Look Afraid: I am at a loss as for why this article would need to remain.  If there is no feedback regarding this matter, I will be bold and delete it.  Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleter ( talk • contribs ) 15:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This request is malformed and should most likely be deleted, and resubmitted following the instructions available at WP:AFDHOWTO ; probably easiest to use WP:TWINKLE .  Also see Wikipedia:Deletion policy about why view counts are not a valid metric for why something should be deleted, Wikipedia:NOTABILITY is, and why you are not able to unilaterally delete this article without following a proper Wikipedia:Deletion process .  -- Cerebral726 ( talk ) 19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've fixed the formatting.  * Pppery * it has begun... 05:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep due to poor nomination.  Industrial Insect (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, fails WP:N based on the sources cited in the article; they are not substantial coverage in reliable independent sources.  Sandstein 08:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 09:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am writing to request the deletion of the article on Look Afraid.  Upon review, it has become evident that the subject matter does not meet the notability criteria outlined in Wikipedia's guidelines for music-related articles.  While the band may have achieved some local recognition and won an international competition, there is a lack of substantial coverage from reliable sources to establish enduring notability.  The references provided in the article primarily consist of self-published sources such as MySpace profiles and dead links, which do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable sourcing.  Additionally, the band's discography and history appear to be limited in scope and relevance to a broader audience.  Given these reasons, I believe that the article does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion and should be considered for deletion.  I appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to your prompt response.  Cleter ( talk ) 15:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You have already started a deletion discussion that Pppery fixed for you.  People have responded, I'm not sure who this letter-like comment is intended for.  Cerebral726 (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)" Cleter ( talk ) 16:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete