hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ahimsa Entertainment: Per WP:BEFORE , the search only returns passing mentions, routine PR articles and company directory listings.  No significant coverage anywhere.  At this point [27] , sources 7, 8, 13 and 14 are tweets.  Two self-published and two confirming their involvement as the distributor of the respective films.  Sources 1, 2, 3, and 5 are passing mentions.  4 and 6 are articles generated by their tweets (no significant coverage).  Source 9 is a listing again.  10 and 11 are unreliable articles with a passing mention.  Only source 12, [28] , with significant coverage.  Per WP:RSP : International Business Times is generally considered unreliable.  The article was previously declined by User:AngusWOOF here [29] for not meeting GNG.  Another new page reviewer has moved it to mainspace without checking for possible COI on the same day the content was added by the founder and has mentioned Should be good to go with film projects in pipeline WP:CRYSTAL Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 06:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Companies , India ,  and England .  North America 1000 06:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stewart Nyamayaro: Sources are mostly blogs which are non-rs.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 12:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Zimbabwe .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 12:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:09, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete You lost me at "Zimbabwean socialite"...  Fails WP:GNG.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Alexandermcnabb , would you say such a thing without the word 'Zimbabwean' in front of it?  Pippa Middleton 's opening sentence is "Philippa Charlotte Matthews... is a British socialite". Has that got you lost also? Or does the word socialite only work in the Western realm? Mangwanani (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Chip, much? Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Again - I repeat the question - would you say such a thing if a European were so described? Yours is a very strange comment to make and I think you ought to explain it, lest anyone think ill of your intentions... Mangwanani (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I imagine their argument is that seeing "socialite" added so prominently in the lead to a bit of skepticism. Being a socialite as a defining characteristic could be seen as something not particularly likely to be meeting this WP:BLP / WP:GNG standards. Maybe not the strongest !vote, but also not quite as outrageous as you seem to see it either? Sergecross73 msg me 17:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Sergecross73 Just what came to my mind. @ Mangwanani there was no "ill intention" meant by  @ Alexandermcnabb . I think you just overread meaning into his statement but again, no "ill intention" meant. Cheers, Jamiebuba ( talk ) 06:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Some coverage [13] , [14] , flowery language. Seems similar to the wording used in various Nigerian sources. Regardless of the quality, I'm not seeing notability. Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per norm. ihateneo ( talk ) 00:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG . Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of English Premier League club nicknames: I'm unsure if this qualifies as a new relevant list.  If anything it should be expanded to include all professional English clubs.  Would appreciate other people's opinions.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 06:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 06:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unnecessary, as all club infoboxes now carry club nicknames, so this is a superfluous list.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Interesting, but people can goto the club articles to see this information per club, I don't see a point for a list.  Govvy ( talk ) 23:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as listcruft.   If by any remote chance the article is kept, it needs to be renamed, as the name of the competition is not now and never has been "the English Premier League" -- ChrisTheDude ( talk ) 13:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – WP:FANCRUFT .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this isn't football fandom, this isn't an encyclopedic list.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 20:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enterprise Wolves Baseball: In my WP:BEFORE search, only routine coverage shows up regarding game recaps; the article's actual subject matter – a Utah high school's baseball program – is non-notable.  Enterprise High School is not a national powerhouse in this sport, either.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 23:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Utah and Baseball SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 23:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – parallel AfD discussion opened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise Wolves Basketball .  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 23:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 23:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As per nomination.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 01:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator Grahaml35 ( talk ) 19:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 00:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article states names, dates, and information that is factual.  The information is referenced to the Deseret News, which is the oldest continuously operating publication in the American west since 1850.  It also references the Utah High School Activities Association, which is the governing body of Utah high school sports and keeps all the sports information and sports record book in the state of Utah.  The article summarizes the baseball history of Enterprise High School in a clear and concise way.   Enterprise High School has the second-most state baseball championships of any high school in Utah, and their coach has won the seventh-most games of any high school baseball coach in Utah.  Yotejonga ( talk ) 02:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The content might be factual, but it isn't a notable subject.  High school sports association record books are primary sources and local coverage a local high school sports team is not really notability-lending.  GPL93 ( talk ) 18:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 03:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, couldn't find any significant coverage and / or mentions in independent news sources Editchecker123 ( talk ) 19:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator, we need to be getting rid of stuff that is clearly WP:FAN .  User:Let'srun 20:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fernandes Group: Two sources is not enough to show WP:GNG or WP:NORG and a search for sources turned up partial matches of other companies, an Indian business of the same name, unreliable sources etc.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 12:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A search on "fernandes soft drinks" yields plenty of hits.   The products are popular in Dutch-speaking markets, so English speakers might have a bit of trouble with sources, but we should not be prejudiced in favor of products popular with English speakers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueMoonlet ( talk • contribs ) 17:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Search hits are not evidence of WP:GNG or WP:NORG , as again what comes up is unreliable sources searching "fernandes soft drinks" yields sites which sell said drinks which are not WP:RS .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 18:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I cannot find anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT . -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 06:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I cannot find anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT.  Even if there were reliable media mentions about its products, then the page should be about the product, not the company.  Topjur01 ( talk ) 14:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anarchic Adjustment: Article has been tagged as needing additional citations since 2007 and it seems that's because there simply aren't sources available.  A WP:BEFORE revealed this article , but it's an interview with one of the founders so isn't independent.  The existing sources in the article appear to be trivial mentions or unrelated.  Uhai ( talk ) 23:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion , Japan , United States of America ,  and California .  Uhai ( talk ) 23:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : It appears both the listed founders may have edited the article over the years using the accounts Imaginarynick and Vast Ozone III .  See the article talk page for linking the latter account with Alan Brown.  Uhai ( talk ) 23:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Philip .  Uhai ( talk ) 05:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete .  If this was Big in Japan , would there not be better sources ?  Bearian ( talk ) 00:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wallace Tangiiti: The NRL Rugby piece in the article (archived here ) is the best source I could find.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league , Oceania ,  and Australia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wilfredo Genes: I couldn't find evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC #5 but did do extensive searches.  Ayo Bandung and Bulao were just squad listings.  Kompas , Okezone and Tribun Kaltim only mention Genes once in passing.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Paraguay .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aloysius Ogbonna: Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO , probably WP:TOOSOON .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 23:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 23:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Just TOOSOON.   Optional dratification.  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 08:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Week keep : Maybe WP:TOOSOON but that will also not bring notability later.  Subject has appeared in multiple WP:RS like this , this and this talking about their emergence after 24years vacancy on the throne which is significant, this could make them pass WP:Basic .  Also, the article is not harmful , hence my lean support.  Kaizenify ( talk ) 18:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You are right, it is not harmful but again Too soon .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 18:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  This is trying to build a tree from a leaf - first, Ogugu-Ntegbenese kingdom should be established with reliable sources ( Ogugu looks to be a different location), and properly de-orphaned.  Then once that's done, the "kings", including a redirected Aloysius Ogbonna and the 24 year vacancy, might be covered there.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 09:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  TOOSOON .  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  15:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zailín Rodríguez: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  IncompA 21:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe O'Connor (footballer): The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 09:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 09:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I believe there's enough coverage.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 15:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Would you mind sharing, @ KatoKungLee : ?  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 21:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per KatoKungLee.  Thanks, Das osmnezz ( talk ) 15:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to Exeter City F.C. as it's simply WP:TOOSOON for this young talented player.  He has many very favourable mentions in various local newspapers (see ProQuest).  It's just a shame to lose all the work that already went into this article.  If he does get his big break someday (or just more focused coverage as an Exeter City player), maybe we could get the article refunded as draft.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 18:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Per KatoKungLee. -- Echetus X e 14:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify , player just made debut in team that gets high coverage.-- Ortizesp ( talk ) 05:07, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Changed my ! vote above to redirect to Exeter City F.C. .  By redirecting, we preserve the page history which can easily be recovered if/when Joe O'Connor's career takes off and there is enough significant coverage for a standalone Wikipedia article.  But as promising as he is.. .I'm not convinced this will happen in the next six months, so instead of kicking the can down the road by draftifying...why not just redirect for now.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 06:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  20:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or delete .  GNG coverage has not been established.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 20:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jordan at the 2010 Asian Beach Games: I would propose a merge to 2010 Asian Beach Games but the only information not already in the 2010 Asian Beach Games article are links to other years in which Jordan has participated in the Asian Beach Games Vegantics ( talk ) 22:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages because they are single sentence uncited articles whose information is already covered in 2010 Asian Beach Games : Chinese Taipei at the 2010 Asian Beach Games ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Bangladesh at the 2010 Asian Beach Games ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Vegantics ( talk ) 22:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jordan-related deletion discussions .  Vegantics ( talk ) 22:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions .  Vegantics ( talk ) 23:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  Vegantics ( talk ) 23:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all as lacking everything.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  All of these articles have been PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 02:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all as per nom.  No article text, therefore nothing to merge.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Smoke Works Boston: The credible sources that are cited do not pass WP:ORGDEPTH .  A lot of them are about the general politics of public funding of drug usage supplies, but not much independent analysis and discussion on this specific company by name.  Their site says it's not a non-profit and not eligible for tax deduction on donation, so that affirmatively rules any possibility of evaluating with the less stringent WP:NONPROFIT SNG.  Graywalls ( talk ) 11:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies ,  and Massachusetts .  Graywalls ( talk ) 11:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete SIGCOV is not reached; I agree that much of the sourcing is tangential and doesn't adequately cover Smoke Works.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sounds good to me. I took a shot at this when I didn’t know how to work the website as well.  I’d love to see a page for it someday but it needs more sources than are currently available Elttaruuu ( talk ) 15:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Elttaruuu : WP:AMOUNT is worth reading.  More sources isn't always merrier.  Listing out a bunch of sources that cover the subject trivially do not support notability.  Lots of snippet references will never make up for lack of WP:CORPDEPTH .  For example, "article subject Pipe Sales Company was established in Boston in 2000. [1] [2] [3] [4] " Graywalls ( talk ) 19:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah I understand that now, I had just only been on Wikipedia for like three weeks when I made this Elttaruuu ( talk ) 19:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete