hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Diamond Tema: Runmastery ( talk ) 07:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albania and Turkey .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Diamond Tema is a well-known YouTuber and writer in Turkey.  She has been featured on all major news channels and websites such as TRT .  See the references in the article.  Kerim Demirkaynak ( talk ) 12:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Per the other commenters, like Kerim Demirkaynak, I'd vote weak keep in this discussion and hope that the sourcing is improved.  71.246.78.77 ( talk ) 12:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Checkuser blocked.  Queen of Hearts talk 23:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Censorship in Turkey : This article was created after a recent controversy.  I can't find much coverage of him in the news prior to that.  There isn't anything that contributes to his wikinotability on Google Books as far as I can see.  Current coverage appears to be largely of the arrest warrant, so if there should be a standalone article, it should be of the event rather than his biography, but I'm not sure about that as well.  Unless an editor demonstrates its notability through WP:NEVENT , it may be considered routine news coverage.  By the way, self-published and primary sources such as Twitter, Youtube, his books do not determine his notability and should probably be left out when merging.  Aintabli ( talk ) 19:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Merge : Coverage is significant but there is not that much of it.  Seems likely there will not be much lasting coverage, and the event would probably benefit from context.  The Censorship in Turkey article is very long already but if it has to be split it can be (and hopefully will be).  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 07:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Văn Miếu station: This one isn't even mentioned in the one source cited!  Web searches revealed two articles (in Vietnamese) that mention this station once each [51] [52] .  Toadspike [Talk] 14:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , Transportation ,  and Vietnam .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the position data, etc. to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) and redirect there if sources cannot be found (they're most likely to be in Vietnamese, so do check in that language).  There is no reason to delete the information present in the article which will be useful if it is expanded in future.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 18:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge there isn't enough coverage (or content) for a separate article from Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) yet, but there might be in the future.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Valmont station: The current citations are a user comment on a blog post, and a single line in a timetable.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Colorado .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the article about the settlement it serves and/or the branch line it was on.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (slightly selective) into Valmont, Colorado#History , where most of this text can be put to good use.  The branch line has no entry.  gidonb ( talk ) 18:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Carrot cake cookie: WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV .  Should be merged into Carrot cake#UK and US if not deleted outright.  BaduFerreira ( talk ) 21:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  BaduFerreira ( talk ) 21:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have bookmarked scores of cookies I'd like to try making.  This one isn't in it, but it appears to be a prime example of something that's just an inspired recipe with many variations, not a notable dish that's cohesively described outside of a cookbook writer's introduction.  This could be a sentence in Carrot cake .  Reywas92 Talk 02:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Carrot cake and redirect, at least for now.  It's possible this one could get there -- oreo makes a version, subway and aldis have a version, I've added that content+refs.  Gourmet did something in 2004, but on a quick search I'm not finding it, and it was not unlikely it was a simple recipe, but if anyone can figure out their archives, ping me to a link and I'll add.  Commercial uptake is probably a promising sign for this cookie's notability, so it would be good to have that info at carrot cake for future consideration.  Valereee ( talk ) 12:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Selective Merge to Carrot cake , which presently has no mention other than a link in its See also section.  North America 1000 10:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as suggested, as a good compromise.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Lê Đức Thọ station: The one source cited doesn't mention this station at all.  A BEFORE search found this rather funny video about trash piled on one of the station's staircases [45] , an article that mentions this station simply as the destination of the reporter's train but doesn't provide any detail [46] , and this article which names the station in two captions but doesn't say anything about it at all [47] .  Toadspike [Talk] 14:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , Transportation ,  and Vietnam .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the position data, etc. to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) and redirect there if sources cannot be found (they're most likely to be in Vietnamese, so do check in that language).  There is no reason to delete the information present in the article which will be useful if it is expanded in future.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 18:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge there isn't enough coverage (or content) for a separate article from Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) yet, but there might be in the future.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
World Series of Darts Finals: Is it worth keeping, or delete?  L1amw90 10:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Sports .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Austria , Netherlands ,  and Scotland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTSTATS .  We have the top level World Series of Darts and we have individual tournament articles like 2023 World Series of Darts Finals (see Category:World Series of Darts ).  The article under discussion is an extra one which just covers the "finals".  As such it seems to be primarily a repository for random stats.  Any useful text could be relocated to a section in World Series of Darts and the stats deleted.  Nigej ( talk ) 11:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into World Series of Darts as a premature spinoff.  Respondent above me seems to agree that the texts should be considered for merge.  I tend to agree with them that in general we have sufficient stats at the target already.  Both opinions culminate in merge as does a nomination that is unsure between keeping or deletion.  gidonb ( talk ) 07:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into World Series of Darts , as it's an unnecessary spinoff of that article.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
IDN App: IgelRM ( talk ) 18:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Indonesia .  IgelRM ( talk ) 18:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Internet ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable app, written by undisclosed paid editor.  The app is already mentioned on the parent article.  Polygnotus ( talk ) 22:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge The article was written separately on Indonesian Wikipedia, so I translated it as such.  However, I agree with the merge as it is more appropriate in this case.  — Zenica87 ( talk ) 08:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for commenting author, understandable.  IgelRM ( talk ) 22:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
KFConsole: NPRODUCT requires some degree of sustained coverage.  All sources in this article are from Dec 2020, when the promotion product was announced.  Over the years since, there has been no further news or details about the product, and no significant sustained coverage.  Using WP:VG/S 's custom reliable source search finds that since 2020, Techradar has mentioned the console a couple times, basically simply recapping the announcement details as there are no new details.  Otherwise, it's largely forgotten by press.  If and when the console actually releases, it can always be recreated if it becomes notable.  But right now, it is not.  -- ferret ( talk ) 17:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  -- ferret ( talk ) 17:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge to KFC advertising#KFConsole Agree that there's a lack of WP:SUSTAINED coverage.  TarkusAB talk / contrib 20:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge to KFC advertising#KFConsole with the presumption that it can be re-created if it turns out to not be vaporware.  There is little WP:SUSTAINED coverage of this product, and most of the sourcing in the article is either based on product announcements that all share similar structure and content, or speculation on if this product will be released.  The Night Watch (talk) 21:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to KFC advertising#KFConsole - appears to be a flash-in-the-pan advertising gimmick/hoax that fails WP:SUSTAINED .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Area Major Incident Pool : Seems to be more of a definition rather than entity.  Google search provides only mostly Wikipedia mirrors.  I did find three mentions in this report (page 115) but still not notable enough to warrant an article Elshad ( talk ) 13:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and England .  Elshad ( talk ) 13:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Given the time period (1985-2000) I'm not surprised little information is available online, but everything in the article (assuming it can be cited, I've not looked) is encyclopaedic information.  I agree though it's a bit thin for a whole article, so I recommend merging this to a broader article about the structure of the Met over time as this is not the first AfD I've seen about such units.  I don't know if such an article exists yet, but if not it can be started.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 11:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  What is the suggested Merge target article here?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Organisation and structure of the Metropolitan Police#Specialist Operations , since it seems that some of the wording for this article is taken directly from there and the remainder may be relevant as historical information if added.  Recon rabbit ( talk | edits ) 21:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Asian Journal of Public Affairs : Boleyn ( talk ) 20:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals and Singapore .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] limited merge looks to be published by a single school.   I can find nothing that counts toward WP:GNG .  That said it looks like a reasonable journal.   I think a line at Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy#Publications would work nicely unless that would somehow be UNDUE as long as we can verify this journal really is associated with the school.  Hobit ( talk ) 01:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 04:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with merge as stated above.  Fails GNG and NJOURNALS.  Also, some the the articles carried by this journal are cited according to Google Scholar.  The journal itself is doing good work in its field.  --- Steve Quinn ( talk ) 23:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Tetiaroa Airport : The airport definitely existed, but the airport does not pass the notability bar.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some references from the corresponding article in the French Wikipedia.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Air Tetiaroa or Tetiꞌaroa .  None of the sources constitute significant coverage required to meet GNG.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 20:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge This is a private airstrip for the resort rather than a full airport, lacks substantive sources.  Reywas92 Talk 14:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to discuss potential merge targets Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 00:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Tetiꞌaroa the The Brando Resort as its airstrip.  gidonb ( talk ) 02:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there are 3 different Merge targets suggested, an air carrier, an atoll or a resort.  We need to whittle that down to one target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Tetiꞌaroa I can't find anything saying that the airstrip is exclusively for The Brando Resort , just that people going there is the primary use.  Shaws username .  talk .  13:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist to determine merge target.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Herald (Benison) , I do not know why this was relisted.  There seems to be a consensus that this needs to be merged to Tetiꞌaroa .  Can you close the debate as it is open already so long?  gidonb ( talk ) 03:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2023 Hamburg Airport hostage incident : This is a recent, isolated event that resolved quickly and doesn't appear to have any lasting impact or braoder ramifications.  We don't create articles for every news story.  Zim Zala Bim talk 20:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Germany .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Aviation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The title leads the reader to think it's an issue with something aviation related, but this is just a circumstance where the airport property is involved with what would be noted in brief within a newspaper otherwise in a regular home or on the road.  The young hostage definitely breaches WP:BLP concerns.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A mention of the incident in Hamburg Airport should be enough.  -- Kammerer55 ( talk ) 03:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hamburg Airport , where an short mention exists (and probably should, an airport effectively shutting down for most of a day, unrelated to weather is generally a rare and big event). The possibility of a merge remains but there's no need to do it now, and no need delete history as there's no major BLP concerns. — siro χ o 06:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Hamburg Airport -- This is does not meet WP:NEVENT or WP:NCRIME .  Either a Redir or Merge is a viable AtD.  I lean toward Merge simply because I think this has more meat on it than a simple redirect can support.  Note for closer: If AtDs fail, I am more than comfortable with a simple Delete.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 17:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Spencer Monroe : four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and Comics and animation .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep if more sources are found, otherwise merge to List of The Walking Dead (comics) characters .  BOZ ( talk ) 20:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Merge per above.  This shouldn’t be it’s own article but should be mentioned among the list of characters.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of The Walking Dead (comics) characters .  No sources indicate this character is independently notable.  There may be mergeable content for the list of characters.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 18:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the character list.  WP:BEFORE only shows a minor character with less than significant coverage.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 17:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge