hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dennaton Games: In the current state of the article, it's also completely lacking third party sources at all to begin with.  So, unfortunately, unless I'm proven wrong (which I'd love to be here), Dennaton Games isn't a studio that is independently notable from their own works.  Negative MP1 09:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies .  Negative MP1 09:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Simply not independently notable from the two games they've made.  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 09:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Dennaton Games is merely the collective name for two otherwise independent developers.  I would argue that, other than "they got together" and "they made Hotline Miami", there is very little actual information on the duo as a duo .  Perhaps there is sufficient sourcing for either of the two independently, but Dennaton Games fails WP:NCORP .  IceWelder [ ✉ ] 11:57, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hotline Miami , mostly notable for making that game.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to Hotline Miami .  Outside of this game, there is no significant information about the company itself.  TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 16:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Zxcvbnm.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 10:35, December 25, 2023 (UTC) Delete and redirect per TWOrantula.  Videogameplayer99 ( talk ) 11:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ruzbeh Mammad: Surə 🗯 19:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 03:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ASM Chemical Industries: Created by a block-evading sockpuppet using the company website as their only source, several editors have tried cleaning it up over the years.  Searches found no sources that would meet WP:CORPDEPTH .  An academic study of the industry mentions what they produce and how much (they're the smallest of five chlor-alkali manufacturing companies in Bangladesh).  [2] Other than that, there is only primary source coverage, and it is not of the company itself.  [3] [4] [5] Perhaps a sentence about the company could be added to a new "economy" section in Sreepur Upazila, Gazipur (where the factory is located), and this article could be redirected there.  Worldbruce ( talk ) 17:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Bangladesh .  Worldbruce ( talk ) 17:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is actually a subsidiary of a larger company that also fails NCORP.  References I find do not meet WP:ORGCRIT .  Wouldn't even be enough for a mention on the Sreepur Upazila page in my opinion.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 03:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails NCORP, insufficient independent sources.  Locu ( talk ) 23:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH -- Devoke water 15:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Coppley Apparel Group: WP:BEFORE turned up a couple of profiles on various company list sites, an obituary for the owner and one article about an exhibition: [34] Sgubaldo ( talk ) 10:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: the username of the creator of this article is 'The Coppley Apparel Group' Sgubaldo ( talk ) 11:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sellindge Music Festival: It has been tagged as possibly not notable since 2020.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 00:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unless sustained coverage is found - I agree with the nom.   An article on a small music festival that went ahead only twice, with minimal coverage, is not needed.  Resonant Dis tor tion 08:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Selective merge and redirect to BBC Radio Kent per WP:ATD .  Given that one of the stages was operated by BBC Kent I see no reason not to include some content on the festival in the history section of that article.  4meter4 ( talk ) 18:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I did not find the significant coverage available to justify passing WP:NMUSIC nor any other notability guideline.  Jacona ( talk ) 00:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist to see if there is more support for a selective Merge.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : References fail to provide WP:SIGCOV so fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ashton Cyrillien: No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Antigua and Barbuda .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Flaccus (composer): He has no notability independent of Terence, and does not merit an entry of his own in either the Oxford Classical Dictionary or Grove Music Online.  Anything that can be written about him belongs at Terence or the articles on each of his six plays.  Cal Engime ( talk ) 18:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and History .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sounds like it will never expand beyond DICDEF length, as there are no sources about this person found in the last 2000 yrs.  I don't see any either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Is there a redirect/merge target?  Deletion seems like it would be quite inappropriate in a case like this where the content would be better covered in a larger article.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 19:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If anywhere, it should redirect to Terence .  The portion of the article on a phrase of music which Flaccus did not write is already appropriately covered at Hecyra .  I sure would be surprised if the few people who might look him up will be seeking him out at the present title, though—we know that Flaccus performed the music, and we can only conjecture that he was its "composer" as well.  - Cal Engime ( talk ) 22:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Or perhaps the redirect should be simply to Flaccus .  I'm not sure it's clear that someone looking for information on a Flaccus who wrote songs is less likely to be looking for information on Horace or Persius .  - Cal Engime ( talk ) 22:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Green Enterprise Initiative: Their website, [18] , is dead and was last archived on January 2016.  Actually, I have to go back to 2014 to find a website not entirely broken, although wayback machine seems to of not properly archived the website rendering the authors used: [19] While notability is not temporary , I cannot find any sources (primary or secondary) about the organisation.  It is possible that most or all of their work was written in Chinese, but I could not find anything on a Baidu search either.  Darcyisverycute ( talk ) 06:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions .  Darcyisverycute ( talk ) 06:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no refs on the page for many years, nothing else I can find.  I'm doubting that this was ever notable.  JMWt ( talk ) 07:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Hong Kong .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Manchar: Firstly, the creator of this article, Ronnie Macroni, has a history of creating poorly sourced and written articles, inundated with religious aggrandization, copyvio, and Google Book snippets to erroneously bolster the Sikhs' military achievements.  He has been warned of such behaviour before.  Two of the only reliable sources, Hari Ram Gupta p.9, as well as the Encyclopedia of Sikhism, only marginally discuss this siege with no mention of the result or casualties, rather it focuses on a likely embellished anecdote of Ranjit Singh- [15] .  The article almost certainly is using Google snippets of Gulshan Lal Chopra and Gokul Chand Narang's works rather than a thorough perusal of them, the former is certainly a Raj era source as is Narang's given that all his publicly available books were written between 1910-1947.  [16] .  Duggal isn't a historian, Lepel Henry Griffin is a Raj era source, Manish Kumar's work is self published and Patwant Singh is not a historian.  Fails WP:RS and Wikipedia's notability standards.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 10:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tessi: No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.     The sources were either brief coverage of news events such as acquisitions plus two that were pretty clearly posting of their press releases/ self descriptions.  North8000 ( talk ) 21:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Management , Technology ,  and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as spam.  Draftifying would still be on the table, but the creator is blocked now.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Australia National Youth Championships (baseball): There is no indication of significant independent coverage of the event.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball ,  and Australia .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  My search of Newspapers.com did not turn up WP:SIGCOV of the type needed to satisfy WP:GNG .  Please ping me if SIGCOV is found.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 17:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Swedish–Norwegian War: Furthermore one of them is not even called Swedish–Norwegian War.  Lightoil ( talk ) 14:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Disambiguations , Norway ,  and Sweden .  Lightoil ( talk ) 14:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Rename to List of Swedish-Norwegian wars .   The list should also make the point that Norway and Denmark were united in 1380-1814, so that Norway was involved in Danish wars with Sweden (of which there were many) after the dissolution of the union of Kalmar (when all three states were united in 1397-1523), with a link to the article on Dano-Swedish wars .  (I am not quite sure that I have my history of the union of Kalmar quite right, as that article lists some wars during it.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 10:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per "NONEOTHER".  Only one valid entry, so what's there to disambiguate?  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also move Swedish–Norwegian War (1814) here afterward.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and replace with Swedish–Norwegian War (1814) per above.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Indefensible , I don't understand your recommendation to "replace".  Do you mean move Swedish–Norwegian War (1814) to Swedish–Norwegian War ?  Because I don't understand what you mean by "delete and replace".  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, recommend article move after deletion as Clarityfiend suggested, although it can be proposed on the article's talk page.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
W39CA-D: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Mississippi .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 00:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamed Ajfan Rasheed: Participation in Olympics is no longer considered enough to be considered notable.  zoglophie 07:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Maldives .  zoglophie 07:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and gets no save from WP:NSPORT .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Most important sportsperson from the Maldives at the 2012 Summer Olympics.  Florentyna ( talk ) 16:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Is that enough to get away with GNG?  I think not.  Just by being a flagbearer, he is not passing those guidelines as per my research, still need some good sources that talk about him in depth.  zoglophie •talk• 20:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the Olympics .  zoglophie •talk• 20:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There appear to be some results searching his name in Maldivian .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 21:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ BeanieFan11 : This is just stating the match results in National Championship, this is about a tournament an academy named after him is organising, no biographical details at all.  This again is all about match scores.  All other sources are the same, either databases or match results.  None of those sources in Dhivehi are enough for GNG.  zoglophie •talk• 10:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per The Gnome 's reasoning.  GuardianH ( talk ) 04:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaurishankaar Chaubey: All of the sources are paid brand posts.  This was previously created under the title Gaurishankar Chaubey and deleted under A7 and G5.  I also want to note that this is likely a UPE/COI creation.  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 05:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 05:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom, also failed Wikipedia general notability guideline.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 10:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Obviously promotional page which likely could be speedied; however, a check user should confirm this which would make it G5 eligible.  Would also recommend salting for evasiveness and persistence of the sock farm involved.  Won't be surprised when the IPs and SPAs start leaving keep ! votes below.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yorky Arriagada: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this transactional announcement from a hometown publication and this story on some community service work she did.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Chile .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Clearly fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 14:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Also, this article is awful.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 16:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete