hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Siddharth Batra: There are 19 sources, but none of them are primarily or even substantially about the subject, but rather mention them in passing as one of several founders or participants in research or a company.  Steven Walling • talk 05:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found this from the academic deletion sorting list but WP:PROF is not going to work for someone who jumped to industry after a master's degree and has only a single-digit number of publications, single-digit h-index, and only publications from when he was a student.  Instead, we need WP:GNG notability for his work in industry.  But all we have are dubiously-reliable sources about the company he works for, without in-depth coverage of him and his role in them.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 16:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Balesh Dhankhar: If it weren't for the sourcing, I would've nominated this article for speedy deletion.  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime , India ,  and Australia .  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNP .  CastJared ( talk ) 09:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:PERP .  We don't create articles for every criminal.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ LibStar : WP:PERP is when an article already exists on the crimes and we can merge this content into that article.  Is there already an article on this topic?  VR talk 05:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:1E small jars t c 11:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is not just a single event and the rapes were committed over a period of time, right?  VR talk 05:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , there's a whole List of serial rapists that lists many standalone articles.  Further, this has received DIVERSE CONTINUEDCOVERAGE .  See: Sydney Morning Herald (15 Mar 2023) , Telengana Today (17 Mar 2023) , Daily Mail (29 Mar 2023) , Daily Mail (30 Mar 2023) , Sydney Morning Herald (12 Apr 2023) , The Quint (25 Apr 2023) , India Today (29 Apr 2023) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oriental Aristocrat ( talk • contribs ) 01:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What?  I don't think so...  CastJared ( talk ) 12:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep for now, as I don't see a compelling reason to delete.  But it would be better if we can find an article to merge this too, because I can't find much reliably sourced content either.  VR talk 05:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:1E .  The subject hasn't attracted enough coverage except for 1 event.  Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk ) 06:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per OA, it is still receiving coverage .  Dhankhar is being called 'one of the worst rapists in Sydney's recent history' say after Keith Simms .  Fahads1982 ( talk ) 18:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You would expect coverage on 1 May in the source you provided as the District Court jury convicted Dhankhar on 24 April LibStar ( talk ) 18:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:PERP .  Onel 5969 TT me 00:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Due to WP:BIO1E.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Salem K. Meera: — Iadmc ♫ talk 20:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only mention is in Wikipedia rip-off sites and this youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCro0duFrlz7wjS9wr0g0AA with less than 100 views on each video.  I see no reason to keep this article.  [Unsigned by User:Spiralwidget ] Delete : This article lacks reliable sources, it's difficult to assess the article's credibility.  I vote for deletion.  Waqar 💬 16:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Michni: Noorullah ( talk ) 02:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Sikhism , Afghanistan ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unsourced article on a likely unnotable battle.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 19:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article literally has no sources cited.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) Keep .  I remembered I voted on this page when it was first nominated but all the sources were removed without concensus that I added back.  Vote is still keep noting two reliable sources by historians Bansal and Sandhu.  Passes WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator should check and see if sources have been removed before claiming an article is unsourced.  They were added back and then removed again.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , It could be considered disingenuous to nominate an article when the sources had previously been removed, so posting this diff from after last afd.  That said, like many of these "battle" articles, the sourcing is weak and does not assert clear notability of the subject.  It's worth noting also we should not conflate the term "historian" which can either be an individual who has had their work peer reviewed and verified, versus someone who considers themselves as such, i.e. self proclaimed (this seemed to form part of the rationale in the previous afd ).  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 18:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No reliable sources whatsoever.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 11:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vincent Sakaria: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and New Zealand .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as does not seem notable as a sportsperson.  David Palmer // cloventt ( talk ) 08:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  We tend not to keep NZ players who have not played at top level Super Rugby .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexey Vladimirovich Kovalkov: Tagged since 2016.  All references are advertising.  - Altenmann >talk 01:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , reads like paid advertising, and created by a single-use account – it most likely is.  Ostalgia ( talk ) 10:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , couldn't find sources with significant coverage .  PaulT2022 ( talk ) 20:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jacques Verwey: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sree Sevugan Annamalai College: Shellwood ( talk ) 18:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  No hits in google news.  and only 1 line mentions in google books.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stephannie Vásquez: The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this 2020 interview with El Comercio .  Everything else that came up were passing mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Peru .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 03:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samuel Amo Tobbin: No RS and flowery language used, all red flags for non-notability.  "Who's Who in Ghana" in particular appears non-useable as a source.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Some Who's Who are reliable sources and others are not.  I do not see why this one is unreliable.  The other news sites appear to be reliable and tp confirm the philanthropy.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete While I'm less familiar with the sources, I don't think any meet the requirements for GNG.  They seem like standard English-style puff profiles and vanity/promo press.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator and David Fuchs.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Quality of the sources seems low and more promotional than anything, I don't see evidence of passing WP:GNG .  IceBergYYC ( talk • contribs ) 09:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aleksandr Zinovyev (footballer): Few sources exist in Google, Google Books, JSTOR, TWL, and others.  2003 LN 6 18:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  2003 LN 6 18:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't seem to be much to go on here.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I noticed some football players doesn't meet WP:SPORTSBIO & WP:SPORTSCRIT , with reference to databases which is not WP:SIGCOV .  Unfortunately, this is one of them!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  01:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of mayors of Langley, British Columbia (city): Lacking secondary sources, also particularly lacking non-local sources per WP:AUD .
 Fails WP:NLIST AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Lists of people ,  and Canada .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Merge into Langley, British Columbia (city) .  Does not warrant its own article.  YordleSquire ( talk ) 15:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge per YordleSquire.  The city's too small to rate a separate list.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 22:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not sure it's necessary to merge.  On the one hand I hate to lose the information, on the other hand, the article appears cited to a single source so is simply proxying for it.  Chetsford ( talk ) 02:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a list of almost entirely non-notable people — the only two who actually have Wikipedia articles both have them for having gone on to serve in the provincial legislature later in their careers, not for having been mayors of Langley per se — and it's referenced principally to the city's self-published list of its own former mayors rather than independent third-party sourcing.  Merging into the city's article would also be acceptable, but it doesn't meet the standards necessary to qualify as a standalone list.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  only primary sources used, and almost all mayors on the list do not meet WP notability threshold to believe that someday they will have articles created in their names.  Lokotim ( talk ) 17:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of ESPN College Football broadcast teams: Just another case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS , fourteen of those are wiki pages, and the rest, if not unsourced, is WP:PRIMARY .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television ,  and American football .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep with sourcing from [12] , [13] and [14] .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 00:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the sources provided above fall under WP:ROUTINE and are not effective to complete WP:LISTN .  This is a trivial list and does not withstand the WP:SIGCOV to remain as an article.  Sources above are a mix of WP:ROUTINE or not applicable to the article.  They are good to add to the main article.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 04:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per the reasons given by the original nominator and other delete voter above.  Gottagotospace ( talk ) 22:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I also agree with the nominators reasoning.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 23:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malta women's national baseball team: WBSC Rankings do not have Malta and never had it, which means it has not played any official game in the last 10 years.  This detailed map of all active women's baseball teams in Europe has nothing in Malta.  The only mention of a women's team at the Malta Baseball and Softball Association website refers to the fastpitch softball team .  There is this no evidence Malta women's national baseball team has ever existed — NickK ( talk ) 11:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Organizations , Baseball ,  and Malta .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  So non-notable that it is unknown if it even exists.  Probably Malta national baseball team should be nominated for deletion as well.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The men's team at least exists, participated in international competitions and has some historical media coverage .  Of course it did not win anything major because it's Malta but it definitely exists and has decent coverage  — NickK ( talk ) 17:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Completely and utterly non-notable, even if it has ever existed, which no evidence exists to show that it ever did.  User:Let'srun 14:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete: Two of the three sources are up for sale.  The first source makes no indication that this could even be a team.  As such, this seems to lack any sources, let alone any secondary sources.  Wozal ( talk ) 14:57, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – It is not even possible to ascertain whether this national team exists.  Svartner ( talk ) 10:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Realm of Nauga: I was unable to find any reliable sources showing notability on Google or Archive.org.  Waxworker ( talk ) 21:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Waxworker ( talk ) 21:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete found nothing either.  Timur9008 ( talk ) 11:23, May 17, 2023 (UTC) Delete Non-notable old game, no sources apparent.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 14:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep I found a reference in the book "Playing Nature: Ecology in Video Games" by Alenda Chang.  I'd like to see at least one more source.  If not, I'm hoping someone can find a valid merge target.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 04:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To what extent does it cover Realm of Nauga ?  Merko ( talk ) 22:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Replying to my own comment, the book [1] has this: "Some of my earliest and fondest memories of playing computer games involved measuring myself against game environments: hurrying across a field of bright green and blue — forest and water — in Realm of Nauga (1982) for the TRS-80, ..."  Merko ( talk ) 19:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Chang, Alenda Y. (2019).  Playing nature: ecology in video games .  Electronic mediations.  Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.  ISBN 978-1-4529-6226-9 .  Delete Fails WP:GNG .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karla Muñiz: All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1 and 2 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete