hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Daniel Natou: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 05:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 05:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Padra (clinic): Sourced to PR material, likely to fail WP:NCORP .  See: Draft:Padra Clinic KH-1 ( talk ) 23:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  KH-1 ( talk ) 23:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Kuwait , United Arab Emirates ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is a creation of the same sockpuppet who created the draft mentioned by the nom.  It is a clear WP:NCORP fail.  PROD was contested because the article has some sources, but reviewing the sources show these are all low quality and do not come close to meeting WP:SIRS .  They are a string of primary source announcements and placed content.  Independence is highly suspect in them all.  See, for instance, WP:NEWSORGINDIA , but the placement concerns exist for others too.  The sources are low quality, and have significant reliability concerns, and not one of them significantly covers the clinic sufficient to meet WP:CORPDEPTH .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 11:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, the sources are very poor and appear to be paid.  The subject does not meet any notability criteria to keep the article and fails both WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 15:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Campeonato Brasileiro Série A broadcasters: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  No context to assert notability either.  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Brazil .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't see how this topic meets the guidelines.  C 679 09:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tiaan Dorfling: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only seeing namedrops in player lists, no GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David D. Mandarich: I am seeing nothing to show that this individual is notable on their own, all I can see is PR from the company or profiles, no significant coverage of the individual in reliable sources.  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 18:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Business ,  and Companies .  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 18:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with Schminnte 's analysis.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 22:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indication of notability.  I honestly was about to CSD the page under criterion A7 but the nominator beat me to it.  CycloneYoris talk!  22:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not meet the WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 08:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The British Railway series: Mccapra ( talk ) 13:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Transportation ,  and United Kingdom .  Mccapra ( talk ) 13:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If the world has actually documented this at all, it is hiding behind so many false positives that I cannot find any of it.   The article is zero help.   No sources have ever been cited in 12 years.   This is unverifiable.  Uncle G ( talk ) 11:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and per above.  We don't have enough to write an actual article on the subject.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 13:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article does not appear to meet any of the notability guidelines, the only independent coverage of the topic I have found is a WordPress blog entry ( https://locoyard.com/2014/03/06/world-book-day-special-tale-of-the-unnamed-engine/ ), and the article has been orphaned since March 2014.  SmileySnail ( talk ) 21:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Adventist schools in the Philippines: Prod reason states "This list is made up of mostly schools that are not notable and also there are no references it has been like this from day one that it was created".  As I am conducting a procedural AfD, I am neutral on the matter.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Religion ,  and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 02:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Rename to List of Adventist universities in the Philippines .  As far as sourcing goes, I wouldn't know what is available in reliability, but I figured reducing the list to be just the colleges and universities  would be more suitable to WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the majority of Seventh-day Adventist schools in the Philippines are not notable and never will be.  And we do not need a separate list for Seventh-day Adventist colleges and universities in the Philippines, that is why we have List of Seventh-day Adventist colleges and universities .  Catfurball ( talk ) 16:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Before a rename is considered, you have to put forth a good, policy-based argument on why this article should be Kept.  A rename can be discussed after an AFD if this article is Kept.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is where a category is much more useful than a long list of which most schools are not notable .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lamin Manneh: Diplomats are not inherently notable and the routine coverage here likely fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 03:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Africa and Rwanda .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG - diplomats are not inherently notable.  SportingFlyer T · C 14:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: there are multiple prominent people in Gambia with this name.  I suggest searching for "Lamin Manneh"+"United Nations" -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 05:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hatim El Otmani: Fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:BIO .  scope_creep Talk 09:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Environment ,  and Morocco .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I found this [44] Currently inbtw to vote because of his contributions.  Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 07:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's a different person.  196.112.247.211 ( talk ) 10:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I wasn't the one who added that link! so I kindly ask you to remove the article from the deletion sorting CiconiaBiblio ( talk ) 11:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Most of the references are passing mentions in the first block.  I will not do a source review for that first block because there is nothing there.  scope_creep Talk 16:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete complete vanity spam sourced to non rs and blackhat SEO.  GRINCHIDICAE🎄 18:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Otherwise, this would be a Soft Deletion and I'm guessing would be instantly restored.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per Praxidicae/ GRINCHIDICAE .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scribbie ( talk • contribs ) 07:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mentioned here [45] but hardly substantial coverage.  What's used now in the article is interviews, primary sourcing and non-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ferdian Mahardika Ranialdy: Stvbastian ( talk ) 08:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Democratic Party for the Development of Carchuna: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Spain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Venkanna H. Naik: Fails the general and politician-specific notability criteria.  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law , Politics , India ,  and Uttarakhand .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found in Jstor, Gscholar or Books.  Sourcing used here is simply confirmation of existence, most of the article is unsourced, could be OR Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete my searching failed to identify WP:GNG compliant sourcing, appears WP:OR and we're not a WP:MEMORIAL .  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 22:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perry Danos: Coverage is low-level local.  BD2412 T 21:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 21:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Released an album over a decade ago and sang at a baseball game isn't reason for notability, I can't find anything else about the person, only a riverboat captain the same name.  No charted singles, no critical mention of this person found in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  May or may not be independent, but is reliable sigcov: [9] — siro χ o 22:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] At 93 words, that's on the thin side of sigcov.  BD2412 T 02:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed, but it's more than a trivial mention.  Doesn't hit BASIC on its own but could be a compon,ent if others find more.  I am iffy other Pa.com ch sources I found, hence the lack of! vote.  — siro χ o 03:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b.Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 11:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't find anything that suggests notability.   -- Devoke water 12:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NSA (basketball): Toadspike ( talk ) 15:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Lebanon .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hoopla Software: PROD removed by IP editor claiming "I could find sources" without actually adding any sources.  – Tera tix ₵ 07:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and California .  – Tera tix ₵ 07:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 08:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources appear to be primary or WP:ORGTRIV coverage.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 16:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 18:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asia Nakibuuka: I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  The best sources I found were 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uganda .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Seun Awogbenle: Onel 5969 TT me 10:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism ,  and Nigeria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article are about other topics that are authored by or mention the subject and BEFORE fail to show anything meeting IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject direct and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV, game news, database, promo.  // Timothy :: talk 05:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG .  The subject lacks in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources.  Although the article contains tons of reliable newspapers, the subject worked for all of them.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  16:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raizy Fried: As an entrepreneur, likewise we are absent notability.  No independent sources (tagged as such) presented and no evidence we pass WP:GNG, including during WP:BEFORE.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and United States of America .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , nothing at all for GNG/BIO.  Also note that article was declined at AfC and then created the next day, see Draft:Raizy Fried — siro χ o 10:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is the best I can find, and it's not enough for notability.  [42] Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not meet notability based on the citations provided.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 01:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete