hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Piero Ferrucci : No indication of notability (looks like it was created for promotional purposes).  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 22:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for PROMO.  I can't find mentions of this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Might have a shot at AUTHOR, but this needs a TNT.  I can find a few reviews of the books.  This but it's a brief mention [18] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Hildeoc ( talk ) 12:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Psychology ,  and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Sources that might help with WP:GNG either 404 or are just book reviews.  Can't find any myself online.  Kalethan ( talk ) 16:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks indepth sources fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ricardo George : For a player who made two international appearances for his country and started his club career in internet times, you might expect to come across WP:SIGCOV through a web search but I did not find anything close.  He therefore fails WP:GNG .  (Oh, by the way: the article was previously deleted after its first AfD .)  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 21:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 21:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have worked on this page for a bit before recognizing that it fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  I have done many searches, trying to find something on this player, and nothing at all of substance comes up.  Also, it was previously deleted in an AfD, recreated by the same editor who created it in the first place and approved the second time by a patroller who has since been struck with an indef ban.  Could this possibly be a WP:SALT situation?  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Liberia , England , Florida ,  and New Jersey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 07:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Ashby : Of the current sources, the first was written by the subject himself, and the second is a brief mention quoted from a press release.  A BEFORE check revealed some quotes and namedrops but little else.  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Finance , Law ,  and Politics .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; no claim to notability.  TJRC ( talk ) 02:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG as none of the cited sources cover the subject in depth. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV , WP:MILL , and my own standards for lawyers .  Yes he's been mentioned in two news articles, but that's not significant coverage.  Many, perhaps thousands, of lawyers are involved in politics.  He doesn't pass my standards for lawyers by a stretch.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Giovan Snyman : JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to be a case of WP:TOOSOON on my part, obviously would have past the old WP:NRU requirements.  Lots of coverage, but I'm not sure there's anything WP:GNG worthy in it, no suitable redirect per WP:ATD also.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Niddrie, Ontario : – dlthewave ☎ 04:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  This locale is notable only in relation to the railway that goes through this point.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ibrahim Osman Afrah : Definitely nothing suitable for a BLP, which their own works (as currently cited) are not.  Not for the whole article anyway.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Somalia .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Poetry .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unless someone finds something in Somali or with a different spelling of his name that I've missed.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE ... this looks like an autobiography to me, because there is nothing in any of the cited sources that confirms the subject's background, birth date, or height, and the photos are either taken from the subject's social media or the article creator claims them as his own work.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 21:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ziff (Book of Mormon) : Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 06:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is an article about a piece of trivia; created 20 years ago, it hasn't improved much then, and improvement isn't possible because there isn't a body of secondary sources with meaningful coverage to cite.  If there were Sunday School lessons, then there might be studies of its theological/cultural reception by the relevant religious community, but that's not the case.  Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits ) 06:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTDICT Speculation about one lone un-defined word found only twice in the Book of Mormon.  — Maile ( talk ) 12:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:SYNTH and WP:DICDEF .  This is not only a synthesis of original sources, but so short and lacking in context that it's a dictionary definition plus etymology.  We are neither .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per others above, this article does not establish notability.  It reads like a dictionary entry and has no claim to notability in the sources.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Bittersweet Constrain : Seems non-notable Charsaddian ( talk ) 16:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 16:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I can't find sources for this album, nor any kind of reviews online.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nominated the singer/artist as well, nothing seems notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of French Open broadcasters : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, all but one are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Tennis ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , I found [30] and [31] which may help.  21:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC) Esolo5002 ( talk ) Unfortunately, those wouldn't be of much help; the first source merely name-drops the broadcasters in passing which fails WP:SIGCOV , and the second one fails to mention the broadcasters at all.  Left guide ( talk ) 01:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I found direct in-depth coverage of French Open broadcasters in this source , but I don't know if it's reliable.  Left guide ( talk ) 01:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lala Dicko : All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2014 , 2016 , 2018 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mali women's national football team .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 08:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - coverage lacks the depth for GNG.  I oppose redirecting to the national team as she isn't even mentioned at that article so a redirect would only confuse the reader.  If someone creates List of Mali women's international footballers then that would be a suitable redirect target.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cook Islands Boy Scout Association : Alexeyevitch ( talk ) 04:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  Alexeyevitch ( talk ) 04:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Move the material to Scouts Aotearoa at least until there is much more material than there is now and do the same for Scouting in Niue and Scouting in Tokelau .  Bduke ( talk ) 04:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Scouting .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Despite this article being created 18 years ago, it has no sources (violating WP:OR ), and is only comprised of one singular sentence (making it a WP:STUB ).  Mjks28 ( talk ) 13:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have moved the material to Scouts Aotearoa as suggested above.  Bduke ( talk ) 23:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the (very little) information seems unreliable.  The connection to Scouts Aotearoa is unsourced; the World Organization of the Scout Movement describes the org as an "potential member" within the Council of South Pacific Scout Associations [18] .  -- jergen ( talk ) 18:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Răzvan Radu : Common name in Romanian, among others belonging to a footballer born in the same year .  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Romania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The only source in the article is a dead link, fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2017 Myanmar Futsal League : The only source that I can find about the season is a Blogspot post , which is not an acceptable source.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Hams That Couldn't Be Cured : Fails WP:V therefore not (yet) appropriate for main space 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Comics and animation .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : practically unreferenced, hence no evidence of notability, despite 5 months in the making and two AfC declines.  Already previously draftified (twice), so deletion is now the only option.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 09:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources, no claim of significance.  Os ari us 11:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - Unreferenced in its current form, and so fails verifiability , but sources almost certainly exist.   This belongs to a distinct sub-genre, which is Three Little Pigs parodies.   The author should be cautioned that another move to article space without sources will result in sanctions.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, films are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — they have to have notability claims that would pass WP:NFILM , and they have to have WP:GNG -worthy reliable source coverage about the film to verify that those notability claims are true.  But this demonstrates neither of those things — and it has already been draftified twice and the creator is simply moving it back into mainspace himself without listening to the reasons why it was declined at WP:CFD , so just redraftifying it again would be unproductive.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write a properly sourced article about it that actually contains a notability claim , but this ain't cutting it in this form.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  When deciding whether to issue a warning to an author, it makes sense to consider this AFD along with another: AFD:The Three Little Bass and the Big Bad Gar .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 15:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Konstantin Kotov (footballer) : No independent or significant coverage.  For example [14] is a routine transfer namecheck, this and similar articles are routine match reports , and this local news article just repeats information from databases.  Kges1901 ( talk ) 13:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  Kges1901 ( talk ) 13:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article about footballer who played for Zenit's reserves and then in the Belarussian top division.  I generally agree with the nominator's source analysis, however, I think the Sankt-Peterburgskie Vedomosti article is pretty good with a four-sentence recap of Kotov's career.  That said, I would need to see more to believe there is SIGCOV that satisfies WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Belize–Brazil relations : Interstellarity ( talk ) 15:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Belize ,  and Brazil .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacking third party coverage to have notable relations worthy of an article.  LibStar ( talk ) 08:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Totally innocuous.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to establish notability here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 19:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fabrizio Colonna (Malta) : I could not find enough sources to fulfill WP:GNG .  Broc ( talk ) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Malta .  Broc ( talk ) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of in depth coverage in reliable independent sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  He is from the "sovereign order", not the island nation of Malta.  Most other countries do not recognize this is an actual country.  It is more akin to the United Nations or the Red Cross.  I think there would be good reason to keep the leader, but not the receiver of donations and member dues.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete