hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Peter Lawrence (author): His name makes it difficult to search for him, but I have carried out WP:BEFORE using his name plus "Geale" (alternative name given in article), the names of his books and the name of his collaborator.  I can't find any sources to support the article.  I therefore don't think he meets WP:NWRITER , WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO .  (Included in deletion sorting lists for Colombia because the article says he lives there, and for the UK because I think he is British, or at least went to university in the UK.)  Tacyarg ( talk ) 20:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding that the article was PRODed and deproded in June this year.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 20:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Television , Comics and animation , United Kingdom ,  and Colombia .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 20:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Probable self-promo.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 00:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , zero sources listed.  Fails WP:BASIC .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 18:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't find coverage that convinces me that the article meets any of our standards of notability .  I do find some non- reliable sources that could point towards something though, so I am willing to reconsider if someone could find some references to back those up.  Jacona ( talk ) 00:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
375 Hudson Street: Has been in CAT:NN for over 2 years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Geography ,  and New York .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leonardo Proverbio: Zero SIGCOV.   Won ski mountaineering competition (which is in itself a niche sport).   Part of a series of BLPs that a blocked sock created around the ski mountaineering championship (maybe to promote it) decades ago; very little notability and can't see this lasting long term on Wikipedia.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 19:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 19:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with the caveat that there might be non-eng sources I couldn't comb through effectively, only found "this guy exists"-type incidental sourcing, nothing for SIGCOV.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 16:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
POP Telecom: As always, every company on earth is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it exists, and has to earn passage by virtue of having reliable source coverage about it in sources independent of itself.  But existence is the only notability claim on offer here, and there are no reliable sources being cited to support it at all -- and while it was recently stubbed down from a longer version, that was semi-advertorialized, still made no stronger claim of notability, and was referenced solely to a routine business directory that isn't a WP:GNG -worthy source.  Nothing here, either in the current version of the article or in any past diff that I've viewed in the edit history, is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have proper referencing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and United Kingdom .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khadisha Debesette: The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this match report, which provides a few sentences of coverage on the subject after scoring a hat-trick , as well as these short pieces , which acknowledge the subject winning minor college awards at the NCAA Division II level.  Otherwise it's all passing mentions, whether from her international ( 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2018 , 2019 ), college ( 2015 , 2016 , 2017 ), or club ( 2023 ) careers.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Trinidad and Tobago .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 18:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Explosions in Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War: Its scope is way too large.  We cannot cover all the explosions that have taken place in Ukraine because of the war.  Such a list would never even be comprehensive because it is clear not 100% of all explosions have been reported or covered by public sources, much less by reliable outlets that Wikipedia requires for adding information here.  I also wonder what could be the benefit of having such an article.  Has anybody here ever thought we should have an article on Explosions during World War II ?  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 10:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Russia and Ukraine .  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 10:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, article is inappropriate, possibly open to bias, and inherently incomplete as noted.  Though * Air raid warnings in Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War and * Buildings damaged in Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War would form a neat series.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 10:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Terrorism .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this scope requires trawling frequently badly-sourced reports to fill a subcategory of no clear benefit.  Bloody peculiar scope too - apparently if a Russian tank met a mine that wouldn't be eligible for inclusion...?  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 06:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Explosions happen, it's war.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 09:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siobhan McColl: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and South Africa .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  02:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There isn't any credible source to meet WP:GNG .  The gross lacking in WP:SIGCOV made it difficult in popping any result for WP:RS .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  19:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This subject lacks the necessary WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG as a BLP.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Swarna Pandey: yvanyblog (talk) 08:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Yvanyblog I believe this article should not be deleted but contributed to...  So instead of deleting it let's add information about it Bukashamba ( talk ) 08:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify at once , this is a totally unsourced biographical article about a child, so it can't stay in main-space.  Bukashamba , there is nothing wrong with developing an article in draft space, but sourcing is absolutely mandatory .  Elemimele ( talk ) 12:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This also exists as Draft:Swarna Pandey , so there is no reason to keep the article.  David notMD ( talk ) 14:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ray B. Oladapo-Johnson: Pepper Beast (talk) 14:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 14:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is the only "new" sourcing I can find, that's been published since the last AfD.  [9] , [10] .  Same photo, similar prose, but with different by-lines; appears to have been written from a press-release.  I don't consider it much more extensive that what was found last time in the 2020 AfD.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment , Nigeria ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lack of sufficient sources to show notability.  Mevoelo 12:50, 02 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eat This Much: The CNN article seems borderline, but I could not find anything else meeting even that standard.  Broader topic of "meal planning service" might satisfy NLIST though, in which case it may be possible to mention and redirect it there in the future.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Technology ,  and Websites .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Okmrman ( talk ) 04:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The Washington Post, CNN, and Lifehacker sources should lift this over the bar for GNG and NCORP (which applies here; it seems like the product is synonymous with the company).  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 18:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As I understand it, Lifehacker was not considered reliable back when it was owned by Gawker, which it was back in 2013, which is what the review is dated as, Dclemens1971 .  It has changed ownership twice since then though, so it might be worth bumping it up to RSN for future articles.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My bad on Lifehacker.  And on second look, the CNN source is from "CNN Underscored," which says: "Content is created by CNN Underscored’s team of editors who work independently from the CNN newsroom."  No RSN discussions but it does appear to be a promotional platform of questionable independence and reliability.  That leaves just WaPo, which is not "multiple," so I'll switch my ! vote to delete .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 14:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : A meal planning app does meet WP:WEB (apps and technology).  Following the sources which is applicable to GNG, I have no doubt that there WP:NEXIST and is WP:SUSTAINED too.  Having this clearly is a strong move to WP:NCORP .  If the CNN were there and it's reliable, WP:N & WP:RS .  It does need sourcing.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure what you mean by citing WP:NEXIST , SafariScribe are you implying I should have looked some specific places for my BEFORE that I may have missed?  The Yahoo Finance article is from Market Wired, it's a press release.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Give me time to analyse the article.  I am not at home and will see it off when I reach home.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  16:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Not much for notability here.  Orientls ( talk ) 17:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Dunderdale: Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Also I don't see any claim of significance in the article, probably we can just speedy delete it under WP:A7 .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 08:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 22:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Amateur footballer with absolutely no indication of notability.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Could not find significant coverage of the subject.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt – The only source of the article is the Claremont Football Club Facebook page... sincerely Svartner ( talk ) 17:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Clear GNG failure.  I'm shocked that this was created by an experienced editor and that the PROD was removed.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Houghton International: Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and United Kingdom .  Pepper Beast (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NCORP.  Sources found are mill business news, nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 08:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – sources seem to be based solely on press releases, not fully WP:INDEPENDENT .  TLA (talk) 06:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:PROMO .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Results of the 1997 Canadian federal election: The page needs to be deleted and redone from scratch.  Wellington Bay ( talk ) 18:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  It looks like somebody tried to get the 1997 election done by copy-pasting 2000 and then starting to make manual changes to it, but then never finished the job — so as it stands right now, this is just an entirely inaccurate article.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation if somebody wants to actually redo it properly, but wrong information is actually worse than no article at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom unless it's HEYed - this is a TNT nom, there's no reason this can't be a perfectly valid article.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghandour Cosmetics Limited (cosmetics company): Abandoned draft: [29] .  KH-1 ( talk ) 02:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ghana .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  In plain English, this means that references cannot rely *only* on information provided by the company - such as articles that rely entirely on quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews, website information, etc - even when slightly modified.  Here, none of the references meet the criteria and I'm unable to locate any that does.  HighKing ++ 13:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The closest source I found not already in the article is an article about the appointment of a brand ambassador, and that simply does not qualify.  Also, I can't see where ref 9 (le Faso) mentions the article subject?  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 04:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tabernacle (software): It's WP:TOOSOON Lordofhunter ( talk ) 12:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Software .  Lordofhunter ( talk ) 12:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom with heavy emphasis on WP:TOOSOON .  Last1in ( talk ) 12:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most sources I find are PR; one in the Mockchung Times, an unclear RS.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  The article seems to be about both the software and company, and while the software coverage is borderline based on perception of RS and SIGCOV, it's clear that NCORP is not met.  — siro χ o 22:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete