Peruvian Universities (MUN): Restoration was requested at WP:RFU .  On the face of the article, I see no reason to disagree with Liz's assessment, but a full discussion will yield a more definitive determination on that point.  BD2412 T 01:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Education .  BD2412 T 01:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:49, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Rename.  I have no great objection to retaining this page if other editors consider it notable, but I do object to the name, which suggests to people who don't know what "(MUN)" means (like me, until a few minutes ago), that it leads to info about universities in Peru.  It needs to be renamed to something like "Peruvian Universities (student society).  Athel cb ( talk ) 07:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Since I previously deleted this article, I won't be closing this discussion but I think it's okay to relist it.  We need more opinions here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ● Keep & Rename - per Athel cb PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 18:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NORG, sources in the article and BEFORE failed WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, only indepth coverage is from sources that fail WP:IS.  Keep votes listed no sources to eval.  Agree this is a promo piece.  // Timothy :: talk 20:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – I see no reason to conclude the speedy was inappropriate.  There is almost no content in the article not focusing on awards the club has received, and I agree with Timothy that there do not appear to be independent sources to support notability.  Tollens ( talk ) 11:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If the result ends up as no consensus I would support a rename as described by Athel cb.  Tollens ( talk ) 11:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per Tollens.  2001:1970:5ACA:E000:0:0:0:A186 ( talk ) 11:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per arguments above, no reliabe sources, no notability, etc.  NiftyyyNofteeeee ( talk ) 14:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete