hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Madhavi Shankar: Refs are non-rs Forbes x of y,PR, profiles,interviews.  No secondary coverage.  scope_creep Talk 12:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and India .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and available sources that do not provide significant independent, reliable, and secondary coverage to support WP:BASIC / WP:GNG notability and the development of a neutral article that is not WP:PROMO at this time.  My search results include a PR Newswire source (25 Nov, 2020) that seems similar to other available sources.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 17:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - References are from reliable sources and independent of the subject, Passes WP:GNG .  Nopstick ( talk ) 06:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The references in the article are: The 2019 "App Alert" source from The Hindu is based on what Madhavi Shankar says, e.g. "explains Madhvi, outlining the journey of SpaceBasic", and it is not an independent, secondary review or evaluation of the app.  The 2021 New Indian Express source about the Australian Alumni Grant Scheme (AAGS) 2021 mentions Madhavi Shankar for communication app SpaceBasic was one of 13 recipients - this is not significant coverage.  The first Forbes profile is a paragraph making the extraordinary claim "In 2019, Shankar was named as one of the Top 60 Women Transforming India by the Indian government and the United Nations" - the UN part does not appear to be repeated by multiple mainstream sources.  This also appears to be WP:FORBESCON (pay-to-publish), so not independent - her Forbes writing is noted below as a Council Post and as "Membership (fee-based)."  The 2019 Deccan Chronicle source is an interview, without independent and secondary coverage beyond the brief and vague summary introducing the interview.  There is also a non-independent interview/brief profile from her university UTS .  Her Ted talk is not independent.  The second Forbes profile is briefer, notes she is a Forbes Councils Member and this is "Membership (fee-based)".  2019 ECOSOC Youth Forum is an event overview, and does not mention Madhavi Shankar, although this non-independent source may link to further materials that can verify that she spoke there.  30 Under 30 Asia: Enterprise Technology is not a significant award to support notability.  The 2020 MAKERS source is based on an interview and has a similiarly vague and glowing introduction as other interviews that does not offer much independent or secondary coverage to help develop a neutral non-promotional article.  2019 Women Transforming India by NITI Aayog .  Beccaynr ( talk ) 11:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vincent Petitjean: Sources found are routine sport reports (announcement or results) which can NOT contribute to the notability for GNG and not ranking world top 10 in mixed martial arts (WP:NMMA]] or world top-10 in K-1 or Glory (kickboxing) or Lumpinee or Rajadamnern champion.  Cassiopeia talk 00:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and France .  Cassiopeia talk 00:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nominator, subject doe snot meet notability guidelines.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 16:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search found nothing that shows WP:NKICK , WP:GNG , or WP:ANYBIO are met.  I found some fight coverage and database entries, but no significant independent coverage.   In fact, almost all of the coverage was either about his loss to Andrew Tate or listings of people Tate defeated.   Removing Tate from my kickboxing search (tried because I found a number of people named "Vincent Petitjean") left me very few ghits.  Papaursa ( talk ) 22:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Logan M. Isaac: Couldn't anything to satisfy a WP:BLP article.  scope_creep Talk 20:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article reads like a self-promotion piece.  Concur with nom that standards aren't met.  Intothat darkness 15:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JPods: No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources.  WP:PROMO / WP:COI concerns as well -- the article's creator appears to be associated with the product, and the page has been deleted twice for notability and spam reasons and then re-created by the same user.  Jfire ( talk ) 17:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Jfire ( talk ) 17:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 19:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Should be salted this time.  Raymond3023 ( talk ) 03:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, Previously PROD'd article so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  No product, no implementation, no article.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 10:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Another day another person trying to reinvent the train.  While there is no current implementation, it is mentioned in several news articles including the Boston Globe.  The article as it stands now is bad though.  I'd be willing to rewrite it if keep is agreed.  Also, User:BillJamesMN should be blocked from editing because he's the founder of this and it's a clear conflict of interest.  [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] -- StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 03:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I support draftify as an ATD if you want to rewrite it! Jfire ( talk ) 04:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment. Another angle: Is the company notable for anything at all? Actually putting a product on the streets, any kind of product? If not, maybe the founder might be notable? @ User:StreetcarEnjoyer : While I see the articles... okay... if there are articles for the concept that can be used, fine, otherwise it's just... well... next of kin to speculation if they haven't actually got anything to show. -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 15:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to consider option of draftifying as suggested by the nominator.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roxana Boamfă: Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Romania .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NSKATE #2 requires gold in national championship.  My deprod was in error.  Apologies.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There are a whole bunch of similarly deficient nominations.  Really, such blanket nominations without evidence of WP:BEFORE and consideration of WP:ATD should be all procedurally kept as WP:SKCRIT#3 given lack of a valid deletion rationale as WP:NSKATE is indicative that sigcov is likely, and is not presumptive/determinative, so someone could meet none of the NSKATE criteria but still meet WP:SPORTCRIT for some reason.   And ! votes relying only on NSKATE are likewise invalid.  That said, it's quite possible that most of these should be delete or redirect results.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 01:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NSKATE.  I am not finding any sources that would meet GNG.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 21:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tango Balekile: The most I found were a handful of sentences here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There's this , this and this found in a simple search.  Enough for a GNG pass I think.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The first two sources are ok, but are from the same day and about the same topic, while the third source has 3-ish IRS sentences and so is pretty far from being the sustained SIGCOV expected for N. Can you find more sources?  JoelleJay ( talk ) 16:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not enough coverage for a comprehensive independent biography IMO.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 01:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete The article, while impressive in length, is based entirely on primary sources.  The three sources provided by Rugbyfan22 are helpful, but not quite enough.  The HeraldLive source in particular is just an interview.  I am willing to reconsider if another source can be found, but I couldn't find one.  Toadspike [Talk] 10:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Digis: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (Speedy) Delete - non-notable, undisclosed paid-for spam, created by Bodiadub sockpuppet, known Wikibusines article.  MER-C 15:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article describing a software development firm going about its business.  The 2019 item from Zik provides detail about the company's origins but neither there not elsewhere am I seeing evidence of attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 20:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Land of poets: Steps were taken to locate said sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful.  Note that this article was previously nominated for deletion nearly a decade ago on September 2015, where there was limited discourse and the outcome was speedy keep.  Reviewing the history of this article, there also appears to be a running content dispute over the origin and application of this phrase.   While this may be a plausible search term on the internet, I do not see valid sourcing to support this as an article or redirect on Wikipedia, hence my recommendation for deletion.  Please do not hesitate to contact me should appropriate sources be located during the course of this discussion.   Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk ) 16:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Somalia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete an IP editor changed this from claiming that Chile was the land of poets to claiming that Somalia was the land of poets.   Neither claim is well-sourced or has anything more than a WP:DICTDEF of content.   If there were content, it would go at Culture of Somalia (or Chile).  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Imo too trivial for its own article.  Would be better suited as a passing mention in another article somewhere.  Procyon117 ( talk ) 14:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep There are some relevant sources on the phrase, El País , La Prensa (referring to the use of the phrase by President Salvador Allende), Icarito (La Tercera) , Chile en el siglo XXI: ¿Nuevos recorridos artísticos, nuevos caminos históricos?  ("Chile, donde el eslogan turístico reza 'tierra de poetas'") , Anales de la Universidad de Chile (used in 1861), Di/versos: Poesía queer autobiográfica , Crecimiento con equidad: discursos escogidos, 1992-1994 (President Patricio Aylwin), Escribir con estilo .  While these do not go into detail in the phrase itself, these can be used as references as to the use of the phrase dating back to the XIX century.  And I did not even use the Spanish translation in the article itself, "país de poetas" but "tierra de poetas".  "País de poetas" gives several interesting search results in Google Books and Google Scholar, which should suffice for this article to be kept.  -- Bedivere ( talk ) 05:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I suggest renaming the article to "Chile, land of poets". -- Bedivere ( talk ) 05:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a content fork of Culture_of_Chile#Literature and hardly a notable subject by itself.  My very best wishes ( talk ) 22:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ELML: Those papers have a combined total of less than 100 citations.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 02:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I'm also mildly worried that this article was created by someone involved with the project.  The article was created in 2006 by a user named Fisler.  That happens to match the name of the first author on a paper about the language.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 02:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Quantum Reiki: Maybe reiki or quantum healing as a redirect target?  ~ A412 talk!  19:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Medicine .  ~ A412 talk!  19:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I won't shed a tear if this quackery is deleted, but I suppose Energy medicine might be a reasonable redirect target.  Pichpich ( talk ) 21:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Reiki since there are secondary sources...however ridiculous the topic may be.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete without merge.  The sources are either not independent or WP:FRINGE .  Reiki is pseudoscience too, but the history of the practice and the history of its study as pseudoscience are at least the topic of that article.  Dekimasu よ!  03:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Herman E. Talmadge Jr.: Nothing here shows notability.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 22:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 20:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Orhan Awatramani: It may be WP:WHATNOT User4edits ( talk ) 10:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Entertainment ,  and Maharashtra .  User4edits ( talk ) 10:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Poast: See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3#Poast .  The contention is that it is a non-notable message board.  (Administrative nomination: I have no opinion on whether the article should be kept.)  Anarchyte ( talk ) 07:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Anarchyte ( talk ) 07:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This website seems to lack any WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS outside of news about the data breach.  Potentially WP:ONEEVENT or WP:NOTNEWS ?  Just another right wing fediverse instance, of which there are plenty.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per arguments I made previously jp × g 🗯️ 05:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Riccardo Mattelli: [3] Angelo ( talk ) 23:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Angelo ( talk ) 23:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of tallest structures in the Commonwealth of Nations: Randam ( talk ) 18:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Lists .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's not hard to look at whatever respective country articles you want to compare; there's no indication the Commonwealth has anything to do with skyscrapers.  Reywas92 Talk 22:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Reywas92.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly we won't create a List of tallest structures in the BRICS ].  Abhishek0831996 ( talk ) 11:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per NOTDIR.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete