hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Peter Baláž (boxer) : My Google searches came up with Peter Baláž (Esperantist) and a motorcycle driver , both of which are Slovak, but nothing about a boxer with the same birth name.  I can't see this article lasting longer-term on Wikipedia.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Boxing ,  and Slovakia .  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 09:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no medal means no notability under WP:NSPORT .  Can't find any secondary coverage via a search.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 10:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Olympics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , subject was the starring role in a movie about himself ( Goat (2015 film) ), and his involvement was covered by such outlets as The Hollywood Reporter [28] .  I'm thankful for the nomination because it gives us a chance to improve the article, although I think the nominator did not do WP:BEFORE by looking up the actor's name with the movie's name (Koza) and addressing those sources.  -- Habst ( talk ) 12:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I AM the nominator.  Sure, not everyone has the same Google search results.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 10:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per the excellent find by Habst.  A movie about the subject!  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just to be clear, the movie is fiction, about a fictional Olympic champion.   This article is about a fighter who badly lost his only Olympic fight in the round of 32.   Boxrec shows he won 3 of his 57 pro fights.  [29] He's not notable as a boxer, but feel free to debate his notability as an actor.  Papaursa ( talk ) 04:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Does not meet WP:GNG , WP:NBOX , WP:NOLY as a non-medaling Olympian, or WP:NACTOR , having only starred in one film.  As Papaursa noted, the film is not about him.  XabqEfdg ( talk ) 02:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to the film.  The film is certainly not about "him".  Hollywood Reporter asserts that the main character is a "character very close to" Baláž (my emphasis).  That's not a completely reliable claim, as the character is a "Olympic boxing champion", which in reality is quite far from Baláž, as described by Papaursa.  Still, he is mentioned in the film article, and the film article really needs to be fleshed out, so Baláž' background, again as summarized by Papaursa, can be mentioned there.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dax Eric López : Falls into WP:BLP1E .  I have no issues with a redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law , United States of America ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies which already has a table entry on this subject, as we're tend to do with these now.   — siro χ o 03:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to suggested target per other similar candidates.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kırklareli Jewish quarter : According to the tag, inadequate referencing has been a problem for almost 9 years.  I wouldn't also have a separate article for a quarter of a small town, unless it had a significant amount of content and coverage.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the article links to a book about the community.  There's an article that includes recent coverage here [51] , there will be other historical articles.  There's historical population numbers in the 2008 Encyclopaedia Judaica [52] .  Jahaza ( talk ) 23:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Here's an academic book chapter in Turkish [53] .  Jahaza ( talk ) 23:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jahaza None of these sources are about the Jewish quarter.  They are all about the Jewish population of Kırklareli in general.  Even if we had sources specifically for the neighborhood (currently we do not), we had to consider whether it should have its own article per WP:NPLACE , which leaves the notability of unrecognized neighborhoods open for discussion.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's just a question of changing the name of the article, which is clearly about the Jewish community in the city.  Jahaza ( talk ) 11:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A move would definitely be appropriate if this article is not deleted.  Though, problems remain as the article largely went unnoticed for 14 years.  It also doesn't appear to be the convention to have separate articles for non-distinct communities within a small settlement.  Instead, expanding on the Jewish population on Kırklareli , a more-visible article, could be more beneficial until we reach the point a separate entry would allow for more expansion.  Aintabli ( talk ) 21:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless more reliable sources are added, cannot find anything that proves WP:GNG Karnataka ( talk ) 19:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 00:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kadiatu Lethbridge-Stewart : All references otherwise are primary sources.  Does not meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Virgin New Adventures .  Wildly excessive fan cruft.  Sionk ( talk ) 11:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/Redirect per nom.  Lacking sources to meet WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete so obscure it’s very unlikely that anyone will search for or link to this character.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 01:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ultima Tower : François Robere ( talk ) 12:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  François Robere ( talk ) 12:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Was also recreated after being previously deleted without anyone noticing.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eugene Tssui#Proposals and city planning projects .  From a brief look at Google Scholar there's enough mentions to have it worth a few sentences, but certainly not enough for a separate article.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 20:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arts/Industrial District station : Per WP:CRYSTAL , this absolutely should not exist.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 00:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 00:08, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor#Stations .  We're a decade or more out from the design of the station advancing beyond a dot on a map.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 00:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor#Stations : Far WP:TOOSOON .  The station won't be existing anytime soon, and who knows if it will still be in the plans 10 or 15 years from now as it's proposed that the station will be there.  Nothing's been confirmed yet, thus it's a WP:CRYSTAL violation.  It can be redirected to the list of stations on the planned rail line for now.  Streetlampguy301 ( talk ) 00:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect so that this can be changed over if it becomes notable later.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
HV 888 : Does not meet WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG .  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 15:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : the star "HV 888" is mentioned in several studies of the LMC, although I don't think it satisfies the criteria for significant coverge.  A redirect to List of largest stars should suffice for now.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 19:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to List of largest known stars .  This is one of the many articles created on the basis of a very large stellar radius, without concerning if they would meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines .  InTheAstronomy32 ( talk ) 21:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to List of largest stars .  User:Hamterous1 ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ ) 00:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of largest stars as {{ R to list entry }} : the star is currently not notable per WP:GNG / WP:NASTRO but is mentioned in the appropriate list.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 12:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Miss You Most (At Christmas Time) : A WP:BEFORE search recognises this, as the only coverage appears to be in passing mentions regarding its relation to "All I Want for Christmas Is You" ( WP:INHERIT ).  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 16:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 16:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore the redirect to Merry Christmas (Mariah Carey album) .  Heartfox ( talk ) 19:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Merry Christmas (Mariah Carey album) as there does not appear to be enough coverage to support a separate article, but a viable redirect target exists, which in my opinion is always better for readers than outright deletion.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 22:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 Jeddah F1 Academy round : MSportWiki ( talk ) 10:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Motorsport ,  and Saudi Arabia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Redirect to 2024 F1 Academy season#Round 1: Jeddah per nom.  Left guide ( talk ) 12:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC) ! Vote modified upon realizing there's no sourcing worth preserving since the only one is a primary source.  Left guide ( talk ) 04:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  LouisOrr27 ( talk ) 16:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – No content worth preserving, Wikipedia is not a database.  5225 C ( talk • contributions ) 23:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Deacon Frey : Per WP:BANDMEMBER , "members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability."  Deacon Frey has no such individual notability.  WWGB ( talk ) 05:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  WWGB ( talk ) 05:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom - The sources in the article do not establish stand-alone notability, and everything relevant is already in the article about the band.  FOARP ( talk ) 05:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alisa Summers : Online news is dominated by another Alisa Summers from Florida (not related) and I can't find anything about Summers that's not about her participation in RuPaul's Drag Race.  Suggest the article is redirected to the Series 4, similarly to the treatment of most attempted Wikipedia articles about contestants in reality TV.  Sionk ( talk ) 12:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Florida .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , do not redirect because of the ambiguous name.  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect This is not an "ambiguous name" on the google search results.  This page was originally a redirect for Season 4 - and should still be since Alisa is not relevant outside of the show / season to justify her own page.  Burnberrytree ( talk ) 17:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect fails notability guidelines, was a redirect, so better redirect it to the original target.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 14:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect: It's better to leave it to redirect insteada of deletion.  There's barely any sources about her outside from the drag competition series.  — JuanGLP ( talk / contribs ) 13:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Redirect or just delete?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 12:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The redirect serves a purpose and the page history should be preserved.  Also, this is the request of User:JuanGLP , who made recent edits.  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Beyond the Pale (radio program) : No WP:SIGCOV and both sources are WP:PROMO anyway.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 01:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not only that, but several other sources I've found seem to contradict each other. .?  See: This source claiming the show ended in 2014, and This other source seems to indicate that the show is still running.  Both on their own seem to have no reason to be untrustworthy, so so much for WP:V on several areas of the article...  I think it should be deleted AriTheHorse 02:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Radio , Judaism ,  and New York .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge / Redirect to Jews for Racial and Economic Justice as the show the organization sponsors does not appear to be independently notable.  Alansohn ( talk ) 04:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , a redirect to Jews for Racial and Economic Justice is appropriate given the dearth of independent sources discussing this subject matter alone, but a full delete ignores the search for this that a user might have, and that would be better suited to being redirected back to the parent organization.  Iljhgtn ( talk ) 13:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  As a note, I personally wouldn’t have even sent to AfD.  Think it prob could have just been uncontroversially redirected.  Innisfree987 ( talk ) 20:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  AryKun ( talk ) 06:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Louanne Katraine : QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Fictional elements ,  and Science fiction and fantasy .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list of characters for the show, fails GNG for stand-alone article.  Plot summary with some trivia sourced to podcast/dvd commentary.  Bottom of the barrel WP:FANCRUFT .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Piotrus.  This topic receives only WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs , but a redirect is a cheap way to preserve something.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 18:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sing and Dance With Barney : What do you think?  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Music ,  and Texas .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could be retained if the commercial sucess is judged enough for notability or if reviews are presented.  If not Redirect to Barney & Friends , where it can have its own section. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've added a {{ cc-notice }} in the references section since the original contribution adding the text from Fandom wasn't attributed, but I think Redirect is the best option here - it can have its own section there, as Mushy Yank said.  Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 16:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per MY.  Nikkimaria ( talk ) 01:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge what is usable, per above.  Comment to nom: good job on the thorough BEFORE.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 20:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Disintegration EP : Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - If the article survives this process, its title should be moved to Disintegration (Samantha Scarlette EP) , as "EP" is not part of the album title and this article's creator may have been thwarted by Disintegration (The Cure album) and other stuff at the Disintegration disambig page.  Also, the singer has two other album articles here -- Into the Darkness EP & Demos and Violent Delights + Violent Ends -- and I think they should all be redirected due to a shortage of reliable media coverage.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Samantha Scarlette .  The article was created on the same day the album was released (yesterday), and it may be unfair to expect lots of pro reviews and other reliable media coverage just 24 hours later.  It's in the usual streaming services and self-promotional sites, and that's all as of now.  I could say " too soon " and someone else could say "give it time".  However, this singer's previous albums are largely unknown as well (see above), so I don't expect anything different to happen for this one.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect