Wilson, Indiana: There are two data implying that this a rail point.  First, the label starts out right next to the tracks before drifting south on more recent maps, towards a string of houses on Rt. 60.  Second, GMaps informs us that the name of the road that crosses the tracks at this point is named "Wilson Switch Rd."  Against this I have, well, nothing, because searching is pretty much hopeless.  The question is whether that string of houses is now known as Wilson or not, and here I draw a blank.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is an interesting one, partly because there seem to be multiple names associated with the same location.  A 1908 map identifies the settlement as "Dallas", while others like this plat map show it as "Wilson".  ( An 1875 map gives it as "Wilson Station" and notes an accompanying mill.)  When time permits I'll aim to check the local histories in more detail, but the fact that it's been consistently present on area maps for the last 150 years suggests it was at one point an actual settlement, so for now I think it's best to keep it.  ╠╣uw [ talk ] 09:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Searching for just Wilson got me nowhere, so I tried Wilson Switch, and I got some interesting results.  A 1973 story about sales tax called Wilson Switch a community of 300, but this 1991 story about the local landfill just refers to the locals as "Wilson Switch Road residents", as do later stories about landfill projects.  Earlier mentions of Wilson Switch were mostly about car accidents or railway incidents in the area, which doesn't clarify much.  Wilson is still on the latest Indiana state highway map , though I don't know how thorough Indiana is about vetting small communities.  Not sure which way I lean on this one.  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation 01:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can still sleep at night if this is deleted.  It's Rail station on the C., I. & L. (Monon) Railway [52] , this same source explains that the post office was called Dallas.  Lest we not forgot that old post offices were one word names, and were not required to share a name with their location.  Huwmanbeing's observation that it is variously known as Dallas, Wilson's switch, and Wilson suggests it doesn't have a strong identity and that people were just referring to the landmarks as a way of being clear about locations.  That book I cite above would use the place as a reference if it actually existed.  Google snippets from this source [53] states the area around the switch was known as Dallas, and later Wilson, and is an "Unplatted village".  I believe that source is just assuming that the place was called Dallas because of the post office at or near the train station.  The name Wilson is almost certainly taken from the station, and post office was probably just that.   The local paper only has mentions of for about 20 or so years starting 1942.  Just life activities of people living near it.  The satellite imagery would be very different if some sort population  center had existed there in the twentieth century.  Be careful researching it, it's not the only rail infrastructure with this name.  James.folsom ( talk ) 22:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  11:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 00:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete