Leon Burchill: I prefer the information of this article to be transferred in other websites like IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes.  Also, this article isn't notable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs ) 11:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 7 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete Fails WP:NACTOR .  All his roles minor usually 1 off appearances in TV shows.  LibStar ( talk ) 17:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks.  I too want this article deleted anyway.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs ) ( talk ) 16:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  One of two co-leads in Stone Bros. so even if nothing else this could be redirected there so there is absolutely no justification for deletion.  But it's not just that.  His role in Wyrmwood is a significant role so he satisfies WP:NACTOR .  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 06:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete : That's no excuse keep the article and consider it notable.  If you consider an article notable and want to keep it, have it expanded by looking for accurate information.  If not, then I'll have it deleted.  Anonymy365248 ( talk ) 07:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC) This ! vote is from the nominator [ reply ] You had already ! voted as nominator, as Aviationwikiflight and Liz indicated on your talk page.  Kindly strike your ! vote, thanks. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC) (and yes, two significant roles are a sufficient reason to consider him notable) [ reply ] You can't "vote" twice.  L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep : Applications of WP:SKCRIT #1 and #3.  The nominator has failed to provide an accurate deletion rationale and has also failed to give intelligible grounds for content deletion.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 08:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk ) 13:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Seriously, why was this relisted?  The initial nomination failed to raise a valid argument for deletion.  One of many problematic nominations that are being discussed at ANI.  The sole support was flat out wrong.  "All his roles minor usually 1 off appearances in TV shows."  Quite simply wrong, two major film roles.  With no credible delete arguments this should have been summarily closed keep instead of a weak arsed relist.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 13:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep bordering speedy for the reasons mentioned above. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Roles in Stone Bros. and Wyrmwood are enough for NACTOR.  Also appears to pass GNG with the sources in the article.  Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk ) 14:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep