hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Makayla Rudder: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches was coverage from non-independent sources or passing mentions, such as those already present in the article.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Canada , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers .  Not notable enough.  killer bee 09:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jin In-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do we know his Korean name?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Football at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads#North Korea .  Giant Snowman 19:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – As done in others similars AfD.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Govvy ( talk ) 07:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Melshi: His apparent impact is inflated by the listing of book and comic adaptations of Rogue One.  This character does not warrant its own article, and I think it would be wise to delete this article; any relevant in-universe information can be added back to List of Star Wars characters , where it broke off from as a WP:BADFORK .  TNstingray ( talk ) 15:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Minor character of a spinoff film with what seems to be no actual cultural impact.  Should be added back to the List of Star Wars Characters (which itself is a bit of a mess), with most of the information present being left to something like the Star Wars "Wookiepedia" to handle.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 17:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Star Wars characters#Ruescott Melshi and restore the entry there.  Notable character, but not ready for a standalone article. — TAnthony Talk 22:03, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Does not have enough WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 04:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Green Light (Valery Leontiev song): Option: redirect to Valery Leontiev. -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk ) 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 22:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Valery Leontiev , couldn't find sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 17:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : or redirect, not notable enough and not enough coverage for a separate article InDimensional ( talk ) 11:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Karla Šabašov: The subject has earned at least seven caps for the aforementioned national team.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Croatia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cyanimide: – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 21:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The simplest compound of that type, according to the article , would be the dimethyl derivative but Chemspider calls this dimethylcyan a mide, which I agree with.  Chemspider has no hit for "cyanimide", although that's not definitive.  Pubchem gives just one hit for "cyanimide", which is a synonym for N-cyanoformamide.  The only reference previously in the article only contains the term "cyan o imide".  I conclude that there is no such set of compounds as cyanimides.  Mike Turnbull ( talk ) 22:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 21:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with what Mike Turnbull says.  However, I might be persuaded to change my mind if anyone can come up with some sources to indicate that this term is used in practice.  Web of Science yields about 17 references, most of them old or very old, but there is one recent one from a respected journal: J. Amer.  Chem.  Soc.  , 142 (39) 16825–16841 (2020) Athel cb ( talk ) 10:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That doi:10.1021/jacs.0c07726 (open access) looks like a wonderful example of citeogenesis to me.  They repeatedly use cyan i mide in their text but the citation #27, for example, uses cyan a mide in its title.  By 2020, the Wikipedia article created in 2005 would be the top search engine hit for cyan i mide!  Mike Turnbull ( talk ) 11:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A Google ngram confirms that cyanamide is overwhelmingly more common than cyanimide.  Mike Turnbull ( talk ) 12:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Then rather than deleting, wouldn't it better to redirect this title to cyanamide ?  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 16:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK, provided {{ R from misspelling }} is used and the hatnote at cyanamide is removed.  The Wiktionary term (see below) is IMO also a misspelling.  Mike Turnbull ( talk ) 14:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cyanamide .  It seems cyan a mide is the simplest form of cyan i mide, where both R groups are a single hydrogen atom, so the two terms aren't identical, even if they are used interchangeably by some sources.  Either way, what we have here right now is nothing more than a DICDEF, which already exists on Wiktionary .  Owen× ☎ 22:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cyanamide as most uses in literature appear to be a mistake for this.  The possible meaning as >C=NC≡N is only in one reference.  I think we need to kill off the Wiktionary entry as well.  Graeme Bartlett ( talk ) 20:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Original meaning: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , to originalism .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 09:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Originalism : No references present to meet the WP:N .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
M5 (Warsaw): This should be a redirect to Warsaw Metro until there is something more substantial to say.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 17:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Poland .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 17:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - probably a case of WP:TOOSOON , as with M4 (Warsaw) .  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 18:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Warsaw Metro : until the line achieves independent notability.  Owen× ☎ 19:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as WP:TOOSOON .  S5A-0043 Talk 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per TOOSOON.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect per nom and others.  Andre 🚐 06:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above per WP:TOOSOON .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 14:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  A solid case could be made for delete (way out, dabbed title, just created) and redirect (ATD, CHEAP).  So how to decide?  Well, nominator suggested a redirect.  ATDs in nominations are appreciated and encouraged.  So respecting the intro and nom with a tie-breaker seems a fair choice! gidonb ( talk ) 22:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cornell Media Guild, Inc.: Fails WP:NORG .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Radio , Companies ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to WVBR-FM : any notability that could be theoretically associated with this company is probably associated with its radio station, and not any subsequent additional ventures.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disclosure: I'm an alumnus of this group, but I disagree with this point.  Electric Buffalo Records (the student run record label under CMG) is building a track record of signing artists with a real following, best exemplified by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Russell_(musician) , who got his start with Electric Buffalo Records (cited here: https://cornellsun.com/2017/05/07/the-unconventional-and-honest-music-of-paul-russell/ ).  I believe this, plus @ NiftyyyNofteeeee 's points below, contribute to the CMG's notability enough to merit its own page.  2.31.28.5 ( talk ) 12:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the suggested target, as a WP:ATD .  No independent notability for this subject to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I disagree because CMG is not just WVBR, it is a company containing also another radio station and record label.  The company has a lot of historical relevance at Cornell and in Ithaca, NY Dalvago ( talk ) 15:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mild Keep : The page may be kept, per significant and historically rich component of student life at Cornell University.  Additionally, the CMG's legacy, dating back to 1935, is kind of impressive.  References to newspapers or books from that era could help and contribute to its notability, which I believe can be verified.  NiftyyyNofteeeee ( talk ) 13:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] thank you 🥺🥺 Dannycool3000 ( talk ) 15:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to WVBR-FM , its sole property.  Fails WP:NCORP .  It sort of acts as an extension of the station.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 01:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2014–15 Peterborough Phantoms season: No notable content, so no need to salvage information.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 16:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Ice hockey .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 16:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (a summary) to a higher level article.  I agree there isn't a need for a standalone article, but straight deletion will not benefit readers.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 17:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please specify a Merge target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Peterborough Phantoms , per much the same rationale as given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Invicta Dynamos season , and per indication there that the club article is an acceptable target, at least for the interim.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 10:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023–24 Ranji Trophy Group C: Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and India .  Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per the nom.  No need for a separate article.  Newshunter12 ( talk ) 22:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Björn Ottenheim: It seems that most coverage of the subject is in the context of zZz , a redirect to which would make sense as an alternative to deletion.  toweli ( talk ) 17:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Netherlands .  toweli ( talk ) 17:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to zZz per nominator, no context, unjustified SPINOFF, ATD, and CHEAP.  It's really a no-brainer.  gidonb ( talk ) Redirect or Delete - not notable to me, just an article of three lines with little or no detailed information about the subject.  Also, there are no references to establish notability.  Mevoelo ( talk ) Hi @toweli - this is lostscot - the creator of the original article.
 Sorry I am new to this.
 I think you are probably right that this page on Bjorn Ottenheim should be deleted and/or merged with the page on zZz.
 I believe the page on zZz is relevant and should not be deleted.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
My Ordinary Life (song): Source 1 and 2 are certifications (which don't automatically make a song notable), 3 and 4 are passing mentions that fail significant coverage , 5 is unreliable per WP:WHOSAMPLED , and 6 is a primary source (exclusively an interview) that only mentions the song once.  All material worth keeping for this article is already included in the article for the band itself .  λ Negative MP1 06:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  λ Negative MP1 06:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Living Tombstone : WP:ATD , unable to find in-depth sources to pass WP:NSONGS (though personally I feel certifications should be a decent mark of notability).  PantheonRadiance ( talk ) 22:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WTNG-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Yep, there is nothing here to show this LPTV meets WP:GNG .  Merely that the station exists does not correlate to it being notable.  User:Let'srun 20:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in North Carolina Only thing they have notability for is packing fifteen subchannels onto one signal; that's (cursed) alchemy of some kind.  It'll still be the same thing when Newsnet takes over.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Back station: Literally just a post along the tracks with no significant coverage to establish notability.  – dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  – dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:49, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train as WP:ATD Jumpytoo Talk 04:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Like other flag stop stations that are today only a signpost, this was probably a staffed building 90 years ago in an era when more people were needed to run a railway.  I can't easily confirm this, but I suspect that this is a case of "Once notable, always notable".  Even if the present-day appearance is unimpressive, it probably was once notable.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - please see the very lengthy station-by-station analysis of stations on this line that I posted previously at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Silcox station .  I spent hours researching this line.  This location is a signpost in the middle of deep boreal forest and bogs.  It’s many kilometers from any settlement.  It serves the occasional canoeist or trapper.  Look at it on satellite imagery and you can see there was never anything there.  — A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 13:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect