University of Colorado Physical Therapy Program: The far majority of references are simply from the university's website, and as such notability isn't proven due to the lack of outside sourcing.  ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 01:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Education , United States of America ,  and Colorado .  ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 01:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - and selectively merge any content with reliable independent sources to University of Colorado School of Medicine .  As the nominating editor stated, article seems promo and lacks secondary sources.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 01:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello Eejit43, thank you for the valuable feedback!  I am presently retrieving outside sources to backup the information presented in this article.  I am aware of the problem of promotion of interests on WP and how many hide their identity.  My hope is that being transparent will help, along with the pending external citations that will demonstrate impact and notability both locally and nationally.  Mikepascoe ( talk ) 13:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello all, An initial draft of the article had 31 cuanschutz.edu (internal) sources + 23 external (independent) sources = 54 total.  The present version now has 19 internal + 42 external source = 61 total.  The percentage of sources from the university website (Eejit43's original comment) has decreased from 57% to 31%.  Further improvements can be made, thank you for your continued review Mikepascoe ( talk ) 14:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm not really seeing any SIGCOV from secondary sources.  A selective merge might still be the best way forward. - KH-1 ( talk ) 04:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, could you please explain what a selective merge is and how this is a good way forward?  I'm also not sure how to satisfy the SIGCOV (significant coverage?) requirement.  There are several external sources discussing the Program now from refutable sources.  Do you have an example of a source that meets SIGCOV from other Wikipedia articles?  Thank you very much!  Mikepascoe ( talk ) 16:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus.  It would also help if an editor(s) would address User:Mikepascoe 's valid questions here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus