hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of peers retired and removed under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 : What's the point?  It may have seemed like a novelty when the first resignations began happening, but this law has been in force for nine years now.  No other article about a legislature maintains a list of everyone who has resigned from it.  Richard75 ( talk ) 23:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What about having a yearly one Earl of Sutton Coldfield ( talk ) 00:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 00:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What about having it in list of decade of retired peers Earl of Sutton Coldfield ( talk ) 14:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That would help with the length, but it still doesn't deal with notability.  Why does this list need to exist at all?  Richard75 ( talk ) 15:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Suport : Doesn't like a noteworthy list to maintain.  2601:249:9301:D570:909A:F52B:67C2:D58 ( talk ) 01:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What are you supporting?  deletion or keeping?  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 14:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a pretty clear failure of WP:NLIST .   I see this was split out from House of Lords Reform Act 2014 , and I think WP:CARGO applies here.   I also note that the main article doesn't even appear to be notable on its own.   Sources in it are all primary, and I found very very little discussing it on its own, and when I did, it was usually in the broader context of previous reform efforts generally.  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 14:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I think is should be done by decade which may work as life peers are separated by 1958-1979 , Thatcher-Major , New Labour , C(ameron), M(ay), J(ohnson), T(russ) and S(unak) .  That doesn't address notability though.  Richard75 ( talk ) 15:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK but it would work if you had them in decades.  Earl of Sutton Coldfield ( talk ) 22:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Deleted I created these as this maybe the solution: List of peers retired under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 (2014–2020) List of peers retired under the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 (2021–present) It is easier to maintain and just keep up to date with either the deaths and the future retirements.  Earl of Sutton Coldfield ( talk ) 13:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I’m not convinced that those meet notability standards, seeing as how they are essentially forks of this article.  64.107.163.147 ( talk ) 16:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
EMCO MSI Package Builder : It lacks sufficient in-depth and comprehensive coverage from reliable sources.  The sources referenced in the article primarily point to the official website or sources that are deemed unreliable.  Barseghian Lilia ( talk ) 19:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mitch Shaw : Prod was contested, and some references were added to the talk page, but there was nothing provided beyond routine coverage.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 10:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 10:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : alas, it is but with a heavy heart I must concede this page does not meet our cherished requirements for GNG, nor SPORTBASIC.  As such, I am compelled to vote 'delete'; sad as I am to extinguish trivialities & curiosities from our cherished global compendium Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I searched ("Mitch Shaw" league ) and only comes up with passing mentions.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wellbeing Literacy : Insufficient sourcing independent of Lindsay Oades , a few other scholarly articles exist but none appear substantial enough to re-write this article.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Health and fitness ,  and Psychology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Craig Blackwood : Simply playing in the World championships does not confer automatic notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: the deepest coverage I could find on the subject is this , anyone have different research?  2601:204:C901:B740:BC4D:4722:86DD:21C0 ( talk ) 06:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] and that's a primary source.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] didn’t know that before, thanks for letting me know.  2601:204:C901:B740:BC4D:4722:86DD:21C0 ( talk ) 07:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New Zealand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:47, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - represented a nation on International level.  A brief search yields several results [17] , [18] etc.  -- Bringtar ( talk ) 18:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Representing a nation at international level even the Olympics does not mean automatic notability.  This one is a 1 line mention and does not meet WP:SIGCOV .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 06:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MidPoint Indie Summer Series : Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Events , United States of America ,  and Ohio .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arend and Anneesa Feenstra : Doing something dumb without thinking, and then giving one interview to a media outlet about it, is not in and of itself a reason to immortalize somebody forever in an encyclopedia just because they had a couple of news stories written about that in the first couple of days.  Obviously, this can be recreated in the future if it actually turns out to have a significant long-term impact on the world (seems unlikely, though I won't say never -- I suppose they could theoretically launch a cult compound in Kamchatka and accidentally trigger World War III or something?), but as of right now this is essentially just a WP:NOTNEWS violation about low-profile private citizens who've done absolutely nothing of permanent significance.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Russia and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Excuse me?  Not wanting to sound disrespective but I wouldn't expect an article about me if I just moved and found out I cannot speak the local language and I'm broke.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 21:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Christianity .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No reason this should be here.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per summary by Bearcat MNewnham ( talk ) 02:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Deleted by article creator, per clear consensus here.  — The Anome ( talk ) 08:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kyaw Htoo : Please note that WP:FPL is no longer relevant and Kyaw Htoo is required to have significant coverage from reliable, independent sources.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no GNG-passing sources to be found.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails in WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Full-Time: Vancouver's Soccer Show : As usual, radio shows aren't "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourceability, but there's no referencing here at all and never has been, and the article was likely a WP:COI from the jump as it was created by an editor named "Fulltimesoccer".  The only reason I'm not immediately speedying this is that it's 14 years old.  Bearcat ( talk ) 04:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 04:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 01:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dewitt, Lassen County, California : It's one of a large group of post offices entered as settlements from Durham's place names book, but the most cursory look at maps and aerials shows that it locates to a single farmstead which has gotten larger over the years but which was never anything town-like.  No GNIS entry, and the text of the article is about the post office, which isn't notable.  Mangoe ( talk ) 22:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm sorry to have missed this one when I was cleaning up California's many non-notable geographic stubs.   Clearly not a notable place, just a post office operated out of a farmhouse, failing WP:GEOLAND .   All sources are about the post office or the family, not any "settlement".  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ironically, the most in-depth source cited is one of those turn of the 20th century hagiographies that has to be carefully used as a source, and has not been carefully used here.   It's about a person, and even says that this is that person's homestead and farm.  Uncle G ( talk ) 15:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Newspaper review finds this evidence consistent with other claims here.  James.folsom ( talk ) 00:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Narayani Subramaniam : BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 07:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Further research shows this person is not notable.  Hadal1337 ( talk ) 16:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Currently cited sources are routine coverage, trivial mentions, and online profiles.  Searches in Tamil only yield trivial mentions and articles written by the subject.  Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 19:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ngonguinha : I have searched "Ngonguinha" and "Zeferina Elsa Caupe," as well as "Ngonguita," which it also appears she has been known by.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Angola .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Péter Fröhlich : Unable to find WP:SIGCOV .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 03:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Hungary ,  and England .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 03:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adarsh Vidya Mandir : Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Maharashtra .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 11:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hilden Grange School : I cannot find reliable, independent secondary sources and I don't think the school meets WP:NCORP or WP:GNG .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 09:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 09:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BlueCentral : Pepper Beast (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete An expert on the source material may be able to bring it up to notability standards, but it does not pass NCORP right now and it seems unlikely that it can.  Happy to hear input from anyone with additional insight on this topic.  Royal Autumn Crest ( talk ) 19:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Swan505 ( talk ) 03:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Highking Roberts : JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can't find the necessary independent WP:RS coverage for this person Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pardee Homes : The article reads like Spam .  Rdavid~enwiki created this article in Dec 2005, and has no other contribution on Wikipedia.   Pardee Homes in Los Angeles was owned by Weyerhaeuser in Washington state.  ( https://www.weyerhaeuser.com/blog/design-trends-2014-part-2/ )  It was sold to another firm ca.2015 and changed its name.  Pardee is a semi-common name of various businesses, and one is not related to another.  I am not able to verify this particular Pardee Homes still exists.  Google searches bring up Pardee listings, but no way to tell how old those listings are, or if they are even related to this one.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , California ,  and Nevada .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Mainly advertising sources for the company.  I note, however, that there are 2 pretty detailed obits for George Pardee Jr. so someone might want to put forth an article for him.  It would include the building business.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Support deletion.  This company does not meet the notability standard set out in NCORP.  There is some excellent coverage of the company in this book.  I am absolutely open to considering a change in ! vote if someone can find multiple examples of sourcing as good as the two pages of coverage within this book.  However most of everything else I found were trivial mentions of developments made by the company in real estate magazines.  These do not constitute the in-depth significant coverage required for companies.  There is good coverage of the company's founder, such as the LA Times article within the existing sourcing.  This article only covers the founder in detail, rather than the company.  The founder may well be notable, however his company does not inherit his notability.  Turning to the quality of the article, I am usually against using "it's spammy" as an argument for deletion because an article can always be cleaned up.  However not only can no editing overcome a lack of notability, I really do not see a substantial amount of text that is worth re-writing or salvageable.  The entire article reads like a company profile or website.  Even if notability is established, I would prefer to see the article draftified or even started all over again .  As it stands, nowhere near fit for main.  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 05:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete