hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha: Lacks credible coverage to verify and pass WP:GNG criteria.  Aronitz ( talk ) 11:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I've spent more time than I'd like looking at this page; I came to it after seeing it at DYK.  While the bare bones of the content is supported by a source, it isn't a very strong source, and as I've said at ANI previously there are serious sourcing issues with most of the content the author has produced.  At this point I'm fairly certain that the phenomenon is a manufactured one; the temples are real, of course, but if there's a documented link between them that's been given this name, I'm struggling to find evidence of it.  TL;DR: there isn't substantive coverage of this phenomenon by name in good sources.  Vanamonde ( Talk ) 12:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  This article is almost certainly a hoax.  No sources go into the subject in-depth, and very few sources even talk about the subject.  There's no evidence that he is related to any of those temples.  The article goes to talk about a legend, which fails WP:NOT and is obviously false.  The article goes more into detail about the temples than the subject.  I think this should be speedily deleted per G3 .  User Memer ( chat ) Tribs 15:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vadim Gurinov: Although the article has a lot of detailed information, it doesn't reference independent reliable sources to back up these claims.  Plus, very promotional tone as the article seems to describe Gurinov in a flattering light throughout.  LusikSnusik ( talk ) 08:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Russia .  Kpg jhp jm 09:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:33, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lyle Adams: Joeykai ( talk ) 13:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Finance ,  and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see any notability here, either in business or football.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Technology entrepreneur or footballer?!  [26] and [27] , all I could find.  Fails WP:GNG.  Gedaali ( talk ) 20:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Standard database management analysis: Created by now-blocked user.   Tagged for eight years as having no sources, and for seven years as having no content.   It is not clear to a database engineer what the topic or topics were supposed to be, but the titles of the empty sections seem to imply that was meant to promote a methodology.  Heymann criterion is for someone to figure out what if anything this was supposed to be within 7 days.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 18:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 18:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete surely a candidate for speedy deletion Orange sticker ( talk ) 10:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sulpice de Charroux: At present, all sources are genealogical in nature, tracing his family's ancestry and indicating that he did, in fact, exist and was likely the Count of La Marche.  However, there isn't significant coverage, and I cannot find anything that indicates Count of La Marche was a notable position.  We may need someone with more knowledge of French and medieval history to double check everything, though.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 22:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lloyd Koster: JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A bit of coverage, but I'm not sure enough to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lana Osiņina: All I found in my searches were passing mentions like this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jest (framework): It's part of series of articles on open-source Facebook software; it's basically stuff that made and backed (both financially and via ads) by corporation which is only well known in limited circles.  No need for a separate article.  AXO NOV (talk) ⚑ 15:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  AXO NOV (talk) ⚑ 15:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in independent sources.  A BEFORE search didn't turn up anything useable either.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 16:48, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perry Perlmutar: BD2412 T 05:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 05:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete This profile from Now Toronto [23] has a by-line.  Now Toronto was a reputable local entertainment free newspaper, but it's been turned into an online only one.  I think if we had one more source, we'd be ok. I can only find sourcing for various comedy festivals he's attended/performed at, one CBC Radio page where they host some of his material...  He's almost famous, but not there yet.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I couldn't see enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG .  Please ping me if good sources apart from Now Toronto are identified.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 18:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wretha Hanson: The attempted notability claim here is that she was an alternate vice-presidential candidate in one state for a minor fringe party's presidential campaign, which is not an automatic notability freebie -- it could get her an article if she were shown to actually pass WP:GNG for it, but it is in no way "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from GNG.  But there are just three improperly-formatted footnotes here, all of which are to primary or unreliable sources that are not support for notability at all, so she hasn't been shown to satisfy GNG.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me .  23:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't have independent sources.  Rustypenguin ( talk ) 17:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alfredo Larín: No WP:SIGCOV on the subject and I doubt if he meets WP:CREATIVE .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and El Salvador .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 07:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't find a single suitable source for the article.  Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk ) 00:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ty States: There are also a lack of sources regarding her.  747pilot ( talk ) 21:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Fashion ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find anything other than being tagged in 2008 photos about a relative.  Nfitz ( talk ) 23:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DBMail: Apparently was deleted back in 2006(!) as a PROD but said PROD was just contested and undeleted today?  Didn't even know you could do that.  But at the end of the day, the page hasn't been substantially improved at all, and if it wasn't sufficient in 2006, it sure isn't sufficient today.  Taking Out The Trash ( talk ) 00:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The argument at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#DBMail makes no case that a verifiable article from independent sources can be written.   It's just a technical challenge to a proposed deletion.  When it comes to independent sources , is

Discussion outcome: delete
Tan Yinglan: Blatant self-promo, no sign of independent sigcov.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 20:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This is currently written as a professional profile , but there is a bit of coverage in New Straits Times [1] [2] .  — siro χ o 21:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Edited to include more sources and independent coverage, open to suggestions on other sources to include.  Paujoqs97 ( talk ) 04:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-19/singapore-s-insignia-ventures-intensifies-push-into-healthtech , https://www.ft.com/content/8c484648-f4b7-11e9-a79c-bc9acae3b654 , https://www.reuters.com/technology/insignia-ventures-raises-516-mln-bets-southeast-asian-tech-firms-2022-08-01/ , https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/13/insignia-venture-partners-fund-25-million-yinglan-tan/ , but needs clean up and maybe just reduce it to a stub to remove WP:COI and WP:PROMO.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] marked as a stub Paujoqs97 ( talk ) 00:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : resume style promo BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  The refs above, like the refs in the article fail WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  The refs listed above are as good as it gets and none of them have SIGCOV.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 23:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Right now, I see no reliable sources that he is actually a billionaire, and as we know from DJT, it's easy to inflate the value of one's assets.  If he is actually a billionaire, there would be better sources.  Tagging DGG for input.  Bearian ( talk ) 01:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sal Sparace: In a WP:BEFORE search the only mention I can find of his name is in articles written by Sparace, about Sandro Paternostro.  He's worked on some notable shows as technical director, but on Wikipedia notability is not inherited.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Italy ,  and United Kingdom .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- Broc ( talk ) 15:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clive Strutt: UtherSRG (talk) 12:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CODE n: written like ad copy.  ltb d l ( talk ) 16:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  ltb d l ( talk ) 16:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Business .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Created by a user who is Working in corporate communications for GFT/CODE_n among others .  Exactly the type of article that WP:NCORP is intended to prevent.  Jfire ( talk ) 03:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hiltz Squared Media Group: Let'srun ( talk ) 04:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television , Companies ,  and Canada .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Little to zero references, not fulfilling WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not properly referenced as passing either WP:CORP criteria or WP:GNG , but simply existing is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt a company from having to pass CORP or GNG.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : a search showed up only passing mentions, not fulfilling CORPDEPTH .  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 16:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Owens (dog trainer): The only notability claim on offer here is that his book exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of WP:GNG -worthy coverage about it -- but the only "references" present here are directly affiliated primary sources that are not support for notability, with absolutely no evidence of GNG-worthy coverage shown at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per nom.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 20:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no independent or reliable sources.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - WP:BLP without any reliable sources ; run of the mill author .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Parvati kurakula: cannot find sources other than short bios in employment/database sites — Karnataka talk 21:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Journalism , News media ,  and India .  — Karnataka talk 21:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Cannot find any reliable secondary sources covering this writer.  Article seems awfully promotional.  pinktoebeans (talk) 21:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and seems like a ChatGPT generated content.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is ChatGPT generated, you can see their replies on my talk page for more details.  — Karnataka talk 10:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, noticed.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too many primary, unreliable sources, Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP: reliable sources Criteria , IssueWire as the first reference?  Bad sourcing!  This topic is in no way notable and doesn't show any significant coverage in a newspaper or online print media.  Frankymulls ( talk ) 12:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  AryKun ( talk ) 15:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete