Artur Orzech: Fails WP:GNG .  178.164.179.49 ( talk ) 06:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 8 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Poland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Which reality show?  He did not nor does he currently host a reality show.  He is an accomplished artist and journalist with very wide recognition in Poland and pretty cult following because of his hosting of the Eurovision transmissions.  I wholeheartedly disagree with RUNOFTHEMILL label.  84.188.101.102 ( talk ) 20:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  A well-known Polish presenter and Eurovision Song Contest long-running commentator having commentated 26 contests.   If we consider this RUNOFTHEMILL, we will need also to consider Peter Urban (presenter) , José Luis Uribarri , José María Íñigo and many other well-known Eurovision Song Contest commentators' articles for deletion.  Qcumber ( talk ) 23:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "Well-known" is not a valid reason for deletion.  And don't do the Pokemon test.  - 178.164.179.49 ( talk ) 04:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm sorry, sir/madam, please, be polite.  And explain me what does it mean "pokemon test".  And if we need to consider this article for deletion, why don't we need to consider for deletion the articles I mentioned above then?  Thanks!  Qcumber ( talk ) 01:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The only thing that the article is not expanded enough.  Because of this 2021 events take the most part of the article.  It's not good.  The label prompts that someone will at least take the information from Polish Wiki.  But I agree with 84.188.101.102 - I don't think that there is a srong reason to delete the article with RUNOFTHEMILL .  Qcumber ( talk ) 02:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Source in the article are routine mill entertainment news, promo, nothing that meets WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth by independent reliable sources.  BEFORE found similar, but nothing meeting WP:SIGCOV.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 15:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  He appears to be a well-known Polish journalist, and his references to music broadcasters and cited content appear to be verified.  Sanwalniazik ( talk ) — Sanwalniazik ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Weak keep.  Could find more and better sources than on e.g. Fredrik Renander or Amun Abdullahi .  Atlassian ( talk ) 21:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Let's focus on existing sourcs that establish notability, not on a subject's reputation or notoriety.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A quick googling showed many sources: [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] .  As well as article collections with and about him [38] , [39] , etc.  Atlassian ( talk ) 06:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't consider myself competent to evaluate their quality, but taken on face value, the Polish Wikipedia version of this page appears more thoroughly referenced.  Lubal ( talk ) 00:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , obviously passes GNG per sources on our WP page and Polish page, which also include a printed encyclopedia, more is easily findable via Google (see Atlassian examples above).  The RUNOFTHEMILL label seems like an excuse to ignore the coverage and not provide an adequate deletion rationale, and describing the subject as a 'reality show host' shows that the IP (who has since made a lot of questionable edits) didn't even bother to read the page, let alone do a minimal WP: BEFORE .   -- C avarrone 07:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  First thoughts: this article in its current form is rather lopsided to focus on the "dismissal" and reads more like a news article about that occurrence rather than being a biography about Orzech.  After review: other editors are correct in pointing out that the sources used here ( and actually in the Polish Wiki as well) are passing mentions that he served as commentator, mainly for Eurovision.  While at first I was impressed with the size of the Polish Wiki page and the idea that perhaps his bio was more developed there, it is in fact just a prose version of a list of times he'd provided commentary or hosted a program; more like a resume than a biographical overview.  The provided sources do not go into any depth about the positions to establish his notability; the sources are instead about the events he was part of.  Overall, I do not believe that the subject meets GNG and NBIO.  Grk1011 ( talk ) 13:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per coverage which are extensive.  Per sourcing which are third party and reliable.  Overall I would say WP:GNG applies.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 08:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 11:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I would concur with Grk1011's assessment of the article.  The parts on his background and career at TVP are wholly unsourced, and background is also wholly unsourced on the Polish article.  Even within the Polish article, which would be the main start for improving this article, it reads more like a CV/resume than an article, and there are large chunks which are unsourced and thus fails WP:VERIFY .  WP:BLP , and specifically WP:BLPRS , means that we have to have sources for any information which is potentially challengeable, which would result in cause for the the first two paragraphs to be likely for removal.  Taking that aside, we then have an article which is exclusively about the subject's issues with TVP management and the resultant removal from TVP and return following the change in government; having an article with only this means it would fail on WP:SIGCOV .  In general I don't believe even with the sourcing available on the Polish Wikipedia or mentioned here that there is enough verifiable referencing to pass WP:GNG and WP:NBIO .  Sims2aholic8 ( talk ) 13:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  He is important enough that his departure from TVP in 2021 was covered by Polish newspaper of reknown, Gazeta Wyborcza , [40] , and said article even included a (very short, yes) paragraph about his background (earlier career).  Considering other sources present, I think the notability is here, sufficient if not impressive.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  He is very popular and recognizable journalist and presenter in Poland.  Besides, he is an iranologist and authored a book about Iran, as well as a musician, member of popular rock band.  I have expanded the article basing on its Polish version and added some sources.  Niegodzisie ( talk ) 09:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on the appreciated expansion by Niegodzisie.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep