hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Iranian dynasties and countries : WP:OR / WP:SYNTH , fails WP:LISTCRITERIA (the lists equivalent of WP:NONDEFINING ), and long series of precedents confirming that language family is WP:NONDEFINING for countries, territories, dynasties, and individual people.  Many users at the "Turkic" AfD urged me to nominate the "Iranian" list as well, so here it is.  On 12 June, I mistakenly WP:bundled this "Iranian" list with a couple of other lists/articles at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Iranian dynasties and countries .  It turned out that they were too different from each other to lump them all together in a single AfD, so I withdrew the nomination.  The AfD ended in no consensus , with No prejudice against creating AfDs for individual articles, if desired.  So now I'm only nominating the List of Iranian dynasties and countries individually.  (Incidentally, virtually everyone at the bundle AfD seemed to agree that this "Iranian" list should be deleted, but we should judge it anew on its own merits rather than as a part of the malformed bundle.)  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 20:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Geography ,  and Lists .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 20:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  -- HistoryofIran ( talk ) 21:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. Aintabli ( talk ) 21:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Afghanistan , Tajikistan ,  and Iran . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete same as my previous vote. -- Mann Mann ( talk ) 12:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per evidences provided.  Sutyarashi ( talk ) 13:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nominator.  Alex-h ( talk ) 08:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Maliner ( talk ) 10:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DO NOT Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:BF10:CE60:6512:B576:E7A0:7A1E ( talk ) 01:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The list is of value.  I don't see an argument of why it should be deleted.  Is any part of it inaccurate?!  If so, It can be updated?  I personally found it very informative.  2600:1700:BF10:CE60:6512:B576:E7A0:7A1E ( talk ) 01:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bharat Maps : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions ) 15:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , No sources or coverage found of the subject.  Only primary sources have been located, which fail to establish the notability required for a standalone article.  Grabup ( talk ) 17:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No secondary or independent sources.  Fails notability guidelines.  RangersRus ( talk ) 17:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing GNG Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sculptris : I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N .  It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some talk of this software in blogs or animation websites, this [6] in Screen Rant.  None of which are extensive or most in RS.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2027 East Timorese presidential election : When I did a WP:BEFORE check on Google, only two resources came up, both being results for the 2022 election.  Similar things came up when I did a WP:BEFORE check on news articles, with everything being for the 2022 election (and one article being about East Timor joining ASEAN).  There probably won't be enough coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article until a year or so before the election, perhaps in 2026 or something.  interstate five 01:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Asia .  interstate five 01:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It can be recreated when the election is actually anywhere close to happening.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 12:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This habit of creating new election articles years out really needs to stop for all nations and all parties.  Nate • ( chatter ) 15:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:CRYSTAL establishes critieria for expected future events, this fails that criteria on the basis that there is no sourcing.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 21:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Beyaz Hap : Donald D23 talk to me 14:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks multiple sources with significant coverage.  No article in Turkish Wikipedia either.  Flurrious ( talk ) 01:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Has not even a single source.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 14:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Masoom (2017 TV series) : Searching for coverage online, I only found reviews of an unrelated show by the same name.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 23:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Fails WP:GNG .  105.103.152.170 ( talk ) 20:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Camp Meadowood Springs : -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prasun Kumar : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Leader of a youth thing and a covid liberator are not notable, I'm not even sure what either of those is.  Delete for not meeting GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep According to the available news articles and the subject's work, I found this topic noteworthy.  Passes WP:GNG .  GM Nova ( talk ) 12:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Why does it meet notability guidelines though?  That's what we're discussing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agreed, and changed my vote to Delete .  For now the person is not notable and does not meet WP:NPOL .  GM Nova ( talk ) 05:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable under any of Wikipedia's subject-specific notability criteria, but the depth and volume of referencing is nowhere near what it would take to earn him notability of the "media coverage exists = WP:GNG pass" variety (which is not just automatically extended to just everybody who can show a small handful of local-interest coverage in run of the mill contexts).  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO per above.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 21:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The March 2023 NDTV piece is clearly SIGCOV and contains multiple paragrahps about the subject's role in the emergence of a state party with national implications and provides details of his personal history.   However, the pieces in Hindi and Telegu are essentially rehashes of the NDTV article and the piece on COVID appears to be churnalism with a tag indicating the site assumes no responsibility for content.   My searches find no further sources that would lead to passing the GNG threshold.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 12:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hani Al-Dobaini : In my Arabic searches I found Al-Jazirah , which mentions him once, Ar Riyadiyah , which is a one-sentence transfer announcement, and Alyaum , which has two quotes from him at the bottom.  None of this coverage addresses him directly and in depth.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG, BIO. There are no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source in article is a database record. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV, game news, database, promo. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 09:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IDFA DocLab Competition for Digital Storytelling 2023 : None of the competing entries is notable.  WP:NOTDATABASE .  Broc ( talk ) 18:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related page as its content is substantially the same, just for another year: IDFA DocLab Competition for Digital Storytelling 2021 ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) -- Broc ( talk ) 18:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Awards .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – no sign of meaningful coverage; this is a relatively trivial competition in the festival, RSs only mention it in passing ( example , example ), and even IMDb with its broad inclusion criteria doesn't list the winner .  RunningTiger123 ( talk ) 01:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nicole de Jesús : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  The only piece of coverage I found which covers her directly ( 1 ), comes from the school she attends.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Dominican Republic .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per a lack of WP:GNG -passing coverage.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
One Economy Corporation : A number of PR sources online, which are not useful.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 17:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Technology ,  and United States of America .  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 17:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.   Finding the same, brief mentions and press releases with most mentions back in 2008 through around 2010 and it appears they ceased  in 2012 ( press release about founders ).  S0091 ( talk ) 19:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Felicia Frick : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Europe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , lacks significant coverage.  Liechtenstein has a population of under 40,000 so it's not like you'd expect significant coverage.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 11:16, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Henry C. Gonzalez : He received some coverage upon his death and for his attempted assassination in 1999, but that does not meet WP:SIGCOV or WP:NCRIME .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 05:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete the LA Times obit is good enough coverage so he's closer to a keep than most of these, but we're not there yet, and I can't find anything else that would push him over the edge.  SportingFlyer T · C 12:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robin Wray : The single source is not about the subject (states, "Greaves then confirmed the appointment of Robin Wray as Town’s full-time youth coach. The New College PE teacher had been working part-time at Leeds Road for the previous two years.") BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 21:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG . The only source within the article fails WP:SIGCOV . I haven’t been able to find any sources that would help to establish notability. Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 18:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:GNG . Onel 5969 TT me 10:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ngoni Mupamba : What I found was a couple of quotes here and not much else.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect There is a bit of coverage on this one, but it seems a bit one event'y and still likely fails WP:GNG even with offline coverage included, no lists so no suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Caster Concepts : vghfr (✉ Talk ) (✏ Contribs ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies .  vghfr (✉ Talk ) (✏ Contribs ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Michigan .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I see local coverage, and coverage in B2B sources which are generally promotional; neither seems sufficient for notability. — Moriwen ( talk ) 16:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with :Moriwen's analysis and the original deltion rationale.  --  Deepfriedokra ( talk ) 16:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I found relatively a good number of sources that this article meets WP: NCORP including this JSTOR article: MAGNUSON, S. (2021).  UP FRONT.  National Defense, 105(806), 6–7.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/27023231 .  Local news doesn't necessarily means it's not reliable.  They seems to be reliable.   All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 23:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree for the deletion of this article.  User:SYNTHWAVER MAN — Preceding undated comment added 22:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Macleod Group : Searches are also not yielding anything.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 13:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism , Organizations , Politics ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete