hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Umbrella fund: 🥒 Greenish Pickle!  🥒 ( 🔔 ) 12:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but improve the article a lot.  The concept of “umbrella fund” or “fund with sub-funds” is certainly notable in UK law.  [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] .  So meets WP:WEBCRIT .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 05:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, voorts ( talk / contributions ) 02:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Aguamania: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep some coverage at [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] per WP:GNG , but it isn't much.  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 17:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete exclusively promotional as written. SportingFlyer T · C 16:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article can be improved per WP:ATD . -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 17:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: More discussion around the extent of sourcing for this article's subject would be helpful in attaining a consensus here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Like it or not, there are dozens of articles about water-based amusement parks.  This is no different from all the others MNewnham ( talk ) 19:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep - as per the sources above, and the fact it is supposedly only one of two water parks in Valenzuela Mr Vili talk 01:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 15:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
National Club Football Association: Let'srun ( talk ) 23:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and American football .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There appears to be plenty of coverage relating to this, especially regarding the teams of the league, e.g. from Newspapers.com: Daily Press ( again ), The Journal News ( p2 ), The Journal News 2 ( p2 ), The Bangor Daily News , The Journal Times ( p2 ), The Index-Journal , The Weekly , etc.  – plus non-Newspapers.com: The Lantern , Griffin Daily News , NBC , etc.  – I'm leaning keep .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 20:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] None of these sources constitute significant coverage about the association itself.  The Daily Press articles are not about the association itself,  The Journal News article is a routine game report, the The Journal News 2 article is not about the association itself, The Bangor Daily News is passing coverage (only 1 paragraph), The Journal Times has independence issues, ditto with The Index-Journal, The Weekly is another routine game report, The Lantern has independence issues and is also not about the association, Griffin Daily News is a press release, and WCMH (not NBC) also has independence issues and is not about the association itself.  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per BeanieFan11's various sources.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 17:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Party "Together with the Vytis": Marcelus ( talk ) 14:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the article.  There are many Wikipedia articles about minor political parties.  This article fufills all (or at least enough) of Wikipedia:GNG .  Many news articles mention the political party, so there's no need to exclusively resort to original research, which would have invalidated the article.  +JMJ+ ( talk ) 19:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 20:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , significant coverage about non-trivial history.  Not a WP:MILL party at all.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - took part in several elections - Altenmann >talk 21:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing used is either primary, or trivial mentions.  I don't see much we could use to build an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  If kept should be renamed Together with the Vytis .  No need to disambiguate.  gidonb ( talk ) 07:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , meets WP:GNG .  Serious consideration should then be given to gidonb 's naming proposal.  Jacona ( talk ) 12:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Sofía Rodríguez: BEFORE showed database, promo, and primary, nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Source eval: Promotional primary source ::  1.  Lima, Agustina (2022-04-17).  "Sofía Rodríguez returns to television" .  Sofia Rodriguez (in Spanish) .  Retrieved 2023-04-16 .  Promotional ::  2. ^ "Sofía Rodríguez returns to television and says: "I like what is different, to be a chameleon"".  EL PAIS.  2022-02-10.  Retrieved 2023-04-16.  Promotional ::  3. ^ "Sofía Rodríguez left Algo with you" .  THE COUNTRY .  2017-06-15 .  Retrieved 2023-04-16 .  Promotional ::  4. ^ "Full Court Player" .  THE COUNTRY .  2017-04-29 .  Retrieved 2023-04-16 .  Promotional ::  5. ^ "PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions".  www.pressreader.com.  Retrieved 2023-04-16.  Promotional ::  6. ^ "Sofía Rodríguez in her great moment: "I do not believe in fleeting success"".  Caras (in Spanish).  2018-10-11.  Retrieved 2023-04-16.  Promotional ::  7. ^ "Sofía Rodríguez will be the investigative jury of La Máscara Uruguay!" .  Teledoce.com (in Spanish) .  Retrieved 2023-04-16 .  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 07:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Television ,  and Uruguay .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: As the creator is active and already disputed the deletion on the talk page, I believe it is likely they would dispute a soft delete, so better to relist and establish consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 10:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There's more sources on the spanish wiki version of this.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 01:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Kanwali: Either delete or redirect it to Dehradun Municipal Corporation .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemant Dabral ( talk • contribs ) 10:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 31 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 02:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Geography ,  and Uttarakhand .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wards may qualify as legally recognized places per GEOLAND.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 18:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep GEOLAND.  TheTankman ( talk ) 19:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Can we get policy-based opinions with more elaboration?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Tristan Tate: I am an uninvolved editor.  A simple google search for " Who is tristan tate " returns significant, notable and reliable coverage of the individual.  He is a two-time european kickboxing champion, was part of a TV show and involved in a very high profile criminal case.  Mr Vili talk 01:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete to move as per my reasoning Mr Vili talk 01:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 02:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Cooper Lutkenhaus: School sports isn't notable in the world of athletics, and coverage of children's athletics is not significant enough for Wikipedia.  WP:TOOSOON with a few years at best.  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Sport of athletics .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep : There's enough coverage to meet WP:BASIC /GNG as a general entry in my opinion.  Doesn't appear to just be a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL HS athlete.  A Google search shows significant coverage in independent sources.  Ex: [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] C F A 💬 22:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with this.  Several American high school athletes with notable achievements have their own Wikipedia article and significant coverage by independent sources, such as Quincy Wilson .  KnowledgeIsPower9281 ( talk ) 23:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination – Editør ( talk ) 14:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the excellent work sourcing done by @ Clearfrienda .  Also to directly rebut the nomination – school sports is actually very notable in the field of athletics, take a look at how often "U.S. high school" is covered by World Athletics here: "u.s. high school" site:worldathletics.org .  The idea that children's athletes are automatically not notable is also not reflected anywhere in WP policy that I can tell – if the general notability guideline is met, an article can be written.  -- Habst ( talk ) 04:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
The Weird Villa: Dan arndt ( talk ) 10:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Cambodia .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 10:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , considering it may meet this criterion for film notability: "The film was successfully distributed domestically in a country that is not a major film producing country, and was produced by that country's equivalent of a "major film studio".  Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having been produced, and if any document can be found to support this (The one reference on the page when this discussion started  ( CInema Online ) claims the film was a box-office success and places it among the best 5 Cambodian horror films of all time).  If not, redirect to Horror films of Cambodia . —— MY, OH, MY!  ( mushy yank ) — 13:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , one of the general notability guideline's criteria is that coverage should come from reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  To presume notability, reliable sources should have significant coverage .  In this case there is no collaborating evidence that it was a box-office success and the statement that it is amongst the best 5 Cambodian horror films of all time is highly subjective and not the opinion of an author who is regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 03:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Tom Teichman: Nothing else located on a search, same as the talk page message left by the person who tagged this for notability earlier this year.  Single source is not enough to retain the article.  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom .  ♠ PMC ♠ (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep subject seems to meet WP:BASIC .  In addition to what's in the article including Evening Standard , there's decent of coverage in FT including this [79] , which has both an interview and secondary coverage .  Lots of other short mentions of the subject in FT .  If no consensus to keep, redirect to Simba Sleep which makes mention of the subject.  — siro χ o 03:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not even close to WP:N .  I have to wonder how this got created in the first place, it must have fallen through cracks.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 19:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Gupi: FMSky ( talk ) 18:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note - The first AfD linked here was actually for something else: a toy of the same name.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 23:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete - This one is a close call and I won't argue with anyone who thinks otherwise, but I think it is WP:TOOSOON for now.  Gupi does have some reliable coverage, as seen in some of the references currently in the article, but they tend to be friendly introductions ( [10] ), promotional announcements ( [11] ), or brief mentions in articles about someone else ( [12] ).  Notability might be achieved in the not-too-distant future, but I don't think Gupi is there yet.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 00:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : the Vice article & EDM Tunes article, read in conjunction with the rest of the sources; amount to SIGCOV of this subject Jack4576 ( talk ) 13:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 22:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . Coverage in Paper (magazine) [13] [14] and 34th Street Magazine (Penn University) [15] also support this article. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 01:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .   Close this as a "no consensus".  The RS is thin but it is there per User A.B above, and being the 24-year-old son of Tony Hawk means (sadly) that there is a high likelihood the notability will develop further from here.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 15:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Mohamed Yalouh: The best way to resolve the issue is not to improve the article, but to delete it.  Ref-1 (This news was collected via a press release, from Moroccan scientific and technological association,OFEED, also this website is a blogging site who posts advertisement.) Ref-2 (404, Page removed) Ref-3 (This is just a passing mention) Ref-4 (No news here) Ref-5 (website is out of service, no news) Ref-6 (only passing mentions, award is not internationally recognised.) Here is their website.  Tisias And it clearly says it majorly promotes Canadian and American inventors.  Ref-7 (Not a biography) Ref-8 (404 page not found) Ref-9 (Again This news was collected via a press release, from Moroccan scientific and technological association,OFEED) Ref-10 (This is an interview article) Ref-11 (This website is out of service) Also, I would like to add that, the person on the article doesn't want himself to be on Wikipedia.  I can prove his identity and request.  Reqsezu ( talk ) 06:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 10 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 06:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No wayy 71.202.180.54 ( talk ) 02:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - There is a clear assertion of notability.  To make a case for deletion, you're going to need to show that there are no reliable sources that support these statements.  This means doing your own search for sources.  See WP:BEFORE .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 13:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus