Kashaf Alvi: While there may be coverage in RS as cited in the BLP, but these all seem to ROTM coverage - PR articles without any by-lines, which isn't sufficient to meet WP:SIRS.  I would say WP:NOTJUSTYET .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sourcing isn't stellar but sufficient to keep the article under general notability.  Cortador ( talk ) 16:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Cortador , So, are you suggesting that we keep this BLP even though we don't have enough coverage meeting WP:SIRS to establish GNG, but because he got some ROTM coverage?  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SIRS doesn't apply to people and has no relevance here.  Cortador ( talk ) 06:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Cortador , Noted.  Are you willing to provide the THREE best coverage that you believe should meets GNG?  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:NAUTHOR .  Teenage is not a disqualifier as we don't discriminate somone's abilities based on their age.  We are an inclusive encyclopedia, that's why we have plenty of articles on such topics Category:2003 births .  This in-depth article in Arab News is written by Saima Shabbir.  The book has been reviewd in Dawn ( [15] ) and The Nation ( [16] ) by their staff members (when a newspaper writes "staff report" it is enough to prove the reliability).  Wieles ( talk ) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And let's not apply guidelines randomly to the mix.  WP:SIRS is for corporations/organizations.  Wieles ( talk ) 22:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wieles , So, it looks like he's only authored this one book, which got some coverage in RS.  Is just writing one book enough to pass WP:NAUTHOR?  Seems like a pretty ROTM author.  And it makes me wonder, if someone just writes a book and gets some press coverage on it, do they automatically qualify for a WP BLP?  As for the coverage, DAWN coverage seems pretty ROTM to me.  It's not sig/in-depth as required by GNG.  And The Nation coverage is based on his interview, which also isn't sig/in-depth or even independent of the subject.  Sure, they can be used for WP:V, but for establishing GNG, I'd say no.  They also don't qualify as reviews of the book, as WP:NAUTHOR states work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.  And just to be clear, I'm not suggesting he shouldn't get a BLP because he's a TEEN!  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 00:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Cortador.  Meets WP:AUTHOR.  Arab News , Dawn , The Nation articles are enough.  80.234.152.31 ( talk ) 12:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep