Battle of Goindval : Noorullah ( talk ) 20:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Afghanistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seems like a WP:FORK better suited for pages that have a broader coverage.  Sources like Mehta and Gupta do not even call this "Battle of Goindval" and have insufficient coverage to warrant an entire article.  Moreover, we're seeing a trend of editors creating articles based on small paragraphs from select one or two books solely so they can inundate Wikipedia with pages promoting religious heroism.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 03:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Primary sources that were earlier indicated have been removed and the work is not mirroring others, the article looks decent and is sourced well and has been cleaned up nicely and can stay as per WP:HEY .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Festivalfalcon873 ( talk • contribs ) 2024-05-11 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please add your signature to any comments in an AFD discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] - Comment by Festivalfalcon873 , thank you , I will do this from now on.  Festivalfalcon873 ( talk ) 17:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment --
 The article is still littered with plenty of old sources that are not WP:RS .  There is nothing "cleaned up" besides the removal of one primary source which does not account for all the other sources that mentioned above, are poor in quality.  [4] Noorullah ( talk ) 00:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article does not use a single WP:RAJ source and contains mostly scholarly sources, now coming to your assessment of reliability.  Your nominations are not dependent upon constructive criticism or from a neutral standpoint.  You did not identify upon which sources you think are unreliable, the sources that are being used are more then WP:RS such as Hari Ram Gupta, however your criticism or nominations do not come from neutral standpoint.   For ex: if a source fits your narrative it becomes reliable, if a source does not fit your narrative then it’s deemed unreliable.  This article should stay as per WP:HEY as the sources currently being used such as Hari Ram Gupta , Ganda Singh are universally approved scholars.  —Festivalfalcon873 Festivalfalcon873 ( talk ) 17:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article was using WP:RAJ sources until you REMOVED them, not sure why you are presenting it as if they weren't here in the first place.  [5] Hari Ram Gupta is a reliable source, but he does not mention it as a "Sikh victory", nor mentions anything about looting, or how many prisoners were relieved as shown here.  [6] Moving on to other sources...  You cite Mehta, yet on page 302, there's no mention of such a battle at all?  Why are you citing  from books that don't mention such a thing?  [7] Gopal Singh is a primary source, and is not scholarly at all.  The rest of the sources are unreliable that fail WP:HISTRS , many of the individuals not being historians either.  Noorullah ( talk ) 18:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not to mention, reliable sources don't even call this the "Battle of Goindval" as Southasian showed above, there's no instance of this being a battle.  Noorullah ( talk ) 18:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] -- First, the issue of being Wikipedia:RAJ being present is fixed, as this has been removed.  This should not be any issue as pointed out initially.  - Second, Hari Ram Gupta mentions clearly on pg 168, “At the ferry of Goindwal on the Beas the Sikhs are said to have relieved the invader of a number of captives, who were afterwards sent to their homes” citing sources such as Shamshir Khalsa pg105 ,( https://archive.org/details/HistoryOfTheSikhsVol.IiEvolutionOfSikhConfederacies1707-69/page/n184/mode/1up ) this source, as you pointed out is a WP:RS .  During this battle, the objective (releasing captives) was complete & thus a victory.  Similarly in the book Ahmad Shah Durrani (1959) by Singh Ganda ,pg 264, “No sooner did the Shah enter the Panjab than the Sikhs, as usual, began to harry him during his march. Under the command of Sardar Jassa Singh Ahluwalia, they surprised the Afghans at the ferry of Goindwal, on the right bank of the Beas, and succeeded in releasing from their clutches as many as two thousand and two hundred women captives, who were restored by them to their homes.” ( https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.503016/page/n292/mode/1up ) Similarly this source is also citing from same Shamshir Khalsa pg105 , mentioning the numbers and quoting of the Sikhs succeeding (victory) in completing their objective.  Both are scholarly sources which are citing factual evidence.  - Third, you made a mistake that Mehta did not cite this occurrence.  Mehta both showed this occurrence and spoke of Sikhs making their attack and succeeding in their objective of releasing captives.  Now let me show you, from Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813 page 302, “They made a surprise attack on the Afghan camp in strength at the ferry of Goindwal on the Beas and secured the liberation of a large number of the Maratha captives, who were being held by the Afghans as enslaved labourers for the carriage of their baggage to Afghanistan; they were subsequently sent to their homes in the south with suitable provisions.”  Here is the clear factual description of the battle or occurrence which is being written but you deny for your own personal viewpoints.  You pointed out further that it does not talk about looting , now going back to Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707-1813 pg302 by Mehta it perfectly describes the looting occurred, “ Nevertheless, they pounced upon the staggerers and carried away their booty and the baggage along with their horses all the same”.  ( https://books.google.com/books?id=d1wUgKKzawoC&pg=PA302&lpg=PA302&dq=%22Nevertheless,+they+pounced+upon+the+staggerers+and+carried+away+their+booty+and+the+baggage+along+with+their+horses+all+the+same%22&source=bl&ots=HOSZf38kUl&sig=ACfU3U080Q5ItKoniFa0n5ysIrLIUaEKyg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi72fXMwImGAxWJIDQIHb0pDLIQ6AF6BAgUEAI#v=onepage&q&f=false )  Therefore your statement on both things your pointed is factually incorrect.  - Fourth, again you made a mistake.  Dr. Gopal Singh is a scholarly source and as noted here ( https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Gopal_Singh ) whose work has been lauded by other scholars and literary figures including Nobel laureate Pearl Buck , who is onpar in credibility to that of J.S Grewal and Hari Gupta which are more then WP:RS .  -Even prominent historians & scholars such as Ganda Singh agree in the book Jassa Singh Auliwalia on pg 106 that this battle attack which occurred on Goindwal was successful , “Therefore, S. Jassa Singh drew his sword and taking a few selected Singhs with him reiched Goindwal and attacked the Durranis when they were crossing the river ; even before they could imagine what had happened, he freed the bonded women. He gave them pocket expenses and sent them to their respective places. This sympathy and bravery made S. Jassa Singh famous in the length and breadth of the entire country, and his valour and selfless service became a household word, and he became famous as a Liberator of bonded women.” ( https://apnaorg.com/books/english/sardar-jassa-singh-ahluwalia/sardar-jassa-singh-ahluwalia.pdf ).  Therefore the credibility of this event should be accepted by the reviewer of this discussion.  - If there are further issues or concerns that need to be fixed , such as unreliable sources or issues in the article, then it is the job of the nominator to point them out and identify them and describe them.  However, to generalize something because you don’t agree with it based mostly on personal reasons, such as not personally agreeing with an author, then is not suitable for the platform on Wikipedia.  Festivalfalcon873 ( talk ) 01:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm sorry, but please follow WP:KEEPCONCISE .  See Wikipedia:Wall of text .  I'm not going to read that but here's instead the main point I'm driving.  The title of this page is completely WP:OR , no sources mention it as a "battle of Goinvdal".  Noorullah ( talk ) 03:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] However, notable reliable historians such as Mehta, Hari Ram Gupta and Ganda Singh and Saggu have noted this place , Goindwal, was where the occurrence of the attack took place.  Festivalfalcon873 ( talk ) 06:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this OR.  Those sources do not call it the battle of Goindval.  Wikipedia is not the place to name events.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  05:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete