Mokradła, West Pomeranian Voivodeship: The listing on the Polish regulation for place-names is for a "settlement" ( osada ), which are not strictly required to be inhabited to receive this status.  This is not a previously-inhabited locality that is now uninhabited as these are given a separate designation under Polish law ("miejscowość niezamieszkana").  Fails WP:GEOLAND as there is no clear evidence of inhabitation and good reason to believe it uninhabited, and as the status the place has is not that of an necessarily-inhabited place (i.e., it is not a village or town).  Fails WP:GNG as there is no other sourcing.  As for ATDs, there is no reliably-sourced information here to merge about this location - it is simply a location.  Redirection makes little sense as it would simply land the reader on a page with no information about Mokradła, since there is nothing to say about it.  FOARP ( talk ) 15:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] wikt:zamieszkany is in the definition, so presumably it was formerly inhabited; the place name register says there are no buildings.  "miejscowość niezamieszkana" seems to be a place with no permanent residents.  Peter James ( talk ) 22:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Peter, many of these locations appear to be statistical artefacts.  Particularly, it seems many/most Polish forestry offices and state farms, amongst other entities, were added as locations to the register, and remained on it even after being shut down or sold off.  At the very least given other errors (eg the non-existent Zielony Gaj) there is plentiful reason to doubt this place was ever anything notable.  FOARP ( talk ) 06:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://zamkilubuskie.pl/mokradla-vw-brenkenhofsbrink/ mentions a German name for the place and says it was only a farm.  Peter James ( talk ) 20:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  TERYT confirms it exists and is classified as a hamlet (osada).  That may be enough to make it notable.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The link you just posted takes us to the search-page, not to any results.  It obviously does not exist at present, since there is nothing at the location the article tells us it's at.  A hamlet would be przysiółek .  In English a "hamlet" requires more than just one building, and this corresponds also to the definition of a przysiółek which requires a cluster of farms (i.e., not just one or no buildings).  FOARP ( talk ) 08:06, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If the only source is a database a redirect to Gmina Świerzno probably makes more sense than a keep.   Though is a case like this I don't feel strongly between delete and redirect.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with the nominator that no evidence has been presented that this is, or has been, a settlement at any point.  At most it may be, or have been, a patch of farmland, but are inclusionary stance on settlements does not extend to farms.  Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete