hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Steven Fisher (diplomat) : Routine coverage here fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 20:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Bilateral relations , Moldova , United Kingdom , Dominican Republic ,  and Haiti .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO for lack of significant coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 13:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kolongastenna : No notable source.  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This is a straight-forward failure of WP:V , since there is no way provided in the article (and I did search around on the statistics page linked there to try to find something that might contain information about it, without results) to verify that this place actually existed.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
In Search Of (film) : There are sources, but sources do not mention film.  Dead sources possibly support that this was screened at a festival, but that does not establish notability and there is no in-depth discussion or coverage.  I am AGF but I am having a hard time understanding why many of these sources were used as they do not appear to involve film at all.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America .  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : You might want to to search typing "InSearchOf" and/or maybe add Rady's name, otherwise (and even then) searching this film is quite difficult.  This review exists.  And the Quebec film directory lists the film's title as having been translated . ... In Search of Sex .  Note: yes, screenings at festival may establish notability but I couldn't check the claim.  Final note: I have issues understanding this sentence in the article: " In Search Of was the first film to play in another reality when it screened in Second Life in 2008."- My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 00:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The source linked is not a full review but "synopsis provided by CinemaSource" per the small text after the first pargraph.  CinemaSource is of dubious reliability and the coverage at just one paragraph IMO is at best marginal SIGCOV.  I was unable to find further sourcing on IMDb, RT, Google, or Google Books using various different names as the film title is highly common.  This also fails to meet any additional NFILM criteria.  So, with IMO one source questionably counting to GNG I am at a delete.  VickKiang (talk) 11:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find any WP:SIGCOV to add at all.  Fails WP:GNG .  Jacona ( talk ) 20:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete .   The sources listed in the article might come close to notability but they are currently dead links.   Was kept previously in the hope that better sources would be forthcoming but instead what little there was has disappeared.   Should be deleted until and unless better sources such as reviews can be found.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 00:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saweria : Sources are about IDN Media BoraVoro ( talk ) 12:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Internet ,  and Indonesia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't find significant sources.  Most are about IDN.  Doesn't pass WP:GNG.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 23:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phil Trow : Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs ) 11:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Another CV article about a local radio DJ.  Nothing but interviews and passing mentions on a search.  Just having appeared on the radio isn't a marker of notability.  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep How long does someone have to be active to be notable?  He has worked in radio for more than 30 years, yet you still think he is not notable?  There is no issue here about notability so this article should therefore be kept.  Rillington ( talk ) 01:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability isn't a question of how long somebody has been "active", it's a question of the quality of the sourcing that can be shown to externally validate his significance.  That is, it isn't demonstrated by sourcing the article to his staff profiles on the self-published websites of his own present or former employers as proof that he exists — it's demonstrated by sourcing the article to journalism about him, in third-party media outlets other than his own employers, and/or books that weren't self-published by his own employers, as proof that his work has been externally validated as important by people without a vested interest in it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC .  No significant coverage found, I did find this but it's a routine announcement about the subject to be broadcasting live from a market.  This interview is not going to satisfy notability guidelines either.  ~ Tails Wx 19:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, radio personalities are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, but this features absolutely none of the WP:GNG -worthy coverage about him that it would take to bridge the chasm between existence and notability.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mikhael Yambe : Found nothing during a WP:BEFORE .  Geschichte ( talk ) 17:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Ivory Coast , Belarus ,  and Latvia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The only source of the article is unavailable.  Svartner ( talk ) 01:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baxon Gopito : JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG fail, and with no lists for Zimbabwean cricketers there's no suitable redirect per WP:ATD either.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Senators of the 39th Canadian Parliament and same-sex marriage : This is an WP:OR attempt to predict how the senators of the 39th parliament would have voted in 2006, given the changes in membership between one year and the next.  (There is a related AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senators of the 38th Canadian Parliament and same-sex marriage .) gnu 57 22:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Goldsztajn ( talk ) 00:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to be all OR.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 04:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , speculative OR.  The situation is that after Stephen Harper's Conservative Party won the 2006 election, there was speculation that they might try to overturn SSM — so this is basically an attempt to predict how such a vote might land once it got to the Senate.  But the thing is that it didn't happen, meaning this page serves no enduring value.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:LISTN criteria not met.  Lightburst ( talk ) 20:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not some sort of backwards WP:CRYSTAL ball to imagine how things might have been if they weren't the way they are.  Jacona ( talk ) 20:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:LISTN .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : entirely OR, highly speculative, generally very much WP:NOT .  UndercoverClassicist T · C 17:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shogakukan Progressive Japanese–English Dictionary : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wo Wo : The song topped a non notable chart and hasn't been covered significantly in reliable news sources.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  09:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Albums and songs , Music , Africa ,  and Nigeria .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  09:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The song fails WP:NSONG and has not been discussed in reliable sources.  The artist himself isn't notable.  Apple Music chart is not a reliable chart.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  14:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's no mention of coverage in established news sources or discussions by music critics.  Waqar 💬 17:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep , because a redirect to Minz (a DAB that doesn't include the artist here) isn't an option.  Native Mag has some coverage, and Bella Naija has an interview with Minz about the song.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Native magazine source you linked here is primarily about the artist and not the song.  Although it mentions the song and is a useful source, it is not enough to warrant a stand-alone article.  The song fails all of the criterion outlined in WP:NSONG.  The Bella Naija source is an interview and isn't independent of the subject.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  15:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there does not appear to be significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources and there is not a viable redirect target.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 19:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NSONG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 04:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matthys Basson : All I found were trivial mentions, both in English and Japanese (search マティウス ・バッソン).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just bios, transactional and team announcements in English and Japanese media, so not enough for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , couldn't find in-depth sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 22:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Caroline McGowan : Let'srun ( talk ) 00:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Oregon .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Seems to be a case of WP:BIO1E .  If someone believes that this article should be kept, could you please list the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability?  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  Fails WP:GNG , but I'd argue against WP:BLP1E as she also gained some fame from her Miss America 2012 competition.  Of course, the majority of the references are passing mentions, although I noticed 2, 3, 11, 13, and 15 are not.  After a quick search I did find some interesting things including her... staring down the scope of a .50 caliber sniper rifle, which is actually on Commons, funny enough.  IncompA 03:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
FV Time Bandit : Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 11:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Alaska .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the article per Onel5969's reasoning.  A redirect post-deletion is probably fine.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Desmond Mok : I found a couple trivial mentions ( 2010 , 2016 , etc.) and not much else.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Completely unsourced and doesn't appear notable.  Not opposed to above redirect, but deletion is my preference.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 12:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete According to Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby league/Notability , players who have participated in the Rugby League Four Nations tournament are considered notable.  But there are no sources here to confirm this.  And I haven't found any-- Saul McGill ( talk ) 16:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Javier Pinto : B-Factor ( talk ) 08:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article is from a single-purpose account and was probably written by self or supporter for promotional purposes.  Under WP:NMUSICIAN his homemade music hobby is nowhere close to notable.  Under WP:NAUTHOR he does not meet the requirements for "well-known work" or "significant critical attention", because beyond basic retail and promotional listings his books have not received any pro reviews or commentary that I can find.  Also note that there are several other people of the same name.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: This is a very newly created article.  If this is deleted as a Soft Deletion, it will be restored quickly.  So, let's try relisting it for a few more comments.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I wasn't able to find anything to establish notability for Pinto or really any coverage at all of him or his works.  I found some general primary source hits and some junk hits, but nothing that would actually be usable for notability purposes.  This seems to be your run-of-the-mill self-publishing creative who has not gained any mainstream attention.  ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1 GAME: Football without violence : Sources are all dead or passing mentions.  No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 15:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT per nom.  Giant Snowman 20:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  ArkHyena ( talk ) 22:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's nothing here at all.  Agree, per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete