hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sven-Olof Walldoff: Fails the general and music maker-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Sweden .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roadshow Players: A quick cursory review of Google shows no relevant articles so WP:NOTE seems to apply.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 19:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and California .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 19:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete short-lived non-notable group of friends who performed non-notable children's pieces.   It was sweet of them, but not encyclopedic.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 02:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non Notable group.  Alekciaaa ( talk ) 13:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Imarda: Mccapra ( talk ) 20:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Computing ,  and New Zealand .  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My preliminary view is that the company founder/owner Selwyn Pellett is notable and this company is not.  There is little published about Imarda although they are present in a number of countires as the article states.  I'll do some more research and see what I can turn up NealeWellington ( talk ) 08:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as nothing notable about the company.  The company founder on the other hand is notable and should have an article.  NealeWellington ( talk ) 00:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L Faraone 22:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete I too am not finding much coverage.   And the official site appears to be down.   Not seeing notability as is.-- Surv1v4l1st ╠ Talk ║ Contribs ╣ 22:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , notability is not shown.  Persent101 ( talk ) 16:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , lacks WP:SIGCOV , two cite are "Dead links".  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 02:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  And, if my first page passes WP:NPP , I'm willing to get involved in creating a page about the company's notable founder.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 06:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghaith Ouahabi: Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 12:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Tunisia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Source for article is a database. BEFORE only showed stats, promo mentions, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing teh subject directly and indepth from IS RS. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 04:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ana Mihajlović: UtherSRG (talk) 12:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not meeting notability standards.  All I find are either photos of her or photo captions.  Nothing for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV .  Three primary database profile references  Been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years and never been updated and no indication of significance.  scope_creep Talk 22:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mommy's Bliss: Cannot find any independent, reliable sources with significant coverage on DDG or DDG news.  Found [13] but it is not independent.  Regarding sources in the article: 1, 3 are not independent.  2, 7, 8 do not mention the company.  4 and 5 are arguably not significant coverage.  And 6 does not seem independent or reliable to me.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 14:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Medicine ,  and California .  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 14:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO.  Some discussion of their products on various sites, but nothing extensive.  Most are PR items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nodus Domini: The game is mentioned in passing in 3 of 5 sources and the other 2 are database entries.  No added content since its creation in 2021.  Humsorgan ( talk ) 07:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Czech Republic .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 08:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete – Video games that were canceled before release are not notable, thus do not deserve their article.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 12:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southern Showdown: No in-deep sources about the event, just passing mention or WP:ROUTINE results.  HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 10:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Wrestling ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Farrell: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and New Jersey .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  IncompA 02:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failure to meet WP:GNG or the criteria set forth in WP:NBEAUTY .  Miss New Jersey is not a national pageant and being in the top 15 at the national level is insufficient.  — Sirdog ( talk ) 05:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Legendele Olimpului: Despite being a children's book, the article does not provide significant coverage in independent sources that demonstrate its impact or importance in literature.  Additionally, the article has been tagged for multiple issues, including being an orphan and needing more citations, indicating persistent problems that have not been addressed.  Ktkvtsh ( talk ) 17:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and History .  Ktkvtsh ( talk ) 17:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mythology and Romania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nashaba Victor: Fails WP:BIO .  The company that he works for VINAStech is also up for deletion.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Uganda .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some content might be work merging to the article on the local senatus for the Legion of Mary.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 00:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article in question is of one of the people that are key to the Senatus of Uganda.  He is one of the officers.  I think the content doesn't require merging NBV2010 ( talk ) 11:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can see no evidence of any coverage meeting the basic biographical criteria, any additional criteria, or any other criteria for establishing suitability for inclusion on Wikipedia.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 09:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the company he works for may not be a ground for deletion of the Nashaba article because his popularity is more beyond that company, VINAStech NBV2010 ( talk ) 11:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks coverage in WP:SIGCOV .  Dowrylauds ( talk ) 16:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe Saddi: No credible claim to notability - the chairman of a regional branch of a business unit of a larger company.  No secondary sources.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NOTRESUME looks like a corporate business card.  Only two sentences.  — Maile ( talk ) 17:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Gedaali ( talk ) 20:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Berle Sanford Rosenberg: Fails WP:MUSICBIO .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per the nomination and multiple issues TAG on the main page.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 13:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A basic internet search present his notability in Hungary, the . Hu sites, as well as in Japan and Korea.  He is an adjunct professor at Ersta Sköndal University College in Stockholm [1] according the German Wikibrief.  In terms of international citations, he meets WP:GNG with the academic professorship adding WP:PROF .  1IceCloudStation ( talk ) 03:03, 11 July 2023 References ^ "Berle Sanford Rosenberg" .  de.wikibrief.org .  Retrieved 2023-07-11 .  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I could find nothing of note upon a Google search on him other than passing mentions.   Does not have significant coverage, fails WP:MUSICBIO.  Heart (talk) 03:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete per HeartGlow30797.  I'm surprised there isn't more coverage from classical critics like in this column , but I'm not seeing it.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 15:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kaushik Izardar: As always, every producer is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it's possible to verify that he exists, and instead must be shown to pass WP:GNG on properly sourced evidence of his significance -- but this amounts to "he exists", and is referenced almost entirely to glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things (most commonly as a provider of soundbite in sources that read like press releases from his own employers) rather than reliable source coverage which represents other people writing about him as a subject, and the only source that offers anything more than a brief glance off his existence is a Q&A interview in which he's talking about himself in the first person.  Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be the subject of third party coverage and analysis.  Bearcat ( talk ) 01:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Bearcat ( talk ) 01:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The reliability of the majority of sources is dubious, lacking proper oversight from their staff or editors.  Some sources merely consist of namechecks or interviews.  Furthermore, the produced shows by the individual in question did not appear to possess the level of notability required.  AmusingWeasel ( talk ) 12:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malekabad-e Shandak: Abadi are not notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hatim Zaghloul: فيصل ( talk ) 19:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Science ,  and Internet .  فيصل ( talk ) 19:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks the independent sourcing required to demonstrate notability.  - MrOllie ( talk ) 13:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  This engineer has done nice work, but has not attracted enough attention to his work through citations to meet WP:NPROF .  There is press coverage, though - is there enough for general notabilty?  If so, I'll change my recommendation.  Qflib ( talk ) 18:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I see the person lacks Sigcov to establish GNG.  -- LusikSnusik ( talk ) 10:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pâteçassaïé: Furthermore, the page stipulated that Hopital de I'Amitie has already existed in 1920s, although the hospital was built in 1988.  [1] Hence, it seems that the page is blatantly hoax.  Faldi00 ( talk ) 17:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Ndeke Luka, Ndeke Luka.  "Centrafrique : des réflexions en cours pour la réhabilitation de l'hôpital de l'Amitié" .  radiondekeluka.org .  Radio Ndeke Luka .  Retrieved 27 January 2024 .  Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Central African Republic-related deletion discussions .  Faldi00 ( talk ) 17:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olímpio Ferreira Chaves: He gets mentions only.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 09:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Aviation ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  Without trying to read non-English sources present, their titles do not suggest WP:SIGCOV is met, and the nom is right that if this is the best claim for notability, well, it's a very weak one.  Do ping me if SIGCOV-meeting reliable sources are found, and I'll revise my vote.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete