hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
John Baker (author): I could not find any mention of him in independent sources.  It does not meet the criteria for notability, IMHO.  Broc ( talk ) 00:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Broc ( talk ) 00:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Couldn't find anything substantial about him, and so there is no indication of him passing WP:NAUTHOR .  If anyone can find some sources about him, please ping me.  KangarooGymnast ( talk ) 01:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The novels are documented in ISBN 9781844680269 in the entries for Stone Lewis and Sam Turner.   However, I have found no independent sources for the author's life, nor a second source covering the novels.   There are supposedly some contemporary book reviews, hinted at elsewhere, but the back catalogue search engine for the publication that supposedly published the book reviews turns up zero results.  Uncle G ( talk ) 22:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gonçalo Foro: Does not meet WP:NSPORT .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 19:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports ,  and Portugal .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 19:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Extensive career, albeit for a minor nation, however a simple search is bringing up coverage.  I imagine there will highly likely be more offline or not easily accessible non-English language sourcing.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please share 2 or 3 reliable sources that have in-depth coverage on the person.  We cannot assume reliable sources from the past can be found.  We need to find them.  Having an extensive career is not sufficient, unless there is such a WP policy which I am not aware of.  If so, please link to the said policy.  Shinadamina ( talk ) 04:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you link them here.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  10:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] We also don't give weight of location, because there maybe system bias from you saying "of a minor nation".  Maybe I misunderstood that and still will need correction.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  10:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP article fails GNG, ANYBIO, and WP:SPORTSPERSON which was recently revised for this exact situation and requires at least one independent reliable source which directly details the subject.  BusterD ( talk ) 07:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No established form of notability.  Doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  10:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a complete lack of WP:SIGCOV as a BLP.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
M'Backé N'Diaye: The most I could find was this and this , which is not enough IMO.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stella Knekna: Best sources that I can find are Ant1Live , which mentions her once, Cypriot Squash Federation , which also only mentions her once, and Sigma Live , which mentions her three times in a listing of winners of an event but provides no prose about her.  I can't find anything that we can build a biography from.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Cyprus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found no reliable sources and she fails WP:NBADMINTON -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 02:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] P.S.,  I checked the German and Greek Wikipedia articles -- they are similarly sparse on references.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 02:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ekaterini Xagorari: Lacking indepth coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 14:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations ,  and Greece .  LibStar ( talk ) 14:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Liechtenstein-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agreed.  No evidence of notability.  TheBritinator ( talk ) 09:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as an ambassador not notable.  Other achievements not available to help with notability concerns raised here.  -- FightBrightTigh ( talk ) 09:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom; no evidence of notability can be found.  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 07:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paramount Defenses: No remotely usable sources.  I initially PRODed but on double-checking the deletion log it's not eligible.  – Tera tix ₵ 10:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and California .  – Tera tix ₵ 10:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There doesn't appear to be any reliable sources available about this company.  The sources I found were actually about a different company with a similar name (Paramount Group).  Gedaali ( talk ) 17:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : There is nothing usable from my WP:BEFORE search and no significant coverage .  Fails GNG.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 20:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
A. Andrews & Sons: A WP:BEFORE on Google News and Google Books doesn't find anything to redeem it.  Chetsford ( talk ) 06:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Companies ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Struggling to find anything and can't immediately see an alternative to deletion.  Could be local sources on such a longstanding business.  Was hopeful that the documents on the company's website [49] might be of help but one of the cuttings is an advertiser's announcement; the other headed "Comprehensive service from 300 employees" I'm unable to decipher and we'd need to find the original newspaper source to confirm whether or not it's an advertising feature.  Rupples ( talk ) 04:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arvinger: Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Norway .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I couldn't find any coverage at all beyond typical music databases and their own social media.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 21:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raúl Aldana: Boleyn ( talk ) 18:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Mexico .  Owen× ☎ 19:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reluctant Delete .   I couldn't find any independent, reliable sources with in depth coverage, but his breadth of work comes close to meeting WP:ENT #1 if it can be reliably sourced.  [7] is comprehensive but not reliable and I couldn't find anything better but I might have missed some Spanish sources.   The lack of coverage of voice actors in general is a great shame and injustice, but we need something to base an article on and I don't see any coverage in reliable sources to base an article on.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 02:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as the Delete argument is a Reluctant Delete.  I think the discussion should carry on for a few more days and hopefully other editors can participate here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG . Lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahmed Mohiyuddin: — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 14:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 14:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nom.  Non-notable police officer.  2A04:4A43:8D2F:F41B:E491:49CA:276B:820E ( talk ) 13:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is quite a famous officer of PSP.  He has a big fan following on social media.  He is known for live coverage of open court where he listens to people and issues directions on the spot to resolve their problems.  In my opinion, article should not be deleted.  39.63.226.172 ( talk ) 03:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] 39.63.226.172 , WP:ATA.  Please provide policy based reasoning.  — Saqib ( talk ) 20:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of yellow pages: Given yellow pages are rapidly disappearing in most places, it seems like it would be difficult to reconstruct a series of references, and the length of the list would make that quite a task anyway.  AntiDionysius ( talk ) 06:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Largely WP:OR , fails WP:NOT .  Possibly notable subject, but requires WP:TNT due to its current state regardless.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Seeing as to how an excellent case has been made for the page's deletion, and seeing how this page so desperately would requires major overhauls of an impossible nature per WP:DYNAMITE , this article neither manages to comprehensively accomplish any aspect of its initial purpose in an orderly manner nor does it, in any way, shape or form, justify the extraordinary efforts which would be required in fixing all the problems contained within.  Excellent nomination, I must say - this is one of the strangest pages I believe I've ever come across, and to think it went unnoticed for so long is rather astonishing.  Alas, when a page (particularly directorial listings) can neither justify its initial existence - let alone to the active nature that this encyclopedic project is geared towards - then it cannot survive on Wikipedia... and seeing as to how, per WP:REDUNDANT , the page offers extremely low encyclopedic value to anyone in any form, this page definitiely deserves to be deleted.  TheMysteriousShadeheart ( talk ) 18:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hospital separation: The single source is a dictionary entry.  [1] also defines the term as "used in commentaries on hospital statistics to describe the departure of a patient from hospital without distinguishing whether the patient departed alive or dead."  It could perhaps be added to wikt:separation .  Darcyisverycute ( talk ) 14:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  Darcyisverycute ( talk ) 14:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : and transwiki to Wikt per nom.  Owen× ☎ 14:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I feel like we should have something here.  We have an article at Against medical advice , which is a subtopic of this one.  BD2412 T 00:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Per WP:WHATABOUTX , I don't think the AMA article's notability transfers to this one.  They are related topics, but I do not think one is a subtopic of the other.  Darcyisverycute ( talk ) 03:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Much of this article seems to be about hospital statistics that are not specifically related to separation.  "In Australia, the main hospital separations of 2004–05 were:  1. Digestive system problems.  2. Neoplasms.  3. Injury/Poisoning.  ..."  But those are reasons why the person went into the hospital, not why they left.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Guillermo Álvarez: The best that I can find are El Pais , a squad listing, Espectador , another mere listing of him, and Montevideo , which mentions him once in the match report.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Venezuela .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Since I know very little about football, I wanted to know how Guillermo Álvarez fitted in WP:SPORTBASIC , since I'm reading that the Primera División Uruguaya is the "highest professional football league in Uruguay", but I'm having a difficult time finding independent sources in Spanish.  Nación Deportes has some articles with his tags, although I can't find him in them.  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 10:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's definitely a possibility of meeting SPORTBASIC but my searches, like yours, seemed to come to dead ends.  I'm not sure why Nación Deportes is giving false positive search results like that.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kang Bong-chil: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails WP:NSPORT due to a lack of secondary coverage User:Let'srun 03:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC (prong 5) due to lack of WP:SIGCOV in the article.  My searches didn't find any either, which is not surprising for an athlete from the hermit kingdom .  Also, he's not listed on the roster of North Korean players at 1966 FIFA World Cup Group 4 .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 17:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find anything more than brief mentions.  Happy to reconsider if substantial coverage is found.  Pax:Vobiscum ( talk ) 14:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete