hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Armed Forces Bowl broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; one is a dead link; four (a duplicate source of two articles), is about the BCS game in general, not just the broadcasting of this and one has a brief info about TV information and five of those (a single source), although a WP:PRIMARY , now a dead link.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per above nom.  I see no encyclopedic value or reason for this list.  Also, the editor who created it is now a blocked sock.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 15:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anastacia Brice : Kpg jhp jm 04:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not meeting GNG, puffy sources, PR pieces and flowery language.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  COI vanity or fanpage.  128.252.210.1 ( talk ) 17:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3971 : C messier ( talk ) 14:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 16:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : yet another galaxy that is in a bunch of catalog papers but not notable itself.  - Parejkoj ( talk ) 17:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Markus Nikolai : Cabrils ( talk ) 23:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nomination.  Worth noting, however, that the article content as we see it was not created by a blocked user, but much more recently by an IP editor.  (The page was originally a redirect.)  Bsoyka ( t • c • g ) 01:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete , he's got a lot of  mentions in RS, but none of it detailed.  The fact that he's in two definitely-notable bands makes me think there should be a profile of him somewhere in an offline source, but pending evidence of that I can't vote keep.  Mach61 ( talk ) 06:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability of this individual has nothing to do with that of their band(s).  dxneo ( talk ) 13:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or smerge (selectively merge) to Bigod 20 .  I would not oppose a merger of all three articles mentioned.  Maybe the closer can be bold .  The collective group is notable, but notability is not inherited .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Discogs, youtube, instagram, then down the non-notability rabbit hole.  Sourcing isn't much to begin with and I can't find any we'd be able to use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kurt Friedrich Gassner : TheLongTone ( talk ) 12:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Austria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra ( talk • contribs ) 14:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ney Mello : InDimensional ( talk ) 19:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music .  InDimensional ( talk ) 19:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Brazil and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Article has been through PROD.  Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 19:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only one source provided.  Nothing came up in Google.  RolandSimon ( talk ) 03:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  NN.  A google search reveals social media links.  Desertarun ( talk ) 19:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deyan Velkov : Darik News , Gong and Topsport were the best that I could find.  All of those are passing mentions of Velkov and do not demonstrate WP:SPORTBASIC #5.  No apparent active career and he last made a professional appearance almost 20 years ago so I see no reason to retain in draft.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 23:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Devokewater | (tαlk) 11:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerome Fernando (Prophet) : The bulk of the information is sourced from Fernando's own website, which is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia.  BoraVoro ( talk ) 06:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Sri Lanka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:ANYBIO - appears to have gained some notoriety based on a single event - can't see there being any long-term notability (smacks of WP:SELFPROMOTION ).  Dan arndt ( talk ) 03:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and for lack of WP:SIGCOV .  There are zero reliable sources.  Bearian ( talk ) 16:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - a run-of-the-mill pastor, who has caused one controversy.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 16:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mo Yaqub : Aside from the primary sources and routine coverage included in the article now, there is nothing more than routine transasctional coverage available online (e.g., [29] ).  There is simply no significant coverage available.  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article fails GNG, footballer only played for a few minutes.  A BEFORE search shows nothing significant.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 21:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Scotland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG, no relevant and significant coverage present online.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 08:48, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Acronis Files Connect : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT .  I'll add too that the creator of the article's contributions relate specifically to this company .  Dawnbails ( talk ) 16:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Dawnbails ( talk ) 16:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:GNG is not met.  Feels like advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TandyTRS80 ( talk • contribs ) 15:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: It's not the current state that matters.  It's inability to find almost anything to cite.  -- Yae4 ( talk ) 05:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete indeed.  Looked for sources on the web and in magazines, and it's not notable.  DFlhb ( talk ) 04:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Camp Roberts, Indiana : The oldest topos don't show it or the main buildings there; then it abruptly appears.  If someone could shed some moe light on this it would be helpful.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree there's no evidence this was ever an actual town or community.  On all the old maps I checked there was nothing of any significance at the site well into the 20th century [27] and modern maps show nothing there now except a few scattered residences near an unremarkable stretch of road.  [28] A 1930s plat map [29] indicates that tracts around the site were owned by the Roberts family, which presumably is the origin of the name, but I'm not sure how the spot came to be a named locality on later maps.  Seems safe to delete.  ╠╣uw [ talk ] 17:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not finding anything via ProQuest or Internet Archive either.  (Searched for "Camp Roberts" and "Indiana" together and got 141 hits on ProQuest, but they are all about Camp Roberts, California.)  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 10:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The brown county news papers have ~700 mentions of a community call Camp Roberts(some are for california), it has businesses but is never referred to as anything but a community or an area.  First mention is a lost dog in 1952.  It is not chronicled in [30] , and this newspaper clipping [31] sums it up nicely.  Look near the bottom of the first column.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ James.folsom Nice work proving "appears to have been a literal camp" was on the money.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 06:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above discussion James.folsom ( talk ) 23:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Granny (2017 video game) : Most sources here are primary; others, except for Common Sense Media , are of questionable reliability.  A WP:BEFORE search only yielded a Game Rant article, which is a Valnet content farm with also questionable reliability.  There are no critic reviews on Metacritic .  WritingAboutCreepypastas ( talk ) 03:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It simply does not seem notable.  The only RS review appears to be Common Sense Media.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 05:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per above.  killer bee 09:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to a dearth of reliable sources and/or reviews.  Steam and Google Play are not reliable sources.  The Newsweek walkthrough is also not considered reliable according to WP:RSPS , and the Common Sense Media source doesn't even appear to be an actual review.  The UsGamer source is thus the only reliable source with decent commentary, but it is a WP:GAMEGUIDE post and not one that provides critical commentary.  I took a look at the notability essay WP:NVIDEOGAMES , and it said that notable games typically have significant and detailed critical commentary, which judging by the lack of reviews this game does not have.  Another look at the WP:VGSE turned up nothing substantial either.  The Night Watch (talk) 00:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG , WP:BEFORE , WP:RSPS , WP:GAMEGUIDE , WP:NVIDEOGAMES , and WP:VGSE .  Videogameplayer99 ( talk ) 09:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2014 Albanian demonstrations in the Republic of Macedonia : Fails WP:NEVENTS and WP:NOTNEWS .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 06:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Albania ,  and North Macedonia .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 06:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:NOTNEWS .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom, and fails GNG due to lack of SIGCOV.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  The Albanian article doesn't help here.  Don't see a good option to re-direct, too.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cranes (drink) : A WP:BEFORE check only came up with this local news source, and nothing else other than the usual slew of promotional websites and posts.  Nick Moyes ( talk ) 13:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  Nick Moyes ( talk ) 13:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Henri Mata : I found this and this in Panorama but neither of them would be considered significant as they are mostly just long quotes from the player but with no meaningful third party content.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Holiday Bowl broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; is about a switch from ESPN, which should be in an article about the game itself, not a list of broadcasters.  Additionally, one is a YouTube video, one is about the BCS coverages in general, not just this and though all of those are about the games itself, the broadcasting gets a passing mention.  The rest is about the games itself, far less for the broadcasting of this game.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and California .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment You might as well mention relevant AfDs proposed that can seen on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/American football This is no part in trying to minimize your efforts but more so hope the effort is unionized across the board.  I want to imagine alternatives to deletion are possible before a deletion is ruled out.  A redirect back to the relevant bowl could suffice.  – The Grid ( talk ) 13:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tell me more, how is this done?  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 18:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 15:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Copyright on religious works : – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 07:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Religion .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 07:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I expected something sophisticated but there is nothing like that here.  Centralknights ( talk ) 09:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete OR or SYNTH, but it's not really discussed in sources I find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :   Agree with the nom and others above, a blantant violation of WP:OR / WP:SYNTH .  At best, a case of WP:TNT .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 20:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anthony Spadaccini : The two films wikilinked here were also created by the same promotional account and probably don't pass muster themselves.  Appears to fail WP:FILMMAKER .  ThaddeusSholto ( talk ) 19:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Delaware .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete