hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Michael Eamon Herbst: WP:SIGCOV and WP:NBIO are not met.  The only coverage, which deals with the subject as a primary topic, is this interview piece in the regional Wexford People newspaper .  And is a form of WP:INTERVIEW which doesn't contributed to notability.  The only other independent coverage I can find are trivial passing mentions like this or this court proceeding .  The other "references" in the article are not independent and/or do not support the text regardless.  In many cases making NO MENTION WHATEVER of the subject.  And representing a form of WP:REFBOMBing .  These "references" certainly do not support a claim to notability.  (Like this page from the Wicklow County Council website - which makes ZERO mention of the subject and cannot POSSIBLY be read as supporting the text it is placed alongside).  The BLPSources and Peacock concerns, raised by Liz , were simply ignored and the tags removed.  The other issues (PROMO/COI/PAID/etc) are so obvious and galling that I was initially tempted to consider SPEEDY or PROD.  However, discussion and clear community consensus is probably required...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 17:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 17:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 17:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  While the article's creator has (repeatedly) removed the related AfD tag before this discussion was closed, these changes have been reverted/corrected by a bot .  If the creating editor, Michael Eamon Herbst , believes that the article meets the applicable criteria (and should be retained), then their contributions are welcome here.  In the discussion.  Removing the link to the AfD discussion, before the discussion has closed, is not the correct means of advocating for retention.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete.  This should have been nominated for speedy delete.  This nonnotable man created a Wikipedia article about himself and his business.  Delete per WP:AUTOBIO , WP:PROMO , WP:COI , WP:GNG . . . the list goes on.  Nothing in that article indicates notability for encyclopedic coverage.  The sources do not meet standards for what is considered reliable and valid.  In fact, they include the creator/subject's own primary sources.  The person in question also cheats by repeatedly deleting the AfD notice on the article, but that is a separate issue.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Sheela Pandit: This article is also same.  — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 05:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Women , India ,  and Bihar .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 05:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete zero evidence of notability.  This was declined at AfC a few times, then yesterday the author had it G7'd, only to create it in the main space instead; that's just blatant gaming of the system.  Fails WP:GNG / WP:NPOL .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG . DSP 2092 ( 👤 , 🗨️ ) Comment now speedied as G5 . -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Didier Guillon: It fails WP:GNG with some clear WP:COI concerns.  It was created by a WP:SPA in 2018.  GuardianH ( talk ) 02:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Visual arts , France ,  and Switzerland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's been G11, I think we can close this.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Battle of Tashkent (713): Lev Gumilevs book mentions nothing about this event on page 374 [40] .  Article looks WP:OR to me.  HistoryofIran ( talk ) 00:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per the above rationale.  ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as more tiresome made-up battlebollox.  We already have detailed coverage of the verifiable events at Qutayba ibn Muslim and Muslim conquest of Transoxiana .  This is a fanciful content fork.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  There is zero ability to verify the alleged sources on the page as they are poor citations.  It is noted in the infobox that the result of the battle was Not clear (no sources available to verify) .  If there are no sources to determine important information of a battle then such a page isn't warranted.  ElderZamzam ( talk ) 10:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 13:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete incomplete, unverifiable sources, no reason to keep.  -- Kansas Bear ( talk ) 18:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Dznrm: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 05:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Maine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Abdul Adnan: Take e.g. the first source [30] , from the Times of India (or something similar), used to source his awards and nominations.  All very high praise, but it seems to be impossible to find out for which series or films he actually did receive these awards for?  His IMDb entry (given as an external link) is empty...  Fram ( talk ) 15:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Fram ( talk ) 15:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is almost certainly promotional, WP:NOTPROMO .  For now, I've removed the most obvious advertisement for the subject's own product.  Also, the so-called "Dada Saheb Phalke Indian Television award" seems to be a knock-off award.  — siro χ o 16:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - First, PROMO is never a reason for deletion through AfD.  If it is a case of TNT, it can be done through Speedy.  That aside, the references are classic WP:NEWSORGINDIA so cannot be used to show notability.  Notice they are all published within the last 60 days, written in promotional tone, and in publications that allow sponsored content.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:NOTPROMO / WP:PROMO is part of WP:NOT , which is a valid policy reason for deletion by WP:DEL-REASON#14 .  — siro χ o 19:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe it would be WP:DEL-REASON#1 since NOT would be criteria for speedy deletion.  Being that you went with an WP:ATD and removed promotional content, and since AfC is WP:NOTCLEANUP , I am not sure how that criteria would still apply so the ! vote was puzzling.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have moved this back to mainspace; the creator draftified the article without discussing and without consensus.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I see you did the same with another AfD that was moved by creator.  I attempted to move it back but see you fixed it before I could figure out the process.  Thanks for doing that.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Bùi Quốc Huy: Inaccurate information is found in the article which cannot be verified by reliable sources, such as being signed by Creative Artists Agency or being nominated as a Top New Artist by NME Magazine.  Article has been sent back to draft space several times but keeps reappearing in article space with the issues unaddressed.  ... disco spinster talk 15:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Vietnam .  ... disco spinster talk 15:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that I've deleted it per G5 .  The vast majority of edits to the article were by various socks; the edits by other users were undoing the damage. -- Ponyo bons mots 22:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
2019 Hyderabad Flyover Accident: WP:NOTNEWS applies as there are no WP:LASTING effects.  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 07:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Lorenzo1235 ( talk ) 08:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation ,  and Telangana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
S.R Mahadeva Sarma S.R Rajasree: - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 09:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , India ,  and Kerala .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 09:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Unsourced article.  Author is probably connected to the subject WP:OR .  A WP:BEFORE search on both together and individually does not bring many results.  Fails GNG .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I found these [23] and [24] , but they seem to be interviews.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional, not notable.  Likely speedy, as above.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 11:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Harvey Moeis: However, according to WP:INVALIDBIO , merely being associated with a notable person, such as a spouse, does not warrant a standalone article.  Additionally, although the individual later becomes an alleged suspect in a corruption case, WP:PERPETRATOR specifies that the crime must be unusual or noteworthy to merit a standalone article.  Furthermore, WP:BLPCRIME cautions against including material that suggests an individual has committed or is accused of a crime, unless there is a secured conviction.  In this case, it's important to note that he is still a suspect and has not been convicted yet.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 05:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom and really no substantial coverage of the subject generally.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 06:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : For all the reasons stated above.  「Hype Boy」  TALK 06:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
2023 Ulsan Hyundai FC season: Shellwood ( talk ) 22:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or Redirect to 2022-23 Manchester City F.C. season I'm not too knowledgeable on the subject, but these articles seem to be about the same topic.  As this one is shorter, it could just be redirected instead of merged (unless it has significant text that the other doesn't).  Also, WP:COMMONNAME .  Again, I don't know much about this, but the club's main article doesn't make any mention of a name change in the lede.  Asparagusus (interaction) 23:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the article content was ripped off another article and has nothing to do with the article's name.  @ Asparagusus : Ulsan Hyundai FC has nothing to do with Manchester City F.C. .  :3 F4U ( they /it ) 01:24, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and ban this user as this is a long-standing vandal which was banned many times already, sock of Hyundaiga ( talk · contribs ) and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bule Cloud and many many banned IP accounts.  Snowflake91 ( talk ) 10:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, nonsense article.  Possibly eligible for CSD under G3?  Giant Snowman 15:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Coach Henry E.V.K: It was nominated for CSD as a trivial recreation of a page previously deleted via discussion.  Improbably, that CSD was contested.   So now we're here.   Just like last time, the page fails WP:GNG and WP:SINGER .  There is a single short article in the Daily Trust that does not meet "significant" coverage and is not "multiple" sources.  "Beautiful Arewa" does not appear to be a reliable source (appears to be a blog at best).  The remainder of the sources are just links to tracks on Apple Music which are not reliable sources.   Google does not bring up any missing sources, nor does there appear to be any new material since the last deletion discussion.   Delete and salt.  49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk ) 05:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria .  49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk ) 05:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just thought I'd mention that the CSD tag was removed by an editor with 17 edits.  So, it's not like an administrator disagreed with your assessment.  L iz Read!  Talk!  06:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Thanks @ Liz : I'm trying proactively to not gatekeep solely based on edit count, but it didn't go unnoticed.  I'm trying to get better about assuming the best from new users except when it's obvious shenanigans.  Thanks for everything you do.  49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk ) 07:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete G4 clearly applies in this case. - KH-1 ( talk ) 09:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Nirav Chahwala: A WP:BEFORE found nothing better to establish notability.  Was originally draftified but moved back to mainspace by creator.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have moved this back to mainspace; the creator draftified the article without discussing and without consensus.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not a single reliable source.  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 20:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Kanta Prasad: On top of that I don't think they should they be forced to have a biography on Wikipedia due to one unfortunate incident.  See Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event and, even more importantly, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Presumption in favor of privacy .  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 17:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Itzeazy India: The article, although a stub, has a promotional tune as in " The company simplifying government documentations for common citizens and offers doorstep citizen services across 12 major cities in India " which is 50% of the article.  The sources in the article are not reliable except for The Times of India which according to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources " known to accept payments from persons and entities in exchange for positive coverage."  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 09:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 09:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Delhi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not much about the company online outside of press releases.  -- Primium ( talk ) 17:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:G5 for being a block evading sock with no substantial edits from good faith accounts Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G5 , obviously created by sock puppet with no edits from uninvolved users.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 11:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Nabin luhagun: Has three roles, all of which were minor.  There is also nothing in-depth that would show how he meets WP:GNG .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Nepal , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It passes WP:GNG and have significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources.Thank you.  WikipedianRam ( talk ) 09:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete UPE spam.  Fake references .  Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fake references .  None of the references have mentioned the name.  Krishna Dahal ( talk ) 11:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References have mentioned the name please check properly.  WikipedianRam ( talk ) 11:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] None of the reliable sources have the name mentioned, nor do any sources support any of the claims.  Krishna Dahal ( talk ) 11:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, name have mentioned and it supports too.  So, please review it properly and hope you will make a good discussion.Thank you.  WikipedianRam ( talk ) 11:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
EdubuzzKids: Fails WP:CORP , WP:WEB , and WP:GNG .  No significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.  Jfire ( talk ) 19:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Websites .  Jfire ( talk ) 19:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete WP:A7 Kinopiko talk 05:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete