First Battle of Lahore (1759): [11] Noorullah ( talk ) 10:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 12:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless proper sourcing is found.  The sourcing on Urdu wiki isn’t any help.  Mccapra ( talk ) 15:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sigh, not another one of these.  We might have to look into the others at Battle of Lahore (disambiguation) , too.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 16:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:HEY .  "Sabaji maintained his position with great valour and strength, inflicted a crushing defeat upon Jahan Khan, who was severely wounded and lost his son in the action. Jahan Khan’s return to Peshawar in discomfiture so roused the fury of the Shah."  Excerpts from New history of the Marathas vol 1 .  p-408 "Dattaji Sindhia progressed slowly through Malwa. He appointed Sabaji Sindhia to occupy Lahore ( March, 1759 ). The Sikhs did not check the Marathas, but co-operated with them in driving away the Afghans under Jahan Khan across the Indus. Sabaji’s forces penetrated as far as Peshawar."  Excerpts from A Study Of Eighteenth Century India Vol.  1 .  p-342 Additional comments - Renaming the article to the Capture of Lahore or even the Maratha occupation of Lahore (per sources) would be better.  Though these sources are enough for keeping this article still additional sources would be appreciated.  Sudsahab ( talk ) 10:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There doesn't even seem to be a battle at all.  Per Sarkar, it states that the Afghans had evacuated Lahore, meaning that there was no "battle" for the city in April 1758.  [12] Also corroborated by Hari Ram Gupta: [13] The Afghans returned in October 1759 and re-occupied Lahore.  [14] There's no mention of a battle in August 1759 whatsoever.  Jahan Khan's battle per this source: [15] Doesn't seem to be mentioned at Lahore at all, nor do the sources you've shown imply this, but rather is " Thereafter the invaders overran Attock , then crossed the Indus , and threatened the historic fort of Rohtas on the left bank of the Jhelum . By that time, Sabaji Patel (Schinde) reached the place with fresh troops and a large number of Sikh fighters, who had made common cause with him against the Afghan infiltrators. The Afghans were defeated by the combined forces of the Marathas and the Sikhs in a pitched battle, in which Jahan Khan lost his son and was himself also wounded."  So again, this shows this was not a battle at Lahore.  Noorullah ( talk ) 14:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] [16] Does not show a battle at Lahore, but mentions Jahan Khan's defeat at an undisclosed location, and only later talks about how Ahmad Shah re-occupied Lahore (presumably in his 1759 October campaign).  Noorullah ( talk ) 14:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's why I proposed renaming this article, either it should be Jahan Khan invasion of Rohtas or Battle of Rohtas .  Coming to Sarkar's reliability which is questionable.  Also see WP:RAJ , we can't rely on him as long as we have better sources for the notability of the Battle of Lahore ( Battle of Rohtas? ).  You do realise [this| https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.98175/page/n361/mode/2up ] work of Hari Ram Gupta (published in 1944) is relatively older than his cited work in the article Marathas and Panipat .  (published in 1961)?  It would be obvious that older sources might not contain more information around this certain event, this is WP:AGE MATTERS .  In Marathas and Panipat .  p-101 tells us: Jahan Khan rushed to Peshawar, captured Attock, and then advanced towards Rohtas.  Sabaji sought help from the Sikhs.  The united forces marched against Jahan Khan, whom they encountered on the other side of the Jehlam.  In a fierce engagement the Afghan general suffered heavily.  He lost his son and a large number of troops, himself receiving several wounds [17] p-260, It also propounds: Thereafter, the invaders overran Attock, then crossed the Indus and threatened the historic fort of Rohtas on the left bank of the Jhelum.  By that time, Sabaji Patel reached the place with fresh troops and a large number of the Sikh fighters, who had made a common cause with him against the Afghan infiltrators.  The Afghans were defeated by the combined forces of the Marathas and the Sikhs in a pitched battle, in which Jahan Khan lost his son and was himself also wounded.  Note Rohtas , Pitched battle and fierce engagement in both of the quotations.  Sudsahab ( talk ) 04:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But why have a separate article for this at all?  It doesn't seem that the sources are discussing it in that way.  They're describing it as part of an overall campaign.  That tells me the best place for this information is somewhere like Northern Campaign of Raghunath Rao , or whichever other article might fit better.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have already quoted the sources which discussed it thoroughly.  And no it's not part of Northern Campaign of Raghunath Rao , not to be confused with Capture of Lahore which occurred in 1758 by Raghunath Rao.  If merging is an option then I'd suggest merging it to Afghan-Maratha War .  But my vote is still keep until someone gives more inputs.  Sudsahab ( talk ) 14:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Sudsahab , if it isn't part of Northern Campaign of Raghunath Rao , you should fix the infobox, since that's what it says.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Alright Sudsahab ( talk ) 08:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: WP:HEY and to allow further discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll just add that the " WP:HEY " was Sudsahab referring to their own edits to the article (seems a bit rich to say this about yourself?), and they have since been blocked as a sockpuppet. So no one is actually arguing this meets the WP:HEY standard. -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] lol.  Noorullah ( talk ) 19:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete