Nepal Mathematical Society: * Pppery * it has begun... 01:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose : the nominator hasn't outlined their WP:BEFORE process undertaken prior to this AfD, which must include a search for local and offline sources.  I'd be willing to change my vote if this can be explained Jack4576 ( talk ) 05:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Same reasoning as the comment I left at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Horizon Institute .  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 06:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am simply asking the nominator, (or somebody else) to provide assurances that they have complied with WP:BEFORE, before I am willing to cast a delete vote.  Can you provide assurances that you conducted those searches JML1148 ?  The nominator has yet to do so.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Again, the same reasoning as the reply I made regarding me conducting a BEFORE search myself at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Horizon Institute .  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Keep for lack of adequate WP:BEFORE ", without citing any sources yourself to back up the claim that I failed to find them, is nothing more than a form of WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES and should be given little weight.  Unlike, for instance, what David Eppstein did below and actually found a source that I had missed and actually made me seriously think about withdrawing this nomination (which I won't do - I'll let it run to give others a chance to find and evaluate sources).  * Pppery * it has begun... 15:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am not asserting that there must be sources.  I'm just asking whether or not before a deletion occurs, process has been followed.  Don't see what's wrong with that.  There is a reason editors usually provide deletion reasons that discuss WP:BEFORE Jack4576 ( talk ) 09:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  These academic societies are often difficult to source in publications independent of themselves, and in this case the language barrier doesn't help.  But there's in-depth reliable independent coverage at [12] , newspaper coverage of some of its events, and incidental coverage in multiple other reliable publications.  It is the officially-listed mathematics society for its country in the International Mathematical Union [13] .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per information identified by User:David Eppstein .  Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per David Eppstein.  RodRabelo7 ( talk ) 00:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep