hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Palcrafts: No significant coverage to meet GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 16:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Palestine ,  and Scotland .  LibStar ( talk ) 16:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  There is a source from The National here and a source from This Week in Palestine here that both discuss the subject.  However, I am not certain on the reliability of the source from TWIP, and excluding that source may make the article unable to satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH The Night Watch (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:34, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article fail WP:GNG and the lack of edits on it points to this conclusion.  -- Artene50 ( talk ) 12:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Employee voice: blow it up , then blow it up again.  ltb d l ( talk ) 08:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some sort of an essay, without proper context.  Not Essay.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with the possibility of re-creation by someone with a better grasp of what Wikipedia is for.   This topic seems to have recognition in the literature, but the article is a personal essay.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep 'Employee voice' is a an appropriate topic for an article.  It's a widely accepted concept (see e.g. https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/factsheets/voice-factsheet/ ) and there's a growing body of academic literature on it (see, for example, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369998765_Employee_Voice_A_Systematic_Literature_Review .  The current article certainly certainly needs a lot of work to get it into better shape, and I note that the January 2023 version appears to have been deleted and replaced by editors in September 2023 who seem to have been working on this article as part of an assigned project for an educational course.  Reverting in full or part to the Jan 2023 version might not be a bad starting point for improving the article.  Hmee2 ( talk ) 15:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] this version ?  yeah, that's... also not very good.  Employee voice refers to the participation of employees in influencing organizational decision-making.  Decision-making by managers an influence their creativity.  The process is going very personal to the managers and what they believe will be beneficial for everyone.  The creativity of one person's view can change the dynamic of a project.  Having personal views is what allows them to make decisions for the better.  ltb d l ( talk ) 15:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A complete mess with no salvageable revision to revert back to.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  16:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to draft .  I think this is a concept with potential, and we definitely cover related topics such as Employee stock ownership and Workplace participation in the United Kingdom .  BD2412 T 20:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per above, an unsourced essay with no salvagable content.  If there is an article here, the author shouldn't be burdened with this legacy.  // Timothy :: talk 21:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bernhard Seliger: Think WP:NACADEMIC ; it doesn't seem like they meet any of the criteria given.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 06:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  toobigtokale ( talk ) 06:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  I found four reviews of his edited volumes : [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] .  But those don't count as much toward WP:AUTHOR and he has multiple co-editors.  I didn't find any authored books (or published reviews of such books) that would count, and the citation record doesn't show a pass of WP:PROF#C1 for his non-book publications.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 21:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patrick Adebola: Nominating for the input of the community.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 13:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 13:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NihongoUp: COI creation by the software's developer.  No hits at all with WP:VG/S 's reliable source search, though that's understandable.  Google News search finds nothing at all.  Most basic google results are database entries, blogs, or written by the developer as well.  Both of the current sources were commissions (acknowledged by the sources) by the developer.  The reward, from "divita.eu" for "Best Game" in the Student category?  Was issued by the developer as well.  -- ferret ( talk ) 14:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Education . -- ferret ( talk ) 14:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero sourcing found for this item of software.  Perhaps some in Japanese-language media, but the fact that it has no article in Jp-wiki doesn't leave me hopeful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems like it was created to promote the creator's product rather than because it was notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Célestin Habonimana: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Allecks Godinho: First he played 7 minutes for Trnava, the next year he played 8 minutes .  Sources I could find was a short transfer announcement that was duplicated in three outlets , as well as a Q-A interview .  Therefore fails WP:GNG .  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:BIO .  The transfer announcement is basically a press release, the Q&A interview is a primary source and not independent.  Pilaz ( talk ) 07:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Brazil .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Played seven matches over three years and then disappeared.  CLearly fails WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Databases aren't sources but reserved for MOS:EL .  The article doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The only source is soccerway which is not entirely reliable.  Rest are listings on database sites.  Be ica verra verra ]] talk 03:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tylers Corner, California: In a previous AfD, this article was converted to a redirect to El Dorado County, California , which in my opinion was a mistake as there is absolutely nothing to be said about this place and it is not mentioned in the county article at all.   No mention of a Tylers Corner or Tylers was found in any of three histories of the region that I was able to access online: [19] , [20] , [21] .   It's first labeled as Tylers Corner on the 1952 Aukum and Camino USGS topo maps: [22] , but that's the only mention of this place I can find other than the cited sources, which are insufficient for notability.   This is just an intersection that once had a few houses; that is not a community, as required by WP:GEOLAND .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 20:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 20:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I also searched for sources and found none.  Jfire ( talk ) 20:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete Could have left mass-produced junk as redirect instead of clogging up afd.  Reywas92 Talk 00:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TogetherAI: Note that this company is different to togetherai.com, which makes looking for the sources slightly harder.  MarioGom ( talk ) 15:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software .  MarioGom ( talk ) 15:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is nothing out there I can find that would come close to meeting WP:ORGCRIT .  Only one hit on GNews and a few blog and forum mentions.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Given how recently this was created and then moved back and forth between mainspace, I don't want to use soft-delete as an option as I doubt it will 'stick'.  Relisting to establish clearer consensus either way.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 18:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I write this, there is one independent source for the funding.  The other sources are the company's github and huggingface page.  Can't seem to find notability myself.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 20:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Brink: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  Dowrylauds ( talk ) 19:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Auto-lead Data Format: I would be interested to hear from people with more expertise in this area than me.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Could only find sourcing from either the standards body creating it, or from technology platforms supporting it as a file format, neither of which are independent, and nothing in reliable sources.  ~ A412 talk!  07:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marwa Rakha: No real sources mentioned her.  Just her ownsite or her blogs.  It's requried to provide independent sources about her notable works if exists.  But I can see that there is no such sources found for her as no notable works.  إسلام ( talk ) 14:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women ,  and Egypt .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG .  I also tagged the authors other article " Feras Bugnah ".  Nswix ( talk ) 02:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment She is number #1 expert in Montessori education in Egypt, Published more than 4 books in arabic and english.  Her facebook page has 196k followers.  I think it's hard to call her Not notable.  Her work and role in Egypt feminist movement was documented in the book: Women Rising: In and Beyond the Arab Spring  by Rita Stephan, Mounira M. Charrad recent interview with her: في عيد الأم. .  حوار مع مروة رخا | راحة بالي (rahetbally.com) AhmedNaji1985 ( talk ) 17:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] More source about her work also here: AP Newsroom HR & Montessori; An Interview with Marwa Rakha - HR Revolution Middle East Insight into Egyptian Relationships - Dipo Tepede مروة رخا (Author of أنا وآدم والمونتيسوري) | Goodreads مروة رخا - Marwa Rakha | Facebook AhmedNaji1985 ( talk ) 17:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] None of these are enough to establish notability.  Its couple interviews, a book review and her Facebook page.  Nswix ( talk ) 23:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO as demonstrated by the above sources.  Primary, social media, interviews do not show notability.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 08:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Delwin Fraser: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luan Nieuwoudt: JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SPORTS for Exceptional Athletes: It was also nominated as part of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation for Enterprise Development and it looks like there may have been consensus to delete but there wasn't, so I'm bringing this here.  Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 21:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 21:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Organizations ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   A local group that I can't find enough good sources for to pass GNG.  LittlePuppers ( talk ) 04:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already listed in an AFD, so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing is present to suggest this meets WP:NCORP .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ultimate Spider-Man and X-Men: Sounds like it could be notable, but I couldn't find sufficient reliable sources to confirm it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete According to the content of this article, the comic is not some unique story, but simply combines two previously published comics due to logistical inconsistencies.  It didn't get any media attention and wasn't an important thing.  I haven't found any mentions except in the fandom, and nothing important there either.  I don't think there's even talk of a merger with Panini Comics , because WP:NOTCATALOG -- Saul McGill ( talk ) 23:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Besugo: According to Correio dos Açores , which is a trivial mention only, he was playing in the amateur fifth tier Liga Meo Azores in 2019 and I can't find any more recent mention of Besugo.  In my searches, including those in conjunction with clubs he played for as well as searching for "Hugo Sá Tavares", I could only find Sapo , another trivial mention.  Most results were in relation to fish.  Not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and BIO, BEFORE showed ROUTINE news articles and stats, nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 12:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete