hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Even Pizango: The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found were transactional announcements ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Peru .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 03:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amanda Puspanditaning Sejati: The only achievement listed in the article is authoring a guide on English writing techniques.  Also, red link in Indonesian wikipedia.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 22:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability not found.  BLP is entirely edited by sockpuppets.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete .  None of the socks was blocked prior to article creation, so we can't go through a G5 speedy deletion, but her citation record [45] is far from WP:PROF notability and we have no in-depth independent reliable sources as needed for WP:GNG notability.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NPROF .  Qflib ( talk ) 18:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 04:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It says that this is the second AfD nomination.  Where is the first?  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 05:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] @ Xxanthippe : The initial nomination is in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah binti Ahmad .  I've withdrawn from that nomination and opted to initiate a separate nomination based on the discussions there.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 12:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the explanation.  I think it would have been better not to have unbundled the AfDs, whose bios are all junk.  Separating them wasted the time of volunteer editors who had to look at individual AfDs.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 21:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] When I suggested a procedural close, the bundled AfD had seemed on its way to a trainwreck [46] , and I was concerned about how much more sprawling one discussion could become while evaluating that many articles under varying notability guidelines.  How the AfD now appears follows the conclusion of an SPI (I had initially been unaware of) and removal of sock comments/discussion; that context is only in the edit history [47] .  Beccaynr ( talk ) 04:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - there is no indication of notability.  TunGunPun ( talk ) 07:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anuj Singh: Macbeejack ☎ 13:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and India .  Macbeejack ☎ 13:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is no significant coverage in reliable sources and current sources are all passing mentions.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL .  GSS 💬 14:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Social and political activists are not judged by WP:NPOL , which they would almost all fail, because they generally work outside the political office-holding system.  We need to use other standards to judge notability.  L iz Read!  Talk!  21:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom — QuadriSyed Sahab ( T · C 09:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ilya Derzhinsky: The best sources found in Russian were the hyper-local Bryansk News , which is a single trivial mention of him, and Russian Futsal Association , which is not an independent source and, in any case, the source is an extremely brief interview with the subject containing no independent analysis whatsoever.  There is no indication that he meets WP:GNG nor that he is on the trajectory to do so.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 20:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Ju-myong: There is no reasonable chance of this passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC but I'm happy to be proved wrong if people can present significant coverage of him.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and North Korea .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom. Svartner ( talk ) 06:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alyssa George: Just being Miss Kansas isn't enough.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason: Hannah Wagner ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) See also the AfD for former Miss Kansas Gayla Leigh Shoemake .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Kansas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- Blythd920wkw ( talk ) 14:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Not WP:BLP1E material.  -- HongKongLewis2828ep ( talk ) 14:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep Meets WP:BIO , WP:V , no WP:CRYSTALBALL here.  GOP-Paula-2849WOWQ ( talk ) 14:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This should not be deleted under any circumstances - needs WP:CLEANUP .  RepublicanParty-Kaitlin-XKC02KW ( talk ) 14:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep No need to delete - just needs to go on Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography .  Very definitely not WP:HOAX .  RepublicanParty-Lucia-Kwamkior9202 ( talk ) 14:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Checkuser note: I've blocked a bunch of accounts that have commented here as socks.  firefly ( t · c ) 14:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sock votes struck by — Trey Maturin ™ 14:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nomination.  Pageants and their winners are often contentious in terms of discerning notability - but the fact that most state pageant winners go on to have rather normal, non-notable lives does lend to the current practice of not having pages for individuals who are only known for their pageantry win (which can be seen in the tables for most any state's "Miss...." article.   As an aside, what a... strange AfD section.  I've never seen anything like it, and I'm genuinely baffled at what the motive and end goal is.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 15:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Seems like an odd article discussion to be a sockmagnet.  L iz Read!  Talk!  05:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete both: Agree with nom.  These subjects each fail WP:GNG as it stands with a lack of secondary coverage.  User:Let'srun 12:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage that is not a result of the beauty pageant victory.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Devarishi Dasa Asamoah: The first source was published by a contributor on a site that doesn't appear reliable.  The second and third sources are practically identical, providing nothing about the subject beyond a name drop.  This fails to meet the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:NBIO imo.  GSS 💬 15:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Astrology ,  and Ghana .  GSS 💬 15:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The sources used are to establish the subject as a spiritual leader of Hare Krsna Movement in Ghana.  Most of the stub centers around this.  As the author of this stub, I do not have access to any information on anything else other than this.  It may be a little short for a biography, but the beauty of Wikipedia is that another contributor may carry on the work that has been started.  Heatrave ( talk ) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the reasons stated by the nominator.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: With an unbolded Keep vote here, Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : as a stub about a religious leader but invite future contributions on the subject.  Heatrave ( talk ) 19:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Heatrave : Articles are not kept based on one's religious background; you need to explain how they meet the general notability guidelines or WP:BIO .  GSS 💬 03:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] .  Keep as he's a the lead priest of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness in Ghana, which is one of the 69 affiliated ISKCON centers in Africa.  [3] .  I believe that this is unusual to deserve attention in the context of Ghana which has a growing Hindu population.  [4] Heatrave ( talk ) 08:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability is not inherited .  Just because he is the lead priest of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness in Ghana doesn't grant him automatic notability.  You need to provide sources that establish significance according to the policies.  GSS 💬 10:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not meeting WP:GNG for miles.  Hitro talk 15:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ravi Karmalker: The attempted notability claim is a long, long list of awards and nominations, which aren't properly referenced for the purposes of establishing whether they're notability-making awards or not -- that test does not just indiscriminately accept every single film or television award that exists , but looks specifically for top-level awards (Oscar, BAFTA, César, top film festivals on the Cannes-Berlin-TIFF-Sundance tip, etc.) that can be established as significant by referencing the awards to media coverage that treats the awards as news .  But this is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as the subject's own self-published website about himself, directory entries, streaming copies of his films on Vimeo, Instagram posts and the self-published websites of non-media organizations directly affiliated with the claims, with not even one reliable or WP:GNG -worthy source shown at all.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Germany .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete poor references, GNG is not met.  BoraVoro ( talk ) 05:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jawahar Lal Nehru Inter College kalyanpur: No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOLS .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL , unsourced.  I couldn't find any reliable sources for the article.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 10:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unsourced.  Google Books and Google News search didn't turn up anything promising.  Appears to fail WP:GNG .  Not a suitable title for a redirect because the title erroneously contains the word "kalyanpur" at the end.  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 11:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indus Net Technologies: Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and India .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete & Salt due to repeated re-creation.  Fails GNG.  This will be the third time this article has been created.  Graywalls ( talk ) 22:24, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article text and given references concerning announcements of company acquisitions fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH .  Aside from these, there is a 2020 India Education Diary piece about the firm, but it is a business buzzword broth about aspirations, which does not in my opinion demonstrate attained notability .  I see no reason to overturn the previous AfD consensus.  AllyD ( talk ) 14:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shree Gyanodaya Secondary School: Maliner ( talk ) 06:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Nepal .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unreferenced and no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Britons in Egypt: Of course there has been a long story of association between Egypt and Britons, but there are other pages which cover that.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with deletion, not a useful article, it essentially contains no information.  BHC ( talk ) 09:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Egypt ,  and United Kingdom .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with deletion, it has no useful content as already stated.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 04:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We have articles with one sentence so I'm not sure about the judgment that the article content here is not "useful".  Usefulness is not a criteria typically used in deletion discussion.  Lots of notable subjects may not be useful.  How about evauating sources?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's possibly expandable from the Whidden 2010 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFWhidden2010 ( help ) source at Egypt–United Kingdom relations#Further reading .   But I have a life.   ☺ Uncle G ( talk ) 16:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   The title could cover anything from tourists to invaders and the minimal content does little to elucidate the subject.   Taken broadly the subject is just an unnecessary fork of UK-Egyptian relations.   Taken narrowly, i.e. British expatriates living in Egypt, it is niche enough to need citations to reliable sources to establish notability.   Either way, delete what we have here and start again from scratch if desired (probably at a different, clearer title).  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 04:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to the Draft Space .  More work needs to be done for the topic is notable!  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 17:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charlie Allan (journalist): It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  No obvious WP:ATD .  No consensus at 2022 AfD.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism ,  and Scotland .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet WP:JOURNALIST .  I don't consider Scottish Sports Writer of the year a major award.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment As he died recently, I've updated the article accordingly, including various obituaries.  I'm not expressing a view on fulfilment but the content of these may be worth considering in establishing notability.  That the BBC saw fit to devote 6 minutes on a national station may be indicative.  Mutt Lunker ( talk ) 12:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article has now been considerably immproved (thank you) with references demonstrating notability about a distinguished and versatile individual.  The obituaries are significant articles with editorial content.  Thincat ( talk ) 21:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll withdraw my ! vote and decide later what to do.  Thincat ( talk ) 09:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Further comment It transpires that evidently there were two Charlie Allans active in journalism, broadcasting and sport in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire.  What a coincidence that the Afd should be submitted the day the other Charlie's obituary was aired on BBC Radio 4.  I have created a separate one, Charlie Allan (farmer) , containing the material I collated in the last couple of days.  I have returned Charlie Allan (journalist) to its former state which, to me, is insufficient to indicate notability.  Mutt Lunker ( talk ) 01:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So, on further reflection, Delete the article under discussion.  Mutt Lunker ( talk ) 10:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ultimate Defender: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : While this discussion appears to have no quorum , it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd .  Logs : 2007-01 ✗ PROD -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I only see how-to remove guides and forum posts on goods.  Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG in any shape or form.  — Matrix(!) { user - talk?  - useless contributions } 17:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find any WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete