hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Energy (Melissa Manchester song): Dug through everything including WP:LIBRARY and only found passing mentions.  🌙 E cl i ps e ( talk ) ( contribs ) 14:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  🌙 E cl i ps e ( talk ) ( contribs ) 14:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  🌙 E cl i ps e ( talk ) ( contribs ) 14:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom, no significant coverage in reliable sources and fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSINGLE .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mathematics (album) ; absolutely nothing to suggest that this song meets notability criteria.  TheLongTone ( talk ) Redirect - agree with User:TheLongTone Free Realist 9 ( talk ) 02:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mathematics (album) - It was released as a single and someone else did a cover version, but neither of those rose beyond fan trivia.  The fact that it was released as a single can be described at the album article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WEON-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 12:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to WVXF : it is mentioned there as the predecessor of WVXF's Fox subchannel, which might be enough to make it a valid alternative to deletion .  (It does seem odd to think of a Fox affiliate as "not independently notable", but this appears to be one of those rare cases.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Francis Napier, 15th Lord Napier: Had an unsuccessful run at a by-elections to the House of Lords whose only coverage were two sentences beyond his non-independent candidate statement.  [5] .  Redirect possibility: Lord Napier .  Pilaz ( talk ) 14:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Pilaz ( talk ) 14:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Lord Napier .  Will consider changing ! vote if sources found, but as things stand and from my brief searching, there seems insufficient to pass GNG or WP:NPEOPLE for a standalone article so a redirect to the family's page seems an appropriate AtD.  Rupples ( talk ) 23:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dulhan (TV series): Donald D23 talk to me 00:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage.  The article relies on unreliable sources.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While assessing the referencing of Pakistani dramas/series, the dynamics of Pakistani media industry should be considered wherein media groups have their own news and entertainment channels.  Normally a news channel from one media group doesn't give coverage to a project of a rival channel unless it's a big hit.  So for other dramas we have to rely on websites and links which otherwise may not be good sources but are sufficient for a Pakistani drama.  Muneebll ( talk ) 18:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Muneebll , But still you have to demonstrate that this TV dramas meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Adeel_Razzaq#Television - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eldrick Celaire: Two appearances for the Aruba national football team .  No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No SIGCOV.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Swarm and Destroy: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Moped Army#Swarm and Destroy (2002) per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  I found only passing mentions about the subject in my searches for sources.  Cunard ( talk ) 07:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
George Kane (American football): Article has been tagged for 18 months due to this deficiency and still no SIGCOV.  Preferred result is redirect to List of players who appeared in only one game in the NFL (1920–1929)#1921 but my efforts to do that have twice been reverted (in 2022 by User:BeanieFan11 and in 2024 by User:Let'srun ).  Cbl62 ( talk ) 17:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , American football , Florida ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of players who appeared in only one game in the NFL (1920–1929)#1921 : My revert was due to the previous request for a discussion to determine notability, which hadn't yet occurred.  However, a search of multiple newspaper archives failed to uncover the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Spent four years at Fordham and played professionally in 1919 as well as 1921 .  That "George Kane Fordham" in NY / OH doesn't seem to bring up anything has me thinking that he might have been known under another name.  It seems Fordham in 1912 had two Kanes, H. Kane and V. Kane .  Wonder whether one of those is our Kane under a different name...  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 21:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of players who appeared in only one game in the NFL (1920–1929)#1921 (although that article title needs to be changed to say "in exactly one game for NPOV reasons).  Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT .  Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Questions as to a person's identity should be resolved long before making a Wikipedia article about the person.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of players who appeared in only one game in the NFL (1920–1929)#1923 , as helpfully suggested by the previous editors.  And Adoil Descended ( talk ) 09:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kobo Kanaeru: WP:BEFORE returns nothing of any substance from reliable, independent sources.  TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 21:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can't find sources with the exception of this suspicious-looking Yahoo News article .  Given the author is 'MrSun' and the publisher is Yahoo News this might not be the most reliable source.  I think Kanaeru could be notable in the future though.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 01:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BEFORE .  Azuredivay ( talk ) 09:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG and BEFORE.  // Timothy :: talk 09:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hololive Production#Hololive Indonesia as an alternative to deletion – subject works under said agency and is listed there.  ~ KN2731 { talk · contribs } 16:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hmm, let's see here...we've got this Duniagames source, and then this , and the "sus" Yahoo source Sungodtemple provided above.  None of these sources convinces me of passing GNG, so Redirect to Hololive Production#Hololive Indonesia per KN2731.  Oh, and there's some passing mentions of her in other sources!  Tails Wx 00:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Essential Stabbing Westward: I wanted to at least have the discussion about this rejected PROD.  Jax 0677 ( talk ) 00:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Discography section at Stabbing Westward , as is standard procedure for a non-notable album by a notable band.  This band was subjected to a series of probably unlicensed quickie compilations by multiple record companies, and this one made no impact and received no significant or reliable media coverage.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 21:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Avatar (Ultima): As a character, the Avatar is barely one, and the reception reflects that.  There's just no meat on this bone.  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 05:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 05:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/Redirect to List of Ultima characters#The Avatar .  As stated by the nom, the importance of the avatar in a gameplay context is more about the game than the character itself, who does not pass GNG.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 05:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Ultima characters#The Avatar where this is already covered.  There isn't WP:SIGCOV for this topic outside of the game itself, and it makes more sense to cover this in a wider context.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 17:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I noticed you raised the previous deletion discussion in 2009.  How time flies!  I think the crux of it is that the Avatar is not a notable character in itself, the character is largely faceless and anonymous, what is being construed as 'The Avatar' is the embodiment of the virtues that form part of the narrative and gameplay.  This is reflected by the sources really coming to struggle to say anything about the character without leaning on the broader concepts of the game and the player's input.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 08:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mmoloki Mooketsi: The closest thing approaching WP:SIGCOV that I found was coverage about his unique bowling action ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Botswana .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Botswana Twenty20 International cricketers Looks to fail WP:GNG .  Redirect a suitable WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
CID Officer: C1K98V ( 💬 ✒️ 📂 ) 05:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG .  Donald D23 talk to me 02:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to DD National : Fails WP:NTV but redirects are WP:CHEAP .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to DD National#1992 to 2010: Competition . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 08:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tyson Apostol: Indeed, we can't be sure whether his Tocantins debut and HvV return suffice, and some other returnees turn out to be notable for only their own winning seasons , especially debut ones.  Furthermore, I can't be sure whether his supposed "notability" (and possibly everything else about him) comply with the WP:BLP policy, and I don't mean WP:BLP1E alone.  Same goes for how he's been eliminated in Survivor , his poker winnings, and his finalist status in The Challenge .  Honestly, I think the article must be preferably redirected to Survivor: Blood vs. Water , but I don't mind it being alternately redirected to the list of Survivor (American TV series) contestants .  Furthermore, his activities outside Survivor , like poker, might not save this article from being redirected(... or deleted if the consensus were to favor the latter more than the former options.) George Ho ( talk ) 05:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Television ,  and Utah .  George Ho ( talk ) 05:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nom's comment – Just in case, if no one opposes, then I am okay with the whole article by default deleted or redirected (preferably to Survivor: Blood vs. Water ) per WP:BIODELETE .  I won't be comfortable with the article being kept by default, but I won't challenge the decision made if that's decided.  -- George Ho ( talk ) 04:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Happy Cactus: InDimensional ( talk ) 22:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , United States of America ,  and Montana .  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  This band has never been the subject of coverage on its own, only in the context of what other members have done (mostly Melroy, also the two Caseys) Mach61 12:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom - Not notable on its own.  There is a mention of the band under Musical career.  Tbennert ( talk ) 17:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Colin Meloy as non-notable fancruft trivia about the high school shenanigans of someone who became notable much later.  I would have recommended total deletion, but the name is probably a viable search term for Meloy's fans.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 21:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Colin Meloy as not enough coverage for a standalone article, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect the band itself is not notable and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 13:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested and as done usually; see WP:OUTCOMES .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mabvazuva Estate, Ruwa: Only one RS(?) mentioned in the article that gives information about the development of this estate.  Other online coverage I found are quite routine for any estate development.  TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 23:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A location stub has been added, just revisit the page.  Mindthem ( talk ) 10:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] •The article has reliable source that Herald Zimbabwe and when we are to verify, we should also look at the dates of the article.  •If we are to use Google Maps and turn on satellite view, we will see that the estate is 70%-90% fully developed and people are living there.  •Also if we are to search on google about the estate, remember we are in different locations so our results differ as well, based on where we are at the moment of search.  Thank you Mindthem ( talk ) 10:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This does need a bit more to pass GNG as the only readily found sources are YouTube videos and estate agents listings plus the Herald feature.  If the estate is officially part of Ruwa maybe a merge there is in order.  Rupples ( talk ) 18:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] How are we gonna merge a town and a suburb?  Mindthem ( talk ) 14:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry, not sure what you're asking here.  Rupples ( talk ) 20:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This page must be kept and listed under WikiProject Zimbabwe , so that editors from Zimbabwe who are much more familiar with the area, can cite it better and do a general improvement on the article.  Mindthem ( talk ) 19:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mindthem As the nominator I want to clarify that I am nominating this page for deletion not because of its quality, but because of its notability.  These two are independent criteria on Wikipedia.  Notability is required for an article to exist on Wikipedia.  You are more than welcome to bring this article to WikiProject Zimbabwe and seek significant coverage from reliable sources of the subject.  Cheers, -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 23:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: redirect