hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Alan Guedes: Being the mayor of a certain city that is most populous in a state shouldn’t inherently make them notable as there are no sources to establish GNG.  Sources are either WP:ROUTINE or WP:RUNOFTHEMILL which do not count towards GNG.  Just like other articles on mayors that I have nominated in the past, just saying one is a mayor doesn’t count, aside that, they should at least pass the three basic criteria for GNG.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 07:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Brazil .  Owen× ☎ 07:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Based on my check, these sources can’t establish notability due to a lack of in-depth coverage, failing WP:GNG .  Additionally, he fails WP:NPOL .  I agree with the nominator, who said, “Being the mayor of a certain city that is the most populous in a state shouldn’t inherently make them notable.”  Grab Up - Talk 08:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WGBI-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Maine .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 13:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" in this topic area in 2008.  The only known programming is national services (it was a TBN-owned repeater in its first decade, and was later sold to become a Retro TV affiliate); the only present source is about the former WGBI stations in Scranton, Pennsylvania, not the Maine-based article subject.  I suspect significant coverage is unlikely to have ever existed with this one.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William van Wyk: Purely trivial mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Garsha Rezaei: Cannot locate anything significant in a WP:BEFORE search and the references on the page are basically directory listings for his songs.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Iran .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was going to move this back to draft space, since Maryahamdon unwisely moved this into main space, but hey, this is also a way to handle it.  Note: an article on this person was created before, by User:Wmozart1 , a blocked sock; I looked at the deleted edits and they're different enough from this one.  Drmies ( talk ) 21:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I considered the same initially but seeing that it was already declined at AfC prior to the move, thought it best to let it be decided at AfD.  Cheers! -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 23:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Almost none of the sources are deemed reliable, and no significant coverage can be found in them, per WP:GNG . Fails WP:SINGER as well. -- Arian ( talk ) 18:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jeremy Bieber: In a WP:BEFORE search, all I can find is tabloid gossip about what he might have posted to social media etc, and always in connection with his notable son, with no independent coverage whatsoever.  Doesn't pass WP:MMANOT for his MMA career, or WP:NFILMMAKER for his filmmaking.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:58, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Canada .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:58, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 09:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 09:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is about the level of coverage found [29] , does not pass notability for criminals.  He apparently dropped his baby and all sorts of other things that don't sound very nice, none of which help prove notability here, other than perhaps getting a brief mention in Justin's article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing has changed since the last deletion discussion nine years ago for this subject to fulfill any of Wikipedia's notability criteria.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 18:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notability is not inherited WP:NOTINHERITED .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 18:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Liberty Bowl broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here?  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; besides a YouTube and a dead link, one is a WP:PRIMARY of one of the teams, one needs a Flash reader and thus inactive.  Of the news scans, one is about the game itself, one is an announcment and one redirects to the home page.  None of these are doing anything at all to help assert notability of lists like this.  All the others are unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per above nom.  I see no encyclopedic value or reason for this list.  Also, the editor who created it is now a blocked sock.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply due to failing WP:LISTN .  WP:NOTTVGUIDE —"An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc."—does not apply here, as the article in question is neither an article on a broadcaster nor does it list upcoming or current content.  Dmoore5556 ( talk ) 15:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:ROUTINE mentions that create a WP:TRIVIA list that doesn't meet WP:LISTN .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eurovision Choir 2023: Article cited solely to Eurovoix the Eurovision news site, and Twitter.  Not currently widely taked about in reliable independent sources, possibly WP:TOOSOON or maybe not even notable enough for its own article and needs redirecting to Eurovision Choir ?  Sionk ( talk ) 20:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Events , Belgium , Latvia , Lithuania , Slovenia ,  and Wales .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] draftify - the current article is poorly reverenced, plus WP:CRYSTAL .  From the article I see many countries cancelled participation.  If low attendance, the event may well sizzle.  Lokys dar Vienas ( talk ) 00:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify.  WP:TOOSOON .  ― Jochem van Hees ( talk ) 10:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  The articles about the prior years' events seem to have enough coverage, so this one might be as notable.  Currently WP:TOOSOON .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 07:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I note that the event now appears to have been cancelled competely.  Sionk ( talk ) 20:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete; draftification is for articles that have potential ( WP:ATD-I ), and since the announcement of the cancellation (without clarification, and with very little media coverage of the announcement), I find it very unlikely that this article can still grow.  ― Jochem van Hees ( talk ) 20:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agree that draftifying should be reserved for articles with scope for growth.  It appears at this stage that with the supposed cancellation of the event that there is very limited scope for continued development.  Sims2aholic8 ( talk ) 20:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KESU-LP (Hanamaulu, Hawaii): Redirect unnecessary due to parenthetical disambiguation.  Not mentioned at list of television stations in Hawaii, either.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Companies ,  and Hawaii .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : At least in theory its status as one of the earliest channel 6 radio stations in the United States might have garnered it some coverage, but until/unless something more substantial surfaces this is a remnant of the far looser standards of 2007 and has no place in the Wikipedia of 2024.  As the nominator points out, the disambiguator means there is no alternative to deletion beyond finding a way to meet GNG.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Implausible search term for a redirect.  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Channel 6 low-power TV stations in the United States as WP:ATD .  Note that KESU-LP (defunct) currently redirects to KESU-LP but the defunct station appears to have been a different station so maybe KESU-LP (defunct) should redirect to List of radio stations in Hawaii instead.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Despite both being on Kauai, these broadcasting outfits appear to have been unrelated.  There is no SIGCOV of either KESU-LP.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 23:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Firstfruits: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SUSTAINED .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 21:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Military .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 21:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HiQnet: This should not have been moved out of draftspace.  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brekeke SIP Server: Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , no significant coverage.  Artem.G ( talk ) 15:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 11:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Download links and one PR item on a Chinese website are all I find for sourcing.  Delete for not meeting GNG or SOFT.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rathod Sravan: I would have put this for speedy but as it seems this is contentious (look at my talk page as well as that of Sachin96700 , who removed the deletion tag from this page they created), I'll put it here for the community to discuss.  GnocchiFan ( talk ) 15:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Poetry ,  and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Um, this person was born somewhere, but the article doesn't confirm where.  It's hard to review notability when it's about a writer from "somewhere".  I found this [25] , but without many details in the article to go on, I can't confirm if it's the same person.  Delete for being unclear as to what exactly this person does in whatever corner of the world they're from, which I'm sure is lovely.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a different person.  Shravan Rathod in your article is from Nadeem–Shravan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no indication of notability ( WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR or any other guideline) and the awards don't appear to be significant enough to pass via WP:ANYBIO .  In fact, the closest thing to a 'claim to notability' is the fact that he completed some element of higher education, which millions of people do every year.  Aside from that, this is a WP:BLP , which requires high quality sourcing for all claims made, and I'm not seeing that here at all or in my searches.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with Spiderone - fails GNG and NAUTHOR, doesn't appear to be the same person that Oaktree (above) found on their search, thiis guy would appear to be an Indian teacher and alive.   The reference in the article is from a self published site anyone can add their bio to.  - nothing of any significance found by me but something may be out there in some of the Indian lnaguages Josey Wales Parley 21:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I moved this article to Draft space, recommended that the draft creator submit it to WP:AFC and stated that if they moved it right to main space, it would be deleted.  Minutes later, that's what they did.  So, here we are.  Ordinarily, I'd suggest draftification but it's clear that the article wouldn't stay in Draft space in order to be improved over time.  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programmes broadcast by Channel U (Singapore): Wikipedia is not a TVGuide.  // Timothy :: talk 14:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and Singapore .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Natalie Gutteridge: Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and England .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Desperate Housewives home video releases: Practically all sources reference online retail sites (such as Amazon) in order to purchase media.  No sources verify home releases are actually notable.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Television .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Abhishek0831996 ( talk ) 11:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete An obvious case of WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTCATALOGUE , as others have pointed out.  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 09:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WBTL-LP: Let'srun ( talk ) 02:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Ohio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Looks like another station that only ever aired national content (it would not surprise me if even the later-year infomercials were carriage of some itself-non-notable service), probably failing to obtain any significant coverage .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Federal Soft Systems: No indication of notability for awards won.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , Software ,  and Arkansas .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  The few sources that aren't press releases are clearly trivial or routine coverage.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 18:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP DSP2092 talk Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG , since the provided sources are press releases so are not independent.  The subject might have some coverage in Hindi, but after a cursory look I could not find any sources, Hindi Wikipedia lacks an article about the subject as well.  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 04:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Pingu home video releases: Also WP:NOTCATALOGUE and WP:NOTIINFO , it's not the job of Wikipedia to list every single home video release that can ever be purchased.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Lists .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete catalog cruft Dronebogus ( talk ) 11:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete