hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Equatorial Guinea–Kosovo relations: The story told is of bilateral relations that do not actually exist.  This is another glaring failure to observe the basic idea of WP:GNG / WP:SIGCOV .  It sounds like some sort of WP:SOAPBOXing over the topic of international recognition of Kosovo , and this trivial bit of info here is already in there anyway.  -- Joy ( talk ) 12:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and Kosovo . Joy ( talk ) 12:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . I fixed the broken links in the article. Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 14:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:GNG . This article helps with the WP:SIZE issues at the International recognition of Kosovo article, and good part of its related content was moved in order to trim the article. Other issues mentioned can be solved per WP:BEFORE , such as a move to Equatorial Guinea's reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence . -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 16:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You need more than a handful of sentences from politicians saying something vague to make a topic worthy of its own article.  -- Joy ( talk ) 17:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete already sufficiently covered in International_recognition_of_Kosovo#E .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom and Libstar.  I don't see evidence of coverage satisfying WP:SIGCOV .  Yilloslime ( talk ) 01:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alianne Matamoro: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  The most I found was this and this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katia's Russian Tea Room: Now closed and not convinced it meets GNG as most sources are local as per WP:AUD .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and California .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find any sources, and what's given are trivial.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Devoid of notability and sources.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 09:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  the sourcing is too trivial.  Fad Ariff ( talk ) 12:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anand Srivastava: The most that any of those numerous references discuss him is covering his appointment to his position.    All of the others are just coverage where he was either mentioned or quoted in a news story about something else.  Article was previously deleted.   This review was during NPP.  North8000 ( talk ) 15:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police , Rajasthan ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  fails in WP:GNG.  lack of notablity Worldiswide ( talk ) 06:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lauren Elizabeth Myrick: Ktkvtsh ( talk ) 06:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kentucky .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not meeting sports notability, lack of coverage [18] is all I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Not sure you linked to the correct article @ Oaktree b .  I'm failing to see any mention about the subject.  In any case, this subject doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ATHLETE .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, wrong link.  Still no coverage found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sandro Caldini: He is also missing from Italian Wikipedia.  Freezejunk ( talk ) 23:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians .  Freezejunk ( talk ) 23:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was also unable to find reliable sources.  There's an article on the Finnish Wikipedia, but it has no sources either.  Random person no 362478479 ( talk ) 23:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It's difficult to find any reliable sources about him, let alone sources that could establish his notability.  Aintabli ( talk ) 05:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A search yields no WP:RS citations of note and there is nothing particularly notable about this individual.  I agree with those who have commented and proposed deletion.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 07:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Marginal speedy.  Relying on a single, possibly unreliable, source is de facto a copyvio and a BLP violation .  Bearian ( talk ) 14:56, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kai Lundstroem Pedersen: This person is notable for only one event, that being the crime he was convicted for, and the crime in question ( sextortion on Facebook) also seems to be relatively WP:ROUTINE in the news.  People get convicted for that basically every day, that doesn't make them notable.  SparklyNights ( t ) 00:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime , Denmark ,  and United States of America .  SparklyNights ( t ) 00:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet , Louisiana , Missouri ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maaron Business School: Fails WP:GNG .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  02:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Cameroon .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  02:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I could only find two listicles covering this school.  Cortador ( talk ) 08:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree, I couldn't find SIGCOV for this either.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 05:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reliable sources available.  Killarnee ( talk ) 15:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant media coverage to indicate notability.  By the way, if the decision ends up being to maintain the article, the external link to maarontraining.com is no longer functional -- they appear to have transitioned to using https://maaron.education .  WmLawson ( talk ) 00:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Welsh Wrestling: I can't find anything of any substance in reliable news sources about Welsh Wrestling ...which currently operates from a Facebook page.  Time for the article to go, in my view.  Sionk ( talk ) 22:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and Wales .  Sionk ( talk ) 22:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The substantive information on the page is almost entirely unsourced and appears to make a subject out of a promotional activity.  No coverage that I could find in reliable secondary sources, so a GNG fail, and not to mention it should probably be required to meet WP:NCORP as it is essentially promoting a particular business.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 06:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maharishi Vastu Architecture: The one-off comments in mainstream sources that are quotemined in the article seem to be present for one purpose only: to make it seem like this is an encyclopedic topic when really it's just thinly veiled propaganda.  We need to start weeding this WP:Walled garden , and I think starting with this article makes sense.  jps ( talk ) 16:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Religion ,  and Hinduism .  jps ( talk ) 16:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- This appears to be a very sophisticated version of WP:NOTADVERT for a specific organisation.  All of the nomination's points are also valid (GNG, primary sources, fringe, etc.).  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:12, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WODR-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Wisconsin .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Another very short-lived DTV America/HC2/Innovate station whose paper existence didn't even make it a decade (and its operational history was even more razor-thin ).  This one was apparently so under-the-radar that the bulk nomination of many HC2 station articles did not include this station.  There is no way any significant coverage is on — or anywhere near — the table here.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I expanded the article, but I struggled to find anything about this station because like Edge Spectrum , these mid-market stations never stay still and pretty much stay on the air or toll until they get to the market's tower site, and if they can't they just give up; I didn't even know until now that its final tower site was not even in market range of Wausau and instead covered Green Bay (and not well), like some of DTVAHC2's other 'voyager' translators (e.g. the Springfield, Illinois station somehow in St. Louis); since it didn't get to Scray Hill , DTV gave up and turned in the license; if even I miss this station's demise in my own backyard (I regularly scan stations and never caught this one), you know nobody ever knew about it outside an engineer-for-hire.  Nate • ( chatter ) 03:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guy Joachim: (From what I can see from other, non-paywalled sources, his works sell in the range of hundreds of dollars only.)  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Haiti .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding any reliable sourcing on this artist.  All the listed sources are auction results which does not count towards notability.  Joachim does not have significant coverage, nor has his work been part of  major exhibition, and I cannot find evidence that his work is part a notable collection.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 02:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peon (slang): Wiktionary enough.  - Altenmann >talk 18:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wiktionary redirect : Reads like a dictionary definition and I don't think it is a bad idea to redirect to the relevant Wiktionary entry.  Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 19:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NOTDICT The term already exists in Wiktionary.  — Maile ( talk ) 02:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NOTDICT.  AryKun ( talk ) 15:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wiktionary redirect would be best.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:28, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The (slang) disambiguator suggests that this is intended as dictionary-type content.  Usage of the word peon in various times and places is discussed at Peon , making this article unnecessary.  I also don't see evidence that an article is likely to be recreated at this title, as described at WP:ATD-TRANS .  Cnilep ( talk ) 04:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Do not remove this article.  It is real story and person who has real achivments in cinematography.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezop2676 (talk • contribs) 3:22 am, 5 September 2023, Tuesday (11 days ago) (UTC−4) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dian Badenhorst: JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep There's this and this which are both ok sources, enough for a weak keep in my opinion.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A routine, brief profile on a site of unknown independence and a routine transfer report with 3 sentences of coverage are not sufficient to meet GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 22:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and is not saved by WP:RU/N .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Surabhi Tiwari: While researching it, I noticed it was speedy deleted from hiwiki twice as spam and not notable.  I mean it's their native language after all, even if they think she's not notable, then I guess she's not notable.  Tehonk ( talk ) 06:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Film , Television ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khorlo: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It is a dictionary definition, and searching online I couldn't find anything that would or could expand it beyond that.  There are plenty of references for things that are named after or incorporate the word Khorlo but little about the word itself as a word.  I suspect if there were any in-depth sources about this Tibetan word it would be in Tibetan (which I do not speak), however the Tibetan Wikipedia entry for the word is similarly sparse and unsourced.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 13:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Artisteer: The only two secondary sources I could find were this and this , neither of which are reliable sources.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 01:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The article was written by a user named "Artisteer", and their only contributions to Wikipedia were on this article.  There may be a WP: COI , but given that their last edits were many years ago, I'm not sure what can be done about that now.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 01:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find some software blogs saying it was abandoned about 10 yrs ago, then this [19] , neither of which is RS. I don't see any reliable sources we'd use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rishtay Biktay Hain: — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 23:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 23:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet GNG.   Sources are announcements about the 'upcoming' show and unable to find reliable sources with in-depth coverage.  S0091 ( talk ) 17:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, I didn’t find in-depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources that can establish notability for the subject.  The subject fails to meet WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 16:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks in depth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete