Danny "Danno" Williams : If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series) characters#Danny "Danno" Williams .  Spinixster (chat!) 08:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 08:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment No opinion on whether to keep or delete, but the proposed merge target would be inappropriate as Hawaii Five-O (and thus this character) has had two different iterations.  - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 19:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it is the best merge/redirect target as the original Hawaii Five-O series does not have a list of characters page, and either way, the two iterations of the character are pretty much the same.  Spinixster (chat!) 08:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Further to this, there is also a similar Steve McGarrett created in 2007.  If you look at the Hawaii Five-O navbox, they appear to be the only who characters like this.  Chin Ho Kelly is a redirect.  — Maile ( talk ) 00:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge but divide the information between the original series characters and the reboot.  That would be the best solution, IMO.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep , as a redirect can not point to multiple targets, and disambiguation is inappropriate for multiple iterations of a single character, which leaves this as the equivalent of a WP:BROADCONCEPT article on the topic.  BD2412 T 17:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep because we can't redirect for reasons cited above.  Now for the improved sourcing that the article needs.  Mystery Scene magazine feels editorialy.  It's About TV is a direct discussion of the character but the author says they've published just one nonfiction book and we'd have to establish that they're generally considered an expert in the field for this source to be considered reliable.  Heading to Google Scholar: Aha!  [13] [14] Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 21:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mystery Scene source is a brief mention.  Also, it's written by a writer for the show and is more about his experiences working for the show.  It's About TV is a self-published source (check bottom of website) First book source mentions the character in plot summaries, there doesn't seem to be much discussion about the character himself.  Second book source is mostly just plot summaries and comparing him to Steve McGarrett.  There's little to no commentary about the character.  Spinixster (chat!) 02:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, Mystery Scene isn't suitable, and we'd have to establish that the writer of the self-published source is publicly considered an expert, WP:SPS , for it to be suitable for anything other than that writer's opinion.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 19:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep because of the multiple iterations of the character.  A standalone page seems better in my opinion for showing these two.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 06:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm seeing many picking Keep due to the character having multiple iterations, but I want to bring out another option to disambiguate the page at Danny Williams instead.  Something like the Barry Allen page, with both the original, Arrowverse and DC Extended Universe versions of the Flash listed as well as other people named Barry Allen.  Spinixster (chat!) 06:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 11:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus