hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of NASCAR broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent NASCAR fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced, one is a dead page and three of those are about the announcers, not helping this list to assert notability.  An WP:ATD will be to merge to NASCAR on television and radio .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 18:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Motorsport , Lists ,  and United States of America .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 18:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE , failing WP:LISTN , and as a trivia list.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 23:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a valid split from NASCAR on television and radio , keeping parent article from being overly cluttered and unreadable.  Alternatively merge to that target.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 17:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:LISTN .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2023 Kech District attack : All the sources are from April 2023, no evidence of WP:LASTING to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (like a paragraph) to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2023 .  It doesn't seem an especially significant one of Pakistan's many, many attacks, but given Pakistan's broader security problems it's best to retain that it happened and this article has a few details that would be useful for a brief summary.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  This is not a newspaper.  -- Saqib ( talk ) 11:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  Don't merge.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 15:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2023 .  There's no analytic coverage here that warrants the event having its own article.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 18:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Józef Kos : Long and worthy of respect life.  But I'm not sure if meets our notability requirements.  According to this article when Józef Kos died at the age of 107, he was "only" the second oldest person in the voivodeship, not to mention a country.  Marcelus ( talk ) 22:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Poland .  Marcelus ( talk ) 22:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of centenarians (military commanders and soldiers) .  Prior AfD in 2007 which I started was a snow keep but with everyone just repeatign that 'being 106 years old is sufficient to make someone notable'.  Well, our standards have risen since, I am afraid, and we require significant coverage in RS.  What we have instead is a bunch of obituaries in local news.  No pl wiki article.  The subject fails WP:NBIO .  But we have a valid list he should be mentioned in and redirected there.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 01:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Lerappa : What few sources exist fall under the category of WP:NOTNEWS , and even then, is more related to American Apparel's controversies than it is about their short-lived virtual store.  Jontesta ( talk ) 21:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Jontesta ( talk ) 21:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 22:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to American Apparel , "History" or "Branding and advertising" section.  There's a couple of passing mentions and an interview in reliable sources ( [26] , [27] , [28] ), so it warrants a mention in the American Apparel article but not its own article.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 14:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per WP:ATD .  There is a valid merge target for the brief news burst.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 18:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
BioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology : Does not seem to be a good reason to consider it notable outside of Rutgers University , so possibly a merge is appropriate as AtD JMWt ( talk ) 13:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and New Jersey .  JMWt ( talk ) 13:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge / Redirect to Rutgers University or to a more specific school within the university.  The institute, which now appears to be known as the "Rutgers Center for Quantitative Biology", does not appear to have any independent notability as a standalone entity.  Alansohn ( talk ) 14:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge / Redirect to Rutgers University , a search for the new Center doesn't find anything of note, just primary sources.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 16:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Consulate General of the United Kingdom, Osaka : AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Japan ,  and United Kingdom .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge' .  There is plenty of encyclopaedic information in this article that shouldn't be just thrown away.  If additional secondary sources can't be found (remember some are likely to be in Japanese and/or predate Google) then it should be merged to a broader article, maybe Japan-United Kingdom relations .  Thryduulf ( talk ) 13:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG and WP:ORG .  Any relevant material should be in Japan–United Kingdom relations .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Japan–United Kingdom relations .  Not enough notability for a full page.  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 12:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of chairmen of the Legislative Assembly of Zabaikalsky Krai : The assembly has no article.  One of the two listed chairmen has no article, and there is no indication in the poorly written article about Anatoly Romanov that he was a chairman of this body, despite the unencyclopedic list of his credentials in the lead.  Bbb23 ( talk ) 16:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Lists ,  and Russia .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The assembly does have an article, Legislative Assembly of Zabaykalsky Krai .  An WP:ATD could be merging this article there.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The bolded part of the lead sentence is not wikified, and I could swear the word "legislature" was red when I nominated the article.  It's blue now, and I don't see any reason for it to have changed from red to blue, so I must be seeing things.  :-( -- Bbb23 ( talk ) 17:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You're not crazy, it was red! It was using a different romanization (Zabaikalsky instead of the standard Zabaykalsky); a redirect was created to the correct article title. Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You're a wonder; thank you.-- Bbb23 ( talk ) 18:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Legislative Assembly of Zabaykalsky Krai .  There is not yet a reason to spinout the list of presiding officers.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 17:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Basically, the existence of such article-lists seems odd.  I would place this information as a section in an article about the regional parliament.  -- Khinkali ( talk ) 23:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
BYD HES : Refs are directory entries or trivial mentions.   Maybe just redirect to BYD_Company , but the product is not mentioned there.  AndrewWTaylor ( talk ) 11:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and China .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or redirect to BYD Company — siro χ o 05:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Interplay Discovery : Under the program, the company published five games in total.  A search for "Interplay Discovery" on search engines reveals little about the program, and it seems that the program would never be talked about again since 2011, when the last game under the program was released.  I think this article is doomed to remain a permastub .  However, I think the program would prove excellent for the Interplay Entertainment article since it involves the company reentering the gaming arena and trying to reclaim its former status as a reputable publisher, even if the attempt turned out to be short-lived.  Free Media Kid$ 15:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Free Media Kid$ 15:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Interplay Entertainment .  Doesn't seem independently notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 16:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 20:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Interplay Entertainment , concur with earlier reviewers.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Unitarian Universalist Buddhist Fellowship : No evidence of notability.  Fails WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 09:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Religion .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 09:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability.  Searches bring up nothing for me.  Cortador ( talk ) 11:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Buddhism and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - A merge or redirect to Unitarian_Universalism#Organizations should be considered as an WP:ATD .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 13:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Unitarian_Universalism#Organizations where its mention can be expanded.  I found mentions and directory entries in several books indicating this is a topic of interest but I did not find significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 13:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Primary and secondary (polyamory) : One reference (to the essay that coined of the term).  Delete or merge into Terminology of polyamory .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 08:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Polyamory as basic terminology that does not need its own article.  — The Anome ( talk ) 10:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with The Anome that this is basic terminology that maybe deserves a sentence or two on the Polyamory article.  Delete per WP:NOTDICT and the essay-like nature of the article.  Opal|zukor ( discuss ) 12:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with the polyamory article is fine, nothing more than a DICDEF otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Autumn Moon Entertainment : Last AFD was delete?  IgelRM ( talk ) 21:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Companies ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Unweave the Weave : While construction projects can be notable, this one seems run-of-the-mill.  Also borders on POV in certain instances.  Rs chen 7754 00:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Minnesota .  Rs chen 7754 00:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to I-35E - It does seem run-of-the-mill, but there seems to be some lasting coverage from the Star-Tribune regarding the section's use as a testbed for variable tolls (e.g. this 2021 article and this 2016 article ).  Sounder Bruce 00:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge information to relevant articles.  The interchange project is not notable enough for an individual article but the information can be mentioned in the articles about the roads that meet at the interchange.  Dough 4872 00:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above comments Jack4576 ( talk ) 01:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the history sections of Interstate 694 and Interstate 35E (Minnesota) , though some of the information is already present in the Interstate 694 article.   It could be added to the I-35E article.   In general, I don't think there's a lot of notability for completed construction projects in Minnesota, since I don't regularly see news coverage on projects that have been finished.   The I-35W Mississippi River bridge collapse and reconstruction is the level of enduring significance, since it raised awareness of similar fracture-critical bridges, but I can't see the point of having separate articles for every state construction project.  -- Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Elkman.  Admittedly (as one who loves designing highway exchanges for my geofictional ventures), this is as well-written and organised as AFD candidates get.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 22:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Midlands Rugby League Division One : Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable competition.  Fails WP:GNG .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 12:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Establish how it fits into the British rugby league system - Merge and Redirect to Midlands Rugby League .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Operation Ajay : Can perfectly be merged into Evacuations during the 2023 Israel–Hamas war .  We have too many content forks about this war.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 11:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Israel , Palestine ,  and India .  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 11:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Military .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge: Not really a particularly notable or worthwhile in of itself.  It could be readily incorporated into the target.  Nepalese citizens are meanwhile not Indian ones ... not sure what's going on there.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 11:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some countries evacuate citizens from other countries as well during incidents like these.  It might not make much sense to send a plane yourself if you have just three people there.  Another country could just help you out.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 12:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was more highlighting the lack of effort to align the lead and body.  The net effect of the page is a bare bones list with half a dozen entries in it - not exactly stellar standalone content.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 12:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes then, I agree with that.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 16:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge not particularly notable, mostly just has the run-of-the-mill coverage all evacuations received at the start of the war.  AryKun ( talk ) 19:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge