hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Younique (disambiguation): There is already a hatnote at Younique , linking to the other item ( Younique (album) Leschnei ( talk ) 13:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Leschnei ( talk ) 13:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Other topic does not have a standalone article, redirecting to the band's discography.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 16:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ye Lin Htet: BLP sourced only to the unreliable Facebook and with no evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  Best I can find is a squad list mention in SCMP and a trivial mention in Myanmar Digital Newspaper .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Myanmar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eunises Núñez: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adalberto Velasco: Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Mexico .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  I was not able to find any reliable sources.  Shadow 345110 (talk) 20:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Mayors are not "inherently" notable just for being mayors, unsuccessful candidates for higher office are not "inherently" notable just for being candidates, and this article is not sourced even remotely close to well enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass WP:NPOL .  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete Certainly shy of meeting NPOL, being a mayor of a relatively small town, for a short period of time, and a failed electoral candidate.  Found a couple of sources on his more recent work as president of the Jalisco Livestock Union, [15] [16] but I'm not sure they're enough to show a pass of GNG.  IceBergYYC ( talk ) 23:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Poorly sourced article clearly fails WP:GNG , and unlikely to bootstrap into notability.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
UEFA European Qualifiers broadcasting rights: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Contextes are there to claim 'channel x' brought out the right to coverages in 'country x', not to assert notability.  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Football , Lists ,  and Europe .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 09:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rudolph Flowers: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 17:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bi'r bin Ghunayma: Nothing found in my WP:BEFORE but mirrors of this page searching both with the arabic name given on the page and the Romanised version.  Based on the creator this was likely algorithmically-created based on GEOnet Names Server data which is unreliable.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Libya-related deletion discussions .  FOARP ( talk ) 10:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it’s a well.  Horribly reminiscent of Carlossuarez46‘s endless Iranian water pumps.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mccapra - it is, very much so.  In Blofeld's defence he admits that this methodology wasn't the best and also agrees that something should be done about his mass-created articles, though his favoured solution is redirection, which is unworkable in this case (are we supposed to redirect the names of all the wells in this district to the district article?).  Additionally the articles were created before many of the standards that would have stopped them were decided on.  The question is what to do about the 181 other articles that were created on the same day as this one (see 18 May 2008 here ).  Clicking on a few of them ( Oukredo - unreferenced, Taban, Libya - a checkpoint, Al-Jweideh - potentially just an unofficial neighbourhood or jail in Amman) it's just not looking good, and he was 'writing' hundreds of these articles every day for years.  Had the Lugnuts Olympians RFC passed then that would offer a solution, but based on the close of that RFC I'm not sure what we're supposed to do here.  FOARP ( talk ) 12:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok I’ll think about that and maybe two or three of us can take it on as a project.  Mccapra ( talk ) 16:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Bi'r means "well".  It's literally a well, which as far as I know is not notable.  If anyone wants to find WP:GNG -worthy sources for a well in the middle of the desert, feel free to do it.  Chaotic Enby ( talk ) 19:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it's a well in the desert?  I suppose it could be notable due to appearing in films with Omar Sharif or something, but I have my doubts this would be one of those cases.  Not meeting GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A few mentions in German books in Gbooks and a map.  I wonder if this was involved in some obscure WW2 battle in North Africa?  I'm not seeing notability, still.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The books I found refer to other "bin Ghunyama" things, I couldn't find anything for our well?  Chaotic Enby ( talk ) 20:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ovais Mangalwala: — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 09:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 09:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is very well known Pakistani journalist and full fills the WP:JOURNALIST guidelines instead of nominating for deletion you should help to improve the article or ask for citations, this article does require improvements however does not require to be deleted as Pakistani Mr Ovais is famous TV personality and face of Pakistani media for more than 3 decades.  Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 09:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Faizanalivarya : This is just one of the numerous questionable BLPs you've created.  Regardless of his fame or popularity, he needs to meet the basic GNG criteria, which he currently fails to do.  --— Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 10:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is very well known Pakistani journalist and full fills the WP:JOURNALIST guidelines instead of nominating for deletion you should help to improve the article or ask for citations, this article does require improvements however does not require to be deleted as Pakistani Mr Ovais is famous TV personality and face of Pakistani media for more than 3 decades.  We should improve articles together Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 10:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  WP:PROMO article that lacks coverage in secondary sources directly about him.  I can there are some press releases about his appointment on corporate positions but Wikipedia is not your WP:CV .  163.47.119.21 ( talk ) 12:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patrick Bijou: The two IBT articles [16] and [17] are clearly unreliable as they are written by contributors rather than journalists and are hugely promotional.  WP:CRIME lists two ways in which perpetrators can qualify for a stand-alone article; Bijou is certainly not a renowned national or international figure nor is his crime unusual enough to warrant its own article.  Plenty of people in history have pretended to be other people and I'm just not seeing the sustained coverage needed.  Most of the tabloid stories are from April 2022 and from UK press and seem to discuss the exact same thing; that isn't sustained international coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Crime , Finance , United Kingdom ,  and South America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Erotic novelist implies a shot at AUTHOR, but I can't find any reviews of his works.  Not notable otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hamza Zarei: Doesn't cites references as well, therefore should be deleted.  Zimidar ( talk ) 03:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 28 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 15:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Iran .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Zimidiar.  Fails WP:GNG -- Arian ( talk ) 18:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Herr, Indiana: This is a rail spot; the siding has been severed, but its position next to the tracks remains the same as the complex has mutated and expanded across the road, the only significant structures back into the early 1950s.  There's no sign there was ever a town around it.  Mangoe ( talk ) 17:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This May be just an area of land named after the Historic Herr Cabin.  https://discoverboonecounty.com/points-of-interest/#:~:text=%C2%A0%C2%A0Google%20Map-,HERR%20CABIN,-The%20historic%20Herr 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk ) 14:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The existing article sources are not convincing, and no further sources can be found James.folsom ( talk ) 00:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator and James.folsom.  Scanning back through old maps of Perry Township, I don't see that it was a named site at all until sometime in the mid-20th century.  The earliest I found was a county map from 1969 , which shows land around it being owned by the Herr family.  Even local histories that list villages and post offices don't mention it, so this seems safe to delete.  ╠╣uw [ talk ] 11:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sanilac/GB Broadcasting: Let'srun ( talk ) 18:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and Michigan .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patricia M. McCarthy: Let'srun ( talk ) 14:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and Massachusetts .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for failing WP:GNG as article creator.  Safiel ( talk ) 15:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG - judicial nominees are not necessarily notable.  SportingFlyer T · C 19:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: All sources listed are either namedrops or primary.   No evidence the subject passes the GNG beyond routine coverage.  Ravenswing 00:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No notability shown.  Failes WP:GNG .  - AuthorAuthor ( talk ) 05:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom , fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iniga von Thurn und Taxis: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The whole content is birth, marriage, issue and death.  Therfore no notability.  -- Theoreticalmawi ( talk ) 16:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The same can be said her the articles about her parents: Prince Ludwig Philipp of Thurn and Taxis and his wife Princess Elisabeth of Luxembourg , unless those are being deleted too... no question the article needs improvement but I think deletion might be a bit drastic.  Uppagus ( talk ) 10:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS .  IgnatiusofLondon ( talk ) 00:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources in the article do not support GNG (and several are non-RS), and I didn't see any other sources providing IRS SIGCOV.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaurav Prateek: All that I have checked are from unreliable sources such as IMDB and equivalents or based on one press release (identifiable by the use of the same images) or interviews.  This appears to be a one film actor anxious to publicise himself.  Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR .  Velella Velella Talk 01:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Velella Velella Talk 01:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 02:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fail WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR . - FitIndia Talk (Admin on Commons) 12:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 04:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Boston 8-Bit: The only sources listed in the article do not appear to be valid significant coverage in reliable sources, being things like interviews in local news sources and blog/myspace entries.  Doing my own searches did not turn up any coverage on this group in reliable sources at all.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 21:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Massachusetts .  Rorshacma ( talk ) 21:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep according to this here they were still going in 2022.  References in the article are a newspaper article and a newspaper-blog article.  Newspaper blogs are the kind that are acceptable as reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Even if the newspaper blog were to be considered a reliable source, it is from the same Boston paper (the Boston Phoenix) as the article, and per the WP:GNG , multiple publications from the same organization should be considered a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 22:14, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Video games , Organizations ,  and Websites .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I'm seeing very little beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage.   Beyond Rorshacma 's accurate comment about the GNG requiring two different sources, one of the two Phoenix cites is of a performance sponsored by the subject, almost all of it talks about other acts performing, and could not be considered in any way shape or form to be significant coverage of the subject.  Ravenswing 04:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 2 of the three artists described are members of the Boston 8-Bit which is a collective of artists not a group or band, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 00:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete