William H. Kerdyk, Jr.: Also, this article was created by Lisabofita , who has a self-admitted conflict of interest and paid editing relationship with the article's subject, and also moved it from draft to article namespace without going through the articles for creation process properly.  Graham87 ( talk ) 08:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and Florida .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The language used in this article and the sources used are promotional in nature.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 13:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, please specify the particular language of concern, and someone can review and revise accordingly.  The language of the page is not grounds for deletion; instead, efforts should focus on improving the article.  Regarding the sources, I have included a list below of non-promotional sources.  If you believe any specific sources are promotional, please explain your rationale.  Additionally, could you please clarify what constitutes a promotional source?  Are you suggesting that the individual paid to have these articles placed?  Please provide clarification and any evidence or reasoning to support such claims.  Lisabofita ( talk ) 21:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Promotion is using wikipedia to further a goal, such as boosting search result rankings.  You don't have to pay the source to have it placed for it to be promotional.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If any part of the article sounds promotional please feel free to edit it or revise it.  That is not grounds for deletion of a notable politician and philanthropist with dozens of articles.  I have tried my best to not use any promotional language.  If you can point out which exact parts are promotional, they can be revised by someone.  Lisabofita ( talk ) 03:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I have been compensated for writing this article and have disclosed my affiliation on my userpage.  Mr. Kedryk is a local politician in my area.  We were introduced via a friend with the intention of my assisting in creating a page for him.  I am uncertain if I am permitted to vote, so I am abstaining from doing so.  Instead, I am posting a comment outlining my reasons for why the article should be retained.  He is a local politician with dozens of news articles about him.  He meets: WP:NPOL :  Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage WP:ANYBIO : Has won multiple awards WP:BASIC : If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability: Coverage includes: 4 articles in Community Newspapers 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Miami Herald South Floriad Business and Waelth Magazine Weekend Golfer Lifystyle Magazine Gables Insider .  Lisabofita ( talk ) 21:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have also found additional coverage, not presently in the article: - Miami Herald - This is very in-depth - communitynewspapers.com - This is very in-depth - . miamiherald.com 1 - miamiherald.com 2 - therealdeal.com - It is about a real estate deal, but should still count towards WP:BASIC .  "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability"  Lisabofita ( talk ) 00:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I haven't fully looked at BASIC, and I'm not sure I'll be able to for this one, but the well-known and significant award s of ANYBIO refer to things like Nobels and Pulitzers.  The awards listed unfortunately don't quite make the cut.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Noting that a previous version of this page, Bill Kerdyk Jr.  , was WP:G11 speedily deleted a few months ago.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 23:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The previous version is accessible on archive.org .  Personally, I believe it warranted deletion due to its overly promotional nature and lack of citations for much of the content.  In contrast, my version is significantly improved, devoid of promotional elements, and includes more citations.  Lisabofita ( talk ) 00:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Regardless of the creator being paid to make this page, I don't think Kerdyk is notable.  Serving as vice mayor of a small city does not establish notability, and the articles cited on the page seem to mostly be articles from smaller publications or only mention him in passing.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Miami Herald is a widely recognized publication with a longstanding history dating back to 1903.  Therefore, it would be inaccurate to say it is non-notable.  The subject has been featured in three distinct articles on Miami Herald, further attesting to their significance.  Additionally, Community Newspapers has been in existence since 1967 and has also published several articles featuring the subject.  It is worth noting that both of these publications have their own Wikipedia pages, underscoring their credibility and notability.  Moreover, numerous articles provide comprehensive coverage of the subject, including 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , Miami Herald , South Florida Business and Wealth Magazine , Weekend Golfer and Lifestyle Magazine .  I would like to emphasize that these articles offer substantive insights rather than mere passing mentions.  If you have not had the opportunity to review these articles thoroughly, I encourage you to do so.  Upon closer examination, you will find that they provide valuable and detailed information about the subject.  Lisabofita ( talk ) 04:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You can't even list any Wikipedia policies with your above statement which is concerning.  Read up on our general notability guidelines and then look at the specific notability guidelines for politicians .  – The Grid ( talk ) 18:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It seems you didn't read my prior comments.  I named 3 policies above.  How about WP:BASIC : If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability??? WP:NPOL :  Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.  He has dozens of in-depth articles.  WP:ANYBIO : He has won multiple awards.  Although someone has argued these are not notable awards.  I do not agree as they are all from well known local organizations and he has at least 6 awards.  Lisabofita ( talk ) 03:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sourced primarily to promotional puff pieces from hyperlocal media. - KH-1 ( talk ) 04:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please identify the articles you consider to be promotional puff pieces and explain why you think so for each one.  Many articles discuss his political activities and are independently authored by reputable sources like the Miami Herald and Community Newspapers , both of which have presence on Wikipedia.  Are you suggesting that some articles might be paid or sponsored content?  Lisabofita ( talk ) 03:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete being the vice mayor of a relatively small city is certainly not an WP:NPOL pass and all of the awards fall well short of an WP:ANYBIO pass-which is meant to be applied to national and international award like a Pullitzer Prize and not something like the "citizen of the year" from your town's Rotary Club.  Additionally, WP:POLOUTCOMES has dictated over the years that local coverage of local politicians is to be discounted and a higher level of coverage is needed to establish WP:GNG .  I'd also recommend the author of this article read WP:BLUDGEON .  Given that paid-for articles on this subject have already been deleted at Bill Kerdyk Jr. and William H. ‘Bill’ Kerdyk, Jr.  , I believe that WP:SALTing may be needed as well.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 14:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry I am not trying to BLUDGEON, but I must respond to your objections.  Why do you think he doesn't meet WP:BASIC : "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability"??? Please note that I was unaware of previous attempts to create a page for him.  Those submissions were not made by me.  After reviewing an old version on Archive.org, I agree that its deletion was justified due to its promotional tone and lack of sufficient citations.  Therefore, the previous deletions should not influence the evaluation of my current submission.  Lisabofita ( talk ) 03:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I explained my reasoning.  This is a textbook example of BLUDGEONing, which can discourage others from participating in the AfD.  At this point I would recommend stepping back and let the AfD run its course with new editors giving their opinions.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 11:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can COI accounts even participate in these discussions?  I guess they can as it's not an article page but I think closing admin has to be aware of the COI.  – The Grid ( talk ) 12:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They can as long as the COI is disclosed.  A COI/PAID editor badgering every editor's delete vote could possibly be a breach of Wiki-etiquette, though.   Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 14:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] FWIW I blocked this editor sitewide due to disruption but made it a partial block *just* so they could participate here (the results weren't unexpected, but I thought it was fairer this way, if anything).  See their user talk page .  Graham87 ( talk ) 19:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not for CVs, and he fails NPOL.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - violates WP:NOTRESUME , WP:NOTWEBHOST , WP:SPAM , and many others; also specifically fails WP:NPOL for lack of any coverage except local news.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete