hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Carrie Staley (English footballer): Sources in the article do not cover Staley in depth.  An archive search only found mentions in match reports.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 11:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1977 WFA Cup final as sole clam to fame.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I'm finding a lot of hits in the British Newspaper Archive from the 1970s - but my Wikipedia subscription has expired.  Can someone with access please look into these ?  Many at the top aren't match reports.  Nfitz ( talk ) 19:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Many of the top hits are match reports.  There is no sigcov of her in the articles.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 11:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jimmy Kelly (singer): Charsaddian ( talk ) 22:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ireland and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Kelly Family .  I should point out that the nomination needs a far more precise argument, and the nominator seems not to have noticed that Mr. Kelly is a member of a reasonably notable band that would be an obvious redirect target.  But it turns out that Mr. Kelly really is non-notable outside of his longtime family band.  All of his media mentions are as a member of the band and I can find no reliable coverage for any of his solo albums or related activities.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also note that three of Jimmy Kelly's siblings also have their own articles that could probably be redirected as well.  Joey Kelly may have a little potential due to getting some notice as an athlete outside of the band.  I'm less sure about Kathy Kelly (musician) and Patricia Kelly because each is like Jimmy, with only band-related coverage and some solo albums that received little independent notice.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Kelly Family .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Boon, Ontario: – dlthewave ☎ 21:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  – dlthewave ☎ 21:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GEOLAND .   Unable to find any sources to support this was a populated place.  Magnolia677 ( talk ) 22:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This place on the Algoma Central is not notable unto itself (though it could, perhaps, be mentioned somewhere in the article about the railroad).  TH1980 ( talk ) 00:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect , like Magnolia677 I am unable to locate any sources which would indicate notability Horse Eye's Back ( talk ) 22:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Algoma Central Railway#Rail sidings .  The section already existed and probably contains the railway points on the line—though not Boon.  I have added in Boon along with a few details from this article.  -- papageno ( talk ) 05:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (ETA: or redirect ) - Fails WP:GEOLAND .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 07:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Algoma Central Railway#Railway points and sidings .  Redirect should remain because many maps will show this as a place, meaning it is a very likely search term.  -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Algoma Central Railway#Railway points and sidings as WP:ATD : the subject fails WP:GEOLAND so it does not deserve its own article, but it is still a possible search term.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 17:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment (Nom) - I'm not vehemently opposed to the idea, but we've deleted hundreds of rail sidings that appear in maps/databases and I don't think I've ever seen one redirected to the railroad unless it has some special significance.  Is there something about Boon that merits a redirect or is it possible that the "railway point" nomenclature makes it sound more notable than it actually is?  – dlthewave ☎ 21:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Karol Stuchlák: All I found on news websites were passing mentions about his participation at the tournament.  He was not even on top three luge winners.  There are two interlanguage Wikipedia in Norsk Bokmål (Norwegian) and Slovak, the latter of which might help copy over English article, but neither said wiki's provide significant coverage.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Slovakia .  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with the suggested Redirect .  Only database sources can be found, no in-depth coverage, does not fulfill WP:SPORTSCRIT .  @ Clariniie : if there is a viable WP:ATD such as a blank-and-redirect like here, you can be WP:BOLD and do it directly without going through AfD, especially if you think it's uncontroversial.  Broc ( talk ) 15:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Joshua Packwood: It fails Wikipedia:GNG .  The article is Wikipedia:ONEEVENT .  Mpen320 ( talk ) 03:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Economics , Georgia (U.S. state) ,  and Missouri .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 05:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete just a valedictorian.  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Still not enough for WP:GNG .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 07:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Weak redirect .   Redirection to Morehouse College looks like a sensible alternative to deletion.   Otherwise, the situation looks like a classic case of WP:BLP1E , with sources having no mention of the subject's life after graduation in 2008.   The only thing that gives me pause is this 2016 CNN piece [46] , which might tend to point to persistant coverage of the sort that overcomes WP:BLP1E .   Since I didn't find much else past 2008, and since the CNN piece appears to retread the same ground as the 2008 coverage, I wind up at redirect.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 07:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I would agree with a redirect if the article had better sourcing.  Until then, I'm leaning towards a delete .  Fad Ariff ( talk ) 12:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Fad Ariff : Adding sources to an article that will very likely be redirected or deleted seems silly, but the valedictorian bit was covered by several major news websites: in addition to the 2016 CNN piece, there are [47] [48] [49] ; also coverage in the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education [50] .   A search for Joshua Packwood Morehouse will come up with plenty more.   If you're taking the time to ! vote, why not do the search yourself??  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 20:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree the content could be merged into the history section of the college.  BhamBoi ( talk ) 06:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of E Street Band members: Highly repetitive list of band members already covered in E Street Band.  The number of band members does not justify listing them outside that article.  History section makes it look like a fork of the E Street Band Article.  Kleuske ( talk ) 14:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Entertainment ,  and United States of America .  Kleuske ( talk ) 14:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - there is a bit of precedent of having articles like this for long-running bands with lots of lineup changes.  List of Nine Inch Nails members and List of the Smashing Pumpkins band members come to mind.  Certainly some would be silly - like one for ZZ Top - but this seems like the sort of band it's appropriate for.  Band membership is an essential thing to track, and lists make it so band articles aren't massive or bogged down on talking about comings and goings of members all the time.  I also find it rather unlikely that a band of this caliber hasn't mustered up a few NLIST satisfying sources over the course of . ..40 years?  I'll look further but I'm probably leaning keep.  Sergecross73 msg me 15:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] After looking further, my stance is a combination of what I said above, and what's pointed out below.  A split like this is conceptually possible, but it was not properly executed.  I support redirect ing for now, (surprised no one BOLDly tried that first) but with no prejudice towards recreation if someone decides to do it right in the future.  Sergecross73 msg me 11:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy redirect Every word in the history section is at E Street Band , the timeline is duplicative, and the line-ups are duplicative.  If you're going to WP:SPLIT the main article, you need to actually complete the job and remove the content from the main article and use appropriate sumamry style rather than just copy-paste and do nothing else.  This was a bold split that skipped the first four steps, but I do not believe it's necessary in the first place and the table of members should instead be in the main article.  The main article is not "bogged down" with this content at all.  Reywas92 Talk 17:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Look, it's a potentially valid article split, but Reywas92 is correct - it's just duplicative at this point.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Elvina Djaferova: The subject seemingly made a single appearance for the team.  I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV at all, nor is there any indication of notability.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 10:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uzbekistan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 10:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers as the subject does not meet the WP:BIO and WP:GNG for in both citations, there are no details about the subject.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 18:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mansur (bear): Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV - press reporting was fleeting and fairly trivial.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  15:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Oreshkovo airfield .  The references are more than adequate to support a short paragraph there.  Ingratis ( talk ) 16:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Russia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, that sounds like a good plan.  Anna Frodesiak ( talk ) 22:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Edge of the Sword: Donald D23 talk to me 17:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Atef Salem#Selected filmography , where a source can be added (and the title of the film, which is not there yet, the page being a stub and most of the director's films still missing).  Willing to do it if such is the outcome of this discussion.  Best, - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC) (NB- I deproDed the page and suggested the same thing then).  [ reply ] Redirect to Atef Salem#Selected filmography per Mushy Yank .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:59, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Small Planet Airlines (Cambodia): scope_creep Talk 18:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions .  gidonb ( talk ) 03:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Small Planet Airlines as a premature WP:SPINOFF , where the content cannot be safely merged.  This is another example of how excessive fragmentation harms the upkeep and access to information, resulting in a bad user experience.  I would like to widen the debate and also suggest the following: Small Planet Airlines (disambiguation) – delete Small Planet Airlines (Germany) – redirect to Small Planet Airlines Small Planet Airlines (Italy) – redirect to Small Planet Airlines Small Planet Airlines (Poland) – redirect to Small Planet Airlines The Italy and Cambodia operations were tiny.  Just two airplanes.  Poland and Germany were somewhat larger yet also these articles remained underdeveloped.  The airlines shared one ownership and name.  After concentrating on one article, hopefully, more information we will be brought to the parent, and its text will be improved.  That's an urgent need as some of the text implies 6 years later that the company is still active and the undisclosed paid warning doesn't help build trust either.  gidonb ( talk ) 07:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Gidonb : I never saw them.  Kudos for finding them.  scope_creep Talk 19:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, also for concentrating on unnecessary SPINOFFs!  Excessive SPINOFFs make information management a pain and the user experience hellish! gidonb ( talk ) 10:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Its nothing something I've thought about but will in the future.  I think it is really important.  scope_creep Talk 12:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please do.  Also these have great options for ATDs: merge and redirect.  gidonb ( talk ) 12:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Flags of the World: See related RM from 2020 here .  162 etc. ( talk ) 00:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gallery of sovereign state flags -- I agree TheRealOj32 ( talk ) 01:50, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore as article title for contents of Flags of the World (website) , with that article's current title to be redirected there.  This was the vexillological website's stable title for 15 years, up until the requested move linked by the nominator.  I find the rationale of the closing administrator for that evenly-split discussion at the very least questionable, so take my ! vote as a de facto review request for that action.  I find it unlikely that someone who takes the trouble to type only the final W as a capital letter (but not O or T, or even F, O, or T) to want anything other than the vexillological website.  Flags of the world currently redirects to Gallery of sovereign state flags , so add a hatnote there for the vexillological website per WP:ONEOTHER .  Havradim leaf a message 20:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll note that Flags Of The World also redirects to Gallery of sovereign state flags .  162 etc. ( talk ) 22:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for pointing that out.  Following the same logic, I would be in favour of retargeting Flags Of The World to the vexillological website as well.  It is not unheard of to capitalise a proper name title such as this, and it is also evocative of their acronym .  Also, see a similar discussion that restored a redirect to a disambiguated term which capital letters usage pointed to.  Havradim leaf a message 17:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gallery of sovereign state flags per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC .  This is clearly the more likely meaning for the term than some random web site, even though the web site has the exact title and the other article does not.  For an analogous case, see Mathematics in India (redirect) and Mathematics in India (book) (not primary topic).  Also note that "stable title for 15 years" is not a valid rationale for choosing a different outcome; the same thing could as easily be read as "violation of PRIMARYTOPIC that has lasted 15 years before we realized that it needed fixing".  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Senada Ceman: All I found were passing mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Luxembourg .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Redirect All I found was routine coverage, with no news sources.  ‍ Relativity 01:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 11:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect