hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Take the Train: However, I neglected to notice that it had already been PRODed and contested in the past, making it ineligible for a PROD now.  To elaborate further, while the game certainly existed, I have found no actual sources that would count as actual significant coverage of the game.  The only source in the article, which was the rationale for contesting the original PROD in 2016, is just the instruction manual for the game, and obviously not valid for establishing notability.  I had considered proposing a Merge to either United States Playing Card Company or Bicycle Playing Cards , but the lack of sources on the game and apparent complete non-notability of it made me decide that was not an appropriate course of action, as it would give undue coverage of an extremely non-notable product in those articles.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions .  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As it is, this article is just a set of instructions, and WP:NOTHOWTO needs to be kept in mind.  If someone could find an independent source about the game then maybe we could completely rewrite the article, but that looks unlikely to me.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete I'm struggling to find much of anything.  [5] might be a reliable review.   But that's all I can find.   Please ping me if you find better.  Hobit ( talk ) 17:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: I'm good with Userfying per Piotrus as probably the better choice.  Hobit ( talk ) 18:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or preferred Userfy .  Pretty obscure ( BGG link : RANK: OVERALL 24,102FAMILY 2,903).  Even if the review Hobit found is reliable (doesn't look great, but I did not check the site for editorial contriols), we would still be short of another good source (GNG requires multiple in-depth coverage, my rule of thumb is that two reliable reviews are bare minimum).  Note that usefication/drafticiation might be better than deletion, creator is still occasionally active (made few edits last year).  Maybe they'll try to fix it in a year or two if we leave it in their userspace?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John William Goff (baseball): The article was created back in 2012 by User:AndyGoff .  This appears to be a hoax.  L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 22:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions .  L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 22:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:G3 as a hoax.  There is nobody by that name who played in the major or minor leagues.  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 23:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . .  there was a William Thomas Goff a.k.a. Bill Goff [9] that played in the Giants farm system in the 40s... not sure if that is the same person but regardless never played in the majors.  Correction...  I think I found the player indicated [10] J. William Goff with the Cards D league team in 44.  Still not notable but probably not a complete hoax.  [11] Spanneraol ( talk ) 00:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Missouri ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not a hoax - he was a minor league player and he is in the St Louis Amateur Baseball Hall of Fame.  However he does not pass GNG.  SportingFlyer T · C 00:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammad Mabrouk: No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Basically a routine resume/CV.    No independent sources discus him much less be of GNG type.   The only real discussion of him is the bio by his employer.  North8000 ( talk ) 21:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Jordan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines with zero RSes.  Toadette ( Let's talk together! ) 15:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Peluso: There is no record of him as a publisher, the academic criteria here don't seem to fit either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Businesspeople .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence that he passes the requirements of NSCHOLAR or NAUTHOR, and no sources sufficient for GNG.  Most of the sources in the article are primary, except for the Pittsburgh Magazine piece and the Littsburgh entry, both of which appear to be at least somewhat promotional and not entirely independent of Peluso.  I can't find anything more than this myself.  WJ94 ( talk ) 14:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suriya Filmography Telugu: This page is therefore unwanted.  Besides, Suriya mainly works in Tamil cinema.  The films listed on this page are Telugu dubbed versions of his Tamil films.  Trisha'sNemo ( talk ) 17:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:15, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 19:46, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  @ Kailash29792 : Do you think box office success's dubbed version names should be mentioned in Suriya filmography such as Surya S/o Krishnan (re-released in Telugu only) [5] .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 05:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think not, unless the dubbed version made an impact, or has notable differences.  Kailash29792 (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marilyn G. Rabb Foundation: The Guidestar website ( https://www.guidestar.org/profile/36-4416453#financials ) has the following comment: "This organization has not appeared on the IRS Business Master File in a number of months.  It may have merged with another organization or ceased operations.
 This organization's exempt status was automatically revoked by the IRS for failure to file a Form 990, 990-EZ, 990-N, or 990-PF for 3 consecutive years.  Further investigation and due diligence are warranted" suggesting it may be defunct or merged.  Very limited info on existing wiki page.  Previous organisation website does not appear to exist.  Need to find evidence to support notability or delete. Newhaven lad ( talk ) 16:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Illinois . Shellwood ( talk ) 16:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I looked up this organization in the Illinois Secretary of State's online database. Apparently it changed its name to "MGR Youth Empowerment" in 2013, and then dissolved in 2015.  So the question is whether it was notable during its existence before it dissolved.  For reference, their IRS returns through 2011 can be viewed on Candid.org at https://beta.candid.org/profile/7500383 if it makes a difference.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  02:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there do not seem to be any secondary references about the (defunct) organization; merely tax filings and in-passing mentions relating to events the group funded.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 03:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mitra Rafee: And some I checked, they actually don't mention her at all.  Ladsgroup overleg 09:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Iran .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The references did not mention this actor's name for the award and the references that announced the list of awards are unofficial and non-independent advertising sites.  Appears to be written in a PROMO style, not notable anyways please check the references .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.193.77.75 ( talk ) 14:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  This looks like a promo created by an WP:SPA , but I couldn't verify Farsi sources.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 18:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Wines: UPDATE: also appears to have been created by a user with a WP:COI ( User:CnrWines ) [35] Park3r ( talk ) 04:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Australia .  Park3r ( talk ) 04:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete fails WP:NPOL .  First 2 sources merely mention him in 1 line and is not meeting WP:SIGCOV for him.  The other sources merely confirm he is a councillor.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Do some Googling before casting these votes please.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep : found SIGCOV simply by Googling his name.  WP:BEFORE please.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] link (1) , (2) , (3) , plus, there is a courier mail article referencing a specific scandal involving him going on a Dubai trip during a natural disaster Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: per @Jack4576.  The article needs improving, but there appears to be a lot of non-trivial coverage online.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 18:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I looked at those sources from Jack4576, and all of them seem to be routine coverage from a local paper and they don't surmount WP:MILL .  Could you post the online links that show non-trivial coverage?  The first 3 pages on Google are dominated by the councillors own social media and other directory-type sites, and the Google News are just about various council proceedings.  Park3r ( talk ) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:MILL and any non run of the mill coverage is local coverage.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and above as it has been stated are WP:MILL local news, nothing that has SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from IS RS.  The sources shown by the keep votes afer their exhaustive BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV and the claim that the Dubai trip may have SIGCOV is SOURCESMUSTEXIST, and even if found it makes this a 1E.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 06:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I'm seeing nothing but routine, scanty coverage and namedrops.  Ravenswing 01:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Salwa Mahalle: Sources used are wikidata items and lists of where she's worked.  All I find for sourcing are various university websites where she's spoken.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Brunei .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is a low impact of her research with a low h-index: https://scholar.google.com/citations? user=U3jG5lEAAAAJ .  For sure, she is not in the list of Highly Cited Researchers of Web of Science and there is an evident lack of WP:PROF .  Chiserc ( talk ) 23:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Centre for Education Policy of India: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 01:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and Delhi .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -This article have no WP:SIGCOV and fail to fullfil WP:NCORP guidelines Stayed, so article can be deleted.  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 06:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zurab Gurielidze: Subject also doesn't pass WP:NPROF inherently.  It's also lacking in terms of WP:GNG .  Also, can't find good figures in directories like Google Scholar.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 15:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Biology ,  and Georgia (country) .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The Google Scholar citation counts are not promising for WP:PROF [3] .  Maybe there are GNG-worthy sources hidden from me by the language barrier but we can't keep an article unless that sort of thing is actually demonstrated, not merely hoped-for.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 20:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A text haphazardly put together (e.g. "a gameologist") by a semi- kamikaze account about a non- notable subject.  An associate professor of undisputed-here integrity but, nevertheless, non-article worthy.  Wilipedia is not a collection of randomly gathered information .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khanindra Chandra Chowdhury: Was prodded in 2014, unsuccessfully.  Created and edited by a succession of single-purpose accounts.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 05:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 05:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 05:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not sufficiently published or known.  Fulmard ( talk ) 05:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 06:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete.  Doesn't pass WP:NPROF for sure.  Qflib ( talk ) 19:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- hroest 10:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Petter Rocha: Aside from match reports and statistics database entries, there is very little available online.  This Q&A interview is the best I could find, but it is not in-depth and most of the coverage is primary.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Uruguay .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Werewolf (Doctor Who): Article discusses two minor and mostly unrelated one off characters, and cites no sources, and it doesn't seem like there are sufficient sources to establish either GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 14:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 14:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article is completely unsourced (and that entire last paragraph is pure WP:OR ), and searches on my part have turned up no sources that would indicate that the portrayal of werewolves in the Doctor Who franchise is a notable topic at all.  The complete lack of sources and utter non-notability of the topic would also mean that merging to an article like List of werewolves or Werewolf fiction would also be entirely inappropriate.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 18:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:SYNTH , was it ever made clear “werewolf” was a distinct species or just a trope that was used a few times because Dr. Who will seemingly inevitably use every trope ever at some point?  Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete It's hard to believe this article exists at all, let alone has remained on Wikipedia for so long.  It is entirely predicated on synthesis, and needs to be deleted ASAP.  Thanks for bringing attention to it.  U-Mos ( talk ) 18:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Heavy WP:SYNTH - pure WP:ALLPLOT article that fails WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KHVM-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Minnesota .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 02:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
First-party leads: A search on google search results in no academic discussion of the term.  There doesn't appear to be any discussion of this term in other reliable sources.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 10:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the whole article reads like a puff piece about Dealer.com CEO Mark Bonfigli.  Definition #18 of sense 2 of the noun lead on Wiktionary already covers the primary DICDEF aspect.  The rest here, as far as I can tell, is unsourced.  Owen× ☎ 18:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : upon closer inspection, the references to Dealer.com CEO Mark Bonfigli were placed there by User:Mark Bonfigli :

Discussion outcome: delete