hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Makhdoom Shahabuddin (journalist) : While the subject has garnered some press coverage, but it's too common for journalists to get some sort of press attention on every one of them .  To me, this one doesn't appear to meet the criteria outlined in WP:JOURNALIST as well WP:GNG.  A SPA MeriAwazSuno ( talk · contribs ), possibly the subject themselves, has persistently attempted to create AUTOBIO initially at Draft:Makhdoom Shahab-ud-Din , followed by another SPA Bidisufwet ( talk · contribs ) (potentially a sock puppet) successfully creating the BLP later.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 12:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 12:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Turtletennisfogwheat ( talk ) 12:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No significant body of work.  samee converse 02:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG Wikibear47 ( talk ) 00:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Delhi schools bomb threats : Shellwood ( talk ) 17:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 17:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Schools .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; no prejudice against recreation in the very off chance this gets sustained coverage.  Queen of Hearts ( talk ) 17:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:NOTNEWS .  Wikipedia is not a newspaper.  At this point, it's hard to believe there'd be any secondary sources at all.  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 20:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Crystal Garrett : Let'srun ( talk ) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and South Carolina .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found for this person, there's a reporter in Canada with a similar name.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MD Vijay : Sources reveal nothing about the individual.  The creation seems to be a part of a series of additions by the User: Sajantext to promote a single, low-key movie.  Neutral Fan ( talk ) 15:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Food production company CEO with a similar name, no coverage found for this individual.  Sourcing used in the article isn't in RS or trivial coverage Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP :Soon will wait untill do some more film.  Monhiroe ( talk ) 15:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not a notable till now Worldiswide ( talk ) 09:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :The subject of article is not meet to WP:GNG & WP:NBIO .  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 13:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bryan van Putten : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I doubt if winning the 'Grote Prijs van Zuid-Holland' would automatically make someone notable.  The subject did not win the prize.  An opening act for someone with an article does not fly per NOTINHERETED.  Furthermore, 'such as' in these autobiographic entries is never a random name but the most famous name in a list.  This immediately makes an article PEACOCK.  Better use 'including' as no randomness is implied! gidonb ( talk ) 17:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yilianny Sablón : All I found were passing mentions like this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
St. James Armenian Church : A BEFORE search finds nothing but run-of-the-mill local coverage of the church, and it's not a registered historic building.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 22:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Religion , Armenia ,  and Massachusetts .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 22:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and improve - I think with a bit of time and dedication the article can be improved and expanded.  A simple google search yielded 184,000 results.  For an almost 100 year old church, they still seem to be quite active on their website and social platforms and they appear to engage with the wider community through planning various events.  Archives908 ( talk ) 13:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is about a "church located in Watertown, Massachusetts" but a search shows that there are churches of this name/denomination throughout the US.  Were there an article on the denomination (with appropriate sources) this might stand, but I don't see anything that would make this one location on its own worthy of an article.  Lamona ( talk ) 22:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Ref WP:NCHURCH , I don't see that WP:GNG is met (per WP:AUD , local coverage is generally insufficient to establish notability, and announcements of events at the church are both trivial and fail INDEPENDENT).  Mentioned at Watertown, Massachusetts -- the city is quite an Armenian hub -- but given that the name is hardly unique, redirection is not a suitable outcome (and if it were to be kept it should move as it really doesn't meet WP:PRIMARYTOPIC ).  In theory could be turned into a DAB, but that's running up against WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Briefest coverage of St James and St Stephens and any other Armenian churches at Watertown, Massachusetts#Armenian population is probably ok.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 04:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of UEFA Europa League broadcasters : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Contextes are there to claim 'channel x' brought out the right to coverages in 'country x', not to assert notability.  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Europe .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, Not a TV guide. Govvy ( talk ) 21:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Additional information has been added that may help determine notability.-- Claudio Fernag ( talk ) 05:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Worthy in an article itself but we don't need a broadcasting list so you can watch in whoever country. SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 06:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jason Drummond : The specific issues are as follows: Single-Purpose Accounts: The page's creation and most of its edits are attributed to two users, User:NoSelfPromotion and User:Jason7477 .  These accounts appear to be single-purpose, dedicated solely to this article, suggesting a potential conflict of interest.  Potential Autobiography: The username User:Jason7477 closely resembles the subject of the article, Jason Drummond, implying that the subject may have contributed to their own biography, in violation of Wikipedia's autobiography and neutrality guidelines.  Long-Standing Tags for Multiple Issues: The article has carried tags for 'multiple issues,' including neutrality disputes, for nearly four years, indicating persistent, unresolved concerns about its compliance with Wikipedia's quality standards.  Content Resembling a Resume: The article's tone and structure more closely resemble a resume than an encyclopedic entry, which is inappropriate and promotional in nature.  Overreliance on Primary Sources: The article relies heavily on primary sources, contrary to Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sourcing , especially concerning biographies of living persons, thereby raising doubts about the content's verifiability and neutrality.  Given the long-standing nature of these issues, the patterns of single-purpose editing, and the article's overall tone and sourcing, and resume-nature, it appears that this page functions more as a vehicle for self-promotion than as a neutral, verifiable, and encyclopedically valuable piece.  I therefore propose this page for deletion in line with Wikipedia's deletion policies.  Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  These issues can be fixed, but it would take substantial amounts of editing.  Blow it up and start over .  User Memer ( chat ) Tribs 14:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  per UserMemer.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 16:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I am not seeing proper sources.  Many are stock share details.  even if kept it needs a complete overhaul.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 00:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emily Roughan : Only primary sources provided.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:34, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and New Zealand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep there are some article about her like 2011 Stuff-article during her early years , 2021 Daily-Sun-article about her and her partner and 2023 NZ-Times-article described her as the captain at the 2023 World Championships .  Articles not counting I think (too short and somehow related to the subject) are the many of announcement- and results-articles with some paragraphs about her like NAU Athletics and New Zealand athletics .  Note that her best result: 10th-place at the 2023 World Championships is not included in the article.  109.37.152.36 ( talk ) 10:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Thank you 109.37.152.36 for finding the 2011 Stuff article (the first link above), I think this is a good reference to support notability.  But it doesn't seem enough on its own, so does anyone have more examples of in-depth coverage?  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Twice represented New Zealand at the IAAF World Cross Country Championships (highest level of the sport of cross country) and captained the national women's team.  SFB 17:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Representing at the "highest" level is not a criterion for WP:NTRACK .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment 3 of the 4 sources are primary.  The other one is a small mention of Roughan.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . The Stuff article is a high school interview (fails YOUNGATH) conducted by a journalism student (not RS) N .  All the other sources are passing mentions.  The Daily Sun article literally just says, 3/4 of the way into the text, "So Baxter, his wife, Emily Roughan, and Miles booked tickets."  That's the only time she is mentioned other than once in a followup quote by Baxter.  That is patently not an article about her and her partner N .  The times.co.nz article has 1.5 sentences mentioning her N .  Does not meet GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 23:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simha Bhagavathula : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  2001:4455:636:D900:94A8:7FBB:249D:9ECA ( talk ) 12:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jong Kum-song : Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete – With only database sources listed, this article is absolutely unacceptable!  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article seems a little light on sources we can trust, relying just on databases might not be enough.  Waqar 💬 17:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edwin Soenarto : A web search finds no WP:SIGCOV .  The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 12:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Netherlands .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG ; I could only find routine coverage including match reports and transfer announcements.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anshul Garg : His entire article centers around his associations with Tony Kakkar and Neha Kakkar , rather than highlighting any significant achievements or contributions he has made independently.  Also, the references are about Tony Kakkar and Neha Kakkar.  Fails WP:ARTIST .  Charlie ( talk ) 12:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Entertainment ,  and India .  Owen× ☎ 13:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Agha Iqrar Haroon : Also see Dispatch News Desk .  Saqib ( talk · contribs ) 10:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Saqib ( talk · contribs ) 10:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Journalism .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Don't see why this subject is listed under academics and educators.  Does not satisty WP:NPROF .  Qflib ( talk ) 17:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I imagine the listing is because the article asserts that the subject's accomplishments include research and teaching.  Searching Google Scholar did find a small number of publications under author:ai-haroon, but nothing that would pass WP:PROF .  I think we are going to have to look for notability other than through academic accomplishments; I agree he does not pass PROF. That said, I have not yet formulated an opinion on the subject's overall notability.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A wonderful author but didn't meet WP:NAUTHOR .  The LEDs said he is a political analyst while it doesn't meet WP:NCREATIVE .  Another called "him" a journalist—while I was looking per WP:BEFORE to see any coverage that is historic or passes WP:SIGCOV but to no avail, failing WP:NJOURNALIST .  The article about a person just a run of the mill case.  The sources doesn't say WP:SIGCOV and made-up like; the wholly sounds WP:UPE , where I can find much PROMO!   All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 12:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] From the nominator's reason here at the first AFD , it can be possibly recreation of deleted material though was a weak delete.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 12:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete