Haizea (given name) : This name fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT .  Being in a top 10 list for one year does not establish notability.  Few if any reliable sources found online.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 00:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It is referenced and notable as one of the most popular names in Spain.  There also appear to be several people with the name referenced in various Wikipedia articles who might have articles that could be written about them.  I continue to think people are far to quick to nominate articles for deletion instead of expanding and improving them.  I don't agree with the rationale behind these deletion nominations.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 01:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Clearly a widespread and common name with notable examples.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 02:54, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment However common it may be, it still fails WP:NNAME and has no WP:SIGCOV .  Is someone wants to make articles about people with the name, please do so.  Either way it could always be recreated or refunded if articles about people with the name are written in the future.  What is the point of deleting an article that has existed for years instead of expanding or improving it?  I disagree with the standard on general principle, but there are also at least four people with this name mentioned in other articles and it remains an extremely popular name in Spain, which I would argue is its main claim to notability.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 05:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply User:Bookworm857158367 , The age of the article is irrelevant, and expansion is pointless if the subject isn't notable.  I have not found any reliable sources that it could be expanded with.  You think I don't check beforehand?  I don't know what's with this assumption that everything can be expanded and left A-okay.  Being mentioned in articles is not tantamount to notability, and the only person that looks like they could be notable at a glance is Barcenilla Garcia.  I also wouldn't call it "extremely" popular.  I know it is reasonably popular in Basque Country, but the problem lies in the sources.  Like I said, it could have future WP:POTENTIAL and can always be refunded or recreated.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 00:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My opinion hasn’t changed, for the reasons given above.  Continuing a circular argument probably would not be productive.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 05:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 18:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - according to WP:NNAME , a name is notable if it has two or more links to Wikipedia articles of persons with that name.  There is no article for anyone named Haizea on this Wikipedia.  Plus, I'm not sure if the sources are reliable.  One of them is just a name database website and the other doesn't seem to mention the name itself.  -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 21:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If I may, I would like to take this chance to agree and reiterate the third sentence of my nomination statement, as well as the fact that I cannot seem to find many, if any, reliable, in-depth sources online.  Pretty much all databases with dubious reliability.  A name in absence of notable people bearing it is still expected to meet WP:GNG , which, based on what I can find, simply does not.  It becomes indiscriminate information at that point ( WP:NOTDICT ).  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NNAME.  There isn't even one notable Haizea.  There is a Dweezil, but (fortunately) no given name article.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per @ StreetcarEnjoyer .  Name without any notability.  Svartner ( talk ) 14:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete