Debjani Modak : Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NBIO .  Could not find any sources apart from the promo interviews and film-gossip websites.  — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 21:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Artists , Television , India , Andhra Pradesh , Tamil Nadu , Telangana ,  and West Bengal .  — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 21:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I am sorry but she had various lead/significant roles in notable television works and therefore appears to meet WP:NACTOR .  Some of the coverage on the page and available online is in TOI and MSN, for example, which, without being top rate journalism, is a bit above promo and gossip in my view.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Regarding the TOI and MSN sources - see WP:TOI and WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  None of the sources on the page are definitely 'reliable' (and I'm struggling to find any potential sources for her which aren't puff pieces), which is still problematic.  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 13:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note about the Times of India : The Sources noticeboard says not to use it for political subject matters for example, which the Indian task force clarifies: "Uncontroversial content such as film reviews are usable".  Consensus is that concern about retributed coverage exists, but not to the point of making it unreliable. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The creator just added many references, from YouTube and other Un-RS sources.  Agreeing with the nominator, the subject fails WP:NBIO and WP:NACTOR -- QuadriSyed Sahab ( T · C 09:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 18:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How does she fail WP:NACTOR when she had significant roles in notable television productions?  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, We might not know the standards and we would request you to keep the page altering any information which you think is not relevant to Wiki norms.  We would also like to cooperate with you if you have any questions related to the Content.  Kindly, Please refrain from deleting the Page as you all know we have did our ROI and spent lot of time in maintaining the Page.  Hope you understand on humanitarian ground.  Thanks for understanding.  Renu214 ( talk ) 22:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Renu214 Do your colleagues also maintain other pages?  If so, could you please tell us which ones?  Also, you must declare the connection as per WP:PAID policy.  — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 11:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately I have not got an opportunity to interact with other wiki authors/users.  I am not a pro in this.  Learning step by step everyday on editing.  Your valuable suggestions are always helpful in learning.  Renu214 ( talk ) 16:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, this is a perfect opportunity for you to interact with other wiki authors/users (in fact, you did it just then!).  You also said that you would like to cooperate with us, so please kindly do so - by doing these tasks which you have a duty to complete: Firstly - Have you read WP:PAID , WP:COI , and WP:PEW ?  Your talk of 'colleagues' implies that you are editing wikipedia on behalf of someone - and you are required to disclose who you are editing Wikipedia for.  Please follow the instructions in WP:DCOI and WP:PAID .  Secondly - Please ensure that your colleagues have read WP:PAID , WP:COI , and WP:PEW (and follow the instructions in WP:DCOI and WP:PAID ) as well.  Finally - Please confirm when you have completed these tasks.  It is vital that you complete these tasks, regardless of what your employer may say on the matter - as the policies of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation have priority over your employer's instructions here on Wikipedia (and failing to follow them could lead to quite a bit of negative press for yourself and your employer ).  Thanks for understanding.  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 12:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you!  To share light, I am not doing this for any one's sake.  writing is my passion and i have not created this page to be honest.  I am just updating the content based on my research.  Since, you said this is the perfect time to get valuable information from you all expertise writes and wiki editors, how can i add my newpaper cuttings beacuse they are from 2013 and at that time online archiving was not found.  Please help.  Renu214 ( talk ) 15:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see, apologies for completely misinterpreting your word choice.  Anywho, to answer your question - use Template:Cite news (newspapers) or Template:Cite magazine (magazines/newsletters) for those non-online sources.  I would also suggest quoting the important bits of info from these offline sources in the quote parameter of the citations (like |quote=important words from the article go here ), think of it as archiving the important details where everyone can see them.  For example, {{ cite news | last = Doe | first = John | title = Thing happens at place!  | work = The Placeholder Times | date = 1970-12-31 | page = 39 | quote = The thing happened at place yesterday }} .  Hopefully that helps :) 🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 17:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 04:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Source eval: Comments Source One  paragaraph promo database bio  1.  "Debjani Modak Biography by nettv4u".  nettv4u.com.  Promo about series, annouces subject has joined, nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth  2. ^ "Actress Debjani Modak has replaced Pavani Reddy in 'Rasaathi' Jan 27 2020".  The Times of India.  27 January 2020.  "Exclusive Interview" fails WP:IS  3. ^ Jump up to:a b "Actress Debjani Modak Schooling details in news channel interview".  NTV News Interview.  Duplicate of #3 above  4. ^ Jump up to:a b "Actress Debjani Modak Schooling details in news channel interview".  SumanTV Entertainment news.  Does not mention subject, article is titled differently from ref, may be incorrect link  5. ^ "Debjani's Bengali Movie 'Knock Out' debut 2013".  Times of India.  Interview Fails WP:IS  6. ^ "Debjani's ANDHRA JYOTHI TS 21 OCTOBER 2021 newspaper interview".  NTNB NEWSPAPERS.  Nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth  7. ^ "Colors Bangla launches 'Aponjon'- a Tale of love and revenge, 26th June 2015".  The Times of India.  26 June 2015.  Mill enterntainment news about quiting a project.  8. ^ "Actress Debjani Modak quits Tamil daily soap 'Vaanathai Pola' 26th April 2023".  The Times of India.  26 April 2023.  Duplicate of #8 above  9. ^ "Actress Debjani Modak quits Tamil daily soap 'Vaanathai Pola' 26th April 2023".  The Times of India.  23 November 2023.  Film trailer, nothing SIGCOV about the subject.  10. ^ "Knock Out official theatrical Trailer HD 2013".  YouTube.  Sources #10-54 in the article are promo refs about media they have been in.  Nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Notability is NOTINHERITED.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBlue ( talk • contribs ) 03:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] clarification - it appears that sources 8 and 9 were different sources (different URLs, editor probably forgot to edit the `title=`), but source 9 is just a gossip listicle anyway (published by WP:TOI ).  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 13:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  09:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All the sources on the page are either outright promotional or are covered in WP:NEWSORGINDIA promotionalness, and I'm struggling to find a properly reliable source about her myself.  Granted, she has had top billing roles in a couple of serials, but I'm not sure how notable those serials are, and, ofc, WP:NOTINHERITED , so probably doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR .  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 13:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as explained in the chart above, nothing is usable as a source.  I don't find anything we'd use either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I might be a beginner but there are so many pages out there who does not have proper reference added but still no complaints from wiki so called editors and users.  I don't understand this partiality sorry to say but I am little bit biased with the kind of proceedings happening here.  As experts, someone will expect the required changes to be made to the page encouraging the fellow authors/writers but its completely out of my knowledge, why would somebody is so particular to delete the page.  respectfully, please do what is according to the norms and what you think best and kindly, keep the norms and do it for all the pages and Thank you for your time.  146.146.7.1 ( talk ) 20:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete