hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2021 Colorado Springs shooting : No lasting WP:EFFECT ; unfortunately, shootings of this nature are not particularly rare or notable in the United States.  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 00:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events ,  and Colorado .  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 00:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Even in gun-crazy USA, seven deaths is noteworthy.  WWGB ( talk ) 02:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Is it, though?  Do you have the sources to back that up?  This was a pretty typical shooting at a party, many of which have more victims and don't get articles, the only difference here being that all of the injured people died.  There's also plenty of shootings with six deaths and more injured without articles; seems weird to draw the line for automatic notability at seven.  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 02:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mass shootings in the United States in 2021 as WP:ATD — siro χ o 02:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mass shootings in the United States in 2021 per siroxo and WP:EVENT , which specifically excludes "shock news" with no lasting effect or deep analysis.  A standalone article is not needed for such straightforward information.  The first AfD happened barely after the article was written, so now that time has passed a clearer picture can emerge.  6 people being killed is what stands out here, but it was an obvious crime of passion that happened in a private venue, with the perpetrator committing suicide, so not even a trial.  Compare with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smithsburg shooting , another borderline case, where this time the killer of 3 lived and was declared not criminally responsible a year later, with all the resultant drama.  Stony Brook babble 07:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mass shootings in the United States in 2021 .  Although the number of deaths is shocking, other mass shooting related articles have far more deaths.  🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！ ) 08:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mass shootings in the United States in 2021 , which is what should have happened in the first AfD.  It's just a news story.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 23:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kuroko Shirai : I was only able to find a few articles, mainly this list article , and a few others which say she was added to an updated version of Dengeki Bunko Fighting Climax .  I'm sorta on the fence about this, so I'm bringing it to AfD for some additional eyes.  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 18:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions .  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 18:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_A_Certain_Magical_Index_characters - there's nothing here beyond what's there, and there's not enough substance to support a separate page.  Night Gyr ( talk / Oy ) Delete : Fails GNG with no significant coverage.  As an aside the other characters linked in the info box ( Toma Kamijo ) and ( Mikoto Misaka ) should probably be put up for AFD as well.  Their articles read like WP:PROMO WP:FANCRUFT to me with minimal sourcing and what is there is trivial or routine coverage you can expect from just about any fictional character from a popular media.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 18:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Memorable side character for fans, arguably - but not encyclopedic material, not as it is written, nothing in my BEFORE.  There is half a paragraph of academic analysis/plot summary here .  I also found "A Certain Scientific Railgun: 10 Things You Never Knew About Kuroko Shirai" listicle on CBR, but that's low quality source.  I a afraid that's not enough to meet WP:GNG .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 14:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Not enough WP:SIGCOV found WP:BEFORE .  A redirect is fine for WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect back to List of A Certain Magical Index characters per WP:TNT and thats before we consider the notability issue.  Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 01:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Lost in the process; manually relisting.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Clyde [trout needed] 22:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WDMI-LD : Redirect or merge to List of Daystar Television Network stations .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Minnesota .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Daystar Television Network stations : its pre-Daystar history, from what I can tell, was saw the station owned by Dominion Satellite Network (Domsat), another religious network, and ValueVision International, operators of a national home shopping service .  I don't think there's ever been any local content (ValueVision being based in the Twin Cities metro doesn't really count), or much significant coverage , to warrant anything more than list entries.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Daystar Television Network stations : per above fails GNG and NCORP, nothing found with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from WP:IS WP:RS.  // Timothy :: talk 14:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Seaside Walk : BangJan1999 01:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Azerbaijan ,  and Russia .  BangJan1999 01:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect either to List of Azerbaijani films before 1920#1907 (where the film is mentioned) or to Vasil Amashukeli and add this source . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 08:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Vasil Amashukeli#Dəniz kənarında gəzinti .  I could find very little about the film, not surprising given the date and location.  Possibly there are Georgian sources.  But the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia biography says "In 1908, Amashukeli made films in Baku, which have not survived, only their names and timelines are known.... In 1908-1909, he filmed small stories in Baku: People walking on the seashore ... " It seems like there will never be enough for an article.  Aymatth2 ( talk ) 21:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Aymatth2.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Maybe Man Tour : Tour was just announced the other day and hasn't received much coverage yet, which isn't too surprising given it's for an album which also hasn't received much coverage.  No prejudice toward restoring when there's more coverage – given the notability of the group and the size of venues they're covering, it wouldn't surprise me if more does appear closer to the tour's start next year – but I don't see reason to keep this around as more than the couple sentences at The Maybe Man#Tour for now.  Redirect there for now.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Maybe Man per nom.  The tour could definitely be more notable closer to its start in April 2024 with extra information such as a setlist and ticket sales, but there isn't much to write about as of now.  Koopastar ( talk ) 08:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bachhrawan railway station : Station, not junction.  User4edits ( talk ) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism , Transportation , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  User4edits ( talk ) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Varanasi–Rae Bareli–Lucknow line would be an acceptable ATD.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 09:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect >>>> Varanasi–Rae Bareli–Lucknow line Djflem ( talk ) 19:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Vote to redirect the page to Varanasi–Rae Bareli–Lucknow line .  This is best suitable solution.  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Virgil (The Walking Dead) : four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep if more sources are found, otherwise merge to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters .  BOZ ( talk ) 18:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect would be better suited.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , per arguments at the other AfDs.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WP:ATD .  Not enough coverage.  If someone wants to include something at the target article, a merge of trivial mentions would be fine.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 21:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 23:55, 4 December 2023 (UTC) c [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Henry Thomas Alexander Erskine, 18th Earl of Buchan : Burke's, Debrett's and other genealogical entries only show mentions with no in-depth coverage and are tertiary sources, and therefore cannot count towards WP:GNG , and the Telegraph article has no mention of the 18th Earl.  Pilaz ( talk ) 05:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Scotland .  Pilaz ( talk ) 05:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Earl of Buchan#Present peer per WP:ATD .  Ingratis ( talk ) 10:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Information and notability not sufficient for independent article Coldupnorth ( talk ) 09:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : as Ingratis suggests above.  Insufficient coverage to meet WP:ANYBIO but his basic information does belong in the article on the title.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtrrs0 ( talk • contribs ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lost in Time (Akino album) : Appears to fail GNG.  Andre 🚐 22:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Andre 🚐 22:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Mach61 ( talk ) 00:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Akino (singer) as is the usual solution for a non-notable album by a notable artist.  As for this album specifically, it made the official Oricon chart in Japan and that's nothing to sneeze at, but a shortage of informative articles from reliable music media (at least in English) gives us little material with which to build an encyclopedic article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 16:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This album hit on the Oricon chart.  There's some coverage about it on the Japanese Wikipedia articles [1] [2] [3] .  While my brief search did not bring up additional articles (searching for articles in Japanese from the early 2000s can be difficult), I believe that making being an album from a notable artist that made the charts in what was then the world's second largest economy (+ coverage we have) means that this is notable and simply more time needs to be invested in finding additional sources in order to build out the article.  I don't think anyone would suggest that an album from a major U.S. artist that makes the U.S. charts isn't notable.  DCsansei ( talk ) 00:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] People redirect charting albums all the time, and indeed WP:NALBUM notes that a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article .  Mach61 ( talk ) 01:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to artist article - Impressive charting but reviews from secondary sources to build an article exceeding stub size do not seem to exist. -- N Ø 17:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eagles Postgame Live : Possibly as an ATD could merge to NBC Sports Philadelphia JMWt ( talk ) 08:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Pennsylvania .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG .  No WP:SIGCOV in independent, reliable sources.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 08:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to NBC Sports Philadelphia#Sports coverage : it is mentioned there, making it a valid-enough alternative to deletion , but there's really nothing to merge (especially since this has been tagged as completely unsourced since 2009).  The program itself is a run-of-the-mill postgame show that would not really be expected to merit its own significant coverage .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/merge to NBC Sports Philadelphia#Programming where it is mentioned.  No WP:SIGCOV that I could find.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 18:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to NBC Sports Philadelphia#Sports coverage per suggestions.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Personal Internet Security 2011 : A Google search mostly brings up trivial mentions, and very few year-numbered fake antiviruses have their own page.  This could be merged into List of rogue security software which mentions many more rogue antiviruses.  Xeroctic ( talk ) 18:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Xeroctic ( talk ) 18:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom.  Owen× ☎ 15:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of rogue security software , largely per nom.  I'm not exactly sure what content there is to merge given the list format, but having this title point to that list seems reasonable.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Azhaipithazh : See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources#Not reliable -- Filmibeat is unreliable. 2 sources about director dying. Needs 2 reliable reviews -- bharatstudent.com is likely unreliable (no link on Wikipedia).  DareshMohan ( talk ) 01:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The corresponding article at ta:அழைப்பிதழ் (திரைப்படம்) has six references.  You might want to add any that are from a reliable source.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Eastmain : That page is a direct translation of the English one and does not contain any extra or reliable references.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 03:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to List_of_Tamil_films_of_2008#July–September .  There is no coverage and reviews in reliable sources.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : NN film with no multiple reviews from independent and notable reviewers.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Patiala : No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Punjab .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  If someone who knows Punjabi can look into it, it would be helpful, but I found no RS.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 03:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Again, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya as ATD.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:24, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to main article Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jackson Radio Works : Let'srun ( talk ) 04:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Michigan .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : One-market radio station owners tend not to get the coverage needed to meet WP:CORP or the GNG .  (The existing sources in the article at most are more about particular stations than the company itself.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to WKHM (AM) as WP:ATD , perhaps a light merge of verifiable info.  — siro χ o 05:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : It was recognized by the Michigan Association of Broadcasters as being the "station of the year."-- 23mason ( talk ) 13:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That was only one of their stations, and in any case they are not a independent source.  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect