White Box Requiem : JJLiu112 ( talk ) 14:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  JJLiu112 ( talk ) 14:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Upon further investigation, I'm not sure about most of Jandek's albums; few have major news media coverage and rely on blog 'reviews' &c.  JJLiu112 ( talk ) 14:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Sources eval: No SIGCOV about the subject - the album >>  1.  Breihan, Tom (December 10, 2009).  "Thurston Moore to Play With Jandek".  Pitchfork.  Promotional, No SIGCOV about the subject - the album >>  2. ^ "Jandek: About Jandek".  Tisue.net.  Retrieved 12 May 2021.  AllMusic bio of artist, no SIGCOV about subject >>  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h "Jandek Biography, Songs, & Albums".  AllMusic.  Discography  >>  4. ^ Tisue, Seth.  "Jandek: Discography".  tisue.net.  Retrieved September 23, 2016.  Promotional, No SIGCOV about the subject - the album >>  5. ^ "LCD 22 - Jandek - The Original Disconnect".  WFMU.  Retrieved September 23, 2016.  Intervew, not IS >>  6. ^ Jump up to:a b Jandek interview in 1985 on YouTube Promotional, No SIGCOV about the subject - the album >>  7. ^ the big question No SIGCOV about the subject - the album >>  8. ^ "Good Luck Finding Jandek's Record Store Day-Exclusive Vinyl Box Set".  SPIN.  March 15, 2013.  Fails IS, no SIGCOV about the subject - the album >>  9. ^ August 1999 0, Katy Vine (August 1, 1999).  "Jandek and Me".  Texas Monthly.  No SIGCOV about the subject - the album >>  10. ^ Jandek pitchfork BEFORE showed database style pages and promo, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 01:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Not all of the Jandek albums are individually notable, but this one is.  I've expanded the article and added sources (completely different from those listed above).  Am hoping to circle back this weekend to add at least one more source and list which two or three are the strongest.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 12:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please assess this article after changes since it was nominated.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I appreciate the changes made, but I don't think the article meets WP:SIGCOV .  The sources are either too short or are not about the album or artist.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 01:09, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Standing by my earlier ! keep vote.  Apparently prose reviews on AllMusic can count toward notability, so we have one dedicated review about White Box Requiem here .  If it's length and depth we're looking for, there is a dense, four-paragraph review here by Andre Salles ...but it's on a journalist's website, so even if it's useful as a source to cite with care, maybe we set it aside in assessing notability for now.  In terms of other reviews, we have another dedicated review of the album on In Music We Trust , which is a webzine and counts toward a WP:GNG pass.  While the other sources, such as the articles in Pitchfork and the Chicago Reader are briefer mentions within larger articles, they help to explain the significance of this specific album ( White Box Requiem ) as an opus within Jandek's broader repertoire...so while not every Jandek album may meet Wikipedia's notability requirements, I would argue this particular one does.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 10:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I think the sources Cielquiparle provided help to pass GNG.  Additionally, I found some mentions in a PhD thesis that could help for some analysis and a section on the album cover in this slightly unhinged book .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 11:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus