hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
DRI Capital: Refs are routine coverage.  scope_creep Talk 18:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the source analysis above or below this comment, depending how the reply feature works.  I can't find sourcing beyond coverage that they exist as a business.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Lets examine the references, in the first two blocks: Ref 1 National Post Business magazine.  p. 41.  This is an interview.   Not independent.  Ref 2 [10] [11] Press-release.  Fails WP:SIRS .  Ref 3 [12] The company.  Fails WP:SIRS .  Ref 4 [DRI Capital To Pursue Phase III Assets With Some Of Its Third Royalty Fund] Press-release.  Fails WP:SIRS .  Ref 5 [13] The company.  Fails WP:SIRS .  Ref 6 [14] An interview.  Not independent.  Ref 7 [15] The company.  Fails WP:SIRS .  Ref 8 Sames as ref 7 Ref 9 Unable to find this, but looks routine.  Person resigning from job.  Fails WP:CORPDEPTH .  Ref 10 [16] Press-release.  Fails WP:SIRS Ref 11 Same as ref 7 Fails WP:SIRS This is a brochure advertising article with no attempt to supply references that are compliant with consensus based wikipedia policy.  Fails WP:NCORP .  scope_creep Talk 20:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , at best this needs WP:TNT as it does not maintain WP:NPOV , including WP:UNDUE and WP:TONE issues.  — siro χ o 22:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Nothing I find meets WP:ORGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Keep I agree it is referenced badly but it looks like they are at least mentioned in quite a few books. I am not reading through them all but, I would bet there is coverage or publications where it could be improved. Seeyouincourt ( talk ) 01:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A WP:SPA that arrived this morning. scope_creep Talk 08:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please see WP:NLT reference the username. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP -- Devoke water 12:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2025 Recopa Catarinense: It has questionable WP:GNG and completely fails in WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL .  Svartner ( talk ) 17:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Brazil ,  and Sportspeople .  Svartner ( talk ) 17:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - strange article, it says it has already been played even though it's in the future!  Giant Snowman 19:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angsana Johor Bahru Mall: Only 3 references: first was the archive of mall owner's page, the other two about the buses that pass the center did not even show as such.  No reliable secondary referencing on the page.  Tagged for notability concerns for almost 1 year.  Slothades ( talk ) 02:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I could not find evidence of substantial coverage either.  It does not look notable in any case to warrant a stand-alone page.  The absence of secondary sourcing says it all.  Corncaker ( talk ) 01:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I dug out only 1 source: an interview, and not much else in WP:RS , just not enough coverage to justify against WP:GNG .  Freedomfryff ( talk ) 07:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree, there is insufficient coverage of this shopping centre to meet the general notability guideline.  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Laurent Samer: JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find any decent coverage from independent sources Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Constance Dima: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I think she is probably notable but the article is unsourced and there is no clear indication of signifance.  But anybody who writes and translates essays, plays, literature and poetry and has a series of published poetry books is generally notable.  These types of folk are generally notable.  They are academics but not always.  This individual is a school teacher.  It needs a real expert to work on the article, who understands the language.  scope_creep Talk 14:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The press section of her personal website is not looking very promising.  Seems mostly to be Facebook posts, personal emails, and blog posts.  Jfire ( talk ) 19:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I looked for reviews of her novel in Greek and French and only found database entries and sales websites.  Normally having a novel translated into a foreign language is a good indicator of notability, but the BNF does not record a translator in the cat entry ( [4] ), so I think she may have translated it herself.  scope_creep has the right idea but I think we might be stuck with this one.  Haven't tried the poetry books.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No book reviews in French, I don't see much of anything we'd use for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seems to be an old SPA-created vanity or fanpage.  128.252.172.14 ( talk ) 22:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gymnastics at the Russian Championships – Women's individual all-around: Nothing to suggest a national championship is notable JMWt ( talk ) 22:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Russia .  JMWt ( talk ) 22:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 03:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The whole article is basically just one table, which at most should just be included in the article on the Russian Artistic Gymnastics Championships , provided anyone can show independent coverage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortador ( talk • contribs ) 13:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Egyptian conquest of Tunisia and Tripoli: it is already established in our article Abd al-Wahid Zakariya ibn al-Lihyani that this caliph took power with Egyptian support.  This is not controversial.  However I can find exactly zero sources discussing a non existent “Egyptian invasion of Tunisia and Tripoli.”  That is a piece of authorial invention.  Mccapra ( talk ) 02:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Egypt ,  and Tunisia .  Mccapra ( talk ) 02:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Algeria ,  and Libya .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The article is clearly trying to present Al-Lihyani's use of Egyptian soldiers as an "Egyptian conquest".  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 04:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But Al-Lihyani was under An-Nasir's influence after helping him and the Egyptian troops fought against Abu Al-Baqa forces so isn't that considered a conquest?  if not then just change the title of the article, I see no need to delete.  18Carlox32 ( talk ) 12:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Clearly a POVFORK.  Per AirshipJungleman29 too.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 12:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 07:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Srnec ( talk ) 01:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lynn Hoffman (author): Arguments  at 2007 AfD for keeping it were poor.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Link to the previous AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Hoffman, Author Geschichte ( talk ) 17:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I couldn’t find anything worth adding to the page (reliable sources, or any other meaningful reference).  185.104.138.35 ( talk ) 04:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It currently doesn't meet WP:GNG and I can't see that there's anything better out there.  Thebookstamper ( talk ) 14:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Migue García (musician): While several sources refer to Migue Garcia, they all cover him in a WP:TRIVIAL manner connected to his father Charly Garcia , from whom notability cannot be WP:INHERITED .  Other available sources found in BEFORE search are user-generated or primary.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Being the son of musicians doesn't make you notable; you may be a celebrity though.  WP:INHERITED notability that doesn't meet minimal entry per WP:MUSICBIO , WP:SIGCOV , and WP:GNG .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  08:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Kolkata building collapse: Sohom ( talk ) 19:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTNEWS applies in this case.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  Sk1728 ( talk ) 12:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bradley Thain: The closes to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this transactional announcement.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't appear to be enough WP:GNG coverage in the large amounts of coverage of the subject to warrant a pass, no suitable redirect either.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RYNA: One member was in another band of notability, however notability is not inherited.  A look online brings up no coverage whatsoever.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and England .  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only one youtube source present.  Nothing else came up in Google.  RolandSimon ( talk ) 21:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find anything about the band either.  S0091 ( talk ) 14:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carlo Lacana: Long-time unreferenced BLP - lots of roles, working actor, but i couldn't find the sources to show he meets WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG .  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Philippines .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion due to previous AFD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - even assuming that it were sourced, which the article is not very well , all the parts have been of the "teen" or "young" type, often guest appearances, not a substantial body of acting work.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ignatius Ekwunife: The only sources found are All Africa 1 , a paywalled source that says Ugochukwu Nwankwo, Diri Otimoti and Ebitimi Agogo will run the midfield and Teddy Lucky, Ignatius Ekwunife and Amakiri George in the fore.  and All Africa 2 , which says The goal disorganised Sharks the more and three bookings to Ignatius Ekwunife, Festus Umasah and Chidiekeke Okefe in a spate of five minutes These are both passing mentions in a match report and do not constitute WP:SIGCOV .  I am unable to verify anything else from this stub and, even if I could, notability is still a big issue.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 09:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Based on nominator's rationale.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unverifiable content.  Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSBIO .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karsten Längerich: Does not appear to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Denmark .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Mayors are not "inherently" notable just for existing, but this is nowhere near substantial enough, and is not referenced to nearly enough reliable source coverage about him, to get him over WP:NPOL #2.  Bearcat ( talk ) 19:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete