Hypelist: Speedy deletion was contested by a new editor who claims to be a "fan" of the app .  No evidence of satisfying WP:NPRODUCT or WP:ORGIND .  The references all provide routine coverage and/or are from unreliable sources.  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 19:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and Software .  Teemu.cod ( talk ) 19:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Here is my analyzation of the article: Like said in the nomination, the article, especially the product section, is positive about the "mobile social application".  Buzz words like popular and AI-driven are used along with a dose of ethos , stating that several celebrities use it.  The citations seem to mostly based in trendiness or promotion.  For example, HIGHXTAR is designed to advertise to the youths.  Trying to research the topic, most of the citations seem to be of the same caliber but there may be a few citations.  Any additional citations should be analyzed.  ✶Qux yz ✶ 20:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The topic is notable, as with Alfonso Cobo and related articles.  There are sources from MSN, Conde Nast, Avenue Illustrated, and many other well-known sources.  The article is meant to be a summary of existing sources, some of which might be bordering on the promotional side, but that can easily be fixed.  There is no overtly promotional wording either, such as "award-winning" or "innovative" for instance.  Moreover, this article satisfies basic notability criteria .  MaghrebiFalafel ( talk ) 09:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi MaghrebiFalafel , this is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria applies.  You mentioned three sources.  The MSN article is about a singer using the app - the article mentions the company in passing and does not provide any in-depth Independent Content about the company - fails CORPDEPTH.  The Vanity Fair article is a "puff profile" on the founder and relies entirely on an interview.  All the information is provided by the founder and has no Independent Content.  Fails both CORPDEPTH and ORGIND.  Finally the Avenue article has zero in-depth information about the company, fails CORPDEPTH.  Are there any other sources you believe meets NCORP?  If not, perhaps you might reconsider your ! vote?  HighKing ++ 14:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Id looked up to see if there was any new news and didn't find any.  Then given there already are some references in Spanish thought id see if there are other results in Spanish and there are: Larazon El Correo .  They seem to say more of the same thing ie new app from this guy and it does xyz .  I dont know if this helps establish notability.  If the issue isn't the references, but the subject matter, so be it.  If I had to vote it would be weakish keep but I also get the desire to delete.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep delete It's all hype about hypelist, and it may be TOO SOON, but the sourcing is reasonable.  If this app does not pan out, the hype here may not be enough to save the article in the future.  I looked again and the software has no reviews in the mac app store, and it only has one rating.  All that we have are product announcements.  I'm ! voting to wait and see.  Lamona ( talk ) 16:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If the sourcing might not be enough in the future, then it definitely won't be enough now.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 08:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks, your comment got me to look again.  Lamona ( talk ) 17:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seems almost A7, wouldn't go G11 though.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 09:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: The sources about the song can't establish notability, because notability isn't transitive.  The only source I think could possibly establish notability is the Rivera article.  The Vanity Fair article is an interview that contains almost exclusively quotations from the subject themself, and I couldn't immediately establish the other sources as credible.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 21:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : As I have mentioned elsewhere, Hypelist is definitely notable and has quite a few users.  It's widely used by now and many other applications with similar notability levels are also on Wikipedia.  Redcrablegs ( talk ) 10:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just because a lot of people an app does guarantee notability.  That's also a weasle statement: how many people are quite a few and who is providing these numbers?  ✶Qux yz ✶ 17:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Came back here to see what happened since my first comment.  I noticed that the vote by Okmrman was deleted and they've now been blocked for being a sock puppet.  On April 30 there was a comment on his talk page regarding spurious tagging of pages for speedy deletion.  That was on April 30.  This article was nominated for speedy deletion by a somewhat dormant account on May 9.  The speedy was contested and 9 hours after this was nominated for deletion the sockpuppet voted here.  Not that this affects the vote here one way or another.  Sock puppet or not, doesn't impact whether a subject is notable or not, but the powers that be may wish to cast the Okmrman sock puppet net wider and investigate the editor who nominated this article for deletion.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz @ Yamla Looking at this some more, I'm now convinced that Teemu.cod and Okmrman are one and the same.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strictly speaking, they were blocked for disruptive editing and their other account was the puppet (they're the master).  It is a little weird, has AfD always been this much of a sockfest?  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 08:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't know.  It is peculiar.  Then again, longer one spends here, harder it is to get shocked.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 09:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Teemu.cod is Unrelated to Okmrman.  Just a bizarre coincidence.  -- Yamla ( talk ) 11:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ok thanks for looking into it.  my apologies to teemu.cod MaskedSinger ( talk ) 11:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment People here saying the *company* is notable and then talking about the product are missing the point of establishing the notability of the *company*.  None of the reference meet GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  If you think one does, can you please post a link here and point out which page/para meets NCORP including CORPDEPTH and ORGIND?  HighKing ++ 14:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hypelist 's lead says "Hypelist is a mobile social application."  The article is about the product (the app), not the company that launched the app. Cunard ( talk ) 08:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Advertorial tone, and little or no depth to the coverage. Stifle ( talk ) 08:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Wow. Can't believe this is still going. Not sure what's happening with AFD but this is a weird one. Nominated for deletion by editor who comes out of dormancy to nominate it and then hasn't edited since. Some editor who votes delete is blocked for going on a voting rampage. And then yesterday the discussion is closed not once, but twice by editors who are sock puppets?!?! Still this has nothing to do the merits of the page. Given that its been relisted twice and still no consensus, I think it should get the benefit of the doubt. It satsifies WP:GNG with the non English coverage and there is probably more non English coverage that can be translated and added. If it stays, Ill look for some and add it. MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Now closed a third time by some rogue editor!  It's not just this article. It's also others that are up for deletion. Anyone have any idea what is going on and why? MaskedSinger ( talk ) 12:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah there's an AFD closing LTA. Just revert, WP:DENY and move on. Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Alpha3031 Wow! That's so bizarre. Why do they do it? MaskedSinger ( talk ) 13:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources . " 'Hypelist', el nuevo proyecto del exitoso emprendedor español que triunfa en EE UU" ['Hypelist', the new project of the successful Spanish entrepreneur who triumphs in the US].  El Correo (in Spanish).  2024-04-15.  Archived from the original on 2024-06-06 .  Retrieved 2024-06-06 .  The article notes: "For the second time, the young entrepreneur has managed to cover another need of social media consumers in time. His new app, 'Hypelist', was launched a few months ago and aims to help people share recommendations for activities, products or places they are passionate about. The app innovates by leaving the framework of aesthetics and superficiality that so characterises content on today's networks, something that places this second project at an extreme opposite to 'Unfold', focused precisely on the visual. ... 'Hypelist' allows you to collect all the recommendations in a personalized space for when they are going to be missed. In this way, it has been presented as an application not for entertainment, something that already abounds, but for self-realisation and growth that pushes people to fulfill all their plans. ... This time the launch of the project has been accompanied by the 'Hypelist Session', events organised to promote the use of the new app and full of 'influencers' eager to share their recommendations through this new channel."  Martin, Ruth (2024-03-26).  "Esta es la Nueva App Que Usan Los Viajeros Expertos. Hypelist amenaza competir con Instagram y es perfecta para los que no pueden vivir sin las listas de favoritos" [This Is the New App That Expert Travelers Use. Hypelist threatens to compete with Instagram and is perfect for those who cannot live without favorites lists].  Grazia (in Italian).  Archived from the original on 2024-06-06 .  Retrieved 2024-06-06 .  The article notes: "Are you one of those who always makes lists for everything? Are you one of those who miss the guides that Instagram has made disappear and where you had your favorites saved? Then this new App is for you because with it you can organize, share and connect your best recommendations. It is called Hypelist and was created by a Spanish entrepreneur, Alfonso Cobo, who is not new to the world of entrepreneurship and technology. But not only can you create lists to save all your favorites, but you can also discover everything your favorite creators are obsessed with. Hypelist is the place where users share their true interests: the quirks that make them who they are; what truly obsesses and excites them" Pujalví, Camila (2024-02-07).  "Hypelist: la aplicación para compartir recomendaciones que necesitas en tu móvil" [Hypelist: the application to share recommendations that you need on your mobile].  La Razón (in Spanish).  Archived from the original on 2024-06-06 .  Retrieved 2024-06-06 .  The article notes: "In the blink of an eye, Hypelist has gone from a simple app to a cultural phenomenon. Its creator, Alfonso Cobo, recognised for his previous hits like Unfold, has once again surprised the market with what promises to be the hit of the year 2024. But his ambition goes far beyond conventional. Following the wild launch of the app, Cobo has decided to expand its reach and create an entire universe around Hypelist. Hypelist stands out as a platform to organize, share and connect the best recommendations. Aiming to appeal to a younger audience, Cobo has collaborated with talented singer Cara Hart to release a single titled "Hypelist. "" There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Hypelist to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria , which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".  Cunard ( talk ) 08:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Cough , Cunard I don't think Grazia can be considered an RS for anything other than uncontroversial self descriptions, certainly not for establishing notability.  I mean, on their about page , which is very conveniently written in English, where most publications normally put how they're totally very well edited and all that, they instead put: Our award-winning team prides ourselves on working with partners to create interesting, unexpected and unique experiences.  Our collaborations are designed to deliver incremental value to our partners’ businesses.  GRAZIA has a wide range of solutions to suit almost any kind of marketing and media mix.  We offer branded content, video, integration into editorial franchises, innovative high impact ad units and local events.  ...  Yeah.  I'll look at the other ones in a couple of minutes.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 10:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't believe La Razón meets ORGDEPTH.  I'm less sure about El Correo , but like risbel I am more concerned about ORGIND in their case (though El Correo might be better than risbel RS-wise generally).  While I can't find anything other than the January press release, which those two articles seem to have additional content to (about the launch event, etc) they still read like content taken (perhaps paraphrased) from press kits rather than organic, intellectually independent coverage.  Would rather kick it to RSN, though would not terribly object to this actually being closed as no consensus either.  I would expect to renominate this (after some time of course) if that happens though.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 12:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Another thing I'm a bit concerned about is the language.  It is clear that they are trying to sell Hypelist.  It honestly sounds like a pitch to investors more specifically, they establish the credibility of the creator, describe demographics that it was made to appeal to, and describe the problem it is trying to solve.  These are all pretty reasonable, but at the same time, the language is overly positive.  Hart isn't just a singer, she's a talented singer.  In Grazia, they describe the creator as well-trained, but they don't give any information in the quote.  There are a lot more situations but their easy enough to parse through where I dont think I need to go over it more.  ✶Qux yz ✶ 13:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus