hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Meowth's Party: UtherSRG (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - There's this dedicated IGN source is currently in the article but im not finding much else yet.  This Nintendo World Report source was cited in the first AFD but that it doesn't say that much and kind of feels more like a collection of notes on "what will Pokemon look like on Gamecube" than significant coverage on the subject.  Sergecross73 msg me 17:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge.  The song (which appears to be the real topic of the article) charted nationally on Oricon for 13 weeks , which suggests this passes WP:NSINGLE .  A WP:BEFORE performed in Japanese should always consider Oricon when applicable.  As usual, most media coverage about Japanese music for the 1990s has always been offline.  However, I think information on the song could be merged directly to Meowth if necessary.  Dekimasu よ!  01:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per SIGCOV in here , here / here , and here .  This mention in EGM seals the deal for me that it's notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 02:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  per ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ.  It meets WP:GNG and NSINGLE, so that pretty much seals the deal for me.  – MJL ‐ Talk ‐ ☖ 03:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I just realized I copied the phrase seals the deal for me from zx.  That's awkward.  – MJL ‐ Talk ‐ ☖ 16:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep or merge the aforementioned IGN article is really good.  Other than that, what ZX provided is pretty much partial coverage or routine mentions.  Otherwise this could be merged to Meowth .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 05:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  I generally consider IGN a reasonably reliable source, and they wrote about this song twice.  Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 23:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep https://www.ign.com/articles/2000/08/24/meowths-party-impressions-and-shots https://screenrant.com/pokemon-canceled-games-fans-unknown-unaware/#meowth-s-party https://gaming.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/cancelled-canon-10-cancelled-pokmon-games/86669972/ D r e a m Focus 18:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Third source is unreliable: [4] .  Though it's still likely to be kept.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 21:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Paulo Carvalho (rower): Searches in gnews only yields namesakes.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Uruguay .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 11:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 22:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Just a note that there was a recent AfD for a rower that turned up SIGCOV in Spanish language, for a rower.  Perhaps User:TheCatalyst31 can check.  — siro χ o 01:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately, I don't have access to any older Spanish-language sources, and internet-based news sites aren't likely to have much on an athlete from the mid-twentieth century.  TheCatalyst31 Reaction • Creation 01:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No worries!  Appreciate your work on the other AfD.  — siro χ o 02:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , he medaled in two competitions at the 1959 Pan American Games (bronze in single-scull, silver in double).  While NSPORTS has no rowing-specific criteria, several other sport criteria provide either specifically for Pan-American medalists or generally for medalists in "elite international" competitions.  In view of that, it seems reasonable to grant a Pan-Am medalist in rowing a presumption of notability.  The antiquity of these competitions is likely making it artificially difficult to find sources.  But given that his name comes up quite a bit in US coverage of the games, I have a hard time imagining that SIGCOV doesn't exist in Uruguayan sources.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 00:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Visviva made a compelling case for keep.  It would be great if someone could add this information to the article.  gidonb ( talk ) 00:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and possibly add Visviva's findings to the article.  CycloneYoris talk!  01:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Sitara (actress): I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per WP:NACTOR .  The subject appeared in the lead cast of several notable films like Direct Hawaldar (1985 Nigar Award winner film), Dulari (won 6 Nigar Awards including the best Punjabi film for the year 1987 [12] ), Silsila (1987), Janbaaz (a successful 1987 film [13] ), and others.  Given a career in the pre-internet era, it is reasonable to assume that satisfactory offline coverage likely exists for them.  Insight 3 ( talk ) 04:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Insight 3.  Satisfies #1 of WP:NACTOR .  I agree – we can find offline in-depth coverage about her whenever archives (especially from newspaper like Dawn ) become online.  BookishReader ( talk ) 17:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note I've checkuser-blocked the nominator for socking. -- Ponyo bons mots 20:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Rehan Zaib Khan: There is no justification to create a separate article for this candidate.  HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 16:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose - notable and has sufficient media coverage Abo Yemen ✉ 08:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not an expert in Pakistani politics, but I would suggest that we either keep this article or have one on the assassination itself (which this could be moved to).  Alternatively, we could have an article for the 2024 election to the NA-8 Bajaur seat.  We should have at least one of these, and this article is currently the only one that exists, so it should not be deleted until a viable merge target exists.  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 19:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep/Rewrite article to be about his assassination : The assassination of a political candidate during an election campaign smells pretty darn notable to me, and the variety of sources on the topic probably agree with this.  However, it's fair to conclude that he's rather non-notable besides 'getting assassinated', so it could be worth rewriting the article to focus on that rather notable topic instead ( Assassination of Rehan Zaib Khan or something).  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 00:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep assassination of politcal candidates anywhere in the world will be a notable event in and of itself.  Discussion of appropriate name for the article can continue on the talk page.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 06:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep should likely be rescoped to focus on the assassination and nota full biography but this is a fine starting point and deletion is not required.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Safdar Tawakoli: Fails WP:NSINGER .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Afghanistan .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I enjoyed listening to his music, though.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 01:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep seems extremely likely to meet GNG and possibly WP:MUSICBIO .7  English sources are somewhat spare.  Here's a passing reference in english [2] .  Here's a possible source [3] .   There's a lot of hits in other languages: [4] [5] — siro χ o 05:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - sources like https://www.bbc.com/persian/afghanistan/story/2006/07/060731_ag-studio7-tavakoli and http://afghannews.af/%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%87-%D9%88-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B3%DB%8C%D9%82%DB%8C-%D9%BE%D8%B4%D8%AA%D9%88-%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B1%D9%81%DB%8C-%D8%B4%D8%AF%D9%86%D8%AF seem to indicate some notability.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 20:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Siroxo and Indefensible above as meeting both NBASIC and MUSICBIO.  It would be a bit surprising IMO if an Afghan singer with organic coverage on the FA, PNB and UR Wikipedias could not pass NBASIC.  It would be even more surprising if a singer recognized by the government as the "sultan of dambura" and who was the subject of a two-day music festival at which his statue was unveiled did not meet MUSICBIO point 7 as a one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style .  (At least, I don't think there's any question that Hazara folk music is a notable topic, even if we don't currently do a good job of covering it.)  In any event the BBC festival link I posted and the AfghanNews link Indefensible posted above would seem to meet the NBASIC requirement of significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject .  And given that I don't think either of us have much skill in searching in the local languages, I would venture that there are likely to be considerably more sources out there.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 00:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Covenant House Toronto: Should be removed (W:NCORPT) Linkusyr ( talk ) 14:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Canada .  AllyD ( talk ) 16:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There are already a few independent sources used as references.  A ProQuest search yields numerous potential sources (including many from its founding in 1982 to the end of 1999), and various newspapers have numerous articles specifically about it; for example, at the Toronto Star , there are: A bright and bulletproof home for former sex slaves: Porter The Big Debate: Did Covenant House’s anti-trafficking campaign miss the mark?  Sex trafficking victims to get special Toronto housing Sleeping rough for Covenant House: Jeanne Beker ‘There’s no plan at this point’: Toronto youth shelter raises alarm about feared April closure Burlington kids organize sleep out to raise money for Covenant House Covenant House launches campaign to spot signs of sex trafficking Suzanne Rogers has sleepless night during “sleep out” for Covenant House Suzanne Rogers to ‘sleep out’ for Covenant House kids There are probably many others.  I have also found a few potential book and scholarly sources from a cursory web search.  Mind matrix 17:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've struck a few of the above potential refs, as I cannot access the full articles and cannot determine if these are for the Toronto location or the parent organization, but they may still be useful refs.  Mind matrix 17:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Multiple Toronto Star and CBC articles establish notability per NCORP.  Owen× ☎ 19:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Per the numerous sources found, it's ok.  It's one of the most recognized social organizations in Toronto.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Easily passes WP:NCORP .  Macbeejack ( talk ) 08:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per above.  -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Margaret Adamson: Appears to fail WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 20:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations , Cambodia , Pakistan , Poland ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article was very stub-y so I did some work filling it out using the references that were there.  Someone with better access to Australian sources can probably improve this even more.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : A high office multiple diplomat professionally is notable.  I disagree this doesn't meets WP:GNG as the nominator said.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  09:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:HEY .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I don't see anything resembling a HEY.  Only two sentences has been added .  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Brandenburger: CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  listed in the International Encyclopedia of Horse Breeds [68] , and described in Horses of the World [69] , and Wissenswertes über Pferde [70] , which notes, as French Wikipedia does, that the breed merged into the regionalized Deutsches Sportpferd, apparently in 2003, which is why you're not finding a current breed club or stud book, but notability is not temporary, and we don't have a Deutsches Sportpferd article yet anyways to use as a merge target. -- Jahaza ( talk ) 04:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Currently most of the article had to be removed due to a copyright violation.  Are you familiar enough with horse breeds to be able to rewrite the article based on reliable soures?  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 18:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In light of that I'll change my stance to neutral although the article is in a semi-incomplete status due to the copyright violation.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 07:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , clearly notable even if now merged into another entity, the Deutsches Reitpferd .  I've rewritten the page with ten solid sources  after removing the foundational copyvio.  A further nine links listed on the talk-page in 2008 seem to be fairly comprehensively dead.  There are mentions (at least) in older sources such as this and this , but I can only get snippets so not enough to add them to the article.  Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 23:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Changing my stance to keep but I'd like for this to have a consensus reached before closing it.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 23:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, Traumnovelle !  You can if you wish withdraw this, or indeed close it yourself – please see here .  Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 10:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd rather have it closed with a clear consensus for the record, although if it's better to withdraw I will do so.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 17:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Girl Next Door (anime): Search results for both the anime and eroge show a bunch of anime with similar names but not exactly this one, except for Anime News Network's encyclopedia.  Fails notability.  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 10:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Anime and manga .  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 10:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I searched for: "Girl Next Door" "anime" -demon and didn't find anything.   Searching for "Girl Next Door" "eroge" showed nothing either.  D r e a m Focus 12:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Nominator didn't bother to look at the talk page where you can see a bunch of reviews listed, all reliable sources per WP:A&M/ORS .  2 reviews by Mania.com (former AnimeOnDVD): [25] , [26] , review by THEM Anime Reviews , review by Animefringe , paragraph in an article by ANN .  ANN is not SIGCOV but the other sites' coverage is enough to meet WP:GNG .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 12:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I didn't, sorry, because there's no hint at all that there's something in the talk page. Neocorelight ( Talk ) 13:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:BEFORE says to check the talk page before nominating. Also when you're editing the article and the talk page has a "refideas" template, at the top of the page there's a note that reads: "There are suggestions on this article's talk page for references that may be useful when improving this article in the future." -- Mika1h ( talk ) 13:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also might note that although the Hentai Jump is an unreliable source, the review is by Mike Toole, who later wrote for Anime News Network: [27] .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 13:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep ; based on the sources provided by Mika1h, this clearly meets WP:GNG since at least the Mania and THEM sources are reliable and significant coverage.  Link20XX ( talk ) 14:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Reliable sources found giving it significant coverage.  D r e a m Focus 14:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers: I did a search for news sources about the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, and couldn't find a single one that wasn't either a tabloid article, only mentioned the society tangentially, or both.  The society doesn't seem to be independently notable.  Cortador ( talk ) 11:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Organizations , Politics ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep there are numerous sources on JSTOR.  See here for one example. -- User:Namiba 14:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] " Socialist Lawyer is the magazine of the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers" - it's another primary source.  Cortador ( talk ) 19:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Certainly meets WP:GNG .  Very well-known and notable society.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability needs to be backed up by something. Just stating that something isn't notable won't do. Cortador ( talk ) 19:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That would be GNG. Didn't you notice that? -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - neither the Society's website nor its magazine are independent of the subject.  Didn't you notice that?  Cortador ( talk ) 15:17, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Satisfies GNG.  The society has received significant coverage in books and periodical articles in GBooks and GScholar.  This would be an example from GBooks.  If a society was formed in 1930, you have to look at history books and periodicals, and at historic periodicals and books.  It is not enough to just look at recent news sources.  James500 ( talk ) 02:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Very visible within English legal circles, more than adequate sourcing to satisfy the GNG, eg active in the abolition of the death penalty in the UK (see Politics of the Rope (Arena Books, 2012), pp 90-91 ) or more recently their rejection of the current Labour Leader .  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 03:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep