hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Al-Ahli Club (Dubai) (beach soccer): Boleyn ( talk ) 17:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and United Arab Emirates .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Football .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Shabab Al Ahli Club – Information about the beach soccer sector is interesting, but does not have enough scope for a dedicated article.  Svartner ( talk ) 21:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not mentioned at parent article Shabab Al Ahli Club .  Giant Snowman 13:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shabab Al Ahli Club despite the unlikely title to preserve cat so it remains under Category:Beach soccer clubs .  I have added mention to parent article.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 04:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Henry Beresford, 9th Marquess of Waterford: Marquesses are not inherently notable ( also see AfD precedents ), and this particular one never sat in the House of Lords, so WP:NPOL doesn't apply here either.  My personal source assessment follows: Source assessment table: prepared by User:Pilaz Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  Patrick Freyne (2 May 2015).  " Oh lord: next generation takes the keys to Waterford county ".  Irishtimes.com.  Retrieved 30 March 2016.  ~ WP:INTERVIEW ~ Partial " Henry Nicholas de la Poer Beresford, 9th marquess of Waterford , * 1958".  Geneall.net.  Retrieved 30 March 2016.  WP:UGS ✘ No " About ".  Le Poer Polo.  19 August 1987.  Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.  Retrieved 30 March 2016.  ✘ No https://www.thephoenix.ie/article/earl-of-tyrones-tipple-richard-beresford/ seems to only have a short snippet about the subject of the article, since the article appears to focus on his son ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Pilaz ( talk ) 19:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility , Ireland ,  and United Kingdom .  Pilaz ( talk ) 19:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I, too, could find nothing other than the Irish Times interview that amounted to significant coverage .  I also searched for his Polo career under Henry Beresford but didn't find significant coverage from reliable independent sources .  Fiachra10003 ( talk ) 16:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WP:ATD to Marquess of Waterford .  Ingratis ( talk ) 10:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Seems a low profile geezer by all account.  Found a rather niche interview with him about insurance for hunting: https://www.theirishfield.ie/hunting-insurance-separating-fact-from-fiction-725065 The article states he is Chairman of the Irish Masters of Foxhounds Association.  Here's note of his appointment https://www.theirishfield.ie/news-lord-waterford-appointed-imfha-chairman-674910 Reticent to vote delete and break the chain of articles for holders of this title — feels like I'm wielding an axe.  Number of article page views indicates there is readership and interest.  At least have a redirect to Marquess of Waterford .  Rupples ( talk ) 02:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.   The sourcing is sufficient for coverage in a summary article about holders of the title.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 07:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Southwestern Conference (Illinois): All references are not independent , so fails the general and organization-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Schools , Sports , United States of America ,  and Illinois .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Illinois High School Association member conferences : Agree with the nom rationale regarding this subject being non-notable.  This is another high-school athletic conference with a lack of WP:GNG coverage.  Mentions in local newspapers or television stations are routine and don't equate to notability.  A redirect to the overall association under which this conference operates seems like a fine WP:ATD .  19:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Let'srun ( talk ) 02:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KHCF: All I could find were radio listings and brief mentions.  TWOrantula TM ( enter the web ) 01:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 01:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; unable to find any in-depth secondary coverage about this radio station.  Left guide ( talk ) 02:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in California : this alternative to deletion as a {{ R to list entry }} is probably the best that can be done for such a relatively new station with no significant coverage to speak of.  This stub is definitely the product of the looser "notability standards" in this topic area prior to about 2021.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Boombox (Sirius): Perhaps redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels.  ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels , where it is mentioned; this is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable Sirius XM channels (if not associated with another notable parent entity).  There certainly have been a lot of these… (Even in the old days when NRADIO was given more "authority" than it actually had and overpresumed notability for, for instance, many broadcast stations, it still

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zvinoda Kutendwa: Onel 5969 TT me 10:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Zimbabwe .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] For what it's worth, here is the version that was redirected.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 12:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Alick Macheso .  The older version of the article was not stronger and only had some more fan-type information.  The album received no in-depth coverage that I can find, though I will say that the musician seems to be highly regarded as long-running performer in his country.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Alick Macheso , where the album title is listed.  CycloneYoris talk!  09:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Fejn Stahbejtli: Seems to fail WP:NSINGLE .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 04:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Albums and songs , Music ,  and Malta .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 04:32, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ira Losco : Found no additional coverage.  If a source could be found for that contest win then that would be useful to include in her article.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 07:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ira Losco .  No indication of being notable.  No coverage.  scope_creep Talk 11:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  I've found a source for the contest win but I don't think that is sufficient for NSONG - it seems to be a relatively minor Maltese contest.  WJ94 ( talk ) 12:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ WJ94 could you still add that to the artist's article so this song is at least mentioned in there once?  Even if the contest itself isn't notable, her winning it is worth at least a sentence.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 12:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ QuietHere I've added it to her list of awards and nominations .  WJ94 ( talk ) 13:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That'll do, thanks.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 13:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Get the Girl, Grab the Money and Run: Sources in article are database and stats.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject - the single - directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 13:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United States of America .  North America 1000 13:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to A Low Down Dirty Shame (soundtrack) : The one other piece of usable coverage I could find was this single review written by Larry Flick for Billboard .  While it was a nice find, that alone does not reach notability standards.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Roger Lambart, 13th Earl of Cavan: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTGENEALOGY .  Earls are not inherently notable.  Possible redirect target: Earl of Cavan .  Pilaz ( talk ) 14:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Ireland .  Pilaz ( talk ) 14:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Earl of Cavan .  Per nom, the very recent discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Anthony Nugent, 13th Earl of Westmeath and WP:PEERAGE#Notability , people are not automatically notable by virtue of holding a hereditary title.  If a subject's claim to notability arises, as it seems to here, *entirely* from the title they hold, then cover them in the article on the title.  Otherwise it's a form of WP:BIO1E (where the "one event" is their birth; Or perhaps death of a relative).  Otherwise, if all we can say is that the subject exists, went to school and holds a title, and the only sources (to support even that) are trivial mentions in short directory-style peerage entries, then that doesn't add up to SIGCOV or notability.  My own WP:BEFORE search did not return any significant coverage.  (Even a Google search seems *only* to return the related Wikipedia article(s) and mirrors. ) Guliolopez ( talk ) 16:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If this article is deleted than Michael Lambart, 12th Earl of Cavan , Richard Lambart, 6th Earl of Cavan , Ford Lambart, 5th Earl of Cavan , Richard Lambart, 4th Earl of Cavan , and Richard Lambart, 2nd Earl of Cavan should all be deleted too.  History6042 ( talk ) 17:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why so?  In the same way that notability isn't automatic/inherited, "lack of notability" isn't automatic/transferred/"contagious" either.  One of those people, Richard Lambart, 2nd Earl of Cavan , seems to have been an MP for the Kilbeggan constituency , and so may meet WP:NPOL .  For example.  While Ford Lambart, 5th Earl of Cavan seems to have been a big deal in Masonic circles, and has been covered in works on that topic .  Which might contribute to notability.  There doesn't seem to be similar/other "claims to notability" in the case of the subject under discussion here.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 17:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have to agree with Guliolopez here, there are some which meet WP:NPOL and each should be judged on its own merits.  With that being said, I see plenty of poorly-sourced articles, and if after a rigorous WP:BEFORE on the part of the nominator they are seen as not compliant with the GNG, I could see them being nominated for deletion.  Pilaz ( talk ) 22:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Making of Malaysia: No reviews found, and very minimal citations ( [10] ).  When searching for sources, watch out for "Malaysia: The Making of a Nation", a completely different book, and "Malaysia", a 2004 book edited by Stockwell for the British Documents on the End of Empire Project, also a completely different book.  asilvering ( talk ) 22:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Asia , Malaysia ,  and United Kingdom .  asilvering ( talk ) 22:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to author Anthony Stockwell .  Redirects are cheap and this is a potential search term.  (In general it's worth attempting to redirect an article when there is a dearth of sources before bringing it to AfD.) czar 17:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That is indeed usually what I do, not sure why it slipped my mind this time.  A redirect would work fine.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 23:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Found nothing in ProQuest either.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cape Republic: Lefcentreright Discuss 20:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and South Africa .  Lefcentreright Discuss 20:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep* it’s handy to have an article about the proposed state no?  DirkjanenBert ( talk ) DirkjanenBert ( talk ) 11:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cape Independence Party .  Park3r ( talk ) 21:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cape Independence , the content is almost all excerpts and what isn't excerpts/OR is already covered.  CMD ( talk ) 07:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It’s handy to have the article ready for if more information about the movement gets released.  It’s also an article about the proposed nation, not just the movement.  DirkjanenBert ( talk ) 11:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are apparently already two very closely related articles on this topic, a third is not that handy.  CMD ( talk ) 11:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] They are more about the movement for independence, not actually about the proposed nation.  DirkjanenBert ( talk ) 21:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cape Independence .  Non-notable unrecognized entity, most content is already covered in other articles.  Reywas92 Talk 15:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cape Independence ; no reason for this to exist.  Jlalbion ( talk ) 21:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Xanthomixis (moth): ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 12:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 12:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Appears to be a valid subgenus of Polymixis ; however, consists of only one species [3] , for which we already have an article .  It seems that both classifications with and without the subgenus are being used.  So, suggest redirecting to Polymixis xanthomista and noting the alternate usage there.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 17:15, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please note that according to ICZN Article 42 and 56, the same nomenclatural principles should be applied to all genus-group taxa (including genera and subgenera).  A subgenus (which was described latterly) could not be named the same as a genus.  This is quite different from the case of Ensifera , which is a suborder for insects and a genus for birds.  ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 09:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll take your word for it, however it is not our ambit to police the correct use of the nomenclature guidelines in the literature.  The sources I have seen so far report this as a valid subgenus, and we should follow that.  I don't see that it's our business to treat it otherwise unless some taxonomic authority chooses to take issue with the classification in print.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 16:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK, Redirect .  ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 04:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Polymixis xanthomista : same species .  Owen× ☎ 13:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Polymixis xanthomista : pending discovery of multiple species.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 22:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Masters of True Crime: The one "review" contains no analytical content and is a straightforward non interpretive summary of the book (and is also an unarchived dead link).  There's another similar  summary in Reference & Research Book News .  Oct2012, Vol.  27 Issue 5, p106-109, which says basically nothing about the book other than what it is about and that it is exists.  Other than that, nothing.  There's the Portland review in external links but that website has a note about "sponsored" reviews that makes me unsure of its independence.  I don't think either of these sources is enough to build an article on.   Redirect to author R. Barri Flowers ?  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Crime .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There's also a Midwest Book Review review but that publication has, since 2011, also accepted paid reviews, so that's not useful here.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No book reviews that I can find, only hits on versions of the title/phrasing.  not meeting notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Opinion on redirect?  The author's article mentions the book.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 22:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as an WP:ATD .  Found nothing usable online, and ProQuest only returned the Reference & Research Book News piece mentioned above.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  03:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aliqtisadi: It lacks coverage from reliable, independent sources.  Additionally, it is listed on the Arabic Wikipedia blacklist , indicating its unsuitability as a reliable source.  فيصل ( talk ) 21:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  فيصل ( talk ) 21:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Companies , Egypt , Lebanon , Palestine , Saudi Arabia , Syria , United Arab Emirates ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Abdulsalam Haykal .  Not entirely convinced the founder is notable either, but the company is mentioned there.  I cannot find any NCORP or NBOOK sources.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 07:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect