hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Voskos Greek Yogurt: Nothing seems to have changed to establish notability.  The article cites four sources but the 1st, 3rd and 4th are press releases, on trade blogs that will publish anything about products.  The 2nd is a very trivial mention.  None of these would seem to establish notability under WP:CORP .  Might be eligible for speedy deletion as a recreation of deleted content, but I can't view what was deleted and it was a long time ago.  Here2rewrite ( talk ) 03:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies , Products ,  and California .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 04:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All available sources are press releases (and other primary sources), WP:TRADES publications for the dairy/packaged foods industries that do not qualify for WP:NCORP , and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS in online reviews of yogurts.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 04:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find PR items and trade journal mentions of this product.  Agree that what's used now in the article isn't enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Indian Premier League venues: The tables themselves are unsourced, and I imagine will be very difficult to fully source.  The main coverage of venues seems to be that in 3 seasons, matches were played abroad (which is already covered in those season articles, and is not a justification for having a list of every venue), and there don't look to be high quality sources such as newspapers making reference to the number of matches at venues i.e. venue X held its 50th IPL match today, which would be one basis for claiming notability of this list.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 14:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Cricket , Lists ,  and India .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 14:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Blatant violation of WP:NOTSTATS and fails WP:NLIST .  The venues have not been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, and didn't receive significant coverage about hosting the IPL matches.  The only source in the article is from the IPL official website, which also doesn't list the full list of venues used since 2008.  They just listed the venues for this season and the venues will change every season.  Even the statistical websites like Cricinfo or CricketArchive doesn't have separate lists for IPL venues.  RoboCric ( talk ) 15:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete largely per Robocric.  No independent coverage of the stadiums as all being IPL venues, and the information about each stadium is not sourced on the page.  The stadiums can (and probably should) be grouped together somewhere, but I think a category or a template is most appropriate.  Frank Anchor 15:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NLIST .  All of this can be covered in the main article page.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fall of Nazi Germany: Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 06:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify I think there is a good article that could be created here, as presently Wikipedia's coverage on the collapse of the Third Reich is rather scant.  Right now, though, this article seems to only duplicate material that exists elsewhere.  I'd advise Fakescientist8000 maybe to create something more extensive in draftspace , one which draws upon a wide range of academic sources, and perhaps details the exact series of events the Reich went through, perhaps ending with the Potsdam Conference .  — Czello ( music ) 07:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redundant article.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: unnecessary fork and redundant to Nazi Germany#Turning point and collapse .  -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- A poorly composed article on a subject where there will be multiple articles already.   Possibly redirect to P199's target.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 18:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a newly-created content fork that doesn't improve on coverage of the topic.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 19:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vish Khanna: Prod removed for some reason.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 14:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Journalism , Radio ,  and Canada .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable media personality with the CBC.  I've found a few things written by this individual [34] , [35] , but nothing we can use to establish notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because the person does not pass WP:BIO .  TipsyElephant ( talk ) 10:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm certainly aware of Vish Khanna, because as a Canadian editor who works on musical topics I often cite stuff he wrote for Exclaim!  — in fact, I distinctly remember adding a citation to a piece of his writing within the past two days , though damned if I can remember off the top of my head what article I added it to .  But the notability test for media personalities isn't the extent to which they've been the creator of coverage about other things , it's the extent to which they've been the subject of coverage created by other people .  However, the only references here are to Blogspot blogs, one of which is an interview in which he's talking about himself in the first person and the other is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an interview with somebody else — but that's not the kind of sourcing it takes, and I can't find anything else that would count as GNG-building coverage.  Reliable sourcing means real media outlets and books covering his work as news, not Blogspot blogs or staff profiles on the self-published websites of his own current or former employers.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mark E. Shaw: I can't find significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources, and most of the sources here are his own writing.  There are passing mentions of him in the four World (magazine) articles cited, but all four articles are about addiction generally, not Shaw himself.  A similarly worded attempt in April 2023 by a sockpuppet of User:BrookeCook at Mark Edward Shaw was moved to draft, then speedy deleted G5, and the SPI for BrookeCook has been pretty busy lately.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Christianity , Psychology , Alabama ,  and Kentucky .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the article reads to me like a clear cut case of paid editing.  The fact that the author tried to hide a COI template by moving it to the talkpage doesn't help.   Good day— RetroCosmos talk 13:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete looking thorugh the news results pretty much all of them were for other people called Mark Shaw instead of him, everything else I could find is a primary source or a small generic author bigography.  (And to be clear, no I'm not him and have no relation to him)  Shaws username .  talk .  13:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : My limited time at AfC and the log history listed above all incline me towards seeing this as a likely PROMO work.  Delete, with an eye to salting.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 15:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per the nom, most of these citations are stuff written by himself.  Yolandagonzales ( talk ) 08:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Half of the sourcing is WP:PRIMARY .  A dash of promo as well, with ordained minister, nouthetic counselor, addiction counselor, author, public speaker...  TLA tlak 07:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamed Yusoff: References to his own websites don't count which eliminates about half of the refs.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 11:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople , Music ,  and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : nothing found for this "serial entrepreneur", lots of coverage about a person with the same name that murdered his daughter.  Article feels PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agreed, this is PROMO.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nerd sniping: Valereee ( talk ) 20:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  Valereee ( talk ) 20:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NOTDICT "Wikipedia is not a dictionary, phrasebook, or a slang, jargon, or usage guide."  Also MOS:NEO "(Neologisms) ... should generally be avoided because their definitions tend to be unstable and many do not last." — Maile ( talk ) 01:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lacking GNG.  There is no WP:SIGCOV , no WP:PERSISTENCE , no indication at all that this term is discussed as a a term in scholarly literature.  It appears to fall under WP:NOTNEO and, even if it weren't a neologism, it would be barred through WP:DICTDEF .  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 14:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There may or may not be enough coverage of the term to mention it at xkcd , in which case this should redirect there.  TompaDompa ( talk ) 20:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is just a dictionary definiton.  Please see WP:NOTDICT .  Even if it were expanded upon to be more than just a definition, the subject doesn't meet the GNG (see WP:Notability ).  While a few sources outside xckd have mentioned Nerd Sniping, they're essentially just saying the definition, and not enough of those sources meet the criteria for reliability.  Combustible Vulpex ( talk ) 11:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Na iTalai FM: Not notable, no reliable sources covering it were found.  – Hilst [talk] 22:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Christianity ,  and Fiji .  – Hilst [talk] 22:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I also could not find any reliable sources with any mention of the topic, and the two references linked on the page are a permanent deadlink and a facebook post. — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Clearly fails notability guidelines.  Zero hits on Gnews or Gbooks, and main results shows several Facebook post, an X profile, a (possible) primary unreliable source, a list of radio stations in Suva, and this .  No GNG passable found.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : current sourcing is far from guidelines.  various social media profiles online that don't establish notability, there is a profile but it is WP:PRIMARY .  She was a fairy 00:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This station, Radio Light and Radio Naya Jiwan are all operated by Evangelical Bible Mission Trust Board.  Found this article from reachbeyond.org .  IgelRM ( talk ) 19:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baking a Dream: The Theobroma Story: As the article exists, the only source is an excerpt from the book and a plot that's probably copied straight from the back page.   A WP:BEFORE check found one source from The Hindu that may be helpful - [26] .   It's not really a review, more of an interview but it's at least better than what's currently there.   I don't think it's enough to meet NBOOK though.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and India .  Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Perhaps redirect to an article about the two women or about the cafe, with the same name as the book.  [27] , scattered hits in Indian media about the pair, that mentions the book in passing...  Thoughts?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Promotional Article for a restaurant chain.  WP:PROMO ChunnuBhai ( talk ) 13:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:SPAM .  The first source seems ok , but the second is a first-person entitled interview, which isn't.  In 2024, eveybody knows we are not Pinterest or Etsy .  I don't see significant coverage in independent sources, but ping me if you find something better and add it to the page .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article seems like it was made to promote the book.  The plot seems overly promotional.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 17:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prabodhan Vidyalaya School: ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 02:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dialdirect: Not to be confused with the UK company "Dial Direct".  GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 05:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Just noting that the nominator is now indefinitely blocked for copyright problems.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amount of failed verifications makes me wonder if aside from the from the company existing, the rest of the article is fictitious.  -- D'n'B - t -- 10:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Ahmadi (Afghan footballer): I did come across sources like Tasnim News but this is actually about Ali Ahmadi (Iranian footballer) .  I couldn't find any detailed news coverage about the Afghan footballer called 'Ali Ahmadi'.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article is sourced only to a database. Fails BLP, GNG, BIO. There are no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 05:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC) // Timothy :: talk 05:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 21:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Janes Place, California: I am neutral .  In 2019 Reywas92 BLAR'd this as locality not notable, redir to county .  WeirdNAnnoyed took it to RfD, writing Target article never mentions Janes Place, or gives any hint about what or where it was.  Very obscure place, unlikely search term.  Reywas commented at the RfD Topo map shows it as an isolated cabin.  -- Tamzin [ cetacean needed ] ( they|xe ) 20:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California . -- Tamzin [ cetacean needed ] ( they|xe ) 20:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Consensus from RFD already seems pretty clear that the subject fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG and my BEFORE didn't uncover anything that would suggest otherwise.  Jfire ( talk ) 21:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just a single building.  No evidence this was ever a "community" of any kind.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my comments above, from the RfD.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Whatever this is, it is lost to history.   There's nothing in the Service & Hillman Arcadia book on Eureka and Humboldt County .   I can make no verifiable connection to Henry F. Janes , founder of Janesville, Wisconsin who came to Humboldt and was its first JP, who stated that he lived near Uniontown (not clear to me which one, but I suspect Arcata rather than Lotus) anyway, some 40km away, and is reported to have ended up "above" (north? upstream of? up a hill from?) Humboldt City, California .   Nothing else turns up in the history books that I can find.   I cannot say a single verifiable thing about what this even is.  Uncle G ( talk ) 07:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shwapnopuron: Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 01:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rabinarayan Acharya: h-index in Google Scholar is 19 and the search for references only finds articles such as this which falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 18:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Odisha .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not seeing anything that speaks to notability under either PROF or AUTHOR.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 21:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete