hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mylyn Kuve : A WP:BEFORE search returned only a small handful of passing mentions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women ,  and Oceania .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - civil servants aren't notable, and there doesn't appear to be sourcing for GNG. -- IdiotSavant ( talk ) 06:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
W16DS-D : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 14:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Approx : Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Debian#Features Change vote to Delete .  I did not notice that this was just a program not included with Debian .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 05:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Onkar Ghate : This article reads more like a resume than anything else.  I could find no sources to establish this guy's notability.  SparklyNights 22:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Finance , Economics ,  and Canada .  SparklyNights 22:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  His own writings and non-independent profiles from the places he writes for are available, but not independent, reliable source coverage.  Even recent books covering the Objectivist movement don't discuss him.  -- RL0919 ( talk ) 06:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vettuva Gounder : Perhaps.   There is sourcing to show that they are a "backward class".   Currently, only one of the sources mentions them (although I cannot read the #5 ref), #1 and #2 are the same ref, and both simply mention the backward class in a list, with zero additional information.   Refs #3 and #4 do not even mention the class.   Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage, so fails WP:GNG could be redirected to Gounder , but the redirect was challenged.  Onel 5969 TT me 10:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG, no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth exist.  Oppose redirect, doesn't seem like a viable search term based on a lack of BEFORE search results.  // Timothy :: talk 03:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 14:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amilton Filho : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:19, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:26, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kathryn Myronuk : Amigao ( talk ) 22:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Canada ,  and United States of America .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 23:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 23:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Myronuk contributed and / or was mentioned in multiple books, however, she always works in the background.  Hence, it is first not noticeable.  I support her notability.  See example: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Robots_Ethics_and_the_Future_of_Jobs/kQc8EAAAQBAJ? hl=en&gbpv=0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justynazander ( talk • contribs ) 07:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  She appears to be a futurist associated with Raymond Kurzweil and Singularity University , but without scholarly impact (no citations in Google Scholar, no authored books with published reviews), so we have no pass of WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR .  Of the two sources that look like the could plausibly contribute to WP:GNG -based notability (Wired and CNN), the CNN piece has no depth of coverage on her and is dubiously independent of the Wired piece (it merely repeats Wired's "knowledge sommelier" catchphrase and says she is associated with Singularity University).  The Wired article itself merely quotes her; it does not contain any content about her beyond a job title.  So we do not have any of the multiple in-depth reliable independent sources required by GNG.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:53, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I do not find independent sources for her.  In the Abundance book there is no mention of her, not even in the acknowledgments, and in the Kurtzweil book she is acknowledged as "one of the in house readers" (and dozens of people are thanked for more than that).  I just don't find anything that can be attributed to this person that would be notable.  Lamona ( talk ) 02:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bobo Ajudua : Does not meet WP:IS .  Nswix ( talk ) 12:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Nswix ( talk ) 12:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This individual has coverage, but it all appears to be routine (closing a certain business deal).  He's a practicing lawyer, but nothing beyond that.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Sourced to major Nigerian papers of record .  Zero evidence presented that these sources are paid journalism.  Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 05:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional article and sources, fails GNG.  Avilich ( talk ) 22:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iyad Issimaila : No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:11, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Africa ,  and France .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:11, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Environment Coastal & Offshore : Doesn't seem to have any coverage other than in WP:PRIMARY sources.  If not delete, it should be pared down to a stub.  Drm310 🍁 ( talk ) 22:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Environment ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG .  Scholar search turns up very few citations in other journals or publications, and therefore fails WP:NMAG .  Article relies entirely upon sources that are WP:PRIMARY and not WP:INDEPENDENT .  Bgv.  ( talk ) 06:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Huppe : Coverage is X of Y articles, interviews and PR.  scope_creep Talk 09:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Music ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No independent, secondary coverage.  The awards and recognitions (Washington Post Leadership Award, Billboard Power List) do not really contribute to notability.  Mooonswimmer 14:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mooonswimmer If these are all about sourcing issues (even though CEO of large company) how is this one, [15] https://www.billboard.com/pro/soundexchange-royalty-payment-milestone/ Stravensky ( talk ) 22:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Its an interview.  scope_creep Talk 06:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough coverage to satisfy a WP:GNG pass.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ambika Dutt Ranga : The article was 'supported' by one dubious source called Ambika Sports , which, unsurprisingly, no longer exists.  An archived version can still be accessed here but I don't feel comfortable having an article based solely off what appears to be a website dedicated solely to the subject.  The Ambika Sports website appears to have been entirely written by one person, with no mention of their credentials.  I can't find even a mention of "Ambika Dutt Ranga" in any other source or database.  The Ambika Sports website claims to organise a competition called "Ambika Football Gold Cup" but there are no hits for this anywhere either.  At best this seems unverifiable and a failure of WP:V and, at worst, this is a hoax.  In any case, we should also consider whether there is any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC , as I see both as being comprehensively failed here.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , India ,  and Rajasthan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:19, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No inherent notability as a footballer, fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Previous AFD was also a bad close, sorry. Giant Snowman 15:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scott Reiss : Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 22:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Sports ,  and California .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 22:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Radio , Television , Illinois , Missouri ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete : Apparently fails WP:NJOURNALIST .  I was able to find two sources that satisfy SIGCOV ( [9] , [10] ) and  a few other passing mentions ( [11] , [12] (paywalled), [13] ) but I don't think it's enough to satisfy GNG.  Most of the sources I've found are WP:ROUTINE as well.  — SamX [ talk · contribs ] 14:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hope Through Health : A WP:BEFORE search only turned up primary sources.  Penale52 ( talk ) 11:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations ,  and Massachusetts .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 14:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete while there are a few Google Scholar results, these all appear to be cowritten by one of the founders.  Could be a close call, if we consider the existence of other authors on the articles as "independent" but I don't think that counts.   This org.  has garnered no significant objective media coverage.  Oblivy ( talk ) 23:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The only SIGCOV I could find was this source , which discusses the work they've been doing in Togo to provide maternal care.  The coverage in that source was pretty thorough, but absent any other sources the subject doesn't satisfy WP:NORG .  — SamX [ talk · contribs · he/him] 19:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophie Kovic : Non-notable awards  and local interviews are the only coverage.  ~ A412 talk!  17:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Companies ,  and Australia .  ~ A412 talk!  17:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Environment ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The awards won are minor and fails WP:BIO for lack of in depth coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Blanche Finlay : Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 20:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Jamaica .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with nom.  Fails WP:GNG .  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 11:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vinay Kumar G.B : B-Factor ( talk ) 08:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, not yet elected to any office, and I can only find routine coverage of his candidacy for secondary coverage.  Most of this article is about his business career, and again I can't find substantial secondary coverage of him as a businessman per WP:BIO.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  There is no coverage on the subject's biography or background or early life.  All the sources are about him as the founder of InsightsIAS and his viewpoint.  There are also inessential and unreliable sources on this page.  One of the source comments "Another UPSC Mentor, Vinay Kumar G B found the Mains GS - 1 paper quite relevant and interesting" and this source has been unnecessarily linked to founder.  The subject is not notable enough to warrant a full fledged article on himself.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Hillfields : Available sources are mostly self-published or trivial mentions.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 02:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] User:139.184.129.181 placed the following text incorrectly under my nomination: "Wikipedia states however that " Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. " From me: This is not a nomination for speedy deletion.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 13:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the only coverage I can find is the single paragraph live review in Drowned In Sound (referenced in the article).  No RS reviews of any of their releases that I can find.  Doesn't meet WP:BAND .  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 18:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] bit of a shame you can't seem to read the Spanish articles included in the reference sections, where it states clearly the notability of the LP release in the context of the time it was released.  It can't be all about charts and fame, this page is about rescuing music.  If renowned DJ like Gideon Coe plays their music on BBC Radio 2 and BBC Radio 6, I'd assume it is a relevant artist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angandi ( talk • contribs ) 13:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'm relisting this discussion.  If it is closed as a Soft Deletion, it will just be restored the next day.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails notability criteria of WP:BAND and almost all references just contain passing mentions or simply listings of the band.  InDimensional ( talk ) 16:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete