hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
K35DG-D: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Education ,  and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Why not Merge it with a merge tag instead of an AFD tag then?  Still think it should be merged, it’s just a weird choice not to use the tag.  Danubeball ( talk ) 21:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No support for delete, just a vague comment on merging.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Television stations meet GNG based on their publicly available license application alone.  There's an SNG that explains this but its name eludes me. 4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 00:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge They had a license, they stopped operating and they fail WP:GNG .  Merging to the mother-university is the best option.  The Banner talk 07:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with University of California, San Diego#Student life : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Contray to what the IP said, we no longer keep television stations articles just because the station is licenced by the FCC, based on this 2021 RfC .  All we have here are some FCC licenses, which don't qualify as SIGCOV.  Merge as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Storm Prediction Center mesoscale discussion 329: It fails WP:N as a little-known but routine product issued by the Storm Prediction Center and is a WP:CONTENTFORK of content that can easily be condensed and included in 2023 Rolling Fork—Silver City tornado .  United States Man ( talk ) 06:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too niche to be notable by any means.  Noah Talk 13:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge — I am opposed to condensing/merging (due to this meaning that like 1 or 2 sentences is merged only), but not opposed to a true merge into 2023 Rolling Fork—Silver City tornado .  The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 15:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Arkansas , Louisiana , Mississippi ,  and Tennessee .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Duplicates material already provided by Wkipedia article mentioned above in less technical terms readily understood by the typical user of Wikipedia.  The vast majority of text of this article is too technical and not useful enough to be used in Wikipedia.  Paul H. ( talk ) 19:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — Not notable, no reason to exist outside of the Rolling Fork article.  Penitentes ( talk ) 22:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Merge — Not notable for an article in any regard.  Definitely just clutter.  Wikiwillz ( talk ) 16:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – Per nom, essentially is content fork of 2023 Rolling Fork—Silver City tornado and List of Storm Prediction Center meso—gamma mesoscale discussions and content can easily be merged into one of those.  RandomInfinity17 ( talk - contributions ) 21:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into 2023 Rolling Fork—Silver City tornado : too technical for an article but good in the rolling fork article.  72.68.134.26 ( talk ) 22:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – content fork with no tangible notability or impact.  ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat ) 02:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  14:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Katsa: This is just the Mossad version of a case officer , which every intelligence agency has.  Every linguistic variant of the same concept does not need a separate article.  The term of "Katsa" is not notable on its own.  The article's sourcing refers to katsas who are in Mossad departments covered in the organization's article.  No need for a separate article here.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 17:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I would like to hear more opinions in this discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Mossad .  As the nominator mentions, there's no need for a separate article on this, and no real indication of standalone notability.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 22:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Razorback (character): Industrial Insect (talk) 01:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 01:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: R in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 20:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am finding even less on this extremely minor character than usual when it comes to these articles on obscure comic characters.  I don't think this one even has the bare minimum amount of coverage or notability to even be included in one of the "lists of characters".  Rorshacma ( talk ) 20:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of Marvel Comics characters as an WP:ATD-M Lightburst ( talk ) 01:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different Merge target articles (one of which is actually a Redirect page) being proposed here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: R per WP:PRESERVE .  BOZ ( talk ) 03:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Controversy regarding the number of Palestinian casualties in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war: Does it need a spin-off yet or should we just add to the main article if needed?  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 01:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Israel ,  and Palestine .  Shellwood ( talk ) 01:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war where it can be covered sufficiently in a subsection.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 02:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, this is an obvious merge to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war .  My very best wishes ( talk ) 02:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm inclined in favor of merging, but there are many sources which cover this topic alone in great detail, at least giving it a cursory look through.  There seems to be enough material for a spin-off article of sufficient detail.  So, the question for me comes down to if it needs a spin-off article?  And I'm not sure how to answer that, since we aren't writing a paper encyclopedia here.  Sagflaps ( talk ) 15:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC) (This editor is non EC and per WP:ARBECR , is not permitted to comment here) Selfstudier ( talk ) 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Subsequently granted EC status on 21 January.  Selfstudier ( talk ) 15:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  The proliferation of articles about this war is verging on silly.  It's simply WP:TOOSOON to have a spin-off (or WP:POVFORK , depending on your perspective) of the casualties article ; there may be (some, scant) coverage in news sources, but this type of topic would be better served by allowing for scholarly analysis that could only be done in hindsight, once the fog of war has lifted, if ever.  WillowCity (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war ; That article is not too long.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 20:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm the creator of this article, and I am okay with merging it to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war article.  Crampcomes ( talk ) 02:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war has been moved so it is a redirect and it looks like Casualties of the Israel–Hamas war is the proper target article now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liz ( talk • contribs ) 01:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as seems like best solution.  Alextejthompson ( Ping me or leave a message on my talk page ) 16:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above, to avoid content forking.  Carrite ( talk ) 03:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  AryKun ( talk ) 13:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Abner Jenkins: Industrial Insect (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As stated in WP:BKD , only famous books should have articles on individual characters.  While Marvel is famous, this is not a main character of the franchise.  Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 14:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: J in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 20:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: J in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .... especially as Abner has operated under other names outside of Beetle.  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 20:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development: Wozal ( talk ) 23:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep and expand .  My initial assumption was that this would be a subunit of a larger School of Education at GW, but it appears to be a unique and self-contained entity at the same level as the George Washington University Law School , the George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences , and other such departments.  The article is not without sources, and I expect that more can be found.  BD2412 T 02:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into George Washington University , article is not currently of sufficient quality to be standalone and is largely supported by primary sources.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 01:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into George Washington University of which all the sources used in the article are.  Like Indefensible I don't see the article as a standalone article  for the moment.  Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 11:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Lisa Hamilton (Dead or Alive): Fails WP:GNG , I would heavily recommend the article creator take a look at the details of what WP:SIGCOV entails.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters .  The reception is 100% listicles, so in-depth coverage required by GNG is not met.  WP:FANCRUFT , sadly.  But the character list should be able to accomodate such information.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per reasons above. Relying mostly on listicles. I think Helena Douglas might be also potential to be nom'ed. GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 04:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GlatorNator : She wasn't created nearly as recently, but I agree. IGN seems to be the only publication with SIGCOV about her. She hasn't been notable since 2014 when the article was unmerged. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 19:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GlatorNator : @ Zxcvbnm : I went ahead and merged Helena. I couldn't find much sources as a cursory glance, and even the citations referring to polls noted her as a much lower character when it came to popularity. If it gets unmerged and someone tries to fight it with no proper sourcing, then yeah I agree on AfD.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 02:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I honestly don't know if there's anything to merge, otherwise I'd have made a merge discussion.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 05:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters .  No SIGCOV.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 12:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of disproved mathematical ideas: No inclusion criteria - what is an "idea"?  Maybe a list of disproved conjectures would be a reasonable idea, per Template:Disproved conjectures , but this is not what we have here.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and Lists .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 08:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If someone thinks the article needs improvement, then let him improve it instead of getting it deleted.  What kind of service to the world is it to delete articles?  I think it's interesting to have a list of disproved mathematical ideas, and I would hope that people would add to it rather than criticizing and trying to get it deleted.  Eric Kvaalen ( talk ) 09:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Eric Kvaalen WP:ITSINTERESTING ...  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  What counts as a mathematical idea is rather vague, this should at least be specified in the article.  If one takes mathematical idea to mean conjecture , then there is an overlap with List of conjectures#Disproved (no longer conjectures) .  Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 10:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  After some consideration, I'd say the best course of action is to merge to List of conjectures#Disproved (no longer conjectures) , and format as a table to unify the style with the sections Open problems and Conjectures now proved (theorems) .  -- Jähmefyysikko ( talk ) 13:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment We don't need both this and List of conjectures#Disproved (no longer conjectures) .  XOR'easter ( talk ) 14:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Seems like a notable topic that doesn’t need a separate article Dronebogus ( talk ) 11:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Swat lynching incident: WP is not newspaper.  Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've merged the content into List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan to ensure that editors' efforts are not wasted.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Events .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of blasphemy cases in Pakistan , per @ Saqib 's comment. Incident isn't WP:N enough to warrant an article. — Mjks28 ( talk ) 00:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above. I mean it was already so in theory it can be redirected but, yes. PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 12:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Merge as per the above recomendation I do agree with the nominator's concern.  223.123.10.196 ( talk ) 01:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There is a continued coverage about the incident.  see .  Mfarazbaig ( talk ) 13:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC) —

Discussion outcome: merge
Mashriqi Jews: The article is essentially absent; the concept is rarely used.  Альдий ( talk ) 20:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions .  Альдий ( talk ) 20:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Middle East .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Mizrahi Jews per nom.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 21:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or delete I see very limited value, but if someone finds someone, a partial merge may be justified.  FortunateSons ( talk ) 15:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of names for the Milky Way: WP:NOTDICTIONARY .  Pepper Beast (talk) 22:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 22:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Mythology , Astronomy ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the article fails WP:NOTDICTIONARY .  GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 01:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a cut and dry case of WP:NOTDICT .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I think the cross-cultural grouping into common terms (such as associations with birds, or rivers, or streets) is interesting.  Maybe just delete the large "List of names in various languages", but those translations related to the "Common names" section can be kept and moved there.  Tocharianne ( talk ) 09:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the Common names section (plus Aboriginal Australian languages ) to Milky Way#Etymology and mythology , and redirect.  That part does not fit to a dictionary and should a have a place somewhere on Wikipedia.  I think it's still little enough to fit into the main article.  If that's perceived as too much, I'd be fine with keep, too.  Daranios ( talk ) 11:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as suggested by Daranios .  Good compromise?  Bearian ( talk ) 21:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Sarah Bryant (Virtua Fighter): QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Fictional elements , Video games ,  and Japan .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Virtua Fighter characters , per nom.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 17:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Virtua Fighter characters .  Her reception made me dry heave a little.  Frankly, a character should be defined by more than simply their appearance to merit a standalone page, otherwise it suggests they are not significant, per WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge There's some magazine mentioning about her, but was kept without improvements at first afd nom.  Per WP:TNT .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I found this interview , which would be good to flesh out her development post merge, but it's simply WP:PRIMARY and can't count towards notability.  Most likely, a lot of the magazine mentions thrown at people in the last AfD were trivial.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 23:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Virtua Fighter characters : Per nom's rationale.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Virtua Fighter characters per all.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I think the keep arguments from last time hold up.  And since this was eight years ago, she may have more coverage now.  In the book From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games , Sarah has two pages covering her.  The last AFD also brought up other sources that were, for some reason, not incorporated into the article.  MoonJet ( talk ) 05:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Virtua Fighter characters .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge