hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Rajah R.S.R.K. Ranga Rao College : No evidence of notability.  * Pppery * it has begun... 16:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Andhra University since there is an affiliation ( [20] ).  Couldn't find GNG-level sources for this college as an individual entity.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 06:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Andhra University as above.  Would be worth checking for other affiliated colleges to see if they have spammy/promotional pages like this as well.  The creator has made a number of articles of this variety.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 20:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 02:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Athena: Full Throttle : QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Video games .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Athena (video game) as WP:ATD .  Hmm...  I can't really find anything either.  I'm sure it would be fine as a "sequel" section though.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Hardcore Gaming 101 is considered reliable according to WP:VG/S , so not zero sources.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 09:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The HG101 source is about Athena (video game) , not this game. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 11:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, it's about Athena series and it covers Full Throttle: [25] -- Mika1h ( talk ) 13:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It got one short paragraph and a screenshot gallery.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 22:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I created sequels section at Athena (video game) , so redirect there.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 00:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Athena (video game)#Sequels . -- Mann Mann ( talk ) 03:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was able to find at least one independent Japanese source for whatever its worth -- Totalibe ( talk ) 14:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KINV-LD : Delete or merge with sister KJJC-TV .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Montana .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacking any secondary sources to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG and I can't locate any significant coverage.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 03:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Really only these two articles to speak of: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-billings-gazette-christian-tv-statio/88543335/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-billings-gazette-fcc-licenses-low-po/145098846/ Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 07:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KJJC-TV : I can't say there's all that much to truly merge there, but the brief mention in the lead is just enough to merit a redirect as an alternative to deletion in the absence of sufficiently-substantial coverage.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Debra March : March is the former mayor of a small city and briefly ran for Lieutenant Governor (but did not win the primary).  Originally, I hoped to expand the article, but there don't appear to be sources with significant coverage to do so.  Most sources in the article are only tangentially related to March.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 14:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nevada .  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 14:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : being major of a city of ~300,000 is notable enough for GNG I think.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 12:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Which notability guideline grants automatic notability to cities of 300,000?  Again just inventing criteria to meet your own keep desire.  LibStar ( talk ) 13:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We've typically held that mayors of larger metropolises are notable here in AfD anyway; [13] .  We need some sourcing to prove they've passed GNG.  I don't think this individual has that.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:37, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing notability, NPOL isn't met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 Nevada lieutenant gubernatorial election .  Not seeing notability per WP:NPOL , but I think preserving the page's history may be helpful if she decides to seek office in the future.  14:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC) Merge properly sourced info into 2017 Henderson mayoral election and use a hat note to point to 2022 Nevada lieutenant gubernatorial election .  BLP, fails GNG and BIO, but there is a perfect target for a merge and sourcing to preserve a basic bio in the election article.  Info will be preserved and the target article will be improved.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 07:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 Nevada lieutenant gubernatorial election .  Fails WP:NPOL but worthy of redirect.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Max Yuan Hui : し.  侍.  ( talk ) 08:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and China .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] a very interesting figure to me as creator of Xiao-i robot and "China's ChatGPT".  his views on AI have been featured extensively by Chinese media (when he spoke at Boao forum for Asia etc; has been attending this prestige event eight years in a row).  believe the article can stand as being about an AI expert from China to diversify the discussion.  also to mention the patent litigation with Apple is kinda intriguing as well.  XiaoMming ( talk ) 09:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Neutral mainly per nom.  Are Caixin articles worth anything?  Remsense 诉 10:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nom. -- Wish for Good ( talk ) 04:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The sources I found largely were interviews and about his company.  If significant biographical coverage cannot be found, I recommend a redirect to Xiao-i , his company, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 09:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/123Aristotle#20 May 2024 .  虹易 ( talk ) 15:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Miss 50 plus Germany : If the pageant isn't properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for events, then the people who won it cannot be deemed notable for winning it, so the page serves no purpose besides being a list of non-notable people.  As I can't read German, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to archived German media coverage can find enough to salvage it, but beauty pageants aren't "inherently" notable enough to exempt them or their winners from having to have any sourcing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Beauty pageants and Germany .  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Miss_Germany#Miss_Germany_50_plus:_From_2012_by_MGC_-_Miss_Germany_Corporation_GmbH .  No need for an 'article' which just lists out the winners which can easily be provided for at this target.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gloria James : Rest of the coverage appears typical celeb gossip.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Gloria James Wiki article is fine.  It's part of American history.  The truth is the truth.  It should stay.  69.14.233.102 ( talk ) 19:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We need articles that talk about her.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  She is famous for being the mother of a basketball star but is a large part of his story and is widely known and talked about.   Very famous regardless of her connection to Lebron.  PD8 5:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Discussion outcome: redirect
Clappers Records : I would like to propose either a move to a larger article on reggae or outright deletion.  This article has clearly been lingering for a very long time without any significant improvements.  Variety312 ( talk ) 22:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as lacking indepth sources.  Stuartyeates ( talk ) 08:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I think we should be careful about deleting this.  It seems to have a significant cultural impact on rap and reggae.  It has an entry here which is interesting, and at African American Research Perspectives [43] , of which I can only see a small part.  The label had one release which seems to be of particular significance [44] .  I'm not finding enough coverage for a standalone article.   Perhaps redirect to How We Gonna Make the Black Nation Rise?  ?  It seems to be significant enough to WP:PRESERVE .  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 19:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Matt Freeman (Power of Five) : Only in-universe information, except the lede.  Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Redirect to The Power of Five .  Article is 100% unsourced fancruft.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 20:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Power of Five#Matthew Freeman (introduced in Raven's Gate) , that section already contains more than enough info on this character, there's no need to merge in any more as none of this is sourced.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 13:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rod Boleche Hobe : Out of the four links in the previous AfD , only this one has an archived version, and it doesn't seem to have mentioned the subject at all.  Fails WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Bangladesh .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NALBUMS .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:02, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as an alternative to deletion to singer Shayan Chowdhury Arnob , where his album is briefly mentioned.  The sole source contains only a single sentence about the album, supporting that it was released in 2010.  Neither the singer article nor the Bengali version of the album article have any better sourcing for it, and searches of the usual types in English and Bengali found nothing with which to demonstrate notability.  Fails WP:NALBUM .  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 17:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dunlop station (Manitoba) : – dlthewave ☎ 04:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect would indeed be the best solution, given the stop's minor notability in and of itself.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train : each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is.  Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KUJH-LP : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Education ,  and Kansas .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to University of Kansas#Media : a remnant of the considerably looser inclusion standards of 2006, the brief mention there is probably all we really need in 2024, and a redirect is a valid enough alternative to deletion .  (The sourcing is too scant to merit actually merging anything.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The City of the Saved : No sources seem to exist outside of primary ones, and thus the article doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Literature .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to faction paradox Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The first paragraph notes mentions by the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and the British Fantasy Society -- not sure why those aren't considered sources other than primary?  Phil PH ( talk ) 07:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That was admittedly my bad on misreading those sources.  I'm not quite sure how I did that, but my apologies.  I can't go back and edit my initial nomination, but in this case, the two sources don't constitute SIGCOV, as I couldn't find anything else related to The City of the Saved.  Sorry about the confusion in regards to sourcing, but as it stands, I don't believe it meets SIGCOV or GNG.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Faction Paradox .  A simple reading of the Encyclopedia source shows it is not actually about the article subject, while the book review is not about the article subject either.  This is solely minor plotcruft, belonging in FANDOM.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sources appear to be WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs and fall short of WP:SIGCOV .  A redirect is a valid WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Epsilon Telecommunications Limited : While there are a lot of sources, they are almost exclusively to WP:TRADES that do not help establish notability.  Moreover, virtually all of the coverage is of the WP:ORGTRIV variety (hirings, market expansions, product offerings, acquisitions, etc.), or they are Q&A interviews and thus primary sources.  A WP:BEFORE search found that the author has put just about every available source into this story and even then it doesn't come close to NCORP.  As a result, I propose to merge any encyclopedic content into KT Corporation , Epsilon's parent.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 00:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , Singapore ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All refs fail WP:SIRS in one way or another, so fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 10:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  I have not been able to find anything either.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As nominator I am also comfortable with a redirect to KT Corporation .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 14:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per UtherSRG.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  15:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KT Corp.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 08:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yoga (Brooke Candy and Only Fire song) : It does not meet any of the WP:NSONG criteria.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 02:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the singer's article, I can't find links beyond what's used in the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And the interviews?  BiggestBidder ( talk ) 07:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Croatia and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Brooke Candy discography .  Interviews are appropriate resources for Wikipedia, but not notability is established through significant coverage from reliable, third-party sources.  Interviews count as primary source.  I did a search, and I could not find significant coverage on this song anyway.  I think a redirect to the discography list if it is separate from the artist's main page is the standard target, but I am not opposed to this article getting redirected either way.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 17:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect