hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sacred Heart Church, Harur: Sohom ( talk ) 23:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Sohom ( talk ) 23:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
João Bruno: I can't imagine that someone searching "João Bruno" would be necessarily looking for this footballer anyway, given that his career was so brief and contained few appearances.  I can't find anything better than database sources, like Football Database , and SPORTBASIC explicitly states that such sources don't confer notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, his career makes my non-league football look good!, that's how bad this article is.  Peace.  Govvy ( talk ) 15:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Star Porter: Fails the general and sports-related notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Horse racing , United States of America ,  and Pennsylvania .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Star Porter's sire The Porter (horse) is indeed notable but on balance Star Porter doesn't seem to be.  Limited sources but taking the following source as reliable, Star Porter is not featured as a notable progeny.  http://www.americanclassicpedigrees.com/the-porter.html .  Based on this, I don't believe a redirect/merge is required to the sire and this article can be deleted.  Also, the races won by Star Porter in the article don't seem notable as none appear to have wikilinked articles.  Rupples ( talk ) 01:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bobby-Man Brant Panag: No credible importance.  Sources are limited and provide no detail on the subject.  AmericanHistorian ( talk ) 02:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The cited book source does not seem to mention this person, and the other source looks like it would be  coverage from a local paper .  I can't find a single mention of them online that isn't sourced from Wikipedia.  Jfire ( talk ) 03:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Boxing ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with Jfire's assessment.   My search found no significant independent coverage of the subject, no mention in the book's table of contents/topics, and I couldn't access the local paper's story of the fight.   He also fails to meet WP:NBOX .   WP notability is not obtained by opponents fought, especially when the fight against Camel was over a year before boxrec shows Camel's first pro fight (and 8 years before Camel won a world title).  Papaursa ( talk ) 17:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Saudi road accident: Only covered by WP:PRIMARYNEWS sources with no WP:SIGCOV .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 03:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 03:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Epidemiology of myopia: As an example, in the USA section, there is 7 separate studies of myopia listed (1970s, TX, Socal, La Puente, American Samoa, Chicago, Alaska) , with nothing in particular connecting them.  Even if the topic is found to be notable, this article should be WP:TNTed and a more focused article created.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Medicine .  Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify would be the preferred option if someone could commit to fix the WP:NOTSTATS issue or turn it into a list; it is clearly notable and there are many sources to use.  Otherwise, Delete is the best option, it really is a dump of statistics with no meaning.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 14:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : By the nature of epidemiology ("the study and analysis of the distribution (who, when, and where), patterns and determinants of health and disease conditions in a defined population"), any such article will be stats-heavy.  Turning such article-body-text into one or more tables might help make the remainder more easily readable.  Just a suggestion.  – .  Raven .  talk 11:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Or at the very least draftify.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 23:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hastings Elementary School: Clarityfiend ( talk ) 19:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless independent sources found satisfying SIGCOV requirement of GNG.  As this is an elementary school and such schools have to my understanding never had a presumed notability unlike high schools, I don't see a need to redirect; however wouldn't oppose redirecting to either the suburb Hastings-Sunrise (though there's currently no education heading) or Vancouver School Board#Elementary schools .  Rupples ( talk ) 20:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aisha Ochuwa Tella: The student jewelers association seems to be a non-notable group, the rest of what's given isn't important for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and Fashion .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very clearly not a notable person.  Hadal1337 ( talk ) 08:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kristin A. Bates: Onel 5969 TT me 13:03, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United States of America .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 13:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  XOR'easter ( talk ) 14:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete per nom, and because I have not found full support for WP:AUTHOR /editor notability.  At the WP Library, I found three book reviews: Barrett, K. L. (2014).  Kristin A. Bates and Richelle S. Swan: Juvenile delinquency in a diverse society: Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2014, 452 pp.  Critical Criminology , 22(4), 599-601.  doi:10.1007/s10612-014-9236-5 ProQuest 1656052598 ; Luft, Rachel E. "The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a Modern Catastrophe – Edited by David L. Brunsma, David Overfelt, and J. Steven Picou, Through the Eye of Katrina: Social Justice in the United States – Edited by Kristin A. Bates and Richelle S. Swan and Racing the Storm: Racial Implications and Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina – Edited by Hillary Potter" Sociological Inquiry .  May2008, Vol.  78 Issue 2, p258-263.  6p.  DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00238.x. , Database: SocINDEX with Full Text; Vickerman, M. (2008).  Through the Eye of Katrina: Social justice in the United States.  Choice , 45(12), 2240.  ProQuest 225731967 .  The article also includes : Spohn, Ryan.  "Review of Juvenile Delinquency: Causes and Control (2nd edition) by Robert Agnew," Criminal Justice Review (March 2007) 32(1): 78-80, but this review is not for a book authored or edited by Bates.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 16:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  I searched but did not find more reviews than the ones listed above.  One review of a coauthored book ( Juvenile delinquency ) and three of an edited volume ( Through the Eye of Katrina ) is not enough for WP:AUTHOR for me.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:52, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep mentioned here in a peer review of the work they co-authored, [6] .  Seems ok, not a slam dunk, but just enough with all given above.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lydia Jane Powell: No coverage found online.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 11:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and England .  Timothytyy ( talk ) 11:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angela Birney: The only difference in this version is that her daughter was recently criticized for tearing down "missing persons" posters related to the Israel-Gaza situation.  This does not, in my view, confer  notability on the parent.  ... disco spinster talk 16:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Washington .  ... disco spinster talk 16:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Coverage is all local from the Seattle Times, either about her time as a candidate or doing mayoral things (budgets, commission workings etc).  Nothing we'd use for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't satisfy GNG.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 10:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ICM.com: Most of the article is in bullet points, so doesn't have much to say.  Sourcing confirms there isn't much to say, as nothing is found we can use for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and United Kingdom .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Letterkenny Residents Party: This party contested two elections: the 2009 Letterkenny Town Council election (successfully) and the 2014 Donegal County Council election (unsuccessfully).  It was created in 2008 ahead of the 2009 election and dissolved in 2015 after the 2014.  There's nothing to suggest that it was anything other a branding exercise for Tom Crossan's brief political career.  I've added a note on both election pages.  There's something similar on the 1985 Waterford Corporation election page for the Waterford People's Party and on 2009 Fingal County Council election for the Seniors Solidarity Party, and seems a good way of handling localised parties with a fleeting existence.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 16:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Ireland .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 16:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 17:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom.  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  13:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per nom - did a quick check of my own, as this was only a vague "heard of on the radio topic" and just don't find backing to reach minimum policy requirements (ORG, GNG, VER, etc.).  SeoR ( talk ) 14:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  So minor you'd need a microscope to detect traces of its former mayfly existence.  Insufficiently notable.  Spideog ( talk ) 21:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ukraine Yellow Kitchen Photo: Bedivere ( talk ) 01:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Military ,  and Ukraine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination, cant find any mention of either the photo or the photographer after February 2023.  F.Alexsandr ( talk ) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kanan Guluyev: Redivy ( talk ) 21:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wrestling and Azerbaijan .  Redivy ( talk ) 21:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per possible several BLP and trademark violations (not as serious as WP:COPYVIO , but still ).  Many teenagers from this small country compete in similar events.  It's a nice place to visit, but this kid is not notable .  Bearian ( talk ) 19:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find reliable sources that say anything about him, apart from the fact that he won a silver medal in 2010.  I don't think that single result is enough to establish notability.  Bendegúz Ács ( talk ) 19:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charlotte Ferguson: Fram ( talk ) 07:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  Fram ( talk ) 07:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 13:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frank Ling: BEFORE search turns up no additional references whatsoever in reliable sources.  Birth and death information come from IMDb, which is WP:USERGENERATED and thus unreliable.  Setting aside IMDb, all we know is that he existed and had minor roles in six films.  (The BFI database includes references to his name and roles, but no significant coverage.)  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 14:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom .  Owen× ☎ 15:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Karamaryan: I cannot find a single source for this supposed event that isn't written in Azerbaijani, and of those sources none of them are written by established historians or published by credible publishers.  - K evo 3 2 7 ( talk ) 07:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Azerbaijan ,  and Turkey .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per norm.  -- HistoryofIran ( talk ) 14:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Braisy Cabrera: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:04, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the women's national football team.  GNG not met, per nom.  Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 23:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Artemisa Diario was the best that I could find and it's not enough for GNG.  I don't agree with redirecting as she is not mentioned at the suggested target and so the redirect would only confuse the reader.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete