hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ruben Riccioli : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of in-depth coverage available online.  All I found was routine transfer news ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Italy .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Struggling to see anything other than transactional announcements on this one.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 June 18 : FMSky ( talk ) 07:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Couple of minor mentions here and there but no WP:SIGCOV .  Definitely not a notable musician.  Carpimaps ( talk ) 11:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Cannot find any significance of the subject as no coverage can be found online.  Also the article contains no secondary sources as it is mostly written by the subject itself.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 12:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shah Zanuriman Nuar Paras Khan : He doesn't appear to actually have national/state-wide office, and is rather just a member of his party's youth division.  Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:BASIC .  C F A 💬 00:02, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass NPOL and not otherwise notable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra ( talk • contribs ) 00:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sidney Bowcott : No claim to notability is apparent even in past versions.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 21:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , England ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can't find coverage online, and can't find any WP:SIGCOV after a cursory look through newspapers.com.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 23:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - found no refs.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , obviously without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do a lot better than this.  Although Edmonton is a large and prominent enough city that its city councillors have traditionally been accepted as notable under NPOL #2, that still depends on being able to properly source some actual content about their political careers (specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their time in office had on the development of the city, etc.) — we would likely keep a well-written and well-sourced article about an Edmonton city councillor, but there's little to no value in holding on to a three-line stub that barely goes any further than "he existed" and is referenced solely to his obituary.  If somebody in Edmonton has enough access to the historic resources needed to write and source something with some substance to it, go for it, but that's not what this is.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Didn't find anything either.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 19:04, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Mundamala Ghat : The battle name is not recognized by any of the historians.  Seems like source manipulation Imperial [AFCND] 15:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Bangladesh ,  and India .  Owen× ☎ 15:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete what references, looks uncited?  Slatersteven ( talk ) 16:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Slatersteven : the nominator removed some content with references, this is a version before the removal.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And which ones actually pass wp:v , or (come to that) wp:rs , a snippet, really?  Slatersteven ( talk ) 10:41, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Deltaspace42 , Certainly.  I removed it after reviewing the references but couldn't locate the contexts used by the creator.  The article appears to involve citation manipulation, and there is no mention of "Battle of Mundamala Ghat" anywhere.  I encountered a source in what seems to be a local language, possibly Bengali, where not even the author's name isn't provided.  How could I access and examine the verifiability from that source?  After examining the snippets from the provided links, none of them reference "Mundamala Ghat" or the belligerent's name.  If you have the information, please verify it by assessing its reliability and notability.  Imperial [AFCND] 11:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on WP:V and WP:SYNTH .  If there are no solid, secondary sources that discussion this event specifically as the 'Battle of Mundamala Ghat' (and I can't find any), the article is a synthesis of sources and thus invalid for mainspace.  An AtD of Draftify would be possible, but I just don't see any sources on which to build an encyclopaedic article.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 13:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gil's Thrilling (And Filling) Blog : I have performed a search within local newspapers but can only find passing mentions of the blog within short restaurant reviews by Gil Garduño.  pinktoebeans (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Websites , United States of America ,  and New Mexico .  pinktoebeans (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A whole two hits in Gnews, from similar blog sites.  Nothing for notability found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Multiverse (Stephen King) : This would need a total rewrite to even stand a chance of being notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Literature .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The very definition of fancruft.   Even with proper sourcing (i.e. sources other than the books themselves), I can't see this ever not running afoul of WP:NOT .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:OR .  Some of this is sourced directly to a Stephen King website.  Even if it was declared as accurate by Stephen King himself, there would still be the problem of WP:SIGCOV .  Without reliable sources, I don't see anything to WP:PRESERVE here.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 13:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I wouldn't be surprised if there were some genuine sources that talk about some of King's multiverse concepts, especially in relation to The Dark Tower series.  But, this article is not even really on that topic - its just an in-universe description of some of the fictional concepts that appear in his books, and then a list of "Worlds" that is largely based on WP:OR - the fact that there are some inaccuracies/contradictions in that list kind of demonstrates that it is based off of different users OR.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - appears to be WP:OR .  Please ping me if good sources are identified.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WROB-LD : An overarching article for these identically programmed stations, TV25.tv , was redirected to KCKS-LD in a 2016 AfD .  Even in the days of lax notability standards and even-laxer enforcement of them, I questioned in the TV25.tv AfD whether we really needed four articles related to that network of all-diginet LPTVs.  Seven years later, we have reached the point where the correct number was/is/should be zero , and it has become more accepted that this simply isn't the type of station that gets the requisite significant coverage to meet the GNG — FCC records, directories, and network announcements of their new affiliate just won't do.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kansas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Here's the Reason: Per Nom and my response on KCKS-LD's article of deletion which was Delete .  Also, a little note, I don't understand why WROB-LD callsign starts with a W instead of a K as per rules with most Kansas stations follow (in Topeka, most follow, besides, WIBW ( 580 AM , 94.5 FM , and Channel 13 ) which makes sense as it was created in Logansport, Indiana in 1925 and moved permanently to Topeka, Kansas around 1927-1928.  In a nutshell, Delete .  Mer764Wiki ( talk ) 00:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I kinda forgot, there was/is no sources on the television stations.  Mer764Wiki ( talk ) 00:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG based on the given sources - two of the resources strike me as press releases , which are inadmissible.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 03:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of independent WP:SIGCOV .  Sources are all press releases or FCC records, which aren't secondary.  User:Let'srun 19:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as well.  Sources indicate not much WP:SIGCOV (if any at all); a quick search on my own turned up nothing of note.  Xnyarla ( talk ) 04:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simon Sues : – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Comics and animation ,  and Anime and manga .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete issues not addressed for 8 years; Google only throws up listings and associated official and/or fan social media accounts, meaning notable neutral sources are unlikely to be found, at most Redirect to Tokyopop as seemingly only notable attached page.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 16:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It's ok to mass prod such unreferenced fancruft.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 16:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mass prod was my mistake, I forgot no-one could see that I'd checked to see if anything was salvageable beforehand and put through too many at once.  I have been put gently right by some kind people, and hopefully will not have to do anything with that many pages at once again!  =) BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 20:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  ZERO sources used, I'm not wading through every Google mention with a person named Simon that sues people.  TNT this article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Strongly agree with what’s been said above.  This is a clear delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 08:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - literally unsourced and difficult to find anything.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage.Fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DYAQ-TV : Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD ?  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 08:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerome K. Moore : I cannot find more coverage, however, so do not think he meets WP:GNG , WP:NARTIST or WP:ANYBIO .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 14:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Visual arts , Comics and animation ,  and Maine .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 14:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  Netherzone ( talk ) 15:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Just a single source in the article, and my searches are not finding anything else.  Does not meet WP:ARTIST at this time.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 13:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's a real shame that the folks who edited this article didn't give any indication of where they got the info.  I can't find anything but name-checks and most of those are in bibliographical listings (e.g. names of those who contributed to specific comics).  Lamona ( talk ) 05:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any references for the biographical information presented in the article.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 00:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WWAT-CD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pennsylvania .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Non-notable defucnt local TV network.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, but. .  Well, I did find one source, and apparently it’s technically still not dead yet due to its license to broadcast still being valid.  But still, one source for a Wikipedia article is not exactly going to cut it.  -- Danubeball ( talk ) 16:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Len Bratley : Nothing of note here other than routine local human-interest news coverage of the presenter.  WP:BEFORE reveals no rich untapped seam of coverage of the individual.  Flip Format ( talk ) 21:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Flip Format ( talk ) 21:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , seems very local in nature.  It's best to mention him in the article about the radio station.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If this one is deleted or merged Len Bratley (rugby league) can be moved to the base name.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 18:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The hospital radio wasn't notable, I don't see how working there makes you notable.  Outside of references to that, there is no claim to notability in the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Trust AM .  He's significant to have a paragrah on that page.  There's also good potential for other articles to mention him which would then go to Trust AM.  Karl Twist ( talk ) 12:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of career achievements by Russell Westbrook : Let'srun ( talk ) 17:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Lists .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a couple of achievements (most triple-doubles, but not Best Dressed NBA player and not "set with Kevin Durant") to his article, which isn't so long that they need to be WP:SPLIT off.  The rest are cherry-picked nonsense (e.g. "One of two players in NBA history to average at least 31.2 points, 9.1 rebounds and 10.3 assists in a calendar month").  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 21:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Bagumba.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 00:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Changing vote to Delete after Bagumba 's comments.  In full agreement with Clarityfiend that the article is full of meaningless fluff like "best dressed" and an Espy Award no one cares about.  "NBA achievements" is about 95% unsourced original research.  Clearly created by a fan as opposed to a neutral editor.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 00:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Clarityfiend and HopalongCasualty : The career, single-season and consecutive triple-double records were already in his bio (and sourced).   If there's nothing  else to merge, perhaps deletion is ok? — Bagumba ( talk ) 08:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment For reference, there's recent NBA-related AfDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Larry Bird , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Dwight Howard , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Carmelo Anthony , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Chris Paul . — Bagumba ( talk ) 08:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:CONTENTFORK packed with WP:UNDUE , indiscriminate mentions of being one of X players to achieve a trivial statistical cross section.  Major, defining achievements already captured in the main bio, so nothing to merge.  Also fails WP:NOTSTATS : Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing The page is a pure stats dump. — Bagumba ( talk ) 04:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leverx : The topic may be more suitable in a more comprehensive publication or database.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Florida .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable subject for wikipedia -- Improvised but so real unicorn ( talk ) 11:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] wrong page vote, was not planned for here -- Improvised but so real unicorn ( talk ) 15:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a consultancy operating in SAP integration, etc.  The given references are announcement-based; as the nominator indicates, these fall short of WP:CORPDEPTH .  searches are not finding evidence of attained notability for Leverx or Emerline.  AllyD ( talk ) 08:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New Left 95 : – Vipz ( talk ) 15:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Lithuania .  – Vipz ( talk ) 15:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No establishment of notability, fails GNG.  Written in POV promotional language.  The only link is to an archived versional of their official website, which is no longer active.  Could have probably been WP:PROD 'd.  — Czello ( music ) 15:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete