hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
New Hampshire Rail Transit Authority : This article should be merged, the topic would be better suited as a brief section in the NHDOT article or some other relevant article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldPalChummus ( talk • contribs ) 20:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Transportation ,  and New Hampshire .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the administrative information to New Hampshire Department of Transportation per nom.  Details of the individual rail projects are already covered on the relevant rail line articles.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 22:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  As author Ronald Dale Karr put it, New Hampshire has been by far the least supportive of commuter rail out of the six New England states.  This authority unfortunately didn't accomplish much of anything, but merits a mention at the NHDOT article.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 02:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as per what my two colleagues suggest above would indeed be the best choice here.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Norwich City Services : No WP:INDEPENDENT sources.  A412 ( Talk • C ) 06:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom .  A412 ( Talk • C ) 06:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Norwich City Council .  Not independently notable, but sufficiently important and verifiable for a mention as part of a larger article.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 11:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge : A primary-sourced new article on a Council's service company.  I agree with Thryduulf about its lack of specific notability, and suggest its existence and a summary list of the additional services is better under a new Services section in the Norwich City Council article itself.  AllyD ( talk ) 15:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2013 Cotabato City bombing : Almost 11 years after, no lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT .  Also WP:NOTNEWS applies.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events ,  and Philippines .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of terrorist incidents in the Philippines#2013 .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of terrorist incidents in the Philippines#2013 per WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 20:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Controlocracy : Given lack of sources, I'd also go for WP:NOTNEO on this one - one man's use of a word doesn't a word make.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Norway .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete per WP:NEO .  I only see a few mentions in RS, but it's not the primary topic, except for the opinion piece in Modern Diplomacy .  APK whisper in my ear 07:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NEO .  〜 Festucalex • talk 10:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep The South China Morning Post seems to use the word often enough ( [37] as an example), as does the Guardian [38] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] And quite a few hits in Gscholar using the term [39] , seems ok-ish.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century .  All the sources that use the neologism are only in reference to the book, including in the references Oaktree brought.  :3 F4U ( they /it ) 00:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm ok with a merge.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century per F4U.  Makes sense.  A. Randomdude0000 ( talk ) 22:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Vette (Star Wars) : The controversy were mostly discussed about the game, similarly like Controversies surrounding Mass Effect 3 and not the character.  It doesn't help notability about the character either, AND may be WP:UNDUE or whatever it is.   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 13:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games .   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 13:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the character list.  As with the last AfD, most coverage about her is about a single controversy, and it feels undue to spin off into its own page.  Still, I doubt this will reach a different outcome than last time.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Zxcvbnm's statement.  MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk ) 07:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, always specify a target article if you are proposing a Merge or Redirect.  We have hundreds (thousands?) of articles on Star Wars, its worlds and characters on many different platforms (film, TV, books, video games, maybe board games (?)) and the closer should be guessing which one you think is the most appropriate.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Zxcvbnm, as WP:ATD .  Doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV but can be preserved in a logical place.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 18:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Zxcvbnm's analysis.  For the target, I would assume everyone above meant for it to be merged to Characters of the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic series , as that was the target proposed in the last, No Consensus AFD discussion.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Zxcvbnm.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Paul Phoenix (Tekken) : Most of it are just routine trailer coverage.  Most of them are trivial, talking about his hair on Tekken 8 and its announcement.  This source can be also unhelpful [1] while this one is quite useful [2] .  Meanwhile, this source [3] is a passing mention at the end "I hope Paul Phoenix is a central character in the next series, Tekken 8."  Others are mostly build up listicles.  Thus, Failing WP:GNG since its not enough.  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 23:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 23:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 23:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep This is unusual for me, but this character appears notable from the sources in the article.  However, it is weak because there is just barely enough.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I re-analyzed the sources, and realized that I counted some obviously bad ones.  Weak merge , but I'm open to having my mind changed.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I could simply not find a single piece of WP:SIGCOV anywhere, even in old gaming magazines.  Mostly they are just a small snarky mention of "heh, tall hairdo".  It's not indicative of standalone notability of any sort.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Tekken characters .  This one is particularly aggravating.  Paul has been in the games since day one but all anyone talks about is his hair.  Any serious coverage of him found is from nonviable sources, while any legit site that has a headline about his Tekken 8 gameplay has barely a paragraph dedicated to it.  It almost seems like a copout to vote for merging yet another fighting character, but there's really no other choice here.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 04:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, Paul Phoenix is another character that should have the coverage, but doesn't seem to.  But I'm over these AFDs, so I'm going to refrain from ! voting, unless it's a keep for me, but I just can't find much reason to keep this one.  I'll look a little more to see if I can find anything, because there has to be something .  Just wow.  MoonJet ( talk ) 09:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Burglar (character) : I couldn't find non-trivial mentions of this guy anywhere.  Industrial Insect (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as an ATD to List of Marvel Comics characters: B .  Mach61 ( talk ) 03:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: B in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE like the last discussion which the nominator previously withdrawn after a talk with @ BoomboxTestarossa : .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 18:18, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Preserve does not override WP:GNG .  Nothing does.  If an article is not notable, then it should not be preserved.  Industrial Insect (talk) 01:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability does not dictate content within a page; please give a policy-based argument for not having a blurb of this character on a list and redirecting the current title.  Mach61 ( talk ) 04:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merging is a fine alternative, but there is no reason whatsoever to keep.  Industrial Insect (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per all.  This doesn't pass the bar for WP:SIGCOV , but merge is a good WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 15:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Yasmien Kurdi discography : This is just an album listing which might violate WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Redirect to Yasmien_Kurdi#Discography as per WP:ATD at best.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 23:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Yasmien Kurdi#Discography : Not large enough to be disruptive to the main article/need to stand alone.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 07:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Yasmien Kurdi#Discography , Correct me if im wrong, but Yasmien Kurdi does not feel notable enough to have a discography article.  TheNuggeteer ( talk ) 9:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC) Merge back as we usually due with such unreferenced lists or discogs.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Angela Ismailos : Fails WP:NFILMMAKER and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Greece .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No in-depth coverage from secondary RS.  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 01:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  There seems to be quite a lot of coverage around her film Great Directors , but little else that isn't just puff.  If that survives, a merge might be appropriate.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 02:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on merging?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the "Great Directors" as suggested seems ok.  There is coverage for the film/work.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Anyone else agree on the merge?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as suggested.  Anything which meets GNG requirements seems to be about Great Directors .  WJ94 ( talk ) 13:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
April 2017 Lahore suicide bombing : No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Per the last 20 discussions we have had, merge applicable content to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017 , where it is already listed, without detail or sourcing.  Deleting it would leave that unverified.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 11:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above and NCRIME .  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 04:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
History of Uppland : Ideally a major expansion would take place as a result of this nomination, but as of now there is no useful content.  Merge is unnecessary.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 11:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Sweden .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 11:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Uppland#History : the page has even less notable content that the relevant section in the redir target.  And having been here for 20 years, I doubt an extra six months in draftspace would help.  Owen× ☎ 16:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge to Uppland#History rather than deletion.  The article needs work but the subject is notable.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 12:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Tamasha season 1 : All I found on the web is some ROTM coverage, but nothing significant or in-dept Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 17:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 17:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and REDIRECT to Tamasha (TV series) as we don't need a separate article for each season where the season has no review to meet WP:GNG .  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 07:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Tamasha (TV series) : as was done, I think, with season 2.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Mushy Yank.  I couldn't find any sigcov of this season.  The three sources cited probably don't meet the GNG either.  Toadspike [Talk] 22:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Diurnum : An online search reveals this topic does not have enough in-depth coverage to warrant a Wikipedia page.  Bremps ... 23:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDICT .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] merge to sext , which it's just another name for.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to sext or Daily Office (Anglican) .  The term only really comes up in in the context of two breviaries used by a couple minor religious orders in the US Episcopal Church .  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 14:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to sext as it is dealt with more fully there, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Kraklewo : The location in the article is empty forest .  The only source in the article is a link to the Teryt database (the Polish equivalent of GNIS ), using the SIMC code from the Polish version of the article I find a listing that says, in machine translation, that Kraklewo/Klaklewo is a part of the village of Karpno, something I also confirmed from the Polish regulation list place-names ( część wsi Karpno ).  We already have an article about Karpno, Bytów County .  Kraklewo appears to be a non-descript location and not obviously inhabited.  The article is incorrect in saying it is a settlement - that would be an osada under Polish law, but it is not classified as that.  There is nothing more to say about it than that it is a location on the map.  Fails WP:GEOLAND , WP:GNG , WP:NOPAGE .  I'm agnostic over whether this should be deleted or redirected to Karpno - the name is at least not something that could plausibly be used for something else, and is part of Karpno.  On the other hand we should not simply create redirects for every named location in a village.  There is no content to merge, though.  FOARP ( talk ) 19:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 19:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Karpno, Bytów County , which it is a part of.  It makes sense to have a redirect and information in the main village that it has a part named such and such, but I am not seeing what makes this pass WP:GNG otherwise.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge