WP:AFD : RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12) ( #Episodes ) has summaries and key content of each episode of the season – with plenty of space to expand as well.  While media websites may recap episodes, per WP:NOPAGE there is no need for individual articles for every one, especially not bulk-produced with just worthless single sentences.  Also listing The Ball Ball World's Worst (RuPaul's Drag Race) Choices 2020 Droop (RuPaul's Drag Race) Superfan Makeover You Don't Know Me (RuPaul's Drag Race) Gay's Anatomy Viva Drag Vegas Reywas92 Talk 14:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Reywas92 Talk 14:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep per page creator.  As nominator has said, almost all episodes are reviewed by multiple media outlets, and Wikipedia has examples of what individual episodes of Drag Race can look like once fleshed out: " Queens Behind Bars ", " Trump: The Rusical ", " Moulin Ru: The Rusical ", etc.  As for this nomination, it can be difficult to demonstrate notability for nine topics at once.  So, I'll focus on " Choices 2020 ": Sources for " Choices 2020 " (some of which have been added to the entry) https://www.vulture.com/2020/04/rupauls-drag-race-recap-season-12-episode-9-choices-2020.html https://www.avclub.com/rupaul-s-drag-race-gets-political-as-the-queens-debate-1843056412 https://xtramagazine.com/culture/rupauls-drag-race-season-12-episode-9-recap-171726 https://inmagazine.ca/2020/04/rupauls-drag-race-season-12-episode-9-recap-choices-2020/ https://werrrk.com/2020/04/26/rupauls-drag-race-choices-2020/ https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/apr/26/rupauls-drag-race-recap-season-12-episode-goldblum https://meaww.com/rupauls-drag-race-season-12-choices-2020-recap-jackie-cox-lipsync-for-life-firework-jeff-goldblum https://mundanemag.com/first-of-all-jeff-goldblum-and-drag-race/ https://ew.com/ew-binge-podcast/ews-binge-rupauls-drag-race-season-12-recap/ https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/jeff-goldblum-islam-rupaul-drag-race-jackie-cox-women-homosexuality-a9483536.html I could keep going...  Seems clear to me there's plenty to say and no doubt of notability.  I should also note, WikiProject Drag Race is quite active and I believe more time should be given for editors to collaborate on these entries.  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Of course, episode recaps for television shows exist.  And yet, their coverage is WP:ROTM .  It makes for a good distinction of how encyclopedias are WP:NOTNEWS .  Per NOPAGE, there's plenty to say about the season of television, but less about each episode.  I imagine some episodes, like the fleshed out examples provided, are the exceptions to the rule where there is enough that's worth documenting, like how some television shows have articles for some of their episodes but not others ( Stranger Things (season 4) is the first example to come to my mind. ) – Muboshgu ( talk ) 16:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is absolutely nothing notable about these television episodes.  Pre-existing episode summaries in the relevant season is more than enough.  Thismess ( talk ) 16:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Incubate Other editors are correct in that much of the coverage of the episodes are WP:ROTM and in their current state fail WP:NOPAGE , especially on if they add context to the season episode lists.  However the fleshed out examples above do add more, with that in mind they could be incubated instead of deleted to allow them to be fleshed out.  Shaws username ( talk ) 00:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12) User:Another Believer 's proposal for it is reasonable to me, I'd be perfectly happy with redirecting them instead until they can be fully written out.  I stand by what I said about about them in their current state failing WP:NOPAGE , right now they vast majority of them don't add anything beyond what's already at RuPaul's Drag Race (season 12) , but if/when they're expanded properly stand-alone articles would be reasonable.  Shaws username .  talk .  20:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Why do these exist?  What is the use of articles whose only content is an infobox listing next to nothing and one sentence that says ""x" is an episode of Ruaul's Drag Race " with one or two sources that merely prove the topic exists after? @ CAPTAIN RAJU : I think this discussion should be expanded to include all the articles that have been recently created for Drag Race episodes, like Disco-mentary and Girl Groups (RuPaul's Drag Race) and however many other articles are listed at List of RuPaul's Drag Race episodes . Ss 112 07:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment by page creator: Can we just restore these pages as redirects for now? The redirects serve a purpose, so outright deletion is not necessary. There seems to be a dislike for these stubs, even though I am quite certain at least some are notable and could be expanded (" Choices 2020 ", for example).  I'd roll up my sleeves to expand them now but I am currently traveling.  Thanks!  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes of course...that's what I did before you reverted me with no changes...  Don't make one-sentence junk that doesn't inform readers.  Collaborate in draft space if you need to.  But even what you added to that article is duplicative to or can easily be added to the main article, and individual episode articles are generally not necessary.  Reywas92 Talk 02:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't actually think the pages should be redirected, I'm just proposing this for now because I don't have time to expand the entries immediately.  I'll work on them at a later date, hence my request for restoring redirects instead of outright deletion.  Not interested in expanding or defending nine entries while traveling.  --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't have time to expand the entries immediately Then don't create them like this! Reywas92 Talk 14:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I wasn't traveling when I created them. I understand you dislike stubs, but stubs for notable topics aren't problematic. I don't need you attempting to merge and delete every stub I create. Thanks, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per

Discussion outcome: redirect