hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Danilo Cocks : JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  More specifically, fails WP:BASIC , WP:ANYBIO , and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 19:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brabby Kofigo : In my own searches, I was unable to find any significant coverage of Kofigo.  The best sources were Modern Ghana , a single passing mention, Ghana Soccernet , which also only mentions him once, and All Africa , which looks to be the best source but still only has 2 sentences about Kofigo and doesn't contain enough info to write a bio from.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:10, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:10, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DJ Ram : Not to be confused with the eponymous Dutch producer [11] .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 19:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Russia .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 19:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Also unable to find a single piece of significant coverage on the subject, even when narrowing down to Russian and including his real name in the search.  The article's claims of his stature are very dubious and were likely written from a fan POV.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel Quigley : Nswix ( talk ) 19:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing WP:GNG .  After my own WP:BEFORE (incl news and books and other searches for "Daniel Quigley" + "ISKA" / "Daniel Quigley" + "kickboxing" / etc), I can find insufficient sources to reliably support the text in the article.  And, even if we could scramble a few sources together to do so, we'd still be some way short of WP:SIGCOV .  Can't support a "keep"...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as fails WP:GNG .  MartyTheArty ( talk ) 14:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search efforts could find no evidence that he meets WP:NKICK .   Like Guliolopez, I was unable to find significant coverage that I believe shows he meets WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 00:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bible College NIT : LibStar ( talk ) 00:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable.  Nocturnal781 ( talk ) 02:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable. -- Bduke ( talk ) 05:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jermaine Wilson : Fails WP:GNG .  This article seems promising, but is not enough.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Construct-Bots : Print coverage appears limited to press releases and inventory lists; there's reviews on YouTube, but none of them appear to have been published by a reliable, professional publication.  I tried to find an adequate Transformers-related page that this could be redirected to, but we don't seem to have any lists of Transformers toy lines, and this product line doesn't appear to line up with any specific Transformers sub-franchise.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Toys .  signed, Rosguill talk 19:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Concur that what we have is not good enough for mainspace; fails WP:GNG Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ksolves India Limited : Sources are largely earning reports and announcements, considered trivial coverage .  Others fall short of WP:CORPDEPTH .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  02:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and India .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  02:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - nothing more than a business directory listing .  This might even qualify for A7 speedy deletion: there is nothing currently in the article that even remotely suggests notability, just that it exists, it has products (but none are described), it works with the same tech products that every tech company works with, and it's publicly traded and reports earnings.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 18:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP .  Ciudatul ( talk ) 19:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep According to WP:LISTED guidelines, a publicly traded company is deemed notable if it has received independent press coverage and is cited in analyst reports.  The article under discussion meets these criteria by including three credible analyst reports [42] , [43] , [44] and sufficient independent press coverage.  Artyomolga ( talk ) 01:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  None of the sources meets the criteria of WP:NCORP .  Sources also fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND because of no independent subject matter.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of resorts in the Maldives : Any notable resorts or entries can be accommodated at List of hotels: Countries M .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 08:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists , Companies ,  and Maldives .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 08:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This article does not seem very notable and the list in it seems way too long, thus making it look like a directory or a travel guide which Wikipedia articles should not be.  I also agree with User:Ajf773 that it is better to list the most notable hotels in List of hotels: Countries M instead.  ST7733B ( talk ) 06:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lewis E. Hollander Jr. : The article is poorly written because it lacks sufficient reliable sources independent of the subject.  As a result it reads like a CV/resumé combined with a poor high school essay.  It's painful to read and should be put out of its misery unless it can be re-written using sufficient RS.  NSH001 ( talk ) 06:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Sportspeople ,  and Oregon .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to draft .  Content regarding his scientific work and publications could support notability, if references can be provided.  BD2412 T 17:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 11:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] seems a fairly clear Keep to me.  AfD can delete either if the topic is not notable, or if the article is so badly written it would be better to start back from nothing.  In this case the subject is probably notable as an academic, possibly as an ancient athlete, certainly as a combination of both.  The article is dreadfully formatted, but the solution to that is not TNT, or AfD: it's to get typing and reformat it.  Elemimele ( talk ) 13:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Note Wikipedia's policy "Unsourced content is subject to removal" Most of this article is unsourced content (and therefore subject to removal, aka deletion).  If not a total deletion, remove the sections with no sources.  Unsourced content is either a hoax, not notable, or just someone didn't put in the effort to source it.  If the third, then fix it.  If the first two, then delete.  Starship 24 ( talk ) 16:18, 10 April 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 12:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete i don't see enough coverage on this.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 21:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete article makes a lot of uncited claims, and being in the Guinness Book of Records doesn't confer automatic notability.  LibStar ( talk ) 14:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration .  Lightburst ( talk ) 13:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 14:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nickelodeon (Estonian TV programming block) : Tagged for notability since 2022.  PROD removed with "result of PROD cannot be redirect?", not sure what that means.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Estonia .  Donald D23 talk to me 01:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No references, hard to find serious sources-- Estopedist1 ( talk ) 06:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] IMO, a redirect would be better option than delete.  Pelmeen10 ( talk ) 09:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect either to TV1 (Estonian TV channel) or Paramount International Networks#Nickelodeon given WP:ATD .  - B RAINULATOR 9 ( TALK ) 19:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  09:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources and completely unexceptional block of Nicktoons which just happened to air on a main channel.  Not every Nick-branded block is notable.  Nobody is going to type this long title to end up dumped into an article without a mention of Estonia or Nickelodeon.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sahat Manaor Panggabean : Being a Chief of the Indonesian Quarantine Agency does not qualify for WP:NPOL , and outside routine coverage of his appointment there is not much notability.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Environment .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPOL .  - UtherSRG (talk) 01:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Proposed coat of arms of North Macedonia : StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 21:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and North Macedonia .  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 21:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this is an unnecessary article.  Jingiby ( talk ) 05:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I note that most of the titles of this article in the other wikis translate to "Macedonian lion".  If the Macedonian lion is notable enough, it can have its own standalone article with that title.  It is a rather prominent symbol for some ethnic Macedonian orgs (such as VMRO-DPMNE ).  I otherwise agree that the potential for the lion to become the national emblem can just be covered in the National Emblem article.  -- Local hero talk 15:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It doesn't appear to be notable for its own standalone article.  Otherwise there's already content about it on National symbols of North Macedonia .  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 15:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The lion used by DPMNE is solely an imitation of the symbols of the original organization from the end of the 19th century - BMARC , which borrowed the Bulgarian lion from the Bulgarian revolutionary traditions , that have nothing to do with any Macedonian lion.  Jingiby ( talk ) 19:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There's quite a few renames in the article's history: 19 Oct 2009: Created, probably as Golden Lion of Macedonia by

Discussion outcome: delete
Manichandra : No evidence of wp:notability under sng or gng.   Was a contestant on 4 games shows and won 1.  And is a choreographer.    Sources (and article content) are just facts related to that.    Nothing approaching even 1 GNG source.   Creator is indeffed for abuse of multiple accounts.  North8000 ( talk ) 19:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There seems to be no significant coverage and the role played by the subject on the shows apart from the Jodi S9 is not significant as well.  Fails GNG.  FWIW, I was waiting to G5 this after Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isha.Narain was closed.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 19:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant coverage and achievement in secondary independent reliable sources to satisfy notability.  Most sources on the page are unreliable.  The page has mostly routine news of the subject as runner up on a Bigg Boss game show that is not sufficient basis for a page on this subject.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : They seem to have been on a reality show, but there isn't much written about them in reliable sources outside of that.  Waqar 💬 09:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom was on Big Boss but fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 14:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yasim Abdi Mohamed : Possible WP:BIO1E issue.  UtherSRG (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Terrorism , Somalia ,  and Canada .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable terror suspect, now in the food service business.  Not guilty of the former, latter is run of the mill.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and be sure to mention all the charges dropped at 2006 Ontario terrorism plot .  I'm on the fence about redirecting there, but I'm leaning we shouldn't since charges were dropped and he's not really a WP:PUBLICFIGURE (See also WP:NPF ).  Detailed WP:BLPs of  non-public figures notable for being accused of a crime and later having the charges dropped sets off a lot of BLP alarm bells for me.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 19:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is also exactly what WP:BLP1E is for (meets all 3 criteria).  WP:SUSPECT also suggests we shouldn't even include information that they were accused as a non-public figure.  — siro χ o 20:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable as either as designer or so-called victim QueerEcofeminist🌈 03:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per QueerEcofeminist🌈.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 04:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adam Van Doren : Most of the article is about the subject's notable family (covered in other Wikipedia entries).  Sources confirm that the subject is painter but not one whose work is widely-known or award-winning.  Pprsmv ( talk ) 08:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Actors and filmmakers , Artists , Authors , Connecticut , Illinois , Massachusetts ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Aye, there's a whole lot of fluff here; over half the text in the article is who the subject's related to, to whom he's married, that notable people once owned his studio, etc etc etc.   Strip away all the dross and refbombing, and this guy's just another painter and non-notable junior academic.  Ravenswing 18:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete notability is not inherited.   A line about a grandson in one of the other family articles seems to be the right amount of information for the current position.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: The article does not specifically focus on the subject and tries to show notability by mentioning other people's names.  Southati ( talk ) 12:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No news coverage specifically on the subject.  Agree with above arguments.  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete