hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mané pelado: – Hilst [talk] 14:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  – Hilst [talk] 14:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  Ks0stm ( T • C • G • E ) 14:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Hi

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Elizabeth Bonner Allen: Created by a single-purpose account .  Sources seem weak and mostly about her projects and nothing about her.  Parts of her bio seem lifted straight from imdb .  She did win a Royal Television Society Award though.  Other than that I'd say it barely scratches WP:ANYBIO œ ™ 06:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Television .  œ ™ 06:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  She seems to work as "Liz Allen" which is so common that finding sources will be tricky.  There's several long reviews of Inside John Lewis in good-quality sources (incl Guardian & Independent ) already in the article.  I think it is possible this is a poor article on a notable subject.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 04:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ETA: Some more reviews: Inside John Lewis in The Times [72] (paywalled); Silverville in Guardian [73] ; Parking Mad : Guardian [74] (the last doesn't mention her except in credits).  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 05:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Dubee: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Found this during PROD patrol, and wanted to discuss it at AFD myself.  The pros here are a short Allmusic review and two sizeable writeups at Rapreviews.com.  I have no prior experience with Rapreviews.com, but the site is used for more than 100 wp articles.  I'm leaning keep.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I was able to find this article about the subject, and I would also describe myself as leaning keep .  Hatman31 ( talk ) 17:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Arun Kumar V.R.: Not received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  Just passing mentions.  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , India ,  and Kerala .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 11:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] weak Keep : May meet requirements for Notability of Producers for Kuttavum Shikshayum (2022 film) . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 12:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
World Trade Center Tallinn: Despite the impressive name, this is just an office complex that happens to be part of the WTC network.  As such, it needs to demonstrate notability per GNG, but the sources cited don't come even close to this, and a search finds nothing of substance.  I PROD'ded this at NPP, but the author didn't like that, so here we are.  Fails WP:GNG / WP:NBUILD .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business ,  and Estonia .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Surprisingly difficult to find material on.  A little dismayed as well at the lack of coverage on World Trade Centers in general.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 06:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Bobherry Talk My Edits 20:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  I managed to find detailed coverage in this source , while of uncertain reliability, it pointed me to https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raadio-Elektroonika_Tehas#Hoonestu , which describes the redevelopment project, using sources such as https://arileht.delfi.ee/artikkel/50723547/ret-i-arengugrupp-ootab-pilvelohkuja-ehitamise-luba , and I was able to find http://www.estonianart.ee/architecture/the-new-forekspank-%C2%ADacclaimed-bank-architecture/ as well, searching for sources related to Raine Karp .  I'm assuming more can be found in Estonian language sources.  PaulT2022 ( talk ) 02:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  07:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Zionism, race and genetics: Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 12:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep Disruptive renomination less than 1 day after a no consensus closure.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 12:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Rosguill : It appears that your recent AfD close has been undone by means of instant re-nomination.  FYI.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 12:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, some mish-mash of OR and stuff about almost anything it seems.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ QuickQuokka : There was literally an 'in creation', a.k.a. 'don't nominate for deletion' notice up on the top of the page when you re-nominated it.  Are you being intentionally disruptive, or did you simply not read past the title?  Perhaps read the previous discussion closed by an admin literally a day ago and withdraw this community time-sink.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 13:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Iskandar323 : I read the thing that said it shouldn't be nominated for deletion, yes, but I believe that this article is inherently non-neutral, and should not be given a grace period.  -- Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 13:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This nomination is disruptive.  Selfstudier ( talk ) 13:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well it was closed by an admin, after several admins conferred on the close.  If they had thought a relisting was worthwhile, they would have relisted.  This is just abuse of process, with intent.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 13:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This comment should have been put below mine.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 13:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Scooter Lowry: Reliable sources are almost non-existent, and the couple that I found just barely mention his name, and that is all.  Could easily merge all reliably-sourced information into the Our Gang article in two sentences.  Argles Barkley ( talk ) 15:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] How about more information about Scooter being a vaudeville performer is added?  That Northern Irish Historian ( talk ) 14:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Randykitty ( talk ) 17:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References 1 and 2 do not look like reliable sources to me.  Argles Barkley ( talk ) 20:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I added more references.  Also, more information about vaudeville is added.  That Northern Irish Historian ( talk ) 23:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'm bummed there's not more written about this person.   Internet forums have been debating when he died and other facts of his life, which shows the lack of available sourcing. -- Milowent • has spoken 21:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I decided to check some newspaper, and some details are actually revealed. That Northern Irish Historian ( talk ) 04:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You are doing excellent work on this, I hope it is able to be kept.  Definitely need a better source for his death than this [2] , but I'm not shocked that it is hard to find, since his fame was in his youth.-- Milowent • has spoken 12:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Most sources say he died in 1989, like [3] , [4] , [5] , and [6] That Northern Irish Historian ( talk ) 13:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Bernd Hirschbichler: Between the unsourced sections there is a lot of routine coverage in match reports and primary sources with nothing to support notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Football ,  and Austria .  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – The article on de.wiki is well-founded, with some sources archived in the Wayback Machine.  Needs improvements, but passes WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Specific assessment of the available sources would probably be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 05:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the de.wiki article isn’t well-founded at all.  It has essentially the same refs as the en.wiki article - dead links to various things that don’t look like RIS, online databases of match reports that just list players and results with a name check for the referee.  The only two reasonably substantive sources on de.wiki are  (a) the same as source 12 on en.wiki (a short paragraph citing him) and  (b) de.wiki source 3 which is a profile of him which is a blog post from the head ref welcoming him and thanking him.  That is definitely not enough to build a biography article on.  There is a complete lack of in-depth coverage in independent sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 13:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Sanghamitta Balika Vidyalaya: Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 02:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Sri Lanka .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 02:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Buddhism .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Black Air Force Activity 1: A search shows that all potential sources are merely one or two paragraph announcements of the mixtape; I can't find any significant coverage such as a review.  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 21:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and United States of America .  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 21:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Fader is a green link per sourcebot.  This [7] , brief but helps.  The Hyperbeast is a yellow per sourcebot; I think we have enough.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've got access to that source and it looks good.  However I still think that these one or two paragraph announcements (Pitchfork is one, Hypebeast is two) don't constitute significant coverage.  I've had a look at WP:NALBUM and I'm not sure if the Fader source is good for establishing notability as part of it is the artist talking about the mixtape, which makes the source at least partially primary.  Together this is definitely borderline.  Schminnte [ talk to me ] 11:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Jean-Pierre Schecroun: All I could find is a passing mention in a Time article about something completely unrelated.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 23:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and France .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Maybe merge into Art forgery ?  I don't find any online RS, But see these [2] [3] [4] It looks like he was included in The Art Game by Robert Wraight (1966).   Anyone have access to the print copy of this book?  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 00:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is an unsourced claim in the article that eight forgeries netted £25,000; that's not a lot.  By comparison, Han van Meegeren got an estimated "$30 million (approximately US$254 million in 2022)".  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 06:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 21:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't find any SIGCOV of him.  〜 Festucalex • talk 10:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  As an initial side note, WP:PERP seems to be rather confused about itself, and links out to WP:WELLKNOWN for its criterion  for being "well-known".  But WELLKNOWN is part of BLP and is focused on "public figure" as a privacy standard.  I'm not sure that's coherent enough to try to follow, but in any event, for the following reasons, I'd say it is safe to say that Schecroun is/was well-known in that sense.  For starters, his 1962 arrest and confession attracted massive worldwide attention (e.g. Reuters , UPI , NYTNS ).  That was certainly the peak of his fame, but it wasn't entirely the end of it.  For example, in 1974 he was featured in an Omnibus episode titled "Don't Take It For Granted", in which he apparently showed how forgery is done.  Jeppson gave him a three-page profile with some excellent biographical detail in Fabulous Frauds (1970).  Catherine Dossin has briefer but nontrivial coverage in The Rise and Fall of American Art (Routledge, 2016).  I have reached my personal limit for the night but I have no sense of being anywhere near running out of coverage.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 04:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Lovari (musician): JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done ) 03:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done ) 03:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References for Lovari on Wheel Of Fortune (2023): https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=bV8rMTIQ2C0 https://bobbymgsk.wordpress.com/2023/02/01/wheel-of-fortune-1-31-23/ References for Lovari on Judge Jerry Springer (2022): https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=U78Iy9fFQkc https://www.imdb.com/title/tt25965282/releaseinfo/ https://followmy.tv/episodes/2487792/judge-jerry/3x104/103 References for Lovari on Match Game (2019): https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/match-game-season-four-viewer-votes/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5672484/characters/nm2102281 References for Lovari in The Barn 2 (2022): https://dailydead.com/horror-highlights-8-found-dead-the-harbinger-the-barn-part-ii/ https://hellhorror.com/movies/the-barn-part-ii-movie-7804.html https://podcasts.apple.com/es/podcast/trhs-random-chat-with-lovari/id1539578136? i=1000641962062 https://getoutmag.com/lovari-5/ 98.109.154.93 ( talk ) 04:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 16:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I added filmography and television appearances of the subject that reflect current dates through May 2024.  170.212.0.95 ( talk ) 19:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
V. B. Banjkowski: Google search only results in the Wikipedia page.  A handful of mentions and attributions in the 1910s and 20s research papers, do not impose notability.  X ( talk ) 08:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : It has been requested for long at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds/Article_requests/People for the main reason of being little known to Anglophone audiences (even in scientific circles - https://www.birdforum.net/threads/ioc-6-3.328106/#post-3428736 ).  He is the describer of at least two taxa a taxon , so even if deleted this time round, it will likely have to be recreated in future.  Shyamal ( talk ) 10:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : Several references have been added since the nomination.  X ( talk ) 20:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus