hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2nd iKON Awards: This and its parent article the IKON Awards are not backed by any reputable academy of film or other body and are all too easily abused to create 'notability' for figures where none otherwise would exist.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film , Television ,  and Uganda .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IKON Awards ) or redirect to the Awards main page IKON Awards (and merge). - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 08:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC) (PS- if both pages are kept, rename one IKON or the other iKON...) [ reply ] Delete Presented by one company likely only honoring its products, with other shows on other networks getting a three second clip and nothing more (including their attendance).  It's an 'employee of the year' ceremony in televised trophycast form.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails GNG.  Macktheknifeau ( talk ) 18:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Redirect to IKON Awards if that AfD closes as no consensus.  Like IKON Awards , IMO I have concerns over the independence and SIGCOV of the sourcing.  See my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IKON Awards which applies here as well.  Thanks.  VickKiang (talk) 00:11, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Expedition to Kamaran: For the sake of Wikipedia's integrity, I think this article should be deleted.  If you search this in Google, everything points back to this article at most.  Also, JSTOR has nothing.  The sources may mention Kamaran in passing but do not actually discuss any expedition.  MaximumCruiser2 🚢 ( talk ) 17:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Middle East , Yemen ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support Indeed the article is a complete hoax.  Not only was there never any Ottoman expedition against the Portuguese in Kamaran, but the island of Kamaran was never occupied by the Portuguese for them to be expelled from it in the first place, let alone "completely destroyed".  Wareno ( talk ) 10:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
El Hadji Badiane Sidibé: Created at a time in which an appearance in any WP:FPL was enough to pass notability test.  This player made two appearances for Újpest in 2014, and the rest are in semi-pro divisions.  No in-depth, independent coverage to be found.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 05:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Senegal .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 05:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sicilian Action Movement: Perhaps case of WP:TOOSOON.  A before search did not yield anything except press releases by the party ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk ) 00:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Italy .  Shellwood ( talk ) 03:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:SIGCOV is missing.  The only coverage I found is a couple articles about the party being created, and several press releases.  Happy to reconsider if more sources pop up.  -- Broc ( talk ) 10:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1896 South Bend Commercial-Athletic Club football team: In order of appearance in the article, the first source is merely informing readers of a blub meeting, the second is about the athletic club, not the team, the third is all of two short sentences, white the remaining sources are brief and routine game recaps.  A check of newspaper archives didn't come up with much better.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football ,  and Indiana .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  This is a creation of User:Murphanian777 .  Back in 2000, they created articles on every team that played a game against Notre Dame in its early years.   Many of those opponents were local patsies who Notre Dame defeated easily.  That also appears to be the case here as ND outscored this club, 46–0.  While well intentioned, I have serious doubts about the notability of stand-alone articles on ND's patsies.  Similar articles on ND patsies have been deleted as well.  The rationales in the prior AfDs apply here as well.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1900 South Bend Howard Park Club football team , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1905 Bennett Medical football team , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1904 Toledo Athletic Association football team .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 03:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and History .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 04:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not every team is notable enough for an article, and the sources are rather sparse.  Whizkin ( talk ) 20:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Cbl62's reasoning.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 21:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lee Wells: Having done a WP:BEFORE , I couldn't find anything that had significant coverage.  Chiserc ( talk ) 15:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  Chiserc ( talk ) 15:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Visual arts .  Netherzone ( talk ) 17:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero hits for an artist with this name, anyone and everyone else pops up.  COI and the SPA are also red flags.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The original article, an AUTOBIO was deleted, then recreated by a single purpose account WP:SPA who only worked on articles about Lee Wells and his projects; it is a COI entry likely created by Well's collaborator based on the user name Cbororkowski (see Perpetual Art Machine for more context (a currently unsourced article).  A BEFORE search reveals only primary sources and an interview, nothing in the way of in-depth, independent coverage required for GNG; nothing found that might meet NARTIST.  Will keep searching before ! voting.  Netherzone ( talk ) 17:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've nominated the Perpetual Art Machine for deletion, it's likely not notable either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - After searching via Google and the Wikipedia library resources, all I could find on this artist was a single interview and a few mentions that were basically name checks.  Therefore does not meet WP:GNG .  I also searched to see if there were museum collections or other sources which would meet notable artist criteria, but also fails WP:NARTIST .  Netherzone ( talk ) 20:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I do not find any RS for biographical information presented.  The one source used is just a passing mention.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 23:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Captive white tigers: SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 01:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 01:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not sure why these are more notable then white tigers in general.  Sourcing is fine, but this is an extended list with no indication as to why having a tiger in captivity is notable ("financial reasons" given is rather vague).  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Too much detail, and no clear reason why the topic is notable.  The vast majority of white tigers are captive, and this fact can be noted in the main article.  AryKun ( talk ) 02:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rafael Eitan Mekif Ramat Gan High School: According to the school website (see link on wiki page) (translated from the Hebrew) there were around 30 and 160 students  - indicating it is a very small school.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 15:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Israel .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not a notable school.  Marokwitz ( talk ) 12:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This page lacks sourcing, and secondary sources don't seem to exist.  Not notable.  The HR heading is interesting as it appears to call staff "assets" and "property".  I expect just an amusing lack of clarity.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 13:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jon Tae-yong: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Numberguy6 ( talk ) 01:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - To be fair where is anyone gonna find any sources about a north korean footballer LOL.  Perhaps an exception.  Mr Vili talk 06:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There are quite a few that do.  Simione001 ( talk ) 13:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 15:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nuvolo (Software Company): BuySomeApples ( talk ) 23:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I can see coverage across multiple reliable sources but the article itself should be converted into a stub.  Dympies ( talk ) 13:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Dympies : Can you find some examples of sigcov?  I can add them to the article myself but I couldn't find any.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 22:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Full of WP:ORGTRIV published on Oct 2 and Oct 3,  2023.  Article fails WP:GNG / WP:NCORP .  Should not have been moved to the main space after being declined four times.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 21:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Complex / Rational 02:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :A WP:SPA article about a recently acquired company, moved into mainspace despite being declined multiple times at AfC.  Much of the content is about the acquisition by Trane Technologies , listing the various advisers involved in that transaction: being acquired is trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH .  Aside from that acquisition, searches find announcement-based coverage of partnership deals, certification, a 2018 Q&A with the founder , but I am not seeing the coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability .  (A redirect to Trane Technologies could be possible, if it were demonstratable that this acquisition is notable in the context of that firm.)  AllyD ( talk ) 08:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No where near NCORP.  Promotional in nature.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nepal–Poland relations: The only thing of note is Polish assistance during the 2015 earthquake, which could be covered in April_2015_Nepal_earthquake#Rescue_and_relief .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Nepal ,  and Poland .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:16, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Agreed.  Poland occasional aid to Nepal (maybe we can find few more examples) is not enough to warrant keeping this article.  Ping me if better sources are found (I doubt it).  The information about that particular incident is already present in April 2015 Nepal earthquake so there's no need for merge or redirect.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not relevant article. killer bee 05:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Another example of the trend to build a standalone article for every combination of two nations, no matter how insignificant their connexion may be.  The sources presented are either WP:PRIMARY (Nepalese or Polish government press releases or statements) or casual mentions that do nothing to denote notability (ref 1, for instance).  I can find no scholarly treatment of this relationship nor mentions in reputable journals.  There is no info particularly worth merging.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 21:02, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jean-Marc Alliot: The sources confirm that he exists and works for the organisations claimed but nothing discusses him .  There examples of scientific/ engineering apers but little else.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering , Aviation ,  and France .  Velella Velella Talk 09:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant demonstration of notability.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 00:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Lot of sources.  The bibliography is huge.  -- BobVillars ( talk ) 11:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Notable.  Pasparfait ( talk ) 11:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ITSNOTABLE LibStar ( talk ) 00:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines.  The above ! votes states that the subject has lots of sources and that the bibliography is huge and this is notable .  But the sources I found are mentions with no indepth coverage.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 07:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, " Lot of sources" isn't important, it's the quality of the sources that is.  A source review would be helpful along with some argument based in policy.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not every single aeronautical engineer needs their own article.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 15:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found evidence he authored and co-authored books but no third party coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gauthier Van Malderen: Even in . be websites, all is about the company.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC .  All of the coverage that I could find in reliable sources, such as The Evening Standard , The Indepentdent , and TechCrunch are based on interviews with Malderen, and so are not independent of the subject.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : coverage is mostly mentions and also there are not enough citations.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 07:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Army Public School, Jodhpur: Others may be able to provide evidence of notability (and create links from other pages to deorphan this page).  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 17:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Education , Schools ,  and Rajasthan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:37, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Didn't find any WP:SIGCOV .  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 17:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ramakrishna Mission Brahmananda College of Education: Delete for lack of notability and being an ad page.
 Per this talk post it was created for promo purpose.  Graywalls ( talk ) 23:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education , Schools ,  and India .  Graywalls ( talk ) 23:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unless there are non-English references that are in-depth, there is nothing I found that shows how this would meet notability guidelines.  It exists, but the references are mainly directory listings.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 00:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Subject fails WP:NCORP .  Per Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Ramakrishna_Mission_Brahmananda_College_of_Education , this article was written by a person affiliated with the school for purposes of advertisement/ religious propaganda.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 07:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per GNG failure and everything above.  NotAGenious ( talk ) 10:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Not much available on the internet apart from listings Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 06:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP — TheWikiholic ( talk ) 07:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and has COI issues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seawolf35 ( talk • contribs ) 15:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete