Museum Ethnographers Group: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions .  S0091 ( talk ) 15:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep sourcing isn't great, but [43] , while a podcast, is a reliable podcast published by the American Anthropologist that provides non-trivial coverage of the group.   There isn't a lot else out there that counts toward WP:N (lots of passing mentions though) but my searching finds that this is a long established group that meets regularly and publishes meaningful (reasonably well cited) work by experts in the field.   If we had a WP:NJOURNALS that had consensus, this is the kind of thing I'd want it including.  Hobit ( talk ) 13:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Fails GNG and ORG.  I found some passing mentions in news items [44] but there is not enough coverage that indicates this organization merits inclusion on Wikipedia.  And sorry to say - this is not an academic journal.  It is an organization that is involved in scholarly work.  Just because they produce an academic journal doesn't make this organization worthy of inclusion.  --- Steve Quinn ( talk ) 02:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft keep .  The American Anthropologist podcast's nontrivial coverage gives me pause, and some GoogleScholar sifting is suggestive of coverage, after filtering out the name of its journal from results.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by P-Makoto ( talk • contribs ) 06:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, P-Makoto , what is "soft keep"?  We have policies on "soft delete" but I'm not familiar with a soft keep.  L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz : I think I must've mixed up my words and probably meant to write "weak keep".  P-Makoto (she/her) ( talk ) 01:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I get it.  At this point, I think I've reviewed and closed hundreds of AFD discussions and I've seen "Soft Keep" about a dozen times and I always meant to ask about it.  I thought there might have been a line in a policy page I had forgotten.  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus