hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Oxometrical society : Lacks depth of coverage in independent reliable sources.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 07:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia .  AllyD ( talk ) 08:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] An entire article on a joke university society that doesn't let Wikipedia readers in on the joke.   Sidney John Baker did in 1953, but alas didn't have much to say other than explaining the joke, and that's about the extent to which this has been reliably documented.   The sources at hand don't really say much, either.   The Melbourne Argus is mostly going on about the Ern Malley hoax , for example.  Uncle G ( talk ) 23:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This point has now been address in the latest edits - further content and sources added.  Hope this now helps satisfy?  :) Skullbound ( talk ) 01:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] More links to further independent sources have now been added.  Is it enough to have the nomination for deletion now removed?  Skullbound ( talk ) 01:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] All you've done is bombarded it with more passing mentions, So no, not enough.  And it also raises questions about your own use of oxo shite.  Sources you've provided simply do not directly support the text you have written.  Are you looking for a degree yourself?  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 13:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I suggest that this now be kept.  Bduke ( talk ) 06:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agreed with duffbeerforme, article is just peppered with trivial mentions.   If someone could find just two or three good in-depth references, they could bulldoze this whole thing and rewrite an informative article.   But a dozen or more passing mentions do not add up to information.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relisting.  Right now there is no consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agreed with duffbeerforme.  Where it is mentioned in reliable sources it is only mentioned in passing.  No in depth coverage.  Tar nis hed Path talk 10:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brittney Chantele : This person looks like an obscure artist with only one successful song from 5 years ago.  Bolt and Thunder ( talk ) 21:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists , Bands and musicians , United States of America ,  and New York .  Bolt and Thunder ( talk ) 21:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I disagree - Chantele is an up and coming artist with a wide range of abilities and skills who happened to gain success early on in their career.  They're still producing and creating new artistic works and continuing in their activism.  Lovemedead ( talk ) 22:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @Lovemedead -- your personal opinion is irrelevant.  You need to cite valid reasons based on Wikipedia policies of notability.  Nirva20 ( talk ) 23:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: fails GNG and SIGCOV .  Nirva20 ( talk ) 23:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lack notability issues CSMention269 ( talk ) 16:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olfat Berro : Runmastery ( talk ) 07:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find PR items about this person's appointment to various positions.  Not meeting notability and lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 11:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Created by now-blocked User:Content.Media2023 (Spams / advertising-only account).  The only other article this user created is declined Draft:Hassan Ezzeldine , which also needs to be deleted.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Metak (album) : Charsaddian ( talk ) 17:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 22:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jonah Wineberg : Article has been repeatedly recreated by the same user, and was previously deleted under criterion A7 .  CycloneYoris talk!  08:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Film .  CycloneYoris talk!  08:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – this BLP has 0 references.  Online, it's essentially just IMDb and Fandom.com, not WP:INDEPENDENT .  I think speedy delete could work here, but oh well.  TLA (talk) 09:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I brought it to AfD because the article had been deleted under A7 before, but I guess it could be speedy deleted now that the creator has been blocked.  CycloneYoris talk!  21:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think so, since they were blocked after creating the article, unless I'm misreading.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 01:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete as per above Mr Vili talk 23:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Media Work Inc (design company) : Utterly non notable company, complete promotional garbage sourced to unreliable sources, PR and other nonsense.  There is absolutely nothing in the way of meaningful, in depth coverage in this  article or elsewhere.  Impressive client list is about the extent to which anyone can say anything about this company, though that can't even be reliably sourced.  PICKLEDICAE🥒 21:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , England ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Advertising .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:G11 .  Infomemoh ( talk ) 02:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt obvious promotion, nothing to keep.  May reach notability in the future, but I think it would have to come from AfC.  This feels very COI.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 21:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Owen Sheehy : Creator has stated that he has added more sources and is the son of somebody with apparent notability, however notability isn't inherited and none what's added points to significant coverage.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , United States of America ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found for this athlete, someone connected to the blowing-up of Nelson's column in Ireland with the same name.  Could redirect to the club I suppose.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I could only find passing mentions.  Fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kenny Badmus : The sources available as also seen in the article are not independent of the subject and lacks significant coverage .  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree with this deletion assessment.  Article fails WP:GNG .  Some of the references are interviews and, so, not independent of the subject.  Cheers, Ezra Cricket ( talk ) 18:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:GNG and no SNG to fall back to.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 22:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Google search and Google news shows a lot of mentions in Nigerian news sites.  So if we consider that the person is clearly notable.  Evanzoe ( talk ) 15:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No, this is a clear delete.  Fails WP:BIO by any measure.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kali Troy : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Radio , Television ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Source used (imdb) isn't useful for notability, all I can find are wikis, famous birthdays and various photo sites...  There isn't enough coverage to prove notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DNSimple : Only found trivial mentions of the subject online.  The article was nominated for speedy deletion in the first ten minutes of creation, and was declined for being "the first DNS provider to offer this capability using a custom DNS record type", a claim that wasn't backed up by any source.  Considering that the creating account has only ever edited this particular article, it is highly likely to be WP:PROMO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology ,  and Internet .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 15:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete GNG not met - the only independent reference in the article is that Dave Winer mentioned it once on his blog.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 23:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Josh Warren : I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:ACTOR .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 09:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and United States of America .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 09:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: No major roles in films and couldn't find anything.  Southati ( talk ) 13:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Doesn't pass WP:ACTOR .  No significat coverage found.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 18:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jessica Barton : I can find some coverage, mostly from a publication called Dragzine which isn't used much on Wikipedia and I don't know the reliability of it.  Doesn't seem like much of use beyond that.  Acting career is small time, doesn't seem like there's anything to go on there.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 22:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Motorsport ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 22:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This subject does not appear to meet notability standards.  Very little coverage online, minor acting career, etc.  Agreed with flag above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.134.244.122 ( talk ) 00:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Very obviously non-notable subject, no claim to significance and no corresponding sources.  5225 C ( talk • contributions ) 03:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – as per above.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 20:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:BLP with zero WP:RS .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:BLP .  No notable coverage.  No WP:RS .  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 13:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  It's also an unverified WP:BLP article.  4meter4 ( talk ) 19:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per above, lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
West Indian pound : It seems like this was a thing, however it is hard to see how this could be expanded with more information (for example more history, which territories etc).  It would be great if there was significant sources discussing this topic in detail but even looking for mentions to WP:V basic facts is difficult.  A redirect would be preferable, but I'm not seeing a target.  JMWt ( talk ) 13:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 13:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Caribbean and Trinidad and Tobago .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sputnikmusic : Fails to be notable.  All the included sources are minor passing mentions.  Ca talk to me!  10:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Ca talk to me!  10:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As mentioned in the nomination, there isn't any in-depth coverage in any high quality sources that I could find.  It should be noted that Sputnikmusic is sometimes used as a source for critic reviews, for example in this paper .  Of course, that does not constitute SIGCOV, and it's more so a matter for WP:RSN or WP:NPPSG .  There is an argument to be made that this Metacritic profile of Sputnikmusic is in-depth, but it's unclear who wrote or published it ( WP:UGC ), and it only provides data , not analysis – ergo, not sigcov.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 17:06, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  13:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  WP:BEFORE comes up empty on reliable independent sources.  Qwaiiplayer ( talk ) 14:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Moxie Software : Annoyingly the company appears to have changed its name several times (previously BSG Alliance and nGenera), so an AfD rather than a PROD just to make sure I'm not missing anything.  Best sources I could find: [14] [15] [16] ... "not great" would be an understatement.  – Tera tix ₵ 07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software , California ,  and Texas .  – Tera tix ₵ 07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 20:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International Hobo : I was not able to find any reliable source covering it beyond pass-by mentions in interviews.  OceanHok ( talk ) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies .  OceanHok ( talk ) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unable to find anything like a suitable source to prove notability, and there are none among the feeble refs in the article.  The thing looks like a confection worked up by a paid editor or employee of the company, all fluff and no substance.  Way WP:TOOSOON for an article.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 13:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't see how it passes WP:CORPDEPTH .  Largely a support studio rather than a primary one more likely to get coverage.  Sergecross73 msg me 13:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hur Yoon-seo : 15:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete