hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Zea italica: This is the name of a homeopathic preparation that is maybe prepared from Zea mays (maize/corn), according to this homeopathic vendor , but a homeopathic wiki lists it as being prepared from Setaria italica .  The homeopathic preparation doesn't seem to be notable and it's not clear which plant is used to prepare the homeopathic remedy (if a plant is used at all; this vendor claims to be making homeopathic remedies from a archetype/mathematical model, which is a new one to me, although I suppose that doesn't make much difference in terms of the number of plant derived molecules present in the preparation).  Plantdrew ( talk ) 21:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Organisms .  Plantdrew ( talk ) 21:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails GNG, NSPECIES, and completely lacks references.  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 17:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Except for mention in some homeopathy books, there are no references.  Homeopathy books are not reliable sources.  See Talk:Homeopathy - Q.4.  at the top of the page makes it clear that Wikipedia views homeopathy to be a fringe science per the Wikipedia:Fringe theories guideline.  There have been ArbCom cases on pseudoscience in general and homeopathy in particular that also confirm this. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanghar camel amputation incident: Clearly fails NEVENT!  Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 06:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 06:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Events .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While it's interesting that the incident sparked controversy, the wiki article doesn't say how or why it happened.  I'm not sure an accident with a camel is quite up to our notability standards here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oaktree b , On a personal note, It was quite a sad incident.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Oh, the articles gives more context now...  It is a sad incident, but still not rising to our notability standards here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very much not rising to the level of coverage expected for NEVENT.  Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 19:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oliver Yates: Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 08:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Australia .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 08:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Running unsuccessfully in an election is not a claim to notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only sources that I could find that might prove notability were all from daily mail, which is a deprecated source.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't think violating parliamentary privilege is notable, the rest of his career appears routine.  There's coverage of this person, but I'm not sure what he's done is notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Was ! deleted  1.5 yrs ago as not meeting notability for politicians.  The political violation now described in the article isn't rising to the level of criminal notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete was previously deleted and not seeing much has changed.  Fails WP:NPOL as a political candidate.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, but this article is not making any other meaningful claim of notability that would have gotten him into Wikipedia for other reasons.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marsden Road Public School: This one fails WP:NSCHOOL .  2 of the 3 sources are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aydoh8 ( talk ) 04:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some coverage at https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/how-one-sydney-school-turned-around-its-reading-and-maths-results-20221026-p5bt9k.html , might be somewhat notable for a school actually.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 06:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Liverpool, New South Wales as alternative to deletion .  There's no reason to delete the content.  Deus et lex ( talk ) 05:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all I found was a SMH article, which appears to be already used in the article,  about how the school turned the literacy and numeracy of its students around.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  TarnishedPath talk 10:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Victor Cesar Bota: Page also apparently has a history of WP:UPE .  signed, Rosguill talk 17:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Brazil .  signed, Rosguill talk 17:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Photography .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding any RS to bring this up to notable.  2023 speedy was challenged, but no improvements were made to the page.  No reliable sourcing for DoB or any biographical information.  WP:TOOSOON .  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 21:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not provide sufficient independent, reliable sources to verify his notability, with much of the information coming from self-published or primary sources-- Assirian cat ( talk ) 07:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :Absolutely fails GNG, among several other issues.  Which is probably why it looks like an SPA attempted to make it look legitimate - by adding a bunch of bad references like blogs and other unreliable sources, failed verifications, trivial mentions, or just "Roku.com".  Spagooder ( talk ) 20:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seems to be NPOV/COI issues.  Not much reliable sources found.  Fails GNG .  ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️ ( 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔 ) 02:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't know where to categorise this article but all I can say is that WP:LOTSOFSOURCES doesn't make an article notable.  This article doesn't meet verifiable sources which also meets our guideline for WP:RS .  However there are certain reason why this article may still be notable maybe in the future but not now.  As for WP:ANYBIO , and WP:BASIC , I can't confirm that because almost if not all the sources are unreliable.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  06:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Devanggana Chauhan: Having IMDB as reference, The Print one is ANI PR, 3 Articles in SANGRI TODAY, a Non-RS.  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 09:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Rajasthan .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 09:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Radio , Television ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per the nom, all of the sources are press releases and routine gossip.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Chapakchur (1916): I cannot find a single source for this supposed event that isn't written in Turkish with the expectation of Gawrych, who only dedicates two brief sentences to the event, not even mentioning the result.  Thus, there's no indication this is noteworthy enough for its own article.  As for the other sources, none of them are written by established historians or published by credible publishers.  The only Turkish source in English written by , is an Armenian genocide denier : "The Armenian deportation is a series of events where Armenians in Eastern Anatolia were relocated tot he more peaceful and problem-free Ottoman provinces..." (from the Ataturk's planning of the Turkish revolution source, there is no page number).  - K evo 3 2 7 ( talk ) 07:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Russia ,  and Turkey .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Supposedly a large battle where over 30,000 men died but no mention of it outside of Wikipedia, seems fake to me.  محرر البوق ( talk ) 03:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] - Delete , seems like Turkish propaganda Nafayun ( talk ) 02:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per norm.  Sure is raining with these type of articles these days.  -- HistoryofIran ( talk ) 14:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saydulla Madaminov: Also, notability of the subject is questionable (I am not qualified to assess the quality of all the non-English sources).  Patrick J. Welsh ( talk ) 21:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Military ,  and Uzbekistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : No "inherent" notability, though as the commander of a military branch he is more likely to have coverage in sources than a typical military officer.  Sources likely to be in Uzbek/Russian.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 00:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  This is an extremely weird article.  I have checked the sources in Russian, almost none of them directly reference what is said in the article.  Reference #3 is simply his picture during his study at the Aviation Institute.  #4 Is just the list of all officers awarded a medal, with his name being on the list.  #5 Is completely Irrelevant, its an article on Russian wiki about the rank of colonel.  #7 Is a news article that does reference him, but again, completely irrelevant to the sentence it is referencing.  #8 Is just his name in a list of Inspectors.  The articles only source on him that actually talks about him in depth awas deleted twice because it was from a blog website.  Looks 100% like a paid article F.Alexsandr ( talk ) 00:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Verifiably commander of Uzbekistan's air force, which clearly makes him notable per WP:COMMONSENSE .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  He holds the position of the commander of Uzbekistan's air force, a role that undeniably establishes his notability — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanwarner582 ( talk • contribs ) 07:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  : BLP , fails GNG and NBIO.  Being a colonel who commanded a small military division does not make the subject notable, this is stretching the guideline well past the point a subject can be presumed (and it is well known that ' a presumption is not a guarantee a subject will automatically meets notability). This BLP subject fails any presumtion in the absence of WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. F.Alexsandr did a source review and found nothing, nothing in the Keep votes above has sources, just opinions. AfDs are determined by sourcing and notability. This is a WP:BLP and requires strong sourcing, BLP is policy and overrides any guidelines. BLP policy and lack of SIGCOV from RS mean this needs to be deleted. // Timothy :: talk 08:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kahur Abbas: Hongsy ( talk ) 14:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Reference #1 is the official Census of Iran .  If a town is listed on their spreadsheet for this region (#08 in this case), then it's officially recognized per WP:GEOLAND and therefore notable.  @ Hongsy , is Kahur Abbas listed?  Checking references is part of WP:BEFORE .  Thanks, -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ A. B. - This is an abadi article created by Carlossuarez46.  See particularly this discussion where 13,157 of them were deleted and the ARBCOM case related to this .  Abadi are explicitly excluded from GEOLAND.  FOARP ( talk ) 09:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:V .  Simply put, no source is provided in the article that would allow you to confirm the existence of this "village".  Listing as an abadi in the Iranian census is not evidence of being a populated place since Iranian census takers simply use the names of shops/bridges/pumps/farms/etc.  as the reference points when they take the census - for this reason they are explicitly excluded from GEOLAND.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  FOARP , thanks for letting me straight about abadis and Hongsy , thanks for your work cleaning up this mess.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angela Bogdan: Besides the first Google news hit, the rest of the coverage I found was not in depth.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 19:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations , Maldives , Sri Lanka ,  and Canada .  LibStar ( talk ) 19:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as indicated by LibStar , ambassadors are not inheritably notable - lacks any evidence of notable achievements either in that role or prior to their appointment.  Cited references just confirm the individual's appointment nothing else.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 01:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I couldn't find any notable events in their career as an ambassador, and none are mentioned in the references either.  ADifferentMan ( talk ) 05:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:BIO due to a lack of in-depth coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ethan Willie: JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bahamas .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
De Marchena (Surname): While the surname "De Marchena" exists, most of the info in this article seems very dubious, and the same editor (and others) have been pushing De Marchena's and Van Marchena's left and right, without much if any evidence.  For this article, I can find no evidence that either of the notable members either existed (Francisco de Marchena) or was called "Van Marchena" ( Georg Altner is listed with the surname Van Marchena in the infobox, after an IP added this in late 2022 [11] ).  There is also involvement of User:Freddydemarchena , who added spurious De Marchena's to an article in April 2022 [12] (still present in current article), Draft:Freddy De Marchena (was in mainspace, created by same editor as this surname article, who also edited the Georg Altner article).  The page Marisol (actress) also used to list unverifiable De Marchena's.  All in all, something very fishy, and best to just get rid of this page completely.  Fram ( talk ) 12:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Fram ( talk ) 12:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per nom.  There is no good sourcing here and no indication of meeting WP:GNG .  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 16:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Netherlands and Spain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Found this as Commons CU looking into uploader's socking and hoax nonsense there--see c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by BrennaKaufmann and c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talon Briceington .   This appears more of the same, intended to concoct a false pedigree for Draft:Freddy De Marchena (note, for example, that " Freddy De Marchena " is the same person as the ficticious Lord Mäerzenfeld proffered by sock

Discussion outcome: delete
Social Development Fund of IDP of the Republic of Azerbaijan: There is no reliable sourcing.  The article appears intended to promote the Azerbaijan government.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 13:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources are not reliable.  AasifShrestha ( talk ) 06:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ron Fassler: I could find sources, but not sufficient reliable ones.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Character actor that never rose to prominence, this is about the best I can find, but it's a Forbes contributor piece.  [22] .  Simply being an actor doesn't get you a wikipage.  This appears to be just a longtime actor.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete