hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Embassy of the United States, Sofia: No content about the embassies; each article duplicates the one on bilateral relations.  Biruitorul Talk 01:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages: Embassy of the United States, Guatemala City ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Port-au-Prince ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Amman ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Baku ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jordan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all Unnecessary content forks.  If only the article creator spent more time on actual building up bilateral relations articles.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Foote Wood: His elected roles have been as a district councillor, a county councillor, member of a regional assembly and on the European Committee of the Regions .  Coverage is at the mention level and I don't think it meets WP:GNG .  His biography of his sister, Victoria Wood , received coverage but this looks like WP:BLP1E without lasting significant coverage.  Article has been tagged with Notability since 2021.  There was a previous deletion discussion in 2012, with several ! votes of "weak keep" and an outcome of no consensus.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 15:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Politicians , Literature , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 15:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He hasn't held any role that would be "inherently" notable under WP:NPOL , but has not been shown as the subject of nearly enough reliable source coverage to pass WP:GNG in lieu.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Having done quite a bit of work on this page recently, it would be a shame personally to see it deleted, given the number of citations added to a previously largely unreferenced section.  That said, the citations don't necessarily confer notability, although we do have some pages for perennially unsuccessful candidates for office.  So I'm on the fence with this one.  OGBC1992 ( talk ) 08:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - marginal case but he seems to be something of a local celebrity, there are quite a lot of results when searching for the subject.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 16:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete failed candidate and notability seems inherited from his sibling after source review.  SportingFlyer T · C 14:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Klára Kučerová: Most of the article also looks like self-promotion.  The term "Klára Kučerová" on Google finds other people with this name than this writer, so the verification effort also failed.  FromCzech ( talk ) 04:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Literature ,  and Czech Republic .  FromCzech ( talk ) 04:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , self-promo.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 09:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , notability not established and the article has serious promo tone issues.  – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 08:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ceili (disambiguation): The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 06:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 06:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  * Pppery * it has begun... 17:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A disambiguation page is not required: any potential ambiguity is dealt with by the hatnote.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ethernet Exchange: Not a thing in 2024.   No inline references, general references are decade+ old marketing materials.  WP:PROD nomination of article was contested by Kvng on the basis of WP:NOTTEMPORARY , but the article was never notable to begin with (fails WP:SIGCOV , "press releases [...] are not considered independent", WP:SPIP "press releases [...] are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article", WP:SBST "routine news coverage such as press releases [...] is not significant coverage", WP:PRSOURCE "A press release is clearly not an independent source"), so bringing it here for a full AfD.  DefaultFree ( talk ) 18:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet .  DefaultFree ( talk ) 18:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment' - I reviewed the cited sources before deprodding and they don't look like pure press releases.  It is industry press with bylines and I assume some editorial control.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reviewing each existing source: [53] is a (dead) marketing page published by a service provider ( archive ) [54] talks about MEF 26 ENNI and how it could potentially enable the creation of ethernet exchanges in the future, but does not claim that any are extant [55] is a (dead) "article based almost exclusively on a press release" ( archive , press release ) [56] is based almost entirely around interviews with Equinix's chief marketing officer and a Virgin Media director.  [57] is an "article based almost exclusively on a press release" ( press release ) [58] is an "article based almost exclusively on a press release" ( press release ) DefaultFree ( talk ) 22:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Business wires and various blog posts are all I can find.  I agree with the source analysis above, I'm not seeing enough coverage to keep this.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing seems limited to pretty much only press releases from 2011/12.  Nothing seems to have come of this, and I wasn't able to find anything other than press release from what was discussed above.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on DefaultFree's source analysis and my inability to find anything better.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 21:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cliff Hamlow: No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom and SIGCOV.  No notability established.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 15:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 01:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , barely any secondary sources which are are all WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  Shaws username ( talk ) 16:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shubham Dhas: No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   No GNG type of coverage in references or even any indication that they are about him.    (just have brief mentions)  North8000 ( talk ) 01:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benjamin Qi: Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 22:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Mathematics , Computing ,  and United States of America .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 22:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - his claim to fame is winning a competition.  We need a consensus as to whether this is in itself notable.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Possibly meets WP:ANYBIO #1.  If we want to think of the subject as a competitor, likely doesn't meet WP:SPORTSPERSON .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 21:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .   I don't see the kind of coverage of winning the programming competition that would grant GNG notability.   No sign of academic notability yet for a current graduate student, of course.   It's possible that one could make some kind of combined case, say though the programming guide plus the competitions, but this would require more evidence of impact than is in the article (and I did not find more).  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 22:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perajärve: No working references given.  See KNAB results for Perajärve: [16] Estopedist1 ( talk ) 12:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 13:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - While I don't speak Estonian, it seems like this is some sort of forest retreat, not a settlement ( [17] ).  KNAB results are convincing, and I don't see any sources indicating current or past status as a settlement.  AviationFreak 💬 13:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It isn't in the results list linked above, but it is when the search is changed from "Perajärve" to "Peräjärve".  Peter James ( talk ) 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There was a Peräjärve village (also spelled Perajärve), near Simula , now in Rõuge vald.  Also a small lake there with that name (Vällämäe Peräjärv).  Also, a nature trail (Peräjärve metsarada) in neighboring Antlsa vald.  Think the original creator of the article has this confused.  Either way, the village of Peräjärve no longer exists.  So, delete.  ExRat ( talk ) 03:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The source is GEOnet Names Server ; despite what is stated in the nomination the place is in KNAB (ID is 96093416) but it is described as "mitteametlik asula"; put that into Google Translate and it's "informal settlement".  I think that means it probably fails WP:GEOLAND (as many places in the GNIS or PRNG or with Ordnance Survey TOID do) but it also returns the EHAK ID of Ähijärve so that would be a valid redirect target (although the diacritics differ from the current title and both are the names of other places so a disambiguation page would probably be more useful than a redirect to a specific article).  Peter James ( talk ) 18:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The place near Simula is also in KNAB (ID 96031133).  Peter James ( talk ) 19:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iglesia ng Dios kay Cristo Jesús, Haligi at Suhay ng Katotohanan: There's no citations in the article as well.  ‍ Relativity 04:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Christianity .  ‍ Relativity 04:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Honestly, I thought this was related to the Iglesia ni Kristo .  Seems to be unrelated and I also can't find other supporting sources.  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 11:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only reliable ref I got from GNews Archives and GBooks is that it exists. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anton Matveyev: Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 00:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to contested PROD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - failed simple google test Mr Vili talk 00:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article about a semi-pro footballer with no coverage other than database entries and club press releases.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per WP:V .  The athlete appears to have a consistent career, but without any coverage, and there is no relative article in Russian.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KZTC-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 10:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 10:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Run-of-the-mill local TV station, notable only on a local level.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programs broadcast by Hum Europe: The few references available are about individual programming and not the programming as a whole.  Fails WP:NLIST .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists , Pakistan , Europe ,  and United Kingdom .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This channel seems to be an international service mostly consisting of Pakistani shows that are not specific to it.  No original programming, no list.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'm generally agree of it per WP:RS & WP:GNG for CNMall41 and Sammi Brie .  Although the references are few, this is similar to Hum TV but this article is a broadcast coverage from Pakistan .  Not original programming and no specific list occurs.  HurricaneErl 2022 ( talk ) 11:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lack of original programming & WP:GNG Wikibear47 ( talk ) 16:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, including the lack of specific materials or sources per WP:SIGCOV .  HurricaneErl 2022 ( talk ) 02:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Caterpillar Inc. machines: Merko ( talk ) 16:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A lot of these machines don't have their own pages and WP:NOTCATALOG .  I don't really think this list is going to help anyone other than those trying to buy something, which in that case they can just go to the company's website.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per WP:NOTACATALOG .  Brusquedandelion ( talk ) 23:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clearly fails WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  CharlesWain ( talk ) 18:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 17:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete