Amna Malik: BTW, this was deleted back in 2020.  The creator BeauSuzanne ( talk · contribs ) wasn't only able to recreate it  but they also did their best to conceal the previous deletion discussion , which speaks volumes about their dubious editing nature.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 20:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 20:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : She is a notable actress.  She hasn't done main roles but she has done supporting roles in dramas and her recent work in Mayi was noted [1] .  In these she mentioned how she switched from teacher to host and then acting.  [2] Her peronal life.  [3] ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 07:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] BeauSuzanne , Supporting roles are not enough to meet WP:NACTOR and the coverages you provided can be used for WP:V, but they're not enough to establish WP:GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It meets WP:Nactor some sources are written this way from interviews before that I did my search on the sources it's reliable from ARY News, Images Dawn and BOL News it's both in English and Urdu. ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 19:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] BeauSuzanne , You've to see WP:ATA .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete it with fire.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 15:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Speedy deletion is not appropriate and you haven't even specified an appropriate criteria.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Looking at her last few roles in shows with articles, none are significant (not starring or lead support) so she does not meet WP:NACTOR .   Sources are interviews, do not mention her and many are not reliable such as The Brown Identity, Something Haute, FUCHSIA Magazine, Masala.com, Dispatch News Desk, etc.  S0091 ( talk ) 15:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I find convincing BeauSuzanne's explanation; some of her roles do seem significant enough and she seems to meet WP:NACTOR indeed.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 22:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sure, her recent work was "noted" in source 20, but it's a series of photos with maybe 10 lines of text.  The rest aren't in RS.. .  Most I can find are interviews or the type of celebrity gossip articles that don't help notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, the article fails to meet WP:GNG as there is no in-depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources.  The sources are short and passing mentions.  Additionally, it fails to meet WP:NACTOR as the subject was not a lead or significant character in any notable series, film, or drama.  Grab Up - Talk 15:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete