hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Abuzar Ghaznawi : iMahesh ( talk ) 09:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Afghanistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO in its current state.  A draft for this already exists ( Draft:Abuzar Ghaznawi ), so we should delete this premature creation.  I would also recommend informing article creator work on the draft until notability is established.  Scientia potentia est , Monarch OfTerror 09:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sourcing is weak.  Shankargb ( talk ) 15:30, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mamokgaase Senyatsi : WP:SPORTBASIC is very clear when stating that routine coverage in match reports is not enough for an article.  I found Idiski Times and Thami Soccer which are just more examples of trivial coverage from match reports.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and South Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as notability tagger.  I guess this is closer to fancruft than to a topic that gets significant in-depth coverage.  Geschichte ( talk ) 19:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article seems like it might be about a lesser-known footballer.  It might be better suited for sources that go beyond fan commentary.  Waqar 💬 17:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Myong Song-chol : Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is this the same Myong Song-chol that was elected to the parliament ?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG and it doesn't seem possible to find out if the athlete has a relevant career in local politics.  Svartner ( talk ) 03:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Not enough international appears to make up for lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International air travel from the United Kingdom : Data is from 2008, whole article does not feature a single source for the destinations displayed nor the passenger numbers and percentage changes.  Hasn`t seen a content edit for almost 15 years now.
 Research does not show any reliable sources which would help to update the page.  Der HON ( talk ) 13:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE exactly the sort of list-cruft article that starts out as a good idea but then gets forgotten.  There is no way that this article will ever be updated annually.  Plus it's all WP:OR and it's unreferenced and has very likely been pulled together by someone looking at other sources and collating in a spreadsheet WP:SYNTH .  Wikipedia better off without this sort of article.  10mmsocket ( talk ) 14:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete OR that died about a decade ago when the person gave up on it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Over a decade old.  Just doesn't seem likely it will improved to the state it needs to be.  - Imcdc Contact 14:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:SYNTH that consists of outdated WP:OR .  I am not opposed to redirecting to a target such as Air transport in the United Kingdom as a WP:ATD .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 17:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dream Station Productions : The coverage seem to be inadequate per WP:SIRS, and this page is PROMO.  I strongly smell UPE.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The nominator is biased and running some personal vendetta.  Hence, the page should be kept.  I'm more than welcome to make any changes as deemed necessary.  Aanuarif ( talk ) 10:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi Saqib, The page was approved by the admins when it was created in 2019 I guess.  I don't know why you are making it a personal issue.  I suggest to strongly keep.  The sources are independent.  Aanuarif ( talk ) 10:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Aanuarif , Aanuarif , Just because a page was approved in the past doesn't mean it can't be nominated for deletion now.  I'm curious which admin approved it?  I would like to ask them what basis they used.  The problem isn't just whether the coverage is independent or not, but it's pretty clear they don't meet the WP:SIRS.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No @ Saqib , that's what you believe.  Aanuarif ( talk ) 10:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Music .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I cannot see how the sources in the article meet WP:NCORP .  I agree with the nominator that this has strong whiffs of UPE about it.  Can anyone wishing to advocate for keeping the article please share the best three links that they believe have " significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject "?  Daniel ( talk ) 02:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agreed with nom.  Article style is highly promotional to make it look notable when it's actually not.  Haruka Amaranth 14:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prafulla Moharkar : microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 21:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and India .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 21:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL .  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Four or five articles in RS published after his demise, but I'm not sure his military career was very notable.  Soldiers will sometimes pass away on duty, not all will be notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Korihor : Outside of being a named character in the book of mormon, there doesn't seem to be any independent reliable sources interested in him Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 16:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Christianity ,  and Latter Day Saints .  Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 16:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not seeing significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  Horse Eye's Back ( talk ) 17:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bryttania : In a WP:BEFORE search I could find only routine local coverage and passing mentions in gig listings.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Scotland .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've had a brief search but I'm not seeing any media coverage beyond local press, and no significant claims- so there is nothing so far that might help them satisfy WP:BAND .  Drchriswilliams ( talk ) 20:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - At the moment they do not seem to have more than local coverage, so I do not think they have the level of notability required for an article.  Dunarc ( talk ) 23:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no evidence of notability in the article.  InDimensional ( talk ) 16:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Philip J. Williams : The article currently does not meet the Wikipedia's criteria for verifiability and notability .  -- Muchasz ( talk ) 17:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural note.  This nomination was not logged at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 21 .  I have done that.  — C.Fred ( talk ) 17:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Greece ,  and Michigan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Entirely copied from The Political Graveyard , which is not considered reliable as a source.  Find no other mention of him across the internet.  — Maile ( talk ) 19:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing about this person found, it hits on articles about Trump for some reason.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Looks like just a commemoration piece for (and from) a family member, created by an WP:SPA .  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 21:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Awthaw (25°16'0"N 95°'13"E) : Only source on English wiki does not show the village anymore.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 19:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions .  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The name of the village is also listed in a Region Map from MIMU (May 2023 edition).  Ninja ✮ Strikers « ☎ » 04:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, thanks for that source, I see this Awthaw there- unfortunately maps do not demonstrate notability still (WP:NGEO).  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 13:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete this and, well, seemingly every other Burmese populated place stub.  Those which I looked at were all sourced to GMaps and Bing Maps, or Maplandia, none of which is remotely a reliable source.  We have nothing here which would satisfy even the current bad version of WP:GEOLAND , much less GNG.  Mangoe ( talk ) 23:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - just because it's on Google maps and in one (unreliable) gazette,  a place is not automatically notable.  This appears to be a very small village that is perhaps abandoned, which I have long considered to be not notable .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Picky Talarico : There is only one reference cited in the article, and it only verifies that Talarico was nominated for a Latin Grammy in 2005 (he's only mentioned once in that press release).  On the Latin Recording Academy's website the other Latin Grammy nomination can be verified .  The most significant amount of coverage I found was this 2010 article in Tablet magazine – it's not specifically about Talarico, however.  There's also this 2020 interview with Diario Hoy , but interviews don't establish notability.  Talarico is briefly mentioned plenty of times elsewhere, but that's all they are – mentions.  toweli ( talk ) 11:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and Argentina .  toweli ( talk ) 11:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nassim Nasr : A quick source analysis: Source 1 and 2 are WP:INTERVIEWS and thus primary sources.  Source 4 is an official corporate bio and thus also a primary source.  Source 5 is a paid press release.  Source 6 is a gallery website and thus a primary source.  Sources 7 , 8 and 9 are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs that do not provide WP:SIGCOV .  Sources 10 and 11 appear to provide significant coverage, but it is actually marketing material.  The publisher--Artoze-- describes itself as an "International Online Art Gallery ... We excel in creating strategic art events to boost the visibility of the brands helping them gain more footfall and catalyzing the business growth."  This is a marketing platform, not a reliable and independent source.  The final source left is 3 , Slimi Magazine, whose independence is uncertain.  (Other articles seem to be directly provided by the artists profiled.)  Even if Slimi works for GNG, more secondary, reliable, independent sources are needed.  There in particular appears to be no independent, secondary sourcing for the claims about Nasr's artistic style and approach.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 21:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Lebanon .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  The claim of pioneering "Expressive Color Minimalism" doesn't mean anything, because Expressive Color Minimalism is a made-up term.  Diverging from the conventional gallery system, Nasr donates many of his works to schools and charitable causes.  with a reference to a local arts listing.  Fails WP:ARTIST -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clare Kenny : This article was created in 2009 with no references, and was tagged as having no references until 2011, when one reference was added, which is still the only reference, so now the article is tagged as needing additional references.   The one reference is a book, and Google Books shows the applicable page, which is a passing mention.   After fourteen years, only one reference has been found.   As it is, she is a run-of-the-mill professional musician.   The Heymann criterion will be to find at least two (preferably three) good-quality references in seven days.  Draftify as nominator to provide six months for good-quality references to be found.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 00:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Music ,  and England .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 00:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : or Draftify.  The only coverage I've been able to find are passing mentions similar to "Kenny played the bass on this album" in articles about other things, without any significant coverage of Kenny herself.  ThadeusOfNazereth (he/him) Talk to Me!  00:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The page seems to be WP:1R and not able to find much WP:RS for WP:SIGCOV Pranesh Ravikumar ( talk ) 03:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  An article that's been tagged since 2011 has had time enough for ads to find refs.  128.252.154.2 ( talk ) 20:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NMUSIC and WP:NOTINHERITED .  Article is literally nothing but an unsourced list of musicians with zero content about the subject herself.  After fourteen years of it being in this state, draftifying is definitely out of the question.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 21:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Card enclosure : Might it be a US term?  If so it would be good if an American could add a cite Chidgk1 ( talk ) 18:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] i am an american and have never heard this term PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 18:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's called a "wallet" in Canada, rfid blocking or not.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:06, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No mentions of the term found, RFID blocking wallets are a thing, not sure where this term comes from.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:06, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I also have never heard of such a thing and was unable to find any sources, apart from RFID blocking wallets as mentioned above (which are called...wallets, as far as I know).  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article is largely unchanged from its creation in 2006, and searches for "card enclosure" or even "card case," in quotes, mostly turn up wallets.  I'm not convinced such things are common - though they do exist, and I have one - or that there's enough coverage to warrant an article.  Moonreach ( talk ) 19:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete