hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Rejoice! Musical Soul Food: Let'srun ( talk ) 16:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Radio , United States of America ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete numerically, there's a lot of coverage in radio magazines, but all of it is insignificant.  Mach61 ( talk ) 00:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahlagha Jaberi: Also, the article re-created by sockpuppet (both creators YenWitch and Aferoiand are the same).  Ireland nat ( talk ) 00:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Fashion .  Ireland nat ( talk ) 00:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I had tagged this for notability, which was removed by another individual.  I'm not sure the extensive sourcing provides what's needed for notability.  Image captions, celebrity fluff articles, the rest isn't in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Iran .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only notable coverage of the subject in reliable sources seems to be a very brief one for her protest at Cannes.  So based on WP:BLP1E —Not notable.  YRhyre ( talk ) 20:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe Robbie Cup: The best source I found is [54] , but WP:NOTNEWS , WP:NEVENT , etc.  Is this rescuable?  Or merge/redirectable?  Note: I am nominating this here after a request at pl wikipedia's AfD at pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:08:19:Puchar Chicago 1992 , where a number of similar weak articles were nominated, and several have English Wikipedia entries (but very poor, as the one seen herel the two others that may merit discussion on English Wikipedia are Umbro Cup and 1985 Azteca 2000 Tournament ).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 00:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and United States of America .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 00:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thomaz Ransmyr: 3 April 2016‎ "Both this and the Swedish Wiki have no better convincing signs of satisfying the applicable notability and my searches noticeably found nothing better at all; the current sourcing here is also not convincingly enough." 11 May 2022: "Poorly sourced articles to non-independent websites that has been tagged for 9 years for lack of citations."  No sufficient improvements have been made since.  For example, its references still "do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article —that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published , reliable , secondary sources".  After more than a decade of very basic problems, as pointed out by several users during this time, it does not seem likely that they will ever be resolved.  Caput Deleo ( talk ) 10:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Bands and musicians ,  and Sweden .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I couldn't find the above mentioned Swedish Wiki article, because it has been deleted.  Four times.  Caput Deleo ( talk ) 10:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It has also been considered to be worth keeping.  Three times.  78.76.89.147 ( talk ) 21:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete deleted from svwiki once again last year (a language version with generally a lower notability treshold).  Limited coverage in local press.  Insufficient with respect to GNG.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 09:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It has also been considered to be worth keeping.  Three times.  Links were to nation wide articles, international discography and filming in Sweden and the US.  Seems the info was not correctly checked before deletion.  78.76.89.147 ( talk ) 21:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It has also been considered to be worth keeping.  Three times.  Links were to nation wide articles, international discography and filming in Sweden and the US.  Seems the info was not correctly checked before deletion.  78.76.89.147 ( talk ) 21:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please do not post the same thing multiple times.  This page is about the enwiki article.  If this subject is of personal interest to you, please consider not engaging any further, here or elsewhere.  Caput Deleo ( talk ) 20:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any RS on the biographical information presented.  Most of the items listed under "references" are not RS, or not relevant.  I do not see  away to bring this article up to WP standards fro a living person.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 20:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeyow Evangelista: UtherSRG (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , Television ,  and Philippines .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Gsearch goes straight to social media sites, then nothing.  The award nomination seems non-notable.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no usable sources, fails NFILMMAKER by the looks of it. - KH-1 ( talk ) 05:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Global TV Demand Awards: Not subject of independent, in-depth coverage in reliable sources.  All found sources refer to the subject shows winning one of these awards vs the awards show themselves.  spryde | talk 14:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Websites .  spryde | talk 14:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Another 'award' which is just blatant ballot stuffing "stan" bait; "there are no judges and no voting committees involved. Instead, winners are selected using Parrot Analytics’ global audience demand measurement system" tells us nothing about how and why these winners are chosen.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, you can pay Guinness to certify your "record", so that tells us about this "award".  Non-notable and sourced from a non-reliable source.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non notable award determined by a non-notable company - Draft:Parrot Analytics has been refused at WP:AFC six times - Arjayay ( talk ) 10:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Arjayay.  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 05:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of American television awards .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Grace Santiago: Spinixster (chat!) 11:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 11:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The character seems rather minor and I couldn't find anything to illustrate that it passed GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Danila Medvedev: Medvedev appears to be mentioned in some books, but he is not the subject of them, nor did he write them.  30Four ( talk ) 07:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Tom Morris ( talk ) 14:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I agree this doesn't meet notability, but I don't really like the idea of merging or redirecting to KrioRus .  According to that article, 11 people are listed as founders rather loosely, so I don't see anything that really has to have this subject as a redirect.  Probably best to delete and recreate if they ever do gain more notability whether through that company or otherwise.  KoA ( talk ) 03:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Money (software): Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Products ,  and Software .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very little secondary source coverage apart from the two already cited and another article by Macworld [21] .  Most websites produced by a Google search on "Money by jumsoft" are user review sites which fail WP:UGC .  Liu1126 ( talk ) 10:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Poorni: No significant roles, no good sources either.  Redirect to Boss Engira Bhaskaran , only cited role.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 20:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Computing .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Only two films with no significant roles.  Definitely doesn't deserve a Wikipedia article.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 00:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Profitis Ilias Church, Santorini: The article fails to make clear what makes it notable and its source is an image title from a self-published image in a tourist site.  In general, it lacks significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources (see WP:NBUILD ).  Not to be confused with the Profitis Ilias Monastery in the same island.  C messier ( talk ) 21:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Christianity ,  and Greece .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (as article creator) - support deletion on WP:NBUILD grounds, and with some years of hindsight.  Looked quickly for some reliable sources, and was not able to find anything in depth relating to this church in particular (not the Profitis Ilias Monastery, nor the Profitis Ilias ridgeline).  SamHolt6 ( talk ) 13:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A New Day Cambodia: Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Cambodia ,  and Illinois .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raheem Deterville: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  A few examples of what I did find were 1 , 2 and 3 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Antigua and Barbuda .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - couldn't find anything better than what JT already found Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
White Stag Leadership Development Program: Sourcing is absolutely terrible and advertorial intents are quite evident.  I am not sure if it meets NORG either, although the pure advert nature alone merits a deletion .  Graywalls ( talk ) 12:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business ,  and California .  Graywalls ( talk ) 12:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Scouting-related deletion discussions .  Graywalls ( talk ) 22:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wow! almost all sources are primary and from their own websites.  Although an organization from 1958 might have other better news out there, it's no bother searching since almost entirety of the article must be trimmed once primary sources are removed.  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Perfectstrangerz.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 11:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nike Hypervenom: 2) Fails WP:GNG .  After removing unreliable sources, there are three sources left (even then I'm not sure about them).  One source details Nike giving the product to a famous athlete, another source details a product release and the last details the product being discontinued.  This a far shot from broad in-depth coverage of the product.  A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS that would establish WP:GNG .  TarnishedPath talk 07:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Sports ,  and Football .  TarnishedPath talk 07:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a new article on Nike football boots or similar, which would be a notable general topic.  Giant Snowman 10:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't think it is impossible to have an article about a product line.  For instance, a car model may clearly be notable for a page, but what makes it notable is significant coverage, independent of the subject in reliable secondary sources.  From what I have been able to find, this is not the case here.  The sourcing primarily leads back to advertising copy and product releases and lacks independence.  The creation of a football boots stub seems like a bold move to provide a WP:ATD , but I don't believe that, at this stage, even the general subject has been shown to be notable.  A redirect to Nike, Inc. would be more useful at this time, if anyone feels redirect is suitable.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 07:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pawira Putra: An Indonesian search yielded only stats sites and Wikipedia mirror sites.  Viva was the best source that I could find, but it's only a mention in a squad list.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marc Minardi: His strongest claim to notability as an actor is his role as the friend of the protagonist in Ace Lightning , but I do not think this meets WP:NACTOR .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 14:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Canada .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 14:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, actors are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist — the notability test doesn't hinge on listing acting roles, it hinges on showing WP:GNG -worthy media coverage about them and their performances.  But the only footnote here isn't enough all by itself, and I've had about as much luck finding more as the nominator did.  Bearcat ( talk ) 00:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete