hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Bzówki PGR : Kotbot generated these articles based on articles in PL Wiki, but this one has already been deleted.  The location is near Bzówki which we already have an article about - but you can see that Google Maps, which scrapes Wikipedia data, includes it as a location despite it not existing .  FOARP ( talk ) 13:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 13:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No pl interwiki, no evidence this State Farm (PGR) has stand-alone notability.  TERYT only lists the main village for that county, no related hamlet or anything else.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not notable per Piotrus -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ken Hermann (disambiguation) : The PROD rationale by AllTheUsernamesAreInUse was: "Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic ."  Pinging Boleyn who seconded the PROD.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Photography , Sports , Disambiguations ,  and Netherlands .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  My mistake not checking the talk page; I'm trying to get better at not forgetting.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 20:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No worries.  If you use WP:TWINKLE for PRODs, it will check and warn you before PRODing a previously PRODed article.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unnecessary disambiguation page, due to reasons mentioned.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per above.  Can hopefully be speedied as uncontroversial and/or SNOW.  gidonb ( talk ) 21:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete hatnote is more useful to readers.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thoreson Peak : The article also includes a brief biography of the person the ridge is named after, but as that isn't directly related to the ridge I don't believe it justifies an article on the ridge.  BilledMammal ( talk ) 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions .  BilledMammal ( talk ) 04:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GEONATURAL .  – dlthewave ☎ 15:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nouns DAO : The purpose of the venture is to sell non-fungible tokens or NFTS representing nouns (that is, words identifying things) as digital art.   The business concept is described on this web site: https://www.noundation.wtf/intro/nouns-cc0#nouns-flywheel which can be seen to be a self-inflating financial bubble .   Since this is a business venture, the applicable notability guideline is corporate notability , and this article does not satisfy it, because none of the coverage is independent and significant .  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 noundation.wtf An "interesting" description of this venture, which seems to be a self-inflating bubble No Yes N/A No 2 finance.yahoo.com Appears to be a press release about a Super Bowl ad No Yes N/A No 3 voguebusiness.com Appears to be an ad to sell members-only access to features of an NFT venture No No, not without buying in.  N/A No 4 animationmagazine.net Announcement of a planned film, appears to be a press release No Not about the organization Yes No 5 businesswire.com A description of the planned venture Yes No Yes Yes No 6 titan-comics.com Announcement of the venture No Yes Yes No An article was deleted after a deletion discussion on 3 April 2022: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nouns_DAO .   This article was then created, and deleted as previously deleted , but the G4 was overturned and this article was restored.   So this is a different article about the same business venture that still does not satisfy corporate notability .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation , Cryptocurrency , Companies ,  and United States of America .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt at this point.  No sources as shown above, and as explained last time.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of RIS.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:CORP per the nominator's source table, which is actually rather generous.  The businesswire.com source is a press release by another organisation which is collaborating with the subject, announcing that collaboration.  It isn't independent of the subject.  Hut 8.5 11:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete n’ salt per obvious.  Chart says it all.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 17:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per provide assessment and my searching.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Complete fail of WP:GNG and WP:NCORP , support salting.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 01:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for all the reasons listed above and more.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 22:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RotateRight Zoom : There are no independent sources Mdggdj ( talk ) 13:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Cannot find any significant coverage.  popo dameron ⁠ talk 17:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the 2009 AfD was closed as "No consensus", despite what I see as a rough consensus to delete.  Today, evidence of notability for this esoteric old product is even harder to find.  Owen× ☎ 15:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, does not meet GMC.  Cinadon 36 16:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Erin Manning (photographer) : Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SNG .  Sabih omar 17:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 29 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Photography ,  and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Authors ,  and Visual arts .  Netherzone ( talk ) 19:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This advertorial article for a commercial photographer does not meet WP notability criteria for GNG nor WP:NARTIST .  It was created by a single purpose editor who has only edited on the subject of Erin Manning.  Possibly a PR or COI creation.  WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  Netherzone ( talk ) 19:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HDE Controller X : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Certainly exists, but doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources .  Best I found was some press releases.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Crummy unreferenced stub.  no indication of notability.  cursory searches yield nothing of use.  X ( talk ) 19:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of LGBT-owned companies : As constituted, this is a list of mostly non-notable companies that don't have Wikipedia articles at all -- just three of 28 companies in the "name" column are blue links -- and the possibility of attracting more and more non-notable entries is pretty much limitless, as I've already thought of at least a dozen more (not all notable) LGBT-owned companies I know about that haven't been listed here at all within less than ten minutes of finding the page, which means there are probably hundreds or even thousands that could potentially be added with a modicum of research.  And on top of that, it's also just begging for abuse by vandals who want to make trouble.  This is the kind of open-ended and potentially infinite list that would absolutely have to have an "only companies that have Wikipedia articles to link to" cap applied to it on Wikipedia is not a directory grounds, but it just isn't warranted at all if there are only three companies with Wikipedia articles to link to in it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Sexuality and gender ,  and Lists .  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it's unwise for us to host this article.   If extremists, terrorists or other criminals target these businesses and do them any kind of harm, our ethical position would be terrible.   We should leave this to LGBT advocacy organizations who will have the proper experience and knowledge and the right protections and policies to defend the businesses affected. — S Marshall T / C 09:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - For one thing, this is a list of "trivial coverage".  Per WP:ORGDEPTH "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability", also noting what is considered trivial coverage: "of telephone numbers, addresses, directions, of office locations, branches, franchises, or subsidiaries, of employees, officers, directors, owners, or shareholders, of product or service offerings."  This list comes across as a directory for those wanting to patronize LGBT ownership ....  or as noted above, those who wish to do harm to the LGBT population.  — Maile ( talk ) 14:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not for soapboxing.  TheodoreIndiana ( talk ) 11:37, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I assume good faith about the creation of the article, but this is something that shouldn't be categorized under the same criteria as most shopping-related articles, and the one-source to a listicle isn't acceptable.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NOTDIR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chaitanya Kumar Lingamallu : -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 08:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , India ,  and Andhra Pradesh .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 08:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , can't find SIGCOV in RS to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG.  One very minor award for him, and the rest listed are for his company.  No indication of independent notability sufficient for a separate article.  Edit history suggests UPE.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baffour Kyei : I can find Transfermarkt , a blank profile page.  Please do not confuse this person with Baffour Kyei Sebe , who plays in Guinea and has a different DOB.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cream City Collectives : ( ? )  It had no meaningful hits in searches of EBSCOhost (federated), Google Books, and newspaper archives beyond passing mentions.  Altogether there is not enough reliably sourced content with which to write an article worthy of the subject.  There are no worthwhile redirect targets, as the infoshop list only includes independently notable infoshops.  czar 01:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Wisconsin .  czar 01:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was looking at the cited sources and found that only one of them even mentioned the "Cream City Collectives", but it only verifies there being a gallery in it, nothing else.  I couldn't verify the detail about the Mathilde Anneke infoshop, as the cited biographical source never mentions the infoshop or the Cream City Collectives.  If there's not significant coverage of this that we're missing, this is definitely a non-controversial candidate for deletion.  -- Grnrchst ( talk ) 14:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Couldn't find any sources that could prove the subject's notability.  Davest3r08 > : ) ( talk ) 13:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammed Haruna : There are passing mentions of a footballer for King Faisal with this name, see Ghana Sports Page , but stats sites like Pulse Sports confirm that this other Haruna was born in 2002.  Neither player of this name seems to have sufficient coverage for an article and certainly the 1988 one is not notable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 18:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 World Junior Wrestling Championships : The history shows that an article was created in article space and draftified, and then another copy was created in article space again, so there is already a draft.   The draft can be left alone for expansion, probably immediately after the competition occurs.   A review of the references shows that none of them at this time are independent significant sources.   They are either the sports federation's own or database pages or both.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 uww.org Article about rehosting No Yes Yes No 2 uww.org Page that will show results but is now empty No Not at this time Yes No 3 allsportdb.com Appears to be a future database page Yes Not at this time Yes No Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling , Jordan ,  and Poland .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -draft already exists so no point draftifying per WP:TOOSOON Karnataka ( talk ) 19:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Mirdad : He does not meet GNG in any way.  Ynsfial ( talk ) 08:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Christianity , Spirituality ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete under G11: From reading the article, it feels promotional to me.  As the nom has failed to find any significant coverage, this is likely eligible for speedy deletion as promotion .  QwertyForest ( talk ) 08:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
All Eyez (disambiguation) : " All Eyes " is already addressed at the article via hatnote, and "All Eyez on Me" is a WP:PTM ; see All Eyez on Me (disambiguation) .  162 etc. ( talk ) 16:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per " WP:NONEOTHER ".  All entries other than the primary topic belong to, and are on, All Eyez on Me (disambiguation) .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You mean WP:ONEOTHER ?  Replying directly instead of fixing your comment per WP:TPO .  Intrisit ( talk ) 16:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No, I mean none.  Only one entry qualifies.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 05:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:PARTIAL - A link to an article title that merely contains part of the disambiguation page title where there is no significant risk of confusion between them should not be included.  There is no need for a disambiguation page for this.  All Eyez on Me (disambiguation) already exists.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Northern Press : Official website looks like a free web host.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Organizations , Companies ,  and Uganda .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines; no reliable sources found and the article's listed sources are unreliable or simple description with nothing indepth.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 21:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete