Islamic fundamentalism in Islamic Republic of Iran: Article is a less-detailed overview of the article Islamic fundamentalism in Iran and confusingly shares a functionally identical title.  Not worth considering merging as the article exclusively cites encyclopedia entries and a couple American conservative media sources, nowhere near as rigorous as the existing article that already covers this topic.  Dan • ✉ 04:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Iran .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 04:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Certainly!  Here's a revised and more formal version of the sentence: Keep .  Islamic fundamentalism in Iran boasts a history spanning centuries.  This article primarily focuses on the period following the 1979 revolution, which led to the establishment of Iran's first Islamic state.  Integrating this with the main article would result in disproportionate emphasis .  The term 'scare word' is unclear; could you elucidate your argument?  The term in the title of article refers to the current government's practice of an Islamic state, its official name is also Islamic Republic .  Should you have any critiques regarding the title, we can explore alternative designations such as 'Fundamentalism in Post-Revolution Iran.'  It is noteworthy that the majority of this article's content is not found in the main article, as it concentrates on the emergence of state-sponsored fundamentalism and its systematic implementation.  Regarding the conservative source to which you allude, could you please specify?  The sources utilized are balanced, including esteemed historical references such as Britannica. " I'm also expanding the article. The work hasn't finished yet. 3000MAX ( talk ) 18:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see you were trying to make an article only covering post-Revolutionary Iran and I apologize for thinking the title was a use of non-neutral language. However, it should be noted that the already-existing article is already almost entirely about post-Revolution Iran. The lead of the main article immediately discusses how "Islamic fundamentalism" in the country is primarily connected with Khomeini, and only discusses pre-Revolution Iran in the "History" section. I'll refrain from using the term "main article" to refer to Islamic fundamentalism in Iran as I do see now that the two articles discuss completely different topics despite the similar names. The older article is about the religious intellectual movement, and discusses theology and the political relationship between the clergy and the state. This new article is primarily listing certain actions of the state that it justifies via Islam. This shows a deeper issue: this article doesn't really discuss Islamic fundamentalism at all. Islamic fundamentalism is a theological doctrine and should be discussed in an article on theological movements (as it is in Islamic fundamentalism in Iran ) and isn't really an applicable term for discussing state media censorship. Notably, none of the sources cited in this article use the term "fundamentalism" anywhere (besides of course the referenced Britannica definition of the term). Since none of the sources cited discuss the actions of the state as "Islamic fundamentalism" it seems this article is almost entirely synthesis trying to connect conservative policies to Islam, rather than just a content fork. Some of the connections to Islam fail to even appear to materialize in the prose: for instance, These ministries regulate university curricula, faculty appointments, and student admissions, ensuring alignment with Islamic values is vague and doesn't explain what part of the education might be Islamic. Enforcement of Persian-language studies has no connection to Islam, which is a famously Arabic-focused religion, and is more in line with discussion of Iranian nationalism . Also on sources: I took issue with citing to The Washington Institute for Near East Policy , which as a political think tank is non-neutral in discussion of Iran. [51] [52] [53] The Guardian article cited fails verification – there's nothing about ethnolinguistic minorities in that article. Dan • ✉ 05:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Merge it into Islamic fundamentalism in Iran , seems like a completely unnecessary fork, not sure how it would falter with WP:BALANCE as the creator of the page mentioned. Noorullah ( talk ) 05:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding comment: The content shouldn't differ as Dan was mentioning earlier between both pages, they should go over the same topic, meaning the Islamic fundamentalism in Iran does generally need a cleanup as well.. Noorullah ( talk ) 05:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 03:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Redundancy of title.  "Islamic fundamentalism in Islamic Republic of Iran".   What other kind of fundamentalism could there be in Iran, except Islamic?  — Maile ( talk ) 04:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per WP:FORK .  Bearian ( talk ) 12:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge