hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
London Informer : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE - Agree, not notable - 17:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] comment in the page present state it is ofcourse delete 1keyhole ( talk ) 09:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darren Adamson : PROD objected by User:Florentyna but issues not fixed.  All sources are not secondary and none provide SIGCOV.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 02:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and England .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 02:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sources do not contain SIGCOV and do not establish notability.  Avilich ( talk ) 01:54, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
French Orthodox Church : Claims 10 communities in their own official website.  The French version was deleted by consensus .  Leefeni aures audiendi audiat 22:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Leefeni aures audiendi audiat 22:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Veverve ( talk ) 14:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find independent sources that passed WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 18:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fatimata Tamboura : All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2013 , 2015 , 2017 , etc.) Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Senegal .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blue cheese wontons : All coverage is blog posts, recipes and local review posts.  — HTGS ( talk ) 22:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and New Zealand .  — HTGS ( talk ) 22:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per your comments - no sigcov.  Alexeyevitch ( talk ) 01:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article, unfortunately, falls short of the notability guidelines.  It requires more significant coverage in high-quality, reliable, independent sources.  The existing content comes from blog posts, recipes, and local reviews, which, while interesting, don’t establish the subject’s notability.  Thus, it doesn’t warrant a standalone encyclopedia article.  AstridMitch ( talk ) 11:29, 19 June 2024 The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Connectors for car audio : This article doesn't assert any notability of the topic or the laundry list of random things lincluded.  Zim Zala Bim talk 02:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Technology ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and also a total lack of secondary coverage that isn't trivial.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Shaheed Benazirabad, Nawabshah : Seawolf35 ( talk - email ) 20:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Seawolf35 ( talk - email ) 20:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Ref 2 is borderline on providing SIGCOV, because it's really a story about other existing Boards being concerned about the creation of this one, but I couldn't find anything else after doing a search.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 22:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Educational boards being a government functionary are very much notable.  There must be sources about it as they get regular press coverage whenever they announce results.  Muneebll ( talk ) 14:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Muneebll "There must be sources", well where are they?  Seawolf35 ( talk - email ) 20:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry if that came off as brash, but the sources are really not WP:SIGCOV , and also the subject's sources do not show that they meet WP:GNG .  Seawolf35 ( talk - email ) 20:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notable or not, what exactly are we learning about the organization from this article?   That it exists and was formed in 2015?   I'm all for using stubs to get work on an article started, but the dearth of sources about this means that this will likely never grow beyond this empty stub, even if notability can be established.  Owen× ☎ 16:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
St Scholastica Catholic School : Chaotıċ Enby ( t · c ) 14:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Christianity ,  and Kenya .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Private school.  There's a couple of captioned photos [26] and [27] but not enough coverage to pass NORG/GNG.  Possible redirect to Ruaraka but note there's no education section in that article, so not recommending.  Rupples ( talk ) 23:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:ORG / WP:GNG KylieTastic ( talk ) 14:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Georgia Koskeridou : Recreated in what appears to be the exact same form, with no attempt to address the issues.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC #5.  Appears to be a footballer playing at a very low level in the Greek women's football system with no claim to notability whatsoever.  In Greek searches, I found only trivial coverage.  Sport Drama is a copy of a press release from Amazones Dramas and is clearly not independent of Koskeridou.  Xronika Dramas is probably the best source but it's nothing more than a quote from her, a squad listing and two passing mentions in the minute-by-minute match summary.  Aelole (translated) mentions her once.  Proinos Typos mentions her twice in passing.  None of the above demonstrates the need for a stand-alone article, especially for a player with such an insignificant career.  Should her career take an upward turn and if significant coverage is ever produced, then this can be recreated.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Greece .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - from looking at the user page of the creator, this is possible WP:AUTOBIO or WP:COI .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, as with GiantSnowman if sources are found please ping me.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not a single source in Greek ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη ( talk ) 00:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A Butterfly in the District of Dreams : Couldn't find any Japanese sources besides shopping sites.  QuietCicada - Talk 17:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada - Talk 17:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yes, the Hardcore Gamer review is the only one from a major source.  It's not notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Good on you for doing a WP:BEFORE for WP:NONENG sources.  In that case, non-notable as it's only supported by commentary from one reliable source.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 21:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mickaela Skaric : Also worth noting that that tournament only had a semi-final and final so reaching the final is not as impressive as it might seem.  More importantly, Skaric needs to comply with WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC to have an article.  The current sources fall way short.  In my searches, including a Chilean search , I found only trivial mentions in El Deportero , Guyana Times and Stabroek News .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Chile .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Fails WP:NBAD and WP:GNG.  zoglophie 09:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Bedivere ( talk ) 18:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zeilinga Strydom : A possible redirect seems to be List of South Africa national under-18 rugby union team players .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to be a case of WP:TOOSOON on my part again, loads of coverage on the subject, but none of it really up to the levels of WP:GNG standards.  I oppose the redirect suggested by nom as it's a non-notable team, whereas he has played for a couple of notable teams who don't have redirect lists.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - does not seem to have any WP:SIGCOV Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hanan Rubinstein : An online search for additional sources also reveals none.  I suspect this article is an autobiography; the creator has almost no edits except to this article, and it has been heavily edited by IP's from the same location as Rubinstein.  BilledMammal ( talk ) 11:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and New York .  BilledMammal ( talk ) 11:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I recovered some of the dead links from archive.org.  His best article is probably this fohonline.com , which reads like a press release and most others are from primary type sources or interviews.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 21:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KHHB-LP : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Hawaii .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
LiveProfile : It wasn't notable before, it isn't notable now.  JMWt ( talk ) 10:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Reference 1 might be okay, but I can't access it.   Everything else is either not about the product or routine listings.   And the "features" section runs afoul of WP:PROMO so I think we're better off without the article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This article has sufficient notability to meet Wikipedia’s standards.  LiveProfile's historical and business significance is well-documented by authoritative, reliable and independent sources such as Bloomberg, The Verge, GigaOM, CNET, The Globe and Mail, Etc.  Funding by top tier venture capitalists as well as acquisition by BlackBerry Ltd, a major publicly traded company, further underscores its notability.  This strategic move by a prominent company highlights LiveProfile's value and relevance.  LiveProfile also released a new app this year which further contributes to it’s continuing notability.  Pjk12 ( talk ) 03:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC) — Pjk12 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I reverted an edit by User:Trackbot6578 of Pjk12 's post above.  I have no idea what is going on, but we don't edit other people's AfD comments in that way.  JMWt ( talk ) 13:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Deletion isn’t warranted here.  I personally don’t consider an app with millions of users to not be notable but there’s also plenty of independent and scholarly sources which reference LiveProfile’s notability Trackbot6578 ( talk ) 18:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC) — Trackbot6578 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I also cannot access ref 1, but agree with

Discussion outcome: delete
Gleeds : The only sources appear to be trade publications , and all of the reporting appears to be run-of-the-mill .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , United Kingdom ,  and England .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Would expect to find more sources but there's just not a lot out there.  Lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.  Article in present state is overly promotional and unencyclopedic with listing of office locations etc.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 00:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Portuguese in Lithuania : The article is padded out with information on trade between the two countries, NATO, etc., presumably to make up for the lack of in-depth coverage of the topic in reliable sources.  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 10:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Lithuania ,  and Portugal .  Cordless Larry ( talk ) 10:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Template style article creation along with others (Portuguese in xxx) with very little substantive content to justify the article.  Possibly redirects to Portuguese xxx relations but quite probably ultimately not worth the effort.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 10:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  And there is no Lithuania-Portugal relations to redirect.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete