hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mohsin Hani Al Bahrani: Sources used are either trivial mentions of the subject or promotional articles.  Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 15:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Oman .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 15:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , another non-notable businessman who became CEO of his family's company, with a hefty PR budget.  No indication of notability for the awards received; any coverage I could find in nominally RS is plainly paid placement/paid contributor stuff.  Draft:Mohsin Hani Al Bahrani has an interesting edit history.  SPA creator had it undeleted a day after its soft deletion in the first AFD.  They added two more paid placement references, and left it for three days, so it was moved to draft.  Cue more IPs from India piling in direct and via proxy to REFBOMB it with more junk references.  A month later, creator tagged it db-author, and it was deleted again, even though a second account and several IPs had made heavy contributions.  resubmitted, and it was declined.  Creator then tries their luck with Mohsin Al-Bahrani and Mohsin Al Bahrani , both speedied G11.  Fast-forward a year, and draft undeleted again.  Paid placement junk gets stripped out by Kuru [10] .  Some months go by, and the junk references are all added right back, and the draft is resubmitted.  And declined.  A parallel effort at Draft:Mohsin Hani Al-Bahrani is first speedied G3 as a hoax, creator

Discussion outcome: delete
Vikasa Vidya Vanam: UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , India ,  and Kerala .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Andhra Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Easily fails WP:GNG .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Found nothing other than trivial mentions.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Slutwave: Not enough reliable, significant coverage.  Most sources are just blogs or tabloid articles.  Pabsoluterince ( talk ) 11:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Music .  Pabsoluterince ( talk ) 11:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for failing the GNG.  It's also a WP:BLP problem to list off artists when the article openly states it's a pejorative, and the sourcing is concurrently so weak.  Sergecross73 msg me 13:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source 2 in the article itself is a post-graduate research paper, neither 'blog nor tabloid.   And doi : 10.5209/INFE.54975 that discusses this is a peer-reviewed journal article.  Uncle G ( talk ) 20:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Dear God, no.  You'd be slapped if you told an artist they were in this genre and nearly all the links are to users who made public playlists under the name (and in regards to #2, Academia.edu is a pay-for-play site).  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   I can find a couple of possibly usable sources which mention slutwave (e.g. [2] , [3] ), but no in depth coverage.   Of the sources cited in the article, this is an opinion piece which might be usable under WP:RSOPINION , while this is apparently self-published by a student; I can find no evidence of publication by a reliable source.   Given the inevitable BLP concerns around this article mentioned by Sergecross we should expect much better sourcing than this; the claim to notability here is tenuous at best.  Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk ) 11:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , WINAD Mach61 ( talk ) 14:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William H. Nelson: Subject does not appear to be notable enough for a standalone article.  Fails WP:GNG .  CycloneYoris talk!  08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Medicine .  CycloneYoris talk!  08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California , New York ,  and Utah .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is most likely a promotional resume (ex: "Were he keeping score, he says, his career has had more high points than lows. He's received prestigious awards and Intermountain has been honored a number of times as an example of a well-run health-care system").  None of the 3 refs are notability-lending and even if they were the tone merits a WP:TNT -delete anyway.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Modern City Montessori Intermediate College: Only a wikimap source provided.  No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 04:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I can't find any independent third party coverage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qcne ( talk • contribs ) 19:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reliable sources about the subject.  Enervation ( talk ) 07:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hong Kum-song: Simione001 ( talk ) 04:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:03, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of people considered father or mother of a field in India: Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk ) 14:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Most of this chart is unsourced, rest is only passing mentions elsewhere.  I'd ! keep if we had sourcing for the majority of it; as it is, we have 5 references for a list that is easily double or triple that number.  Could very well be hokum, with no sourcing, we can't prove or disprove anything.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete limited refs, this feels more like a school project than a page deserving of a full article Yoblyblob ( talk ) 17:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Uttara Mhatre Kher: No evidence of Notability, Fails WP:GNG .  Accesscrawl ( talk ) 02:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and India .  Accesscrawl ( talk ) 02:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Wikipedia:SingleEvent - A 3-sentence article, with no substance.  Two of the sentences are not sourced.  She was a contestant at the 1982 Miss World pageant, but did not win.  She married and had children.  Her sister-in-law is an actress.  — Maile ( talk ) 16:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
FTP Commander: The article does not meet Wikipedia notability .  日期20220626 ( talk ) 22:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Advertising blurbs from the software company still exist all of these years later, but there's pretty much zero independent documentation that isn't just a directory listing with a company URL in a list of "Here's where you can get FTP clients."  I thought that I had found a book with a non-directory treatment, but upon reaading it turned out to be 2 sentences: It's like other FTP clients; and it's for Windows.   So I'm not finding in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources, either.  Deleted edits here and at InternetSoft Corporation lead me to think that there was probably a conflict of interest in this article's creation, too, disguised by picking a new username in 2007 and trying again.  Uncle G ( talk ) 05:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  A search revealed the sources discussed by the nominator, enough for a merge if there was a suitable target, but as it stands there does not seem to be an WP:ATD .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 16:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Duliajan Girls' College: Saurabh Saha 01:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Assam .  Saurabh Saha 01:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL , lacking in WP:SIGCOV .  — Prodraxis { talk • contributions } (she/her) 03:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, not seeing any supporting references.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 10:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sankar (writer & director): Not received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Authors , Film , India ,  and Kerala .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Previous AFD so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.   Not the best article title to assist in source searches as results are for other people, but adding the full name yielded nothing new except some unreliable user-editable sites.  - 2pou ( talk ) 16:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Is this the same person [70] ?  Could perhaps be at AUTHOR with a few more reviews.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not the same person.  Author of that book has a career spanning seven decades according to the review, and this subject is only 42.  Additionally, that book would need at least another review to be notable itself (entirely possible), but then another separate work of his would then need to have multiple reviews of their own in order to have a “body” of work to meet AUTHOR.  - 2pou ( talk ) 16:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We could use a few more concrete opinions here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on the explanation to my prior comment; I find nothing about this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Basketball at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games – Qualification: Contested drafting and redirect, so no other choice but to bring it here.  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Basketball , Caribbean , Bahamas , Costa Rica , Cuba , Dominican Republic , El Salvador , Guatemala , Mexico , Panama ,  and Puerto Rico .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - as with all of the other ones deleted recently, seems to lack significant coverage in independent WP:RS .  For what it's worth, I think Archery at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games – Qualification has similar issues too, despite having more citations, the entire thing is an ianseo.net stats mirror.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badminton at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games – Qualification .  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 10:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete just a results listing not covered in independent sources.  LibStar ( talk ) 07:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It is not possible to select 2 sports out of a bunch of sports and iscuss only these 2, whilst the others are kept.  Florentyna ( talk ) 14:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFF .  Also you have not demonstrated how this topic meets a notability guideline.  LibStar ( talk ) 15:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Theosophical Society of New York: Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 04:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have removed the article from both DELSORT lists.  It's not fiction.  Jclemens ( talk ) 07:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Toughpigs ( talk ) 05:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I could find [ source ] that briefly mentions the society, but that about it.  It doesn't seem to be notable.  Cortador ( talk ) 09:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED - NN breakaway group of a notable spiritual organization.  Bearian ( talk ) 21:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Erento: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 13 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] User:Sawerchessread , that someone was me, and you could have told me. I don't know why we are here, and you didn't give a deletion rationale.  You also didn't give any actual reason for removing the PROD--this is just an extra layer of work.  Delete : not a notable outfit.  Likely COI/UPE creation with promotional contributions.  In the past it's had some sourcing, but if you look carefully those are really press releases in things that aren't independent publications.  My PROD rationale said "Pretty obvious COI creation. Lack of secondary sources, no credible claims of notability, really just product placement", and I stand by that.  Drmies ( talk ) 20:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] apologies.  did not know the protocol.  User:Sawerchessread ( talk ) 20:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't think it can meet current standards wrt.  NCORP.  Other issues mentioned by Drmies are also persuasive.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 08:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  NN.  Desertarun ( talk ) 18:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jenny Preece (squash player): Searching under "Jennifer Preece" I only found coverage that confirms she competed in a few regional games.  A relatively low world ranking of 176.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and South Africa .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 02:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - More importantly, fails WP:GNG .  There aren't multiple independent reliable sources about her to establish notability.  SoniaSotomayorFan ( talk ) 19:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rakeem Joseph: JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete