hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dark Matter Time Projection Chamber: Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Technology .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We have quite some academic papers talking about this experiment/device.  See [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] .  I think those are some sigcov from reliable sources, and I am inclined to keep .  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 17:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would agree with keep ing the page, as there seem to be references available, they just haven't been added in. Madeleinehales ( talk ) 15:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC) :) [ reply ] merge with dark matter . The experiment is real but just one of many and readers would be better served by seeing the content in context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnjbarton ( talk • contribs ) Hello Anon, that is also a valid point. In that sense, I think it will be better to merge with Time projection chamber as an example of these kinds of facilities. -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 14:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that Time projection chamber is a better choice, with a sentence in dark matter linking.  Johnjbarton ( talk ) 21:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to assess sources brought up in this discussion and also the possibility of a Merge (although 2 different Merge targets are suggested).  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mates, it seems that there is enough coverage by scholarly articles.  [9] .  So, Keep.  Cinadon 36 19:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Same relisting rationale.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I would support a merge.  Time projection chamber seems better, with a mention at dark matter .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Softdrive Records: Complete failure of WP:NOTABILITY , just because it was established by a notable musician does not mean the label is notable in and of itself.  JeffSpaceman ( talk ) 03:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Scott Weiland .  A lamentably large number of obvious record label merge targets get sent to AfD, for some reason.  Chubbles ( talk ) 05:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Actually, changing to Merge to Scott Weiland per Chubbles .  JeffSpaceman ( talk ) 02:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Simon Rockower Award: WP:NOTDIRECTORY , no WP:SIGCOV .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Judaism ,  and United States of America .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : I agree with the proposal.  Simon Rockower should be merged into American Jewish Press Association, and then converted into a redirect.  Eric Schucht ( talk ) 16:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Kidon: If you take out all the unsourced pop culture references, there are really only 3 sentences of well-sourced and additive content in this article.  Would be better suited in the main Mossad article.  AfD discussion was no consensus, with strong support for merging.  Since then, the article has been winnowed down.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 21:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Israel .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:16, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Mossad , selectively and without prejudice, as an unjustified WP:SPINOFF .  gidonb ( talk ) 00:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Trinity Universe (setting): Already explained in Trinity Continuum: Æon (role-playing game) to a sufficient degree.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Games .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Trinity (role-playing game) if no other sources are found.  BOZ ( talk ) 08:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As far as I can see, all of the information in this stub is already present at Trinity (role-playing game) , including the one source being used, so there is nothing to merge, and I don't really see this as a particularly plausible search term for a redirect to be useful.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Trinity (role-playing game) per BOZ .  The title can be made into a useful section redirect to the "Setting" section of that article.  BD2412 T 14:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the main game article.  This doesn't appear to have WP:SIGCOV , but can be covered in context with the game.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 17:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Grand Mosque of Bucharest: Wikipedia is not a repository for unrealized projects without lasting coverage.  Aintabli ( talk ) 05:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Islam , Romania ,  and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 05:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's not the best reason for deletion.  The tangible topic that exists is the controversy around the plan.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 06:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I said without lasting coverage , which addresses that.  If this proposal is still discussed years after its cancellation, please let me know.  I was unable to find any mention of it past its cancellation in 2018.  The Romanian version of this article is even more lacking.  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The closest thing to a keep I can go for at this point is a merge unless someone comes with a better reason to keep.  Aintabli ( talk ) 06:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A merge with what?  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 11:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Islam in Romania for example.  Aintabli ( talk ) 15:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 16:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2018–19 Electric Production Car Series: Wild8oar ( talk ) 06:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  Wild8oar ( talk ) 06:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not only is this 2018-2019 version a hypothetical, it never had any prior versions nor any versions after that.  It doesn't exist.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 01:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Assuming Electric Production Car Series meets notability guidelines (which isn't a given) I think this could be merged there (or just redirect it as there's not much that would need to be taken across).  That article effectively says that the season was originally supposed to take place but didn't.  I don't have an issue with outright deletion, either.  A7V2 ( talk ) 03:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  01:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – Doesn't need a standalone article but very straightforward to just copy the content over to Electric Production Car Series under a heading like "Aborted first season" and call it a day.  That being said, ECPCS's article should probably also be deleted, but that is a separate discussion.  5225 C ( talk • contributions ) 05:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – It makes sense to add the provisonal schedule to Electric Production Car Series if that article is kept.  Same for the "drivers' club", although presenting them as confirmed drivers is a bit misleading, but that may be a topic for another place.  SunflowerYuri ( talk ) 12:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2011 magicJack season: Its predecessor, Washington Freedom , has no season articles and is far more notable than this relocated temporary successor club.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 08:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Football ,  and United States of America .  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 08:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also worth noting that the creator, User:Quidster4040 , has a long history of deleted misc articles.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 08:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge even though there really isn't much to merge.  The table maybe?  Not convinced the article stands on its own in this state, and since there was only ever one season I'm not convinced it needs to be separated from the parent article.  Jay eyem ( talk ) 16:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 21:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge only Against redirect, can't see it as a search term.  Save the data save the planet.  Govvy ( talk ) 23:01, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – per @ Govvy .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Ayane (Dead or Alive): Alright.  So a lot of what was there was citing things related to the games a whole, or citing for things they didn't even actually *say*.  What's left is a WP:REFBOMB of listicles, with only Sterling's statements offering any actual commentary about her, and that's mostly about the fact she's 14 in a game and thoughts on Japan's portrayal of teen women.  I actually dug through to see if there was any real meat elsewhere but no, she gets passing mentions in books, magazine and scholar, mainly alongside other sexualized women in a list or that she appears in the series.  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 03:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 03:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 03:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Article contains mostly listicles that amount to WP:REFBOMBING .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 04:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  On my own research, I found the same as KFM did.  Doesn't make me feel good to say that though, as I feel Ayane SHOULD be notable, but doesn't appear to be.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 17:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, she should.  I haven't found much on her either, actually, which is pretty shocking, considering her popularity (plus the controversy surrounding her age).  She's probably the second (or third, depending on where Ryu Hayabusa fits in) character most people think of when they think of DOA, behind Kasumi herself.  Look at all the coverage Sarah Bryant has gotten.  You would think Ayane would get similar treatment.  Perhaps she had more coverage at one point in time, but there's been so many sites that have shut down over the years, some of which have no archives to back them up.  This is definitely one article that is worth another look in the future, should it get merged, which it looks like it will.  MoonJet ( talk ) 07:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters only found some very minor passing mentions in an archives search, nothing that meets GNG.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge she’s marginally more notable than the rest of DoA’s roster but one source doesn’t cut it.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 00:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of The Tower of Druaga characters: Has no sources whatsoever, fails pretty much all notability guidelines.  WP:BEFORE and searching for any coverage on this subject from reliable sources turns up nothing.  NegativeMP1 3:45 (UTC) 21 July 2023 Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  NegativeMP1 Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Anime and manga ,  and Lists .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not seeing the deletion log for the article.  Regardless, no reason why this can't be merged into the game article rather than deleted.  Jclemens ( talk ) 17:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge s seem good, to both the game and anime pages.  It also provides something of a list of voice actors as well, which benefits the anime article.  — siro χ o 23:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Light Merge to The Tower of Druaga (TV series) - At the very least, the main characters and voice cast of the anime should be moved over to the article on the show, as that is a pretty standard bit of information to include, and is not currently in that article.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 00:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Light merge (no sources) and redirect as above.  No sources makes this a painful case of WP:FANCRUFT , but some plot summary is useful to have around - but generally, we don't need articles that are unreferenced plot summary and nothing but.  Wikipedia =/= fandom/wikia -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively as the evolving consensus.  Not enough coverage to pass WP:SIGCOV and merge is a reasonable WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Al-Tash Garrison: Given it seems to lack official government recognition, WP:GNG applies over WP:NPLACE and I can find basically nothing about this place.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 17:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iraq .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep but rename.  There was a refugee camp there and I believe it was notable per 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 and other sources.  I think “garrison” is just a mistranslation of “مخيم” and the intended meaning is “refugee camp”.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The problem here is that, since this place is not government recognized, WP:GNG applies.  The first four here are primary sources, 5 is WP:ROUTINE coverage, and 6 about another camp and only mentions this one in passing.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 13:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Rename to Al-Tash refugee camp .  Several thousand people lived here, the refs are good and satisfy gng.  Desertarun ( talk ) 19:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Policy based input please Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist, it would be helpful if the sources mentioned here could find their way into the article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or Merge to American occupation of Ramadi as an AtD.  Agree with source analysis by the nominator.  The sources applied and raised here verify the subject's existence, but do not support an article on it, none of them meeting IRS, imho.  Better to send the redirect to an article which might give the subject needed context.  BusterD ( talk ) 14:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect per BusterD.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of Dune Bene Gesserit: Prior AfD ended with a weird close that implied we should merge this, but that hasn't happened.  Let's try this again - I suggest merge or SOFTDELETE redirect with no prejudice to folks merging what they like from the article's history.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Lists .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] merge to main list of Dune characters.  Artem.G ( talk ) 17:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom.  I'd like to boldly reformat List of Dune characters to something like the featured List of The Mandalorian characters (and similar lists), and merge in the content from this list and List of Dune secondary characters .  I'm ready to start working on this immediately.  I will begin the reformat of the main list today (that should be done anyway), and will hold off on any major merges until I have some confirmation here that I won't be disrupting the AfD.  Thanks. — TAnthony Talk 18:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per TAnthony.  There is an opportunity to improve the main article and preserve select parts of this article, as an WP:ATD .  That's a win-win.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 01:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Pasqua Coffee: Does not appear to get widespread ot significant coverage to meet WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Starbucks, I've heard of them in histories of the coffee chain (various TV shows over the years).  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge There are additional references to be found, but seems appropriate to merge with the History section of Starbucks .  Steven Walling • talk 18:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge