Mario Williams (footballer) : Simione001 ( talk ) 02:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , I assume there is more around than this.  Govvy ( talk ) 21:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] First two sources are 'transfer rumours'; third source is fine; fourth source is the same as 1 & 2 but in less detail; fifth source is a match report.  Giant Snowman 21:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes GNG per above sources. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 18:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 05:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per above.  Barbados internaitonal with ongoing career and first to play pro in Australia A-League Men .  Article needs improvement.  not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 15:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Never played a game in the A-League.  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG as the available coverage is not independent or in-depth.  The best coverage is the article from the Barbados Football Association, but that is not independent of the subject and doesn't count towards notability.  The other coverage is generally routine (match reports, transfer speculation) and not enough to be significant coverage.  Jogurney ( talk ) 21:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Another athlete bio, another 50/50 split of opinion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the article's subject itself does not inherently meet WP:GNG nor does it make it clear how it does.  Moreover, the subject's coverage is mostly routine and there is no outstanding coverage as to warrant an independent article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DimensionalFusion ( talk • contribs ) 09:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 11:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete