hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nasty Blaq : References from unreliable sources and mostly trivial mentions Runmastery ( talk ) 07:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies , Entertainment ,  and Nigeria .  Runmastery ( talk ) 07:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Upcoming??  Nah, he's a blown stand up comedian in Nigeria 75DD ( talk ) 07:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand that Nasty Blaq is a well-known and accomplished comedian in Nigeria, but I still believe the article doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  While he has a significant following in Nigeria, the reliable sources required to establish notability are lacking.  2RDD ( talk ) 06:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  This article is worth keeping, but the sourcing needs to be improved.  71.246.78.77 ( talk ) 12:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Checkuser blocked.  Queen of Hearts talk 23:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : A lot of coverage seems to show this is a notable Nigerian celebrity (see for example https://www.pulse.ng/entertainment/celebrities/comedian-nasty-blaq-bags-ambassadorial-deal-with-dubai-based-fashion-line/rxffl59 ) and that the subject meets the requirement for a page; deletion does not seem necessary but trimming does.  I am not sure the mention of the cars he owns is of extreme interest, for instance, but maybe I'm wrong.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I'm concerned that this article doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO as there is limited coverage of the subject in reliable sources.  I think it's important to prioritize notability and ensure that our articles meet Wikipedia 's standards.  — talk 7:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He has worked with worked so many famous brands, few are Kubanah Whiskey Unveils Nastyblaq As Brand Ambassador , Cardtonic signs Mega Influencer, comedy star Nasty Blaq as their latest Brand Ambassador and so many more but I intended not to put it in the article because it will sound promotional The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CCFilms : No sources in article, and can't find any proving notability when searching either.  Jonatan Svensson Glad ( talk ) 22:36, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Advertising .  Jonatan Svensson Glad ( talk ) 22:36, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, no usable sources.  Probably eligible for G11 as well. - KH-1 ( talk ) 00:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since there’s no sources Elttaruuu ( talk ) 02:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charlie Downs (animator) : Only substantial material that I could find on this animator was an obituary on a blog.  Everything else only brief mentions about the work he did and little to nothing nothing about himself (thus also failing WP:BASIC ).  The Night Watch (talk) 21:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Walt Disney Animation Studios .  A simple GBooks find does find coverage of his involvement in various Disney works and animated films, but they are not necessarily on the man himself.  The interview in Walt’s People –: Talking Disney with the Artists who Knew Him , the first result, is simply an WP:INTERVIEW .  User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 22:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Comics and animation ,  and Idaho .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:59, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  A search found zero sources that show notability, just a couple of brief mentions.  Subject fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:BASIC .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 15:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hmm, what searches did you do?  A Google Books search did find the WP:INTERVIEW source I mentioned earlier as well as his contribution, and his contributions to animated projects were discussed for more than a few brief mentions.  User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 14:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  I'm not sure about a Merge to Walt Disney Animation Studios as that article doesn't contain any content about animators.  Perhaps a Redirect would be more appropriate?  Or a different target article?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Something like List of Disney animators ?  There are a fair amount of these animators that do not have sources mainly about them, but are heavily discussed for their contributions.  User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 14:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That would be great, User:HumanxAnthro , if the article actually existed.  We can't Merge or Redirec to a nonexistent page.  Care to start this one?  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just making a suggestion.  That's all.  User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 14:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pamela Smith Hudson : BD2412 T 06:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and California .  BD2412 T 06:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:47, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I have worked on the article, but I don't think there are RS to bring this up to notable.  The artist has taught for years, but has only begun to exhibit in 2015 WP:TOO SOON .  - WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  LAT is a good source, but SPA-created article does not make any compelling claim of notability.  128.252.154.9 ( talk ) 18:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Manoj Anand : No independent sources that I can find and the Hindi version of this article is similarly under-referenced.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 20:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The person on whom this article is mentioned has worked in many notable films ranging from Hindi cinema to English cinema and its information is easily available on Google.  The actor has worked in many films of national and international level.  These are remarkable actors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by अ-ह ( talk • contribs ) 21:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi @ अ-ह : being in many notable films does not make that actor notable under Wikipedia's guidelines .  To show notability, that person needs to have significant coverage in reliable sources .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 21:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Notability isn't inherited.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Question : WP:NACTOR says that an actor may be considered notable if "the person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions".  Does that contradict what you're saying about inheritability, or am I misunderstanding it?  Toughpigs ( talk ) 02:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] NACTOR is not a secondary notability guideline; it just indicates that something will generally have SIGCOV in RSes if it meets that criterion: Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.  Additionally, acting in minor roles generally doesn't meet NACTOR, otherwise every working actor would meet that guideline.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 02:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article fails wp:n with  unreliable sources.  Source like rottentomatoes do not even have any significant information on this actor.  RangersRus ( talk ) 02:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Dad's Army home video releases : Completely unsourced.  Nothing notable about this list.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Television .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can we just start PRODding these things?  Dronebogus ( talk ) 21:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, probably.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 22:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Teri Ik Nazar : The rest was bootlegs of the series on social media.  It was one of several series nominated for a Lux Style Award in 2010, but I can't see how this alone brings it over the line for WP:GNG.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:40, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:40, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The only source that appears reliable is actually one that falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA .  Page likely only created to try to promote the Lux awards.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Based on references, seems reliable enough as a television series article to be published on site.  An award winning show than how it can be not WP:Notable .  182.182.8.51 ( talk ) 13:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC) — 182.182.8.51 ( talk ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] SOCKSTRIKE, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335 .  Izno ( talk ) 22:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The only coverage I can find is already used in the article and this [11] , both of which are trivial coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of books featured on Book of the Week in 2012 : -- D'n'B - t -- 17:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Radio ,  and Lists . -- D'n'B - t -- 17:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages because they are part of the same list: List of books featured on Book of the Week in 2013 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) List of books featured on Book of the Week in 2014 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) List of books featured on Book of the Week in 2015 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) * List of books featured on Book of the Week in 2016 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) List of books featured on Book of the Week in 2017 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) List of books featured on Book of the Week in 2018 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) * the 2015 does have a single source, but I'm standing by the lack of encylopedic value. -- D'n'B - t -- 17:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all .  Radio 4 is a single UK radio, Book of the Week is one program on the radio station.  So we're into a very small audience before asking who would be looking for this list?  The answer being nobody.  So the nom is correct this information isn't encyclopedic.  And its unreferenced because nobody would ever care to talk about the topic in reliable third party media.  Desertarun ( talk ) 21:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All of em.  Redundant lists with no encyclopedic value.  As the nom states, Wikipedia is not an Electronic program guide .  X ( talk ) 23:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rainbow Saver Anglia Credit Union : Several refs return 404 errors.  Searches reveal very little that isn't already in the article.  It was a small, now failed, credit union in East Anglia.  No doubt commendable in its aims but does not appear to have generated comment or review that might establish notability here.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 15:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 15:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I placed a PROD tag however it was removed and replaced by a redirect to List of credit unions in the United States .  As I said at the time this fails WP:GNG and is lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources.  It certainly fails the more stringent WP:ORGCRIT .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 19:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I deprodded thinking this could be redirected to List of credit unions in the United States but I was mistaken; This organization is outside the US.  I am unable to find an alternate suitable redirect target.  Prods can't be reinstated.  Sorry for the trouble.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Selby (psychologist) : No reliable sources are referenced or can be found online.  Alexwiki0496 ( talk ) 13:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Business , Spirituality , Psychology ,  and United States of America .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject spectacularly fails WP:GNG despite the effort to inundate the text with pseudo-sources.  The fact that the text has been created, curated, and posted up by a kamikaze account , the same one that provided the (perhaps, self-) portrait, is typically a warning sign.  A pachyderm from the land of Prom .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I find it very strange that the article title has the disambiguator "psychologist" but it doesn't mention what qualifications he has in psychology.  Could it be that that is because he has none?  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 21:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MarilynManson.com : Not inherently notable; no evidence that the use of the website is unique or notable in-and-of-itself.  Includes numerous unnecessary external links.  Fails WP:WEBSITE .  Any minor content worth noting about the website can simply be part of Marilyn Manson .  Zim Zala Bim talk 21:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Websites .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I got an edit conflict trying to nominate this; you've said exactly what I was about to :) Notability is not inherited , and the OR/fancruft factor means there's little left that can't be merged into the main articles on MM the band / MM the person if needed.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 21:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - for all reasons highlighted by nominator and first commenter.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 22:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not satisfy the requirements at WP:WEBSITE , and is full of non-notable WP:FANCRUFT .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Jonathan Deamer Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 10:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nomination InDimensional ( talk ) 21:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom Waqar 💬 20:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  This page's material would better fit a Marilyn Manson Wiki too.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Grant Janke : All I found was this piece detailing a criminal charge in Australia.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alenga Charles : That said, this article clearly fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG as it stands right now.  Several searches hardly brought up databases, much less anything of substance.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Tanzania .  Kpg jhp jm 04:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 18:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are quite number of sources though primary and silent meet out criteria for media coverage.  The article may be notable in the future.  But for now, WP:NOTJUSTYET .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  01:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sikandar Khan Khoso : Donald D23 talk to me 20:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Absolutely nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable at all without proper WP:GNG -worthy reliable sourcing to support it, and the article has existed since 2009 without ever having one scrap of GNG-worthy reliable sourcing added to it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete