hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Lisa Tucker (singer) : Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Television ,  and California .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep as has a staff written bio at AllMusic here which includes post-Idol credits such as duetting with Dionne Warwick and a 2020 release.  Haven't done a full source search yet, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep per WP:BASIC - with the source found by Atlantic306 and coverage I found and added to the article about her on the American Idols Live!  Tour 2006 , as well as other sources I added, there is sustained and secondary coverage of her and her career in independent and reliable sources, including 2000 coverage of her role as young Nala in a Pantages Theatre production of The Lion King musical.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 04:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : sources already found demonstrate that the subject passes WP:GNG : not the greatest sources, perhaps, but fine for the standard and seem to be WP:SIGCOV enough (that is, more than a trivial mention).  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 17:55, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
South East Men's League : Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Closest league on RFL website to the description is "London and South East Rugby League".  Perhaps a merge and redirect with London Men's League is an option as that page looks to cover to similar material.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Establish how it fits into the British rugby league system plus found a few sources not yet added - Keep merge with London Men's League and rename London and South East Rugby League .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Karyl McBride : She's definitely not notable beyond her books, and those don't seem too notable either.  ~Strawberry of Arctic Circle System ( talk ) 14:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep Some of her books have reviews and she's used as a subject matter expert in this PBS program [12] , seems to be at notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - sources added to the article help support her WP:BASIC notability as an author and subject matter expert/therapist.  There is sustained international coverage, including in The New York Times , The Washington Post , CNN , Maclean's , ABC Radio National , The Daily Telegraph , etc.  The are multiple reviews for one of her books; another was featured by The New York Times Well Book Club, and the most recent one on PBS .  Beccaynr ( talk ) 21:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Beccaynr and WP: NAUTHOR .  pburka ( talk ) 13:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The sourcing is now sufficient per WP:NAUTHOR .  A. Randomdude0000 ( talk ) 03:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ali Hamadeh : No sources provide coverage for the subject on the web.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 12:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Tennis ,  and Lebanon .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 12:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Ad-Diyar source demonstrates SIGCOV in Lebanon.  One of Lebanon's top tennis players (most wins in Davis Cup ), featured at GS level and is an NCAA Division I doubles champion.  Jevansen ( talk ) 00:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Big Keep this is like the 4th one of these frivolous deletion requests from this same editor.  No. 1 collegiate player....  30 Davis cup wins... easily notable.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 07:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Fyunck(click) If you believe this article is "easily notable" you can suggest draftifying the article or adding sources yourself instead of saying "Big Keep" without any possibility of passing GNG.  Anyway some sources were added later.  It is not easy at all for it to pass GNG as only one source provided significant coverage after some addition of references .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 10:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, I suggest keeping the article.  Fyunck(click) ( talk ) 19:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails both WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 13:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - sufficiently sourced and notable per reasons given by Jevansen. -- Wolbo ( talk ) 18:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - WP:NTENNIS suggests notability by way of multiple Davis Cup appearances (I admit I have no idea what "played in 20 ties" means, but the source indicates he appeared in his group's finals in 1997 and 2000 and has 30 total wins), and also as it appears that NCAA Division I Men's Tennis Championship winners are inherently notable (as evidenced by the existence of the {{ NCAA Division I tennis men's doubles champions }} navbox which is mostly bluelinks).  AfD isn't cleanup .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 18:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep for the reasons listed above.  His challenger title in doubles and grand slam appearance ensures that the article passes muster. -- Leonstojka ( talk ) 06:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Baltimore Choral Arts Society : I see some mentions and directories and possibly even programmes for performances, but I'm not seeing the level of substantial independent reliable sourcing needed to meet the inclusion criteria on en.wiki JMWt ( talk ) 17:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Maryland .  JMWt ( talk ) 17:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There's plenty of WP:SIGCOV [8] - article needs work but that's not grounds for deletion.  Simonm223 ( talk ) 17:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok great, please add the strongest sources to the page that show the notability criteria have been met.  JMWt ( talk ) 17:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How about you do it instead.  Simonm223 ( talk ) 17:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The news sources you've provided are mostly not accessible to me in my country.  But you are right that these appear to be SIGCOV looking at the titles of the news articles, but it is a shame nobody has improved it since 2009.  JMWt ( talk ) 17:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I also don't have a subscription to Baltimore newspapers.  This is neither here nor there for whether the article should be deleted.  Hopefully an editor from Baltimore will see this conversation and do it.  Simonm223 ( talk ) 18:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 18:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I see enough independent reviews to support notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Columbia University commencement : Very little in-depth independent coverage.  Much of the independent coverage appears to be trivial to actual subject or WP:ROUTINE .  Filetime ( talk ) 19:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Has many reliable sources, covers details specific to the topic.   It could use a little editing, but not an unusual amount.  Antony– 22 ( talk ⁄ contribs ) 01:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Education ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Thought I'd be for deleting, since every school has a commencement, and these get local press, but this seems quite good.  Hyperbolick ( talk ) 11:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Well done, I think.  This university dates back to the US being a colony of England, making this article a documentation of part of our national historical heritage.  Although, if it were up to me, I'd eliminate  the John McCain profanity quotes, which seem like Clickbait rather than substantive content of the subject.  — Maile ( talk ) 19:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep no issue with this passing wp:GNG - I see no major issue with it.  KylieTastic ( talk ) 15:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kavoor, Mangalore : Moved back without a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable sources.  Onel 5969 TT me 13:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , India ,  and Karnataka .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 13:16, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - It seems pretty well sourced and a quick Google search brings up multiple mentions of the locality.  -- Sohom Datta ( talk ) 22:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The Times of India has it as a ward of Mangalore https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/sewage-treatment-plant-bane-for-kavoor/articleshow/104636.cms and lists neighbourhoods within.  Another source reports the opening of a police station in Kavoor.  I'm satisfied Kavoor is a legally recognised populated place so has a presumption of notability under WP:GEOLAND .  Rupples ( talk ) 14:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Wilfrid McVittie : No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO .  Ambassadors are not inherently notable.  LibStar ( talk ) 11:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and United Kingdom .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Portugal , Argentina , Dominican Republic ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Via Gale -- There's a paragraph in The Times at the time of his appointment, which goes somewhat beyond routine to give a little detail of his career. (New ambassador. The Times (54038) Jan. 2, 1958, p. 6.) Also several shorter bits of Times coverage at the same time (Court Circular  Jan. 11, 1958 The Times (54046) p. 8 & Court Circular  Feb. 13, 1958 The Times (54074) p. 10). He received a Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George in the Queen's Birthday Honours (The Birthday Honours. June 12, 1958 The Times (54175), p. 4). His retirement is briefly covered (News in Brief. Friday,  Mar. 23, 1962. The Times (55347), p. 8). Via Newspapers.com -- Decent (6-para) article in Times Colonist (Japanese not anti-British. 28 Dec 1937, Tue ·Page 2).  Also covered in The Toronto Star (3 paras. Sees Japan's people friendly to Britain. 29 Dec 1937, Wed ·Page 20).  Decent article on his marriage in The Toronto Star (seven paragraphs; 29 Dec 1937, Wed ·Page 26).  Article on him warning people to leave Japan in Panama City News-Herald (ten+ paras. 21 Jan 1941, Tue ·Page 1).  Some coverage in The Toronto Star (8 Dec 1941, Mon ·Page 27), which says he was consul-general in Japan and talks about his (Canadian) wife.  Paragraph on their honeymoon in The Toronto Star ( 18 Jan 1938, Tue ·Page 20).  Long para in The Winnipeg Tribune on birth of child (7 Jan 1942, Wed ·Page 8).  He's quoted on trade in Manchester Evening News (3 short paras; 21 Oct 1957, Mon ·Page 16).  Article in The Guardian on trade (2 long paras; 22 Oct 1957, Tue ·Page 14) Short article in The Guardian Journal on his appointment as ambassador (2 Jan 1958, Thu ·Page 2).  Para in Telegraph (11 Jan 1958, Sat ·Page 8).  Several paras in The Daily Telegraph on 4 ambassadors travelling together (16 Oct 1959, Fri ·Page 12) Also mentioned in Liverpool Daily Post (16 Oct 1959, Fri ·Page 6) and para in The Guardian (16 Oct 1959, Fri ·Page 2).  Retirement briefly covered in The Telegraph (23 Mar 1962, Fri ·Page 15).  I think there's enough here.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 20:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Holder of the CMG, always considered to be notable per WP:ANYBIO #1.  Plus meets WP:GNG per Espresso Addict.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Shiawassee District Library : No WP:IS .  No indication it passes WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries , United States of America ,  and Michigan .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep - This Carnegie library article needed a little copy editing today, which it has had.   The Carnegie  libraries are historically and culturally notable to the United States.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article at issue encompasses the historic Owosso Carnegie library.  I have added to the article three examples of SIGCOV on the Carnegie library.  In addition, the libary system as a whole has received additional coverage in more recent times, including here and here .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 14:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 13:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The sourcing used in the article is fine, Carnegie libraries are usually on the NRHP as well, but I haven't checked this particular building.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep WP:HEY achieved.  — siro χ o 20:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
North Beach Bandshell : Significant, independent coverage not found online, and current cited sources are all primary sources.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Entertainment ,  and Florida .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] STRONG Keep Registered and listed on the NRHP.  Full heritage details can be found in the links provided.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Searching this online brought up lots of directory listings of concerts that were being held there, but also lots of discussion about its historical listing.  A specific newspaper search also brought up lots of directory concerts of listings and until I wasn't able to view results anymore.  The coverage I found doesn't count, but I had to sort through enough hits of recent articles, including lists of best concert venues in Miami, to suggest there's plenty of information out there we can use to create a good article on this.  An older newspaper search might help.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
College of Fine Arts (University of Tehran) : Fails WP:NORG .  The U is itself notable, so a merge/redirect there as an WP:ATD is fine.  UtherSRG (talk) 10:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Iran .  UtherSRG (talk) 10:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep [31] and sources therein.  Consider a move to Faculty of Fine Arts (University of Tehran) as seemingly a more common name.  — siro χ o 11:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep had WP:NORG .  This faculty is actually a university campus.  With budget and management independent from the parent university University of Tehran . -- Patricia (Talk) 12:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Gerhard Klingenberg : Single reference provided is from a wiki.  No notable works (regardless of WP:NOTINHERITED anyway).  MIDI ( talk ) 16:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Theatre ,  and Austria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I don't know where you looked.  I looked at the German Wikipedia, and saw solid biographies for sources, and several notable awards.  I don't know what kind of "works" you expect from an actor and stage director.  His prime was well before the internet, so no wonder that there few online reviews.  - I'm willing to expand the article, but won't have time before Monday.  Help welcome.  -- Gerda Arendt ( talk ) 16:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If you think that the sources are good enough to use you could transfer them over to the English Wikipedia article. Procyon117 ( talk ) 16:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Kindly read my comment to the end: yes, but I have no free time until Monday. You can begin. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk ) 17:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep I can’t see how notability is in question at all.  The subject was accorded the highest civil honour by the Austria for services to the republic.  Mccapra ( talk ) 17:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep .  There is significant coverage in highly reliable German sources — Zeit [14] , Süddeutsche Zeitung [15] .  There is article in Der Standard [16] .  As was mentioned, he does have awards, see German wikipage.  There are notable works.  BilboBeggins ( talk ) 18:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : Taking the page about an obviously notable director to Afd the day after his death is wrong.  And Prodding the page about one of his films ( Was wäre, wenn...? ) with no evidence of any basic BEFORE was wrong too (I deproDed it and expanded it).  Nominator, please kindly withdraw.  Just read the obituary in Die Zeit ( https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2024-06/theaterdirektor-regisseur-gerhard-klingenberg ).  Thank you.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep The man was a star in the Deutscher Sprachraum .  Just because we didn't hear much about him in the English-speaking world, that doesn't make him unnotable.  Oh, and by the way, I'll see what I can do to improve the article.  Kelisi ( talk ) 20:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep