French exonyms : I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason: List of French exonyms for Dutch toponyms ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) List of French exonyms for German toponyms ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) List of French exonyms for Italian toponyms ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Pepper Beast (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Geography , Lists ,  and Europe .  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT , not to mention being entirely unsourced.  ---- D'n'B - t -- 14:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep this was just closed as no consensus a couple weeks ago, and has been re-nominated by the same nominator.  Definitely a WP:TROUT or possibly even sanctions may be in order.  SportingFlyer T · C 18:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] > just closed as no consensus a couple weeks ago That's... that's the point of re-nominating.  To... create consensus where it wasn't possible to do so before.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 18:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No, the mass deletion of all exonym listicles failed to reach consensus, so they are now listed separately .  —Tamfang ( talk ) 19:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh.  Well, that's still ridiculous then.  The UN has a working group specifically on French exonyms, as does the French government , showing this is a valid encyclopedic topic.  I don't know how any of you are getting to WP:NOTDICTIONARY here - these are not definitions or dictionary entries but rather valid lists - and WP:LISTCRUFT is simply an "i don't like it" argument.  SportingFlyer T · C 19:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, an article on the working group might be interesting.   But how is an endless list of French words for places more worthy than a list of French words for spices or engine parts?  —Tamfang ( talk ) 20:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] or Bosnian names of primate families —Tamfang ( talk ) 02:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In that link, the author refers to the project as an attempt to create a database.  Sure would be a shame if there was a policy called WP:NOTDATABASE .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 20:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This isn't a database, though, it's a valid WP:LIST .  SportingFlyer T · C 22:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In most of our lists, most of the entries have their own articles.   Is there any prospect of an article about the French word for Bangkok?  —Tamfang ( talk ) 22:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:NLIST specifically says the entries in the list do not need to be notable enough for their own article, just that the group or set is notable.  A simple Google scholar search lends more credibility to the fact this set is notable, such as [13] [14] [15] , including (but not linking here) two articles on French exonyms for Polish place names.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] … I meant to add: no consensus because not all such listicles are equally trivial, i.e., some do more than belabor the obvious fact that each language adapts foreign words (including placenames) to its own phonology and orthography.  —Tamfang ( talk ) 20:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Quite true.  There was no consensus because there was simply too much in the nom for one discussion.  My bad.  So, I'm going back through the area in a more rational way.  Re-listing when no consensus emerges is what's supposed to happen.  Pepper Beast (talk) 20:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree with nominator, this is a case of WP:NOTDICTIONARY BrigadierG ( talk ) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 20:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No consensus.  Please include a link to any previous AFDs concerning these articles.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's still notable, there are plenty of sources available, needs improvement, not deletion.  SportingFlyer T · C 04:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you make that more specific?   Notable why, what sort of improvement?  —Tamfang ( talk ) 20:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article needs to be better sourced, but there's plenty of sources available, especially if you search in French.  Such as this .  Most of the ! voters in this discussion are ignoring the fact this can be better sourced, which is equivalent to notability.  SportingFlyer T · C 21:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is it?   Are dictionary entries notable?  – That pdf is roughly a French analogue of Toponymy of England , and I would be happy to see analogous articles about various countries, but it is not about exonyms.  —Tamfang ( talk ) 00:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:NOTDICTIONARY , which this article obviously is (It's not a WP:GLOSSARIES , as it just provides straight translations between word).  Also, clearly, any WP:ITSUSEFUL or WP:JUSTNOTABLE are unhelpful in this discussion.  Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 06:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a list that violates WP:NOTDICTIONARY , same holds for the child articles.  It would be absolutely cool to have an article about the topic of French exonyms.  Certainly meets GNG, many sources that would explain how French exonyms historically evolved, the phonological challenges when toponym get nativized etc.  But this article has nothing, rien about that.  It's just an indiscriminate list of toponyms.  – Austronesier ( talk ) 13:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I had not noticed the child articles.   I would not remove lists of German names for places that were formerly in German territory, but a corresponding French list would be pretty short!  —Tamfang ( talk ) 01:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Agletarang ( talk ) 09:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete