Division 8 (Swedish football): There is little to say other than supplying a dictionary definition of Division 8 as well as trivial truisms such as the winners being promoted to Division 7.  The reason is that such low tiers only get local news coverage, if even that, making it failing in generating significant coverage.  This overview of Division 7 pre-pandemic shows match attendances ranging from 5 to 60 .  Most districts in Sweden don't even have enough teams to fill tiers as low as this.  (I would surmise that Division 5, 6 and 7 should go as well, but I won't make a bundled nomination ever again.)  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:42, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 09:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I am inclined to keep, as to not break the chain of this article set.  I also feel this is a valid WP:STUB article, even if it is neglected.  Govvy ( talk ) 10:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It needs to pass GNG with significant, in-depth coverage.  I also forward that the "chain of articles" argument is invalid, because Division 7 and 6, and maybe 5 should be deleted too.  England's lowest leagues do not have articles .  Geschichte ( talk ) 13:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep – There is little coverage, but it is understandable as it is the lowest level of Swedish football league system .  I think it's worth maintaining the article so it doesn't become a lack.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep , indeed a very weak keep, for the same reasons that this is a keep—continuity, if nothing else.  I admit, though, that the fact that it is part of the Swedish football pyramid alone doesn't justify the article's existence.  The majority of leagues in the English football pyramid don't have articles of their own.  However, every league between levels 1 and 11 has an article, so perhaps precedent is there to keep this one as well.  In any case, I'm not opposed to deleting this article.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 20:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Swedish football league system , it being part of a series of articles is not reason to keep it.  Giant Snowman 16:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge What should really happen here is the Swedish lower leagues should all be merged into their own article so that we don't lose valid, sourced information, even though the information isn't necessarily notable enough for a stand-alone page.  However there's no good merge target - it's something that should happen through editing, so a keep with a plan to merge - it's unusual, but that's what should really happen here.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to consider merge option, as proposed by SportingFlyer.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Not opposed to a merger, and that goes for Division 8, 7, 6, maybe 5 and 4, but is there any valuable and referenced info that is not yet present in Swedish football league system ?  I don't see any.  Geschichte ( talk ) 13:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge