Christian Credit Union: No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Sources are just a couple routine local notices plus coverage on a couple criminal charges against associated individuals North8000 ( talk ) 20:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks, North8000 .  I think the Christian Credit Union in Edmonton probably meets notability; however this is not well demonstrated in the current stub.  I think the bank will meet notability because of its strong cultural connection to Edmonton's Dutch community.  It is where the vast majority of Edmonton's Dutch community has banked for almost 75 years and the bank has hosted and sponsored a range of cultural events in the city.  I am happy to continue working on it in Mainspace, or someone can move it back to draftspace where I will attempt to demonstrate this.  Tracklan2 ( talk ) 02:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Tracklan2 : Cool.   From a Wikip[edia standpoint that requires finding and including an independent (of the credit union) source or 2 that covers them in depth.   For example, a Dutch community source that does that.   If you could do that in 1-2 weeks we could settle this right here as a "keep".    Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 03:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, I just expanded the article a bit and added a handful of citations Tracklan2 ( talk ) 18:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - that's a lot of references over decades - including National - here's a better link for the National Post article, for Wikipedia editors.  Nfitz ( talk ) 16:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Am I allowed to vote keep even though I'm the one who wrote it?  The Christian Courier articles from 2002 are independent of the bank and discuss its history and mission/vision in depth.  I agree with Nfitz that the national coverage and ongoing coverage across decades and publications is significant.  Tracklan2 ( talk ) 4:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Yes, you are allowed.   (although we don't call it a vote  :-) ) North8000 ( talk ) 17:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  I'd be interested in hearing the opinion of the nominator on whether recent additions assuage their concerns.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep/withdraw Creator has made many source additions including a rock-solid-GNG source (which looks like it was hard to find).    Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 13:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep