Anurag Sinha : The issue is that the references, other than this , are not reliable to show notability.  Everything is mentions, WP:NEWSORGINDIA , press releases, churnalism, interviews, or otherwise unreliable.  I removed some WP:FAKEREFerences prior but kept everything else in tact so the AfD could be judged based on how it sits currently.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bihar , Delhi ,  and Madhya Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @CNMall41 I think you are indulging in provocation to prove you’re correct.  Please refer this case to senior editors and administrators for opinion.  My knowledge about Wikipedia rules is limited.  However this nomination for deletion seems fishy.  Hope fellow editors will objectively contribute to sort this, whatever is right.  Request to refer to the Talk Page of Anurag Sinha to understand the case.  His notability and credibility is vouched and acknowledged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fixing001 ( talk • contribs ) 05:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Fixing001 , Don't worry this ADF discussion will surely closed by an Administrator of Wikipedia.  Grabup ( talk ) 17:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello @ CNMall41 I would really like to contest your decision to provocatively send the article for deletion, while I was engaging in a meaningful conversation with you in the talk page.  I will also request the inclusion of other editors and administrators to have a look at this case as I feel that this step may have been influenced due to reasons while this could have been avoided certainly for an actor who has a valid presence and calibre in the indian films industry.  Please have a look at the references right from 2008 till 2023 where these references are attributed from TOI, Press Trust of India, ANI News, NDTV, Organisational bodies, Etimes, Recognised Production Houses and International Film Festivals, Directors and fellow actors from the industry of India.  While some citations may come from a list of as you call “Paid Media”, there is a plethora of other google search articles and references in the article where the subject is not in ‘Mentionary terms’, but actuality a major point of interest.  Articles by reputed journalists of India, like Mr Subhash K Jha, Mr  Khalid Mohammad and other prominent journalists have done interviews and wrote articles on ‘Anurag Sinha’.  His recent Best Actor Award in International Film Festivals is also merited by TOI and PTI, ANI News, The Week, Zee5 News etc.  While, you discredited the article and the subject 2 months earlier accusing of Paid Creation, why did you not send it for deletion then itself  when proper cleaning of language and any inkling of promotional intent was also removed by myself.  I had only requested you remove the “paid template” and present any transactional proof made by the user/article subject for creating the page, to which there is still no evidence  provided by you.  You have stated the ‘creator of the page’ has been flagged, but that does not mean that all articles created by the creator are false and paid, when the merit of this particular artist/actor is recognised by a mass audience and people of his industry.  However, I again repeat that today seems out of hasty decision, you have altered the article by your edits which are not justified.  This article is on my watchlist and some removals are uncalled and was not needed at all.  While you also have wrongly exercised your rights to put templates and send the page for deletion.  Why?  Also, for clarification of my interest in the article, I certainly am interested in the work of actors and indian film industry and will want to contribute positively towards it.  As a responsible Wikipedia editor, I again would address you to clean the page, if you find it dissatisfying.  According to me, all current references are reliable third part sources that are not just mentioning, but are talking about the subject or acknowledging the achievements of the subject.  I trust this process and hopefully this matter will be justly resolved.  I will also invite other editors and experienced editors to engage in its resolution.  Thanks Fixing001 ( talk ) 14:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the article must be uploaded back and edited with supervision.  The article subject is legit.  DSTR123 ( talk ) 05:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It appears to me that DSTR123 and Fixing001 might be the same individual, given that the DSTR123 account was created today following this nomination and has only posted this comment thus far.  Grabup ( talk ) 17:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Grabup : , They likely are.  SPI filed here .  I believe the image uploads are a pretty good trail of breadcrumbs.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Based on my checking, I've discovered that sources are only WP:NEWSORGINDIA and press releases, sponsored articles, and interview pieces can't establish notability at all.  The individual clearly doesn't meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG due to a lack of comprehensive coverage on the subject.  Grabup ( talk ) 17:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ’’’Keep’’’ - The article subject has a 16year career where he has recently won Best Actor Awards in his field at International Film Festivals in New Jersey and Toronto.  The notability can’t be debated with the individual being working with premium indian production houses like Mukta Arts, Emmay Entertainment, Applause Entertainment, T Series etc in leading roles with directors and co-stars who are also having a sterling background. .  like Subhash Ghai, Anil Kapoor, Nikkhil Advani, Shefali Shah, Purab Kohli etc.  The article references are cited from the premier news agencies of indian media viz.. Times of India, HT, Rediff, The Week, Press Trust of India, ANI News, NDTV, Money Control, The Print etc.  Mostly all the articles in India media are cited with references from the above agencies, if that’s the case, we may need to delete every article in Indian Films section.  This article must be added with citations available in the public domain and be made available.  It’s a KEEP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fixing001 ( talk • contribs ) 08:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC) struck sock vote -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There is enough information on public domain for the credibility of the actor.  The article needs more citations.  Not all artist must have a comprehensive coverage, consistent qualitative work over a sustained period with accreditation from international film festivals and other platforms must be taken in account.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40E5:1041:EA04:B517:90B9:EDEE:D31E ( talk ) 17:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NACTOR with various significant roles in notable productions (one for which he was nominated for a FF award; another that received minor awards; which also contributes to prove the roles were significant); his role in P.O.W. – Bandi Yuddh Ke can also be considered significant.  So, at least 3.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As with other AfD's I have requested this, can you show me the specific references that show notability?  Simply having "various significant roles in notable productions" does not grant notability, it only says they "may be considered notable." -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The actor debuted in a leading role with one of the most renowned and controversial director of Indian Film Industry, Subhash Ghai where he was nominated for Best Actor at FilmFare Awards.  He has a list of projects where he has worked in leading roles with premier directors like Nikkhil Advani Radhika Rao etc.  He has exhibited credible performances in numerous productions, some of them being immensely popular and genuinely praised for acting performances,  like the ones in Black & White (2008 Hindi film) Sanam Teri Kasam P.O.W. – Bandi Yuddh Ke Kaun Banegi Shikharwati Mannphodganj Ki Binny Shadow Assassins etc.  The actor has demonstrated acting calibre at par with the likes of his co-actors like Anil Kapoor , Naseeruddin Shah Lara Dutta etc.  There are references available on the public domain.  For Shadow Assassins, he has won Best Actor Awards.  Here are just some of the articles that are published where the actor is talked and discussed in a positive prominent light and not merely in mentionary terms.  This merely are a few articles from only one of the indian publications, Times of India, TOI Entertainment.  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/kill-terrorism-not-the-terroristshubash/articleshow/2849557.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/anurag-in-black-and-white/articleshow/2917175.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/genres-dont-matter-says-anurag/articleshow/3184943.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/i-think-i-can-handle-the-curiosityanurag/articleshow/2864389.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/actor-anurag-sinha-to-marry-on-nov-19/articleshow/5156245.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/anurag-sinha-wins-best-actor-award-feature-for-shadow-assassins-at-alternative-film-festival-toronto-altff-2023/articleshow/104649337.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/subhash-ghai-feels-inspired/articleshow/3973118.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/star-plus-p-o-w-bandi-yuddh-ke-gets-3-new-faces/articleshow/56625506.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/anil-is-jealous/articleshow/2787866.cms? _gl https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/another-honour-for-subhash-ghai/articleshow/3900541.cms? _gl Again, all this issue of notability was only brought by the editor who flagged the article, when was requested on the Talk page to remove the paid templates as there was no citation of proof for payment by the artist in discussion for a period of two months or so.  I still am not clear why is it happening here, where the article on this actor in discussion can easily be expanded with reliable reference and citations that are available on the public domain.  My perspective -
 The India media is suffering with the malady of copying and publishing information from one source to another and is suffocating genuine talents and films with the issue of paid marketing and publicity.  If Wikipedia doesn’t provide a platform like its own of credible acknowledgement to authentic artists/talents, soon must find it surfeit with articles on Arts & Entertainment , that are already influenced and published under bias and discreet funding from production houses.  Why are we not calling out the ones overtly known ?  As for this article, this feels like a pitiful hassling over an unjust removal of a credible and relevant indian talent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Centrepiece12 ( talk • contribs ) struck sock vote Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Times of India is totally not reliable when it comes to BLP.  They are known for their paid editing and promotional material.  See WP:TOI and WP:RSN archives.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: For policy based input Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I went through all the sources cited in the article.  Can't find any that satisfy reliability + independence + significant coverage.  Most of the sources are about the movies the subject played a role in, with trivial mentions of him interspersed.  I doubt the notability of the movies too, These are sponsored stories [1] [2] .  This is an interview.  So not WP:IS .  Alternative Film Festival best actor is not a significant award or honor.  The article is just deliberate and malicious refbombing .  — hako9 ( talk ) 19:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The article must be reassessed.  The references are from the most read publication of India, TOI.  Barring a few, the references are credible enough to abide by WP:NACTOR .  The actor has worked as protagonists in films that have been notably popular.  The present article is acceptably consistent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40d2:103a:b4e6:2d76:969:3718:41d3 ( talk • contribs ) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, I'm not sure about determining consensus as I see editors I respect on both sides of this debate along with a lot of IPs and newcomers.  Can we get an essential THREE that can be agreed upon instead of posting dozens of links to bad quality sources?  Also editors are advised they need to sign all of their comments with their signatures.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't know where all the "keep" votes are coming from.  Anyways, not enough reliable sourcing to establish notability, and there is possible paid editing.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor and unreliable sources.  The actor's work has not been significant and unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The actor has been honoured with Best Actor awards at Film Festivals and nominated for best actor award at Filmfare, India.  Sources as checked are abiding to WP:SIGCOV with sources being secondary and abiding by independence of the subject.References are found to be consistent.References that are not paid and independent sources.  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/anurag-sinha-wins-best-actor-award-feature-for-shadow-assassins-at-alternative-film-festival-toronto-altff-2023/amp_articleshow/104649337.cms https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/bollywood/story/anurag-sinha-not-big-b-to-play-sarabjit-in-subhash-ghais-next-215349-2013-10-23 https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/striking-it-hot-with-black-and-white/story-snmGGlHB2ytv86PqxNxauN.html https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/story/entertainment/anurag-sinha-marry-girlfriend-nov-2568467 https://www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/subhash-ghai-s-sarabjit-biopic-to-have-newbie-anurag-sinha-as-lead/story-WyHBMQcK21qJf8zcb0mstL_amp.html https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/anurag-sinha-to-play-sarabjit-in-subhash-ghais-next-614525/amp/1 The article can be expanded.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40E4:1047:11C:F8F7:A83:EA0A:22DF ( talk ) Same person with a similar IP address rang is repeatedly commenting and voting to Keep the article.  The sources provided only offer passing mentions and lack in-depth coverage of the subject.  The Times of India is considered unreliable for establishing notability.  Probably sockpuppet of @ Fixing001 .  Grabup ( talk ) 09:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's not significant coverage.  And read WP:SYNDICATED before posting gazillion sources that are from IANS churnalism.  — hako9 ( talk ) 00:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The article is satisfactorily credible and seems factual to the achievements of the actor.  The actor has worked in lead roles in successful Indian films and shows with respectable directors and production houses.  Confirms to WP:NPACTOR WP:GNG .  Many of the references are reliable and credible sources of information in the Indian media.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40C4:101D:80A8:8000:0:0:0 ( talk • contribs ) Again, vote from the same IP range, with the same type of comment, and without providing any sources.  This AfD is being targeted by the creator or a team who were paid to retain the article, or the subject himself is doing this.  These IP votes should be avoided.  Grab Up - Talk 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article do not meet WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE found similar, listings, name mentions, promo, nothing that meets WP:SIRS.  BLPs require strong independent reliable sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 12:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete