M. Firon & Co.: It just seems to be a law firm with no significant coverage.  Kingsmasher678 ( talk ) 02:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Companies ,  and Israel .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Internationally operating, 8th-largest law firm of Israel with plenty of coverage in 74 (!) years of existence.  Easy pass of NORG.  Unclear how this could have nevertheless been nominated.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Gidonb , could you provide a few hebrew RS with sigcov?  FortunateSons ( talk ) 11:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I had put a few references in the article when I removed the reference warning.  There are plenty of sources out there by the golden NEXIST rule.  Nom's It just seems to be a law firm with no significant coverage doesn't convey a solid BEFORE.  We can belittle any company or topic by putting "it just seems to be" before, while claiming that there seems to be no SIGCOV.  Seems to be is extremely uncommitted.  Such nominations are better not made as we have too many nominations already.  M. Firon & Co is definitely not just a law firm.  It's steadily one of Israel's top 10 law firms (currently number 8) and has been around for 74 years.  This was written in the article all along.  gidonb ( talk ) 22:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just checking what was added.  This from Globes is a company announcement about expanding to Haifa with a merger and contains no "Independent Content", fails WP:ORGIND .  this in YNet is another company announcement, this time expanding to Casablanca in Morocco, also fails ORGIND.  They're a big firm, as can be seen from the announcements, but that doesn't meet our criteria for notability, we need very specific types of references.  HighKing ++ 16:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 03:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 16:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist to consider Highking's argument.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no one has provided sourcing establishing the firm meets NCORP.  "Being the largest X in Y" is not a notability criterion, and WP should not serve as an advertisement (which is exactly what this article is doing when it's sourced to non-SIRS media).  JoelleJay ( talk ) 03:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : doesn't meet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Independent_sources EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 18:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete