hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dedert Corporation: likely not notable, written promotionally being the big 2 Clone commando sev ( talk ) 02:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  Was deleted G11'd a week ago, see User talk:RazaqDesigner#May 2023 2 .  // Timothy :: talk 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So this AFD might deserve a speedy delete then?  Clone commando sev ( talk ) 05:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] AfD seemed a more permanent solution.  If it returns it can then be G4'd and salted.  No objection if it SNOWs to delete.  // Timothy :: talk 05:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : promo-only sources.  Lokys dar Vienas ( talk ) 03:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Article is being edited and advertising content have been removed and tonned down.  Thanks to everyone who's been contributing to this work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RazaqDesigner ( talk • contribs ) 09:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't see any independent sourcing, just company-submitted profiles, press releases, and press release churnalism.  - MrOllie ( talk ) 14:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ MrOllie The article about Dedert Corporation has been toned down.  You might want to take another look and close the discussion.  Cheers.  RazaqDesigner ( talk ) 18:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Of the 16 sources cited, most are primary/press releases (dedert, pharmaceuticalonline, anugafoodtec, just-food, powderbuilsolids, manufacturing, thomasnet, bignewsnetwork).  The yahoo one is a press release for marketsandmarkets which I can't verify, but is only supporting that they have a 10,000sqft testing facility in Chicago, which frankly sounds pretty trivial.  fortunebusinessinsights is likely just a scraper sector review of public/PR materials - not a great reputation for that firm.  The only one that seems independent is the foodnavigator-usa piece, which is again pretty cursory.  A secondary search turns up surprisingly few sources, and almost all are SEO/paid placement.  It's not over-the-top spam like the previously deleted version of the article - I just don't see anything that would support WP:CORP .  Sam Kuru (talk) Delete per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rob E. Gregory Jr.: Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  4/6 souces are obits, the other two are routine mill business news.  There is history on the author's talk page [31] to eval.  // Timothy :: talk 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Law ,  and South Carolina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources cited in the article do not meet GNG.  [32] is an obit from an institution where the article subject was on the board of trustees, and is thus not Independent .  [2] is not an reliable source because we don't know if the South Carolina General Assembly conducted any fact-checking.  [33] and [34] are routine announcements in trade publications .  [35] appears to be a paid and/or family-written obit.  Additional sources I've found via TWL and google are similar.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 04:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing is here to show this subject meets the WP:N .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Goldberg Weisman Cairo: The article's sources are not WP:SIGCOV , as they are primarily about the cases themselves, not the law firm.  DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 07:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Companies ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Very clearly an advertisement.  Notability not justified.  Dan Leonard ( talk ) 01:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete : Have nothing else to add.  Pitiful excuse of a page.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 12:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James L. Pharr: None of the provided citations assert any notability.  Much of the article is unsubstantiated and uncited Vertigo Acid ( talk ) 08:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and North Carolina .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 08:56, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete could not find any additional sources using standard searches.   Nothing in the article suggests notability under as an academic or author.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 01:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wish Way: It does not cite any sources and I could not find SIGCOV.  Jontesta ( talk ) 21:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a minor plot point; the article is only sourced (implicitly) to the Oz books themselves.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Literature .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Completely unsourced article on extremely minor fictional element.  Searches turned up nearly nothing on the fictional concept, and the article name would not serve as a particularly useful Redirect anywhere.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 05:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samson Oladeji Akande: Sources in article and found in BEFORE do not have WP:SIRS.  // Timothy :: talk 01:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Nigeria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Abysmal sourcing and hagiographic.  Does nothing to demonstrate notability as Wikipedia defines it.  AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rainbow-collar worker: The terms appears to be more of a title hook than an actual defined concept, and a quick WP:BEFORE couldn't bring up any other article using that term.  Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 22:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The cited article is just using this phrase as a title hook.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 18:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't appear to be a term with significant coverage from multiple reliable sources to meet the WP:GNG .  Unless better sourcing is provided, this should be deleted, as while reliable the only source is not WP:SIGCOV of the topic Let'srun ( talk ) 19:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sole source cited seems to be the (legit) journal article in which the author coins the term, but not every neat and interesting turn of phrase catches on as part of the English language, and not everything that catches on as part of the English language is notable.  Language changes over time; we can always draft a new article if "rainbow-collar worker" becomes a thing.  The only non WP:CIRCULAR source I could find on this term is this dictionary entry, which cites a different meaning for "rainbow-collar worker": [1] Darkfrog24 ( talk ) 19:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha': nov.  ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race ( talk ・ contribs ) 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per linked AfD - these species are essentially taxonomic phantoms that can never be nailed down now that they are extinct.  No basis for an article.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 16:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is a sufficient reference.  See also the references in https://recentlyextinctspecies.com/fishes/aplocheilichthys-sp-nov-naivasha Hanssens, M. (2004a).  Aplocheilichthys sp.  nov.  'Naivasha'.  In: IUCN 2012.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.  Version 2012.2.  ( http://www.iucnredlist.org ).  Downloaded on 04 May 2013.  Hanssens, M. (2004b).  Aplocheilichthys sp.  nov.  'Naivasha'.  The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T61225A12451418.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T61225A12451418.en .  Downloaded on 27 June 2021.  Seegers, L., De Vos, L. and Okeyo, D. O. (2003).  Annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Kenya (excluding the lacustrine haplochromines from Lake Victoria).  Journal of East African Natural History 92: 11-47.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 10:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and Kenya .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above.  Only formally described species are considered automatically notable, and this fails GNG and SIGCOV besides.  SilverTiger12 ( talk ) 04:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard Tyrrell (disambiguation): It would be best to just add a hatnote on both articles and point them back to each other.  CycloneYoris talk!  06:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and remind the editor who created the unnecessary dab page that even if it was a useful dab page it would need a hatnote on each of the articles to point to it.  This orphan dab page is no use to anyone.  I will now add the necessary hatnotes to the two articles.  Pam D 08:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 09:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as unnecessary disambig.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 09:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Disambiguations ,  and Ireland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Gjs238 ( talk ) 10:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  WP:ONEOTHER violation, solved easily by hatnotes.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aref Jalayeri: Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  14:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Iran .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  14:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I agree that the article does not show any information warranting nobility, nor do the sources.  Coulomb1 ( talk ) 14:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But in parts of the article, the identity of this person is stated correctly.  I know this person.  He is active as mentioned in the article.  Aref Jalayeri ( talk ) 06:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as written.  Entirely dependent on below-par sources.  BD2412 T 14:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You can wait a little until better sources are attached to this article.  Aref Jalayeri ( talk ) 06:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Little to no independent coverage.  Possible WP:PROMO .  Aintabli ( talk ) 10:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Did not notice the above comments by "Aref Jalayeri".  "Possible" would be an understatement.  Aintabli ( talk ) 10:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Artem Zhurko: I found only a trivial mention in Tribuna and 2 passing mentions in football.by when searching in Russian and Belarusian.  The other Wikipedia projects only have trivial coverage of him.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belarus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only sources are player profiles and I could not find anything else to meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 12:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Clearly fails WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No source to establish notability.  Doesn't meet WP:SPORTSBIO .  Databases are literally not sources though they can help say a bio exists.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JSON→URL: The only sources cited on the page are a primary source from the project's official website, and two links to JSON specs (unrelated to this derivative language).  I couldn't find any unconnected sources describing this language.  StereoFolic ( talk ) 18:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  StereoFolic ( talk ) 18:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Cannot find sources that establish notability.  popo dameron ⁠ talk 21:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I couldn't find any other sources either.  — Sean Brunnock ( talk ) 12:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
White market: Searching gets mountains of false hits, and even searching in GScholar most hits are either completely spurious or are for the book White Market Drugs , which is about drug industry abuses, not economics.  One reference from the Von Mises Institute isn't enough.  Also, the article, when stripped of its explanation of other "off-white" markets, it's just a definition.  Mangoe ( talk ) 12:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Libertarianism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The term in this case, is mentioned as "babies in the white market" in the article's only reference source "Stork Markets: An Analysis of Baby-selling, The journal of libertarian studies".  — Maile ( talk ) 13:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:NOTDICT .  -- Broc ( talk ) 14:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for reasons others have given.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of armed conflicts Involving Poland and Ukraine: At best, it duplicates existing lists.  Of the conflicts listed, only in one was the Ukrainian state a party.  The list includes the Cossack uprisings among the Polish-Ukrainian conflicts, which were mostly an internal PLC dispute.  Marcelus ( talk ) 12:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poland and Ukraine .  Marcelus ( talk ) 12:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Lists .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  Poorly referenced, and to what degree Kievan Rus or Cossacks = Ukraine?  ORish for the pre-20th century content.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete anachronistic ( t · c ) buidhe 02:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jameel Ahmed Memon: Certainly the two provided sources don’t establish any notability whatsoever, and there’s nothing else on the internet that might help in that regard.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 07:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as A7, but also happy to wait for the AfD to run its course.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 08:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete non-notable auto-bio KylieTastic ( talk ) 09:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Airsmith (HVAC): Both references failed verification.  Google search on term failed to find anything usable as a reference.  · · · Peter Southwood (talk) : 14:23, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete neologism with no footprint in searching: evey hit I saw was for a business with this name.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ladislav Nagy (footballer): Fails GNG in that there is a lack of significant and/or independent sources for a biography.  Geschichte ( talk ) 21:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Slovakia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Possibly WP:TOOSOON ...  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete