hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
W15CG: Let'srun ( talk ) 12:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Mississippi .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is unlikely to be any significant coverage for a short-lived LPTV that was only known to carry an apparently-co-owned network… whose article was itself recently deleted for lack of notability.  An obvious relic of the looser inclusion standards still in place in 2010.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ion Exchange (India) Ltd: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, I am ready to update the article based on your suggestions.  Please let me know what changes are required on the page Akhare 2024 ( talk ) 16:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, I have added some more citations to the page Akhare 2024 ( talk ) 05:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WNCORP.  Bakhtar40 ( talk ) 16:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have recently updated the article with citations, is it ok to close this discussion and remove the notice from the article?  Akhare 2024 ( talk ) 17:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , more sources were added but none of them are sufficient to meet WP:NCORP .  I can't find any independent sources that provide in-depth coverage.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 19:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamed Ahmed-Chamanga: Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 15:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nomination.  🌺 Cremastra ( talk ) 15:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comoros-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tripmasters: Fails WP:GNG WP:NCORP .  Sourced to database entries and blogs.  A412 ( Talk • C ) 17:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Washington, D.C. .  A412 ( Talk • C ) 17:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:29, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NCORP .  No evidence of notability is demonstrated within the article or found through a Google search.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 14:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elkhan Mammadov (football official): Thenightaway ( talk ) 15:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Football ,  and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – WP:PIG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Jamaican books: "List of books about Jamaicans" doesn't seem to have a category, but we do have Category:Books about Jamaica and Category:Jamaican novels , which presumably covers any of those books.  I don't think this list makes sense to keep (topic is too broad, containing both books about and by Jamaicans), but it could be split, if there's consensus for that.  At least some of these are spam entries though (lulu.com books, etc).  asilvering ( talk ) 18:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies and Jamaica .  asilvering ( talk ) 18:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The list only makes since if it only list those with their own Wikipedia articles, and contains columns listing various information to make it more useful than a category at finding things.  D r e a m Focus 18:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Philip Teye Agbove: Article has many issues with sourcing, very dependent.  He works for MFWA, The Fourth Estate, and pieces from thefourthgate are used 10 times in this article.  Other pieces are mostly passing mentions, some awards by the organisation he works for, others, non-notable.  ModernGhana and newsghana.com.gh are unreliable publications.  Thus, non-notable investigative journalist.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism , News media ,  and Ghana .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Most sources are unreliable and/or not independent and/or do not show significant coverage.  Luke10.27 ( talk ) 22:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Innovative Emergency Management: Democracy Now! is marginally reliable, whilst all the remaining ones are fairly routine.  Online search does not reveal any non-routine coverage, and the article reads as promotional.  Bremps ... 00:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Bremps ... 00:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Building Owners and Managers Association: Niche trade organization.  They have too many trivial mentions to list out, but I didn't find truly independent, significant, reliable, secondary sources meeting WP:ORGIND The article is also highly advertorial, possibly meeting Deletion #4 category.  Graywalls ( talk ) 02:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business , Companies , Canada , United States of America ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Graywalls ( talk ) 02:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jensen Chandler Bringins: Promotional and replete with inline exlinks.  Sources shine by their absence.  Kleuske ( talk ) 13:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New Zealand .  Kleuske ( talk ) 13:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have removed any promotional material, please tell me what I can do to not get this page deleted!  Earniebernie ( talk ) 14:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage even in . nz sources.  Could be PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the inline external links are insufficient to establish notability.  The subject is young so this article may be a case of WP:TOOSOON . - gadfium 18:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , undoubtedly SELFPROMO, TOOSOON would be an understatement.  DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs ) 21:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] removed all self promotion material Earniebernie ( talk ) 04:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - He looks like an impressive young man and I wish him good luck in his pursuits, but he has not achieved notability per Wikipedia's rules, and this article is clearly a rather desperate attempt at promotion .  That belongs on a different type of website, and not one that is intended to be encyclopedic.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 20:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is now no more attempts of promotion now, it is only about his life, music, education and his cerebral palsy! Earniebernie ( talk ) 09:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That still does not make him notable . Kleuske ( talk ) 11:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, it is still overwhelmingly promotional, just with language that is a little more subtle than before. --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 20:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blackrock, Washington: Non-notable location.   I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939.   But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of some John Doe "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish.   This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby.   This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails WP:GEOLAND because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails WP:GNG for lack of SIGCOV.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Washington .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is one of the farming districts.  There is one single passing mention of it as a town.  Here: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-blackrock-town/140746918/ .  All other mentions either don't specify what it is, or they are "Blackrock District", "Blackrock Valley" and a few other similar descriptions.  These are the districts in 1909 https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-seattleaypeyakimacou/79192547/ see the top right.  This is example of how it is otherwise referred to.  https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-farming-districts/140747823/ There is not enough RS to write an article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by James.folsom ( talk • contribs ) 2024-02-11T21:52:48 (UTC) I came at it from the other direction and tried to find the Blackrock Creek documented.   I couldn't even get contemporary documentation for it in Yakima County.   The Washington State Geologist only recorded a Blackrock Creek in a completely different county.  Uncle G ( talk ) 03:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Someone at GNIS liked that place names book, because here we have another example where it is the source.  A very early topo shows "Black Rock" as a label somewhat north of the cemetery, but these early maps don't show buildings so it's impossible to figure what was really there.  Later the GNIS people assumed that the cemetery was in town, which is not usually the case in these western rural areas.  The topos also record the area as "Black Rock Valley", btw.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dmitri Kurakin: PROD removed without explanation.  Not to be confused with Dmitry Kurakin, sociology professor at Yale University.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Skating ,  and Estonia .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bgsu98 : multiple Estonian champion at senior-level championships, see [63] Estopedist1 ( talk ) 06:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : although he did win medals at Estonia's Skating Champs I am tempted to still vote keep given there are no independent RSs on this guy.  P,TO 19104 ( talk ) ( contribs ) 22:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: User:Estopedist1 are you arguing to Keep this article?  I can't tell.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : only results, no significant coverage.  Best I can find is https://web.archive.org/web/20190317125050/http://www.isuresults.com/bios/isufs00005164.htm -- Estopedist1 ( talk ) 07:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charles W. Goodier: Just because he was a mayor does not mean that he deserves an article.  Just an average mayor of a small village in New York state.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 21:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and New York .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 21:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If they satisfy WP:NPOL they are presumed notable and may have an article.   In this case, I would say the subject does not satisfy WP:NPOL .  However, that in itself gives no indication into their lack of notability.  Regards,-- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 02:57, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not satisfying WP:NPOL does indicate that they are not presumed to be notable (lack of a presumption, not the same as a presumption that they are not notable) but I was unable to find significant coverage outside of the Buffalo News obituary, fails WP:GNG -- DannyS712 ( talk ) 03:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mid-century small town mayor, I can't find coverage about him.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG , being the mayor of a town with a population of roughly 3,000 (at the time of his term) certainly doesn't meet WP:NPOL .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 20:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Queen consort of Gozo: There is no mention of a queen consort of Gozo in any of the citations listed in the article.  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 09:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , History ,  and Malta .  Celia Homeford ( talk ) 09:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence of usage anywhere.  Google searches for "Queen consort of Gozo" return only Wikipedia results and a post on Reddit regarding AfD.  -- estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 20:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to be a made up term not backed by historical evidence.  Keivan.f Talk 04:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Ferdinand III of Sicily was nominally the King of the island of Gozo (a.k.a. the Gozitan Nation ), next to the island of Malta .  The island of Gozo was part of the nation of Malta except for 3 years.  This period was after the islanders rebelled against French occupation under a local priest, Saverio Cassar .  They asked Ferdinand to be their king; Cassar ran the island as "governor general".  During these three years, Ferdinand's wife would have been the the Queen Consort.  This article gives a brief history of this time but does not mention a queen consort.  I've never seen this before.  It's safe to say that Wikipedia is not a repository for articles that don't say anything about their subjects.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : nothing in the article relates to the title. Pam D 07:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Repurpose (or merge) -- The content is about the History of Gozo 1798-1800s.   This is closely related to Siege of Malta (1798–1800) , which recounts the history from the POV of British naval and colonial history.   This article adds detail, but there is only a passing mention of Ferdinand III and none at all of his wife except in the lead.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 16:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- It is possible there is something to merge to Gozitan Nation (preferably renamed  as Gozo (1798-1800) or with slightly later end date, but most of the content is already there, so that it is the appropriate merge target.   Ferdinand's role is unlikely to have been more than nominal: he was asked to become king, but he probably did little.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 16:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Charles: Two are not independent, however, and the other is a passing mention.  I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALIST .  The article has been marked as possibly not notable since 2020.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media , Radio , Television , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Have now added the archive of his BBC profile, but don't think that changes notability status.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete