hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Matt Hunt (journalist): Except for nigeriasportsnews.com, which appears to be a puff piece, none of the sources refbombed in the article are actually about the subject—only tangential mentions from issues he has been involved in.  Paul_012 ( talk ) 09:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Journalism ,  and Thailand .  Paul_012 ( talk ) 09:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pinging Jamiebuba , who recently accepted the draft at AfC.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 09:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Environment , Internet , California , Florida ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He is notable as a journalist.  Several coverage from BBC and also a host of a show on BBC as well.  Subject is a main personality on a notable international station.  Be ica verra verra ]] talk 02:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC) – Note: User has been blocked for undisclosed paid editing.  [ reply ] Please provide a valid, policy-based reason when commenting at AfDs.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 09:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , his cause/work may be notable but notability isn't inherited.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 01:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 19:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The controversy section isn't terribly notable, rest of the sourcing is simple confirmation of employment.  I don't find sources we'd use to build an article.  Sadly as a free-lancer, there likely will not be much critical notice of their work; this assumes no awards such as a Pulitzer or an Emmy.  I don't find any sort of confirmation of awards won.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Ghana, Kinshasa: LibStar ( talk ) 01:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Democratic Republic of the Congo ,  and Ghana .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Lord Roem ~ ( talk ) 01:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This is very badly sourced, and articles about the physical embassies are rarely a good idea.  Democratic Republic of the Congo–Ghana relations would seem like an interesting topic, but it does not exist due to WP:BIAS .  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kennedy Ekezie: The article mainly relies on a limited number of sources, some of which may not be considered reliable or independent.  Edit.pdf ( talk ) 11:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete PROMO for another "entrepreneur" which means anything and everything these days.  CEO of a company that doesn't warrant an article isn't notable.  The award seems trivial, but I can't comment how notable it is. I don't find sources beyond puffy things that confirm the person exists.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promo BLP, borderline G11, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article is are promo, and BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 06:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chennai Pallavaram Corporation: It was a proposed City Municipal Corporation, a form of local government for cities in Tamil Nadu, India .  Additionally, the information on the proposal is scarcely available, often based on unofficial comments.  The proposal was abandoned on 3 November 2021, when the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation was established, annexing Pallavaram and other areas "proposed" for Pallavaram City Municipal Corporation.  I do not think it merits a merger with the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation as most of the information about the proposal is unofficial comments.  Wiki6995 ( talk ) 03:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] State Government had announced forming three municipal corporations in Chennai Metropolitan Area adjacent to Chennai Corporation Limits.  There were progress in Formation of Pallavaram Corporation and later decided to fuse into single corporation under Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.  All the sufficient references have been specified while creating and contributing to article.  The article itself having the conclusion that the proposal came to end by fusing areas into Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.  The article can be retained for reference as it was a past proposal but it can be marked as defunct/dropped in title.  DonGamerz1 ( talk ) 13:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zenarmor: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it does seem promotional and fail WP:NCORP .  Haven't found secondary coverage.  DFlhb ( talk ) 13:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Constantin Pigla: Created on 12 November 2013 JoeNMLC ( talk ) 21:46, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cameroon-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This was the only source I could find about him when I searched his name and then clicked on the news tab.  Fails WP:GNG .  Tarantula TM ( speak with me ) ( my legacy ) 18:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hunter Scott: The first sentence of the article is "Hunter Scott is best known for the research he did on the sinking of USS Indianapolis as a sixth-grade student."  I would go so far to say that he is only known for this accomplishment.  As such, this is a BLP1E and the article should be deleted.  He has not done any academic work since so no further historical work, so does not meet the criteria for academics .  In an effort to add information so the article focuses on more facts , it also mentions he is a naval aviator.  However, it provides no context to presume that his naval aviation career would meet GNG.  An incredibly accomplished individual, nevertheless Wikipedia's policies indicate, in my opinion, there should not be an article on the subject.  Mpen320 ( talk ) 20:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Mpen320 ( talk ) 20:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Mpen320 ( talk ) 20:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - classic WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTINHERITED .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Kuwait, Warsaw: The notability standard for buildings is WP:NBUILDING , which essentially requires a WP:GNG pass with significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.  None of the sources present in the article are independent as they are all Polish government sources.  A WP:BEFORE search for additional sources turned up only brief mentions in the official Kuwaiti state media such as this one and this one .  There is no Polish-Kuwaiti relations page to merge to, nor is there likely to be anything that could sustain the notability of such a page.  FOARP ( talk ) 17:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Bilateral relations , Kuwait ,  and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 17:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Does not appear on the list of heritage-listed buildings in Warsaw .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khvodrowgan: Abadi are not notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Detelin Cheneshkov: According to the one source cited, he played 6 games at professional level but that alone isn't enough for notability, which requires WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG .  Best Bulgarian sources found were Gong , a single passing mention, Borba , a match report mentioning him as a goalscorer, Darik News , a trivial mention, and Blitz , another trivial mention.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nomination.  -- Nk ( talk ) 06:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kate Kallot: Dubious notabilty.  Refs are profiles, PR from company and x of y scope_creep Talk 16:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I watched the page and felt the same way as the nominator.  I didn't AfD the page, but once it's here, I think the person is not yet notable enough, nor is the sourcing good enough to establish notability.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 10:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gerrit van Wyk: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Portuguese in Albania: Despite quite a lot of fancy window dressing, a Wikipedia article dedicated to the lives of eight worthy people is something I think we should consider as worthy of deletion as it contains virtually no salient content.  Just, just possibly a redirect to Albania-Portugal relations ?  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albania and Portugal .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there's no indication that this tiny group of people meets WP:GNG .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 07:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It's unfortunate because this is a well-written article with sources, but unless the 8 Portuguese Albanians are notable as a group (which I somehow doubt), the article is a bunch of figures tied together by WP:OR .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Herminigildo Ranera: I am aware I may be missing something in Tagalog sources.  Last AfD had very low participation, so no consensus.  As this has been waiting in CAT:NN for 14 years, I really hope we can now get a discussion going.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Bands and musicians ,  and Philippines .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This person seems to be male.  I did see several hits at Google News (all in English; if you can't find English sources, you won't find non-English ones, at least on the internet), but mostly focused on the Philippine Philharmonic Orchestra (imagine John Lennon, but most sources talk about the Beatles).  I don't know if it would be enough, as some sources call him " Maestro ".  Howard the Duck ( talk ) 20:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] wait...I voted keep for this the last time and so did Ian Lopez, but apparently the other AfD was closed as "no consensus"?  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 11:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tito Pao , Probably lack of quorum . Rfd's can be closed comfortably with at least two votes but Afd is supposed to have a wider audience. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 22:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I tried to look at the News archives for articles but most of the info that I found are shows for orchestras that he was conducting for rather than about him as a person/musician.  Maestro just means he's a conductor.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find any significant coverage.  Other editors have had 14 years to do so.  At this point, absent any evidence to the contrary, it seems fair to assume there aren't any.  Jfire ( talk ) 03:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Being conductor of the Philippine Philharmonic Orchestra, along with other high profile accomplishments, sounds notable.  Agree that lack of RS is a problem.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Source in article is a name mention in a list, and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Ping me if sources are found.  // Timothy :: talk 18:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paola Goyco: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Puerto Rico .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 06:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zettagrid: References fail WP:ORGCRIT and I find nothing else in a BEFORE search to fix it.  While not a reason for AfD, page is spam and created  and edited by same SPA editor along with ZettaNet which has been prodded.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 03:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Australia .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 03:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete and salt the earth as we used to say...  Andre 🚐 03:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All cited sources are primary publications, trivial mentions or routine coverages.  Did not found suitable sources to prove the subject's notability.  The account that created the article is pretty much dedicated to the article, pretty likely to be WP:PROMO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 20:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Goddy Nnadi: Available coverages are press releases.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete