hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Yonezawa PR21 : The references are PR articles.  WP:NPRODUCT can also be applied.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 15:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Companies ,  and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Wasn't able to find any independent sources.  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 18:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the header that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Internet television providers : Questionable accuracy, see Germany for example where linear channels are listed and which are not 'Internet TV providers'.  Lack of references, and seems to be an easy target for vandalisers who want to promote their own services.  Amchipo ( talk ) 20:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 4 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Internet ,  and Lists .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:20, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article feels like a victim of the times.  It was created 15 years ago, when streaming services were nascent and Netflix's only existed in the United States.  Now, there are lots of flavors of internet TV, from on-demand streaming services like Netflix etc. to virtual MVPDs that mirror the cable bundle and free ad-supported streaming television that is typically a series of linear channels.  The page size graph mirrors this explosion: from 2015 to 2017, it grew from 8 kB to 35 kB, and it went from 47 to 64 kB in the last two years.  We have hit a point where a list presents more maintenance load than it is worth.  WP:CLN notes, Some topics are so broad that a list would be unmanageably long and effectively unmaintainable.  This, I believe, has happened to the topic as a result of secular growth.  Category:Internet television streaming services was created in 2018 and has some 130 entries.  Someone should review the entries in the list and look to see that relevant ones are in that category.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 02:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Osseus Labyrint : No obvious good WP:ATD .  Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Organizations .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Garib Dassi : And in fact most of the article is about its founder, who has his own article, Bhuriwale .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 08:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Insufficient coverage, does not meet notability standards as per WP:GNG Dcotos ( talk ) 19:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tracy Andrus : The fact that his U.S. Senate campaign has also attracted little attention is also telling.  Also--and I know this isn't really relevant but it's worth mentioning--the article is terribly written and not at all neutral.  Sentences like "For more information or to make a donation to the Tracy Andrus Foundation, please visit www.tracyandrusfoundation.com" should not be on Wikipedia.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 18:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Running for Senate isn't notable.  There are few hits for a female Tracy Andrus, who was the daughter of the Idaho governor at one point, nothing found for this person.  Routine coverage, having to shut down his foundation because of the political campaign etc.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My fave is when the showers for the homeless people are open, given days of the week and hours of operation.  I don't know what to say, this isn't a social services directory; if having showers available is what the creator thinks gets you a wiki article, well, just don't bother creating it.  Flowery language...  I'd have deleted this for promotional material.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Louisiana .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as abuse of Wikipedia.  Promotional puff.  Notability not found.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete as abuse of Wikipedia.  I agree it is all promotional verbiage that is completely lacking in notability.  Paul H. ( talk ) 23:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MC Swat : The existing sources do not establish notability effectively.  Additionally, the source from middleeasteye.net is an interview, and its reliability is questionable , infomigrants.net is not reliable, and the article from The Guardian seems to rely heavily on hearsay.  A WP:BEFORE search yielded no additional reliable sources beyond those currently cited.  GSS 💬 14:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Libya .  GSS 💬 14:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources used are exactly the first 3 hits I get in Gnews.  Guardian is ok, the others don't appear to be RS, or somewhat so per the source bot here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep : I accepted this article via AfC (which was promotional when submitted, I fixed it a bit) — Middle East Eye isn't a bad source, though, it's an interview.  Guardian was okay for me.  Here's another CNN piece , which isn't too bad.  TLA tlak 02:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The CNN piece is an interview, and interviews are not considered independent sources, thus they do not meet WP:GNG criteria.  Similarly, The Guardian's article falls into the category of a 'he says, she says' type of article.  GSS 💬 04:38, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Like Oaktree, I think The Guardian is solid but the others are based mostly on what he says or not RS.  S0091 ( talk ) 18:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) S0091 ( talk ) 18:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Durgapur High School : The school does not show any notability for inclusion in Wikipedia.  Searches showed that the school existed, but no notability is shown.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Bangladesh .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nom.  ‍~ 𝕂𝕒𝕡𝕦𝕕𝕒𝕟 ℙ𝕒ş𝕒 ( inbox - contribs ) 12:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete an unreferenced 1 line article that fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not Wiki notable.  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 20:38, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per Nominaton.  Deloar Akram ( Talk • Contribute ) 11:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WDYH-LD : (And yes, this is another station of this type previously included in that failed bulk nomination .)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Georgia (U.S. state) .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom (and the reasoning in the K04QR-D nom I wrote).  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 18:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Without seemingly any WP:SIGCOV , this subject fails all notability guidelines.  User:Let'srun 03:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't even believe this station ever broadcast as the two contributors to the article outside maintainers look like they've never been anywhere near Augusta to confirm the station's existence as a going concern (most TV stations wouldn't downgrade their main channel from 16:9 HD to a 4:3 SD channel, even among HC2 sub farms, as this article somehow asserts).  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William D. Clay Jr. : Avishai11 ( talk ) 11:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Avishai11 ( talk ) 11:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sourcing of any kind found for this "special advisor", even the term is vague.  The article provides barely information about what the individual does/did for the UN...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No indication that article's subject is sufficiently notable.  Page feels promotional and is written like a CV - readers gain little from article.  Boredintheevening ( talk ) 15:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Food and drink , Italy ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bogey Awards : Sgubaldo ( talk ) 15:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Awards ,  and Germany .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 15:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nomination, no WP:SIGCOV to establish general notability.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 17:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Excel High School (Minnesota) : I can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 12:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. — Alalch E. 12:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Minnesota .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  If kept, this article should be renamed.  It is not really a high school in Minnesota, but an online school granting diplomas "across the globe" and headquartered in Minnesota.  Jacona ( talk ) 13:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources consisted of primary sources, profiles in online database, promotional pieces and announcement of collaboration programms.  Only found trivial mentions or other promotional contents about the subject.  Does not appear notable.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources are read like press releases.  Fails WP:GNG .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 04:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Objection to deletion .  While I do agree that the work reads like an advertisement, Excel High School is an online high school.  If Penn Foster 's High School and Ashworth College 's James Madison HS have articles, then this should likely stay.  It would help potential enrollees.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeBo82 ( talk • contribs ) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS not a reason for keeping.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like a WP:PROMO , and as noted above it's a private company not really a school.  Fails WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:40, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Triangle of power notation : No significant coverage found. " certainly describes this sourcing; it was reverted by Kvng , while adding one of the two blog posts, which doesn't suggest the presence of sources of appropriate quality.   Maybe some day someone will write some RS about this subject.  JBL ( talk ) 21:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  JBL ( talk ) 21:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I originally PRODed the article, and I stand by the assessment that there simply isn't coverage. — Moriwen ( talk ) 21:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  This is a cute idea, but not notable.  – jacobolus (t) 23:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , mostly per WP:NOTINVENTED and WP:NEO .  I tried to tag this as an A11 speedy deletion, before the prod, but this was contested on weak grounds.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability; indeed, the quality of the sources and prose of the article suggest a lack of notability.  -- Kinu t / c 20:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 10:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sipho Nofemele : I searched using both Sipho and Siphosenkosi as his first name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Reasonable amount of coverage, but nothing suggesting a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manukau Cruising Club Rugby League Club : No WP:SUSTAINED coverage, just match reports, padded with lots of speculation, information about the cruising club (but not the rugby club), and so on.  Fram ( talk ) 14:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Rugby league ,  and New Zealand .  Fram ( talk ) 14:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  In a way it is an interesting article, but no way is it notable, so delete.  Bduke ( talk ) 09:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 20:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Danial Zakaria : Non-notable creative professional with no significant coverage.  I also cannot find coverage of the subject’s creative works.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 10:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom .  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 10:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I took a look myself and I'm not seeing anything that would suggest they meet NCREATIVE either.  I also couldn't find any detailed secondary coverage of their films.  Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 08:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Budhiram Tudu : All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2010 , 2011 , 2016 , 2018 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 12:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guide (magazine) : ForsythiaJo ( talk ) 20:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable at all.  Searching doesn't bring up any results on Google.  Seems to be some sort of internal magazine or documentation for its members.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 20:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable yet.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 21:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Guide (disambiguation) where there are potential targets as per WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , minor, non-notable news source.  Disambiguation pages are to signpost to subjects already mentioned on Wikipedia, there would certainly be no point in redirecting.  Sionk ( talk ) 00:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and move Guide (Adventist magazine) to Guide (magazine) as it appears to be the more notable of the two magazines (based on (superficial) comparative searches on Google).  Could not find any meaningful coverage of this Guide magazine in a Wikipedia Library general search.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 19:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm also fine with the delete and move.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete