hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Franco Lino: Still WP:TOOSOON .  Still fails WP:GNG .  If the result of this discussion is a delete again, can I suggest that Draft:Franco Lino also be deleted in order to prevent a repeat of this behaviour.  TarnishedPath talk 10:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Australia .  TarnishedPath talk 10:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Pinging @ Simione001 , @ PearlyGigs , @ GiantSnowman , @ Ortizesp , @ Spinifex&Sand and @ JML1148 as editors who took part in the recent discussion.  Delete and WP:SALT .  I don't see anything that has changed since a month ago.  Jenks24 ( talk ) 08:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Drafify and SALT -  per last AFD.  Giant Snowman 19:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Genèvre Charles: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Haiti .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no indication of notability.  Please ping me if sources are found.  Yes, I really did just copy GiantSnowman's format, and I know he will see this :-) Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 04:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kenneth Michael Inglis: A soldier that was killed with no real accomplishments.  Obviously a brave man, but he doesn't qualify for an article.  Lettler hello • contribs 19:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , History , Military ,  and England .  Lettler hello • contribs 19:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately delete .  It's not a badly written page by any means, but seems more like a personal memorial or genealogical entry, which Wikipedia is unfortunately not.  The creator is not very fond of talk page messages it seems.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No credible claim of significance .  With regret.  But mere service even in wartime, does not warrant a Wikipedia page.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG , clear case of WP:NOTMEMORIAL .  Mztourist ( talk ) 02:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Completely NN.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom and others.  Intothat darkness 13:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  "Where have all the young men gone ?" asked Pete Seeger in the famous song, but not to Wikipedia .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per Wikipedia:NOTMEMORIAL Mr Vili talk 00:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Nothing notable enough to warrant a stand alone article.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Krystal Muccioli: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and New Hampshire .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no sourcing we can use from the article, none found.  Beauty pageant winner, non-notable career otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  The article fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Additionally, the references are all passing mentions, 1, 2, and 3 mentioning the pageant win and 4 mentioning the win and her acting career.  IncompA 00:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree with previous comment.  Fails WP:GNG Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 08:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Laura Ellen Howard: One report in a local newspaper does not satisfy WP:GNG , and I can find nothing else.  WP:NACTOR is not satisfied by a minor part in the soap Glenroe and a minor part in Vikings (TV series) .  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs ) 10:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Ireland .  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs ) 10:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems to have had bit parts, some over 20 yrs ago.  There is simply no sourcing to be found, even on . ie websites.  Long way from ACTOR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Nothing to indicate that WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR are met.  Relatively small role (5 episodes over several years?) in Glenroe and limited local coverage of role in (unreleased/independent?) film do not establish notability under either criteria.  The subject's apparent role in Vikings isn't covered in any sources that I can find.  Seems pretty clear-cut to me.. .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 12:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and own search - a clear fail on GNG (and NACTOR, and artist provisions if relevant - this oddly-worded short does seem to be using artiste for actor), and it doesn't even really try to assert notability anyway; this is sub-stub.  Very clear case.  SeoR ( talk ) 08:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR and GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 16:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Beretta 9000: We know that this pistol exists but it's not likely notable.  It was easier to find mentions in fiction that it is to find published works that verify the facts in the article.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Firearms and Italy .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't seem that there is any significant coverage to be found.  The source I found barely even talks about the gun itself.  TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 20:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 08:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  No GNG established.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prateek Dhankhar: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 02:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and India .  Kpg jhp jm 06:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Simply being an attorney doesn't show notability.  Existing source was to jatland, a wiki, WP:UGC and with that removed, the article is unsourced.   Web search didn't turn up anything useful, merely a couple of cases where they were involved, but no significant coverage.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 01:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is classic WP:A7 .  Should have been speedied.  The article has been made by the subject themself.  Jupitus Smart 19:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable, no significant coverage.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 06:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:Sigcov .  Maliner ( talk ) 07:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:N .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 09:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unable to locate credible sources that satisfy the criteria outlined in WP:GNG.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 12:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Themodmin: As always, companies are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as its own self-published Facebook posts, and shows no evidence of GNG-building coverage about it in reliable sources independent of itself.  Bearcat ( talk ) 23:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Companies , Technology , Software ,  and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - almost entirely sourced to itself, and that to Facebook.  Created by an SPA, likely with a COI.  It's an advert.  KJP1 ( talk ) 10:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  The only thing I could find that was anything approaching a third-party source was this from the Design Institute of San Diego, which is a link to Themodmin's YouTube tutorials, and and that doesn't meet the "significant coverage" requirement.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 17:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Fails GNG.   Could not find anything on Newspapers Extended.  BBQboffin ( talk ) 16:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Per BBQboffin .  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Concordia Lutheran Church (Swedish denomination): A cursory Google search doesn't turn up anything of note.  Graham ( talk ) 05:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Sweden .  Graham ( talk ) 05:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : doesn't meet the Wikipedia Notability guidelines, not enough coverage.  EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 14:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Internet search does not yield results that would qualify as WP:SIGCOV ; this fails WP:GNG .  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 02:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rashed Ahmed Rashed: My WP:BEFORE search in Arabic did not yield any examples of significant coverage.  I can find no evidence of meeting the current agreed guidelines - WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Honeygain: Previous article instances were speedy-deleted 3 times in 2020-1, after which an admin-only creation restriction was in force for one year.  This new instance was created on the 11th edit by a new user.  It references a couple of recent online articles about this firm's proposition and its sector: to my mind, it is promotional coverage falling short of what is required to demonstrate attained notability here, but given the history, I think it is worth bringing to AfD seeking a persisting decision.  AllyD ( talk ) 06:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Products ,  and Internet .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't think this meets WP:GNG / WP:NSOFT .  At best it could redirect somewhere, but it is a WP:ORPHAN , so, really, let's be frank : this is spam about an app that has next to zero real world impact.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete still appears PROMO.  I don't find much in RS talking about it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's all PR newswires, so PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maulvi family: Nothing found to support notability claims and the article itself includes references which make no mention of this family.  Individual members may be notable but not the family.  As per WP:BIOFAMILY , notability of even one person is not sufficient for the entire family being notable.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 16:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and India .  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 16:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 23 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Evaluation of references shows that not only they are unreliable but also unverifiable.  There is no significant coverage about the family in reliable sources to contemplate notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 20:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eddie Ellison: I'm not seeing any sources of him for passing notability.  Tails Wx 23:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tails Wx 23:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable detective that fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG , with no reliable sources on him.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 20:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Completely unsourced article about a person who had a job, which is claiming absolutely nothing that would make him "inherently" more notable than other people who had jobs.  I'll grant that since I don't have particularly good access to archived British media coverage from 15-20 years ago, it's remotely possible that he might actually have a stronger notability claim, and better reliable source support for it, than this shows — so I'm willing to reconsider this if somebody who does have access to the necessary resources can find enough to salvage it — but this, as written, is not up to a keepable standard at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yohann Tihoni: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SPORTBASIC .  I don't see substantive coverage in RS, only sites giving his bio or stats.  APK whisper in my ear 08:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A. K. Infradream Limited: Nothing found that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Found routine mill news articles, mentions, nothing showing this meets NCORP, or SIGCOV meeting GNG.  Remsense 诉 09:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above reasoning.  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 15:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] please educate me about GNG and NCORP.  Here i am only trying to cover details about a public company with available sources.  GrooveGalaxy ( talk ) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Feel free to read WP:GNG (our general notability guideline), and WP:NCORP (the extended notability guidelines regarding corporations).  Long story short, the subject does not appear to have substantial mention in reliable sources .  Remsense 诉 07:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly fails WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fox Kids (Australia): A WP:BEFORE search yielded no usable results either.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 08:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Actualcpscm , I tried to add more references to the article, and I also listed it on WP:RFU last week.  Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page ) 21:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Couldn't find any in-depth, independent third-party coverage.  TarnishedPath talk 10:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge relevant information into Fox Classics history section.  Happily888 ( talk ) 10:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 20:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Could not find coverage to meet GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 16:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I noticed @ Happily888 added 5 references to the article just now, so it now meets WP:GNG .  Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page ) 06:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fully 5 4 of the 7 references in the article are links from Foxtel.  TarnishedPath talk 07:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete