hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ground Air Emergency Code: Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cha Jong-sok: Simione001 ( talk ) 02:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 02:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Korea .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NSPORT #prodraxis connect 15:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:53, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aldo Elmazi: No sign of WP:SPORTBASIC .  My own searches yielded only database sources and one trivial mention in Panorama .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 18:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yep, fails WP:SPORTBASIC —one league appearance in five years.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Same as three databases, no source.  Problem of SIGCOV! but may meet still meet notability in the future!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  07:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:SPORTBASIC Robertjamal12 ~🔔 14:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thue (programming language): wound theology ◈ 07:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 07:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 08:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Insufficient coverage online/in books to justify inclusion per WP:GNG .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Aesthetically, the language is simple.  Theoretically, the language is founded in semi-Thue grammar , so it has a basis.  Practically, it is a simple example of a rewriting system, like hello world , so it can be fed into a process .  -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 13:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] None of these are good reasons to keep the page.  There's no sources and it isn't notable.  wound theology ◈ 19:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Most of the content of the article appears to be from the esolang wiki article , and that's the only non-primary mention of it I could find online (And even then, only through the external links section, a quick internet search returned no english-language results).  Fails WP:GNG for me.  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 13:27, June 18, 2024 The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Kutalik: Acebarry ( talk ) 00:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A few articles he's written turn up in Gnews, but that's about all I find.  I don't find mention of any games he's designed.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Games ,  and Politics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete possible CV bio, fails WP:GNG .  SportingFlyer T · C 11:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete while there a few hits on stuff he himself has written, I can't really find anything in terms of WP:SIGCOV on the subject himself.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 20:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no evidence this passes the WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO Chetsford ( talk ) 21:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I find stuff he's written, but I don't find any discussion about him by others.  I don't see how that fulfills any notability standard.  Jacona ( talk ) 12:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Micro Labs: A single controversy from an income tax raid does not warrant notability either.  Charlie ( talk ) 12:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 12:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carnage Crew: Besides WP:ROUTINE results or passing mentions, there is no in-deep coverage about them.  [15] HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 08:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Soben Huon: Let'srun ( talk ) 02:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Utah .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dana Rosendorff: I find no evidence of multiple significant roles to meet WP:NACTOR .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is all the coverage I could find [41] .  delete for lack of coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not enough and relevant information in the article.  Not notable enough.  killer bee 05:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CM Scientific English High School: Schools are required to pass one of the above or, preferably, both.  My searches yielded Facebook, Wikipedia mirrors and Bharatpedia, which is user-generated.  The current references fail to establish notability as the first one is Facebook, Indiacom contains no coverage other than the school's name and location and BSEM list is just an exhaustive list of schools in Manipur, mentioning this school once.  I can't see any reason why this school, out of the hundreds or possibly thousands in that list of schools in Manipur, warrants an article of its own.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Manipur .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  〜 Festucalex • talk 09:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdul Maroof Gullestani: This included a search in his native language (عبدالمعروف گلستانی).  The best that I could find was a single passing mention in Dawn .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Replace Sinema Project: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Irrelevant PAC, no merge needed as article is basically an unfiltered copy of the PAC's 'about us' page.  Nate • ( chatter ) 16:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  No significant coverage of the PAC itself.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 14:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lovekesh Kataria: Being a contestant on a Bigg Boss show does not inherently make the subject notable.  A WP:BEFORE shows that the sources go back to 2023, but they are all related to the same show.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Entertainment ,  and India .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Easy Delete due to lack of notability or claim of such — Iadmc ♫ talk 11:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sign of notability of any flavour.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 13:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jeraxmoira delete!  2403:6200:8851:9199:458:B9EF:9898:F8E9 ( talk ) 13:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The youtuber's work has not been significant and unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG , No in-depth coverage.  I have drafted this article earlier also.  But the page creator is creating it again and again.  (It will be considered as spam)  And the page owner has also tampered with my user page.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 15:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Haryana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:BLP1E , not indepedently notable.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 22:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : These sources are only for one event and are not significant enough to establish notability.  The subject fails to meet WP:GNG and any other criteria.  It appears to be a fan-created article following news coverage of the individual's participation in Bigg Boss.  Grab Up - Talk 07:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are no sources to establish notability here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Too soon for BLP1E .  Thanks C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂 ) 04:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Based on the current sources, it seems this article might be based on fan interest rather than established notability.  Waqar 💬 15:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:TOOSOON or maybe not at all.  Lightburst ( talk ) 01:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Novostroika: The word simply means new construction (building, site, district) in Russian.  I speedied and prodded it with clear explanation, but wikiformalists want to waste the community time in AfD, so let it be.  - Altenmann >talk 22:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete DICDEF.  Salt as needed.  I can't even find the term being used many places.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find no evidence that the word "novostroika" is in common use in English, and of those uses that I have found, none of them has the meaning attributed to it in this article.  JBW ( talk ) 12:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexey Okulov: The article was created by its subject ( Okulov99 ( talk · contribs )), contains no references or sources confirming the subject's notability (expect of the publication list of the subject).  It is basically a promotional page.  Ruslik _ Zero 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Science ,  and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Citation counts [10] too low to pass WP:PROF#C1 .  Membership in scientific societies, and working for the Russian academy of sciences, are not the sort of honorary memberships needed to pass WP:PROF#C3 .  The references appear to alternate between Okulov's own publications, and academic publications about background material that do not mention or cite Okulov; a rare exception is reference [2], which actually does cite a paper by Okulov, in passing.  None of these references contribute to notability nor provide the material to properly source an encyclopedia article.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 21:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per above.  No indication that he is close to any of the notability criteria.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 23:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see how any of his research was anything other than secondary.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet WP:NPROF as yet.  X ( talk ) 22:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As just stated, does not yet meet WP:NPROF .  This page is a few years too early in this subject's career.  WP:TOOSOON .  Qflib ( talk ) 20:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pyae Phyo Thu: Onel 5969 TT me 17:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:43, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article has very poor sourcing, and was deleted and recreated.  I would be in favour of salting if it was recreated a third time.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 23:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt Quite honestly, I don't understand why the G4 keeps being denied; this was deleted following an AfD less than a month ago, and even if the article content may not be technically the same, the gist of it is, namely: there is no evidence of notability per WP:GNG .  I also think salting is required as certain authors clearly do not respect community decisions.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 05:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and WP:SALT .  The latter is necessary because the deletion tags have been removed repeatedly from this article so it is extremely likely that this article will simply be created again after this AfD closes.  As to the notability of Pyae Phyo Thu, I found some coverage of a golfer of the same name but next to nothing about the footballer.  Thanh Vien remains the best source that I can find, as it was a few weeks ago.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT - nothing has changed since the last AFD.  Giant Snowman 12:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Salt Fails WP:GNG and was previously deleted little under a month ago.  I cannot find any sources that would be sufficient in establishing notability.  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 07:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 15:35, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Boston Ironside: – Aidan721 ( talk ) 00:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Massachusetts .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 00:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The organizarion is “notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.”  This article does not meet any of these criteria.  Topjur01 ( talk ) 16:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: This subject does not pass WP:NTEAM or WP:GNG due to a lack of non-primary sources prevalent.  User:Let'srun 00:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ken Gaines: No sources other than a link to the artist's personal website, and I am unable to find any reliable sources or any WP:SIGCOV of this artist.  Tagged for notability since 2010.  Streetlampguy301 ( talk ) 03:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Streetlampguy301 ( talk ) 03:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support.  I also don't see any coverage.  — Moriwen ( talk ) 16:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete