Lunar Panoramic Photography - Apollo 14: Perhaps this can be transwikied somewhere else?  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 23:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Spaceflight and United States of America .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 23:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, thanks for the feedback.  On the face of it, I would agree that the the article appears to be a gallery - in its current form...  It's one of a series featuring the panoramas shot on Apollo and I've been focussed on getting the basics in place first so that I can return and enrich each of them later.  I'm a day or so away from completing the Apollo 17 article, but I would stand up the "Lunar Panoramic Photography - Apollo 11" article as an example of the direction I intend to go in.  Although that isn't complete either, at least it includes some of those added-value features, such as placing the panoramas in context through the use of maps, and providing commentary as to how the shots came about.  (And after Apollo, there's all the panoramas from the automated missions that occurred before and after the manned missions.)  Naturally, having done the work, I think it's a worthy inclusion.  If there is a more appropriate format for it to be presented in then I would be happy to transfer it, but, for now, I'd prefer to think of it as moving in the direction of being a 'Catalogue' rather than a 'Gallery'...  Usedtoknoweverything ( talk ) 14:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This almost looks like it satisfies LIST, with some critical discussion about items in the list, a significant lead and a closing paragraph.  This could be useful for someone looking at the photos for context of the larger lunar mission.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My issue is that there isn't even a single secondary source covering the topic.  If there were, I wouldn't have brought this to AfD at all.  The article appears compliant with policies, except for notability.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 01:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - It would be a tragedy to delete these, but as of now they don't seem to satisfy WP:NLIST .  We would want secondary WP:SIGCOV discussing either the set of photographs or the photography techniques used.  This certainly does seem to be widely discussed.  With a quick Google Scholar search, I found: blog post from NASA , this book , "Training Apollo astronauts in lunar orbital observations and photography" in this edited volume , and possibly this book .  I'm leaning keep, since I suspect sources exist; there appear to be hundreds of papers written about Apollo photography, presumably some of them discuss e.g. Apollo 14 specifically.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 19:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  04:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus