Pista House: Nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft delete – some sources are WP:SELFPUB .  Others seem to be just short of WP:SIGCOV of the company.  TLA (talk) 20:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Lot's of independent credible news sources wrote extensively about Pisa House.  So this does not qualify for deletion.  Check citations first Rasalghul1711 ( talk ) 00:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As the creator of the page I am going to assume you did a deeper dive into sourcing so if you can show me which ones meet WP:ORGCRIT I will have another look and withdraw the nomination should they meet the criteria.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ CNMall41  1. Deccan Chronicle - Well established newspaper in India  2. Indian Council of Agricultural Research - An Indian government body.  3. The Hans India - English daily read widely in Telugu states.  4. Also Pista House's Haleem has received the GI tag by the Indian government which makes it a notable establishment.  5. Indulge Express - A subsidiary of the New Indian Express which happens to one of the biggest media conglomerate in India; wrote an entire article dedicated to the restaurant and it's owner So in a nutshell, this is a article for a notable establishment and it's citations helps the article meet WP:ORGCRIT ' Rasalghul1711 ( talk ) 11:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for pointing out the references. First, let me point out that it is not necessarily the quality of the publication, but the quality of the reference itself. So, something like the The Hans India reference may be from a reliable publication, but it is marked as being from Hans News Service which indicates churnalism or WP:NEWSORGINDIA . The only reference out of those you listed which appear to meet WP:ORGCRIT would be the Deccan Chronicle; however, the author of that piece appears to be all over the board with what they write about so not sure how other Wikipedians reviewing that reference would take it. So, assuming the Deccan Chronicle does meet ORGCRIT, that would be only a single source. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What about the GI of the restaurant given by the government? Surely that does count as reliable. Rasalghul1711 ( talk ) 00:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Regulatory findings aren't notable. Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Delete based on the source discussion above. Nothing found for notability otherwise. Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete