hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Samer Jundi : Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails GNG.  Only a passing mention made, no Arabic sources found either that is GNG-noteworthy.  Tails Wx 02:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JMD Railtech : WP:BEFORE showed no sources that satisfied this.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 00:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Transportation ,  and Australia .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 00:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete looks like a WP:PROMO .  Fails WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:19, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not finding enough sources to support the article.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 01:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Doesn't pass the bar at present.  Independent company so no good merge target.  Principal is NN as well.  gidonb ( talk ) 01:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly a promotional article.  a search brings up nothing.  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 07:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:CORP .   -- Devoke water 12:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DotSUB : All the sources I could find were trivial mentions, a few user reviews, and what appear to be self-published profiles on sites like Crunchbase.   I could find no in-depth, independent coverage.  Squeakachu ( talk ) 18:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Technology .  Squeakachu ( talk ) 18:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  CastJared ( talk ) 03:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Support deletion.  Insufficient sources to meet the notability criteria for companies per NCORP.  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 04:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Parothumneer : Tooncool64 ( talk ) 22:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Kerala .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 23:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete The ward name checks out; the village claim does not and isn't cited.  Election wards are specifically noted as not notable.  Mangoe ( talk ) 20:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jang Kyong-il : Simione001 ( talk ) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A few databases online, but nothing else to suggest GNG, delete per nom.  Govvy ( talk ) 21:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing here.  Per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , also doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability (sports) .  Noorullah ( talk ) 05:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mjölby Turabdin FC : Modest history peaking on the 6th tier.  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shade sandbox : Article appears to be entirely promotional and the creator of it has only contributed to the one article [75] along with adding a link to it on Sandboxie .  [76] Sources on the program appear to be nonexistent, with few websites briefly mentioning its existence; article itself uses very poor sources.  Dawnbails ( talk ) 22:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Dawnbails ( talk ) 22:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it's useful for software to have a collector page where information can be gathered later on.  I don't receive any commission for supporting this.  :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.97.217.205 ( talk ) 12:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll note here that this IP's only contribution at all is to this AFD, and stating "I don't receive any commission for supporting this" makes this reply seem more like WP:CONFLICT .  As for the argument made in the reply itself, this article has existed for nearly eight years with minor improvements and using just about the same references.  I think it's safe on my part to say that information here cannot be gathered; there is no information to gather on this program that doesn't come from either its own creators or from very brief mentions on random tech news and tutorial websites that don't qualify for WP:GNG .  Dawnbails ( talk ) 16:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aoidh ( talk ) 01:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - I can find exactly zero sources with significant coverage of the subject.  Ignoring the fact that IP's comment is their only contribution, the sentiment appears to be misguided - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information .  Tollens ( talk ) 08:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable piece of software, there are no reviews of it in PC Mag, Cnet or just about any of the other sources we'd use for software.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bridge City Sinners : It did chart, but no independent reliable sources.   One website, savingcountrymusic, fails WP:RS, as does Riot Fest, which isn't independent anyway, the others are primary.   The one blip on the radar, being #70, doesn't give the article a pass on having multiple reliable sources that have significant coverage of the band.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Oregon .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — Could not find any independent reliable sources on the first ten pages of Google Search.  DJ Cane (he/him) ( Talk ) 06:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as per nomination,  this article shouldn't have made it through AfC due to lack of coverage InDimensional ( talk ) 11:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akade : Creation tends to indicate an undeclared conflict of interest.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and West Bengal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, voorts ( talk / contributions ) 01:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  MeltPees ( talk ) 06:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC) — MeltPees ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd like to hear from more experienced editors.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- Min☠︎rax «¦ talk ¦» 03:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kaimana F.C. : Looks like a local foot ball team, which is not notable per Wikipedia Notability guidelines.  iMahesh ( talk ) 08:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  iMahesh ( talk ) 08:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sad pop : The sources are actually discussing sad pop songs, not "Sad pop" as a genre.  A cursory search online supports this, with all articles simply discussing music that is sad.  Anarchyte ( talk ) 06:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Entertainment ,  and Popular culture .  Anarchyte ( talk ) 06:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Mach61 07:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Otokar Kaya : The only Link goes to manufacturer website, which provides very little information.  From my research has not been adopted by any agency or country.  F.Alexsandr ( talk ) 15:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Turkey .  F.Alexsandr ( talk ) 15:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yup, delete .  Not a single RS as far as the eye can see.  W. Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me! / c ) 16:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dodge City Crips : Only RS cited at the moment is an LA Times article...which doesn't mention Dodge City Crips.  A WP:BEFORE search only turns up incidental mentions (eg. photo captions in tangentially related articles) or non-RS coverage.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 18:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and California .  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 18:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Searching for coverage of them in RS, I've found a passing mention in a book and a passing mention in a police magazine .  The rest is social media.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can't find any other RSes beyond what Wikishovel already found.  Subject doesn't seem to meet GNG.  > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 19:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Swissqual : It's been marked as not being notable since June 2010.  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 02:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 02:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lack of three-quality sourcing yields a fail of notability .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elaine Nalee : As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have articles just because the article lists acting roles, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage about them and their performances -- but this is referenced entirely to primary source directory entries that aren't support for notability at all, with no evidence whatsoever shown of any GNG-building media coverage about her career, and even the roles themselves are virtually all supporting or bit parts rather than "major" roles.  Further, she's so poorly sourceable that the article has bounced all over the place over its three years of existence, as editors have repeatedly disputed whether she's American, Canadian or South African by nationality without ever showing a shred of sourcing for any of those claims — even her birthplace has been editwarred between Durban ZA and Sheridan WY without ever properly sourcing either of those things, and while the article has never claimed that she was born in Canada there's been an unverified assumption that she must be Canadian because her earliest listed film and television roles were all in Canadian productions that would be profoundly unlikely to take on the expense of importing a foreign actress just for a tiny bit part.  (That can happen for a leading role, but not for one five-minute scene as a waitress.)  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to get over GNG on her sourcing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , South Africa , Canada ,  and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : "Mashed potato lady" in a Muppets movie isn't quite what we're looking for here...  I don't see any sources talking about her.  Even the Littlest Hobo part was a bit part...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KumoMTA : MarioGom ( talk ) 11:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software .  MarioGom ( talk ) 11:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure how https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halon_(software) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halon_(software) are fine, but this is nominated for Deletion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhillyer ( talk • contribs ) 13:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See WP:WHATABOUTX .  There are many articles in Wikipedia that might need to be deleted, but this discussion is about KumoMTA, and it will be discussed based on its own merits, regardless of any other examples you find.  MarioGom ( talk ) 17:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] They don't appear much better, thank you for signaling them, I'll review for possible deletion as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Being hosted on GitHub isn't notable, anyone can throw anything up on the site.  Sources found are the GitHub repository, their own website and Reddit thread.  Nothing we can use for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mamath Eka Malak : Got a flutter of mentions in 2014, but not WP:SIGCOV .  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Disability , Discrimination ,  and Sri Lanka .  Pepper Beast (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 19:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom non notable no SIGCOV.  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 16:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wilhelmina Alexander (disambiguation) : The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.  Also ping Shhhnotsoloud who seconded the PROD.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 02:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 02:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete yes I'd have PROD this.  No point for this disambiguation page.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I created this dab page some years ago and agree that there isn't much point in a 2DAB, but was hoping that there's some acceptable way (and title) for a dab which includes other forms of the name (Vilhelmina, Vilma, Wilma, and many variations on Alexander) which can have similar and sometimes confusing spellings.   Something along the lines of Diana Frances , another dab page I made.  Would appreciate any advice.  – Reidgreg ( talk ) 03:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A disambiguation page is not required.  I can find no articles with similar names.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete