hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Skylab Radio : All the coverage I can find is for an unrelated Australian internet radio station, and even that is pretty thin (passing mentions etc).  The links in the article are either primary sources, passing mentions or directory entries on sites that list radio stations that WP:EXIST .  The article is cleverly written, at first glance it looks like Slate (magazine) has written about the station, but on closer reading it's a general description of "chill out music".  I just don't think this makes the cut.  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United Kingdom .  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree as per nom.  According to article and official website, it is not even based in a studio, it loads up enough music tracks to fill the day on their computer and mostly stream to internet based servers.  It vaguely mentions two areas it streams to in DAB format, I happen to live near one of the areas and could not pick up the broadcast.  I would agree I don't think it meets WP:GNG .  Equine-man ( talk ) 08:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of sourcing, the Slate article looks promising, but it's a brief mention.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Japan : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, all of the sources are primary sources, are nothing but announcements and does not assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Australia .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTTVGUIDE covers this explicitly BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree, no suggestion that the ‘group’ is notable, and no suggestion individual listings are notable.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Spinifex&Sand ( talk ) 03:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
As Live As It Gets Tour : Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Events ,  and Europe .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable tour that fails WP:GNG and WP:NTOUR .  Aspects ( talk ) 03:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non Notable tour fails WP:GNG and WP:NTOUR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of battles in medieval India : Follow-up to List of battles in Albania List of battles in Algeria List of battles in Belgium List of battles in Croatia .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 20:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and India .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 20:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Poorly written article with no sources cited and it only has "three battles" in the list.  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 05:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  No sources on the page.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete List of wars involving India already has all essential ones.  Abhishek0831996 ( talk ) 17:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete has no references which Wikipedia requires.  Catfurball ( talk ) 21:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - poorly defined list with zero references at all .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep but populate This might have been a useful navigation tool, as it could provide brief details, which a category cannot.   Being unsourced is not an objection, since the linked articles will (or should) have references.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 17:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Casamassa : He did get some minor notability for his role in Mortal Kombat but that is his only major acting role.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 17:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Martial arts ,  and Pennsylvania .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 17:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Stunt Vampire in Blade and uncredited tournament guest in the Karate Kid?  These are not notable roles.  Rest are about the same level.  No sourcing for this stuntvamp.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Forgot this article was still around.  Like many other '90s Mortal Kombat -associated actors, no longer meets notability requirements.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 17:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom Lethweimaster ( talk ) 08:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Broken Dolls : Article is unsourced, and I am unable to find any solid sources or any WP:SIGCOV of this band.  Was previously nominated for deletion in 2005 and kept, but obviously a lot has changed in the guidelines since then.  Streetlampguy301 ( talk ) 15:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Streetlampguy301 ( talk ) 15:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found for this band, all I get are hits for an episode of Arrow with the same name.  Unsourced article here and I doubt it ever met notability standards here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This strikes me as PR for a garage band.  Plus, it's full of peacock terms (e.g., "Their album ... was released ... to rapturous reviews and excellent support"). -- Gen. Quon [Talk] 21:14, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Taylor Wilsdon : I can't find mentions of him outside of various court cases.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I find nothing beyond the sources in the article, none of which establish notability: links to his court cases, and promotional reviews on justia.com.  I note that the article was created by an SPA.  I suspect COI.  Lamona ( talk ) 21:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  I did not find significant coverage in my searches for sources.  The subject does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline .  Cunard ( talk ) 08:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zak Thompson : BLPPROD was contested by adding a single piece of non-independent, primary coverage that contributes nothing to SIGCOV.  The sources available online are almost entirely from his college, its conference or his clubs - none of which are independent of the subject.  The secondary coverage is entirely routine/trivial stuff like match reports and a Baltimore Sun piece that barely touches on him.  He's been named to conference teams of the week by Collegesoccernews.com but its trivial coverage.  Jogurney ( talk ) 18:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A piece on him here from The Boston Globe .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - PDL players are generally not going to have the in-depth coverage required to meet GNG, and this is no exception.  Sounder Bruce 08:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 21:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Omari : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : In the shadow of our cherished 'SIGCOV', I stand somber, yet obedient.  The sphere's toll, an Afghan booter of note, is lamentably exiguous.  Our commitment to policy, albeit staunch, unwittingly casts a pall over the Global South - an affront to our quest for universal enlightenment.  This inadvertent bias, a silent saboteur, gnaws at our noble mission.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unless there is a redirect target.  There should be a list of national low capped players for these know.  Govvy ( talk ) 22:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frank Melloul : They have uploaded a high-resolution picture of the journalist, the article itself seems to lack objective and comprehensive content about the journalist.  Instead, the focus appears to be primarily on their nomination as the head of the channel, rather than providing a well-rounded sources about their career or accomplishments.  Riad Salih ( talk ) 14:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as mentioned below.  Riad Salih ( talk ) 14:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 14:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , News media , Politics , France ,  and Switzerland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no enough sources.  Panam2014 ( talk ) 18:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  I generally don't challenge opinions in an AFD discussion, but I don't think "no enough sources" is valid here.  The sources might be passing mentions and not sufficient to establish GNG but there are quite a few present in this article.  Relisting in hope of a more serious review of sources present in the article and others that might be present online.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz The sources in the article are duplicated, featuring the same articles multiple times for his nomination in I24.  Additionally, the picture added has been directly taken from the channel and the same user upload it, Furthermore, in the French Wikipedia, he deliberately avoids disclosing whether he receives payment for these contributions or works there.  It should be noted that the user has been creating articles about all the staff of I24 News.  Riad Salih ( talk ) 00:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] These are sources that do not constitute sources focused/centered on his biography.  These are either unfocused information or simple press dispatches Panam2014 ( talk ) 00:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cerebra (charity) : Most of the sources that I can find also seem to be written by the organization or people connected with it.  Overall, there don't seem to be any independent sources with significant coverage .  Ships & Space ( Edits ) 02:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Psychiatry .  Ships & Space ( Edits ) 02:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Holiday Snapshots : JJLiu112 ( talk ) 19:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and United Kingdom .  JJLiu112 ( talk ) 19:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found no refs when searching for "Holiday Snapshots"+"david hamilton" The article says it's banned in New Zealand because of child pornography issues but there's no ref in the article to back that up.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I was unable to find significant coverage.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aleeze Nasser : I tried evaluating it based on WP:GNG, but there's not enough coverage to pass that either.  AUTOBIO by Aleeze nasser ( talk · contribs ) — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 13:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 13:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Clear case of an unsourced bio.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 14:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not a WP:NACTOR .  Plus not much available on Google search as well.  Sameeerrr ( talk ) 16:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kehinde Ipaye : Almost all the sources if not all were about his company which are too not notable per WP: ORG .  No way yet for meeting GNG.  Fails business people guideline for notability.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 14:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 14:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and per nominator.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael J. Fitzgerald (writer) : Self-promo article, no independent sigcov provided to establish notability.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 00:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Technology , Computing , Internet , Oregon ,  and Utah .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough.  The article does seem like an advertisement.  The sources used are from personal website as well.  killer bee 05:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:SPIP this is a self-biography.  See User talk:Mjf2009 - it was noted by multiple editors at the time.   The user did not respond, and the article was never deleted.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kieran Kentish : No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No SIGCOV.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 21:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete