hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Camp Victoria: Found no significant coverage of the subject.  Previously deprod with this article , which counts more as trivial mention.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Kosovo ,  and Sweden .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Here is a link to the archive for the dead link: https://web.archive.org/web/20141029064632/http://www.forsvarsmakten.se/sv/aktuellt/2010/06/nya-boendelosningar-nar-camp-victoria-laggs-ner/ Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 18:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment All I'm finding in Finnish is a few extremely short (think single paragraph) news articles about the death of a Swedish peacekeeper in an explosion of an ammunition storage.  Leaning delete unless better sourcing is found, but I'll wait a bit before ! voting as I don't really have access to any Swedish language sources.  - Ljleppan ( talk ) 18:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The Swedish media archive w:sv:Mediearkivet contains a number of articles on Camp Victoria, typically in the form of depicting someone's visit or work there.  I've added articles from Expressen , Hallands Nyheter , sv:Karlskoga Tidning , sv:Södra Dalarnes Tidning and sv:Värnpliktsnytt .  I couldn't find any of the articles easily accessible online, but anyone with access to Mediearkivet (students and staff at Swedish universities, Wikipedians with access through Wikimedia Sweden) can read them.  None of the articles are amazing (they tend to be 500–800 words long, and the camp itself shares the attention with the lives of the people being depicted), but I'm convinced this can be kept.  / Julle ( talk ) 19:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nom .  Enough sources found.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 14:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Robert Hessen: This article only has one reliable source, most of its content is clearly original research.  SparklyNights 21:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Authors ,  and United States of America .  SparklyNights 21:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  High GS cites pass WP:Prof and befit a professor at Stanford as expected.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 21:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Keep .  Also passes WP:AUTHOR with many published reviews of his books.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 22:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Nominator, who has been editing for three months, might do well to study WP:Before .  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Withdraw.  I hadn't seen the review of his books at the bottom of the article, that makes him notable.  SparklyNights 01:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , History ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:47, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
2023 Battagram cable car incident: Fram ( talk ) 08:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation ,  and Pakistan .  Fram ( talk ) 08:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , or at the very least, redirect to Aerial tramway#List of accidents .  There's an analysis by Reuters published 6 days after the incident [51] and sustained coverage 5 days after that [52] , as well as this on Sep 5th [53] , which clearly shows at least some form of sustained coverage after the initial news cycle passed.  S5A-0043 Talk 08:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep, per S5A-0043, appears to indeed be sustained coverage.  Garuda3 ( talk ) 10:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Sustained coverage in media outlets all over the world.  Clearly meets WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep due to major billing in global media, easily meeting WP:EVENTCRIT #2.  {{u| Sdkb }} talk 13:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
The Political Machine 2020: WP:BEFORE turned up no critic reviews, Metacritic also shows nothing except one review from a non-reliable source (New Game Network).  This game fails WP:GNG .  λ Negative MP1 21:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  λ Negative MP1 21:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I was able to find a review from Common Sense Media - I think this combined with the PC Gamer and VentureBeat coverage meets WP:GNG .  Waxworker ( talk ) 21:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per source found by Waxworker.  It shows the article passes GNG.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Francisco J. Blanco: Uhai ( talk ) 01:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Science , Biology ,  and Spain .  Uhai ( talk ) 01:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Very clear pass of WP:Prof#C1 .  Nominator is advised to carry out WP:before before making further nominations.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 01:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Please do not make bad faith accusations that I did not perform a WP:BEFORE when this was a misunderstanding of arcane notability criteria significantly different than other notability criteria.  Uhai ( talk ) 03:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
InsideOut US: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  Merge to parent article.  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies , Germany ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Independent Gay Forum: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  This article has been here since 2004.  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism , Libertarianism , Organizations , Politics , Sexuality and gender , Websites ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Ziarat Hissar Baba: I looked through a government database and the village did not appear.  Sources seem sketchy, I see TikTok more than any villages.  There is also no Cebuano translation which makes it slightly more shaky.  ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 02:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 02:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Found and added 2 references to the article – it's a village in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan with 408 households and a population of 3700 per 2017 Census of Pakistan shown on Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan website.  The other reference, Digital South Asia Library, Imperial Gazetteer of India, v. 17, p.72 is for Utman Khel tribe living in Malakand Agency ...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 23:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The nominator's comments above were taken in good humor.  This article was created by someone in 2016.  A lot of articles back then were accepted UNREFERENCED by Wikipedia, as we all know...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 23:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Due to new sources being found, I have struck out my nomination.  However, if these sources are referring it as only Hissar Baba, the article should be renamed to reflect this change.  ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 01:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Erigo: Perhaps TOOSOON.  LusikSnusik ( talk ) 10:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Noticed this AfD where more sources were added.  I withdraw my nomination.  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erigo LusikSnusik ( talk ) 10:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion ,  and Indonesia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Motherless (disambiguation): A disambiguation page is not required ( WP:ONEOTHER ); the primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.  Where the primary topic redirect Motherless should target ( Single parent or Orphan ) is a matter for WP:RFD and does not require a disambiguation page.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator with thanks to other editors for finding other entries for the page.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 06:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed , certainly don't need this disambiguation page because at best it refers to only two topics.  I don't think it needs to refer to Single parent anyway, as that article is looking at things from the perspective of the parent, not the state of the child, and if a link to Orphan is appropriate, that can be done by a hat-note.  If more topics appear, then of course disambig can be reinstated.  Elemimele ( talk ) 13:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Postpone this discussion until an RfD has decided where to point the Motherless Primary Topuc redirect (I support Orphan as better than Single parent ).  Then we can agree to delete this dab page, once we know where to put the hatnote which replaces it.  Pam D 22:05, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Postpone I've added three potential articles, and I'm sure our descendents will find many more.  No Swan So Fine ( talk ) 08:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Institute for Structural Research: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Science , Economics , Mathematics , Social science ,  and Poland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Chai Khang Chao : See prior AfD for arguments regarding notability.  signed, Rosguill talk 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Thailand .  signed, Rosguill talk 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  signed, Rosguill talk 00:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify until episodes are released and then notability can be reassessed, particularly as there will likely be more sources available at that time.  Redtree21 ( talk ) 02:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: This should just have been re-draftified per the AfD result, with an explanation and WP:trout stern reprimand to วรุฒ หิ่มสาใจ.  If anything, this is a behavioural issue on part of the user, not an AfD one.  Rosguill , I would withdraw this nomination and move the page back to draft.  I've already given วรุฒ หิ่มสาใจ a warning, in English and Thai, as they do appear to be unwilling to communicate in English.   -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 08:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I strongly support Paul 012's suggestion.  WP:DRAFTOBJECT does not imv apply in the present case and rather : "Authors should try to understand and respond to the reason for moving to draft status, and then use the AfC submission process to have the page moved back to mainspace." (unless either the article is vastly improved or something has changed in the real world that makes the status of the subject considerably different  (just like in a similar situation treated in this essay ) (but the series has not been broadcast yet, as far as I know)).  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 15:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Johnson & Bell : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 06:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Companies , Illinois ,  and Indiana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
HMF Engineering : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Engineering , Technology ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Hugh O'Brian Youth Leadership Foundation : Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , United States of America , California ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Dazzle (video recorder) : The best I could find was a CNET review of one of the models and some trivial mentions in books that amount to "it is recording software that you can use."  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Computing .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Found a litany of sources from over the years.  Sustained significant coverage exists.  DigitalIceAge ( talk ) 00:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : per DigitalIceAge .  Checking on ProQuest and Newspapers.com returns many results, indicating WP:SIGCOV throughout the years.  The article was just never expanded upon, which DigitalIceAge has now done.  B3251 ( talk ) 01:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare : No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 06:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations , Medicine ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Eli Kowaz : Schierbecker ( talk ) 02:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fine I’ll just merge most of it into his current employer since that’s what he is known for.  Keizers ( talk ) 03:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions .  Schierbecker ( talk ) 02:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:53, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 15:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Redirect to Israel Policy Forum#Eli Kowaz where I added the relevant content.  Keizers ( talk ) 21:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Flick of the Switch Tour : However, I believe that there may be enough notability that the article can be kept.  These are a few sources that go into some detail for the article: Perkins, Jeff (2011).  AC/DC: Uncensored on the Record .  Warwickshire, England: Coda Books Ltd.  ISBN 978-1-908538-54-3 .  Masino, Susan (2015).  AC/DC FAQ: All That's Left to Know about the World's True Rock 'n' Roll Band (Paperback ed.).  Hal Leonard.  ISBN 978-1-4803-9450-6 .  Popoff, Martin (2017).  AC/DC: Album by Album (Hardcover) .  Minneapolis, Minnesota: Voyageur Press.  ISBN 978-0-7603-5374-5 .  Apter, Jeff (2018).  High Voltage: The Life of Angus Young, AC/DC's Last Man Standing .  Chicago Review Press.  ISBN 978-0-89733-047-3 .  Masino, Susan (2020).  Let There Be Rock: The Story of AC/DC .  Omnibus Press.  ISBN 978-1-913172-14-5 .  I think there are enough sources that in my opinion, the article is a keep.  I won't object if anyone says otherwise.  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 18:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Events .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 18:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator Taking suggestion from Relisting comment, as sources are provided.  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 06:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: If you want to Keep this article and you are providing sources, I have no idea why you nominated this article for Deletion.  You should consider withdrawing this nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:57, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Hydra Ventures : Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Health and fitness , Business , Companies , Sports ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn