hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jon Yong-chol: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – To Football at the 1998 Asian Games – Men's team squads#North Korea as WP:ATD .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  I want to vote keep, because 18 senior caps is substantial, but I think a redirect is a better option.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 01:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
CIRS (AM): To be fair, this was a legitimate article subject at the time it was first created (by me, full disclosure) in 2008, but due to various changes in Wikipedia's notability standards for media outlets, it no longer meets the standards that apply in 2024: in 2008, a radio station was considered "inherently" notable so long as it was possible to verify that it existed , but in 2024 the test depends much more squarely on the radio station's ability to pass WP:GNG on its sourceability, which this one just doesn't.  Further, tourist information radio stations are specifically deprecated by WP:BCAST as unlikely to be notable at all in most cases, but this one can't really offer a compelling reason why it should be considered a special case of greater notability than the norm for a not-generally-notable class of topic.  By contemporary standards, all this really needs is a sentence or two in Sault Ste.  Marie International Bridge -- which, in fact, it already has -- rather than its own full standalone article as an independent topic.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Redirect to Sault Ste.  Marie International Bridge and addition of "a sentence or two" per nom.  - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sault Ste.  Marie International Bridge : given the existing mention, this seems like a valid enough alternative to deletion here.  I'm surprised this article has lasted as long as it has; we weeded out most articles on (particularly Canadian) tourist information stations in 2016, five years before the RfC that confirmed that GNG , not NMEDIA , was the notability barometer for broadcast stations (but again,

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hayastan Jan (TV series): Relies on one source with no clear notability for subject and article as-is fails WP:GNG.  There's also no other language-wiki pages for this show.  Cheers, Dan the Animator 23:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Armenia .  Dan the Animator 23:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Nothing found in article or BEFORE showing subject has WP:SIGCOV addressing it directly and indepth from WP:IS WP:RS.  BEFORE found listings and promo.  No objection if a consensus to Redirect to Hayastan Jan develops, article would need much better sourcing for a merge.  // Timothy :: talk 07:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm also open to creating a redirect to Hayastan Jan as an AtD.  Cheers, Dan the Animator 18:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lamprey, Manitoba: The "history" is a generic description of the Hudson Bay Railway.  – dlthewave ☎ 14:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  – dlthewave ☎ 14:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found except sites that apparently scrape from the WP article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 17:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the associated census district 23 - please see the very lengthy station-by-station analysis of stations and associated “towns” on the railroad to Hudson’s Bay that I posted previously at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Silcox station .  I spent hours researching the points along this line.  This location is a signpost in the middle of deep boreal forest and bogs.  There’s no town.  It’s many kilometers from any settlement.  The flag stop serves the occasional canoeist or trapper.  Look at it on satellite imagery and you can see there was never anything there.  The station should be redirected to the article for the train.  — A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 13:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't believe that the location and station are separate entities to be directed to different targets.  They use the exact same sources (Geographical Names Data Base and VIA Rail) which only mention the rail point/station.  I think that these are all duplicates that should be redirected to the railroad if not deleted outright.  – dlthewave ☎ 14:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Lamprey station or Redirect to same, or Delete all seem reasonable options.  My preference order is given.  ++ Lar : t / c 14:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mt Pleasant Public School: Newhaven lad ( talk ) 16:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Grand Erie District School Board per SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 18:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Christopher Brook: The page was mainly a copy-paste job from official press releases and still reads like a promo piece.  The only sources are a campaign website, a press release and ballotopedia.  hroest 19:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  hroest 19:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or redirect to North Carolina Court of Appeals#Former judges Subject should meet WP:NPOL for holding a statewide office that is normally elected.  I understand that here Brook was appointed and not elected, but the position is a statewide elected position and I think the NPOL presumption applies to appointees if they're appointed to a normally elected office.  However, if there is not enough sourcing to write a good WP:BLP due to the short tenure in the position then we should redirect it to the office he held.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 18:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
𝼛: This one is apparently used in a language spoken by some 200 people, and isn't even mentioned in the article on that language.  Sources are all primary (from Unicode).  No evidence of any notability.  No objection to a redirect to Iwaidja language if people feel it should be mentioned there, but otherwise I see no reason to keep this.  Fram ( talk ) 07:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Australia .  Fram ( talk ) 07:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Iwaidja language ; letter isn't notable on its own.  ― Ö S M A N ( talk · contribs ) 13:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the title of this article is just the character - but the character doesn't display on my laptop, and I very much doubt I'm alone.  All the article says is that the letter is used in Iwaidja language .  I can't see how anyone could reasonably find this article unless they already knew what the character is, and unless they're very lucky, they won't even find out what it looks like.  So I'm struggling to see how this article in its current form can be useful to anyone.  I'm definitely leaning towards delete but don't consider myself a technical specialist on character sets or languages, so I'm not formulating this as a full ! vote.  Elemimele ( talk ) 08:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and/or merge to Iwaidja language .  Unicode databases are not sources that show notability here.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect as suggested above.  W a g ge r s TALK 10:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Iwaidja language .  — The Anome ( talk ) 10:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and merge to Iwaidja language .  DRMcCreedy ( talk ) 15:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Iwaidja language Character doesn't even display ––– GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 12:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Square (shape) .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 00:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lyddal station: – dlthewave ☎ 04:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Transportation .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train : each train station is not individually notable, although the whole train line is.  Several other stations on this line have already been WP:BLARed to that article.  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 10:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Haribhai Deokaran High School: No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Maharashtra .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Shikshan Prasarak Mandali , the school's governing body, if sources insufficient to support a separate article.  Rupples ( talk ) 07:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ●Delete or Redirect- I have found 1 hit in Google News, & it has nothing to do with the school.  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 15:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bianca Druță: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Moldova .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:SPORTBASIC .  That list should only be populated with people who are also notable, so if this person isn't notable, then having a redirect to that page doesn't make sense.  Until such time that they are notable, anyway - which currently they are not.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 05:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 11:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Penny Pax: The sources provided are basically just awards noise that doesn’t count for anything and there was nothing for google news except some non-GNG counting tabloid fodder suggesting she was paid for sex by a disgraced executive.  This was prodded years ago before our standards hardened but this isn’t at the current sourcing expectations Spartaz Humbug!  20:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Page Six and Daily Star articles, which aren't a RS, are all I can pull up.  Lack of sourcing for this individual.  The AVN and Xbiz articles are just lists of winners.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Sexuality and gender ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 07:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A few years ago, a group of users has managed to create a consensus that states that pornographic entertainers are basically not notable for what they do (their awards do not count, the coverage from the industry does not count, etc.).  Fine.  But this actress, having received various awards that still have a page on this Wikipedia (so far, until the cancellation of PORNBIO is cancelled or extended further to the awards themselves, maybe), the page about the recipients might be redirected to the most notable they received.  Here obviously, the AVN_Award_for_Best_Actress (mentioned in the lead section).  So I ! vote for a redirect to AVN_Award_for_Best_Actress#2015–2019 , where she is obviously listed.  If my ! vote is commented with "Oh, but we can't really decide to redirect her article to that page, because she has received various other notable awards that also have a page", I won't reply (but I will smile :D). - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Until the article can be expanded, I wouldn't object to a redirect.  Erpert blah, blah, blah... 04:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Im not fundamentally opposed to a redirect.  , Spartaz Humbug!  18:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A won-an-award-but-independent-rs-coverage-is-nil porn bio.  No claim of passing WP:BASIC and insufficient RS support for passing WP:ENT.  • Gene93k ( talk ) 19:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chip Van Os: I could only find the subject highlighted in some press releases announcing his joining Raymond James about a decade ago.  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Handball , Olympics ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Handball at the 1996 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads .  I can find no significant coverage in a search of newspaper archives and online sources.  The above squad list should be a good redirect target as an ATD.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gorosaurus: Despite in universe notability, the character is an all-plot article, and a search yields very little in terms of developmental info and reception.  From what I can tell, there just doesn't seem to be enough out there to justify this article's existence.  A possible AtD would be a redirect to King Kong Escapes, which seems to be Gorosaurus' biggest movie role.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Film .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 02:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to King Kong Escapes - Only had two appearances that were more than simple cameos/stock footage use, and searches do not turn up anything that are not just summaries of those appearances, or churnalism "Top Ten Kaiju that could appear in the Monsterverse!" style lists.  The corresponding article on the Japanese wiki appears to be better sourced, but it looks like those sources are almost entirely just different editions of various "Godzilla Encyclopedias" and are supporting very little outside of plot summaries of his(?) two appearances.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect per Rorshacma.  Tertiary sources don't meet standards of WP:V , WP:RS , and WP:SIGCOV .  Articles need significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 03:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Rorshacma.  Andrzejbanas ( talk ) 19:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Munkir (TV series): — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_TV_One_(Pakistan)#Drama_series - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Star Action: ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 08:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect this and Fox Action Movies to Star Premium per past consensus regarding premium multiplex channels; this article should have never been created and the FAM title moved here, and this channel isn't going to surprise you with a sudden cooking show or comedy block.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The nominator has been blocked indefinitely.  Geschichte ( talk ) 04:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  00:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rusi Mulla Feroze: BilledMammal ( talk ) 06:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and India .  BilledMammal ( talk ) 06:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cycling at the 1948 Summer Olympics – Men's sprint .  Per nom, the article does not meet the standard set forth in WP:SPORTSCRIT #5.  Also, no SIGCOV is presented to show qualification under WP:GNG .  Since he is at least mentioned at the proposed redirect target,I'd favor that as an alternative to outright deletion.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 13:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect