hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Genomatix : The article reads like an advertisement.  Chance for improvement is very small.  Probably not very useful as a good starting point for a rewrite.  Janhrach ( talk ) 14:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Biology , Medicine ,  and Technology .  Janhrach ( talk ) 14:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete : I was able to find this, at least: [33] , but that might be well-disguised churnalism, hard to tell.   Same for this one: [34] .   Everything else I found was either not independent or obvious press releases.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – WeirdNAnnoyed’s findings are helpful.  The latter is definitely a press release due to the email tag at the bottom of the article.  Other then that, per nom.  TLA (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Global Metal Apocalypse : Neither source is reliable independent significant coverage, nor can I find such.  Notability not established.  Reywas92 Talk 14:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Reywas92 Talk 14:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Textbook non-notability 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page!  Talk 16:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Politics ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO.  I can only find links to the facebook page and other social media for the organization.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just a random blog.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of naturalised international footballers : This article conflates 2 things: sporting nationality and people's actual citizenship.  And is way less encylopedic than the already existing List of association footballers who have been capped for two senior national teams , which is a well verified list that has sources showing that it meets WP:LISTN .  This list article on the other hand has no sources, and no evidence that "naturalised citizens" create a notable list together, rather than just creating confusion about its unclear aim (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Naturalised international footballers ) Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Football .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and consensus in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of association football players with dual nationality ; nominator might also wish to consider List of Chinese naturalized footballers .  Giant Snowman 21:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 12:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Takuro Okuyama : Japanese Wikipedia has no decent sources.  He is mentioned 3 times in this blog post and once in Reds Denk but this is far from enough for WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unnotable insignificant footballer without decent sourcing.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Necessary International Initiative : It is yet another obscure Trotskyist international; this one didn't even last longer than a year before splitting!  Its two cited sources are both (clearly unreliable) articles published by other obscure Trotskyist Internationals (the International Bolshevik Tendency and League for the Fifth International ).  A search on Google Scholar yields only two results, both of which are false positives.  [9] I tried looking for it in one Robert J. Alexander 's books, but only found a passing mention in a section about the International Marxist Group , without any real detail whatsoever.  As it doesn't appear to have any significant coverage in reliable sources , I don't think it meets our notability guidelines for organizations and I'm recommending it for deletion.  Grnrchst ( talk ) 13:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics , Germany ,  and United Kingdom .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 13:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Yue 🌙 01:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Berto Ferrero : signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Russia ,  and Spain .  signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Noting that additional sources have been added that interview Ferrero [9] [10] but provide no significant independent coverage of his career or life, and thus do not help build a case for notability.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no significant coverage in any language.  People whose most significant role is an academy coordinator or assistant manager very rarely meet GNG.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject Directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 15:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Geoff Warburton : That means the article will not be expanding beyond its current state any time soon, and as is this is a blatant WP:NOTDATABASE vio.  Article has since been restored and there is one more source than before, but it appears to me that my point still stands.  The coverage here still does not support independent notability.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That one new source being this interview with Music Business Worldwide .  Doesn't seem like the hottest source for notability to me.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 11:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is based far, far too heavily on primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, while the media sourcing consists mainly of glancing namechecks of his existence in sources whose primary subject is someone or something else.  What's left for sourcing about him is one Q&A interview in which he's talking about himself in the first person in a publication that would probably not meet reliable source requirements anyway, and one Billboard article that's technically fine but not all by itself enough if it's the only substantive source on offer.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have considerably better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:39, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Despite the admirable, last-minute efforts by a single-purpose account , we still do not have enough to categorize the text's subject as Wikipedia-notable .  Which, of course, is no reflection whatsoever on their musical talent and artistic value.  We have routine announcements in the field press, e.g. here , here , or here ; one Rolling Stone 404 link ; listings in All Music such as this ; the not-exactly-earth-shaking report about a contract extension; and so on.  Truly very little in terms of support .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thet Hein Soe : No indication of wp:notability under either GNG or the SNG.   All references are database type sites.   No even medium dept coverage vs. in depth.   Previously deleted.  North8000 ( talk ) 22:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deepak Ravindran : I'm bringing this here for discussion since I"m not sure and otherwise with the promotion and blackhat stripped, I'm not sure he's a notable businessman.
 NB: I suspect this was created by an untagged sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Morning277 given timing and visible & deleted history, but it's not a G5 so we're looking at this on merits only.  Star Mississippi 18:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Star Mississippi 18:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No, he's not notable.  The Wired article referenced is a one line quote he gave while speaking at a conference.  The rest is fluffy promotional coverage, Bizcrfut we'll call it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BIZCRFUT .  Thincat ( talk ) 09:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 04:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete notability is not established here.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 06:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sonny Bunch : RS cites and WP:BEFORE show only some RS writing by the subject, and not RS biographical coverage of the subject.  This would be needed for a WP:BLP of the subject to be present in Wikipedia.  Tagged for notability issues since 2019.  A previous PROD in 2022 was removed on the argument that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS , but the problems were not remedied in the years since.  There appears to be no reasonable prospect of this article organically fixing itself - David Gerard ( talk ) 14:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Film ,  and United States of America .  David Gerard ( talk ) 14:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete hard when he has published so much, but did not find any substantive coverage of the subject in reliable sources.  Eddie891 Talk Work 13:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No available RS substantive coverage.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 23:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Russell K. Standish : Subject seems to be a fairly run-of-the-mill computer scientist who had a leading position in some non-notable conferences.  Since its creation in 2007, the article has never had any independent citations.  BD2412 T 17:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 17:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If by "independent citations", you mean wikipedia articles linking to this page independently of the original author, then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Library_of_Babel would constitute as such.  Originally this page was created as part of an attempt to document the field of Artificial Life and its history, as a resource for students interested in exploring the topic.   Those pages have changed substantially since that time.  Hpcoder ( talk ) 22:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I mean WP:Reliable sources documenting the subject.  BD2412 T 22:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete he seems to be a serious scientist.  However, there is nothing in this article or a quick web search that demonstrates that he meets the relatively high bar set for notability.  He may eventually, but not yet ( WP:TOOSOON ).  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 23:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Madhur Sharma : Hitro talk 09:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and India .  Hitro talk 09:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Someone who's wrong on the internet ( talk ) 02:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable singer, article almost seems like a vanity page.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:27, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AlphaPets : QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , not notable.  Artem.G ( talk ) 17:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can confirm that the books were published around 1990 but do not find awards nor reviews.  They are found in only ~55 libraries in all of WorldCat so their impact appears to be limited.  Lamona ( talk ) 01:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NBOOK .  4meter4 ( talk ) 19:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aboureihan High School : 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 15:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Iran .  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 15:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ace-Liam Nana Sam Ankrah : This is an article about a one-year old who has been declared the youngest male artist by Guinness because, like any child, he can randomly put paint on a canvas.  It seems pretty clear that there will never be sustained coverage of him.  Pichpich ( talk ) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Ghana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, there are a grand total of two news articles in Yen News about the child; we don't hold Guinness Records as notable, so I'm not sure what's left for notability...  A child that draws pictures is what every child, everywhere on the planet, does.  I don't see notability, at all.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Perhaps a merge to Guinness World Records as a brief mention somewhere but other than that, no, Wikipedia does hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves.  -- œ ™ 09:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm guessing you meant to write: " no, Wikipedia does NOT hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves "? Pichpich ( talk ) 18:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes thank you for correcting my error. -- œ ™ 12:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No need to merge to Guinness World Records as this is extremely minor based on very few sources over just a short period of time.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 12:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This GWR is usually not a criteria for being notable except at a great case like Hilda Baci , Lata Tondon , etc.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Living in Tehran : I wasn't able to find any additional coverage searching in English and Persian.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Travel and tourism ,  and Iran .  signed, Rosguill talk 15:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/16/iran-jailed-british-iranian-aras-amiri-nazanin-zaghari-ratcliffe 148.252.24.130 ( talk ) 15:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.motorsport-total.com/oldtimer/news/den-peugeot-405-gibt-es-noch-als-neuwagen-fuer-7800-euro-21091701 148.252.24.130 ( talk ) 15:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There were several references to it in English and Persian https://financialtribune.com/articles/travel/80774/guide-to-living-in-tehran 148.252.24.130 ( talk ) 15:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Guardian piece does not mention Living in Tehran, other than to say that a Persian lion from Bristol zoo had been sent to live in Tehran zoo .  The Financial Tribune piece is unbylined and reads like an ad.  We're nowhere near meeting WP:NCORP here.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] IP, please stop wasting our time by re-linking sources already cited in the article which don't even begin to address notability concerns.  The latest addition is a reprint of an article, not independent coverage.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - does not seem to meet WP:N.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete