hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
板橋: -- Primium ( talk ) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  -- Primium ( talk ) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  There's no policy forbidding disambiguation pages with titles in non-English scripts.  They're a logical extension of redirects in languages other than English when there's more than one primary topic and we have hundreds in Chinese alone .  Suggest you withdraw this and related AfDs.  – Joe ( talk ) 16:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , such disambiguation pages (which are not articles) has been much discussed in the past and is accepted practice.  Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/CJKV task force .  older ≠ wiser 11:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Membership in Category:Disambiguation pages with Chinese character titles (385) is not a valid deletion rationale.  Not sure how else we'd disambiguate names of subjects that are transliterated differently depending on the native language of the subject, but a new process would take a sitewide RfC.  Folly Mox ( talk ) 12:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Suzan Sabancı Dinçer: Appears to be a rough translation from a language I don't speak, likely Turkish.   It was AfD'ed on 28 June 2008.   At that AfD, the creator said: "Keep. It is a new entry and It will be edited."  Although I'm mindful that there is no deadline , I do feel it's pertinent to point out that this editor hasn't touched the article at any time in the fifteen (15) years since he made that representation.   The only genuinely reliable source cited in the article is the Forbes rich list that tells us she's a billionaire from a billionaire family, and our criteria require more than one reliable source.  — S Marshall T / C 09:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  — S Marshall T / C 09:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Finance ,  and Turkey .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  See the corresponding article in the Turkish Wikpedia at tr:Suzan Sabancı Dinçer and the references cited in that article.  Bank chairpersons are usually notable.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Limited English coverage [12] .  Give it a pass based on the explanation from the Turkish language site.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The sources in the Turkish article should be sufficient to establish notability.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Christian, Crown Prince of Denmark (disambiguation): estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 13:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, unless another historical crown prince of Denmark named Christian is identified.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 13:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility , Disambiguations ,  and Denmark .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as unnecessary.  -- Killuminator ( talk ) 14:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete' Completely unnecessary.  scope_creep Talk 16:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the for link for Christian, Prince-Elect of Denmark on the younger's page is sufficent enough.  EmilySarah99 ( talk ) 10:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  I could maybe see the value of this page if it listed the other four Crown Prince Christians of Denmark at Category:Crown Princes of Denmark and List of heirs to the Danish throne , but at the moment the page doesn't make much sense with only two entries.  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 13:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Who'd get those two people confused?  GoodDay ( talk ) 12:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep but alter it .  Under its current state it should be deleted based on WP:2DABS .  However, as User:Celia Homeford pointed out, there were other crown princes of Denmark named Christian (similar to how there were several heirs in England named Edward, Prince of Wales ).  The redirect should be expanded and a similar one should be made for crown princes named Frederik.  Keivan.f Talk 14:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Changing previous ! vote and will fix the DAB per discussion above.  Thanks Celia Homeford .  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 04:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Gukjeong chumyo: General search also brings up nothing that can establish notability.  There may be information that can establish notability in Korean.  If notability can't be established then content could be merged with Byeon Sang-byeok Traumnovelle ( talk ) 07:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Animal , Korea ,  and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep , it is sourced via pamphlet to its holding museum.  Artworks on Wikipedia are considered to have notability if they have a museum source.  It is by famous Korean artist Byeon Sang-byeok , so the article's existence here since 2009 has enhanced Wikipedia's Korean art collection.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 11:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do you have a link to that guideline?  I couldn't find any art specific notability guidelines.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 18:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Merge It's a very Korean painting that has always been in Korea, so an absence of web sources in English (but using a Korean title, presumably) means very little indeed.   We only seem to have about a dozen articles on individual Korean paintings, which is far too few, given their distinctive and old tradition.  Byeon Sang-byeok , the artist, is a significant figure, with one only one other article on an individual work.   I don't doubt there are lots of sources in Korean; perhaps someone from the Korean project can find some.  Johnbod ( talk ) 15:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 11:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep and no merge.  Sufficient individual notability in Korean language [18] ( Kansong Art Museum ), [19] ( Kyunghyang Shinmun ), [20] ( The Dong-a Ilbo ), and more.  I'm sure it's covered extensively in print books on art too.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 17:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If you're familiar with Korean could you add these into the article?  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 20:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I can quickly put some stuff in; my to-do list is pretty long so I want to prioritize other major articles if that makes sense.  Lot of important missing info about Korea on Wikipedia toobigtokale ( talk ) 22:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair enough, I'll take your word that the sources you've provided establish notability and change my stance to keep/withdraw the nomination.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 22:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Style of the Swedish sovereign: ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 17:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Sweden .  ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 17:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too long and involved to be a BS article, but there is minimal sourcing with no inline sources.  I'd be willing to give it a pass if we had some kind of coverage.  I can't find anything, only articles about sovereigns in general.  With one source, this could be seen as a copyvio as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The Swedish royal titulature is in fact a subject of serious scrutiny.  See, e.g., "Rex Vandalorum" and "What about the Finns:" .  Srnec ( talk ) 21:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - This article needs more RSs, but it passes GNG easily and is eminently encyclopaedic.  I see no COPYVIO here at all after reviewing the source.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 14:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep No sensical reason to delete has been given.  The titles and styles of Swedish monarchs are well covered.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 19:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] where are they covered?  I didn't found any coverage in the article!!!! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 15:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Passes WP:GNG with ease indeed.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 13:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Rajendra Bajgai: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  He looks rather notable to me.  His awards seem to have a national significance.  See also this and this among other things. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: There are lots of significant coverage about him in reliable, secondary as well as independent sources to the subject, like Himalaya Times, Madhyanna daily, gorkhpatraonline etc.  Fade258 ( talk ) 06:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , there are plenty of sources here for WP:NBASIC .  Note that NBASIC allows us to combine non-significant coverage from multiple sources to contribute toward establishing notability, which may be relevant here.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 15:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Camerun Peoples: Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 19:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football ,  and Alabama .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly passes WP:GNG , see the sources I posted on the creating user's talk page: PFN , SI , HERO Sports , AL.com , Charlotte Observer , Winston-Salem Journal , etc.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GNG with the above sources.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 20:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC , per BeanieFan11's sources.  Ejgreen77 ( talk ) 15:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC , per BeanieFan11.  Themanwithnowifi ( talk ) 13:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per sources found by BeanieFan11.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 15:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Colin Shindler: Conducted WP:BEFORE , but it's not that more sources will inherently push the article to keep; the subject is not notable as an academic.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 18:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added twelve published reviews of four of his books to the article.  It already contained one review of one.  I think that's enough for WP:AUTHOR , and his work as the screenwriter for a notable movie also counts toward WP:CREATIVE (although it might not be enough by itself).  The nomination argument is flawed: it is irrelevant whether a subject passes WP:PROF if we can find other criteria they pass.  (Incidentally, I think the other Colin Shindler who writes about Israel may also be notable based on my finding many reviews of his books while looking for reviews of the subject.) — David Eppstein ( talk ) 19:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Enough there from what I see for WP:BASIC and WP:NAUTHOR for me.  Govvy ( talk ) 10:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It's a well-written, well-referenced 8000-byte article with more than 20 articles linked to it, an average of 14 views per day over the last 90 days, and it also has a disambiguation line that distinguishes this Colin Shindler from the other one, something unique to Wikipedia.  Sammyrice ( talk ) 07:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as notable.  I also took the liberty of moving the disamb phrase from Life and career section to the lead.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 11:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2024 World Friendship Games: Theroadislong ( talk ) 17:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Russia .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 17:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Plenty of coverage is present from RS, including [ [20] ] and [ [21] ].  Some cleanup is needed but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP .  User:Let'srun 06:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Added international sources from which the information for the article was used.  Balalaka21 ( talk ) 14:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Passes GNG.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 21:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as it passes notability standards.  Cleanup is needed but AFD is not cleanup.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 03:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: per forementioned reasons above.  Needs some work Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tamarack Developments Corporation: BEFORE search turned no reliable search at least.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 08:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added references from reliable sources about the death of a worker and reports of poor-quality construction.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 09:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No consensus, which would repeat the past result, it would be nice to establish one.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 🍪 Cookie Monster 11:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the references from a quarter-century ago look good to me.  Nfitz ( talk ) 17:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kevin Blatt: Subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies WP:GNG and doesn't have WP:SIGCOV from reliable secondary sources.  Also as per WP:CREATIVE : The person is ' not regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors, with no real claim to fame. Does not satisfy criteria for Subjects notable only for one event: WP:BLP1E . Lethweimaster ( talk ) 13:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC) Lethweimaster ( talk ) 13:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sexuality and gender ,  and Ohio . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There seems to be a lot of coverage of the person [27] , [28] and [29] . Not sure he's a fixer, appears to be a "leaker", but that's another discussion altogether. Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 16:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep The article definitely needs improvements, many lines are subjective and definitely appear to come off as a Conflict of Interest (being referred to as a "fixer" seems ostentatious and being known for "outrageous stories" isn't really substantiated) - but he does seem to have a few articles that would constitute significant coverage (at least two where he is the main focus, one of which from Vice, a major news outlet). However, I would agree that he does not fall under the definition of being "regarded as an important figure or widely cited by peers or successors". A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 17:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . Depressingly, the subject of the article does actually have enough significant coverage from reliable sources to meet the threshold of notability - the New York Magazine piece, the Wired piece, the Cleveland Plain Dealer article, and arguably the NBC piece.  Also, he's kept in front of the media for a long time, so WP:BLP1E doesn't apply.  As the old saying goes, nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the public. Fiachra10003 ( talk ) 00:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Oliyum Oliyum: Tagged for notability for over a decade.  Kailash29792 (talk) 14:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Would seem to be notable [9] , but this area of film isn't my expertise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Have added References clearly notable Tamil song program was amongst the most popular in Tamil Nadu during the Doordarshan era.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep in view of the reliable sources references added to the article that together show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 16:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Light Records: The second source literally leads to the Billboard Pro home page, so it doesn't help at all.  I can't check the first source because I'm currently at a school where the link is blocked, so someone should check that.  My Google searches on Light Records yielded nothing useful.  TheWikiToby ( talk ) 18:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Albums and songs , Music ,  and Companies .  TheWikiToby ( talk ) 18:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have repaired this nomination, which had malformed syntax that was transcluding Wikipedia:Notability and thus breaking {{ subst:afd2 }}.  No opinion or comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Merge .  Several possible merge targets here, including its founder, its co-venture partner, and its parent label.  I suspect there is coverage of this label in Christian-interest magazines, though; a little digging by specialists might turn up more WP:ATD here.  Chubbles ( talk ) 06:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - it's hard to overstate the impact of Light Records on Contemporary Christian Music.   Absolutely one of the most important, influential labels in the genre.   If you go to Google Books, and search "Billboard Light Records", then click on one of the issues and search "Light Records" at the "Search all issues" you'll find a plethora of coverage.   Also significant coverage in "Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music" ISBN:9798216065562.  (addendum: the Wikipedia Library is down for me, so I can't search JSTOR or Newspapers.com.) 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 02:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per Billboard, and Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music sources as detailed above, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep