hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
TruckersFM : Apart from unreliable Metro, sources appear to be about a community around the game as a whole.  IgelRM ( talk ) 12:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Video games .  IgelRM ( talk ) 12:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Got SIGCOV from 2 sources, here and here .  While Metro is considered a tabloid newspaper, there's nothing to suggest the article from them is factually skewed or influenced by bias.  This seems like an edge case where Metro would still make sense as proof of notability.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 07:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see the argument that Metro ( WP:METRO ) is in this case not much worse than the other sources.  But it feels off that we write about this and not say, the TruckersMP modification.  Could the modification pass notability, maybe that could be a merge target then?  IgelRM ( talk ) 10:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] With regards to TruckersMP, it does not seem to have gotten any coverage in RS whatsoever, while this did.  So, it's simple why this should have an article while the mod should not.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The modification probably got more coverage, see PCGamer , GameStar , Shacknews .  IgelRM ( talk ) 02:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not really.  All 3 of those seem like basic announcements rather than SIGCOV like the radio station got.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair enough, but I would not count those Truck Simulator feature articles as SIGCOV for the radio station alone.  Found more from Eurogamer , PCGamer and note that multiplayer is now an official feature.  IgelRM ( talk ) 10:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Those are definitely more substantial.  Still, that seems to be the sole SIGCOV that exists on the Internet.  It falls just short of passing GNG.  If you can find something else, it would probably merit an article.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 19:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the series article Truck Simulator .  Zx's Eurogamer and PCN sources are good enough to write a small subsection, but not really enough to support a full article.  I think it's best covered as part of this parent article.  Sergecross73 msg me 19:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 14:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 15:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Kagerō no Tsuji: Inemuri Iwane Edo Zōshi : Tagged for notability since 2021.  PROD removed because it "ran for 37 episodes".  Still needs reliable sources though.  Donald D23 talk to me 03:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Japan .  Donald D23 talk to me 03:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This series appeared for 10 years on NHK , Japan's primary public broadcasting station; see WP:NTVNATL , although WP:NTV cited above is not an accepted notability guideline.  As noted here and here , I am concerned that there does not appear to have been sufficient WP:BEFORE performed here.  Last time I wrote " WP:BEFORE directs us to 'search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.' I understand that this is not practical for all editors, but there is always the option to ask someone (say at the article's talk page, or at WT:JAPAN , etc.) before taking something like this to AfD. In this case we have a nationally-televised series from the 2000s with a double-digit audience share. How did you go about checking for sources?"  Pretty much everything I said then also applies here, and I did not receive a reply last time.  Dekimasu よ!  05:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] More recent sources are easier to find in this case, since the show was mainly broadcast between 2007 and 2009 but the most recent episode was broadcast in 2017.  That ranked fifth in the drama category for weekly viewership ratings.   An article on that episode from Sports Nippon can be found here .  Here is another article on that episode.  The book series on which the show is based has sold 20,000,000 copies and the author discusses the TV version here .  Dekimasu よ!  05:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The two notes above by Dekimasu are convincing.  Notable show.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  I'd like to see more evaluation of the new sources discovered.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Iain Jennings : It was also redirected and then that too was undone .  The article currently has the same issues that the redirecter had concerns with.  Kometalgreat ( talk ) 23:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 23:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 13:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Oleksandr Yaroslavskyi : None of the claims are particularly noteworthy, and none have ample third-party coverage.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 00:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There appears to be a well-cited article on the Ukrainian Wikipedia: [13] .  Thriley ( talk ) 02:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Most of the article in Ukrainian is largely unsourced.  Ostalgia ( talk ) 12:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Kill it with fire .  Unsourced article waxing lyrical about an oligarch, looks like a PR release, probably paid editing to boot.  Found it quite shocking when I first saw it.  Ostalgia ( talk ) 12:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration .  Thriley ( talk ) 18:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This article from the Kyiv Post is a nice summary that could be used to build out the article: [14] .  Thriley ( talk ) 19:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's mostly an interview - as far as secondary sources go this is as primary as it gets.  I do not think this is acceptable for a BLP.  Ostalgia ( talk ) 19:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per significant coverage in the following sources: Rachkevych, Mark (2015-09-19).  "Kharkiv's Richest Man Sounds Off - Sep. 19, 2015" .  Kyiv Post .  Retrieved 2023-09-30 .  "Олександр Ярославський: Біографія, досьє, фото Олександр Ярославський" .  forbes.ua (in Ukrainian).  2022-12-27 .  Retrieved 2023-09-30 .  "Олександр Ярославський, бізнесмен, власник і президент групи DCH, входить до списку найбагатших українців" .  dumka.media (in Russian) .  Retrieved 2023-09-30 .  Two significant secondary-source profiles in Ukrainian and one in English is more than enough to establish notability -- we don't even have to consider news coverage, which is prolific and ongoing as can be seen from the sources in the Ukrainian Wikipedia.  Jfire ( talk ) 19:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Fran Mires : Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and Television .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , California ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak, weak keep .  There's an article about her ( Northern Virginia Magazine ) and another with substantial info about her ( Khaleez Times ), plus a few interviews ( HuffPost , Gulf News ).  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP - C-SPAN has a video on her work as an Executive Producer on Libya Alhurra TV .  "Communicators at Alhurra and Radio Sawa" .  www.c-span.org .  — Maile ( talk ) 13:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Scandinavian hydrogen highway partnership : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 07:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but move to its current name, Nordic Hydrogen Partnership (leaving the current title as a redirect).  Sources e.g. here , here , here . — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hynor .  This article provides almost no context.  gidonb ( talk ) 21:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
May al-Ibrashy : I think it is significant that I could not find any sources at all in Arabic.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I think al-Ibrashy is notable on a number of levels, and that this can be demonstrated through appropriate sourcing.  I’ve added around 9 cites, with some limited text expansion, and done some tidying.  Google Books is also showing a number of sources that could be used if other editors had access to them.  KJP1 ( talk ) 10:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Architecture ,  and Egypt .  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for adding these.  I’m still not seeing sustained in depth coverage in independent sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:54, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That’s fine.  We just disagree.  She’s a woman architect, in an Arab society, undertaking work which has gained international recognition.  Let’s see what others think.  KJP1 ( talk ) 15:35, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Podcasts aren't what we're looking for with sourcing; appears to be a working architect, nothing found that we can use for RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oaktree b - I apologise in advance if this comes across as badgering, but I think there's one podcast in the sourcing, in addition to Worldcat / SOAS / Architectural League of New York / France 24 / The American University in Cairo / Honolulu Star-Advertiser / Charlotte School of Architecture / Egyptian Streets etc.  Plus a bunch of Google Books that show potential.  We can certainly debate the extent of the coverage, as Mccapra has done, but to suggest that there is no RS really isn't accurate.  All I ask is that we consider carefully the case for deletion.  We know women are underrepresented on here, Arabic women in the professions certainly so.  In al-Ibrashy we have a successful professional working in an important area of heritage conservation, with a body of work that has gained international recognition.  Would there be any objection if I flagged this discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red ?  I don't want to canvass but I think it's a topic that may generate interest there, and perhaps some additional views/sourcing.  As an example, I learnt from it that Egyptian Streets has an article on here.  KJP1 ( talk ) 17:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Festival du Film Merveilleux : It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Film , Magic , Events ,  and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would say Keep .  I removed a few things.  Cleanup is still necessary.  And update.  Added a few sources that seem to prove it is notable.  The full name is "Festival du Film Merveilleux et Imaginaire".  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 00:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  A gnews search comes up mainly with www.sortiraparis.com which is an event listing website.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak Keep poorly sourced but IMO notable.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] how is it notable?  In what way does it meet notability criteria?  LibStar ( talk ) 22:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Libstar.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 18:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist for clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG, sources in article are promo, primary, not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE found nothing and the above keeps provide no sources to eval.  // Timothy :: talk 02:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Paul Luna : Boleyn ( talk ) 08:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Food and drink ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Owen× ☎ 09:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Still opening restaurants in 2021 that I can find, but nothing about a "mad genius" or whatever flowery terms thrown around in the article.  Very spammy article with nothing for notability here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There's enough sustained coverage in Atlanta-area papers to satisfy WP:GNG .  [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] .  Jfire ( talk ) 04:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Yeah, WP:PROMO article, but subject has pretty good coverage in the area.  TLA (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Midwest Cities Lacrosse Conference : Let'srun ( talk ) 02:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Illinois , Michigan , Minnesota , Ohio ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  I would guess there is a lot of discussion of the league in local newspapers (which are probably not online).  Llajwa ( talk ) 22:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Lucky (Indian TV series) : Tagged for notability since 2013 Donald D23 talk to me 14:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Donald D23 talk to me 14:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Loïc Jean-Albert : With only 2 google news hits, the first one not being in-depth, not enough coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 16:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and France .  LibStar ( talk ) 16:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Aviation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak keep : [3] , [4] and [5] give at least basic coverage of this person, he was an early adopter of the wing suit it seems.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus