hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Danielle_Noce: As fontes são o próprio site de Danielle, e a foto, uma selfie.  Marisaconsuelo ( talk ) 17:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
National African Immigrant Heritage Month: Perhaps this article could be rescued into a longer article about the various national efforts to establish the heritage month, but that would require significant improvements.   — BillHPike ( talk , contribs ) 11:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Events , Politics , Education ,  and United States of America .   — BillHPike ( talk , contribs ) 11:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to African immigration to the United States .  That article could have a few sentences but I don't think this page is necessary to cover a resolution that only passed one house.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reywas92 ( talk • contribs ) Comment See this talk page discussion with WayMaQueen .  If this article is rewritten to cover the broader topic of National Immigrant Heritage Month , I would be in favor of retaining it, despite my original AfD nomination.   — BillHPike ( talk , contribs ) 02:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the two are different months.   National Immigrant Heritage Month was a White House proclamation, to happen in May.  They should be two different articles.  — Maile ( talk ) 16:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -It was not "failed legislation".  This one is a Congressional resolution, celebrated in September.   Please see: A Guide to Legislative Votes , "Resolutions are not laws; rather, they are expressions of the “sentiments” of either the House or Senate."  It's sourced and correct, H.Res.371 — 111th Congress (2009-2010).  The article is explanatory, so it does not necessarily need more.  Please see Category:Commemorative months - it's within line with other such articles.  — Maile ( talk ) 03:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Het Arubaanse Padvindsters Gilde: Drmies ( talk ) 16:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Caribbean .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 04:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Hancom Office: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment Honestly I'm torn, looking at the links given by siroxo with a machine translation, it seems like it has a few articles which are substantially about the subject, though I question how much of it has any encyclopedic merit other than just simply acknowledging it exists.  The notability seems to be just "oh hey, this exists/new version of thing" without much more coverage than that.  Honestly, I want to ! vote delete  but it seems like it meet the standards for being notable in itself.  Maybe we can merge it into the company's page.  DarmaniLink ( talk ) 05:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  ZDNet Korea has a lot of coverage.  [10] Hard to evaluate which individual articles are SIGCOV but it seems likely some are.  Seems to be a fair bit of coverage in books [11] Again difficult to evaluate — siro χ o 04:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This seem like decent coverage [12] , these are less about the software and more about the company but they provide context [13] , [14] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Hancom I dont think its notable enough to have its own article DarmaniLink ( talk ) 15:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] extremely weak keep if it's notable enough to come preinstalled, it could potentially have an article, but right now it's in a state worthy being merged.  If someone wishes to improve it, ill change to a strong keep.  DarmaniLink ( talk ) 02:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Hancom.  I agree with

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Draft:Glitch: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - deletion of drafts should be listed at WP:MfD but, in this case, I think we should just WP:G3 it as this is uncontroversial.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Minotaur VI: The blog used as the second source isn't a RS either.  Delete for lack of sourcing, not meeting notability requirements.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Spaceflight-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Oaktree, I will admit that yes, this article had a lack of sources.  There are reputable secondary sources I used during edits of other Minotaur rockets that can be applicable here; I have since added those to the article.  The spaceflight101 source is a data sheet from Spaceflight101, which is a now-defunct but otherwise reliable spaceflight news website.  I did a little bit of digging just now and found that they have a whole encyclopedia of different launch vehicles ( https://spaceflight101.com/spacerockets/ ).  The PDF I linked as a source is actually originally posted on this page: https://spaceflight101.com/spacerockets/minotaur-v/ .  I personally find that to be a valuable secondary source, and I would expect other pages on that site to be useful for future edits of other launch vehicles.  As for the article's notability, I personally feel it's notable since Minotaur VI is still listed as available on Northrop Grumman's website and has capabilities that other Minotaurs do not have (i.e. can get payload to Mars).  However I will say I may have bias as I created this article, so I am absolutely open to opinions from others regarding its usefulness.  IanThePineapple ( talk ) 18:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Operation Snowball: Jax 0677 ( talk ) 23:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  I found this , this , and this , which I think are at least marginally notable enough that there's a case for the article to continue.  Having said that, if it does continue to live on, it needs to be massively cleaned up.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 04:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: The previous relist was never transcluded to the log: see closure request .  This should be considered the first relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 02:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   There are some ghits, like above, but they are mere mentions or interviews of the leaders or participants of the organisations activity, which is not sufficiently independent.   No independent person can be found to be making qualities commentary on this organisation.   It’s close, but definitely fails.   All draftification should someone find better sources.   Also note that the current version looks too much like the archive of the organisation website.  — SmokeyJoe ( talk ) 07:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Nana Astar Deviluke: WP:GNG fail (nod to WP:SIGCOV in particular), I fear.  The best WP:ATD I can think of is to redirect this WP:FANCRUFT to List of To Love Ru characters .  Wikipedia =/= Fandom.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 14:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Anime and manga .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 14:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Comment : I think the reception section has enough detail in this to warrant an article.  But in case consensus goes the other way, I would like to add that if we delete this article we should delete Momo's as well, since the two are almost always mentioned in tandem.  Maybe we could merge them into a single article?  Just a thought.  The other To Love Ru girls should be looked at as well as it seems they all have their own articles apart from Mea and Nemesis.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bensci54 Red link.  Do you mean Momo Belia Deviluke ?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, my mistake.  It's been fixed.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 12:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Brady Daniel: Creator has stated that he has played for multiple teams and is the brother of someone with notability, however notability isn't inherited and none of this is pointing to significant coverage.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , United States of America ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Paulina Constancia: I would like to see this page improved and am going to try to make some edits myself, but it has too many deep issues at the moment.  PickleG13 ( talk ) 23:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Poetry , Visual arts , Philippines ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 13:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 05:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is about all I find [12] , not enough for a ! keep.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there's other coverage, such as this from 1997 .  That Phuket one looks good to me as well.  Nfitz ( talk ) 20:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 08:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:BIO with sources presented above.  They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 01:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per new additions, seems proven to be a notable topic.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 15:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
WMDF-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Florida .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is a burst of really interesting coverage at its launch, but otherwise, the record is pretty lackluster.  RabbitEars doesn't even seem to know what its main channel airs.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , The WGAY-LP coverage and the extra source I slid in, should be enough to justify keeping the article into Wikipedia.  Danubeball ( talk ) 21:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Tan Yinglan: He's an active businessperson, and  Insignia Ventures Partners may be notable but he does not appear so as an author.  Star Mississippi 01:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Businesspeople ,  and Singapore .  Star Mississippi 01:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-19/singapore-s-insignia-ventures-intensifies-push-into-healthtech , https://www.ft.com/content/8c484648-f4b7-11e9-a79c-bc9acae3b654 , https://www.reuters.com/technology/insignia-ventures-raises-516-mln-bets-southeast-asian-tech-firms-2022-08-01/ , https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/13/insignia-venture-partners-fund-25-million-yinglan-tan/ .  There is also coverage in New Straits Times [29] [30] .  182.190.216.63 ( talk ) 14:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Anyone want to assess the sources offered by the IP editor?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment here's a start on assessing the newly identified sources: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-19/singapore-s-insignia-ventures-intensifies-push-into-healthtech – free version here [31] just regurgitating information from the company https://www.ft.com/content/8c484648-f4b7-11e9-a79c-bc9acae3b654 - paywalled, can’t access https://www.reuters.com/technology/insignia-ventures-raises-516-mln-bets-southeast-asian-tech-firms-2022-08-01/ this is regurgitating information from the company with a tiny bit of commentary on the market as a while; no bio on Tan https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/13/insignia-venture-partners-fund-25-million-yinglan-tan/ - could be significant coverage with some biographical details; even though this is a capital-raise article it seems to be drawing on other editorial resources for the info on Tan New Straits Times - paywalled, can’t access Oblivy ( talk ) 02:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
This Won't Hurt...: little more than a track listing, and none of this band's other albums have articles either.  refs listed aren't significant secondary coverage either.  StartOkayStop ( talk ) 22:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  StartOkayStop ( talk ) 22:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:NALBUM#C1 /GNG.  Note that the presence of articles on subject's other albums have little bearing on this discussion.  Regardless, taking a quick look, they could almost certainly be restored from redirect based on available coverage.  145 word dead tree review in AMP (magazine) [68] 300 word online review on punknews.org [69] 255 word dead tree review in Razorcake , a long-running zine with editorial staff [70] 106 word dead tree review in Maximum Rocknroll , a long-running zine that has been core to the west coast punk scene for 40+ years [71] A 100+?  word review in Ox , highly influential German language zine [72] — siro χ o 23:45, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Siroxo shows that WP:NALBUM#C1 is met.  Moreover, when the album was re-released 15 years later (which itself shows lasting impact), the news was noted in multiple publications.  Pichpich ( talk ) 19:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Analysis of the proposed references would be very helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
No Peace Without Justice: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Italy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep The page is a mess but it has received significant media attention following the Qatargate scandal recently, I found a full profile of the NGO written by the Huffington Post: [4] .  Older sources in Italian likely exist.  -- Broc ( talk ) 08:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As an additional comment, the NGO keeps a section "In the News": [5] . Many of those mentions are only minimal, though. -- Broc ( talk ) 08:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus