Kaşınhan railway station: Fails WP:BUILDING / WP:NTRAINSTATION , not seeing significant coverage outside of routine non-independent service announcements from Turkish State Railways and passing mentions which confirm this train station exists, but not that it's notable.  The only source in the article doesn't even namecheck the subject.  Possible redirect target: Konya–Yenice railway .  Pilaz ( talk ) 18:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Turkey .  Pilaz ( talk ) 18:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Why has this specific article been tagged after years?  I find these requests very puzzling, as there are numerous articles like this, not just for Turkish railways, but around the world.  While editing Turkish railway articles, my goal is to add and bring them up to the standard of American railway articles, hence the article on individual railway stations.  If this article will be deleted, does that mean every station in Turkey, except the large one, will follow suite?  Of course additions can be made, given time (I work full-time).  The history can be added regarding the Baghdad railway, hosting the famous Taurus express along with its rebuilding to accommodate HSTs.  In any case, this article should be kept and NOT deleted.  Cheers.  ( Central Data Bank ( talk ) 18:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] New page patrollers check whether new articles conform to Wikipedia's core content policies.  I found this article through the New pages feed , and, despite its age, it was yet to be reviewed.  As far as community guidelines go, articles may be deleted if they don't meet the general notability guideline or one of many specific notability guidelines .  In this case, a cursory search of sources turned up little to show that this two-platform station is notable, hence why it is brought here for broader community review.  Pilaz ( talk ) 19:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] More than likely they will be deleted, unless you can find significant sourcing for each building.  We don't have much of anything here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well then as a patroller, please tell me the difference between this article and, for example, Alderson station .  Both have more or less the same amount of info provided.  I am asking, so I can update Kasinhani station to keep the article.  And if we are going to firesale and begin to destroy the whole Turkish railway community on wikipedia, why has Kasinhani been singled out?  Why not go on to delete all the others, except the large notable ones?  My point being, this seems to be an act of prejudicial(?) selection, not following any consistent form of wider article selection other than singling out a random article and nominating it for deletion.  Yes, I am frustrated in this situation, because it is very random, and without logic, unless ALL other similar articles would follow suite.  (Not just in Turkey, but all over the world) ( Central Data Bank ( talk ) 17:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] All buildings require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability per WP:NBUILDING .  The fact that that article hasn't been nominated doesn't mean it's necessarily notable or abiding by Wikipedia notability guidelines.  And no, you article wasn't singled out: railway station articles are routinely brought to AfD, see for example Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puksinhyon station .  So, unless anyone can find significant coverage for this building (basically: has anyone ever written about this train station in detail?), this article does not meet our notability guidelines.  Wikipedia is not a collection of everything .  Pilaz ( talk ) 13:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unless there is some sort of heritage designation for the building, there likely isn't much on it.  This is all I could find [36] , which is trivial coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The pdf you have shared is a great resource for stations in Turkey actually, thank you for finding it.  ( Central Data Bank ( talk ) 17:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Keep without prejudice to a discussion about all the stations on the line as a group.  There is no benefit to the encyclopaedia from singing out random examples from a set of similar articles.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus