hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sarecta, North Carolina: I couldn't find anything reliable supporting the existence of this community, Henry McCulloh appears to be his own can of worms, but I don't think there's much on him either.   It's also worth noting that this article hasn't been edited since 2014, and the one reference (which is not cited inline) is now a dead link.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and North Carolina .  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I don't see any reason why this wouldn't be a reliable source.  This probably warrants more care to determine its level of scholarship, but also offers greater depth of coverage.  Lubal ( talk ) 16:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They were not considered because the main subject of those sources is not "sarecta", therefore they are "passing mentions", eg not sig cov.  James.folsom ( talk ) 17:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GEOLAND and also WP:GNG , per my search which found the books above and also some mentions in scholarly articles.  SportingFlyer T · C 19:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per sources presented above and incorporated status.  – dlthewave ☎ 03:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Definite keep.   Added some sourcing and 1943 map showing location.   Very fascinating to see that older states in the United States have formerly incorporated towns that have sunk so far into oblivion to lead to a deletion nomination.   Apparently it still had a charter from the state until 1984 although it (and many other towns in the state) had long had no local government.   But it was definitely was incorporated in 1787, though losing a battle to be the county seat in 1784 was apparently a blow. -- Milowent • has spoken 15:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I found it was surprising how contentious county seats were, and how many "towns" disappeared for that reason.  James.folsom ( talk ) 17:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Antonela Roccuzzo: Recommend redirect to Lionel Messi#Family and relationships ---- FMSky ( talk ) 14:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  FMSky ( talk ) 14:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep - Previous AFD closed 18 days ago.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 14:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Previous AFD here under a name misspelling: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonella Roccuzzo Suriname0 ( talk ) 14:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Was kept at the last vote, I can't see that notability has changed in the last month.  Famous for being with a famous person I suppose, coverage is there.  I wouldn't consider her "notable", but my opinions aren't what we use to establish notability in wiki.  GNG is met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Fashion , Football , Internet ,  and Argentina .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 15:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per previous AFD.  Giant Snowman 13:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep She is written about in a fair bit of tabloid, although wikipedia is against such media that does not discount it.  There will be stronger sources that can go in the article, the article could look better, it's not very well written or a great read.  Govvy ( talk ) 13:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per above.  Clearly notable figure with many sources.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 08:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per recent AFD. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 17:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
The Answer (Steven Universe): Kuchi Kopi ( talk ) 16:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep .  The reasoning for this deletion is not only absurd, but so broad that it makes little sense, especially since you are nominating, but claiming it is in regards to off-wiki information, but WON'T even describe what it is!  Please withdraw this incorrect AfD.  This episode IS notable and the fact you nominated this for an AfD instead of beginning a discussion on the talk page is an indication that this discussion is not productive to anyone.  Historyday01 ( talk ) 16:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep BRV only applies to articles that were created in violation of a ban.  It does not apply to editors who created an article, in good faith, and were later banned.  Unless you're accusing

Discussion outcome: keep
Anita Soina: NortonAngo ( talk ) 11:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kenya .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Passionate environmentalist doesn't get you a wikipedia article.  I can't find sources that talk about her at length.  Delete for lack of sourcing and the flowery language used.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  The article needs work, but the subject is notable.  Soina is discussed in Kenyan media (often with regard to her activism, 1 2 3 4 , affair with a comedian 5 6 , and political campaign 7 8 9 ).  She is also featured on sites focused on youth-driven climate change advocacy 10 , 11 12 , including PBS and Reuters .  -- Jaireeodell ( talk ) 15:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Environment .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Have added another couple of newspaper articles about her and her book: seems to have plenty of coverage in RS.  Pam D 07:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Now that more reliable sources have been added.  Article is clearly in a better shape than it was before.  CycloneYoris talk!  21:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Safe Surrey Coalition: As always, political parties are not "inherently" notable just because they exist -- notability hinges on media coverage about their activities, not just on verifying their existence.  But this is referenced almost entirely to content self-published by the city council itself, which isn't support for notability at all -- and even the one hit that actually comes from a WP:GNG -worthy media outlet isn't about this party at all, but is here solely to verify a tangential fact about somebody else from a different party.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have much, much better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacking anything to indicate meeting of notability requirements per WP:ORGCRIT .  Coverage I found is local and does not help establish notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Meets notability and is covered by significant national media.  For example: From The Globe and Mail : 1 .  From CBC News : 2 , 3 , 4 .  From Global News : 5 .  In short, it passes WP:ORG as having been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.  ⁂CountHacker ( talk ) 09:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per sources above which show notability.  Red Blue Green 93 17:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Aril Brikha: Google search brings up fewer than 60 results, mainly social media accounts and music streaming sites.  ... disco spinster talk 17:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Iran ,  and Sweden .  ... disco spinster talk 17:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : A search in w:sv:Mediearkivet , which collects all but not all Swedish newspaper articles from more recent years, gives 154 hits in print media, though.  Articles like "Techno för själ och fot" ( Sydsvenskan , November 2000), "Själfull techno" (Sydsvenskan, January 2000), interviews in major media like Svenska Dagbladet or Sveriges Radio P2 and so on seems to indicate notability to me. I figure the problem here isn't notability, but rather that most of the buzz never ended up easily accessible online because he peaked 23 years ago.  / Julle ( talk ) 19:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : i improved and added more citations and based on what Julle said, I will vote to keep this one.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 18:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per edits to the article since it was taken to AfD and my comment above.  / Julle ( talk ) 13:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Antslive: Still has a long journey to get to notability MaximumRespect!  MrFixer200 ( talk ) 20:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Music ,  and United Kingdom .  MaximumRespect!  MrFixer200 ( talk ) 20:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , seems like plenty of coverage: [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Geschichte ( talk ) 22:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Almost TOOSOON.  Looks like he just became a musician in the last year or so...  These are from a RS per Project Albums [13] , [14] , just not enough coverage yet to establish notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Geschichte, see also [15] , [16] .  If kept, it should be renamed to AntsLive .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I second the proposal on moving the page title, as the guy's name has the capital L in the middle.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the RS coverage identified above, significant play on BBC national radio per [17] & [18] & [19] , and nomination for a notable award per [20] .  Resonant Dis tor tion 18:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per the multiple reliable sources significant coverage identified in this discussion.  He also passes WP:NMUSIC criteria 8 for winning a notable award at the 2023 UK Music Video Awards and being nominated for another at the MOBO Awards , imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The article needs improvement, but the rapper is getting coverage from reliable sources as found by the voters above.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : With such prominent media coverage and award nominations, it's hard to argue against this artist's notability.  The article needs improvement, for sure, but it seems unfair to delete the article.  Waqar 💬 17:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per the references provided by Geschichte, The subject has received significant coverage from multiple reliable sources, including prominent media and national radio.  He has also been nominated for and won notable awards, meeting WP:ent criteria.  The article needs improvement, but the existing coverage clearly establishes notability.  Therefore, the article should be retained.  Master rollo ( talk ) 12:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Abhijit Mukherjee (earth scientist): Shellwood ( talk ) 14:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete : As per my checking, I found no reliable secondary sources with in-depth coverage that can establish notability.  The sources are just passing mentions, and the subject fails to meet the WP:GNG criteria.  The majority of the article is also unsourced.  Grab Up - Talk 15:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I agree with Atlantic306, He meets WP:PROF .  Grab Up - Talk 17:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as passes WP:PROF criteria 1 with well cited works as shown at Google Scholar here and has won a notable award Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology so deserves to be included, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , it fulfils the notability criterion as per WP:PROF since the person received the SS Bhatnagar Prize, the highest science award in India.  Pinakpani ( talk ) 06:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , the subject has 6400 citations and an h -index of 45 on Scopus, as well as multiple first-author papers with 100+ citations.  Passes C1 and probably C2.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 16:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above passes WP:PROF .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Emmanuel Khamis: Seems at best WP:ROTM .  Fails WP:NPOL , WP:ANYBIO .  Cabrils ( talk ) 04:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sudan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep : the nom does not indicate a WP:BEFORE and the WP:Scare quotes does not add anything to the nom.  This South Sudanese politician is notable as he is mentioned in multiple reliable sources (e.g. Sudans Post and Sudan Tribune ) which are now included in the article.  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 17:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How does the subject meet WP:NPOL or are you suggesting that the subject meets GNG?  - Enos733 ( talk ) 05:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would think under “Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage”.  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 13:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Just want to note the subject is a former mayor of the capitol city of South Sudan.  Generally, a capitol city mayor would probably have enough sources for an article.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 16:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above, mayor of a national capital.  The nominator seems to have missed this fact?  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Cal Harris (engineer): Rates one passing mention each in Motown Encyclopedia , Motown: The Golden Years and I Hear a Symphony: Motown and Crossover R&B .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 00:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , California ,  and Michigan .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think the combination of the references and the awards adds up to notability.  Wikipedia's coverage of recording engineers is weak and ought to be improved.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is not Wikipedia's function to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS or even LESSERWRONGS.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 12:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Engineering .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:CREATIVE .3 for co-creating significant body of work as a recording engineer, mixer, and occasional synthesizer player, most immediately verifiable via [80] others verifiable by liner notes, including but not limited to Last Time I Saw Him , Trouble Man (album) , 1990 (The Temptations album) , Marvin Gaye Live!  , Let's Get It On , Caught in the Act (Commodores album) , and Hot on the Tracks .   — siro χ o 06:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Meets WP:CREATIVE #3 as head of recording during the glory years at Motown .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Auriga Leader: References are press releases from a decade ago for a "PR stunt" installing solar panels that provide 1/2000th of the ship's energy.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 00:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 00:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions .  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  It's an expiremental ship so not "a run-of-the-mill ship".  I have not yet looked for sources, hence only a comment.  Nomination seems to be focused on references, rather than on sources, as we should per WP:NEXIST .  On the upside, correct use of the concept "references".  gidonb ( talk ) 03:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there is extensive coverage of this ship, including 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 .  There’s plenty more beside this.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , Mccapra's sources (and here's another one I found) show the ship passes WP:GNG .  ~ KN2731 { talk · contribs } 15:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Further to my initial comment, and the sources found by Mccapra and KN2731 , this ship passes the WP:GNG .  gidonb ( talk ) 12:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The amount of the ship powered by solar power is irrelevant to whether it is notable.  There is significant coverage, so it is notable.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Nangal Puthiyavargal: Fails WP:NFILM .  Kailash29792 (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to List_of_Tamil_films_of_1990#Released_films .  Per nom, fails WP:NFILM .  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per new sources.  Disappointed with this nomination please do not nominate Murali 's films in future if sources exist.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 23:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw : Per WP:HEY .  Good work DareshMohan.  Kailash29792 (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Thanks to the improvements made and the withdrawn nomination.   (Ineligible for a speedy close thanks to !vote prior to improvements.) 2pou ( talk ) 17:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep