Bahari Ibaadat: References given are not reliable and there is also the WP:REFBOMB - Rich T | C | E-Mail 02:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women .  - Rich T | C | E-Mail 02:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I just pruned the majority of the article as unverifiable or non-neutral.  Haven't checked into notability.  — siro χ o 04:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Generally best not to do that while the article is at AfD, so that participants can get a better idea of the subject's notability (or lack of it).  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 13:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's why I noted it here, but to be clear I haven't removed anything that established notability.  — siro χ o 22:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 13:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Beauty pageants , Afghanistan ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Miss Afghanistan as WP:ATD .  That article is currently a WP:SETINDEX (a type of list), and as such only requires verifiability to include, I've added a reference for such.  (I checked notability and was unable to find sources to establish it).  — siro χ o 07:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, I don't think a Redirect to Miss Afghanistan is a good closure decision as it is just a disambiguation page that contains this article on it.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz , I'm not an expert on the topic, but the page at that title claims to be a WP:set index which is not intended to be a type of disambiguation.  This does not appear to have been an annual competition like some, so it may very well be a complete set index, but I'm not sure.  — siro χ o 03:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability.  Fails to meet criteria of WP:GNG .  Not enough sources to confirm intrinsic value of an article.  Villon411 ( talk ) 12:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - couldn't find much in the way of WP:RS .  The CNN source [15] looked promising until I realized that it was part iReport initiative, which is user generated and not verified by the company.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KH-1 ( talk • contribs ) 07:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom Worldiswide ( talk ) 03:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete