hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Pujan Malvankar: The main notability claim here is that he's the leader of the youth chapter of a state-level political party, which is not an "inherently" notable role -- it could get him into Wikipedia if he were shown to pass WP:GNG , but does not automatically entitle him to a guaranteed inclusion freebie just because he exists.  But the referencing here is not getting him over GNG: it's referenced to one primary source , one glancing namecheck of his existence as a provider of soundbite in an article about something else, and one article that doesn't even mention his name at all , and appears to be here just to tangentially verify that the political party he works for exists, none of which is support for his standalone notability as an individual at all.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This individual doesn't meet the general notability guidelines ; there's no news coverage about him, only passing mentions.  Additionally, he doesn't meet WP:NPOL since he hasn't been elected as an MLA or MP yet.  Grabup ( talk ) 15:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO with the typical flowery wording we see, boils down to "nice guy runs for functionary position in the youth wing of a political party".  Very not notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You mentioned that the leader is of a 'state level poltical party'. This is just to inform you,its not a state party Aam Aadmi party is a national paty (AAP).  a Link for your reference https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/story/aap-national-party-status-how-to-get-the-tag-2358592-2023-04-11 If needed i shall add more references.  Unknowncrypto ( talk ) 07:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/aap-requests-cm-to-postpone-exams/articleshow/88819441.cms Unknowncrypto ( talk ) 07:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't really think it matters, he's a functionary regardless.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He's the leader of the youth division (not the entire party) of a state-level chapter of a national party, not of the youth division of the entire national party.  So I said nothing incorrect at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well thank you for clarifying, the leader of the youth division of a state-level chapter is not notable for our purposes.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The subject doesn't meet the WP:GNG ; no decent independent news coverage and doesn't meet WP:NPOL too.  Rustypenguin ( talk ) 17:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
News9Live: Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 07:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Entertainment , Organizations , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 07:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Looked for reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the subject, but was unable to find any.  It fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Ping me if someone finds one.  Grab Up - Talk 10:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Poor sources with no significant coverage on the channel.  Fails WP:NCORP .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very poor sources for yet another indistinguishable 'screen, shouter and L3 generator set to 135 pt font' Indian news-to-debate channel (do they even have quiet ones now?).  Nate • ( chatter ) 04:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Struggling to find reliable sources that give this topic the in-depth coverage it deserves.  It might be best to remove it for now unless strong sources emerge.  Waqar 💬 15:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MorphThing: Flounder fillet ( talk ) 12:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Websites .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 12:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find anything beyond name checks.  We can't have an article exclusively sourced to primary, first-party sources.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only primary, user-generated sources and trivial listings found.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 13:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stefan Behrens: Unable to find significant coverage across independent, reliable, sources via a BEFORE search.  Rotten Tomatoes is not in-depth coverage, fails GNG.  Tails Wx 14:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Germany .  Tails Wx 14:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I see that there aren't many sources and documentation about him, but still he got articles in 5 other languages and contributed to a somewhat big number of films ( [42] ).  I could therefore add a fimography part to his article and/or help translate the german article.  Nyraxis ( talk ) 16:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The German wiki article only uses imdb and another site I'm not familiar with (but just has a list of films and a small blurb as a bio).  Unless we can locate own-language sources, it should be deleted for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paappa Yawson: I can't find sourcing and being nominated for an ward with dubious notability doesn't help, not meeting GNG or MUSIC Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - As the curator of the page, I have thoroughly read through Wikipedia:Notability (music) and the article passes criterium 8 as a four-time nominee of a notable award scheme, Ghana Music Awards USA .   The person also has publications on GhanaWeb , ModernGhana , Ameyaw Debrah , TV3 Ghana and News Ghana , a simple Google search proves it here .  Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Ghana ,  and United States of America .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP - Meets WP:MUSICBIO since he has award nomination in his own country, which also means he probably had radio airplay and chart ranking songs.  Pershkoviski ( talk ) 02:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG and WP:RS .  - Xclusivzik ( talk ) 15:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject fails WP:GNG and has not received significant coverage in reliable sources.  The one song and extended play he has released has not been discussed in reliable sources.  He has received multiple nominations for an award whose notability is questionable.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  16:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: No commentary since last relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 14:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:RS .  It's a bit WP:TOOSOON as well.  -- Wesoree ( talk · contribs ) 16:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  If the award nominations are notable, their should be SIGCOV about the subject surrounding their nomination, but I see none, just routine annoucements in entertaimnet news.  Ping me if someone adds new SIGCOV refs to the article.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 00:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Apex Sun: Citations do not meet WP:OGCRIT, and aren't exactly independent Comintell ( talk ) 05:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Comintell ( talk ) 05:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, no WP:SIGCOV out there at all and nothing in the article.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 07:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am a new author here and try to figure which area I am able to contribute.  I cannot see a violation of any kind but would like to have more information where I can find the notability guidelines referring to sports teams, so I can make my article better.  Greetings -- Puppygray ( talk ) 15:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ( WP:Notability (sports) ) Industrial Insect (talk) 18:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Clearly fails WP:GNG .  See also the corresponding micro-stub Apex Moon .  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No where near satisfying WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 11:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harold Hofmann: Received some coverage upon his death, though I don't think that means anything.  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California .  CptViraj ( talk ) 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Long before his death, the LA Daily News wrote this about him in 2008, and the LA Times wrote this about him in 2010.  Combined with this 2012 piece by the Daily Breeze (already in the WP article) and the various published reactions to his death, I believe he meets WP:N criteria.  Left guide ( talk ) 07:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Military .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't think the previously mentioned articles are satisfactory seeing as they're all from local outlets.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 03:53, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Respectfully, I don't believe that a source being "local" disqualifies it from counting towards notability, especially when "local" in this case refers to a metropolitan area with 18 million people , with the Los Angeles Times being the sixth-largest newspaper by circulation in the U.S. (also significant enough as a source on Wikipedia to have its own RSP entry – WP:LATIMES ).  If such a clause disqualifying "local" coverage is written anywhere in the notability guidelines, please provide supporting evidence.  Left guide ( talk ) 06:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ROUTINE disqualifies routine news coverage such as the first article.  WP:AUD is specifically about companies and organisations, but specifically disqualifies local coverage.  SportingFlyer T · C 16:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I think this is closer than the other ones, but I don't think the coverage there is necessarily enough for an article.  The first one is definitely just routine campaign coverage.  The LA Times article isn't bad, though.  SportingFlyer T · C 16:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect >>>> Lawndale, California#Municipal government , where he is already mentioned.  Djflem ( talk ) 19:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per SportingFlyer's sentiments.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sally Studio Art Center: I tried, but I can't find anything that could satisfy either WP:GNG , WP:ORG , or WP:NGEO .  GSS 💬 14:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and New York .  GSS 💬 14:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, I similarly failed to find significant coverage in a WP:BEFORE search.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 14:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 2 gnews hits says it all.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 08:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seems to be another non-notable school.  Better Nuncio ( talk ) 10:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per all the above, lacking the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources we require.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 09:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DeArrow: Ingrinder ( talk ) 19:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Lacking WP:GNG - Found only two sources, both of which lack depth of coverage; I feel these do not constitute reliable sources nor display significant coverage.  Ingrinder ( talk ) 19:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete had a bit of coverage but mostly of the press release type, so even within the techsphere not really notable yet.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete Fully promotional only online coverage I can find is press releases no devolepement or reception info.  Only citation is to its github.  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Transwiki to Wikibooks, then delete Encyclopedically useful, but not notable enough.  Erkin Alp Güney 05:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG , WP:NSOFT , and WP:NORG (via WP:PRODUCT ).  I similarly could not find any sources online that would contribute to the subject's notability.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 16:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ashley Melnick: A  case of WP:BIO1E .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Fort Worth newspaper article is about all there is, I don't see sigcov in anything else.  Name drops in a list of pageant contestants.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Günther Janse van Vuuren: JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A lot of team announcements and signing bits, but not seeing enough to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Khanqah Daep Sharif: Fails WP:GNG .  BookishReader ( talk ) 00:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Pakistan .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The book used as a reference in the article is a reliable source.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is about a place in Dera Ismail Khan District .  BookishReader ( talk ) 11:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep All of the sources cited are reliable.  Delete - The sources refer to a different place with a similar name.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 05:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DreamRimmer Obviously they are, but two of them are about a different place.  BookishReader ( talk ) 11:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for bringing this to my attention; I just double-checked the references and decided to amend my vote as a result.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 02:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep All sources are reliable and amount to SIGCOV.  I'm confused as to why this page was nominated Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] They are reliable, but are they related to this place?  Have you even opened any source?  BookishReader ( talk ) 11:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Sources are fine, meets WP:GNG .  Delete per nom.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] JML1148 Hello JML1148, I'm sharing my analysis with you as I know you'd change your thoughts about this.  This place is in Khushab District of Punjab, Pakistan .  #2 and #3 references are about a place in Dera Ismail Khan District of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa .  Two places are miles apart.  #1 reference is just a mention in a government website (which has mentioned multiple places).  Still lacks WP:SIGCOV .  BookishReader ( talk ) 11:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh my bad, I didn't notice that!  I'll change my vote now.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 23:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The cited sources talk about a different place.  Insight 3 ( talk ) 14:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  AryKun ( talk ) 05:03, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and BookishReader's source eval.  // Timothy :: talk 21:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete