean the shows were not notable.   It's just one of those phenomenons we have to work around, and source them when we can.  — Maile ( talk ) 21:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep If this episode guide is deleted then nearly every other guide would go.  The summaries are short and only if individual episodes pages were created would you need longer plot summaries and ideally  real world information.  See MOS:TVPLOT REVUpminster ( talk ) 23:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Episode list for notable shows have always been considered acceptable on Wikipedia.   A valid WP:spinout article.  D r e a m Focus 02:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , deleting episode lists of notable series would require a more general guidelines discussion, because this kind of WP:SUBARTICLEs have always been acceptable.  Killarnee ( talk ) 01:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Burdickville, Rhode Island: – dlthewave ☎ 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Rhode Island .  – dlthewave ☎ 16:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I found this reference: "Burdickville: Rhode Island Blueways" .  exploreri.org .  Retrieved 2023-05-07 .  Google Maps shows Burdickville with boundaries, not just as a point, and there is a Burdickville Road.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 18:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hopkinton, Rhode Island#Geography .  While it did exist, it does not appear to have ever had official recognition and does not satisfy WP:NGEO .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 23:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment I found a "census" listing from 1885 which named this as a town.  Also, the presence of the dam would indicate a mill of some sort in the past.  That siad the documentation is extremely scanty.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I found some additional sourcing and content to add.   if anyone has free newsbank access, the original of that Aug 23, 1931 article I cite can be pulled, as well as others, it looks like at [16] . -- Milowent • has spoken 17:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 05:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  04:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  More opinions are welcome.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Timothytyy ( talk ) 10:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep population of 52 in the 1865 Rhode Island census [17] .  A mill was operated there earlier in the 19th century [18] .  Jahaza ( talk ) 00:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the sourcing identified by Milowent, especially the Providence Journal article.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 02:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Silver Jubilee Government Degree College: Revirvlkodlaku ( talk ) 02:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I've found two newspaper articles, one in The Hindu , and there are a variety of primary sources.  The article needs to be cut down, but AFD is not cleanup.  I don't think there's serious contention that this tertiary educational institution doesn't exist. -- Jahaza ( talk ) 04:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep . English language coverage including several more short articles from The Hindu on ProQuest, puts it right at the edge of GNG, which is what is required here by WP:NSCHOOL . I presume there is also coverage in Telugu. — siro χ o 06:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Andhra Pradesh . — Karnataka talk 07:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . Meets WP:GNG with new sourcing. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Grace Wong Kit-cheng: The article states that she is a member of the Legislative Assembly of Macau .   If her status as a subnational legislator is verifiable , then she passes political notability .   There is one reference, in Chinese, which is http://macaodaily.com/html/2017-05/07/content_1176995.htm .   However, a machine translation shows that it makes no mention of the subject.   It is a statement by someone else.  There is also a draft, so that this article is not a candidate for draftification, but this article appears to have been copy-pasted from the draft, and a history merge will be needed if the article is kept.   Both the article and the draft require heavy copy-editing for grammar and usage if they are kept.   The draft should be kept for improvement.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 21:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , Politics ,  and China .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 21:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; since the draft and the main article are near identical, we only need one of the two, and since the text needs extensive work before it will be fit for main-space, draft-space is the right place for it.  Deleting the main-space version is the easiest solution.  Elemimele ( talk ) 21:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets NPOL - Gov profile ( Eng ).  Her Chinese name appears to be "黃潔貞", which is mentioned multiple times in the Macao Daily article. - KH-1 ( talk ) 00:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep status as a legislative council member is verifiable at [1] which is WP:primary but if this is just a question of verifiability and it's not disputed that should be OK. I added the cite to the page.  Oblivy ( talk ) 01:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:NPOL .  Here are some additional sources showing that she was elected to the Legislative Assembly: [2] [3] [4] .  @ Robert McClenon : I imagine the machine translation may have confused you because of a different transliteration.  "Wong Kit-cheng" is evidently a Cantonese transliteration; the pinyin (standard Mandarin) transliteration would be "Huang Jiezhen".  — Mx.  Granger ( talk · contribs ) 03:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep per WP:NPOL .  Agreed with KH-1 and Mx.  Granger.  CastJared ( talk ) 13:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NPOL .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sourcing provided; nom's mistake identified as confusion regarding transliterations of different languages.  I seult Δx parlez moi 18:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:NPOL .  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Golica TV: A number of unsubstantiated claims, failing WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 12:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Slovenia .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Golica TV has received considerable national attention.  It was awarded the Viktor award as the best local/cable station in 2010, [19] [20] and it was also involved in a fraud widely reported by Slovenian media a few years ago.  [21] [22] It is the only Slovenian TV station with a full-day folk music programme.  [23] -- TadejM my talk 13:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per TadejM A09 | (talk) 22:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Per all above.  TV with considerable reputation in Slovenia.  Svartner ( talk ) 14:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Uju Kennedy-Ohanenye: Lulakayd ( talk ) 15:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Women , Law ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The person is a Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the only female presidential aspirant of the ruling party in the 2023 election.  On the view that the article is flattery and promotional, can you outline words or statements that I need to remove?  Deborahudo ( talk ) 20:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : A minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is inherently notable.  Princess of Ara 10:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep — a member of the Cabinet of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.  May be promotional but AfD is not for cleanups .  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 17:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Passes WP:NPOL as a cabinet minister and has likely has enough coverage for an outright GNG pass; deletion is not cleanup .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 19:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clearly passes WP:NPOL ( WP:NSUBPOL ).  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 07:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Hutti Gold Mines Limited: No reliable source, no notability.  LusikSnusik ( talk ) 11:51, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , India ,  and Karnataka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 12:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The coverage (multiple articles in The Hindu ) seems to be enough to establish notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] •Keep- This is Defiantly not an advert, it is well written & well sourced.  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 23:32, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Bold final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Doesn’t read like an advertisement at all, sources exist and support notability.  - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 01:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Greg Siegele: The links provided do not meet WP:SIGCOV .  One of the cited sources from ABC Australia might have been SIGCOV but it's a dead link.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For the record, the link is archived here .  That said, Redirect to Ratbag Games .  Not independently notable.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 07:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Video games ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sigcov in these sources: The Advertiser (not the most reliable name, I know): [13] [14] [15] and many more.  Weekend Australian : [16] The Sydney Morning Herald : [17] The Sunday Mail : [18] (more about his company securing a contract) He also has dozens of passing mentions or minor quotes in news articles regarding his company RatBag.  I think all these combined establish notability.  Merko ( talk ) 22:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per Merko Jack4576 ( talk ) 07:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources Merko found; passes WP:BASIC .  Also found a book source that dedicates a chapter to him and how he formed Ratbag Games.  PantheonRadiance ( talk ) 08:05, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Hava (musician): Does not appear to have significant coverage from secondary sources.  May be notable from chart placements as lead or featured artists.  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany .  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] English results are drowned out by Hava Nagila (per above), but I've tracked down some more recent sources in German: EA Sports FC 24: Soundtrack veröffentlicht – Auch deutsche Künstlerinnen und Künstler vertreten KRIEG IN DER UKRAINE: DAS SAGT DEUTSCHRAP "Gucken, aber nicht anfassen": Hava über Dardans Fans I can't speak to their reliability or value to the article, though if anyone speaks German, these may be of use.  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 17:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete : The sources provided are not enough for the article but the charting is a start.  Fails WP:GNG and passes WP:NMUSICIAN .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheChineseGroundnut ( talk • contribs ) Keep Our notability guidelines WP:MUSICBIO state we may presume notability with a record in national charts.   Hava has 13 entries in the German official chart, including a number 1, which is cited in the article and meets WP:GOODCHARTS : GfK .   Another example of further secondary coverage: HAVA - "JA SAGEN" .   I don't have the language skills for in-depth investigation - however with this sort of charting record I think we can safely presume further secondary sources exist.  Note: I've added two more charting singles, including a top 10, to the article.  Resonant Dis tor tion 22:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 17:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per ResonantDistortion, appears to pass WP:NMUSICIAN Tehonk ( talk ) 17:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep chart-holders are of public interest and there is some coverage.  - Altenmann >talk 21:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes criteria 2 of WP:NMUSIC with nationally charting releases as confirmed in reliable sources such as this , imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
First International Bank: microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 18:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Companies .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 18:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Not to be confused with First International Bank of Israel , I found citation of it being " Largest bank in North Dakota ", so it may be worth keeping it for that reason, although the sourcing could certainly use some improvement.  Whosethose ( talk ) 02:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 20:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : would we keep an article based only on the subject's merit as being the largest bank in, say, McAllen, Texas?   North Dakota has the same size population as McAllen.  Other than an occasional small deal or lawsuit, I couldn't find any news coverage about this bank.  Owen× ☎ 21:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC) Changed to Keep per Sammi Brie 's thorough work on sourcing.  Thank you!  Owen× ☎ 19:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep I've given it a go to see if I can't improve this article.  Seems to be just enough coverage.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Sammi Brie began adding sources.  While we are at it we probably need to remove the Forbes (contributor) WP:FORBESCON article from references - it was in there before the AfD.  Lightburst ( talk ) 15:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 18:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Icelandic equitation: Luiysia ( talk ) 19:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Iceland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GNG with the sources now in the article.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 21:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Currently passes WP:GNG and the article is 12 years old.  V.B.Speranza ( talk ) 15:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes GNG.  Andre 🚐 00:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep