hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Deorwine : I can't see evidence of notability for this name; it fails WP:NNAME and the sources I could find are limited to baby name websites and dictionaries, so it may also be a WP:NOTDICT fail.  Alternatively, the redirect could be restored, or it could be redirected to Darwin (given name) or Darwin (surname) .  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 03:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , History ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Of course it was undone, because as already documented, it's an Old (ancient) Anglo-Saxon/English name predating (by hundreds/thousands years) usage by JRR Tolkien and other fantasy authors/creators that  in fact use it (such as Warhammer 40,000 ).   Wikipedia isn't a fandom encyclopaedia, so real-world takes precedence.   Nevertheless, I think it'd be okay to redirect to Darwin (given name) , as in its history there were only forenames (such as Robin of Locksley ) with people using place names and professions at the end, which some became surnames later. -- dchmelik ☀️🦉🐝🐍( talk | contrib ) 07:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You have a point.  I just saw that Déorwine redirected to that, but in hindsight I should’ve just redirected to one of the Darwins.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 21:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Darwin (given name) or as determined.  Happy to go along with all that has been said above.  There's no reason to make it a Middle-earth (Tolkien) redirect.  If we have nothing more to say about Deorwine than that it is an OE name, I'd say it likely falls foul of WP:NOTDICT ; but I have no objection to redirecting it to Darwin (given name) .  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 12:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
OPTi 929 : Fails general and product-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Technology ,  and Computing .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This might have gotten a review from PC/Computing , other than that there’s nothing but directories — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mach61 ( talk • contribs ) 02:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to OPTi Inc. #History as a valid search term.  DigitalIceAge ( talk ) 18:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per DigitalIceAge.  Redirects are cheap, the article subject is mentioned there and it is a plausible search term.  Pavlor ( talk ) 05:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
OSAMI : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Europe .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eureka_(organisation)#Significant_projects : the organization running the project.  Not enough notability for a standalone article.  Owen× ☎ 16:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023–24 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season : Case of WP:TOOSOON , but draftify is no longer an option.  Onel 5969 TT me 12:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete / restore redirect , TOOSOON as no SIGCOV yet.  Spike 'em ( talk ) 13:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: per User:Joseph2302 on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023–24 S.S.C. Napoli season " Wait until there is significant news coverage of this season e.g. once the 2022-23 season has ended, and there's some actual fixtures, transfers to report. " A pre-season fixture for the next season has been announced, therefore there is sourced information on this season and there is coverage on it.  There are four different sources on the page, all valid to the article.  The article is reliably sourced and is nothing on there is CRYSTALBALL or TOOSOON.  Mwiqdoh ( talk ) 16:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Where is the significant coverage?  An announcement of a fixture is ROUTINE coverage, not significant.  Spike 'em ( talk ) 19:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This seems like a complete misquote of what I said there, which is don't create articles WP:TOOSOON .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, let's break down whether your suggested criteria have been met: there is significant news coverage of this season No the 2022-23 season has ended No some actual fixtures Maybe An insignificant pre-season friendly, sourced only to the club website, doesn't count to me transfers to report No All of the sources used are from the club / the league it plays in, so cannot be used to establish notability.  Spike 'em ( talk ) 10:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per Mwiqdoh.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 18:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete / restore redirect , Fails GNG and NSEASONS.  Might be too soon, but not now.  // Timothy :: talk 05:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect for now, too early.  Giant Snowman 15:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect as per Spike's assessment above (based on one my comments at a previous AFD), the existence of one pre-season friendly match is not enough information to warrant an article this soon.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I prefer to keep the article, it was created too early, but whats the point in the faff when the article is needed.  Other than that, talk about WP:BATTLEGROUND at [34] , Spike 'em Careful mate!  Govvy ( talk ) 16:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tunzala Suleymanova : All I found was this interview, where she claims to have retired at age 23 or 24.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Azerbaijan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 20:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect As nominated by JTtheOG.  Chekidalum ( talk ) 11:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Red Rock Peak : Most results on Google are for other mountains also named similarly.  Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions .  Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mirabito Range per WP:GEONATURAL - that article should be developed instead.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 16:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Good point, I should have done my due diligence to find a suitable target before nominating.  Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Have a word with Aymatth2 who is quietly busy in Antarctica with the names dumps articles, too.  Uncle G ( talk ) 22:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  I much prefer redirecting to a section in a parent article.  It takes a lot less effort than an AfD discussion, and users can at least find the basic data even if there is nothing else.  See David Range#Features .  A lot of the sections here, at present with {{ main }} links to stubs, will end up as the targets from stubs converted to redirects.  Aymatth2 ( talk ) 23:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I pumped up Mirabito Range mechanically by adding a section for each entry in Geographic Names of the Antarctic that mentions the range.  Probably the other three peaks could also be quietly redirected to the range article, assuming searches do not turn up significant new information about them.  The range article could obviously use much more detail about geology, glaciology, botany etc.  Aymatth2 ( talk ) 12:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chin Ho Kelly : A quick Google search doesn't give sources that prove notability either.  Spinixster (chat!) 01:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 01:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hawaii_Five-O_(1968_TV_series)#Characters .  Plot summary, nothing to suggest GNG is met.  WP:FANCRUFT .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as WP:PLOT without WP:SIGCOV in third-party sources.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Plutomania Records : Graywalls ( talk ) 00:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and Nigeria .  Graywalls ( talk ) 00:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shallipopi : For now, as it fails WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT , in the future it might have more WP:SIGCOV in WP:NGRS .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 05:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Per Vanderwaalforces .  There's insufficient significant coverage for now.  @T.C.G. [talk] 07:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shallipopi#Career Reading Beans 03:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shallipopi#Career : Best summary.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Caribbean Broadcasting Network : Let'srun ( talk ) 04:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Television , Puerto Rico ,  and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Caribbean .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Unless Sammi Brie can find some sources (if anyone can, it's her), I say redirect to List of television stations in the U.S. Virgin Islands .   It's not perfect, but most of their stations are in the US Virgin Islands.  - Neutralhomer • Talk • 12:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 03:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This seems like the type of small group that isn't likely to have much coverage in independent sources .  (Redirecting to the list of television stations in the U.S. Virgin Islands does not seem like a good idea to me, as that list does not mention any station owners and thus may present a surprise , and this group has also owned Puerto Rico stations.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist given the opposition to a Redirect which is how I would have closed this discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in the U.S. Virgin Islands , a couple mentions here and there, but quite sure it doesn’t merit its own article.  TLA (talk) 07:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Scott Hatch : WP:NOTINHERITED .  Literally.  jps ( talk ) 13:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  jps ( talk ) 13:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I was surprised to find not much about him online, except for routine business stuff.  I don't think the not-inherited argument holds water in his case.  It's not that we're claiming notability based on having a notable father, we're claiming notability based on the fact that he's a lobbyist with a massive conflict of interest (because his father is a politician).  Most of the articles I found that address this are actually more about his father than about him, so my inclination would be to redirect to Orrin Hatch#Lobbying ties , which is all about exactly this subject, and better referenced.  Elemimele ( talk ) 13:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : LA Times is fine, but that seems to be all there is.  There's an NPR article about a biologist with the same name, I assume it's a different person.  I don't see notability with the sources we have.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Washington, D.C. .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to Orrin Hatch#Lobbying ties per Elemimele, as he already referenced there.  Per nom.  and Oaktree b, it fails WP:GNG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 22:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, not notable based on the available sources.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination or redirect per Sal2100 good suggestion.  2A01:799:2E3:C500:556:815E:86C2:7DB1 ( talk ) 15:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Orrin Hatch#Lobbying ties : notability is not WP:INHERITed though sourcing is not bad.  She was a fairy 03:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mary Shelley (Doctor Who) : I only found sources relating to The Haunting of Villa Diodati, which doesn't acknowledge this companionship, and none of the articles bar this one: https://www.themarysue.com/mary-shelley-deserved-better-on-doctor-who/ Actually discuss her in depth.  I don't think there's grounds to justify the existence of the article separately.  She's mentioned in both the Companion and List of Doctor Who Supporting Characters articles, so a redirect there may work as an alternative to deletion.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 16:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 16:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Companion (Doctor Who) , where she is already listed.  Her only appearances as a companion were in largely non-notable spinoff material, and her only appearance in the show proper was in a one-off episode that did not acknowledge those spinoff appearances.  There are not enough sources to demonstrate this fictional version of Shelley is notable enough for an article.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 20:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Update I am also fine with Eighth Doctor#Mary Shelley as the redirect target, as suggested by Sgeureka below, as that does seem to be the better target.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect because the character does not have enough sources to meet GNG.  I don't really care which target we choose, but I slightly prefer List of Doctor Who supporting characters .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 21:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect since nothing in the article suggests GNG is met, this is just a fancrufty plot summary as things stand.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect This character doesn't pass the WP:GNG .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eighth Doctor#Mary Shelley (there is more info there on her than in the Companion (Doctor Who) article).  No enough non-plot content for a stand-alone article.  – sgeureka t • c 14:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eighth Doctor#Mary Shelley per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Indoor Swimming Pool : Aintabli ( talk ) 23:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 23:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Swimming at the 2011 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival as an ATD, largely per nom.   The only significance I could find about this venue was that it hosted the aforementioned swimming event.  Frank Anchor 00:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that would be inherited notability, which is not allowed.  Aintabli ( talk ) 00:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Possible inherited notability is why I voted not to keep.  But redirect is certainly allowed and a preferable option because this is a reasonable search term.  Frank Anchor 02:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, I don't have any problems with your vote; just wanted to note that inherited notability is not allowed, which was directed to editors deciding on their vote.  Aintabli ( talk ) 03:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Swimming at the 2011 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival as WP:ATD-R , per Frank Anchor .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 12:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Brice Dahité : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment perhaps notable in particular region or field.  Yet requires more content and sources to support a keep.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 16:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 21:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers .  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , nothing to suggest independent notability.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , as suggested above.  The sources don't show the subject's notability.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 20:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dancing Through Life : Little coverage of song to be found, therefore failing WP:GNG .  Jontesta ( talk ) 23:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Theatre .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   The song has not charted or become a standard.   The sources do not give it significant coverage separate from the musical.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 03:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wicked (musical) per above.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wicked (musical) per above.  Ssilvers ( talk ) 17:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect