Postage (album) : Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 22:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and New Zealand .  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 22:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Supergroove : The Amplifier article ( archived here ) has a good bit to say on this album.  I don't know enough about the site to judge whether it's reliable or not, but without any bylines and the likelihood that those articles are just unedited press releases, it doesn't look great.  Regardless, it's not enough on its own, and I couldn't find anything else supporting notability.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 12:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I don't know to what extent the following support keeping the article, but they are probably worth consideration for people making votes: The album won an award for best album cover in New Zealand's major music awards event .  The "album debuted at number 10 on the New Zealand Album Chart, remaining in the Top 20 for four weeks, and the Top 50 for seven weeks going gold a week after release", as noted in the above-linked article (which is a press release, to be clear, though from the awards ceremony rather than directly from the band or label).  The New Zealand Herald gave it a 4-star review (with a byline!).  -- superioridad ( discusión ) 07:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , after thinking some more about the info in my comment above.  I say that an album with independent sources  (a) that review it,  (b) that verify that it is award-winning, and  (c) that verify that it is gold-certified is a notable album, and notable enough to merit an article.  I have also found three additional reviews that are not on the publicly searchable web, but that anyone with a relevant database subscription can confirm: The Waikato Times , 30 October 2003.  Within a music review column titled "The Wrap".  Reviewer: Tracey Chapman.  Verdict: 2/5.  The Southland Times , 25 October 2003.  "Supergroove show huge talent".  Reviewer: Phil McCarthy.  No numerical verdict afaict; positive in tone.  New Zealand Truth , 31 October 2003.  "Still just can't get enough of band called Supergroove".  Reviewer: South Kristian.  No numerical verdict afaict; positive in tone.  -- superioridad ( discusión ) 04:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep , I'm inclined to being swayed by the reviews mentioned above.  The charting positions should be possible to confirm independently of a press release.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The official website of the NZ music charts , a website of Recorded Music NZ has archives going back that far, and it gives these chart positions: 2-8 November 2003 , No. 10 9-15 November 2003 , No. 10 16-22 November 2003 , No. 15 23-29 November 2003 , No. 19 30 November-6 December 2003 , No. 26 7-13 December 2003 , No. 44 14-20 December 2003 , No. 36 It is also marked as a Gold-certified album on those same pages.  -- superioridad ( discusión ) 03:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus