hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Artem Kuchkov: Was in the youth system at a top division Ukrainian club (but never played for the first team) and has only made first team appearances for a club playing at level 9 in England.  All references are either databases or not independent of the subject.  Number 5 7 05:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Túlio (footballer, born 1987): Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Brazil .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , hardly played games so why would there be any coverage.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Looking at the website ogol.com.br , the athlete had a short professional career, playing only in clubs without a national division from 2008 to 2013.  He undeniably failed in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 13:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Thought about redirecting (to Sport Club do Recife , but no mention there) or draftifying (but no perspective).  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 15:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peter Plantec: A look in the wayback machine finds this satisfies at least 1 out of 2 of the required references.  A newspaper search and thorough Google trawling doesn't turn up anything.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Authors ,  and Computing .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding any reliable sourcing on this person.  Google search shows LinkedIn, Professional profile on World Building Institute site.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:09, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raúl Pineda Rodríguez: He has no significant achievements on BWF , which shows a complete lack of info on him.  The best that I can find are passing mentions in Crónica and Movimiento y Deporte neither of which we can build an article from.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Colombia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a bare-bones article with no sign of notability.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 20:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Organization for Understanding Cluster Headaches: some of the sources identified then are now dead links.  I searched for "Organization for Understanding Cluster Headaches" and "Organisation for the Understanding of Cluster Headache " and could not find significant indepth coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations , Belgium , United Kingdom ,  and Texas .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to the lack of reliable sources.  DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 06:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The organization is mentioned here [48] , but that's not enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per all forementioned reasons above.  Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- 12:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahsan Akbar: There is not enough SIGCOV in RSs to establish notability.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 10:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry , Bangladesh ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree with the nominator.  - AlbeitPK ( talk ) 16:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Clearly notable.  Not just as a poet/columnist, but also as a successful cultural producer/entrepreneur whose literary festival is the biggest of its kind in one of the world's largest countries (at least three times bigger than the UK by population).  Anglophones may or may not be aware of it, but that is utterly irrelevant to the Bangladesh-based popularity of Dhaka LitFest.  -- Peripatetic ( talk ) 12:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete References appear to be not about him, notability not established; unclear why his role in Dhaka LitFest meets notability thresholds.  Royal Autumn Crest ( talk ) 11:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some sources are primary but I am sure there will notability in the future.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  07:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of professional paintball teams: External links are being added likely for promotion.  A prime WP:TNT candidate if nothing else.  Merko ( talk ) 21:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Laundry list of non-notable sports teams.  Even the ones with references are only sourced by paintball related sources, so no verifiable depth of coverage outside of the sport.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Almost none of them have any evidence of notability (i.e. no articles).  Athel cb ( talk ) 07:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete despite calling itself a list of notable paintball teams, almost none of the teams actually look notable according to Wikipedia definition.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Vast, sprawling unsourced list with only a few notable entities included.  Almost certain to be a magnet for hoaxes and vandalism.  Carrite ( talk ) 09:55, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  An unsourced list of sports teams with basically no notability.  ULPS ( talk ) 02:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Throne (company): WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : yet to match the social media networking site’s guidelines.  For now its DELETE — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarshalDhotre06 ( talk • contribs ) 13:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 03:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] del - nothing but adverts.  - Altenmann >talk 03:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SamLogic: There doesn't appear to be any coverage of this company itself, and the products don't get much reliable coverage either.  The Swedish article is the exact same as the English article.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , Internet , Software ,  and Sweden .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: There might be more TechWorld articles and also descriptions of their software on Softpedia .  IgelRM ( talk ) 17:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] None of the software postings describe anything about the company at all, and those downloads websites are not reliable sources.  Websites like Softpedia basically only exist to get people to download software from them so they accidentally install malicious installer programs or malware.  The TechWorld article isn't even about the company itself, and is basically just an ad for one of their products.  Nothing I could find counts as meeting the WP:NCORP requirements of containing WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject of the article directly in WP:RS .  I did find coverage of the company in a college thesis, but information from it was seemingly taken from an email interview, making it WP:PRIMARY , and theses are not usually counted as reliable sources.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The thesis in question (presumably) – Tera tix ₵ 15:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Techworld article is clearly unsuitable, I couldn't find any other decent coverage and both the Swedish and English articles were created by single-purpose accounts.  On the another hand, supposing there were coverage of this Swedish company founded in the 1990s, would it really show up in my own Google and database searches?  I'm inclined to delete but I would be reassured if we had some Swedish input.  – Tera tix ₵ 15:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm unable to locate any references that meet GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 20:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bonneville Environmental Foundation: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Worthy organisation, but I am not convinced it is notable.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Environment .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : News reporting I've seen is trivial at best and most hits on Google scholar are either name drops or papers written by the organization's staff.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 02:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PJ Vermeulen: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just found this on this one, so not enough for a GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Branch Area Career Center: Article is strongly promotional, including phone and fax (!) numbers.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Michigan .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the RESA that is associated with it (sorry, it's not known to me which RESA that is) or Delete.  Schools like this provide facilities for member schools to be able to award vocational diplomas to their students; they are not strictly speaking high schools on their own.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 01:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  If you are arguing for a Merge or Redirect, please provide a link to the target article you are considering.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article doesn't exist.  So you can consider my ! vote above to be Delete 4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 17:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Because it's a promotion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GQO ( talk • contribs ) 08:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :Because it's clearly a promotion ( GQO ( talk ) 08:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Delete as it stands WP:PROMO applies here.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mike Flores (author): Boleyn ( talk ) 20:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Games ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Telephone (artwork): Fram ( talk ) 14:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and United Kingdom .  Fram ( talk ) 14:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find anything about this particular artwork, many articles about telephones in art.  Doesn't appear to have been a notable piece past the initial display a decade ago.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  After the lead the text is gallerist gobblededook.  Johnbod ( talk ) 14:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It would be too big of a stretch to say the artwork is notable, perhaps consider listing it under the artist's article?  Avignonesi ( talk ) 16:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No WP:SIGCOV , does not meet WP:GNG .  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Delete as per the nominator.  Pragnain ( talk ) 03:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rina Bjarnason: This article fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  Australia only played in the Olympics as a host nation and lost every game.  Only primary sources provided.  LibStar ( talk ) 18:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Handball ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 18:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sports biographies are subject to a heightened sourcing standard.  See WP:SPORTBASIC prong 5: "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources."  This one-sentence stub does not meet the standard.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Even gold medalists are not afforded inherent notability; as Cbl62 says, all sportsperson biographies must cite a source of SIGCOV in addition to the subject meeting GNG.  A search through newspaper archives and ProQuest only turned up brief mentions in the context of the 2000 Games, a short local interview with her son some years later about his cancer, and an article that at first seemed promising but ended up only having a few of sentences actually on Bjarnason and included a high percentage of unencyclopedic details (like her husband and son being in the stands).  JoelleJay ( talk ) 02:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  The only sources are primary, and multiple searches didn't come up with much better.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yu Song-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Certainly fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV , but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rankings of business schools in South Africa: Per WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:NOTSTATS , all the rankings data could be redirected into the relevant university page and there is no need of a separate page to compare the rankings of business schools in South Africa.  The only other related page that I found for business school rankings is this one for US business schools which is very detailed in methodology and it is not just a few Financial Times business rankings or other data that are not explained properly, as in the case of this South African article.  Since there is seems to be a quite small coverage on South African business rankings overall, there is no need for a compilation of such academic, very specialized rankings.  Chiserc ( talk ) 21:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and South Africa .  Chiserc ( talk ) 21:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Apparent listcruft.  Orientls ( talk ) 12:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails CLN and NLIST.  // Timothy :: talk 14:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete