hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dreams of India: JMWt ( talk ) 05:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Radio .  JMWt ( talk ) 05:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 05:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maratha invasion of Awadh: Clearly the author has mixed up several battles and conflicts to get this resulted article.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 18:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , History , Military ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , As per above comment Rawn3012 ( talk ) 08:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Basically you are selecting articles for deletion for no reason in actual, you may don't like these article just say it.  Combination of those articles has been disscussed long ago and admins gave the permission to Merge it DeepstoneV ( talk ) 14:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC) —

Discussion outcome: delete
David Ogbueli: 11 days ago, Ritchie333 draftified it.  I had already draftified it but moved it back to mainspace (because the creator will likely publish it back and I didn't know it had been previously draftified) for broader consensus.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 12:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 12:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just a working religious man, no different than many thousands of others here and there and everywhere.  Coverage is either routine or vaguely promo.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is also most likely COI/UPE in addition to not meeting WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 13:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are so many articles in the mainspace that is similar to this, it can be kept and improved as time goes on.  And I have no connection with it if is not good enough then it should be deleted.  Dannyjade ( talk ) 7:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a reason to keep anything Nswix ( talk ) 21:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per others.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 13:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per above.  Possible WP:COI - Imcdc Contact 01:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b's reasoning.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ricus Nel: Zim Zala Bim talk 03:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  I am seeing a lot of trivial mentions (live show lineup listings) [64] , but nothing that could really contribute to WP:BASIC .  I don't think MUSICBIO will be met either, but there is a slim chance that "Select Musiek" could qualify artist.  — siro χ o 04:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see notability for this person.  Perhaps someone from South Africa could comment on the importance of the Select Musiek item.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:MUSICIAN .  Lefcentreright Discuss 14:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert A. Phillips: This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science , Medicine ,  and Canada .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - In addition to the submission comments, the lead appears to be directly copied from the University of Toronto's website ( WP:COPYVIO ).  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdirahman Ali: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Som Production (SP) .  Ae245 ( talk ) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Somalia .  Ae245 ( talk ) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom, WP:MILL business person - no significant independent coverage C F A 💬 17:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass WP:GNG , In the article the only secondary source is Somali Inside News, both articles from that source look like paid placement, and neither has WP:SIGCOV of the subject anyway.  No GNG compliant sources apparent from searches either.  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:44A3:EFF3:245F:594D ( talk ) 17:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Study Breaks: Neither of those provide notability, and while the Paisano article ( archived ) does, it alone does not show notability for this article.  I couldn't find more coverage, though the problems with searching for a news publication with a generic name like this are not lost on me, but if there indeed isn't more coverage available then I'm afraid this fails the notability pass and should be deleted.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Entertainment ,  and Texas .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 14:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iridium 77: No other satellite has an article except for Iridium 33 (which was destroyed in a well-documented satellite collision), and I don't see why this one should either.  I'm not really sure if it should be redirected or converted to a disambiguation page or straight-up deleted.  Kdroo ( talk ) 05:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology , Spaceflight , United States of America ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Iridium satellite constellation : unlike Iridium 33 , this one has no SIGCOV about it.  Owen× ☎ 15:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not meet GNC criteria.  Redirection is not the optimal solution.  Cinadon 36 16:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - little original content that isn't readily available at https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action? id=1998-051E ( — 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk ) 01:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gregg Braden: Their ideas seem to be WP:FRINGE (e.g. the magnetic field of the earth unifies the hearts of all humanity into a "global consciousness") but there's little engagement with them by reliable sources.  The existing article has few citations and none of them establish notability.  I can't find secondary sources documenting this person's history or work.  Chase Kanipe ( talk ) 14:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Television .  Owen× ☎ 17:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions .  5Q5 | ✉ 11:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't pass AUTHOR as I can find no book reviews.  This is about the best otherwise [1] talks about him visiting a local conference centre but has some biographical info.  Just not enough RS here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] For novice editors, AUTHOR is WP:AUTHOR .  5Q5 | ✉ 12:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was unable to find reliable sources on the subject.  NYTimes or BBC these were only mentions.  Yolandagonzales ( talk ) 16:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:BLP , WP:FRINGE , WP:SOAP , and WP:SIGCOV all essentially stack against this page.  Extraordinary claims by - or more importantly about - a living person requires extraordinary proof.  Being interviewed by an "entertainment" show or speaking at one convention does not make a person automatically notable .  If his works had been reviewed by legitimate sources ( cf. Erich von Däniken ), then I'd lean keep.  This guy isn't even close.  We are not a free web host for every writer , and in 2024, everyone knows that.  Protect against further creation .  Bearian ( talk ) 21:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shireen Matthews: Let'srun ( talk ) 23:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Rather straightfoward as per nom, current position is not notable and simply running for a district judge position does not confer notability.  There may be some exceptions for particularly notable candidates - but that does not seem to be the case here.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 03:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : ROTM failed district judge nominee.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 04:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Clearly not a notable; arguments already provided above!  Ekdalian ( talk ) 08:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No notable, no significant or notable positions were held nor unique deep coverage on the person available.  Mozzcircuit ( talk ) 14:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks significant coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non Notable and not have reliable sources Worldiswide ( talk ) 04:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notability falls below the bottom.  The subject may probably become notable with career progression in future.  Noneate ( talk ) 17:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Violent Delights + Violent Ends: The North Jersey article has suffered link rot and I can't comment how reliable it is, but the others used in the sourcing here are not RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've found an archive version of the North Jersey article; it is potentially reliable but alone is insufficient for GNG.  I can't find any reliable sources beyond this.  I'd say redirect to the artist but there's an AfD there too and a cursory glance suggests the artist isn't notable either.  If the artist's page survives, then a redirect will be fine.  WJ94 ( talk ) 20:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Samantha Scarlette .  The album only received some minor announcements about its release, with no pro reviews or deeper coverage to be found.  Procedural note: My vote is to redirect because that is standard procedure for non-notable albums, but events will be made more complicated by a scattered pile of AfDs surrounding this musician that should have been bundled together.  If the musician's article survives, the album titles will still be there as possible search terms.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 13:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural Comment - This debate is now moot because the singer's article has been deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Scarlette (2nd nomination) .  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Darkness EP & Demos .  This album should now be deleted .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mathematical theory of democracy: The sourcing in the article appears to be diverse from a first glance, but upon a closer examination it's clear that the only the sources tied to one person actually talk about a 'Mathematical theory of democracy'.  The rest of the sources are inserted into the article in a WP:SYNTH fashion.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 17:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Mathematics .  Shaws username .  talk .  17:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I think the nominator has it right: this is one person's idea, puffed up with other sources that at best discuss the background.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 16:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Australia: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, all of the sources are primary sources, are nothing but announcements and does not assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Australia .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTTVGUIDE covers this explicitly BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree, no suggestion that the ‘group’ is notable, and no suggestion individual listings are notable.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Spinifex&Sand ( talk ) 03:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – nothing else to add.  Should be deleted.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 20:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTGUIDE .  LibStar ( talk ) 06:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Third Carrickfergus Silver Band: I can find nothing to indicate that the subject of this (effectively orphaned) article meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:NBAND .  In terms of SIGCOV, and after exhaustive searches (for reliable/independent sources to expand the article beyond the single/primary source we have), the only coverage I can find are passing mentions in regional papers - like these listings entries in the Belfast Telegraph .  And "local interest" stories in similar papers - like this in the News Letter ).  And passing mentions (in articles about people connected to the subject) - like these online pieces in the local news website Northernirelandworld.com .  I can find no coverage at all by the BBC or other non-local outlets.  Google searches (for various combinations of the subject's name) barely return a few hundred results .  Mainly the subject's own website, social channels and this Wikipedia article and its mirrors.  That we need to rely entirely on primary sources, to establish even the basic facts, suggests that SIGCOV is not met.  The NBAND issues are self evident.  This local amateur brass band hasn't charted or released an album on a major label.  And coming 2nd in a very specific category in a North of Ireland Bands' Association competition is objectively not success in "a major music award"...  I have reviewed possible WP:ATDs .  But draftifying this ancient article serves no purpose and I can't recommend redirection anywhere (like to Carrickfergus - as there is no related section and creating one would give UNDUE weight/preference to a single otherwise non-notable local community group).  I, frankly, can't fathom why this article was created in the first place.  Its original incarnation reads entirely like WP:NOTWEBHOST content....  Guliolopez ( talk ) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Guliolopez ( talk ) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 11:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 11:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of notability in the ability in the article.  InDimensional ( talk ) 12:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not a notbale band.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 17:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anthony Lugo: The strongest source I found was this piece from the Thousand Oaks Acorn, which includes about a half-dozen sentences of independent coverage.  I found a couple passing mentions, most notably in the Ventura County Star , on Newspapers.com , but nothing substantial.  I would support draftification as an ATD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A few details here .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 21:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Seems to be the same article under a different name, albeit with more pictures.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Lugo is the head coach of the DIII Cal Lutheran football team.  In three years under Lugo the team has gone 12-17.   I confirmed that the articles found by JT and Beanie are the same piece, and it's borderline SIGCOV from a smaller newspaper group in Ventura County.  The paper of record in Ventura County (where I live) is the VC Star .  The Star's archives are on Newspapers.com, but my search failed to turn up any SIGCOV of Lugo in the Star .  The best I found was this which IMO falls below the SIGCOV line.  I lean toward delete unless someone comes up with additional SIGCOV.  (The article from the student newspaper, The Echo , doesn't count as its not an independent source.)  Cbl62 ( talk ) 01:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Caveat: If someone comes forward indicating a desire to work on this in draftspace, I'm ok with that outcome.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 02:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find the requisite WP:SIGCOV for this to meet the WP:GNG .  If BeanieFan11 or someone else wants to draftify this to try and find more sources, I'd support the effort.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete