hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Fex urbis lex orbis : Apparently non-notable Latin phrase used in passing in Les Misérables .  A review of the first dozen or so pages of Google Books search yields primarily the book itself, with a couple of passing mentions in other books, and the name of an album by a heavy metal band ; Google Scholar/News and Jstor are no better.  It's also a near-orphan: the only article to link to it is the book in which it appears, and there it's relegated to the "See also" section without mention in the article body.  Smdjcl ( talk ) 23:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Literature ,  and Law .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing that I find is largely to Les Misersables; I don't think this phrase has been used much outside that context.  Delete for non-notability, lack of sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So we've been taking the word of a work of fiction for 17 years, over all of the scholarship on Jerome which records no such thing .   (The nearest that all of the books on Jerome going back centuries get is probably "Major est autoritas orbis quam urbis" which is a completely different thing.)  This is unverifiable and almost certainly false.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 14:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with List of Latin phrases (F) : I agree there's not enough here to write an individual article.  However, it's notable enough that it should be merged to the List of Latin phrases.  Other than sources that discuss the phrase in the context of the book, which are generally brief mentions, there's one source (p. 59) that applies the phrase to modern capitalism, but I wouldn't call that significant coverage of the phrase itself; rather, it's using the phrase to frame a discussion about another topic.  Another source is a brief mention: "As the anonymous revolutionary so succiently expressed the concept of postmodern contingency, 'shit happens', or the Latin variant, 'Fex urbis, lex orbis' (Saint Jerome)."  The final source I could find briefly discusses the phrase in the context of discussing Baudrillard : "Fex urbis, lex orbis (Saint Jerome)—The law of the world is made out of the feces of civilized life.").  On page 46 of that source, there's also a section heading called "Fex urbis, lex sociologis", which is also about Baudrillard's work on the field of sociology.  (Side note: I gave a brief listen to the metal album; it's meh.) voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If search results "yield primarily the book itself", then the search engine is not being used properly.  The simplest way to exclude the book, and quotes from it, is to look for results that don't include other parts of the text, such as excluding all results that contain the word "exaspérations" and translations of that word.  Like this: (

Discussion outcome: merge
Against Nature (band) : This article was created in 2007 by Nothingagainst The Sputnikmusic website tells us that it was a side-project of the band Revelation , and went on to release a number of albums and EPs under the "Against Nature" name.  Encyclopaedia Metallum tells us pretty much the same Given this article's long existence on en.wp, perhaps an articles for deletion discussion might be preferable to outright speedy deletion?  Please do note that I am not suggesting Sputnikmusic and Encyclopaedia Metallum are reliable sources, but they possibly hint at some possibility of a "keep" or "redirect" outcome here.
 That said, my ! vote is: fails WP:GNG , WP:BAND and any number of other policies and guidelines.  Let's see what happens.  Shirt58 ( talk ) 🦘 09:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Maryland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'd suggest to merge this article with that of Revelation , but  1) that article already mentions Against Nature  2) the Revelation article is also unsourced, and  3) "Revelation" is a terrible term to search for because it's not generic.  Leaning delete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortador ( talk • contribs ) 30 June 2024 (UTC) Merge to Revelation (band) .  This is an odd story, as it looks like Revelation temporarily changed their name to Against Nature then changed it back, possibly due to contractual problems forcing them to self-release new material under a different name.  This article's text about how Against Nature formed is largely taken from this uncited source: [6] .  They soon relaunched Revelation, and Against Nature achieved little notability as a stand-alone act, so the whole temporary hiccup in their history can be described briefly at Revelation's article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Revelation (band) as not independently notable imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Vital Signs (school publication) : No independent references.  If there's anything of value in this article, it can be merged to West Visayas State University .  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Philippines .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, can we give the article a chance to grow itself?  The Philippines is not a country of sophistication; therefore, referencing might be a problem.  Maybe they can submit primary sources to back it up.  Lovelovetheworld ( talk ) 05:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We don't need to be patronized.  Everyone follows WP:RS .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No independent sources, not indexed anywhere; fails WP:NJournals and WP:GNG . -- Randykitty ( talk ) 17:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Merge with another article detailing publications within West Visayas State University 122.54.60.130 ( talk ) 07:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Joe Higashi : Despite the effort being written, sources were mostly from trivia mentions.  Also at reception section, those were full of passing mentions and of course listicles, thus showing zero WP:SIGCOV .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 13:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 13:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 13:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Fatal Fury characters .  Not much to say beyond the fact that there is no significant coverage shown.  Everything in reception is a trivial mention pulled from a review or list.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 16:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I agree.  Fails WP:GNG .  Blitzfan51 the manager 16:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge fails WP:GNG but some information can be WP:PRESERVEd .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Turn Red : Eternal Shadow Talk 04:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Eternal Shadow Talk 04:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Unlike nom says, the song passes WP:NMUSIC .  A sufficient requirement is for any song to have "been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts".  It has ranked 59 on Sverigetopplistan , which is not a WP:BADCHART .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 05:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Per WP:NSINGLE :   Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts: Note again that this indicates only that a song maybe notable, not that it is notable .  There has also been nothing that shows that the song passes WP:GNG , which supersedes WP:NMUSIC regardless.  Eternal Shadow Talk 05:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : One low chart placement alone would not cut it for NMUSIC if you ask me, and this song shows no other signs of notability that I could see.  The only other coverage I could find was a page on the artist on Know Your Meme, and we don't regard that as a reliable source anyway .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 06:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What do you mean by "low chart"?  WP:NSONG never said any of such but that it may be notable if it charted, probably if there's WP:SIGCOV and/or enough news coverage, or a certificate and award/nomination.  dxneo ( talk ) 11:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Anyway redirect to M Dot R , and it peaked at 69 not 59.  Nothing in RS whatsoever.  dxneo ( talk ) 12:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Dxneo Low on the chart, as in not even in the top half and only for one week.  A lot of songs can achieve that, but that doesn't mean it's an impressive or even notable chart run.  Whether NSONG says anything about it or not, I still stand by it personally.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 22:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] QuietHere , unfortunately "personally" is not enough and does not override the WP:NSONG requirements.  However, I doubt the article will see the light of the day, and I don't know why you voted del while there's a target page.  dxneo ( talk ) 01:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to M Dot R since the single and chart info can be placed in the artist's Discography section.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 02:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to M Dot R .  Not notable.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 14:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with M Dot R : Not notable per QuietHere , but chart info can be merged per बिनोद थारू .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2020 Benishangul-Gumuz bus attack : No sustained significant coverage.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 00:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events , Terrorism ,  and Ethiopia .  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 00:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Benishangul-Gumuz conflict , where it is mentioned.  Not enough coverage to justify a standalone article, but including this information there seems reasonable.  -- Kinu t / c 01:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to above target.  Doesn't warrant its own article due to lack of extended coverage, but seems to warrant a mention somewhere.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 02:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Benishangul-Gumuz conflict .  Although I disagree that it's wholly WP:NOTNEWS , without considerable expansion and contextualization—which would be achieved by a merge in the first place—it sits very close to it.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Benishangul-Gumuz conflict .  Not enough coverage for a standalone article.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 01:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  If the murder of at least 34 people is not notable then what on earth is?  Pure WP:SYSTEMIC .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of ESPN College Basketball personalities : Just another case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS , there is none.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television ,  and Basketball .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Trim and Merge to ESPN College Basketball#Personalities with only the most notable announcers on that list.  The article on its own is good for the fandom, it is otherwise WP:LISTCRUFT .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  05:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Super Junior Full House : Nothing found in a BEFORE.  Tagged for notability since 2015.  PROD removed with "try AfD" and zero improvements.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Television ,  and South Korea .  Donald D23 talk to me 01:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Super Junior filmography#Television , where it is mentioned.  Coverage, even in Korean, is scarce.  ✗ plicit 02:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Real Situation Saturday .  The only secondary discussion of the program I could find was [3] .  :3 F4U ( they /it ) 03:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  03:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Ks0stm ( T • C • G • E ) 14:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Real Situation Saturday sounds more fitting, so if nobody disagrees i would start merging!  Lililolol ( talk ) 19:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Lililolol wait till the AFD closes with the result is merge before merging.  Lightoil ( talk ) 11:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Real Situation Saturday : As there is material suitable for a merge.  Lightoil ( talk ) 11:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Kaszuba, Podlaskie Voivodeship : It is a small colony near Sławno .  Ilawa-Kataka ( talk ) 15:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question - @ Ilawa-Kataka : , have you considered a merge or redirect to Sławno, Podlaskie Voivodeship as an WP:ATD ?  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Kvng I am absolutely appalled that I did not think of deletion alternatives—though I am experienced with Wiktionary, I have only edited Wikipedia recently.  However, I think it may be better as a redirect to Gmina Dąbrowa Białostocka as it is legally distinct from Sławno, and which census area(s) include Kaszuba or where it even is, is unclear (sources consistently locate it at some empty fields, and there are no addresses for Kaszuba).   Is there a way I could retract my AfDs and just do that, and would that be appropriate?  Ilawa-Kataka ( talk ) 16:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think, since there are not yet any ! votes, you can retract.  I'd ask Liz who recently relisted this discussion.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If possible, redirect/merge > deletion.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Homelessness in popular culture : What we get is poorly referenced list of random works featuring homelessness .  This fails MOS:TRIVIA , WP:IPC , WP:INDISCRIMINATE , WP:NOTTVTROPES , and so on.  While this could be redirected to Homelessness#Popular_culture , that subsection has the same problems and should likely disappear in its current form anyway.  The only salvageable part of the aricle is the short prose section "Depictions of homelessness", which I'd suggest is used to replace the current content at Homelessness#Popular_culture .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Popular culture and Social science .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 12:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Give "Depictions of homelessness" a new home per nom; delete the remainder.  (Disclaimer: A book of mine featuring a homeless character as a semi-protagonist is currently in intermittent development.) -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 23:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to homelessness.  AryKun ( talk ) 17:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Give the soon-to-be homeless prose shelter in the Popular culture section per nom and delete the random sampling of depictions as well as such profound nuggets of wisdom as "The homeless are frequently divided as either protagonists or antagonists."  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the prose portion to Homelessness per nom.  No objection to recreation if enough sourced prose content can be added to make a WP:SIZESPLIT necessary.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the first two paragraphs to main article.  Otherwise we are not an exhaustive list database of depictions of common thing that appears a lot in popular media.  And no, not even Wikipedia:TVTROPES is that either (see their page “people sit on chairs”).  Dronebogus ( talk ) 23:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Wisdom of the Gnomes : Tagged for notability since 2021 PROD removed with "deprod; ran for 26 episodes; not an uncontroversial deletion", but nothing added to support notability.  Donald D23 talk to me 03:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and Spain .  Donald D23 talk to me 03:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to The World of David the Gnome .  Would be ideal as a section there.  Hiding T 12:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to The World of David the Gnome .  Unneeded CFORK that lacks sources to meet GNG.  // Timothy :: talk 00:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge