hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Philadelphia Union broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS , these consists of WP:PRIMARY and dead links, the only decent source is an announcment for a new announcer; not helping this list to assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Pennsylvania .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom ,fails WP:NOTTVGUIDE and WP:LISTN .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IceChat : Relisting comment: Posted to the wrong daily log page.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Consider this a First Relist as the previous one was just to move the discussion to the correct daily log page.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Other than download links, this is the best I can find [50] , which is at least from a RS, but it's still a download link.  I don't see enough coverage for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG . -- DanikS88 ( talk ) 11:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aaron Hurst : The only source present in the article which goes into any detail on the subject is this and my searches have not found any others.  If that is the only in-depth coverage, we are short of having multiple sources which provide in-depth coverage.  SmartSE ( talk ) 22:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Michigan .  SmartSE ( talk ) 22:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete.  Nothing in this article suggests real notability.  It looks like weakly written self-promotion.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nomination.  Jeffrey Beall (talk) 12:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and Colorado .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in addition to Hurst being non-notable, his organization the Taproot Foundation may not be notable either given it appears to mostly be referenced by paid for press and press releases.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 23:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing to establish notability.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 16:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fast Company article may be good, but there aren't enough coverage to keep this one.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 09:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sovereign State of Good Hope : Lefcentreright Discuss 20:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and South Africa .  Lefcentreright Discuss 20:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 21:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The self-declared head of state, Cornelius III , is also nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelius III .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 17:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, page is disconnected from reality— blindlynx 23:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] When sources like

Discussion outcome: delete
Roar! TV : Let'srun ( talk ) 17:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - unsourced, orphaned, and original PROD was removed with misleading edit summary.  I cannot find any evidence of WP:SIGCOV (or indeed, coverage at all).  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 18:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gibraltar Socialist Labour Youth : No WP:SIGCOV in any WP:SIRS .  (A couple of churnalistic sources are available, but as WP:INTERVIEW -based journalism they would be considered primary sources.)  Moreover, WP:BRANCH would apply since it's a sub-organization of the GSLP.  Sources in the article don't even reference the subject.  As an alternative to deletion, I propose to redirect to Gibraltar Socialist Labour Party as was previous done prior to reversion by the creator.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirected as ATD, but now we have no ATD...  Agree totally on lack of notability!  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 10:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maven Securities : Out of 7 links, most of them refer to the same website 13Joker13 ( talk ) 10:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This is probably not going to make a difference to this discussion but FYI, nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry.  Not sure what this user has against me, but he has tried to get other articles of mine deleted under different accounts.  - Imcdc Contact 10:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or mention in another article Agreed, fails WP:GNG , other than the sources already in the article (which are mostly the same site), I haven't found anything other than passing mentions.  Could probably have a section in another article, but doesn't need its own.  Endersslay ( talk ) 16:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rajesh Ganguly : [38] .  BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).
 BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV, game news, database, promo.  // Timothy :: talk 10:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Draftify : As per nominator - no sources in article, and some searching didn't really turn up anything that would meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR.   I *think* there is potential here for an article, and they have directed a notable film, so WP:FILMMAKER could be met, but not with this mess.   Start it as a draft and require AFC acceptance, there's going to be a fair number of fan edits otherwise.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 18:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Ravensfire.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 10:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patricio Vidal (Chilean footballer) : He seems to have been a bit player on the teams he played.  WP:GNG fails.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 13:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless the resident expert on Chilean football, @ ImSnot , knows of any sources, any accomplishments, anytihng useful.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Chile .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Music Summit : Let'srun ( talk ) 04:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No proper sources.  Not notable enough.  killer bee 09:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Wave .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom and killer bee .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 08:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DXET-TV : Given the age of the article, there are a lot of Wikipedia mirror results.  Previous AFD did not seem to discuss any WP:SIGCOV .  MarioGom ( talk ) 23:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 23:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - if this had the first tv broadcast in the history of Mindanao , that sounds historically notable.  But it is unsourced.  Llajwa ( talk ) 19:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NCORP.  Two refs in article are mill news, neither meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth , BEFORE found nothing other than promo and listings.  // Timothy :: talk 11:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Timothy's rationale.  Chaosbrigader64 ( talk ) 23:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Once Just : Possible WP:ATD is redirect to Sudden Death Records , I wouldn't suggest a merge as the information here is all unverified.  There are assertions to notability here (e.g., songs charting) but nothing I could verify.  Boleyn ( talk ) 08:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources claiming notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 14:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deepak Gupta (researcher) : References on the page and in a WP:BEFORE are all about the company LoginRadius which was also deleted from Wikipedia.  There are some interviews as well but these are not independent.  Having patents or writing books do not automatically qualify someone for Wikipedia.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 01:59, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  One of subject's books has >50 citations per Google Scholar [37] , not enough on its own.  — siro χ o 06:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I wouldn't read too much into individual citation counts.  They're really field dependent.  Mason ( talk ) 20:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed.  Just meant as more of a note that it's not strictly an obvious delete, though I currently suspect it will end up there.  — siro χ o 23:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rudra Narayan Sahoo : PRODed but PROD removed by article creator.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Science , Israel ,  and India .  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable.  Reads like a CV.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Far WP:TOOSOON for academic notability, no sign of other notability is apparent.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 21:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While the researcher's work in academic journals is impressive, it is self-published material with editorial oversight.  Evidence of impact should involve scholarly articles, awards, or honors covering such research material that is independent of the subject.  This article seems like a case of WP:TOOSOON.  Multi7001 ( talk ) 02:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Creator had the right but no content-based justification for removing the PROD.  gidonb ( talk ) 02:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not a LinkedIn for scientists.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 16:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not significant enough yet.  Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) ( talk ) 06:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gareth Frodsham : All I found were routine transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 ).  Possible redirect targets include List of St Helens R.F.C. players and List of North Wales Crusaders players .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and England .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough sources.  Oppose redirects on the basic that he had played for multiple clubs so will be known by different people for playing at different clubs so picking one will be arbitrary.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 13:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   After searching online, the only quality coverage is the BBC link that the nominator posted, which I don't think is enough to establish notability.   I agree with MN1548's take on the unsuitability of a redirect target.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 20:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HitmanPro : Tagged non-notable for 9 years without improvement.  Previously dePRODed in 2009 claiming software is fairly widenly used and thus probably notable - this is irrelevant unless sourcing is provided, which it hasn't for 15 years.  * Pppery * it has begun... 16:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Rusty4321 talk contribs 19:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : In this current state, I can't tell why it hasn't be deleted since.  To be honest such like this, remains till ages and no improvement.  It doesn't meet our general notability guidelines and absense of WP:SIGCOV shows almost the existing sources maybe PRs.  Delete for now.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  12:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : According to my check, I searched for reliable sources with in-depth coverage from multiple independent sources but found none.  The article totally fails to meet WP:GNG .  To establish notability, it requires multiple in-depth coverages from independent reliable sources.  Grab Up - Talk 08:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete