hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Good Men (film): Deprodded with the rationale that it won a notable award.  I’m not convinced that the award it won is sufficient reason for keeping it, and I couldn’t see an obvious merge target, so bringing here.  Mccapra ( talk ) 09:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America .  Mccapra ( talk ) 09:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Dear Mccapra , your vigilance in upholding our hallowed guidelines is beyond reproach.  In scrutinising the evidence available for "Good Men", I confess I am obliged to concur with your assessment.  The dearth of substantial commentary in reliable independent sources, despite the film's commendable recognition at The Los Angeles Arthouse Film Festival, steers us toward an unfortunate course of deletion.  Such compliance, however, is not without its pangs of regret.  It weighs heavily upon my conscience that we are compelled to erase a testament of artistic accomplishment, one that has been honoured in the sphere of short film.  Is this not a contradiction to our purpose, our commitment to the preservation of knowledge in all its varied forms?  While we adhere to the present guidelines, I fear we are straying from the broader purpose of our encyclopedia.  A purpose which, in my humble view, should encompass a magnanimous approach towards the many faces of human endeavour, such as this fine film.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 11:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] well we’re not compelled, it’s up to us to make the judgement.  I mean, if there are some sources to discuss we can always decide that we want to keep something even if it’s borderline.   I’ve managed to keep a number of articles in that grey area.   My issue with this is I’m not even seeing any grey.   Also it’s true that because of its name this film is particularly hard to search for.   Maybe someone with a better knowledge of film or better access to offline sources can weigh in.   Ultimately we’re not condemning a topic to oblivion by deleting.   If there are sources out there somewhere then someone else can have a go at maybe writing a better article in the future.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A google search returns almost no reliable sources that mention this film, and the few there are mention it only in passing.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 11:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shehab Mohamed: The only coverage I can find is routine transactional announcements like [9] , match reports and statistics database entries.  Consensus at the 2019 AfD was that the article failed the GNG, but it was kept due to the now-deprecated NFOOTBALL.  Zero improvements have been made since 2019.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Egypt .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find any WP:RS addressing him directly and in detail Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wilmaure Louw: JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete There appears to be a bit of sourcing on an event that took place in 2015 here , here and here however this is probably a bit WP:ONEVENTy .  While there is coverage of his rugby career it is limited and there's not anything to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cardo Siddik: I have previously moved back to draft space, but this should go through a proper deletion discussion.  Spike 'em ( talk ) 12:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Spike 'em ( talk ) 12:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Player would not pass the previous NFOOTY and rest of coverage is pretty routine contract announcements / minor match coverage.  Spike 'em ( talk ) 12:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Due to the article being moved from draftspace mutiple times without the proper submission process.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Forgot Darlington was no longer a league team, I agree with the assessment from the nominator.  If it is recreated maybe a SALT is in order.  Govvy ( talk ) 19:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hemmo Paskiainen: A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Pahkasika .  toweli ( talk ) 12:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Finland .  toweli ( talk ) 12:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since there are no sources that can support, let alone verify , independent notability.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject of the text does not possess any kind of well-supported , significant, independent notability .  All we have is admirable passion.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 19:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frank Kiwanuka: A COI page from which others have previous removed inappropriate content.  What is left is not viable as a BLP for anyone or for an academic.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 00:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Medicine .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 00:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Uganda and Finland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- clearly fails WP:NPROF with an h-index of only 11.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 04:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no evidence of notability.  Broc ( talk ) 15:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NPROF .  Adjuncts and researchers are rarely notable.  Bearian ( talk ) 21:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Impact seems insufficient to meet WP:NPROF , no evidence of meeting other notability guidelines.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 13:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yona (musician): — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 14:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and South Korea .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KEDD-LD: Let'srun ( talk ) 20:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Even in Los Angeles, it's hard to imagine a low-power station that started within this century and has seemingly only carried national programming getting the requisite significant coverage .  (It does not help that these articles for such low-profile stations have tended to attract unsourced, not-always-accurate, IP edits.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  User Memer ( chat ) Tribs 22:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gayathri Vivekanandan: The subject is a successful business leader but that is not the basis for a Wikipedia article.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Computing ,  and India .  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Recently, the draft was declined by me.  Upon my further check, I couldn’t find anything other than interviews or her own words in articles.  These sources are not in-depth and can’t establish notability.  The subject fails to meet WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 04:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I had performed an BEFORE prior to

Discussion outcome: delete
Matthew Suberan: There were a few passing mentions, but the subject fails WP:GNG in my opinion.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andy Lee (actor): The sources are all tabloid garbage.  I looked for better ones and found nothing useful.  gnu 57 01:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Sexuality and gender ,  and Ireland .  gnu 57 01:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Pornography . - MY, OH MY!  (mushy yank) 12:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , there is a boxer with the same name, with more coverage.  Otherwise, this person has appeared on a talk show with Hugh Jackman, that's all there is for sourcing.  What's used in the article for sourcing is non-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nasser Meftah: The best that I can find in Arabic is FilGoal and stories about players with similar names like Ismaël Bennacer and Majed Naser , which don't help matters.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Myanmar Futsal League: That said, it currently has no acceptable sources and probably shouldn't have passed.  I don't consider a Facebook photo to be acceptable justification for an article.  Searching in Burmese (မြန်မာဖူဆယ်လိဂ်), I was unable to find any significant coverage of the 2024 season.  News Eleven contains a passing mention of the 2020 season, MT News seems to be about a different tournament and is from 2023, this News Eleven article is from 2024 but is about the national team rather than the league.  Searching in English, I can find GNLM but that's about the 2023 season and is painfully brief besides.  In summary, this article is totally inappropriate for mainspace and I can't find any sources to justify it.  If someone can find sources that show in-depth coverage of the 2024 season of this competition, I would suggest moving this to draft space.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because if we move it to draft, he'll just move it back.  Star Mississippi 14:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Villowo: Fram ( talk ) 07:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Cricket ,  and India .  Fram ( talk ) 07:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  The page does not provide reliable sources showing that the sport meets the general notability guideline.  RangersRus ( talk ) 11:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A non-notable localised sport.  AA ( talk ) 12:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, I found nothing that would make this subject meet WP:GNG .  It requires multiple independent, reliable sources with in-depth coverage to establish notability.  Grab Up - Talk 17:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Poorly referenced and specific to a crazy sport no corresponding article on another wiki.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  Lacks coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Reelers: A search on the web for references brings up nothing on them, even when including band members names into the search.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and England .  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have found a reference that verifies the live session on BBC London, and added it to the article.   Apart from that I've come up empty; even the claim to have played Glastonbury is debunked as they don't appear on the listings .   Seems like a promising group that has now disappeared.   Unfortunately I just don't see a page being justified given WP:MUSICBIO guidelines.  Resonant Dis tor tion 19:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WRZB-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Washington, D.C. .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 22:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Non-notable LPTV.  -- Danubeball ( talk ) 20:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : all five of the sources are routine directory entires, so they prove existence but don't hint towards notability. -- D'n'B - t -- 17:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks in depth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nay Moe Naing: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no evidence of sources outside profiles and WP:ROUTINE sources.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 18:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Active athlete for the Myanmar national team, the article demands improvements but the deletion seems exaggerated at this moment.  Svartner ( talk ) 15:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please can you provide significant coverage showing that WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC are met?  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gabriella Baldacchino (Actress): Fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR and even AGF is tested by the likelihood of UPE.  The line "Gabriella Baldacchino was born on November 20, 2001, to her parents." is, however, a classic...  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 11:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] TBF, if you're going to be born, those are the people to be born to... -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America . Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 11:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; no sign of notability of any flavour. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 11:13, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Trivial roles with no coverage in RS, or anything extensive.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Ibjaja055 ( talk ) 11:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, all I can find is trivial coverage and passing mentions.  The creator of what's now titled Gabriella Baldacchino (actress) has just been blocked for sockpuppetry, as nominator suspected.  In the unlikely event that this is kept, it should be moved to Gabriella Baldacchino , currently a redirect.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:24, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : None of the sources provided are reliable and significantly covered for the article.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 17:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all above.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 15:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete