hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of World Bowl broadcasters: Nominating so User:SpacedFarmer can't -1ctinus📝 🗨 19:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  hahahahaha, I fell asleep in between edits after a day of work and did not think of this.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 22:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] . ..1, 2, 3, 4.. .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here.  Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Also, mostly unsourced per WP:RS .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on additions made post-nomination?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per failing [WP:LISTN]].  I'm not sure what the relister means by additions?  A single source was added since the AfD, and its from IMdB.  Similar to the other college bowls, it's WP:LISTCRUFT , with loads of WP:OR that is just trivia.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adelita Kabuki Ami Tettegah: Fails GNG and NMODEL.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 01:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Ghana .  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 01:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Fancy, I understand my article is being considered for deletion.  Please what can i do to prevent this deletion from happening?  Any suggestions please?  ￼ Adelitattegah24 ( talk ) 02:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello Adelitattegah24, I noticed that the article you created used many Instagram sources.  please note that Wikipedia generally does not consider Instagram as a reliable source.  You may see WP:NOTRELIABLE for more information.  Cheers, -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 13:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Okay. Please is it possible for my article to be retained/published if I update it with more reliable source? Is there a chance for me that way? Adelitattegah24 ( talk ) 14:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello Adelitattegah24, sorry that I am not certain about that. Article deletion depends on the consensus of the community. -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 15:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Adelitattegah24 , yes, finding reliable sources could help retain this article, and you could add a list to this discussion for the community to review.  You can also review the Africa sources list for more information about reliable sources published in and about Africa.  I have not found many sources about her, e.g. [47] , [48] , [49] ; it may be WP:TOOSOON for an article at this time.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 21:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG lack of WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS.  Also note that article creator and main contributor Adelitattegah24 has a name oddly similar to that of the article's subject...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero sources for this assistant superintendent of something...  No indication what the person does to warrant an article and I can't find any sources discussing them.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please the contributor Adelitattegah24 is not the same person.  I did this Article using the same username or email I created for her.  I'm a guy and she is someone I have worked with some years back and so I decided to set up a Wikipedia page/article for her looking at how far she has come with her achievements at her young age.  I only thought it will be better to use same email, username and article name as one.  Thanks.  Adelitattegah24 ( talk ) 17:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Natalia Montiel: From the database sources available, WP:NBAD doesn't seem to be met either as her only 'claim' to notability is a runner up in a tournament at the lowest level of the tour, the 2016 BWF Future Series .  According to BWF , she only ever won one match, which doesn't give me confidence that WP:SIGCOV can be found.  An Argentine source search yields nothing better than what we already have and nor do Google searches.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Argentina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Fails WP:NBAD and WP:GNG.  zoglophie 09:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Galerie Smend: WhinyTheYounger (WtY) ( talk , contribs ) 16:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Germany .  WhinyTheYounger (WtY) ( talk , contribs ) 16:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J. Sivaneswaran: Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 09:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Data is correct only — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vigneswarapandian ( talk • contribs ) 09:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom fails WP:NPOL .  Poor sources with no notable coverage on the subject.  The subject does not seem to warrant a biographical page because of no significant, interesting, or unusual enough coverage to deserve attention or to be recorded.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Mostly all the reference added.  Will add few reference Vigneswarapandian ( talk ) 01:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they didn't win — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one — but the article is referenced entirely to a mixture of run of the mill campaign coverage in the context of his non-winning campaigns and primary sourcing that does not support notability at all, so nothing else here establishes that he has preexisting notability for other reasons besides non-winning candidacies at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 17:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Data is correct and accurate.  All information are true — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40F4:102B:A92B:6591:BAC2:2B96:3244 ( talk ) 10:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Asserting that the article is "correct and accurate" is not sufficient.  The article doesn't just have to be accurate, it also has to be  (a) supported by WP:GNG -worthy referencing that verifies its accuracy, and  (b) meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria .  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nomination and above comments.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 11:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sarah Powell: Google searches of her full name, the title of her best known work, and the title of the single reference for the page all return mirrors of the article and nothing else.  Onorem ( talk ) 21:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Poetry ,  and France .  ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 22:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm sorry that we are so late to the party, Andy Dingley .   ☺  It looks like you were quite right all those years ago.   I've checked Worldcat, Google Books, and the OUP search, and I cannot find any indication that the book cited by the article's author exists.   This appears to be a hoax.  Uncle G ( talk ) 02:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My tea leaves and goat liver are infallible.  Andy Dingley ( talk ) 09:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree that this appears to be a hoax.  Jahaza ( talk ) 03:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Andy Dingley ( talk ) 09:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to be a hoax.  Pam D 14:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to be a hoax.  -- Grnrchst ( talk ) 16:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , appears to be one for the 10+ year list .  Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 20:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Federation of Galaxy Explorers: WhinyTheYounger (WtY) ( talk , contribs ) 02:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and Spaceflight .  WhinyTheYounger (WtY) ( talk , contribs ) 02:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  PROMO.  Gsearch goes straight to their website and social media.  GNews only has hits on Star Trek items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PortClintonRadio.com: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Internet , Websites ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm surprised I didn't end up sending this to AfD or PROD.  Delete as non-notable.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 18:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Even when older (pre-2021) versions of NMEDIA overpresumed notability for licensed broadcast stations, this was never extended to Internet stations, which as far as I know have always been solely judged by GNG and its requirements for significant coverage .  (Note that there actually was a 2019 PROD; it was declined by the creator, in their only edit since 2010. Note also that if deleted, the disambiguation page at WPCR should be reverted to the redirect to WPCR-FM that existed before this article's creation.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : only finding passing mentions for the station.  Does not meet GNG.  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 16:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bert Allum: I searched on newspapers.com for his name as well as "Albert Allum" and "Albie Allum" but no sigcov was found.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 12:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , England ,  and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrea Chianucci: JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Italy .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG as his career hasn't really kicked on.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jenna Merrill: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  Plenty of mentions from her college and international careers but nothing substantial.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Oceania ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG .  All coverage of the subject is WP:ROUTINE .  User:Let'srun 18:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hibriza Nail Hawwa: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 19:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Indonesia .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 19:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Allan Nonymous you may want to tag the article for speedy deletion under category G5 if it is created by a sockpuppet.  It may not need to go through the AfD process in this case.  Otherwise, my vote would be Delete as this is not notable at all.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 20:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed, and added salt because of the habits of the sockpuppeteer in this case.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 20:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment CSD G5 does not apply here.  Page creator was not evading a block when they created this article and later became a sockmaster, not a sockpuppet.  Let the AFD continue and judge the article on its own merits.  L iz Read!  Talk!  20:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and Women .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] : Keep There is no indication that the nominator has done WP:BEFORE before creating a deletion page [16] .  He also lack the ability to understand about Indonesian subject and notability of sources used in the article as he did here in other nomination page that he created [17] [18] .  202.43.93.9 ( talk ) 03:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] — 202.43.93.9 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  — Struck per WP:SOCKSTRIKE Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 20:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find any SIGCOV and she certainly doesn't pass NACTOR.  Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk ) 12:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per Somebodyidkfkdt.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 17:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Precision cut tissue slices: The language is pervasively promotional, despite several editors making changes to tone it down.  I'm not sure there needs to be a dedicated article on this topic, but WP:TNT seems like a good solution.  -- Beland ( talk ) 23:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  Beland ( talk ) 23:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] After further hunting, it appears this topic overview is also covered by Histology#Sample preparation .  -- Beland ( talk ) 00:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per all of the above.  TH1980 ( talk ) 00:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional and far from summary style, per nom.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 07:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Noting that article quality issues are not determining factors in AFD (the promo bits mentioned above).  But a separate article on this topic feels redundant.  X ( talk ) 18:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MCTM Chidambaram Chettyar International IB School: Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abby Cunnane: A mere 5 google news hits,  none are in-depth coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women ,  and New Zealand .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Stuff article is all I find [32] , no book reviews or no listing in the Getty ULAN.  Lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dayawati Modi Academy: Source eval: Comments Source Primary, promo Best School in Meerut | DMA".  Dayawati Modi Academy, Meerut.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Name mention  2. ^ "CBSE Class X results: Many score perfect 10 in Meerut".  The Times of India.  2016-05-28.  ISSN 0971-8257.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Name mentioned in routine news about an academic competion.  Not SIGCOV  3. ^ "दयावती मोदी एकेडमी, मेरठ अव्वल".  Amar Ujala (in Hindi).  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Primary, promo List of Schools in Meerut".  Dayawati Modi Academy, Meerut.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Database record  5. ^ "Best Schools in Meerut 2023 - Govt, Private, Fees & Admissions Process".  Careers360.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Top ten style promo list  6. ^ Dewan, Vidisha (2023-09-07).  "Top 10 Schools in Meerut 2023: CBSE, ICSE, Admission and Fees".  Leverage Edu.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Primary, promo  7. ^ "I_Facilities".  Dayawati Modi Academy, Meerut.  Retrieved 2023-11-13.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth , found database records, routine mill news.  // Timothy :: talk 20:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joel Jacob: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Antigua and Barbuda .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete