Imperium (film series) : I don't see why this topic deserves an article as there are no sources on the Imperium series, only sources on the individual movies.  MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk ) 05:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , History ,  and Romania .  MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk ) 05:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Why was this sorted in the Romania-related discussions?  Some of the production companies involved are Spanish/German/French but I see no participation of Romanian actors or producers.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The answer to the nom's implicit question is that Wikipedia:Notability , right at the top, says that we can merge up articles into a bigger subject.   See also Wikipedia talk:Notability (books)#Should NBOOK cover series or just individual books?  , which has almost 150 comments on a closely related subject.   See statements like "Where a source contains coverage of one of the books in a series of books, this coverage is deemed to be coverage of the series of books, in addition to being coverage of that book" and "Articles on book series may be created in some cases where there are no series-level sources, drawing on the sourcing of the individual books."  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 04:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WhatamIdoing , what outcome are you arguing for?  L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If I'm not wrong I'm pretty sure he's saying that keep is the answer, even though what he's talking about is the Notability for books.  MK at your service.  03:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WhatamIdoing indicates in her preferences that she would like to be referred to as she.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] True, but if you don't have WP:NAVPOPS installed, it's not usually convenient to look up those settings.   Innocent mistakes never bother me.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 19:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz , I'm not sure whether it should be kept and converted to an article (e.g., adding paragraphs and sources), kept as a WP:SETINDEX , or converted to a WP:DAB page.   But I don't think overall that we solve any problems by deleting it.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 19:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist, last hope for some more participation.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Although the series is a loose one, the miniseries that are part of the set are all RAI productions and seem to be part of the same project indeed.  I favour a keep, as the page helps navigation as a disambiguation page does.  I would rename it but not sure how, because most of the "films" were broadcast as miniseries...  Imperium (miniseries series) would be a terrible name!  Imperium (TV productions) ?  Sources would not hurt either.  Would redirect and merge to/into Imperium (disambiguation) be a suitable WP:ATD ??  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Italy ,  and United Kingdom .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , France , Germany ,  and Spain .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a list of related topics that all have articles, therefore useful for navigation.  Jclemens ( talk ) 20:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a useful navigation list, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 18:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep