hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of fictional holidays : Also conflates the use of fake-in-universe “holidays” as gags with actual, significant fictional holidays and doesn’t even have citations for almost all its examples, at least one of which is wrong (“Decemberween” is a nonsensical version of Christmas, not a “Christmas Halloween hybrid”).  Overall nothing salvageable from this WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:FANCRUFT mess.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 11:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 13:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Searches actually did bring up some sources talking about the subject of "fictional holidays", but these all came in the form of the typical low quality "Top Ten Best X!" lists that do little to actually discuss the topic in any meaningful way or demonstrate notability.  Even if proper sources did exist that could allow the creation of a prose article on the topic of Fictional holidays , this almost entirely unsourced list of largely non-notable trivia would not be useful for the development of that.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 15:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's missing Life Day !  Mostly one-off mentions, not actually notable holidays that need to be grouped together.  Reywas92 Talk 15:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep The article needs some work but its scope can just about be interpreted to encompass fictional holidays invented for brands, which are notable as a group on their own.  [17] [18] [19] COI: I think this article is a work of art and I can't stand to see it deleted.  small jars t c 00:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and strongly disagree with the suggestion of conflating this with advertising-driven holidays.  If they are a notable group of their own, then that list should be created as a List of brand celebration days , or similar.  As is, this list isn't notable or discriminate.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sadie Hawkins Day is the only real article I see linked to.   The rest are just linking to television episodes that mentioned an imaginary holiday one time for that episode, and other brief mentions of things about.   Not enough legitimate links to justify a list article for this.  D r e a m Focus 02:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suelyn Farel : At best, we could redirect to her husband Julien Farel , but that is a puff piece of someone with marginal notability.  Edwardx ( talk ) 09:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is a lot of PR styles stories on Farel, mock interviews about her 1000 dollar per haircut salon and there is a lot on the husband.  There is a couple of interviews but nothing of substance.  scope_creep Talk 08:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Society Sons of the American Colonists : Toadspike ( talk ) 10:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Nothing comes up in a WP:BEFORE search and article cites only the subject's own sources.  Notability is not WP:INHERITED from National Society Daughters of the American Colonists .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trajectoid : A classic example of WP:TOOSOON .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 09:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Computing .  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 09:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:TOOSOON describes it very well.  Athel cb ( talk ) 16:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darejan Mezvrishvili : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Georgia (country) .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect– Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 08:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] She is not mentioned at Georgia women's national football team so a redirect may confuse the reader.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per @ Spiderone .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with mercy.  Subject fails WP:GNG .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Air Belgium (disambiguation) : About half of the arrivals onto the historical Air Belgium page come from the contemporary one anyway.  Halfadaniel ( talk ) 00:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Aviation , Disambiguations ,  and Belgium .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Advanced Digital Radio Testing Service : I'm not seeing sources which could be considered.  JMWt ( talk ) 18:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Germany .  JMWt ( talk ) 18:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , and I don't even think it's worth redirecting.  This could have been PROD'd to save AFD effort in my opinion.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 18:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, the article should be deleted.  The subject of the article hasn't existed for many years.  Utuado ( talk ) 17:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BTU International : Pepper Beast (talk) 13:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Massachusetts .  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete aside from winning some non notable awards I don’t see anything other than ROTM coverage.  There may be material in US newspapers that I can’t access in which case I’ll reconsider.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Veejay (software) : No RS/IS/SIGCOV sources.  Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Visual arts ,  and Technology .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 10:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  While there are only primary sources on the page, it is covered in the news and it is not all press-releases.  Needs additional analysis to do a final verdict: https://www.google.com/search? rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS909US914&q=Veejay+(software)&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDq9T3zv3_AhUWPUQIHa8vC_4Q0pQJegQIOxAB&biw=1920&bih=927&dpr=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onetimememorial ( talk • contribs ) 22:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep , has some decent coverage [6] [7] , I think this will meet GNG — siro χ o 12:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No significant coverage, fails GNG and NSOFT.  The google search provided by Onetimememorial does not contain any news coverage of this software ; the articles about VJing as a concept do not mention this program at all (at least, the ones I get back from doing that search).  I've looked at the sources Siroxo provided and both appear to be broad surveys of software and not significant coverage of this program specifically.  The ACM source mentions Veejay only once in passing ( Outstanding packages include FLxER, FreeJ, Gephex and Veejay, all of which work with video files and streams in ways analogous to the actions of audio disc jockeys ).  The IEEE source's abstract suggests it's a broad survey of 150,000 open source projects, but I do not have access to the full text.  If @ Siroxo or anyone else can provide sections of the IEEE article that do constitute significant coverage of the program I'd reconsider.  Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 16:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tim Rabbitt : Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 09:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Ireland .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 09:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom, WP:NPOL and WP:SIGCOV .  In terms of NPOL, the role of chair (mayor) of Galway County Council isn't an "international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office".  In terms of SIGCOV, the only sources in the article are either primary or the very definition of trivial passing mentions .  In my own WP:BEFORE a Google search (which which returns barely 50 results ) and a news search (which returns only opinion pieces and passing mentions ) does not amount to SIGCOV.  Certainly any more than we would expect for any other candidate for a local office.  As we (quite correctly) do not have articles for Mayor of Galway County Council or Cathaoirleach of Galway County Council , I do not see how a redirect would be an appropriate WP:ATD .  Or draftification or other forms of ATD.  Hence the only action I can support is deletion...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 11:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom and per WP:NPOL .  Spleodrach ( talk ) 06:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Mayors are not "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to pass WP:NPOL #2 on the provision of significant substance about their work in the role and significant reliable sourcing to support it — but this is just "mayor who existed", supported by a minimal smattering of primary and unreliable sourcing with no evidence of WP:GNG -worthy referencing shown at all, which is not what it takes.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Biofuelwatch : Few reliable sources available.  Because of the non notability in the article, it has been neglected.  Possible redirection to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Issues_relating_to_biofuels DashDashUnderscore ( talk ) 16:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  DashDashUnderscore ( talk ) 16:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment , United Kingdom ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New York Software Industry Association : Newhaven lad ( talk ) 18:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business , Software ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  A search at the New York Secretary of State https://apps.dos.ny.gov/publicInquiry/ says that the association still exists.  The archived versions of the association's website include pages that redirect to another group, New York Technology Council, Inc., which later merged into NY Tech Alliance, Inc. https://www.nytech.org/ Perhaps references exist for NY Tech Alliance and its events, including NY Tech Meetup.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 06:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A non article.  It says nothing and has no refs.  25 edits in 19 years, so could have been prodded away.  Desertarun ( talk ) 20:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shehu Ahmed Tukur : The only secondary coverage I can find on him in reliable secondary sources is routine coverage of his candidacy, and passing mentions in election articles.  The one exception was this article on a brief legal dispute over his win in a 2022 primary election [13] , but I don't think that single reference pulls him over the line of WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nigeria .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 08:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Architecture .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage and WP:NPOL as but an unelected candidate for political office.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 11:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, this is a recently created article and I think if this is closed as Soft Delete, it will just be recreated.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some coverage here [14] , unsure of the quality of the source as well.  I don't think we have enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 23:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Himna kosovskih junaka : The only source in the article doesn't mention the name "Himna kosovskih junaka" or "Hriste Bože", which is another common name, it only mentions the lyrics, quoted by a single source in a passing mention.  🔥 Jala peño 🔥 Stupid stuff I did 09:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Christianity ,  and Serbia .  🔥 Jala peño 🔥 Stupid stuff I did 09:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Total Drop : It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we cannow resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no claim let alone evidence of notability, apart from the arguably notable groups the members went on to be part of.  Llajwa ( talk ) 17:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raja Rani 2 (Tamil TV series) : Karnataka ( talk ) 10:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep :more value source added, WP:GNG have added references from News18 India [10] , www.medianews4u.com [11] , The Times of India [12] .  sufficient significant coverage in reliable sources. -- P.Karthik.95 ( talk ) 10:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I still don't think these sources explain the notability of the topic: Link 5 is routine updates on the casting (news18) I'm not sure about Link 6's reliability as a website.  however regardless it seems to be a routine entertainment news that states generic information about the source available everywhere else (mn4u) Link 7 is a routine update on an actress leaving the serial (ToI, which is unreliable anyways. ) Karnataka ( talk ) 14:31, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 13:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 15:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete