hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2024 shooting of Sonoma County sheriff's deputies: No fatalities other than the shooter.  No ongoing media interest after one week.  WWGB ( talk ) 06:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  WWGB ( talk ) 06:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  nothing to say besides the fact it happened PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 07:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 08:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Events .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above.  Tragic, but rather run-of-the-mill for our purposes.  Left guide ( talk ) 12:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – NOTNEWS; no coverage beyond the local press.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 16:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NOTNEWS and doesn't meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per above.  To the creator: I would recommend looking at another incident in San Bernardino County back in January if you're interested in writing an article.  Raskuly ( talk ) 21:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As above; no lasting or greater significance; no real reason to be considered encyclopaedic.  Happy days, ~ Lindsay H ello 15:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : ROTM NOTNEWS .  Queen of Hearts she / they talk / stalk 04:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mateo Tannatt: This fails WP:ARTIST .  Rocfan275 ( talk ) 19:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment he is now a professor at Cal State Fullerton - [15] is a piece from the student newspaper about him.   But that isn't "independent" coverage.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No listing in the Getty ULAN.  This is all I could find, but it won't open from my location due to copyright restrictions [16] and it's only one source, not enough to pass notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable enough.  Fails WP:GNG .  There is not enough significant coverage about him.  The results of internet search are mostly brief mentions and/or self-published.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 22:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I found more articles about him and his art:  1. CAMPAGNOLA, S. Mateo Tannatt.  Flash Art International, [s. l.], v. 43, p. 109, 2010.  Disponível in: https://research-ebsco-com.ezproxy.sfpl.org/linkprocessor/plink? id=17e8727e-1492-3c58-a112-24bf6142a05d .  Acesso em: 30 jun. 2024.  2. Epstein, Edward.  “First among Equals.”  Art Papers Magazine, vol.  36, no. 4, July 2012, p. 59.  EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink? id=e7571334-92bb-3016-a679-01efa378e91e.  3.  Abel Folgar.  “Mateo Tannatt’s ‘Horse’ at Gallery Diet, a Lot More Than Meets the Eye.”  Miami New Times (FL), 17 Mar. 2015.  EBSCOhost, research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink? id=aee3e6f8-2d01-346b-ae80-5d4a909ae80d.  The first is a half page (small type) about an individual show; the second has a paragraph about him in the review of a group show.  I wasn't able to access the third.  Lamona ( talk ) 19:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Radio UTD: Okmrman ( talk ) 15:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Internet ,  and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A brief mention in a section somewhere on UTD student life may be all that is merited.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karayel (horse): We have a lot of directory listings and two articles (one in a trade magazine).  I was able to find an actual description of this horse in Horse Racing: The Records.  Even with that and generously reading of WP:GNG , I feel this poor horse comes up just short.  If only there was a WP:NHORSE .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 14:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 14:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 14:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, the source given in the nomination statement says "Karayel was the best horse ever to race in Turkey..." .  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 20:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found for this horse.  I don't see anything beyond directory listings as explained.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no WP:NHORSE , but there is a WP:NHORSERACING .  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 12:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I know, but WP:NHORSE would be funnier (and probably more helpful when it comes to horses themselves) than WP:NHORSERACING .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 13:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Even so Karayel seems to surpass by a long way the requirements of WP:NHORSERACING .  Given the era that he was racing in and his location it is unlikely that we would find many sources online.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 13:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angelina Ignatjeva: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  All I found were passing mentions of the subject ( 2009 , 2011 , 2013 , 2017 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As it’s not notable bio not meeting Anybio or Basic.  185.104.138.35 ( talk ) 03:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jasbir Singh Cheema: The attempted notability claim as a journalist is that he existed, with no coverage or analysis about the significance of his journalism; the attempted notability claim in business is that he won an internal staff award from his own employer, with no coverage or analysis about the significance of that; the attempted notability claim as a politician is that he was once a non-winning candidate in an election.  None of those things clinch inclusion in Wikipedia, however: people are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia just because they've done things -- the notability test isn't in the doing, it's in the amount of media coverage that third-party reliable sources opted to devote to analyzing it, but this is "referenced" entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as directory entries and the self-published websites of organizations he's directly affiliated with.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be written and referenced considerably better than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Journalism ,  and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I see no coverage of this person in Canadian sources, plenty of coverage around the Air India bombing from the 1980s, likely due to similar names...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, which, for better or worse, leaves little to add, except to underline the strong aroma of WP:COI in the article's curation .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tex Whitelocke: This is the most I could find.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pater Sparrow: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Company of Select Marksmen: Cursory search for sources include passing mentions in books dealing with the Revolutionary War Era but that does not indicate notability.  Could not find any information either about the leader of the unit, Captain Alexander Fraser.  The article has been without sources for 16 years, so I propose deletion unless new sources can be found.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 05:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America .  CptViraj ( talk ) 05:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Wikipedia Library contains no coverage.  XxTechnicianxX ( talk ) 18:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William Richard James Hayler: Did check to find coverage about the subject of the article and found nothing that meet Wikipedia criteria for notability.  No in-depth coverage from reliable sources FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 17:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - all cites in the article are from genealogy websites like Ancestry which are unreliable.  No coverage beyond that.  - estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 18:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no indication of significance.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 18:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sourcing in Gnews, newspapers or books.  Working on the Royal Yacht could perhaps be notable (and that's a big if), with no sourcing in RS and none found, this one's a bust.  Delete for lack of notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No credible claim of notability.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There's something else peculiar here: note the references to Queen Victoria.   She died in 1901, but the events are claimed to have happened in 1907.   Using my British Newspaper Archive subscription I can confirm that the story from the Sussex Agricultural Express exists and has been quoted correctly, but the quote in the article is the entirety of the story rather than just an excerpt.  Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!) 22:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable; no reliable sources found.  Quuxbazbarfoo ( talk ) 14:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Being a member of the crew of a Royal Yacht doesn't ensure notability.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 14:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Zero notability.  But you have to love someone in 1907 being described as a "marine engineering technician"!  No, he was a stoker.  The Queen is question was presumably Queen Alexandra, not Queen Victoria.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sensorimotor psychotherapy: I cannot find reliable sources providing significant coverage independent of its main author, Pat Ogden.  Note that Ogden frequently co-authors with Janina Fisher, ideally there would be review material or robust studies without either of them as listed authors.  Sources need to meet WP:MEDRS also.  The article history has had multiple attempted insertions of copyvio and advertising/promotional material since creation.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 06:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions .  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 06:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  Owen× ☎ 16:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karawita Central College: I can find no evidence that this school meets criteria.  I have tried searching in English and also "කරවිට මධය මහ වදුහල", both of which just yielded social media and other unreliable sites.  I did find School 3411 but the content appears to be written by someone from the school so it isn't independent.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:37, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Sri Lanka .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:37, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NSCHOOL , lacks any independent reliable sources or references.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 05:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unreferenced and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Milan Uzelac: No sources, did WP:BEFORE and was unable to find anything, looked at other wikis and couldn't find sources there only links to papers he wrote.  Is a member of academic societies but is not an elected member of a prestigious one or a fellow in a major one.  If sources are found please ping me and I'll withdraw this nomination.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Biology ,  and Serbia .  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per Dr vulpes Jack4576 ( talk ) 13:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no WP:RS.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 01:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no coverage.  ULPS ( talk ) 02:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tanja Manuela Sadow: Edit.pdf ( talk ) 08:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disagree, however observe many links are now dead or behind paywalls or, in case of national library, only accessible from library systems as a result in policy changes.  Recommend AfD nomination be removed - replaces with This Wikipedia page may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards .   The specific problem is: Citations out-of-date/inaccessible.  Please help improve this Wikipedia page if you can; the talk page may contain suggestions.  More detail: Nominator has expressed concerns about Ms. Sadow's notability and the reliability of available sources.  Listed sources are no longer online/accessible - this is not justification for deletion, but for flagging need for update.  Tanja Sadow is a leading figure in the jewelry industry in Singapore.  Azupancich ( talk ) 08:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC) — Azupancich ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women ,  and England .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete In the articles I found there are mentions of her in relation to jewelry-making and to jewelry-related events, but only mentions.  I only found one article that is minimally substantial ( this ) and it is mainly an advertorial.  The design school she founded seems to have all of four instructors.  I don't find anything outside of Singaporean sources, and would expect a wider range for notability.  Lamona ( talk ) 00:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: more input needed Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Less Unless ( talk ) 16:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There are no refs that aren't PR or advertorials.  Non-notable individual, appears PROMO.  School also appears non-notable, with scant mentions online.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , does not meet notability standards.   Also noting that article creator's entire contribution history is centered on this person and her school.  RecycledPixels ( talk ) 17:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  References do not need to be online or free to be valid.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 18:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I note only 2 articles link to this.  The vast majority of sources are not WP:SIGCOV .  Rather promotional and fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kosmic Kart: Article is unsourced and a google search returned only two pages of passing mentions and WP:ROUTINE coverage.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Motorsport ,  and Italy .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , couldn't find anything that would establish notability.  W ADroughtOfVowels P 15:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - all I can find on this is sales, I couldn't find anything useful.  I also couldn't find much racing record wise, I only know the racing division talked about exists because of promo material.  This just isn't notable at all, if someone wanted to keep this I'd like to see multiple ind. sources and a sourced racing record with something showing their notability via ind. sources as a race outfit.  JM 12624 13:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete