hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
D401 road: I do not speak Croatian but I don't see sources that would meet the GNG.  JMWt ( talk ) 17:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Croatia .  JMWt ( talk ) 17:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This one is a very short, local one, and a Google search of Croatian sites mostly produces cursory references to it.  This could stay as is if we declare it a gazetteer entry per WP:5P1 .  Even then, such a small entry without much WP:POTENTIAL could still be upmerged into a list, though.  In that case it probably should still be redirected rather than deleted because this term is signposted and it's plausible as a search term for the average English reader who comes across it.  -- Joy ( talk ) 10:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Highways_in_Croatia#State roads .  No info here that is not better presented in a list ForksForks ( talk ) 18:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Wikipedia is not a map Mr Vili talk 22:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Highways in Croatia#State roads .  There is likely to be significantly more (local) coverage of this road than might be expected of typical Croatian state roads given its function serving the airport.  This should be a redirect with possibilities until such sources are presented to justify a standalone article.  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 01:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Laal Ishq (Pakistani TV series): Donald D23 talk to me 00:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : First things first—NTV is an essay, not a policy or even a guideline.  Secondly, yes, it fails to meet WP:GNG because I couldn't find sign/in-depth coverage, such as reviews.  All I could find is some ROTM coverage which isn't sufficient.  For example, this coverage based on interviews doesn't meet GNG because it's not independent of the subject, and this other coverage is more like a press release.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While assessing the referencing of Pakistani dramas/series, the dynamics of Pakistani media industry should be considered wherein media groups have their own news and entertainment channels.  Normally a news channel from one media group doesn't give coverage to a project of a rival channel unless it's a big hit.  So for average hits we have to rely on other industry sources which otherwise may not be good sources but good enough for a Pakistani drama.  Muneebll ( talk ) 18:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Muneebll , But still you have to demonstrate that this TV dramas meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That assessment is not based on Wikipedia policy or guidance.  In order for an article to be kept it must be demonstrated that it meets WP:GNG at a minimum.  Saying that one media group doesn't cover another one is not a reason to keep an article.  Donald D23 talk to me 22:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dilawar_Malik : (director) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023–24 Ranji Trophy Plate Group: Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and India .  Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per the nom.  No need for a separate article.  Newshunter12 ( talk ) 22:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
X (demoparty): The name of the event makes it more difficult to search.  I was only able to find mentions, such as "One of the most traditional and largest events still running today is demoparty X, a specific event for the Commodore 64 platform with the first edition held in 1995 in the Netherlands (POLGáR, 2016)." (machine translated from Portuguese) in a paper about the demoscene in Brazil .  A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties .  Edit: X is also discussed in Freax: The Brief History of the Demoscene, Volume 1 (2005) by Tamás Polgár: "The great meeting events of the Commodore 64 scene in the second half of the nineties were the great international demoparties: The Party in Denmark, Assembly in Finland, and mainly the German Mekka Symposium and Breakpoint. These parties, in addition to the great annual X parties organized by Success & The Ruling Company. For the first time, in 1995, this party was held in Utrecht, Netherlands but moved several times to different cities. Some still remember X’95 as the best X party, and later X parties as the best parties of C64 scene history. Interestingly enough the X still takes place every year. In 1997 the party united with Takeover, and became a multiplatform party under X-Takeover label but the cool oldschool atmosphere was broken by Amiga and PC users, so the cooperation split up. X is still the largest Commodore-only demoparty." .  toweli ( talk ) 12:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Video games , Visual arts , Events , Computing ,  and Netherlands .  toweli ( talk ) 12:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties as an WP:AtD .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 16:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Joanna Loughran: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Cricket ,  and Ireland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Joanna Loughran has played in a Women's T20 International match between two full member sides, fulfilling notability requirements for WP:OFFICIALCRICKET .  CarnivalSorts ( talk ) 18:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ CarnivalSorts : That just means that coverage is likely to exist for a player.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've added some more coverage from the Irish Independent and RTÉ.  CarnivalSorts ( talk ) 19:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Ireland women Twenty20 International cricketers Looks to be a case of WP:TOOSOON .  Coverage is certainly increasing, but not sure there's enough yet for an article, although close, redirect for now and then convert once there's a couple more sources.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Family Star: Fails WP:NFILM .  Potentially WP:TOOSOON .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NFF .  Note that references used on the page fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and should be removed.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:33, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NFF .  NaanReady ( talk ) 18:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Vijay Deverakonda : Fails WP:NF K-Pop contributor ( ✍️ • 📚 ) 08:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Vortis (Doctor Who): Only survived the first one due to having some encyclopedic citations, but all of them are primary sources related to the franchise itself.  A search shows no other sources related to the planet.  As it stands, the article does not meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Given no article for the Planets in Doctor Who exists, its contents should most likely be merged into The Web Planet and the List of Aliens in the series.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Web Planet because shockingly we don’t have a “list of doctor who locations” (and we shouldn’t but considering we’re drowning in Whocruft I’d 100% expect it to exist).  Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect per Dronebogus.  There are a lot of stub articles without support of reliable third party sources.  A redirect to a list, perhaps even whoniverse , might be a solution.  But there is nothing independently reliable to WP:PRESERVE from this article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023–24 Ranji Trophy Group D: Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and India .  Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Per the nom.  No need for a separate article.  Newshunter12 ( talk ) 22:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 Portland, Oregon Auditor election: This differs from the mayoral election which is obviously notable.  After a search I believe it violates WP:SIGCOV and WP:NOTNEWS .  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 18:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Oregon .  Owen× ☎ 18:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 18:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A city accountant election is completely non-notable (and Portland is plain overcovered here as a whole).  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 2024 Portland, Oregon municipal elections .  Municipal row offices generally don't need separate articles for their elections when there is a relevant main article.  City auditor is not the position that receives even much routine local coverage.  Reywas92 Talk 21:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete completely non-notable election.  SportingFlyer T · C 11:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge to 2024 Portland, Oregon municipal elections , where this election is mentioned.  Those advocating for deletion are likely correct that this is not presently a notable election, but I don't see any good reasons why this title shouldn't point to the place in our encyclopedia where we do cover this election.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
L Corleone: These sources include MusicBrainz, Album of the Year, Rate Your Music, Last.fm, Genius, and other, non-trivial sources.  Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 6 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect I'd redirect to the article about the singer; most coverage is now about his estate launching a line of clothing, the album is mentioned.  I can't find critical analysis of the album.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Big L per WP:ATD .  I was unable to locate nothing but passing mentions on this album.  4meter4 ( talk ) 22:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Live on 5: A WP:BEFORE shows nothing to pass GNG.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 02:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 02:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 09:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs aired by TV5 (Philippine TV network)#Newscast , does not meet general notability guideline.  - Ian Lopez @ 13:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs aired by TV5 (Philippine TV network)#Newscast per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Petpet Park: I've found no sources that weren't passing mentions: if this discussion fails to turn up SIGCOV, then it should be redirected to Neopets , which it is a spinoff of (though a sourced mention should be added to the body of the Neopets article) PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 17:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Internet .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 17:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Neopets per nom, fails GNG criteria.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 00:37, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Failed WP:GNG .  Not enough WP:SIGCOV to warrant a separate article.  Prof.PMarini ( talk ) 00:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Torchwood Archive: Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 13:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions .  Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 13:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Torchwood_(audio_drama_series)#Background : if existing coverage is judged insufficient for a standalone page.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Radio ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Torchwood (audio drama series)#Background - The only sources currently in the article are primary, and searches are bringing up only brief mentions in reliable sources.  This specific audio drama is already covered in the indicated section, so this should be redirected there.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mummy Sandbox: For the sources used in the article, the Dread XP review looks good, but the PC Gamer piece only mentions the game and the Indie Games Plus piece (archived) is a very short announcement.  QuietCicada ( talk ) 01:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada ( talk ) 01:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Creator Delete No objection here and suggest an uncontroversial PROD to speed this along.  This was created when I had looser views on notability.  The game has no significant coverage from any source deemed reliable by WP:VG/S .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 03:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Redirect to List of Haunted PS1 games per ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ .  Non-notable game, couldn't find much significant coverage besides the sources mentioned by the nominator.  Mooonswimmer 13:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Haunted PS1 games per WP:ATD .  Whether that list is notable or necessary I am unsure, but as long as it exists it is a viable redirect target.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 12:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Capital intensive industry: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 18:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , but possibly move to draft.  The article currently is obviously not suitable, but a cursory JSTOR search gives plenty of papers mentioning the concept, so it is likely notable.  I don't have the energy to rewrite it at this moment, but it is something that can be done.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Capital intensity#Capital-intensive industry .  Rewrite can begin there spun out if necessary.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 11:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Capital intensity#Capital-intensive industry , where the term is given coverage.  It seems rational to cover this topic within the scope of an article on capital intensity; should the coverage become too large , it can be split back out into its own article, but right now it's better covered as a section of an article on the broader concept .  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect