hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Faith Academy, Delhi : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Karol Bagh#Education as the locality.  This a fee paying private school, but looking at the fee levels doesn't seem to be a for-profit school.  Found mentions but not signicant coverage.  One source says the current Mayor of Delhi was educated here.  Rupples ( talk ) 17:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Thames Video : Would also support a redirect to Thames Television .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 15:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television ,  and United Kingdom .  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 15:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thames Television seems fine.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thames Television , as wary as I am about the potential ease of that being reverted against consensus.  Still, a brief mention there is probably the most that can ever be said about this not-independently-notable subsidiary.  (Not to mention that sourcing entirely to a YouTube posting of the logo is questionable at best , and that's being generous — it might be "sourced" on paper, but it may as well still be unsourced in spirit.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thames Television : Seems a valid WP:ATD-R .   There is nothing of substance that is sourced that can be merged.  2pou ( talk ) 18:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thames Television as per WP:ATD .  Unable to locate any references that meet notability criteria.  HighKing ++ 18:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Thames Television per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Stanford University Computer Science : These were discussed in AFD and the results were "merge."  Similar action should be performed on this too.  X ( talk ) 07:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Computing ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you hadn't opened this discussion,  you could have done that BOLD LY and used AfD as a fallback if you encountered pushback.  Just sayin'.  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 14:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : as proposed by nom.  // Timothy :: talk 05:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Evghenia Dumic : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as I am unable to find sufficient independent coverage of the footballer.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Moldova .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Champaign-Urbana Bandits : Let'srun ( talk ) 14:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports , Baseball ,  and Illinois .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure what standards the baseball project applies for lower-level minor-league teams, but a search on Newspapers.com turns up a lot of hits from the 1990s that are not available via a Google search.  E.g. this ( part 1 / part 2 ), this , this , this , this , this .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 15:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: These sources are all routine reports that do not provide the requisite WP:SIGCOV (I checked newspapers.com during my WP:BEFORE check).  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Dude -- This ( part 1 / part 2 ) two-page, multi-column piece is the antithesis of "routine".  It may or may not be enough (and may have some indepedence issues), but you lose credibility when you call it a routine report.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 15:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Re-direct to the Great Central League , where all info on this minor league can be contained.  Spanneraol ( talk ) 20:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Spanneraol.  There is at least one piece of SIGCOV, as noted above, but even that consists almost entirely of quotes from team reps, calling into question its independence.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Zachary Rapp-Rovan : Nearly all of the content (and sources) here is about the band, and the coverage I can find of him in RS is about his work with the band, including some mentions of the art he displays when the band performs.  I proposed a merge on 9 March, but that's had no response apart from the article creator.  Creator has now removed the merge proposal template from this article, so I've closed the merge proposal at Talk:Zeds Dead , but the problem of notability hasn't been addressed yet.  A redirect to Zeds Dead would be fine as an WP:ATD .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Bands and musicians ,  and Canada .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I did not remove the merge proposal with any intended malice.  I am not sure I can properly promote the necessary "proper notability" other than to say that many entertainers have a duality of creative ability other than the one they are most famous for.   Given a little time I will endeavor to find more reliable sources to support retention of his BLP.  Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 03:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Never having experienced an AfD, a redirect sounds like it might be a good solution.  Before creating the Rapp-Rovan article, I tried to increase the mention of his graffiti art in the Zeds Dead article but was unsatisfied with the result.  A separate BLP seemed to be the answer.  Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 03:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Zeds Dead .  The majority of this article is on that topic.  I don't see the sourcing to support a separate article on this band member's graffiti art.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 12:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tara Hall (model) : I can find no significant modeling work and sources that mention her are just trivial coverage relating to her husband's death and her suing someone.  Mbinebri ( talk ) 00:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Biz Markie .  — siro χ o 00:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Biz Markie per WP:BLPFAMILY .  APK whisper in my ear 03:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] merge per above.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 05:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Diagnosis of Asperger syndrome : Some content might be merged into the Asperger syndrome or the Diagnosis of autism articles.  Skvader ( talk ) 16:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge anything that might be useful in the Asperger article, Delete the rest.  nf utvol ( talk ) 17:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep - historical value.   Lots of references.  Heck, we have articles about obsolete medical things, most prominent IMO being Female hysteria (with its "tendency to cause trouble for others" :-).  The lede must be updated, to include its removal and controversy.  - Altenmann >talk 19:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the more apt parallel would be the article Asperger syndrome , which definitely has historical value along the lines of Female hysteria .  But there's no article for *diagnosis* of hysteria.  I don't see any "diagnosis of" articles in Wikipedia for any disease/syndrome that isn't currently a valid diagnosis (but I might've missed something).  Skvader ( talk ) 20:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree.  merge/redirect - Altenmann >talk 00:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Medicine ,  and Psychology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect.  Since Asperger syndrome isn't a medical diagnosis in the DSM-5 and ICD-11 and those are the classification systems that are most used, having a standalone article about its diagnosis isn't really necessary.  I agree with the nominator; the content should be placed in Asperger syndrome and Diagnosis of autism .  That Tired Tarantula Burrow 21:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rachelle Epanga : The subject has earned at least two caps for the DR Congo women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  This is the 135th women's footballer article nominated for AfD by this user in the 41 days since the start of the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup on 20 July 2023, accounting for 95.7% of their AfD nominations in that span.  At this rate of approximately 3.3 articles nominated per day, a user could nominate every international women's footballer article currently on Wikipedia in approximately 7 years and 4 months.  Good luck!  - 75.164.167.40 ( talk ) 19:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 17:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Secularism in Yemen : The available citations do not discuss "Secularism in Yemen" either.  Dympies ( talk ) 08:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Yemen-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:12, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:12, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Irreligion in Yemen .  Left guide ( talk ) 10:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Left guide.  There is a notable topic here but this article doesn’t address it properly.  The redirect is a decent AtD until someone can make a more coherent and better sourced attempt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra ( talk • contribs ) 11:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, this was a poor early article attempt.  The page should be put up for speedy deletion.  Tony24644 ( talk ) 15:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Tony24644 , was this written with ChatGPT?  Curbon7 ( talk ) 22:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy , Politics , Islam ,  and Social science .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Irreligion in Yemen per the comments above.   The latter has much better sourcing but needs to be expanded to include more historical perspectives.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 04:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
In Holy Flux : How this tour is notable is not indicated.  Redirect back to the album until there are more substantial sources to warrant a separate page.  Karst ( talk ) 08:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Karst ( talk ) 08:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the singer's page.  This is a PROMO for the tour, with basically a list of dates and venues.  No indication why it's a notable tour.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the singer's page or the associated album, And in the Darkness, Hearts Aglow .  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 15:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable, underreferenced tour that only has one Facebook post from the artist fails both WP:GNG and WP:NTOUR .  Aspects ( talk ) 14:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to singer's page.  The only source is a facebook post, and seems to fail WP:NTOUR .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  12:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KCBT-LD: This subject did survive a 2019 AfD, but that was under a much different (and looser) standard of notability for television stations than what we have today.  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Snow Goose Produce: Article is about a run-of-the-mill farmstand with no significant coverage outside of the local region; the sources found outside of the area are passing mentions in a travel piece about the county as a whole.  Attempts to find articles in other regional newspapers (Portland and Vancouver, B.C.) did not yield results.  Doesn't pass the WP:NCORP sniff test in my view.  Sounder Bruce 04:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions .  Sounder Bruce 04:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Snow Goose Produce has received significant coverage in multiple national, independent, reliable secondary sources in addition to its local/regional citations.  National magazine Sunset wrote a full article on the business and described it as "the farmstand of all farmstands".  The market was rated the No. 1 "Best Roadside Stand" in the country by national magazine Martha Stewart Living .  The Detroit Free Press citation is not a "passing mention"; around 1/2 of the article is directly dedicated to Snow Goose Produce.  The Michigan-based writer uses the farm stand as the framing for her entire Skagit Valley travel article and describes the market as "the best metaphor for this earnestly rural region".  PK-WIKI ( talk ) 06:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Detroit Free Press article has five paragraphs related to the stand, not "around 1/2".  The Sunset article is a short listicle, and the MSL article (which I cannot access) is probably of the same vein.  Frankly, it'd have to be an extremely special farmstand to warrant an article; there's no obvious sign that it is.  Sounder Bruce 06:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You are not counting the article's lead or ending, both of which are dedicated to this notable farm stand.  11/19 of the indented or bolded paragraphs are about Snow Goose Produce... over half.  PK-WIKI ( talk ) 07:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Five paragraphs is SIGCOV.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 19:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge For all this is, we can merge into the Fir Island article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 11:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Elnur Aslanov: -- Correspondentman ( talk ) 10:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 7 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 10:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Politics ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The article has many sources, enough for Wikipedia:GNG , even searching for him unloads possible sources.  TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 08:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 13:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I somehow didn't catch when I first sorted this that {{ subst:afd2 }} does not appear to have been implemented here, leaving the AfD header incomplete.  I have fixed this.  (No opinion or further comment at this time.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 17:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep plenty of references.  Jake Wartenberg ( talk ) 19:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per above, but also there are plenty of potential sources on Google Books and Google Scholar .  Aintabli ( talk ) 13:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a promotional page create by an SPA, Flambergesword .  There is no nearly enough RS about the subject to establish notability.  Most of the page is filled with irrelevant and poorly sourced political propaganda.  My very best wishes ( talk ) 23:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus