Salman Muqtadir: One significant coverage is about his investigation by the police.  No other significant independent secondary source covering his popularity as a content creator.  - AlbeitPK ( talk ) 01:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bangladesh .  AlbeitPK ( talk ) 01:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Internet ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Most of the sources cover the police investigating him.  That is not enough to satisfy WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 17:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Given previous AFDs, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Have any sources mentioned in previous discussions been examined?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article that doesn't meet WP:ENT for inclusion on Wikipedia.  While I couldn't find any clue in the former AFDs that I still hold deep breath of how it had survived two–three discussions.  I am not going to base in any past whatsoever but here is the source analysis and final conclusion.  source 1 is a primary source but it verifies the content as used in most of the articles like that per WP:PRIMARYSOURCE .  Source 2 is good for sourcing but doesn't support the 'wife marriage'.  source 3 is an obvious advert and interview making me suspect the credibility/reliability of source 2.  Source 4 is unreliable, and source 5 looks like an advertorial unverifiable publication.  Source 6 , source 7 , and source 8 contributes to a non notable controversy and I call it WP:BLP1E because the said event is not notable for a standalone article.  [10] and [11] supports a non notable film and book, hence doesn't meet WP:NACTOR or WP:NAUTHOR .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  21:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not a notable person Md Joni Hossain ( talk ) 18:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Previously I nominated this article for Afd and my view still same.  There is no WP:SIGCOV and fails WP:GNG .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 21:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article has been improved and more reliable sources are added, such as The Daily Star or Prothom Alo .  Popular national reliable newspapers claim that Salman Muqtadir is a popular YouTuber and actor and there are a bunch of sources about him from reliable sites.  Although some news are about his marriage or other things but they are published independently about him and declared him as YouTuber, influencer or actor.  Therefore GNG has been able to establish.  Ontor22 ( talk ) 12:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Daily star tag link you showed popped paid/sponsored articles [12] , [13] , [14] , and [15] .  They doesn't credibly means this article won't met notability later.  See WP:LOTSOFSOURCES and know there isn't any amount of sources you add to a non notable person to be notable.  On the aspect scene of YouTube, famous people are celebrities bur that doesn't mean try are notable .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  18:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] News from The Daily Star are not paid or sponsored articles at all.  Other news channels including Daily Star use disclaimers on sponsored articles but these are not.  His marriage news appeared in multiple news channels.  See his marriage news from Prothom alo , Dhaka Tribune , The Business Standard .  Older articles about him also show his prominence.  See these article from Prothom Alo 1 2 , Bangla Tribune , The Business Standard , Jagonews24 Salman Muktadir is not only YouTuber but also worked in various entertainment fields including television, stage performance which established his notability based on WP:ENT .  Ontor22 ( talk ) 06:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - He is notable on YouTube as an influencer & content creator.  but doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:ENT for inclusion on Wikipedia. -- DelwarHossain ( talk ) 11:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - He is notable person.  I agree with Ontor22 .  Yubrajhn ( talk ) 19:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD.  There's close to a consensus to delete here, but not something I'm comfortable closing as myself given the promises I made to stay out of using my admin tools for tricky content issues.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 20:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE Not notable enough for Wikipedia standards.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 00:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP After four consecutive AFDs, the article mostly survives on Wikipedia.  Still, there is a stir among editors.  Mainly his being a YouTuber, but he has also worked in drama and music which makes him notable under WP:ENT .  Mafmes ( talk ) 03:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete