Memoona Qudoos: However, upon closer inspection, it becomes evident that the subject only had minor roles in the majority of those television serials and films, thus failing to meet NACTOR.  Anyone wishing to argue based on GNG must provide THREE, i repeat, THREE of the best coverages in RS -only.  ROTM coverage like this , this and even INTERVIEWS like this is not enough to meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : She is notable.  In this source her education and how she started is all mentioned [36] and her married life source in this [37] . ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 07:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] BeauSuzanne , Your comments sound WP:ATA.  These coverages can be used for WP:V, but they're not enough to establish WP:GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am not talking about WP:V.  I am saying that it meets WP:NACTOR.  It has mentioned her drama roles and her recent role of Shehna. ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 19:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] BeauSuzanne , Could you provide evidence that the subject had major roles?  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 13:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep because the interviews in rather reliable sources have a presentation that might show her roles are signficant.  If not why not DRAFTITY until better sources are found, so as to avoid the risk of constant recreations/deletion and mutual frustration? - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Mushy Yank , Roznama92News isn't even a RS.  It's just one of the countless Urdu language newspapers circulated in Pakistan.  And I wouldn't outright label the interview in The News as a paid placement since I lack evidence, but considering the nature of the questions posed by the interviewer, it's a plausible possibility.  Anyhow, I'm fine with DRAFITIFICATION, though.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 14:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  04:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clean up shouldn't be deletion.  Appearing in multiple notable films meets WP:NACTOR though requires whether it is significant or not (though should be); it is a known role in the films.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  09:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SafariScribe , Fwiw - In Pakistani TV dramas, supporting roles do not have the same level of significance as in Western or even Indian TV series.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Then a policy should be initiated in Wikipedia:Village pump .  Fwiw also, supporting roles can be notable when it has been done for multiple times.  Why then do you see a supporting actor or actress awards?  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  09:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SafariScribe , But the fact is she hasn't even really had any supporting roles in the series she's been in so far.  No one's provided any evidence for it, not even for dramas like GT Road, Guddu, Farq, Nikah, Kalank, Umm-e-Haniya, and Jaisay Aapki Marzi , which she's known for.  So, it seems she's just part of the ensemble cast .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I am not convinced that the GNG or NACTOR have been met.  Keep counterarguments have been unconvincing, so I am inclined to side with the nom.  Toadspike [Talk] 10:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep