hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Polina Nioly Pushkareva: Charlie ( talk ) 18:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Russia .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Francis Carlyle: Most of the article is unsourced.  Not clear the subject passes WP:GNG .  4meter4 ( talk ) 19:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Magic , Massachusetts ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:V .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Éric Martin (footballer, born 1973): Only sources I could find are this and this .  It could be argued that the second one offers significant coverage.  However, with only one appearance at the professional level and no other online sources for a player who played only in the 90s and 2000s, GNG is failed for me.  Note that I know I created the article, but I rather go through AfD for this.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 00:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and France .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 00:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 00:55, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  The article fails WP:GNG and the references are stat sites.  The first of the two that the nomination provides is one already on the article, and the second one is a bit of a biography but still isn't enough to be anything more than original research on the website's part.  Oh, and by the way, bold move nominating your own article.  IncompA 01:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the recognition, IncompA .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 06:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Razik Zarook: Sources available do not discuss the article subject in significant depth.  Coverage is routine.  No evidence of significant coverage over a sustained period of time.  Most sources within are primary.  The Bloomberg source is just a profile, per NCORP such standard profiles are generally not counted towards notability for corporations and for the same reason I do not consider this one source to constitute notability for this otherwise non-notable lawyer.  Entire article is written like a resume and whiffs of self-promotion.  Was de-prodded without reason by the creator of the article (who has disclosed they are paid to edit Wikipedia) without any reason.  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 01:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 01:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Sri Lanka .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Requires significant coverage - noting the Chairman of the Insurance Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka, Ambassador and High Commissioner roles are not automatically notable.  All the references are merely mentions in passing.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 01:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saikat Baksi: Macbeejack ☎ 13:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Macbeejack ☎ 13:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly Fails WP:NAUTHOR — QuadriSyed Sahab ( T · C 09:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NAUTHOR , no significant coverage in RS, all I could find was the ToI interview already cited (interviews are primary sources), and this obvious paid puff piece on Mid-Day [13] .  Article creator is a blocked sockpuppet of a serial spammer.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brooke C. Wells: Snickers2686 ( talk ) 18:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No serious claim to notability apart from being a US magistrate judge, and it's well-settled ( WP:USJUDGE ) that such a judgeship is by itself insufficient to establish notability.  TJRC ( talk ) 18:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Oklahoma and Utah .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with the above and the cite of wiki rules on judges.  No claim to notability here, so I vote delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael J. Szanto: Sourcing used in the article is mostly primary or non-RS.  I can't find any articles about him.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Politics , Florida ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless an editor adds references to reliable sources entirely independent of Szanto that devotes significant coverage to him.  What he says on TV or in newspaper opinion pieces are of no value in establishing notability.  Coverage of his grandfather is also of no value.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 04:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The undisclosed payment claim is unfounded and seemingly libelous.  The POV and tone of the article have been addressed.  Aaron1a12 ( talk ) 16:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Aaron1a12 is the creator of the article Delete since subject clearly fails WP:GNG .  Grandfather's article , too, seems rather devoid of notability traces, so no issue of inherited fame invoked here.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources are written by Michael J. Szanto.  I don't think this counts as being independent, even if it is in a reliable source.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 01:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tom McFadden: Only minor roles, fails WP:NACTOR .  Unable to find WP:SIGCOV .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 18:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 18:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Juan Carlos Figueiras: I didn't PROD as I'm finding some stuff in Spanish.  Only fair to allow people to debate this.  — Iadmc ♫ talk 17:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Music .  — Iadmc ♫ talk 17:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bhoomika Mirchandani: Analysis of sources indicates they are all WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS (1, 12) WP:INTERVIEWS (2, 4, 8, 10, 11)
 tabloid coverage (which is not SIGCOV) (2, 9, 12), or just plain unreliable (5, 7, 13).  Plus, per WP:NEWSORGINDIA , sources 1-4, 8, 10-11 should raise caution since they are unbylined and promotional in tone.  Source 5 fails verification.  BEFORE search turns up nothing else reliable.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 23:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Television ,  and Delhi .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found no indication of notability.  Wolverine XI ( talk to me ) 15:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT - there's too much lost in the translation from one dialect of English to another.  There are allegations of notability, so I would not salt it.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali-Mohammad Mirza: Tooncool64 ( talk ) 01:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Iran .  Shellwood ( talk ) 01:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete me neither.  A search in Farsi brought up a single page on an official Iranian state website that is blocked in the UK, linking to a “Printed copy of the payment of the pension of Ihtisham al-Malamek” but who that person was I can’t say.  That’s all I can find so nothing in our article is verifiable.  Even if it was he still wouldn't be notable unless there was quite a bit more to be said about him.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no SIGCOV in RS.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 16:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Alopecia Areata Foundation: I thought of redirecting it to alopecia areata , but that article doesn't even mention the foundation.  Bbb23 ( talk ) 14:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , there is significant coverage in [29] and a large number of Google Books hits that aren't freely accessible.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 22:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ULPS ( talk ) 15:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zev Sebastian: There definitely isn't enough WP:RS coverage to justify an article, and doesn't meet any of the WP:MUSICBIO criteria OwainDavies ( about ) ( talk ) edited at 12:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A few weeks ago I contemplated opening an AfD on this article, as I was not finding solid grounds for notability : placing between 4th and 10th in an age-band award in the Henle competition is insufficient, and the EMS (presumably Enfield Music Service) awards mentioned in his programme notes are non-notable here.  See also Cullen328 's evaluation of the given sources on the article Talk page.  AllyD ( talk ) 09:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find sourcing for this young musician, sourcing used isn't helpful.  Having a large following on social media is fine, but we don't use that for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BMI Federal Credit Union: The one reference in the article is a dead link but the article is from a local business magazine or newspaper so scope is limited.  Whpq ( talk ) 18:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unfortunately I have discovered today that we have quite a few utterly unencyclopedic articles on completely non-notable credit unions, some created by single-purpose spam accounts.  Like this example, they completely fail WP:ORGCRIT .  Many have few or no secondary sources.  This article was also created by a single-purpose account as spam.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 18:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I did get some hits on ProQuest but they were all trade publications, local routine coverage, brief mentions or based on their comments.  S0091 ( talk ) 15:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Serie A broadcasters: No context to assert notability.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Italy .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GiantSnowman : At the similar AfD for Copa Sudamericana broadcasters, you ! voted Redirect rather than Delete .   Do you think a redirect isn't a viable alternative to deletion in this case?  IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️ ) 13:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no opposition to a redirect.  Giant Snowman 13:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Serie A#Television rights (a section which could be renamed to "Media coverage").   Absent media coverage about the list as a topic, I agree that I don't think this is a list within Wikipedia's scope that is therefore worth preserving per WP:NOT , but the topic does merit some encyclopedic coverage in the context of Serie A , and it is a reasonable redirect as an alternative to deletion .   I do not think there is anything worth merging, though preserving the page history allows an interested editor to do so if they disagree.  IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️ ) 13:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, not a TV guide.  Govvy ( talk ) 14:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, no objection to a cheap consensus redirect to Serie A#Television rights , but don't find it useful.  // Timothy :: talk 07:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bizkaia Boggarts: Non-notable sports team for non-notable assocation/league.  Unsourced except for a Facebook post since 2016.  Neither have articles on the Spanish Wiki.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 20:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Europe ,  and Spain .  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 20:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What it does have is a Basque Wikipedia article: https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizkaia_Boggarts_Quidditch_Kluba However, this quidditch team does not compete in a setting that yields independent coverage about the subject.  The only things supporting this page are social media and primary sources.  So even the 27th place in the https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europako_Quidditch_Kopa doesn't help.  Delete .  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - unable to find any coverage in reliable, independent sources.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 21:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Thompson Foundation Classic: Let'srun ( talk ) 18:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and American football .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete