hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Theresa Diederich: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This was really the only piece of real coverage I found, and it's from a school newspaper.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Florida .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agree with JT, there doesn't seem to be a GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC pass here Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zacharias Sexual Abuse Center: Mainly 1 line mentions, like getting support from the Chicago Bears.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Illinois .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I found this article by Chicago Tribune / Lake County News Sun which is behind a paywall, but appears to be reliable, independent, secondary, and with significant coverage of the subject.  Left guide ( talk ) 09:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As per WP:AUD we would need wider coverage than local news sources.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 17:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cecil Dumond: JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A few team announcement bits, but not enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  18:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Rey Malto: John Rey Malto is a person working in his field, he got some awards, but I don't see major notability.  Nadzik ( talk ) 16:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Advertising ,  and Philippines .  Nadzik ( talk ) 16:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with nom.  Notability doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG , and the promotional tone of the article certainly does not help either.  GuardianH ( talk ) 23:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I even tried to add some few references until I see that there have been a lot of IP addresses adding junk sources and social media links.  Apart from the fact that notability does not meet WP:GNG , the edits revertion war on the edit history make the article looks suspicious of being a promotional article.  Ojewuyib ( talk ) 14:59, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  I'm not sure if those awards are notable in their industry -- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 08:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails wp:GNG.  — Yahya ( talk • contribs. ) 19:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per those above.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Omgili: gidonb ( talk ) 14:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Computing , Internet ,  and Israel .  gidonb ( talk ) 14:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  A related AfD (same owner) is held on the following company: Webz.io .  gidonb ( talk ) 12:17, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP , WP:SIRS .  No indication of significance.  scope_creep Talk 13:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found for a search engine company, this [12] with the same name, I don't think it's the same company.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ted Millstein: I removed the "refs" that don't actually say anything about the subject, and that doesn't leave a whole lot.  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and New York .  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article was promotional to begin with.  City Life reporter Victor Fiorillo rightly questions why this local lawyer has a Wikipedia page.  After the tax evasion sentence, it became embarrassing but, in my view, not necessarily notable.  Deleting the article does Mr. Millstein a favor.  The article should have been deleted long ago.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 03:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
W2 Racing: Searches did not turn up enough other than routine sports coverage.  Onel 5969 TT me 11:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Brazil .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 11:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:46, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not notable.  RemotelyInterested ( talk ) 13:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brighton Chipungu: JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of a suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG and given we don't have any lists for Zimbabwean cricketers currently, there's no suitable list to redirect to either.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG .  Robo Cric Let's chat 16:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Redlands Terrier Marching Band: Onel 5969 TT me 00:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does get some coverage but it's in very local media outlets like the Redlands Daily Facts or Redlands Community News, which I don't think is enough (and newspapers at that level probably aren't very reliable anyway).  Possibly redirect to Redlands High School , which doesn't mention it but certainly could.  Hut 8.5 17:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The coverage is local, run of the mill, and despite the fact it has won competitions, these are run of the mill scholastic-level competitions (not sure if that's the right term).  It seems a vanity page by an editor who, in general, wrote/contributed to several articles about this high school.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 20:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not only the coverage is not enough, but if kept it needs a whole rewrite and removal of uncited content.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 02:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stone Giant: InDimensional ( talk ) 21:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Currently fails WP:BAND and can't find any sources that could help.  WikiMane (TP2001) ( talk ) 18:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wallo Brands: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 03:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] it's tough to find a lot of news coverage for smaller companies.  But we shouldn't solely judge their significance based on news.  The lack of extensive coverage doesn't mean they aren't impactful.  While it's reasonable to be cautious about notability, we should also weigh factors like how long they've been around, their profitability, and the impact they've made on the industry or community.  These aspects can offer valuable insights into their notability.  Trimmer56 ( talk ) 19:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately, notability for Wikipedia when it comes to companies IS solely judged based on news.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Checking Google, Google News, Books, and even the references on the current page do not show anything meeting WP:ORGGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree.  Fails NCORP MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Highway 55 Battle: Joeykai ( talk ) 00:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Nothing is here to show this meets the WP:GNG .  Sports rivalries aren't inherently notable.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This does seem to be a thing; from a quick glance, refs 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 seem to all be independent sources talking about the rivalry.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 21:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not seeing the notability here; this article (in terms of its sourcing) is essentially a compilation of reports of non-notable individual games glued together here on Wikipedia in a way not done by any outside sourcing.  A few sources briefly describe the previous matchup or the then-current season for one or both of the teams, but I am still unable to find sufficient and meaningful overview-level contextual coverage of the rivalry as a whole cohesive topic.  The only such coverage I see is a single sentence in this source which says: In the Battle of Highway 55, Campbellsville leads the series, 4-3, but after winning the first three games of series, the Tigers have won just one of the last four meetings.  This alone appears to fall short of making the rivalry notable.  Left guide ( talk ) 06:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bryana Pizarro: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Puerto Rico ,  and New York .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  WP:TOOSOON ; hasn't even started at Washington State yet.  Most notable coverage is high-school success in Newsday ( 1 , 2 , 3 ).  Non-IS video content from Concacaf and Oregon State .  Next year or two might establish notability, it might not.  - Socccc ( talk ) 01:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanjay Kumar Verma: The position of High Commissioner of India to Canada does not confer any notability, and his previous positions as ambassador to multiple countries didn't confer automatic notability as well.  Outside of routine coverage of him doing his duties, there is no special notability about the subject.  His involvement in Hardeep Singh Nijjar case is routine.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sudan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not yet passes WP:GNG .  Macbeejack ☎ 09:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom -- QuadriSyed Sahab ( T · C 08:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Routine coverage, does not meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Natalia Naumoff: All that came up were passing mentions ( 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and North Macedonia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Julián Casanova (ski mountaineer): Zero SIGCOV on him.   Nothing in the main mountaineering or skiing magazines.   Article seems to be a UPE as it was done by a blocked editor/sockpuppet completed with stylish photo.   He is now almost 40, so his skiiing/mountaineering career is probably done.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 19:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 19:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found for this individual, only hits on the name, which seems rather common in Spanish language media.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dyras: Broc ( talk ) 12:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Germany ,  and Poland .  Broc ( talk ) 12:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The Dyras website exists and has a link to a Dyras-branded catalogue from a company named Quad Star.  I can't find any evidence of notability, though.  The company was also known as The Global Electric Factory, but I can't find much related to that name.  I can't reach http://www.theglobalelectricfactory.com/ , but here is an archive of the site from 2021: https://web.archive.org/web/20210121140018/http://www.theglobalelectricfactory.com/ Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amir Tsarfati: François Robere ( talk ) 13:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  François Robere ( talk ) 13:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Christianity ,  and Israel .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : He comes up in a significant number of promotional websites, which don't contribute to notability but might be diluting material that could contribute to notability.  However, the only times I found him in independent sources was as an interview subject for Evangelical media covering news items about Israel.  These, too, don't contribute to notability.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 13:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete found superficial mentions in some websites only.  Hogo-2020 ( talk ) 14:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Appears mostly on "religious propaganda" websites, for lack of a better term, such as this [23] .  Nothing I can see for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Straight off the bat, this fails WP:NPOV per Oaktree.  The lead section is unsourced and fails MOS:LEAD , specifically, Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article.  The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 (The Garage) 16:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all above.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete