hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Disappearance of Gaynor Lord : A case of missing white woman syndrome .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 22:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 22:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The sources used here are The Guardian, BBC News, ITV News, and The Independent - not a single one which is a tabloid.  WP:SENSATIONAL does not apply.  9News, the last source used, could be a tabloid, but even if it was, broad coverage by non-tabloids has been demonstrated.  Furthermore, missing white woman syndrome isn't a valid reason to dismiss an article because  1) the term is used to highlight that non-white women deserve more coverage, not that white women deserve less, and  2) it's not Wikipedia's job trying to fix social issues.  Cortador ( talk ) 23:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with everything @ Cortador said.  There is, to my knowledge, no such as thing as WP: Missing White Women Syndrome even if this concept denotes a very real thing.  Wickster12345 ( talk ) 08:15, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per my comment above.  Wickster12345 ( talk ) 08:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS , WP:N , and WP:NEVENTS .  All sources are primary sources that amount to routine news coverage.  Notability requires secondary sources.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 23:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000 per the same argument.  I was not aware that the target page existed, but this is the optimal solution for these one-off incidents with no historical significance.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 00:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  To add to my rationale, this article fails WP:NOTNEWS .  It is a run-of-the-mill missing person case that lacks persistence beyond the news cycle and will not have a lasting effect, beyond her friends and family.  I also agree with Thebiguglyalien.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 23:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000 where it can be sufficiently covered.  It was, after all, a high-profile case while the search for her was ongoing.  This is Paul ( talk ) 00:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I support this option; I had no idea that list existed.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as per above Mr Vili talk 00:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000 , as proposed by User:This is Paul .  Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Otacon : My WP:BEFORE searches on WP:VG/SE , Google Books, and Google Scholar didn't seem to demonstrate anything that wasn't either plot summaries on analysis' on the themes of Metal Gear Solid 2.  Would love to be proven wrong here, but Otacon unfortunately does not seem to be a character with standalone notability.  Negative MP1 18:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games .  Negative MP1 18:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I found some possible examples of reception in reliable sources, but it may not be enough.  I couldn't find anything major about him.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Characters of the Metal Gear series .  The source is made up of very little significant commentary other than listicles and even Zx's sources don't seem like enough to save it.  I feel there is some content worth merging though, hence why I believe this is a good AtD.  It's a shame, since it feels like there would be a lot more analysis given Otacon's character in the series, but alas.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I don't feel lime the sources presented above would be enough.  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 12:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I wasn't able to find much either.  I feel the assertion Pokelego made is correct. -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 19:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Characters of the Metal Gear series , does not seem like he is independently notable with the sources I could find.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of military engagements of World War II : Should be merged with List of World War II battles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antny08 ( talk • contribs ) 12:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , it's certainly remarkable we've had WP:CFORKs on this topic for so many years.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 14:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom or possibly rename List of World War II battles by year (because List of World War II battles is rather long) and also rename the other list as List of World War II battles by theater .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 20:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
The Miniature Killer : A quick Google search doesn't give sources that prove notability to the character.  Spinixster (chat!) 01:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 01:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : The source you're talking about ( The devil is in ‘CSI’s’ details ) should be included in the List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters for the Miniature Killer.  The rest of the article is only filler and doesn't need it's own article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd like to see if there is more support for a Merge.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters .  There are not enough sources for notability.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 21:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Ralf Jones : Most of the sources you can find are just what you called "routine trailer coverage".  Failing WP:GNG .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Ikari Warriors .  I agree that this character fails GNG.  Small mentions in reviews cannot be cobbled together to support notability of a character, it goes against the entire tenets of significant coverage.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Zxcvbnm.  Tintor2 ( talk ) 14:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , reception section doesn't really speak to his notability in any meaningful way.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 07:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as an WP:ATD .  Reception isn't sufficient for a separate article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 03:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Mentioning a character in a game review doesn't mean notability for the character but for the game.  ULPS ( talk ) 17:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Mel Wasserman : 1keyhole ( talk ) 21:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ohio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge this older version to CEDU .  The reference in the book by Paris Hilton potentially establishes notability, but most of the references are more about CEDU than Wasserman.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 21:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to CEDU .  Not enough for a stand-alone article.  — Maile ( talk ) 00:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Jinpachi Mishima : GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 22:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Selectively to List of Tekken characters .  His reception is a joke and clearly fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Wikipedia is not FANDOM.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 23:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge per above.  The reception is, as pointed above, indeed a joke - a bunch of listicles placement plus the claim to fame in the form of "having one of the best mustaches in video games".  Nope.  Nope.  Nope nope nope.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Merge to List of Tekken characters .  There is nothing here showing any notability.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Family Court (Ireland) : Fails WP:GNG .  Could be merged....  somewhere... if sources are found.  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Organizations ,  and Ireland .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  While I haven't yet completed a full WP:BEFORE sources/notability check, at first glance (and as noted by the nom themselves), I'm not sure that outright deletion is likely to be an appropriate outcome here.  (Perhaps a retitle, to cover family law in Ireland generally, including seemingly impending reform , which has received relatively significant coverage [18] [19] [20] , might be in order).  Otherwise, at the very least (and noting that Circuit Family Court already redirects to Circuit Court (Ireland)#Circuit Family Court ), perhaps something similar could be done here.  Which would also be consistent with some of the other members of the related DAB title ...  In the meantime at least.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 00:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Courts of the Republic of Ireland .  This article on the fringes of notability would be better off as part of the proposed target, which currently is only at 1,346 words (see WP:SIZESPLIT ).  Per WP:CRYSTAL , this court has been going through its birth pangs for 50 years, and still seems to not exist yet as a distinct entity.  Stony Brook babble 21:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Per above.  Additional discussion of the proposed merge target (or of course, of any other views) would be quite helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as proposed.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 20:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Bonathorne railway station : At present, this train station does not seem to pass GNG.  The two sources cited are routine coverage.  A quick Google search did not provide better coverage.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 05:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to South Western railway line, Queensland , which should really have an overview of every station on the line.  I wouldn't object to Dirranbandi, Queensland as the merge target either.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 07:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Other stations where there is little information or notability usually go on the line's page.  MarkiPoli ( talk ) 13:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
BISU Visual Identity : We tend to have articles on university colors only for those with a significant history and influence (e.g. Oxford Blue (colour) ), which is unlikely to be the case for a system introduced in 2003.  I was unable to find any secondary sources, although perhaps someone who speaks Chinese could confirm.  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 21:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Beijing International Studies University as nom.  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 21:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Advertising , Education ,  and China .  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 21:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Minimal merge to above target, perhaps a single sentence would be the right amount given reliance on primary sources.  — siro χ o 01:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See also related AfDs for UCLA Blue , Tufts Blue , and RISD Blue .  I tagged Carolina blue for notability, as it's a little more borderline.  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 01:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Nordic cross skating : Boleyn ( talk ) 11:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Roller skiing .  While there are multiple sources, some very detailed (see, for example, [66] ), it is hard to distinguish from Nordic blading .  -- Викидим ( talk ) 09:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Roller skiing#Nordic blading .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2018–19 Oregon Battle of the Books controversy : Local incident that had no lasting or widespread impact.  The competition involved in this controversy ( Oregon Battle of the Books ) also appears to be non-notable.  However, the incident is worthy of a short mention at Melissa (novel) , so relevant information should be merged there.  Astaire ( talk ) 04:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Oregon and Literature .  Astaire ( talk ) 05:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Melissa (novel)#Reception , which seems to already have a subsection about this very controversy.  I don't see independent notability in the controversy, and even if it were marginally notable I'd think it better to cover this article's subject in the context of a broader article where more context can be provided .  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Melissa (novel) per above.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 06:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Count Baltar : QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Battlestar Galactica (1978 TV series) .  He has plenty of mentions in book sources, but they all seem trivial and largely in relation to the Cylons , who are indeed quite notable (despite the really poor state of said article).  I can't see significant coverage of Count Baltar.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or selectively merge to Battlestar Galactica (1978 TV series) .  Mostly WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs at best, and not enough WP:SIGCOV directed towards the actual character.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 01:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or selectively merge to List of Battlestar Galactica characters .  No need to retell the plot.  – sgeureka t • c 07:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 12:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Mitchell Institute : Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 11:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and Maine .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 11:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Most recent edits are by bunch of edits by IPs and COI accounts some of which were pasting copyvios, the other edits have been reverting said copyvio, previous edits prior to the IP/COI were three years ago.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 13:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to George J. Mitchell There are a couple of hits on GBooks but no SIGCOV.  (One of them is Mitchell's memoir).  It looks like there's probably enough at least for a mention in the article on Mitchell himself but not a separate article.  There is also an organization called the "Mitchell Institute" in Australia which is possibly notable.  Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback ) 12:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Presidentman, seems like a reasonable compromise. - KH-1 ( talk ) 04:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Cyberworthiness : The context is lacking and this seems like an unestablished Australian?  neologism.  TadejM my talk 02:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Computing ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to cyber resilience .   I did find this paper: [12] and some conference proceedings mentioning the word.   It seems to be mostly used in military contexts, in Australia, so it might be a distinct enough topic (or have distinct enough usage) to mention in the cyber resilience article, but probably isn't worth its own article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per WeirdNAnnoyed .  Owen× ☎ 17:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge