hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Leila Feinstein: The awards do not confer notability.  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Television , California , New York ,  and Rhode Island .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:SIGCOV clause CSMention269 ( talk ) 15:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leeds hip hop: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 14:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and England .  Owen× ☎ 14:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm typically unsympathetic to WP:TNT votes, and there is some sourcing available [12] , but I'm quite confident that this article is useless now, was created by somone who made the term up, and see no evidence of a distinct "style" vs. routine coverage of regional artists in the genre.  No reason to think this needs a standalone article.  Mach61 ( talk ) 15:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Downtown, Agoura Hills, California: Broc ( talk ) 14:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Broc ( talk ) 14:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Agoura_Hills, California#Geography , where this neighborhood is briefly mentioned, and appears on a map, and per the previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Agoura, Agoura Hills, California .  Someone could write a sourced article about these neighborhoods, but there is no need for a half a dozen unsourced articles on neighborhoods.  Firsfron of Ronchester 15:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Agoura_Hills, California#Geography Delete these places aren't real.  Something stinks here.  Normally when a city has well recognized districts or neighborhoods you can easily find them mentioned the newspapers.  Even it just irrelevant stuff.  It feels like somebody has just conjured these up in effort to will them into existence.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It would appear that I am correct: User_talk:Arspickles17#Agoura_Hills_Neigborhoods They are just made up.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not a notable neighborhood.  Lightburst ( talk ) 17:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   No evidence of coverage in reliable sources.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lech Stanisław Laszkiewicz: It provides the biography of a seemingly non-notable WW2 pilot, who is mentioned because he served and lived long enough to talk to the Imperial War Museum about the war, but unfortunately does not appear to pass any level of notability; he was not, for example, an ace.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 17:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Poland .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Aviation .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 23:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sadly, I have to concur with the nom.  Non-notalbe pilot (never shot down an enemy plane, not listed at Bajan's list ), not subject any any coverage outside having been interviewed for the IWM, which did not lead to any media or academic coverage - just blog/catalogue inclusion.  No pl interwiki.  No major awards (or minor even?).  I am afraid he belongs on Wikidata but not Wikipedia.  https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123250223 will be enough (it can be expanded, and the creator of this article, SPA otherwise, plausibly a relative or such, is encouraged to do so - this can always be userspaced as a draft).  Bottom line, not every soldier is notable.  In the meantime, we need to delete photos as they are copyvio (WW2 photos described by the uploader as "own work", sigh).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Piotrus.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 18:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexandru Sabalin: Actual articles about Sabalin seem to be missing or scarce.  Fram ( talk ) 14:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cycling ,  and Moldova .  Fram ( talk ) 14:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Notability , the cyclist should meet one of the mentioned criteria, and Sabalin meets two of them.  The second criteria is perfectly matched as he raced at three senior UCI World Championships (confirmed by official sources).  he also meets the first criteria as he raced for two fully professional teams for many seasons.  Also, Tour of Romania , the race he won, is  2.1 UCI Category, which makes it notable according to the same page about Cycling Notability.  Andrei Anghelov ( talk ) 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As it says at the top of that page, "This is an essay on notability.".  Sports notability essays are not generally accepted, and RfCs over the past few years have made it clear that sportspeople have to show WP:GNG notability from direct, substantial attention from non-database sources, and that participation-only notability at any level (even world championships or Olympics) isn't sufficient.  Fram ( talk ) 07:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  14:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Spartaz Humbug!  07:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This individual does not meet wp:GNG and is a non-notable cyclist.  They never race a UCI event rated higher than .2, so no professional races.  They raced at Worlds but as an Amateur and Under-23 so non-notable participation's and once as an elite but did not finish.  Source's I found on the rider said he only ever rode for amateur teams.  Paulpat99 ( talk ) 09:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just 1 gnews hit.  Clearly fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 16:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
As Sunnah Foundation: Most of the sites are unreliable,  some of them are recirculation of press releases, contain bank account information for collecting donations, some contain external links to the site of the organisation.  I think the purpose of creation of this article is to promote the organisation.  Topic of This article can be well explained in the article of the owner.  Although I am not sure whether the owner's article warrants his own article or not.  - AlbeitPK ( talk ) 16:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Islam ,  and Bangladesh .  AlbeitPK ( talk ) 16:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Beata Szałwińska: Sourcing in our article is likewise very poor.  I've asked User:Gerda Arendt for comment and she did not find much ( comment diff ).  Best sources we have is an interview in major Polish radio station [49] , I don't think any English sources are better (minor websites/promotional rewrites of press releaes/etc.).  Discography does not seem to meet NMUSIC threshold, some claims of awards here and on pl wiki are poorly referenced and vague (what award(s)? ).  Seems like a promotion of a minor artist that falls under WP:TOOSOON to be in encyclopedia yet.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Poland .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 16:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stevie Meyer: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mackay Radio: The link http://www.mackayhistory.com/ doesn’t exist anymore.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 12:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Original editor was blocked with a mile-long talk page of warnings ; this seems to be an article about stations in Mackay, Queensland , but this article seems to have been both pay-to-play from a sockmaster who never visited Australia, and completely unintelligible (it previously also had a duplicative entry about Clarence Mackay ).  No redirect.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'm not entirely sure whether this article, such as it is, is about an American company or about Australian radio stations… and I'm not sure the article knows either.  This has been tagged as a potential WP:CORP failure since July 2021 (only a month after creation); if there is any solution to this that doesn't involve deletion, I'm not seeing it.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies , Australia ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links (it took me a while to catch that, despite my earlier comment here).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Without even going into suspect bona fides of the page’s author, and putting best spin on page’s intent, which is to serve as a list of Mackay Radio stations, then still fails WP:STANDALONE .  Spinifex&Sand ( talk ) 23:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Favour Eucharia Ngozi Ugwuanyi: Article sourced to PR announcements and affiliated sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Education ,  and Nigeria .  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to establish notability here, not presumptively either.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 19:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is really not notable.  Subject fails WP:GNG .  Being the Chairman of PPSMB does not make you notable.  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete claerly not notable.  LusikSnusik ( talk ) 10:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Star Anchor Hunt: Fails WP:NTV .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quentin Newcomer: Fails WP:GNG and there has been no increase in coverage since the first AfD.  None of the sourcing in the article suggests significant coverage either.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , United States of America ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage to meet GNG.  The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet GNG. -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Héctor Martínez (footballer, born 1967): Contested PROD.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Paraguay .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete Unsourced BLP, definitely delete this.  Also, probably isn't notable, considering that it's unsourced .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 01:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I found [31] among more Spanish sources. Definitely has many offline sources, having played in fully pro Paraguayan top flight for years and played for Paraguay national team during the pre-internet era, and the fact that there are articles about him like above decades after his retirement show he was once a significant figure in Paraguayan football. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 17:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sources are hard to get hold of due to the period and place where he played but a quick search in Spanish shows that he played at the top flight of Paraguayan football for about 10 years and has at least 1 league title to his name. He appears to have played for Club Olimpia in the Copa Libertadores in 1993 and 1994 and there are likely to be newspaper reports on those, especially since Olimpia reached the semis in 94 and only lost on penalties. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 16:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 01:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails BIO and GNG. No sources in article, Common name can be confused with others, but BEFORE showed stats, mentions, but nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 09:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KPAL-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG , I did not find any coverage in WP:RS .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Qwt: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is no doubt this fails GNG and is not notable for a page.  these are GUI components meant for programs with technical data to display in applications compatible with Qt.  No one is writing about these as independently notable.  The question is only whether this is an aspect that should be mentioned on the Qt page.  The widgets are compatible with Qt and thus extend the functionality, and might deserve a mention on the Qt page under a heading such as extension libraries .  If so, Merge with Qt would be the right outcome.  Yet I don't see much mergeable content here, nor a good reason to list such extensions on that page.  Wikipedia is not a programming manual.  I have thought back and forth between delete and merge, but when it comes down to it, if the Qt page were extended in this way, we would not be starting with this content on Wikipedia.  There is nothing here that is not on Sourceforge, and such a new section on that page would need to look at all such extensions anyway.  Merge is not there for dumping indiscriminate information on other pages.  The encyclopaedia is not improved by it, so I have settled on delete.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 10:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Expressing agreement with above comment.  Does not meet notability.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 23:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdullah Marafee: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Qatar-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pier 8: * Pppery * it has begun... 16:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There would appear to be any number of Pier 8s in the world, none of them notable.  There's a Pier 7 in Dubai Marina, which is a 7-story tower full of noisy restaurants, bars and clubs.  It's fun, but it's also not notable... :) Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete