hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Molecular Conceptor: Google returns plenty results, but most are connected sources or routine coverage.  I didn't find anything independent, secondary and in-depth.  The stub has been around since 2008, created by a single-purpose COI editor, with no content other than defining what the software is.  Curb Safe Charmer ( talk ) 17:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science , Medicine ,  and Software .  Curb Safe Charmer ( talk ) 17:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrzej Walter: No WP:SIGCOV .  Zenomonoz ( talk ) 03:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry , Photography ,  and Poland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails both general and creative-specific notability guidelines.  There might be some Polish sources that provide sigcov and I missed but I doubt it.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 19:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah I checked the polish Wiki sources before nomination, and it didn't meet the standard either.  Zenomonoz ( talk ) 03:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per forementioned reason above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Psychogenetic system: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : a handful of mentions in academic literature, but nothing close to meeting our notability standards.  Owen× ☎ 23:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This article is advertising for the Gestalt Institute and Teachworth's book (article creator's name is very similar to the writer).  It treats a term made up in that book as its own thing, so WP:NEO may apply.  Most of Wikipedia's articles about the TA/Gestalt/schema therapy sphere are pretty low quality, and deleting pages like this will help concentrate improvements to more central articles.  HansVonStuttgart ( talk ) 10:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bangladesh–Namibia relations: There's a lot of "we want to do more" but no signs of actual bilateral relations like state visits, significant trade and migration or embassies.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:11, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and Bangladesh .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:11, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per dearth of WP:SIGCOV .  03:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC) Delete -- Yet another in the fad of making a standalone article for every combination of two countries.  There is no coverage of this relationship as a relationship , only casual mentions of potential interactions between the two nations (and even then not at a governmental level).  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 20:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Holy Angels' I.S.C School, Thiruvananthapuram: A PROD was removed in favour of an advert tag.  Not sure if it was intentional or not.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 08:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Religion ,  and India .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 08:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Christianity ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unreferenced for 14 years.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete as non-notable school.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 04:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Beverly Crest shooting: Wikipedia is not a repository of news stories.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events ,  and California .  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, from the details this is likely a gang shooting - they almost never have sustained coverage.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 23:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Again, with all due respect for the victims, unfortunately, this tragedy lacks notability.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:SUSTAINED .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 04:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete pretty garbaggio article by yours truly Lettlre ( talk ) 17:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all the coverage from the time of event or subsequent arrest.  No lasting impact.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BT-4 Combat: Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete yet more non-notable paintball fandom.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Karnataka ( talk ) 10:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jalaal Hartley: Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 17:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , checked newspapers.com and was unable to find anything beyond name drops for taking about films and shows, nothing on the actor himself.  Wizardman 01:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Wumpus Search Engine: Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 18:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Software ,  and Canada .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet GNG.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nasir Madni: Saqib ( talk ) 16:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Middlesex 9s: Fails WP:GNG .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 20:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 20:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Barely sourced, out of date, a quick Google search doesn't bring anything of note up.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 15:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vik Edwin Stoll: Let'srun ( talk ) 13:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Missouri .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete currently basically a CV, clearly fails WP:BLP1E .  SportingFlyer T · C 16:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for failing WP:GNG as article creator.  Safiel ( talk ) 18:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nominee for a position that he did not get.  No sources about him other than his nomination.  Lamona ( talk ) 02:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brian Grosz: There's an interview with the Dogs of Winter where Grosz speaks for the band, but interviews don't contribute to notability.  Grosz is, of course, mentioned at least a few times on the website of the college he went to ( Vassar College ), but that's not really anything either.  I don't see an alternative to deletion.  This is the page creator's only article, and it was previously speedy-deleted.  toweli ( talk ) 11:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , United States of America , Connecticut , New York ,  and Texas .  toweli ( talk ) 11:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A pretty clear remnant of the early Wikipedia:MYSPACEBAND era.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) Delete : as per nomination.  No significant coverage of his music or career to be found on the web.  InDimensional ( talk ) 14:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some coverage of a person with the same name having tattoos [30] , but not enough about a musician.  Early days of Wikipedia when anything goes, fun times.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Previous comments and the nomination sum it up quite nicely.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : without sources.  Nothing came up in Google.  RolandSimon ( talk ) 21:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Consulate General of Germany, İzmir: Most embassies aren’t and there is nothing special about this as an institution or as a building.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Germany and Turkey .  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, there are many such consulates that are located only in offices.  However, the German Consulate in Izmir is not like that.  It has both a solid history and a separate diplomatic complex.  The consulate has been operating continuously since 1924.  The consulate has a separate diplomatic complex, the land area is more than 5000 m2.  Ayratayrat ( talk ) 20:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But how does having a separate complex make it notable?  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see the notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  2 of the 3 sources are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 08:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lineker Machado: All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 2012 , 2014 , 2019 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 12:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chuma Mmeka: No way to notability and SIGCOV.  The books were  all self pubs and the citations were blogs from unreliable sources.  The subject fails WP:AUTHOR and no way to SNG All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 16:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Poetry ,  and Nigeria .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 16:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : More of PROMO!   All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 16:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Beliamen: Happy to be corrected.  – Joe ( talk ) 10:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Pakistan .  – Joe ( talk ) 10:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage, not even one, does not meet WP:GNG .  Dcotos ( talk ) 12:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails to meet WP:NGEO , the place doesn't actually exist.  M.Ashraf333 ( talk ) 17:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I couldn't find any coverage—let alone mentions—of this place, other than in entries on Wikipedia mirror sites.  Definitely fails WP:NLAND .  That Tired Tarantula Burrow 18:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not seeing anything.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 19:48, January 22, 2024 (UTC) Strong Delete : a quick google search turned up no results.  As stated before, this article doesn't meet WP:GNG .  ''Flux55'' ( talk ) 02:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Opportunity Network (matchmaking): Nearly everything is reliant on information provided by the company's founders - the sole exception is the American Banker source which has one paragraph attributed to a third-party analyist Both of those trends make Citizens' partnership with Opportunity Network stand out.  In 2016, Patricia Hines, a senior analyst at Celent, researched the venture capital and private-equity money that was flowing to fintech startups.  Only 5% of it, she found, was going to startups working on commercial applications.  "I have not seen anything even close to this," she said, referring to Opportunity Network.  But that by itself is nowhere near enough to support notability.  Previously deleted and salted as Opportunity Network * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Business , Companies , Websites , Spain , England ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All of the references fail the GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 11:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brighter Star Secondary School: Article is currently pure WP:OR .  The school does exist as it has its own Facebook page and an entry on Kaha6 but these sources do not confer any notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Nepal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Since the school is in Nepal, relisting to allow more opportunity for editors with relevant language skills to possibly contribute.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 08:55, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , can't find any English or Nepali-language sources.  AryKun ( talk ) 09:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  〜 Festucalex • talk 09:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete