hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Scribe (band): Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  They seem pretty inactive as well.  No album since 2014?  Yeah, take 'em out.  IncompA 18:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Since 2010?  They've had plenty of time to fix this one.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 22:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I wrote the original version of this article back in 2009, and it has not aged well.  Plus, the band no longer exists.  MadScientist ( talk ) 16:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ofentse Boloko: It seems like he is now out of the sport and working in fitness .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cyril Edward Sweney: PatGallacher ( talk ) 00:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Police , Politics ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The KPM is fairly common and does not make someone notable, but it was actually very unusual for a bar to be awarded for it.  I think this meets WP:ANYBIO #1.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I note that there were 54 bars and one second bar. PatGallacher ( talk ) 13:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Which rather supports my comment! 55 bars in 70 years throughout the largest empire in history is really not very many. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BIO .  There's nothing much here (we don't even know what he got the medals for), and the sourcing is terrible.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 02:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant sourcing establishing why being Deputy Inspector General of Police in Madras would possibly be notable or why his receipt of a common medal specific to his position is notable.  Just because the specific type of award given was uncommon doesn't mean recipients are notable absent better coverage.  Reywas92 Talk 17:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lydia Kose: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This was the most I found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of bus routes in Lahore: Just a list of unremarkable bus routes in one particular city.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists , Transportation ,  and Pakistan .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete: As per nom.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 11:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Transport in Lahore#Buses .  This is excessively detailed, but a summary of the principal routes/area of coverage in an article about a city's transport is encyclopaedic.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep This article is very helpful with regard to its subject for citizens using local transport in Lahore.  It's always difficult to find buses given Lahore's urban complexities and traffic.  Wikipedia is first result Google will give incase someone search it.  Transport authority's website is with a difficult interface and with change of routes it is less likely that they update it earlier so this article can be easily updated by anyone.  Muneebll ( talk ) 13:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:USEFUL , is not a compelling enough reason to keep this article.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are many similar articles like that present on Wikipedia, are we going to delete them all?  Or if they can stay, why can't this article?  Muneebll ( talk ) 07:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS .  Articles are present in Wikipedia because they meet specific notability requirements, those that don't usually get deleted.  London has close to 100 bus routes that have a long history and are deemed notable, so a list of them is also notable.  Not seeing anything remarkable about any in Lahore.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Getting around a transit system is not what an encyclopedia is for; that information belongs at Wikivoyage .  Fails WP:LISTN .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 03:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clear violation of WP:NOTDIR .  This information belongs on Wikivoyage .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , we aren't here to help people decide what bus to catch.  I don't even think it's for Wikivoyage, but that's for them to decide.  Without any sort of scholarly discussion on why the routes matter, this is just another list.  Beyond sources reproducing what's here, there are none for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eastern European identity: Lots of WP:REFBOMBED issues where the article just references random articles with the phrase "Eastern European" in it.  Also WP:SYNTH .  (This is almost verbatim the rationale of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern European people , and it also applies here).  NLeeuw ( talk ) 05:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Politics ,  and Europe .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 05:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy ping @ SunDawn , Hemiauchenia , Mzajac ,  and Bearian : for your consideration because you participated in the 2021 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern European people written by the same user.  This AfD is a follow-up.  NLeeuw ( talk ) 07:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing evidence that "Eastern European Identity" exists as a coherent topic that an article could be written about.  As the nom says, this appears to be refbombed with used of similar phrasing , but doesn't really demonstrate that this concept exists.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 12:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SYNTH and WP:OR .  This is essentially a review synthesizing material and citations, bordering on original research.  Sometimes we ignore the rules and let such articles slide - I've been guilty of that - but based on past outcomes, I'm going for deletion.  This compares unfavorably to such topics as Pan-Slavism , which is a thing and could be a good article.  I would not oppose a redirect to an appropriate target.  Bearian ( talk ) 16:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of vehicles of the Israeli ground tech tree in War Thunder: Nothing to merge here, implausible search term.  ~ A412 talk!  00:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ~ A412 talk!  00:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Military , Lists ,  and Israel .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Clear Delete .  Also all those images were uploaded at Commons, being images of said vehicles taken from War Thunder, which would all be copyrighted, though this is a problem outside AFD.  -- M asem ( t ) 00:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and masem. There's really not much more to add. -- ferret ( talk ) 00:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Great for FANDOM, but against guidelines for Wikipedia.  For the same reason we don't have "List of swords in Zelda" or "List of Mario enemies by level".  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - textbook WP:GAMECRUFT , spun out into its own article.  Sergecross73 msg me 01:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is not a notable concept in the slightest.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 01:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- The War Thunder wiki exists and already cover this . We're not the War Thunder wiki. -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 02:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  S5A-0043 Talk 07:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I hope this debacle sends a clear message, along with the 38 (!) images deleted at Commons, that Wikia is Wikia and Wikipedia is Wikipedia, and never the twain shall meet.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable in the slightest.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 13:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This topic is not so notable.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 17:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly not notable.  – Pharyngeal Implosive7 (talk) 18:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW .  Marokwitz ( talk ) 20:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – WP:DAFT , basically no one will search for a topic like this.  Svartner ( talk ) 17:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tasrif Khan: Not enough in-depth coverage about this person to show notability.  Fails WP:GNG .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 22:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is absolutely ridiculous.  On what basis is it proposed for deletion?  Please, first know enough about living person then learn to decide.  Since 2017 he is well known all over Bangladesh.  He was in front of everyone in the 2022 edition of the World Cup in Sylhet.  Wikipedia should have an article on it.  Olafrozen ( talk ) 02:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Observe on আফতাবুজ্জামান, he puts deletion tag on any article for no reason and remains negative in all decisions.  He has done this before.  He has done this before without studying a living person.  Olafrozen ( talk ) 02:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - since previous unanimous deletion, the only thing that has changed is his facial paralysis, which was reported at a low level in some places.  Not seeing enough there to justify a stand-alone article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep some citations were dead, which I removed but I added a new one.  He seems to have a good amount of coverage.  There are more news on his band Kureghor, than him.  I would not be opposed to changing the page to the band instead.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 02:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for cleaning it.  However there isn't enough reliable independent source about this person.  All of them are either interview (primary), presa release, passing mentions or are about his facial paralysis.  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 08:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : borderline G11ish.  Fails BLP, GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE only showed promo, nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 19:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PivotX: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I, too, couldn't find any independent RS about this.  I'll gladly change my ! vote if someone else finds something.  Owen× ☎ 01:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft-deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 19:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above - this fails on a lack of reliable sources .  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 03:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - adding agreement with above.  WP:RS StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 00:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jess Murphy (Scottish footballer): Subject fails WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: concur with @JTtheOG .  It's too soon .  Tkaras1 ( talk ) 19:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lack of independent, reliable sources raises concerns about the subject meeting WP:GNG .  Waqar 💬 19:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete but if this person becomes notable, it should be titled as Jess Murphy (footballer) as no other titles with that name and profession exist yet.  Iggy ( Swan ) ( Contribs ) 07:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adeseha Wuraola Becky: She has not starred in a single notable film; a Google search of her doesn't show her being discussed in reliable secondary sources.  Most of the sources cited in the article are primary sources that involve the subject granting interviews to several publications.  The article was previously deleted via an afd discussion, which can be seen here .  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  22:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Nigeria .  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  22:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Same as the previous deletion .  My mind is why there seems always to be a minimal participation for consensus reach.  However, an article created barely two /four days after deletion.  What am I suspecting?  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  16:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Versace1608 , isn't this G4 you could have tagged.  — Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  16:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Safari Scribe, I wasn't aware that the article was previously deleted.  I only learned this info after nominating it.  Sometimes if an article is different from the one that was previously deleted, the admin handling the speedy deletion will decline the G4 request.  I have experienced this in the past.  Anyways, thanks for the message.  Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your contributions to this site.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  17:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You can't G4 on a prod/soft delete.  Desertarun ( talk ) 18:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The refs check out.  She doesn't pass Nactor, nor does she need to because she passes both Basic and GNG.  Desertarun ( talk ) 18:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The fact there is that there isn't much verifiable source(s) to verify whether she acted those films or not, that's part of WP:NBASIC .  For the refs, there are WP:ROUTINE like made from interviews, etc and points towards WP:MILL —not notable for now!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Same as last AfD, nothing has changed, nothing found that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Sources in article are promo or mentions, nothing meeting WP:SIRS.  Article looks like a promo bio to me.  // Timothy :: talk 09:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samta Sagar: DSN18 ( talk ) 22:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  DSN18 ( talk ) 22:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non-notable actress that has only had minor roles in notable productions.  Fails WP:NACTOR .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete