hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Berona's War : I cannot find other coverage, however, and think that this does not meet WP:NBOOK .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and United States of America .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   We have two or more reviews in RS with SIGCOV, meeting WP:NBOOK#C1 so far I count 3.  While the reviews focus on a single entry ( Field Guide ), I think keeping it at this title is best.  Wired mentioned above and linked in article.  Publisher's Weekly [1] Comics Bulletin [2] from January 2011, reliable in this time period.  Note, there's also a review from a long-running blog published by a professional freelance writer, which may be usable.  [3] — siro χ o 00:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw (as nom).  Thanks - I could only find the Wired review, and agree 2+ reviews meets the first criterion.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 00:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2025 Women's Cricket World Cup : Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON , but currently fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 09:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Events , Cricket ,  and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This will be the next staging of the event.  There are sources discussing who will be hosting.  I would also support a redirect to the Women's Cricket World Cup as a WP:ATD .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  For now, I think this is sufficient for a standalone.  We know the tournament will take place and there are references discussing who might host.  StickyWicket ( talk ) 09:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Zero in-depth, independent sources (!!??), nominator surely ignored WP:BEFORE .  Article passes WP:CRYSTAL requirements which states, Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place.  This and this clearly indicates that sufficient coverage is available about the event and it is almost certain to take place.  Anyway, Cricket World Cup is undoubtedly a notable event topic to pass WP:GNG / WP:NEVENT .  RoboCric ( talk ) 15:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Think there's already enough here for a standalone article to exist.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Silviu Florea : Does not meet WP:NSPORT .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 19:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Sports ,  and Romania .  Shinadamina ( talk ) 19:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby union and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Extensive career with 3 World Cups, a considerable number of caps and appearances in major competitions.  A simple search is bringing up WP:GNG passing sourcing.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please share 2 or 3 reliable sources that have in-depth coverage on the person.  We cannot assume reliable sources from the past can be found.  We need to find them.  Appearances in World Cup are not sufficient, unless there is such a WP policy which I am not aware of.  If so, please link to the said policy.  Shinadamina ( talk ) 04:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe these help: https://www.prosport.ro/alte-sporturi/rugby/rugbystii-romani-sunt-la-mare-cautare-in-franta-2765321 https://rugbyromania.ro/silviu-florea-s-a-retras-din-activitate/ https://www.sudouest.fr/sport/rugby/prod2/arrete-trois-mois-et-demi-silviu-florea-relance-sa-saison-demain-9784624.php https://www.sudouest.fr/sport/rugby/bordeaux-begles/union-bordeaux-begles-entorse-pour-florea-9139959.php I'm not saying that each of these are "in-depth coverage", but they may help someone looking to add sources to the article, so it can be kept.  Razvan Socol ( talk ) 17:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] #2 is a primary source, but the third article seems to have some pretty good coverage...  JTtheOG ( talk ) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the references added above, which establish notability.  Frank Anchor 03:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
John Røen : Ethmostigmus ( talk ) 10:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Norway .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am probably able to save it.  Cross-country skiing is the national sport in Norway, and he is covered in several books - as well as contemporary and later news.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That would be much appreciated :) Ethmostigmus ( talk ) 10:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Done, so keep .  Enough in-depth significant coverage, although he, unlike his brother, does not have an entire book dedicated to him.  (I haven't used this book in the article yet)  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , per excellent work by Geschitchte.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also very happy to keep in light of all the print coverage Geschitchte was able to find :) Ethmostigmus ( talk ) 06:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
John Walker Baylor : Interesting footnote in Alamo history, perhaps.  Onel 5969 TT me 10:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The Handbook of Texas , which according to its Wikipedia article is a comprehensive biographical dictionary of Texas, has a 594-word biography of the subject, here .  If we're not basing our standards of notability on one of the best biographical dictionaries in the area, what are we doing? .  Also, Alamo Defenders has a 2-page biography of the subject, here (the source is in the bibliography of the Handbook of Texas article).  There is a biographical sketch in this history (also cited in the Handbook of Texas , although I can't read all of it on Google Books).  The website of the San Jacinto Museum of History has a 1,719-word biography by Louise W. Kemp, here , which is the first hit on Google.  And there's this piece from a mid-20th-century Texas newspaper.  𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk ) 11:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Texas .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I was able to find many notable sources in a simple gsearch.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : A search finds multiple sources with WP:SIGCOV that can establish notability.  The subject passes WP:BIO .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 13:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep sources posited by Ficaia more than meet our general notability guidelines.  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 13:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Appears to pass GNG.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 13:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Ficaia.  Mccapra ( talk ) 21:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
List of constituencies of Gujarat : Thus disambiguation page is not needed.  — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 04:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 5 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : a valid dab page helping the reader.  Pam D 07:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disambiguations and Gujarat .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - a valid disambiguation page.  The list of parliamentary constituencies in Gujarat is a section within a separate page , but that doesn’t necessarily mean that List of constituencies of Gujarat isn’t a term that could be used to refer to that sub-list.  As far as I can tell, this phrase is one that can be used to refer to both lists, and this is therefore a valid dab page - per WP:D2D , there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which [this]…phrase might be expected to lead .  All the best, ‍—‍ a smart kitten [ meow ] 09:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : It's definitely a helpful page that very well distinguishes the two pages from each other and allows the user to choose which page to select.  NoobThreePointOh ( talk ) 19:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Fingertip (TV series) : Karnataka ( talk ) 17:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Although this is not a film ( Wikipedia:Notability_(films)#Other_evidence_of_notability ), there are two reliable reviews [8] , [9] , [10] .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 04:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - independent reviews are exactly what you are looking to see in an ideal case, and the nomination notes that there are two of them.  This meets the GNG.  matt91486 ( talk ) 10:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per DareshMohan.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2008 INC-CCP MoU : There is too little reference material.  And I suspect that the references are suspiciously politically induced.  Roci xu ( talk ) 06:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  Roci xu ( talk ) 06:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I was able to add several new references.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 06:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per sources in article.  This needs to be moved to a better name, I understand why its been abbr, but it needs a better name.  // Timothy :: talk 06:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Ground Round : Drmies ( talk ) 00:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies , Maine ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The earlier chain is where most of the notability is, Drmies .  The problem is that it's mostly pre-social media coverage (and a lot of wading through ads and non-article material).  I turned up a very long 2004 article that could help: [86] + [87] .  Also: [88] Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] User:Sammi Brie , wanna help me out?  Drmies ( talk ) 14:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Drmies : Done and more.  Nation's Restaurant News (in EBSCOhost via TWL) has some substantial coverage of this chain's perpetual problems.  We are in clear Keep territory.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 00:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This was a major, nationwide restaurant chain for a many years.  It's basically died out, sure, but Wikipedia actually does have some articles on things that don't exist anymore.  The article could stand some improvement, certainly, but it's functional enough in its current state, even.  - R. fiend ( talk ) 13:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per other keep ! votes.  I am really having trouble figuring out how there could even possibly be an argument for deletion.  Maybe it depends on what part of the U.S. you grew up in.  When I was a kid these places were everywhere.  The last one near me, in a now-embalmed mall , closed years ago after an employee got murdered there after hours.  Daniel Case ( talk ) 04:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd only heard of this chain because of reading about it online.  Even at its height, I don't think it operated in the Southwest.  The closest it might have come was Idaho.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep thanks to User:Sammi Brie 's extraordinary research and writing to establish notability and bring it up to Wikipedia's standards.  SilverbackNet talk 07:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets our notability requirements.  Note: I came here from DYK because the article was nominated there.  Bruxton ( talk ) 15:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Sylvia Gomez : All sources are primary, with a direct connection to the subject, or exclusively local.  GuardianH ( talk ) 05:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Seems to meet WP:GNG standards.  This is an article from Puerto Rico's largest newspaper.  This article from another PR newspaper mentions "Sylvia Gomez will be recognized with a Silver Circle Emmy by the Suncoast Chapter of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences, in recognition of her career of more than 50 years in television", which seems noteworthy.  APK whisper in my ear 05:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep Frankly, with the amount of reliable sources there and of sources that are considered major, reliable newspapers, this surprises me. I did not expect this article to be up for deletion.  I think the nominator is unaware that El Vocero, El Nuevo Dia and Primera Hora are Puerto Rico's three largest newspapers and considered reliable sources.  Antonio Madonna Ringwald Martin ( queeeee? ) 20:28, 16 July, 2023 (UTC) Keep Sylvia Gomez is a notable Puerto Rican television journalist and show host and meets WP:GNG standards.  Tony the Marine ( talk ) 06:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The coverage is a bit piecemeal, but in total I think it meets WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kanika Tekriwal : User4edits ( talk ) 06:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Women , India ,  and Madhya Pradesh .  User4edits ( talk ) 06:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Don't the listed honors and awards establish notability?  Zanahary ( talk ) 06:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Zanahary From what I see, they are niche awards , not any notable NGO/Government award such as Magsaysay Award , Women in Business Award or from Orders, decorations, and medals of India .  Also WP:commonsense , subject and her "awards" derive notability from founding a 10 aircraft charter company.  User4edits ( talk ) 07:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : recognised by UN, BBC, and Indian Government, none of which can be called "niche".  Pam D 09:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the comment above, she's recived international coverage, to me meets WP:GNG Shaws username .  talk .  12:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clearly passes GNG as enough sources available with detailed coverage.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  13:00, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Alexander Pryadko : Кронас ( talk ) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Кронас ( talk ) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  He participated as a policeman in the 2024 Bashkortostan protests Слава Україні 10:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Seems to meet WP:GNG .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
J-Popcon : Also fails WP:GNG .  Proposing Delete.  Powerplay44 ( talk ) 21:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga , Events , Popular culture ,  and Denmark .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disagree , I've been able to find some seemingly independent sources to back up some of the article.  Moreover, this seems to be a pretty major event and this article significantly benefits readers in my opinion.  AriTheHorse 01:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Updated Nov. 22.  There are now non social media sources present to back up this page.  Still not sure about the notability, but it can stay for now.  AlleghenyPA ( talk ) 22:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I’ve added several non-social media citations to it.  AriTheHorse 02:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks, I’ll gladly alter my thinking!  AlleghenyPA ( talk ) 18:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Potential sources I could find: I can't speak Danish, but there could be enough sources to justify a keep vote.  Non-paywall - The Copenhagen Post: Turning Japanese, we really think so! https://cphpost.dk/2017-04-16/things-to-do/turning-japanase-we-really-think-so/ The Copenhagen Post: About Town: Going Japanese and we like it! https://cphpost.dk/2018-05-19/general/about-town-going-japanese-and-we-like-it/ Ekstra Bladet: Letpåklædte kattekvinder indtog Øksnehallen - https://ekstrabladet.dk/forbrug/Teknologi/article4685782.ece Ekstra Bladet: 'Sensation' er for amatører! https://ekstrabladet.dk/forbrug/Teknologi/article4131694.ece Paywall - Mangafest: Derfor går de unge rundt med blåt hår og ninjakostumer i weekenden Politiken: https://politiken.dk/ibyen/byliv/art5914373/Derfor-g%C3%A5r-de-unge-rundt-med-bl%C3%A5t-h%C3%A5r-og-ninjakostumer-i-weekenden Politiken: Udklædt som skolepige: »Folk forstår ikke, hvad det er, vi har gang i« https://politiken.dk/kultur/art5508816/Udkl%C3%A6dt-som-skolepige-%C2%BBFolk-forst%C3%A5r-ikke-hvad-det-er-vi-har-gang-i%C2%AB Politiken: 2000 manganørder mødes til Japan-messe https://politiken.dk/kultur/art5706890/2000-mangan%C3%B8rder-m%C3%B8des-til-Japan-messe Esw01407 ( talk ) 00:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Plenty of sources in Danish, from reliable sources, appears to be significant.  Not having sources in English does not equal non-notable.  Wes sideman ( talk ) 15:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep