hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
A Bride of the Plains: I have done a quick Google search and Google Scholar search but have been unable to find more reliable sources.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 02:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I also could not find any RSes about this novel.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Articles on books are are formatted differently.  I added a source for the first paragraph.  No sources are required for the Plot section.  I added an external link to the book on Project Gutenberg , which provides many online links to this book.  — Maile ( talk ) 04:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, but you need something that talks about the book, a review or a scholarly study.  Simply existing isn't enough for a wikipedia article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Maile66 : Can you explain what you mean when you say, "Articles on books are are formatted differently"?  I understand that the plot section does not require a source.  However, books still need to meet certain notability requirements, as explained in WP:NBOOK .  I do not see those requirements being met for A Bride of the Plains --at least not as the article is currently written.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 05:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no critical notice of the book, no scholarly discussion of it; [50] briefly mentioned here.  Nothing in Jstor, no sort of critical reviews found.  Delete for lack of sourcing Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Hungary ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lack of sourcing that meets WP:RS, aka also fails WP:SIGCOV Cray04 ( talk ) 08:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : An LOC newspaper search only brings up one ad in NY newspaper for the book when it was for sale [51] , trivial coverage Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NBOOK , reviewed in NYTimes , Boston Evening Transcript , The Courier-Journal (All via TWL).  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  17:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Changing to keep per ARandomName123 .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 17:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Yutaka Sone: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - He meets WP:NARTIST criterion #4, in the permanent collections of several notable museums: the Tate Modern , [1] London, and the Museum of Modern Art, New York , [2] and the Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles , [3] I removed the unsourced section with the flowery unencylopedic tone, and added a section for the collections.  The sourcing can continue to be improved moving forward, however, a BEFORE search revealed that he is indeed notable.  References ^ "Yutaka Sone, Highway Junction 110-105, 2002" .  Tate Modern .  Retrieved 17 January 2024 .  ^ "Yutaka Sone" .  Museum of Modern Art .  Retrieved 17 January 2024 .  ^ "Yutaka Sone" .  Museum of Contemporary Art .  Retrieved 17 January 2024 .  Netherzone ( talk ) 20:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - In permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums as noted by Netherzone and also a substantial part of a significant exhibition, the 2004 Whitney Biennial , which I've added a cite for in the article.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 22:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The subject's work is on display in galleries and museums and in permanent collections, as pointed out above as well, both of which clearly make the subject notable.  Passes WP:GNG and meets WP:BASIC .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 23:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination per WP:SNOW .  Thanks for everyone's input, Boleyn ( talk ) 12:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: keep
Workers Party of Ukraine (Marxist–Leninist): Onel 5969 TT me 10:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Ukraine .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Search for the Ukrainian name, which is Робітнича партія України (марксистсько-ленінська)  (

Discussion outcome: keep
The Amethyst Ring: I'm not seeing refs that could be considered for WP:NBOOK JMWt ( talk ) 15:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 15:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Covered in The University of Chicago Guide to Children's Literature, 1979-84 p.324, Kirkus and Rapid City Journal (not sure if this is an actual review though).  Sufficient for WP:NBOOK .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  16:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Mm.  Well the section in the Chicago Guide is one paragraph, most of which is the plot.  It's only a one sentence review.  JMWt ( talk ) 16:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] NBOOK doesn't require in-depth reviews, just coverage.  As long as the plot isn't just a copy-paste of the back flap or something, it's fine.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  17:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There's also a review in The Reading Teacher , Vol 37 No 4 (Jan 1984), and some discussion in " A Master Storyteller and His Distortions of Pre-Columbian and Hispanic Cultures " (Journal of Reading, Vol 29 No 4, Jan 1986).  Passes WP:NBOOK .  Toughpigs ( talk ) 16:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Great, please go ahead and add these to the page.  JMWt ( talk ) 16:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yup, done.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 16:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as the reviews provided above show it meets notability standards.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 14:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2023 Bahrain Darts Masters: Tagged for months without improvement.  Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 15:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Sports ,  and Bahrain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Numerous articles on the tournament 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 6 and others.  Nominator clearly hasn't done a WP:BEFORE .  Dougal18 ( talk ) 15:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Onel5969 I reckon those sources do warrant keeping the article.  Happy for your thoughts on this one?  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 01:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to World Series of Darts , unneeded CFORK, fails GNG and NEVENT.  Sources found in article, above, and BEFORE are routine sports reporting on event, promo, and stats, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 07:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If the coverage found by Dougal18 is merely trivial, we would lose half the project.  Sigcov means covering the event in-depth and not merely announcing dates/stats etc.  Coverage looks good to me.  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 23:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per sources found.  Kante4 ( talk ) 18:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Autant en emporte le vent: Unclear that the subject meets WP:GNG .  4meter4 ( talk ) 02:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] French Wiki has 19 citations .  They look reliable enough, at a glance.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 11:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  References from the corresponding article from French demonstrate notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 15:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep - this article on using GWTW in the classroom says "A successful 2003 French musical spectacular by Gérard Presgurvic, Autant en Emporte le Vent, also gave the black characters greater voice, in song and dance, as they expressed their desire for freedom." jengod ( talk ) 04:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Anton Smit: That web site is a cinema database, which lists all of the films he has written, but does not provide any independent significant coverage .   This article reads like a resume or filmography, and says nothing else about the subject.   Unilaterally sending this article to draft space after six years would be disruptive.  Draftify as nominator.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 04:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film ,  and Netherlands .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 04:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The corresponding article in the Dutch-language Wikipedia at nl:Anton Smit has some additional references that could be added to the English article.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 05:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Anton Smit is an important screenwriter and producer with a long track record who contributed to some of the most well known contemporary Dutch movies and TV series.   Additionally he was an Academy Award nominee for motion picture 'De Tweeling'.  Mill 1 ( talk ) 05:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The citation links in the Dutch article are a bit difficult to navigate (as they don't directly lead to the sources), so I'll list an updated version of them here for the future editors to access:  1. List of recipients of the Golden Calf Award by Netherland Film Festival , in which the subject was shown to have won in 2003 in the Feature Film category along with Hanneke Niens;  2. Oscar Award for 2004 (switch to "Foreign Language Film" category).  The subject was not named, but Twin Sisters , a film where he was one of the producers, got nominated;  3. Prix Europa 2006 Awards .  The subject was not named.  Instead, De Uitverkorene , a film for which he was one of the producers, was awarded Television Programme of the Year;  4. Eye Film Institute Netherland Awards .  Again, the subject was not named.  Bride Flight , a film where he was one of the producers, was given the 2009 Feature Film Award;  5. His profile in Vpro Cinema .  Honestly I can't really decide on this one.  On one hand, he does seem to meet the third criteria of WP:PRODUCER ; On the other hand, I did not manage to find any significant coverage that can be use to improve the current article (Unless he is also the sculptor that many news articles talked about).  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Israel Gay Youth: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sexuality and gender ,  and Israel .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Easy pass of the GNG and NORG per sources in the Hewiki article (only one click away) and NEXIST.  Not sure why this was nominated.  gidonb ( talk ) 22:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per @ Gidonb , as far as I can tell, there are other sources that allow the article to meet GNG/ORG.  Better sources are an ATD, but I do not speak Hebrew, so I may be wrong.  FortunateSons ( talk ) 01:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per Gidonb Ayenaee ( talk ) 21:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The search engine shows a lot of independent news coverage, including in English.  Better Nuncio ( talk ) 09:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – While in the news there seems to be mere passing mentions (upfront), possibly not WP:SIGCOV , there is strong sourcing in books and other areas that I found.  And per the above.  TLA tlak 07:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Michael Xavier: Has been a nominee for awards, but there is no real conveyance of notability beyond any other actor on Broadway.  Fails WP:GNG .  — That Coptic Guy ping me!  ( talk ) ( contribs ) 23:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Theatre , Entertainment ,  and England .  — That Coptic Guy ping me!  ( talk ) ( contribs ) 23:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Entirely self-promotional, but that in itself isn't a reason to delete — what matters is independent coverage in reliable sources.  I found an article from the Evening Standard, which is pretty good — direct coverage of Xavier for six paragraphs in an independent source.  It's not enough to convince me right now, but if there's more out there along those lines, then Xavier could be a notable subject.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 23:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Canadian actor with the same name [8] , not the same person.  I'll try to filter for a UK person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete hits of notability, but this was the best I could find that wasn't simple PR [9] .  I don't think we have enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly meets WP:ANYBIO #1 having been nominated twice for the very significant Laurence Olivier Award .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Necrothesp makes a good point; the Olivier award is a major award.  Add that to the coverage I mentioned above, and I think it demonstrates notability.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 21:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - as per @ Toughpigs Mr Vili talk 22:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : references ain't great but Laurence Olivier Award is good.  She was a fairy 02:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This might be a trifling detail, but he did not win the award--only nominated for it.  — That Coptic Guy ping me!  ( talk ) ( contribs ) 03:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Alliance University: Ratnahastin ( talk ) 13:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 13:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to removal of references.  Achmad Rachmani ( talk ) 13:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  University established under state legislation.  We have usually kept these.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . It appears to be a proper university, but it needs a serious cleanup to remove a load of puffery. -- Bduke ( talk ) 01:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have made a start on a cleanup, but it needs work from someone nearer to it who has access to sources.  -- Bduke ( talk ) 02:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] significant copyvio , including from here so will need massive cleanup and probably rev del if kept.  I don't want to gut it which would affect assessment while at AfD Star Mississippi 01:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for pointing this out, apparently most of the article's content is copied verbatim from their own websites.  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 06:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It may be open source and suitably licenced for sharing.  I know a lot of them do that but worth checking.  scope_creep Talk 10:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see any language releasing the content on their pages.  Since it appears likely to be kept and this won't impact assessment here, I'm going to stub it back on those grounds.  Noting here for transparency.  Star Mississippi 13:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note, the ancient rev dels were not me, those had been done.  I just handled what had been added this month.  There seems to be some feuding in the history that I can't make heads or tails of.  Star Mississippi 13:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Its is a real university with real degrees awarded and real people studying there.  Passses WP:GNG .  The article needs work and copyedit but not Afd.  scope_creep Talk 10:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It's a real university.  I can't see why it wouldn't pass WP:GNG or WP:N .  It's a very short article now that the copyvio is gone, but it's not a bad article.  D u s t i *Let's talk! * 20:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Giuseppe Zappella: Joeykai ( talk ) 13:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep he is literally the current head coach of Juventus FC (women) [5] , and a quick Google search returns plenty of articles about him.  I recommend expanding and sourcing it instead, as the subject is clearly notable enough for a Wikipedia article.  Angelo ( talk ) 15:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per above.  Current manager of high profile team with ongoing career and had extensive pro career in pre internet era.  I found [6] , [7] , and [8] among many more Italian sources.  Article needs improvement, not deletion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 19:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources above which show notability.  Clearly notable as both player and coach.  Lazy nomination where no BEFORE has been performed.  My Google search has this as the 3rd hit, which would have shown the nominator (had they bothered) that the article was simply in need of an update and clean.  Giant Snowman 21:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment 12 lines in the lasentinella is not SIGCOV, calciogiappone.altervista.org is a blog and "Museo Grigio is an independent, non-political and non-profit association and aims to support, disseminate and promote the image of Alessandria Unione Sportiva, its culture, its history and its fans."  Hardly unbiased.  juventus.com is his employer and therefore non independent.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 10:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Very clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Enough WP:SIGCOV to establish subject's notability.  - Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 22:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Per above.  Pass smoothly in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 22:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Clearly should be notable, sources need to be hunted down and the article cleaned up.  Seems like there is enough for WP:BASIC .  Govvy ( talk ) 19:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep