hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Grey Blackwell: Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and United States of America .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unsourced.   See talk page note:→creating editor User:Badbilltucker was suspected for being a sock of User:Grey Blackwell .   Has accounts on YouTube, Instagram, and ImDB (with only one entry there), but nothing that made him notable.  Also see User:Badbilltucker/Admin Oversight Board which should also probably be deleted.  — Maile ( talk ) 18:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BEFORE brings up only social media and professional listings.  Non notable Cartoonist/Flash Animator.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 22:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aaron Phypers: There is very little notable about Aaron Phypers, other than being married to Denise Richards and previously being married to Nicolette Sheridan .  The article describes him as an actor, but he isn't WP:NACTOR and isn't WP:N for other activities. -- Samp4ngeles ( talk ) 10:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 10:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Health and fitness ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Being married and operating a wellness clinic are confirmed in the sources, but don't make you notable; all I find are "get to know the celebrity" articles.  I don't even see anything for ACTOR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : NACTOR not established.  I couldn't find any sources with SIGCOV either.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vermont Business Magazine: Only found passing mentions in my WP:BEFORE search Carpimaps talk to me!  13:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  Carpimaps talk to me!  13:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Vermont .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WeScheme: The name makes it tricky to search, though, and another editor may be able to turn up sources I could not.  ~ T P W 16:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  ~ T P W 16:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pamaria: No evidence of notability.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 14:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and India .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 14:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bihar-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Unreferenced stub that has been a single line of text for 13 years.  I find no significant discussion in RS and no real chance of expanding this into an article.  With its age, draftify is simply not a viable option.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 21:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Doménica Ananías: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this interview and a couple of sentences of coverage here .  Everything else are trivial mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Chile .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Inus Kritzinger: There are a few sentences of coverage here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tamari Epitashvili: All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Georgia (country) .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - she has some coverage in Georgian but it's mostly weak and/or non-independent.  For example, Crystal Sport is just a squad listing and GFF only mentions her once in the main prose.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Ballantine: Only source in article is primary.  WP:BEFORE finds no evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  Obvious failure of WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG IceBergYYC ( talk ) 22:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 22:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Non-notable sportsman; fails GNG!  Couldn't find reliable sources supporting notability.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 14:51, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nonfiction (band): The only notability claims being attempted here are  (a) that one song was a "modest commercial success" in unspecified ways, which isn't an instant notability pass if you can't quantify and properly reference a specific Billboard chart placement, and  (b) having had two independently notable members, except that even one of those two members has been flagged for notability concerns since 2016 due to poor sourcing of his own, and the other one probably should have been because he's not actually citing adequate sourcing to genuinely demonstrate standalone notability independent of any of his bands either .  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have any referencing, and the article's been tagged for lacking sources since 2008 without ever having any sources added.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , California ,  and Michigan .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  This is an unsourced WP:BLP .  This band is one of hundreds with one hit of moderate success .  In 2024, everyone knows we are not MySpace .  There's not zero sources; see this interview , but interviews don't contributed to prove notability as we use significant coverage in multiple reliable sources .  I would not oppose sending it to draft space as WP:TOOSOON or if someone can find better sources, of changing my mind.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KLHO-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oklahoma .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adorján Czipleá: CosXZ ( talk ) 18:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hungary and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Is it blatant enough?  If so, we could speedy delete it under WP:G3 section.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] true CosXZ ( talk ) 18:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] i will nominate it for speedy deletion CosXZ ( talk ) 18:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] someone please close this as this page is now up for speedy deletion CosXZ ( talk ) 18:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See also User:Mhammerhead/Adorjan Cziplea , which shouldn't stay up if hoax is the verdict.  However there does not seem to be sufficient reason to rush this.  Let this discussion run its course.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete Blantant Hoax, checked my own university's library search as well as some relevant encyclopaedias with no results.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 09:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zwartbosch Private Nature Reserve: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I cannot find any sources other than maps and Tripadvisor listings.  Does not meet [WP:GNG]] nor WP:CORP .  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 16:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trunk Archive: I considered merge/redirect to Waddell & Reed but it doesn't even have a mention in that article at the moment, so may unbalance it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Denmark ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject as required by WP:NCORP and WP:SIRS .  Jfire ( talk ) 02:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Genesis Health Clubs - Orlando Sportsplex: Seems to fail WP:NORG .  funplussmart ( talk ) 23:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Sports , Basketball , Ice hockey ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies ,  and Travel and tourism .  – The Grid ( talk ) 17:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There appears to have been regular mentions of "RDV Sportsplex" in local news but I can't find anything beyond the usual namechecks.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 11:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Appears to be a single gym and a couple of ice rinks, nothing notable i can see.  Desertarun ( talk ) 11:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Omukwiyugwemanya: The first source is an actual newspaper, but the article is about sending books to Namibia and just mentions the tree in passing.  The second source is a broken hyperlink.  I can't find anything else about this tree online that isn't from Facebook or a wordpress blog.  BusterTheMighty ( talk ) 02:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , insufficient references for WP:GNG .  -- Pgallert ( talk ) 06:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  BusterTheMighty ( talk ) 02:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Garrett Immel: no Reliable sources Edit.pdf ( talk ) 08:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No reliable sigcov found from my search Carpimaps talk to me!  11:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTRESUME .  He has had some interesting jobs, but until reliable journalistic sources cover his career in significant ways, he's a working stiff like the rest of us and does not qualify for an encyclopedic article.  If anyone is concerned about alternatives to deletion, he could possibly be redirected to his band Ghastly Ones .  but I'm not so sure about their notability either.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I looked into his band and decided that they are worthy of a deletion discussion as well.  See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghastly Ones .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Airespring: Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 03:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , Internet ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  The references are a collection of PR announcements and company soundbites.  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 20:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mid Valley Shopping Centre: I could find no indepth coverage to meet WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG .  I could not find any reliable sources, noting that the current references also include Facebook.  Cabrils ( talk ) 23:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  It's a shopping centre and it's not notable.  TarnishedPath talk 02:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above discussion , terrible sources , and as a run of the mill shopping center, one of thousands in the First World.  Bearian ( talk ) 00:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shahid Siddiqui (politician): Never held any political office that makes them inherently notable.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 18:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL , never held office.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete