Faria Sheikh: No evidence indicating significant roles in notable films, TV dramas, etc.  Merely being in a film or TV drama does not make one WP:Inherent notability.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Seems to meet WP:NACTOR with multiple significant roles in notable series.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But I was unable to verify if she had significant roles.  As I said in my nom, merely being in a film or TV drama does not make one inherent notable.   — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 15:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note The creator of this BLP has peculiar editing history.  I've raised concerns about it on WP:ANI .  --— Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 17:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) . 182.182.97.3 ( talk ) 15:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is akin to WP:PERX — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 18:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I wonder why the IP copied all the formatting for Mushy's signature? ;) Must be a fan. // Timothy :: talk 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] IP blocked. --— Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 21:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This IP account was not blocked.  Please do not take it upon yourself to strike out opinions/votes unless the editor is a confirmed sockpuppet.  L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and found in BEFORE do not meet WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth, in a non promotional way.  Sources in article are programming annoucements, promo, etc, nothing meeting WP:SIRS.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : After checking, I searched for in-depth coverage from multiple independent secondary sources to meet WP:GNG , but I couldn’t find any.  Therefore, the subject fails WP:GNG .  Regarding WP:NACTOR , I don’t think she has played a significant role in these dramas and films.  Hence, she fails WP:NACTOR .  Grab Up - Talk 12:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete