hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Aztec Soccer Club : Consensus is that NPSL teams do not have the presumption of notability, and that page is at Boston Aztec already.  A cursory search returned no significant coverage of the organization, just lots of routine local coverage.  Jay eyem ( talk ) 16:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Jay eyem ( talk ) 16:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete To me this feels like a case of WP:PROMOTIONAL content.  Govvy ( talk ) 22:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akhtar Lawa : -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 13:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Pakistan ,  and Bahrain .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 13:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : First few sentences appear verbatim here: [22] , but I wouldn't call any of them sourcing extensive.  Viral videos doesn't help notability here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails to comply with WP:GNG, apparent lack of in-depth coverage.  ContributorMix ( talk ) 22:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kevin Wilhelm : The subject is a non-notable consultant.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 12:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Appears to be Self-promotion and publicity .  This is indeed written like a résumé.   I've searched Amazon.com, WorldCat, the Library of Congress, and an internet search.   The titles are variations of "sustainability", and for corporate entities.  His Amazon bio is an updated version of the Wikipedia one.  I find no verification sourcing for the unverified sections of this article.  — Maile ( talk ) 18:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a promotional resume.  I don’t see that he is notable as an author, Mccapra ( talk ) 18:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
José Cardó Guarderas : No sources, one external link to the candidates site.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Peru .  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I PRODed this article but an IP editor removed the tag so I've brought it to AfD.  I will openly admit that my Spanish is really bad so if there are non-English sources that meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL that pop up please ping me so I can withdraw this nomination.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It fails WP:NPOL .  CastJared ( talk ) 10:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable and I vote delete for the reasons above.  You don’t get a Wiki article just for running in an election.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 02:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, fails WP:NPOL Karnataka ( talk ) 21:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abtin Abassi : Macbeejack ☎ 07:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Iran ,  and United Kingdom .  Macbeejack ☎ 07:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination GoggleGoose ( talk ) 12:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Maker here.  Meets GNG because article in The Telegraph / British GQ / Vice / more I will keep finding.  I will try to add more Deondernemers ( talk ) 02:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Article by GQ here is a paid piece, the second source by The Telegraph is self-published here .  I doubt the Genuity of the other sources as well.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 10:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This Forbes citation is unreliable an written by a contributor.  According to @Jamiebuba, the British GQ article is also a paid one.  Promotional theme failing business related guideline.  No GNG.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 14:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fontão River : Searching Rio Fontão or Fontão river in GNews, GBooks and GNewspaper Archives did not turn any results.  Google Maps shows a place called Fontão which is near a river called Limia instead.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Portugal .  Lenticel ( talk ) 01:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note - Creator is blocked as a sockpuppet -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find a single reference in this blog site but the link through to Google maps doesn’t show a river at that location, so it seems to be a non notable creek.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete under G5 and possibly A3.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure its a good idea to G5 an article created in 2009 even though it does meet G5 I think over 14 years and 4 months is enough to say the statutes of limitations may have expired though I'm at the same time not really opposed give its still a substub.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 17:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Substub with zero context other than an entire country + Tobias Conradi sockpuppet as creator (c.f. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive236#Tobias Conradi: Still community banned? ) = delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 15:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sean Ensign : Absolutely surprised that a completely unsourced BLP has survived in mainspace since 2007(!).  Housekeeping note, I'm intentionally not notifying the original author as they don't seem to be active anymore.  Taking Out The Trash ( talk ) 18:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Ohio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I verified that he did indeed have some charting singles on the Billboard charts, but that's as far as I was able to find information about him.  Pretty weird that someone with several charting singles does not even have a local newspaper article archived somewhere, but whatever.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 20:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Images use are uploaded by Sean Ensign on Commons.   There's no verifying sources within the article - nor for any of the music.  External links look to all be his sites.   Nothing of substantive sourcing that I can see.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all I can find is a wrestling coach in Baltimore with the same name.  Very old school wikipedia article, still has myspace page!  Delete for no sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The charting singles are not the kind to meet WP:MUSICBIO charting requirements.  Since there are no proper citations, then it should be deleted.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 07:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kevin Maguire (figure skater) : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Canada .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find more than some trivial mentions, and as such, this subject does not meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Please ping me if significant coverage is found.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Has a picture so that's an improvement but still lacking in WP:SIGCOV .  Therefore, it's a Delete for me. 104.7.152.180 ( talk ) 14:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yasmin Nair : Based on the contents of the article, such as using the subject's personal website as a source numerous times and directing the reader to articles archived on the subject's personal website, it was possibly created as a result of self-promotion.  Floralbergamot ( talk ) 20:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women , Sexuality and gender ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not quite notable activist, coverage is mostly in articles she's written, or stuff  about spats she's having with one person or another... [21] .  I don't see notability with a lack of sourcing as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a bigoted attack.  The page is defaced all the time.  She's a published author cited by others.  This should NOT be removed 67.253.77.78 ( talk ) 17:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I created the prior deletion proposal for this article when I came across it and it was poorly sourced, mostly with links to the subject’s blog, and seemed very likely an act of self-promotion.  The deletion proposal was not accepted at that time, and so I have tried to improve the quality of this page with biographical information on her background and education.  Even then I have had to rely on primary sources, such as the subject’s answers in interviews for a non-peer reviewed community history project.  I still believe the subject falls very short of Wikipedia’s standards of notability for, which are very clear.  The closest the subject comes to notability is authoring two chapters in a self-published book with other non-notable individuals.  Wikipedia’s notability standard for academics is for those who have made an outstanding contribution.  Outside of the academy, none of her activity meets the basic criteria for notable people.  QueerRigor ( talk ) 21:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep while sourcing needs to improve, I think this subject falls under WP:ANYBIO .  The Hypocrite Reader interview is substantive as is this podcast interview . -- User:Namiba 22:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The linked Evergreen Review podcast averages under 100 listens per episode.  The episode interviewing the subject has only amassed 550 listens in the three years since it was published.  Both it and the Hypocrite Reader piece are interviews.  Such primary sources, per the notability standard, “may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.”  QueerRigor ( talk ) 23:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Agnel Gomes : The Goan footballer of this name does not seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC with only database coverage like Tribuna found.  His 2 professional matches might be enough to survive a PROD but I'm not seeing enough for the article to be kept.  The only other coverage that I could find was a trivial mention on SC Goa's Wordpress blog .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and Goa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 07:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
George Knapper : Article is sourced to trivial puff pieces, blogs, and non independent sources.  The actor doesn't appear to have been in any significant productions.  Just small regional theatre companies.  No film or television work.  4meter4 ( talk ) 04:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Dance , Music , Theatre ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Trivial sources about appearances in the film, nothing independent as per nom.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 04:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Have searched, can only find a small amount of local coverage, agree he does not meet WP:NACTOR .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 10:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV or GNG met.  Couldn't find any sources for establishing notability.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kabbir Khan (actor) : Fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in the article are a promo mention and photo credit, a 404 page that does not appear after a search, and a database page.  BEFORE showed promo, database, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 22:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  According to the article, he just "appears" and is "seen" in movies.  Not much notable acting.  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Delhi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NACTOR and WP:TNT .  Right now, there is no evidence he meets our accepted standards for actors.  The article is so filled with weasel words , yet oddly blank of relevant biographical details, as to require a start from scratch.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luke Brennan (soccer) : Gets the usual routine sports coverage, but no in-depth sourcing so as to meet WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 11:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Volume of Self : No chart placement, no record of notability.  Fails WP:NALBUM: "All articles on albums or other recordings should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."  Redirect as ATD unlikely as band article is itself at AfD.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United Kingdom .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article about the album's author was soft deleted , but had a vote saying that there was "no coverage for this musical group".  I assume the same logic can be applied to this article.  The first reference provides a list of songs in this album, and the second appears to be an article about this album on Blabbermouth , which is a heavy metal news site.  As far as I can tell, that is the only source I could find for either of these articles, so this article doesn't meet the WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Northeastern Centre for High School Research : Created by undergraduate students last year; no substantial coverage that is independent from the group.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I do agree with the conclusions for this article @ Walsh90210 Flyingphoenixchips ( talk ) 02:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with the above.  Bduke ( talk ) 23:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
I'm on the Battlefield for My Lord : This hymm got no hits to significant coverage in reliable sources during my WP:BEFORE .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 13:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Christianity .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 13:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Ethel Caffie-Austin , since the sources do not establish notability (not significant coverage).  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It appears that the title is sometimes simply "I'm on the Battlefield".  This is because the hymn is listed in many directories of hymns that can be performed during services, and they all have their own interpretations.  I can find no further reporting or analysis of the song as an item with its own encyclopedic information.  Also, since it has been recorded by several different people, a redirect to Ms. Caffie-Austin is not workable.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete