hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sophie Basenga: This also includes my searches under "Sophie Kadima."  All that I found were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tantine Mushiya: The subject has earned at least one cap for the aforementioned national team.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Whatever with Alexis and Jennifer: Let'srun ( talk ) 15:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Radio , Television ,  and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with that assessment.  There are passing mentions that prove it existed, but nothing that actually discusses the show in any depth.  Delete .  Drmies ( talk ) 15:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Alexis Stewart , where the show, its cancellation, and its television successor are described in a Wikipedia-appropriate amount of detail; the show's other host does not have a Wikipedia bio.  I agree with the assessment that the show itself fails WP:SIGCOV , and the article has no sources at all.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 15:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Jennifer Hutt does have a wikipedia article, for what it is worth.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:52, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah, just not linked from anything I looked at.  Not sure then, could redirect to either one.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 15:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to either of the host's biographies.  The show lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WDHC-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Tennessee .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 17:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only seeing press releases and TV guides as coverage, which isn't secondary.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in Tennessee#LPTV stations : At least in theory there is probably more potential for significant coverage here than the numerous all-national too-new LPTVs (this one does seem to have always had some local content), but in 2024 notability on Wikipedia is determined by, at minimum, the known existence of GNG-level sourcing, not merely the possibility of them.  There might not be enough to justify anything more than an {{ R to list entry }} as an alternative to deletion .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:43, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
LDE(X): Proposed for deletion back in 2016 as "Not notable or important. Poor quality information. Project also long-since defunct.", which was contested with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ITSIMPORTANT .  Sources are all primary.  No third-party notability apparent.  * Pppery * it has begun... 19:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Download links from SourceForge and a discussion thread in ArsTechnica, that's about all I can find.  Delete for not meeting notability for software.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to LiteStep#History .  Found some coverage one of which could potentially be GNG usable, I can't manually dig through old computing magazines to prove or disprove the existence of GNG-meeting coverage, but at this point I believe the best place for it to be covered would be at that section, where it is already mentioned.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG , it also reads like a technical manual, not very easy to understand -- Devoke water 21:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Personal protection officer: "Personal protection officer" is a generic term that could apply anywhere in the English-speaking world.  Some of the references are newspaper article where the writer may have just used it as a generic term.  I can find no statutory footing for this term or published material from the Met clearly demonstrating that this is a term specific to the Met.  Overall is a vague article.  Elshad ( talk ) 22:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and England .  Elshad ( talk ) 22:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion - previously at AfD under another title.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : frequent references to the term in mainstream media: [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] .  Unless there's a suitable merge target for this, we need it here.  Owen× ☎ 00:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Changed to Redirect to Protection Command , per MrSchimpf and Lightburst .  Owen× ☎ 01:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Protection Command as a one-department concept that can be detailed in summary.  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Protection Command , there is room in the target article Lightburst ( talk ) 00:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Celestial Toymaker: While some commentary related to his role in the episode "The Celestial Toymaker" may exist, I don't think it's enough to warrant a separate article.  In regards to the 60th speculation, it's just that and rumor mills right now, unlike someone like Beep the Meep, who's confirmed to return and has a shot at getting some significant coverage from it.  Should anything turn up then, the article can be recreated, but I believe that as it stands right now, there's nothing concrete, and the Toymaker just doesn't have enough to justify the separate article.  A possible AtD would be either a redirect to his titular episode, or a redirect to the Doctor Who Villains list.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 20:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Celestial Toymaker as there's more info of him there.  He is not notable enough to have his own article.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 21:53, 28 August 2023   (UTC) Delete/Redirect per nom.  Doesn't have enough WP:SIGCOV .  WP:BEFORE didn't reveal sources that really focus on this character.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 03:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Celestial Toymaker : This seems to be a valid WP:ATD-R as it could be used as a valid search term for anyone omitting "The", and it can also provide the relevant character information given the character's limited use.  - 2pou ( talk ) 19:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect The character does not have enough SIGCOV.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ajana Path: Google search comes up with about 66 results -- directory listings for the film and its soundtrack, but no reviews or significant discussion.  ... disco spinster talk 20:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  ... disco spinster talk 20:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Prosenjit Chatterjee filmography ? - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC) (Other option for the target page, see below) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Bengali films of 1994 .  Fails WP:GNG .  Oppose suggested redirect above as he's just the top billed actor and not the director/writer/producer.  Uhai ( talk ) 20:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment As there is opposition expressed against a redirect to the page about the lead actor (I am not sure why), may I suggest redirect to List of Bengali films of 1994 , then? - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I agree with the user above and have changed my vote above from delete to redirect.  Uhai ( talk ) 04:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Believers Broadcasting Corporation: Article survived a 2005 AfD but notability standards have changed significantly since.  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Television , Companies ,  and Illinois .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KJIR , the company's remaining property.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for 'soft' deletion/redirection due to previously declined speedy.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 19:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KJIR per previous comment.  These two entities seem to be basically one and the same at this point; the KJIR article can also mention the other stations which its corporate owner previous owned and sold.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KJIR - no need for 2 articles.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to KJIR : per everyone else.  There is no separate notability from that station at this point, not that the company ever really had its own notability to start with (one or two-market station groups are a tall order with regards to meeting WP:CORP or GNG ).  For the record (as the usual means of displaying past nominations can't pick it up), the 2005 AfD came when the article was titled Believers Broadcasting Company (and in error, as a commenter there noted at the time).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
790 (number): The other properties are all calculated, so the article does not comply with Wikipedia:Notability (numbers) .  Wikipedia:Notability (numbers) mentioned that numbers must have three mathematical properties and at least these mathematical properties can be directly mentioned in the source of the article, so it is recommended that the article be redirected to 700 (number) .  日期20220626 ( talk ) 06:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 700_(number)#790s .  Owen× ☎ 16:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of Florida fire departments: Location of individual fire departments and stations are not notable.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists , Florida ,  and Organizations .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a clear WP:NOTDIRECTORY -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 11:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Would this include other states that fall in this category?  Or is Florida the exception here?  Conyo14 ( talk ) 18:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A lot of them would.  I have nominated this one first as it is the least sourced.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 20:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:MILL WP:NOTDIR Dronebogus ( talk ) 18:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of fire departments in United States .  Category:Fire departments in Florida shows 14 of these have articles, so they can just be listed there.  D r e a m Focus 20:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This article is new since the nomination.  A redirect to there seems like a good alternative.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 20:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That’s probably a better idea than deleting, but why do we need to list fire departments in the first place?  Dronebogus ( talk ) 23:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mainly for navigation purposes, although cats do a better job.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 23:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But of course most people don’t know categories even exist.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of fire departments in United States as an ATD: redirects are WP:CHEAP and preserve the page history better than deletion.  The list should not be Koenig because it is not notable and violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 17:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Necromancer (novella): Clarityfiend ( talk ) 08:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Necromancer (disambiguation)#Literature . -- Gen. Quon [Talk] 14:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I wasn't able to find any reviews or any other coverage in reliable sources.  In the absence of any sources at all, there's no real benefit in redirecting to the author's article.  Don't redirect to Necromancer (disambiguation) as none of the works listed there are novellas, making a redirect potentially confusing.  – Arms & Hearts ( talk ) 16:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2008 Swat Valley bombing: No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2008#July – September (considerations from our last 20 AfDs apply).  It has basically the exact same content and source already there so no need to merge anything.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 22:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2008#July – September per recent AfDs in this subject area.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 20:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Anne Gerwig: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 14:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep the "village" has 60 000 people apparently, that's not a small hamlet.  It might be called a village, but certainly has the population of a town.  We've had mayors of towns this size with articles here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2024 Florida House of Representatives election .  The subject does not pass WP:NPOL as the only metric for a clear pass of the SNG is holding a national or statewide elected position.  However, the appropriate standard is WP:GNG .  What is generally expected of a local official is whether the coverage of the subject's service as an elected official illustrates the lasting impact of their actions and votes taken (not statements), and what is generally expected for candidates is whether the coverage is well beyond that of the average candidate, such as internationalized coverage.  As it is, I do not see any coverage beyond her local area, nor do I see an independent write up comprehensively documenting her service as mayor.  Also, size of population does not determine whether or not a stand-alone article is created.  Redirect to the main election page as a usual and appropriate outcome where information about the election and the candidates can be added.   -- Enos733 ( talk ) 17:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Enos733, we can restore the page if she is elected, but not notable now.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Fine with any ! redirect if it goes that way.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Apopka Fire Department: No SIGCOV Grahaml35 ( talk ) 14:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 14:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If you believe that it's not significant enough, I'm willing to merge this with Apopka, Florida .  Would that be better?  Justafriendlykiwi ( talk ) 17:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe that would be better than the stand alone article.  It is not significant at the moment.  There is no WP:LASTING .  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 19:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect