hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Maria Toumazou: The subject has earned at least one cap for the Cyprus women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cyprus .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Charmed Again: This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid.  In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show.  Donald D23 talk to me 15:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 15:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , a REDIRECT to the series or season page would be a viable WP:ATD Donald D23 talk to me 20:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect given this is just a plot summary with no evidence of notability.  WP:NOTTVGUIDE .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arianys Argüelles: The subject has made at least one appearance for the Panama women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Panama .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' as above.  Giant Snowman 20:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who): Highly dependent on primary sources, doesn't meet GNG.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is no reception from reliable sources.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens seems obvious.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 01:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to unreliable sources that don't meet WP:GNG .  A redirect would be fine.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:10, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect (or merge) to the List of Doctor Who characters unless improved with reception/analysis.  Fails GNG as written ( WP:FANCRUFT ).  Note : The user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pokelego999 has over approx two days mass-nominated for deletion fifty-one Doctor Who-related articles as follows: Blinovitch Limitation Effect, Destrii, Muriel Frost, Kadiatu Lethbridge-Stewart, Iris Wildthyme, Shayde, Fey Truscott-Sade, Sam Jones (Doctor Who), Molly O'Sullivan, Jason Kane (Doctor Who), Flip Jackson, Mila (Doctor Who), Charley Pollard, Evelyn Smythe, Thomas Brewster (Doctor Who), Abby (Doctor Who), Vislor Turlough, Rutan (Doctor Who), Draconian (Doctor Who), Sisterhood of Karn, Henry Gordon Jago, Professor George Litefoot, Forge (Doctor Who), Timewyrm, Threshold (Doctor Who), Coal Hill School, Nimrod (Doctor Who), Nobody No-One, Borusa, The Monk (Doctor Who), Polly (Doctor Who), Ben Jackson (Doctor Who), List of UNIT personnel, John and Gillian, Shalka Doctor, Sabbath (Doctor Who), Chris Cwej, Grandfather Paradox (Doctor Who), The Other (Doctor Who), Alan Jackson (The Sarah Jane Adventures), Vortis (Doctor Who), Thal (Doctor Who), Ogron, Werewolf (Doctor Who), Sil (Doctor Who), White Guardian, Mara (Doctor Who), Sabalom Glitz, Castellan (Doctor Who), Professor Edward Travers, Alpha Centauri (Doctor Who) Such a mass deletion would significantly alter the coverage of Doctor Who on Wikipedia.  WikiProject Doctor Who was not informed beforehand.  Regards, Anameofmyveryown ( talk ) 14:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Interesting, is there a precedent for this?  Editchecker123 ( talk ) 19:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of Japanese campaigns of the Second Sino-Japanese War: What is the encyclopedic benefit to compiling this specific list of campaigns, rather than, say, all of Japan's campaigns during WWII?  SilverStar54 ( talk ) 01:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Japan .  SilverStar54 ( talk ) 01:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the cleaner list at List of military engagements of the Second Sino-Japanese War (and merge any contents there that are not already included).  The Second Sino-Japanese War is a perfectly valid encyclopedic topic to deal with in greater detail (and not simply as a subset of WWII), both from a Chinese perspective and a Japanese perspective.  Although the scope of this list is clear, and in the context of Japanese history a different part of the military was waging the war in China from the part of the military active in the Pacific, I am not sure why this needs to be framed as a list of "Japanese campaigns" rather than noting what was happening on the Chinese side as well.  Thus, redirect to the article on the full list of engagements.  Dekimasu よ!  03:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A stand-alone article for quick information is better than a very long article which is List of military engagements of the Second Sino-Japanese War .  Both can exist.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 15:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect per above as I see no difference between the two subjects.  The target article is crappily organized, but that's something that needs fixing there, not by forking it.  Mangoe ( talk ) 16:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No need for two articles covering the same subject matter.  Unneeded redundancy.  If there’s anything not already included, it can be merged.  Kierzek ( talk ) 19:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the superior List of military engagements of the Second Sino-Japanese War article.  Nick-D ( talk ) 06:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
ZAPPAtite: Previously deleted, but recreated Donald D23 talk to me 12:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs ,  and Music .  Donald D23 talk to me 12:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Frank Zappa discography#Posthumous official albums : Previous AfD presented a handful of announcement articles from what I take to be reliable sources (including one from JazzTimes which unfortunately appears to be permadead).  It's not bad, but personally I don't think announcement articles alone should be enough to keep an article, no matter how many you pile on, since they usually just say the same thing adapted directly from a press release.  Couldn't find any more substantial coverage.  Not every release by notable artists deserves its own article.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 03:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nelly Sawe: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2019 , 2020 , 2021 , 2022 ,  etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Kenya .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 18:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ei Yadanar Phyo: I am unable to find enough coverage on the subject, a Burmese women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2014 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Myanmar .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - the source assessment seems to be fair as the online hits are all squad list mentions and trivial match report mentions.  I'm not seeing any detailed coverage and the article, in its current form, has no sources that even comply with WP:SPORTBASIC #5 so we lose nothing by redirecting.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , makes sense as just mentions Password (talk) (contribs) 05:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Palahniuk's Laughter: UtherSRG (talk) 12:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , United Kingdom ,  and England .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to They Liked You Better When You Were Dead : Found an issue of Music Week listing the song as charting at #13 on their TV Airplay chart but I have no idea if we ever use that one.  Even so, I found nothing else on the song.  The EP was an indie release from a band who later signed to a major, but I doubt they were getting significant coverage when they were working with a label the size of Deep Elm in the mid-2000s.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 02:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Is there support for a Redirection?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm good with redirect.  - UtherSRG (talk) 10:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Architects Collaborative, 1945–1965: Tooncool64 ( talk ) 21:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree.  Merge into The Architects Collaborative ?  SSR07 ( talk ) 17:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chase Minnaar: JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of South Africa national rugby sevens players There is this , but would be nice to have a bit more for a GNG pass.  Redirect is a suitable WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Princess Alice of Bourbon-Parma (born 1849): Wikipedia is not a genealogy website.  Surtsicna ( talk ) 12:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Royalty and nobility , Austria ,  and Italy .  Surtsicna ( talk ) 12:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany , everything in Alice's article is already included in her husband's.  EmilySarah99 ( talk ) 12:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany as per WP:ATD .  Ingratis ( talk ) 13:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany .  At this point it's nothing more than a genealogical entry.  It can be recreated if someone can find substantial relevant information on the subject within reliable sources.  Keivan.f Talk 05:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany per others.  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 20:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany per WP:ATD as argued by others.  estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 21:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  A cursory search reveals the subject receives independent coverage in a discrete encyclopedic entry in Women in World History: A Biographical Encyclopedia (Yorkin Publications and Gale Group, 1999), 220.  The article's current content being over-focused on genealogy does not on its own mean the page should not exist (see WP:ARTN ).  Leaving the page in existence will provide a chance for editors with more experience in the subject area, and who may be able to find further sourcing, to come across the topic.  P-Makoto (she/her) ( talk ) 21:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany as above.  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 11:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 13:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany : I have not been able to find sources after looking around in databases and Google scholar/books.  A redirect would maintain the page history, and it should be tagged with {{ R with possibilities }} per P-Makoto, since the subject meets ANYBIO #3.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 19:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany .  "Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus" is presumably a joke.  Consensus was already clear.  Don't waste editors' time with inane unnecessary discussion.  DrKay ( talk ) 09:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Fearmonger: There is a lack of reliable sources for this article online, and it only contains an external link to the production company's website.  List reference to this article is at Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures .  Torpedoi ( talk ) 16:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence or assertion of notability; this is not a Whovian completist Wiki, but rather a global encyclopedia.  Delete - ideally it would have been useful to nominate all the episodes in this series, because the exact same thing could be said about all of them.  There are plenty of blogs and fan sites about these programmes, but nothing that would help the subject meet WP:GNG.  I can't see anything suitable as a target for a redirect.  Sionk ( talk ) 16:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Doctor_Who:_The_Monthly_Adventures#2000 seems like a reasonable ATD.  Eddie891 Talk Work 16:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Perception (company): Suggest a merge to Stargate SG-1: The Alliance .  I haven't done a WP:BEFORE due to the infuriatingly vague name.  Judging by the current state of the article, the developer never seems to have successfully published a single game on console and only managed two coin-op arcade titles, and the cancelled Stargate SG-1: The Alliance .  The studio's entire notability really does just seem to be hinged on the notoriety and controversy for the development of that game.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 00:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 00:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per nom.  Basically complete TNT material even assuming the company was notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Aside from this The Sydney Morning Herald [66] article I found nothing else.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 04:17, January 10, 2024 (UTC) Redirect per nom.  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 20:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom, dont think this can merit its own article.  TLA (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aleksander Aberg (ship): No indications of significant coverage in secondary sources after a basic BEFORE search, only primary sources.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:39, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Estonia .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 15:39, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As mentioned in the nomination, a search turns up no appropriate sources to establish notability, including under its other names.  I don't think a redirect or merge are warranted, since a lack of reliably verifiable information about the history of this vessel makes it unclear where the merge/redirect target would be – the source in the article right now doesn't look particularly good.  If someone figures that out in the course of this discussion, I wouldn't be opposed to redirecting to an article about, say, the shipping company that verifiably operated the vessel.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 17:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Estonian Shipping Company per WP:CHEAP and WP:ATD .  I found some passing mentions.  Sufficient for a redirect, NOT for keep! gidonb ( talk ) 19:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect