hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Bedford Esquires: Boleyn ( talk ) 21:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I found an article about it on the BBC but that is far from the three required since the article itself has MySpace as its only secondary "website" (I dont use MySpace so I cant tell if it is truly a secondary source, but I doubt it matters) ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 21:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete mostly tour dates popping up, minimal coverage of the pub itself Mach61 ( talk ) 03:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sayed Kayan Association: Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 18:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Afghanistan and Canada .  Owen× ☎ 19:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing even in Canadian sources; this is largely PROMO with primary sourcing used.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable and promotional.  Local Variable ( talk ) 14:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A new reference from a government agency in Canada was added which verifies the registration and establishment of the cultural organization.  Sanchoof ( talk ) 00:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for your contributions, but that does not address the concerns raised above.  Entry in a directory of organisations is insufficient to establish notability.  Local Variable ( talk ) 01:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You can apply for a business license just about anywhere, it doesn't make your business notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not yet passes WP:GNG .  Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV .  Macbeejack ☎ 08:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Extinction Level Event: Recommend a primary redirect to Extinction Level Event: The Final World Front ; the DIFFCAPS Extinction level event already redirects to Extinction event .  162 etc. ( talk ) 18:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No other topics are apparent; one item is possily a WP:PTM .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 00:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - we don't need dabs of dabs.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Se-tenant (disambiguation): - Altenmann >talk 15:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : didn't find either any mention in a dictionary of se-tenant also means semi-detached house.  If it's a regionalism, we could create a redirect, but the disamb page would still be unnecessary.  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 16:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I also thought is a French-language regionalism eg in Louisiana, but it must be discussed in the target article before we make any kind of disambiguation. - Altenmann >talk 16:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  "Semi-detached house, also known as a se-tenant house" is WP:OR not backed up by anything in the target article.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 20:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Basic Education High School No. 2 Mayangone: Seawolf35 ( talk - email ) 17:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools .  Seawolf35 ( talk - email ) 17:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced, no evidence of notability- only found in MoE database and facebook.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 20:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect .  Nothing found in searches for reliable sources, including under the St Judes original name, which suggests the school may have been set up during the colonial period.  Possible redirect to either Mayangon Township or List of Basic Education High Schools in Myanmar#Yangon Region .  Rupples ( talk ) 10:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of the United States, Lusaka: The rest is a content fork about bilateral relations.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- All sources discussing the embassy itself are WP:PRIMARY , including those I was able to find that are not int eh article.  THis seems to be part of a string of embassy articles with the same problems.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per ample precedents.  — Biruitorul Talk 16:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 14:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael S. Berman: The article relies only on primary sources and has been tagged for this since 2008.  Reason is there are no reliable secondary sources covering the guy.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 06:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America .  Central and Adams ( talk ) 06:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable lobbyist - neither of the two sources in the article passes GNG.  There's another political Michael Berman who got an obit in the LA Times, but I don't think they're the same guy.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:19, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Minnesota and Washington, D.C. .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Hill is a reliable independent secondary source.  Kablammo ( talk ) 07:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RevPro Uprising 2021: I can't find any significant journalistic news coverage about the event Sionk ( talk ) 22:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  Sionk ( talk ) 22:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nad's: Refs are routine news, product launches, growth reports, in violation of WP:SIRS , WP:ORGIND , WP:CORPDEPTH , WP:ROUTINE - BeFriendlyGoodSir ( talk ) 00:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies .  - BeFriendlyGoodSir ( talk ) 00:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Australia .  ~ A412 talk!  00:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 00:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This appears to be a local business (with multiple locations) rather than a notable company.  It fails WP:NCORP .  Knox490 ( talk ) 01:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Google news mainly comes up with product reviews.  1st hit is an interview.  So lacking reliable sources to meet WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Julian Calv: The draft itself was subsequently deleted after a PROD nomination.  The subject appears to be a busker and member of a non-notable avant-garde chamber music ensemble "Non Prophets" (NB - not Non-Prophets ) with some local-interest coverage but no evidence of yet meeting inclusion criteria.  The single Route 4/Thorn and Roots is included in this nomination and contains a couple of additional references.  The main article references are: (1) Primary (dekoentertainment.com).  (2) Local (Seven Days; perhaps the most interesting reference in that it is in the form of a comic strip).  (3) Local and passing (Valley News; the article describes a charity event which included a Non Prophets performance).  (4) Not a reliable source (The Comenian; student media) The single article references are: (1) Primary (antiMusic; written in the first person).  (2) Primary (press release in allaboutjazz.com).  There is therefore no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or any of the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN .  Dorsetonian ( talk ) 07:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Vermont .  Dorsetonian ( talk ) 07:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : "Known for his intimate concerts", yet has no coverage in sources...  I can't find anything for this person.  Delete for not meeting NMSUIC.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , neither album nor musician shows any notability as far as I can tell, and there is no mention of their popularity or success.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiralwidget ( talk • contribs ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Web Developer (software): I don't think web browser extension automatically merits an article if it once won some competition (2006 "Extend Firefox" in this case).  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no indication this is published to any significant extent in reliable sources, while an internal mozilla "competition" is hardly something notable.  No indication this is even close to passing the criteria at WP:NSOFTWARE .  Searching is made a little harder by virtue of the term "web developer" being a common phrase in itself, but nothing evident which would assert notability.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 22:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Centre for India & Global Business: No independent sources - Altenmann >talk 15:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Education , India ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 14:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lost In Society: Magatta ( talk ) 00:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Magatta ( talk ) 00:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  01:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC) Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sourcing appears to be an interview and some very local news coverage.  I found one brief discussion of an album in the Brooklyn Vegan, but there isn't enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there are not enough sources and the ones provided are mostly interview or quotations.  Naomijeans ( talk ) 03:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KUOT-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oklahoma .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Edmund Williams: No evidence of notability under SNG or GNG.   The only source is FamilySearch.org.  And it it just very basic obit type info plus a one sentence mention that he was one of the founders of a political party.  Tagged for wp:notability by others since December North8000 ( talk ) 15:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Wales .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The stated notability claim here would be fine if he were reliably sourced as passing WP:GNG for it, but is not an "inherent" notability freebie that would exempt him from having to have any valid sourcing, but the sole footnote here is genealogical information, not GNG-building reliable source coverage about his work in politics.  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Helping found a notable party does not in and of itself establish that someone is notable.  And that's if it's even true; people have lied about this sort of thing before (see Randy Toler ), and the one source cited on the page doesn't exactly help prove it.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 04:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
R. N. Mukhija: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 13:46, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saxoncourt: Even if we take the (now dead) Japanpost links at face value they are, at best, routine coverage.  Fails WP:GNG pretty clearly.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Japan ,  and United Kingdom .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 08:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too much self promotion here http://www.saxoncourt.net/en/groupnetwork.php Acartonadooopo ( talk ) 07:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I added to Companies delsort because although they operate schools, this is about Saxoncourt Holdings, Ltd.  The page is a bit confused about whether it is a company or companies (I presume it is multiple companies held in a shell company), but that does appear to be the primary topic.  Therefore WP:NCORP pertains as relevant guidelines and the sources on the page do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH .  Neither could I find anything that meets WP:SIRS .  Information is either passing, or lacks independence or is a primary source.  Non notable company (or companies!).  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 08:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of significant coverage .  This is not a high school or college, but rather a company that runs tutoring services and cram schools.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Isaac Malitz: No publications found in MathSciNet or Google Scholar; no evidence of academic notability nor of notability for more than one thing.  My prod saying all this was removed by User:Kvng with no justification for disputing it, and with a suggestion to instead merge to positive set theory .  There was nothing to merge; everything in this article was already there.  I removed it from the positive set theory article as well because it was unsourced and had no hope of being sourced.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with proposal to delete.  Gumshoe2 ( talk ) 17:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- per David Eppstein -- one thesis is not sufficient for WP:PROF notability unless it is cited so much as to become a classic of the field.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mscuthbert ( talk • contribs ) 01:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 06:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete