hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ohio Institute of Health Careers : Hits are on any sort of career college/healthcare school in Ohio.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Education ,  and Ohio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG .  5.42.92.163 ( talk ) 15:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Lacks reliable sources.  Alex-h ( talk ) 08:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Maliner ( talk ) 10:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, current article is a stub without sufficient referencing to support notability or encyclopedic quality.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 02:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Carpatair destinations : EDIT: per a subsequent AN discussion these were to be AFD'd in orderly fashion, with a link to the original RFC, and the closer of any AFD was to take into account the result of the RFC in their close.  Additionally fails WP:NOT (specifically WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTDIRECTORY ).  Even if the RFC were to be overturned somehow, and the NOT issues removed - neither of which appears possible - WP:CORP would still be failed since the only source for this article that is clearly about the activities of a commerical organisation and falls within CORP, is the website of the company itself.  WP:BEFORE searching is not required here since the failures of this article are more fundamental than a mere lack of notability (and BEFORE is anyway not a strict requirement), but I did a search anyway and found nothing that would remedy this.  This article was previously nominated for deletion in 2007, 2008, and 2015.  Whilst it might seem unusual to nominate an article for deletion for a fourth time, in this case the AFDs were clearly superseded by the 2018 RFC which was at a higher WP:CONLEVEL and which recognised the outcome of the previous AFDs as a mistake.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Romania .  FOARP ( talk ) 10:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom but prefer WP:BUNDLE henceforth.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 07:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - list is not covered in detail by sources independent of Carpatair that can also be considered reliable.  Also, Wikipedia is not a directory of plane destinations.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Denver shooting : Drug deal gone wrong, 10 wounded.  This doesn't stand apart from the other hundreds of shootings.  Lettler hello • contribs 15:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events , United States of America ,  and Colorado .  Lettler hello • contribs 15:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a routine shooting.  Sad that 10 victims doesn't count as a mass shooting anymore in the USA, but it's ROUTINE at this point.  Coverage is all "as it happens" news stories, which will likely be glossed over in a few days.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The vast majority of things in the newspaper are not notable, and appearance in newspapers is not sufficient to meet WP:GNG .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 00:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No deaths, no big deal.  Just another day in Gunmerica.  WWGB ( talk ) 09:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Only routine coverage here.  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 21:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Routine event, really broad title, and WP:NOTNEWS .  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 21:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thullum Kaalam : Two of the sources are passing mentions in media reports about a different film Sokkali .  I checked 2 spots where reviews are posted [5] [6] and could not find any reviews for this film ( Das released on the same day).  Entire article depends on Behindwoods article which is not long enough to make this film notable.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 06:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NFILM .  No reviews, no notable cast or crew members.  Kailash29792 (talk) 07:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to List_of_Tamil_films_of_2005#July—September .  Fails WP:NFILM with hardly any media coverage and reviews.  The film is fully watchable on YouTube but that does not meet the notability guideline.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NN film, no reviews received from independent and credible sources.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Majid Sajadi : Many of the refs provided have nothing to do with the subject.  Likely promotional spam.  Moved to draft but moved back without improvement.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment just realised there is an open AfD for this from yesterday so there is clearly some gaming going on with recreation.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Links from the Tehran Times used in the article are about the Sports Minister, not this person.  I'm not seeing notability; this is likely PROMO.  I can't find mention of this individual in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment unable to understand how come 2 AFD’s are existing at the same time?  Also this article was already deleted under A7, so I requested speedy under the same, and that tag got removed by some other user as creator can’t remove it.  Also it’s poorly sources and absolute failure of GNG Wikipedian ( talk ) 13:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It was speedy deleted but immediately recreated Mccapra ( talk ) 13:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per other discussion.  I'm fine with A7 if someone wants to add it back.  — siro χ o 15:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For convenience, here's what I had in the other discussion: "Subject does not meet WP:BIO including WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC . Also violates WP:NOTWEBHOST " — siro χ o 18:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article creator is persistently vandalising the page by removing the AfD template despite several warnings to stop and reversions by several editors.  Mccapra ( talk ) 17:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I’ve blocked them for that.  Courcelles ( talk ) 17:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete This is for what we have A7.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 22:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete vanity page for a clearly non-notable individual. - KH-1 ( talk ) 03:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources, or if there are sources, they are promotional and/or the style is unclear, and the person is not notable enough.  HarukaAmaranth ( 話 ) 23:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andi Hasa : He is present in most database sources, which do not confer notability, but I can only find trivial coverage in acceptable news sources, such as Panorama .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Systems Research Institute (India) : It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 21:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Maharashtra .  Owen× ☎ 21:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Tough article to defend.  The institute seems to had been supporting GoI in various strategic decisions by providing background studies.  One such testimony by Shashi Kant Sharma (not this Shashi Kant Sharma ) gives 2 such examples.  Many notable personalities seems to have been associated with it; for doing their researches mostly.  Unfortunately, the institute seems to have closed in ~2020 and hence i think it would be difficult to find more info.  But trying... §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ { Talk / Edits } 11:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete - no evidence of notability apart from alumni.  Llajwa ( talk ) 17:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Morgan, Ontario : – dlthewave ☎ 04:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Sometimes an area's geology can establish notability.  Pyrrhotite was found near Morgan, according to the Geological Survey of Canada , but that fact on its own doesn't establish notability.  No ! vote from me yet.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  This locale is notable only in relation to the railway that goes through this point.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing to support notability.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 19:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David E. Smith : The subject also does not meet WP:NBIO because they do not inherit notability from being associated with the Haight Ashbury Free Clinics.  Ew3234 ( talk ) 02:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Ew3234 ( talk ) 02:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Kpg jhp jm 04:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  Entirely uncited, the only source is a self-source.  I did a quick search on the internet and there are no few reliable sources about this person.  There is a David Smith at the University of Michigan , who has a named professor appointment at the university, but it is unlikely to be the same person.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 07:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A little more elaboration here.  I am certain that David E Smith has published books, and that he is an adjunct prof at UCSF [55] , but neither amounts to good notability.  Maybe this article from the San Francisco Chronicle and this report from the UC system could establish some notability?  He also got a NYTimes mention by the book he co-authored (see here ).  I think if someone works to rework this article, I can imagine it getting kept, but at this point I still would ! vote weak delete.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 07:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raw Run : "Non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM that fails the WP:GNG . Neither of the included references are reliable sources, and searches did not turn up any coverage in reliable sources that discusses this term in sense that it is described here."
 However, I failed to notice that it had already been PRODed shortly after its creation in 2015, and thus would need to go to AFD.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 20:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Sports .  Rorshacma ( talk ) 20:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only reliable source that I could find with it was this article from CBS news , except it's only used there as the title of a self-published youtube video.  I'd also note that it doesn't even appear on the longboarding article.  Shaws username .  talk .  21:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Gsearch brings up a ton of youtube videos, but I don't see any use of the term in RS like books or news items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DRC, Inc. : Graywalls ( talk ) 22:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Based on a search, the company is either defunct, moved, or has a competitor with the same name.  The website on the page is no longer active and some of the references I find say it is based in Texas.  So again, not sure if the same company.  Regardless, I cannot locate sources meeting WP:ORGCRIT so doesn't meet WP:NCORP .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 00:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jewish International Connection of New York : Suggest delete unless significant events or connections can be found.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 19:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Judaism ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ntsika Fisanti : JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to be lots of coverage, but not sure there's enough to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Budde : His strongest notability claim (actually missed entirely by the article as written) is that he was once a nominee for (but not a winner of) a regional (not national) literary award, which would be fine if the article were well referenced but is in no way "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have any referencing -- but even on a WP:BEFORE search I'm really only finding primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence rather than substantive WP:GNG -building coverage about him or his writing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Minnesota .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only found profile pages of the subject on websites that he belongs to, or trivial mentions in books/news articles.  Lacks significant coverage to pass WP:AUTHOR .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ephraim Heller : According to the IP editor they have retired and "no longer want or need a profile".  It was also recently blanked by a different IP.  As nominator I am neutral unless I comment below.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural note to closer - as this is a WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE request, if there is not a clear consensus to keep, the page should be soft deleted by default.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources are affiliated, simple business announcements, bare mentions in discussion of the industry or company, etc.  The "Businessweek profile" is a Bloomberg listing.  Not finding anything better on google search, it all seems to be bare mentions in stories about the industry/acquisition of the company.  I'm not seeing notability.  Valereee ( talk ) 16:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (reluctant): this seems even A7 speediable to me, and the sources fall short of GNG.  My only reservation is that I wouldn't want to encourage the notion that simply because the (alleged) subject "no longer want[s] or need[s] a profile {sic} on wikipedia" , we should get rid of it.  Still, the article contains no evidence of notability (and I for one can't be bothered to go looking for it), so let's nix it.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 16:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Looking at it, I thought "delete", but I haven't looked to see whether there are sources that could save it. But I echo DoubleGrazing 's concern, and if it is deleted, I would want somebody to reply to the IP explaining that it was deleted according to Wikipedia's policy, and should never have been there in the first place. -- ColinFine ( talk ) 19:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reason not to comply with their wishes given the other comments.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 19:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine , Connecticut ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Tangents: Mr. Heller and his father, Adam Heller should not be using Wikipedia (and our ranking in Google search results) for free PR, and I agree with the above: Wikipedia is not at their beck and call.  If Therasense, Inc. existed, I'd propose redirecting there.  FWIW, that company also appears to fail WP:ORGCRIT , so much so that the primary topic of Therasense is not even the company, but a court case establishing precedent in U.S. patent law (

Discussion outcome: delete