hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
SAPSAN: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Irtysh Air as both appear to be related.  Minor airline, fails notability criteria.  Geeraarts ( talk ) 00:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NORG, nothing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  I think this may be related to Irtysh Air, but I can't find a WP:RS for it.  What I did find was database style records that were very probably sourced from this Wikipedia article.  I found material (not showing notability) for a SAPSAN airlines in the Kyrgyz Republic.  [3] .  With the sourcing in and out of the article, I can't tell if there is a relationship.  If RS can be found showing a relationship to Irtysh Air I have no objection to a redirect.  // Timothy :: talk 19:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DXRV-TV: Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD ?  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anne-Kathrin Dern: Awards don't appear to sufficient for notability.  IgelRM ( talk ) 10:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Film ,  and Music .  IgelRM ( talk ) 10:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : blatant self-promotion, the page is essentially a resumé and the subject fails WP:COMPOSER notability guidelines.  InDimensional ( talk ) 16:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enensys Technologies: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : A French Wikipedia article was deleted in 2011 ( "Critères d'admissibilité non atteints" ).  AllyD ( talk ) 09:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The most substantial given reference is the 2018 Q&A with its founder (which contains information not in the present article about financial problems and restructuring during 2008-11).  Aside from that, searches find routine listing and announcement coverage, which is insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH .  A company going about its business, but I am not seeing evidence of attained encyclopaedic notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 09:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jim Polito: No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.  GuardianH ( talk ) 11:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG and also has clear WP:BLP concerns.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism , Radio ,  and Massachusetts .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Driveby comment: I cut out the stuff about firing for now due to BLP concerns.  Also, the links didn't work right so I deleted them.  Google News search turned up multiple hits but I did not have time to evaluate them: [15] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 18:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:37, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete His name appears in local (Massachusetts) newspapers but primarily as announcements of his shows and guests.  He does appear to still be at the station ( here ) but I have not found anything substantial and independent about him.  As someone with a radio show you expect his name to be found in listings, but that's all I find.  Lamona ( talk ) 18:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ewart Potgieter: I found a transactional announcement , as well as coverage of an alleged criminal incident in Spain ( 1 , 2 , etc.), but nothing substantial.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Think there's just about enough in the Spanish coverage combined with other bits for a weak WP:GNG pass.  No real suitable redirect per WP:ATD here though.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and ANYBIO.  The relevant SNG, WP:SPORTSPERSON requires at least once source which directly details the subject in RS.  Nothing but stats here.  BusterD ( talk ) 13:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no SIGCOV identified for this player.  Owen× ☎ 22:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roxanne Clements: I can't find any good sources beyond those in the article, and those are local sources, and I'd really like to find something of national prominence before I'd feel comfortable having an article.  It's always worth erring on the side of caution for BLPs.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Beauty pageants ,  and South Africa .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, thanks for taking the time to review the article.  She's been featured in Blue Monkey Magazines , PPMC Magazine issue 75 , and Randfontein Herald .  She also had a radio interview with Hotmix Fm.  JohnDoe46991 ( talk ) 22:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt - this is the article's third creation, having been previously speedy deleted twice on March 30, once by me.  The subject's claim to notability is winning a beauty pageant which itself does not appear to be notable: we have no article on it, and Googling it does not bring up any significant results.  The creator has previously asserted in a now-deleted edit, "The article is written about a person of interest in the local community. People want to learn more about this person."  This to me strongly suggests promotional intent, and given the subject matter, very likely undisclosed paid editing.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 22:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Winning a beauty pageant is notable.  There are hundreds of articles about beauty pageant winners.  Indicating that there's an interest does not show any promotional intent whatsoever and solely states the reason why the article was created.  After every deletion request the article was edited with the efforts to abide by the criteria.  41.216.201.244 ( talk ) 22:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not every beauty pageant is notable.  Winning a pageant no-one has heard of does not confer notability.  -- Random person no 362478479 ( talk ) 02:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt per above. // Timothy :: talk 08:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , salt.  Not notable. Uhai ( talk ) 05:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sign of notability. -- Random person no 362478479 ( talk ) 02:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find reliable sources.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 04:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of scholars of St Augustine: Most of the scholars in the list are redlinked, and Augustine is such a big name that I'm not convinced this list really adds much value.  Searching "List of scholars of" returns no other Church Father afforded this treatment.  Category:Augustine scholars provides a suitable navigational function for readers interested in scholars notable enough to justify standalone articles, while this article encourages WP:OR and WP:PROMO .  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 16:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , Religion , Academics and educators ,  and History .  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 16:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : concept unlikely notable enough to warrant a list, likely worth a category.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 17:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not a notable collection, and the list asis appears misconceived.  Does not meet WP:LISTN .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 19:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NLIST .  Remsense 诉 23:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm confused by the statement that Augustine is such a big name that I'm not convinced this list really adds much value .  Would a list make more sense for more obscure scholars?  Surely it is Augustine's bigness that would justify the list?  This list could be reworkd into an Augustinian studies article.  Srnec ( talk ) 14:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's rather that I think the list will perpetually be incomplete.  You can expect many Christian theologians to have at one time or another written on or extensively studied Augustine.  Augustianian studies would be an improvement, but I wonder if it's superfluous to the articles documented in the series Template:Augustinianism IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 17:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Also NOTDIR.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 11:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Dan: Has not played top professional level in Australia which is Super Rugby .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found these other articles (1) , and (2) but am still not convinced this person is notable Jack4576 ( talk ) 08:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is some coverage of him, but I don't think enough to pass GNG.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Albawings destinations: Fails WP:NOT , specifically WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  This is a complete and exhaustive listing of all the services offered by a business.  Also fails WP:CORP , as the only source cited is the company's own website.  A WP:BEFORE search uncovered nothing that could fix this, as, unsurprisingly, there is no significant coverage of all the destinations of a minor Albanian airline to be found (at least, not easily) in reliable, independent sources that meet the audience and independence requirements of WP:CORP .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and Albania .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:IINFO , these kinds of ephemeral lists are not really appropriate for Wikipedia.   Also, the RFC above recommends deleting these already.   -- Jayron 32 14:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator and per Jayron32.  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 01:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Proto-Dené–Caucasian language: Note that this is not to be confused with the Dené–Yeniseian languages , which is a plausible (and in my view likely) macrofamily that would represent a stunning cross-continental migration.  Even that family, which is not (quite/yet, depending on one's view of it) fully accepted, does not have its own proto-language as a separate article.  – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs ) 03:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs ) 03:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 03:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This has been addressed.  – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs ) 03:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , has always been a marginal theory and had zero effect on the mainstream. -- Ymblanter ( talk ) 07:19, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The main article meets WP:GNG for a fringe topic, but all spin-off articles are fringe-promoting by their very existence.  Also agree that the material is non-mergeable, since excessive in-universe detail in fringe articles produces undue weight.  – Austronesier ( talk ) 10:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Change to: delete Proto-Dené-Caucasian roots , redirect Proto-Dené–Caucasian language to Dené–Caucasian languages .  The title "Proto-Dené–Caucasian language" is a legitimate search term.  – Austronesier ( talk ) 21:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe instead of an article, the fringe theory could have a cited mention with an parent article.  Yuchitown ( talk ) 18:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) Yuchitown [ reply ] Delete this is the linguistics version of a geoscience article which presumes a flat earth as a given.  This is a sub-basement of fringe which has no evidence for it, and there’s a few of these article around that probably need to be AfDd.  Fails GNG and inherently PROFRINGE.  Warrenmck ( talk ) 18:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As per everyone else, this is WP:OR and WP:PROMO of WP:FRINGE .  Also support deletion of related articles as per User:Warrenmck 's recommendation.  Yuchitown ( talk ) 15:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC) Yuchitown [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Punjab De SuperChef: Donald D23 talk to me 21:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : before it grows articles for every season and every episode in every season, all based on tv scheduling and promo material.  // Timothy :: talk 19:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, no eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roberta Beach Jacobson: She has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, with a question over notability since 2006, so hopefully we can get this resolved now.  Previous AfD was 'keep' but that was in 2008 when our standards were significantly lower for inclusion.  Boleyn ( talk ) 12:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Her website comes up, then various links to buy her books.  Nothing about the person, no reviews of the books I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism ,  and Massachusetts .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I agree with Boleyn that this kind of promotional hagiography was a common keep at AfD back in the way -- without even looking at the previous one, I'm sure there were "Ooooo, look, she wrote a lot of books!!" answers -- but enough is enough.   The subject meets none of the provisions of BIO or GNG, there is not and never has been any proffering of reliable sources concerning her.   Time to clean this up.  Ravenswing 14:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - an IP editor removed reviews on 13 March 2023 [103] ( Globe & Mail archive version ; ABC AU archive version ).  These reviews discuss her contribution to Rite of Passage: Tales of Backpacking 'Round Europe , but on their own, do not support WP:AUTHOR or WP:BASIC notability. Other reviews removed by the IP editor on 13 March 2023 [104] seem to be not helpful for supporting notability (absolutewrite.com) or have limited information provided to help locate the review (The Journal of the Lincoln Heights Literary Society) for assessment. Beccaynr ( talk ) 19:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I also searched for sources and reviews online and at the Wikipedia Library. There were some results for her writing, but I have not found substantial independent and reliable secondary support for WP:AUTHOR or WP:BASIC notability. Beccaynr ( talk ) 19:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sierra Fellers: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete