hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
WAST-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Wisconsin .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I have added several references, most offline to NewsBank (Duluth paper is some of the hardest to obtain anywhere — that can be said of any Forum Communications paper!).  There is SIGCOV of its very short-lived news operation.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Each of the sources added by Sammi provide the WP:SIGCOV needed for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: More review of new sources would be welcome.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Florencio Badelic Jr.: There are a lot of citations in the article, but all of them are routine and/or match reports.  There seems to be little or no WP:SIGCOV here.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Decent coverage in local media, even though it is from a not very popular football center, the article seems sufficiently based.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't disagree.  There seems to be a lot of match reports in the mix, though, and little of substance.  That said, I'm still unsure about the article as a whole.  Thanks for the vote.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:BIO per Svartner's argument.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 00:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
He Ri Jun Zai Lai: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English states: "This guideline for deleting redirects states that redirects in languages other than English that point to articles not directly related to that language (or a culture associated with that language) should generally not be kept." - I added emphasis with the italics.  Two of the terms are related to Mandarin: When Would You Come Again (1999 Taiwanese television series) and When Will You Return?  (1937 song) are related to the Mandarin "He Ri Jun Zai Lai" Two of them are from pre-1997 handover Hong Kong: Au Revoir, Mon Amour (1991) and Till the End of Time (1996).  My understanding is that both films are in Cantonese, so this would mean they are related to the Chinese text "何日君再來" but not necessarily to the Mandarin pinyin.  WhisperToMe ( talk ) 01:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a borderline case—one thing I might note is that these are spaced syllables, which is definitely a way a Chinese speaker might type this into the search bar, but not the only or most likely way?  I'm not sure: I would type Heri jun zai lai first, because 何日 ; 'when' is one word here.  Remsense 诉 02:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding another comment... personally I would keep because redirects can also include alternate capitalizations/spellings/etc.  It is plausible that a native born Mandarin speaker would use this form, and so this would be a correct redirect/disambig only for topics related to cultures of Mandarin Chinese-speaking communities.  WhisperToMe ( talk ) 04:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep as harmless, and potentially helpful.  BD2412 T 00:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Lo Presti 'ndrina: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 31 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:53, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  DonCalo ( talk ) 20:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  DonCalo ( talk ) 21:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The main argument to delete this article is that it violates the Wikipedia:No original research rule.  The information in the article, which switched name from Lo Presti crime family to Lo Presti 'ndrina back and forth, can be easily incorporated into the article on Rocco Lo Presti . Google searches on Lo presti crime family , Lo Presti 'ndrina or Lo Presti clan only show results from Wikipedia and Wikipedia replicates. -- DonCalo ( talk ) 17:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 21:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As above. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively into 'Ndrangheta : the information seems verifiable, but not notable enough for a standalone article. Owen× ☎ 22:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Harish Kumar Gupta: Appears to be mainly sourced from a LinkedIn resume and government bio page (both fail WP:IS, WP:RS), with other refs being routine mill news and name mentions.  Government service awards are routine, not meeting WP:ANYBIO.  // Timothy :: talk 15:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Police ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Andhra Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Page reads as resume for job application.  Things he did or delegated as correctional officer and none of it is a significant achievement and widely known to warrant a page on the subject.  Fails WP:BIO and notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Head of the police of Andhra Pradesh, a major state of India.  For those used to state police forces having a limited role, state police forces in India are huge and provide all policing in the state.  Clearly notable and sources satisfy WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Embassy of Italy, Tirana: Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 07:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Albania ,  and Italy .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Like many other embassies, this one occupies an architecturally significant building.  The corresponding article in the Albanian Wikipedia at sq:Ambasada_Italiane_në_Tiranë , provides some information abut the building's status as a Cultural Monument of Albania that I have added to the English article.  Several photos of the embassy are on Commons at commons:Category:Embassy_of_Italy,_Tirana .  It is always a good idea to check an article's counterpart in the Wikipedias of other languages before nominating it for deletion.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I disagree with Eastmain , the fact that other languages have content on a subject does not mean that it is notable.  I am not able to read AR and ARZ Wikipedia (I'm not even sure which languages they are without looking it up) but it looks like they may have more sources.  I was not able to find any sources with a quick search but one may have to use other languages or look up a different phrase.  ✶Qux yz ✶ 13:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Listed cultural monuments will have documentation on file with the  corresponding authorities; I see no reason to believe this one wouldn't.  I can't read Albanian but some Gsearch and Gtranslate brings up at least a few mentions of this building.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Here's the listing: https://iktk.gov.al/site/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Vendim-nr. -32-date-07.02.2023-Ambasada-Italiane.pdf Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps redirect to the "Cultural Monument of Albania"?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Juan Abarca Cidón: Fails WP:GNG, coverage is incidental, owned media such as ey.com, press releases.  No inherent notability.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Law , Medicine ,  and Spain .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:ROTM businessman doing his job.  Nothing to suggest a pass at WP:BIO 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep :Juan Abarca Cidón is a physician and doctor with several scientific publications, he is the head of the third largest hospital group in Spain.  There is a lot of media coverage because he has raised the controversy about public health and private health, and he is an advisor to the government.  In the Talk section of the article , you can see links to numerous independent publications about him in which he is featured. -- DamAzul ( talk ) 08:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Abarca C. is a notable person in the health sector and should not be considered for removal, as he is referenced in many reliable sources independent of Wikipedia, such as El Pais , Cinco Días , El Mundo , El diario.es , ABC , El Confidencial -- Fittipaldi92 ( talk ) 08:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 12:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Well known and important in the health and political sector.  Appropriate references according to Wikipedia standards. -- Miskito89 ( talk ) 08:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Justinmind (software): Sources that aren't the app's website are limited to lists of apps that won an award.  Only one of these lists discusses the app, and it's more ad copy Wizmut ( talk ) 17:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Being limited to lists does not mean the source doesn't count towards significant coverage.  [1] is definitely not just ad copy, and, apparently, the fucking EU wrote an article about their tools to design for spatial computing .  (Not that it's your fault for not realizing that article exists. I glanced over it on first sight because the title under Google search results is just too darn long and windy and untoward.)  There's also some buzz about some "Absolute Report" about them that's locked behind business bureaucracy.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 03:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
WorldSkills: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 23:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 23:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The previous AfD was when the article had slightly different name-spacing; the discussion can be found here .  AllyD ( talk ) 14:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think that the references are now enough to establish notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aoidh ( talk ) 07:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 16:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Ted Pierce: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That leading Australian newspaper archive Trove brings up NOTHING for "Ted Pierce polo" has me suspect that he was known under some other name or something.  I also think that there's a good chance there's sigcov in Water Warriors , a 600-page book chronicling the Australian Olympic water polo team, especially given that he seems to have been one of the more prominent players as he was chosen for three Olympics (he is mentioned in the book ).  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He's also known as Edward Pierce but that gave me nothing.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 19:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Trove is actually extremely limited.  It lacks most of the major Australian newspapers.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 00:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Trove is extremely limited from 1954 onwards.  And this guy was in the 1956, 1960 and 1964 Olympics.  Using online newspaper sources for this era in Australia is useless.  WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES should have a comment on what to do when there are copyright or similar corporate subscription imposed online blackouts.  The-Pope ( talk ) 15:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Although there isn't abundant information about him online, he's a three-time Olympic national and that's significant.  I've been able to find three mentions of him on a Dubbo local newspaper and I'm sure there's more to be found in media that's contemporary to his participation in the Olympics.  Rkieferbaum ( talk ) 17:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Mojo Hand ( talk ) 03:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  I noticed there's a source in the article - offline - from the Sunshine Coast Daily newspaper that is titled "Triple Olympian prefers a 'dry' sport these days".  That seems almost assuredly detailed coverage of him.  Considering the difficulty in finding sources for the period, that this man competed at three Olympics and is covered in the mentioned book, and that there's another offline source that we know is of him, I end up "weak keep".  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Michal Suchánek: He was last known for starring in The Andromeda Strain before disappearing from the entertainment industry in 2008.  My Google searches exclusively showed coverage about the Czech actor but nothing about the younger Michal Suchánek.  No news have been reported on him for more than 15 years either.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 13:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 13:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Some roles seem verry very mildly significant.  But the 1st source on the page mentions 1 Emmy nomination and 2 Young Artist Award nominations which may have him meet ANYBIO.  Notable as a child actor, then. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No new comments since last relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete no evidence of notability, no independent coverage.  noms are not awards.  - Altenmann >talk 19:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus