hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nicolai Andrews: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  His first name is also spelled "Nicholai" in a lot of sources.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this was created by me at a time that there was WP:NFOOTY .  However, since it no longer exists, this cannot be used as an argument.  This player quite clearly fails WP:GNG , although if just a little bit of coverage is found, that should be enough, since we are talking about the low-coverage Guyanese football league.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 13:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Md Moin Khan: No WP:SIGCOV in any WP:SIRS ; coverage cited in article (and found in BEFORE search) is WP:TRIVIALMENTION .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 12:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Delete I can only find trivial mentions of the subject in English language sources but would like to know whether there is anything available in Bengali before voting.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 19:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Searches in Bengali found the same sort of thing as what is available in English - press releases announcing promotions/assignments or mentioning in passing that he inaugurated a golf tournament.  [11] [12] [13] No significant coverage to justify an article.  -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 00:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage. Ontor22 ( talk ) 11:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WorldBruce. There is not enough coverage. Zakaria ښه راغلاست ( talk ) 00:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only WP:TRIVIALMENTION and fails GNG -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 11:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KJ Dhaliwal: The Forbes article is authored by a brand builder .  Nothing about the subject in the TOI article.  Source 3 is a blog.  nytimes article is an opinion piece.  [20] No significant coverage and a primary source.  Looks like the dealstreetasia article is about the app Dil Mil.  qz.com is about the app again.  techcrunch.com is about the app.  WP:TECHCRUNCH [21] has no mention of the subject.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , India ,  and United States of America .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Business ,  and Internet .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 12:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : subject lacks GNG as most of the sources available online are press releases, passing mentions, etc.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 14:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per source analysis by Jeraxmoira.  To satisfy GNG articles need significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources which the subject of the article does not have.  2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5450:3A3:46CC:17EC ( talk ) 16:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources are just about his company, that too mostly about fundings.  No independent sources about the subject.  Lacks GNG 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 19:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Punjab , California ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The individual doesn't meet WP:GNG , and the sources provided aren't independent reliable secondary sources.  Blogs, opinions, and primary sources can't establish notability.  Grabup ( talk ) 15:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Kind of close, but not close enough.  I think the Dil Mil app could be notable, so this can be redirected there if an article for Dil Mil is made.  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 01:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Countess Victoria Bernstorff-Gyldensteen: BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk ) 03:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Royalty and nobility , Denmark ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete I could find only a single source that had more to say than what it says here, and that was the capsule bio from one of the charities she sponsors.  Other than that there was some fussing among royal jewel watchers about how one of her tiaras was worn by Carina Axelsson .  Her husband only appears in the Danish WP, and is tagged for a lack of citations; about the only thing I found out about him was that they are using drones to count pumpkins on one of his properties in order to manage the crop better.  They seem to be pretty peripheral nobility.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophomores (TV series): Donald D23 talk to me 19:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Alas this 2010-11 college TV series article, an article created by the creator of the show, does not appear to be notable. -- Milowent • has spoken 18:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources .  The article notes, "The show was produced by Georgia State Television and filmed on the campus of Georgia State University in Atlanta, Georgia ."  Other than in newspapers associated with the university, I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources about the subject, which does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline .  Cunard ( talk ) 09:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: I am saving the sources from the article here: "Sophomores on IMDB" .  IMDb .  Retrieved August 7, 2010 .  "GSTV New Shows" .  GSTV .  Archived from the original on August 2, 2012 .  Retrieved August 7, 2010 .  Dean, Amber (March 2010).  "Sophomores Official Web Site" .  Sophomores TV .  Archived from the original on April 18, 2010 .  Retrieved August 7, 2010 .  Keo, Savanna (April 2010).  "GSTV launches original comedy series 'Sophomores' " .  The Signal .  Retrieved August 7, 2010 .  "Sophomores on Amazon.com" .  Amazon .  Retrieved August 7, 2010 .  Cunard ( talk ) 09:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Djamalldine Bounou: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Africa ,  and France .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : By virtue of his affiliation with a notable club, he is notable.  If you go on Twitter, sports players get verified because they are associated with certain notable organizations.  From graphic designers, to photographers to PLAYERS.  Amaekuma ( talk ) 20:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia isn't Twitter and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG , and player is not notable by "playing for a club" - I've never heard that one before.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 18:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nikolai Pokotylo: I couldn't find notability guideline-passing sources from a BEFORE search, in American and Kazakh.  Tails Wx 00:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Kazakhstan .  Tails Wx 00:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Absolutely nothing to find of this individual, only wikis mirroring this site.  They claim the subject placed fifth in a competion, however there's no proof of that and the SuperStar KZ show is also Unreferenced and has limited sources online which are probably not reliable.  Not sure if this was about the same subject but this discussion ( WP:Articles for deletion/Nikolai Pokotylo ) resulted in no consensus 17 years ago, I don't know what was going on as they weren't citing any sources.  dxneo ( talk ) 05:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, this is not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Drowssap SMM ( talk ) ( contributions ) 01:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerome Dingwall: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  Lots of passing mentions, nothing substantial.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ernest Gold (disambiguation): A hatnote is in place on Ernest Gold .  Leschnei ( talk ) 17:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Leschnei ( talk ) 17:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Clearly not needed per WP:ONEOTHER .  BD2412 T 17:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Omni Group of Companies Pakistan: Coverage is related Fake accounts case and we have an article already.  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 11:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Most of the sources are related to Fake accounts case .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of audiovisual works related to Spiritist phenomena: WP:OR / WP:COATRACK , apparently translated from Portuguese.  Fram ( talk ) 14:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Film , Music , Television ,  and Lists .  Fram ( talk ) 14:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Paranormal and Spirituality .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 00:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I added this to fix the broken link in the popular culture section of Spiritism , which I also copied from Portuguese.  If this gets deleted here, then I'll nominate the original for deletion too.  Thiagovscoelho ( talk ) 14:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You should nominate it now.  I don’t know if ptwiki has WP:COATRACK but I’m sure it has some rule against articles being random collections of information with no particular connection to a supposed main topic.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 16:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete poor quality, roughly translated article with no reason to exist.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 16:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't object to the idea or benefit to researchers, but these types of lists are never ending and are best suited for publishing elsewhere.  IMDb has a search function with topic check boxes, for example.  5Q5 | ✉ 12:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jamie Gross: Fails WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Television , United States of America ,  and Pennsylvania .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Hits on several people with this name, nothing for this person.  Does not appear to have won any awards, only worked on B-movies.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:43, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets criterion#3 for creative professionals; her contributions to notable films are verifiable, here or here , for example.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Needs some modicum of significant coverage to establish that she "has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work."  She has credits as an editor, but I don't think we can say that's a "major role" in "co-creation" when there's no depth of sourcing.  These are feature films, but don't have the significance that anyone who worked on them is notable per criterion 3 to the detriment of WP:BASIC /GNG, as this is "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources".  Reywas92 Talk 00:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per

Discussion outcome: delete
A Miracle of Science: BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 12:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Even restricting the search to the years following the webcomic's publication, there are no RS on it.  It may be a good work of art, and it may have had a passionate fan community at one point, but without RS we're in no place to judge that.  If someone does find reliable sources I will happily change my mind.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 12:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ BoomboxTestarossa I recommend removing the bold from "delete", because it makes it appear as though you are casting a ! vote, and as nominator you cannot do this.  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 12:35, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Webcomics .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only found mentioned in online stores and online encyclopedias.  The subject does not seem to have reviews or coverage that can pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Sadly there do not seem to be any sources covering this one.  ~ Maplestrip/Mable ( chat ) 09:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , I have added a reference to the article that seems Ok (a conference by a Ph professor in economics).  The sources pointed at the article talk page 16 years ago ( this an this archived versions), maybe could be considered as reviews by "experts in the field" (I'm not totally sure though).  Anyway, it seems that the webcomic was very popular at the time.  Alexcalamaro ( talk ) 18:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly not notable and not by a notable author either.  Hadal1337 ( talk ) 15:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Neterra: Highly promotional - Rich T | C | E-Mail 13:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Bulgaria .  - Rich T | C | E-Mail 13:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - but revert to the last version without all the advertising.  . .  Mean as custard ( talk ) 11:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Even if the article is rewritten to get rid of the promotional language, I still don't see the topic as qualifying under WP:NCORP.  Owen× ☎ 19:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it violates the policy WP:NOT , in particular the passage saying Wikipedia is not Advertising, marketing, publicity, or public relations .  Due to the reference spam in this article, I believe that this WP:policy violation can suffice as a rationale to justify deletion.  The specific notability guideline for corporations, WP:NCORP , does not seem to be met either after quick WP:GOOGLE search.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 02:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Peninsula (Dubai): * Pppery * it has begun... 19:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and United Arab Emirates .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If any skyscrapers in Dubai are not notable, this article, along with The Skyscraper will be removed as it fails WP:GNG .  CastJared ( talk ) 21:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Generic vaportower project that's never been constructed nor was going to meet N to begin with.  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 08:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete