Addison Road, London: The other sources are used to discuss various buildings along the road and not the road itself.  LondonTown.com and London's Abandoned Tube Stations are not RS.  Rs chen 7754 06:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom .  Rs chen 7754 06:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Kensington or other appropriate area article.  I agree that the road itself is not independently notable, but there is salvageable content which could plausibly be used in an "Architecture" or "Listed Buildings" section of a broader article.  Barnards.tar.gz ( talk ) 06:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep — a historic road with very strong literary connections, some already mentioned, but others are not such as Radclyffe Hall and Joseph Conrad .  There are scholarly references currently not included, e.g., see https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-09387-8_3 — Jonathan Bowen ( talk ) 09:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Those two articles don't mention Addison Road, and the Springer link goes to a chapter of a book which contains a passing mention of it, which I don't think counts as either scholarly or supportive of notability.  Barnards.tar.gz ( talk ) 09:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The link provided fails WP:SIGCOV as it is a trivial mention.  -- Rs chen 7754 16:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: Addison Road has its own entry in The Encyclopaedia of London (Macmillan, 1983), indicative of notability.  — Jonathan Bowen ( talk ) 20:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you write anything more about the road from that source besides that it exists?  Rs chen 7754 20:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just checked my copy of the Encyclopedia of London and it has a an entry that goes far beyond simply stating the road's existence.  Philafrenzy ( talk ) 22:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Kensington per Barnards.tar.gz - No evidence of notability to warrant an article but some of the content could certainly be used in the Kensington article.  – Davey 2010 Talk 14:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per the above, much of what is here is encyclopaedic and appropriate for a Wikipedia article but the street itself isn't notable.  Either Kensington or something like a List of streets in Kensington and Chelsea would be a better home for it.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 15:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Notable, sourced, meets WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Well-cited article.  Notable road, and easily passes WP:GNG .  Edwardx ( talk ) 13:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Self-evidently notable I would have thought and easily passes GNG with the literary and architectural connections.  I find a good entry in the Encyclopedia of London , plenty in Pevsner (London NW), and entries in the next two London books I consulted.  Philafrenzy ( talk ) 22:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : there are multiple sources which indicate that the article passes WP:GNG .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 16:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:GNG .  Justwatchmee ( talk ) 19:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Opinion is divided between those supporting Merge and those advocating Keep.  No support for article deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I believe the Survey of London and Pevsner London 3: North West individually provide SIGCOV, which is supplemented by The London Encyclopaedia (5 sentences).  There are eight groups of listed buildings, including Debenham House , which contribute to the notability of the Street.  TSventon ( talk ) 12:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Satisfies GNG.  James500 ( talk ) 12:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep