Shahrul Pitri Jusoh : This  article is about a triple murder rather than about the person who did them.   Doesn't meet wp:notability requirements and guidance for events.   Nor guidance provided by wp:Not news.  North8000 ( talk ) 20:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Crime ,  and Malaysia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  How is a triple murderer not notable?  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article isn't about him and doesn't have GNG sourcing or sourcing to be an article about him. And that is the main criteria for passage of an article on the person under either GNG or nBios.  So by that process, and also by the fact that the article is about the event .    Hence "Doesn't meet wp:notability requirements and guidance for events.  Nor guidance provided by wp:Not news."  Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article not being about him isn't a good reason to delete it. The killings are certainly notable. The article title is a different issue. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My nomination was addressing that.... .(un)suitability as a news event article.  My last post was instead addressing your post that it was indented under, it was not the rationale for the nomination as was implied in your subsequent post.  Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 02:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - the person is not notable but the event is, so I am inclining to Delete it and creating a new article on the incident.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 11:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd like to hear some more opinions, especially on the quality of sources which can determine notability.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   It would be better information if there were details of of the murderer's background, as well as his motivation for the crimes.   Nevertheless, he is a serial child killer.   The article is worthy of keeping.  — Maile ( talk ) 03:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : This should be a case of WP:BLP1E .  Reliably cited with sources supporting WP:THREE , WP:SIGCOV , and WP:CRIMINAL , its still unclear determining having a standalone article.  Maybe Rosguill ' s making sense where we should have this draftified as the event and maybe applicable as a redirect either way. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 11:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:BLP1E states that we shouldn't have an article about people only notable for one event. Did you mean something else? -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Asilvering , that should be WP:BIO1E . I'm having much consideration on this article as it's unclear whether to have an entry or not. — Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 08:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This crime, while gruesome and sensational, does not meet WP:CRIME : neither the perpetrator nor the victims were notable prior to the act, and there is not likely to be any historical significance to this act. (I.e. it is unlikely that news coverage will extend past the immediate event.) WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 14:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify as 2018 triple homicide in Perak or something equivalent. signed, Rosguill talk 14:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus