hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ariel Beery: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not an easy one.  There is certainly coverage but it seems insufficient to sustain a BLP.  Basically the same conclusion as nominator.  My own analysis of references and sources.  Hopefully this will make it easier to close.  gidonb ( talk ) 23:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC .  I agree with gidonb , I can't find any sources that meet all of the notability criteria.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katokhar, Ambedkar Nagar: Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 16:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 16:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Place does exist as you can find bank like Union bank of India in this location but no significant coverage can be found in reliable sources for this geographical location to presume it to be notable.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joy Henderson: I found a couple self-published op-eds from her and she's been interviewed a couple times but I do not see numerous in-depth articles written about her.  The references used in this article are quick "middle of the moment" articles that do not show notability.  The fact that she was interviewed about racist costumes does not show notability.  The fact that she left the NDP (I don't think she was ever elected to a notable position) does not show notability.  The references I can find online seem to show that she's been interviewed for sound bites/opinions but I don't think that makes someone notable enough for Wikipedia.  HickoryOughtShirt? 4 ( talk ) 15:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women .  HickoryOughtShirt? 4 ( talk ) 15:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not seeing notability.  The first Toronto Star article is basically her talking to the newspaper about why certain Halloween costumes are/were offensive to groups (before they were removed from stores).  She now writes for the newspaper [17] .  She seems to be the "talking head" media in Toronto go to when they want to do an article about the issue [18] , which is fine, but none of the articles are about this individual, only asking her opinion on xyz thing.  "Advocate" is another way of saying marketing person, which seems to be what this is, she's the "expert" on sensitive issues involving certain communities (nothing of which is bad, it's just not the type of notability needed to have an article in wikipedia).  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:59, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when somebody can do better.  Notability is not established by sources in which she's the writer or speaker giving soundbite commentary about other things , it's established by sources in which she's the subject of coverage and analysis written by other people — but the sources here are the former, not the latter, which means they aren't helping to get her over WP:GNG at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carmen Toaquiza: Zero in-depth or partial coverage of individual exists.  WP:BEFORE search reveals nothing.  Does not satisfy WP:GNG .  Delete per changes in WP:NSPORTS2022 .  Skipple ☎ 23:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Sports ,  and Olympics .  Skipple ☎ 23:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Ecuador .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom; it really does seem like zero coverage at all, even in some South American sources.  Kingsif ( talk ) 21:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  According to IAAF records, in the article, her highest ranking for any of her distances she ran world-wide was 291st.  I would also agree WP:NSPORTS2022 applies.  Equine-man ( talk ) 10:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nick Peel: This is my exact concern now.  Coverage is very much local, routine and expected for a local government leader.  Peel is lacking "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to meet WP:GNG .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and England .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - local councillor.  SportingFlyer T · C 16:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Politicians at the borough council level are not automatically notable just for existing, and have to pass WP:NPOL #2 on the basis of a hell of a lot more reliable source coverage about their council work than has been shown here.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Local politician who doesn’t meet criteria for an article.  Not notable and few RS media coverage.  Delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Local councillor without evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 08:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gurdip Ram Bungar: The politician is not notable and doesn't have  a "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".  BoraVoro ( talk ) 17:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Punjab ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – issues brought up in original AfD are not addressed in this new article.  Dan • ✉ 21:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for providing a chance to let others know why the page for Mayor Gurdip Bangar is important on Wikipedia.  His origin is from the Dalit caste, and he is the first from this community.  This is his second term as mayor.  This page should be on Wikipedia because he is a symbol of confidence for Dalits.  Dev Mahey ( talk ) 06:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth , Source eval: Comments Source Council page, not WP:IS  1.  Mistry, Rahul.  "The Mayor".  Gravesham Borough Council.  Retrieved 28 September 2023.  Routine mill news about election by council as deputy mayor.  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c Singh, I P (16 May 2014).  "Gravesham council, UK, gets first ravidassia deputy Mayor".  The Times of India.  Does not mention subject, fails SIGCOV  3. ^ "'I can only say thanks to the NHS, you are our real heroes'".  Kent Online.  12 May 2020.  Council page, not WP:IS  4. ^ "Councillor details - Cllr Gurdip Ram Bungar".  democracy.gravesham.gov.uk.  28 September 2023.  Interview  5. ^ "New mayor 'humbled' by role".  Kent Online.  17 May 2019.  Fails WP:IS, subject is associated with source  6. ^ "House of Mercy Gravesend - Home - News & Events".  www.houseofmercygravesend.com.  BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 17:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LeadPoint: PROD removed back in 2009 by article creator.  Sources are non-independent (e.g. press releases) or trivial (e.g. The Telegraph piece briefly mentions the company appears in a top-50 list).  There's a lot in the FT Adviser but these seem to be thinly rehashed press releases ( example ), not independent analysis.  – Tera tix ₵ 16:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies , Software ,  and California .  – Tera tix ₵ 16:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:CORP .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 18:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : routine coverage fails to meet NCORP.  Owen× ☎ 19:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maternity And Child Health Care Institute Benazirabad: I don't see it passing WP:ORG either.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dylan Bester: No in-depth coverage to be found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom, does not standout, never headlined any news.  Just TOOSOON .  dxneo ( talk ) 17:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Unfortunately there are always people creating pages like this after one appearance in minor matches.  Expect to see several others coming from the African Games.  It could however be redirected to List of South Africa Twenty20 International cricketers .  Bs1jac ( talk ) 18:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not seeing any stats site or article state that these players are being awarded T20I caps for South Africa, especially given they're playing under the title University of Sport South Africa.  If you have seen something suggesting the award of caps, please ping me and I'll reconsider my vote.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Rugbyfan22 : Up until this evening South Africa's games were being awarded official status (Cricinfo had T20I match numbers, debuts etc, and the player stats included these games as T20Is).  The status has since been revoked, so agree that a straight delete is appropriate.  Bs1jac ( talk ) 20:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines with no reliable sources apart from profiles.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Robo Cric Let's chat 09:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Per Bs1jac's closing comments.  AA ( talk ) 09:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Now Cricinfo has amended the team and match status, he definitely doesn't qualify for even a redirect!  AA ( talk ) 21:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG as there's no real significant coverage.  South Africa aren't listing these as capped internationals for the players that represent them in the tournament, playing under the University of Sport South Africa title, so don't think the redirect is suitable.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yep, as mentioned above, status has been revoked by the ICC and is reflected on Cricinfo.  Bs1jac ( talk ) 12:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arbat-Opera: Itsfini ( talk ) 12:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Itsfini ( talk ) 12:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Austin Forkner: Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Missouri .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete: A WP:BEFORE check comes up with only 1 source which could pass GNG.If other sources can be found I could be persuaded to change my vote.  [ [20] ] User:Let'srun 00:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete due to a lack of independent RS coverage.  SoniaSotomayorFan ( talk ) 13:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khasarehzad: No english source, and Tageo is a database, not a source Hongsy ( talk ) 08:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran .  Hongsy ( talk ) 08:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
One Life Crew: A BEFORE search found the usual social media accounts/sites, forums/Reddit, retail/e-commerce, and plenty of music sites with no professional reviews (Last.fm, Rate Your Music, etc.).  The only actual reliable sources I could find were this Vice article with remarkably little information about the band itself, and another Vice article that only mentions the band in passing—so no SIGCOV.  Woodroar ( talk ) 16:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Woodroar ( talk ) 16:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - They come kind of close to notability, but I agree with the nominator on how their media coverage is not entirely encyclopedic or informative for our purposes.  The first Vice article found by the nominator is actually about a fan dwelling on his years as a scenester, the second Vice article is about one band member's later activities.  I also found this: [10] , which explains a few things about the band but is actually a protest against one of their bookings.  Also like the nominator, beyond these I can find nothing but the usual social media and directory listings.  Per WP:SIGCOV , they're close but no cigar.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  In addition to lack of SIGCOV, they only released one album on a major label and I can find no evidence that it charted.  I'm sure some pre-internet sources exist concerning their first album and the events at the 1996 Cleveland Hardcore Festival, but that is speculation.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 19:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adel Saqr: Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and United Arab Emirates .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why, is there something wrong with the eleven sources currently in the article?  You have to write more than just "notability."  SportingFlyer T · C 13:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] None of the sources are about the player specifically, they all cite matches.  None of them really meet the criteria for notability.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 14:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Plaza Magazine: MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Companies .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:28, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and is very promotional.  Couldn't find any sources online.  The PROD was removed with the rationale of "improve, don't delete flawed articles", which seems strange considering they didn't address the part that the article is unsourced.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 23:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Diego Rangel (footballer, born 1997): Joeykai ( talk ) 02:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If we do delete this article, which is a potential in favour of deletion, then the this requested move will be irrelevant until another Diego Rangel comes onto Wikipedia.  I have no objections on this 1997 footballer to be deleted at this point unless it is expanded.  Iggy ( Swan ) ( Contribs ) 19:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete