hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Holy Angels School : The sources provided are all directory listings.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lacks references to support notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 00:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Punjab .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no RS hits in Google News, Google Books and Google News Archives.  Note that there are several false positives as Holy Angels seems to be a common school name in various parts of the world.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Lack of reliable sources; clearly fails GNG.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 07:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SAP implementation : — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This reads like a kind of essay or perhaps class notes or a course outline.  Even with adequate sourcing, this fails WP:GNG for a standalone page under WP:NOTHOW and WP:NOTESSAY .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 16:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The entire article lacks sourcing, and cleaning it up would amount to blanking the page.  Deletion is appropriate per WP: STARTOVER .  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 14:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Steven Denning : TLA (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Utah .  Shellwood ( talk ) 01:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree this is likely Promo created.  Article creator BeekeeperRed is a sock of TardyMarmot.  Several of TardyMarmot;s articles are tagged for "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments".  — Maile ( talk ) 02:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing I find is press releases and non-RS.  What's used now in the article is of a similar quality.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:19, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kumbirai Thierry Nhamo : Current sources consist of homepages of news websites, and articles written by the subject.  Doesn't seem to have any independent or significant coverage.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  21:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:BASIC , WP:GNG .  Mooonswimmer 04:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alejandro Illescas : This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now get it resolved.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ayesha Patricia Rekhi : Could not find significant coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , Bilateral relations , Czech Republic ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is a Slovak article, too: sk:Ayesha Patricia Rekhiová .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks, looking at the Slovak article.  is a small mention of Rekhi and more about her husband.  sources 3 and 4 are primary, and 5 is a dead link.  Source 2 may be the only worthy one.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As Per Nomination.  Fails WP:GNG , WP:BIO Charsaddian ( talk ) 12:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fakhr ad-Din al-Burdwani : Fails WP:N with no significant level of coverage.  Article contains a lot of Original Research .  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 14:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh , India and Islam .  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 14:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vincent DiCalogero : Let'srun ( talk ) 18:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Handball , Olympics ,  and New York .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manish Doshi : Renomination reason: sock puppet activity in the prior AfD discussion , also six months have passed since the last AfD.  Charlie ( talk ) 04:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 04:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine , Technology , Gujarat ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG even WP:BASIC .  Youknow?  ( talk ) 16:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JP Lewis : JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TRENDS Research & Advisory : Un assiolo ( talk ) 21:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Arab Emirates .  Un assiolo ( talk ) 21:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Un assiolo , do you have any policy-based evidence to support your claim?  Just saying "not notable" is not very helpful .  C F A 💬 21:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Seriously?  This is a borderline A7.  The sources are all press releases, a LinkedIn (which I have now removed), the company website, and a few company profiles (on websites that collect them indiscriminately).  Adding something along the lines of the three sentences suggested at WP:JN would not, in my opinion, add anything of substance to the nomination.  -- Un assiolo ( talk ) 22:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources do not establish notability whatsoever.  Also is one of them seriously a job listing??? Procyon117 ( talk ) 09:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Helon : The reasoning given was: A collection of spurious connections.  A complete mess that nobody is ever going to—nor should attempt to—clean up.  Family DNA, the Bible, a fictious travelogue, botany, Scythians...  We have a dab page that can be moved to its place.  Srnec ( talk ) 22:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The page Helon has existed for a number of years and has had a number of edits (including revisions and editions) by independed Wiki Editors.  The content of the page is used by quite a few users around-the-world to gain a grounding on the subject(s).  YES - the page could do with a tidy-up as previously suggested.  I don't see any mention of "Family DNA, or a fictious travelogue" and I don't see any justification for deletion.  I question your motives Srnec, and given comments by others on other pages it seems you are just up to mischief because you either don't like someone, something, or have a personal interest in seeing the page Helon deleted?  PLEASE EXPLAIN your expertise?  Pegasus1965 ( talk ) 01:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You are right about the DNA—not because you didn't add it, but because I must have been looking at an older version of the article.  That material was removed by Doug Weller on 2 December 2013.  The fictitious travelogue is Helon's Pilgrimage to Jerusalem .  Srnec ( talk ) 02:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So then as far I can see, there's no reason to delete this article.  @ Srnec : , would you like to withdraw your AfD (I had to withdraw one a few days ago!)?  Doug Weller talk 07:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and the people and language are already listed in Helon (disambiguation) , which should be moved here afterward.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It is unclear what the proposed course of action is here.  Move a DAB, delete or otherwise.  As the deletion might be needed for the move, relisting for more input rather than a no consensus/handle editorially.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , History , Religion ,  and Geography .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT and move Helon (disambiguation) to the title.   The excessive detail and attempts to tie everything together amount to WP:SYNTH .  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 18:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- This article brings together in one article a number of disparate subjects which ought to be in separate articles, united by a disambiguation page.   For the same reason we do not allow SHAREDNAME categorisation.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 17:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Capperauld : Dougal18 ( talk ) 14:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Scotland .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baltimore Blast (disambiguation) : Hatnotes are already present on both articles.  Halfadaniel ( talk ) 01:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Disambiguations ,  and Maryland .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 01:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and move a discussion to RM, because I don't think there's a PRIMARYTOPIC and the dab should probably be at base. Giant Snowman 18:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with nomination, a simple hash note on the top of each article will link the two together. Govvy ( talk ) 19:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , hatnotes are more than enough. C avarrone 08:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Hyperbolick ( talk ) 08:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Xpert Times : Speedy delete may apply.  BoraVoro ( talk ) 09:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Companies ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article has the sources with news and reliable sources with ISNI authority control.  It don't need to apply speedy deletion.  Anjalijk ( talk ) 10:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC) — Anjalijk ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Reliable Sources, relevant Authority Control.  No need to delete Ukmathura ( talk ) 11:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC) — Ukmathura ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Speedy delete as not notable and salt : Fails GNG.  Blatant LTA and sockpuppetry.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 14:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as Yet Another Indian AdNonSense Spam Blog Disguised as A News Blog® .  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non notable blog.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 08:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] explain why you think so 110.235.234.133 ( talk ) 10:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] explain why you think so 110.235.234.133 ( talk ) 10:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a blog.  which is non notable.  There isn't really much else to say.  TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 10:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It contains syndicated, poorly-written or machine-written gruel solely existing to get ad-clicks.  Nate • ( chatter ) 20:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I looked at one "article" and ohh boy: There are several other top features as well, like self-deposits and self-withdrawals in 24 hours, getting the ID in less than one minute, 24×7 chat service, no registration, no documentation and minimum ID from 100 that makes the platform a unique brand in the industry that is 100% safe and secure.  Move over, NYT.  The more reliable-seeming sources are merely passing mentions.  A few sources seem like blogs themselves.  SWinxy ( talk ) 20:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , junk paid placement SEO blog that's been abused on wiki several times.  More likely candidate for blacklisting than for an article.  Sam Kuru (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable website, References looks like Paid Releases .  Most of the references covers the Founder and some articles Covers News Website's paid advertising news.  Yasal Shahid ( talk ) 05:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Russell Johnstone : The supplied sources are all primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Olympics .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What's wrong with the Equestrian Life story?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is that a WP:PRIMARY source?  A mainstream media source would be better for establishing notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 20:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How is it primary?  It looks like an independent secondary news outlet devoting a story to him.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The only thing I can think of is that there is no author listed (it just says by Equestrian Life), but I agree it appears to be a usable source for notability purposes.  Hopefully LibStar can elaborate on what they mean.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah, I think I see the issue.  It appears that it is a paid promotional piece, since at the bottom of the article there is a note which says " This article was written in conjunction with Barastoc".  Barastoc is a sponsor of the subject's team.  In that case, the article lacks independence.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : From what I can tell, the Equestrian Life story is a paid promotional piece.  The other source is a database, and I'm not finding anything better to show this subject meets the WP:GNG .  BLPs require strong secondary sourcing, and that doesn't appear to be there here.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete