hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Timothy O. Johnson : No RS coverage presented nor found with WP:BEFORE.  Fails WP:GNG.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople , Film ,  and United States of America .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak redirect to Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman , where he gets a brief mention and should perhaps get a little more.  Otherwise probably delete.  I note that he often is referred to by the supremely un-Googleable name "Tim Johnson", so there could be sources out there but the material in the article is not promising.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 22:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Turin factory occupation of 1920 : I tried looking for other sources, but only managed to find a couple through Google Scholar; [3] these only reference it in passing, without much detail, as part of broader sections on the Biennio Rosso .  As this article doesn't appear to meet our notability guidelines , I propose redirecting it to our article on the Biennio Rosso, where sourced information about it already exists.  There's nothing in this worth merging.  Grnrchst ( talk ) 20:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Italy .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 20:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment you don’t need an AfD discussion for a redirect.  Just go ahead.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect seems fine and uncontroversial.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 23:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Siberya (song) : Patriotic and ethnic songs of this kind usually require from what I've seen some academic coverage.  But both sources here are YouTube links.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 13:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Romania .  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 13:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Siberia (disambiguation) : As the redirect that was previously there.  BangJan1999 19:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect because the current article relies entirely on self-published sources.  Partofthemachine ( talk ) 20:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pierre Esber : Propose redirect to List of mayors and lord mayors of Parramatta .  J2m5 ( talk ) 08:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  J2m5 ( talk ) 08:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of mayors and lord mayors of Parramatta .  Djflem ( talk ) 08:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Roderick Gemmell : Fails WP:BASIC as lacking "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject".  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , United Kingdom ,  and Bahamas .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of high commissioners of the United Kingdom to the Bahamas .  Fails BASIC, only shows up in primary sources and directories, no significant coverage of the subject.  Pilaz ( talk ) 23:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO .  Not one gnews hit which is highly unusual for an ambassador.  1 line mentions in google books.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect; to List of high commissioners of the United Kingdom to the Bahamas , I couldn't find sufficient in-depth sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 17:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Don't Make a Beggar of Me : JMWt ( talk ) 14:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - As a song from 1953, online sources are slim but it does have a song-specific review at AllMusic (already cited) which is unusual.  A Google Books search reveals that Sinatra biographers have discussed this song often, which is noteworthy for a guy who recorded several hundred songs .  This one is discussed in biographies as either emblematic of tough times that Sinatra was going through that year, or as a distinct example of his work with various collaborators of the period.  These matters are discussed in the books Sinatra!  The Song Is You: A Singer's Art, September in the Rain: The Life of Nelson Riddle, Frank Sinatra: An Extraordinary Life, Frank: The Voice, Sessions with Sinatra: Frank Sinatra and the Art of Recording .  With all that being said, I will admit that the article is unlikely to be much more than a stub, even with expansion from those book sources.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My opinion - fwiw - is that we can't really take bios as strong indications of the notability of works of the person under discussion.  It wouldn't be surprising if a book of this type mentioned say 50+ of the songs they'd written, and I'm not sure that means all 50 are then notable enough to have a WP page.  Again just my opinion.  JMWt ( talk ) 15:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 21:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The song is mentioned in several discographies for Sinatra, this is about the most review-ish one I could find [13] .  I can't see that it charted, so it may not have had much critical attention.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge might be a better fit if we merge it to the Sinatra article, seems to be an early song with some discussions about it in books, but not really enough for it's own article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If merging, consider the results.  His biography and life story would be sidetracked by an incongruously detailed discussion of this one song, which could raise an issue with WP:UNDUE .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Choice Lab : Also not addressed was the fact that the entire article was a copy-and-paste of the official media release, which makes this self-promotion.  In 10 years the article has gotten no content edits or inbound links, so it's still that official release word-for-word.  The Choice Lab seems to have largely rebranded as something else but I still can't find any real sources actually about it.  Details like who founded it and who the members are, what its funding is and who provides that funding, where it's specifically located - the core of an encyclopedia article on this topic would be - it just doesn't seem to exist in reliable sources.  Combined with a decade and no real encyclopedia editing occurring on the article makes me think this just isn't an encyclopedia topic.  Perhaps it should redirect to Norwegian School of Economics but I didn't want to do that unilaterally.  Here2rewrite ( talk ) 12:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 16:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and Social science .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect as proposed.  I agree with your analysis.  Ruud Buitelaar ( talk ) 01:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .   Searches reveal little or no secondary coverage that suggest this lab is notable.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 13:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jeimy Prudencio : The subject has made at least three appearances for the El Salvador women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and El Salvador .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Can't find any independent in-depth sources either.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 05:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : It looks WP:TOOSOON for a stand alone BLP article.  I wish her success and notability in the future.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 05:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' as above.  Giant Snowman 15:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Shehryar Shehzadi : All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Syed_Ahmed_Kamran : director - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Same rationale for almost every nomination.  I am doubting WP:Before is done or not as received some coverage [23] and mention [24] .  The series broadcasted in 2012 is likely notable considering these sources as most of the Pakistani newspapers remove that much old coverage.  I am doubting why a series broadcasted in 2012 need nomination discussion after more than a decade.  Libraa2019 ( talk ) But this coverage by Dawn and this coverage by Daily Pakistan s merely WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS and are insufficient for WP:GNG.  --— Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 20:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mark Adrianatos : Cricketer BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Western Province representative cricketers Looks to fail WP:GNG .  Suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Career mode : My BEFORE in scholarly shows mentions in passing, but nothing dedicated to this.  Not sure if WP:SIGCOV can be met; the current sources focus on this term within one game.  OR is present as the alternative names are for example just examples; ditto for the poorly formatted list of examples.  This might warrant WP:TNT or redirecting for now - it should be written from scratch with reliable, scholarly sources, if it is possible.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Sports .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to glossary of video game terms .  I agree with much of the nomination, and this target is a common location for these under-sourced, under-developed video games terms.  Sergecross73 msg me 03:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Campaign (gaming) of which this is essentially an overlap in every way.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 08:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to glossary of video game terms per nom.  Campaign (gaming) has a host of content issues, chiefly that it too is being used as a glossary term.  czar 04:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, I'm not really certain "campaign (gaming)" would survive an AFD or merge discussion either...  Sergecross73 msg me 19:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to glossary of video game terms as a WP:ATD .  It lacks the coverage to substantiate notability.  The article needs a WP:TNT approach as suggested by the nominator.  I do think there is potential to reforge something.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 05:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Sports video game#Game design ; this article lacks the overview-level sourcing required for a stand-alone page but it's essentially being discussed in the context of sports video games, it fits in nicely with the target section where such information is lacking, and the target section has been tagged since February 2009 as needing expansion.  Left guide ( talk ) 11:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Roderick Lampe : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from independent sources, thus failing WP:GNG .  Passing mentions like this seem to indicate he's a youth coach in Aruba.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ JTtheOG : Could you not have WP:BLAR 'd it, and then taken it to AfD if someone objected, or is there something I'm missing?  This also applies to all of the other Aruban footballers that you've nominated recently.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 10:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] JML1148 I suppose I could have.  I don't feel comfortable doing that without AfD though, no matter how likely to fail GNG they might be.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Football articles don't seem to be easily redirected or PROD'd right now, some editors revert on sight.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 16:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with both of the above.  BLAR and PROD can both be reverted without even providing evidence of notability.  At least an AfD encourages people to provide at least some evidence of notability if they oppose deletion or redirecting.  I'd only ask that we don't send too many to AfD in one go, though.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Aruba international footballers per nom.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 08:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Innkeeper's Collection : AusLondonder ( talk ) 12:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 12:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete per nom, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Wish I had checked for sources before wasting my time moving the article/updating logo but hey ho.  Fails GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 15:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Davey2010 ( talk · contribs ), would you support a redirect to Mitchells & Butlers#Acquisitions per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion ?  Cunard ( talk ) 01:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Of course, I don't see why this can't be redirected and redirecting as you say preserves the content in case it ever becomes notable in the future.  Redirect per Cunard below.  – Davey 2010 Talk 07:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for supporting a redirect!  Cunard ( talk ) 07:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mitchells & Butlers#Acquisitions , the company that owns the brand, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 01:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Willowbrook station (SkyTrain) : Joeyconnick ( talk ) 17:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages based on the discussion and close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langley City Centre station : Bakerview–166 Street station ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Fleetwood station (SkyTrain) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) 152 Street station ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Green Timbers station ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Hillcrest–184 Street station ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Clayton station (SkyTrain) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) — Joeyconnick ( talk ) 17:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge all to the article about the line per the arguments at the linked discussion.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 12:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect all per nom.  Nothing much to merge.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 23:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect