hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Vibha Bhatnagar: Can't find info on this person and only found on the doctor [10] of the same name.  I smell COI in this article.  Best to redirect their husband?  Manoj Bhatnagar [11] DareshMohan ( talk ) 07:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can't find proof that she is Manoj's wife.  Kailash29792 (talk) 07:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople , Women , Mauritius , Indonesia , United Arab Emirates , India , England ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only sourcing I find is for a doctor that died recently, with a similar name.  The article barely has any inline citations and what's given doesn't appear notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No news coverage AShiv1212 ( talk ) 6:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ring My Bell (webtoon): A quick search before the nomination turned up only appearances in "top 10 manhwa "–type lists, none of which have significant coverage about the subject.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 06:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Webcomics ,  and Korea .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 06:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  Two reasonable discussions of it in Korean: [13] [14] .  toobigtokale ( talk ) 05:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Toobigtokale : Thanks for your comment!  I'm working through machine translation here, so my assessments may not be wholly accurate, but I have reservations about these sources.  Firstly, even though the articles have been published separately, a lot of their content is almost exactly the same, which gives me the impression that there's some paid promotion or press release copying happening.  In any case, they don't seem to have any significant coverage of the subject of this article, so my notability concerns remain.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 06:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh you're right; I didn't read in detail but they do overlap and seems like paid promotion.  Lean delete now.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 07:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nachtstern: Barely any independent sources related to this, and not even given a mention in the city's article, so not sure why this network of night routes is any more important than for the rest of the city Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Switzerland .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable group of non-notable buses.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 00:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Option screener: Agree with the hathote from 2014 that it sounds like an essay and no significant improvement for a long time.  It needs WP:TNT until someone can rewrite it in an encyclopedic way JMWt ( talk ) 07:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Economics .  JMWt ( talk ) 07:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This software appears to have shifted to various apps now [30] but sourcing is very much PR items and crypto blogs.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As the OP author, this article really shouldn't have been written.  Kill it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronnotel ( talk • contribs ) 20:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Comment moved from above debate header post-close by Daniel.  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emily Naphtal: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Mexico ,  and Illinois .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with the nom.  And since when is Linkedin a source?!  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV from independent sources.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abed Chaudhury: LibStar ( talk ) 04:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 07:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources cited are either not reliable or have no independent, significant coverage.  Furthermore, as a researcher, his total citation count is not that high.  No evidence of significant impact as a geneticist.  Multi7001 ( talk ) 03:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : found an independent article from theafricareport.com but I'm not confident this is a reliable source.  Opened RfC Jack4576 ( talk ) 14:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the reporting on subjects work by The Africa Report amounts to SIGCOV by an independent reliable source.  That coupled with the rest of the scattered sources throughout the article is enough for notability IMO Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If his citation count isn't high enough, it's a no.  I can't find much else for additional sourcing to support keeping the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I have searched Google but have not found any sources to meet WP:THREE , WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 12:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Sultan: Assistant professors are rarely notable and this doesn't seem to be an exception - his most highly cited paper has 65 citations , which is far from satisfying WP:NPROF#C1 , especially in a high-citation field.  The citations in the article comprise primary sources, his own works, and news items in which he provides a quote in passing - there's no independent biographical coverage of the subject himself.  The article appears to have been the subject of extensive COI/UPE editing, which wouldn't be a reason to delete it if it were actually notable, but which furthers the impression that the topic doesn't meet our standards for inclusion.  Spicy ( talk ) 21:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Psychiatry , Venezuela ,  and United States of America .  Spicy ( talk ) 21:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clearly not a WP:NPROF pass and I don't see WP:GNG coverage either.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 22:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with everything the nominator says: we do not have a pass of WP:PROF based on citations or anything else, nor any reason for a separate pass of WP:GNG , and the editing history is also problematic.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 20:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't pass WP:NPROF or WG:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 12:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPROF and WG:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of deaf superheroes: Dronebogus ( talk ) 09:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Disability ,  and Lists .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 09:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Overspecific, indiscriminate list, of which most of the entries are from a single work.  A "List of superheroes with disabilities" may be a better idea (even if that is something of an oxymoron).  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 19:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I wouldn't consider that to be an oxymoron.  Daredevil might have elevated abilities elsewhere, but he's still blind.  Anyways, there should be a List of superheroes with disabilities.  It has more notability than this.  Thus I'm a delete for this, but there should be a list for the broader subject broken down by disability (deaf, blind, mental disabilities, paraplegic, etc.) Conyo14 ( talk ) 18:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unfortunately, this is one where there just aren't enough to generate sufficient attention in the press.  Wrinkling my nose at the proposition that someone is pushing a POV just for noting that a deaf writer worked on a deaf superhero, though.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only three entrees have their own articles, so not enough to justify a list article.  D r e a m Focus 14:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Let's Talk Penn State: Let'srun ( talk ) 14:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Sports ,  and Pennsylvania .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find podcast listings but nothing else.   Fails WP:GNG for lack of RS.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 20:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per everyone else.  I note that this program is mentioned at WKPS § Previous shows , but given that the program lists in that article in general, with all those airtimes, come dangerously close to program guide territory ( which is one of the many things Wikipedia is not ), I'm not as sold on a redirect as I otherwise might be.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adamu Ibrahim Lamuwa: His name obviously pops up occasionally but even the Voice of Nigeria ref from which most of the article is written is a Government publication.  Black Kite (talk) 08:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Lack of reliable IS to establish notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gowrishankar srg: WP:ADMASQ , fails WP:BIO / WP:GNG .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero coverage found, unless he was running for elections.  Delete for lack of any kind of sourcing.  Sourcebot gives red links for what's used in the article.  Some are yellow, but don't talk about this individual person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Feraye (name): Geschichte ( talk ) 20:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Language .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would be a keep if any two of these people were notable and had enwiki articles, but otherwise delete .  ( t · c ) buidhe 08:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - violates WP:LIST and WP:MILL .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Högalidsspången: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, I can't find many reliable sources at all and no in-depth writing on the subject in those sources.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 07:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   I couldn't find any reliable sources discussing this pedestrian overpass and I don't see any viable redirect targets.   In particular Högalidsparken is a red link.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2018 Palmerston City Council election: There are simply not enough sources to make this a worthwhile Wikipedia page.  Steelkamp ( talk ) 06:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Australia .  Steelkamp ( talk ) 06:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose - Normally it wouldn't deserve to have a page but given the elections delays and news coverage (it is also one of only two city councils in the NT) it's notable enough AmNowEurovision ( talk ) 10:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete .  I did find a few sources about the election.  I can't read this one because it's paywalled, so I don't know how good it is.  This ABC source is pretty good, but another one is mostly WP:ROUTINE coverage of the election result.  Otherwise, I couldn't find anything that could help meet WP:GNG .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 08:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose - it's a city council with a fair bit of News Corp and ABC coverage given its multiple delays Obviously the normal non-delayed elections wouldn't/shouldn't have their own pages Totallynotarandomalt69 ( talk ) 10:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete local council elections aren't generally eligible for articles unless there's coverage "above and beyond" the election, including WP:LASTING coverage.  I don't see that here.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Teraplane ( talk ) 21:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  and SportingFlyer.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 17:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 23:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kieran Goss (rugby union): All I found was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A lot of transactional stuff from his time in England, but struggling to see enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Heksis: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not seeing how this meets GNG, it just exists.  If the author woudl create it on much more inclusionist pl wiki, it might survive there, but sadly, they did not.  Trying to promote it on English is not a good idea, we have higher standards.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zé Miguel: The best that I can find is Record , which is not enough on its own.  He doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naijatastic: Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Software , Websites ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Reading Beans and his/her source evaluation.  Given our discussions elsewhere about the difficulties evaluating Nigerian sources, I trust his/her judgement.  This is tricky for oyiboes like me.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 06:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 20:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources are Paid/PR sources as mentioned by ReadingBeans.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 14:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree that all current sources are only promotional and I tried to find some other sources.  I could find anything but promo and presentation-like articles, such as in Tribune Online Nigeria , This Day Live , or Sun News .  There is no external coverage in these sources as well, apart from the typical advertisement presentation.  Chiserc ( talk ) 08:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete