hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sergio Torrens : The most I found were three-ish sentences of independent coverage here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Conton family (Sierra Leone) : In this article, only one of the family members is associated with some reliable sources.  Sources about notable people that mention their family do not show that the family itself is notable.  The existence of the article implies some original research or synthesis.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 08:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Africa , France , Caribbean ,  and Barbados .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: Message left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sierra Leone informing them of this AfD -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 03:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I only know what this article tells me, and it's not much.  Maybe they are notable somehow, but neither the article nor the sources listed make the case.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 15:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Siviwe Mpondo : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Article was previously nominated in a WP:BUNDLE , which was closed as a procedural keep.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 13:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, no evidence of notability.  Fails to meet any of WP:SIGCOV , WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG .  Contributor892z ( talk ) 19:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom as non-notable Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samuel Leach (trader) : In a WP:BEFORE search all I can find is a ton of self-promotional interviews and obvious paid placement, including deprecated sources like WP:THESUN and WP:DAILYEXPRESS , but also the cited "contributor" article from WP:FORBESCON , and the Bangkok Post interview cited here which is at least clearly marked as PR.  His charity work has only routine local newspaper coverage.  The rest is passing mentions such as the Reuters and Huffpost articles cited about him joining charity fundraisers, articles written by him, and unreliable sources like news blogs.  Speedy deleted G11 once at Samuel leach (created by same editor), and this one is borderline.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 11:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Finance ,  and England .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 11:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have noticed a fair amount of organic coverage on this individual: https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/22143690/i-once-shared-one-room-with-my-dad/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/eladnatanson/2023/09/21/the-rise-of-the-smartphone-trader-experts-on-the-future-of-investment-apps/ https://www.express.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/1763562/fire-movement-early-retirement https://www.manxradio.com/podcasts/manx-newscast/episode/in-conversation-with-celebrated-entrepreneur-samuel-leach/ https://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/entrepreneur-has-big-plans-for-the-island-591649 https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/money/saving-and-banking/fire-savers-regret-save-salary-wife-leave-me-2300748 https://techround.co.uk/interviews/a-chat-with-samuel-leach-samuel-co-trading/ I got bored of pasting more, but there is a lot of coverage on this notable individual.  Autocorrectgods ( talk ) 13:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Those are in unreliable sources (The Sun), Forbes is a contributor piece, so also not notable.  Rest are promotional or PR items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is typical [26] , PR-ish coverage.  Nothing for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-Notable, almost all references are blog types (Interviews, promotional content, trading services).  Kkb091 ( talk ) 11:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have semi'ed this to avoid disruption pending the SPI.  Star Mississippi 02:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Created by a sock of User:Abbasshaikh124 but enough other editors have worked on the article that I don't think it is eligible for CSD G5.  L iz Read!  Talk!  04:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Coverage consists of profiles and non-independent/insignificant coverage.  Does not meet WP:NBIO .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  13:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sack on Alicante (1582) : Sources in article and found in before are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Source eval: Comments Source Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details  1.  The Conversos and Moriscos in Late Medieval Spain and Beyond: Volume  2. The Morisco Issue.  BRILL.  2012-06-22.  ISBN 978-90-04-22860-3.  Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details  2. ^ Haedo, Diego de; Haëdo, Diego de (1881).  Histoire des rois d'Alger (in French).  A. Jourdan.  Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details  3. ^ Friedman, Ellen G. (1983).  Spanish Captives in North Africa in the Early Modern Age.  University of Wisconsin Press.  ISBN 978-0-299-09380-8.  Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details  4. ^ Collado, Manuel Danvila y (1889).  La expulsión de los moriscos españoles: conferencias pronunciadas en el Ateneo de Madrid (in Spanish).  Librería de Fernando Fé.  No objection to a consensus merge or redirect, nothing here merits a stand alone article.  // Timothy :: talk 09:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Spain .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of in depth coverage in any sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 15:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bob Thomas (Irish footballer) : The single reference is a match programme, which fails WP:SIGCOV .  Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ireland .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and WP:SPORTBASIC .  The absolute minimum criteria of SPORTSBASIC is that "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources".  That is not met.  Nor, in my own BEFORE searches, can I find anything other than trivial passing mentions in fan blogs (like this scarcely fleeting mention ).  There's nothing to expand the article beyond the sub-stub we have (or support even basic biographical details like DOB, death, etc).  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A pretty common type of article, a sportsbio with references to either match programs or databases.  From my searches, I could not find anything that comes close to SIGCOV.  ULPS ( talk • contribs ) 03:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Probable keep I think it's highly probable this is an important historic figure in Irish football.  I found one source, although it is The Sun!  [18] , But winning all those honours means something.  I believe this is all about digging deep and finding those offline sources.  He clearly seems an important figure with two clubs of Bohemian F.C. and Shelbourne F.C. ,  I did also have a dig at google.  But it's a tough one for sure.  But if this is deleted then this is really sad for wikipedia.  Govvy ( talk ) 15:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Business suite : Chidgk1 ( talk ) 18:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unsourced and heavy on jargon, and it's hard to find sources that aren't talking about office space.   Would be willing to reconsider if someone could find RS discussing this topic as presented in the article.  WP:TNT at the very least.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject completely lacks sources as described, and as such this fails WP:GNG as written.  User:Let'srun 01:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This isn't my domain but the topic and scope seems identical to Enterprise resource planning .  I'm assuming the title is riffing on common product names like SAP Business Suite and Oracle E-Business Suite .  I don't see content worth merging anywhere.  DFlhb ( talk ) 21:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Steak (youtuber) : May have qualified for CSD A7 (no indication of importance) except the YT channel has 184k subs and might satisfy that requirement on its own, however I am not finding suitable coverage for inclusion.  ASUKITE 23:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Video games , Internet , United States of America ,  and Utah .  ASUKITE 23:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found for this youtube person, only hits to videos of people cooking steaks.  Nothing in RS or anywhere.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no reliable sources and less than 200k subscribers, which is fairly unremarkable for gaming youtubers.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 02:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is not a single piece of SIGCOV on this guy.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 14:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 18:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm hungry per above.  Er, I mean, delete.  SWinxy ( talk ) 15:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:20, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barry Gough (businessman) : Paid editor created an article for this businessman and his company, Memento Exclusives , which will also be sent to AfD shortly.  In the case of Barry Gough, the sourcing does not support notability under WP:GNG and WP:NBIO .  Sources are almost exclusively WP:PRIMARYSOURCE or WP:TRIVIALMENTION .  For example, the Mirror piece solely interviews the subject, and the Times article is an as-told-to WP:INTERVIEW .  Other sources, in-article and in BEFORE search, are similar.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering , Motorsport ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strongest delete - Rich guy paid a few outlets to interview him, then paid a Wikipedia editor to compile those interviews.  Barely ambiguous enough that G11 probably wouldn't work, but barely.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Paid articles don't establish notability.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 04:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PR published source and unreliable sources.  The company doesn't meet WP:ORGCRIT .  In TOTAL, a promotional article that doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dar El Agha Mosque : Kadı Message 17:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Islam ,  and Tunisia .  Kadı Message 17:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It'd be great if someone could at least try to verify this.  I have trouble searching in Arabic.  SportingFlyer T · C 22:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] {{vd}} THe only source is a book from 1939 and I can't see reliable and independent sources to meet the notability guidelines. -- Nanahuatl ( talk ) 04:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pedro Batista : My searches only yielded social media, stats sites and mentions on Blogspot.  I couldn't find anything that would count towards WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO. No sources and a primary EL and stat page. BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article are 404, and stats.  BEFORE showed stats, mentions in game articles, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 13:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Noting for the record that this is a duplicate ! vote.  Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 22:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2015 SPA Cup : Similar AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPA Cup (2nd nomination) LibStar ( talk ) 23:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Cricket ,  and Nepal .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails to pass general notability guidelines as well as with the lack of significant coverage in any reliable and independent sources to the subject Fade258 ( talk ) 13:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , coverage for the main tournament is incredibly limited, let alone for a season article.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The parent tournament isn't even notable, this single season of it definitely isn't.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  AA ( talk ) 19:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vendolite : zoglophie •talk• 19:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  zoglophie •talk• 19:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  One source on the whole page that talks about complaint of vending machine.  No significant coverage.  Fails notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 23:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails gng Ben Azura ( talk ) 01:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zero Deposit : Reads as advertisement.  Does not meet notability Thelisteninghand ( talk ) 21:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 17 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 21:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The page is created by someone.  10 days later, an IP from India adds significantly more content.  An IP that hasn't edited since.  Way too fishy.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 11:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just adding a note that we don't even have a page for its parent company.  Spam.  Thelisteninghand ( talk ) 22:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chad–Spain relations : No embassies, no state visits in over 40 years of relations.  Most of the cooperation happens in multilateral contexts.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 15:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa ,  and Spain .  LibStar ( talk ) 15:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Yet another example of a standalone article being created for every combination of two nations, no matter how insignificant their connexion may be.  The subject is not encyclopaedic, the sources presented are all WP:PRIMARY (government press), and there is no secondary analysis, depth or other indication of notability.  I can find no scholarly treatment of this relationship nor mentions in reputable journals.  Merging to one or both countries' articles might be possible, but I can find no info particularly worth merging and no sourcing on which to base such a merge.  Redir begs the question of which country to redirect towards (and do we really expect this as a search string?).  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 13:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No indication of meeting WP:N .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gee-Haw Stables : SL93 ( talk ) 01:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  SL93 ( talk ) 01:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  SL93 ( talk ) 01:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom Mr Vili talk 06:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete