hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ludicrous Lollipops: Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect or redirect to Damaged Goods (record label) but it may unbalance that article.  This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 10:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Haitian Creole vocabulary: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary .  Yilku1 ( talk ) 02:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 16 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 03:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, seems pretty clear.  Tollens ( talk ) 03:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Haiti .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I expect it is possible to write a Wikipedia article about this topic—for example, encyclopedic discussion of the sources of vocabulary—but at the moment it is TNT worthy.  ( t · c ) buidhe 15:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Is Wiktionary interested?  Elinruby ( talk ) 21:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  Carrite ( talk ) 23:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roxana Mirea: I found Sport Tim and Timisplus but both are just trivial mentions of her.  I note the existence of SS Politehnica but it's a primary source and a transfer announcement.  Also SPORTBASIC gives us extra reason to rule the source out by saying that Team sites and governing sports bodies are not considered independent of their players Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Romania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG . -- Nimorinka ( talk ) 14:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Debi Carson: This biography article contains: Reference 1, a passing mention; reference 2, self-authored; reference 3, dead link.  The sources should be (1) reliable, (2) secondary, (3) independent of the subject, and (4) talk about the subject in some depth.  Was PROD 7 November 2010.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 19:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women ,  and Texas .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seeing more of these, I've just created a new redirect which I will cite now WP:NOTPORTFOLIO (same as WP:NOTCV , WP:NOTLINKEDIN , etc) — siro χ o 22:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any RS to bring this up to notable.  Fails WP:GNP .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 20:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brian Woulfe: Coverage is mostly PR, interviews and WP:SPS sources.  scope_creep Talk 21:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ireland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Possibly speedy delete as overtly promotional.  The COI account that created this removed the COI template, of course.  2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk ) 03:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTLINKEDIN , professional profile with substantial NPOV issues.  — siro χ o 03:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 08:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:DEL-REASON #4.  Primary purpose of this article looks to be advertisement.  Graywalls ( talk ) 08:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I removed the COI tag after a vandalizing IP editor inserted it.  See the article's editing history.  Showmesicily ( talk ) 19:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Your edit history speaks more clearly than your accusations, Showmesicily .  Other editors can see the quality of the content you've added to Wiki, and that you have not answered legitimate concerns about WP:COI , instead removing maintenance templates while accusing others of vandalism, now for the third time.  If you believe you've been targeted by vandals, please open a report at AIV or ANI, and allow administrators to weigh in.  2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk ) 20:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete very clearly promotional in nature, notability still not shown.  Please don't call all editors vandals.  — Karnataka talk 21:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Geneva International Peace Research Institute: The article is short, and there are not so many links in the Internet that help understand its relevancy Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 10:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 10:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Created by prolific sockmaster User:Chaudeau .  The external link goes to a non-English site.  It is not clear what this is, but it is not related to the Geneva Conventions .  — Maile ( talk ) 13:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Legrek Parond: No reliable sources, and WP:BEFORE did not reveal any.  Article was previously sourced with a longer collection of Amazon links to what appear to be his works.   Appears to call himself an author, CEO, rapper, and singer.  However, I can't find anything to establish notability in any of these fields.  Heavy Grasshopper ( talk ) 10:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism , Jamaica ,  and United States of America .  Heavy Grasshopper ( talk ) 10:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources found are his website, amazon links, then various social media.  This is PROMO, with no RS found.  What's now in the article are primary works.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Syed Asim Waqar: Very PROMO with flowery language in the infobox as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a non notable party functionary.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Spokesperson for a party is not a role that confers notability.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The subject fails WP:NPOL , the subject is just a functionary of a recognised state party.  | Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi ( talk ) 12:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC) | [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:Sigcov .  Maliner ( talk ) 05:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rapstrap: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am the article creator.  I have no objections to deleting this article.  Triwbe ( talk ) 10:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SNOW , WP:SIGCOV and WP:BLP1E .  No opposition exists.  There is very weak coverage, and what does exist seems to revolve around a reality show.  This implicates the inventor getting 15 minutes of fame .  Bearian ( talk ) 19:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michelle Ronksley-Pavia: Could not find indepth coverage, article is rather promotional.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Artists , Authors , Women , England ,  and Australia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article is way out of date (see her current bio ), and while there are some new sources that mention her passing ( here and here ), on my search I did not find enough to meet WP:PROF and warrant me adding them to the page.  Fails WP:PROF , WP:ANYBIO .  Cabrils ( talk ) 12:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions .  Netherzone ( talk ) 17:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I'm not finding enough in a BEFORE search that is about her to establish notability as an artist or professor.  She is a lecturer in an important educational field (gifted education & special needs), however I don't think her citation scores/h-index is high enough in her field for her to pass WP:NACADEMIC .  Her bio on the Griffith University website states she is "award-winning", but the only award mentioned there is ‘Best Research Paper’ international award from the K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education (Republic of China) which I don't think is a notable award.  I found zero about her as a visual artist: no record of shows nor reviews of exhibitions, and no museum or national gallery collections.  Therefore does not pass WP:NARTIST .  What I have found are things she has published but no reviews, therefore it seems she doesn't seem meet WP:NAUTHOR either.  The two main editors of the article are Lolliedog2 and LaylaCat who are both SPAs which may indicate a COI (tho neither have been active since 2013).  Her field of work and service is an important one, and she is obviously very good at what she does, however, she does not meet our notability criteria.  If I'm wrong about this and others find SIGCOV in reliable sources, I may consider changing my ! vote.  Netherzone ( talk ) 17:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ibrahim bin Ismail: figure lack of WP:SIGCOV and fails WP:GNG .  His importance appears to be largely restricted to Bengkalis Regency , with minimal recognition beyond this local area, let alone nationwide in Indonesia.  While he may have some standing within the local Muslim scholar community, his broader significance is dubious.  It's worth noting that the only source cited in the article, focuses on the 21 ulamas in Bengkalis regency rather than specifically highlighting him.  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 04:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Indonesia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not much to say here but that I agree with your assessment.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 12:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Men's Divisions International: No obvious good WP:ATD .  Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sonny Zulu: Apart from being the CEO of a recognized bank, they're no WP:SIGCOV on the subject.  Sources are mostly Trivial mentions on the subject or regular PR announcement of his appointment as CEO.  Does not meet our WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 18:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Africa .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 18:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a relatively standard professional profile , and WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  The main depth in the article is entirely about awards received by a business, notability of the subject is not established.  If sources are found, this article requires TNT.  — siro χ o 22:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonathan Lamas: Does not appear to pass any notability guidelines.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Authors , Bands and musicians , Journalism ,  and Texas .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Literally no secondary sources. Central and Adams ( talk ) 16:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Fails WP:GNG . Likely promotional, given the username of the editor who created the article. -- Kinu t / c 16:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I saw that too.  Could they be any more obvious?  Central and Adams ( talk ) 17:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails notability as a journalist, I can barely even find articles he's written.  not passing AUTHOR either, no book reviews found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree that there seems to be no results ThreeBootsInABucket ( talk ) 23:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lee Sun-bin (figure skater): PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and South Korea .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per rationale 104.232.119.107 ( talk ) 15:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete with the exact same rationale I presented at Lee Chu-hong ’s.  CherryPie94 🍒🥧 ( talk ) 05:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Digital world: There doesn't appear to be much coverage of the term in a way that would support an encyclopedia article, such as for its history of usage.  The second paragraph of WP:NEO applies to this article: while there's plenty of evidence of use of the term, there's little coverage about the term itself .  As an example, the reference for a statement in the article about the term predating the World Wide Web is misattributed, firstly, and links to an unrelated paper from 1958 that uses the term once.  Said statement is WP:OR .  Uhai ( talk ) 15:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  Uhai ( talk ) 15:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Lewcm Talk to me!  20:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Raza Mahmoudi: My WP:BEFORE search yielded no sources showing significant coverage, even when searching in his native language ("رضا محمودی").  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pledgie: The sources are mainly self-published sources ( WP:RSSELF ), and the secondary sources are blog posts (possibly falling under WP:USERG ), with the only news coverage being hyperlocal.  Sources 1 and 2 are blog posts.  Sources 3, 5, 7, and 8 are self-published blog posts (with source 3 being a Tweet).  Source 4 is from KC Free Press, which seems to be a hyperlocal news organization (but I would say it's closer to a blog).  Source 6 links to the topic's GitHub page.  Sources 9 and 10 link to the home page to websites, so are not even sources for anything in the article.  My research on this topic results in user-generated blog posts, hyper-local news coverage or original sources (such as their website or their GitHub).  BlueSharkLagoon ( talk ) 20:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Websites ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find articles about people named Pledgie, nothing for this website.  Sources used aren't adequate, blogs or primary sources, download sites and the like.  This appears PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my checking, I searched for reliable sources but couldn’t find any with in-depth coverage.  The subject fails WP:GNG as it requires multiple in-depth coverages from multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability.  Grab Up - Talk 12:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete