hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Usman Bengali: Fails WP:N with no significant level of coverage.  The article was initially deleted after an AfD request by @ TrangaBellam : and the article creator was involved in WP:Canvassing which is classified as disruptive behaviour according to the Wikipedia guidelines.  This article should be deleted.  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 20:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh , India and Islam .  Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 20:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Link to previous AfD : [22] . -- asilvering ( talk ) 23:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and previous AFD fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 01:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 21:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Soft deletion was used in the previous AFD so it is not an option here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Fails WP:N .  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 10:10, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above discussion and WP:NOTINHERITED .  His alleged notability seems to rest in that he studied under other scholars and was locally famous.  That's never been enough at English WP.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG, no reviews found.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Some brief mentions in print magazines but nothing what I would call significant coverage: [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 07:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KDS Micronex: Blatant brochure advertising article.  scope_creep Talk 15:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Canada ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:PROMO .   Most references are passing mentions and article is clearly self-serving.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rhys Toms: MirrorPlanet ( talk ) 09:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Australia .  MirrorPlanet ( talk ) 09:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Whilst there might be some notability here this article is purely paid for PR in direct opposition to the TOU and what Wikipedia is NOT.  Blow it away and let someone independent take over.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 07:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghent University Association: At present, the article doesn't cite any sources, and I couldn't quickly find reliable secondary sources, though they may be available elsewhere.  Based on my review, I don't believe this article passes WP:ORG .  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 03:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and Belgium .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I've found three additional Dutch language, "possibly" reliable sources about the association (other than the organization's own webpage).  The first is a description of AUGent on Ghent University's homepage ( [22] ).  The second is a political science paper on Semantic Scholar that seems to be about the association but only has its abstract available ( [23] ).  The third is a document coauthored by Ghent University and HoGent ( [24] ).  However, there are two issues.  First, I don't speak Dutch.  My evaluation of these sources was based on Google Translate, which isn't very trustworthy.  It would be best if we could get a Dutch speaking editor here.  Second, even based on my not-very-reliable evaluation of these sources, the third source's reliability is very doubtful, and the second source, at least before we can find the paper itself, provides not much more information other than showing that the association exists.  Consequently, I'm currently leaning more towards delete.  Liu1126 ( talk ) 04:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tomáš Chovanec: I could only find a story of his transfer to MFK OKD Karviná , which is routine and not significant coverage.  Under the keyword "Tomáš Chovanec", Google searches mostly find other men of the same name than this footballer, failing WP:V too.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 10:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 10:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  There is no corresponding article in Czech.  Svartner ( talk ) 14:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I find a lot of Slovak sources to be paywalled and tricky to assess fully but I couldn't find anything that looks to comply with GNG.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Morphic (band): Shellwood ( talk ) 11:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Cannot find find anything let alone a thing that comes close to RS or meeting WP:MUSICBIO requirements not even a Allmusic bio, only download/streaming links.  Please ping me if sources possibly from archives are presented.  dxneo ( talk ) 12:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lady Rizo: I couldn't find a good WP:ATD .  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and Women .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andy Tudor: Just another run-of-the-mill video game employee lacking in notability that fails to assert notability besides being a non-notable musician.  As for reliable sources, one source is through a paywall and is to promote a video game he was involved in, which I doubt highly asserts notability.  The other is an announcement of his position as a director.  The article has been created by COI editor who has since been banned for sock-puppetry, who since continues to ban-evade as an IP user.  This has been dePRODded and recreated despite a successful PROD nomination in 2010 but was recreated in 2011; despite this, issues still remains unaddressed since 2017.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural Comment - The action above does not formally nominate Stephen Baysted for deletion, as there is no notice at the top of his article.  Trying to tie nominations together just because they're both video game guys is unnecessary and awkward.  Simply create an entire new AfD for Baysted if you think it's appropriate.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:40, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for this advice, done it since.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if anyone has a response to this nomination.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage about Tudor as a subject.  That said, he has a public-facing development role and has been interviewed widely in primary sources covering his work as the creative director of the Project Cars series (e.g. [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] ) and co-penned an article on game design [45] .  So he may not quite be a run of the mill video game employee , but it's clear he lacks the sort of coverage that warrants his inclusion as an independent article.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 11:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Krehbiel family: It's possible the patriarch, Fred, is notable, as he had a Chicago Tribune obit, but the entire family?  No chance.  Fred Zepelin ( talk ) 03:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per WP:NOTGENEALOGY and failing to meet WP:GNG .   Searched ProQuest and Newspapers.com but did not find sources about the family.   All mentions were in relation the company.   The Forbes list only covers John Jr. and Fred, and obit is about Fred.   Other sources are likewise not about the family or not reliable.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Silfade: Looking up creator SmokingWOLF, I get two (a 4gamer piece and an interview with Famitsu.  Using Google Translate, I see the different spelling 'sylphide'.  Again, zero results (except results to the unrelated ballet La Sylphide ).  Fails WP:GNG .  soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan .  soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because this is probably not notable, but please note that such a search really needs to be perfomed in Japanese (シルフェイド) in order to determine whether there are sufficient sources ( WP:BEFORE ); it's not the case that there are no hits when searching in Japanese.  The Famitsu link you gave above calls this the maker's most important work.  Dekimasu よ!  15:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Automation-media.com , forest.watch.impress.co.jp IgelRM ( talk ) 16:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of sig cov via my search.  Printed sources in Japanese are unlikely considering the topic.  X ( talk ) 05:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tarun Poddar: Article about a lesser-known entrepreneur, with routine/promotional sources cited as sources.  Does not meet WP:GNG Thilsebatti ( talk ) 07:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 07:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable, but this likely does not help notability [46] , coverage is typical fluffy PR posts from Indian media.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of countries by intentional homicide rate by decade: This article tries to list every yearly murder rate ever published for each country.  It's unreadable even though it's incomplete - if complete, it would house 20,000+ data points and no guidance to the reader on which parts are supposed to stick out.  There are better ways to represent these data: perhaps line graph by region (neighbors rarely differ much).  If any notable trends exist, then editors should make them obvious to readers, not just assail them with raw data.  Wizmut ( talk ) 15:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Lists .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete under WP:CROSSCAT and WP:NOTDB -- This exactly the kind of complex, intersectional list that makes it so hard to establish a firm policy on cross-categorical lists.  As the nom suggests, it is trying to do too much .  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 17:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Trying to do too much.  I think some of the data here per country could be folded into the countries' respective articles on crime (if it was reliable and complete, which it doesn't seem to be, so let's not do that) and while I think the list without the 'by decade' part is fine, this is complicated and useless due to its inherent incompleteness spoiling the point.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 21:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too much of a trivia for encyclopaedia.  Lorstaking ( talk ) 04:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KSDY-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is another run-of-the-mill local TV station, also notable only on a local level.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kaye Fox: I do not think she meets GNG or anybio .  Four of the references are to obituaries of her in local papers.  The remaining one is an article originally in a local paper, reprinted in Q-Notes , based on an interview with Fox.  The article has been tagged for notability since 2019.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 14:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sexuality and gender , Religion ,  and New York .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 14:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The obituaries are staff-written obituaries, not paid death notices, and the broken link has been fixed with the Internet Archive.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 14:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The Democrat and Chronicle story linked in the article is all I can find about this individual; not sure the individual is notable for wikipedia, barely any coverage beyond a local level (and this is sparse to begin with).  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It's unusual for coverage of clergy to roundly fail to mention which denomination a particular cleric was associated with.  In this case, my assumption would be Episcopal or some sort, but it's an odd defect of coverage in this case.  Jclemens ( talk ) 02:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not meet the criteria under WP:RELPEOPLE nor WP:ANYBIO .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 11:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Belgium: Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Europe ,  and Belgium .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my rationale in my previous nomination, literally irredeemable list.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 23:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia isn't a TV guide.  Doesn't meet the WP:LISTN .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete