hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
The BG'z: Redirect to Hot Boys as the BG'z are considered a precursor to that group.  Binksternet ( talk ) 01:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Binksternet ( talk ) 01:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that this page was created by a sockpuppet, Free Keyz , so it could be speedied per G5.  But I think it's worth settling the matter by discussion.  Binksternet ( talk ) 01:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : uncontroversial G5.  Doesn't need a thread.  HarukaAmaranth ( 話 ) 02:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Checkuser note: this not eligible for G5 since the master wasn't blocked until after creation.  I just blocked all three accounts today.  TonyBallioni ( talk ) 02:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Although the musical group's importance is low, it does not necessarily mean that deletion is necessary to resolve the dispute.  And the information about the group was recorded by some authoritative magazines.  I think the best way is to preserve edit history through redirection.  - Fumikas Sagisavas ( talk ) 10:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Fumikas Sagisavas : Which article would you suggest the article be redirected to?  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - See also the AfD for the group's one album at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Story (The B.G.'z album) .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:57, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hot Boys as recommended by the nominator. This early teenage group had guys who became notable later, but that is a historical tidbit that can be mentioned briefly at each of their articles. If someone happens to search for the name, their immediate successor group is the most viable redirect target. --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 18:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Degankhel: The tribe may exist, but it certainly appears to fail WP:GNG .  If reliable sources can be found, I would suggest merging with Pashtun .  Edward-Woodrow ( talk ) 19:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Afghanistan ,  and Pakistan .  Edward-Woodrow ( talk ) 19:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Pashtuns or Yusufzai .  This article's template at the bottom shows that Degankhel is a sub-tribe of the larger Yusufzai tribe...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 23:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Yusufzai (or Pashtuns if there is a consensus for this target) per above, lacks sources for a standalone article.  // Timothy :: talk 06:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm good with redirecting to Yusufzai instead of Pashtuns .  Edward-Woodrow ( talk ) 11:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Yusufzai#Subtribes where the sub-tribe is listed.  CycloneYoris talk!  23:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Korg Electribe EM-1: Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:GNG .  Maybe redirect to electribe .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Products , Technology ,  and Japan .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Korg Electribe EM-1 , Korg EA-1 , and Korg Electribe R to the relatively short article on the entire product line at Electribe .  Dekimasu よ!  05:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Asumi-chan is Interested in Lesbian Brothels!: Sources in article are database records, primary, name mentions.  Nothing found that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 04:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga , Sexuality and gender ,  and Japan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Comic Yuri Hime as WP:ATD .  Jumpytoo Talk 07:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are sources that can be found to prove its notability.  SimonLagann ( talk ) 14:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Draftify article could use more work to prove its notability.  SimonLagann ( talk ) 14:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You initially said there are sources, if that is still the case can you please provide them?  Per WP:NEXIST if sources exist then the article should be kept.  Jumpytoo Talk 05:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I searched for sources in English and Japanese and found them rather unsatisfactory.  That's why I changed my mind on it.  There was an article on AnimeCorner, but it wasn't about the series, it was about manga that the author of the article began reading in 2023.  There was another one on Livedoor, but it was a list article about yuri series the author recommends.  SimonLagann ( talk ) 12:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Comic Yuri Hime#Serialized works ; I don't think this manga meets WP:NBOOK just yet.  Link20XX ( talk ) 04:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Andrew Horowitz: There is only one profile specifically about him [50] .  Nothing else appears to come up focusing on him.  Definitely fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN imo.  DemonDays64 ( talk • contribs ) 05:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  DemonDays64 ( talk • contribs ) 05:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Tangential connections to notable artists fails under NOTINHERITED.  Delete based on a lack of RS recognition.  Largely written and maintained by 2 SPA accounts and unregistered IP addresses, it seems suspiciously self-promotional by the subject himself.  On second thought, Redirect to Tally Hall seems a better option.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 18:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Tally Hall .  There's also [51] a short bio here.  SWinxy ( talk ) 21:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirecting now would be most sensible here.  Bringtar ( talk ) 18:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
IntraMural Physical Education Building: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Activities and Recreation Center (UIUC) .  Took about two minutes of digging to find that the building was refurbished and became the ARC, which has its own article already.  Garuda3 ( talk ) 18:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Activities and Recreation Center (UIUC) Djflem ( talk ) 19:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Activities and Recreation Center (UIUC) .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Soul Street: Open to redirecting this but not sure what makes sense as a target.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Radio , Television ,  and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers , where it is mentioned, seems like the best (or at least least-worst) target here.  Redirecting somewhere in that article is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable pre-Sirius merger XM channels (if not associated with another notable parent entity), though a bit more awkward than for the outright-defunct channels.  (I'd say that this would mean the effective loss of content, but the article is completely unsourced and has been tagged as such since 2016.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Malawi–Ukraine relations: There is no bilateral relations except for a single phone call.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and Ukraine .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Foreign relations of Ukraine#Africa .  Kazamzam ( talk ) 12:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is hardly any content to merge, the extent of the relations seems to be just a phone call.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  THere's not much here.  Yilloslime ( talk ) 19:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I have merged the very little content in this article into Foreign relations of Ukraine , as it warrants a place there in any case.  imo this means the article can now be deleted as it certainly doesn't stand on its own.  Akakievich ( talk ) 18:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect now that a merge has taken place.  Attribution is legally required .  ✗ plicit 14:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Explicit .  Owen× ☎ 17:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Richard Sele: JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 07:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Coverage is all routine, match descriptions and the like [53] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers as WP:ATD-R .  ミラP @ Miraclepine 20:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers - plausible search term Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Vanessa Grenier: Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Canada .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  All I could find were passing mentions.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Maxime Deschamps#Partnership_with_Grenier as an ATD.  The subject's skating partner is notable.  The only GNG source I found of the subject was the 2014 GoldenSkate article previewing their season.  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 21:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That is actually not a bad idea.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ogron: I can't find any sources outside of primary ones and a listicle, and the article already doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 14:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 14:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Doctor Who creatures and aliens Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete due to insufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Redirect target seems like a reasonable compromise.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As a minor fictional race.  Does not seem like they even merit a mention on the aliens list.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 09:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sarah Reed (musician): I can only ever locate coverage about people sharing this name, but nothing about this particular artist.  Her profile on AllMusic can not provide any useful information to improve the article either.  Fails WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , United States of America ,  and Arizona .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or Merge to The Husbands .  There are several references in this article, which do need some gardening for linkrot, but which establish she's not totally unknown; however, it may be that she is better known as a member of The Husbands than for any solo work.  In any case, a redlink is certainly not what we would want here.  Chubbles ( talk ) 03:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Husbands .  She has received a little coverage for activities outside of her main band, but I do not consider that coverage to be significant enough to justify a separate article.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Husbands per above, where the subject is mentioned.  CycloneYoris talk!  05:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Husbands .   Given there is no RS here, there is little to merge, so a redirect is best for now.  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 09:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Husbands per above reasoning.  There are no citations other than the few external links at the end, so subject fails GNG itself.  Might as well just redirect to the band name.  - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌) 🔥 14:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
MP3 Newswire: I note that the deletion dicussion was closed 11 Aug 2005.  the article was recreated on 28 September 2005 Given its almost 20 years existence in WP:ARTICLESPACE , it would appear to me reasonable to review the 2005 deletion.  a number of articles link here it would appear to me that it may quite possibly be a plausible Redirect to either an article of sections in an article - and if so which ones?  As always, please do prove me wrong about this!  Shirt58 ( talk ) 🦘 09:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Music ,  and Websites .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Results are all Newswires talking about mp3, nothing much for the site.  This is all I got [23] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] or redirect to Richard Menta, but his article is about as sparse...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, I had considered that and gave up, so I PRODded Menta, only to facepalm when Explicit the admin pointed out that I'd missed the PROD in the deletion logs.  I might take his advice to take that to AfD, too.  Until then, I decided it was a long shot and decided to try to G4 this.  Instead of a side of WP:TROUT with a decline, reviewing admin Shirt58 decided to take time from their busy admin duties to come to AfD themself.  A pleasant surprise!  Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs ) 15:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment These were cited in the last deletion discussion, but they're trivial [24] , [25] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Appears to be blogger Richard Menta .  IgelRM ( talk ) 23:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikiquote Richard Menta about MP3 Newswire IgelRM ( talk ) 00:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Orin C. Smith Elementary School: Subject is a local elementary school with no apparent notability beyond being named for a Starbucks executive, which is a good chunk of the article and its sources.  The sources that do focus on the school are from a local newspaper, the school district, or state databases, thus not meeting WP:GNG .  Sounder Bruce 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Washington .  Sounder Bruce 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Chehalis School District which covers this subject.  BD2412 T 21:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm alright with that!  Should I get going on it or wait until others have weighed in here?  LibrariesStillRock ( talk ) 20:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chehalis School District – When regarding the local newspaper, the school would have passed GNG checks, but if they were not passing GNG, then ls notability guidelines.  Merge not feasible.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 21:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you explain what you mean?  Sorry, I'm new here, lol LibrariesStillRock ( talk ) 19:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
POPmail: However there doesn't seem to be a lot about it.  The name of the client is also very close to the mail protocol it used, and is also re-used elsewhere (e.g. Zope classes) so searching is complicated.  I was going to WP:BLAR to Mark P. McCahill , its creator, but saw there was an old AfD from 2006.  On reviewing the old AfD, no secondary sources were discussed at all.  It was kept on the basis that it existed and people remembered it.  (Those were the days!)  I do not oppose a redirect to Mark P. Cahill as a WP:ATD , but suspect this fails WP:PAGEDECIDE for a page of its own.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 19:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology , Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 19:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  I was not able to find anything useable in magazines like Computerworld, Infoworld or PC Mag (via Google Books).  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom and above comment.  Cannot find any sources distinct from generic POP server coverage.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 06:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Ben Azura ( talk ) 17:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect