hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Alex Waimora: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This isn't notable, still don't have WP:SIGCOV .  CastJared ( talk ) 10:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  〜 Festucalex • talk 21:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 19:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - refs added.  It would be helpful if people did WP:BEFORE before jumping to nominate. -- IdiotSavant ( talk ) 04:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , passes GNG with refs added.-- Ortizesp ( talk ) 04:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting after article additions (for review) Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The "Change Maker" Sol Star piece is mostly a low-quality interview, with ~8 sentences by the interviewer that are arguably independent.  It's better than the other sources , but still hardly substantial.  Every single other source is either trivial or non-independent.  That is nowhere close to meeting GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 17:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - @ GiantSnowman : , Per above.  Clearly significant figure in Solomon football.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 01:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As Joelle says, one decent source is not enough.  Giant Snowman 07:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Musa Herdem: Nswix ( talk ) 21:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I have added more sources to the page, including links to pages for two films which featured the subject as the main subject of the film.  I think this certainly counts as 'significant coverage'.  Jwslubbock ( talk ) 14:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 18:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Merge/Redirect into Siege of Kobanî , this is insignificant based on WP:ONEEVENT compared to the siege overall.  Tirishan ( talk ) 21:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Keep, delete, or merge?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 13:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC) (striking duplicate vote L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Keep His life is represented not just his role in the siege, I don’t see how anyone would want this to be deleted on a genuine merit, it’s history and people like to use Wikipedia to read about history Bobisland ( talk ) 22:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect per Tirishan .  The BInsider reference [12] has some depth but insignificant based on WP:ONEEVENT .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JunitaWorker ( talk • contribs ) 18:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Still no consensus here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Brief mention here [13] .  Nothing else found.  appears perhaps to be a memorial page, which wiki is not.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom WP:NOTNEWS and WP:ONEEVENT applies.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 05:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:ONEEVENT .  Maliner ( talk ) 07:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dressing down: The article consists of the two meanings of the phrase.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 03:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Military ,  and Fashion .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDICT .   Also, I can't imagine any sources exist talking about this particular phrase.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 13:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emily Peachey: She's been in a few well-known productions, but not in starring roles.  -- Mike 🗩 19:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  -- Mike 🗩 19:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Virginia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Appears to have moved to Broadway [1] , but that's all I find for sourcing.  Delete unless we can find a few more decent sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Fault in our Stars role she had appears to be a minor role also, likely not meeting ACTOR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Maybe someday, but not enough significant RS news coverage to merit an article at this time.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 10:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle for Mospyne: [15] This version is an almost identical translation of the Ukrainian Wikipedia article uk:Бій під Моспиним , albeit with less attention given to the sourcing, some examples of poor translation and even some factual errors.  As this isn't substantially different from the earlier (now merged and redirected) article, and I'd argue even represents a downgrade in quality, I'm nominating this article for deletion.  Grnrchst ( talk ) 14:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Russia ,  and Ukraine .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 14:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom's arguments.  Tehonk ( talk ) 08:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Radical, North Carolina: (This may have been one of the minor "locale" entries that have been purged from the database.)  There is certainly a Radical Road in the vicinity of the location indicated by the coordinates, but I'm not seeing the place labeled on any maps.  References 2 and 3 are just entries in lists, and I'm not finding any substantive coverage elsewhere.  Fails WP:GEOLAND , methinks.  Deor ( talk ) 17:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and North Carolina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Not finding anything for this beyond the post office.  Mangoe ( talk ) 06:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - William S. Powell's 1976 The North Carolina Gazetteer: A Dictionary of Tar Heel Places describes it as "community in n Wilkes County between Chestnut and Herald Mountains".  Using newspapers.com I can find some passing mentions of this variety , but its quite clear this is an insignificant place.  NGEO states that "Populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the GNG" and I do not see GNG being met.  - Indy beetle ( talk ) 09:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : For what it is worth, Radical does appear on the 1913 Rand McNally atlas of North Carolina [4] (found via this article ).   It also appears on recent NC Department of Transportation maps, albeit along with many other tiny place names we don't have coverage on.  [5] Seems clear it was a rural community identified by/with its post office.    I also see Wilkes County was named after John Wilkes which even our article calls a radical in the first sentence, apparently as a reference to a political movement of his time, so seems like the source of the name. -- Milowent • has spoken 19:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My guess was that it had to do with Radical Republicans of the Reconstruction era.  - Indy beetle ( talk ) 21:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] State road maps have not proven to be a particularly reliable source, particularly in this case when the map is more about road construction than giving directions.  I also looked into the PO business a bit further and found this listing which shows it as a 4th class office, indicating that their wasn't a separate facility and that the office was in someone's store or house or the like.  Mangoe ( talk ) 05:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's no doubt the place name exists and was in existence to describe a rural area, but I've not jumped to saying it meets GNG. -- Milowent • has spoken 21:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Career Preparation Center: Dicklyon ( talk ) 23:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Dicklyon ( talk ) 23:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Michigan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - generally an article on a vocational support facility like this would be made a redirect to the school district or RESA that manages it as an ATD, but the extremely generic title seems to fail our rules for article titles.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 14:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above IP comment, my standards for schools , and WP:SIGCOV .  I don't strongly oppose a redirect to Warren Consolidated Schools , but it might cause confusion to our core readership.  Bearian ( talk ) 13:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Not sure a redirect is appropriate due to the generic title.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claims to notability that I can tell.  CrocodileUnderling ( talk ) 22:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing WP:GNG Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tony Dyer: None of the offices the subject occupies/occupied can make them inherently notable under NPOL.  GNG is not passable as there are insufficient sources.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 09:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 11:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Minimal coverage for the city position, simply standing as a candidate isn't notable enough for here.  Not meeting notability, I can't find anything beyond confirmation of the city position.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Don't meet WP:NPOL .  Unverifiable contents.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  15:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nyota, The Peacemaker: All other mentions seem to point to this page.  Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NB .  Given the edit history, suspect this was self-advertising from 2011 created by an editor who had an undisclosed conflict of interest.  Waterfelt ( talk ) 03:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find anything about this comic.  This very discussion is now one of the highest-ranking search results, and all other pages about the comic just copied their text from Wikipedia.  Cortador ( talk ) 06:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable comic, and article has remained unsourced since its creation in 2011.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 23:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kyran Lacy: No non-routine coverage.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 08:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Hong Kong .  Fermiboson ( talk ) 08:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect either at this stage.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Author contests deletion on talk page .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Tried to find sources in Google, but couldn't, fails WP:SIGCOV .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adrian Flannelly: I found only one other reliable source, from Mayo County Council https://www.mayo.ie/en-ie/home-to-mayo-2022/ambassadors/adrian-flannelly -- but that doesn't seem independent.  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs ) 10:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Brown HairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs ) 10:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that the creator of this article is Pdflannelly

Discussion outcome: delete
FK Bosna 92 Örebro: Modest history peaking on the 5th tier.  (They are now on the 6th.)  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Project Starfighter: Looking at the past AfD, the sources found were largely trivial coverage or unreliable coverage, including forum posts.  As the article stands, it is largely supported by self-published sources or unreliable sources, with the only exception being the Maximum PC link.  If someone can save it, I'd be more than happy to see that.  Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 07:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very poorly sourced and no evident WP:RS out there with full reviews.  The original creator didn't seem very concerned about whether it was notable, at least.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete couldn't find reliable sources to meet basic policies of WP:RS / WP:V / WP:OR / WP:N .  Wikipedia is built from reliable third-party sources.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 04:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , only RS is this short Maximum PC listing: [12] -- Mika1h ( talk ) 12:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails notability Blitzfan51 the manager 15:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sohag Jol: Sohom ( talk ) 20:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A WP:COI -problem is also possible.  This article reads as work from the marketing department desperately looking for sources.  The Banner talk 22:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I have improved the page by adding more reliable sources.And these sources clearly passes WP:NTV and WP:GNG with sufficient WP:RS .  So there is no question of deletion.  Nilpriyo ( talk ) 10:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You have changed not a letter since the nomination...  The Banner talk 08:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : significant coverage in Aaj Tak Bangla and TOI ; if sources are not judged sufficient,redirect to Zee Bangla#Drama series 2 - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Setting aside the COI and SPI issue, all of the references fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  Not a single one has a byline that shows it is written by anyone on staff which indicates churnalism or sponsored post. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Notable television series and clearly passes WP:GNG and and WP:NTV coverage.  103.121.36.100 ( talk ) 03:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Note to closer - As expected, IP address part of the SPI related to this page shows up to vote.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 09:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also note associated SPI . -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Take Back the Sun: Clearly WP:SELFPROMOTION of a local cover band by an undeclared WP:COI .  PROD notice removed by article's creator without addressing issues.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 01:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Wisconsin .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 01:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , the article's creator has a significant undeclared conflict of interest, in that they have previously stated they are a " Member of Take Back the Sun, a Rock band located in southern Wisconsin. " (see [46] ).  Dan arndt ( talk ) 00:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - perhaps just too soon, but I'm not seeing more than a handful of local references.  We need more sources and sources for a wider geographic region.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2022 As-Suwayda clashes: Ecrusized ( talk ) 13:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete