hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Douglas Tuman: Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Politics ,  and United States of America .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Libertarianism ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, seems promotional and sources do not seem enough to support the article.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 01:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not notable.  Also, related article Monero Talk is currently being AfD'ed too, some relevant discussion is there.  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 11:33, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The related article's Monero Talk AfD just concluded as delete .  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 21:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable in the absence of a properly demonstrated and properly sourced WP:GNG pass for it, but the article is based almost entirely on primary sources that are not support for notability, with virtually no evidence of GNG-building coverage shown at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in New York#District 4 , as we do with such failed political candidates.  A source search did not find anything beyond run-of-the-mill election coverage which is typical of these races.  Since the article is so promotional, delete-and-redirect is preferable than just WP:BLAR .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 08:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not seeing enough RS referencing to establish notability.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found only trivial mentions and quotes in the media.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 15:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bart Defoort: Fails WP:GNG; WP:MUSICBIO.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Belgium .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:44, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability.  Fails to meet criteria of WP:GNG .  Not enough sources to confirm intrinsic value of an article.  I, basically, agree with @ Alexandermcnabb .  ContributorMix ( talk ) 20:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yannik Pisanne: I cannot find this professor through internet search.  TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 02:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and France .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  His name appears to be misspelled: sources give it as "Yannick", not "Yannik".  That could explain the difficulty finding sources.  In case this ends up being kept, this should be fixed.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 19:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The creator of the article supplied me with a source here .  Does it constitute as RS and sigcov?  An extra set of eyes would be helpful.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 17:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I personally think this source alone does not amount to WP:NACADEMIC . I am sharing my communications with the creator of the article, @ Notrecercle , on the deletion of this article. See User talk:Notrecercle#Deletion discussion about Yannik Pisanne . -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 17:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The source describes him as a secondary school teacher and a writer of historical novels.  That is definitely not what WP:ACADEMIC is for and he does not pass.  He should also not be described as a "professor", as that word means something different and more specific in English than it does in French.  To me it seems the only hope of notability would be to find enough published reviews of his books to pass WP:AUTHOR .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 20:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet any of the criteria of WP:NACADEMIC and WP:BASIC .  I couldn't find any coverage beyond the already-mentioned RS Ouest France , which is likely also problematic on independence grounds per WP:INTERVIEW .  Actualitté only offers a brief passage from the book, but does not constitute a review.  Pilaz ( talk ) 14:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
EMML (Motorola): Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 12:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable technology.  Jfire ( talk ) 05:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet notability requirements StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 19:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Bunn: Essentially an article uncited since 2006 – Aza24 (talk) 19:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians .  Aza24 (talk) 19:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found and added one footnote to the article ( [13] ), and I expect there is more coverage like this, but I haven't found anything better.  I don't think any amount of coverage like what I just found would really be enough for notability, so, delete from me.  If anyone else finds something actually substantial, do ping me.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 22:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . I looked and came up with no reliable sources to add. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 02:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Heena: Annwfwn ( talk ) 23:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support searching for 'heena dog' brings up more results for 'henna' and 'hina' and the first non-Wikipedia 'heena' result is a completely different dog.  https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/virat-darmi-and-heena-awarded-army-chief-commendation/article38283178.ece Traumnovelle ( talk ) 09:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Article needs improvement, like you know, actual citing, but there is decent coverage from 2005, 2014 and 2018.  [30] [31] [32] [33] .  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 11:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Trying again, these [34] [35] are relevant to this article, doesn't reach GNG IMO.  Also had a hit on ProQuest for Heena police dog Ghatkopar , but can only see abstract.  Usable non-English sources may exist.  The 2018-retired Heena may be notable.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 12:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 11:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The is coverage as the editor above mentioned.The article needs to be improved.  We Are All Here talk 11:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ We are all here Whoops, my 2014 and 2018 sources are clearly not about the same dog.  Sorry!  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 12:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The article now cites one (1!) source on it (wow!) and actually links the incident which Heena was involved in.  However, regardless of how much of a good girl Heena may have been - Heena ultimately falls foul of WP:BLP1E , so, unfortunately, Heena's article may need to go to live in a server farm upstate.  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 23:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sorry Heena!  WP:BLP1E .  Password (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
McCaleb Burnett: Non-notable subject.  No notable information since previous deletion 15 years ago.  Update: A lot of work was done on this page by Geniustechwizard4556 , a sockpuppet of MetaWiz4331 , who appears to have a notorious history of creating pages for non-notable actors.  AdyFieldston ( talk ) 18:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: I created this nomination page after the original nominator had edited the previous, closed AFD to renominate.  I have so far expressed no opinion on the nomination.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 19:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Besides social media links and confirmation of films he was in, the best I can find are Rotten Tomatoes and Shutterstock pages.  Deleted in 2007, still appears non-notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:NACTOR .  This nomination was created by an WP:SPA , which I find a little suspicious.  Novemberjazz 21:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This keep vote comes from the creator of the article, who has had numerous articles flagged for non-notability, which I find a little suspicious.  WP:NACTOR doesn't seem to apply as the article subject does not have "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" or "unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment."  AdyFieldston ( talk ) 21:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: more input from established, unconnected editors would be helpful Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Not notable.  The three sources used on the page seem to be the only RS on the internet to mention his name, and even they only summarily mention him as being in the film the article talks about.  WP:NACTOR calls for "significant roles in multiple notable" productions.  Burnett's roles in major films/shows have to date been very minor ones, and his major roles have been in decidedly non-notable productions.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 19:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with Tserton; the sourcing is not impressive.  Doesn't pass the GNG or NACTOR.  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 04:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahmoud Al Malloul: The Syria News article cited is a trivial mention.  Arabic searches bring up a lot of hits about similarly named footballers like Ali Maâloul .  The only relevant hits that I can find are Al Rai and Al Jazeera .  These are more trivial mentions.  No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 18:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Child.ua: DreamlarT ( talk ) 12:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JD Doyle: An overabundance of non- WP:IS leads me to lean on the NN side.  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Radio , United States of America ,  and Texas .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This leans far too heavily on primary sources that are not support for notability, and shows nowhere close to enough reliable source coverage about him and his work to get him over WP:GNG for it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete Completely agree.  Somehow this article has escaped scrutiny since the maintenance banner was placed questioning notability.  This is an easy call.  Delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 10:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alex (2025 film): Moved to draft three times, where it was correctly declined once as failing WP:NFILM .  My speedy A7 was declined in favour of a third move back to draft, but article creator moved it back to main space minutes later, so here we are.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Australia .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Also keeps removing COI templates despite doing nothing to actually resolve it, although seems like they've stopped for now.  Sadustu Tau ( talk ) 10:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Self-promotional and non-notable.  Creator has already been blocked.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 01:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NFILM .  The 2 YouTube sources are hardly reliable.  LibStar ( talk ) 19:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aycha Sawa: Does not pass WP:NPOL , and a WP:BEFORE search only returned routine coverage from local news.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 02:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women ,  and Wisconsin .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 02:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft keep: Normally, I'd probably lean delete, but she's the first woman elected to a city office in a major American city so I think I'd soft keep this.   The article needs some improvement though and is on the line for me.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 19:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable politician, being the first minority in a position is an interesting piece of historical trivia, but you can't hang a hat on just that.  If this person does significant things in the future, come back and make an article, and that can still have its place in the lede.  Til then, the coverage is either local in scope or routine X-runs-against-Y political coverage.  Zaathras ( talk ) 14:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Note, off-wiki canvassing.  - here .  Zaathras ( talk ) 14:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
COAS meeting with Ulema: delete as this clearly fails WP:NEVENTS — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , Politics ,  and Islam .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is obviously the kind of thing that belongs at Asim_Munir#Chief_of_Army_Staff_(2022-present) , not in a standalone article.  Selective merge in a relevant manner.  Reywas92 Talk 17:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zubin Dowlaty: No WP:SIGCOV .  Uhooep ( talk ) 12:14, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just noting for the record that this page was "moved" by Rusty Soto from the draft space via copy/paste ( diff ).  While I have no opinion on the page itself (as I have not looked back) re-draftification may be more appropriate given the unilateral non-AFC manner in which this was moved to the Article space.  Primefac ( talk ) 13:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there's no WP:GNG coverage of him, and it's written promotionally.  No problems if anyone wants to move it back to draftspace if they think they can do better.  SportingFlyer T · C 15:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: 3rd and final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see full articles about him.  Some of the citations are books that he wrote and others primary.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 19:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Alter: There’s not enough sources that are independent, reliable and significantly covers the subject to warrant a standalone entry.  Sources are mostly WP:ROUTINE coverages, statistical or PRs.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all sources cited are routine coverage.  Doesn't seem like he's done anything that would warrant a page.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 02:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sources here are routine accounts of council meetings.  The one source I found that is substantially about him is pretty negative .  I see no notabiity.  Lamona ( talk ) 05:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete