hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Chizo 1 Germany: Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  A WP:MILL .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  10:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Artists , Lists of people , Africa ,  and Nigeria .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  10:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agreed.  Subject did not pass WP:GNG , WP:NACTOR or WP:NSINGER .  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to establish notability here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 11:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  The Dailytrust here seems to be a relieve but the problem is that it is not a reliable source despite being part of Newspaper Proprietors' Association of Nigeria per its about .  Legit here is mixed with different cases with none GNG.  His song becoming a hit is not enough without disclosed more sales, wins and nominations at best.  - Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 13:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Tumbuka Arch , Daily trust per WP:NGRS is a reliable source.  However in this context, it's an interview and per WP:INTERVIEW , isn't reliable.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  23:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ SafariScribe I see.  Then it should be added here for quick reference.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 08:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are insufficient reliable sources with in-depth coverage to establish notability.  There are a lot of unreliable blogs that could probably be PR.  Best, Reading Beans 00:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Liāna Rožaščonoka: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage, failing WP:GNG .  All I found were passing mentions like 1 , 2 and 3 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hiber Nation (album): Nothing found from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 20:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Ireland .  Owen× ☎ 20:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet GNG.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thorntons Gap: Article has been unreferenced for 16 years.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 23:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 00:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The property that sources have to have is reliability .  I did consider rewriting and refactoring this, which would have involved completely overhauling and even renaming the article, from the sources that I found.   Then I noticed the edit history.   Written in 2007 by Djolsen ( talk · contribs ) this pointed to a now-defunct WWW site named djolsen that was run by David and Justine Olsen that offered tours to tourists, and the article even advertised the tours .   I'm not going to waste my time rescuing an advertisement.   A proper article, at least from the histories and documents that I have found, wouldn't be at this title, and wouldn't have any of this content.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 08:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Elshad ( talk ) 13:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per Nom.  I could not find any reliable sources on the subject.   -- Otr500 ( talk ) 03:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no secondary sources exist.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 05:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cornelius Booth: only database entries/image entries online.  Password (talk) (contribs) 08:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Whilst this article is substantially out of date, there is still not enough to meet notability requirements.  MNewnham ( talk ) 00:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CptViraj ( talk ) 09:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Larisa Akrofie: I'm also seeing results from her personal LinkedIn and just some talks she gave.  Few suitable cited sources.  Fails WP:GNG .  — That Coptic Guy ping me!  ( talk ) ( contribs ) 05:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Women ,  and Ghana .  — That Coptic Guy ping me!  ( talk ) ( contribs ) 05:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Program management specialist/advocate don't get you notability here.  Seems to have been on a few lists of "Influential young people", which really don't help either.  I can't find SIG (or any kind of) COV.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines.  None of the sources has significant coverage, and search results show up this , aside from profiles and some irrelevant content.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Declan O'Dwyer (director): Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 14:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You've broken the AfD wikibot...  Help!  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Ireland .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ok, so we're back.  I can't find sourcing for this fellow beyond a few Deadline articles confirming he's directed various projects.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  In terms of WP:GNG , my own WP:BEFORE searches have returned no significant coverage.  As the subject is Irish, I searched in the usual Irish national/general news outlets (Irish Times, Irish Independent, Irish Examiner, RTÉ, etc) and found nothing.  Not even passing mentions.  I also searched in the Irish media/film news outlets (screenireland.ie, iftn.ie, etc).  Also nothing.  In terms of WP:NDIRECTOR , all we have (to support a claim to being "an important figure [..] widely cited by peers" or "won significant critical attention") is a 2019 daytime Emmy nom .  Which, while impressive and laudable, isn't anywhere close to the typically expected by convention in these types of discussions.  The COI/SPA/PROMO overtones do little to help.  Mine is a "delete" recommendation.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 21:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Law Society, University College Cork: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - at least for now, does not seem to meet WP:GNG, and in itself one student society of one university is not an obvious article candidate without significant activity well-covered.  SeoR ( talk ) 19:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to UCC : without significant coverage most such university and college societies are not notable enough for their own article.  ww2censor ( talk ) 08:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 15:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eric K. Adae: My WP:BEFORE has not uncovered SIGCOV.  Lightburst ( talk ) 20:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Lightburst ( talk ) 20:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Iowa .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  His GS profile is [16] with only a handful of citations; certainly fails WP:PROF.  Needs a check of his books for reviews.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 12:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG .  It should be noted that much of the language of this article can be found at Draft:Eric Kwame Adae , which was rejected due to lack of notability and also an WP:AUTOBIO .  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 15:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a clear case of WP:TOOEARLY , the citation count only goes back to 2021 and he is an assistant professor with an h-index of 4.  No hits in JSTOR of any reviews of his books.  -- hroest 18:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no pass of WP:PROF or any other notability criterion.  Local awards do not rise to the level of notability.  Despite his Ghanaian origin, as an academic at a US institution I don't think there is any likely issue with Wikipedia:Systemic bias in this case, but even if there were we would still need some evidence of notability beyond what we have here.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KDEV-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Wyoming .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Jazja: Minorincident, No sources found showing this has WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC) // Timothy :: talk 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hey I don't understand why this article is being deleted, could you explain what's wrong with it ?  Yubudirsi ( talk ) 05:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I see no significant notability to warrant its own article.  Same goes for 2nd Battle of Yedaya Socialwave597 ( talk ) 06:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I added another secondary source, I think that makes 3 Yubudirsi ( talk ) 17:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and History .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Added another secondary source Yubudirsi ( talk ) 17:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to assess new sources.  Of course, this AFD discussion can be closed at any time.  But it would be helpful to get an editor to review new content.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete though I’ve no objection to draftification.  The creator appears to have gone through the chronicles and written an article about every armed conflict that ever took place between Ethiopia and Adal using the formula “battle of [place mentioned] whether the source describes that as “[battle of place mentioned]” or not.  I think there is sufficient sourcing for several more broad-based articles talking about each war, or each campaign, or each period, but not one for each “battle”.  This is an area of history which is currently under covered, but that isn’t a license to embroider and expand on what sources say.  Draftification would allow the creator to figure out some way of repurposing the material they’ve researched and combining multiple current articles in the series they’ve created in the NPP queue, but unless they ask to do that, I agree we should delete.  Mccapra ( talk ) 03:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There are five citations, this should pass GNG .  Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk ) 03:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Which of them is more than just a passing mention?  What coverage is WP:INDEPTH ?  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dubai Polo & Equestrian Club: I can't talk of WP:NCORP when there is no notability and WP:SIGCOV .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  07:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business , Companies ,  and Asia .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  07:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with the nom.  Doesn't satisfying {WP:GNG]].  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 09:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
24saat.org: Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV .  Sources in article only contain trivial mentions.  The censorship and the website's block and suppression constitute a wider-ranging political issue, and were not specific to this website only.  Fails WP:WEBCRIT .  Bgv.  ( talk ) 22:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Websites .  Bgv.  ( talk ) 22:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Great spider: would recommend salting as well DrowssapSMM ( talk ) 17:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Biology .  DrowssapSMM ( talk ) 17:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Previous deletion discussions: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Spider , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jba fofi .  Plantdrew ( talk ) 18:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like this was recreated by the same author.  It also does not seem to be notable.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 18:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Giant Spider Invasion Redirect to Wild Wild West#Writing Delete per the above.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 20:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A collection of anecdotes with nothing holding them together but WP:OR .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That is pretty great Comment I wonder if the article would be slightly more acceptable as Great spiders , instead of sort of focusing on one Nessie, "the creature" per current lead.  Still, current sources aren't great.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 07:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] G4 Speedy delete and salt - Inappropriate repeat re-creation.  The notability and source reliability issues raised in the previous AfDs still stand.  – dlthewave ☎ 15:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Given that the purported creature has been listed in several more sources in the intervening years and is found in at least four published fiction works [added to the article], I thought that another stab at this would be appropriate.  Marino73 ( talk ) 16:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Being in fiction doesn't really help.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 17:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mikhailo Deyak: Looks like he could be notable, if information is verified, but no evidence of it.  Unref blp.  Boleyn ( talk ) 09:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Ukraine .  Owen× ☎ 10:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The person does not appear to be notable from reading the article.  I can't find any refs in the article either and an unsourced BLP is not something we want.  In the meantime, I'll remove anything that looks contentious or promotional to me.  QwertyForest ( talk ) 12:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BEFORE does not bring up any RS references to show notability.  He is listed on a few gallery sites and some pay-to-play sites.  The artist has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums.  WP:TOOSOON .  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 15:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Driver deaths in British motorsport series: We have the main list of those who died globally so how necessary are a list like this?  Since the last nomination in 2011, I doubt anything has been addressed.  Many of those listed are from club championships.
 If this was narrowed down to bluelinked drivers as recommended in the last AfD, this would make just 3, meaning we have a list of non-notable drivers.
 I cannot see this unnecessary WP:FANCRUFT list appealing to those but to the most obsessive motorsport fans.  Also, not notable enough to pass WP:LISTN .  In short, Wikipedia is neither Motsport Memorial (whom most are sourced from per WP:1R , abeit poorly) nor is WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists of people , Motorsport ,  and United Kingdom .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: List of non-notable people that fails WP:LISTN ; has not been discussed as a group in secondary sources.  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per the rationale of the nominator EnthusiastWorld37 ( talk ) 07:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete