hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
David Hurwitz (actor) : As usual, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- the notability test doesn't vest in listing acting roles, it vests in showing that they've received WP:GNG -worthy coverage in real reliable source media outlets about them and their performances.  But this is completely unreferenced, and even the roles posited in the intro as his "best known" performances were still supporting or bit parts rather than leading roles.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on the sourcing.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Anime and manga .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reliable sources to establish notability.  Esw01407 ( talk ) 11:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is merely a list at current, and I could not find any sufficient indications of notability outside of Wikipedia, either.  WmLawson ( talk ) 12:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sudbury Downtown Master Plan : Things like this might be valid article topics if they're well-referenced, but are not "inherently" notable just because they exist -- but except for one "article" (really just a reprint of a press release) in Canadian Architect magazine, this is otherwise referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as content self-published by the city and content self-published by the Ontario Association of Architects.  And since we already have articles about Tom Davies Square , the Art Gallery of Sudbury and the Sudbury Arena — basically every noteworthy building involved here — those can already cover off virtually any content we would actually need about this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 00:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 00:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: a master plan is never notable in itself - but its accomplishments might be notable.  Therefore, any notable redevelopment that may come from the master plan should be incorporated in the history section of Greater Sudbury once it has been completed and reported on in secondary reliable sources.  -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sabina Mausam : Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 20:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Gujarat .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 20:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find anything in Gnews about this person.  No sources we can use, delete.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Far from becoming notable.  CharlesWain ( talk ) 06:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NACTOR , no SIGCOV in RS, just NetTV4U, film blogs etc.  Same when searching for her former surname, "Sabina Malik".  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Per norminator.  Non-notable actress who has only played minor roles in movies.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 13:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Fails WP:NACTOR , Non notable so called actress.  Who has only played minor roles in movies.  Mrjoegoldberg ( talk ) Delete : not enough to show WP:NACTOR is met Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 16:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Baringo' : nov.  ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per linked AfD - these species are essentially taxonomic phantoms that can never be nailed down now that they are extinct.  No basis for an article.  (Maybe don't make the nomination that terse though, at first I thought there wasn't a rationale at all) -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 16:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not formally described?  Then definitely not notable.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 19:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and Kenya .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Not officially extinct, and real enough to warrant listing in the Red List.  Once it is formally described, the article can be moved to the new name.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 11:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above.  Only formally described species are considered automatically notable, and this fails GNG and SIGCOV besides.  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 04:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Linda Aslaksen : -- Ipigott ( talk ) 06:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Ipigott included me in the email exchange with the subject, and after considering Aslaksen's reasoning, I support the request for deletion as it is eligible per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE . -- Rosiestep ( talk ) 23:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough notability found, also WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Weak delete .  I think there's enough sourcing to support keeping the article (if not for the BLPREQUESTDELETE) but not so overwhelmingly so as to override the subject's wishes.  I'm sad to see us lose coverage of an interesting street artist, though.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not so notable that our wish for a full encyclopedia should overrule her wish for deletion.  Pam D 23:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and Norway .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE .  She was a fairy 08:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sense of Purpose : DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 07:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unable to find any coverage.  Article cites no sources, the only outside links are to a Myspace page (seriously?) and a dead website, and I'm unable to find any others than a Bandcamp page (primary source so not reliable).  Doesn't meet WP:BAND or WP:GNG as per nomination.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 18:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Queensboro (company) : I can't find any good sources about the company.  Most references used in the article are from an unreliable website called WilmingtonBiz.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 07:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Fashion .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 07:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: North Carolina and Texas .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 08:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't think this does pass notability standards for WP:ORG .  The sourcing is almost entirely from a local trade publication and many of the mentions butt up against WP:ORGTRIV (an example of something being discussed) and WP:AUD .  The one national source is AdWeek and as a weekly WP:TRADES , an interview about the company's pivot from direct mail to email marketing doesn't seem to establish notability.  In one of the local trade mentions, however, the company does make the claim that is was the first to offer custom logo t-shirts, but source doesn't seem reliable enough to back that claim and I could find nothing to help verify.  Also, their Zap Tee app doesn't seem to be notable or in existence.  MertenMerten ( talk ) 01:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hovhannes Mkrtchyan : Ineligible for PROD.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Armenia .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Single EL source in article is not an independent source addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIRS.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 23:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSKATE ; sources do not appear to pass GNG.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 01:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
*H₂eryo-men : The opening of this page makes the claim that this is the name of a reconstructed proto-indo-european deity, but only one of the page sources even has the word, and that is Mallory & Adams, which says, inter alia, Another possible mythic reflection of a healing deity may be seen in the Indo-Iranian Aryaman-Airyaman and the Irish Eremon « *h₄erjo-men-).  So one source conjectures a possible common root for a healing deity, and suggests derivation from a PIE word, but does not reconstruct the deity.  In any case, the deity reconstructed in this article is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH because it uses sources that describe the derivative deities and imputes those functions (e.g god of roads, of welfare etc.) back on the purely conjectural root.  This goes beyond the sources.  The only source that says any more is a self published one.   See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H₂weh₁yú for a similar issue.  I have today reviewed all the sources on the page and marked up issues, but have not modified any page text.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 20:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Mythology .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 20:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The article's sources don't support the claim that a god of this name existed in PIE mythology.  Sojourner in the earth ( talk ) 12:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Ultraman Blazar characters : This article uses primary sources exclusively, and I could not find any good sources in my BEFORE check.  The one interwiki link also had little of use.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 21:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Television ,  and Japan .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 21:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 22:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence that this needs to be created.  Several character creations also show that all of those aren't reliable also and have been sourced primarily.  🥒 Greenish Pickle!  🥒 ( 🔔 ) 02:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reject: This article wre under copyright law.  Harimua Thailand ( talk ) 04:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] UNO REVERSE.  🥒 Greenish Pickle!  🥒 ( 🔔 ) 06:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alacritech : DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 22:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NCORP due to lack of sources.  I couldn't find any significant articles to even attempt notability.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 04:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aliyar Najafi : just a regular league player with no special achievement, the fact that the page is an orphan also proves his non-notability.  Sports2021 ( talk ) 03:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Sports2021 ( talk ) 03:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Basketball ,  and Iran .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable, fails GNG.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 20:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oupa Mthiyane : Note that he is more commonly known by Mandisi Mthiyane, which seems to be his legal name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Career has never really kicked on to show WP:GNG coverage.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kairali Ayurvedic Group : GregChi ( talk ) 03:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reliable sources found through google search.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 03:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enrique Mederos : This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Mexico .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Anime and manga .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Sad he died so young.  I would love to know more about the career of a professional Mexican film dubber.  It would be nice for him to continue to float in the WP ether for a while longer.  But I assume his filmography and photo are on IMDB too.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article, and BEFORE found listings, nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBlue ( talk • contribs ) 19:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Unprocessed Child : Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Psychology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reviews in WP:LIBRARY .  Gets a mention in [20] , but nothing to substantiate that it was "influential".  Jfire ( talk ) 03:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources.  The Unprocessed Child: Living Without School by Valerie Fitzenreiter does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Criteria .  Cunard ( talk ) 09:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
St Joseph's Primary School, Mysore : Primary schools are rarely notable and this one fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Karnataka .  LibStar ( talk ) 13:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 15:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom NM 19:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ivaylo Velinov : I can't see any way of bringing this up to a level that it complies with WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC , partly because his professional career was so brief.  I did find some coverage of him, so he does exist, but the coverage is all just trivial mentions in Bulgarian news sources.  Gong mentions him once, confirming that he received a red card, Darik mentions him as one of 9 OFC Belasitsa Petrich requesting termination of his contract, an event that is covered well enough in the club article and does not require stand-alone articles for all involved, Topsport is yet another trivial mention, saying that he is in good shape and can play as a right back.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Well below the notability limit.  -- Nk ( talk ) 06:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete