hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
International Neural Network Society : Article created in its original form by obvious COI editor Internationalneuralnetworksociety , which was reverted to a redirect.  Very similar article then created by Hailneum , whose only other contribution is twice-failed AFC submission Draft:International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) .  Sources cited in the article are either: primary: 1, 4, 5 passing mentions: all else Other coverage of the organisation I was able to locate includes a few passing mentions in newspapers at the time of its founding; and a handful of passing mentions in an "oral history", which is mostly transcripts of interviews with people involved with the organisation.  In short, despite the existence of Stephen Grossberg and the journal, there does not seem sufficient inherent notability to meet either GNG or NORG.  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 23:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals and Technology .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 23:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see the organisation having recieved signficant coverage, or at least signifcant enough to meet NORG, hence I would have to agree with the nominator.  Golem08 ( talk ) 18:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NORG , WP:NOTINHERITED , and WP:SIGCOV .  Other than the folks associated on its board, there is literally no evidence this organization is notable.  I'm generally suspicious or organizations that have heavy-hitter boards but no visible presence of outcomes.  Ordinarily, an organization does not inherit good notability from a notable board.  Almost all the sources are primary and about folks associated with the organization, not about the organization itself or anything it's actually accomplished.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Football at the 2027 Pan American Games : There is absolutely no need or use for this page so far away from the 2027 Games.  The desire to create articles too early should be stamped out.  It won't be any more useful in six months either, negating the desirability of draftification.  See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 South American U-17 Women's Championship and many others.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Football ,  and Chile .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely hasty in relation to the event.  Svartner ( talk ) 12:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete way WP:TOOSOON .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability, and there won't be any updates for 2 years.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Far WP:TOOSOON .  — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kanchan Gupta : Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 10:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Journalism , News media ,  and West Bengal .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 10:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the article relies almost entirely on one source,  and therefore fails General notability guideline.  EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 18:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Coupled with the source in the article, I found some reliable ones online ( here (this one is the most reliable), here , and here ) which is therefore enough to establish WP:NBIO .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as fails WP:GNG .  All three sources mentioned by Cocobb8 are just about Gupta's appointment as "the chairperson of the Raja Rammohun Roy Library Foundation" only.  The Hindu , though notable media, wrote only "A senior journalist, Mr. Gupta was associated with the first NDA government, having worked in the PMO of Atal Bihari Vajpayee.", as addition to the announcement which is not enough for WP:NBIO .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 14:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Twinkle1990 , The Hindu wrote at least 2 paragraphs.  How is that not WP:SIGCOV ?  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Cocobb8 please quote what were in those two paragraphs.  I don't see any anything beyond mention .  If you see, please enligten us .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 15:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Twinkle1990 Well I won't quote that much because that would constitute a copyright violation .  But, here's the very first sentence of the article.  The Union Culture Ministry has appointed journalist Kanchan Gupta the chairperson of the Raja Rammohun Roy Library Foundation till May 2020, weeks after Union Culture and Tourism Minister of State (independent charge) Prahlad Singh Patel was nominated to the post.  At this point, I'll leave it to other editors to share their thoughts with this article.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 21:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  M S Hassan ( talk ) 12:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zora (platform) : Others included questionably- WP:RELIABLE sources / cryptocurrency publications like https://decrypt.co TLA (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency ,  and Companies .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  The various crypto publications might be OK for providing some verifiability but I'm not seeing a level of coverage that suggests that this is sufficiently notable.  The connections to celebrities seem minor and notability is not inherited anyway.  As always with crypto stuff, any mentions of dollar values should be taken with a substantial pinch of salt unless verified by truly Reliable Sources.  Ironically, it might be more notable if it was a shadier operation, getting coverage for its shadiness, but I don't see any evidence of that.   -- DanielRigal ( talk ) 00:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Yahoo News reposted a Coindesk article, which is a non-RS.  Funding announcements don't contribute to notability and the list of "notable events" is longer than the rest of the article.  PROMO Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SOS United : Fails the general and album-specific notability policies.  Possible redirect (preferable) or merger (less preferable) to SOS Children's Villages .  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Austria .  UtherSRG (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No album reviews found in Gnewspapers, or Books.  Allmusic and Discogs have nothing.  No sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tetraapeirogonal tiling : As with the now deleted pentaapeirogonal tiling , this tiling is not mentioned of this tiling in the cited sources.   Searching for the name yields next to nothing, although it may go by another name in reliable sources.  As it stands, the article appears to be entirely original research .  AquitaneHungerForce ( talk ) 23:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  DanielRigal ( talk ) 00:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yet another polytope article failing WP:NEO and being pure WP:OR and trivial statements.  I think at this point, you can use WP:PROD and any similar articles on hyperbolic semiregular tilings .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 01:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree that the same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentaapeirogonal tiling apply.  Adumbrativus ( talk ) 02:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triapeirogonal tiling and before.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 07:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No doubt this and the other pages mentioned above are less harmful than other types of material we have floating around, but the fact remains that Wikipedia is not a fandom wiki for polytopes and tilings.  (If someone wants to start that wiki, hey, more power to you, and I mean that sincerely; it's just not what Wikipedia is for.)  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the citations were copied verbatim from other hyperbolic plane tiling articles.  I doubt this tiling is even mentioned there.  Regardless, this isn't remotely notable.  Owen× ☎ 00:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aaron Ray : Only a single source ( [38] ) is more than a passing mention, and this is insufficient.  Jfire ( talk ) 00:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Jfire ( talk ) 00:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jfire It wasn't UPE, but am happy to take notes if improvements should be made in the future.  I felt based on his colleague Michael Green (agent) this page was an improvement, sorry if not the case somehow.  Stravensky ( talk ) 00:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This article reads like a professional profile and is basically promotional, even if accidentally so.  This happens a lot with articles on businesspeople, because most the information out there is structured as such.  To write an article that will be kept, find some secondary sources that provide an independent look at this person, and summarize the secondary coverage in those sources.  It might not be possible, a lot of businesspeople relentlessly self-promote, but don't get much independent coverage, and we can't build an encyclopedia article around that self-promotion.  — siro χ o 03:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would also suggest engaging with editors in the discussion at the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard you were notified about on your talk page.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Out of the 22 references on the page, this is the only one that comes close to showing notability.  The rest are one liners, quotes, and some don't even mention the subject.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople , California , Florida ,  and Kentucky .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete The article has no real sourcing in the first two references blocks.  They are passing mentions often in something or someones else's context.  The article is terrible as well.  It is a brochure article.  scope_creep Talk 06:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
O Jin-hyok : Simione001 ( talk ) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only source doesn't appear to be WP:RS and wouldn't establish notability even if it were.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 04:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV , but I have reservations about national team caps not meeting notability requirements for nationals of countries with almost zero available or trustworthy media coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 15:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joseph (Yoske) Levy : However, I couldn't verify it.  It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 07:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Israel .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 08:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any references to support this.  Claims llike "part of important collections around the world" are unsupported.  One of the books listed as a reference in the article, "Depiction & Interpretation: The Influence of the Holocaust on the Visual Arts"," seems to only mention the name "Levy" three times, and every time it is instead art dealer Julien Levy they are writing about. Elspea756 ( talk ) 12:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Like others above me, I could not establish notability. Names like Joseph and Levy are difficult so I may be off but I really tried. Hewiki has an article about another Yosef "Yoske" Levi who was mayor of Eilat and is notable.  gidonb ( talk ) 00:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , reluctantly.  @ Netherzone and CT55555 : and I tried to tackle this when I found it in the same backlog.  I don't read Hebrew so I had even less luck than Gidonb did in tracking down sourcing.  As Boleyn says, he should be notable.  If sourcing eventually comes to light, we can recreate.  Star Mississippi 03:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete , I haven’t done as much research as the rest of you, but the article felt wrong and possibly hoax-like to me especially the total lack of references, so I’ve done some research.  As Boleyn says if what the article says is true there’d be some mention of this person somewhere, but nothing on the internet about them, taking into account what gidonb said about how common the name elements are nothing on the internet about the two pretty generically named paintings mentioned in the article Neither of the Hebrew articles in the bibliography mention this person.  They talk about Holocaust art, but don’t mention him.  The article was created by a banned sockpuppet, part of a farm, still seemingly active (click on the name in the history and look at the ban log) At least one article involving the same sock was deleted for lack of notability ( Articles for deletion/Jonathan Kis-Lev ) At the very least, if this artist exists, they’re not notable.  Ayenaee ( talk ) 11:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As per WP:NOTABILITY .  Searches on Google Web, Books and Scholar return absolutely nothing.  He might as well be made up.  -- Jkaharper ( talk ) 14:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not notable, and due to lack of accessible sources I'm not convinced this artist is real.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 20:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Coherence-free processor : Can only find a single academic paper as a reference, and that appears to be written by the editor that created the page.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 20:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A bot removed the link from cache coherence.  Since this is a coherence mechanism, can I place it there or under cache coherency protocols?  That eliminates the notability problem.   The reason I created a new topic was because it is rather lengthy.  Thank you FrankYang43338 ( talk ) 00:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd suggest following the steps outlined here if there is conflict of interest, and requesting the edit on the talk page of one of those articles (see Wikipedia:Simple conflict of interest edit request ).  Do let me know if I can provide further info, but afraid I'm probably not qualified to add content in this area myself with confidence.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 07:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Indeed this is an attempt to republish an academic paper as a Wikipedia article.  Blatant violation of WP:NOT .  Tercer ( talk ) 23:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there is an unbolded Keep comment here from the article creator so I don't think Soft Deletion is appropriate.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Halit Armay High School : 1keyhole ( talk ) 16:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  1keyhole ( talk ) 16:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Cannot find any RS that are independent from the subject and don't merely involve a passing mention.  Aintabli ( talk ) 17:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - can't find any substantial coverage under the Turkish name Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Radio Pura Sanchar FM Baitadi : Could not find link to its official website or social media page.  nirmal ( talk ) 09:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Onyika Junior Secondary School : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG per nom.  UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vivekananda Vidyapith : Beland ( talk ) 23:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools , Hinduism ,  and New Jersey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - consider G11 speedy deletion as PROMO.  This is nothing but a self serving OR promotional essay on a subject with 0 indication of notability.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 23:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete: Complete WP:PROMO .  Be ica verra verra ]] talk 18:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete