hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Solhah Singaarr: PROD'd and restored.  Elevating to AFD.  Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 12:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NTV .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jitesh Singh Deo: The Indian Express article is PR, unsure of the second one.  I can't find mention of this person in reliable sourcing (to be fair, it is the typical flowery language we've seen in umpteen articles here, but it does not seem to help in this case).  Gsearch goes straight to social media, this wiki article, then youtube and the like.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The coverage on the page and most of what I am finding fails WP:NEWSORGINDIA and there is nothing outside of the 2017 pageant that could be considered significant.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Beauty pageants , Fashion ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khalik Mammadov: As best I can tell, the subject is vice-president of "HR, IT and regulations" within the state-owned oil company.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 20:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC .  I was only able to find brief mentions of, and quotes from, the subject in secondary sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 12:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of college sports team nicknames in North America: Let'srun ( talk ) 14:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Lists , Canada , United States of America ,  and North America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I don't think there's a corresponding article, but college teams' nicknames is certainly a notable topic discussed by a variety of sources.  Sources include [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] .  Reywas92 Talk 14:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In North America though?  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, delete the ones in Canada and Mexico if you want a US-focused list.  I don't see the point of that though.  Reywas92 Talk 18:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We have U Sports#Conferences and members and List of Mexican collegiate American football programs for Canada and Mexico respectively.  I do not expect the remaining North American countries to have significantly notability, WP:LISTN , for navigational purposes.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 18:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So shorten this list to be the US ones.  I think this is a valid navigational list for that at least.  Reywas92 Talk 03:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] List of college team nicknames in the United States exists already.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, I had searched but didn't see that.  I would support a merge, but I do like how this is sorted by type and with the length this is a rare instance that keeping separate (or even merging the alphabetical list to this one) would be appropriate.  Reywas92 Talk 15:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , U Sports#Conferences & members , List of Mexican collegiate American football programs and List of college team nicknames in the United States are sufficient.  I couldn't find anything that discussed everything has a group.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 00:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dellon Torres: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  The most I found was this and this , both from the same website.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Axtell High School (Nebraska): There is an actual school that is a combination of junior high and high school in Axtell.  It's at a different address.   See here .  In any event, the article is a nothing, consisting of one sentence that says it's a school.  If the community decide for some reason to retain the article, the name needs to be corrected, and I'm not sure about the data in the infobox.  Bbb23 ( talk ) 00:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Nebraska .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this seems like a hoax .  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : As Bbb23 said, this is a real school in Axtell, NE, but it is a PK-12 school known as "Axtell Community School" .  I wouldn't say this is a hoax, since it cites a government source that incorrectly refers to it as "Axtell High School".  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 22:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tapiwa Marobela: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Tennis ,  and Botswana .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahrix: Majority of sources about charting relate to his collaboration with Alan Walker , all other sources found are suspected unreliable.  Fails WP:MUSICBIO .  Jalen Folf (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Netherlands .  Jalen Folf (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No SIGCOV.  Even few passing mentions.  gidonb ( talk ) 17:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luka Lekić: It adds no information that isn't present in the main article for the shooting.  I can find no more sources that would add anything to this Ionophore ( talk ) 16:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Ionophore ( talk ) 16:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I also cannot find any additional sources related to this.  Even if you assume the sources listed qualify as WP:SIGCOV (I don't think they do), there has been no sustained notability for this individual ( WP:NSUSTAINED ).  There was only one burst of coverage in the immediate aftermath of the shooting.  The article has a lot of problems in general, and I don't think it can be salvaged at this time.  Garsh ( talk ) 03:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indrė Venskevičiūtė: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Lithuania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Crystal McLaurin-Coney: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and North Carolina .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No results found for this individual.  The acting roles appear trivial (commercials and such) and the beauty pageant win does not seem to contribute to notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  Certainly doesn't meet any notability guideline.  IncompA 02:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  MercuryOxide ( talk ) 19:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep : I was totally in agreement to delete when I discovered that she uses Crystal Coney professionally.  I was able to find content for both names, but specifically about her television career using her stage name.  My keep vote is "weak" because she is not a huge star.  However, my vote is to keep, especially given how many Wikipedia pages she links to.  We were just missing that info because of her name variation.  I updated the article to include the sources I found and to trim the unsourced content.  Rublamb ( talk ) 19:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  To add, article was created by a SPA with initial version suggesting it started as a vanity page.  128.252.154.8 ( talk ) 00:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Johnson Keland Management: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  I didn't really see anything on Newspapers.com, just ad placements.  Suggest merging any useful info.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 04:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Management ,  and Wisconsin .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:BEFORE finds nothing that could support company-specific notability guidelines.  I don't believe there's any info that needs to be merged to Samuel Curtis Johnson Jr. or Karen Johnson Boyd since this company is basically just their financial advisor.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 19:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per above.  Not enough details for an article.  killer bee 09:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southern Caribbean: The only two sources do not contain the phrase "Southern Caribbean".  On the Internet, it seems to be mainly used by cruise ship industry promotions.  No WP:RS properly or consistently define the phrase, and apart from "South Caribbean" being a term in plate tectonics, nobody seems to be regarding this as a distinct region with its own separate identity/history/culture/music etc. other than the sum of its parts.  Similar situation with Caribbean South America , just a lot more unsourced text.  Formally proposing deletion after rejected WP:PROD .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 18:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 18:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Islands .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Ungh, of these unsourced articles that's too wordy to be hokum, but without sourcing, we can't prove anything.  The phrase is used [3] , [4] , but I don't see it being anything other than a geographical descriptor.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's easy to pick a region and then subdivide it into subregions by compass direction, but that doesn't mean that subregion is a distinct or notable entity about which you can say things as a whole.  Everything in every section can be either also be applied to countries elsewhere in the Caribbean (they drink rum!) or is just a jumble of facts about specific countries that don't apply to the subregion overall.  I'm not even sure how Saint Lucia was picked to be in this but not Martinique, because everything here is made-up.  Reywas92 Talk 20:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well said.  NLeeuw ( talk ) 20:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:OR , critical lack of any good sources.  Noorullah ( talk ) 00:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as OR Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Registered Accessibility Specialist: A stub since it was created in 2005, probably a permastub .  It was apparently an orphan from its creation until 2018, and the only incoming links now are from a "see also" section and the disambiguation page Ras .  No plausible redirect target.  Un assiolo ( talk ) 15:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Texas .  Un assiolo ( talk ) 15:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All I find are articles that use the title when describing a person.  Nothing for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it's basically just a dicdef, there's simply not much to say about the subject beyond "it exists".  Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 17:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Essentially a run-of-the-mill dictionary definition of a job title.  -- Kinu t / c 06:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Les Cyclopes: Agree with the hatnote that the notability standards are not met JMWt ( talk ) 11:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Catherine Evans: A number of keep ! voters tried to argue inherent/automatic notability of ambassadors which is definitely not the case.  Still fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and United Kingdom .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of notability.  None of the sources listed in the article support notability, and the article subject does not have automatic notability under WP:NPOL , which confers a presumption of notability only on [p]oliticians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels .  I have reviewed the ! keep votes at the previous AfD and have found them unconvincing.  Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c ) 02:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No extensive sourcing for the ambassador.  Same as last time, could be notable with sourcing, but we have none...  Simple confirmation that she held the post doesn't cut it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ragged Islands: It is unsourced.   I don't think it's a hoax, although it seems more likely based on my WP:BEFORE that there are a group of islands called Ragged Islands but not a "settlement" with that name.  In any event, even if the place as named exists, I don't believe it meets the low bar of WP:NPLACE .  Bbb23 ( talk ) 16:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This does exist as a group of islands, but not as a named settlement as the article claimed.  I've rephrased it accordingly, but cannot find adequate sourcing to say anything more than "this exists, the end" — so even rewritten it still can't stick around without sourcing, but no prejudice against recreation if somebody can write something more substantial with better sources than I've been able to find.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete