Securian Canada : This page can be a redirect to Securian Financial Group .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 15:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 15:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They are separate business entities with separate governance structures from what I can tell and have reference on the Government of Canada website when I was digging around for references.  While they share a name, I don't think the connection is that strong beyond that, seems like a worthwhile distinction for people who want to recognize the two entities especially when they have separate reputations (Securian Canada for example has poor reviews vs US which seems to be neutral).  Brendanphilp ( talk ) 15:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : And I used to work for them, so I'll avoid this discussion.  But yes, most of this is correct, they did insurance for Sears Canada, Hudson's Bay and Capital One (credit insurance and direct marketing items).  Used to be the direct marketing division of JC Penney, then it was sold to Aegon, then sold again.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Coverage here [9] and here [10] .  Then here [ https://www.dmnews.com/penney-sells-dm-services-to-aegon/ ].  The article now seems to gloss over most of their history, which was "colourful" to be generous.  A proper article on the company here should at least include the JC Penney and Aegon history.  I've poked around the Canadian company's website, they're the subsidiary of the US Securian; they also tend to gloss over that for the same reasons I've outlined.  They sell insurance using non-traditional methods (again, I'm trying to be diplomatic, but it seems to be about the same quality as when I was there in the JC Penney days), and even then, it was direct marketing/telemarketing, with all the "fun" that comes with that.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Interesting, I think the JC Penney references are worth including if that's the case.  I think maybe the tactics they use should be omitted unless we can reference that somehow like a newspaper article etc. I'll have a poke around again if there's anything I can reference around that but I didn't see anything on the first pass for including as a "controversy" section so to speak.  Brendanphilp ( talk ) 13:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So I've dug into it a bit over my morning coffee, it looks like maybe we're confusing two entities.  What I can find here is Securian Canada used to be Canadian Premier Life, not JC Penney or Aegon.  I did find this: https://www.advisor.ca/industry-news/industry/cpp-owned-wilton-re-buys-transamericas-canadian-business/ which has a same parent company that was purchased but they look like two separate entities in that deal.  Maybe still worth referencing.  Brendanphilp ( talk ) 14:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 19:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I still think given the above additional, that it's worthy of its own listing compared to rolled up into US parent.  If it makes sense to add the https://www.advisor.ca/industry-news/industry/cpp-owned-wilton-re-buys-transamericas-canadian-business/ article to help add some context about these acquisitions, I think that would be helpful.  I haven't personally been able to find external sources to validate the JC Penney part of the discussion or their "business practices" Oaktree b referenced but if someone finds something, happy to include as well.  Let me know your thoughts!  Brendanphilp ( talk ) 19:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus