hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Alexandria Aquarium: Other language WPs exist but have similar issues with lack of sourcing and evidence of notability.  Google check didn't come up with sufficient evidence of notability - I am aware though that I may be missing something as this is not an area of the world I am familiar with.  Boleyn ( talk ) 09:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 09:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Egypt Today wrote these two articles about the aquarium.  Left guide ( talk ) 06:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 06:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:ITSANAQUARIUM .  Tourist attractions are usually listed in guidebooks and are generally considered notable.  The citations from Egypt Today are a good example of the kind of coverage this sort of public attraction often gets.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 05:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG .  I don't think this is a good example for WP:ITSANAQUARIUM .  The most extensive guidebook coverage I've been able to find is in a National Geographic guidebook , whose coverage consists of this sentence: Across the street is the Marine Aquarium , where the fish, sea turtles, and Nile crocodiles, housed in small and dirty glass tanks, are barely more alive.  On TripAdvisor it's 31 of 69 things to do in Alexandria.  So I don't believe the Egypt Today sources, which say things like the ultimate sea collection and one of the most important tourist attractions in the city , should be considered reliable on this subject.  Note that Arabic wikipedia claims that the photo on the page is of a different museum.  Jfire ( talk ) 18:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mehmed Merejan: The user who deprod it provided a book as a source, but the subject was only mentioned once as part of a list.  No other significant coverage can be found about the subject, fails WP:GNG Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 12:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Poetry ,  and Bulgaria .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 12:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 16:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC) (and removed from Artists).  [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I literally can’t find anything except the prize announcement.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable.  The article is very small and does not cover the subject matter -- Loewstisch ( talk ) 18:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul McPhee: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , California ,  and Massachusetts .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Ugh.   Plainly promotional , sourcing is hopelessly inadequate, tagged for many years, and was the creation of a SPA with no other Wikipedia edits.   It's frankly embarrassing for this NN article to have been up for this long.  Ravenswing 20:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2012 Gilbert mayoral election: Okmrman ( talk ) 22:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not a particularly contested or notable election.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 01:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable election.  The nom has been blocked indefinitely for disruption, but this wasn't a bad AfD - the only source in the article is for web results, and this wasn't a local election which was notable above and beyond the fact it happened.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ejes Gist News: The site has not been the subject of much attention in general (only 10 Ghits? , some more as Ejesgist apparently).  Fram ( talk ) 15:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A third source has been added [12] , coincidentally posted today, about an endorsement of the news site by the "Humanitarian Movement for Development".  Impressive, too bad that the organisation has apparently never been mentioned before they made this statement [13] and organised the "lecture" the other two sources are talking about.  All of which is rather fishy.  Fram ( talk ) 15:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Websites ,  and Nigeria .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The creator also shares a name with the site's founder (but claims to only be a relative of them), and their user page has been deleted twice for misuse of Wikipedia as a web host ( autobiography ).  Possibly some sanctions are warranted.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 06:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply  ] 1. The said pages were delete because they were not properly arranged or put together on Wikipedia.  2. Being a relative is not against Wikipedia policy...  I don't think so...  3. The issues at hand is that the Name is Worth to be on Wikipedia  a. It has been registered with CAC  b. Names who are not registered with CAC are already here as cited by another users.  Omajemite ( talk ) 06:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum .  There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located.  This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.  Logs : 2023-09 ✍️ create -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Value Inquiry Book Series: No sourcing to show a pass of the GNG.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not seeing any independent coverage Traumnovelle ( talk ) 21:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ta Re Moriori (app): Ref 1 and 2 are dead ( WP:404 ) and it appears to be taken off the Play Store.  Ref 3 reads like an ad ver tize muhnt.  Alexeyevitch ( talk ) 12:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions .  Alexeyevitch ( talk ) 12:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Education ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Scoop (website) publishes press releases and has pretty much no standards.  They're absolutely useless for notability and should only be used where primary sources are appropriate.  The name doesn't help but there does appear to be no independent coverage.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 07:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge to Moriori language ; the app on its own seems unlikely to become noteworthy.  —Tamfang ( talk ) 01:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Minor coverage about its release but no coverage about its usage or impact.  Does not meet WP:N .  Adabow ( talk ) 05:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deborah Mackenzie: I performed a WP:BEFORE and did not find any in-depth coverage of Mackenzie in independent reliable sources; no other notability guidelines are met, and no alternatives to deletion are apparent.  DePRODder stated "may be notable" but provided no explanation or evidence in support of that conclusion.  Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 17:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism ,  and United Kingdom .  Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 17:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  I can't find any sources on google.  Only websites that seem to auto generate data (like those net worth sites).  ForksForks ( talk ) 18:35, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2027 Angolan general election: Onel 5969 TT me 12:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Angola .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 18:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Have any candidates even been announced for an election that is over four years away?  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 18:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I nominated a similar article on East Timor for deletion, and out of the three people who commented, all said delete.  Similar to the East Timor article, all of the refs on this article are from the 2022 election, thus failing not just WP:TOOSOON but also WP:CRYSTAL .  interstate five 20:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : way TOOSOON.  // Timothy :: talk 22:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Buro: Looks like a minor incident, the only source cited is brief mention from a primary source.  But no reliable secondary sources found addressing the topic directly and in-depth.  Socialwave597 ( talk ) 22:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military ,  and Ethiopia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as an example of skirmish-inflation.  Mccapra ( talk ) 05:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aviation Capital Group: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 20:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Aviation ,  and California .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alberta Debate And Speech Association: I do not believe that it fulfils WP:GNG or WP:NCORP .  Z1720 ( talk ) 17:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Education ,  and Canada .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don’t see any coverage in RIS.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Found no significant coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Findability Sciences: The majority of citations are press releases masquerading as legitimate sources, WP:ADMASQ .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United States of America .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:11, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Massachusetts .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yoanna Calderón: No indication of notability.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Delete per WP:GNG Os ari us 11:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mumin Aliyansyah: An Indonesian source search yields nothing better than the usual Wikipedia mirrors.  Viva and Tribun News were the best sources that I could find but both of them only mention Mumin once and the depth is trivial.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Scored one goal while playing in the third tier of Indonesian football.  The article lacks any depth and fails to comply with WP:SPORTBASIC (prong 4) as it does not include any SIGCOV (just databases).  Also, my searches turned up nothing that would constitute SIGCOV that might satisfy WP:GNG .  Not finding a suitable redirect target, so deletion unfortunately appears to be the right result.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 19:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sites are either stats databases or spambait sites with too many pop ups to be reliable.  Nothing found for sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angel Montes de Oca: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dominican Republic-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:TOOSOON can't find any relevant evidence of the entity that I can use to support the Article. NP83 ( talk ) 20:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG, BIO. Nothing in article or BEFORE shows any notabilty. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 08:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: fails to meet the standards set in WP:GNG and WP:BLP 1keyhole ( talk ) 03:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TOOSOON .  Bearian ( talk ) 18:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group: CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!  ⚓ 02:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mykyta Nagatkin: 鲁纳娄于 ( talk ) 10:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draft:Nick Nagatkin another previous attempt to recreate the page 鲁纳娄于 ( talk ) 10:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Technology ,  and Ukraine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (Speedy) Delete - non-notable, undisclosed paid-for spam, created by Bodiadub sockpuppet, associated with known Wikibusines article Digis .  MER-C 15:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete