hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Multimedia Container Format: Zero independent sources, nobody cares: tagged since 2022 - Altenmann >talk 20:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Owen× ☎ 23:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect into Matroska .  Streamline8988 ( talk ) 06:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Which is also nominated for deletion.  But maybe together they will survive.  the WP:RS scrutiny.  - Altenmann >talk 07:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect into Matroska .  Absolutely no chance of this having any reason being kept.  An unreferenced crummy article.  X ( talk ) 19:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Legends Drum and Bugle Corps: It does not seem to meet the notability requirements to be a standalone page, and I am against a merge to List of defunct Drum Corps International member corps per my comments on the talk page.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 07:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Organizations ,  and Michigan .  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 07:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion due to the previous AFD.  That closed as Redirect, is that an option here?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sadly, it can't be redirected to the old target because it no longer qualifies.  They are no longer a Drum Corps International member corps .  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 15:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 08:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively  to List of defunct Drum Corps International member corps .  Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I like the idea of merging, thus preserving some content.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 10:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of Is It Legal? episodes: Not much has improved since then, other than the addition of a table instead of a plain list.  The article is still unsourced, so I'd say this fails WP:NLIST and should perhaps be merged to Is It Legal?  .  Spinixster (chat!) 08:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Lists .  Spinixster (chat!) 08:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per my statement in the 2nd AFD outcome.  Nom makes no assertion that any effort was made to source or otherwise improve the article.  Jclemens ( talk ) 08:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, but to be honest, is it still worth a separate article?  Even with television series that have around the same episodes as Is It Legal, the episodes are kept in the original article (examples: Barry , Ted Lasso , Russian Doll , Never Have I Ever ).  I'd say a split is only warranted if there are a lot of episodes or if the article is too long (examples: Boardwalk Empire , Succession , The Mindy Project ).  Spinixster (chat!) 11:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Did you start a merge discussion first and fail to gain traction?  Or Boldly merge it and were reverted?  You've already garnered one "delete" vote from someone who apparently doesn't understand NTEMP and ATDs.  As a discussion, sure, a merger proposal is appropriate.  As a matter of policy, however, the lack of sourcing as a fixable problem is not a justification for deletion.  The topic is the show itself, so primary or trivial sourcing (e.g. summary, TV Guides, etc.) for each episode which presumably exists somewhere would be sufficient.  Jclemens ( talk ) 16:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Is It Legal?  .  No sourcing whatsoever, just an external link to the British Comedy Guide, which is a British version of IMDb.  The larger issue is that the main article also has no sourcing, just external links to sites Wikipedia does not recognize as reliable sourcing.  — Maile ( talk ) 14:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom, the show doesnt have enough episodes to justify having this page.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ OlifanofmrTennant Would you like to consider an WP:ATD and merge the list to the original page instead?  You seem to be hinting at that in your vote.  Spinixster (chat!) 01:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 18:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Per Spinxster.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Is It Legal?  per nom.  Fails NLIST.  // Timothy :: talk 16:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
E.D.I. production discography: I am not against a merge to E.D.I Mean#Production credits .  ~ UN6892 t c 18:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Lists .  ~ UN6892 t c 18:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge seems right, probably worth collapsing the section headings, and let's mark the whole section unreferenced and give editors a bit of time to fold existing sources in.  — siro χ o 22:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
C6A1 FLEX: If that were the case we would have at least a dozen articles (for example, the British L7 and subvariants, although extensive, do not have their own article and are covered at the FN MAG article).  Furthermore, it makes no sense to start an article at the C6A1 variant.  If an article were warranted for the Canadian version, it would be titled C6 machine gun, and cover all variants.  It makes no sense for this single "FLEX" variant (which is just a brand/marketing name by Colt Canada) to be given its own article.  The content should be merged under the Canadian section of FN MAG.  Elshad ( talk ) 11:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Firearms and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to relevant section of the FN MAG article.  Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me ) 07:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of supermarket chains in Belarus: 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 15:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , Lists ,  and Belarus .  😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 15:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of supermarket chains in Europe .  Listing notable entries only.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 23:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Europe's article, as above.  Dawid2009 ( talk ) 06:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with the general list of supermarkets in Europe.  User:TheOmniDex ( talk ) 16:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Jibanyan: Not sure the first source at further reading section helps, but the second one is dead?  Anyway, even thou we can still access it; not sure it will squick through WP:GNG .  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 13:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Literature , Television , Video games ,  and Japan .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Yo-kai Watch .  The reception is worse than bad and there's no indication of GNG being passed.  I didn't say the character list because that is honestly TNT material in itself.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 19:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Zxcvbnm.  The reception doesn't support a separate article, per WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 21:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2012 U.S. state secession petitions: This fails WP:NEVENT .  I remember it, Obama won reelection, some upset conservatives created petitions on a website that doesn't exist any longer, they received official responses from the White House, and that was that.  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 05:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 05:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Secession in the United States#State secession then selectively summarise (post-AfD) at Secession#United States .  Muboshgu 's point on the 10-year test is spot on: all of the sources presented are WP:PRIMARYNEWS , and there has been no WP:SIGCOV since then.  All recent RS I can find are mere mentions, and the entire thing fails WP:NEVENT for (amongst other problems) WP:EFFECT , WP:DEPTH and WP:PERSISTENCE .  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 13:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per other users.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 20:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Epic non-event.  (In fact, this is the first I've heard of this nonsense.)  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per other users.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Battle of Romny: Notability as independent topic is rather dubious.  Article had been created by an editor who has been involved in similar cases in the past.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 18:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Russia ,  and Ukraine .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 18:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete it does look not notable to me.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 20:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notability does look questionable.  WP:NOTNEWS .  Cinderella157 ( talk ) 22:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Most of the incidents are unconnected, nor was there a battle by any means.  The whole article should be merged and pasted to a new section about Romny Raion in Russian occupation of Sumy Oblast .  Jebiguess ( talk ) 01:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Correction, merge.  Jebiguess ( talk ) 20:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Northeastern Ukraine campaign , as appropriate.  Searching for the exact title finds nothing significant.   — Michael Z .  14:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Northeastern Ukraine campaign as per Michael Z BHC ( talk ) 08:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge as two different target articles are suggested here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Russian occupation of Sumy Oblast#Romny Raion looks the easiest, most of the material is already there.  But further reorganization and merges of both targets are still possible based on the different ongoing discussions.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 02:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge WP:ATD-M Lightburst ( talk ) 13:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Comparison of homeowner associations and civic associations: Its synthesis would will remain the latter unless WP:reliable sources could be found that extensively compare these associations.  The top search results ( [44] [45] ) are merely 4 paragraphs.  Scholarly sources are unlikely to provide necessary comparison [46] [47] .  XxTechnicianxX ( talk ) 02:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Wow, what a flashback!  I confirm with the noms assessment.  Still fails GNG and OR.  Thank you for tagging me.  Missvain ( talk ) 03:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Neighborhood association : and source properly.  Owen× ☎ 11:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge if you can find sources.   I assume its different in different nations.  D r e a m Focus 19:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   There is no clear merge target (why NA and not HOA, or other similar topics)?   And even if there were, nothing here is sourced, so there's nothing to merge anyway.  If you want to flesh out content at any similar articles, then do it de novo .  35.139.154.158 ( talk ) 22:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
May the odds be ever in your favor: Of the 10 sources: 1 is the original book with the phrase ( WP:PRIMARY ) 2 link to a non-reliable site designed to promote the phrase 1 just mentions the phrase the rest are somewhat OK-ish sources that do not actually even mention the phrase (I have simply searched them, so a mention or two could have escaped my attention) Викидим ( talk ) 00:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  Викидим ( talk ) 00:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/merge anything reliably sourced that turns up to the main Hunger Games article.  While the phrase itself doesn't appear to meet the WP:GNG , it's common enough that somebody might search for it here.  GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk ) 03:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Literature .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Hunger Games : I could not find any significant coverage, and none of the material in the article is suitable for merging.  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 04:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Eh, current sources 6 and 7 probably belong in a cultural impact section.  Jclemens ( talk ) 06:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Once we zoom out and look at The Hunger Games, and not just at the phrase, there is indeed a large cultural impact.  It is therefore documented in a score of research articles (see doi : 10.3138/jrpc.25.3.372 and [37] as very different examples showing the breadth of material available from the researchers), so journalism from daily newspapers is not needed as a source at all.  Викидим ( talk ) 06:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively to The Hunger Games .  There's not enough here for a spinout article on the phrase itself, at least not yet.  Jclemens ( talk ) 06:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Hunger Games .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 17:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per all.  Doesn't meet the WP:GNG but a selective merge could preserve what is in reliable sources.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Hunger Games per others.  Notable in that context, but not for a standalone article.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 05:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Hunger Games .  I agree with the above discussion that there is not enough coverage to support a separate article, but a selective merge would preserve the coverage that does exist and this is a viable search term so it would be helpful to lead readers somewhere for it.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 21:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Poso Pesisir language: Onel 5969 TT me 22:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  Onel 5969 TT me 22:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Pamona language GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 22:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as suggested above.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge , but carefully pruned for factual errors and made-up stuff not mentioned in the sources.  I have fixed the most blatant ones.  – Austronesier ( talk ) 09:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as suggested and is reasonable.  Languages in the Austronesian languages family can be so close that basic words in Tagalog, Malay, and Ilokano are mutually intelligible cognates, while their glossaries can also be distinct.  I recall that President Obama's mother wrote about this phenomenon.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bearian : Just for the record, this is not about obvious cognacy between related languages.  Tagalog, Malay, and Ilokano are very much not mutually intelligible; it is just easy to tell for the layperson they're related from a few identical words.  That's nothing special about Austronesian languages: I can say [dat is mai̯ hau̯s] in the Moselle Franconian dialect of German, which sounds exactly like the corresponding sentence in an English variety with TH-stopping.  OTOH, Poso Pesisir is almost identical to the central dialects of Pamona in every respect.  There is literally more linguistic variation among Mid-Atlantic US English dialects compared to that.  – Austronesier ( talk ) 20:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge properly sourced material with Pamona language , unneeded CFORK with a good target that will be improved after the merge.  // Timothy :: talk 17:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Sterile Records: Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earthly Delights (record label) .  No reliable sources .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Business , Companies ,  and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Both the founders of this label and the band they played in have articles; there's no reason why we'd want a redlink here and no good reason why this needed to be adjudicated at AfD.  Chubbles ( talk ) 08:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - I second the proposal to merge.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkiehne ( talk • contribs ) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there is support for a Merge but no Merge target specified.  Earthly Delights is being merged to Nocturnal Emissions , is this a possible Merge target as well?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Nocturnal Emissions per above.  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 00:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Henderson family: Reywas92 Talk 01:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Reywas92 Talk 01:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge just a bit to William Henderson (architect) and perhaps Gordon F. Henderson .  I think the latter makes sense as the redirect target.  — siro χ o 05:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Scotland and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge