hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Casanova (Valery Leontiev song) : The article currently has one reference: YouTube with Leontiev's performance. -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk ) 21:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 22:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough coverage online of this song to warrant it having it's own page InDimensional ( talk ) 11:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Winzo : The article was previously rejected at AfC, deleted as an expired draft, refunded at the draft creator's request, then moved into mainspace by another account without substantial change.  DoubleGrazing 's AfC rejection text gave a good appraisal: "Sources consist solely of routine business reporting such as raise rounds, sponsorship announcements, etc. We need to see significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources that have chosen to write about this company of their own volition" , but was not acted upon.  Looking for other sources, there is a 2020 Entrepreneur India item, which is interview-based and clear when it is the company's own claims that are being repeated [9] , and a DNAIndia profile piece describing the company's influencer-based model [10] but I don't see enough to demonstrate attained encyclopaedic notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 16:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games , Companies ,  and India .  AllyD ( talk ) 16:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 17:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and my own AfC review.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 17:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pleasant View Village, Indiana : Mangoe ( talk ) 02:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to German Township, Bartholomew County, Indiana , of which it is part and is listed, per Wikipedia:NGEO guidelines, If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the informal place should be included in the more general article on the legally recognized populated place or administrative subdivision that contains it. " Djflem ( talk ) 06:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, don't redirect ROTM housing tract; generic name makes it hopeless to search for information but I can't imagine any would be found even if it were called Ybrfovquixxqil Estates, because it's just a subdivision like countless others across nearly every county in the United States.  A redirect is pointless, because per WP:NGEO "information on the informal place should be included in the more general article..."  What information, other than "it exists"?   That would be pointless trivia and violate WP:DUE .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 13:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How would it violate Wikipedia:DUE ?  That guideline has absolutely nothing to do with this subject or target.  What is the point-of-view that concerns you?  There countless towns populated places across nearly every across the United States, many if not most of them ROTM, so what's the point? .  IDONTLIKEIT is an argument to avoid in AfD discussions.  The target lists populated places within the township and a comprehensive encyclopedia should be comprehensive.  Djflem ( talk ) 19:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not redirect and remove from the German Township page.  No need to list generic non-notable subdivisions like this on that page.  Reywas92 Talk 15:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This didn't exist prior to 1957 and is a subdivison.  The person who titled this didn't even get the gnis class right.  We definately do not need to put every subdivision into county and/or city articles.  I agree with Reywas, get it off the township page too.  SEE, https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-republic-subdivision-duh/143381788/ .  James.folsom ( talk ) 00:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulellah Hawsawi : Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Saudi Arabia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are ten sources used in the stub, in Arabic - are none of them suitable for notability?  You need to do a better job with your nomination statement.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks essential requirements for general notability guidelines.  Noneate ( talk ) 09:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 in Ecuador : can be recreated in 2024 — Karnataka talk 09:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Ecuador .  — Karnataka talk 09:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, this is premature.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 2024 is yet to come.  Pranesh Ravikumar ( talk ) 04:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A case of WP:TOOSOON , but the article can be recreated next year.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blair Kurtz : Only sources provided are primary.  Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Most sources are databases or primary sources.  Unless more references can be found current coverage isn't sufficient.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 13:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mikhail Khodunov : I found no decent coverage in Belarusian and Russian searches yielded only a trivial match report mention in Gorod214 and a list of footballers sitting on the bench in the same source .  Neither of these show WP:SIGCOV .  The articles in both Belarusian Wikipedias also don't show SIGCOV, just database sources.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belarus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree that this fails WP:SIGCOV .  I'm not sure about WP:SPORTBASIC , but that's no matter.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Devin Millar : References are clickbait, event listings, listings and listicles.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 11:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable musical performer.  This is about all the coverage I can find: aboutinsider.com/devin-millar-and-his-life-as-a-famous-music-producer/, which is a blacklisted site here, so not an acceptable source.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, aboutinsider is a paid seo dump.  On that note, I previously removed a ton of paid placement/SEO sites from this article, so we need to be very careful when evaluating sources on this topic as there's obviously been a rather sketchy PR campaign.  Sam Kuru (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom, nothing in RS or even allmusic .  Her name comes up in Ultratop but I cannot confirm that she has charted.  dxneo ( talk ) 05:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zaeem Zia : Jamiebuba ( talk ) 13:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 13:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does appear PROMO.  Coverage is only him speaking to media [25] , [26] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 21:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sugiarto : Bola , Viva and Tribun News all confirm that he was a real footballer but none of these are instances of actual significant coverage, which is what is required.  Indonesian football was well covered at the time but little was written about Sugiarto it seems.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very little to go on here.  Clearly fails WP:SIGCOV and even WP:SPORTBASIC .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Even as an Indonesian person myself, I could only find other people with this surname than this soccer player, failing WP:V .  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 11:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 18:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Park Seung-ri : Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep per sources at ja:朴昇利 Japanese wikipedia.  Govvy ( talk ) 16:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] what do the sources say?  Giant Snowman 20:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GiantSnowman : To be honest, the sources seem pretty routine, transfers, contracts and terminations.  There was one good source talking about his trial, but it really wasn't that great.  I realised I read some of it wrong, I also thought he was playing at a higher level.  As he played for quite a few clubs I don't believe a redirect would work.  I am going to change my vote to delete .   Regards Govvy ( talk ) 21:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for taking a more in-depth look.  Giant Snowman 17:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect I think its better to either redirect the page to Azul Claro Numazu or delete it since the subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, including WP:BASIC or even WP:1E .  Also, the Japanese page lacks sufficient sourcing and quality writing, so i see no reason to maintain it.  Lililolol ( talk ) 20:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Just routine sources.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Süper Lig broadcasters : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, the only source are nothing but news announcement and does not assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Turkey .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NLIST, fails NOTTVGUIDE, fails CLN.  Listcruft.  // Timothy :: talk 12:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, not a TV guide.  Govvy ( talk ) 14:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not notable, and NOTTVGUIDE Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2021 Lancaster, Pennsylvania mayoral election : Star Mississippi 01:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Pennsylvania .  Star Mississippi 01:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy pings to AfD participants, AfC accepter, refunder: @ Scope creep , Im really bad at this , Number 57 , Doctormatt , Explicit , Apocheir , GeorgeBailey , Qcne ,  and Graeme Bartlett : Star Mississippi 02:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment Notability plays no role when refunding a draft.  So I am not opposing or supporting deletion, but I would be happy to make this a draft again.  Graeme Bartlett ( talk ) 07:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I approved this draft as it seemed to meet the criteria for WP:NEVENT , but happy to defer to more experienced editors.  Qcne (talk) 08:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for that insight @ Graeme Bartlett .  I wrongly thought it was weighed when refunded following an AfD.  (And of course no issue with the refund itself)  Star Mississippi 13:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge to List of mayors of Lancaster, Pennsylvania and/or Danene Sorace .  Since the last commenter invoked WP:NEVENT , I would point to WP:GEOSCOPE , WP:ROUTINE and WP:DIVERSE from those guidelines.  Also, all my points from the first go-around still stand.  Apocheir ( talk ) 01:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with the above comment.  It should be deleted or possibly merged if there is consensus but I don't think it is notable.  If its deleted, it should be salted.  scope_creep Talk 09:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet NEVENT per policies linked in Apocheir 's ! vote.  Like horrific crimes, not every important local election is an event... of lasting, historical significance .  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 02:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Glitter cymru : Sources in the article are social media listings, a promo interview with the founder [33] , and images of flyers.  BEFORE showed nothing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 03:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sexuality and gender ,  and Wales .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Fails WP:NORG ; sources found are mentions, nothing significant found.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 08:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:ORGCRIT .  I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
On2Cook : Funding announcements are ORGTRIV, interviews fail ORGIND.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 12:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies , Technology ,  and India .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 12:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Gujarat-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This company was a contestant on Shark Tank India and this is what most sources cover on the page and this does not make an organization notable merely because a notable event was associated with it.  A corporation is not notable merely because it owns or generates notable subsidiaries.  The organization needs to be discussed in reliable independent sources to be considered notable.  Fails WP:NCORP and fails WP:ORGCRIT .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Retain .  I believe it should not be removed.  This company is very reputed and has won awards like Forbes DGEMS 2023, Best Emerging Food Tech of the Year, FCICS Indian Awards- South India Edition 2023, IF Design Award (2021) and many more.  15:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC) Note to closing admin - this is a "new" editor, creates an account, does some gnomish edits to establish activity (but well able to handle a complex citation and banners to their Talk page which is typical behaviour of the meat/sock puppets we encounter all the time), and within an hour of creating the new account, pops over to this AfD to ! vote and then disappears again.  HighKing ++ 16:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete None of the references come close to meeting GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 16:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KGMM-CD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 19:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Texas .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 19:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No SIGCOV in the Express-News .  All it says is, The festival will be taped by Mas Musica TeVe, an independent music video network that airs locally on noncable channel 58.  (Aug. 6, 1999).  That's what became MTV Tres .  Explains the call letters but very little else.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 21:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : That passing mention might be enough for a mention in MTV Tres#Free-to-air affiliates (which currently makes no mention of K58EU/KGMM, listing a different San Antonio station instead), but probably not even a redirect.  Overall, a station with a history that is basically just Más Música TeVe, MTV Tres, and then becoming another all-diginet station doesn't strike me as the type of station that could possibly warrant significant coverge .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete