All Eyes on Rafah : The slogan gained traction as it was used by, among many others, many social media influencers.  In accordance to WP:NOTDIARY , as well as WP:RECENT as a whole (because it is a small event belonging to the Rafah offensive ), I believe this article should be deleted.  A bit about this can be added to the "international reaction" header in the Rafah offensive article, but it should not exist standalone Pharaoh496 ( talk ) 21:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as it had a seismic impact, especially in allowing broader acceptance in having pro-Palestinian views.  In the same way the black squares in the BLM movement swept across platforms in 2020, All Eyes of Rafah was a turning point for many in Instagram and beyond, and detailing its impact would be too long for a comfortable read in the Rafah offensive page.  This page does just that, and to simplify it wouldn't do justice to the shockwaves they've presented.  It may have a minute effect on the grand scheme of things in politics, but it sure swayed the limit of what's deemed acceptable across international communities and societies.  Azurevanilla ash ( talk ) 16:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Like you said, it has had a  minute effect on the grand scheme of things in politics.  If it turns out to be more significant in the future, it can be recreated.  Not right not.  Pharaoh496 ( talk ) 06:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .   We aren't responsible for cataloguing every single viral phenomenon, ever.   If this proves to have enough significance to be covered a year or two from now, then maybe we can re-create then.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 00:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOT .  This topic is discussed in reliable sources but does not meet the additional criteria for a standalone page.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 05:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC) See updated comment below Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 15:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the interest in this topic as a new phenomenon in global conflict media has continued.  See for example, a 25 minute TV program aired yesterday, and an AP explainer from last week.  If organizations like these can create post-fact focused articles and programs on the topic, it is equally appropriate for Wikipedia.  Onceinawhile ( talk ) 06:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Like I and other users have mentioned, it violated WP:NOT .  A paragraph or even 2 can be included on the main rafah page instead Pharaoh496 ( talk ) 07:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I concur that WP:NOT and WP:NOTNEWS are violated by this article.  Garsh ( talk ) 18:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOT, though maybe a few sentences could be salvaged into some other articles.  FortunateSons ( talk ) 14:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this flavor of the day campaign per NOT and NOTNEWS.  gidonb ( talk ) 15:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you explain how this violates WP:NOTNEWS ?  VR (Please ping on reply) 04:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] routine news coverage of announcements .  gidonb ( talk ) 02:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wikipedia is not a directory for every internet slogan.  Hogo-2020 ( talk ) 08:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep People voting delete perhaps have a case for the abstract "slogan", but that's not all this article represents.  The most notable aspect of this phrase is the viral AI-generated image that was shared over 50 million times on Instagram, generating worldwide headlines specifically focused on the image.  The AI-generated image and associated online protest clearly meet GNG with massive coverage in every top newspaper.  Multiple facets of the AI image are covered in reliable sources that bring it beyond WP:NOTNEWS : Comparisons with Blackout Tuesday and other "online protests".  Image has already been held up as an example of performative activism and surely will continue to be referenced as such in the future.  Early high-profile AI image.  "All Eyes on Rafah" has been shared over 50 million times, making it one of the most seen / most shared AI images of all time right at the cusp of this " AI boom " that's currently happening.  This image is going to forever have a place in the history of early Artificial intelligence art .  Usage of AI in political/social movements, disinformation , deepfakes , Artificial intelligence in government , etc.  This "All Eyes on Rafah" image has already spawned discussion about the ethics of the use of AI images in political movements, and is sure to continue to be referenced as such.  Such as yesterday in the Washington Post : Deepfakes and AI-generated images have been around for several years, but as the technology improves and the tools to make them become widely available, they’ve become increasingly common on social media platforms.  An AI-generated image of a sprawling refugee camp with the words “All Eyes on Rafah” went viral in late May as a way for people to show their support for Palestinians in Gaza.  As major elections take place across the globe, some politicians have tried to use fake images to make their opponents look bad.  The image has cited "enduring notability" in reliable sources, passing the WP:NOTNEWS bar.  The image has already prompted re-analysis on the above facets in the weeks since it went viral.  PK-WIKI ( talk ) 21:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Each and every reason which you have given does not make sense for the given page: The article, not the picture is being nominated here for deletion.  The image may / may not exist on here or on commons - as it is the most notable aspect of the article.  It does not warrant an entire article for itself.  Blackout Tuesday was an event.  A phenomenon.  It does not compare to a mere hashtag - version of an AI image which lasted for 24 hours on social media - without materialising.  Thats exactly why part of this should be added to Rafah or sample AI pages and not have one of its own.  Pharaoh496 ( talk ) 08:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article is mainly about the image and associated social media protest.  It's perfectly valid to write encyclopedia articles about notable images.  The AI image does warrant an entire article for itself, based on its cited coverage in reliable sources.  50 million people posting this image was also an event/phenomenon.  It was directly compared to Blackout Tuesday by myriad reliable sources.  Any deletion arguments here apply equally to Blackout Tuesday; neither should be deleted.  The next significant coverage about the next social media protest in the future will surely mention both.  PK-WIKI ( talk ) 17:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, this article isnt about the image.  Its about the phenomenon Pharaoh496 ( talk ) 21:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTNEWS.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 12:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per

Discussion outcome: no consensus