1895 Pacific Tigers football team : The only source is a database, and I'm not finding the sources needed to meet the notability guidelines.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Given that every other season on Pacific's football history has an article, I think some kind of merger would probably be best so that the information on this one is not lost.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 02:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do you actually have a suggestion for a merge, perhaps to a combined season article?  I'm all ears, but looking at 1898 and 1899, I'm not seeing much for those seasons either...  Let'srun ( talk ) Let'srun ( talk ) 02:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not to mention, there isn't much info here to save, considering the only source.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pacific Tigers football, 1895–99 , perhaps?  Or maybe extend it to include a few of their next seasons?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 02:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see coverage to meet NSEASONS even for that range, at least from a first glance at the sources in those articles and elsewhere.  1898 has only the database and a very short recap, while the 1899 one has only the database and a long section devoted to the rules of the game in the era with no references to the actual team.  Reasonable minds may differ.  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , this is the first game and the first season of the team's history.  The year is a matter of record and the season covered to some extent in the sourcing.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 11:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] covered to some extent in the sourcing Where?   All I'm seeing is one line in a database entry here .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 15:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (without prejudice).  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS due to the lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Pacific was a major program in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s but not so in the 1890s.  Indeed, the program was practically non-existent prior to 1919 -- a grand total of five games played between 1895 and 1918 (zero wins, one tie, four losses, 11 total points scored).  If someone some day wants to create an article on the early history of the Pacific football program, it might possibly be viable, but I certainly don't have the time or inclination to work on that when there are so many more worthwhile topics to pursue.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Pacific Tigers football, 1895–1899 .  Jweiss11 ( talk ) @ Jweiss11 : Two issues with your suggestion:  1) a closer cannot redirect to a redlink so that's not viable unless someone creates it; and (2) is there SIGCOV to support the proposed article?  Cbl62 ( talk ) 19:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's probably worth the editing time to create the proposed article, though, and merging the very small amount of information.  The 1898 and 1899 articles aren't in great shape either, and it's possible the game(s) which were played were indeed covered in local papers of the time.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Wikipedia is also not a directory .  Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge now that a target article has been created.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Personally, while I appreciate the work put in by jweiss11, I don't think that the combined article meets the WP:NSEASONS due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We could expand the scope of Pacific Tigers football, 1895–1899 to include 1919 and perhaps some or all of the 1920s.  I think Pacific may have played rugby at some pint between 1900 and 1918, a la 1906–1917 Stanford rugby teams .  That could be covered in an expanded article as well.  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 02:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: My inclination is to Merge but I'm a closer, not a participant, and I don't see a consensus to do that.  Another closer might IAR this but I'm not ready to do that yet.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Given that the merge target of Pacific Tigers football, 1895–1899 had already been created (by me per precedent with suggestion from two other editors), what's the point of keeping this AfD open?  I don't think there's any consensus to keep this as a stand-alone article.  Randy Kryn , you were the only keep vote.  Would agree now that the merge to Pacific Tigers football, 1895–1899 is the best course of action?  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 02:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sure, Jweiss11 , that works.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 02:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think all editors were in favor of this Merge.  But I'm not the only closer in town, another one might decide to close this discussion presently.  I just wanted to see more support which Randy's opinion helps.  L iz Read!  Talk!  02:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Liz, okay, I understand that it's not solely on you to close this.  For the record, I'll note two similar recent AfDs with analogous content: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1884 DePauw football team and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1884 Wabash football team .  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 03:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Pacific Tigers football, 1895–1899 , as it is unlikely to see enough sourcing for its own article.  ~ EDDY ( talk / contribs ) ~ 01:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  There's no 'merging' to be done as all relevant content is already included at the target.  Simply redirect it to Pacific Tigers football, 1895–1899 .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 01:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Beanie - I've previously taken the same position, but I think that may be wrong.  I think (someone correct me if I'm wrong) merging preserves the edit history of both articles.  If that is correct, the merge maintains the attribution history on the original work.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 01:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Merge or redirect .  Favoring merge if that preserves the attribution history.  Otherwise redirect for the reasons outlined by BeanieFan.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 01:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I suppose an admin could perform a WP:HISTMERGE here if that's deemed necessary.  But there's never been a whole a lot of substance in this article.  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 02:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that in the case of 1884 Wabash football team merging to Wabash football, 1884–1889 , no history merge was performed.  Same for 1884 DePauw football team merging to DePauw football, 1884–1889 .  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 02:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge