hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Anders Holmer: No evidence page passes WP:AUTHOR --being nominated for an award does not garner assumed notability. WikiLibrary search did not return any WP:RS . Cabrils ( talk ) 05:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , a simple google search reveals several book reviews in WP:RS : [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] . Geschichte ( talk ) 10:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Authors , Visual arts ,  and Sweden . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep . Geschichte's sources are all good, but they're short. It's too early in his career for more substantial coverage. But when I was looking for more, I found that at least one of his books have been translated into English. Here are its reviews in Kirkus [33] and PW [34] . I'm confident there will be more. But because it's children's literature, I'm also confident they'll be short. -- asilvering ( talk ) 12:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep nominee for both the August Prize and the Beskow Plaquette, with substantial coverage in mainstream Swedish press.  The article is weak, but notability is not a problem, not nearly.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 13:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Brief reviews as given in a few other comments have been found, but we have more than enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think this passes "has won significant critical attention".  / Julle ( talk ) 17:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Clear pass of GNG, while not respecting NAUTHOR.  Substantial sources found on Google worth adding onto the article.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 18:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:BIO.  And WP:GNG.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 14:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Chinna (art director): Copious tone and copyediting issues.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 20:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 20:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  See this (Note, August 2): See comment below)(which raises a massive copyright violation issue but there was no need, I thought, to flag yet another issue ... a big cleanup would be necessary) or this .  Various articles on this .  Mostly, I've checked a few films in the considerable list of his alleged participations and they seem to be correct.  (examples: [10] [11] . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 08:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: the link number 1) above has for some reason turned "dead" on the TOI website-  But it leads, if one clicks a few things, to the following text (copied verbatim by the article, as indicated): "Chinna is one of the leading art director in Indian cinema. His debut venture was ‘Kalisi Nadudham’ (Telugu). He started art direction together with his guru B Anand Sai (son of senior art director B Chellam). His started his career as Assistant Art Director for the Tamil movie ‘Roja Malare’ starring Murali. Next was ‘Santosham’ followed by ‘Enasare Asave’ and so on. Then Shifted to Hyderabad for ‘Tholiprema’. Again together with his guru Anand Sai, he did Telugu movies like ‘Tholiprema’, ‘Thamudu’, ‘Badri’, ‘Kushi’ and ‘Prematho ra’. In July 2017, his name was included in the list of 12 personalities of Telugu cinema, including actors, directors and producers, against whom the Telangana Prohibition and Excise Department had issued notices under relevant sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, asking them to appear before its special investigation team (SIT)." (The layout is currently terrible for some reason) [1] The TOI also provides a filmography , which, makes me think he meets the criterion#3 for Creative professionals for his various contributions to notable films ^ "Chinna" .  The Times of India .  ISSN 0971-8257 .  Retrieved 2023-08-02 .  My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Serkan Ramanlı: Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 09:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment — He seems to be a parliamentarian which isn't mentioned in the article.  [34] Semsûrî ( talk ) 09:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Semsûrî Hmm, okay, but none of the offices I see here are NPOL passable.  Unless there's something else you mean with "parliamentarian".  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] By parliamentarian I mean he's a member of the national parliament since 2023 which I assume passes NPOL per: " Politicians and judges who have held international, national , or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office..."  Semsûrî ( talk ) 12:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Okay, well, now the article clearly says that as it was not before, and I couldn't a source that says that.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Law ,  and Turkey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Based on clear WP:NPOL pass now.  I will withdraw this.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Evildoers Beware!: Was about to BLAR it, but would be challenged.  PROD would also be challenged too.  No sources I can find online.  Toadette Edit!  18:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mustard Plug : Found a handful of zines, but nothing reliable.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 18:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Reviews in [4] Ox Fanzine (German printed magazine), Visions (German printed magazine), Skin Up (German zine), [5] Sputnik Music (marked as staff review), Punknews.org , [6] Allmusic (short).  And these are only the ones that have survived online for a 1997 album.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the sources Geschichte found.  -- Here2rewrite ( talk ) 16:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Union Stadium: The only search results on JSTOR are a university paper in Wisconsin and a local paper in Ohio, both of which are hardly reliable sources for a stadium in South Africa.  For this reason, I feel the article does not meet general notability guidelines .  WikipediaNMP ( talk ) 09:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 26 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 09:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I had a hard time figuring out what this was supposed to be, but references show that it has significant historic importance but has fallen victim to the times.  Some examples: [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] .  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources above which show notability.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Geschichte's sources which show GNG.  (Sources found by nom are probably for a stadium in the USA.)  SportingFlyer T · C 19:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Per all above.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Nicholas Suman: Dougal18 ( talk ) 14:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep – The player doesn't seem very famous outside of Australia, but he seems to have WP:SIGCOV in the country's sports media like the offline sources of The Press & Journal and Evening Express .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep sufficient sources already present which show notability.  Giant Snowman 18:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Sources indicate notability.  Blethering Scot 19:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment All newly added sources either fail YOUNGATH or are routine transfer stories.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 08:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Appears to be an easy keep.  The player doesn't need to be world famous to be notable.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of Reformed Theological Seminary people: Shellwood ( talk ) 10:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and improve : This list is lengthy enough that it would make the main article unwieldy, and it corresponds to Wikipedia treatment for similarly lengthy lists from other religious institutions of tertiary education.  (See List of General Theological Seminary people , List of Virginia Theological Seminary people , List of Columbia Theological Seminary people , List of Fuller Theological Seminary people , List of Westminster Theological Seminary people , List of St. John's Seminary (California) people , List of New Brunswick Theological Seminary people . ) I'm willing to work on adding citations, but per WP:IMPROVEDONTREMOVE , let's keep and allow time for improvements (unless editorial consensus is also to delete/merge the other list pages cited above, but they have not been nominated).  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 22:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : If the article gets more citations, I feel like it could be important enough to merit its own article.  It could use a bit of polishing, but the article itself has its place here.  ❤History Theorist❤ 06:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Dclemens1971.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 22:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep List articles are (like categories) largely a means of navigation.   As such they do not need references: the references will appear in the listed articles.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 18:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Michael Fell (artist): Some include trade publications, which is doubtful.  There are a few obituaries, like source 6, but seems to be written by a family member sharing the last name (Mark Fell).  TLA (talk) 08:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Artists , Visual arts , France ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is also evidence of notability in the fact his work  is in the British Council collection: source 5.  86.16.5.172 ( talk ) 21:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article cites at source 2 an obituary from Jackdaw (a specialist art magazine) by Andrew Wilton.  Whilst the article is not accessible online, Wilton is a noted authority on British art and was the Keeper of the British Collection at the Tate : https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/wilton-james-andrew-rutley-1942 86.16.5.172 ( talk ) 22:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Evidence of notability includes a British Museum artist biography and the fact that his work is in their collection.  Source 3.  144.82.8.103 ( talk ) 12:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article also cites by ISBN a book on the work by an art publisher, Unicorn Press.  86.16.5.172 ( talk ) 23:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  There's more coverage (in French) at [23] and [24] .  He also has four prints in the collection of the British Museum [25] .  That alone goes a long way towards WP:ARTIST .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:ARTIST after the addition of the Ashmoleon gives him works in the collections of more than one major museum.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per David Eppstein plus "Fell’s work is the subject of a forthcoming book, The Art of Michael Fell . Unicorn Press. 2023" (EDIT: plus the addition of new reliable sources after I wrote this) Randy Kryn ( talk ) 13:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: the sources now mentioned seem quite promising.  I don't know French, so I can't fully verify it.  Would love to see a bit more input before I withdraw.  TLA (talk) 01:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Added references to:  (a) biog on website of Royal Society of Painter Printmakers (source 1);  (b) work held at Ashmoleon Museum, Oxford (source 7);  (c) French press coverage of exhibitions in Gascony (sources 14, 15 and 16).  Hope that is helpful.  Thanks.  Darkusfell ( talk ) 14:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Francisco de Marco: MirrorPlanet 🪞 🪐 05:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Brazil .  MirrorPlanet 🪞 🪐 05:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly notable serial killer.  Easily meets WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Disturbing subject, but the deletion rationale is incorrect based on the article as it currently stands, note especially that this article is a biography, and LASTING and INDEPTH are part of WP:EVENT .  Additionally, GNG is met with sources in the article.  — siro χ o 08:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Gail Eskes: Shellwood ( talk ) 20:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I had to go back through the article's history - apparently, she studies(d?) brain function after a stroke, specifically in relation to fatigue: Feb 1999 , Nov 2003 , June 2015 ; and cognitive motor function: Dec 2013 .  There also seems to be a lot of work on general cognitive function and with children: 1990 , July 2005 , 2009 , 2010 , July 2012 , Apr 2015 (There are a lot more - 10 pages minimum on Google Scholar .) When I searched her under "news" in Google, I got this paper she was an author on.  I got two returns on Internet Archive , both articles she co-authored.  There was a lot of material removed from the article as unsourced, but it was inline sourced like an essay (author, year; no title, no URL).  It looks like it was all WP:OR .  She's an expert in her field for certain, and I did find some articles about her research implementation ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ; scanned, didn't do a thorough read through), but that's it.  Everything else that returned is all her own material.  I'm not finding much on just her.  If the article were rewritten to focus on her research, would that be sufficient to keep it?  (Would it be BLP then? Would it move to another type of article?)  OIM20 ( talk ) 21:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .   I'm seeing several articles with hundreds of citations on Google Scholar, including some with the subject as first/last author, in what I believe to be a medium citation field.   I think it is a marginal pass of WP:NPROF .  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 10:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep due to citation record meeting WP:NACADEMIC -C1.  There is also some media coverage of her research , but it's mainly the citations.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 11:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Biomedicine is one home of big author, big citation papers, but with H41, I think this person pass NPROF.  128.252.154.1 ( talk ) 17:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:Prof .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 10:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Keep - Thousands of citations on a few dozen of papers likely passes WP:NPROF .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 13:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:PROF#C1 .  Strong citation record even for a high-citation field.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep with 19 papers that have 100+ citations this should be a clear keep and a testament to an impactful career.  -- hroest 18:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:PROF .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Alan Hirsch: Current sourcing includes a lot of primary sources and not enough to meet WP:BIO .  Created by a single purpose editor.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Christianity ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jupither: No WP:SIGCOV in reliable and independent sources.  Sources cited in article are (1) primarily about the lead singer, incidentally referencing the subject; (2) AllMusic which is of disputed reliability (and in any event is a single paragraph); and (3) a primary source.  WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing else to support notability.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 11:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Sweden .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I've found significant coverage in three different newspapers [15] , "EU-sponsrad turné för nytt Skellefteå-band" in Östersunds-Posten 2000-12-05 and "Det är ju Jupither! Snart känner ni igen popkometerna" in Nerikes Allehanda 1999-11-24.  Meets WP:GNG and WP:NBAND .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Coverage in any language is sufficient, and though I do not speak Swedish, I assume good faith on the part of the above searcher that the references cited qualify.  Chubbles ( talk ) 05:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I cannot read the article at the link but I will also WP:AGF , withdraw my nomination and change my ! vote to keep .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 22:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep