hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Choi Hyon-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 21:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 21:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't appear to pass WP:NSPORT .  toobigtokale ( talk ) 17:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohsin Jamil Baig: It's too common for journalists to get some sort of press attention on every one of them and this one was arrested so the coverage was anticipated.  This one clearly fails WP:JOURNALIST and from my perspective, this also doesn't seem to fulfill WP:GNG.  Additionally, the subject has attempted to edit this BLP themselves so COI is also involved Mohsin Baig media ( talk · contribs ) — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 20:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 20:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Crime .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Famous because of a single event.  Fails WP:Notability .  Wikibear47 ( talk ) 00:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG .  He is a "close friend" of the prime minister.  And he provided his own photograph.  Were it all so easy .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deysla Reyes: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found was this , which would not be enough to establish notability on its own.  Everything else was passing mentions ( 2013 , 2014 , 2018 , 2019 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Puerto Rico .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Seybold (criminal): Frank Hohimer was a real person who wrote a memoir while in prison.  That memoir was adapted into a film by Michael Mann.  The mistaken belief that Hohimer is a pseudonym is the sole reason this article exists.  Seybold did not write the memoir in question.  Even if he did, would that alone merit a Wikipedia article?  Because the article is both inaccurate and not noteworthy, it merits deletion.  Trumpetrep ( talk ) 19:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was literally in the middle of transcluding it when Cyberbot conflicted with my edit.  ;) Trumpetrep ( talk ) 20:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and New Jersey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Even if the nominator is incorrect and Hohimer and Seybold are the same person, WP:GNG and WP:NCRIME still aren't met.  — SamX [ talk · contribs ] 16:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adekunle Olayinka: Olayinka holds the post of a special adviser to the Governor of Lagos State ; which does not pass the bar for WP:NPOL .  As an aspirant, sadly, Olayinka could not make it to the House of Representatives; again, fails NPOL.  Neither does Olayinka meet the general notability guidelines independently.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Engineering .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass NPOL and the sources cited are recycled press releases.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The person lacks coverage from credible sources.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 17:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Generally pass GNG 102.88.36.78 ( talk ) 13:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:NPOL .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Google search has multiple reliable sources from secondary independent sources.  [15] , [16] and [17] are enough to establish notability.  102.89.34.12 ( talk ) 04:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per all mentioned reasons above. - Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 08:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pierre Le Manh: ROTM business executive, tagged for promotion but not so promotional as would warrant G11, nevertheless fails WP:GNG, WP:NBUSINESSPERSON.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Business , France ,  and United States of America .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can only find PR items; the Bloomberg link is in fact a republished PRNewsWire item (cleverly disguised in a RS), but not-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Do not delete: Several of the added links are secondary links.  John Munroe 1950 ( talk ) 01:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC) — John Munroe 1950 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Delete essentially a string of pr announcements about appointments and promotions strung together into an article.  Notability not demonstrated.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Turns out this should have been speedy G5 as it was created by a sock of Abbasshaikh124, who was blocked back in January...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 10:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  I can find nothing better than what's cited already, just look-at-me interviews and passing mentions in coverage of the company.  New secondary sources added by the obvious sockpuppet post above are more of this, along with one reference that doesn't even mention him.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yusif Mammadaliyev (disambiguation): Leschnei ( talk ) 17:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Leschnei ( talk ) 17:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unnecessary.  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nevaun Turner: Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 20:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Jamaica .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 20:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , passing mentions made in here , here , and here , none of them meeting SPORTSBASIC or GNG criteria.  That goes the same for other sources found.  ~ Tails Wx 00:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Echolab: Sources only are about the company being acquired by another.  Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Technology , United States of America ,  and Massachusetts .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 19:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing I find meets WP:ORGCRIT .  I was originally going to suggest a merge into Blackmagic Design but I have reservations about that page's notability as well.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dreams of India: Only 45 google results that I can find.  Some are just Audible.com etc.  Previous deleted as a soft delete expired prod.  Andre 🚐 00:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and India .  Andre 🚐 00:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Colin Street: Notability is not inherited, a street doesn't get notable because some building on it gets some attention, or an activity happens in a building on the street.  Fram ( talk ) 09:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Australia .  Fram ( talk ) 09:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] List of streets in West Perth is gasping for proper sourcing, better writing, and pictures.  Uncle G ( talk ) 18:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because being simply the location of notable things is an WP:INHERITED issue BrigadierG ( talk ) 14:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete The only thing bordering on a claim to notability is in the location section, none of which is cited.  It may be a long street, but it's just a street that has things on it.  There's no reference to coverage of the street in its own right.  Mangoe ( talk ) 12:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Qabatiya and Tammun raids: The only coverage of this is in the Palestinian Authority's state-run wire service Wafa, then a one-bullet mention in an Al Jazeera round-up of dozens of developments in the 2023 Hamas-Israel war .  Unlikely to be sustained or widespread coverage.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 03:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep for at least a month.  Event is still new.  If up for deletion again, would suggest to Merge with the articles for Tammun , Qabatiya and the timeline for 2023 Hamas-Israel War .  AmericanHistorian ( talk ) 03:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let's look to Wikipedia policy to make the argument.  The event already happened and fails WP:EVENT , specifically WP:DEPTH .  The WP:SIGCOV drives the article creation, not the anticipation of ( WP:DELAY ).  Longhornsg ( talk ) 04:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Longhornsg.  Loksmythe ( talk ) 04:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , Israel ,  and Palestine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  This is a bullet point and sentence in another article, not its own article which fails GNG and NEVENT no WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Fails NOTNEWS for an article and there is nothing indicating this will become notable in the future or will meet WP:LASTING .  // Timothy :: talk 10:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there is a lot of WP:CFORKs in this topic area.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 20:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NEVENT , nothing to indicate that this barely covered event, which is almost routine in the context of the I/P conflict, will have any notable future ramifications.  Mooonswimmer 22:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NNEWS , WP:LASTING , WP:CFORK .  With regards, Oleg Y. ( talk ) 01:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amicus International Consulting: LinkedIn and the company website don't count, and a WP:BEFORE didn't turn up replacement sources.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 04:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 10:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fancy name with just 2 gnews hits and an orphan article.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 11:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is a reference in the Digital Journal but based on byline it is native advertising.  There is also this from the South China Morning Post but it's marked as an opinion piece.  Other than that, everything is PR or churnalism.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete Has no place here.  Clear cut failure of WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Josh Garvin: TheLongTone ( talk ) 12:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Political candidate that doesn't meet WP:NPOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 14:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wikipedia is not a political advertising platform.  One of multiple candidates from same party created by person with connection to a party pollie.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 00:59, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article seems to be about a political candidate who hasn't achieved the level of prominence required for a Wikipedia page yet.  Perhaps it would be best to wait and see if they get elected or gain wider recognition before creating a dedicated article.  Waqar 💬 17:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they haven't won, but this makes absolutely no claim that he has any established notability for other reasons besides the candidacies.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation after election day if he wins the seat, but nothing here is already grounds for an article now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
W27DH-D: After this page closes, it's a delete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BMarGlines ( talk • contribs ) 13:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The deletion rationale makes little sense, but it's an obvious GNG fail out of the 140-station failed HC2 stations AfD.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 17:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, Sammi Brie.  BMarGlines ( talk ) 13:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A TV station that was likely not even viewed outside testers in its only time on the air and never originated any local programming.  It's a failed test station among many of HC2's licenses.  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree that this fails WP:GNG .  User:Let'srun 19:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2nd Independent Division of Henan Provincial Military District: Boleyn ( talk ) 20:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Looking for this unit brings up nothing but Wikipedia articles, bot-written articles that copy it, and some other wiki articles.  There's no Chinese-language article either.  This doesn't seem to be noticeable independently from the PLA.  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and China .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  These Chinese divisions certainly need a rewrite, but it does appear to be covered on Chinese Wikipedia , with sourcing.  In general, I think divisions are large and significant enough to be notable and generally have sufficient coverage (in this case, if you speak Chinese!).  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 09:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no corresponding Chinese article, and a plain google search of "河南省军区独立第2师" yielded mainly WP mirrors.  Unreferenced so I can't support it meeting GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 16:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete