2024 zebra escape: Short-lived event that has, even a few weeks later, had no discernable lasting impact.  Per WP:N(E) , the depth and duration of non-local coverage is not sufficient to establish notability.  Sounder Bruce 19:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Washington .  Sounder Bruce 19:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , zero impact on anything, probable WP:SUSTAINED / WP:LASTING failure.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Transportation .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom PersusjCP ( talk ) 20:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Quintessential WP:NOTNEWS of a local event with no actual significance.  Escapes of exotic animals are not particularly rare, even if their unusualness attracts some public attention.  Reywas92 Talk 13:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per previously raised points by above editors.  Gottagotospace ( talk ) 22:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Keep: Changing my vote.  Randy Kryn and Another Believer convinced me below.  Gottagotospace ( talk ) 15:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , meets WP:GNG with coverage in the New York Times , The Guardian , and the Seattle coverage which covers a large regional area (not just local), but is it noteworthy?  In the United States, yes, as a rarity.  Maybe change the title to the name of the zebra who was on the loose for almost a week, Shug (zebra) , which is what makes the topic notable (if all the zebras were quickly captured it wouldn't be, but the zebra wandering around for a week captured news coverage as well as the public's interest).  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 15:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Zebras wandering around is funny and great for meme material, until it's time to move onto the next meme.  I don't think that justifies having an article for it, especially because it wasn't widespread coverage.  Gottagotospace ( talk ) 15:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Doesn't get much more widespread than BBC + The Guardian + Smithsonian , AP, CNN, etc etc --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, the coverage was widespread, so GNG is not a problem. In looking at other zebra articles this one stands out as being about individual zebras (Shug, the main focus of media coverage). Since Wikipedia coverage about individual zebras is low, then this article should be welcomed and lionized (lionized? run!). Randy Kryn ( talk ) 15:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Gotcha, y'all changed my mind! Gottagotospace ( talk ) 15:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep (disclaimer: page creator), per GNG. Received international coverage, plenty of sources on the talk page to expand the page. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  Might well have been thrilling and got a lot of short-term news coverage (click bait), but it doesn't rate encyclopedia coverage.  ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 16:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the few lines about the impact on the town and the "zebra specials" to the article on North Bend, Washington, otherwise this is a non-notable event.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Merge per WP:NOTNEWS .  -1ctinus📝 🗨 23:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no sustained coverage.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 01:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sustained coverage issues 104.7.152.180 ( talk ) 03:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Completely fails NOTNEWS as a trivial "and finally" story that is unlikely to have sustained coverage.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 22:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and selective merge to North Bend, Washington largely per WP:NOPAGE and due to lack of WP:SUSTAINED coverage that is unlikely to form.  Frank Anchor 22:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS , no indication this has sustained coverage.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete