hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kenny Wayne Hollingsworth: The page was previously deleted for lack of any source, and undeleted on 2018 with trivial mentions and Discog profile as sources.  His profile on AllMusic has neither biography nor review for his work.  Does not seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 03:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - He's a local musician and occasional studio sideman whose only semi-reliable media appearances are as a name in the credits for the Leon Bridges album.  Good luck to him but he does not merit an encyclopedic article here.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cavin's Milkshake: CptViraj ( talk ) 18:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and India .  CptViraj ( talk ) 18:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , for reasons of notability.  Brusquedandelion ( talk ) 23:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amin August Jr.: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 07:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 07:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of Azerbaijan, Canberra: There's really not much about this embassy that wouldn't fit under Australia–Azerbaijan relations : the only coverage I could find was this non-independent press release regarding the creation of the embassy; this small clash between Azeris and Armenians outside of the embassy; and the fact that the embassy staff imported over 40,000 cigarettes and lots of booze, possibly to sell it to the black market.  All in all, there's nothing really noteworthy *about the embassy* that makes me think we should be keeping this article, and all the material I dug up could end up at Australia–Azerbaijan relations .  I think a redirect here would be a good fit.  Pilaz ( talk ) 21:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Azerbaijan ,  and Australia .  Pilaz ( talk ) 21:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article merely confirms it exists.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG, nothing independent and nothing of substance GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 14:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tommy Brown (record producer): Nothing that satisfies WP:GNG in my books.  TLA (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pennsylvania .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aswin Tripathy: Edit.pdf ( talk ) 07:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Odisha .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lack of significant coverage.  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Osman Pamukoğlu: Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Military ,  and Turkey .  UtherSRG (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - the Turkish article has many more sources - which I can't help much with presently, but may be able to come back to - so this may not be a lost cause.  Also, Turkish newspapers will certainly have more to say about him, if anyone is up to the search.  Ingratis ( talk ) 07:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 23:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete' Examined the 8 references for the Turkish article.  The de article and os article weren't referenced which for de certainly is an indication of poor quality.  Some are press-releases, several of them are him talking, for example "TURKISH PEOPLE LIVING IN ANATOLIA AND THRACE, THIS CALL IS TO YOU!" and are WP:PRIMARY .  and others are videos of him talking to the public, whch are WP:SPS sources.  Others are proclamations.  You can see his signature at the bottom of the documents.  These are non-rs.   None of them are WP:SECONDARY sources.  It is all him doing his work.  scope_creep Talk 04:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Skillit (platform): WP:CORP does not seem to be met.  SmartSE ( talk ) 23:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Websites ,  and New York .  SmartSE ( talk ) 23:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Engineering .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT .  The article is about the software/platform, not about the company itself, so applying WP:NCORP is a stretch.  [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] all articles include anaylsis and description of the Skillit platform (and are reliable sources per WP:RS , that's why on Wikipedia article, we have two lines about funding and a separate section about the platform.  The article is very much expandable based on the provided references and is an encyclopedic topic in a niche industry like contruction, where software use is minimal.  SHilhorst ( talk ) 14:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.inflection-point.us/ is a random blog - not a reliable source Can't access but looks like routine coverage of funding Can't access but looks like routine coverage of funding Again a routine funding announcement Again, can't access but from the headline clearly about funding.  SmartSE ( talk ) 18:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I disagree with the author of the article who voted keep - this subject does not meet the general notability guideline or the subject specific notability guideline set out in WP:PRODUCT.  Rather, I agree with the source assessment conducted by the nominator, these sources are sheerly routine and not significant coverage at all.  Routine articles about funding are not sufficient for notability.  Article should be deleted.  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 08:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 23:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If this were to be a considered as a product-focused article, then the funding information should be eliminated from consideration as both irrelevant and non-independent (noting that these don't contribute to NCORP notability anyway, largely arise from press releases, and SAAS startups are basically their product).  Coverage in listicles and similar minor comparisons of similar products/services doesn't demonstrate individual notability, and I can't see suitable SIGCOV of the platform on a quick BEFORE.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 04:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability beyond routine coverage -- VViking Talk Edits 14:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oryon Networks: There are no references to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, such as news articles, books, or academic publications, which would establish the company's notability.  Edit.pdf ( talk ) 15:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet , Websites ,  and Singapore .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - unnotable and promotional.  . .  Mean as custard ( talk ) 12:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing in gnews, which is surprising for a Singaporean company.  Fails WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kang Song-ho: Simione001 ( talk ) 04:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan and North Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough information here to be worth keeping.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Models: Why the members might have achieved success with other bands, here we have an issue with one single and a Peel session that does not indicate any chart success.  Language is also promotional in character.  Karst ( talk ) 13:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Karst ( talk ) 13:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am familiar with this item.  The article says accurately that the Models are often mentioned in punk rock histories because they had members that went on to bigger things later.  True, but they accomplished nothing notable in their own right.  They are only of interest as a brief stop in the biography of Marco Pirroni .  I have added some text to his article to verify his brief membership in this band, and that's all that is necessary for Wikipedia.  Delete this article for lack of independent notability .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 13:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Keegan Smith (soccer, born 1993): He had a relatively successful college career before a brief stint in the pro game.  However, I can't find significant coverage, only routine coverage and passing mentions.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 13:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Football , United States of America ,  and California .  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 13:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Winning West Coast Conference Men's Soccer Player of the Year would be a pass of WP:NCOLLATH , I believe; I'm rather surprised I haven't been able to find SIGCOV - though his common name makes it difficult.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 03:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adnan Al-Rifaey: Mccapra ( talk ) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Syria .  Mccapra ( talk ) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete It's so hard to assess articles where no sources in the native language of the project are going to exist.  Such articles are not a requirement for inclusion here should they be.  However the (auto-translated) sources cited here seem to be a forum post, the top level of a website, and two very press release-y articles seemingly provided by the person himself or his publicist.  This does not seem sufficient for a properly written and sourced encyclopedia article.  -- Here2rewrite ( talk ) 16:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks in depth coverage from reliable sources.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
André Manuel (rugby union): The closest I found to WP:SIGCOV was probably this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SJK(T) St. Teresa Convent: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 11:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  9 years since its (first) nomination for deletion, almost nothing has been improved and I couldn't find any reliable sources about this school.  Clearly fails WP:GNG .  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 05:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Looks like another school PR case.  The page creator made 1 (!) edit at all.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 10:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tin Zaouatene volcanic field: Liégeois mentions it only in a table with relatively few data.  GVP removed their entry; when I emailed them for an explanation they said that there is no indication of volcanic rocks in the area and pointed out how sparse the mention on Liégeois is.  This source has only a few data, too, with no detailed description.  Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk ) 11:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Africa .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If the experts who decide whether this is a volcanic field have decided that they were mistaken and that there is no such field, surely Wikipedia should follow suit?  Special:Diff/1186683457 boggles the mind.   The clear rationale seems to be that the article is false and not supported by the experts any more.   That is unverifiability , and a basic reason for deletion that has been in deletion policy since 2003 .   Furthermore: As I have said elsewhere I think the answer to A. B. 's question is that the NERC ‐ BGS will follow suit soon enough, since its database, it claims [1] , is a join on the Smithsonian's; and soon Smithsonian record #225002 will be there no more.   It all depends from when it imports and how it handles records that get deleted and no longer join to its own data.  Uncle G ( talk ) 07:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - If the databases that constitute our cited sources are deleting it, so should WP.  Blueboar ( talk ) 22:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Ebmeier et al. 2018 .  sfn error: no target: CITEREFEbmeierAndrewsArayaArnold2018 ( help ) Ebmeier, S.K.; Andrews, B. J. ; Araya, M.C.; Arnold, D. W. D. ; Biggs, J. ; Cooper, C. ; Cottrell, E. ; Furtney, M. ; Hickey, J. ; Jay, J. ; Lloyd, R. ; Parker, A. L. ; Pritchard, M. E. ; Robertson, E. ; Venzke, E. ; Williamson, J. L. (2018-02-06).  "Synthesis of global satellite observations of magmatic and volcanic deformation: implications for volcano monitoring & the lateral extent of magmatic domains" .  Journal of Applied Volcanology .  7 (2).  doi : 10.1186/s13617-018-0071-3 .  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Motorcycle Action Group: Article has been long-tagged for non-notability and nothing has been done to improve it.  Most recent editing was about organisational infighting and involved COI.  Nothing was/has been done to improve the article.  Last person to edit the article has a still undeclared conflict of interest as the organisation's chair.  His last contributions at ANI were revoked (I believe because they to make legal threats.).  Sum total is an article, marred by COI bad behaviour, that fails to assert notability.  10mmsocket ( talk ) 14:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Transportation .  10mmsocket ( talk ) 14:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A lot of gnews in the non independent source Visordown.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete