Lars Bern: The main concerns include:
 - **POV (Point of View) Issues**: The article heavily reflects the claims and views of the biographed person without sufficient neutral coverage.
 - **Lack of Reliable Sources**: The content relies predominantly on sources that do not meet Wikipedia's reliability standards.
 - **Notability Concerns**: The subject does not meet the general notability guideline as the article lacks significant coverage from independent, reliable sources.
 - **Content Focus**: The article focuses more on claims made by the person rather than providing a balanced biographical account, which is a core requirement for biographical articles on Wikipedia.
 These issues combined lead to the conclusion that the article may not be suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form.  Looking into the bibliography at least four of them seems to be self-published, or published on "print-on-demand" publishing companys. "Recito": "Recito is an innovative publisher specializing in small print runs and making the publishing world accessible to authors. We work closely with our authors to create wonderful books, and because we are experts in small print runs, we can test the market with each book without having to predict the future or risk mistakenly rejecting a manuscript." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franke1281 ( talk • contribs ) 09:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 21 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Politics , Engineering , Environment , Technology ,  and Sweden .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but Stubify - The article has severe issues, but being a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences means that he meets point 3 of the WP:NACADEMIC criteria.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 14:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's been some recent significant coverage of him as a person advancing climate change denialism and other fringe beliefs, but a notable crank is still notable, the article just needs to reflect the RS on him.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 14:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If so that has to be abuntantly clear.  For instance, right now it says "Klimatupplysningen, a Swedish climate debating movement".  Describing Klimatupplysningen as a "climate debating movement" is a bit like describing swedish "Strålskyddsstiftelsen" as "an organization that works to show the pros and cons of good mobile phone coverage".  (And for those not knowlegable about Strålskyddstiftelsen: https://www-vof-se.translate.goog/utmarkelser/tidigare-utmarkelser/arets-forvillare-2013/? _x_tr_sl=sv&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=sv&_x_tr_pto=wapp As it is now, this article reads more like an Op:ed for Lars Berns, to put it mildly, controversial opinions, than a biographical account.  Franke1281 ( talk ) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've edited the article to what I believe is a better state policy-wise.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 12:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Good changes.  Now I believe the article aligns much better with Wikipedia's guidelines for biographies and appears more neutral and factual than it did before.  Franke1281 ( talk ) 15:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per AlexandraAVX .  While there are significant changes which need to be made to the article, the topic is notable and the issues can better be handled by shortening and editing the article than deleting it.  / Julle ( talk ) 21:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep