hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Biota, Cinco Villas : Got DEPRODed PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 00:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Spain .  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 00:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep Spanish article https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biota_(Zaragoza) has plenty of content and sources, I've added Template:Expand Spanish .  Reywas92 Talk 00:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I will translate the article PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 00:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep municipalities clearly pass GEOLAND and the status of the article isn't normally relevant as long as sources do exist, see WP:RUBBISH .  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 06:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep a stub with room for improvement is no valid rationale for deletion in its own right. --Asqueladd ( talk ) 08:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:GEOLAND . Obviously. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : the subject clearly passes WP:GEOLANDm and sources can be added to improve the article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 15:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ◆ NOM WITHDRAWN PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 16:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Lego pneumatics : I couldn't find any independent sources that provide significant coverage of Lego pneumatics in general outside of hobby blogs.  A few magazines reported on a Lego pneumatic V8 engine (e.g. [18] ) but they do not discuss the pneumatics in detail.  This should be redirected to Lego Technic#Pneumatics .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 05:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 05:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Judas (manga) : I have attempted AtD's and all have been reverted with no further changes.  The present article objectively fails all notability standards, but it appears the community insists on a full AfD, so here we go.  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 01:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WITHDRAWN BY NOMINATOR --As another editor has noted, there has been a Heymann rewrite on this article which  establishes notability and brings it up to WP standard.  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan .  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 01:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep ; this article meets WP:NBOOK with the three reviews listed in the external links section ( Comic Book Bin , Sequential Tart , Mania ), all of which are from reliable sources per WP:ANIME/RS .  The article is poor but deletion is not cleanup .  Link20XX ( talk ) 01:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Additionally, a review exists in Jason Thompson 's Manga: The Complete Guide (page 598 in my digital version), thus giving it four good sources.  Link20XX ( talk ) 01:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] How many of those meet WP:RS ?  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 01:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] All of them.  Their reliability was all discussed just for them to be listed at ANIME/RS.  Not to mention Manga: The Complete Guide is a published work that has been widely used throughout other articles; its author is also well-noted for his work in the industry.  Link20XX ( talk ) 01:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I just completely re-wrote the entire article with sources and a shorter plot summary.  Link20XX ( talk ) 03:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The sources provided by Link are sufficient to meet NBOOK.  Jumpytoo Talk 03:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In addition to reasons above, WP:HEY is achieved, the article is in a much better state thanks to Link20XX and likely would not be nominated at this point.  — siro χ o 04:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Alan Hampson : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 08:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator per consensus Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 23:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 08:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - fatally flawed nomination by somebody who, respectfully, does not have a clue, as shown by their attempt to CSD A7 the article prior to this AFD.  This is a professional player (over 120 appearances) active in the 1950s with sufficient sources to show notability.  Giant Snowman 19:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Over a hundred caps for Halifax in the football league, one for Everton and a few for Bradford City.  I will have faith there is more in a newspaper source and WP:OFFLINESOURCES , the online ones are not so great, mainly databases from what I see.  However there is certainly confirmation of the players career like [24] , what makes me want to keep more is this source [25] , which tells us more than whats on the article, including he was manager of Prescot Cables F.C. If I found that in a few min on a google search I am unimpressed with the WP:BEFORE here.  As there are multiple sources online which can easily boost the article.  Regards.  Govvy ( talk ) 21:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Youmi Kimura : — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 15:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Music .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 15:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and improve; definitely does satisfy WP:MN #2, #8, and #10.  The first song from the Ghibli film charted at #6 and spent 42 weeks on the charts per Oricon , and was also nominated for Song of the Year in the Japan Record Awards in 2001.  She also wrote the theme song of Howl's Moving Castle , for which she won the Los Angeles Film Critics Association Award for Best Music (confirmed here ).  The song from Spirited Away won the prize for best music at the 56th Mainichi Film Awards and a special prize at the 25th Japan Academy Film Prize .  Dekimasu よ!  02:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The song from Spirited Away should also have been certified platinum in Japan, since it sold over 400,000 units in 2001 according to Oricon, which would mean she also meets WP:MN #3.  I don't think Oricon puts those figures online itself anymore, but the number can be seen here or here .  Dekimasu よ!  02:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Willing to withdraw, and these sources can be incorporated in some way.  The article really needs some cleaning up, though.  It should probably also be moved to Yumi Kimura ; I'm not sure why this article is even at this title to begin with.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 23:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Mila (Doctor Who) : Does not seem to display GNG or SIGCOV, and I doubt it ever will.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Threshold (Doctor Who) : No sources seem to exist for them, and the article already cites no sources.  Does not meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Treujenn-gaol : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some text and references from the corresponding article in German.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I see no issue that requires deletion.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 13:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I vote to keep this article.  It has been improved with additional references and content.  Waqar 💬 17:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Tribe (Philippine TV series) : Donald D23 talk to me 01:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Added some sources, and I think that this show is notable because it was one of Net 25's (the network's) most popular shows for children and teens.  Also, I think it's impressive that it was consistently being recognized as a source for family-friendly, informative entertainment.  D-Flo27 ( talk ) 06:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Appears to meet WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep and tag for improvement – sources show notability and so do the awards.  It could use synopsis/development and reception sections but deletion will not achieve that.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 22:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep .  For starters, this is a nominee of the PMPC Star Awards for Television which is the near-equivalent of the Emmys in the Philippines (actually, AFAIK, the only industry-related award).  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 04:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per nominations from notable award giving bodies. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per everyone who voted/commented.  - Ian Lopez @ 16:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Special:Diff/1171599920 - Procedural, but please be mindful of WP:WNTRMT #3.  Templates shouldn't be removed when "There is ongoing activity or discussion related to the template issue".  99% fad-free ( talk ) 11:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn per the notices above.  Donald D23 talk to me 21:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Lawrence Sebalu : Yes, he may be the Minister of Finance, but I'm failing to find SIGCOV of this individual.  All I can see is passing mentions.  Probably not notable just like his successors.  dxneo ( talk ) 00:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Africa ,  and Uganda .  dxneo ( talk ) 00:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Subject passes WP:NPOL as a finance minister, and a perfunctory Google search as well as a search on newspapers.com ( [59] ) shows quite a few sources which can be used to sustain an article ( WP:NEXIST ).  Curbon7 ( talk ) 01:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Having sources unreachable is not a genuine reason.  Subject is not the current but was a finance minister soon after independence which I hope in the days was notable.  A quick Google search on books brings lots of recorded books, see here , here and here .  This shows that subject passes WP:GNG / WP:NPOL - Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 01:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw the nomination : per recent article improvement.  Word to Tumbuka Arch , I would suggest that next time if an article is moved to draftspace, it must not be moved back to mainspace without convincing improvements that it passes WP:NBIO as WP:BLP is a very delicate subject which requires strong sourcing.  I couldn't verify the notability of the subject based on an unreachable source and blog source.  dxneo ( talk ) 02:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I concur with Dxneo here.  I have cleaned-up the article and added to it significantly in terms of both prose and sourcing, but am generally not a big fan of cleaning up other people's messes.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 03:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Tim Nedow : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 21:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - if some of the information is wrong, this can be corrected through editing, rather than deleting the entire article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It seems there was a lot of old vandalism never reverted about weight, height, etc., but I've reverted it here .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 21:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , vandalism isn't a reason to AfD.  I will say I find it odd that a new account's only edit at all is to nominate an article for deletion; TommieKunst ( talk · contribs ), have you got any other previous Wikipedia accounts?  CoconutOctopus talk 22:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - A search found numerous reliable sources to back up notability.  Meets WP:GNG and passes WP:BASIC .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 01:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sources found in the article seems to back up notability.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 02:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Meredith Badger : I have looked for book reviews on Kirkus, Publishers Weekly, and Booklist, as well as a general Google and Google Scholar search, but haven't found any reviews for her books -- nor any other reliable, independent sources that discuss the author.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 16:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator : Thank you, Bridget , for pointing out the pseudonym!  I somehow missed that when I nominated for AFD.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 23:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors ,  and Australia .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 16:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Bridget (talk) 05:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Were you able to search for sources using her other name Em Bailey?  I've found some sources on her that should be included in the article in a preliminary search: Publishers Weekly review of Shift (2011) , these articles from the Australian books outlet Books+Publishing [24] [25] [26] [27] , and this review of The Special Ones (2017) in The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books .  Also, some reviews are mentioned on the US publisher's ( Macmillan ) website for two of her books: [28] [29] , which might also be worth searching for.  Bridget (talk) 05:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I think there's definitely a case for WP:NAUTHOR .  There's this brief review of The Special in the The Australian , one from Kirkus Reviews , and one from School Library Journal , and this review of Shift (via Gale) in The Horn Book Magazine .  Bridget (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Gesser : My consideration is to redirect to the football coach and have a hatnote for the record producer, but I guess a straight up deletion also works.  Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 15:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Disambiguations .  Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 15:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep if anything, this is a case of WP:TWOOTHER .  We can choose what to do, in this case I would opt for the status quo.  Broc ( talk ) 15:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  For starters WP:ONEOTHER is about disambiguation pages.  This is not a disambiguation page.  Jason Gesser is also not particularly notable and is certainly not ubiquitously referred to only as "Gesser".  The bar for a primary surname redirect is way higher than this one.  — Xezbeth ( talk ) 16:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep particularly with the addition of another person but agree that this isn't suited for a surname redirect to a single person.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 18:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : now has 3 names, standard surname page.  Pam D 07:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination someone else has been added, no longer eligible for AfD.  Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 09:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Sam Kaplan (American football) : Open to redirecting this to List of players who appeared in only one game in the NFL (1920–1929)#1921 or another target.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Washington, D.C. .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.   Another possible target is List of Washington Senators (NFL) players and I have no preference between the two lists.   I could not find any SIGCOV of the subject.   Willing to reconsider if coverage is identified so please ping me.  Frank Anchor 23:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] changed to neutral per below request to withdraw.  Frank Anchor 00:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Article has now been expanded substantially.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 00:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Appears to be just enough WP:SIGCOV now.  Willing to withdraw this AfD, what do you think @ Frank Anchor ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] It’s enough for me to not get in the way of a good faith request to withdraw.   Some SIGCOV, not a lot, but that’s typical for a player of that era.  Frank Anchor 00:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Eric Saucke-Lacelle : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Canada .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Subject meets the WP:GNG due to WP:SIGCOV such as [ [42] ] and [ [43] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural keep -- Nominator regularly bypasses WP:BEFORE searches (see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , etc. within the past week) and fails to address GNG in his nominations.  Regardless, 50 AfDs in 30 minutes is wholly inappropriate.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep