hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Maelyn Jarmon: Aside from some less-than-impressive charting singles, most of which also come from her time on the show, I don't see independent notability at this time.  Merge/redirect to the season page.  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wait for You (Maelyn Jarmon song) .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 21:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Television ,  and Texas .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 21:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep She charted #6 on the Digital chart, that's not nothing.  One Other single charted in the top 20 on the same chart, that's notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] On the digital chart, sure, but with zero placements on the Hot 100 that it feeds into.  It's not nothing but I'm not convinced it's much of something, and without much else to match it, I still don't see the keep.  Besides, that's info that can still be merged easily.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The point is that she got #6, it doesn't mater what you think will happen after said occasion.  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 00:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 23:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think her notability is recognizable with chart topping singles.  The article mentions noteworthy statistics that a redirect could not.  2603:9001:1B02:FB65:1182:B2D5:A51C:9565 ( talk ) 23:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 13:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep- everything said in here and the article points towards keeping it.  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 00:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Charts on the US Digital Song Sales make this eligible for WP:MUSICBIO #2.  Jalen Folf (talk) 02:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Wonjong station: This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability).  A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability.  ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 02:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that Siheung Daeya station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Sinhyeon station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Siheung City Hall station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Siu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Wonsi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Seonbu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Dalmi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Siheung Neunggok station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Delete : Searches for its English and Korean names return nothing.  Given the station was only opened 30 days ago, also perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON .  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Eastmain's references.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 02:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Korea .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  @ ClydeFranklin : I added some references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per cites added by Eastmain.  Meets GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 15:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
The Fearless Collective: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  As I stated when I decided the Fearless Collective article was not eligible for speedy delete, there are plenty of reliable sources that prove the notability of this artist collective.  In addition to the reliable sources already in the article, a quick Google News search returns 616 results including coverage of this group in the Kashmir Observer , The Daily Star ( link ), Homegrown , The Sunday Times ( link ), News9Live ( link ), The New Indian Express ( link ), The Express Tribune ( link ), Business Standard ( link ), and many more not listed here.  And in addition to that the Wikipedia Library returns even more articles about this group in journals and magazines such as Bitch Magazine , Development, Women's Studies in Communication, The Journal of Women in Culture & Society, and more.  While this article does need a lot of work, the Fearless Collective easily meet Wikipedia's notability standards. -- SouthernNights ( talk ) 22:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the large number of good refs.  Consider “speedy keeping”.  — A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
San Rafael City Schools: Stating ahead of time that school districts are not automatically notable.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 19:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , United States of America ,  and California .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 19:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I put a neutrally worded notice at Talk:San Rafael, California .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 20:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You should place the same notice at WT:WPSCH , on any schools in the district that have articles and WT:WikiProject California .  If you're in for a dime, you need to be in for a dollar.  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 15:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Keep in mind a school district is a local government just like a city or a town, and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#School_districts states: ""Populated, legally-recognized places" include school districts, which conveys near-presumptive notability to school districts per Wikipedia:Notability (geography). " (my emphasis added) However I think I can also find sources and argue such on WP:GNG grounds, especially those that are about appointment/resignation of superintendents and/or construction and/or development of school facilities. WhisperToMe ( talk ) 20:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep on WP:GNG grounds after finding three sources in San Francisco-area newspapers. WhisperToMe ( talk ) 21:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per WhisperToMe's statement and the sources he found. School districts in the US are governmental units, no different than a city. As a matter of fact, in at least one state (Indiana) they are commonly referred to as "school-city".  They are not educational institutions, but rather quasigovernmental administrative districts with taxing authority and elected officials; the same reasons other governmental entities recieve a near presumption of notability under the geography SNGs.  SNGs exist because certain things always have secondary coverage.  Bond issues and elections are always covered by the press.  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 15:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  School districts are in a special category, and serve as redirect targets for schools in the district that do not have articles, such as elementary schools or new high schools not yet covered in reliable secondary sources.  Besides, this article meets eets GNG with sources identified by WhisperToMe .  — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk ) 17:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Based on the assertions above that this is a local government area rather than a grouping of schools (despite the current contents of the article).  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Salman Muqtadir: The current and googled sources are not both independent and reliable.  NiftyyyNofteeeee ( talk ) 09:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bangladesh ,  and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - It has been less than two months since the last nomination was closed.  This is borderline disruptive editing.  Please take a moment to read WP:RENOM .  Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 14:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep as last time, see the source list from that AfD.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - enough reliable sources and there is multiple news coverage.  EngrShakamal ( talk ) 15:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Bartholomew Cubbins: Shellwood ( talk ) 21:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dr. Seuss bibliography , as the character is in two books.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 21:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Three stories, a couple of plays, a film and a TV show.  Maybe merge into The 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins , but I'm not convinced that would be an improvement.  pburka ( talk ) 03:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Article does need some improvement, but I don't think that merging or redirecting would be the solution.  I guess maintaining the status quo, at least for now, would be best.  CycloneYoris talk!  21:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Esso Station: It seems like a good addition to the article on the town, but I don't think it merits its own article.  Incidentally, even if the article is kept, "Esso Station" isn't a good title.  There's a lot of Esso stations out there.  Ormewood ( talk ) 20:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep In general, things listed on the NRHP are considered notable by default and there exists at some coverage of it outside of just the NRHP filing.  See Arkansas listings in the National Register of Historic Places , Latimer, Franklin Allen, Arkansas Historical Quarterly, Summ 2002, Vol.  61, Issue 2.  It has several sentences of historical details and a pull photo of it, in particular Although not large in size, the Esso Station in Piggott is notable for its Colonial Revival style of architecture and its excellent state of preservation.  .  And being torn down doesn't really change anything since notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY .  For the name, there's no other full article with that base name.  But changing this to a disambiguation page with links to this and other Esso stations that are under other names may make sense once this AFD is resolved (either boldly or through a WP:REQUESTEDMOVE .) Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep agree with Skynxnex, a future merge may work, but the article on the town is a bit of a hodgepodge and needs some organizatio, so I think for the moment a merge would not improve the state of the encyclopedia for readers seeking knowledge.  — siro χ o 22:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep with title change.  Agree with Ormewood that the title is useless, but Skynxnex is right about NRHP subjects.  Last1in ( talk ) 20:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
EssentiallySports: Mercenf ( talk ) 14:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Companies , Sports , Websites ,  and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Bizcruft soucing.  This is about the best I find [7] .  Appears paid promo article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The website appears to have significant reach and influence, with 30 million monthly readers across 150 countries, according to the information provided.  This statistic suggests that it has considerable notability within the sports journalism world.  Also, the site claim to produce original content such as the 'Quarentennis - Bridging the Broken Strings' podcast, suggesting that it plays a role not only in disseminating but also in creating sports news and analysis.  LusikSnusik ( talk ) 09:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per quite significant site's audience.  Also, there is a minimum sourcing needed to establish the website's notability (although some of the sources may not be of high quality).  The site also received a notable award from the Indian news site Afaqs, for best sports coverage or something similar.  [8] .  Could be added to the page's credibility.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 14:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep with over 1 billion views this independent sports media also ranks among top sports sites worldwide per Feedspot.  It's also listed among the top 30 blogs in the world per https://detailed.com/50 .  IMO, looks pretty notable and interesting mix of fan-generated community and classic sports broadcasting.  多少 战场 龙 ( talk ) 13:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Alex Zurdo: A notable attempt at making them look as notable has been made by ChuchoVCJMusik, who has created other articles for non-notable "entertainers" recently deleted such as those of Sagcy, Aiona Santana, and may be involved in a potential COI.  Bedivere ( talk ) 06:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Christianity ,  and Puerto Rico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Check The references and Awards (Dove Awards, Tu Música Urbano Awards, Arpa Awards, a Latin Grammy nomination).  ChuchoVCJMuzik ( talk ) 13:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets point 8 of WP:MUSICBIO : Nominated for Latin Grammy.  Since the Latin Grammy nomination establishes notability, the deletion of other articles created by the author are not a valid reason alone for deletion of this one per WP:WHATABOUT .  I contributed to neutralize this article in 2021, so I don't think it violates WP:NOT . -- Crystallizedcarbon ( talk ) 06:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as nominated for Latin Grammy and won 2 Dove Awards as confirmed in reliable sources Spanish newspapers referenced in the article, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham: BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 02:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found for this person; article reads like a likedin post.  Associate professor is a long way from notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] People are so quick to say "nothing found".  Here's an entire NY Times article [23] about the 2014 article in the New England Journal of Medicine of which she's the first author.  [24] She's not a slam dunk for notability, but it's also far from "nothing".  Jahaza ( talk ) 03:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I didn't find the NYT article and it's paywalled, I stand by my statement.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Associate profs are nothing to be overlooked.  Give me an associate professor from Harvard or MIT over one from an Alaskan Community College.  BostonMensa ( talk ) 18:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women , Health and fitness ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The Google Scholar page on her at https://scholar.google.com/citations? user=3qiScrMAAAAJ&hl=en shows an impressive citation count and h-index.  I think together they establish notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I'm not entirely persuaded by the citation statistics alone, since she's not a top author on three of the four Lancet articles that are supercharging her citation count, but I think there's enough here (see my comment above with a NY Times article).  Jahaza ( talk ) 03:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Eastmain and Jahaza's decisions.  CastJared ( talk ) 03:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - even ignoring the Lancet articles, her work is highly cited both by the academic literature and in the popular press.  Her 2014 paper on childhood obesity generated multiple news stories, as did her work on doctors' strikes, and a 2022 article on increases in childhood obesity.  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 10:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 00:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Yangyuan & Tiesiyuan station: A redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro) seems best.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations , Transportation ,  and China .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro) Djflem ( talk ) 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I've added some sources, which I think are enough to meet GNG.  — Mx.  Granger ( talk · contribs ) 08:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article is better now.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Now meets WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ulrike Fitzer: No SIGCOV, only a few passing mentions, she once was in a non-notable documentary film.  〜 Festucalex • talk 20:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Military , Aviation ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Also known as Ulrike Flender.  Her article on the German Wikipedia is much more fleshed out and has links to several sources of significanto coverage.  In short, passes WP:GNG with sources such as these [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] .  Alvaldi ( talk ) 23:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The first female fighter pilot in a major air force is clearly notable.  And easily enough coverage to meet WP:GNG in any case.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep