hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Platinum Point: Shellwood ( talk ) 19:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is nothing in the article to suggest that this is anything other than a routine property development and it does not have the sort of notability required for an article of its own.  Dunarc ( talk ) 22:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is perhaps more that could be said around the whole area regeneration ( Granton Waterfront regeneration , etc.) but coverage such as this doesn't demonstrate the specific notability of this particular property development.  AllyD ( talk ) 06:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a routine property development that doesn't meet GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jay Sutherland: No evidence of WP:Notability under GNG or SNG.   Has been tagged for notability since November when the person who tagged it noted: "Content relies mostly on very minor sources, or alternatively, on more valid media in which subject is barely mentioned. See for instance the Herald article, where Jay Sutherland is not even mentioned!"  I agree with this.   Regarding coverage, none of the large amount of sources cover him.   Regarding possible SNG, I found nothing.... basically a student activist.  Also tagged for COI.  Probably due to the great effort to create this when there is no real coverage of him in the sources.  North8000 ( talk ) 16:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politics , United Kingdom ,  and Scotland .  Shaws username .  talk .  16:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Activism is fine, but I don't see much beyond the burst of coverage in 2019 when he confronted the candidate.  Rest is non-notable career or student things.  Being on a podcast isn't notable...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing much outside of the one incident in 2019.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 22:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amy Greenbank: There's a bit of coverage of the assault on her but that's almost WP:BLP1E .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Television ,  and Australia .  — Karnataka talk 07:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Per nom, this subject falls into BLP1E.  Unable to find any RS anywhere to expand on this one User:Let'srun 12:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found no WP:RS except for coverage of her being hit in the eye with a camera (BLP1E) -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Got nothing to add on top of what already's been written.  Whitemancanjump23 ( talk ) 11:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aivita Muze: My rationale was that the subject isn't fully notable enough per sources.  The sources in the article are only her agency and the (which only verifies work but does not establish notability) and a press release from the brand Hugo Boss.  The Vogue source is the image from her walking the runway for a notable fashion house but like I said before that only verifies work rather than showing notability as if she had been chosen for one of their 'Top X models of the season" articles or if they did an article about herself.  I tried looking for sources in Latvian to no avail which brings me here.  Trillfendi ( talk ) 18:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Latvia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Sources have not got significant coverage ( WP:SIGCOV ).  Not notable enough.  Shadow 345110 (talk) 00:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SideCho Records: The company existed at one time.  Maybe sources exist, but from what I can find, I am not finding adequate sourcing to meet company notability guidelines threshold, and as presented, I feel article actually meets "no indication of importance" based deletion Graywalls ( talk ) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  Graywalls ( talk ) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure there's anything that would meet any of our SNGs or GNG.  Delete .  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 15:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am finding mentions that prove it existed, but nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not keep GNG -- Assirian cat ( talk ) 09:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Connor Lunn: Joeykai ( talk ) 14:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 15:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Subject meets the WP:GNG with sources such as [ [1] ] and [ [2] ] Let'srun ( talk ) 16:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The first source explained above is the better one, the second is only a brief profile.  I don't find anything we'd use, mostly statistics on various sites.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , we require in-depth coverage for the general notability guidelines , all we have for Connor Lunn is some statistics.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 17:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Telihigala: No reliable source.  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete without prejudice to recreation if actually sourced.  There's just not enough here to validate this article.  Mangoe ( talk ) 23:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:V .  No information provided in the article which would allow you to confirm the existence of this place - a general link to the very large Sri Lankan statistics website, on which I cannot find any information about this place, is not sufficient.  FOARP ( talk ) 13:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Software: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet , Arizona ,  and Wisconsin .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The guideline states that in order for a company to be notable, the sources have to be secondary, independent, and reliable.  There are three references that cite the "About" pages of companies, one reference citing a Google+ forum, two of them cite the subject's website, and the remaining one doesn't give significant coverage.  Tarantula TM ( speak with me ) ( my legacy ) 05:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Absolutely no significant coverage.  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fakesysdef: * Pppery * it has begun... 15:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with Pppery that SealAndBear's description of the malware is indistinguishable from other trojans.  This is reinforced by all of the references coming from sites simply announcing Fakesysdef's existence to advertise anti-virus software.  MEMZ is a comparable article on a trojan virus, but it justifies its notability through third-party coverage detailing the malware's unique creation and its place in the broader history of computer viruses.  BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 08:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enid Rivera: Article already had a removed PROD, so bringing this to AfD.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Women , Wrestling ,  and Puerto Rico .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet GNG.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: This article has already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  One citation is by definition not significant coverage, and is actually original research .  Bearian ( talk ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Assisi Convent School (Etah): This one is unreferenced and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Uttar Pradesh .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL as well as due to multiple issues TAG on the main page.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 11:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't comment on the sources since there are none.  A quick search doesn't produce anything significant on this school either - Imcdc Contact 14:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 11:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I echo what the others here have said.  My WP:BEFORE shows up no sources.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 22:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Virtual Database Manager: It strikes me as an advertisement for a product disguised as a description of a technology.  It also manages to pack in a lot of unsourced description and terminology that is opaque to the non-programmer, but which strikes me as overly promotional in tone.  BD2412 T 15:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 15:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The presentation is ok as far as it goes, but the lack of citations says it all really.  This is one commercial gadget, with one source, its own.  Notability is not established.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 19:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As the nom suggests, the article is really a promotion for SoftNtic's Enterprise Connector, which fails WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT , and the rest of the article is unsourced WP:OR .  ~ A412 talk!  00:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matt Corker: Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:RU/N .  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 20:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Rugby union .  The C of E God Save the King!  ( talk ) 20:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Incorrect - in process of updating entry.  240 appearances across premiership and championship rugby (2x winner), British & Irish cup winner.  Coach across 2 national league rugby teams.  2A00:23C4:498E:6001:8119:2988:43DB:575B ( talk ) 20:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete There seems to be a good deal of coverage, however I'm not sure how much of this would pass WP:GNG .  If someone can dig up some more interviews, then I'd be happy to reconsider, as there is some stuff out there.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Several sky sports and BBC articles have been added 185.104.136.31 ( talk ) 19:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Interview reference added and archived Wasps team profile also gives clear backing to early career standing 2A00:23C4:498E:6001:3407:C73:7F98:7C85 ( talk ) 20:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ľubomír Bajtoš: SME might be the best reliable secondary source that mentions his name, but it's only in an image caption which does not count towards significant coverage.  Article fails WP:GNG overall.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The article is from ye olden times and is not satisfactory with current guidelines.  The false information about 47 minutes is a misinterpretation of 47 matches in the Czechoslovak First League , and he did of course have a longer career before and after that even though WorldFootball has not recorded it.  But someone has to have recorded something in order to have a Wikipedia article.  This piece is an overview of his career.  It's a good start, and there are more in pre-Internet media, but I don't know how to find it.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  That article linked by Geschichte appears in the Czech-language version of the page.  It is a good start.  The link from Clariniie suggests he played in European competitions in the 1994–95 season on top of the league matches.  Sources likely exist.  I was able to find details of his performances in the Czechoslovak First League: 1990–91 season , 1991–92 season (didn't play), 1992–93 season for 42 appearances and 6 goals.  Will add more if I am unable to uncover further sources.  C 679 15:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  C 679 05:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Due to the lack of sources.  If there are new sources that are possible for WP:V , I change the vote.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Restore the Broken: KH-1 ( talk ) 02:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and West Virginia .  Kpg jhp jm 06:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless some reliable secondary sources can be found—has the band been discussed in significant newspapers (i.e. the Wheeling Intelligencer , Charleston Gazette , Huntington Herald-Dispatch , etc., other than merely being mentioned on concert/event schedules?   Are there any sources other than schedules/promotional materials and self-published blogs/websites?   If the band has even minimal notability, it should be easy to establish now that most media are available online.  P Aculeius ( talk ) 13:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This band was featured today on the Southwestern Virginia Sun due to their upcoming performance at the local festival today.  I added the news source to the page.  Danzigmusicfan1 ( talk ) 18:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a passing mention: all it says is that it's an 8-piece band from Danville and that they're performing at the Chautauqua festival in Wytheville, Virginia at 8:30 p.m. tonight.   That's a schedule, not significant coverage, and the paper it's in isn't exactly a household name.   This looks like what WP:SIGCOV calls a "trivial mention": it doesn't talk about the band or its members or its songs; it's the briefest description possible, and its sole purpose is letting a small number of readers know that the band performing at a local festival two hours from now.  P Aculeius ( talk ) 22:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alan J. Porter: – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Comics and animation , England ,  and Texas .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete self-promotion and seemingly no particular notability within field.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 16:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not seeing anything in this bio on how he meets WP:NARTIST / WP:NBIO .  I did my own BEFORE and got nothing (tiny bios on some fandom pages and like).  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacking reliable sources to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage,fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete