Khmer Airlines: Sources in article and BEFORE show nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from IS RS.  There are brief ROUTINE mentions about accidents.  // Timothy :: talk 03:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Aviation ,  and Cambodia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Notable as a particularly accident-prone airline.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 12:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Accidents: The first accident is to an incident where 2 people died.  Because they were Americans there was a brief news article.  Nothing SIGCOV about the subject of the article, the Airline.  The second accident is to a plane hitting an animal.  Unless you're the buffalo, it doesn't show notability.  The third accident is not documented in any way.  The database record used as a source states, "Little or no information is available".  None of the above meets GNG or CORP guidelines.  The sources for the article are all database records and one article that mentions the subject, none of which is SIGCOV.  One is literally a reference that says there is no information.  // Timothy :: talk 13:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Google books Heckman, Charles W. (1990) The Phnom Penh Airlift, Confessions of a Pig Pilot in the Early 1970s, McFarland, Incorporated, Publishers . ,. .  (Google books) has some details... not sure how to add.   ( Msrasnw ( talk ) 15:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Here is the link to the above [23] This is not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth; its a mention in passing while discussing another subject.  It also contradicts the assertion of the first keep vote, showing there is not reliable information about this subject, just opinions based on scant information.  // Timothy :: talk 15:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Salvio giuliano 08:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It existed, and there is enough coverage to write a stub article.   Are there reams of Khmer-language business press coverage that survived the ravages of time?   Probably not.  List of defunct airlines of Cambodia could be a redirect target.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 04:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of defunct airlines of Cambodia per ATD.  References fail to establish notability.  HighKing ++ 09:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : No objection to redirect to List of defunct airlines of Cambodia // Timothy :: talk 10:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of defunct airlines of Cambodia per above as an ATD.  CycloneYoris talk!  00:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect As an WP:ATD .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect