John Ratcliff (producer): I could not locate sources with substantial coverage of Ratcliff.  All sources cover him only peripherally, as a producer for a-Ha.  The article is now primarily an autobiography.  Would accept a redirect to a-Ha as an alternative to deletion.  Jfire ( talk ) 03:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Music ,  and United Kingdom .  Jfire ( talk ) 03:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I not only re- produced the final masters of 8 of the tracks on a-ha’s 15 million selling first album Hunting High and Low but I also discovered them in 1983 and kept them, gave them £thousands and helped secure a record deal with Warners.  I managed them under contract from 1983 to 1993 and without my financial and creative input they would have returned to Norway and never been heard of again!  How dare you propose to delete this article.  I have nearly completed my autobiography which inevitably contains the entire story of how I rescued them when they had no money left and put them in my recording studio for 2 years without any return for another 12 months.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 01:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Journalism , Television , Advertising ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] agree that REDIRECT to a-Ha is appropriate.  Most sources are primary references.  The only third party references are more about a-Ha with this subject being mentioned tangentially.  Otherwise, this article seems more promotional than anything else.  ShelbyMarion ( talk ) 18:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How dare you presume!  You know nothing.  In 1983 a-ha came into my studio but ran out of money after 2 weeks.  For the next 2 years I covered every housing cost. , food cost and leisure costs out of my own pocket because I believed in their talent.I also let them have free studio time for 2 years during which we recorded and produced nearly all of the tracks on their first album.  I became their manager in 1983 and their contract lasted with me until 1993! Their best 10 years to date.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 01:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I.will take legal action if you have the cheek to remove this article.  My autobiography is almost finished detailing my entire 10 years managing the band and the consequences for both a-ha and myself.  200 million record sales for a start!  If you want a copy of my management contract with a-ha just ask.  I lost my house and marriage while supporting the band before their success.  Buy my autobiography next year and you can read every detail.  Nobody, nobody knows the ‘a-ha’ history better than I do.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 01:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Get your facts right.  I discovered the band when they came into my studio and spent 2 weeks recording.  I liked what I heard and when they ran out of time and money I supported them for 2 years before Take on Me became a bestseller.I was contractually their Manager from 1983 to 1993.  I re-produced 8 out of 10 tracks on their first and most popular album Hunting high and Low.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 02:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There are two decent sources on the article, both telling the story of the recording of "Take On Me": " Talking Away: A-Ha On The Making Of Take On Me " on The Quietus, and " Classic Tracks: A-ha 'Take On Me' " on Sound on Sound.  There may be some claim to notability.  However, the article subject badgering us and making legal threats on this deletion discussion makes it difficult for me to vote keep.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 02:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If you are not going to allow this article to remain then you are ignoring the truth of the matter.  I thought the truth was a basic necessity of a site that should only provide fact.I am only writing as a matter of principle.  My lawyers will only reveal their legal expertise.  Buy the album…my name is all over the sleeve.  More times than the band members themselves 217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 02:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To toughpig.  I don’t give a damn - oh sorry. .is that blasphemy?  In this day and age?  I am in no way making threats!  I am merely standing up for myself and the truth.Who is your superior?  Put him/her on to it before I wake up my lawyer and we can sort this out legally and properly.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 02:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I now understand the reason for your username.  Well I am tough too but my lawyer is tougher, and very expensive as you will discover should this minuscule matter not be resolved satisfactorily.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 02:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To tough pig.  It says you have ‘2 decent sources’.  What better ‘source’ could you have but myself.  I discovered, produced and managed ‘a-ha’ for 10 years from 1983 to 1993.  I think my knowledge of this entire matter is inevitably going to be seen as the most accurate.  Your organisation obviously listens hardest to those names you recognise.  You don’t realise that it’s the people behind the names who have a far greater knowledge and understanding for detail than you ever will.  Change your username…. or is it your real name?  I do apologise.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 03:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It will be very easy for me to find out who you really are.  217.137.18.193 ( talk ) 03:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] 217.137.18.193, stop your threats.  WP:NLT and WP:OUTING are policies here.  You can vent, and you can argue for this article to be kept, but you can't harass people.  Jfire ( talk ) 04:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Read my opening statements from the top again.  Johnratcliff ( talk ) 04:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am not harassing anyone.  I am merely pointing out that I am not ‘just’ their producer.  I discovered them in 1983, kept, housed, fed and gave them my studio for 2 years,signed them to an extremely lucrative management contract for 5 years and then to a major deal with Warners.  That is an awful lot more than ‘producing’ a track don’t you think?  Johnratcliff ( talk ) 04:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I was their manager from 1983 to 1993.I still get royalties!  Why am I having to justify facts that are common knowledge in my industry?  Johnratcliff ( talk ) 04:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I saw your opening statement and I believe you when you say you've done all those things for the band and were important to their success.  But saying things like " I will take legal action if you have the cheek to remove this article ", " My lawyers will only reveal their legal expertise ", " before I wake up my lawyer and we can sort this out legally ", and " It will be very easy for me to find out who you really are " is not okay here.  You need to avoid making statements that can be construed as legal threats or threats to reveal someone's identity.  " Why am I having to justify facts that are common knowledge in my industry? " is a valid question.  The answer is that one of the pillars of Wikipedia is that information here is verifiable : readers must be able to check that any information is not just made up.  That means we can't rely on what's "common knowledge" in any industry unless it's been published in reliable sources somewhere.  When your autobiography is published, we may  be able to use it as a source in a-ha (depending on whether it is self-published or not).  But we can't just rely on your own personal statements here, even if we believe them.  Jfire ( talk ) 04:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I apologise if you feel I was harassing you.  ‘a-ha’ is a very sensitive subject for me. I gave up my home and lost my wife and young child on account of my involvement with a-ha.  So it is a passionate and sensitive subject.  I reiterate, I am very sorry to have upset you.  John Johnratcliff ( talk ) 04:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a-ha (with merging in of any useful information) pending publication of the autobiography referred to by the 217 IP (who appears to be the same person as Johnratcliff ?).  If it gets reviews in reliable sources, the article can then be reinstated based on those in addition to the few good sources currently present.  Notability is borderline at present, since it can't be inherited from the band (and since our criterion for an independent page is notability, not admiration).  The article is an under-referenced BLP and the last paragraph is stylistically inappropriate: "PS ... John".  But it may be rewritable from sources a year from now.  Yngvadottir ( talk ) 08:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above, does not seem independently notable.  Slatersteven ( talk ) 09:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Yngvadottir.  I removed a lot of recent COI additions that were entirely unsourced.  Those should not be in a BLP.  What remains are 4 sources that I will throw into a source analysis table: Source assessment table: prepared by User:Sirfurboy Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://www.johnratcliff.com/john--a-ha "In his own words".  His own website.  WP:SPS ?  Reliable but self promotional ✘ No https://web.archive.org/web/20220521024623/https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/ha-take-me I believe it is.  Didn't actually check.  He is mentioned in the source several times but there is no significant information about him ✘ No https://thequietus.com/articles/18805-aha-hunting-high-and-low-take-on-me-review-anniversary He is mentioned in the source several times but there is no significant information about him ✘ No https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01727601 A primary source that says nothing about Ratcliffe in any case ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  However the redirect is reasonable as this is clearly someone who gets a mention regarding a-ha and is borderline notable.  Although the above assessment covers what is in the page, there could be more secondary sources on him.  However the name is quite common and searching is complicated by finding other notable Jonh Ratcliffes.  I was not able to find any suitable coverage, but if multiple independent reliable secondary sources with sigificant coverage can be found, then, of course, this would be a notable subject for a page.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 10:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a-ha : Not enough notability outside of a-ha to warrant an individual page.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a-ha .  I haven't been able to find sources to support WP:GNG beyond those mentioned here, and none of those support a stand-alone article.  Schazjmd (talk) 16:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a-ha I must admit the table really sold it to me Sansbarry ( talk ) 01:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect