hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Stavriana Antoniou: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .
 P.S. Her transliterated name is Σταυριάνα Αντωνίου.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cyprus .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Váci Mihály Gimnázium: Xx236 ( talk ) 12:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This one is blatant PROMO .  Stuff like "it has always preserved its own traditions, teaching methods suitable for any of the students and remained a strong institution." has no place in an encyclopedia.  Industrial Insect (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Hungary .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Milford Keresoma: JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and New Zealand .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A bit of coverage exits on his career, but struggling to see enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks in-depth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LARP Alliance, Inc.: No evidence of notability.  Previously deleted and salted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LARP_Alliance * Pppery * it has begun... 03:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United States of America .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 03:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet WP:GNG as has no independent sources of the subject. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdullah Al Huwail: Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Saudi Arabia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article uses only sports blogs for sources.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 14:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ayeah Games: It was created by a WP:SPA so it seems like open and shut WP:SPAM unless someone can bring up evidence it is notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 01:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 01:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No significant independent coverage except for a single article about its game published before the game was even released.  This article was copied across a few websites.  The article appears to be based on a press release, so even that coverage is not independent.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 03:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't pass WP:NCORP or WP:N .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 21:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Antogonist: TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 10:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Spain .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shivalik Public School, Mohali: I suspect this to be made from someone related to the organisation.  Yamantakks ( talk ) 11:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Punjab .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Did a brief search and found a tidal wave of routine The Tribune India posts (which read like press releases and very well might be), and a couple of databases, but overall no significant mentions in secondary sources.  (Worth also concurring with the nominator that the only source in the article dedicates a grand half-a-sentence to talking about the school itself.) 2600:1012:B126:B9A5:5C66:DDC7:69F9:F20E ( talk ) 19:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC) (Please send talk messages here instead) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NSCHOOL or WP:GNG .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hysterectomy Educational Resources and Services Foundation: This was contested with nothing more than deserves a closer look at AfD , so here we go.  * Pppery * it has begun... 02:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations ,  and United States of America .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I restored some references that another editor removed.  I think that the article now demonstrates notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I maintain that those sources don't demonstrate notability - they're about the topic of hysterectomies and mention the organization only in passing, to attribute a claim.  * Pppery * it has begun... 17:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I've reviewed the current sources (except for boston.com which is behind a paywall) and looked for additional ones.  The organization is mentioned only in passing in everything I reviewed.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 20:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Sources are insubstantial, as previously mentioned.  Any other secondary sources fail to establish notability.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 13:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no extensive independent coverage.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 12:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rylo Huncho: See WP:BLP1E .  TolWol ( talk ) 04:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 04:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Virginia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Was not meeting musical notability while alive, his death would not make him more notable.  No coverage found outside of his death, not meeting notability guidelines Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable for being a musician.  Notable for the manner of his death, which is already yesterday's news and certainly doesn't merit its own Wikipedia page.  -- Jkaharper ( talk ) 09:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not a notable person. -- JaneciaTaylor ( talk ) 07:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] wikipedia editors when it comds to demeaning a kid who accidentally shot himself: 2605:59C8:2653:8B10:EBBB:1D42:4291:808A ( talk ) 23:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aranxa Vega: All I was able to find were interviews ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , etc.) and coverage from when an advertising panel fell on her during a post-match interview ( 1 , 2 , etc.), and everything else is trivial mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Peru .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - interviews are fine as an indication of notability; what it's poor for, is sourcing - but that's not what AFD is about.  Nfitz ( talk ) 00:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As has been noted hundreds of times by now, interviews only contribute to GNG if there is secondary independent SIGCOV of the subject by the author.  Nothing derived from what the interviewee says counts toward notability.  The above sources in fact aren't even interviews in the sense we use them: they are routine match reports that happen to quote Vega's press statements.  Nowhere close to SIGCOV, nor is the brief bump of primary news coverage from the incident noted above.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 03:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I closed this AFD as "Delete" but didn't notice at the time that the majority of participation occurred in a few hours before I closed the discussion.  I was asked to relist this discussion and I think that's a reasonable request so that's what I'm doing.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with what JoelleJay says.  Notability means significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.  Interviews are neither secondary sources (they are primary sources) and not independent sources.  Ms Vega scoring a goal, her opinion on a match, particularly that an opposing goal was offside, and being hit by an advertising board does not amount to notability and I see nothing better.  -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk ) 00:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MailHippo: Deletion reason still stands.  The Yahoo Finance ref is a press release, the other sources are likewise either primary and nonindependent, blogs, or both.  I have performed searches in EBSCO, Gale and ProQuest and have not been able to locate any sources suitable for WP:NCORP , it is likely that it is simply WP:TOOSOON for any significant coverage to exist.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Products , Software ,  and United States of America .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can only find regular business listings such as Crunchbase.  Nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT . -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 00:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some press releases and company database listings.  Doesn't meet WP:NCORP .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dmitry Kalineyko: The only non-database source across all languages of Wikipedia for him is Tribuna , which is a trivial mention.  In my own searches in Russian and Belarusian, the best sources found were KP , which doesn't meet the high standards of WP:YOUNGATH , and Football.by , another passing mention.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belarus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brahmondi Kamini Kishore Moulik Government High School: Searches in English and Bengali found nothing but passing mentions and indiscriminate directory listings.  Without significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources, should not be a stand alone article.  Worldbruce ( talk ) 21:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Bangladesh .  Worldbruce ( talk ) 21:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 22:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Found some refs: https://sangbadsangrah.com/? p=2842 , https://www.narsingdipratidin.com/2023/01/01/%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%82%E0%A6%A6%E0%A7%80%E0%A6%A4%E0%A7%87-%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%87-%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%A3-%E0%A6%89%E0%A7%8E%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%AC/print/ , https://old.bartabazar.com/archives/390567 - Indefensible ( talk ) 04:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Kudos on a diligent search.  In all my years editing Bangladeshi topics, I've never come across those three websites, but those are what I mean by passing mentions:  1) "The 18th annual sports competition of Narsingdi Sunbeam School ... was held on Saturday at the Brahmandi Kamini Kishore Maulik Government High School ground ..."  2) "Later he distributed books to ... and Brahmandi Kamini Kishore Primary School in the city".  3) "In the pre-award discussion held under the chairmanship of Masudur Rahman, the head teacher of Brahmandi Kamini Kishore Maulik Government High School, ..." -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 04:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I probably agree (with some regret) that subject does not seem to meet currently, however listing for others to review and there might be other sources out there.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 04:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relisting.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless an editor can provide references to significant coverage of this high school in independent, reliable sources.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 23:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Creativerse: The Bleeding Cool review is substantial and a RS.  The VentureBeat articles ( 1 , 2 ) are good.  The Softonic review is three paragraphs total, more of a description than a review, and not attributed to a specific author.  QuietCicada ( talk ) 22:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada ( talk ) 22:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ...So, weak keep ?  Not gonna lie, this isn't exactly a compelling case as to why this article should be deleted.  PantheonRadiance ( talk ) 22:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete It's a vague if sort of fair nomination given that the article only currently has one reliable review and is otherwise mostly citations from primary sources.  The VentureBeat sources are helpful as a developer interview and providing release context, but they only very briefly assess the game itself.  Given the Softonic review is not exactly reliable, it really would help if there are one or two more sources out there that independently evaluate the game.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 00:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I actually would be more critical about the sources than the nom themselves is.  The deletion argument is weak, but it does not appear that there is sufficient WP:SIGCOV here that isn't in clearly promotional language.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 01:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 1 review and 2 promotional interviews is not enough to satisfy WP:GNG criteria.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 15:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Avenue Mohammed VI, Marrakesh: This is a major street, but there's not much else to say about it.  It's not even one of the more central streets of the city (Avenue Mohammed V would maybe qualify for that).  At most, you could list some businesses along it, but that's not significant coverage and would fall into WP:TRAVELGUIDE -style trivia.  R Prazeres ( talk ) 22:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions .  R Prazeres ( talk ) 22:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete