hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
CaliCam : I have carried out WP:BEFORE and have not found references to add.  I don't think he meets WP:ANYBIO , WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 20:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and United States of America .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 20:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a blatant ad, would have speedied it as such if that were possible.  Mach61 ( talk ) 20:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I have my doubts about the charted singles, as they are unsourced. .  Gsearch goes to some . ai site, then github, then not much for RS.  There are zero mentions/no hits at all in Gnews.  I can't find anything about this person online.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A liar could at least pretend to be competent.  He wrote this article himself in 2012 (see history) and didn't even know what his stage name was.  So was it CAM, Cam, or CaliCam?  Cam Cali and CAM CALI also appear in the history.  Note to rappers: don't choose a stage name that is unsearchable online (Cam, etc.) or one that rips off a trademarked product (CaliCam).  That leaves the option of searching for his various song titles, or the blatant lie that someone invited him to contribute to a Hunger Games soundtrack, and absolutely nothing reliable can be found.  This guy's biggest accomplishment was a fake Wikipedia article that flew under the radar for 11 years.  Hope it puts food on the table.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per all forementioned reasons above. Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- 12:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) Delete .  Should have been deleted since because there are no WP:references and reliable sources .  Read this WP:NOT .  Ezra Cricket ( talk ) 02:54, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No WP:references and reliable sources cited in the article.  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 20:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as an obviously promotional article.  would've been speedied as WP:G11 if it wasn't put up for AfD.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 19:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hugo Pingray (CIO) : jlwoodwa ( talk ) 04:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Sportspeople , Finance ,  and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , lack of significant and/or non-primary sources.  Geschichte ( talk ) 03:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lemon Drop Kick : A google search for this band brings up no coverage at all.  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , Japan ,  and United States of America .  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing popped up in my search.  Mach61 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Government performance management : It appears to be a term used by consultants and in low-quality sources.  If there is any content worth keeping, it can be merged with articles on "good governance" or "public administration".  Thenightaway ( talk ) 16:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hip-Hop Dance Conservatory : The only sources I could uncover via TWL and Google are trivial mentions of the organization or articles where people associated with the organization were interviewed.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 21:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance and Organizations .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:ORGCRIT .  I was unable to find significant, independent coverage of this organisation in secondary sources.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 13:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
FC Indiana Girls Academy : The PROD was removed with the rationale that this should be merged and redirected to the main F.C. Indiana article but seeing as the title is incorrect and the page has been tagged as having no sources since 2015, I can't go along with that option.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Indiana .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Not mentioned at parent page and no sources.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : My first thought was to merge and redirect to the parent club, but as there is no evidence that this academy exists, there is nothing to merge and no justification for a redirect as it isn't already mentioned there.  Pam D 11:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Partiboi69 : Nagol0929 ( talk ) 22:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 22:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find any reliable sources in the article but while searching I have found that he has written some Medium articles, [1] has released alot of songs that are on Genius, [2] and is on BBC Radio 1 's residency.  [3] But, this does not prove notability.  GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 23:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO , most of the sources are not independent, would need more independent sources such as mainstream press.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It seems that this page was already contested for speedy deletion from the messages on the talk page .  Some of the sources have also been analysed by Jack4576 here — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk • contribs ) In my opinion the analysis is incorrect as several of the sites he listed as secondary, reliable, and independent were in fact not secondary, and not independent as they were literally promoting his show or appearance somewhere.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:MUSICBIO .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 23:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 18:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aks Swadhin : fails GNG.  Non-notable cricketer stub.  X ( talk ) 11:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  X ( talk ) 11:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 12:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Fails WP:GNG , and given there isn't a suitable list to redirect to here per WP:ATD as he's played for a number of teams, none of which as a main team, delete.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jarreth Merz : No evidence of notability under GNG or SNG.   Under items listed under his "filmography" 8 have articles.   Of those 8, 6 did not even mention him  and two (only) included him as an item in a list.  The two wiki articles under the "He is known for" statement don't even mention him.  Two references have some content on him which appears to be self-description press release type wording.  A third (behind a paywall) appears to be a review of "An African Election" the documentary that he made.  North8000 ( talk ) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The parts listed are bit parts, I don't see ACTOR as being met.  I don't find any sourcing, beyond mentions in cast lists.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of mayors of Lobos : The city of Lobos does not seem significant enough to warrant an entire page for its mayors.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 06:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Argentina .  CptViraj ( talk ) 09:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : while the city of 30,000 certainly has a long history, I can't see this as anything but LISTCRUFT.  The fact that none of the mayors listed have their own article here further suggests lack of notability.  No point in turning this into a redirect (other than keeping history visible), as this is an unlikely search title.  Owen× ☎ 14:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify I may be a minority here, but I see lists of mayors as a valid WP:SPINOUT of an article for any municipality.  Size of city has no basis in policy (for deletion or to keep an article).  Lists of mayors are not indiscriminate and I do not think they are trivial (overcoming WP:LISTCRUFT ).  I support moving the article to draft space because there are no sources provided in the article.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 17:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or draftify It can't be in mainspace as an unsourced list, it's possibly a valid split if someone wants to save it, but the current article isn't good enough for the reasons previously expressed.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Huseyn Mursalov : My own searches yielded only Fanat and Sportnet , both of which are mere squad list mentions that do nothing to suggest that Mursalov is notable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Per nom.  Can't find anything here.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 18:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There seems to be a lack of coverage about this footballer in reliable, published sources.  Waqar 💬 20:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anna Sophia van Schönborn : Nonsourced stub containing bizarre comment such as "she had a 24th child (twins) and also a couple of miscarriages."  Nirva20 ( talk ) 02:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , History , Royalty and nobility ,  and Netherlands .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources, no way to verify if this person even ever existed.  What's to say this isn't all made up?  AusLondonder ( talk ) 08:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment What’s to say it isn’t all made up is putting the subject’s name into  google search and finding it in dozens and dozens of reliable independent sources stretching over a century.  Whether she’s notable or not is harder to say.  Most of the refs about her are passing mentions in almanacs or handbooks of the nobility.  The few I could find that offered greater depth are 1 2 and 3 .  Whether that’s enough for a stand alone article I’m not sure, and there may be other sources I didn’t manage to turn up.  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not saying it is in fact made up, I'm saying without sources present there is no way of readers being able to verify information or know whether an article is made up.  Just looked at the sources, the second one appears to be the website of a restaurant.  Other two could potentially be useful.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] restaurant in the castle she owned, yes.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Her "Marquess" spouse is equally non-notable.  Thus no potential redirect.  Nirva20 ( talk ) 17:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as no context is provided.  The article was created by someone who appears to have gotten carried away with creating articles on subjects in their region.  Better than deleting it, would be redirecting to Schönborn family , HOWEVER, Anna Sophia is NOT listed there.  Nor is her husband.  Until listed, the article should be viewed as an improper SPINOUT of the family article, and regardless of notability be deleted.  Information should not live in a vacuum! gidonb ( talk ) 17:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there is not a single source.  If someone wants to restart the page with sources they are probably better off starting from scratch anyway Tennisist123 ( talk ) 23:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joseph Iyobo : Being a head of a church regards a notable one per WP:CLERGY and verifiable by multiple reliable sources.  BEFORE found nothing even with different change of related name on google news per WP: BISHOP .  It is noteworthy to say: it's neither written as an Encyclopedic material nor a notable reference since it lacks context also to identify WP:N All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 04:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Religion ,  and Nigeria .  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 04:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Also did not pass WP: NAUTHOR and WP: JOURNALIST.   All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 04:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 23:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Witches reel : I'm re-opening as the article currently has no sources at all.  The "article" at https://www.alkistisdimech.com/words/the-witches-dance claims to have been published in The Brazen Vessel, which I could not verify.  It is by no means a reliable source, since there is no indication of any editorial oversight.  Other sources have been discarded for similar reasons in past discussion.  Given that there is apparently no reporting of this in any reliable sources, the case looks quite clear-cut.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 12:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance , Music ,  and Scotland .  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 12:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Noahfgodard ( talk ) 02:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with no prejudice against creating a new article on one of the many things with this name.  This microstub doesn't have enough information for anyone to be sure what it's meant to be about, which has prevented it from either being expanded or confidently proven non-notable.  Since it's unlikely that it will ever be improved from this state, it's not worth keeping.  small jars t c 16:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pricena : A WP:BEFORE found very little coverage and nothing in-depth to demonstrate notability.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Websites ,  and United Arab Emirates .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 04:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not seem to meet NCORP.  A BEFORE search showed very few results.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 11:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bob Walker (artist) : Did some artwork for a band.  No WP:SIGCOV .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 02:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , England ,  and Australia .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 02:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 07:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ARTIST .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 18:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ARTIST .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:56, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete