hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Brigita Partikaitė: All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1 , 2 , and 3 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Lithuania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 08:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sasha Kuzevski: Then was simply moved back to mainspace.   Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source.   Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 10:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Australia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Football NSW source is good, not enough on its own.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  The football NSW source is no good because it isn't independent of Kuzevski.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 09:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG, BIO.  Nothing in article or BEFORE shows any notabilty.  Source eval: Interview with subject, not IS RS ::  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d ""I love the club, and this is where I want to be" – Sasha Kuzevski ready to earn his stripes".  Central Coast Mariners.  6 July 2022.  Fails IS ::  3. ^ "Kuzevski has eyes on clinching the double".  Football NSW.  30 August 2022.  Interview with subject, not IS RS ::  4. ^ "Mariners triumph over Sydney at Our Paradise".  ccmariners.com.au.  17 December 2022.  Retrieved 7 January 2023.  Scholarship accouncement ::  5. ^ "Kuzevski's scholarship extended, Bayliss and Hong secure new scholarships".  Central Coast Mariners.  18 January 2023.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 08:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't you dare delete it.  It's clear he is a professional football player in Australia's top league.  Why on earth would you delete it completely, surely leave it in draftspace until it's ready?  Matt jobe watson ( talk ) 04:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't delete it??  Just leave it in draftspace until there's a more major article on him?  He's a current football player in the top tier professional league in Australia.  What harm does leaving my work in draftspace do until he gets a bit more media coverage?  Matt jobe watson ( talk ) 04:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage .  Alvaldi ( talk ) 19:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 03:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Serge B. Provost: Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I just added four more published reviews, two each of two of his books, to the article.  Normally I would count five reviews for two books as being good enough for WP:AUTHOR .  I am hesitant to do so here, because the reviews are in MathSciNet and zbMATH , which might be considered routine because they are reputed to review essentially everything in research-level pure mathematics.  In fact, they only reviewed two of Provost's four books, with a third book merely indexed with a copy of the publisher blurb by each, and a fourth book not listed at all.  I'm not sure whether that should be interpreted as evidence that these reviews should count as being more selective than we have traditionally counted them (because obviously they are selecting some books and not others) or as evidence that Provost's books are not making significant impact (because only half of them even got reviewed by the review-everything sources).  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:51, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .   I don't think that the MathSciNet or zbMath reviews are the kind discussed under WP:NAUTHOR .   I did add one more review contributing to NAUTHOR to the article but that's still 1 + 3 reviews on two books.   This is marginal.   I am brought over to weak delete, as the books are multiply-authored, and as it looks to me like the subject here is overshadowed by his more notable coauthor A. M. Mathai .  Citations look weak for WP:NPROF C1 in a moderate citation field.   Comment that while he appears to be a fellow of the Royal Statistical Society, this is what they call their base level of membership (so no WP:NPROF C3 apparent); associate of the Society of Actuaries also would fail to meet WP:NPROF C1 so far as I can see (if it could even be verified).   I will watch this discussion in case more reviews or other evidence of notability are uncovered.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 13:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 12:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Ukraine, Ljubljana: Lacks third party coverage to meet WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Slovenia ,  and Ukraine .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:47, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Another embassy article that isn't worth having.  The article mostly mentions the relation history between the two nations and their respective ambassadors and almost little to no information is written about the embassy.  If a Slovenia-Ukraine relations article was created, most of the content here could be merged over there.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 01:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nomination.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 04:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTACATALOGUE .  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Travor Mutsamba: JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to be a WP:GNG fail, and with no lists for Zimbabwean cricketers, there's no suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG with no substantial coverage and also WP:NCRIC .  Robo Cric Let's chat 19:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I concur with all of the above, and add that having one type of source often is not enough for WP:SIGCOV .  They all seem to be from that country's ESPN, and are routine.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James A. O'Flaherty: (Article was created, seemingly, by a family member.  And relies entirely on sources written by family members.  Was speedy deleted in 2007.  Was restored, after request from creator, shortly afterwards - on the basis that notability might be established by "news reports" and having a music retreat "named for him" .  However, the only news report mentioned (which doesn't appear to be verifiable) seems to be about the music retreat.  Rather than the subject.  And while it is a credit to the man/family/community that the event was so-named, it doesn't establish notability.  Even if the event was notable (and I would question whether it is), notability isn't transferrable . ) My own WP:BEFORE has returned nothing to indicate that NBIO or SIGCOV are met.  WP:COI and WP:NOTMEMORIAL are also relevant.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 13:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 13:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Guliolopez ( talk ) 13:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Military ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG all sources seem to be related to the subject.  Mztourist ( talk ) 03:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The nominator nailed the problems with the article.  It is possible that the Irish music retreat was named after this gentleman, but the retreat itself is not very notable and the gentleman's music career appeared to be semi-pro at best.  This article is clearly an attempted memorial that is inappropriate for Wikipedia, where notability is key.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : for the reasons outlined in the nomination InDimensional ( talk ) 11:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:SNOW .  There are literally no sources on the page independent of the subject or his family.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Snehil Dixit Mehra: Article content is basic resume material with flowerly wording.  Lots of references but all appear to be brief announcements  or press release material.    In some cases the exact reference is repeated, in other cases the exact same press-release type material at different sites.    Author is current blocked for multiple account abuse.  North8000 ( talk ) 00:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 00:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alphonse Bongnaim: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This is a good start if anyone can find more.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Albino Squirrel Preservation Society: Think thats too long ago to G4.  Sending to AfD instead.  My rationale for the PROD, and now this AfD is: "Non-notable university club. Coverage is predominately local press and a novelty. Does not meet our standards for inclusion."  TonyBallioni ( talk ) 03:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ORG .  Coverage is very local as per WP:AUD .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organizations ,  and Texas .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just one of many university clubs.  Not notable and of no real significance.  -- SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 15:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Chicago Network: Very short article provides almost no context at all.  Could not find any sources of information online, partly due to many organizations with similar names and purposes also operating in the same area, such as ACG Chicago Women's Network, IWIRC Chicago Network, Ellevate Chicago's Network for Women, Chicago Booth Women's Network, the Chicago Network for Justice and Peace, and the Chicago Republican Women's Network.  Article has no sources at all despite being more than a decade old.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Business .  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NONPROFIT / WP:CLUB , their activities do not appear to be national or international in scale, and I also have not located significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization (or outside the organization's local area).  Outstanding in Their Field: How Women Corporate Directors Succeed (2009) has a paragraph at p. 19, describing the organization as an advocacy group and noting their history of conducting surveys since 1998.  Crain's Chicago Business in 2018 quotes the CEO but the focus is another organization; a 2020 Q&A interview with the CEO is not independent.  There is a 2010 obit in The Chicago Tribune with a brief mention that they were "one of the founders of The Chicago Network, a still-prominent organization of professional women started in 1979 as a group of "movers and shakers with the sole purpose of doing some collective moving and shaking," according to its Web site."  There are quotes from the president and CEO in a 2020 local news piece (which describes the org as a "professional organization that works to empower women to lead and help create gender equity in organizations") and a mention of data from one of their reports in a 2014 Chicago Tribune article on another subject.  In 2022, CBS2 reports on the participation and attendance of its own employees at a Chicago Network event.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 01:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marcela Santos: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Honduras .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Penman and Sommerlad: No notable independent coverage in secondary sources.  Popcornfud ( talk ) 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Popcornfud ( talk ) 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Literally a poor stub article, but most importantly fails GNG!  Ekdalian ( talk ) 14:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammed Rashed Farazuddin: Doesn’t passes the WP:NPOL .  — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , India ,  and Telangana .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote , but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors.   Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.  However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome.  Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.  Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts : {{subst: spa | username }} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst: canvassed | username }} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry : {{subst: csm | username }} or {{subst: csp | username }} .  Delete .  The person does not have enough article material and recognition.  -- killer bee 15:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP.  Kindly check out the citations added in the article for sources.  Furthermore, i will be adding more citations from reliable independent publications and media houses to improve the article.  Thewikicolumnist ( talk ) 20:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .   Person has not won any election and doesn't have independent significant coverage to meet the basic notability guidelines.  DSP 2092 ( 👤 , 🗨️ ) 04:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP .  Farazuddin has been a councillor for more than 7 years and was elected twice by the people of his community.  Kindly check out the citations added in the article for evidences.  Thewikicolumnist ( talk ) 20:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP.  Farazuddin has been a Councillor for more that 7 years(for two terms).  In addition to that, he has been a member of GHMC standing community since 2021.  [39] Thewikicolumnist ( talk ) 20:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 07:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Xclusive Yachts: Fails WP:NCORP.  US-Verified ( talk ) 00:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Transportation ,  and United Arab Emirates .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 05:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Vyvagaba ( talk ) 09:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – There is a bit more than routine coverage in this but I'm wary of it given what's stated at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Entrepreneur .  There's some other coverage I've been able to find that seems more like thinly veiled advertising and I haven't been able to find anything that'd make this article meet WP:NCORP .  Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 08:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete