hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Petrozavodsk (disambiguation): The AfD is issued after the PROD tag got removed.  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk ) 01:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and per WP:TWODABS .  Everything else is just a WP:PTM referencing the city anyway.  BD2412 T 02:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A disambiguation page is not required; "Petrozavodsk" is not ambiguous.  Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 18:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rebecca Weber: Ibjaja055 ( talk ) 07:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Conservatism , Politics ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] was that old deletion about the same person?  There are a few with the same/similar names.  Juno ( talk ) 05:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Article don't have any significant coverage to be in main space.  ~ India cup 09:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Association of Mature American Citizens .  Most of the coverage about her is in conjunction with AMAC.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 10:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Delete for lack of sourcing, not even sure a redirect to the association is needed, I don't think being the CEO of it gives any notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Weber participated in the January 6 uprising and wrote about it 3 days later on the AMAC website, insinuating violence was triggered by " Antifa " agents provocateurs .  This link is a primary source and does not establish notability.  However, there may possibly be news coverage elsewhere of her involvement.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 18:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I added more material/sources.  There has been a lot written and she gets interviews with all the R presidential candidates, among others.  Juno ( talk ) 05:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Juno Unfortunately the two  articles you added written by John Grimaldi don't count, because Grimaldi himself works for AMAC.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 06:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Edgeryders: StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Websites ,  and Europe .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, I can find almost nothing about the org that is not hosted on its own website or LinkedIn.  I did find [39] but I don't think it's enough.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 18:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cruise Miles: Source 1 is the best thing in the article, and it's fairly trivial (it's a promotion, not a news story).  Sources 2, 5 and 7 are unavailable.  Source 3 is an advert.  Source 4 is clearly promotional copy.  Source 6 deals with a different company and source 8 is not reliable.  And the official website link in the External links section is dead.  Dweller ( talk ) Old fashioned is the new thing!  12:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find their website on ROL Cruises and a few links to travel companies that offer this reward program.  Noting for notability found; the source analysis in the nom is spot-on.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  I could not find significant coverage in my searches for sources.  The subject does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria .  Cunard ( talk ) 08:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
D R Parajuli: Also does not seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN or any other relevant SNG.  User:Nplz/Dilli Ram Parajuli is a slightly better version of this article but it still contains no decent sources that we can use to confer notability.  In my own searches, the best source that I can find is The Peninsula , which mentions him as a winner of a raffle at Doha International Airport .  Not enough for me.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Businesspeople , Journalism ,  and Nepal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG.  Article in its current state is probably eligible for A7.- KH-1 ( talk ) 06:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it has no citations and none can be found.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 07:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Roen Davis: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Bahamas .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Castle Donuts: Cannot find any significant non-local coverage.  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 18:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and California .  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 18:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete FINALLY!  S&%t's starting to make sense around here!  Incidentally, I initially believed, when I started writing articles on local businesses, that you needed at least 1 "outside the area" source in order for it to stick.  THEN, before writing this article, I read somewhere that purely local sources were OK because they were still independent from the main topic, or something.  Now it turns out there was this big brou-ha-ha back at the beginning of May about this very thing, now I don't know WHAT to believe.  Listen, I enjoy writing articles on local businesses (especially ones in my area/that I'm familiar with), I just wish you guys would come up with SOMETHING that tells me what local businesses are notable enough for an article.  If it's none of them, fine, I'll look for other areas to contribute to.  Americanfreedom ( talk ) 19:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Typically a few good in-depth reliable sources, with at least one applicable to a large/outside audience.  In practice, it varies based on what people consider to be local, regional, etc. in a given case and who shows up to ! vote in these discussions.  The way people interpret these requirements varies somewhat, and some places have a higher concentration of folks who interpret the guidelines in stricter or looser ways, for better or worse.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok!  That sounds good!  Thanks for the reply and sorry for sounding flippant and PO'd in my response, it's been something that's been stuck in my craw (so to speak) since I started writing about these things.  Americanfreedom ( talk ) 18:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - cannot find and reliable sources of significant coverage.  Fails GNG.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 14:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 16:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG .  159.196.171.101 ( talk ) 22:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gymnocalycium nova: Perhaps somebody thought there was a new species and had some intent of describing it; "species nova" (usually abbreviated "sp. nov.") is a phrase associated with describing new species, but it is impossible to determine what species name was proposed, if any from just "nova".  'Sierra Medina' is apparently a cultivar of Gymnocalycium bayrianum ( [35] ), but the cultivar isn't notable, and there is no reason for Wikipedia to perpetuate the apparent confusion surrounding "nova".  Plantdrew ( talk ) 21:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions .  Plantdrew ( talk ) 21:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Could be true, i dont recall the details on the culivar.  ZyMOS ( talk ) 21:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If found no reliable references to establish notability.  The one reference cited by the article links to a zipcodezoo.com page that no longer exists.  Zipcodezoo's "About us" section says: "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscin elit. Morbi pellentesque vehicula magna, nec lobortis lorem sagittis ut." -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2nd Battle of Yedaya: Minorincident, No sources found showing this has WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 19:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the refs provided are only skimpy passing mentions and I don’t see anything more substantial.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just added another secondary source talking about the battle Check it out Yubudirsi ( talk ) 17:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Africa ,  and Ethiopia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No assumptions were made on my page, I added secondary sources AND primary sources, none contradicts the other neither what I wrote, I can't seem to see my mistake so I asked other wikipedia editors to review my recent articles, still cant pinpoint a single mistake, recently all my articles I put hard work in were reported for deletion by SocialWave, please explain yourself in more detail Yubudirsi ( talk ) 08:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as if this closes as Soft Delete, it is likely to get immediately restored.  Remember, editor participants, to BOLD your "vote" of what you are arguing should occur with this article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The issue with all these battle articles is that while they are verifiable, they are not notable, because we do not have multiple independent sources discussing them in depth.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sources are not sufficient for a stand alone article.  There isn't much in detail about the battle then a sentence or two.  Socialwave597 ( talk ) 06:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BlueMSX: A WP:BEFORE search gives me a book that copies the article from the French Wikipedia on GBooks and forum posts, which are unreliable.  Davest3r08 > : ) ( talk ) 14:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Computing ,  and Software .  Davest3r08 > : ) ( talk ) 14:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benito Juarez Marg: Has been in CAT:NN for nearly 7 years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 09:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Delhi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The road is notable as the South Campus of Delhi University is located along the road.  This is a false statement.  There are thousands of university campuses in the world, but the existence doesn't mean the roads they are near are notable.  It's a generic four-lane road that's not even two km long.  Reywas92 Talk 18:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ACL injuries in Australian rules football: There is nothing specific about this type of injury in Australian football that makes it different than the same injury in any other sport.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Australia .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only 1 source is specifically about AFL, the rest is generic info on ACL injuries in sport and WP:SYNTH to link it to AFL.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't see anything here that isn't basically already covered in Anterior cruciate ligament injury .   I'm all for niche content being included in the project, but this feels kind of... needlessly specific.  Sleddog116 ( talk ) 02:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is an article about ACL injuries, with some WP:SYNTH to try and link it to the sport (and at most 1-2 of the offline sources that might be usable, but cannot tell as offline sources).  I don't see a large amount of coverage linking the two (unlike for example women's association football and high levels of ACL injuries, which do seem to get a lot of mainstream coverage like [45] ), and so this isn't a topic that needs to exist on Wikipedia.  And especially not this article, which is really just an essay about ACLs.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Sleddog.  I've had a read through the article and it looks like an essay to me.  There's nothing linking ACL injuries to Austrailian Rules football that does not link it to any other sport.  QwertyForest ( talk ) 11:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : User that created the article in 2015 has never edited anything since it was finished; based on the username, I suspect it was a student of about 9-10 yrs old at the time, but who knows.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Their username included 86, which by calculation could mean they were around 19/20 at that time.  Which is consistent with this being a university style essay.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 18:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  With reference to the outcome of and my comment in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Overtraining_of_AFL_athletes , this was one of several essay-type articles appearing around the same time by editors with no other edit history; long suspected that these appeared from a school/university project.  Aspirex ( talk ) 09:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mahari Cortijo: JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and United States of America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Although there are plenty of sources on the article, none of them provide significant coverage.  I also searched online and in local media sources like The Virgin Islands Daily News but could find nothing more than passing mentions.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 16:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fintan Coleman: Creator has stated that he is notable as he has played for teams with Wikipedia pages, and makes claim to a connection to a team he plays for, however this does not make him notable, and while there is some coverage, it is WP:ROUTINE and does not constitute significant coverage.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , Ireland ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Delete' - there are clear NSPORTS / NRU criteria, which do not seem met, and on the GNG side, clearly not a match.  Maybe just TOOSOON.  SeoR ( talk ) 08:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naresh Eswar: Article looks like it was made without following notability guidelines.  Only source found: [10] .  Probably, WP:TOOSOON .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as sources are mainly routine about events he will take part in, and other interviews.  so should fail the actor notability guideline.  Karnataka ( talk ) 17:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Advanced Warriors: Unable to identify any reliable source for the subject.  OceanHok ( talk ) 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  OceanHok ( talk ) 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete cannot find any promising leads on Global Newstream, Newspapers.com or MasterFile.  Fails GNG and V at present.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 20:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  -- Mann Mann ( talk ) 02:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete