hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
WISE Cup: No Google News sources or other similar sources to show that this has received significant attention, and extremely few regular sources [19] .  Fram ( talk ) 13:52, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Sports , Ireland ,  and United Kingdom .  Fram ( talk ) 13:52, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:SIGCOV is not met.  A Google search, for example, barely returns NINE results [20] [21] .  It is telling that the article needs to rely on primary sources (mostly Facebook/Instagram posts and YouTube videos) to support even the basic facts.  The COI/SPA/PROMO overtones do not help.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 14:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 07:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brewster Road: Tagged for notability in August and no improvements in sourcing since then.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and New Jersey .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Generic short local road, baffled why this would need an article.  Reywas92 Talk 02:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —not notable.  It's not a state highway, so it needs to meet GNG, which it fails.  Imzadi 1979 → 03:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NROAD -- Artene50 ( talk ) 23:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's a road, and nothing more, that happens to wind around the airport, but is simply not notable.  Alansohn ( talk ) 19:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per ATD and CHEAP to Newark Liberty International Airport , where Brewster Road is mentioned and described at sufficient length.  (i.e. no need to merge anything) gidonb ( talk ) 06:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete though this is likely the most notable Brewster Rd it is far from the only one to the point that I suspect a redirect would cause more confusion than it alleviates.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jahfeeil: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Source eval: Comments Source One paragraph promo for single "Honey Cotton Candy", fails WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV.  Repeated on #4 and #5 below, same promo paragraph, different site.  1.  "Hottest Hit Singles of 2022: The Wrap Up".  Thisis50.  2022-11-30.  Retrieved 2023-12-27.  Q & A post, fails WP:SIGCOV  2. ^ "Who wrote "4EVER" by Jahfeeil?".  Genius.  Retrieved 2023-12-27.  Q & A promo interview, fails WP:IS  3. ^ Jump up to:a b Staff, 24HH (2022-12-03).  "Exclusive Interview with California's Rising R&B Singer-Songwriter Jahfeeil".  24Hip-Hop.  Retrieved 2023-12-27.  Duplicate of #1 on different site, one paragraph promo for single "Honey Cotton Candy", fails WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV  4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e "Hottest Hit Singles of 2022".  Home of Hip Hop Videos & Rap Music, News, Video, Mixtapes & more.  2022-12-29.  Retrieved 2023-12-27.  Duplicate of #1 on different site, one paragraph promo for single "Honey Cotton Candy", fails WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV  5. ^ Wells, Dawn (2022-12-30).  "Hottest Hit Singles of 2022".  USA Wire.  Retrieved 2023-12-27.  BEFORE showed lots of promo, but nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 06:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I checked online and in the newspaper archive and nothing came up.  There is an interview but the source isn't reliable.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 22:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : usawire, 24hip-hop, and nvweekly are garbage SEO farms with fake or PR authors.  I've removed those.  hiphopsince1987 is a SEO/guest posting blog.  thisis50 is a PR/SEO funnel now (unmaked paid blog posts).  I'm sure those two throwaway accounts that created/edited the article are totally not paid editors.  Sam Kuru (talk) 14:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Subject not notable aaronneallucas ( talk ) 02:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom's source accessment table 94rain Talk 05:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kripa Sadan High School: The best that I can find are database pages like Justdial and Schools.org.in .  The latter source says that the school only has one classroom, so this might explain why I was unable to find any significant coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perpetual Art Machine: Gsearch goes directly to the wiki entry.  Then search finds [12] , which I'm unsure if it's a RS.  Then this [13] in a different city.  Not meeting GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The first citation (ArtDaily) is a press release, the second citation newyorkalmanack seems to be about an unrelated project of the same name.  In a BEFORE I was able to find primary sources, such as an interview and the like, but nothing so far that is independent and in-depth.  Will continue to look before ! voting.  Netherzone ( talk ) 20:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Websites .  Netherzone ( talk ) 20:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  An evident case of WP:IBA , connecting with the article of Lee Wells which has been accused of WP:AUTOBIO .  Even if some sources are available, I don't think anything will eventually pass WP:GNG .  Chiserc ( talk ) 20:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability.  (Incidentally, this article might well have been deleted 16 years ago. It was created by an editor with an unambiguous conflict of interest, and in its early versions it was absolutely blatant spam. It was nominated for speedy deletion by Irishguy shortly after its creation, but the speedy deletion tag was removed by Nihonjoe with the edit summary "notability is claimed, feel free to AfD if you wish", which made little sense, because the reason given for speedy deletion was to do with being promotional, not to do with notability.)  JBW ( talk ) 21:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Being 16 years ago, I don't remember that.  However, as it currently stands, the article doesn't meet notability requirements.  ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan !  15:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NCORP , no inherent notability per WP:ORGSIG .  WP:NOTADVERTISING .  Netherzone ( talk ) 21:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with above, fails GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 21:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete Delete for all the many reasons given by other editors above.  This is an easy call.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jalal Khodami: Sports2021 ( talk ) 22:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Iran .  Sports2021 ( talk ) 22:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete He doesn't appear to have competed in any major competitions as an adult.   Most of the claims of medals are either not supported by sources or the sources given don't mention him.   There also appears to be no significant independent coverage that would meet WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 02:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet GNG and has no notable accomplishments.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 14:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stairs Mhlongo: JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roy Lipski: Looked at the first blocks of references.  Mix of PR, technical papers.  Mostly passing mentions, company info or WP:PRIMARY , WP:SPS sources scope_creep Talk 09:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Technology , Israel , England ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The company he was CEO of, Velocys, Inc, might be notable, but there is no in-depth coverage of Lipski in independent, secondary sources.  Mostly passing mentions and PR, as per nom.  Mooonswimmer 15:27, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No enough notable references are weak 111.119.189.160 ( talk ) 19:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Does being "the first to develop sentiment analysis AI software" not count as notable?  Stravensky ( talk ) 22:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
English Club TV: LDM 2003 talk to me!  20:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Content is meant for promotion of the channel, thus violating our policy.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 14:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete cannot find sources to establish notability.  Promotional in nature as well, would need a complete rewrite if notability is proven — Karnataka talk 21:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stepchildren of Society: Article also seems to be pretty WP:PROMO.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 16:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Sweden .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 16:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival: As always, film festivals are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage about the festival in media — but this is heavily reference-bombed almost entirely to primary and/or unreliable sourcing that isn't support for notability (the festival's own self-published content about itself on its main website, press release distribution platforms, Facebook posts, blogs, YouTube videos, etc.), with very little evidence of genuinely notability-building media coverage about it shown at all.  Simply existing isn't automatically notable enough to exempt it from having to have much better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events ,  and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : It's been an event for over 20 years, i was hoping to find something in RS.  This is the best I could find [10] ; not strictly about the festival, but confirmation of it at least.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Please see sources I added to External Links on the article.  I had them listed here, but there is some Wikipedia dictate that won't allow sourcing listed at AFD.   So check the External Links on the article.  .  — Maile ( talk ) 03:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] These appear to be ... lists and press releases?  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - based on what I wrote here and per nom.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is no coverage in notable sources about the event, even what's been added to the external links section is PR or passing mentions.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The event seems notable but The entire article is sourced as self published references.  Does not meet WP:SIGCOV for now.  Macbeejack ☎ 08:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Campus Market: It is more than likely that the purpose of this article's creation was to boost credibility, giving off the impact of being "written like an advertisement".  It does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability requirement for companies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by B3v3nt33n ( talk • contribs ) 23:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Websites ,  and North Carolina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non notable self promotion.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siege of Ranthambore (1226): There's no significant coverage in the sources but passing mentions of few words that "Ranthambore was captured by Iltutmish".  Definitely it should not be in mainspace, simply because it fails WP:GNG and WP:SIRS .  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 18:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Rajasthan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, As it does not passes WP:GNG .  More of a background story with no mentioning of actual seige.  Regards Rawn3012 ( talk ) 08:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lars Ootes: Nothing useful on Google News.  Fails WP:BIO Fram ( talk ) 07:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Netherlands .  Fram ( talk ) 07:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep player has participated in notable events ( Tata Steel Chess Tournament ), accomplished notable feats (wins against higher-rated players), and has independent reliable sources (theweekinchess) GeorgeMHall ( talk ) 18:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The definition of notability is about the same for chess players as for other topics.   Participation in a notable event is not itself notable.   Games won against stronger players, even against notable players, are not inherently notable.   Appearance in TWIC is not the kind of coverage that defines notability; everybody and his brother-in-law has appeared in TWIC.  Bruce leverett ( talk ) 21:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear to have significant coverage - all I see is routine tournament results and databases of his games.  If there is a trove of offline or Dutch language sources out there then great, but we need to see some evidence of that in order to keep the article.  Pawnkingthree ( talk ) 12:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jules' Undersea Lodge: — Trey Maturin ™ 16:33, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  — Trey Maturin ™ 16:33, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there is an obvious lack of reliable references.  One of the two sources I reviewed only gives a brief mention of the hotel.  Hence, the significant claims made in the article might not be verifiable.  -- Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 09:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Kyong-hun (footballer): Simione001 ( talk ) 01:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amy Kofoed: Some coverage here and here , but not enough significant coverage, and it was WP:ROUTINE declaring that she had been drafted as well.  Every college player is not notable because they have some local news about them, and this is a case of that.  Nothing to be found about her professional career.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 15:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Utah .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 15:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete