hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
M. B. Ranjit : There are lots of refs but overall I don’t see how this person was notable in Wikipedia terms.  He was a man with a career.  This appears to me to be a memorial page so bringing here for consensus.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Andhra Pradesh ,  and Telangana .  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Being sympathetic and sincere isn't the thing that makes you notable for a Wikipedia article.  A working police officer, no different than many others from what I read in the article.  Sourcing is simply confirmation of what the person did as a job.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any reliable resources.  Fails WP:GNG .  Macbeejack ☎ 08:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rimbun Air de Havilland DHC-6 Twin Otter : The guidance at WP:AIRCRASH suggests this should be an entry in a larger list, nothing more.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 18:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Indonesia .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 18:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Aviation .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Event fails WP:GNG and the event criteria .  No evidence of lasting effects with no continued coverage of the accident.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 09:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : In the future, it would be better if you cited something else than WP:AIRCRASH as it is an essay and should not be applied in AfD nominations.  Per the consensus from the page : By consensus this should not be used to determine whether a stand-alone article should exist or not.  If an accident or incident meets the criteria for inclusion in an airport, airline or aircraft article it may also be notable enough for a stand-alone article, if it also meets the criteria provided by the general notability guideline, a notability of events guideline and a guide on the use of news reports.  Because this is an essay and not policy and also because it should not be applied to stand-alone accident articles, it is recommended that it not be cited at Articles for Deletion discussions for either keeping or deleting.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 09:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Point taken, after all I'm trainsandotherthings, not airplanesandotherthings.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sookshm Information Services : BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I couldn't find sources with significant coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 15:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shannon Rick : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zapata Espinoza : Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 16:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 18:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer “JJ” Leigh : Couldn't find any sources online.  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 14:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] NB: the article is an WP:AUTOBIO .  ( [26] ) ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 15:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found for this individual.  Google keeps bringing up hits from the Just Jared website, or hits from the Friends tv show.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.rarepeace.com/post/20-important-female-led-rock-bands-you-should-know Katiechainsaw ( talk ) 21:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://m.soundcloud.com/25000miles/interview-with-mande-elaine-jj-from-the-devotchkas Katiechainsaw ( talk ) 21:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] there’s plenty of other links - either under my old nickname JJ I don’t know what you need to keep my bands page or mine up… Katiechainsaw ( talk ) 21:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See WP:GNG for the quality criteria of sources to provide.  ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 00:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Munir Hasan : Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 15:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  Sources in article are primary and name mentions, and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 18:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ashok Chauhan : Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T ) 10:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Businesspeople , India ,  and Delhi . Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T ) 10:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Pretty much all of the links in the article seem to either be broken, make no reference to the subject, or make very brief, passing mentions of the subject which is not in line with WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  The only other source I could find was a PR piece from the subject's university that he presumably founded.  Lynch44 ( talk ) 12:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Sources are mostly broken and others have no mention on the subject.  One source with a reference on Award and can not tell if it is about same person.  The subject is not significant or made well known notable achievement to have an page on himself.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per the comments above.  TheChronikler7 ( talk ) 10:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination failed to establish notability.  HarshalDhotre06 ( talk ) 13:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- assertion of WP:PROF is only on founding a university that does not have independent notability.  No significant coverage for GNG.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 11:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iobi : Boleyn ( talk ) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  There doesn't appear to be any sources independent of Verizon and no evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 22:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Iobinetwork (username indicates WP:COI , just removed the AfD template, I have restored it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: self-promoting but insufficiently notable for a stand-alone article.  Nirva20 ( talk ) 22:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BraveJusticeKidsCo. : Fails WP:NCORP .  US-Verified ( talk ) 23:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Paid-for spam by an editor-for-hire.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 04:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A lot of the sources aren't even about the company itself.  And the one that are only have a have a brief mention which is not enough for WP:CORPDEPTH .  - Imcdc Contact 14:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This article is what the company would say about itself.  Corporate notability , like general notability , is based on what third parties say about the company, but that is lacking in this article.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 18:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , CORPDEPTH per above.  SWinxy ( talk ) 15:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I also wasn't able to find any sources that would meet WP:GNG .  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 16:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sheebah Zalwango : I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  The most I found was 1 , 2 , and 3 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uganda .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per lack of notability and journalist's coverage on the subject.  -- VertyBerty ( talk ) 08:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BLV Group Corporation : In a WP:BEFORE [41] was the only independent mention that I could be sure was the same company, and only in passing.  [42] Is a press release.  All of the reliable sources that I could find to support meeting WP:NCORP were for other companies with similar names.  Shaws username .  talk .  14:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and United States of America .  Shaws username .  talk .  14:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mereoni Tora : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This was the most I found.  List of Fiji women's international footballers does not yet exist, so a redirect is not yet possible.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aidan Burrell : I found a couple sentences of coverage here and not much else.  Fails WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and England .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Played one match, not notable.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 11:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : this source says that he left Hull to pursue a full time job which implies his rugby career is concluded and we shouldn't expect any further coverage that would bring him up to a notability threshold.  -- D'n'B - t -- 12:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , sources and accomplishments are not enough to write a biography about him.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing SPORTSCRIT, not enough sources or accomplishments Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dean Ebarle : Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Philippines .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I researched Dean Ebarle, it has some notability, being the defender for a popular football team, im not that much interested in football, so correct me or ping me if im wrong.  TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 09:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you present the sources of your research?  Svartner ( talk ) 17:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: If you know of any sources, please mention them here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No one has unearthed any SIGCOV of this player and there is no evidence that any might exist.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 20:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patrik Pietschmann : A quick search before the nomination turned up no useable reliable sources .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 22:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Internet ,  and Germany .  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 22:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP and WP:SIGCOV .  There is a single reliable source - the Piano Society - but that fails far short of significant coverage.  The rest are not reliable or not independent.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James M. Brophy (American politician) : He politically services stems from being a delegate which is not a very notable position which is evident by the lack of coverage from sources.  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 04:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Either draft or deletion, Sources were a bit difficult to find.  Best, Kevin9217 ( talk ) 04:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - does not seem to have ever been elected to public office.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  11:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Party functionary that was never elected; office work generally isn't notable.  I can't find any mentions of this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree.  I doubt much will be contributed if it is made into a draft, and since sources were scarce, I believe our vote will be unanimous for deletion.  Kevin9217 ( talk ) 19:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete