hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Lawson Lunde: During a WP:BEFORE , only one source came up that might satisfy contributing to GNG: [30] .  However, this is a local news source with a writer that may possibly be a relative of Lunde's (same last name).  Based on this lack of sourcing, I think this fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:NBIO .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   The one sources they cite reads like a family produced obituary and the only ones I found on google were publishers' blurbs on sites selling his sheet music.   Though there is a review of his Sonata [31] from an academic site.   We just don't have enough independent, reliable sources for an article.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Najma Akhtar: The sourcing used in the article now isn't enough to meet notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep in this reliable AllMusic staff written bio here it states that her second album reached No. 4 on the Billboard World Music chart and that another of her albums sold 50,000 copies in Japan.  Some album reviews here , and here , imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 20:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  01:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 13:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Applied and presented sources fail GNG, ANYBIO and NMUSIC; nothing approaching RS covering this BLP.  BusterD ( talk ) 17:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aapla Alpha Awards: Redirect disputed by IP.  Cannot find sources to show how this meets notability.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Awards ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Source in the article and found in BEFORE do not meet WP:SIRS, found promo, listings, etc, nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Material in article is mainly unsourced, shouldn't be merged.  // Timothy :: talk 15:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
L3Harris Airline Academy: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 10:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Aviation ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kendriya Vidyalaya Indian Institute of Science: Fwiw there appear to be many schools affiliated to Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan which have WP pages but with questionable notability JMWt ( talk ) 11:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  33ABGirl ( talk ) 14:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If any schools in India are not notable, it will be deleted because, it can't pass WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  CastJared ( talk ) 15:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The school doesn't meet the notability requirements stated on WP:NSCHOOL Ertrinken ( talk ) 17:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:N .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Elliot Pennington: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and United States of America .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree.  Needs to be more here to pass WP:GNG .  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tanvir Ahmed Khan: Mccapra ( talk ) 20:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and India .  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 17:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L Faraone 22:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Did WP:BEFORE and was unable to find anything.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Lacks the basic elements of a biography.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 02:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Based on the analysis in the first AfD nomination .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanantha: Given names don't get a GNG carveout, so AfD it is. I was not able to locate any significant coverage of this name on a search.   Normally I would simply turn this kind of page into a disambig to famous people who have the name, but no articles exist with this string in the title, so that's not plausible.  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable name, interesting how there are no BIOs with this name to covert to a disambiguation page anyway Karnataka ( talk ) 20:07, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - don't need it.  Non-notable in English language searches (note: it's a Tamil language name and Google has difficulty with transliterating search words involving non-Latin scripts) -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 20:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Houlihans of Garrycastle: See the talk page and User talk:Fram#Speedy Deletion nomination of The Houlihans of Garrycastle.  for analysis of the sources and why this isn't a WP:V subject.  Based on some loose mentions and a trail of breadcrumbs across sources of varying reliability,   a whole story is fabricated.  No reliable source which actually discusses the Houlihans, Lords of Garrycastle, seems to exist.  Something like "Corcran O'Ullaghan, last Lord of Garrycastle (died in the Battle of Aughrim)" is based on thin air.  The Barons of Garrycastle were the MacCochlans.  Fram ( talk ) 19:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Ireland .  Fram ( talk ) 19:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Not only do the available/existing references not seem to support the text of the article, I can find no additional references to support a claim to notability under WP:GNG / WP:SIGCOV .  While some of the available sources (like these: [4] [5] [6] ) confirm the existence of several branches of the Hoolahan family (and associate one branch with some Colgan cousins(?)) it requires more than a little OR/SYNTH to come to the conclusions we see in the article.  Even if we were to accept that a family existed called the "Houlihans of Garrycastle" (and the sources would need significant interpretation to even come to that conclusion), where is the evidence of SIGCOV/GNG/notability?  (I certainly haven't found any...)  Guliolopez ( talk ) 15:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No evidence has been provided to verify the notability of the subject.  The article is quite obviously not more than an original synthesis of misinterpreted sources.  Borsoka ( talk ) 17:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails notability, not verified.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 11:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment -- A very minor family of lords at most.   It would not surprise me if Colgan was an anglicisation of Hoolahan, but that does not deal with the problem that they were all NN minor gentry.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 18:58, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cinta setelah Cinta: Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Lots of promo, database listings.  // Timothy :: talk 13:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Great Hope Baptist High School: I did a BEFORE search and couldn't find any usable sources, and no good target for a merge or redirect.  Mojo Hand ( talk ) 21:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Christianity ,  and Virginia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - lacks references to support notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 22:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tomas Fiala: All hits found are in PR items.  Nothing here given to show notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Czech Republic ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This article  may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page created by a banned user ( Bodiadub – SPI confirmed suspected ).  -- Yakudza ( talk ) 22:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've blocked the creator as a Bodiadub sockpuppet.  Delete as non-notable spam.  (This is headed for deletion anyway, please keep this open.)  MER-C 16:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nick Bailey (musician): Please see the history for the (unverified) songwriting resume.  Drmies ( talk ) 18:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Virginia .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emmanuel Broutin: Might be notable, but I think not.  UtherSRG (talk) 11:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , France ,  and Spain .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hard to say .  I found a copy of the first reference ( Vigeant, Arsène : Un Maître d'Armes sous la Restauration - Paris - 1883 ) here: [35] , but could only find one reference to "Broutin", and it looks like a passing reference.  I couldn't locate the other general references.  The French and Spanish Wikipedias have a couple more references, which I also couldn't locate.  Barnards.tar.gz ( talk ) 12:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find references to him in the BnF Gallica database, nor in Gscholar or Gbooks.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think the references that have been added to the article are sufficient to demonstrate notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 05:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unless we can actually verify that any of the sources contain SIGCOV, the article shouldn't be kept...  JoelleJay ( talk ) 17:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence that any of the sources contain significant coverage.  Avilich ( talk ) 14:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Delta Pi Delta: Naraht ( talk ) 19:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions .  Naraht ( talk ) 19:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was unable to find additional sources in newspapers or online.  This is a local group and appears to be inactive.  Rublamb ( talk ) 20:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per above.  Hyperbolick ( talk ) 06:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Diamond Cancer Foundation: Pepper Beast (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and California .  Pepper Beast (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Maliner ( talk ) 19:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as it exists in Google Trends.  -- Maxim Masiutin ( talk ) 22:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: "exists in Google Trends" is a rational not clearly grounded grounded in the notability guidelines.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 23:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find anything suggesting this subject passes WP:NCORP , and the sourcing currently present within the article isn't enough.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV .  Rajeev Gaur123 ( talk ) 06:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 1 gnews hit says it all.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ruhaan Rajput: Possible UPE/COI concerns and Does not meet GNG or NACTOR.  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 05:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 05:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Salt - Was going to wait for this SPI to run a CU but looks like creator is still bludgeoning the process, including removing the AfD template from the page.  Subject is not notable and has no major roles in films.  References are simple mentions or WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 08:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails NACTOR or GNG, as per above.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 13:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Subject is not notable and references don’t meet the criteria.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 15:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to show that WP:NACTOR is met.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 21:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Disclosure, I was the closer of the 2nd AfD.  While this isn't a G4, factors don't appear to have changed.  Hopefully this will establish a firm consensus to apply to the continued UPE around Rajput.  Star Mississippi 15:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete