Ayan Babakishiyeva: Sources in article cannot prove her notability because it is all idle news about her marriage and personal life.  NMW03 ( talk ) 22:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Azerbaijan .  NMW03 ( talk ) 22:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE showed nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Comments Source Interview  1.  "Mənim üçün həyat yoldaşı tapmaq asandır" - Ayan Babakişiyeva.  Axşam promo, entertainment news  2. ^ 250 min manatlıq mənzili azərbaycanlı müğənniyyə kim hədiyyə edib? . Day.az Mention  3. ^ Azerbaijan chooses its beauty for 2014.  Azernews Divorce info  4. ^ Ayan Füzuli Musayevin boşanma sənədini yaydı.  Aznews promo human interest story  5. ^ Jump up to:a b Azərbaycanlı məmur sevgilisinin təqibindən Türkiyəyə qaçan müğənnimizin.  Sonxeber.az Interview  6. ^ Şou əhlindən Füzuli-Ayan davasına maraqlı açıqlamalar.  Musavat WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 20:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : has recieved SIGCOV as an individual and therefore is presumed notable under GNG guidelines.  Meets #1 of WP:SINGER as she is the subject of multiple local articles.  It doesn't matter that the articles focus on her personal life and don't actually focus on her singing.  Personal life reporting can still satisfy SIGCOV.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — Pretty much agree with the assessment of Timothy above.  Apart from mostly magazine-style gossip reporting and interviews which aren't independent coverage, there is not much more to be found.  Doesn't pass the GNG or its respective SNG.  ~Styyx Talk ?  19:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per SIGCOV and WP:GNG .  I don't think we have ever been arbiters of what's trash and what's culture.  Even if a singer fails NMUSIC, they still might be notable because of their notoriety in the tabloids and reality shows .  Otherwise, half the Kardashians and 2/3 of the deposed royalty of Europe would not have articles here.  Without assessing the reliablility of the sources , they look like significant coverage.  I was ready to ! vote to delete, but upon reading the article and looking at the Interwebs , I am convinced that she is notable.  She has hundreds of followers on social media, and Spotify, Tidal, and Apple music downloads or listens of over 1 million.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I still refuse to believe gossip reporting of tabloids is reliable, hence failing one criteria of the GNG.  ~Styyx Talk ?  19:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per BLP.  By my edit and self revert I've just demonstrated how little of this article is actually cited.  The article appears to have been written and then sources supplied.  This article is currently cited with a bare mention, several interviews and minor routine entertainment news, and nothing approaching significant coverage of the subject.  I keep seeing folks using the link SIGCOV, but nothing applied or found meets the criteria for significant coverage required of a biography of a living person.  I largely agree with User:TimothyBlue 's source analysis above. The articles in other languages are using the same poor sourcing. BusterD ( talk ) 13:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . This reminds me of a recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shilpa Bala an Indian actress who posted lots of photos of herself to various online media to generate publicity. I'm getting a similar vibe here. Taking into account User:BusterD 's stripping of uncited material and putting it back (informative & fair IMO) and User:TimothyBlue 's source analysis I'm inclined to agree with the assertion that the quality of sources so far presented is not of sufficient reliability to pass notability for a BLP. Rupples ( talk ) 01:34, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . Shortly after writing the above I found this article in a Turkish newspaper which seems OK for reliability https://www.oncevatan.com.tr/superstar-ayan-babakishiyeva . Rupples ( talk ) 02:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC) (edit: replaced incorrect link Rupples ( talk ) 02:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC) ) [ reply ] It isn't the reliable Vatan . ~Styyx Talk ? 18:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Er OK. The article's not exactly indepth but seems independent of the subject. I've searched the reliable sources board and nothing came up for Once Vatan. I said it "seems" reliable but I've no specific knowledge of Turkish media. Are you saying it's not? If so, on what basis? Rupples ( talk ) 23:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above. The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete