hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Barr Tribunal: Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Carthy was in 2007.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 22:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 00:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Law ,  and Ireland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Death_of_John_Carthy#The_Barr_Tribunal may be revised as appropriate.  Reywas92 Talk 14:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Death of John Carthy#The Barr Tribunal per nom.  and Reywas92.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 21:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Anglian Radio: Trade press coverage revolves around the company buying and then selling its radio stations, nothing appears to be covered other than this.  There is nothing here that could not be covered in the articles for the individual stations - it warrants a brief mention of the ownership transfers, rather than a full article.  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there are huge problems with general notability and NCROP as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpaul2030 ( talk • contribs ) 08:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NCORP , and reads like an advert.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 05:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This is a difficult one to call as I am never in favour of article deletion.  I think it passes notability but only just but, as Flip Fprmat says, the references are only related to the forming and selling of the company.  However, to delete it means that the information which is contains will be lost.  Merge with Tindle is another option, and maybe the best option, and ensure that the relevant information is transferred to the Tindle Radio article before it is merged as merge is another word for delete.  Rillington ( talk ) 11:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have now done this so I'm prepared to change my vote to Merge .  Rillington ( talk ) 12:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rahul Yadav: Press Releases and announcements.  Most of the news is about his firm.  The news are about the company.  Or it will be better to Redirect this article on Housing.com .  Bakhtar40 ( talk ) 15:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Bakhtar40 ( talk ) 15:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2009-02 ✗ A7 -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Housing.com : No independent reliable sources denoting notability.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gert Dippenaar: JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , didn't find any sufficient coverage either.  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 11:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Namibian first-class cricketers Coverage for non-international Namibians always difficult, suitable redirect saves the history as a WP:ATD if anything found.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , no GNG coverage in The Namibian or AllAfrica, nothing coming up in South African media on PQ.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 22:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Southern Pacific 1273: Could be redirected to Travel Town Museum or deleted.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Travel Town Museum#Exhibits .  No evidence of independent notability.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 19:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to its entry in Travel Town Museum .  Thee doesn't seem to be anything more to say about it than is already said there.  Mangoe ( talk ) 22:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Alternatively, redirect to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock .  No evidence of notability either for GNG or under WP:TWP/MOS ; there is no evidence of this individual locomotive being superlative or recognized as historically significant.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as we have more than one Redirect target article proposed here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Travel Town Museum is fine, it's associated with the museum.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Scott Tibbs Documentary: It was a extra feature on the " Saw II : Unrated Special Edition" DVD.   Should be redirected/merged to Saw (franchise)#Short films at least.  Mike Allen 18:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Mike Allen 18:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Saw (franchise) as article does not appear to meet WP:NFO .  Owen250708 ( talk ) 22:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Saw (franchise)#Short films , per nom.  Merge would be extremely WP:UNDUE .  -- asilvering ( talk ) 22:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Creed of the Kromon: One can find Doctor Who fan blogs with reviews, but I don't see sigcov in reliable sources, and therefore this fails the GNG.  Heavy Grasshopper ( talk ) 12:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Radio .  Heavy Grasshopper ( talk ) 12:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures .  It exists but nothing in the article suggests it meets WP:GNG .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Voice (Emi Hinouchi album): Unsourced.  BEFORE showed promo, database style results, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly (the album) and in-depth.  No objection to a consensus redirect to the artist // Timothy :: talk 11:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Japan .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Emi Hinouchi as {{ R from album }} per WP:ATD .  ✗ plicit 13:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Just Sue Me: I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and nothing suitable or reliable was found in Newspapers.com .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 10:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 11:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Because the cast is mildly notable and given the director has no page (yet), and because redirects are cheap, may I suggest to redirect to List of comedy films of the 2000s , where the film is not listed (yet)?  Willing to add a line there with cast and director and a source (this one-short-line entry in TV guide for instance), if this solution is chosen.  Best, - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC) NB- The film is listed in this list but I think that the comedy films one is a much better targe if redirect is chosen.  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amazed there isn't a review to be found, I vaguely remember this film.  Rotten Tomatoes has none, Gnewspapers only seems  to have movie theater listings for it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - The article could be improved if there was more sources to go along with it, but if there's not enough information presented in a long time period, then the article should be deleted.  But, I think it should be improved, then it will convince other viewers that the article passes notability.  Geko72290 ( talk ) 21:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 07:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to List of comedy films of the 2000s per Mushy Yank's suggestion.  The current refs are obviously deficient and fails GNG, a search on Google, Google Books, and TWL finds trivial mentions and this newspaper piece.  However, it mentions the film first then cover it in four sentences (one quoting the director) and fails WP:SIGCOV IMo.  VickKiang (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kimberly Surio: Former college soccer player who earned at least one cap with the El Salvador women's national football team .  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , El Salvador ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK to redirect to List of El Salvador women's international footballers .  I've updated the other page with her team name (Cal State Los Angeles Golden Eagles) and added the footnote to the single piece of significant coverage which exists about her , which is a university publication and doesn't count toward notability.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 18:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 11:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
What Is This Feeling?: Little coverage of this song is found, therefore failing WP:GNG .  Jontesta ( talk ) 23:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Theatre .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Not every song from a popular musical is notable.   The song has not charted or become a standard in any way.   The sources do not give it significant coverage separate from the musical.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 03:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wicked (musical) per above.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wicked (musical) .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KOBS-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Texas .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I doubt it garnered much, if any, significant coverage pre-2016 — that was when it became another DTV America/HC2/Innovate station, and that incarnation definitely has no coverage, notability, or anything of note.  Yet another survivor of that bulk nomination from last year .  Note that prior to 2019 this was a redirect to KPFW-LD , but a previous mention there is long gone, and it probably has as much (i.e. little) notability anyway, so that's not an ideal solution.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No SIGCOV in the Express-News .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 21:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  Without any knowledge of its pre-HC2 history outside snippets there really isn't much here there to be had.  KPFW-LD itself could probably meet the same fate (that there's even a mention of it not being on Spectrum 'at this time' is astonishing).  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Subject lacks WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Redirect as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
RondoNumbaNine: The article subject was not notable before he was arrested for murder, and he is not notable for the murder under PERP or BLP1E .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 23:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Illinois .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 23:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Lil Durk .   Cannot find any sources which don't fall under WP:NEWSPRIMARY , but he has some sustained coverage with regards to his imprisonment [3] and appears on a few "best songs" lists [4] [5] .  Mach61 ( talk ) 01:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Think about the ramifications of this merge recommendation.  This guy's biography would be sitting in the middle of a different guy's biography, which makes no sense for two different people, or even for two different performers who have a connection.  it would be like cramming Stevie Wonder's life story into one paragraph of Paul McCartney's life story just because they once collaborated on a song.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 16:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Meh.  It would be a very short section.  Mach61 ( talk ) 18:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree; merging his bio would be inappropriate.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 18:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - His rap career is non-notable except for his associations with other people, and if he is relevant for someone else's song or some other association, such as Lil Durk, he can be mentioned briefly at their articles.  His own music is only visible in the usual promotional and self-upload sites and received no significant media coverage when he was only a local rapper.  His murder conviction got news coverage as seen in the sources already used, but per WP:CRIME he is not a well-known criminal and his crime was not unusual.  Thus, he was a non-notable rapper and now he's a non-notable murderer too.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 16:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Federal University of Technology Ikot Abasi: - UtherSRG (talk) 11:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Nigeria .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment We've generally kept public universities, they're usually inherently notable, however, given the relative newness of this institution, possible AtD would be a redirect to List of universities in Nigeria#Federal Institutions .  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 06:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is acceptable to me.  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Indeed, we have generally kept government-established universities.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 13:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  We have article for the other Federal Universities in Nigeria.  It is fairly new but it will grow since it has federal support.  (I was once a Professor at a Nigerian University, so I do know something about the system).  Bduke ( talk ) 00:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep –  Per above.  Princess of Ara 14:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect This brand new university makes no claim to notability.  Being founded does not make it notable.  This is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON .  Let is work, grow and prove itself.  Before that, redirect this to List of universities in Nigeria#Federal Institutions .  The Banner talk 20:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : We've had articles about newer US/UK originated universities kept and this shouldn't be an exception.  Passes WP:GNG which is the bedrock of WP:NSCHOOL .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 11:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Views are evenly split between Keep and Redirect to List of universities in Nigeria .  Additional views would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 16:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of universities in Nigeria#Federal Institutions , fails GNG, nothing found with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Satellite Boulevard: This doesn't seem to be a notable street, simply saying it's the location of American Megatrends isn't enough - that's the company being notable, not the building.  (If this were not the case, AM's article would mention the street).  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —this utterly fails both WP:GEOROAD (not a state highway) and WP:GNG (not the subject of significant coverage), thus it fails WP:N .  Additionally, both images in the article are copyright violations and should be deleted from Commons shortly.  Imzadi 1979 → 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per both of the above.   Not notable, no coverage.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 20:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Interstate 85 in Georgia#Atlanta to South Carolina state line as an ATD; it's pretty much a frontage road that follows I-85 all the way north, and the 'exit list' is de facto within the I-85 article already.  A short mention of the businesses along it (which I did add) is appropriate.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect