Ashok Attri (diplomat): The citations in the article do not appear to pass WP:GNG , and the closest I could find with Google search was this one newspaper article , which looks a bit short and routine.  It is my understanding that diplomats/ambassadors do not auto pass WP:NPOL or WP:ANYBIO .  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 03:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 03:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa , Oman , Denmark , United States of America ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep.  I can't find enough for WP:GNG .  However, I consider this a pass of WP:ANYBIO #2 because he's going to come up in writings about relations of India with Oman, Denmark, Zambia.  And he passes ANYBIO#1 as a recepient of one of Oman's highest civilian honours.  Someone's going to write who all have received that award and there, write something about who he is and what he did to get that award.  Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And he passes ANYBIO#1 as a recepient of one of Oman's highest civilian honours.  Got a citation?  I don't see it in the article.  If Ashok Attri received the Order of Al-Said , I'll withdraw this AFD.  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 06:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Novem Linguae , This is what I found.  I don't think this is that.  That appears to be for heads of states; this appears to be for diplomats.  — Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Novem Linguae .  Ashok received Wisam al-Na'Oman , or The Order of N'Oman per TOI .  This is the highest Omani honor for diplomats, which was started by Sulatn Al Qaboos in 1982.  You may wish to see Honor's description in this book by Guy Stair Sainty and Rafal Heydel-Mankoo from 2006.  World Orders of Knighthood & Merit - Page 1439.  Maliner ( talk ) 07:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Attri has served as India's ambassador to Denmark and Oman and a high-ranking member of its missions in Zambia and the US, and took up his last post c.  2010.  So it's likely that much of the available sources are  a) in Arabic, Danish, Hindi and other Indian languages, and  b) in print newspapers.  A simple Google search isn't going to find any of that up, and as such I don't think this nomination presents adequate grounds for deletion.  Searching just in Danish turns up dozens of sources, especially with regard to the Niels Holck extradition , a diplomatic dispute between Denmark and India in 2011 in which, as the Indian ambassador to Denmark, Attri was obviously a key figure.  [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] This case was also covered in the English press [26] and doubtless even more so in Hindi and Bengali, but I don't have the language skills to search for those.  – Joe ( talk ) 20:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I don't find any significant coverage in Denmark.  How are the above hits about Ashok Attri?  I know from Denmark's neighboring country (Norway) that the only foreign ambassadors who attract media attention about their person are those of the US and Israel.  Having a key role in an "affair" is an argument for merging with said affair.  Receiving orders is common for diplomats.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I didn't say there was significant coverage (there might be, I wasn't really checking).  My point was that offline sources and sources in languages other than English are very likely to exist and that, unless those are checked, we can't properly assess the level of coverage.  I take the fact that five minutes of searching, in a language that I only have limited proficient in, produced eight additional sources as a strong indication that significant coverage is probably out there.  A merge would only be appropriate if Attri had a key role in one event .  Given the he was an ambassador or high-level diplomat to multiple countries over at least two decades, I find that implausible, but you never know.  – Joe ( talk ) 11:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This whole premise gravitates to "there must be sources out there" and "He's bound to be notable in other languages" , both of which do not amount to much.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 18:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The fact that a banned account has created the text is the least of its problems.  There's a breath-taking dearth of source - supported notability .  All the sources proffered above are about the case of activist Niels Holck where our subject is perforce name-dropped in passing, e.g. here , here , here , here , and so on.  We are left with listings such as this irrelevancy , typical announcements by the Ministry of External Affairs, such as this , or, worse, a commercial event which our subject attended.  Truly nothing to prop up even a modicum of specific, individual notability.  Ambassadors and diplomats are not , as such, notable in Wikipedia.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 18:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on the Gnome's assessment.  Ambassadors are not inherently notable and routine coverage does not meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete