hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Andrew Ostrowski: Extensive editing could be done to fix it up, though the person isn't really notable in the first place.  OnlyNano ( talk ) 19:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Bibliographies .  OnlyNano ( talk ) 19:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - NOT A SOCIAL NETWORK : Possible socking involved.  Editor Sanctus7 and Andrew Ostrowski are possibly the same person.  Sanctus7 supplied the images dated 2009, 2011, and 2012.  Written like an in-depth press release for media outlets - more likely for a dating website - no doubt written by him ("I guess I'm an old fashioned ‘bump into somebody/love at first sight’ type of person as opposed to a wolf out for the hunt.”) Details on his likes and dislikes. An entire subsection on his "Spirituality", his various collections and personal life. "Ostrowski was in a relationship with the daughter of an executive..." — Maile ( talk ) 03:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to a contested PROD .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Now this is a real work of art in the personal self-promo genre, I don’t think I’ve ever seen an entry at this level.  My instinct is that this will end up as a delete vote, but it’s not a speedy one, as there are in fact in-depth profiles here.  The Staten Island advance is a real outlet.  This coverage does not however appear to be independent of the subject however at first glance.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 14:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The sheer level of effort this must've taken for someone to try to promote themself is sad at best.  May it's deletion be swift.  The13thTroll ( talk ) 04:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed, this is a really interesting article he's worked on here.  Really caught my eye when I was copyediting it...  OnlyNano 18:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patty Mayo: Not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to pass WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 11:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Massachusetts .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete One could say that Patty Mayo doesn't cut the mustard when it comes to WP:GNG .  RickinBaltimore ( talk ) 11:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] spread a bit too thin perhaps.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Heavily promotional piece sourced entirely from the subject's own YouTube channel.  Ravenswing 12:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No coverage found in RS, Dexerto and the like.  Delete for lack of sourcing and the appearance of PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Onel5969, verily, your judgement rings true.  It grieves the spirit, this erasure, compelled by our own policies.  Yet, one ponders if, perchance, these same policies imperil the broader mission, consigning obscurity to the notable yet unheralded.  A conundrum, indeed!  Jack4576 ( talk ) 14:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Entire article written with sources from his channel.  No coverage other than a couple of articles and a police statement that talk about his staged videos.  Dawnbails ( talk ) 14:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete poorly sourced.  Fails WP:BIO for lack of independent coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 07:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TNT and WP:BLP .  This is a disaster of BLP violations wrapped in poorly worded nonsense.  15:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian ( talk • contribs ) Delete .  Does not appear to have reliable sourcing.  The best I found were [14] [15] [16] , but those aren't suitable for N or BLP.  SWinxy ( talk ) 17:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
M'bawine Atintande: DePRODed so bringing here for consensus.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , News media , Military ,  and Ghana .  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The following three sources were added to the talkpage of the article by the ip editor who removed the prod.  Nigel Ish ( talk ) 12:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.peacefmonline.com/pages/local/news/201302/156016.php https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/Mali-mission-is-a-Combat-Mission-Colonel-Atintande-264898 https://www.modernghana.com/news/460989/gaf-apologises-to-media-over-assault-of-journalists.html 161.69.71.25 All three seem to be reports of statements made by the article subject as part of his job and not really ABOUT the subject, and as such probably don't count as significant coverage.  Nigel Ish ( talk ) 13:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 14:45, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Mztourist ( talk ) 02:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
E-Novation: Could not find any sources to meet WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and Australia .  –– Formal Dude (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , obvious advert.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 08:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG and unable to locate anything.  The awards listed aren't persuasive as to notability Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Relies exclusively on being recipient of several small awards, and search only yielded promotional pieces or trivial mentions of the subject.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Martin Waud: I don't see much coverage searching online and in Cayman Islands news sources.  I can see some passing mentions in the Cayman Compass and one piece that provides a little more prose.  All told I don't believe the subject of the article meets GNG.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports , Football ,  and United Kingdom .  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Racine Rhinos: It's unclear if they ever played a single game.  Fails WP:GNG .  ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 16:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wisconsin .  ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 16:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions .  ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 16:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Set to begin play in 2011 eh?  Still nothing about the team, only rhinos at the local zoo [24] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete don't look to meet WP:GNG .  Although they played in the United States Women's Football League , they aren't mentioned at all there, so I don't see a plausible redirect target.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Tagged for lack of sourcing in 2018 -- six years later and still no GNG sourcing.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 22:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Virtual Observatory India: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 12:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astronomy and India .  Owen× ☎ 13:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 19:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Port Phillip Bay mid-air collision: The accident has a lack of continued coverage with one to three articles popping up in january with the release of the preliminary report but are not enough to justify its notability and not much in depth coverage .  Whilst tragic, I can't see what would make this accident notable as there's not much that would give this accident additional enduring significance Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 13:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Aviation ,  and Australia .  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 13:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  It seems highly unlikely that any notability factors will emerge from the investigation, but the article could always be re-created if they do.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 14:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 14:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable under event or GNG.  Avgeekamfot ( talk ) 23:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  ‹hamster717🐉› ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 01:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Don Pedro Mexican Restaurant: Would need significant coverage in wider sources to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Coverage is local, and being named the best Mexican restaurant in Express-News readers' polls is not a criterion for encyclopedic notability.  -- Kinu t / c 19:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply a local Mexican restaurant.  SportingFlyer T · C 15:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malena Ratner: Chris Troutman ( talk ) 20:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Disney ,  and Argentina .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 20:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 21:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom MNewnham ( talk ) 02:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adetokunbo Sijuwade: There is a minor claim to notability "He is the first child of his father and for a long time was seen as the heir to the throne" and he moved in elevated circles, but WP:NOTINHERITED applies.   This is his resumé rather than an article.  He is a WP:ROTM businessman doing his job.   Fails WP:BIO 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per norm.  Apart from being "a prince"  there's nothing presumably notable about him.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 09:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a professional profile of someone who happens to be a prince.  WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  If the individual is notable it requires TNT.  — siro χ o 09:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This article does not speak for itself and does not explain why the subject is biographically notable , probably because he isn't notable but is a run-of-the-mill businessman from a traditionally wealthy family.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 16:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - notability is not meant with the sources available (unless none that I am not aware of.).  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 19:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clive Dawson: Could not find SIGCOV on him.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of notability.  The contribs of the article creator make me wonder if there was perhaps a close connection to the subject.  Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk ) 18:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Herbert Sutcliffe's cricket career (1919–1927): Its simple, this time as it is a set of articles about Herbert Sutcliffe , where exactly identical articles were successfully called for deletion here just today Pharaoh496 ( talk ) 18:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason: Herbert Sutcliffe's cricket career (1928–1932) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Herbert Sutcliffe's cricket career (1933–1939) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Pharaoh496 ( talk ) 18:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , History , Cricket ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 19:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If you can't describe a person's career in their own BLP article in several paragraphs, that might be a sign you should learn to edit, not infodump into three separate chronological articles.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Nate above.  RobinCarmody ( talk ) 20:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammed Al-Zakrouti: I can't find anything outside of database sources and Wikipedia mirrors.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Metagaming (disambiguation): At best it is WP:ONEOTHER and can be dealt with by a hatnote, but I question if it even rises to that level.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 23:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Disambiguations .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 23:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The page is under the wrong name as it stands, so it would need to be moved to Metagame (disambiguation) , but as nom says WP:ONEOTHER applies at the moment.  A month ago some of us started looking at this set of pages in regards to another deletion discussion, and found a lot to clean up.  The discussion got...sidetracked.  Let's let the cleanup continue first before trying to salvage an unneeded disambig.  — siro χ o 00:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Serves zero purpose.  NegativeMP1 ( talk ) 04:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As a several-times contributor to this page, I agree it is no longer necessary.  Llew Mawr ( talk ) 21:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vin Suprynowicz: The article presently has no citations containing WP:RS -based significant coverage of the subject, and my WP:BEFORE search across multiple search engines failed to locate any.  His appearance on one state ballot as a vice-presidential candidate on a third party-ticket in the 2000 election is insufficient to establish notabilty per WP:NPOL as well.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 20:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Politics , Libertarianism , Connecticut ,  and Nevada .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 20:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Politicians , Arizona ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - non-notable subject.  Very little coverage exists.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 19:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brandon Richards (disambiguation): Clarityfiend ( talk ) 08:44, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete