hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Samantha Scarlette: No charted singles, no awards won.  The radio host job doesn't bring up much for coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New Jersey .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Was also deleted in 2014; if nothing has appeared in the last decade for notability, we likely won't find much either, but I'll leave the wiki folks here to work their magic.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Radio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - She has been around for a long time as a Jill-of-all-trades, relentlessly promoting herself as a musician, skateboarder, model, radio host, and who knows what else.  The article is ref-bombed with directory entries, social media posts, self-upload promotional sites, credits for other people's works, and basic announcements of new releases.  There is a lot of that stuff online, but I can find almost nothing that is reliable and independent.  Hope she has been able to make a living, but the media just hasn't noticed.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If anyone is in favour of keeping this article, could you please highlight the WP:THREE best sources that support notability?  Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG .  All coverage of the subject seems to be WP:ROUTINE and puff.  User:Let'srun 18:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:ROTM .  Fails WP:BIO per above arguments.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 07:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PRJCT18: My PROD rationale, which still applies, is that this is a fan group that does not meet the notability threshold .  Pichpich ( talk ) 21:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Philippines .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 13:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; and the PROD duplication is fine. – Abacusada ( t • c ) 15:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 04:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 15:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:Notability .  Maliner ( talk ) 18:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Radio Broadgreen: Article completely unsourced and research does not reveal much (if any) coverage, other than a single event in 2016 which attracted some offbeat news coverage [12] .  Flip Format ( talk ) 14:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Medicine , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Flip Format ( talk ) 14:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unfortunately there are many, many hundreds of completely unsourced, non-notable radio station articles (of which this is one) on Wikipedia due to previous policy effectively suggesting all radio stations were inherently notable.  While it is a shame to see people's work be deleted, without sources we have no credibility, we effectively become a social media site.  It's extraordinary how many of these articles have existed for 10-20 years with literally no sources.  I also note that the page was specifically created to "advertise the station as much as possible" AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brahim Souleymane: The most I was able to find was this 2017 piece on his contract renewal with his club.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 23:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sebra Yen: Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Taiwan .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources.  There is a passing mention here in The Washington Post , which says, "ICE SKATING EXHIBITION Friday 6:30 to 7. Champion ice skater Sebra Yen performs. Reston Town Center Pavilion, 1818 Discovery St., Reston. 703-709-6300. Free."  Sebra Yen ( simplified Chinese : 颜少博 ; traditional Chinese : 顔少博 ; pinyin : Yán Shǎobó ) does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria .  Cunard ( talk ) 01:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NSKATE and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 04:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Broodwork: Kpg jhp jm 06:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks notability.  Some of the sources are 404.  The NYT piece is an opinion piece.  Even if the subject satisfies notability, I think this page is quite dismal and needs TNT.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 07:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per

Discussion outcome: delete
Theresah Boie: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:34, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Coalition for Divorce Reform: Graywalls ( talk ) 23:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics , Companies , Websites , United States of America ,  and Iowa .  Graywalls ( talk ) 23:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mickey Charles Award: Having looked at the article and done a WP:BEFORE search I am really struggling to see how this award is actually notable.  The article as it stands contains a single source from The Sports Network, this is not independent coverage because the award was created and awarded by The Sports Network's CEO.  Doing a few further searches turns up a bunch of republished press releases from The Sports Network, e.g. [69] , [70] , [71] and some posts by the college the winner attended [72] .  I can't see any evidence of third party coverage existing to satisfy WP:N .  -Lemonaka‎ 01:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Sports .  -Lemonaka‎ 01:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The URL in the article says FCS, and using that to search, I came up with https://www.espn.com/espn/wire? section=ncf&id=25667940 Graywalls ( talk ) 01:49, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There is some coverage on the award found on Newspapers.com, such as [73] [74] Alvaldi ( talk ) 15:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kaburu: I also cannot find any references to this on Google so appears to fail notability requirement.  — Panamitsu (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music .  — Panamitsu (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete --there's just nothing there.  Drmies ( talk ) 01:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Found nothing of value on this.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 10:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No mentions in Swedish media and nothing that even comes close to helping to meet WP:GNG that I can find online.  -- AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I've tried and failed to locate any sources to save this article.  There are mentions in Swedish media, but nothing substantial – the best I can find is the Vestmanlands Läns Tidning article "Sanning – konsekvens" from 30 January 2006, where there is a couple of sentences which actually touch on describing their music, but it's not really something to build an article on.  / Julle ( talk ) 17:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wesean Student Federation: Kautilya3 ( talk ) 17:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics , Asia ,  and India .  Kautilya3 ( talk ) 17:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom; not a notable organization.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  Raymond3023 ( talk ) 11:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed thank you.  I wrote articles, about various organizations in NER region, to fill the gap between the region and Wikipedia.  I agree that more sources would be needed Flyingphoenixchips ( talk ) 03:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Organization fails notability with no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edenspiekermann: Non-notable organization, sourcing does not appear to exist.  Article creator was a WP:SPA – Muboshgu ( talk ) 00:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 01:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Social media pieces, PR items, are about all I find.  Tagged for notability issues for almost 15 yrs, if nothing has turned up in that time, there likely isn't anything.  Happy to revisit if we find something.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Advertising ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Didn't find anything reliable.  Doesn't meet WP:NCORP .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question: - what about the "further reading" section - some of those refs are paper.  Are they not valid?  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just based on their titles, as I have not read them, they don't look to be coverage of the company, but rather relevant to the industry.  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 16:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Looking them up on Google Books they just appear to be about graphic design or logo design in general, also the first one is an autobiography of the founder of the company.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources are nothing but press releases.  Fails WP:NCORP .  GTrang ( talk ) 23:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tan D. Nguyen: It also mentions his conviction for voter intimidation.  Congressional candidates are neither notable or not notable under WP:POLITICIAN .  However, nothing is so distinct about his candidacy that he himself warrants an article.  It is otherwise run of the mill coverage of candidacies that do not rise to the level of candidates like Christine O'Donnell or Pro-Life (born Marvin Thomas Richardson) .  The other is his conviction.  Notability as it relates to crime and criminals states that "a person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person."  The information on his conviction can be merged into the 2006 election's article .  Mpen320 ( talk ) 00:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Crime ,  and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable individual, not meeting notability for politics; what's left is the "crime", which seems rather minor.  There is more focus in the article about his transgressions rather than him as a person, this is perhaps some sort of attack article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  People do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they didn't win, but this neither demonstrates any preexisting notability for other reasons nor evinces a reason why his candidacy should be treated as a special case of greater notability than everybody else's candidacies.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
University of Belgrade Faculty of Civil Engineering: Efforts to restore redirect have failed and redirects are costly .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Engineering ,  and Serbia .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thai Square: WP:FAILN - organizations local to a city, town or country maybe added to respective article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London#Leisure_and_entertainment Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 7:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Nom: Fails Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) .  Not deserving a page on Wikipedia .  I initially thought this a geographical article about "Thai Square".  It is a collection of "15 Thai-themed restaurants".  Wikipedia is not a business directory or a vehicle for promoting a business .  -- Otr500 ( talk ) 21:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edward Grillo: BEFORE doesn't help and this article has been having issues since 2006.  No inline citations, etc.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime ,  and Italy .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I confess to having edited this article 14 years ago when I felt that every article belonged on Wikipedia.  The subject is a low level member of a crime family whose article is essentially about his murder.   There are no claims of notability (or notoriety), no mentions in the New York City newspapers or other sources.  In Murder Machine, there are numerous mentions of Grillo, but nothing to indicate that he was really important in the crime family or an important figure to law enforcement.  I searched Mob Star: The Story of John Gotti on Google Books and found no mention of Grillo.  Rogermx ( talk ) 03:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Death of Meshioye Remilekun Toyosi: This story is tragic, but there is no indication that this event is notable in any way, other than the conspiracy that has grown up around it over the failure of any authorities to provide a clear cause of death.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  14:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Egypt and Nigeria .  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  14:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unpleasant, but not a notable incident.  Fails WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Wikipedia is NOT NEWS.  There is no greater significance of this incident, and while unfortunate, there will be no prolonged coverage.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Falling sick and dying isn't notable, unless there was some unusual reason why it happened, this is a routine event.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : False information is on this page.  Whathappentoremi 20:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEEVENT , WP:NOTNEWS .  Jacona ( talk ) 15:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete