hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
The Hairbrain Scheme : Free Realist 9 ( talk ) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Free Realist 9 ( talk ) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find any evidence that this band were popular outside of Santa Barbara – any reviews I find are from local media [34] , [35] .  As far as I can see, they released one mini-album in 2006 and one full-length album in 2008, both on non-notable labels, before splitting up...  Singer Grant Parsons' contact details suggest the band was active until January 2008 [36] , I can find social media posts from 2009 saying "I miss this band" and their website was dead by 2011, according to the Wayback Machine.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 15:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not meet Wikipedia's notability, it lacks enough credible information and sources to prove the band's importance.  Yakov-kobi ( talk ) 20:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks ok to delete .  Haven't looked very hard but ProQuest yields very few hits when you search for "Harebrain Scheme" and "band".  Did find one mention in a 2007 newspaper in Eugene, Oregon , but it's literally just a passing mention about an upcoming gig – so little information, in fact, that it's not entirely clear that it's the same band.  Please ping me if sources are found.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 09:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it is the same band, but they appear to have been the second support act on another band's tour [37] , so it doesn't really make them notable.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 12:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree.  Would also point out that the Daily Nexus (referenced above) is a student newspaper so doesn't count toward notability.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 02:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's some info here, but it's hard to tell how well-known this band really was.     The sources look mostly local, and they only put out a couple albums on small labels.   Maybe with more evidence of broader impact, the article could stay, but right now it seems a bit thin.  Waqar 💬 16:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ms. Vampy : Sources in article and found in BEFORE show nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  No objection to a redirect to Brooke Lewis Bellas if a consensus exists, a bold redirect would almost certainly be rv'd.  Strongly oppose drafting after looking at author's talk page User talk:Ricktheelectric .  // Timothy :: talk 00:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails WP:NTVSERIES , no relevant sources other than mentions on Google.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 06:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Short-lived Ottoman provinces : Each reference is for that specific province.  Whether they are "short-lived" depends on our interpretation, and "short-lived provinces" in general is not a concept specifically discussed in the sources as far as I can see.  Aintabli ( talk ) 18:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 18:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the minds of those who create such articles continue to baffle.  "Short-lived"??? What next, "Ottoman provinces with more than three vowels in their name"?  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 23:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since there is no clear selection criteria for the list members, and "short-lived" is ambiguous and subjective ( WP:SELCRIT ).  ("More than three vowels in their name" criterion would be better in this regard; LOL.) -- Kammerer55 ( talk ) 02:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Extremely problematic article that has no definable criteria.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nonhlanhla Joye : The attempted notability claim here, that she founded an organization, would be fine if the article were reliably sourced to WP:GNG -worthy coverage about her in real media of record, but this as written is referenced far, far too heavily to primary source content self-published by organizations she's directly affiliated with, and shows very little evidence of third-party coverage about her in independent GNG-worthy sources.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and South Africa .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak delete : Should be notable, but there just isn't much coverage...  A PBS interview here [37] and a brief mention here in a French article [38] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Schalk Oelofse : JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tasnim Isleem : The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was a few sentences of coverage here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Jordan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 23:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – more coverage is required for individual article.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Top Spin (ride) : I could only find one review from an inadmissible personal blog, and the article is almost entirely WP:OR .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks and Products .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
GTO Wizard : Shellwood ( talk ) 10:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
N.M. Badusha : Not received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , India ,  and Kerala .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 11:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jimmy Crystal (Fictional Character) : Disputed draft.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 23:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to Sing 2 .  Only "sources" are from unreliable Wikis.  Not at all notable.  Lynch44 ( talk ) 23:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Film ,  and Comics and animation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails notability and poorly written.  Like a test article.  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 06:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'd support any admin closing this AFD early given the history and the editor who moved it into article space (who knows if was the editor who created it since that was an IP back in December) has effectively requested deletion/move back to draft space: Special:Diff/1221686889 .  (They also moved it back to draft space and removed the AFD template during this discussion; I've moved it back to article space for the duration of this AFD and, helpfully, fixed the tags.)  I moved from redirect to delete since I don't think the non-standard capitalization should be made in this way.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I also support the delete.  It really should.  Also, the sources, which Lynch44 said.  so, yes.  SingFan2023 ( talk ) 15:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am sorry.  I didn know what to do at first.  SingFan2023 ( talk ) 15:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing Wikipedia:Notability Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 01:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This page isn't good enough.  If someone wanted a bio on this character, there would be a page established for the characters of the Sing franchise.  Right?  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 01:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes I would think so.  SingFan2023 ( talk ) 11:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing WP:NOTABILITY .  Jontesta ( talk ) 22:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James McFadden (dancer) : It is from a period of time where it is harder to find online sources, unfortunately.  It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance and United States of America .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - this is someone's OR project based on newspaper articles.  Subject is not obviously notable nor are there sufficient sources provided.  But if the original author had gone further and found good secondary sources, it might have met requirement.  Maybe one day someone will.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Power sign (astrology) : PROD was recently removed, but searching for "power sign" astrology on Google search and Books did not yield any relevant results.  This is not surprising since "Power sign" isn't an actual concept in astrology (as compared to positive/negative sign , cardinal/fixed/mutable sign , fire/air/earth/water sign which are actual concepts in astrology).  Describing certain astrological signs as 'powerful', 'energetic', etc. does not mean that it's a " Power sign " (as if it's an actual concept or categorization in astrology, which it is not), and doing so violates the WP:Original research /SYNTH policy.  Some1 ( talk ) 15:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astrology-related deletion discussions .  Some1 ( talk ) 15:08, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Prod removal that failed to add the supposed Books sources was inappropriate.  If real, this could still be redirected elsewhere.  Reywas92 Talk 20:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Do you have a suggestion where this could be redirected?  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as synthesis at best, and probably synthesis of unreliable sources at that.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 16:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find anything that suggests this is a real term, so I wouldn't redirect.  The reasons at nom are more than sufficient for deletion.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 22:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I've reviewed the Books results that prompted me to deprod and I don't find WP:SIGCOV .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 01:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Montenegro, Ljubljana : Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Montenegro ,  and Slovenia .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:50, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Very short and not worth having an article.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 04:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Wikipedia is not a directory of every nation's embassy.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTACATALOGUE .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:15, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023–24 Isles of Scilly Football League : DrKay ( talk ) 07:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  DrKay ( talk ) 07:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Facebook is the only source of notability offical Facebook page 92.30.92.108 ( talk ) 21:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - a user has now added an RSSSF source .  Is this usually enough for a league season article?  If not, then we may need to look at 2022–23 Isles of Scilly Football League as well.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is essentially a pub league which occasionally gets a bit of "and finally...." news coverage because of the oddity that it only has two teams.   The league itself is probably notable, but individual seasons certainly aren't -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 15:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for all the reasons above.  It's a minor "league" of two teams, that occasionally gets mentions, but each specific season doesn't need a separate article.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 13:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sani Usman Kunya : - UtherSRG (talk) 12:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails notability guidelines.  I can only find three true sources about him, but no other GNG sources among profiles and possible routine news coverage.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nauru–United Kingdom relations : There is no significant coverage of these relations which previous keep votes failed to address.  Any relations can be covered in British Western Pacific Territories and History of Nauru .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United Kingdom and Oceania .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Last AfD is here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nauru-United Kingdom relations Delete I'll quote from the FCO website: "The UK government does not have any permanent representation in Nauru but covers it remotely from Honiara in the Solomon Islands."  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Alextejthompson ( Ping me or leave a message on my talk page ) 23:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- I can find no sources at all that would make this notable (fails GNG).  We do not need a stand-alone article for every combination of countries on the planet.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 13:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bhagu : I think the article itself sums it up pretty well, "Little is known about her."  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 23:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  Grumpylawnchair ( talk ) 23:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Femmes fantastiques : Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , France ,  and Canada .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Jclemens ( talk ) 06:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have found a source about it [65] , however I agree it is very unclear if it meets notability.  Perhaps its best merge the article to the author's article.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 15:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment found no reviews in English, French or German.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 15:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Οἶδα ( talk ) 19:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I also found no reviews.  The source found by

Discussion outcome: delete