hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Al-Okhdood Club Stadium: No sign of meeting GNG.  Andre 🚐 00:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions .  Andre 🚐 00:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Defunct?  From everything indicated it looks like it's still a live and open stadium.  Nate • ( chatter ) 02:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Google Maps address shows that it permanently closed.  [27] Andre 🚐 07:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Google's open/closed notifications are user generated, either by the store or by users who may do so as a prank.  I wouldn't call that reliable at all.  Nate • ( chatter ) 20:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The bottom line being there's very little reliable about this stadium, and it's difficult to source a whole article at all.  Whether the stadium is defunct or not is somewhat immaterial to that, but I'm just explaining why it appeared to be defunct, perhaps explaining why there is so little about it.  I would not attempt to insert this Google Map entry into the article, but I have no reason to believe it's inaccurate either.  Andre 🚐 20:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Al-Okhdood Club as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 11:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fine by me Andre 🚐 20:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Grant Edmeades: Seems like he played for two provincial sides, so I'm not sure which redirect list would be ideal.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Boland representative cricketers Looks to fail WP:GNG although there are some reports.  Played the majority of his games for Boland, so suitable WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Khadija Abbouda: Her only achievement is that she competed in the 2008 Summer Olympics.  There are also no Reliable Sources about her.  Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Women .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 18:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Morocco .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Archery at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's individual .  Fails WP:NOLYMPICS as she did not win a medal (indeed, she finished 64th in her event).  Also fails WP:SPORTBASIC which requires "at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources."  Cbl62 ( talk ) 02:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Avtovokzal: Possible merge/redirect to Almaty Metro or userify as WP:ATDs .  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Almaty Metro until such time that sufficient secondary coverage can be established for the subject to have an independent article, with no prejudice against deletion if that is what others ! vote for.  I could not dig up any English language sources that discuss this subject explicitly (although there are mentions of other bus and metro stations with the same name in other countries).  Further, Wikipedia is not a directory for every metro or subway station that exists (or is planned, but hasn't been built yet).  MaterialsPsych ( talk ) 04:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only if unverifiable .  Without speaking Kazakh it's extremely difficult to work out what coverage of this exists, but if it is verifiable that the station is planned to be constructed (or indeed is being or has been constructed) then it should be merged to the article about the metro or a list of station on the metro/line.  If it's verifiable that it has been officially proposed or widely called for then again it should be merged.  Only if unverifiable is deletion the appropriate course of action, but this needs attention from someone who can read Cyrillic (and ideally Kazakh).  Thryduulf ( talk ) 12:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 08:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Almaty Metro unless someone can find sources to meet WP:GNG , right now it's just a WP:NTRAINSTATION .  I also couldn't find any English language sources and agree that it needs attention from someone who can read Kazakh or potentially Russian.  Shaws username .  talk .  12:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "Avtovokzal" is a transliteration of "Автовокзал", the Russian for "bus station".  Trivia question: do you know the etymology of "вокзал"?  This gets in the way of searching and it seems that it may have led the author of this article to misinterpret the source.  However, don't take my word as gospel on this - it is nearly 50 years since I studied Russian.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 12:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Armen Kazarian: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 22:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : This was originally a redirect to the aforementioned Medicaid fraud article.  BD2412 T 22:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] BD2412 , it should fall back there!  — Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  06:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He is well documented to be the first Vor which is a high ranking mobster to be sentenced for racketeering.  This is said by the FBI!  He also is well known for what he was involved in by MANY sources.  Please read the references again, thank you.  Nocturnal781 ( talk ) 23:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Nocturnal781 : It looks like the Wikipedia page and the references are about the racketeering case he got convicted in.  Normally in a situation where a person is only mentioned because of their role in a crime and that crime has a page, they shouldn't have a standalone page.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 23:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and California .  Owen× ☎ 23:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2010 Medicaid fraud : Nothing much here to push on a stand alone title.  The article doesn't meet WP:CRIMINAL or WP:BLPIE .  There is always a saying criterion for such article.  Move back as a redirect to the main topic per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  23:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Belinda Martínez: Boleyn ( talk ) 19:13, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Television , Anime and manga ,  and Mexico .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Fujiko Mine with a name mention per WP:WORLDVIEW as this appears to be her most dubbed character.  - Knowledgekid87 ( talk ) 14:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I searched with spelling "Belinda Martinez" as well as found no results.  Redirect to Fujiko Mine and add name mention per above -- PeaceNT ( talk ) 02:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kazi Sherpa: Should never really have been a BLP as the subject's notability is tied to a climbing record that was never in itself notable.   Coverage is limited to the recording of him holding the time record at a given moment, but nothing else beyond that.   No SIGCOV of coverage on the person as a notable individual in any quality RS.  Could also redirect to Mount Everest#Selected climbing records .  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 18:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Aszx5000 ( talk ) 18:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mount Everest or Mount Everest#Selected climbing records — siro χ o 04:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 F-35 crash: Rosbif73 ( talk ) 14:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The event has a lack of secondary sources and has nothing inherently notable that would justify the creation of an article.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 14:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Borgenland ( talk ) 15:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  User:TheKeyboardofDoom 22:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  WILD MOUSE what?  14:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep this is recent, 0 casualties, so I had WP:LASTING in mind when creating.  However, the fact that this crash caused discussion in reliable sources --like commentary on whether this puts the program into jeapordy or not--makes it notable.  There are an abundance of secondary sources apart from regurgitated press: [11] [12] Jaden7667 ( talk ) 03:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Lasting effects cannot be determined in the first few days, weeks, months or maybe years.  Taking into account the amount of F-35s manufactured vs how many experienced accidents or incidents, it's clear that the F-35 is still very safe.  For now, it's way too early to judge this event's impact on the F-35 program.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 16:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hm... here is some food for thought.  Thoughts on me starting a 'List of accidents and incidents involving the F-35' and redirecting this to that instead?  Jaden7667 ( talk ) 19:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That list already exists in the F35 article.  86.3.219.123 ( talk ) 20:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That doesn't make it uncreatable?  Jaden7667 ( talk ) 04:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of accidents and incidents involving the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is my second vote.  Jaden7667 ( talk ) 05:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect this or delete it.  ‹hamster717🐉› ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 01:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
High Value Manufacturing Catapult: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Engineering , Technology ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The best coverage that I am finding is Jon Excell's 2022 interview with the HVM Catapult's CEO in The Engineer [20] - a fairly substantial piece albeit interview-based.  The coverage of HVM Catapult in the Catapult centres article covers the basic territory, so a redirect to there could be a reasonable WP:ATD if more substantial specific coverage can't be found?  AllyD ( talk ) 13:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Catapult centres : In the absence of any further discussion above, I am solidifying my WP:ATD suggestion to a redirect proposal.  AllyD ( talk ) 12:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Catapult centres as above.  On it own, this topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing ++ 22:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chantal Lynch: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) No indication of notability, either.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Canada , Caribbean ,  and South America .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jason Willett: PROD was contested in 2013, allegedly by the subject of the article.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 22:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 22:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Half Japanese .  Lacks independent coverage to justify keeping the article.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested is reasonable, as would be a selective merge ("smerge").  Bearian ( talk ) 15:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
S5P4418: No evidence of notability.  Broc ( talk ) 09:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing .  Broc ( talk ) 09:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 24 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 10:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, and no sources used at all.  Editing84 ( talk ) 11:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not seeing any sigcov.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with ARM Cortex-A9 : as a line in the table.  Owen× ☎ 23:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
EMD F40PHR: The F40PHR is almost identical to the regular F40PH and has no reason to have an independent article.  BigSneeze444 ( talk ) 16:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to EMD SDP40F : It's a rebuild of that type of locomotive, could easily be covered there, with a redirect so people looking for info on the type get pointed in the right direction.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The F40PHR is very different from the SDP40F, if it gets redirected anywhere.  It should be redirected to the F40PH page.  BigSneeze444 ( talk ) 16:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to EMD F40PH#History .  This model is already covered in detail there; there is no need for a separate article.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 17:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to EMD F40PH#History .  This is a needless duplication of information.  TarnishedPath talk 01:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 12:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect back to F40PH.  This never should have been created, and shows yet again why this editor should have been blocked.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 23:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yip Yips: I did a search for sources and for the Yip Yips, but there is little to no discussion about them as characters overall.  I found maybe a couple of okay sources, but there are nowhere near enough to build a whole article on.  I feel a good AtD is to the character list, where they are mentioned.  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Television .  Has one ever considered Magneton?  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Sesame Street Muppets .  I tried looking for some more sources yesterday while editing the article (searching for both Yip Yips and The Martians) and couldn't find anything significant.  There are 3 references for the entry on the List of Sesame Street Muppets article but I don't have access to them and so don't know to what extent the Yip Yips are covered.  Even with those I don't think there is enough coverage in reliable, independent sources to meet GNG .  Sarahj2107 ( talk ) 22:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Sesame Street Muppets .  Nothing in the article nor my BEFORE suggests this meets WP:GNG , most of the article is unsoruced OR.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Funny as heck?  Yip, yip, yip-yip-yip.  Independently notable?  Nope, nope, nope-nope-nope-nope.  Cheers!  BBQ boffin grill me 19:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Beezer Book: Nothing found which suggests there is independent notability to the inclusion standards beyond The Beezer , not clear this content could be supported fully with references per WP:V even if it was to be merged.  WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk ) 07:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 07:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Beezer .  These are common finds in secondhand bookshops in the UK.  Have briefly searched for sources for WP:V but found nothing.  Orange sticker ( talk ) 11:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  It could be redirected to The Beezer per ATD.  Desertarun ( talk ) 09:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Beezer as no standalone sig coverage of the topic.  X ( talk ) 16:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect