hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
IPer: It was never notable, and claims on the page about it being a first, in 1996, are dubious at best.  Other tools already existed.  There are no citations on the page, and the citation needed tag has been there for 17 years.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 23:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 23:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Article is in shambles with too many external links inserted.  Also lacks WP:SIGCOV .  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 02:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] DO NOT Delete .  This tool is still alive and became commercial, PaperKiller and HyperPublish - it is available at Paperkiller.com and HyperPublish.com (VisualVision.com) - Please cite other tools that where WYSIWYG and that allowed visual linking and visual navigation between pages while in edit mode in 1996, if they exists.  They do not exist.  Otherwise this page that is very old would have been edited to point to them.  This is probably the first really visual tool and this page should remain as noticeable track: if on the Web we do not keep track of the first products for the Web, where they should be noted?  188.216.49.45 ( talk ) 12:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, for instance, Adobe PageMill was released in 1994.  However you mention it went commercial which might suggest that there is a notable subject in the commercial software.  Do you have independent reliable secondary sources that demonstrate notability of PaperKiller?  If so, it may be that that should have a page and this would either be merged to that or else this could be kept and moved to that title and repurposed.  But first, we still have to establish the notability of the subject, so we need the sources.  Thanks.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 12:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no sources and very badly written currently.  online, just tiny mentions.  Password (talk) (contribs) 05:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
South American Board of New Football Federations: It is not a notable organization, just a very self-important one.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and South America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – It's not a HOAX because I've heard about the project outside of Wikipedia, the point is that it's an embryonic entity with no relevance and that it hasn't managed to hold any competition.  Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 13:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cristian Cerioni: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of in-depth coverage available online.  All I found was routine transfer news ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Italy .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Struggling to see anything other than transactional announcements.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bahula Shakti Peetha: Fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and West Bengal .  UtherSRG (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article is a machine translation of a Bengali Wikipedia article: বেহুলা শক্তিপীঠ .  The three identical "citations" in the English-language article are to the 29 May 2022 version of that article.  The Bengali Wikipedia article has two citations: first is to West Bengal Tourism (given as [1] and [3]) the second [2] is to page 587 of a Bengali-language book called Bardhamāna Jelāra itihāsa o lokasaṃskr̥ti [History and Folk Culture of Burdwan District] by Ekakaṛi Caṭṭopādhyāẏa (ISBN-8185459363).   In Bengali Wikipedia the citation to this book is given for the description of the statue in the section called মন্দির [temple].  Nothing is lost by deleting this machine translation of the Bengali Wikipedia article.  If other sources could be found like Ekakaṛi Caṭṭopādhyāẏa's book, it would perhaps be possible to demonstrate notability.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hosoi Bros: Sharing the stage with bands with Wiki pages doesn't mean notability.  I can't see in what format they were featured in the Oct '13 issue of Decibel, but they weren't mentioned in the cover.  A search on the web for their quite unique band name brings up no significant coverage.  InDimensional ( talk ) 21:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and United States of America .  InDimensional ( talk ) 21:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND .  I'm not finding any significant coverage in an online search.  For what it's worth, none of their songs have more than a few thousand views on YouTube, which is nothing.  – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk ) 22:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruno Marques (architect): Of the links provided one is to his staff biography and the other doesn't mention him at all.  All I found were items that show he exists but don't show notability.  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 18:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And I just noticed the name of the articles author, Brunomarkes .  A variant of the subjects name.  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 18:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is this not eligible for speedy deletion due to the article probably being written by the same guy, serving as a promotion, and not going through AfC but instead being created by a page move?  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 06:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is nothing stopping an editor from moving a draft to main space.  I didn't feel that any of the criteria at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion applied.  So easier to go with AfD and then if it is re-posted it can be G4.  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 11:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Architecture , Germany , Portugal ,  and New Zealand .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:ARCHITECT .  Self-written bio, reads like self-promotion.  No details of individual accomplishments.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WNCE-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 20:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New York .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 20:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International Poker Rules: BEFORE (GScholar) yields zero results, the article is referenced solely to the non-notable organization that created the rules and has just a single footnote.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seems like WP:PROMO , a redirect to poker may be fine, but I think even mentioning it in that article might be UNDUE at this time.   — siro χ o 09:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and tag or Draftify – the topic is notable and has sources elsewhere but the article does need work, so I think a draft would be great.  At the very least a redirect or preferably a merge would be best.   I would work on it but I know nothing about poker, though I removed a sentence that sounded too much like promo/spam.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) Do you have any sources?  All I found in my WP:BEFORE was press releases and publicity pieces that depended on the creators/backers.  Also note the originator of this article was User:FIDPA , which is the name of the publicizers/creators of these rules [29] .  — siro χ o 11:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I also can't find a single notable tournament that has used these rules.  — siro χ o 11:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A set of rules formulated by an organization that 99.99% of poker players have never even heard of?  I think not.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 07:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raj Mathur: JMWt ( talk ) 11:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Computing ,  and India .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Trivial coverage used for sourcing.  The name is too common to pull up this individual, I tried adding "linux" to Gsearch using his name, still too much stuff comes up, unrelated to this person (or nothing at all in Gnews).  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Likely not notable as an individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Vietnam: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  I also advise Fandom for them if they want to save it so much.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Vietnam .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia isn't a TV guide.  This fails to meet the WP:LISTN criteria.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gage Canning: Joeykai ( talk ) 04:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The refs are either team-specific blogs or passing mentions.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 23:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Run of the mill minor leaguer without the needed depth of coverage for notability.  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 02:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tinashe Nenhunzi: JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG fail this one, and with no lists of Zimbabwean cricketers there's no redirect here also.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG .  Robo Cric Let's chat 16:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Diāna Suvitra: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  There are several versions of this article, which mentions the subject in the title but barely talks about her in the article itself.  It's a republication from the national football federation, either way.  Otherwise, there are just passing mentions like this .  Please lmk if I'm missing any significant coverage.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment WP:TOOSOON .  Article is also out of date; she transferred to Greek club Trianton Ialysos (of G.A.E. Ialysos ) in January 2023.  Could find only WP:ROUTINE coverage of the transfer and match reports in Greek media.  ( 1 , 2 )  Five UWCL appearances across two clubs but no SIGCOV.  - 63.224.250.203 ( talk ) 18:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe Blade (series): soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find a formal policy for series by notability, but I would assume that if sources aren't there to provide coverage on the background, development or assessment of the series as a whole, there is no notability for an article that purports to cover the series as a whole, even if its individual games are notable.  Happy to strike this if someone does a WP:BEFORE and finds otherwise.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 05:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Faruk Buljubašić: Boleyn ( talk ) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Bosnia and Herzegovina ,  and Croatia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games: It's still too early for this article (and other similar ones) to exist.  CycloneYoris talk!  19:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Vietnam .  CycloneYoris talk!  19:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify per WP:TOOSOON .  Frank Anchor 00:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete way WP:TOOSOON .  In 6 months time, it will still be too soon, and so I object to draftifying this as draftspace is not an indefinite holding area.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I disagree strongly.   It is very reasonable to have some level of information about a country's participation in international competition two years ahead of time.   Therefore, drafspace would be the exact opposite of an indefinite holding area If this proves not to be the case, the draft can easily be deleted in October 2024.  Frank Anchor 15:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For most events like this, the qualifying tournaments will be at most a year before the event i.e. in 2025.  Unless there is evidence that there are 2026 Asian Games qualifiers this year, and so we'll know some qualified Vietnamese competitors in 6 months time, then draftspace is not needed.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 16:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Utterly non-encyclopedic.  The current entry contains nothing of value.  The desire to create articles way ahead of time needs to be stamped out.  It's an unhealthy "I was here first" culture which does not add value to Wikipedia.  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete