hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Hon. Frances Brooke : Seems mostly known for being related to other people.  Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with nom - the 'notability' seems to be inherited through subject's relatives Karnataka ( talk ) 18:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Windsor Beauties#List of Beauties - I have not been able to find any significant coverage apart from Wikipedia mirrors.  Her main claim to notability seems to be her Windsor Beauties portrait, so it would be an apt target for redirection.  Some minor additional info about her may be added as long as it is within scope there and sourced.  ~ UN6892 t c 18:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep , otherwise redirect to Windsor Beauties#List of Beauties per Username6892.  I'm not familiar with The Fair Ladies of Hampton Court but it was at least published by a major publisher (Little, Brown & Co.) and gives the appearance of representing fairly thorough and sober research.  It devotes five pages to a biography of Brooke, which seems like very substantial coverage to me.  And then there's this approximately one-page note in Notes and Queries by William Francis Prideaux, a biographical researcher of some note in his day.  Add in the lesser coverage to be found here and there and I think there's a reasonable amount of encyclopedic material to work with.  (And to the extent this might still be a borderline case under NBASIC, while Dryden is certainly not a reliable source, such an indicator of contemporary significance should IMO weigh somewhat in favor of an article.)  -- Visviva ( talk ) 02:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We've got a keep, a redirect, and a delete... relisting for more discussion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 01:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Solar eclipse of September 26, 2117 : Q 𝟤 𝟪 13:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Q 𝟤 𝟪 13:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:CRYSTAL .  Predicted solar eclipses are already listed at List_of_solar_eclipses_in_the_22nd_century .  Per WP:FUTUREEVENT , future events follow normal notability guidelines, and therefore is not notable.  Ap m h 14:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century per what I seem to recall is past precedent.  Primefac ( talk ) 06:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century as primefac said MICHAEL 942006 ( talk ) 11:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century per Primefac and this RfC : general consensus is that future eclipses that do not meet WP:GNG / WP:NASTRO should be redirected.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 18:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of solar eclipses in the 22nd century per Primefac and others.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Noel Tutangata : No indication of notability (two international caps for the Cook Islands national football team ).  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, thus failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Cook Islands international footballers - can't find any evidence of GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Cook Islands international footballers per Spiderone.  Frank Anchor 18:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Cook Islands international footballers per Spiderone. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 16:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
School of Computing and Information Sciences, Saint Louis University, Baguio : May need to be redirected to Saint Louis University (Philippines) .  Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 01:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Philippines .  Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 01:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Saint_Louis_University_(Philippines)#Academics per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Snout Spout : 🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 11:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 11:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters#Snout Spout per WP:ATD .  I agree it fails GNG for a standalone page.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to his section in the character list.  Lacks enough coverage to work as a stand-alone article. -- PanagiotisZois ( talk ) 10:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Zxcvbnm.  Fails WP:GNG for a separate article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters .  A sensible medium-term alternative to Delete, and an article that can be patched up on and improved.  Should sources for GNG be found it can always be returned to standalone.  Comment I know next to nothing about MOTU and care about it even less than that, but this flood of near-identical nominations would give anyone with the knowledge to put together a Keep vote far too much research to do.  This is yet another case of eschewing a potentially constructive discussion on talk pages that could genuinely improve articles and Wikipedia by selectively merging salvageable material to a strong list instead being turned into someone yelling "BALEET!" because it's easier.  I used to wonder why so many articles are neglected.  Now I know it's because passionate editors get tired of being at the mercy of lazy rubbish like this.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 10:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lindsay Monroe : If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to CSI: NY#Lindsay Monroe .  Spinixster (chat!) 14:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 14:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Yet another plot summary and nothing else.  Fails WP:GNG .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Olga María Aguja Zúñiga : No in depth coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Guatemala .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Bilateral relations , Taiwan , Ecuador ,  and Peru .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of ambassadors of Guatemala to Taiwan (with the history preserved under the redirect) , where the subject is mentioned, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 09:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:BIO as indicated by nom.  No issue with a redirect.  SportingFlyer T · C 22:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nilhan Osmanoglu : Fails WP:GNG .  Nirva20 ( talk ) 21:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and Turkey .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 22:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Osmanoğlu family : She is particularly known for minor controversies revolving around the present-day Osmanoğlu family.  Nothing else.  Aintabli ( talk ) 05:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Galatasaray_Islet .  There seems to be no information of value in the article apart from that.  MNewnham ( talk ) 19:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: For consensus on a target Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Osmanoğlu family .  (By the way, she is the only listed sultana there with an individual article.).  -- 03:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chris Kilmore : I would suggest a Redirect to Incubus (band) .  I would have done it myself, but given the already open AfD for another band member , I prefer to gather consensus.  Broc ( talk ) 08:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America .  Broc ( talk ) 08:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I can see a couple of interviews published, [10] [11] but interviews don't add to notability.  The Los Angeles Times reported in 2016 that he was selling his house in Topanga.  [12] (It's not much but at least it is outside of the context of the band Incubus.) The best source I found was this biographical piece in the Las Vegas Review-Journal in 2016.  Weak keep.  Binksternet ( talk ) 19:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is one single biographical piece sufficient to determine notability?  Broc ( talk ) 15:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to his band.  Lacks independent notability.  Most of the above is about XX from Incubus.  A interview for a local gig and house sale piece is not that much.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 09:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per reasons above, not independently notable apart from actions in the band.  LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 15:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kettle Rapids station : – dlthewave ☎ 04:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per the above would be the best for this page.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train : each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is.  Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Women's Party (Turkey) : Kadı Message 08:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Politics ,  and Turkey .  Kadı Message 08:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning redirect to List of political parties in Turkey - I have not found much in-depth coverage; e.g. Daily Sabah (2019); Jerualem Post (2022), Women's UN Report Network (2014), Cumhuriyet (2023); Artı Gerçek (2023).  Beccaynr ( talk ) 15:30, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as inherently encyclopedic content.  Topics like this is what we are here for, people.  I favor the lowest of all low bars for articles on political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections.  Carrite ( talk ) 10:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  09:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge into List of political parties in Turkey , as the party lacks significant coverage in sources to be worthy of an article, as discussed in a recent trwiki AfD .  Having encyclopedic content does not exempt articles from passing the GNG.  ~Styyx Talk ?  23:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Styyx and Beccaynr.  Aintabli ( talk ) 22:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - apparently insignificant party with no elected representatives.  Searching for Kadın Partisi , I mostly found articles about historical women's parties [21] , articles on women's participation in AK Party [22] , and an opinion piece that opens with the lament Neden kocaman bir kadın partisi yok -- Why is there no big women's party .  I was able to find this source which is essentially just reprinting a statement from the organization, and here TRT mentions them briefly in a list of parties investigated by the authorities.  Based on the article itself, which cites only primary sources, the party's membership is.. .zero?  Per a government database?  Elections are inherently notable; parties are organizations that need to attain coverage to become notable, and lowering standards in this area means playing fast and loose with potential political misinformation that we have no way of verifying.  signed, Rosguill talk 05:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Star Pavilion : Fails the general and building-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Architecture ,  and Entertainment .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Hershey Entertainment Complex with the infobox.  No coverage of opening or expansion, only of tour dates Mach61 ( talk ) 17:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KCDN-LD : Redirect or merge to List of Daystar Television Network stations .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Missouri .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge not even have WP:SIGCOV Jo the fire dragon 🐉 「 talk 」 06:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Daystar Television Network stations This is a very unknown station, even in Kansas City where it serves.  I mean, doesn't have the coverage to serve all of the market, and especially now, Merging the article is the best thing here for the station.  mer764 KC TV ( Talk ) 11:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Daystar Television Network stations : while there is a pre-Daystar history, that still doesn't mean there is sufficient significant coverage to merit a separate article.  (Its last pre-Daystar owner was "VVILPTV", which was associated with the ValueVision shopping network and its successors .)  It's already listed, so I don't think there's much to "merge" per se.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply to WcQuidditch: That's true and also the fact that the station is relatively unknown, even in its Community of License , which is Kansas City, Missouri.  mer764 KC TV ( Talk ) 13:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Daystar Television Network stations#Missouri Entire station history is as a translator of larger national networks.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Daystar Television Network stations#Missouri : No WP:SIGCOV is present for this station to meet the GNG.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Adutha Kattam : Possibly fails WP:NFILM .  Kailash29792 (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_Tamil_films_of_1999#January_—_March , where it is listed. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to List_of_Tamil_films_of_1999#January_—_March .  Per nom, fails WP:SIGCOV from sources.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Tamil films of 1999#January — March : Per above.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 14:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Puja Mahato : As her participation in T20I matches were not for a full member country, it doesn't either contribute towards WP:NCRIC .  Robo Cric Let's chat 14:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Cricket ,  and Nepal .  Robo Cric Let's chat 14:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Nepal women Twenty20 International cricketers Looks to fail WP:GNG , however suitable redirect exits here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect