hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Where the Blind Horse Sings : WP:COPYQUOTE advises that "extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited" and "The copied material should not be a substantial portion of the work being quoted".  The article does not comply with these guidelines.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 23:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 23:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NBOOK .  I've done a bit of cleanup on the page, and removed the lengthy quotes.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  23:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , especially with ARandomName123's cleanup.  The current state of the article doesn't matter; problems can be solved through editing.  The thing that makes a difference per WP:NBOOK is that the book has received at least two reviews, which it has.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 00:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] After cleanup I withdraw my nomination Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 16:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:NBOOK .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Wess'Har : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and tag for further improvement.  Most books in this series seem to meet WP:NB .1, and the series itself seems to as well eg.  [4] [5] — siro χ o 21:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep .  To my surprise, I found quite a lot of academic scholarship specifically about the series as a whole: "No Easy Answers in Karen Traviss’s The Wess’har Wars Series" , "Unbalanced Nature, Unbounded Bodies, and Unlimited Technology: Ecocriticism and Karen Traviss’ Wess’har Series" , plus discussion in other articles on broader topics: [6] [7] [8] [9] .  I also found two more casual pieces: [10] [11] .  I'm not sure if WP:NBOOK is really meant to apply to a series, but this looks like plenty of coverage for GNG to me.  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 06:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] FYI, those six (!) academic articles showed up right away when I searched "Wess'Har" in Google Scholar.  Don't forget GScholar for your WP:BEFORE , especially for books!  ~ L 🌸 ( talk ) 06:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Richard Saunders (skeptic) : Most of the sceptical publications used in this article seem to have links to him in some way and are not independent, and the others seem to mention in passing.  GnocchiFan ( talk ) 14:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable media personality.  Appears in the ABC piece, as an "expert" in xyz field.  Nothing beyond that for notability here in wiki.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:58, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep now that it's shored up some.  I added a dozen solid mentions from traditional media, going through ProQuest, added those to the article with useful bits of text.  Turns out the Power Balance article talks about him (he contributed to the company going bankrupt), so I migrated that content too.  I think it's a keeper now.  But yes, it definitely needed trimming and better sources.  Robincantin ( talk ) 00:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Robincantin : Thank you for editing the article, it's definitely an improvement!  If you can find any reliable sources regarding content I have deleted from the article, I would not object to that being re-added to the article.  GnocchiFan ( talk ) 13:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:GNG easily with all references already on the page.  Plenty can be added from Scholar and Books .  Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 00:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Monson High School : a search for sources only turns up some sources about some emergency there and some people who teach there.  lettherebedarklight 晚安 06:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Massachusetts .  lettherebedarklight 晚安 06:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ●Keep- this article is well referenced with independent sources.  PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 03:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sources sufficient to meet WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 08:38, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
BBC Choice : Coddlebean ( talk ) 15:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Coddlebean , I don't understand your deletion rationale.  Can you explain why we should delete the BBC Choice page?  Toughpigs ( talk ) 16:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] tv channel bbc three 's original name was bbc choice Coddlebean ( talk ) 23:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So what?  Why is that a reason to delete this page?  Toughpigs ( talk ) 00:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  The main problem I have with the article is that all of the sources given are to the BBC.  If some decent independent secondary sources can be added then OK.  Athel cb ( talk ) 19:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as a cursory view of Google Scholar shows this appears to have received non-BBC coverage.  If a detailed review proves that insufficient and no other independent RS'es are identified, then merge to BBC three.  Jclemens ( talk ) 22:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural keep : The nominator has not provided any rationale for deletion; for all that I understand, it might actually be a request to merge, or even an edit request.  This should be closed as keep, with the opportunity to reopen it with a proper deletion rationale.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 00:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep : WP:CSK#1 applies here as there isn't any rationale for deletion.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Larry Block : I searched books and news sources and found other individuals with his name who are more notable, but no news articles, interviews or other things outside of series fan pages or Facebook mentions, to warrant him inclusion in Wikipedia.  Putting up for discussion in case other editors have notable sources.  LovelyLillith ( talk ) 03:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and Entertainment .  LovelyLillith ( talk ) 03:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:NACTOR with multiple significant roles in notable media including: films: Shamus (film) , Hardcore (1979 film) .  stage: Shlemiel the First (musical) (verification in [28] ).  tv: Sesame Street Note also that this subject seems to be primarily a stage actor.  Given this and the pre-internet era, I think BASIC is likely met as well based on what I've found.  Here's sources we can combine per WP:BASIC , for coverage of the subject's acting ability.   (some of these may also qualify for NACTOR, but I'm being cautious as the productions don't have articles on Wikipedia at this time): [29] [30] [31] , [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] .  This does not represent an exhaustive search, as I haven't checked other newspaper archives yet.  — siro χ o 05:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I did find sourcing for a number of films, and one stage performance.   I have no access to sourcing on TV shows.   Most likely he worked behind the scenes in the entertainment field, and filled in for small roles.   But where would the entertainment business be without the background actors?  — Maile ( talk ) 12:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It would be helpful to see more assesment on recent sources found.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:06, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I agree with @siroχo here.  The sources he has found shows that the subject meets WP:BASIC .  Hkkingg ( talk ) 21:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
El Watan (TV channel) : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Algeria .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep .  Found some sources [1] [2] [3] .  There are more sources out there.  Brachy 08 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to consider sources brought up in the discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] An Arabic-language source search would be quite useful.  I am also attempting to figure out if the newspaper of the same name was a related business.  The channel's closure did get covered in CNN Arabic [53] ; the report linked indicates that there was a demonstration in front of Parliament in protest of its closure, and 18 people were arrested and brutalized by police.  I would lean weak keep .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 20:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Just giving a second relist.  I know that we do have some editors who participate in AFDs who are familiar with Arabic and Arabic language sources.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the refs dug up above since the AfD started.  Here's another one.  [54] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 05:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Mason Verger : If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to Hannibal Lecter (franchise)#Cast and characters (perhaps not the best redirect target, but I can only think of that).  Spinixster (chat!) 02:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , Literature , Film ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 02:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:GNG here's a few links from a couple minutes on ProQuest.  [4] [5] [6] ( See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Crawford (character) for my concerns about this set of 8 nominations in 7 minutes) — siro χ o 07:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let's see... the first source seems okay for use.  Second source is more brief, but I think it's more about the portrayal of the character in the movie.  Third source mentions the character more in a plot summary.  Spinixster (chat!) 07:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Less traction in this AfD so here's a couple more sources to chew on.  Few pages of SIGCOV throughout Dissecting Hannibal Lecter: Essays on the Novels of Thomas Harris ed.  Benjamin Szumskyj [7] Few paragraphs of SIGCOV in The Silence of the Lambs: Devil's Advocates by Barry Forshaw [8] — siro χ o 23:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep .  This is not quite the central slam-dunk case as with many of the other characters, but I count sources evaluating the actor's performance of the character as evidence of the notability of the character.  BD2412 T 01:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the fictional character is notable.  Lightburst ( talk ) 01:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Michael Rymer : I couldn't find sources to prove notability.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I have added some references which, together with the fact the director's work has won notable awards, are enough to satisfy the guidelines (per WP:DIRECTOR , " The person's work (or works) has :  (a) become a significant monument,  (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition,  (c) won significant critical attention , or  (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.  ) -- Scjessey ( talk ) 01:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Rymer is a well-known director, probably best known for the pilot episode of Battlestar Galactica .  His first film, Angel Baby , won seven AFI Awards in 1995, including Best Director and Best Original Screenplay for Rymer himself.  -- Canley ( talk ) 13:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above and per the recent work put down in the article.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Enough here to say he satisfied WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Walt Strony : Boleyn ( talk ) 12:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is an immense amount coverage particularly in organ magazines, reviews of other work, his work reviewed in at least two continents.  The man has had a long career.  Lots of GBooks refs.  I think it needs a copyedit to remove the early WP:PRIMARY stuff and promote the WP:SECONDARY .  He even has his own signature organ product line, organ review (physical instrument review) how it sounds, how it should sound (Never knew they did that).  scope_creep Talk 15:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Walt is an internationally known and highly esteemed classical and theatre organist.  He has published arrangements, as well as an authoritative book on theatre organ registrations.  I don't know how to edit citations, but #6 should be: Theatre Organ Journal of the American Theatre Organ Society, Vol.  54, No.1, January-February 2012, page 31.  21 should be: Theatre Organ Journal of the American Theatre Organ Society, Vol.  54, No.1, January-February 2012, page 28.  Wmcoale ( talk ) 23:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Change the keep above for accuracy and for brevity's sake.  scope_creep Talk 20:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2025 Africa Cup of Nations qualification : The subject itself also fails GNG.  Efforts to redirect this back to this year's cup have failed because we allow fans to edit, much to my chagrin.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Africa .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - While this is early in the process, we have sourced information for qualification to a major senior-level international tournament that will begin next month.  Certainly not WP:CRYSTALBALL or WP:TOOSOON .  — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - agree with Jkudlick, this is an impending, notable event, part of an established series (see Category:Africa Cup of Nations qualification ).  Giant Snowman 09:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Unlike European/UEFA competitions or competitions from other confederations which have articles created a fortnight before official start, the CAF competitions are more of battle of creations among African Wikipedians as I've seen since my account creation.  Also the nominator posted a notice of reversion on my talk page on the count of notability, which I consider an anomaly, and stated it is ongoing.  What is actually ongoing as at this writing is the Olympic qualification tournament .  Intrisit ( talk ) 10:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep No reasons to remove, next matches to be played within 3 weeks, thus NOT too early Riktetta ( talk ) 18:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Seems extremely obvious to me.  The most recent tournament has now ended, the next fixtures in this qualification cycle are starting in a few weeks.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
National Housing Conference : Boleyn ( talk ) 15:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Washington, D.C. .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - the generic name makes searching difficult.  Google Scholar and Google Books do show fairly regular references to the NHC in academic work, and occasionally studies they have sponsored or hosted are cited.  There is not a ton of in-depth coverage of the organization, but there is some, especially with regards to their 1931 founding, work in the 30s, and their founder, Mary Simkhovitch ( example and especially example 2 ).  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 02:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- There are plenty of sources under the former name of National Public Housing Conference.  Here's a findsources for that so you can see what I mean: (

Discussion outcome: keep
Pedro Pinto (footballer, born 1951) : However, the rate if cited unreliable sources is alarming.  I have searched and searched, yet nothing is coming.  Maybe sources may being Spanish but I doubt since the ones cited here aren't reliable per WP:RS .  If sources are found, pls me.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Football ,  and Chile .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Over 220 top-tier appearances, 60+ goals and over a half-dozen national team-callups for a major team.  Sources are near-certain to exist.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 23:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And this source appears to have photos of a magazine feature story on him.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 23:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Passes on WP:GNG .  There are several mentions from Revista Estadio .  Svartner ( talk ) 09:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources and arguments above which show notability.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I don't get the nomination, there are a couple of decent sources, seems fine for WP:BASIC .  Govvy ( talk ) 18:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Maybe I was sleep deprived the night I nominated this.  But I was certain this is notable but wasn't sure if the sources, per se , I can identifiably say I am okay with others opinion.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  19:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep