hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of mayors of Burlington, Ontario : Burlington is large enough of a city that its mayors would probably be eligible to keep good, properly sourced articles, but not large enough that its mayors would get an automatic presumption of notability on an inadequate article just because they existed -- so of the 28 people listed here, just six of them have articles to link to, but three of those are up for AFD as not really passing NPOL #2, one hasn't been put up for AFD but it's still debatable as to whether her article is really doing enough to put her on genuinely solid notability ground, and the two whose notability is secure are both notable for having gone on to hold higher offices at NPOL #1 levels rather than for having been mayors per se.  All of which adds up to a list that we shouldn't be keeping without solid sources for it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just a strange idea for a list even.  Not formatted or sourced well and yes, simply being the mayor of a mid sized city at one point in time does not confer notability.  Out of scope with Wikipedia and sure to make many dedicated list-haters wake up in a cold sweat.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 03:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge to Burlington, Ontario#Government .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Since it's completely unsourced, there is really nothing to merge.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 01:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unsourced list, doesn't make sense as well!  There's hardly any option other than deletion.  Ekdalian ( talk ) 14:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  I had initially PROD tagged the article, but it was not improved upon.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can be merged somewhere if urgent.  NavjotSR ( talk ) 16:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
K. C. John : Based on only one source that is a primary source.  Clearly fails WP:BLPSPS .  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 13:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 13:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Initials are too common to be able to filter out the results.  What's used now is one primary source, I don't see GNG as being met.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Christianity , Kerala ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -  Too vague and too old to come up with any verification.   The only source is an external link to the subject's own television station.  — Maile ( talk ) 22:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Forest Cove, Agoura Hills, California : Broc ( talk ) 14:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Agoura_Hills, California#Geography , where this neighborhood is briefly mentioned, and appears on a map, and per the previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Agoura, Agoura Hills, California .  Someone could write a sourced article about these neighborhoods, but there is no need for a half a dozen unsourced articles on neighborhoods.  Firsfron of Ronchester 15:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The neighborhoods are hoaxes User_talk:Arspickles17#Agoura_Hills_Neigborhoods .  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Agoura_Hills, California#Geography Delete as these are not real.  I'm applying the newspaper test to this.  If you search against the LA county newspapers there ~400 mentions.  Obviously, I'm not going to check all of these.  But just sampling by decade I find the hits are all to forest cove park or lane.  Notably, there are no obituaries mentioning  the place, which is real red flag because it means the people who live there don't even think it's worth mentioning.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not a notable neighborhood.  Lightburst ( talk ) 17:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arboretum du Rosay : Kadı Message 18:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and France .  Kadı Message 18:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Warren Pettey : Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 08:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Promotional and vanity article created by a SPA against advice to do so.   Subject meets none of the criteria of NMUSICIAN, sources are a mix of primary, press releases and casual mentions.  Ravenswing 12:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a promotional article as per WP:PROMO that is  relying on mainly promotional sources.  Not passing WP:GNG at this stage, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 22:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above remarks about SPAs BrigadierG ( talk ) 14:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ignacio Uría Mendizábal : WP:BIO1E applies; the ordinary coverage of his death are the only sources.  List of ETA attacks might be a redirect option.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Spain .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the death of a businessman is not notable in itself.  — Iadmc ♫ talk 11:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no assertion of notability outside a single event.  ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 14:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Right now, the only sources seem to be basic reports of his death.  For a Wikipedia article, we'd need more substantial information about his impact and career.  Waqar 💬 15:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marnix van den Broeke : Unref BLP.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Netherlands .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No news coverage.  Does not satisfy WP:NACTOR .  Perfectstrangerz ( talk ) 01:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NACTOR .  None of his parts even had a full name, just "Werewolf" and the like.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Terry Pratchett's Hogfather as his best known role.  In agreement that this fails NACTOR.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Come Back to Sorrento (upcoming film) : I found brief mentions from 2009 in The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney) and Hollywood Reporter .  Obviously the film is not going to be made.  APK whisper in my ear 09:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, turns out Wikipedia was not a crystal ball — siro χ o 10:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, no crystal balling .  2001:F40:970:202E:ACC9:CD55:77D6:86AC ( talk ) 13:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NFF , WP:NYF and WP:CRYSTAL .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 19:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per WP:FUTURE .  Also after research I cannot find any WP:SIGCOV .  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 20:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of SEC men's basketball tournament finals broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; besides unsourced, a majority of those are WP:PRIMARY and dead links besides the YouTube posts, not offering anything to assert notability.  Besides being by a banned sock.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Basketball ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT , failing WP:LISTN with mainly WP:ROUTINE , WP:PRIMARY , WP:TERTIARY sources such as YouTube or Tweets, or WP:OR making a list of trivia only suitable for the fandom wiki.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 14:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:NLIST as this grouping isn't discussed in non-primary sources.  Sources are press releases, internet forums, and YouTube clips, none of which contribute to notability.  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Esther Kurabi : I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 15:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No sources found online along with newspapers.  Kline • talk to me!  • contribs 01:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment national football team members have to be notable.  -- VertyBerty ( talk ) 08:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is incorrect.  Per WP:NSPORTS2022 , a national team cap no longer makes an article exempt from having to meet WP:GNG .  See also WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:NSPORTS in general for further guidelines.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - best source I can find is Loop , which is a trivial mention Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Paczkowski : I tried to see if the subject met WP:GNG during my WP:BEFORE , but it's hard to find WP:RS coverage for the critical late-2000's period and earlier.  Besides that, I found one article about him leaving Buzzfeed News (besides Forbes itself ).  The Forbes article would be pretty good at demonstrating The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors part of NJOURNALIST, but it's from his employer.  Another good source in that same type would be [3] , but it has the same issues.  I just don't think the sources are there, but I am happy to be proven wrong.  – MJL ‐ Talk ‐ ☖ 18:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Technology ,  and California .  – MJL ‐ Talk ‐ ☖ 18:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Tech reporter, plenty of articles by him, nothing about him.  No sourcing we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree.  Add in unsourced quotes and other puffery about him and article basically adds up to a promotional piece.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 04:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Inverse Ninjas VS. The Public Domain : The article has secondary sources cited, each of them citing the game as an example of a trend of creative properties emerging after the expiry of Steamboat Willie in the public domain.  In terms of the details about the game, the sources at best just repeat what the game page has to say.  The sources lack reception and reviews about the game in a manner necessary to indicate that this game has notability beyond the novelty of its exploitation of the recent Steamboat Willie public domain.  Given the specific context of the coverage, I would be comfortable to also consider merging this to Works based on a copyright-free Mickey Mouse although I can't comment on the strength of that article.  Welcome any views or additional sources.  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 05:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk ) 05:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Totally fails WP:GNG .  Wikipedia is not for advertising.  I personally think Works based on a copyright-free Mickey Mouse fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE so I will not suggest a merge.  The Steamboat Willie Mickey is just a curiosity meaning nothing, when we can make a full "Non-Disney works based on Mickey Mouse" and he is fully in the public domain, it may become more relevant.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 10:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vincent Masekesa : JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Looks to fail WP:GNG , and with no lists of Zimbabwean cricketers there's no suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Acklam Wold transmitting station : I have tried to find sources to improve the article, but WP:BEFORE reveals no coverage, there are zero hits on Google News and Google itself only brings up lists of transmitters that exist.  I don't think this is notable in and of itself - it probably just merits a mention on the articles for the stations it transmits.  Flip Format ( talk ) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Flip Format ( talk ) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Random telecommunications tower, nothing notable.  I can't find sourcing for it.  Long way from GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and per Oaktree B's comment.  RobinCarmody ( talk ) 18:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Secretarias : Nothing found in a BEFORE.  Tagged for notability since 2018.  PROD removed with links to 2 sites with nothing more than blurbs about it, no indepth coverage.  Donald D23 talk to me 15:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Ecuador .  Donald D23 talk to me 15:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:58, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , links in the deprod are not sufficient.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Without any reference or parallel article on es.wiki Svartner ( talk ) 03:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Toptani Shopping Center : Fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 20:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Albania .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Insignificant in size and a lack of independent coverage so fails WP:GNG .  Promotional in tone.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 21:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Iaof2017 ( talk ) 14:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable promo.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:59, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Strategic Consortium of Intelligence Professionals : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 20:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NORG / WP:SIRS .  No reliable sources in article and nothing in WP:LIBRARY .  Jfire ( talk ) 21:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Candace Kane's Candy Factory : QuietCicada ( talk ) 02:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  QuietCicada ( talk ) 02:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It does have a Gamezebo review .  However, 2 reviews is still too small to satisfy GNG requirements.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 02:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The game does not have enough sources to meet GNG.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 21:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete