List of Torchwood items: Nothing covers objects in Torchwood to a significant extent, and the bulk of the items covered here are minor and non-notable.  I definitely feel this list should likely be deleted, or at the very least partially merged into the Doctor Who items list, though I'm not feeling confident on that list either.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 17:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 17:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of meeting NLIST, and it looks like it would fit in perfectly on a Fandom wiki.  Ping me if anything comes up that could change my mind.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 18:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A complete mishmash of random things related to Torchwood, ranging from things that appeared in the background of an episode, to things mentioned once or twice, to just real world things that just happened to be shown on screen.  There are very clearly no sources that cover this random gathering as a group or set, meaning it fails WP:NLIST , and probably runs afoul of WP:INDISCRIMINATE as well.  I think even a Fandom wiki would think twice before including a page like this.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:CSC #2.  The topic of this list is "Torchwood" not "Torchwood items", much like the topic of "characters of franchise" is "franchise" so the group does not have to be discussed as a set to meet NLIST, because Torchwood is already notable.  No objection to renaming the article, but since we have other AfDs likely to close as merge to here (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiff Rift ) deletion is particularly problematic as it would result in the destruction of content that could be better rewritten from history to be more encyclopedic.  Jclemens ( talk ) 20:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just because Torchwood is inherently notable does not mean this list should really be existing.  It's a collection of indiscriminate information about random items from the show, none of which seem to have much of an indicator that they're actually important.  There's no real encyclopedic value here, as there's nothing really to be discussed .  Non-notable subsets related to shows have been removed in the past for these reasons (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who henchmen (2nd nomination) as an example from the same shared universe).  As for the Cardiff Rift discussion, the Rift isn't really an item, so I'm not sure why it's being brought up in regards to that discussion, especially since the Rift isn't even mentioned in the Torchwood items article.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OSE applies both ways; previous removals aren't normative.  If there's a need to edit a list, great, do it, improve it by editing rather than deletion.  The fact that this is brought up in that deletion discussion gives us a hint that  1) there is a need for an article to cover not-individually-notable aspects from Torchwood, and  2) this may be it, but at the wrong title.  I'm not the person to do this, since my wife peace out'ed after Countrycide so I'm hardly informed enough about the series.  Jclemens ( talk ) 23:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] While CSC applies to lists, the list must still meet NLIST in order to be a valid standalone list, regardless of the notability of the parent topic.  If this weren't the case, we'd be swarmed with a lot of useless lists like this one that don't really have any benefit to existing beyond the fact there's nothing saying they can't exist.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NLIST and WP:IINFO , per Rorshacma.  There isn't WP:SIGCOV for this as a stand-alone list.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 18:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fancruft that fails NLIST.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete