hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
M4 (Warsaw) : This should be a redirect to Warsaw Metro until there is something more substantial to say.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 17:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Poland .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 17:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - probably a case of WP:TOOSOON , as with M5 (Warsaw) .  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 18:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Warsaw Metro : until the line achieves independent notability.  Owen× ☎ 19:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as WP:TOOSOON .  S5A-0043 Talk 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per TOOSOON.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect per nom and others.  Andre 🚐 06:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  A solid case could be made for delete (way out, dabbed title, just created) and redirect (ATD, CHEAP).  So how to decide?  Well, nominator suggested a redirect.  ATDs in nominations are appreciated and encouraged.  So respecting the intro and nom with a tie-breaker seems a fair choice! gidonb ( talk ) 22:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above per WP:TOOSOON .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:56, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Areni Hamparian : The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was a few sentences of coverage here .  Everything else that came up in my searches were passing mentions, mostly in Armenian media.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Armenia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 13:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 15:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Freedom Brigade : The article is sourced only to the comic issues themselves, and searches turn up no significant coverage on the characters at all.  What very little there is that mentions the group is merely repeating that they were made up as part of the backstories for the Inferior Five.  Merging to an article like List of teams and organizations in DC Comics would be inappropriate, not only due to the extreme lack of sourcing, but due to the fact that they were never actually a real team in the comics.  At best, this could be redirected to the Inferior Five article, but given the extreme obscurity of the topic, I am not convinced it would even be a useful search term.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation .  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Inferior Five per WP:ATD - it is the cruftiest of fancruft that is even possible, one-off background characters in service of another character's backstory.  If the Inferior Five is also deleted or redirected, then this should probably be straight-up deleted.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Zxcvbnm.  It's questionable if this meets WP:N , but this is a valid WP:ATD for now.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 11:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
OnTV4U : Let'srun ( talk ) 22:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Wisconsin .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cannella Media : this is the network's parent company, making it a logical-enough alternative to deletion here.  (That might require adding a mention of it there if a source allowing so much as that turns up, but not necessarily a "merge" per se.)  There really isn't much notability, or significant coverage , that could possibly be expected from an all-infomercial network — this is another reminder of how lax our inclusion standards (or at least enforcement of them) really were in 2008.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Canella Media I've been waiting for this day; there's not much you can do with a network whose existence is all infomercials.  I've added the mention to the Canella article.  Nate • ( chatter ) 02:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the article for Cannella Media .  That'll be the most sensible thing that I can think about what this can happen to the article.  Fair and Simple.  Mer764Wiki ( talk ) 13:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cannella Media appears to be the best option here.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 10:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above as non-notable enough.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nootdorp Panthers : Boleyn ( talk ) 16:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Rugby league ,  and Netherlands .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rugby league in the Netherlands where the Nootdorp Panthers are now mentioned.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 20:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or above Redirect Fails notability.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 10:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rugby league in the Netherlands per GNG, ATD, and CHEAP.  gidonb ( talk ) 18:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rugby league in the Netherlands#NNRLB era .  Doesn’t meet WP:SIGCOV .  Tau Corvi ( talk ) 00:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Bagudi : Sohom ( talk ) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Schools , India ,  and Odisha .  Sohom ( talk ) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources are primary or dead links.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:49, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No issues with a redirect.  Sohom ( talk ) 12:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
W30CV-D : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 16:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Carolina .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 16:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in South Carolina#LPTV stations : I'd at least like to think there is more likely to be at least some coverage of a low-power station that has local programming and a 30-plus year history (and will happily amend my !vote if any signfiicant coverage surfaces), but it's difficult to justify (particularly under the stricter standards of 2024, as opposed to 2006) retaining such a short and minimally-sourced (databases and the station website don't count toward the GNG) article that has attracted some COI editing over the past decade.  An {{ R to list entry }} may well be more than enough here.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Emilio Bonfigli : The only reference is a database entry.   The Heymann criterion is to find two or more sources to establish general notability .  Draftify as nominator, to allow six months to find significant coverage .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 03:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Boxing , Olympics ,  and Italy .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 03:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:17, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Article was created when just competing at an Olympics was viewed as sufficient to show WP notability.   A first round loss doesn't meet any SNG.   The coverage doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG .   Of course, there may be coverage in archives of old Italian newspapers, but that's not within my scope to check.   It seems like deletion would be the correct option, but I have no objections to making the article a draft and giving the article's creator addition time to find good sources.  Papaursa ( talk ) 22:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Boxing at the 1924 Summer Olympics – Middleweight Thanks, Cbl62.  I should have thought of that myself.   This provides info on him and allows time for sources to be found that would allow the article's recreation, if possible.  Papaursa ( talk ) 22:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Boxing at the 1924 Summer Olympics – Middleweight .  His name rolls off the tongue mellifluously, but unfortunately the article fails to comply with WP:SPORTBASIC (prong 4) as it does not include any SIGCOV (just databases).  Also, my searches turned up nothing that would constitute SIGCOV that might satisfy WP:GNG .  Finally, fails WP:NOLYMPICS as he lost in opening round.  Unless there's someone who is indicating a desire to work on this in the near term, I think a redirect is a better alternative to deletion in this case.   The history remains with the redirect if someone chooses to dig into 100-year-old Italian newspapers.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 19:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ingrid Osegueda : The subject has made at least one appearance for the aforementioned national team.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , El Salvador ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 15:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
PMMR 62 : Anyway, does not meet WP:SIGCOV and therefore not WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG .  Should be deleted or redirected to the list of largest stars .  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 08:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The {{ Notability }} tag is in the article since 2021 and the notability problem was never resolved.  Fail WP:NASTRO .  Also, you were the one who created this article.  InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 13:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because the {{ Notability }} tag has been there since March 2021 and issue not resolved.  User:Hamterous1 ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ ) 00:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of largest stars per other similar AfDs.  SevenSpheres ( talk ) 16:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of largest stars as {{ R to list entry }} : the star is not notable per WP:GNG / WP:NASTRO but is mentioned in the appropriate list.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 12:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Soha Abed Elaal : Her only achievement is that she competed in the 2008 Summer Olympics.  There are also no Reliable Sources about her.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Women .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Egypt .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Archery at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's individual .  Fails WP:NOLYMPICS as she did not win a medal (indeed, she finished 57th in her event).  Also fails WP:SPORTBASIC which requires "at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources."  Cbl62 ( talk ) 02:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Maurice Roche, 6th Baron Fermoy : Fails WP:BASIC .  BEFORE did not turn up anything other than passing mentions due to being related to Diana Spencer , and a Tatler interview, which is not independent from the subject.  Pilaz ( talk ) 13:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility , Ireland ,  and United Kingdom .  Pilaz ( talk ) 13:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Clear WP:ATD would be a redirect to Baron Fermoy .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Baron Fermoy .  Or, failing that, simply delete .  Another of these articles on title-holders which seems to exist only because they are a title-holder.  The holders of titles are not automatically notable .  (Nor are military people, business people, relations of royals or attendees of royal weddings.)  I can find no additional sources to establish notability (under SIGCOV or similar) and the single ref in the article is of a type not considered to be suitable to either support article text or to support a notability claim .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 09:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Pilaz ( talk ) 10:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Baron Fermoy .  Very few (or zero) reliable sources.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 02:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dil Muhallay Ki Haveli : — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Amin_Iqbal#Television : director - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Same rationale for almost every nomination i guess.  I am doubting whether WP:Before is done or not.  It was broadcasted in 2013 and many Pakistani newspapers remove old coverage from their websites.  Why a series broadcasted in 2013 need nomination discussion  after more than a decade, and if its the case then all the old films/television related articles should be removed from wikipidea.  It received some coverage as one can see here [28] Libraa2019 ( talk ) 09:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Libraa2019 ,  This is a WP:ATA.  Unless the source is unreliable or dubious, old archives can always be found.  And if you doubt that I haven't done WP:BEFORE, why don't you provide some solid coverage (not some Google searches or even ROTM coverage) from RS that help establish WP:GNG, instead of doubting my intentions?  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
E. Scott Frost : As it stands, this is simply a CV.  Perhaps redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law , United States of America ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies per recent precedent.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete & redirect per nominator, as article creator.  Safiel ( talk ) 02:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies#List of unsuccessful federal judicial nominations per nom.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies#List of unsuccessful federal judicial nominations .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 15:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 Indian Premier League squads : As such, we don't need this article which is just a repeated table of squads, and these reasons are why every other IPL season doesn't have this either, because it's so unnecessary.  Generally, we only have separate cricket squad articles for major events for international teams, not franchise tournaments Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Cricket ,  and India .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to 2024 Indian Premier League .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2024 Indian Premier League for reasons given above.  AryKun ( talk ) 17:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2024 Indian Premier League a separate article not needed for this.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect No need for the same information to be copied in a separate article.  Robo Cric Let's chat 16:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2024 Indian Premier League 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect