hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Rik Amrit: The currently cited sources are either passing mentions or unreliable, and a search in Google News did not yield anything useful.  GSS 💬 05:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Poetry ,  and India .  GSS 💬 05:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , although there are number of sources cited, but these are apparently unreliable, could not established the notability as per WP:NBIO .  Pinakpani ( talk ) 06:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non-notable.  Ahmed Reza Khan ( talk ) 08:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, I looked for in-depth coverage from multiple independent secondary sources but couldn’t find any.  The sources are just passing mentions or unreliable.  Therefore, the article fails WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 12:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject fails WP:BIO with poor sources.  Page fails WP:GNG .  Subject is not well known who made any significant achievement worthy of notice to warrant a Wikipedia page on.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TV Tango: No indication of wp:notability of this website under GNG or SNG.   Zero references except for their own website.  And I could not find any.  North8000 ( talk ) 20:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Websites ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] del no indications of notability.  - Altenmann >talk 22:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unexceptional television aggregator; I also have to dock points as they refer to us as "Wikipedia.com".  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This TV aggregator has zero notability.  TH1980 ( talk ) 00:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there as it only uses WP:PRIMARY sources and fails WP:GNG without any WP:RS .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : primary sourcing.  Password (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sergey Vabishchevich: I found kick-off.by and football.by but neither of these are even close to significant.  There is a basketball player with the same name but they are different people as the basketball player celebrates his birthday on 4 June.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belarus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Several games and then nothing at all.  Fails WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 42: C messier ( talk ) 13:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, as it is not notable.  ‹hamster717🐉› ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 16:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : yet another galaxy that is not notable.  - Parejkoj ( talk ) 17:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dean G. Popps: There's nothing else other than routine announcements of appointments to boards and one article he wrote.  [32] Clarityfiend ( talk ) 15:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages for essentially the same reason: Kenneth J. Oscar ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Paul J. Hoeper ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ACRD Acicatena: WP:BEFORE also doesn't produce anything of note except for the usual websites for statistics and data.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 22:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Italy .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 22:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete empty article without citations, I can't believe this went so long without being draftified.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish • growths ) 17:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of association football clubs by average attendance: New list that has an unclear criteria and is maintained by individual sources, and not a collective listed source.  Would appreciate other opinions as I'm not sure.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 06:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Why?  Criteria is the same as List of attendance figures at domestic professional sports leagues .  Why should there be a collective source?  Is this a reason for deletion?  Why deleting this and not lists for leagues?? ?-- Afus199620 ( talk ) 13:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Lists .  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 06:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Totally agree with the nomination, and the inclusion based on All clubs with an attendance of over 35,000 are listed.  That's a fair amount of clubs globally, not a very thought out list.  Govvy ( talk ) 22:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What exactly is wrong with this inclusion and not any other?  Could you be more specific?  Why not thought out?  Very lazy argumentation.  Afus199620 ( talk ) 11:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it's a usefull list for many people.  "All clubs with an attendance of over 35,000 are listed" could be replaced with "Clubs with an attendance of over 35,000 are listed".  As far as I know, almost all clubs seem to be included that should be in this list.  The information seems to be reliable, here you can find all the information: https://www.worldfootball.net/attendance/eng-premier-league-2022-2023/1/ and https://www.european-football-statistics.co.uk/attn.htm and https://www.transfermarkt.com/statistik/zuschauerrangliste for example.  141.0.29.182 ( talk ) 10:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] These are all just football stat sites.  They do not show WP:SIGCOV of this topic, which is what is required.  WP:NOTSTATS applies.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - we've had many AfDs on this type of list before and all have resulted in delete due to essentially falling foul of WP:NOT .  See here , here , here and here .  I don't see any reason as to why this would be any different.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This page looks fine to me, I’d say let’s keep it.  2A02:A44A:ABBA:1:64A2:E757:FF10:5E30 ( talk ) 16:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thomas Brewster (Doctor Who): Article doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 01:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can find only the briefest of mentions of the character outside of things like fan wikis.  I would have suggested a possible redirect to The Haunting of Thomas Brewster , which is apparently the character's first appearance, but that article is also completely unsourced and potentially non-notable.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I did a notability check on that story and yeah it’s definitely not notable.  Went ahead and redirected it.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 12:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Rorshacma.  There aren't reliable sources to support this article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 23:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete generically named supporting character from a minor spinoff that had only seven appearances in a 60-something-years-old franchise, which admittedly is an improvement over the “two works and it’s notable” gang like Nobody No-One and Nimrod (Doctor Who) .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 01:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chemish: There are no in depth reliable sources about this topic - it isn't notable Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 18:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Christianity ,  and Latter Day Saints .  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 18:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  This individual is mentioned in two verses of the Book of Mormon, and there are not even extensive LDS sources about him (which couldn't even be used to establish notability).  Rollidan ( talk ) 23:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tahani Al-Yanbaawi: All I found was this transactional announcement and a few sentences here .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like WP:GNG as the editor above suggested.  Wolverine XI ( talk to me ) 15:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —per above and per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jacky Ruben: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 05:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 05:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Tiny bit of coverage here [32] , that's about all I can find.  For lack of sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Steljano Velo: My own searches only yielded database sources.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete – What's the point of creating an article if the creator can't find any better source than, like, database and match reports?!  Nonsense!  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 12:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
András Kocsis: Google searches aren't turning up anything usable (strings: "András Kocsis", ["András Kocsis" diplomat], ["András Kocsis" ambassador]), with the best sources found that way being interviews with the subject or reporting Stuff He Says and the results quickly sinking into non-responsive territory after.  — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:ANYBIO .  No sources found either that are non-routine.  Mdann52 ( talk ) 16:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Diplomats including head of missions are not inherently notable, unless meets the WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO Saqib ( talk ) 16:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 16:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Netherlands .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
European Party for Individual Liberty: Its cited sources are its own Facebook page (which has been inactive since 2019) and an archived article on the website of one of its constituent parties.  I have found no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources , so it doesn't appear to meet our general notability guidelines .  As such, I propose the article's deletion.  Grnrchst ( talk ) 21:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Libertarianism , Organizations , Politics ,  and Europe .  Grnrchst ( talk ) 21:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  - DonCalo ( talk ) 20:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Quijano: JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no significant coverage.  There's a data scientist with the same name but they aren't notable either.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 12:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malcolm Dick: Logan Talk Contributions 05:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Logan Talk Contributions 05:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shree Kshetra Korthan Khandoba Devastan: Searches online only found two Marathi articles, both were announcements of upcoming festivals that would be held in the temple in 2021.  Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Hinduism , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per above.  There are no sources that use this name; perhaps this temple is better known by another name.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 16:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Seems to have a large number of devotees attending the Yatra if this report is reliable.  https://marathi.abplive.com/photo-gallery/news/maharashtra-khandoba-yatra-parner-ahmednagar-pimpalgaon-korthan-khandoba-jatra-photo-latest-news-1139136 .  Also this about a 451 year old inscription https://divyamarathi.bhaskar.com/local/maharashtra/ahmednagar/news/published-marathi-translation-of-korthan-khandoba-temple-inscription-451-years-ago-unveiled-by-pandurang-gaikwad-129686787.html .  As it was "neglected" for many years it's likely difficult to uncover historical sources for the site.  Rupples ( talk ) 03:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete could not find any WP:SIGCOV in gnews or gbooks.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete