hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nana Mensah (footballer): Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 00:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gastrosexuality: Appears to have originated in the Daily Mail, which is not usable as a source.  RS usage that I can find is one Irish Times mention .  There's a HuffPost article that turns out to be a reblog of the Daily Mail piece.  There's a Times article that admits it's an advertising feature.  That's it.  This was an article, then it was a redirect, then it was restored as an ill-sourced article.  I'm pretty sure a single usage of an advertising promotional term is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article, and it would be a dicdef in any case.  David Gerard ( talk ) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  David Gerard ( talk ) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article does not meet Wikipedia's standards for citation and a reliable source and isn't notable enough.  Yakov-kobi ( talk ) 00:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Social science .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A single, possibly promotional use wouldn't qualify for a Wikipedia article.  It might be better suited for a dictionary definition.  Waqar 💬 18:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination, and all of the above.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete The article as it is now is poorly sourced and not so well written.  But I plugged gastrosexual into Google Scholar and got plenty of decent-looking hits from a range of years: [8] This is not a term that flared up in 2008 and then died out quickly.  If there's a Wikipedian willing to put in the work, this could scrub up into a keepable article.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 03:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Marcus: Even what's now used for sourcing in the article isn't much.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Television , Law , New York ,  and Rhode Island .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - there's some evidence that he's notable as an attorney , but that would not be the consensus of Wikipedians .  What about a redirect?  Bearian ( talk ) 14:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KreekCraft: I could not find significant coverage of him in reliable sources .  The sources cited in the article are mostly his own videos, as well as sites like this .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Video games , Internet ,  and Florida .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete with over 9 million subscribers I thought this would be a slam dunk, but sure enough the only coverage is low quality churnalism/AI video summaries.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 00:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I too thought there would a lot about KreekCraft on the internet seeing the fact that he is nearing 10 million subscribers, but all I found were these [112] [113] .  The article also only uses primary sources and self published sources, and the Esports articles seem very unreliable.  Still can't believe no good sources on KreekCraft.  I would've said draftify but theres nothing else to put in this article.  MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk ) 07:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - I could only find three/four reliable sources that would possibly count towards notability.  The following are all reliable per WP:VGRS : Esports Insider , Venture Beat , and PCGamesN .  Also, Esports Advocate is probably reliable, but Dexerto is rarely suitable for BLPs per WP:DEXERTO .  – Pbrks ( t · c ) 15:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Esports Insider and Venture Beat are run-of-the-mill announcements based on the same press release which don't provide any significant coverage of KreekCraft other than to mention that he's part of the thing being announced.  PCGamesN just describes what he found in one of his videos, which isn't really significant coverage in my view.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 19:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article is somewhat written "promotionally", with external links and BLP issues.  Myrealnamm's Alternate Account ( talk ) 18:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
North American Forum: If not delete, merge into University of California, San Diego , which took on the now-defunct role of meeting organizer, per this .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 07:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Economics , Canada , Mexico ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jacob Rott: No coverage outside of this type of photo spread/ "look what the celebrity is wearing".  I don't see notability in the given sources either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already been through PROD.  Not eligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 14:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it is still eligible for WP:soft deletion as the edits that came after the PROD was nothing but padding with unreliable sources.  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  Anybody can call themself an influencer, and many do.  Want to get noticed?  - label yourself "an influencer".  If his group the Elevator Boys don't rate a Wikipedia article, the individuals therein certainly are not notable.  The search brings up a lot of hits that mostly say "gained a lot of attention through their videos on the social media platform Tiktok".  So?   Being noticed is not the same thing as achieving awards and mainstream media coverage.  — Maile ( talk ) 20:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dhanushkodi (film): The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 13:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 13:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Priyadarshan_filmography#1981-1990 , where it is mentioned and add 'unreleased' with a note . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nicholas Ebanks: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This was all I was able to find, if it's the same person.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails GNG.   — siro χ o 23:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adel Shirazy: A draft of this name already exists.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Politicians ,  and Poetry .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lots of resume-material involving his works, miscellaneous papers, work experience, and poetry writing, but nothing that seems to definitively secure his notability.  Closest thing might be his (failed?/successful?) candidacy for the assembly.  The recent COI activity doesn't help either.  GuardianH ( talk ) 15:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This appears to be part of a cross multiple wiki spamming exercise by the creating editor.  There is a possibility that this is self promotion, whcih I rate currently at a 0.75 probability.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Nothing mentioned in this article suggests encyclopedic notability.  I concur that it looks a lot like self-promotion.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  10:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marabunta (software): Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 21:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology , Internet ,  and Software .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 21:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Cannot find any coverage at all.  Even the website is down.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 22:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No significant coverage.  Non-notable software.  SL93 ( talk ) 22:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Couldn't find much mention of it anywhere.  Waqar 💬 19:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks coverage.Fails WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ryan Warren: No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Articls is just basic resume information.  Of the 4 sources:  Two just list him as one of hundreds nominated or finalists for two awards.   The third ref does not even mention him.   The fourth was two short paragraphs as recipient of the Clinton Grybas Emerging Talent Award.  North8000 ( talk ) 18:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sources as the nom correctly states are not WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:SIGCOV .  His career is too new, and the awards he's gotten are of the up and coming variety .  Because his career started so recently, he hasn't accumulated significant coverage yet.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable.  Fails WP:BIO DI V I N E 20:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Awfis: Most of the coverage are routine.  Amitbanerji26 ( talk ) 09:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and Delhi .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete There seems to be sufficient number of links in all categories.  In-depth evaluation can yield the result.  Deleting it outright will not be fair.  Cruzdoze ( talk ) 18:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Asquith: Rest is trivial coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All of the articles that I found were essentially interviews, and some are copies of each other.  He self-published a book.  That's all I can find.  Also, I looked him up on the Guinness site and he doesn't turn up in a search there, so we really only have his word that he holds a record.  Lamona ( talk ) 22:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable.  Athel cb ( talk ) 10:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sourabh Chowdhury: Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Asia ,  and India .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : All I can find are variations of this story [36] , which don't contribute to notability, and I'm unsure if it's the same person.  The article now is very PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Are you seriously confused if the person of the article is same or not?  Common man, there's no chance to be confused because he is a social influencer and, therefore, you can easily watch his channel and cross-check those achievement on official website of organizers.  Yeah if you think it's a PROMO, just feel free to give your touch and delete whatever word you think as promotional.  Thank you Strikingstar01 ( talk ) 18:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So you think the major cause for deletion is insufficient sources and a little bit promo content?  OK, if I fix both causes, then will you guys agree on retaining the article?  Strikingstar01 ( talk ) 03:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is clearly PROMO, created by a SPA.  The subject hasn't received sig/ in-depth coverage in RS, aside from some churnalism or paid coverage which is not enough to establish GNG .  Saqib ( talk ) 21:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Assalam o alaikum, I don't know but would like to listen why you think it's a promo and I'm a SPA?  1) the sources clearly varifies that the person got 1st rank in multiple national and global tournament, You can't buy the organizers to mention your name in 1st place yearly events because they can mention names of only one and actual winner.  2) Common man, How could you expect churnalism from government's site?  3) Yeah the article could be PROMO because I've just started this journey with tons of guideline and could make several mistakes.  Please mention sentences which indicates promotional content.  Strikingstar01 ( talk ) 07:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:PROMO page.  The subject has not made any significant achievement, notable to warrant a page on him.  This page reads clear promotion of the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't you think, if a person have more than 40 Million impression and bunch of golabal achievements, he deserve a page?  Strikingstar01 ( talk ) 13:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shannon Mulligan: Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghost (production team): Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Sweden .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of significance and the two references are non-RS.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 04:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources don't cut the mustard and claims to notability are very very weak.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 13:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cake in a Cup: The owners names or the company name doesn’t appear in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Cupcake_Wars_episodes Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 12:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete even if they did appear on that show, notability is not WP:INHERITED BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't see how this meets notability.  Also one of the citations is to a cupcake-themed 2048 clone?  [1] That's not part of my rationale or anything, it's just amusing.  It does bring their citation count down to 3 though, all of which are Toledo-specific news articles.  The Savage Norwegian 21:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Kristen, Micael.  "2048 Cupcakes" .  Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Television , Companies ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete