hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Avis Stearns Van Wagenen: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 09:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Stearns company article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBIO .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Binod (meme): While there is a significant amount of coverage circa March-September 2020, there has been little coverage of this specific meme since (there is some coverage of a Binod/Vinod meme from 2023, but that is completely unrelated to the one mentioned in the article).  If we do want to document this event/meme in a encyclopedic manner, we could easily import some of the verbiage as a seperate section in the Binod article instead of having a seperate article on the Binod meme.  Binod.  Sohom ( talk ) 20:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Sohom ( talk ) 20:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and merge to Binod - no sustained coverage but enough sources to justify inclusion in another page.  Plus, there is not much information here and this can all be pretty easily condensed to fit on that page without losing important details.  Alternatively, this could be merged to an article on Slayy Point if there are the sources to justify it.  On a brief look, Slayy Point appears to have gotten more sustained coverage but haven't checked the reliability or depth of coverage.  Shapeyness ( talk ) 10:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  Sohom ( talk ) 17:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Also, I don't think "Delete and Merge" is a viable suggestion, you must have meant, "Merge, then Delete".  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  It does have some lasting coverage, as it's mentioned in meme reports from 2022 and just two weeks ago .  SWinxy ( talk ) 18:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The 2022 link is to a different meme, the two weeks ago is a profile of Slayy Point with one mention of the original Binod meme.  Sohom ( talk ) 18:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, but those show that SUSTAINED is *somewhat* here, since it was mentioned.  The brief mentions don't go far, though.  SWinxy ( talk ) 22:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 23:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Best Dick Sucker: The album may be notable, but there is no significant coverage of this single in reviews, only passing mentions.  Pilaz ( talk ) 21:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Pilaz ( talk ) 21:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to S.T.D (Shelters to Deltas) The song isn't really notable but a redirect to the EP is appropriate (or as much as can be for the subject matter of the song).  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to S.T.D (Shelters to Deltas) .  There does not appear to be significant coverage of this song from third-party, reliable sources so it does not seem notable enough for its own article.  That being said, a redirect would be helpful for readers looking up this song.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 00:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to S.T.D (Shelters to Deltas) per above arguments.  Ss 112 14:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jackie Gilday: The subject has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found was this short four-sentence piece.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Nicaragua ,  and Florida .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 16:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above comments.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Robert Beeson: However, I couldn't find sources at the level I was looking for to source a BLP when I tried to find some to add.  Possible redirect to Essential Records .  Boleyn ( talk ) 11:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Music , Christianity ,  and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] More work needs to be done on this article and I suggest that it is redirected to the sandbox for it to be polished from there.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 14:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I don't understand what is meant by "redirected to the sandbox" as a resolution to this discussion.  Which sandbox?  Articles are typically redirected to target articles.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Essential Records No in-depth coverage.  Mostly WP: TRIVIALMENTIONS .  Atighot ( talk ) 01:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WLEK-LD: Article was part of a bulk AfD last year that closed as no consensus, but there is nothing to show this station individually meets the notability guidelines.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Massachusetts ,  and New Hampshire .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Yet another run-of-the-mill DTV America/HC2/Innovate station with no substantial history, no non-national programming, no significant coverage , and no notability.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp. per above.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Richard Lenton: It's possible that sources are hard to find because he passed away in 1870 and played in the 1820s-1840s, but I can find little to attest to notability or to much of his life other than his playing cricket and some associated statistics.  I would normally PROD, but I feel that there might be something out there that leads to this person being notable only because his playing a first-class cricket match in both 1828 and 1841 as attested to on cricinfo means he has a shot at notability as a 14 year playing career isn't normally for players who barely played, but cricinfo only has him playing 2 matches over those 14 years.  Tartar Torte 17:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Cricket .  Tartar Torte 17:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of English cricketers (1826–1840)#L Doesn't seem to be enough to pass GNG (although there may well be coverage in past papers).  However there is a suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per Rugbyfan22.  RobinCarmody ( talk ) 12:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jana Jamnicky: It should also be noted Australia only got to play handball in 2000 Olympics as host nation.  They lost every game.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Handball ,  and Olympics .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Slovakia ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Ping me if sources are found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Handball at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's team rosters : Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  All of the sources in the article are primary and a WP:BEFORE didn't reveal anything better.  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails GNG.  Not really any history worth preserving as it's all just a rephrasing of a database.  (Except for the family connection, which should be mentioned at her daughter's future(?) page because the daughter seems more accomplished, among others a 5th place at the PAG. ) Furthermore, Jamnicky and many of the other 2000 Olympic players played at the 1999 World Women's Handball Championship as well, making it less clear where to redirect to, although the Olympics were on home ground.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with above.  Whilst she played in the 1999 world championships, Australia lost all their games there as well.  The performance of this team is quite insignificant.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Handball at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's team rosters per WP:ATD .  She is not named in 1999 World Women's Handball Championship , so no issue there.  Ingratis ( talk ) 22:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Descendants: School of Secrets: Pamzeis ( talk ) 15:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Television , Disney ,  and United States of America .  Pamzeis ( talk ) 15:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect per Cunard, fails GNG and already covered (albeit with poor sourcing) at Descendants (2015 film)#Prequel spin-off .  I'm able to find a few other mentions in potentially reliable sources, but they don't constitute SIGCOV.  I'll also note that the TV Guide listing is dead and none of the IA copies seem to be usable.  —⁠ PlanetJuice ( talk • contribs ) 18:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Edited: 18:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Descendants (2015 film)#Prequel spin-off (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 07:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Summer Demos 2006: Has been tagged as such since September 2018 with no improvements or referencing.  The previous AfD argued that it was notable because it was released by a notable band.  As per WP:NALBUM , the recording needs to be notable in its own right ( WP:GNG ).  I've searched but cannot find any reliable independent secondary sources for this release.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 07:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and Kansas .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 07:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Josephine Collective : found absolutely nothing supporting notability.  I'm not even convinced the band is notable; all their article has is an AllMusic bio which is just a paragraph long.  But for now, this may as well be sent there despite receiving zero mention on that page.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 08:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Josephine Collective .  I was amazed to see that this article survived an AfD in 2010, when dinosaurs walked the earth, partially because of a "weak keep" vote from me.  That vote was a reaction to the circumstances of the time: Wikipedia had recently decided that demo albums were not notable unless proven otherwise, and this caused a rash of AfDs in which nominators scoured the earth for album articles that simply had "Demo" in the titles but rarely bothered to discuss possible notability.  My vote back then was procedural due to weak reasoning from the 2010 nominator.  So anyway... this album article seems to have fallen through the cracks until now, and since 2010 the album notability rules have gotten tougher.  This album clearly gained no notice from the reliable music media, so I hereby overrule my younger self.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is about all I find [21] .  Nothing for sourcing for the album, I doubt the band is even notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Josephine Collective as preferred WP:ATD .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 13:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Josephine Collective : Not independently notable.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Josephine Collective : mention per Oaktree.  Password (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hiram Slack (cricketer, born 1808): 〜 Festucalex • talk 21:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For now we're probably better of redirect ing here.  There are two possible targets: List of Nottingham Cricket Club players and List of English cricketers (1826–1840) .  I'd probably prefer the former, but have no real preference.  I'll see if I can get around to adding a little more detail from the source cited there .  That's probably compiled using Peter Wynne-Thomas' book Nottinghamshire Cricketers 1821–1914 (the web source may have been written by Wynne-Thomas) so it's unlikely that we'll have a tonne more than that, although the possibility remains.  Blue Square Thing ( talk ) 05:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/merge to either of the targets mentioned by Blue Square Thing.  Doesn't look like there's enough known about the subject to write more than an extremely short stub which might as well be a list entry.  Hut 8.5 17:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Nottingham Cricket Club players Looks to fail WP:GNG , however a suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Nottingham Cricket Club players .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Nottingham Cricket Club players , as a suitable WP:ATD IceBergYYC ( talk ) 09:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
A. J. Chegwidden: Spinixster (chat!) 08:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 08:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to List of JAG characters .  I am not seeing enough reception/analysis/ WP:SIGCOV treatment that goes beyond plot summaries to warrant keeping this as a stand-alone article.  Ping me if better soruces are found.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Lack of evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Doesn't pass the WP:GNG without more coverage in reliable third-party sources.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 23:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of JAG characters .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KUSE-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep : No deletion rationale has been proposed.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Subject does not meet the GNG.  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A textbook LPTV with no meaningful or GNG-garnering history.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : It has a longer history than many other HC2/Innovate stations, but with no significant coverage to actually demonstrate notability (and as this has since become an HC2/Innovate station, this situation is not going to change anytime soon), it would appear that this is just another remnant article from the lower "notability standards" of 2006.  It's also a technical survivor of a bulk nomination from last year .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  .  Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Catherine Kobelka: No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers as an ATD.  ミラP @ Miraclepine 00:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per @ Miraclepine .  - Socccc ( talk ) 08:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 09:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zhang Lihui: No third-party indication of notability outside of Caixin ; possible redirect there?  – MrGnocci ( talk ) 10:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and China .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect makes most sense.  Deleting is also reasonable.  Pichpich ( talk ) 21:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Caixin (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources about Zhang Lihui ( simplified Chinese : 张立晖 ; traditional Chinese : 張立暉 ).  Preserving the history will allow the redirect to be easily undone if significant coverage is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 00:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect