hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ram Govind Das: Found the page while searching for sponsored or paid news sources.  Evaluation of sources from the article are below.  I also did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing better.  There was an article in Mid Day which is a “brand media” piece which falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA as do many of the references already on the page.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Review of sources:  1. The Indian Express , page not found  2. Hindustan Times , brief mention of him offering someone education.  3. Outlook India , “brand spotlight” article which is a sponsored post and falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA  .  4. Dainik Jagran , (through Google Translate) brief mention of him in a quote.  5. Times of India , brief announcement of him marrying 111 people.  No byline so likely falls under NEWSORGINDIA.  6. Amar Ujala , (through Google Translate), mentioned once in the article which is not about him.  7. Hindustan , unable to translate but is a single paragraph so not likely in-depth about the subject.  8. Dainik Jagran , (through Google Translate) a few sentences announcing a trip overseas.  Nothing in-depth.  9. Amar Ujala , (through Google Translate) same as above and posted one day apart so likely churnalism from a press release or PR campaign.  10. Amar Ujala , (through Google Translate), similar to the two above.  Posted about week after giving a brief recap of him going on a trip to London.  Nothing in-depth about him.  11 & 12 - Both are brief and appear to have the same content, nothing in-depth.  13.  Source has no link for me to evaluate.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This subject fails WP:GNG for lack of in-depth third-party coverage by reliable sources ; and separately fails WP:ANYBIO , per nom.  Thanks CNMall41 for delving into the WP:LOTSOFSOURCES .  They are accurately described.  Though, the first does exist archived , but reads like an advertisement.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 05:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the link.  The byline for that is "Express News Service" which would indicate a sponsored post under NEWSORGINDIA so could not be used for notability.  Appreciate you finding it in archive.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on the sources analyzed above.  Nothing but mostly churnalism.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and Uttarakhand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AndEngine: The article has no links, no secondary sources, and seems to be for an engine that is a decade old with no use examples in notable media.  Article creator created article with no other edits.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Also ran a quick search for results on Google and wasn't able to find anything.  Negative MP1 22:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
First Frontier: Couldn't find any reviews on isfdb, newspapers.com or proquest.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  00:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  00:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  Toughpigs ( talk ) 02:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NBOOK and GNG.  Unable to find any independent third party sources that cover this topic in detail.  Mostly what I am seeing is affiliated texts on the web, and, in any case, these would not be reliable sources per Wikipedia standards.  --- Steve Quinn ( talk ) 05:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NBOOK .  I'm also struggling to find any reliable sources - only fansites.  It is mentioned under Bernice Summerfield#Books and David A. McIntee#Bibliography which is all that's needed as far as I'm concerned.  Irltoad ( talk ) 15:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
U.S. Army Medical Materiel Center – Europe: Little if any independent coverage.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 22:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Medicine , South Korea ,  and United States of America .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 22:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Europe and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just not enough coverage anywhere, simply a copy and paste from government websites.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 00:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephen Aldrich: BD2412 T 15:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Minnesota .  BD2412 T 15:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Article is WP:BLP1E material built around a group's complaint, which is not an event that reaches article-level notability.  The two news sources in the article are from the same date.  The source to a defunct website for a complaining group doesn't meet WP:BLP inclusion standards, and the fourth source is a database.  -- Nat Gertler ( talk ) 15:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Subject was a district court judge, not a county court judge. He retired as a judge in 2010. Although it is possible that he may meet our lax standards of notability on the basis of other aspects of his career, this page is nothing but an attack page. Kablammo ( talk ) 13:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Lack of continuing coverage suggests lack of notability.  Though I'm not sure of our standards for notability of state district judges, the lack of any content worth keeping in the current page mitigates towards deletion.  Should the subject deserve an article, it would be best to simply start from scratch.  Arcendeight ( talk ) 00:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of fiction employing parallel universes: WP:NOTTVTROPES - this is just, sadly, WP:FANCRUFTy list of randomly selected works that include this concept - some of them are pretty far fetched, too (ex. Avengers: Endgame which does not even mention this term in the article).  The aforementioned Parallel universes in fiction article will do just fine (although it has some listy content that needs to be pruned).  At best, per WP:ATD-R , this can be redirected to the main article - maybe someone will fine something from here useful for merging or otherwise one day.  PS.  On the off chance this is kept, it obviously needs a rename too.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 23:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , Popular culture ,  and Lists .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 23:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete we already have a Parallel universes in fiction article we do not need another.  GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 01:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This definitely falls under WP:OLIST as over-extensive - the entire isekai genre would have to be listed here, and that's just the start!  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 03:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:IINFO and redundant.  This is already covered in a more reliable way at Parallel universes in fiction .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redundant.   Simply rehashes Parallel universes in fiction .  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - We already have Parallel universes in fiction as a prose article covering the topic, which itself already contains overly long lists of examples.  Having a separate list on top of that is simply redundant.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:FORK and WP:TNT .  As noted, we already have a very similar article, so this is a content fork.  This is a list of dozens, if not hundreds, of examples, but only a dozen citations , some of which are not even reliable .  I've long been an advocate of SF here on Wikipedia, but this is so bad as to be detrimental to the project.  21:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom + other comments  -- Devoke water 19:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete We should pretty much never have both a list article and a prose article on the same topic when it comes to these kinds of fiction-related topics, and this is redundant to parallel universes in fiction as pointed out above.  I see nothing to WP:PRESERVE here.  TompaDompa ( talk ) 19:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khawaja Habibullah Nowsheri Shrine: There is no explanation of what reliable sources have written about either the person or the place.   None of the references are secondary.   They include a map, which shows that the place exists.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 google.com/maps A map showing location of the shrine Yes No Yes No 2 thekashmirimages.com An article about the Sufi poet, Khawaja HabibUlLah Nowsheri Yes About the poet, but not about the shrine Yes No 3 YouTube Appears to be about Sufism in Kashmir Yes Not about the shrine No No If the article satisfied notability, it would need to be tagged for heavy copy-editing for grammar, usage, and style, but it doesn't pass notability.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 02:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Jammu and Kashmir .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 02:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This appears to be a draft article that was moved by the creator to mainspace after it was declined.  Definitely not notable, as a person or place.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : although this appears to be a locally venerated site , a google search does not help very much.  I tried finding some stuff in Urdu, this indicates that a grand veneration ceremony ( urs ) happens at the shrine every year.  This has gotten another two lines (p. 59) in this thesis but nothing helpful and substantial to support keeping a standalone article.  This could perhaps be incorporated into a biographical article about the saint.  ─ The Aafī (talk) 12:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of the United States, Conakry: The rest is a content fork about bilateral relations.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Identical problems to Lusaka article that is also on AfD right now.  All sources discussing the embassy itself are WP:PRIMARY , including those I was able to find that are not int eh article.  This seems to be part of a string of embassy articles with the same problems.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — not about the purported subject.  — Biruitorul Talk 20:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 14:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akash Anand: Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 08:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and not passes NPOL.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  11:39, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7.  Minor party functionary, no indication of importance.  Mccapra ( talk ) 16:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no indication of notability according to WP:NPOL .  Ira Leviton ( talk ) 20:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 23:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I saw below, it seems he has enough coverage both local and internationally atleast to pass WP:Basic [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 07:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benchmark, South Dakota: Although the name appears on topo maps, I could find no evidence of a community or notable place at this location.  – dlthewave ☎ 17:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and South Dakota .  – dlthewave ☎ 17:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete This looks like a mistake at some point where someone converted the benchmark which is there into a place name.  I can find no evidence at any era that there was anything else here.  Mangoe ( talk ) 01:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I like places, but this isn't much of a place.  Google Earth shows there's not even a cross-roads or a house at this location; I wonder if there's a mistake in the coordinates.  There are several dozen homes on dirt roads scattered over about a square mile 3/4 mile to the northwest.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 12:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LGBT in Israel: Unless there are more articles about LGBT in Israel.  -- MikutoH talk! 23:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender , Disambiguations ,  and Israel . -- MikutoH talk!  23:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Without prejudice against having this article in the future.  gidonb ( talk ) 01:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom clear case, unless there are further articles somewhere?  FortunateSons ( talk ) 11:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have just added a link to the rights page in the first sentence of the history page, and a hatnote to the history page on the first section of the rights page.  Now this can be deleted per others above.  Toadspike [Talk] 14:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] FWIW, there is Recognition of same-sex unions in Israel , but I'm not sure that falls under this topic.  The DAB has an awkward title and I'd prefer this were resolved with links and hatnotes.  Toadspike [Talk] 14:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to LGBT history in Israel , which mentions rights in the first line.  This is not an ambiguous topic, per WP:DABCONCEPT .  BD2412 T 20:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chi Chi (singer): It is also very messy and may require cleanup if not deleted.  JTZegers ( talk ) 23:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Women .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable at all.  Fails WP:GNG .  ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 15:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fermín Martínez: Creator has stated that him playing semi-Pro in Argentina and in America makes him notable, but none of this shows any form of significant coverage.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , Argentina ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - seems to be lacking in WP:SIGCOV .  Best I can find are transfer announcements, which don't really help us to build an encyclopaedia article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saugeen Stripper: It does not appear to be a notable event.  Given the last AfD occurred in 2006 (result was no consensus) it is appropriate for the question of notability to be tested again.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 02:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Canada .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 02:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Photography , Events , Sexuality and gender ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support .  The OP sums it up handily.  I'll add there is no sustained coverage .  And really, what purpose has the project served by maintaining for nearly 20 years this gossipy article?  WP:NOTCENSORED doesn't mean WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits ) 07:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment From the article history there appear to be a few single-purpose accounts attempting to restore the article.  Richard Nevell ( talk ) 09:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Clearly an obscure, unremarkable event with no lasting consequences.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Until recently this was a redirect to the relevant section of Saugeen–Maitland Hall , where there is a brief description on the incident.  As long as that section remains (and I could certainly see it being removed for lack relevance) restoring the redirect seems to make the most sense.  If that section should be removed, the redirect should then be deleted.  - R. fiend ( talk ) 13:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:COMMONPLACE .  When I lived in the dorms at a certain Big10 school noted for its basketball and swimming programs, girls stripping at alcohol fueled parties in the hall social room were more the norm than the exception.  Granted this was 30 years later and in Canada, but college kids haven't changed much.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 21:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Albanian–Yugoslav conflict: I was able to review some of the sources, especially the ones in the lead section, but also others.  They do not confirm that there was a secret Yugoslav paramilitary operation in Albania, or that there was any military conflict between the two countries.  Considering that most of the sources do not have any page numbers, it is hard to know what to seek.  If there are editors who claim that the content is supported by the sources, they should give relevant page numbers and quotes.  Right now though, this article seems to be WP:OR and WP:POVFORK of the article Operation Valuable .  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 18:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Europe , Albania , Serbia and Yugoslavia .  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 18:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete POV fork  per nom.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.245.46.14 ( talk ) 07:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete