hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Empires of Sand : Nothing much found to consider against the inclusion criteria JMWt ( talk ) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  When you're working on an article about a novel, it's always worthwhile to use The Wikipedia Library to find book reviews.  That's what I did, and I added several reviews that I found to the article.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 10:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the references are incorrectly formatted but they are there, and significant magazine coverage pre-internet is generally strongly indicative of notability.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 10:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the reviews added by Eastmain.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 16:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Booklist, Publisher's Weekly, and Library Journal reviews?  Looks like sufficient SIGCOV for a book to me.  Jclemens ( talk ) 20:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Disposable Heroes : didnt chart or anything, wasnt even a single, it just exists -- FMSky ( talk ) 11:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs ,  and Music .  FMSky ( talk ) 11:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A couple of low-quality sources in the article, but overall it's well-sourced to reliable publications.   The fact that it wasn't a single doesn't seem to have prevented it from being discussed in RS.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Has multiple articles written specifically about it from reliable publications including Loudwire and Metal Hammer.  Just because it wasn't a single or didn't chart doesn't mean it can't have a page.  BoxxyBoy ( talk ) 17:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on existing news coverage provided in the article.  Naomijeans ( talk ) 03:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the article has a good amount of information on the song compared to the main Master of Puppets page and contains a good amount of sources.  HGP7 ( talk ) 15:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Outline of the Book of Mormon : Its a list of lists related to Mormonism with no sources.  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 03:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 03:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This is an outline, not a normal list, see Wikipedia:Outlines .  I don't know why these exist, but they do, and we have a lot of them.  This seems to be a decent one (though I'm unsure what they're really supposed to look like) so unless we want to delete every article in Category:Outlines I'd say keep this.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It aids in navigation, sorting related things in a nice logical manner, so a valid navigational list.   But yes, call it an outline article if you wish.  D r e a m Focus 08:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is an outline, which is a fancy navigational list.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , as noted by others, this is not your everyday article, but a navigational list for this general topic.  Perhaps the purpose of these types of articles could be updated, as it stands this needs to stay.  Rollidan ( talk ) 19:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Rojda Aykoç : Only IFEX source is good, but it is not adequate for passing GNG.  As a result of the research conducted on the person, it was not possible to find independent and reliable sources.  Considering there are not enough resources, deletion is appropriate.  Kadı Message 20:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Turkey .  Kadı Message 20:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep She is a notable singer, mostly known for musical performances in Kurdish.  More than enough sources are available, from reliable news outlets like Rudaw , Evrensel , NTV , Hurriyet , Gazete Duvar TheJoyfulTentmaker ( talk ) 04:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] These are promotional content for promote her new album.  These sources do not contribute for passing notability criterias.  You can read trwiki discussion by translating in order to see the analysis.  Best wishes.  Kadı Message 09:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Women .  TheJoyfulTentmaker ( talk ) 00:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 23:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as the references in the article and listed in the first AfD at the top left of this listing shows a pass of WP:GNG in my view, including a 25 minute radio programme about her.  Also she still has an article on the Kurdish wikipedia, and the deletion on the Turkey wikipedia may have a political context, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:SIGCOV per the sources above and those given in the first AFD.  The claims that the sources are promotional are entirely spurious.  These are independent mainstream media sources, not all of which are positive (such as the first source given above).  The deletion on the Turkish Wikipedia does appear to have been politically motivated and based in a flawed and unethical argument not rooted in Wikipedia’s policies.  That is concerning, and hopefully an admin on that wiki will do an AFD review on the Turkish wiki page.  That article should be restored.  4meter4 ( talk ) 14:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2008 Villa Canales bus disaster : Only covered by WP:PRIMARYNEWS sources with no WP:SIGCOV .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 03:55, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation ,  and Guatemala .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 03:55, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, a road incident in which 54 people are killed feels rather exceptional.  Garuda3 ( talk ) 06:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Coverage sufficient to meet WP:GNG .  And 54 fatalities.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - 54 deaths is a large amount, Covered by BBC News and Prensa Libre (Guatemala) so imho meets GNG – Davey 2010 Talk 18:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The requirements for notability can be found at WP:N .  You'll see that notability requires sustained coverage by secondary sources, which this subject does not have.  It also requires compliance with WP:NOT , so WP:NOTNEWS may be of interest.  You can find requirements for what sort of lasting effect gives inherent notability at WP:EFFECT .  You'll notice that 54 people dying is nowhere near the type of effect that's expected for a topic to have presumptive notability.  Any ! vote that's based on the number of deaths or a brief instance of primary news coverage may be ignored by the closer per WP:DISCARD and WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 18:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The BBC News cite is a secondary source, Prensa Libre appears to be primary granted but still sources nonetheless.  Well for any bus crash 54 is still a very high number.  NOTNEWS and EFFECT are irrelevant here as is the rest of your comment that apparently tries debunking everyone's ! votes.  Fact of the matter is the article is backed up by a secondary reliable source and a primary reliable source and there are higher fatalities than your normal average bus crash so imho with all this combined this is a notable accident.  – Davey 2010 Talk 19:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let's assume for a moment that the BBC article really is a secondary source.  How does this article comply with WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NOTNEWS ?  Can I just create a new article for every event ever written about by the BBC?  And what part of WP:GNG suggests that "54 people died" is in any way relevant?  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 21:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's clear we have very different opinions on this so will allow others to have their say – Davey 2010 Talk 22:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Arthur Sweetser : JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 05:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Politics , Education , Europe ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I've been able to locate a few sources on Sweetser.  Per this book , Sweetser's (1888-1968) was a journalist and League of Nations' staff member whose dense and global relations almost completely escaped historians' attention , so it seems like he was an important figure but just hasn't been written about too much.  I was also able to find some biographical coverage in a few different pages of this book .  Additionally, this contemporary journal article provides coverage of him and one of his books.  If this article is kept, this brief note contains biographical info which can be used to source it.  There are around 2,000 mentions of him on newspapers.com for the period between 1915 and 1945; I haven't gone through all of them of course, but [39] [40] [41] were some big mentions that came up.  Additionally, his obituaries ( [42] [43] ) provide further biographical information which can be used to source the article if it is kept.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 21:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This as well, gives a few paragraphs to his career to that point [44] and a book review here [45] Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  06:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Please scroll to the bottom of the article and the Authority control databases.  There are international results there, meaning his works are published in those countries.   The Library of Congress returns 20 resources on his works.  .  — Maile ( talk ) 03:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clearly pass WP:GNG , WP:JOURNALIST .  There are many ref. i added.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 04:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Global Biofuel Alliance : It is basically also a WP:CFORK of 2023 G20 New Delhi summit .  Pirate of the High Seas ( talk ) 11:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 15 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Pirate of the High Seas ( talk ) 12:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mauritius , Bangladesh , United Arab Emirates , India , Italy , Argentina , Brazil ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep BusinessLine used in the article now is green per sourcebot, then I find this in a Canadian financial news tv station [31] .  Many other hits turn up, should be ok for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Alliance an international alliance and is notable enough.  It has enough citations from reliable news sources.  Thewikizoomer ( talk ) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep , bunch of sources available [32] , more than can fit in the G20 page.  Nom fails to explain why it fails WP:ORG , seems to pass fairly easily.  Captain Jack Sparrow ( talk ) 21:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  DSP 2092 ( 👤 , 🗨️ ) 21:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Philippe Eidel : The only citation in the article is about his death, which isn't notable.  He was nominated for a grammy but didn't win.  InDimensional ( talk ) 20:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and France .  InDimensional ( talk ) 20:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] being nominated for a grammy is literally criterion 8 of WP:MUSICBIO.  the article isnt very good though and needs more sources Computerz4 ( talk ) 21:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] True, edited my nomination to remove "does not pass WP:MUSICBIO " InDimensional ( talk ) 22:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Being nominated for a Grammy is automatic notability. -- 2601:345:0:52A0:E165:4C72:14FB:3B9A ( talk ) 23:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete : Subject hardly meets WP:GNG as none of the sources dig deep. Of course, not any Grammy nom deserves a standalone article. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 21:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article is way too thin to establish minimum notability.  Insufficient notability signals.  WmLawson ( talk ) 23:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The current state of the article is not the standard for notability, and Eidel's French-language page gives sufficient signifiers to indicate notability, including independent coverage in French media.  Chubbles ( talk ) 16:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep on the basis of the references in the French article at fr:Philippe Eidel .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Sources used in the Fr wiki article are profiles and mostly directory listings.  I've found this [4] and [5] , although the second source is weak.  He spoke to a group of music students here [6] .  His name comes up over and over with an Algerian musician Khaled, I don't think is the same person as DJ Khaled...  Regardless.  Sources are likely in paper format, given the time he was active.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Sources found on fr wiki combined with "Estrepublicain" gives some hope.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 10:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Stephen Lett : Dennis C. Abrams ( talk ) 19:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Medicine ,  and Canada .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Anyone listed in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography or another selective national biographical directory is notable.  The DCB biography includes (among others) these references: Globe , 12 Oct. 1905.  Canadian men and women of the time (Morgan; 1898).  J. D. Griffin and Cyril Greenland, “Psychiatry in Ontario in 1880: some personalities and problems,” Ontario Medical Rev .  (Toronto), 47 (1980): 271–74.  C. [L.] Krasnick Warsh, Moments of unreason : the practice of Canadian psychiatry and the Homewood Retreat , 1883 – 1923 (Montreal and Kingston, Ont., 1989).  Here are some more references: The Canadian Encyclopedia article on Stephen Lett "Dr. Stephen Lett a pioneer in treatment of addiction" .  Wellington Advertiser .  2018-09-27 .  Retrieved 2023-04-20 .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Has a rather extensive bio here [7] and a mention in the American Journal of Insanity [8] confirming time and place of his work.  Rather non-acceptable journal title, but it was the 1850s.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I added two references.  There's a lot of significant media coverage from the 1800s to today.  Nfitz ( talk ) 21:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Article definitely needs improvement, but there are good sources out there to improve it with.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Easily passes WP:GNG Lightburst ( talk ) 19:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Little G : Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per GNG and the sources already present in the article.  pburka ( talk ) 13:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Solo Cissokho : Did a search for more sources but found no sources that were both independent secondary sources and had significant coverage of the subject.  Eternal Shadow Talk 05:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music .  Eternal Shadow Talk 05:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Senegal ,  and Norway .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , obituary (Norway's main TV channel), 1 hour radio special (same channel) obituary album review tour news etc etc.  In other words there is independent and in-depth coverage of him being a griot and one of the world's foremost kora players.  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think that any doubt can be cast about this.  Others?  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 03:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per

Discussion outcome: keep
La Doña (singer-songwriter) : This is not a draft space.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 04:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and California .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some references that I found using Google News searching on her birth name rather than her stage name.  Probably passes WP:GNG now.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are several WP:BLPSPS (interviews where the subject talks about herself), scant promotional-looking mentions, and the artist talking about a different topic of coverage on NPR.  The in-depth coverage is not multiple or from sources getting information independently from the subject.  See WP:LOTSOFSOURCES .  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 06:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The artist has been profiled by The New York Times, Rolling Stone, NPR, Billboard and KQED — so both local and national press.  She’s been asked to play at major music festivals (some of which were canceled because of COVID) and had Barack Obama recommend a song on his summer playlist.  It was surprising, quite honestly, that she didn’t have a Wikipedia page when we looked for her, which is why I created a stub bio before dinner so others could add to it (thank you for those who did(.  Jenny8lee ( talk ) 07:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per User:Eastmain .  -- MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!  ( talk or whatever ) 10:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep I can't access the NY Times (paywalled).  NPR is an interview, Billboard is a small amount of coverage.  [34] works as a food reviewer for a San Francisco paper and has some bio info.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep