hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Molly O'Sullivan: Article currently doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The lack of secondary source material is an issue for WP:BASIC , so the article should be deleted.  I'm surprised that this made it through the approval process via AfC.  Definitely delete this one UNLESS strong secondary source material can be added to this article.  Pumpkinspyce ( talk ) 01:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, I didn't even think of the WP:GNG policy, but I don't think that this article meets that either.  Firmly delete unfortunately, UNLESS other folks have some secondary source material to add into the mix here.  Pumpkinspyce ( talk ) 20:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Pumpkinspyce.  I don't see enough secondary source material to support this article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete generic name, unlikely search term for a redirect Dronebogus ( talk ) 01:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mayowa Adenekan: Ref bombed with articles that anyone can get made for them .  Nswix ( talk ) 19:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Nswix ( talk ) 19:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Advertising .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The page has citations from notable and credible media houses.  Bear in mind that the subject is from a third world country with media gagging.  Putting that in context in mind, the citations are good enough.  Amaekuma ( talk ) 08:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete refbombed with lots of links to various stories but overall lack of in depth coverage in reliable independent sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Obviously doesn't pass WP:ANYBIO nor WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I couldn'see anything that make this article notable.  The sources are mostly advertorials and cannot be use as RS for WP: GNG The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christopher John Fields: The main notability claim on offer here is that his work exists, which isn't "inherently" notable without WP:GNG -worthy coverage about it, but the sole footnote offers a blurb's worth of information about him in the process of being fundamentally about something else, which isn't enough to get him over GNG all by itself.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and California .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to insufficiency of reference citations.  The one reference cited about him being asked to step down is relatively minor - that incident does not seem to merit notability in of itself.  The inclusion of the termination of the theatre position even seems to be an attempt to defame him some, because of its insufficiency as a good reference.  WmLawson ( talk ) 03:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP .  One reliable source is not by definition significant coverage .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lack of WP:RS citations and unable to demonstrate meeting WP:GNG guidelines.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 14:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chandra Pant: One source doesn’t lead anywhere — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerryman1 ( talk • contribs ) 19:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Sportspeople , Boxing , Martial arts ,  and Nepal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NFILM .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 13:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search found no evidence that he meets any WP notability criteria.     There's no evidence he was a "national player" (whatever that means) in taekwondo, boxing, and gymnastics.   I don't believe that just being part of the crew on a film that won an award makes you "award winning".   I also question some of the claims.   For example, the article says he was the "action director" on the film Ravaan, but I don't find him among the 100+ members of the crew--despite the fact that two action coordinators, an assistant action coordinator, and a stunt double are listed.  [31] I also believe there's strong evidence of COI.  Papaursa ( talk ) 14:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
South Africa Partners: (Note #15 features one of the directors of the org as a guest).  Search reveals no more sources.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 01:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , South Africa ,  and United States of America .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 01:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Education ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete full of primary sources and the lists of non notable people suggest this is WP:PROMO .  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeannette Sagna: All I found was passing mentions in squad lists and match reports.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Senegal .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak, Keep Found few mentions of her such as thishttps://www.sofascore.com/player/jeannette-sagna/1470746-- JanAminK ( talk ) 09:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Databases are not sufficient coverage.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - when we're offering database sources as the best example of coverage, we really are looking at a serious GNG failure.  I found some squad list mentions like SeneNews and Sport News Africa but such coverage is far from decent.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
File sequence: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 16:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete an unsourced essay; the good parts are already at File system .   I don't see use of this term on Google Scholar and cannot endorse any redirect.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 14:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jamie Watson (voice actor): As always, the notability criteria for actors is not automatically passed just because the article lists roles, and requires evidence of WP:GNG -worthy coverage about him and his performances in media -- but there's absolutely no GNG-worthy sourcing being shown here at all, and instead the article's only footnote is to a Q&A interview in which he's talking about himself on a podcast.  An ACTRA Award is also not an instant free pass over NACTOR or ANYBIO in and of itself -- it would be a perfectly acceptable notability claim in an article that was sourced properly , but as a regional award it's in no way "inherently" notable enough that he would be exempted from having to pass GNG just because the article has the word "award" in it.  So no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim and/or better sourcing, but nothing here is already enough now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR this way, can't even verify DOB from any BEFORE.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 21:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions .  ミラP @ Miraclepine 22:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Herbert Chikomba: JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG fail, and with no suitable lists for Zimbabwean cricketers existing, there's no redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thoppul Kodi: Notably the film never released (see List of Tamil films of 2011 , which lists every Tamil film).  Three database sources, two of which are dead.  I tried saving the second one but it was just a search for Thoppul and since Thoppul means navel, the search is questionable (commented out since blacklisted).  A Google search in both English and Tamil returns nothing [56] except information about umbilical cords .  Speedy delete this article, surpised many people edited this since 2012 and did not nominate.  Article creator created article with 10+ bad sources.  Not notable per Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Albums since only the music released.  Guess who created the article?  Either Thomas Rathnam or his fan.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 06:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Per nom.  Kailash29792 (talk) 07:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage , no evidence the film was released.  hinnk ( talk ) 07:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not enough reliable sources to prove notability.  EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 19:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Fails all criteria for general notability guidelines.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
All-China Youth Network Civilization Convention: @ GAOPEIYUN : You are welcome to add cites.  If it is notable why does the article not exist in any Chinese languages?  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and China .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah same, did a google and baidu search, can't find anything other than some random articles not related to it, Baidu has a single result from 2001 semi-related to it.  Randomdudewithinternet ( talk ) 00:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless someone can find indepth coverage in Chinese media, it fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asim Iftikhar Ahmad: Fails WP:GNG .  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 16:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:16, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Fixed the formatting on all 4 existing references at this article, which it definitely needed ... 2 references are from The Express Tribune and The News International newspapers (both reliable sources).  Also, the existing reference from the Embassy of Pakistan in France has his in-depth Profile and career details in it.  In my view, considering his two decades long career, he meets WP:DIPLOMAT ...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 00:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It appears that WP:DIPLOMAT is an essay and is no longer an acceptable guideline to cite.  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 13:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ambassadors are not inherently notable.  2 of the 4 provided sources are primary.  Coverage is routine and not indepth to meet WP:BIO .  00:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LibStar ( talk • contribs ) Delete per LibStar Aaron Liu ( talk ) 03:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 04:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robin Brochon: It's possible I missed something, as Google had a good amount of hits, but really all that came up were interviews ( 1 , 2 ) and post-match quotes ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and France .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Professional footballer who made his Super League debut in 2018, and has made dozens of appearances for another professional club in France.  Fleets ( talk ) 09:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Fleets , this ! vote rationale is invalid, as participation-based athlete criteria were deprecated 2 years ago and the existing requirement that athletes meet GNG was strengthened to require at least one SIGCOV IRS source be cited in the article from the start.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Per JT, news items would be the very least to qualify as RSs.  Tony (talk) 11:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Coverage is routine or primary/nonindependent in addition to being trivial.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Undecided : Played for Catalans and Toulouse and there should be more written about him.  Should be expanded, but currently not sufficient coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 01:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kicking Harold: Past that, I saw passing mentions but nothing else of worth.  Redirecting to Tim David Kelly would make sense, though his article isn't much more promising in the realm of notability and could potentially go at any time as well if there's nothing more to be found there.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 20:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 20:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The only coverage I'm able to find is a prnewswire.com piece from 2014, which does not satisfy the criteria for multiple pieces of significant coverage required for WP:BAND InDimensional ( talk ) 11:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ InDimensional PR Newswire just publishes unedited press releases and does not provide any notability.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 15:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree with the above.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ihor Hrytsyuk: is what WP:SPORTBASIC tells us is a requirement for any footballer to have their own article.  Whilst I note that this footballer has an article on Ukrainian Wikipedia, all of the references used there are just database sources.  The only non-database source that I could find in Ukrainian was Rayon , which is only a trivial mention of Hrytsyuk.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New generation of African leaders: I struggled to find any RS to substantiate that this is a coherent and consistent term that has long-term encyclopedic value.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 10:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 14:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , on the basis there's very little evidence presented for this phrase the article appears to be quite essay-like.  Sionk ( talk ) 21:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete