Holy Cross and St Helen's Church, Lincoln : St Helen's Church, Lincoln is grade II* listed and rightly has a separate article; Holy Cross Church has no claim to notability, and nor does the joint congregation which worships at the two churches.  A merge proposal template was removed from the St Helen's article with no explanation, after a brief discussion of the proposed merge (propose, oppose from creator of both the articles, one further comment from proposer).  I considered just redirecting this article to St Helen's but bring it here to get further eyes on the discussion.  A Redirect to St Helen's Church, Lincoln would be my preferred outcome from this AfD.  Pam D 07:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and England .  Pam D 07:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to St Helen's Church, Lincoln or just redirect .  There is mergeable content.  The congregation are not notable for an article, per nom. , but the joint use of this and another church by a single congregation is worth mention on the merge target page - it is the current use of this church.  It is a small merge, but a merge nonetheless.  The merge discussion has the page creator arguing for the notability of Holy Cross.  I don't think those arguments pass muster, but they are not a reason to keep this page which is specifically about the joint congregation.  A Holy Cross church article could be created although my view is that it would not meet notability requirements and should not be attempted without sufficient reliable secondary sourcing.  I didn't see where the merge header was removed, but it clearly lacked visibility, so the discussion here is appropriate.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 09:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Sirfurboy The article on St Helen's already includes "The church is joined with the nearby Holy Cross Church as the "Congregation of Holy Cross and St Helen's".", with a link to the parish website.  Is that enough?  The merge header was removed earlier today with the uninformative edit summary "Slight tweaks".  Pam D 09:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah yes, I see it now.  Yes, on the basis the information is already there, I have unbolded my merge and bolded redirect instead in this edit.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 09:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Agree the two churches are linked and can be covered in St Helen's Church, Lincoln .  There isn't a church called Holy Cross and St Helen's Church, Lincoln , so that title as a redirect may be of limited use.  For readers to find content on Holy Cross it would need a redirect page, titled "Holy Cross Church, Boultham" or such like.  The main discussion point regarding a merge is whether there should be an infobox for each church, just for one of the churches or a combined one.  Found brief local news reports on Holy Cross's opening in 1940, which can be used for additional factual content.  None of the references currently in the article count towards notability and so far I haven't found feature length coverage.  Rupples ( talk ) 17:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I agree that one article is sufficient to cover both churches however it is accomplished.  Esemgee ( talk ) 10:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think Holy Cross church needs to be covered at all, except perhaps in a list of churches in Lincoln.  It appears to have no claim to notability.  Pam D 13:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Holy Cross is mentioned in Boultham and Wikiproject UKGEOG content guidelines for settlements say to note churches within their locality WP:UKTOWNS#Religious sites — it doesn't state the church has to be notable for inclusion.  Rupples ( talk ) 14:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Churches mentioned in settlement articles don't have to have their own article.  Maybe this article should be renamed and redirected to St Helen's Church.  Esemgee ( talk ) 14:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Take it you mean 'redirect' rather than 'article' as the closing word in the first sentence?  Yes, agree with a retitle, and redirect to St Helen's but I've seen an admin state not to do this before the AfD closes.  Suppose we'd recommend redirect under the current title then rename the redirect page.  Rupples ( talk ) 15:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC).  Strike, maybe misread.  Rupples ( talk ) 16:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability not established for this church.  The title of this article "Holy Cross and St Helen's Church, Lincoln" is inaccurate and misleading.  It leads one to think it's the name of a single church building.  The website for the church is Boulton Parish and the home page begins The Congregation at Holy Cross and St. Helen's .  We already have an article St Helen's Church, Lincoln where reliably sourced detail on Holy Cross can be added.  It's simpler to delete this, add a section to St Helen's about Holy Cross and create a redirect page, (suggest Holy Cross, Boultham ) than redirect this article's rather nonsensical title.  Rupples ( talk ) 22:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Rupples There's already a redirect, with categories, at Holy Cross Church, Lincoln , and that is listed in the dab page at Holy Cross Church#United Kingdom .  OK, have now created Holy Cross Church, Boultham as a second redirect.  Both currently pointing to this article, Holy Cross and St Helen's Church, Lincoln , but if this is deleted or redirected they should both target St Helen's Church, Lincoln where the church gets a mention.  Pam D 16:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to one name, one place, one church, one body.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  06:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to St Helen's Church, Lincoln , which bizarrely isn't even linked in the article.  If there is anything worth merging, go ahead and save that bit, suitably cited, but apart from St Helen's there doesn't seem to be anything here worthy of note.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 13:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to St Helen's Church, Lincoln .  Changing from delete to redirect as a new, more aptly named redirect has been created.  Doesn't require a formal merge as there's so little to merge that any reliably sourced content can be added to the redirect target separately, should anyone feel inclined.  A separate heading is warranted for Holy Cross in the St Helen's article as reading through it's starting to get confusing which church the text relates to.  There is further relevant material that can be added about Holy Cross, though insufficient coverage to establish notability.  In any case, as the churches are linked it is better for context the two are combined in the article for the church whose notability is proven.  Rupples ( talk ) 15:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per

Discussion outcome: redirect