hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
WinRumors: Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with The Verge .  Blog by current The Verge journalist Tom Warren operated for 2 years.  Gets some mentions by reliable sources for its reports on Microsoft, but not seeing enough context for an article.  IgelRM ( talk ) 18:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Edit Redirect suffices.  IgelRM ( talk ) 13:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 02:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Any other opinions about the suggested Merger?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a blog which was operated by an industry journalist during 2010-11.  While reports by a journalist reporting on a major firm's changing business plans are bound to get some traction, I don't see them or the Blog's award nomination as sufficient to demonstrate attained notability.   I also don't see a merge with the article about The Verge , its author's later employer, as feasible: Warren is not mentioned in that article and any content merge would be WP:UNDUE .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per nomination Samuel R Jenkins ( talk ) 06:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 03:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Penguin Crime & Espionage: Shellwood ( talk ) 12:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Penguin Classics , the umbrella topic.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 02:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Toyota G Transmission: A before finds no independent coverage of the product and the article relies on primary Toyota sources.  Possible re-direct?  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Transportation .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#G-series : Fails WP:NPRODUCT , not enough coverage by secondary sources.  User3749 ( talk ) 16:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] All additional sources would just be repeating what the primary sources state.  It's a build spec, not something that is subjective.  It's an objective fact.  12DionneJ ( talk ) 17:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#G-series : Fails WP:NPRODUCT .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#G-series : When this came up yesterday I tried to find GNG sources and came up dry.  The target has its own issues, but they should be solvable.  WP:NOPAGE would counsel against these spin-offs even if sources exist.  If someone does turn up a few sources that support notability feel free to drop a {{ talkback }} and I'll try to find time to look them over.  184.152.68.190 ( talk ) 21:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#G-series per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Toyota transmissions#G-series as topic fails notability guidelines.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Claes Oldenburg (The South Bank Show): Most of the so called production section is purely about Oldenburg and has no direct connection to this documentary.  Even if there is some notability/ATD we should DENY the creator and start over.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 03:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Sweden , England ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Claes Oldenburg : I don't see that this particular episode is notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Obvious paid editing involved, as parts of Gerald Fox , which was used as one source, has UPE involvement.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 13:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yermolay: As of now, Gamper is the only Yermolay, Yermolai, Ermolai or Ermolay on English Wikipedia, so the name in its present state fails WP:NNAME , and I cannot find many, if any sources outside of dictionaries and baby name websites; the Russian language equivalent article seems to be sourced predominantly to dictionaries and there is only one source on this article that actually pertains to the name itself, which is also kind of a dictionary website, making it a WP:NOTDICT fail as well.  Some of the other people listed might be notable, so I propose that the redirect be restored so that the page can be spun out if they ever receive articles, though it could also be redirected to Yermolayev , which explains the etymology.  Sorry for the long read.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 18:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand your arguments, although I don't think that redirecting it to Gospodin Gamper was appropriate, which is why I unredirected it.  I would be happier with redirecting it to Yermolayev.  -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd be fine with that. In fact, it probably is more appropriate in hindsight, as it's not likely that many people will be searching for Yermolay Gamper by typing in 'Yermolay'. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Bingo. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 07:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
This Week in WWE (TV program): Tagged for notability since 2022 Donald D23 talk to me 20:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 20:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of WWE television programming#This Week in WWE (2009–present) as an alternative to deletion — its mention there is probably as much as an official recap show (that likely does not receive much significant coverage on its own) needs.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Center for American Politics and Citizenship: BEFORE turns up one article that mentions it (arguably meets SIGCOV) and a few poll reports that interview people connected to it, but not enough to meet NCORP or GNG.  AviationFreak 💬 05:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Schools ,  and Maryland .  AviationFreak 💬 05:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete & Redirect to Center for American Politics and Citizenship University of Maryland College of Behavioral and Social Sciences Graywalls ( talk ) 07:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Graywalls : That would be redirecting to the same article?  AviationFreak 💬 14:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What I pasted wasn't what I meant to say.  I changed it.  Graywalls ( talk ) 15:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - per above.  There's nothing really sourced well enough to merge.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 19:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are lots of results on ProQuest, many look primary but not all.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 19:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
S.A.M. (comics): The page is also barely unorphaned, with only the author and the disambiguation page Sam linking to it.  BenzoAid ( talk ) 10:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  BenzoAid ( talk ) 10:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to author’s page, which admittedly doesn’t look that great either.  If there are any sources for this they’re probably in French which makes improvement difficult and unlikely even if they’re found.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed.  BenzoAid ( talk ) 11:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't know why I was asked to give my view on this as I haven't been involved in the article.  But according to WP:NBOOK it's notable if it's "has won a major literary award".  According to the article it has won two awards.  I don't know if they are notable or not.  But there are no sources listed and that's a problem.  // Liftarn ( talk ) 14:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Apparently you were automatically invited to the AfD discussion because you made the 2nd edit on the page, back in 2004.  Sorry for that BenzoAid ( talk ) 14:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And the Angoulême International Comics Festival award, while the festival itself is major, the award is not, and shows 0 results on Google.  The 2nd award does not give any results either, meaning the awards are likely very minor.  They're both from the same year as well.  So I can't find any sources, and original research is forbidden per WP:NOR .  So yeah...  BenzoAid ( talk ) 14:40, 24 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Richard Marazano .  I failed to find any suitable sources to support an article, only ones that confirm this existed.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 11:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Funny thing is that Richard Marazano is in AfD because Marazano wrote his own article.  It also looks like a promotional article or phising scam.  So if both AfDD's pass, then the redirect will be broken.  // 💪Benzo💪 ( Send me a message! ) ( Here's what I've contributed. ) 09:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd redirect this article but the target article is now also at AFD so I'm relisting in case anyone has a Plan B. Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Richard Marazano per above.  // Timothy :: talk 04:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
ISO 8373: BEFORE pulled up no sources.  Drowssap SMM 04:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing .  Drowssap SMM 04:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , and redirect to Industrial robot .  As far as standards go this one is rather minor, I don't believe it warrants its own article.  It just lists definitions of robots, their types, modes of movement, components, etc.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 07:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Industrial robot : where it is cited, but not yet mentioned.  I agree with Ouro that this standard isn't notable enough to have its own page.  Owen× ☎ 13:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Karampon Little Flower's Girls' Maha Vidyalayam: Cremastra ( talk ) 21:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Sri Lanka .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep 97 year old school there are bound to be offline sources in  the Tamil language so keep per WP:NEXIST .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Karampon where the school is located and listed.  Sourcing in this article insufficient to pass GNG and haven't found anything that supports notability.  Google search using the Tamil name in the infobox didn't come up with anything.  Rupples ( talk ) 23:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Should be kept if sources are discovered.  Lorstaking ( talk ) 05:07, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 16:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
I'm Not That Girl: Little coverage of song to be found, therefore failing WP:GNG .  Jontesta ( talk ) 23:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Theatre .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   The song has not charted or become a standard.   The sources do not give it significant coverage separate from the musical.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 03:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wicked (musical) per above. QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Numberguy6 ( talk ) 16:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect: Per @ QuietHere 's suggestion, and as article is WP:OR and WP:STUB . -- Mjks28 ( talk ) 05:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wicked (musical) .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DXER-TV: MarioGom ( talk ) 18:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 18:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television and radio stations owned by TV5 Network per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 11:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WUSV-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 00:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and West Virginia .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 00:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect to List of Antenna TV affiliates#West Virginia : the page at this title started as that (and the redirect was created by the nominator, as it happens), and was later on converted into the current stub.  A relatively new LPTV such as this one is far less likely to get the significant coverage we now require, and separate articles for stations that have only ever carried a single national service were theoretically frowned upon even before our standards were finally tightened.  This has never needed to be anything more than an {{ R to list entry }} .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Wcquidditch.  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 02:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Przemysław Potocki: In my opinion, its not notable enough to be on Wikipedia.  Normanhunter2 ( talk ) 17:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Poland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : WP:ATD is a redirect to Potocki family .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 23:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to his father Antoni Potocki (1780–1850) to which Przemysław's mother also redirects.  Oppose redirecting to Potocki family, which I assume is for notable entries (although I see one non-linked entry).  Also, neither his father nor son who have standalone pages, have entries in the Potocki family.  Jay 💬 00:36, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (although not on BLP grounds for a subject who purportedly died in 1847).  Not finding any sources to pass WP:GNG .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 18:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Procedural close with NPASR on grounds of nominator being a banned sockpuppet with a pattern of disruptive AfD nominations.  (I stand by my earlier !vote but would rather see it nominated by an editor in good standing.)  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 13:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would like to say that this article does not contain footnotes and it says " He was married to Princess Teresa Sapieha since 1830. They had five children together: Roza Marianna Potocka, Idalia Potocka, Pelagia Potocka, Stanisław Antoni Potocki and Antoni Potocki. " No further description and some hopeless information AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam ( talk ) 13:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article fails to suggest the subject was notable; being a noble from a notable family is not enough.  No sources, no pl wiki interwiki.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Antoni Potocki (1780–1850) per Jay.  By the way, Piotrus is correct for mentioning that there is no interwiki to copy over.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bahad (film): I'm not sure if this is reliable either; this may be notable but a passing mention isn't going to establish notability of the film.  I couldn't find any other sources that try to establish notability for this film, either.  Additionally, I wouldn't oppose a redirect to List of Philippine films of 2019#October–December .  Thanks!  :) ~ Tails Wx ( 🐾 , me !) 02:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_Philippine_films_of_2019#October–December : It is listed there with the Mindano Times ref.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 07:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_Philippine_films_of_2019#October–December per User:Mushy Yank and WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect