hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Zee Yuva: I was about to redirect this article.  But a redirect to Zee Marathi#Sister channels has been reverted several times by an IP editor against general consensus.  So we should either delete or keep this.  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 06:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 06:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Zee Entertainment Enterprises : Seems like the best choice, this is just a long list with no discussion of the channel.  Sourcing I find is all about individual TV shows, not about the channel.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Zee Marathi which contains more information specific to this channel than Zee Entertainment Enterprises .  Zee has a lot of channels in large part because of the multilingual nature of Indian media, and this target makes more sense as it is the main Marathi channel and the article contains summary information on other Marathi channels run by Zee.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 21:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, we need to get this down to one Redirect target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Busch Field: Not seeing substantial coverage of the topic in independent reliable sources needed for consideration against the inclusion criteria.  JMWt ( talk ) 14:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 14:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agreeing for the reasons listed above, and I would raise the idea of redirecting to Busch Stadium Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 14:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Convert to disambiguation page with an entry for William & Mary Tribe#Field hockey and an entry for the more notable Busch Stadium .  Maintain article history at the DAB page.   I would have voted "redirect" if not for the complication of the other stadium.   Fails GNG due to no SIGCOV, but a reasonable search term.  Frank Anchor 20:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support disambig per Frank Anchor.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fascism and Freedom Movement: All sources found refer to a court ruling that acquitted the party of the charge of Apologia di fascismo [ it ] (apology of fascism).  No WP:SIGCOV .  Broc ( talk ) 13:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Italy .  Broc ( talk ) 13:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to founder Giorgio_Pisanò , or more accurately to Giorgio_Pisanò#Political_activity_and_parliament , where the party and the relevant court acquittal are already mentioned.  C avarrone 12:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I like the second option, it makes sense.  -- Broc ( talk ) 12:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Diyora Erkinova: The subject made a single appearance for her national team as a teenager five years ago.  I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uzbekistan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : not notable and not likely to become notable, redirection seems sensible.  Akakievich ( talk ) 15:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sharon O: Coverage presented is PR, interviews.  Fails WP:GNG; WP:MUSICBIO; WP:NACTOR.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and Uganda .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Big Brother Africa (season 6) .  WP:BLP1E applies, not any all Big Brother contestants local or global franchises are notable under BLP1E rule.  2600:1700:9BF3:220:F5FA:A7D7:9AA4:E005 ( talk ) 06:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Big Brother Africa (season 6) .  Subject lacks proof of independent notability .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 17:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Joel Wicks: JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and England .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - multiple season pro footballer.  Fleets ( talk ) 04:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Participation-based criteria for athletes were deprecated two years ago.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Undecided Not really enough references but still something, notability if carrer is also somewhere in the middle.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] REDIRECT to List of London Broncos players .  Maybe too soon .  Maybe not.  Tkaras1 ( talk ) 19:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Under Siege (Regnum Irae): No objection to redirect to Arise (Sepultura album) .  // Timothy :: talk 17:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Brazil .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Arise (Sepultura album) : Article has zero sources and I found no additional coverage.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eleni Ttakka: The subject has earned five caps for the Cyprus women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cyprus .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 10:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per nominator.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 13:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - I found a few Greek sources like Ginekio but nothing with enough detail for a GNG pass Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bizarre (album): JJLiu112 ( talk ) 14:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  JJLiu112 ( talk ) 14:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Sylvers .  Despite what the nomination says, this is an album and not a song.  The article has a link to AllMusic, but that is just a bare listing page and not a pro review of the type that is necessary here.  I managed to find a few results in Google Books for tomes that list the album as something released in 1984, and it is briefly mentioned in a book called A Touch of Classic Soul 2: The Late 1970s as an unsuccessful late release by a group that had been more popular in the previous decade.  That's not enough to satisfy WP:SIGCOV and I can find no other informative coverage of the album.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Sylvers as an alternative to deletion.  // Timothy :: talk 22:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mohammed Abdullah Alhabshee: Almost all sources are incidental coverage of him, primarily on his wife who is the outgoing Singapore President.  The only two sources here that are of him are [31] and [32] , which are virtually paraphrasing of one or the other.  A search on Google indicates that coverage of him are mostly him accompanying his wife during her official duties and trips.  I am unable to find any significant coverage of him using his position to advance any causes as well.  All information here can also be found on his wife's article, Halimah Yacob .  – robertsky ( talk ) 09:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions .  – robertsky ( talk ) 09:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Due to reliable sources nd fails in WP:GNG .  Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Spouse of the president of Singapore or redirect/merge to Halimah Yacob#Personal life .  Not notable enough for a standalone article, but there will be people looking for info on this person.  Keeping at least the search term will help satisfy these and also solve the WP:GNG issue.  S5A-0043 Talk 03:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Motoaki Tanigo: WP:ADMASQ with multiple references to primary sources.  Suspected self publicity.  Definitely a puff piece.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lets examine the references, in the first block.  Ref 1 [53] Landing page.  Non-rs.  Ref 2 [54] Reads as a partial interview with PR.  Looks and reads like manufactured clickbait.  Ref 3 [55] Another business insider ref.  A full interview this time.  Not independent.  Ref 4 Holilive Youtube page.  Non-rs Ref 5 Holilive Youtube page.  Non-rs Ref 6 [56] Another style interview.  More PR.  Exact same image used in a couple of the other references.  Ref 7 Facebook.  Non-RS Ref 8 [57] Another interview.  Not indepdent.  Ref 9 [58] Company profile.  Non-rs Ref 10 [59] Straight up plain interview with no association PR muck.  Looking at the first 10 references, 5 are non-rs.  1 is clickbait, and the rest are a mix of interviews and PR.  Not one of it is a WP:SECONDARY source.  The article was sent to draft over the weekend after being review and moved back to mainspace probably indicating its a coi editor that created it.  Fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:BIO .  Changed from comment to delete.  scope_creep Talk 11:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Some coverage, more of an interview, at Crunchyroll [60] .  This Forbes site, but it keeps timing out [61] so I'm unable to evaluate it.  Oaktree b .  Forbes actually points here [62] , which seems ok but it's a short few paragraphs about the person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This but it appears to be a series of video clips he hosts [63] .  I'm thinking it's almost TOOSOON.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b The Forbes link works at present.  It's a paragraph per nation, so fails WP:SIGCOV and has a paragraph on the subject as one of Forbes's 200 "Superstar Entrepreneurs" which is along the same lines as the rest of their multiple meaningless lists.  It's very easy to be fooled into thinking that all of Forbes has gravitas.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hololive Production until it becomes clear that WP:NBASIC is met.  Any future recreation, however, will need to tone down on the primary sources and press releases.  ~ KN2731 { talk · contribs } 14:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Japan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hololive Production .  The Forbes article is "Stuff", but it's a very short mention.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gasoline (Seether song): Most media mentions seem to be in the context of the broader Disclaimer album and not the song itself.  CJ-Moki ( talk ) 02:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Disclaimer (Seether album) .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 05:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - as the article notes, the song broke into the top ten of US rock radio in the early 2000s.  Realistically spreading, it's rather unlikely that the sourcing doesn't exist out there somewhere, but due to the timeframe, it's likely locked away in print media.  If the article is redirected anyways, it should be without prejudice of recreation if someone is able to dig up some of these sources.  Sergecross73 msg me 16:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The song hit number 8 on the chart, per [21] .  I think that's a RS, we can use it as sourcing.  And a reprint of the Modern Rock Chart in a period newspaper [22] , bottom left side, about 3/4 of the way down.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's listed in several newspapers [23] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : As I understand it, these mentions in chart reprints and listings in newspapers count as trivial coverage per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM .  CJ-Moki ( talk ) 17:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh I know, but having a charted single is one criteria for NMUSIC.  We still have to flesh out the rest of the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : Assuming you're referring to NALBUM criterion 2, The recording has appeared on any country's national music chart , as far as I'm aware, "Gasoline" did not appear on any national music chart, such as the Billboard Hot 100 .  Please correct me if Hot Mainstream Rock Tracks and Hot Modern Rock Tracks count as national charts.  CJ-Moki ( talk ) 18:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Per [24] , "may be notable", not that it makes it notable automatically.  I suppose you're correct.  I'm not opposed to a redirect to the album.  I'll amend my ! vote above.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the album as suggested seems the best choice.  I can't find anything discussing the song, only proof that it charted at one point.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  Not notable song.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Edward Jones (cricketer): JMWt ( talk ) 07:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Wales .  JMWt ( talk ) 07:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hignell has a little on him, but if we can't find anything else then I'd be relaxed about a redirect to List of Glamorgan County Cricket Club players with a note added summarising the sources and what we know.  Blue Square Thing ( talk ) 11:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Be bold and just redirect it, no need to bother with noms.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 17:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Glamorgan County Cricket Club players Not enough for a GNG pass, but a suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: Part 2: So here we are.  Unsourced, non-notable part 2 of series Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!  , which article covers this topic more than adequately reflecting its independent notability.  Clearly consensus now needed to either redirect without fear of reversion or delete.  Personally, I'd commend the latter to your excellencies...  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film ,  and Philippines .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There may be offline sources I can’t see but it doesn’t seem notable to me.  There is a perfectly adequate article on the whole series so if there’s no consensus to delete a redirect would be ok.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:51, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or redirect to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko! : The Movie .  This version of the article may give a better idea of why.  The last Afd was not that long ago (July 31!!!) and things haven't changed.  Please note that this is a feature film and not a part of the TV series .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 07:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry I missed that AfD, not sure how, 'cause I'd have gone G4 if I'd have realised...  Redirect was reverted, hence AfD...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Except G4 Speedy deletion applies to pages that were deleted and the consensus here was for a merge .  I have an opinion on the page (above) but no opinion on renominating the page; still, this essay , that I am sure you know, might be of interest.  Best, - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let me have my fun.  I'm imagining a G4.. .  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My vote would go towards a redirect , because while the movie exists, stars well-known actors and (from what I remember) was a blockbuster, it's really hard to come up with (online) sources about this movie.  A redirect will be better.  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 09:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect : per the first AfD. ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 10:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested is fine, nothing has changed in the last month that makes it now more notable. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If possible, salt the article until notability has been found (unless this AfD is not closed as keep).  The creator JuanTejada19 keeps on restoring the article despite the result of the first AfD and this seems disruptive .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 09:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect