hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Teenage Bottlerocket discography: Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 23:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Simple redirect to Teenage Bottlerocket § Discography .  (P.S. To think that I'm now meeting a newcomer who shares the same real first name as me...how amazing! What are the odds?) -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 23:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music .  Netherzone ( talk ) 00:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Teenage Bottlerocket#Discography . It's just a copy of the section; there's no point for it to have it's own separate page. JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 02:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Teenage Bottlerocket#Discography . They don't have enough chart placements or related info to justify a separate Discography article, per the requirements at Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies . --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Teenage Bottlerocket#Discography per above.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 18:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Teenage Bottlerocket#Discography .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 03:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Web chat: I propose deleting the article or moving to draft space until it is significantly improved.  Ae245 ( talk ) 14:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  Ae245 ( talk ) 14:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Online chat .  No one's going to improve this in draftspace for the same reason no one's addressed the maintenance tags in a decade: it's not 2010 anymore.  Online chat is basically the same topic, so we can redirect there.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 04:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect s are cheap and effective.  This page would likely be a content fork of Online chat if expanded further.  There's an additional issue here: the requested move discussion at Online chat.  But that's not relevant to this process.  BusterD ( talk ) 15:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Luke Lazarus Arnold: Appears to fail WP:GNG as the references are mostly poor quality passing mentions, and collectively these references don't constitute significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  Uhooep ( talk ) 19:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Brunei , Indonesia ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of high commissioners of Australia to Brunei per WP:ATD .  Sourcing is either not in-depth or not independent from the subject.  Pilaz ( talk ) 21:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I agree with the nomination of redirect, as I do find the sources not very in-depth and the individual only holding one diplomatic position.  A redirect seems very reasonable.  Pangalau ( talk ) 02:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of high commissioners of Australia to Brunei : Appears not to pass WP:GNG and redirect is a sensible alternative to deletion.  Tar nis hed Path talk 03:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of high commissioners of Australia to Brunei .  WC gudang inspirasi ( Read! Talk! ) 11:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Toyota E transmission: A before finds no independent coverage of the product.  Possible re-direct?  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Transportation .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#E-series .  Per nom, no evidence of notability.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 18:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#E-series .  No GNG sources come up on search even with variations and the topic is highly unlikely to be independently notable.  It is possible that some print sources exist, but even then WP:NOPAGE would still make this highly questionable as a stand-alone.  184.152.68.190 ( talk ) 21:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jonny Benjamin: — C.Fred ( talk ) 23:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes i created a new account as per the advice of Geoffrey Lane-i was following the instructions step by step from his reply to Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team Re: [Ticket#2024071110029918] Request to delete page about me Jonnybenjamin ( talk ) 07:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have corrected the link; it previously linked to a non-existent article.  Please confirm this is the correct link.  -- Un assiolo ( talk ) 19:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per BLP1E.   I have removed some of the more unnecessary personal details.  The Stranger on the Bridge might be a redirect target, or another candidate for deletion.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Stranger on the Bridge : per WP:1E .  C F A 💬 20:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] also support protection per below.  C F A 💬 03:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and protect so it can’t be undone.  We don’t need this amount of sensitive personal information about a living person.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Health and fitness , Internet ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Melungeon DNA Project: No RS.  Most properly sourced material already covered in Melungeon article, making this a possible REDUNDANTFORK.  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 23:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Social science , United States of America , Kentucky ,  and Tennessee .  Just Another Cringy Username ( talk ) 23:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  The article is bad-written, but the subject looks notable enough - per Google Scholar search results .  .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Melungeon#Genetic testing .  WP:TNT may apply.  I agree that the article as it stands is simply a note of what the study says and relies on the study itself, appearing to be WP:OR .  Given some of the comments in both articles' talk pages and historical edits, an article on the reliability of the study may be more in line with Wikipedia's standards.  WP:NOTTEXTBOOK possibly applies to what is there now.  Regarding the Google Scholar results: there are 13 total, with no.s 7, 9, 10 all being the same thing (a dissertation that was eventually published into a book).   No. 5 actually only mentions the article topic to state that it was removed from the data set the article covers; no. 2 is a book review, not about the study itself.  Mapping Melungia (no. 4) is a self-published book - via Lulu.com -  that reads like an essay and isn't peer-reviewed as far as I can tell.  At a glance, Internet Archive has 6 results , but 3 of those are the same - and those three are result no. 8 on the Google Scholar link above - and it is only a brief couple of paragraphs that discuss how the study's results could be skewed.  The only one in IA that doesn't appear in the Google results is "Explorations in Consumer Culture Theory".  There doesn't appear to be SIGCOV of the study itself, and the main article only has the one source - again, the study itself - for the genetic testing section.  Still, I think a redirect is more in order than deletion if for no other reason than the back and forth in both pages' histories.  OIM20 ( talk ) 00:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Melungeon#Genetic testing per above.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Spitalfields Market: The page does not relate to New Spitalfields Market which has its own page.  Davidstewartharvey ( talk ) 22:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Food and drink ,  and Shopping malls .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore dab for which its useful.  Star Mississippi 12:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm leaning to restoring the dab page.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
1921 Santos FC season: 1keyhole ( talk ) 05:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Brazil .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Out of a whole series of these articles, there are loads like this, why nominator this one?  Did you not look at or nominate others like 1920 Santos FC season or 1950 Santos FC season ?  I am confused here by this single nomination.  Govvy ( talk ) 08:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Santos are one of the most notable football clubs in the world, so their individual seasons are definitely notable, but there is no value in article which consist of a single sentence and no real content, so I suggest that this and any other similar ones get redirected to List of Santos FC seasons until such time as someone feels like creating actual articles.... .  -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 09:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Santos FC seasons as suggested by Chris.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Santos FC seasons There is information about the seasons of Santos FC both online and mainly offline in Brazilian literature.  Redirect per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 02:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shareek-e-Hayat: All I could find is some namechecks coverage.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 14:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 14:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Hum_TV#Anthology_series - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.   Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Same rationale for almost every nomination.  I am doubting WP:Before is done or not.  It was broadcasted in 2013 and many Pakistani newspapers remove old coverage from their websites.  Why a series broadcasted in 2013 need nomination discussion after more than a decade and if its the case then all the old films/television related articles should be nominated and removed from wikipidea.  It received some coverage as one can see here [29] Libraa2019 ( talk ) 09:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Libraa2019 , This is a WP:ATA.  Unless the source is unreliable or dubious, old archives can always be found.  If you doubt that I haven't done WP:BEFORE, why don't you provide some solid coverage (not some Google searches or even ROTM coverage) from RS that help establish WP:GNG, instead of doubting my intentions?  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lorensberga: Previously prod-nominated with the stated reasons being WP:MILL and failure of WP:GNG .  Sure, it exists, but a level of detail beyond mentioning it in the article of the city seems excessive.  Though the school has been involved in the political situation in the city , Ludvika , which is a haven for the far right.  Geschichte ( talk ) 17:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Sweden .  Delta space</substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local areaspan> 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to the city Ludvika .  We very seldom keep primary (elementary) school articles, and almost always redirect to the school district or city.  This school fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL , and no evidence has been provided of Wikipedia:NRVE , "substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area".  — Grand'mere Eugene ( talk ) 00:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
David Ulch: The subject fails WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) A possible redirect is 2017 Rugby League World Cup squads .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and Florida .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As many references about his work as a school dean as there is about his rugby career (which isn't many).  Mn1548 ( talk ) 07:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  20:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Vusala Hajiyeva: The subject has not received sufficient in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2018 , 2021 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Azerbaijan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above or to Azerbaijan women's national football team (for it has her birth date).  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jirahs: Tried to do a WP:BEFORE search, but found zero sigcov.   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 06:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 06:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Ultraman or a to-be-created villains/characters article where individually NN fictional elements like this can be curated appropriately.  Jclemens ( talk ) 07:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the appropropriate page, specifically Ultraman as proposed by Jclemens in an above comment.  71.246.78.77 ( talk ) 12:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Checkuser blocked.  Queen of Hearts talk 23:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per WP:ATD and to achieve consensus.  This doesn't have WP:SIGCOV but it can be summarized at the main topic.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 18:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ultraman (1966 TV series)#Monsters : This monster has not received any significant coverage in a single reliable source.  The closest would be a brief article on a purchasable statuette of the character.  Much of the content of this article is discussed in the article on the show that the character first appeared in.  ― Susmuffin Talk 18:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ultraman (1966 TV series)#Monsters - This monster is actually already covered in a couple sentences in that section already, and there are no sources to indicate that this monster is particularly notable enough to warrant more than those couple of sentences.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 01:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
George Mirabal: Does not appear to pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG .  He does have some media coverage related to his role in the City of Bell scandal , though his individual role does not seem to pass WP:NCRIME .  Could be merged or redirected to City of Bell scandal as an WP:ATD .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Crime ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to City of Bell scandal , a much more detailed account of what happened.  Mirabal is only notable for being one of many people involved in that scandal.  — Maile ( talk ) 14:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per previous vote.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to City of Bell scandal , most  of the secondary sources I could find are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN and the involvement in the scandal isn't enough to pass WP:CRIME enough to merit his own article,  so a redirect sounds good to me.  Shaws username .  talk .  04:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect