hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sopo FaKaua: Simione001 ( talk ) 01:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:GNG , only the last source passes WP:SIGCOV , and even that is debatable.  Couldn't find any other sources online.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 06:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kehshur Asgar Babai: Abadi are not notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Finn-Henry: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 02:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Canada .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 02:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lots of refs but they are from poor sources/tangential mentions.  Zero WP:SIGCOV from any quality source.  The article was created by an WP:SPA who made it and left.  Has WP:PROMO , likely also a WP:COI case.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 11:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I left a notice of this discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Climbing .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep (article author) meets WP:GNG.  Bronze medal at the 2017 IFSC Youth World Championships, medal at the North American Cup Series, has broken the Canadian national record twice, and some useful contributions as a researcher.  Enough to prove the notability.  Mulerd ( talk ) 19:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Even participated recently: Sport climbing at the 2023 Pan American Games – Men's speed .  Mulerd ( talk ) 19:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The vast bulk of all speed climbing athletes are non-notable (and hence have no WP:BLPs), including most of the World Men's Speen Champions and World Women's Speed Champions .   Michael Finn-Henry (who I suspect wrote his own BLP), is nowhere near being a World Speed Climbing Champion (not even in the top 20).  Regardless, to meet WP:GNG we must have some WP:SIGCOV in quality WP:RS (es), but he has none.  Sorry, but WP:TOOSOON at this moment in time.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) Aszx5000 ( talk ) 19:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Timothytyy ( talk ) 10:40, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks depth of coverage in reliable sources.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 05:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing a WP:GNG pass and his accomplishments don't merit a WP:BIO pass.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 22:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J.J. College of Arts and Science: My real namm ( 💬pros · ✏️cons ) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  People from the school were a part of several books (albeit endless passing mentions ) and the college's tryst with sports is documented (albeit passing mentions).  DareshMohan ( talk ) 06:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 18:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I just had citation bot go fix bare URLs, this article has been here for almost 7 years now.  My real namm ( 💬pros · ✏️cons ) 19:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Draftify at most.  Not notable and not enough WP:SIGCOV at this time to gather enough information to create a standalone article.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 09:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't pass WP:GNG as the basic.  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 14:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only a handful of WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS and no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS to qualify under WP:NORG .  As for the first commenter above, the "endless passing mentions" do not qualify the subject as notable.  They simply validate that the subject exists.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 18:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
方 (disambiguation): Remsense 诉 00:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Disambiguations .  Remsense 诉 00:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Don't see why this is necessary as the symbol is Chinese and this is the English wikipedia.  (Not putting transwikify as the Chinese wiki already has a disambiguation for this symbol.)  GrayStorm ( Talk | Contributions ) 01:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unnecessary disambiguation page.  We’re not Japanese wiki and it’s just a collection of random unrelated things that don’t have the character in their title.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Graystorm, this is English Wikipedia after all.  SchoolChromebookUser ( talk ) 15:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : If this is deleted, the hatnote at Radical 70 should be modified to link to Fang (surname) , as 方 would be a valid WP:RLOTE for the surname if the article about the radical did not exist.  — Mx.  Granger ( talk · contribs ) 16:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To be clear, there are valid redirects whose names are non-Latin script, and even disambiguation pages are okay as long as the terms require disambiguation.  But thjis is not one of those cases.  Remsense 诉 16:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Techi Tatra: An Indian source search gives us nothing more than database sources.  I found some sources in Google relating to futsal and football, more than I thought to be fair, but nothing that addresses Tatra in detail.  The Hindu mentions him once, same with Assam Tribune and Arunachal Times doesn't do any better.  Those were the best WP:RS that I could find.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and Arunachal Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lack of GNG-passing coverage.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BarBurrito Canada: Although there are many locations like the article says, there is not much media coverage showing why BarBurrito is actually notable.  Also, the affiliated American restaurant Burritobar isn't even notable enough and doesn't even have an article on Wikipedia.  747pilot ( talk ) 20:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Canada .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete - paid WP:PROMO article which is highly advertorial in nature, created by User:Shof19 (who at least admits accepting payment).  Sourcing fails WP:GNG / WP:NCORP and a google search returned a couple of fluff pieces in local outlets.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 08:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sourcing in the article is actually better than what I could find [1] , still nothing for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
VAX Killer: Provides nothing in the way of evidence that the phrase has been the subject of significant coverage in WP:RS , and instead provides a potted history of routine rivalry between commercial rivals, during which the phrase seems to have been occasionally used.  The article fails to demonstrate that the phrase was in any way of significance, despite the clear attempt to synthesise such significance through cherry-picking sources.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 20:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Computing .  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 20:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ AndyTheGrump , would you feel the same if the first sentence said " VAX killers were IBM products positioned to compete against DEC's VAX computer systems", rather than " VAX Killer was a marketing phrase"?  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 01:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No.  Firstly because it clearly was a marketing phrase, rather than any sort of product name or type description, and secondly because as the article states, the phrase was used to refer to Data General products, as well as those of IBM.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 01:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and possibly WP:NOTNEO .  Where's the beef?  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Incred Finance: I can't find sourcing in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and India .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 01:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep See [3] , [4] for the only GNG sources I found.  As ATD, perhaps redirect and merge to Anshu Jain Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 00:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just FYI, this is based entirely on a company announcement (same as this in moneycontrol.com and simalarly the India Times article also relies exclusively on an company announcement.  These fail WP:ORGIND .  HighKing ++ 15:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 15:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Left me with the impression of a non-notable business, given the web search.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I do not see WP:SIGCOV in independent WP:RS .  Fails WP:GNG , WP:NCORP .  Jacona ( talk ) 19:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Code For Change: Basically an advertisement for the event.  nirmal ( talk ) 11:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Nepal .  nirmal ( talk ) 11:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, i did some googling and found nothing even related,curretly checking history to check if it could be G11'd begocc questions?  14:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] History is also an advert.  begocc questions?  14:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  nirmal ( talk ) 01:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
George Omoraro: Does not meet WP:IS .  Nswix ( talk ) 12:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Nswix ( talk ) 12:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete More promo puff pieces and advertorials as sourcing, from Nigeria.  Getting an award from a church isn't notable, offering advice to the younger folks neither...  This is getting to be a chronic problem on wiki, just based on the amount of these we see in AfD.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] How does the fact that it comes , from Nigeria.  make it less usable?  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Zero evidence presented that the sources in question are paid.  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional sourcing and article.  Avilich ( talk ) 22:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Hasan Osama: Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 20:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors ,  and Islam .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO .  LocomotiveEngine ( talk ) 07:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Keystone Derby Cup: A self-published book was published about the cup but that does not contribute to notability [ [2] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Pennsylvania .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Floored nomination, this article is about a Cup, not a rivalry.  If nominator wants to address the notability that's a different question.  However, due to lacklustre nomination, I had a look at the article, but I shall say a rather weak keep, I could easily go the other way for delete, but there was enough citations and a tiny bit more online to suggest some notability, however mine is a very weak keep.  Govvy ( talk ) 15:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:39, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete rather than being pedantic on whether it's a rivalry or a cup series between 2 teams, we should instead be focusing on WP:GNG , which this cup does not meet.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 16:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghulam Mustafa Burdwani: Fails WP:N with no significant level of coverage.  Article contains a lot of Original Research .  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 14:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh , India and Islam .  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 14:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] .  Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  RomanRaju ( talk ) 10:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom does not meet GNG.  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 01:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as the two participants just registered their accounts and sped here.  So, I'd welcome more opinions especially if there is a feasible ATD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep He is very old Muslim Scholar, whose names are recorded in the old books of Urdu.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 15:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  It would be helpful to get an assessment of newly added sources.  By the way, this AFD was not set up properly, the article was never tagged with an AFD tag until a bot eventually did.  Please review AFD instructions, nominator.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Half•alive on Tour: Particleshow22 ( talk ) 01:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 23 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  ULPS ( talk • contribs ) 16:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No independent coverage found.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable, unreferenced tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:NTOUR .  Aspects ( talk ) 01:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete