Zoran Kalabić : While there are some resources, there is a problem of WP:SNG , since most available resources are very promo-like, and there is no secondary and reliable coverage.  After an online research, most available resources lack of independency and are written in a blatant way to promote this person, and most of these resources in a similar way are presented in his website: https://zorankalabic.com/biography/ .  It should be noted that there is a weird editing history, since the main editor created almost entirely a few months ago both the English and Serbian Wikipedia articles of this person, having a very minimal presence in editing other articles of Serbian people.  Lately, the templates with notability issues were removed without any valid explanation, and the photos that are blatantly promo and were initially removed, were restored.  Apart from notability issues with lack of reliable and independent resources, there may be a strong problem of WP:COI .  Chiserc ( talk ) 08:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Serbia .  Chiserc ( talk ) 08:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep this is quite strange request here.  Article is not promo, as there is nothing in it to make it like that.  Subject is notable and i already explained that i have seen this person on television receiving highest medal of Republic of Serbia after some large donation to the hospital, and wanted to create article as it was incredible for me the person of such importance does not have article on Wikipedia.  Some parts of the article were edited and fixed by other editors that actually wanted to contribute instead of this user who only insisted to tag the article and inform others to delete it, without actually working on article.  That is normal way of working on article.  Notability is without questions no problem at all, many sources are top level independent news agencies of the world so nominator also misrepresented sources quality.  Photos were not deleted because they were promo, that is another blatant lie by nominator but because it took some time to confirm original ownership of them by website where i found them.  When that was done they were restored as in many other articles.  In the end article history shows only good proper editors who are actually trying to make article of this notable person better, and nominations without any proper Wikipedia work which fails good faith guideline, making false accusations about original author of the article.  Also, templates with notability issues are not intended to indefinitely tag the articles, but to make explanation that further work is needed.  Bit if none is actually trying to fix the article and tags are standing there for weeks without any further comment on talk page or edit, wiki guidelines allow them to be removed.  You are not allowed just to restore them and never to point in detail what do you find problematic with this article.  I feel that I should protect the article I wanted to create but not because I have COI, i dont, but because this person received highest awards by several countries and donated to many causes, which make it more then valuable and notable addition to Wiki.  It baffles me is there anything else behind this request as most of the things article is nominated for are actually misrepresented, also having in mind nominator agenda to delete it for quite some time.  -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk ) 06:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no significant coverage from reliable sources Good day— RetroCosmos talk 19:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] User:RetroCosmos , Most important national public news services of European countries are very much reliable sources. Talking like Radio television of Serbia for example, there isn't anything more important and reliable than that. -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk ) 18:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia is not a soapbox.  Sources that appear to be should not be acceptable for the purposes of establishing notability Good day— RetroCosmos talk 21:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete Initial reaction is Delete.  Article is a gushing account of this subject.  Definitely MOS:PEACOCK .  In conjunction with the simultaneous creation of English and Serbian articles, and a block of photos going up on Commons (lifted straight off subject's own website, with release emailed to VRT by the subject - WP:COI much?), this has the feeling of a PR job.  Also the fact that the Wikidata Description was "one of the most successful Serbian businessmen in the diaspora" instead of a more appropriate "Serbian businessman".  HOWEVER, this is only a Weak Delete.  There might be a case to keep given that there appears to be a legit and (minorly) notable award in the Order of Karađorđe's Star .  I'm mindful of WP:Globalise - I would not expect a lot of coverage in English language media and a lack of a profile in the BBC or NYT does not imply a lack of notability!  Coverage in Serbian or German would also be acceptable.  In that case though, this article needs an end-to-end rewrite to encyclopaedic style ( WP:MOS ).  About 30% of it needs to go, and the rest needs to be backed up by independent cites, not the subject's personal website.  Hemmers ( talk ) 15:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Hemmers is there a way to ask you to change your mind to week keep?  I will be more then willing to follow your guidelines and to make article better, but he is really notable in more than a few countries following his donations and support.  I find out about him over news following his donation of equipment to children's hospital, and it was incredible to me that such a person does not have Wikipedia article.  There isn't anything of those things you mentioned.  I was the one who took the photos from website because I found them there, and wanted to make article better as other articles look better with images.  There are many important news services publishing about him, including central national ones like Radio Television of Serbia .  Would be more then interested in fixing the article, even if it would be smaller, but i cannot understand why would we delete notable subject just because some of the content is not ok.  -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk ) 18:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] P.S. wikidata description was the first sentence of the article, but that was deleted after other users explained it to me that we cannot use "big words" in articles. I didnt know that, and that's why it was like that. Please assume good faith, i didn't mean anything bad, and its not promotion, i just wanted to create nice article for someone who created many good things for many countries. That is my only motivation. -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk ) 18:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The difficulty is that I have searched for sources using google.at, google.rs and google.sr in an attempt to find additional coverage.  Each search (for both Zoran Kalabić and Зоран Калабић) returns very few results, at the top of which are these wikipedia articles and the subject's personal website and social media.  Whilst he does have the Order, this is not itself enough to establish notability.  There are lots of people who do a great deal of philanthropic work, appear in local media and even get an MBE (in the UK).  But they don't all get an article.  WP requires sustained and substantial coverage which I am struggling to see.  I am open to the idea that there is coverage which has not been indexed by google (because their coverage of non-English material is often flaky, particularly for Cyrillic and other non-Latin scripts), and that is why I am wary of deleting articles for subjects covered by those languages simply because Google does not trivially surface a load of English-language sources.  There are undoubtedly many notable Serbs, Kenyans, Indonesians and Malay who are omitted from Wikipedia because native-English speakers are notoriously bad at foreign languages.  Nonetheless, you need to bring those sources to bear, because I am increasingly unsure that they exist.  A mention in RTS is not notable (everyone who receives an MBE is listed in The Times, but that does not automatically earn them an article).  Likewise several of the sources are basically press releases or interviews - not substantial independent coverage.  Hemmers ( talk ) 10:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, there are many more sources in Serbian I didn't included in the article, but I will list you here and add an article more if that will help, now I understand it will.  -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk ) 10:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I don't understand why this article is nominated for deletion.  It is quite relevant; this person is a well-known public figure.  The article has reliable sources, and it is generally well written; there is no need to delete it.  If someone is missing something, they can add or edit it.  Bandzimir ( talk ) 14:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] it is generally well written "generally" is doing quite a bit of heavy lifting there Good day— RetroCosmos talk 14:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I tend to agree with Hemmers that the only minor and possible aspect that may imply some notability is the Order of Karađorđe's Star .  However, I have checked that these state awards and orders have been given by President of Serbia to many people, and, only during the last very few years, hundreds of institutions and people have taken this or even a higher state order - check the website: https://www.predsednik.rs/predsednik/ukazi-o-odlikovanjima .  For this reason, while this award can indeed establish some notability, I see that this one fact cannot validate the notability of WP:ANYBIO for a well-known and significant award or honor, especially if the article continues to be a WP:SOAPBOX .  Chiserc ( talk ) 16:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm sorry but this is again very misleading I don't understand why are you doing this.  The list you sent is a general list of all state awards that have been given by president, every single metal and awarded that was given throughout the years.  That does not imply that quantity diminished quality, as it is one more lie in this nomination.  Only 10 was given for entire year for entire country.  So this award recived by this person is by far something important as it is for other countries.  Please stop with this anti propaganda.  Article is NOT the soap, and you have never pointed anything that is wrong with the article but you just keep repeating and tagging it without any proper explanation this is actually disruptive editing.  -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk ) 20:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article should stay since there is sufficient evidence that he is a public figure, but it should be reduced to appropriate size. For example, two photos from ERA events are absolutely not needed. One is more than enough. Parts of some sentences like "and is currently preparing for a doctorate" (Why is this relevant?) and "After a series of successful business years" (What's the evidence?) really make this article look like a PR project. Whoever wrote this should take care of it. But I still think that article should not be deleted. Tresnjevo ( talk ) 07:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your productive comments, i will fix and delete all of those great guidelines you pointed out. This means a lot to me to understand editing style, thank you. -- Pane.Vino.Wiki ( talk ) 09:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Randykitty ( talk ) 15:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I believe this meets WP:ANYBIO #1, for Order of Karađorđe's Star .  I don't agree that this one fact cannot validate the notability of WP:ANYBIO for a well-known and significant award or honor, especially if the article continues to be a WP:SOAPBOX ; notability is a property of the subject, not the article.  Furthermore, I agree with Pane.Vino.Wiki that this has been a disruptive, not a collaborative process.  No one should be saying things like if the main author does not fix these issues, I will aggressively delete the offending texts.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep