hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Shipping discourse: Americanfreedom ( talk ) 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep as this article is currently on the main page ( WP:SKCRIT#6 ).  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 04:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  This nomination reads like WP:IDONTLIKEIT , no actual reason for deletion has been provided.  Di (they-them) ( talk ) 04:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  There are no issues with the quality or notability of this article and WP:SIGCOV is clearly satisfied here despite the topic being a relatively new internet phenomenon.  "it's strange/frivolous" is not a valid deletion rationale.  This AfD and Americanfreedom 's repeated (ab)use of the prod tag is pure WP:IDONTLIKEIT .  (Disclaimer: I have discussed this article off-wiki with its creator, Generalissima , on several occasions, however, she did not in any way prompt me to participate in this AfD and the opinion expressed here is my own.)  Ethmostigmus ( talk ) 04:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  <signature> Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  <signature> The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Stocker Fontelieu: The Film Creator ( talk ) 02:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 02:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Perhaps the nominator may have considered this individual as a film actor rather than a stage actor, and a withdrawal may be in order.  Clearly meets GNG, meets BASIC, almost certainly meets WP:NACTOR .2 for contributions to New Orleans stage acting.  The New Orleans Times-Picayune has literally dozens (hundreds?) of articles on the subject.  Other sources have coverage too.  Here are just thew first few though clicking through others there's no shortage of coverage.  78+ words about the individuals acting in (David Cuthbert, T. w.  (2000, Sep 15).  Simon's 'sunshine' peeks through a few clouds at carlone's.  Times - Picayune Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/simons-sunshine-peeks-through-few-clouds-at/docview/415388250/se-2 ) 80+ words about collaborating on the authorized biography and living situation (Cuthbert, D. (2006, Apr 20).  The unsinkable stocker fontelieu ; theater legend lost his house, but the show goes on.  Times - Picayune Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/unsinkable-stocker-fontelieu-theater-legend-lost/docview/416050036/se-2 ) 85 word obit giving overview of career in national magazine (IN MEMORIAM: Stocker fontelieu.  (2010).  American Theatre, 27(2), 18.  Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/memoriam-stocker-fontelieu/docview/220582493/se-2 ) — siro χ o 03:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:GNG .  In addition to the links above, I found more coverage in The Times-Picayune ( 1 , 2 , 3 ), New Orleans Magazine , Monroe Morning World , Hattiesburg American , and AFTRA .  There's also a book written about him.  APK whisper in my ear 04:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Based on the consensus and significant coverage mentioned above, I speedy withdraw this nomination.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 13:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Jonathan Apphus: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 18 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 13:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Very clear keep of this important historical figure.  AfD is not for cleanup of the sourcing.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 13:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Royalty and nobility , Israel ,  and Palestine .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep Improper nomination.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 22:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   The subject is clearly notable; if the article needs secondary sources, feel free to add them.   There is nothing wrong with citing to primary sources on historical topics; the need to add modern sources is not an argument for deletion, nor is there a deadline for improving articles.   Deletion is not cleanup; you don't improve an article in need of improvement by deleting it.  P Aculeius ( talk ) 23:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Very obviously notable and meets WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per User talk:Serrwinner #Roman AfDs , this is a pointy nomination of a clearly notable subject.  FortunateSons ( talk ) 14:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Marylyn D. Ritchie: I cannot find any independent sources on the subject.  – CopperyMarrow15 ( talk | edits ) Feel free to ping me!  18:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Professors/Academics generally have slightly different requirements about notability requirements than other biographies—see WP:NPROF .  AriTheHorse 18:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women , Pennsylvania ,  and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per WP:SK3 , no valid deletion rationale supplied.  Subject passes WP:PROF#C1 (massive citations to her publications) and #C8 (editor-in-chief of a notable journal).  Our academic notability guidelines are not based on the existence of popular-press puff pieces about their subjects, unlike for other types of subject, so the deletion rationale does not apply.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 19:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Very well.  I had no idea about the academic notability guidelines.  – CopperyMarrow15 ( talk | edits ) Feel free to ping me!  19:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ CopperyMarrow15 , should this be interpreted as a withdrawal of the nomination?  -- Maddy from Celeste ( WAVEDASH ) 19:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes.  – CopperyMarrow15 ( talk | edits ) Feel free to ping me!  19:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Skibidi Toilet: CPounds57 ( talk ) 00:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Clicking the Google news search at the top of the AFD, I see good results.  https://news.yahoo.com/skibidi-toilet-creepy-youtube-series-180500777.html and https://www.newsweek.com/what-skibidi-toilet-inside-eerie-videos-taking-over-internet-1813590 and of course plenty of referencesin the article.   Reliable sources give it significant coverage, so it meets the general notability guidelines.  D r e a m Focus 00:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as one of the main contributor of the article.  There is plenty of independent sources reporting and giving commentary on this series.  It have been used to show that a new generation, Alpha, is gaining prominence on the internet.  You should explain how the currently references in the article does not demonstrate significant coverage.  Ca talk to me!  00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per @ Dream Focus .  Additionally, "semi popular" is debatable.  B3251 ( talk ) 00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep many reliable and independent sources give significant coverage to the subject.  Skyshifter talk 02:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Georgia (country) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] SNOW Keep : Poorly formed deletion rationale.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 08:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The notability concerns on the nomination are not sufficiently substantiated.  It's not as self-evidently notable as others state, and the article does have issues and struggles to distinguish trivia from substance.  But there's clearly a few mainstream articles from reliable news sources describing it and providing commentary on it as a fixture of online humor for younger generations.  That's enough for GNG.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 09:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Reasoning is flawed.  Ryme071 ( talk ) 18:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The series has half a billion views on the official playlist alone, isn't that notable enough?  Finxx ( talk ) 20:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Snow Keep ; bad deletion rationale and probably WP:IDONTLIKEIT .  Internet memes can warrant articles in their own right, take " Press F to pay respects " for example.  Negative MP1 21:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Many of these keep arguments aren't the best and the article is not great either.  However, as silly as it is, "Skibidi Toilet" is notable.  I feel old just typing that out.  There are a few good sources on the topic that are already in the article and its an ongoing popular series that will probably continue to get that coverage.  ULPS ( talk • contribs ) 01:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Lisa Henson: The sources utilized all lack independence from the subject.  4meter4 ( talk ) 00:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America .  CptViraj ( talk ) 04:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Television ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Jim Henson Company - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 10:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I have added a number of news articles covering Henson.  These include coverage of her being named president of The Harvard Lampoon , work at Warner Bros.  , and Columbia Pictures .  [1] [2] [3] The articles date back to 1982, and are an indication of significant coverage that spans multiple years, well before she became CEO of the Jim Henson Company.  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 12:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The three New York Times sources added by DaffodilOcean clearly provided enough SIGCOV on the subject person and satisfied GNG, not to mention her numerous executive producer roles which should fulfill WP:CREATIVE .  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 13:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clear meets SIGCOV.  pburka ( talk ) 13:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I would withdraw but we have a vote for a redirect.  I support keeping the article based on the excellent sourcing improvements made to the article.  Thanks to all who worked on it.  Best.  4meter4 ( talk ) 14:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Klemesrud, Judy (1982-05-16).  "AT HARVARD, SHE RULES LAMPOONLAND" .  The New York Times .  ISSN 0362-4331 .  Retrieved 2024-07-19 .  ^ Sims, Calvin (1993-08-10).  "COMPANY NEWS; Columbia Pictures Selects A President for Production" .  The New York Times .  ISSN 0362-4331 .  Retrieved 2024-07-19 .  ^ Weinraub, Bernard (1994-04-04).  "She's Young and Smart, But Not Too Smart to Lead" .  The New York Times .  ISSN 0362-4331 .  Retrieved 2024-07-19 .  Keep : Since nomination, many reliable sources have been added to the article.  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 17:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Salsta Castle: Only really seems to be mentioned on tourism bureau type promotion sites Gugrak ( talk ) 10:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions .  Gugrak ( talk ) 10:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator see below Gugrak ( talk ) 11:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I have added entries from Nordisk familjebok , Statens fastighetsverk , and Bedoire's Svenska slott och herrgårdar ( Swedish Castles and Manors ), all substantial coverage in impeccably reliable sources.  None of these are tourist bureaus.  Further, anything that's notable in Sweden is notable "in English".  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 11:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Jason Kane (Doctor Who): As it stands, this article doesn't seem to meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Pat Gillis: Existing sources are not significant and I was not able to find any indepth articles on him.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 16:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians .  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 16:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep He was a member of the Oregon House of Representatives.  From what I understand, serving as a state legislator automatically makes one meet notability guidelines.  Thriley ( talk ) 16:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Adrian Schrinner: Mayors/councillors of city councils are rarely notable for doing mayor/councillor things alone.  Tar nis hed Path talk 04:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Politics ,  and Australia .  Tar nis hed Path talk 04:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article has problems, and I agree that holding a local government position does not necessarily confer notability.  However, subject has been substantially covered in media, and not merely as a medium for policy.  Just recently, you could point to the broad coverage regarding his position on the 2032 Olympics forum and relationship with state government, or the commentary on his substantial budget cuts.  Even outside of those larger events, he is regularly covered and quoted in media.  The fact that he is the mayor of a major (capital) city , and indeed heads the largest council in the country is also persuasive .  gompk 04:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (edit conflict) Keep NPOL/POLITICAN is a positive test for presumed notability, not meeting NPOL is not grounds for deletion.   Subject is lord mayor of an urban conglomoration of 1 million+ people; it is the single largest local government area by population in Australia.  NB WP:POLOUTCOMES : "Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD"...".  That aside, the article contains a plethora of reliable sourcing that demonstrates the subject passes WP:GNG / WP:BIO .  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 04:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Nelo : It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 13:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Sports ,  and Portugal .  Owen× ☎ 14:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This company appears to be notable.  I understand this is not a nom's fault.  It is just hard to search in local languages, but I managed to do that with Google CSE.  Here's some reliable coverage: [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] .  There is a lot  more out there.  Use search terms: "Nelo" AND "caiaque".  Geeraarts ( talk ) 00:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination thanks, Geeraarts , that's much appreciated.  Boleyn ( talk ) 08:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Vasily and Andrey Shchelkalov : The page should be split or deleted.  Changeworld1984 ( talk ) 04:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If you're saying that it should be deleted or split solely because it is a biography of two brothers, then that is not a valid reason for deletion.  It is perfectly acceptable to have a biography on two closely connected people in the same article.  I will note, however, that it is an unsourced biography.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : Per WP:SK3 .  Nomination is flawed in innumerous ways.  No WP:BEFORE search was conducted; if even a perfunctory one was, the nominator would have found the corresponding articles in ru.wp ( ru:Щелкалов, Андрей Яковлевич and ru:Щелкалов, Василий Яковлевич ), which list a number of sources providing WP:SIGCOV , including entries in the Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary ( [27] ) and the Russian Biographical Dictionary ( [28] and [29] ), among many others.  Additionally, split proposals occur at the article's talk page, not at AfD.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 07:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Additionally, a biographical article can have multiple subjects if they are strongly interlinked; examples include Sacco and Vanzetti and Mildred and Richard Loving .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 10:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Bilateral relations .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 07:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Curbon7.  No objection to splitting as there is clearly enough material to make this possible.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , a quick search returns a few sources that bundle the brothers together.  On the other hand, the French and Russian Wikipedia currently have separate articles for each of them, so there may be some good reason for that as well.  But more importantly, as pointed out by others, this is not a matter of deletion.  Aintabli ( talk ) 15:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Marcus Cromartie : I don’t see how he is notable.  The only news was about his signing, in other meaning, fails to meet WP:GNG .  The bunch of source on the article 95% was just singing and profile, nothing else.  Gabriel (talk to me ) 15:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , American football ,  and Handball .  Gabriel (talk to me ) 15:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  Unquestionably notable as a four-season modern NFL player with extensive coverage (as anyone with his credentials would have): [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] etc.  Clearly notable.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Louisiana , Texas ,  and Wisconsin .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per BeanieFan11.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 16:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There's very clearly enough WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:GNG , per BeanieFan11's sources.  Ejgreen77 ( talk ) 18:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:GNG . -- Paul McDonald ( talk ) 18:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The sources provided by BeanieFan easily meet the WP:GNG . Let'srun ( talk ) 19:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:GNG .-- Mooon FR ( talk ) 20:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep