hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mercer Bay: The topic which this is competing with, a Mercer Bay in Cumberland West Bay , is an obscure location that doesn't even warrant an article.  Further, a Google News search for the past year finds no results for the bay in Cumberland West Bay, but over a dozen for Unuhanga-a-Rangitoto / Mercer Bay.  BilledMammal ( talk ) 04:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Disambiguations .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A redirect does not require deleting an edit history first, and could have been done with 1 ⁄ 3 the number of edits that an AFD nomination takes.   This is not an appropriate use of Articles for deletion .  Uncle G ( talk ) 10:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To clarify, I intended to propose a redirect; I agree that the edit history doesn't need to be deleted.  However, AfD can be used to propose redirects ; I expected that if I made this boldly it would be reverted or otherwise objected to and so I wanted to get consensus for it, and this is the appropriate venue for that.  BilledMammal ( talk ) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, that would be Talk:Mercer Bay .   You are utterly wasting people's time, everyone who even looks at this, with a simple disambiguation fix that you could have just done .  Uncle G ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Emmy Clarke: Emmy Clarke had two supporting roles in movies and was in three television shows, only one of which in a reccuring capacity.  As an actress, she does not meet GNG.  I also think a redirect to Monk (TV series) could be appropriate.  Mpen320 ( talk ) 03:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A redirection to Monk (TV series) would be most appropriate.  Her participation in the series has been her only relevant role.  BrookTheHumming ( talk ) 14:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Determinancy diagramming: FranklinOfNull ( talk ) 16:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mathematics and Computing .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to dependency graph .  Popo Dameron ⁠ talk 19:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to dependency graph as above.  The stubby content-fork article is of no value in itself but the title is a plausible search term.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 20:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to dependency graph per above.  // Timothy :: talk 04:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Retarget to Dependency graph is this is a content fork but not an implausible search term.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 07:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Maria Teresa Santillan: No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The secondary sources are all fairly WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  Shaws username .  talk .  12:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mayors of Lynwood, California Shaws username .  talk .  13:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to very obvious ATD >>>> List of mayors of Lynwood, California Djflem ( talk ) 07:43, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of mayors of Lynwood, California .  I think that the small blurb we have about her in the present article could be incorporated into the table there, in line with WP:NOPAGE .  Rather than deleting outright, I think that some of the content may be worth preserving, and that we should keep the page history if we decide to merely redirect.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Baruda: I removed a lot of the copyvio, but now, I can't find information about the village from reliable sources, though they may exist.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 02:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bhanjanagar : Redirects are WP:CHEAP and this fails GNG.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep it seems to be a census settlement per WP:GEOLAND .  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 18:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - per above and WP:NOPAGE .  Census tracts aren't presumed notable per WP:GEOLAND , and the only data provided here is purely statistical.  FOARP ( talk ) 08:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Leaning redirect.  Would that be okay with the nominator?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , no evidence this census tract has received SIGCOV in IRS.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 07:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Schnaitkapf: The refs on de.wiki do not appear to meet the GNG here.  I don't speak German but I'm not seeing much which could be considered in terms of notability.  JMWt ( talk ) 11:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Germany .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:GEOLAND applies.  It's the highest point in the region and there are some references in the German article, and I've found a number of hiking entries, especially when including the Wilhemshütte at the base of the radio tower.  Whether this is enough I'm not yet sure.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment while it's the highest local point, it's hardly the Matterhorn, and seems to be more of a local rambling destination than a great peak to which the world's mountaineers flock in hopes of conquest.  We could keep the article, but does that serve our readers?  It might be better to merge with Schwenningen, Sigmaringen and leave a redirect.  Our article on Schwenningen is currently very thin, and the German equivalent does mention the Schnaitkapf, which is obviously viewed as a beautiful asset by the Schwenningeners.  I'd rather have one good article on the locality than two unconnected stubs.  Elemimele ( talk ) 17:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] expand/merge to Sigmaringen (district)#Geography which is after all the area it's supposed to be the high point of.  Other than that it doesn't seem to be of much note.  Mangoe ( talk ) 23:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Redirect/Merge option to Schwenningen, Sigmaringen makes perfect sense, and is probably a better organization scheme for English readers than a separate article.   I also can't find any significant coverage of it in German or other sources. -- Milowent • has spoken 20:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Merge as per either of the above Mr Vili talk 22:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We have two different target articles suggested as a Redirect/Merge, can we settle on one?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Redirect/Merge option to Schwenningen, Sigmaringen Djflem ( talk ) 16:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Claudia Prats: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2020 CONCACAF Women's U-20 Championship squads .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shihab Chottur: Lots of people take long walks.  – Jonesey95 ( talk ) 16:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Internet ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All the attention was focused only because of the walking.  WP:BLP1E , fails WP:GNG .  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 06:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of longest walks , where there's already a subsection about him.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Split between delete and redirect Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 12:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to claim other than being a long distance walker.  Most of the coverage he received was because of some controversies like [18] .  111.92.123.60 ( talk ) 17:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Josh Maree: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league , Lebanon ,  and Australia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Rugby League footballer who played for Lebanon at the Rugby League World.  8 sources.  Fleets ( talk ) 20:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The quality of the sources has to be addressed.  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirecting to 2021 Men's Rugby League World Cup squads is an WP:ATD .  On that page, one will find his club and cap count at the time (I don't know why rugby doesn't put DoB as well, like football squads).  @ JTtheOG , note that several other of the Lebanese 2021 World Cup pages are of the exact same build as Josh Maree .  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Played in a team that got to a WC QF, nothing is written about his club career, needs expansion.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  No evidence of the requisite GNG coverage, merely playing in some league does not meet any notability criterion.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 01:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Keep or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  01:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2021 Men's Rugby League World Cup squads .  No standalone notability and no established first grade career.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Participation-based athlete criteria, which both keep ! votes are based on, were deprecated 2 years ago.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2010 WSK Euro Series: After a search, there was an announcement regarding the calendar, but the rest were just results.  There were some notable drivers in the series, but that does not establish notability.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 19:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Europe .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to WSK Euro Series per WP:CHEAP , otherwise I concur with the nom's rationale.  Article was made after Max Verstappen became a multi-time world driving champion.  Notability of this particular year of the championship is not WP:INHERITED by future accolades of participants.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 22:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The City (XM): Let'srun ( talk ) 04:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers : it is mentioned there, and this is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable pre-merger XM channels that were replaced by its Sirius counterpart (if not associated with another notable parent entity).  As I've mentioned before, even the pre-2021 version of the NRADIO essay, amidst its overpresumption of notability on the broadcast side,

Discussion outcome: redirect
Now What? (House): Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to House_(season_7)#Episodes , as only 1 review found.  Donald D23 talk to me 20:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  What's the cut-off line for retention of TV episodes?  One review?  Two?  Bearian ( talk ) 12:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  00:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to House_(season_7)#Episodes per above.  // Timothy :: talk 04:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Wonsi station: This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability).  A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability.  ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs.  I'm learning!  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 02:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that Wonjong station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Siheung Daeya station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Sinhyeon station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Siheung City Hall station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Siu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Wonsi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Seonbu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Dalmi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Note that Siheung Neunggok station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion .  Redirect to Seohae Line#Stations per WP:NTRAINSTATION and WP:GNG .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 06:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Korea .  Jumpytoo Talk 08:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Seohae Line#Stations Djflem ( talk ) 11:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
BootstrapCDN: All references in article are primary sources published by the company and I couldn't find any sources to satisfy WP:GNG elsewhere.  Might be worth a brief mention at Jsdelivr at the very most.  ~ Liance talk 20:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , Computing ,  and Internet .  ~ Liance talk 20:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge with Jsdelivr , as that appears to be more notable and is now BootstrapCDN's successor, per the article.  However, Jsdeliver's article is mostly covered by primary sources and a Google search mostly brings primary sources and trivial mentions, so its notability might be uncertain as well.  Xeroctic ( talk ) 11:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, I think you meant to suggest JSDelivr as a Redirect target as the page you refer to is, itself, a redirect.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jsdelivr - It's definitely not a keep.  Per nom. , no secondary sources.  My hesitation was whether it should be delete or redirect.  The problem with redirect, as per Xeroctic, is that the redirect target may itself not be notable.  However, on balance that ATD is okay.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 21:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
TravelPod: Because the site is down I can't verify whether the "positive press" described by the site was substantial or trivial.  Since it's been defunct since 2017, it's unlikely to become notable.  Either delete or maybe redirect to TripAdvisor .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 18:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and Websites .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 18:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TripAdvisor I guess.  Nothing for notability found otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TripAdvisor .  You know an article is doomed when it's referencing its own shuttered service.  IncompA 21:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TripAdvisor : worth, at best, a subsection there.  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 22:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TripAdvisor with the option to merge, at most, a couple of sentences into that if there are reliable independent references to support that.  -- DanielRigal ( talk ) 23:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Echo what was said above.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to TripAdvisor per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Trip Advisor Nothing is present here that leads to this subject getting to any GNG for a standalone article.  User:Let'srun 13:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect