hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jo Mango: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can resolve it now.  No consensus in 2005 AfD when standards for inclusion were significantly lower.  Boleyn ( talk ) 10:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE unless someone is willing to do the work to establish notability - there’s nothing so far.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've had a bit of a look into this and think it will meet the 'Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself' notability criterion (at least).  So I'll keep working on the article to bring it up to standard.  Alarichall ( talk ) 09:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Review in the Glasgow Herald is fine, but that's all I can see that would count toward notability.  I can't find anything beyond streaming sites or a bio at the Conservatoire of Scotland where this person works.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] OK, so I've added references to coverage in national UK papers including The Sunday Times , Metro , and The Scotsman .  I haven't done a comprehensive trawl of reporting, but I think that the article now shows that Jo Mango meets the notability criterion 'Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself'.  Alarichall ( talk ) 11:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep in view of the additional reliable sources coverage references added to the article such as the Sunday Times, The Scotsman, and The Herald (Scotland).  Am exercising WP:AGF as urls are not provided for two of the three aforementioned sources, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kobla Ladzekpo: Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Bands and musicians , Dance , Ghana ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep — There are sources, such as this Los Angeles Times , that are significant enough for the subject to meet WP:GNG.  Shoerack ( talk ) 09:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 19:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep just enough with the sources above.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Is notable, but poorly.  ArvindPalaskar ( talk ) 16:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Pavane for a Dead Girl: One passing mention, one non-independent source, one review.  UtherSRG (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep ; found quite a few sources when looking at websites listed at WP:ANIME/RS : Sequential Tart , Comicbook Bin , ICv2 (which is already in the article), and its review from ANN meets WP:100WORDS .  Link20XX ( talk ) 03:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per Link20XX, plus some coverage from Manga Bookshelf [22] ; Kono Manga ga Sugoi!  [23] ; and Natalie [24] [25] [26] [27] Xexerss ( talk ) 04:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources brought up by Link20XX and Xexerss.  Fulmard ( talk ) 19:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kostya Tszyu vs. Sharmba Mitchell II: Additionally, all these extra details aren't supported by the single source provided, which I believe is WP:NOR .  When looking for reliable resources about this fight and match card, I could only find a couple of news articles from ABC News (Australia) that explained the fight was happening and not much else.  CREEDIXMO ( TALK ) 22:48, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - World title fights are usually inherently notable events.  This article was written at an era in which reliably-sourced material was not deemed as important to the article as it is today.  It will be hard to find reliable links due to the fact the bout took place 20 years ago, but I am working on that as I speak.  Jeanette La Trevi Martin ( digame ) 03:40, 12 July, 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Boxing ,  and Arizona .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - A notable world title bout, the article needs rewriting not deleting.  Sam11333 ( talk ) 15:04, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Elizabeth Salmón: In-depth coverage by multiple reliable sources appears not to exist.  Separately, she remains far from passing special criteria at WP:ACADEMIC or WP:POLITICIAN as well.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 22:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Pretty sure her position would meet the requirements of WP:POLITICIAN , but regardless, there's been coverage of her since the appointment of both her and her activities (and North Korea being angry at her findings from her work).  For example: Peruvian legal expert set to be new UN rapporteur on North Korean human rights - NK News North Korea COVID rules put pressure on women providing food - U.N. expert - Reuters UN Highlights Abuses Against Women and Girls in North Korea - Human Rights Watch UN special rapporteur Elizabeth Salmón laments lack of information from North Korea - Korea JoongAng Daily New UN special rapporteur makes first visit to Seoul - Korea JoongAng Daily North Korea: UN human rights expert is 'US puppet' - Agence France-Presse UN special rapporteur for N. Korea human rights to visit S. Korea this month - The Korea Times UN Special Rapporteur Focuses on Women’s Rights in First Report to UN Human Rights Council - Korea Institute for International Economic Policy I think there's enough here to meet the WP:GNG .  Silver seren C 23:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you.  I've reviewed the list and ported it to the article as Further Reading, with hopes it might underpin biographical content in the future.  I appreciate your research.  Cheers.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 00:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Politicians , Women , Law ,  and Peru .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The UN special rapporteur post seems to satisfay WP:ACADEMIC #7: having an impact outside academia in her academic capacity, in this case being appointed by the UN as a legal expert on human rights.  Pam D 07:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I disagree that she meets NPOL, but being a UN rapporteur and having regular media coverage meets NACADEMIC #7.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 15:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Likely passes GNG with the JoonAng and other newspaper articles listed above.  I'm unsure about satisfying academic notability, but there is ample coverage in RS for general notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Has anyone searched in Spanish for Spanish sources.  They wouldnt come up if looking in English.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have not.  I would expect searching in Korean and whatever the Hangul transliteration of her name is would also be fruitful.  Silver seren C 20:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Eric K. Little: Nevertheless it is not evident to me that the subject is really notable, and the purpose of the article appears to me to be to memorialise his misconduct.  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America .  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sexual assault in the United States military : Seems to be the logical redirect, there is some coverage [7] , but it's more about the scandal than the person here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:GNG .  A US Major general removed due to sexism is significant.  Mztourist ( talk ) 03:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This article was added with the intent that it demonstrates the issues that have come with US military confronting systemic issues that are prevalent within their ranks.  Skuzbucket ( talk ) 07:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks to the article creator for this explanation.  Please see WP:RGW .  We don’t create biographies of living people to highlight broader issues.  An article on the broader issue would be absolutely fine, but personalising it isn’t what we’re here for.  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly satisfies WP:GNG .  Not just an attack page, as he is a general and therefore plenty has been written about him.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 09:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep US generals are not inherently notable, and this comes close to notability for a single event , but coverage like this [8] and, to a lesser extent, these [9] [10] reinforces that he was likely marginally notable before his firing.  The article is far from an attack page and does a good job of maintaining NPOV.  Toadspike [Talk] 09:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ashish Aviral: Shellwood ( talk ) 09:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Have enough sources.  Citadeol (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No comment on whether or not the man meets WP:ANYBIO .  (Offhand, I'm unfamiliar with the particular awards, etc, and I lack the time to investigate.)  But what if he fails to do so?  Failure to meet WP:ANYBIO isn't a reason for deletion.  -- Hoary ( talk ) 05:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: There are lots of reliable sources as well as secondary and independent sources to the subject.  Fade258 ( talk ) 06:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   The sources in the article appear to satisfy the WP:GNG by being in-depth, independent, and reliable.   I am not familiar with Nepali media so I am relying on Google translate to establish depth and independence and general principles to establish reliability.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 23:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jody Maginley: Sources exist such as [9] but its not enough for WP:SIGCOV .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 19:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Tennis , Caribbean ,  and Antigua and Barbuda .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 19:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Loads of coverage [10] [11] [12] from Antigua's only newspaper (I could add more as thankfully this paper is written in English and easily available online) and also [13] [14] [15] these sources from his college career are plenty enough to meet GNG.  Iffy ★ Chat -- 20:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ( edit conflict ) Keep – I've found quite a few more good sources in local Antiguan or Caribbean news, like here , here , and here that I think are enough to reach WP:SIGCOV .  I'll try to see if I can find anything from his time playing college tennis in the States, but I think there is enough to push him over.  Adamtt9 ( talk ) 20:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Loads of coverage pop up after pressing the search button (including the ones Iffy provided), nom might have to do a more careful BEFORE next time.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 04:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above meets WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Amin Gaon railway station: Nagol0929 ( talk ) 13:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 13:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with the article about the line it's on.  Straight deletion of items of notable sets (railway stations in India) without a at least redirect to content in a broader article or list is harmful.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 10:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Then you should ! vote redirect instead of merge because there is really nothing to merge.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 13:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  There's verification concerns.  Amingaon is the settlement's name and the name of a former railway station in operation from 1907 to 1963.  Amin Gaon is the title of the article, there's no passenger station but a railway line terminates at a container site, which some 'sources' (not necessarily reliable) suggest was a railway station.  Perhaps was in 2017 when this article was written, but need confirmation.  Rupples ( talk ) 15:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and move to Amingaon railway station I think Rupples is correct the actual name of this station is without the space, searching for sources without the space gave some sources: Sharma, Sukanya (2016-06-19).  "Re-living an â€œAbandonedâ€ Space" .  Space and Culture, India .  4 (1): 1–5.  doi : 10.20896/saci.v4i1.193 .  ISSN 2052-8396 .  Bureau, The Meghalayan (2022-08-17).  "NF Railway to preserve Amingaon Railway Station as heritage site" .  The Meghalayan .  Retrieved 2023-11-17 .  Jumpytoo Talk 19:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and move per Jumpytoo, the above sources make a good case for notability.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of Sports Illustrated writers: Definitely useful as a category than being a standalone list.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , News media ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This subject meets the WP:NLIST as the grouping has been discussed in several secondary sources, such as [ [30] ] and [ [31] ], along with several books about the magazine which discuss the writers.  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Let'srun.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 18:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per references provided by LetsRun which show passage of NLIST.  Frank Anchor 18:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Roger Morris (English writer): Most of the sources found in a BEFORE search deal with the British Army officer Roger Morris , and the remaining sources found about this subject are non-independent sources lacking significant coverage of the subject.  Tails Wx 15:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Tails Wx 15:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Kirkus Review has reviews for 8 of Morris's books covering a sustained time period from 2007 to 2020: R N Morris .  Publishers Weekly has 7 book reviews: R N Morris .   Further book reviews in The Guardian : [1] ; Library Journal : [2] ; and Booklist : [3] .  These RS reviews should contribute to WP:NAUTHOR : multiple independent periodical articles or reviews .  Resonant Dis tor tion 14:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Furthermore, Morris has twice been shortlisted for a notable award.   Details of which, and more independent book reviews, have now been added to the article.  Resonant Dis tor tion 22:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Wider evaluation of the sources and whether this passes NAUTHOR would be hepful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 16:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As well as the 18 book reviews identified above - there are another two published in the Library Journal : [4] , and further available in the New York Times : [5] , Spike Magazine : [6] , The Times : [7] , and The Millions magazine: [8] .  It is not wholly clear why the notability of the subject continues to be in doubt.  Resonant Dis tor tion 17:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  More participation in this discussion would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I'm a bit iffy on use of Kirkus [9] and PW [10] , but there's clearly sufficient critical coverage of his work elsewhere in RS above to meet NAUTHOR#3 (and coverage at a single author article is clean where individual pages for books are not needed ref WP:NOPAGE ).  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 08:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep