hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Yasmin Omar: Doesn't meet notability as most refs are non-notable interviews.  Nswix ( talk ) 17:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Egypt .  Nswix ( talk ) 17:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete I think it is WP:LOWPROFILE , no real notability and poor significant coverage, also the article looks like WP:MASK and written in a way that exaggerates the importance of her activities.  -- Ibrahim.ID ✪ 18:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  This is G11 content but AfD is a better forum, since I suspect recreations will need CSD'd.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 05:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Running Season: Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There's no notability claim here besides existing, which isn't automatically enough all by itself, but the sourcing is not getting it over WP:GNG .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
João de Abreu: Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 06:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless someone can find significant prose coverage of this person in reliable, independent sources.  Database entries are insufficient to establish notability per WP:NATHLETE .  Cullen328 ( talk ) 07:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there are no good sources available to indicate the subject meets GNG.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 20:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dakota Watch Company: I spent over an hour looking for sources to satisfy WP:NCORP in Google Books and Google News archive.  I searched NewsBank's newspaper archives.  I even searched in a list of wrist watch blogs, which would be considered generally unreliable, just to see if anybody had reviewed one of this company's products.  I used the current name and their two previous names in all my searches.  I found absolutely no non-trivial coverage in any reliable source.  AnAbandonedMall ( talk ) 05:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and Ohio .  AnAbandonedMall ( talk ) 05:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found a singular source on my own search, [20] , which I doubt has a snowball's chance in hell of being compliant with any WP:NCORP policy.  I think the nominator sums it up well here.  — Sirdog ( talk ) 06:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unable to find non-trivial coverage in books or online.  Graywalls ( talk ) 16:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KBFK-LP: Let'srun ( talk ) 14:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Advance Design: See coi report.  No indication of being notable.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 08:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Same deal as Advance Concrete and Advance Steel .  Cortador ( talk ) 11:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Engineering ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:NSOFT.  Owen× ☎ 15:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPRODUCT which requires "sustained coverage in reliable secondary sources."  My searches for this product, as with the other GRAITEC products in this line, did not produce anything meeting that requirement.  Spintendo 02:56, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benjamin Kaufmann: References are mainly credits for his work.  I have carried out WP:BEFORE and added one source, but I do not think it is reliable.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 08:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Fashion , Germany ,  and United Kingdom .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 08:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexander Brattell: anyway i think this also meets the WP:TNT thing.  Password (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  Password (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 18:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  No page updates for a decade MNewnham ( talk ) 02:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Page has been revised with citations and some sections removed, 22 February 2024 following notification of deletion from Senior Wikipedia Administrator and Editor, guidelines have been read and followed in order to avoid deletion.  Kirasondra ( talk ) 18:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  Removing material does not allow it to pass WP:HEY .  Bearian ( talk ) 19:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Some material with citations was added.  Material removed was due to lack of current online sources - no archive material on organisations websites or subject/event occured before common use of the internet so no digital evidence ever existed.  Some pre-internet documentation can be digitised in the future.  Kirasondra ( talk ) 22:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sabari (2023 ): The page was originally created as Sabari (2023 film) and moved to draftspace because it wasn't release.  However, the director himself came and moved the page to articlespace.  Unreleased film.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 18:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - All I can find are more teasers and trailers type coverage.   That is not substantial, and certainly not enough for a film that hasn't been released.   -- Whpq ( talk ) 19:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No release date or quality sources that aren't just unbylined PR, no article.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Screams of Cold Winter (UK): Previously deleted and salted at Screams of Cold Winter * Pppery * it has begun... 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing of notability in the article and the only real reference I can find on these guys is a review at soundspheremag.com which does not seem like significant coverage.  Article references seem to be mostly local news.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fanny Duarte: According to BWF she has never won a match on the tour and has a win-loss of 0/8 having not played since 2018, which gives me little confidence that future notability is likely.  I found a trivial mention of her in Radio Havana and Escambray but this type of coverage doesn't meet GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Dominican Republic .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only source online was a trivial mention about another person of the same name, which is a criminal.  Otherwise zero coverage.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 13:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Florentyna ( talk ) 17:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Based on what sources?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage .  None is present in the article and none has been presented here.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 21:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP,fails BIO and GNG.  Source in article is stats, BEFORE showed mentions, stats, but nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 05:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alinur Velidedeoğlu: Kadı Message 19:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media , Television ,  and Turkey .  Kadı Message 19:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would like to share my analysis about the sources provided by Fram in the 1st nomination .  Haberler.com and Gecce.com are unreliable websites, we do not use it as Turkish users in trwiki.  Second link is from Hürriyet Kelebek, the article is about his divorce with his wife, magazine news, do not contribute to notability.  Capital.com.tr website gives information about his explanations, do not meet independence criteria.  In conclusion, most of the links are magazine news which do not contribute to notability.  Kind regards, Kadı Message 19:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing here to establish notability.  Doesn't meet WP:BASIC .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there is an extraordinary claim of notability of a living person , and yet zero citations .  Bearian ( talk ) 14:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kory Rabenold: This article is well written; however, it seems that almost all of the sources are in some way WP:SPS and I cannot find enough non-self published sources (counting PR releases as self published sources) to confer notability.  The driver did run the second half of the 2009 ARCA series, so there is some possibility for notability, but from my research I have been unable to find anything to push this person over WP:GNG and they do not have any notability confered per the requirements in WP:NMOTORSPORT either.  Tartar Torte 19:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport , United States of America ,  and NASCAR .  Tartar Torte 19:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  A side note: I honestly don't know how many articles like these there are on here; but I've noticed an uptick in these sorts of articles on WP:NASCAR .  Cheers, and carpe diem!  Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c ) 04:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Primax Broadcasting Network: I can't find any reliable sources that could support the subject's notability.  PROD was contested by an IP user without any reason given.  Israel's Son 03:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines .  Israel's Son 03:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources = WP:SELFPUB profile and a court document.  Clearly fails WP:NCORP .  TLA (talk) 03:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claim or references for notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 14:34, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ramm Bogadi: Sources are generally trivial or from social media or IMDB.  Draftified twice to allow improvements to be made but returned to mainspace immediately by its author.  No evidence for WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 15:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Velella Velella Talk 15:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think IMDb is a trivial medium.  How do you say there is no evidence of significance?  Take a look at the IMDb page.  I collect content from standard, official websites and wrote this article.  Thelakyanaik ( talk ) 07:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] IMDB is not an acceptable reliable source on Wikipedia.  Velella Velella Talk 08:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails notability guidelines with pretty no reliable source coverage.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 20:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The artist or actor is not regarded well-known who has played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work that has been the primary subject of multiple independent articles and reviews.  Sources like imdb and bookmyshow are not helpful.  Fails notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't find anything that suggests notability   -- Devoke water 12:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamed Hedi El Amri: Tooncool64 ( talk ) 21:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Tunisia .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:N -- Artene50 ( talk ) 23:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Manacaud: Furthermore, the article does not meet the criteria of WP:GNG and lacks sufficient coverage in WP:RS .  Only a few sources, mostly failing WP:RAJ and WP:AGEMATTERS , mention it in fragmented lines.  Imperial [AFCND] 10:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  This is one of many highly questionable articles about battles, where even the most basic details can't be verified.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 00:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Tehonk ( talk ) 02:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Sadustu Tau ( talk ) 13:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Draftify .  The one and only source on this page is by Indian historian A. Sreedhara Menon and this source only has 9 lines of paragraph which shows that such a battle did occur but that's about it.  It's just an overview from source and not enough detail.  Everything else on the  article page cannot be verified and seems self opinionated.  Why I did vote for Draftify as well is to let the editor rework on the page by referencing more reliable sources while this nomination is in progress.  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I tried to find sources for this article and barely found few, most of them are not WP:RS, falls under WP:RAJ or AGEMATTERS.  And the fact that there is no Mughal records about this makes it more concerning.  Imperial [AFCND] 16:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luis Mario O. Rizzo: Great resume but only 26 Google results and probably doesn't meet NBIO or GNG as the coverage is light.  I can't check the 2003 book mentioned but the other sources are basically passing mentions and profiles on self-published blog sites or the person's own website.  Andre 🚐 00:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Businesspeople , Dance , Music , Radio , Ecuador , Florida ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing more than incidental mentions in RS.  Mach61 ( talk ) 05:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – No sources found are independent or significantly covered.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 08:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources found that are both independent and significant coverage .  Also, although I don't have access to the 2003 book, it doesn't seem like it would be significant coverage of the subject either per a few summaries I found of the book online.  Bsoyka ( talk ) 21:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , due to lack of reliable sources.  Assuming the print source is reliable, the guideline requires multiple sources to establish notability.  Not that it weighs on the discussion, but the article also borrows liberally from this source for its prose.  Substantial rewrite to avoid plagiarism is recommended if kept.  Zsinj Talk 03:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete