hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Losing Our Sons : Based on the conversation at Talk:Losing Our Sons#Notable?  , I am bringing this here.  Perhaps others will have better luck finding more references.  Either way this has been tagged for notability since 2013 and its time to make a decision one way or the other as a community.  4meter4 ( talk ) 15:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Their own website, streaming on Youtube, then nothing.  There doesn't seem to have been critical notice of this film.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Education , Islam ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Reasons for Ram avatar : Chronikhiles (talk) 07:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rama .  This article doesn't even mention Ram or Rama until the fourth paragraph.  This article might have something to do with an important subject in Hinduism but it doesn't clearly indicate its own topic.  As a second choice, just delete .  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article isn't about Ram: all of the avatars are avatars of Vishnu, since Ram doesn't have any avatars (he just is an avatar).  A redirect would be inaccurate.  AryKun ( talk ) 09:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 09:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Does this help determine what this article is supposed to be about?  Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 09:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete this article is mistitled; from what I can tell, it's a list of reasons that Vishnu reincarnated as an avatar.  It's a fork of Vishnu and avatar ; we probably do need a separate article on Vishnu's avatars, but this is not it.  AryKun ( talk ) 12:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Metropolitan90.  There is possibly a notable topic here but as it stands this isn’t an encyclopedia article and it is very difficult to discern what the topic is and why all the detail covered in the article matters.  As written it’s very in-universe and I think redirecting to the purported main topic would be best until someone can take another run at this.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] the title isn't a particularly likely search term, so a delete would be better than redirect imo.  AryKun ( talk ) 12:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Out of the two cited sources on the Hindi version of this article, one leads to nowhere and the other does not have online preview for the cited pages.  There does not seem to be coverage of the subject topic either.  The title does not appear to be a likely searched term, so deletion seems to be the only viable choice.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1993–2016 military reforms in Azerbaijan : There is no independent reliable sourcing to substantiate that.  Furthermore, most of the article is poorly written, poorly sourced text that doesn't touch on the supposed reforms.  If there is ant content worth keeping, it can be merged with articles on Azerbaijan's military.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 19:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and merge.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete most of this is poorly written Aliyev regime propaganda, and/or fascimiles of lists of NATO cooperation programs.  Buckshot06 (talk) 23:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baran (singer) : Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 05:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - she is notable Iranian singer. .  i see many reliable sources nd discography available in results Worldiswide ( talk ) 07:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I added some albums nd source on my basis...  Worldiswide ( talk ) 09:22, 8 December 2023 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet of

Discussion outcome: delete
Jack Oliver (record executive) : jlwoodwa ( talk ) 22:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Music .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 22:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete pet nom and WP:TNT .  Creator and primary writer's talk page is troubling .  They were indeffed after a checkuser block discovered all sorts of socks colluding in promotional editing.  We don't write WP:BLP 's to a single first party source.  A lot of their other creations have been since deleted for similar issues as well.  Sergecross73 msg me 01:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : can't find any in-depth coverage that meets WP:BLPRS online.  article reads like a promo/resume.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 01:47, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTCV .  Some passing mentions in Billboard and books but not nearly enough for WP:BASIC [3] [4] [5] , etc.  — siro χ o 19:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found only one or two brief mentions in a Billboard newspaper, and nothing else reliable.  I've also noticed that the article follows a very similar structure to the LinkedIn profile for this executive, so I have a feeling that there might be a COI with the creator.  Either way, article fails WP:GNG due to improper sourcing, and also fails WP:NBIO .  The Night Watch (talk) 02:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brenda Combs : While inspirational, she does not seem to meet the WP:GNG .  All sources in the article are dead (though archived), and there's little else available that I'm seeing.  GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk ) 21:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've incorporated information from a 2007 Today article , which is definitely the best source in the article, but I don't think this is sufficient coverage to meet the GNG.  GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk ) 21:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women ,  and Arizona .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Transitioning from homelessness to being a respected teacher is truly admirable but is not enough to pass WP:GNG .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete The articles from Today and 3TV are of the "human interest story" variety, not what I would consider to be researched information sources.  My gut tells me that they did not do any investigating and took the story from her.  The sources from Grand Canyon U are not independent (she was working there at the time).  The book was indeed self-published and does not appear to have been picked up by libraries (a measure of how far the book has not reached).  Today I can find only self-promotional sites online (her web site, linkedIn, etc.).  Lamona ( talk ) 03:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The editing history suggests this could be a vanity page.  128.252.55.251 ( talk ) 19:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Apache Lenya : There are no independent sources Mdggdj ( talk ) 10:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence of notability.  Greenman ( talk ) 10:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom JM ( talk ) 11:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NSOFT Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christine M. Rose : I don't believe that meets the criteria.  Noting SPA page creator.  30Four ( talk ) 09:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women ,  and Ohio .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Old SPA-created article that is basically a CV.  There is no credible claim to notability (eg being lauded at conventions) and sources are almost all ephemeral, obscure, or the subject's own webpages.  Rowan of the Wood is held by a paltry 24 institutions (WorldCat).  These are the sorts of articles that make WP look like a directory.  128.252.154.3 ( talk ) 15:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Rose appears to have won an award, but it does not appear to be significant.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Reál Sangria : The only citation was to a company website that appears to have been taken over by a Chinese spam site, and that link was just removed.  The product does exist, and there are articles that mention it, but I am not seeing anything complying with WP:Golden Rule or WP:GNG standards.  ~ Anachronist ( talk ) 17:00, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Wine ,  and Spain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Spam with no citations.  Blatant advertising.  Reál Sangria is a specific brand.  Products section tells you the various sizes and types you can purchase.  Distribution sections lists the retailers where you can purchase the product.  — Maile ( talk ) 20:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per nomination Samuel R Jenkins ( talk ) 06:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 03:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional material of a non-notable brank of drink.  No citations included.  Alan Islas ( talk ) 19:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Digital motion X-ray : WP:TNT applies unless this article can be merged or redirected somewhere.  Steel1943 ( talk ) 06:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Rewrite if possible, otherwise delete : I can't help thinking there is something worthwhile hidden (very well hidden!) in here.   Somebody who knows the topic needs to go through those references and use them to write an actual article.   Failing that, I don't see any point in keeping it as it is.. .-- Gronk Oz ( talk ) 08:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with the nominator.  The subject seems notable [25] , the article is not worth keeping.  Pieceofmetalwork ( talk ) 08:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that the content of the article creator's user page, DMX Works ( talk · contribs ), tells us everything that we need to know.  Delete without prejudice to a non-advertisement being written, possibly not even at this title (as all too often these articles tend to be company-invented names for things).  Uncle G ( talk ) 11:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Medicine ,  and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : a thinly-veiled ad by a SPA COI.  The common name for this technology seems to be Dynamic Digital Radiography .  "Digital motion X-ray" may be a trademark owned by the equipment maker for which the author works.  Owen× ☎ 22:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ktery SK : There is no sign that this place actually exists.  It was created automatically on the basis of a Polish Wikipedia article that was deleted some years ago.  No location is given in the article, though probably it is some former part or company of the village of Ktery .  There is no indication what SK stands for though.  A reference is given to the TERYT database, but withinout the SIMC ID it is not possible to search the database for it - however there is no listing for Ktery SK in the Polish regulation of place-names .  FOARP ( talk ) 12:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 12:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A possiblity, based on https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/zespol/-/zespol/72822 and https://zamkilodzkie.pl/leki_koscielne/ , is that the "SK" in this and Łęki Kościelne SK is pl:Stadnina koni and that these were stud farms, or parts of the villages where a stud farm was located.  The SIMC IDs were probably 0568060 and 0568150.  Peter James ( talk ) 19:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No pl interwiki, no evidence of notability.  We don't even know what SK stands for.  Peter makes one suggestion above, my first guess would be "stacja kolejowa" (train station), but who knows?  TERYT has no entry for anything on Krety that is not a village proper ( Ktery ; TERYT search ).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per FOARP .  Another bogus bot creation.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Toothpick Bridge : Only hits on this phrase are for toothpick bridges, nothing for a musical album.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable album, couldn't find anything but passing mentions in interviews and a single paragraph review on a site with undocumented editorial practices.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 23:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Searching for this album is a bit tricky because it turns out that some people have the hobby of building model bridges out of toothpicks.  (I learn something new every day.)  Beyond that, I can find no reviews or other coverage of this album in reliable media, and it is only visible in the usual retail and streaming services.  Do not redirect to the band because they may also be deleted; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ist (band) .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NMUSIC Graywalls ( talk ) 01:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The band's article has now been deleted after the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ist (band) .  Under most interpretations of WP:A9 , if the band is not notable than neither are their albums.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Government Elementary Teacher Education Institution : It is not clear from https://dhe.odisha.gov.in/government-colleges/list-of-govt-colleges/teacher-education-institutes that there is still a teacher training establishment of that name in Chikitigada.   However, https://www.shiksha.com/college/government-elementary-teacher-education-institution-chikiti-ganjam-94787/questions indicates that there is - but it looks like it only offers 50 places each year?  So - confusing, but nothing notable.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 17:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions .  Kpg jhp jm 17:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
R. V. Swamy : The article has always been laden with prose praising the subject, but with predominantly primary sources and shopping sites.  English-language searches are not finding better, but it is possible that someone familiar with Tamil literature may find sources to verify the claims in the article text - in which case I will happily withdraw this nomination - but as it stands this subject appear to fail the WP:AUTHOR criteria or broader WP:GNG .  AllyD ( talk ) 18:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Tamil Nadu .  AllyD ( talk ) 18:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it looks like a ludicrous hagiography to me, but I’d reconsider if there are sources in Tamil to indicate a pass of WP:AUTHOR.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  07:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Borderline G11.  Fails BLP, GNG, BIO.  // Timothy :: talk 10:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amar Janta Intermediate College : Only source is a directory listing.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 07:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unable to find GNG-level sources for this school.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 07:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per above.  - Imcdc Contact 14:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete At present, there are no sources that satisfy the criteria stated in NSCHOOL.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 13:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
W16CW-D : We used to be a lot more lax on notability for broadcast stations, but even when the NMEDIA essay was given more weight than was warranted, many of these low-power facilities probably still didn't even meet that in reality.  Suffice it to say, I can't imagine that the significant coverage needed to meet the GNG exists here.  Also being nominated are these commonly-owned stations, under similar circumstances: W17DL-D ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) (

Discussion outcome: delete
Yudisleivi Reyes : I was unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG , nor is there any other indication of notability.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Drafify.  Not good on current state Cray04 ( talk ) 08:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found even in . cu sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete