hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Prantle: Moreso, sources are talking about Ogelle, so, I am surprised why they're being used in an entry called Prantle formally known as Jawonsi.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 17:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Products ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 17:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Websites ,  and Delaware .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt none of the references even mentioned the company so I removed them.  Searches turn up nothing.  Check previous deletion logs.  SmartSE ( talk ) 00:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marian Orr: Fails WP:NPOL as not being a "major local political figure who has received significant press coverage".  Coverage almost exclusively related to two incidents, one in which she accused another politician of swearing at her, another in which her husband was arrested in a domestic incident.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Wyoming .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, but this isn't referenced to the depth of coverage about her that it would take to get her over WP:NPOL #2.  We need to see content about her political impact — specific things she did as mayor, specific projects she spearheaded as mayor, specific effects her mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth — but essentially the only content of that type here relates to a single incident of accusing the state governor of swearing at her, which doesn't rise to the level of what we're looking for.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation if somebody can actually write something more substantive than this, but what's here now isn't enough in and of itself, and Cheyenne isn't nearly large enough to extend a presumption of notability to an inadequate article about its mayor.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 08:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ché Zuro: Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creep Talk 12:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unconvincing claim of notability, with article sourced almost exclusively by sources not noted as reliable by Wikipedia:RSP .  The outsized content suggests this is a fanpage.  128.252.210.2 ( talk ) 16:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suboptimal health: Except for sources 3-6, all sources include both Yu-Xiang Yan and Wei Wang on the author list.  Sources 4 and 5 also do not have listed authors.  This makes me seriously question if sources 3, 4, 5, 6 can pull their weight as reliable and independent (of Yan and Wang's research), especially to the high standard of WP:MEDRS .  I suspect the original creation of this article was a COI edit, as several paragraphs show up as copy pastes on earwig from Yan and Wang's publications.  I will now go over sources 3-6: - Source 3 does not cite any of Yan and Wang's publications, but comes after in 2013, suggesting that the research on 'subhealth' is only coincidentally similar to 'suboptimal health' researched by Yan and Wang.  It seems to be the only source independent of Yan and Wang to meet MEDRS.  - The concept of suboptimal health been used to uncriticially promote chinese traditional medicine (TCM) - see

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programmes broadcast by Colors Kannada: References are basic for the individual programming and mention that it airs on Colors Kannada.  We have a category for "Colors Kannada original programming" which suffices and Wikipedia is not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 05:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wikipedia is not a TV Guide.  Pages like this should not exist only to list the programmes that the channel offers but should also describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on achievements.  Per nom fails WP:NLIST .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Taggart, Indiana: Anyway, the gods of Google did not shine upon me, as there are at least two quite famous Taggarts and plenty of kin and offspring to clog the works, but at an rate, I found nothing.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This locale is only notable at the most local level.  Wikipedia is also not a directory of every spot on a map.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  So far I have found one reference in the Brown County Democrat to the "Taggart community of Hamblen township" in an obituary ...speaking of which, there are many references to "Taggart cemetery",  "Taggart-Hamblen cemetery", and other variations.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 10:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Here is a 1987 article on the Taggart Cemetery which refers to the possibility that it may have once been the site of the first school house in Brown County.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 10:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] According to the Brown County Historical Society in 2020 , there is now a historical marker where the first school and church in Brown Couny (actually a meeting house started by Brother Patterson C. Parker of the "Republican United Brethren Church").  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 11:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Whatever the place is it may be actually know as taggart-Hamblen James.folsom ( talk ) 02:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you mark that obit clip as public, so we can view it?  James.folsom ( talk ) 02:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A 1939 article about the historic Taggart Cemetery , also referring to the first school house and church erected in Brown County.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 11:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Only one problem with this...  Communities turn out to be just rural areas, in AFD after AFD.  Schools and cemeteries are found in rural areas.  None of these things demonstrate the presence of a concentration of people rising to the level of a populated place.  But I will be back with more detail...  James.folsom ( talk ) 02:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Seriously the # of taggart people is an issue.  James.folsom ( talk ) 02:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I tried a alot search tricks with the local paper to limit the hits to places, the only term that found anything was "taggart community" which only had ten hits, so thumbs down on this.  James.folsom ( talk ) 02:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Objective approach: A merge into Objectivity was proposed all the way back in 2006, but that is (and was) a disambiguation page.  We have Objectivity (science) and Objectivity (philosophy) , but I'm not sure that one is obviously more appropriate for a redirect than the other.  Gnomingstuff ( talk ) 23:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like WP:OR .  Karl Popper used the term.  But I doubt that an entire article on it is justified.  Apart from Popper it seems to be used mostly as a buzz word used to assert some kind of scientific superiority.  Random person no 362478479 ( talk ) 00:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The comment about being a "buzz word" seems to fit well.  No objection to a consensus merge of properly sourced material that can also show the term in context in the target article.  // Timothy :: talk 08:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT , WP:FORK , OR, WP:NEO , and WP:NOTESSAY .  Besides the other issues, sourcing this would require an entire re-write.  Whoever created and wrote this has the super ability to make a content fork, original research, and an essay about a buzz word, all in one.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Bonnitcha: Further, there was question in those deletion discussions about whether he was with the olympic team [15] Mason ( talk ) 19:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : agree with the nom.  The person has a very low h-index (13) and is not mentioned beyond primary sources and Rhodes which is not a defining characteristic for academics.  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 19:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination and FuzzyMagma .  The article's track record is also something to take note of.  IncompA 21:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable sports person.  No pass of WP:Prof .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:PROF and WP:SPORTSCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn'y pass PROF , and I don't see sports notability.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 14:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and discussion, I concur.  Cabrils ( talk ) 02:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gomora (kaiju): Tried to do a WP:BEFORE search, but found zero sigcov.   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 05:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 05:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per the prose above.  I wouldn't even have it re-direct because the character is so obscure there isn't even mention of them on the Ultraman article.  Andrzejbanas ( talk ) 18:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Google search reveals no significant coverage from any reliable source.  In fact, there's barely coverage from unreliable sources either, outside of marketing material.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  04:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yaneth Viveros: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found was this .  Otherwise, it's all passing mentions ( 2010 , 2014 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 23:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mesude Hülya Şanes Doğru: Kadı Message 06:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and Turkey .  Kadı Message 06:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Church of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, Cameron Highlands: No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG.   One of the reference is dead but from the title is a self-description by the Archdiocese that it's in.  The lack of even "1/2 GNG" sources is reflected in it's lack of content.  The only content is a sentence on where it's at, a sentence on it's founding, and a sentence that it was closed for covid and reopened.  North8000 ( talk ) 20:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Christianity ,  and Malaysia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and NORG.  Article doesn't make any claim of notability, and as the nom mentioned this reflects in the lack of content.  BEFORE showed hardly anything at all other than travel sites, nothing with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from WP:IS WP:RS.  // Timothy :: talk 15:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Spalding Amateur Dramatic And Operatic Society: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Electronic News Production System: Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Software , United Kingdom ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A mere 4 gnews hits.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 12:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Appears to be enough to pass GNG [ [8] ][ [9] ][ [10] ] It is also commonly noted by its abbreviation, ENPS, making it somewhat dificult to find sources User:Let'srun 18:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamed Firuzul Abdullah Haleel: Was previously draftified but author unilaterally moved past AfC back to main space, so here we are.  Cites only one source, and a search finds nothing other than news of his appointment, or him doing his job ie.  speaking for the administration, neither of which makes him notable.  Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politics ,  and Maldives .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Here are few links I have found on him.  In Maldives Media is mostly in local language.  https://www.presidencymaldives.gov.mv/Press/Article/29102 https://presidency.gov.mv/Government/Officials/146 https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/? ref=watch_permalink&v=1040656450459406 He is appointed at the rank of Deputy Minister and so far local TV's are showing him since he is the official government spokesperson.  On Point (3) found a live of him.  Hope this helps.  Existence Leesaaisath 15:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage other than him being quoted as a spokesperson.  None of the sources provided by @ Leesaaisath provide any significant or independent coverage.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  18:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the Boloney sources @ Leesaaisath provided and that are on the article.  Terrible page that doesn't demonstrate GNG.  AaronVick ( talk ) 02:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC) —

Discussion outcome: delete
Etienne Janeke: JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to be a case of WP:TOOSOON , but would have passed the old WP:NRU guidelines.  Lots of coverage, but none of it really WP:GNG worthy.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD also.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Buckwald: Could not find anything near a GNG coverage.  Previously deleted and then again proded.    Some concern that the creator has 144 lifetime edits and starting with edit #1 was an expert at creating articles for living people who could benefit from having an article.  Has some recognition,   with the top one their being listed in Forbes top 30 under 30 but IMO that is not enough to override GNG type coverage requirement.  North8000 ( talk ) 23:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Technology , California , Florida ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - very likely WP:UPE spam.  I've blocked the author.  MER-C 19:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above - WP:UPE applies and written in a promotional tone.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 22:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete