hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Philip Shelby: Fails the general and author-specific notability policies.  Possible redir to Covert-One series .  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Confusingly organized list of work, needs cleanup, article needs expansion.  But, seems to meet WP:CREATIVE both through authorship of notable books from the 1990s that are missing articles including This Far from Paradise and Days of Drums , and Last Rights (book) , not to mention the book with Robert Ludlum; as well as more recently as a screenwriter of Mechanic: Resurrection and Survivor (film) .   Might also meet WP:BASIC we have an in-depth profile, [2] , plus many book reviews, many of which have smaller amounts of SIGCOV about the subject.  — siro χ o 19:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There are lots of book reviews coming up in the Ebsco search, sufficient to meet WP:AUTHOR.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 02:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article is poorly formatted and in need of serious cleanup but the article meets GNG guidelines and should not be deleted.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 10:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Sports broadcasting contracts in the Netherlands: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, all of the sources are primary sources, are nothing but announcements and does not assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Netherlands .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTTVGUIDE covers this explicitly BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Further comment Per advice by Conyo14 , I wish to close this nomination to repackage them into a single nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Serbia to make it convient for editors.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tanglewood Music Festival: Suggest to redirect/merge to Tanglewood .  Yinglong999 ( talk ) 07:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 07:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 07:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Events ,  and Massachusetts .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge is fine.  I can't find much for this listing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - It would take work, but the Tanglewood facility and the music festival are indeed different concepts and there would be benefits to having them separate.  We already have Tanglewood Music Center as a separte article, which covers the summer academy as an event.  - Fuzheado | Talk 18:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Addendum – the article for the music festival exists for five other languages: es, fr, ja, pt, ru.  - Fuzheado | Talk 18:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 16:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep a Google book search shows a great amount of Un-depth coverage in reliable independent sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ant Raid: Article failed a PROD in 2020, but has not been edited since.  The game has been subject to Metacritic reviews [32] but the Touch Arcade review is the only reliable source.  A light WP:BEFORE does not seem to yield anything patently reliable at first glance.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with the above explanation, one good review, one iffy/short review.  I can only find Raid (the bug spray to kill ants).  Not meeting notability requirements.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Gamezebo , TouchArcade and Slide to Play are all listed as reliable in WP:VG/S .  148Apps is situational.  It would seem simply from an overview of Metacritic that the game is just barely notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   The 8 reviews on Metacritic are surely sufficient to flesh this stub out.  SnowFire ( talk ) 00:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Inclusion of sources on Metacritic are not in themselves signs of reliability such as under WP:VG/S , but as stated by @ Zxcvbnm above there are enough that do to satisfy GNG.  I'm happy to withdraw the nomination at this point.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 05:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above; nomination has been withdrawn.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 17:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Olympics on CBS commentators: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced and dead links, these consists of WP:PRIMARY , staff rosters and announcements, some being nothing more than a guide; barely much to help this list to assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 19:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympics on NBC commentators SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 06:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Olympics ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 19:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : WP:LISTN appears to be met with the 4th source in the article, combined with [ [7] ] and [ [8] ] describing the commentators as a group.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : As of now, about 43 sources have just been added.  The hosts section and the 1998 Winter Olympics section as for intents and purposes been extensively covered and referenced, as well as the 1960 Winter Games.  This article should be at the very least, merged with the main CBS Olympics broadcasts article as a secondary option.  BornonJune8 ( talk ) 10:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete per nom, I found the same sources as Let'sRun, but they mirror a WP:ROUTINE news source/press release than significant coverage, plus the rest of the list is just WP:OR anyways.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 16:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : "An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable."  The editor that seems to be spending their entire time on wikipedia recently trying to remove pages on TV broadcasts should try reading the article which they cite, which I quoted from.   These broadcast articles contain primarily historical information, they do not read like a TV guide "forthcoming Olympics broadcast on CBS on July 27 at 8pm", etc. would be a TV guide.  Tennishistory1877 ( talk ) 20:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Isle of Wight Garlic Festival: No WP:SIGCOV references, so fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Events ,  and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , seems to have some coverage in the Isle of Wight press, [13] .  Few other mentions here [14] and [15] and here [16] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Newchurch, Isle of Wight .  Preliminary spinout from the community article.  Per sources identified, the topic is notable, just creates excessive fragmentation.  The rationale of this nomination defies WP:NEXIST .  gidonb ( talk ) 07:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Agreed with Oaktree b.   Many articles in the regional IoW press on this festival - and also coverage in national press, with further articles such as [17] and [18] and [19] and [20] .  Resonant Dis tor tion 22:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sources found above seem to demonstrate GNG.  Not fundamentally opposed to a full merge as recommended above, if it can improve things for both subjects per WP:NOPAGE .   — siro χ o 06:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep notable event with RS WP:NEXIST Lightburst ( talk ) 20:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
1802 in Ukraine: Not significant enough for its own article.  BangJan1999 17:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Ukraine .  BangJan1999 17:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and add some of the notable people and things listed in the corresponding Ukrainian article at uk:1802 в Україні .  I feel really frustrated with nominations like this.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 18:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And the "someone without their own article", Józef Bohdan Zaleski , already has an article in the English Wikipedia and several other languages.  The nominator might want to withdraw this nomination.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 18:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I fixed the link to the Template:Years_in_Ukraine this a common thing for nations to have.  Józef Bohdan Zaleski has their own article confirming where and when they were born.  D r e a m Focus 03:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - common for nations to have this type of article.   Now that the links have been fixed, the page is working and can be expanded.  Onel 5969 TT me 09:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Famiclone: A lot of cruft that few people in the general public that the encyclopedia serves would be interested in it.  Grandmaster Huon ( talk ) 03:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The nominator's statement suggests that they're attempting to open a merge request , for which AfD is not a proper venue.  Apart from this, a deletion discussion is closed based on a determination of the notability of the subject, not whether it is interesting ; there are somewhere north of a hundred sources here which seem to militate against deletion.  jp × g 08:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , GNG — siro χ o 09:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This article has 122 citations, many of them from reliable sources both domestic and international, with quite a few of them talking about the decades-long history of Famiclones at length.  It is very clearly notable.  FlotillaFlotsam ( talk ) 11:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Clearly notable and GNG passing article.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 11:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Derek Webster (actor): All sources are passing mentions, so fail WP:SIGCOV and hence WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: @ UtherSRG In my talk page, another editor suggested that the notability was established after the previous AfD.  I suggest viewing my talk page to see better their arguments.  Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk ) 🇮🇹 15:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Randy Kryn You're invited to participate.  Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk ) 🇮🇹 15:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Its advisable if you provide the diffs.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 20:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Has multiple significant roles, famous actor, which makes him notable.  Is main cast member on Mayor of Kingstown, had prominent roles on NCIS and 9-1-1.  Has numerous TV roles.  Was also in famous films like Independence BilboBeggins ( talk ) 16:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This article about him from Looper is particularly helpful in establishing notability.  "Why Dr. Hudson From CSI: Vegas Looks So Familiar"  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , there is no comparison to his acting career as it was in 2017 and how it has progressed since.  Easily meets GNG, per his sourced acting resume since the last AfD in 2017.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 23:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I agree with Eastmain that that Looper article is good coverage.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 00:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
MicroSIP: Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It has limited media coverage, but I'm not sure how much the media would cover something so esoteric.  There is robust discussion about it (which indicates wide usage) on platforms like reddit and Youtube. --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  I'm seeing a respectable amount of discussion in academic papers (e.g. here )— Moriwen ( talk ) 15:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep it's got decent industry adoption, as evidenced by several scholarly articles, as well as a very large number of how-to's.  it's kinda esoteric, but still notable.  -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 20:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Henrik Karlsson (musicologist): Clear friend a 💬 22:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Bands and musicians ,  and Sweden .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Probably meets WP:AUTHOR , I easily found several reviews of his 2013 book.  Quickly added them, though several are paywalled.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I'd like to see more than one book for WP:AUTHOR but Royal Swedish Academy of Music might be a pass of WP:PROF#C3 .  It depends on whether it is for music scholarship (likely in his case) or performance (also prestigious but not really academic notability).  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also ping Mscuthbert as our in-house music scholarship expert.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- my sense is that the membership in Royal Swedish Academy of Music would be a WP:PROF#C3 qualification (membership in a very rigorously chosen and prestigious academic society).   There are four academics (or five if the society director is included) in the list of 177 current members, among 800ish since the founding in the 1770s, suggesting that at least one society considers him among the top handful of music academics in Sweden.   I don't personally know his work, but I haven't really studied Swedish music history, which is his specialty.   But he is the author of the plurality(? majority?) of the articles on Swedish music in the New Grove 2001 encyclopedia, meaning he had enough reputation by then to be a significant authority.   I think that to the extent that the Academy does appoint researchers as members, it is in that capacity an academic institution; the American Academy of Arts and Sciences appoints some non-academic musicians and screen actors as well, but its appointments of academics are considered as WP:PROF#C3.   (I was convinced of a Keep before I looked at WP's coverage of Swedish academics in music.  A delete here would be 20% of the living people in the category).   -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (And thanks for the Ping David Eppstein !) -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep it certainly seems that NACADEMIC is met.  Niafied ( talk ) 04:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Mike Blackburn (businessperson): I think this is a case of WP:NOTMEMORIAL .  If sources meeting WP:IS , WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, no objection to Drafting until it is ready for mainspace.  // Timothy :: talk 10:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weakish Keep , this is an article clearly re-written from an obituary, but the man himself is probably notable as the CEO of two of the UK's largest financial institutions.  The obituary is from the Times, so it's quite a heavy indicator of notability on its own.  But more sources about his career could be added, for example [41] , rather less favourable [42] , or a pay-wall source that seems to include discussion of him [43] as well as copious passing mentions of which this Guardian piece is typical [44] .  Elemimele ( talk ) 12:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Elemimele.  Commander of the Royal Victorian Order , CEO of two major building societies of the UK, coverage in all major newspapers of the UK.  I've added additional references.  This is not an attempt to memorize anyone – hasty nomination IMHO.  Burthert ( talk ) 17:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The CVO passes WP:ANYBIO #1.  And an obituary in The Times is also always seen as notable.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Niftski: ltb d l ( talk ) 08:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and United States of America .  ltb d l ( talk ) 08:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm not at this moment certain of notability, but I do not think that BLP1E applies?  It seems that there are multiple events covered over several years.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 09:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Snow keep Invalid rationale.  There are sources ranging from 2021 to 2023 covering different events related to Niftski.  It's clearly not a case of BLP1E.  Skyshifter talk 10:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Article creator here, subject meets WP:BASIC with sources currently present in the article, BLP1E does not apply.  — siro χ o 11:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep