hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Abdurrahman Abba SheShe: Sources cited are passing mentions, appointment news, and primary sources, and a search finds nothing better.  Has been back and forth between drafts and main space, and declined several times at AfC, but author insists on publishing.  Fails WP:GNG / WP:NACADEMIC .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 10:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Medicine ,  and Nigeria . DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 10:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment there seems to be mentions of him as a government representative [17] I'm not sure what that changes. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've been trying to find significant coverage in independent sources, but can't see that he meets WP:GNG , and he is not so highly cited as to meet WP:NACADEMIC either. And that's aside from the promotional tone – that can be fixed by editing, but the lack of notability cannot. -- bonadea contributions talk 12:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete - Nothing in this article satisfies general notability because nothing refers to significant coverage by independent sources , and  nothing satisfies any of the conditions for academic notability .   An article should speak for itself .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 01:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a resumé of a WP:ROTM surgeon doing his job.  WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  Fails WP:BIO .   🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Run of the mill surgeon with insufficient coverage to warrant inclusion MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 04:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Choudry Mohammad Sadiq: HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 23:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock [ reply ] Delete Low grade notability, seemingly impossible to verify MNewnham ( talk ) 18:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law , Islam ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't see anything about a lawyer that died in 1975.  Many hits on portions of the name, nothing for this individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just noting that the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet.  In their 3 weeks of activity, they began quite a few AFD discussions.  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b.  Non-notable lawyer.  41.97.58.27 ( talk ) 20:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No GNG.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vongchavalitkul University F.C.: Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 20:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Thailand .  Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 20:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – amateur club without sources...  Svartner ( talk ) 10:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kontakt.io: Has not been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.  Contested draftification.  Jfire ( talk ) 04:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Computing ,  and New York .  Jfire ( talk ) 04:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and strongly consider salting.  Fails the notability guideline for companies – any apparently promising sources turned out to be trivial coverage for organisations .  The creator likely merits a block as an advertising-only account, although they haven't edited in two weeks so it may be a moot point.  – Tera tix ₵ 11:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt.  All coverage is WP:ORGTRIV – can't find anything that shows true notability.  Dan • ✉ 06:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete none of the references meet GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 10:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sabīne Kadirova: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2010 , 2012 , 2013 , etc.) Furthermore, the last two sources are on a Latvian rugby player, which is (probably) not even the same person, meaning there are even fewer sources of the footballer.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 08:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pakitherium: Only used by Malkani.  No secondary sources.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 18:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Indonesia, Abuja: The sources in this merely confirm the ambassador and location.  3 of the 4 sources are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Nigeria ,  and Indonesia .  Kpg jhp jm 06:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable, and I can't see anyway this could be expanded, improved or made to meet nobility.  Nswix ( talk ) 01:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Football Superleague of Kosovo broadcasters: The most fancrufty list to appeal to the most ardent fans.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, the only source does not help to assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Kosovo .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 20:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anastasija Čumika: All I found were passing mentions in match reports and squad lists like 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bill Gilliland: The strongest attempt at a notability claim is that he had a single peak #94 on the charts -- but that's not a high enough chart position to confer an "inherent" notability freebie in the absence of any WP:GNG -worthy sourcing, and while the song itself is a famous one his version was only a 14-years-later cover , not the definitive fame-making version, and simply having covered a song that was previously made famous by somebody else isn't a notability freebie either.  Other than that, however, this is strictly on the level of "Bill Gilliland is a person who existed", and five of the seven footnotes are primary sources and/or WordPress blogs that aren't support for notability at all -- while The Canadian Encyclopedia just briefly namechecks his existence a single time without being about him in any non-trivial sense, and RPM (which I had to search-in-document to actually find, because the footnote links to the entire issue but fails to name what specific article in the issue was being cited) just features him as the speaker making a corporate announcement about a Gordon Lightfoot compilation album, and thus isn't about Bill Gilliland either.  So we're sitting at zero for GNG-worthy coverage, because only two footnotes here are reliable or GNG-eligible sources but he isn't the subject of either of them, and nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment not enough for me to vote keep yet, but there's lasting, significant coverage in this book Mach61 ( talk ) 20:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Radio ,  and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, the fish were biting in this confirmation [58] , rest of Gnewspapers is for various politicians.  Nothing about this person found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 01:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b.  Mach61 ( talk ) 19:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kevin Kandala: JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : According to https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/kevin-kandala-603705/matches this person only played in 2013 and 2014; thus a short career without distinction.  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Now might be a good time for List of Matabeleland Tuskers cricketers to be created, thus providing a decent WP:ATD by redirecting here.  AA ( talk ) 19:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG fail, and with no lists for Zimbabwean cricketers there's no suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough evidence from reliable sources of WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributor892z ( talk • contribs ) 12:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raquel Anderson: A possible redirect target is New Zealand women's national rugby league team .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Rugby league ,  and New Zealand .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I can't find any sigcov.  David Palmer // cloventt ( talk ) 07:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Week keep Some sources to indicate notability, but only just.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Has played at the highest level, having represented New Zealand including at a World Cup.  Paora ( talk ) 12:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Paora : Participation-based criteria for athletes were deprecated in 2022.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It would be helpful to identify which sources establish notability, by current Wikipedia standards, rather than just making a claim.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Literally zero independent sources in the article--everything is from league press releases or directly from a governing body--and even then there's still zero SIGCOV.  A search on PQ (including for Raquel Pitman) returned exclusively namedrops in squad list press releases and a couple trivial mentions in match reports.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find the needed WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mr. Backup Z64: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, and I couldn't find a good WP:ATD .  Boleyn ( talk ) 10:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable obscure unlicensed N64 hardware.  Some of the other unlicensed hardware pages like the CD64 or the DexDrive are also obvious deletion candidates as well.  There's not really a merge candidate for these things other than Homebrew_(video_games)#Nintendo_64 which is more in terms of software.  But then, other than say, the GameShark I'm just not sure anything about random unlicensed hardware really merits encyclopedic status unless it clearly received significant coverage.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not really much to go on about here.  There really aren't that many sources discussing about this hardware (per above), and the reliable sources engine only pulls up this .  TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 04:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edward P. Romaine: The main notability claim here is that he's county executive of a county, but that's not a role that automatically guarantees a Wikipedia article -- it's a role where he would have to pass WP:NPOL #2, which hinges on the quality and depth of his sourcing . But of the five footnotes here, two are just redundant repetitions of two of the three others, so there are really only three sources -- and of those, one is a primary source (the county government's own self-published website about itself) that isn't support for notability at all, one is his "voter information" blurb in the local newspaper's "voter information blurbs about every candidate on the ballot" section, and one is just simple verification that he won the election -- which doesn't add up to enough to satisfy NPOL #2.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and New York .  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources.  It may be that he becomes a notable county executive, but at this point, it's too soon .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 21:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I’d keep him, because there’s a local NBC source that he won the election of that county, but it’s true that it’s to early to tell, but I’m sure that coverage will come to him eventually.  Ivan Milenin ( talk ) 21:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ivan Milenin is the creator of the article.  We don't keep articles about local politicians on the presumption that they may eventually get more coverage than they have right now — if and when he does have enough coverage to pass WP:NPOL #2, then that will be the time that an article about him will become eligible for creation.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I've added additional reliable sources to the article.  Check them out to see whether they're good enough or not.  Ivan Milenin ( talk ) 01:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obviously fails WP:NPOL and coverage about his election victory at the county-level is routine and local.  We don't keep articles in case someone becomes notable one day.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 09:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL , local politician with local coverage.  SportingFlyer T · C 15:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Local or planetary, our subject's coverage in reliable sources is simply inadequate.  Wikipedia has tightened up .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WebFetch: None of the sources in the article establish notability, and I couldn’t find any sources that would establish notability.  This had a failed PROD in 2009 because two sources were added at that time.  However, those sources are either primary or don’t cover the subject in depth.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 18:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Primary sources now in the article, all I can find are download repositories.  Not seeing notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge what can be merged to Web scraping , as I believe this is an instrumentality that enables that activity.  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not have any secondary coverage to meet WP:GNG .  (Merge not recommended as it is a Perl module used to essentially create a feed reader and there's no secondary sources anyways).  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete