hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Keti Chomata: This leaves a sole article from Lifo newspaper, definitely not enough to establish notability.  Fails WP:NBASIC and all 12 criteria for WP:SINGER .  No relevant newspapers articles and google results can be found online either.  SpaceEconomist192 ✐ 15:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 18 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Greece .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  You simply have to search in Greek (or whichever minor, in e.g. number of speakers, modern language you deal with) to find relevant stuff, it's as simple as that.  So unless the real criterion is either Anglophones know about it or it doesn't exist, please refrain from such hasty proposals.  PS.  I'm adding more and/or fixing refs now.  Thanatos | talk | contributions 19:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The subject might be more known in Greece but this is the English Wikipedia and it must be relevant to the Anglophone speakers which is definitely not the case.  Furthermore after looking through the Greek results, Keti Chomata only has a couple of articles about her and most of them are quite short, just having 2 or 3 paragraphs or a video, the rest of the articles results are just mere passages of her name, the same applies to the books, just passages of her name and definitely not enough to establish notability.  SpaceEconomist192 ✐ @ SpaceEconomist192 : this is the English Wikipedia and it must be relevant to the Anglophone speakers ← That is absolutely not how it works.  All we care is that something is significant according to reliable sources —not that those reliable sources are in English.  -- Tamzin [ cetacean needed ] (she|they|xe) 23:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I didn't say it needs English sources, I'm aware of WP:NOENG .  I already refuted the premise that the subject had reliable sources in Greek.  SpaceEconomist192 ✐ Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as well as the Lifo article the first three references in the Greek wikipedia article here show significant coverage directly about her.  It also states that she had a number of hit singles from her 18 released albums.  There is enough coverage to pass WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Mao Zedong Flag: Everyone can publish their articles (without royalties) on the website and thus the website is subject to pervasive conspiracy theories and yellow journalism.  Most importantly, the article lacks sufficient sources to support its independent notability.  NZCAJD2 ( talk ) 09:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and China .  NZCAJD2 ( talk ) 09:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are at least three sources sufficient to meet SIGCOV: [30] [31] [32] .  As with Red Song Society, for which identical criticisms were offered, attacks on the article subject are misplaced at an AfD nomination.  Oblivy ( talk ) 03:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
New Ankara Stadium: I didn't find any sigcov in English, might be WP:TOOSOON , since the construction only started in July 2022.  If someone can look into it in Turkish, it would be great.  TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 14:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator .  Seems like TOOSOON is a bit of a weak argument here.  News coverage is plenty in Turkish.  TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 02:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Although it is not expected to open until the 25/26 season https://www.gazeteilksayfa.com/ankara-19-mayis-stadyumunun-acilisi-ertelendi-198487h.htm I doubt it is worth the bother of deleting and recreating.  However someone in Ankara will likely know better than me Chidgk1 ( talk ) 14:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are five sources in the tr.wiki article and a search for “Ankara yeni stadyum” shows plenty of news coverage.  Mccapra ( talk ) 16:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per above.  Clearly notasble fotbal staidum in Turkey.  Article needs improvement,  not deeltion.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 18:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  While maybe a tad WP:TOOSOON , notability will be clearly evident upon its completion, and I don’t believe it’s worth the hassle of deleting only to inevitably recreate when completed/opened.  The Kip 19:24, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per arguments above which show notability.  Giant Snowman 15:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Dylan Fergus: Tkaras1 ( talk ) 21:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Role in the main cast of Passions and lead role in Hellbent, that are notable productions, (at least) have him meet WP:NACTOR imv.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Red Asphalt: Given the age of the Red Asphalt videos, sources may exist in print, but I cannot speak for certain on that.  Either way, doesn't meet GNG as it stands right now.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to California Highway Patrol#Programs .  BD2412 T 01:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The films have received quite a bit of newspaper coverage over the years.  I just added information from three sources: " Asleep at the Wheel " (Los Angeles Times, Jan 1998), " Driver's Dread " (Sacramento Bee, July 2003), and " Gore or Emotion — What Moves Teen Drivers? " (Los Angeles Times, January 2003), along with the 2006 LA Times citation that was already present in the article.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 02:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police , Education , Transportation ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The lack of RS citation has now been remedied and WP:GNG is handily satisfied (I also just expanded the article a bit more with an additional RS citation - a chapter in a 2017 Rowman & Littlefield book; while it largely an updated version of the already cited 2006 LAT article with some additional information, this is good extra evidence of WP:SUSTAINED coverage).  Regars, HaeB ( talk ) 05:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Willing to withdraw for now per sources found above.  Still a stub that could do with improvement, but notability seems to be met for now.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 20:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Death of Li Keqiang: Even the death of Hu Yaobang (which triggered June 4th) don't has article about his death.  Coddlebean ( talk ) 14:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians .  Coddlebean ( talk ) 14:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Coddlebean , which deletion criterion is met here?  You used similar argumentation at the Early life of Mao Zedong AfD quite recently, and that article was speedily kept because you did not provide a rationale .  Folly Mox ( talk ) 16:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep I agree with @ Folly Mox your nominations need to provide a clear rationale.  Saying x similar article exists or y similar article doesn't exist isn't a rationale for deletion.  The article is both on its face impressively sourced and in need of cleanup, but I don't think there's any discernible policy-based rationale here.  Oblivy ( talk ) 01:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3 – I don't see anything resembling a rationale for deletion in the nomination statement.  The article looks fine at a quick glance.  — Mx.  Granger ( talk · contribs ) 02:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep : per Mx.  Granger; WP:CSK #3, as the nominator did not provide any rationale for deletion.  Also, I disagree with the example the nominator raised.  Death of Hu Yaobang [ zh ] did exist in zhwiki, and it is clearly notable as well since it is literally the triggering point of the June 4th Incident with many in-depth analysis from academic or media sources.  The fact that it does not have an article in enwiki is simply because no one had created it yet, and this argument is clearly a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST .  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 13:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep per WP:CSK #3 as no valid deletion rationale is provided.  I also concur with Mx Granger and Prince of Erebor above.  S5A-0043 Talk 16:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Oded Hod: [1] The article currently cites no independent sources .   — Freoh 20:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the topics Academics and educators and Science .   — Freoh 20:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ WP:PROF Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep , faulty nomination.  The article states that he holds a named chair, a clear pass of WP:PROF#C5 .  It is sourced to his university, but WP:PROF states "For documenting that a person has held such an appointment (but not for a judgement of whether or not the institution is a major one), publications of the appointing institution are considered a reliable source."  Secondary independent sourcing is not needed for this purpose.  For that matter he also has many highly cited publications, likely to pass WP:PROF#C1 .  The nomination makes a WP:VAGUEWAVE at PROF but makes no show of understanding it.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 20:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep for the reasons articulated in the ! vote above and the lack of a valid deletion rationale presented in the nomination in the first place .  XOR'easter ( talk ) 20:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes NPROF.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 01:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  No valid reason to delete was brought forward.  Nomination contradicts WP:NEXIST .  gidonb ( talk ) 15:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  As the person who wrote the article in Hebrew, I will say that my decision to write about it resulted from watching his lecture on thermodynamics.  I immediately contacted him and wrote to him that I would be happy to write an article about him.  We spoke on a Zoom call and he gave me information about himself and scientific articles he had written, and even provided me with his CV.  I wrote the entry without payment or compensation, but purely out of appreciation for him.  Regarding any doubts about the reliability of the value, I can confirm that all the information about the value has been checked against it.  Besides, there is no reason to delete the entry.  ארז האורז ( talk ) 16:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Phyllis Mary Nicol: Additionally I would raise serious questions about the notability of the subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerNotable ( talk • contribs ) 12:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The subject has an entry in the Australian Dictionary of Biography.  That is the national dictionary and that makes her automatically notable.  As for cleanup, WP:AFD is not cleanup.  scope_creep Talk 09:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- Clearly notable based just on the sources already in the article.  If nom dislikes the current version the solution is ordinary editing.  As my colleague scope creep very rightly notes, AFD is not cleanup.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 16:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:GNG / WP:BIO - any cleanup issues should be tagged rather then pushed to possible get forgotten in draft.  KylieTastic ( talk ) 16:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Women , Science ,  and Australia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The prose is indeed awful , unencyclopedic, and at times nonsensical, but there is a presumption of notability afforded by ANYBIO so the solution here is to fix through editing rather than deletion.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I encourage @ RogerNotable to withdraw this nomination .  Since you are a new editor, I encourage you to try improve the article.  Working on content is important for getting a good grasp of when to make an AfD nomination or instead work on improving an article.  As others have noted, AfD is only to discuss the notability of an article, not cleanup issues.  If you do decide to work on this article, I'd be happy to review your work when you are done; just leave a note on my talk page.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 19:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Tempo (film): I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 10:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 10:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There is a review in DVD Talk.  Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk ) 10:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete DVD Talk review is fine, but that's all there is. I can't find anything.  Gnewpapers has some links to a film from 1986, but that's not this film.  13:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment found this review [8] Donald D23 talk to me 14:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Excellent work to Somebodyidkfkdt and Donaldd23.   I consider both DVD Talk and Contactmusic.com to be suitable and reliable sources/reviews.   I therefore withdraw this nomination.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 16:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I would also like to add that Christopher Null , who wrote the Contactmusic.com review, is a notable film critic.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 16:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Mahmoud Abdin: Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 00:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Egypt .  Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 00:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This looks to have a really good chance of notability - I've found when Olympedia gives bios, especially decent-sized ones - they turn out to have enough coverage.  The Olympedia piece alone could actually be considered SIGCOV in my opinion, as it has three decent-sized paragraphs.  Also, the offline source in the article looks like likely sigcov, as his name is in the title (it seems to be titled "The Death of Mahmoud Abdin").  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 01:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep In addition to the obituary already cited on the page (which is not a paid obituary, but a feature in the sports page), whose title is translated as mentioned by User:BeanieFan11 , there are plenty of articles that satisfy WP:GNG in Al-Ahram .  As an example, the main headline of the sports page on February 13, 1936 is "تكريم الاستاذ عابدين بطل مصر في لعب الشيش" (Honoring of Professor Abdin, Egyptian Champion in Fencing).  The online database for Al-Ahram is subscription only, but I am happy to send PDFs if necessary to confirm (although they would be in Arabic).  Canadian Paul 03:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : It did pass WP:GNG .  Agreed with Canadian Paul.  CastJared ( talk ) 03:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as well.  The Olympedia gave me a dead link, that's why I replaced it with what I found and nominated for deletion.  Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 04:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You can withdraw the nomination and close it yourself with a non-admin closure if you've changed your mind.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 09:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Doesn't seem to be possible.  I tried, but 7 days have not yet passed.  Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 10:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See the guidelines here .  But I will do it for you as you have clearly withdrawn the nom, no worries.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 13:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Jody Armour: ( talk ) 05:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators .  Unknown-Tree🌲?  ( talk ) 05:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry, I somehow missed the first AfD—I'd like for this to just be speedily closed.  Unknown-Tree🌲?  ( talk ) 05:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep