hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
SV Vesta Stadion: Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Caribbean .  Owen× ☎ 13:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , tried finding some substance when I saw it in the prod feed.  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article falls short of WP:NARENA and WP:GNG .  It doesn't prove the notability of  the stadium .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZyphorianNexus ( talk • contribs ) 15:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless it's mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia what teams plays/played there, in which case redirect to that team's article.  Note that S.V. Vesta seem to play at a different stadium ( Stadion dr. Antoine Maduro ), so I can't work out which team plays/played there, and so cannot currently see a sensible redirect target.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 16:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing notability Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 10:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lacks reliable sources to establish the stadium's notability WP:NARENA , WP:GNG , WP:NSTADIUM .  Waqar 💬 17:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leila Fletcher: WP:NOTADVERT would seem to apply.  Further, fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO .  4meter4 ( talk ) 15:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Canada .  Edward-Woodrow • talk 15:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  On a ProQuest search, I get a fair number of glancing namechecks of her piano coursebooks — a few times in reviews of Two Pianos Four Hands , once in a review of an Emily Haines album, that sort of thing — and on Newspapers.com I get her name popping up in ads for music stores selling the books, but I found absolutely SFA that was about her for the purposes of WP:GNG .  An article about her would probably be keepable if it could be sourced properly , I'll grant, but I haven't been able to find anything that resembles proper sourcing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 22:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 22:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I haven't been able to turn up any useful sources that could be used to confirm notability.  — CurryTime7-24 ( talk ) 18:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Exocentric environment: Shreevatsa ( talk ) 13:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Shreevatsa ( talk ) 13:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , or potentially redirect to virtual reality with a topic merge.  The majority of scholarly articles that use this terminology set are not independent of its creators (Ivica Bukvic and Disha Sardana, inter alia ), but there's a little bit out there that might be usable.  I don't think it stands alone as much more than a dictionary definition, but it might warrant a brief mention in the parent topic and, thus, a redirect.  Maybe.  Lubal ( talk ) 15:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Artists Anonymous Theatre Network: due to its similarities with existing artist, the owner Alexander Parsonage has allowed for this deletion on wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TazioLinse ( talk • contribs ) 15:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 29 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre , Organizations , England ,  and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No independent coverage found of this apparently short-lived "network".  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 21:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per INDY and SIGCOV.  Doesn't meet notability guidelines either.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 16:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marco Scherbaum: Reasons: It is an obvious marketing article.  The person concerned is an average businessman (insurance broker) with no regional nor national relevance.  In addition, he advertises with fancy titles ("European Senator"), which derive from the membership of a private association (Europäischer Wirtschaftssenat e. V.), but may give the impression of being an official title/legit political position.  By mentioning on Wikipedia, this impression becomes reinforced and, if necessary, legitimized.  The German Wiki's article has already been deleted for these reasons.  -- BancoBank ( talk ) 10:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not 100% sure though, there's quite a few sources.  Idk if they're WP:PRIMARY though, I'm guessing quite a few of them would be.  Seems like a puff piece.  There's not really any reasoning in the article as to why he is notable.  Google shows up nothing that's a reliable source.  If someone can give a summary of the German wiki deletion discussion, that would be useful.  MarkiPoli ( talk ) 18:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dead Register: - Rich T | C | E-Mail 17:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It is un-notable.  CastJared ( talk ) 17:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG .  Maliner ( talk ) 18:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeffrey Ignacio: Has won some routine competitions.  The article suggests he's won big international tournaments, but simply hasn't.  Didn't have the sort of coverage to meet WP:GNG in my WP:BEFORE Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 08:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cue sports-related deletion discussions .  Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs ) 08:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Giridhara R Babu: While there are quite a few sources that state that this individual has contributed significantly to their field, all of them (that I could find) are closely associated with the subject and possibly written by them directly.  Per NACADEMICS#1, academic impact needs to be demonstrated through reliable independent sources, and those are just not there.  They also don't seem to meet any of the other relevant criteria.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 22:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 22:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I've restored a fuller but unsourced version from the edit history to facilitate scrutiny.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 22:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Top citations in GS are 218,201,188,172,152; several of these are Covid related; if one takes those out, the top ones are 218,152,142,139,113.  Some of these are highly co-authored, but others are not.  A few years ago, I'd have said this was enough to meet WP:PROF but with the inflated counts that GS now returns I'm not sure.  His academic profile page [34] does not appear to list any elected fellowships or similar.  It may be a case of too early career?  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 23:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF - Altenmann >talk 18:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shashank Shah: Closest things to a claim of notability appear to be: founded a surgery center, the Laparo Obeso Centre; had some interesting patients, including "one of the youngest patients for bariatric surgery"; the heaviest British person; and the heaviest woman in Asia; A few awards, non apparently significant enough to merit notability; Has served as the president of three different medical societies in India relating to obesity.  None of these amount to notability; and having performed a WP:BEFORE search, I can find nothing more that suggests notability.  TJRC ( talk ) 22:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Medicine , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC) , [ reply ] Comment Being president of three different medical societies relating to obesity might pass criterion 6 of WP:NACADEMIC if one of the societies is a "notable national or international scholarly society".  Perhaps the societies in question don't count as notable.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 23:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sounds from your bullets above that you're already giving reasons for why some trimmed down version of this article should be kept.  No idea why this needs to be deleted.  Several independent sources about his work.  Yes there are some self-published sources and other sections that should be deleted, but I don't understand the move the delete the whole article.   — Chris Capoccia 💬 12:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, not really.  As I said above, none of the points I listed amount to notability.  The fact that they can be put in bullet-point format doesn't make him notable.  (Although Eastmain makes a good point that if one of those medical societies is a "notable national or international scholarly society" he may meet WP:NACADEMIC . I'll leave that to the discussion. None of those societies has so far been deemed notable enough to have a Wikipedia article; but that's not conclusive.)  To be clear though, I nominated this article for deletion based on the lack of notability of the subject; not on the quality of the sourcing, which can always be cleaned up.  TJRC ( talk ) 15:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - almost notable.  I wish we could get some physicians to look at this. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 22:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Babai Sen: The primary notability claim here is that his films exist, which isn't automatically enough in and of itself in the absence of WP:GNG -worthy coverage about him in reliable sources -- but the only "reference" actually being used as a proper footnote for any of the body text is simply the exact same article copied and pasted from another wiki (a user-generated source that cannot support notability), and the article otherwise just contextlessly lists a bunch of further sources which are all either short blurbs that don't add up to enough coverage to pass GNG, or glancing namechecks of his existence in articles that aren't otherwise about him, which don't help to establish notability at all either.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per thorough reasoning by nominator.  LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 15:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] G12 speedy delete see revision history.  Snowmanonahoe ( talk ) 16:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy deletion has been declined.  My new position is delete as I cannot find anything on any of the works this guy has produced, let alone himself.  Snowmanonahoe ( talk ) 19:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aintabli ( talk ) 18:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Admin note : the copyvio content was removed and I have purged the affected revisions, which was all but three.  G12 does not apply to what remains.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 19:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Apex Trader Funding: No proper references for primary information, most sources are not reliable.  ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and Texas .  ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Churnalism, PR items and the like.  This is PROMO with no discussion found in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Having PRODed this just yesterday, I arrive to the same conclusion.  References are mostly from press releases, it is hard to see how this meets WP:CORP notability criteria.  Article seems promotional to me. I get the impression I'm being presented a way to get a big payout with this product, which doesn't come across as very encyclopedic.  Mlkj ( talk ) 17:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Websites .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've removed the routine paid placement and SEO/PR sources.  The remaining ones are likely just blogs and more PR.  Was not able to find much organic material about the company; address is a mail scanning service.  Will be difficult to pick out real sources from the clouds of press releases.  Not clear where some of the details in the article came from, and not clear why this was moved in to mainspace.  Sam Kuru (talk) 00:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Over the past month, I've dedicated myself to researching the relatively new field of trader funding companies.  With a history of about five years, these companies are gaining traction in the market.  Notably, the second-largest company in this sector is TopstepTrader .  I'm eager to hear your thoughts on what additional information or insights could be included to make this article worth staying.  XK8ER ( talk ) 01:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ XK8ER even if this company is "gaining traction in the market" you will need strong sourcing to meet WP:NCORP .  you can read WP:THREE which would be helpful.  She was a fairy 20:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:CORP .  Possible promo.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG .  Article reads like a promo piece, and sources are PR and churnalism.  -- Kinu t / c 22:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : this article's backbone includes non-reliable blogs and press releases, and a sprinkle of WP:PROMO .  She was a fairy 20:03, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Padanilam Higher Secondary School, Nooranad: See https://indiankanoon.org/doc/107838062/ Newhaven lad ( talk ) 18:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Kerala .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KBFY-LD: Let'srun ( talk ) 22:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Arizona .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage in Yuma paper.  An ad indicates they aired God's Learning Channel in the early 2000s.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 20:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 02:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zoran Đorđević (photographer): I haven't been able to find a single secondary source, in English or Serbian, which discusses the subject, so it fails the WP:BASIC criteria guidelines as well as WP:PHOTOGRAPHER .  The article content which is unsourced is taken largely from his own website .  Griboski ( talk ) 02:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  Griboski ( talk ) 02:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 02:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly fails WP:BIO for lack of coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete