hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Burak Bora Anatolian High School: The article on this topic on Turkish Wikipedia has now been deleted ten times for lack of notability.  Can we call it a day now?  Mccapra ( talk ) 13:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Turkey .  Mccapra ( talk ) 13:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG .  Unable to find significant coverage of this school in secondary sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 01:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Information Systems Associates FZE: Its presence on Wikipedia (including list entries and other links, hence I don't favour a redirect) is entirely down to a single-purpose account , almost certainly with a conflict of interest.  – Tera tix ₵ 13:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Travel and tourism , Software , Sri Lanka ,  and United Arab Emirates .  – Tera tix ₵ 13:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails the requirements of WP:NCOMPANY , lacks significant coverage in reliable/independent secondary sources.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 01:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Johannes Reich-Rohrwig: Xnyarla ( talk ) 23:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Xnyarla ( talk ) 23:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject may have published a lot, but nobody seems to have noted it.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete , reads entirely like a resume which wikipedia is not and with an excessive amount of WP:REFSPAM which does nothing to assert notability of the subject.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 23:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Law ,  and Austria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Most sources are court decisions, which you would expect for a lawyer, but aren't acceptable sourcing.  Nothing found for this person either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : doesn't demonstrate N microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 16:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deathworx: I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Michigan .  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources of any kind found in Gsearch, the band is not found on the internet in any sort of RS.  Not meeting music notability guidelines, no charted singles, no Grammy or other awards, not much of anything really for them.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Some sources now present.  Reliability of varying quality.  Add half a dozen more independent sources and the article could be much improved.  Pablothepenguin ( talk ) 16:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting but I see no new sources added, Pablo.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Couldn't find any usable sources, fails WP:NBAND . - KH-1 ( talk ) 00:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The good news: Spotify lists Deathworx, and its founder Grayson Rupp.  The bad news: Deathworx is shown as having 1 monthly listener; Rupp is shown as having 0.  This does not favor a finding of notability.  – .  Raven .  talk 03:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A complete failure of WP:NBAND .  There are no valid sources in the article, and searches turn up absolutely no coverage in reliable sources.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 03:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Reshape Reason: I'm unable to find suitable sources to justify keeping them.  SWinxy ( talk ) 20:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the two other albums by Elitist for the same reason: Earth (EP) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Between the Balance ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  SWinxy ( talk ) 20:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all three : Found no evidence of notability for any of these releases, nor the band behind them ( now PROD'd ).  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 21:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phil Agcaoili: Unclear the subject is notable, and the article is highly promotional.  The company he founded is apparently not notable enough to have an article.  -- Beland ( talk ) 02:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Beland ( talk ) 02:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Internet , Georgia (U.S. state) , New York ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Coverage is all about SecureIT and Verisign, nothing about this person, other than mentioned in passing.  I don't find any sources for this person either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Glen Reynolds: Chancer.  scope_creep Talk 11:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not meeting ANYBI, plus no better sourcing than presented already in the article; wp before won't help.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 10:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is not nearly enough SIGCOV here for GNG to be met.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 17:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree per nom.  Paul W ( talk ) 18:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Doral shooting: Fuzheado | Talk 17:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very standard late night bar shooting incident which likely was just a sudden dispute, which are sadly common and indistinguishable; the only likely change out of this is the shopping center will force the bar to change hours and add some rules ( which have already been done ), if not outright close it, or it'll wind down naturally based on reputation or the eventual liquor license revocation if it occurs again.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Wikipedia is not a newspaper.  An article should not be created for an event unless there are sources beyond routine news coverage.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 05:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I mean the victims no disrespect, but I have to agree that this tragedy is not notable as per WP:NEVENTS , and Wikipedia not being a newspaper.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per WP:NEVENT , subject is not notable beyond routine news coverage.  Spinixster (trout me!) 07:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] um excuse me ( Personal attack removed ) 30 people died 65.36.85.38 ( talk ) 16:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Only two did; please don't exaggerate factual information.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Routine US shooting, no indication of ongoing significance.  WWGB ( talk ) 13:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unfortunate event but usual in the us.  likely not to have any lasting coverage.  X ( talk ) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raymund C. King: My own searches have not turned up anything better.  WP:BIO does not seem to be met.  SmartSE ( talk ) 23:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , New Mexico ,  and Texas .  SmartSE ( talk ) 23:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom.  I could also find no significant coverage online.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 23:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kriti Dhiman: The article fails WP:ANYBIO .  The only coverage I could find was in relation to MasterChef, in which case WP:ONEEVENT seems applicable.  John B123 ( talk ) 21:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Television ,  and India .  John B123 ( talk ) 21:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Shaws username .  talk .  22:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete; As nominator notes, fails WP:ANYBIO .  This should never have made it out of draft, but did so because the author...who is the subject of the article...made enough edits just working on this article to make it possible to move to mainspace.  One might argue to draftify, but I don't think that's appropriate.  I mean no disrespect to the subject of the article, but finishing 7th on a contestant show and having a few blurbs written about you because you were on the show doesn't make you famous enough for a Wikipedia article.  No draft work is going to change that.  All references so far provided are based on the subject's appearance on the show.  There does not appear to be any notability based on anything other than their middle-of-the-field performance on the show.  The claim that she opened a small bakery which became the best selling in Mandi Gobindgarh is unsupported by the citation used in association with the claim, nevermind that it would be 'best selling' in a relatively small community.  There's no mention of the business at all in the citation.  Overall, there's just nothing to go on here except for their appearance on the show, and that's just not enough.  Maybe...MAYBE...if they won the show.  But, that didn't happen.  Delete.  -- Hammersoft ( talk ) 23:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just not enough coverage in RS.  Sources 1 and 6 are semi-reliable, the rest aren't RS per Cite Highlighter.  What I find are similar articles with the same titles, indicative of press-release churnalism.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Scrolling through all sources on the page, I find no significant coverage about this person's personal life, background and career, notable enough to warrant a page on her.  Personal life segment has only one source which is an unreliable blog.  There is no source on her education.  What is written in the career segment does not even make parallels with the source.  Most source are all about her as a contestant on MasterChef program and about the challenges she faced as contestant.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Keith Shannon: Fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 23:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bilateral relations , Latvia , Moldova , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources are all primary.  Fails WP:BIO .  Ambassadors are not inherently notable as nom points out.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Care-O-bot: Sources have not changed; all available substantial references are press releases.  Recon rabbit 18:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology .  Recon rabbit 18:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Consensus was reached already, and the differences between that version of the page and this one are minor.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 17:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not nearly enough to establish notability.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 14:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Walsh Company: Should be redirected to Kevin J. Walsh if not outright deleted.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 18:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television ,  and Companies .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Making a notable product doesn't make the company itself inherently notable.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 18:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources seem to be about the owner, not the company.  Please note that having a draft rejected isn't the same as having a draft declined, as is the case here.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  13:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ava Moore: Spinixster (chat!) 11:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Spinixster (chat!) 11:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Can't find any sources either, and as there are no sources to begin with, article doesn't seem to meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 18:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blaze News: Youknow?  ( talk ) 12:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media , India ,  and Kerala .  Youknow?  ( talk ) 12:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Poor sources with no significant coverage on the organization.  Fails WP:NCORP .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Blaze News meets the notability criteria under WP:ORG and WP:N .  It has significant coverage in reliable sources and plays an important role in providing news in its region.  Removing this article would diminish the breadth of knowledge on regional news organizations, particularly those significant in Kerala and India .  Jigar1984 ( talk ) 07:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you tell me How is it passing WP:ORG ?  Youknow?  ( talk ) 08:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom fails WP:NCORP .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not finding any evidence it passes WP:NCORP .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jürgen Radel: Shellwood ( talk ) 16:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  References 6–12 (seven of them!) are all to the same publication in various languages.  That looks like padding to me.  It would be sufficient to keep [6] and mention that other versions exist.  Athel cb ( talk ) 16:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] to be honest, I should have PROD the article rather than using XFD given how obvious this one is, but here we are FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 17:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NPROF , his h-index score on Google Scholar is 4, and is 0 on Scopus; his position is not a named chair or distinguished professorship, no other indication of rank.  Fails GNG also.  Netherzone ( talk ) 16:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Delete, very low h-index score, indicaiton of non-notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Management .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per User:Netherzone .  Mooonswimmer 17:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  h-index of only 4, nothing else to indicate passing WP:PROF .  The page reads rather promotional.  Nsk92 ( talk ) 22:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  One paper with 160 citations in GS, but not seeing anything else of note.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 20:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see evidence of passing any WP:PROF criterion.  I've seen some editors argue that all German full professors in established full-professor positions are notable under #C3 but I don't subscribe to that expansive philosophy.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 07:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Knowlarity: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Article has links to reliable publications with non-trivial coverage.   However, it does read like an advertisement and the puffery needs to be taken down several notches.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:54, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Besides probably being written by the marketing company Candid marketing, I don't see any coverage that could possibly support the writing of an encyclopedic article.  The Khaleej Times article fails ORGIND, Techstory is a blatant ad, and it's unclear they have an editorial process, the Indian Express article, besides falling under INHERITORG, does not cover the software in depth.  Not sure if it's based on the same IANS news release that was in this Economic Times article, which seems to be a permanent deadlink but I believe should have the same content as the (google cached) Deccan Herald article here, but neither is compliant to current standards.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 08:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  11:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not the most helpful of nominations, I must note.  However, clearly WP:SERIESA stuff here, fails WP:GNG; WP:NCORP with a LOT of company statement derived material in sources.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete