hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
V. Y. Bezel: I was thinking of doing speedy deletion but decided against it as someone might feel as if the article could be expanded upon.  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - I intended to create a draft, but made a mistake on the namespace.  Note [37] .  I'll keep working on the article in Draft from now onwards, this article can be deleted.  -- Soman ( talk ) 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete : The author requested to delete it and confirmed that he created a draft.  Grab Up - Talk 11:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G7 as the original author requested its deletion.  Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib. ) 13:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, it needs to be deleted Cowinatree ( talk ) 11:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Let the author work on it as asked.  Vajzë Blu ( talk ) 23:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is filling no purpose, I believe speedy delete is right decision for this article.  UNeditx ( talk ) 13:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just to clarify, I've already created a draft at Draft:V.  Y. Bezel .  -- Soman ( talk ) 13:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No other information is here about the subject, and so I think that speedy delete is a good idea for this page.  Þórir vestan ( talk ) 18:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Vladimir Bezel , since that page has now been created and this title is a plausible redirect to it.  Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 19:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete since the author requested it and the page for Vladimir Bezel now exists.  Uncreative172 ( talk ) 15:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Nashruddin Zakaria: Attempted to PROD but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock/blocked editor) Ckfasdf ( talk ) 06:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Indonesia .  Owen× ☎ 07:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : He worked as a civil servant and gave a speech in public, once.  I don't see notability.  This reads more like a family history project, with more details about his lineage than his actual accomplishments.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Conserve Italia: As written, violates WP:NOTADVERT and would require WP:TNT even if sources are found.  Current sources do not meet WP:NCORP .  A quick WP:BEFORE shows a lot of routine coverage, nothing that would meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:SIRS .   — siro χ o 04:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy .  — siro χ o 04:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Witchcraft (diabolic): Treybien2 , 21:57 21 July 2023 ( talk ) (UTC) Oppose - This article was made from material copied from witchcraft , so it makes sense that there would be significant duplication in a page that's existed for less than 24 hours.  Discussion in an ongoing move request for the Witchcraft page indicates that page is or should be a perfectly good WP:BROADCONCEPT and is not WP:UNBALANCED or biased .  If that's true there should be space for these two articles to develop clear differences.  Darker Dreams ( talk ) 05:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : For a greater appreciation of the context of this article's creation, please read Talk:Witchcraft#Systemic bias .  This is not an endorsement of either side of ongoing arguments.  Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 06:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete: It's not a virtual duplicate; it is a duplicate, seemingly aimed at avoiding/circumventing actual discussion and community consensus on the home page, making it plain old disruptive editing and a candidate for WP:A10 .  Also this page was created without the proper AfD template, so it isn't currently an actually properly functioning AfD, just a page with an AfD title.  Just a mess really.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 09:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Is it a plausible redirect to Witchcraft ?  Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 09:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have contested the speedy delete.  Despite that, I do hope that the AfD is repaired.  I can only guess why you're making accusations that I'm "avoiding/circumventing actual discussion and community consensus on the home page" and "plain old disruptive editing."  But, what I am doing is moving forward based on the direction it appears consensus is evolving.  The discussion indicates an opinion that the existing page as an unbiased, broad concept - which would mean there's additional information to cover in a separate article.  If there's not additional information and that page is unduly focused on this subject, this page should absolutely be deleted and the other moved to an appropriate name.  Darker Dreams ( talk ) 09:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Would it not have been sensible to discuss the scope prior to creating a duplicate page?  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 10:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] NB: The AfD template was fixed at 13:29 22 July by NinjaRobotPirate here .  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 15:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Apply A10 . — Alalch E. 19:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Maarten Nagtegaal: Fram ( talk ) 13:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Netherlands .  Fram ( talk ) 13:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable individual, there is zero coverage for him.  He appears to be the son of a rich person, which isn't enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Completely irrelevant non-notable figure.  ULPS ( talk ) 14:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non-notable figure.  Creator claims that the information comes from knowing him personally (see talk).  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 16:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  This might be a different person with the same name.  Also probably a different person: This .  The corresponding article in the Dutch Wikipedia has been deleted.  Twice.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete almost a speedy for an unreferenced BLP.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete since cyber harassment of a lving person.  Admin assistance appreciated! gidonb ( talk ) 19:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Teleperformance Philippines: Teleperformance is noteworthy but already has its own article.  No need to create a new one for its subsidiaries also.  Gnkgr ( talk ) 00:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Philippines .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly PROMO.  Bullet points of business accomplishments with no real discussion around why they're important.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , clearly promotional, falls under G11.  Fails WP:NPOV Brachy 08 (Talk) 04:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NCORP and written in a highly promotional tone .  Kpg jhp jm 04:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I also noticed that the person who created this is probs a member of Teleperformance Philippines.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 06:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Qualifies for G11 speedy as pure promo that would need to fully be rewritten.  - UtherSRG (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 12:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , should have qualified under G11 and G12 a long time ago (see relevant entry here ).  Teleperformance's operations plus CSR programs (if any) in the Philippines can be mentioned in the Teleperformance article.  - Ian Lopez @ 14:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : WP:G11 .  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 04:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ugh.  Strictly speaking we don't have a CSD for blatant UPE that's been stubified to have no content and I can't find anything that isn't more likely a backwards copy but I'm going to tag it for G11 and the user page draft as G7 and U5.  Speedy delete , snow.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Marvín A. Santana: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , same as with Marvín Sántana , Marvin A. Santana , and Marvin Amparo Santana ...  Hatman31 ( talk ) 15:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Ayaz Sheikh: Deletion cannot be done via WP:G4 as the page was already speedy-deleted previously, hence the second AfD.  Broc ( talk ) 20:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pakistan .  Broc ( talk ) 20:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy pings to ThaddeusSholto who tagged the page for speedy deletion and to Cactus.man who correctly declined the nomination.  Broc ( talk ) 20:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Quick question, 'cos this is a new one for me - where's the rule that a page can't be speedied more than once? I looked, couldn't find... Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Alexandermcnabb : Pages can be speedied more than once, but not if they've been tagged as G4 , where it says: This criterion also does not cover content undeleted via a deletion review, or that was only deleted via proposed deletion (including deletion discussions closed as "soft delete") or speedy deletion. Though it only applies to pages that are tagged under the G4 criterion, and not to other types of speedy criteria. CycloneYoris talk! 05:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ CycloneYoris : See, I read that as 'if it has only been deleted via speedy and then restored then it can't be G4 but would have to go to AfD' rather than 'If it has ever been speedied and subsequently gone to AfD it can't be speedied again', which seems more logical to me.. .  ie: AfD is sovereign...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Less than a week later?  Still nothing notable, found.  SALT as well Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Same user Syed Shaveer that's re-created this article again, that was very passionate about the last AfD discussion...  Somewhat worrysome.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Good GRIEF.  Delete and SALT with extreme prejudice, fire, silver bullets, garlic.  I'd propose blocking the author for disruption, and all.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt per above.  Author should at least be warned for disruptive editing, and to stop recreating pages that have just been deleted.  CycloneYoris talk!  05:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt , and some sort of remedy against article creator per Alexandermcnabb and CycloneYoris.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Namaste Henry: Un assiolo ( talk ) 21:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies ,  and India .  Un assiolo ( talk ) 21:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not meeting corporate notability, I can only find a database listing [9] , their Linkedin and an Imdb profile for some reason.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7, G11, G5, take your pick.  It's spam for an unremarkable company, by this week's sockpuppet of Btw Santhosh, and mainly sourced as usual with Santhosh's dire news-skinned blogs.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would think "India's largest advertising company" disqualifies it from A7 (though it might not actually be true), and there is some non-advert content, disqualifying it from G11.  If it really is a sockpuppet, then of course G5 applies.  I was not aware of any alleged sockpuppetry which is why I nominated it at AfD instead of requesting speedy deletion.  -- Un assiolo ( talk ) 19:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:A7 would apply in my opinion, because the claim of "India's largest advertising company" is simply not credible.  But I didn't mean to criticise you for bringing it to AFD: that was a perfectly valid action based on your assumptions.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 19:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Only promotional content is there.  ☆★ Sanjeev Kumar ( talk ) 14:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Obviously promotional content per G11.  Haruka Amaranth 02:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per above.  — Yahya ( talk • contribs. ) 21:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nom Master rollo ( talk ) 18:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing I can locate meets GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 20:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Capital Q Ventures: ~ Dictionary ( chat ) 14:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] About to tag it with G11 but you took my words out.  Speedy delete as promotional.  Toadette ( Let's talk together! ) 14:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry @ ToadetteEdit .  I will tag it for G11.  ~ Dictionary ( chat ) 14:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What can I do, to make it not promotional.  My client wants Wikipedia page for his company Article - Gregory Romano ( talk ) 14:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as promo.  ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 14:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as a promo, because uh yeah Jesus, that page plus the admission of guilt here Claire 26 ( talk ) 14:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
List of programs broadcast by Green Entertainment: microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 20:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Once a CU is available, this will be G5 eligible per this .  Also at ANI now .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Garang Wachbaar: Repeatedly recreated, recommending WP:SALT .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Africa .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 20:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete WP:SALT no existence of importance, using for promotional purposes, next time should be properly reviewed by WP:AFC .  NP83 ( talk ) 20:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I'm updating it) Daniel Garang ( talk ) 16:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC) Sockpuppet; blocked.  ~ ToBeFree ( talk ) 19:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete and SALT purely promotional and does not meet WP:NMUSICBIO or WP:GNG .  None of the refs appear to be from reliable sources and many appear to be sites that publish self-submitted articles.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 17:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't close deletion discussions, but the page creator has self-confirmed through an autoblock unblock request, the page was deleted via WP:G5 and salting was a logical step to take.  ~ ToBeFree ( talk ) 19:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Pavlo Tanasyuk: I found one credible source, but it again heavily relies on Panasyuk's citations or focuses on the Spacebit company.  Another source is citing the Ukrainian Wikipedia (thus it’s automatically depreciated), which is utterly funny and not a reliable way to cover a biographical article.  In summary, the page doesn't pass WP:ANYBIO but feels like WP Mill Dirubii Olchoglu ( talk ) 11:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you please clarify what you mean by "WP Mill"?  I googled it and all I found is WP:MILLS about windmills.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] my first thought was WP:MIL but that doesn't seem to make sense either since it's a wikiproject.  JM ( talk ) 11:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Deltaspace42 @ JM2023 it's this stuff I guess: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Wikipedia:MILL&redirect=no 2603:7000:5041:2AE0:C0D4:40E3:B743:F190 ( talk ) 13:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, that makes sense.  Thank you!  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can agree that we have lack of reliable sources which mention Pavlo Tanasyuk directly, not his Spacebit company.  But how can I agree on WP:MIL , while this person is first ukrainian who organized british-ukrainian lunar mission?  It's a local fame at least.  Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 14:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In the article I can only see that "the British company Spacebit has developed a lunar rover", not that Pavlo Tanasyuk organized the whole lunar mission, am I missing something?  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You are right.  I not insist.  Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 16:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Technology , Ukraine ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is hard to create page from scratch so now it looks like WP:ONEEVENT .  I as the author of the page aprreciate your nomination to deletion.  I won't lose my Article's progress so please vote Move instead of Delete , thx.  I hope Dirubii Olchoglu will help to improve Draft article and find more third-party significant coverage reliable sources.  Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 12:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit): I initially tagged as a WP:G3 but, upon reflection, it doesn't meet the definition.  I can't see this meeting any of the speedy deletion criteria so I'm sending it to AfD.  The creator seems adamant that because the article is 'funny', it doesn't need to meet our notability guidelines.  I'm hoping that common sense can prevail and WP:SNOW delete can happen.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Oregon .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete An admin really should just come along and delete it.  There's no use in holding an AFD for an article that should be speedy deleted but can't because it hardly fits under any criteria (though maybe it fits under A11, since there's no such thing as a "vandalism bandit").  Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as clearly unfit for an encyclopedia.  Completely non-notable.  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 23:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete either by closing this AFD early or WP:A7 or something.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 00:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete.  Misplaced humorous page.  The author of this article, @ MrHistoryH also looks NOTHERE.  I did laugh with this article, though.  SparklyNights 03:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete: per WP:A11 .  Not a notable topic.  User:Let'srun 01:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete .  Per all above.  Not a humor page.  This straight up looks like an attack page against a school.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 06:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I've added a tag to see if an admin is willing to delete under WP:A7 and/or WP:A11 per the above comments.  If not, we may have to wait for the snow to fall...  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete