hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Li Chang-ha: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find reliable sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:26, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Input capture: Seems to fail WP:NOTE .  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 20:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : poorly sourced, and reads like OR.  Owen× ☎ 01:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I feel like this is probably a notable title , but there is a reason it has not received any expansion or sources in 15 years.  I wasn't able to really find any sources online that supported or expanded upon the definition of input capture given in the article.  I'd support WP:TNT -ing it for now.  HappyWith ( talk ) 21:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ServedBy The Net: Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Washington .  Pepper Beast (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Computing .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage beyond what's used in the article now.  If they are defunct, there won't be further coverage.  This appears to have been PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable corporation.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 03:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An obsolete WP:SPA -created promo.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 11:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sakarwar: Out of 5-6 source, 3-4 are about role of a particular family in 1857 rebellion, which belonged to this sub caste.  There are not enough sources available for this sub-caste itself.  Hence it should be deleted or merged into Rajput clan .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 19:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 19:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bihar , Madhya Pradesh ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kahamachli: Only used by Malkani.  No secondary sources.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 18:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Allison Kugel: This article has a chequered history, having been created by a sockpuppeteer and has seemingly received a lot of promotional editing, which has since been repeatedly cut down.  I'm just not seeing any coverage that passes WP:GNG , including coverage in previous versions of the article.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 20:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Journalism ,  and United States of America .  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 20:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure if it's the same person, quite a few mentions of this person that does interviews [4] ...  For what's in the article, being laid off isn't notable, 9/11 is neither here nor there, employment- and notability-wise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the interviewer is the same person.  She seems to be associated with PR.com.  I was not able to find any sigcov of her work as an interviewer, but only mentions in passing.  The closest I was able to find was this , but this is in the unreliable NYPOST, so therefore is not usable.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 01:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete prolific interviewer of celebrities, but I find no independent sources about her.  She is listed as an author in tons of minor publications, including at least one, Cannabis Today , for which no articles appear.  She has self-published a memoir .  Lamona ( talk ) 17:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the Entrepreneur source in the article appears to be a contributor piece, which per WP:RS/P should be treated as self-published, and I have also not found independent and reliable coverage to support notability.  The Amazon listing for the self-published book also does not appear to list substantial, independent, reliable, and secondary coverage in its "Praise for Journaling Fame" section.  The best coverage seems to be a 2016 news.com.au interview that also announces the upcoming book, without substantial independent or secondary content.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 01:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Keenan Prochnow: Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TOOSOON - the relevant rules are a strong consensus .  Having placed in the top 6, but not the top 3, junior teams, he is not automatically notable.  I don't see enough coverage , but if I missed something, please ping me.  Bearian ( talk ) 21:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fightin' Words: TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 02:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 02:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I could not find reliable sources about it either.  Fails WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 11:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sorrow is the worst thing in life ...: Sgubaldo ( talk ) 21:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Poetry ,  and Ireland .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 21:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable.  Scolaire ( talk ) 11:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  12:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While I found an archived copy of the source, the only secondary part of it is the introduction to the provided translation.  I could not find anything else.  Even Brian Ó Cuív , the translator of the poem, noted that scholars "seem to have ignored this item".  ― Susmuffin Talk 09:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - how was this considered notable and kept since 2009.. .  Kazamzam ( talk ) 17:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of E City programmes in 2013: Programming guide for shows on Hub E City in 2013.  Duplicate information in Hub E City .  No objection to a redirect.  // Timothy :: talk 21:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and Singapore .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete without redirect per WP:NOTTVGUIDE .  The content in Hub E City should also be removed for the same reason.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 22:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I tried searching in Chinese as well, but still didn't found any significant coverage of the program list.  Fails WP:NLIST .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 02:35, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bolin, West Virginia: Topos show a single point on the railroad, which is consist with the passing mentions to this as some sort of rail feature.  Given that hundreds of similar articles by the page creator have been deleted as being false claims of a community or settlement, I don't think we should be keeping this when all indications point to this being a non-notable rail feature.  Hog Farm Talk 23:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and West Virginia .  Hog Farm Talk 23:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : it is on the 1907 topographical map, with two structures—if it was a railway station, then perhaps only one house, with a few others across the Guyandotte.   It is not shown on the 1962 map, and all of the structures are gone.   There was no post office by this name, according to U.S. Appointments of Postmasters , and it is not mentioned in West Virginia Place Names .   I might suggest that it could be incorporated into an article about Lincoln County, either in a list of unincorporated communities and rail stations, or as part of a stand-alone list of the same.   It is clearly not a hoax, but it does seem to have been a very minor, perhaps ephemeral location.  P Aculeius ( talk ) 12:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The railroad station is the only thing we can verify was here; anything else is speculation and in any case there's not enough coverage to merit even a mention in a county article.  – dlthewave ☎ 03:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete I found nothing textual, though I must admit that searching is heavily masked by the surname.  OTOH the buildings shown on the oldest topos don't seem to add up to a settlement, as there doesn't ever seem to have been a way across the river, which is somewhere in excess of 100 feet wide at this point.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harita Kata: Single source that is not WP:IS .  Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Environment ,  and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sourcing is primary as given in the article, and I don't see sourcing we can use in my search.  Unless there is some in the native language of course...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kang Hyun-su: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Corresponding article on Korean Wikipedia is an unsourced stub.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ramona Mibuy: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  I tried using several combinations of her name as well.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of British scientists: We have much more selective categories (by city, by field by century,...), there is no need for this overarching list.  Broc ( talk ) 06:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Science , Lists ,  and United Kingdom .  Broc ( talk ) 06:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Despite the large number of edits I made to this list a year or so ago (many more than I guessed before checking), I agree with Broc that it is too long and unwieldy, as well as being seriously incomplete, to be useful.  Athel cb ( talk ) 08:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Is there space for a "list of lists" of British scientists or similar?  I think the concept is certainly sound, and it seems to be visited a fair deal.  Spiralwidget ( talk ) @ Spiralwidget : I only find following sub-lists that could be included in a potential Lists of British scientists list-of-lists: List of Cornish scientists List of British Jewish scientists List of female fellows of the Royal Society I'm not sure if it makes sense to group them together.  Broc ( talk ) 14:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It is far too incomplete, and I don't see how it could ever be kept current.  Category:British scientists already exists, change to a redirect if possible.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 06:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Chamberlain: Hirolovesswords ( talk ) 08:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Politics ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E .  Please note that the *first* AfD discussion is not about *this* Ryan Chamberlain, but rather about a fictitious character on General Hospital (TV series) who happened to have the same name.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 12:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E .  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 20:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:03, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
GENIVI Alliance: Andre 🚐 15:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies ,  and United States of America .  Andre 🚐 15:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG in current state.  Also written like an advert or fluff piece and has been marked as such without correction for a long time.  -- AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 16:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Parkmore Shopping Centre: Google news comes up with routine news like a robbery occurring but nothing indepth.  2 of the 4 sources are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with nomination.  Closest I could find to WP:SIGCOV was this however it appears to be paid marketing.  Everything else that came up for me had to do with incidents or events which were at the shopping centre, however the articles themselves appear not to be about the shopping centre.  This doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG .  Tar nis hed Path talk 02:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's possible this does pass our notability guidelines.  This local government business news I'm not sure would count, but it does show the centre was notable enough when it opened to receive press which would count towards WP:GNG .  A historical source search will be needed.  SportingFlyer T · C 04:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Potentially notable in 1973 because there was a party and John Farnham performed there doesn't demonstrate that there are verifiable secondary sources which demonstrate WP:SIGCOV .  Tar nis hed Path talk 08:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't do that web search at the moment, though.  Simple WP:BEFORE searches have gotten a lot harder - a search only brings up references to help you get there and to stores which are located there, but the local government source definitively shows that there was plenty of coverage when this centre opened, and shopping centres of this size have been kept in the past.  A proper WP:BEFORE will include historical newspaper articles in a way a web search cannot.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The local government source only indicates that there was "local newspapers" covering the opening.  That gives us entirely no indication about how many, whether the publications are/were reliable and whether there was significant coverage in them.  I do agree that WP:BEFORE searches have gotten harder which has made me not nominate some things that I might have, but I don't think we can imagine SIGCOV when that is not verified.  Tar nis hed Path talk 05:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete