hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Raul Moreira: No significant coverage.  Contested PROD.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No SIGCOV, fails GNG.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 01:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 01:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is no evidence of lasting notability, and since NFOOTY was deprecated then GNG must be met.  If sources of lasting notability are found, please ping me.  — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - While it appears that Moreira appeared in over 100 league matches for Belenenses during the 1950s, there  is simply no online coverage that suggests this can satisfy WP:GNG .  He has a common name (there is a living Portuguese futsal player and a manager that get some coverage, although nothing in-depth), and I accidentally pulled some in-depth coverage for Francisco Moreira (who played in the 1940s) which crystallizes my opinion that if Raúl Moreira were actually notable, we could find something suggesting SIGCOV online now.  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of arabophones: The selection criterion for this list is internationally well-known personalities that speak Arabic which is absolutely arbitrary.  Broc ( talk ) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Language ,  and Lists .  Broc ( talk ) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete looks like OR to me. — Iadmc ♫ talk 11:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is incredibly arbitrary- the list will never be exhaustive, the premise could be expanded to millions of other potential articles- i.e. people that speak Telugu, Tagalog- and is clearly original research.  Spiralwidget ( talk ) 13:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Welfare and Institutions: Ping me if the article is improved with RS. dxneo ( talk ) 23:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Utterly meaningless and pointless.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , nothing in the article suggests notability and no sources are provided.  Suonii180 ( talk ) 22:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per CSD:G2.  Owen× ☎ 17:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no references provided and fails GNG.   I oppose a G2 speedy.  Frank Anchor 19:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Troy Greenidge: This would be a good start towards meeting GNG if it were not published by CONCACAF .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Astros–Braves rivalry: Wikipedia is not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information, including going through each set of teams and picking out the times that they met in the postseason.  There is no "rivalry" between the Braves and the Astros.  If we don't draw a hard line on what constitutes a rivalry and what doesn't, we will have individual pages for each potential matchup.  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 17:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There's very little local or national coverage of this matchup being a significant rivalry.  It certainly isn't worth of its own article.  Nemov ( talk ) 19:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 17:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Georgia (U.S. state) and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom and Nemov.  Definitely not as much of a rivalry as with the Phillies, Marlins, or even the Dodgers.  BilCat ( talk ) 21:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very little coverage of these teams as “rivals.”  The sources present in the article only mention terms like “rivals” or “rivalry” in the title or briefly and show little depth of animosity between the two teams and their fan bases.  Frank Anchor 12:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The teams being arguably the most successful teams of their respective leagues in the past half-decade doesn't constitute a rivalry.  That said, the primary claim made in the article and its sources is that the rivalry was strong in the '90s when the teams played in the NL West together, and has recently seen something of a resurrection.  A rivalry can still be notable and worthy of inclusion if it's dormant (no one would've suggested that the Texas–Texas A&M football rivalry article should've been deleted when Texas A&M left for the SEC).  Ultimately, however, those are all moot points.  The question is whether there is substantial coverage in multiple reliable, independent secondary sources, and the sources don't really establish it as a notable rivalry, as per Frank Anchor .  P 1 ( talk / contributions ) 15:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Insufficient evidence of a notable rivalry.  This article only really says that the Astros and Braves have faced each other in the playoffs, which isn't enough.  Nohomersryan ( talk ) 19:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thompson Creative: Let'srun ( talk ) 12:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies , Arizona ,  and Texas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge to jingle , there are some references primarily from Dallas but not enough to show notability in my opinion.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 17:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kike Tropical Fruits Factory: Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Uganda .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV .  estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 12:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eàrlaid: Even if it is, we need more references to verify it.  Even if we can verify it, WP is not a dictionary WP:NOTDICTIONARY JMWt ( talk ) 08:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United Kingdom and Scotland .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Farming in Scotland?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Jstor has 2 hits in obscure sources.  And small mentions in gbooks but not enough to meet GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 16:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Additional thoughts on redirecting?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:DICDEF indeed, and that in Gaelic.  If you're looking for a redirect, then perhaps History of agriculture in Scotland , but there's no discussion of this land ownership arrangement there - maybe Sharecropping ?  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 16:08, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If this could be verified as a legal concept I would advocate a merge to Scots property law .  In the absence of competent legal sources I would be tempted to redirect to List of English words of Scottish Gaelic origin , which currently contains it -- but I'm not sure that it verifiably should , as it's not clear to me that it's actually been used as an English or even Scots term. It's always a shame to lose content, but I'm not seeing enough encyclopedic value here to get too fussed about it. -- Visviva ( talk ) 22:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sneha Club: During a WP:BEFORE search, I was able to find its own website , and this website which literally asked me for my phone number (!) (it took a great deal of willpower to resist responding with 867-5309 ) ; neither of these are helpful.  House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Andhra Pradesh .  House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Katchungu-Tchambogo Cessna Grand Caravan crash: The accident barely has any coverage.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 10:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No indication of any factors that might lead to lasting effects.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 10:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Aviation ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources are largely self-contained aviation websites.  Borgenland ( talk ) 11:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't meet Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Aircraft_accidents_and_incidents , I know it's an essay, but is the only guidance that exists.  The subject wouldn't meet GNG which in the absence of any other guidance it would need to.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and James.  Should be at most a list item somewhere.  Choess ( talk ) 15:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Margot Davy: Does appearing on notable fashion platform calls for a Wikipedia page?  Because we have so many people appearing on notable fashion platform but no independent reliable sources.  Most of the source on the page just only talked about her appearing and nothing more.  Meligirl5 ( talk ) 11:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Women ,  and Fashion .  Meligirl5 ( talk ) 11:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Also this seems to be like a promotional work , paid work or a conflict of interest . -- Meligirl5 ( talk ) 12:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I tried a search in . fr sites, and even then, we have only a few photo shoots that come up.  "Muse of the Month" [24] is about the extent of coverage I could find, it's simply a photospread and some small text.  Delete for not meeting notability requirements and a lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Narendra Mairpady: Remsense 诉 23:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , India ,  and Karnataka .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  One source from Manglore Today looks reliable and the others are not secondary or independent but I do not find this banker notable to warrant a page on him.  The person is not regarded as an important figure.  I cannot find this person's work of any significant monument or widely recognized contribution.  Fails WP:ANYBIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not enough secondary sources which go into enough detail to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 16:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and for additional reasons.  This person hasn't done anything notable ; there are literally thousands of similar business persons around the globe .  Unless you can convince me otherwise, this has all the hallmarks of spam disguised as an article.  In 2024, everyone knows, Wikipedia is not a place to post a resume .  18:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barnabas Enjoy: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, thus failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, also, is this really a real name?  Govvy ( talk ) 10:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In a world of Bongo Christ and Argélico Fucks ...  Giant Snowman 10:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't have significant coverage and the Wikipedia page is very out of date in saying "currently".  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 11:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AMC Institute: I am unable to find anything else.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 06:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies .  Royal88888 ( talk ) 06:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No sources found.  Ping me if you find one.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 07:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Francis Mensah: The best that I can find are Abidjan 1 and Abidjan 2 , both passing mentions in Ivorian media.  The Feyenoord mentioned is the one in Ghana, not the Dutch team.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ghana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I fixed the link to the Voice of America article, which seems pretty good.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for restoring it.  I'm not going to withdraw this AfD yet as I don't think that it's enough on its own for a GNG pass.  The coverage is Fifteen-year-old Francis Joe Mensah is one of the academy's best players, a lightning-quick, technically solid, left back, who can also play left wing.  He predicts he will make it in Europe.  He says he has no fear of failure.  followed by a quote from the subject.  I also think WP:YOUNGATH might apply given the age of the subject at the time (the coverage does not seem to be substantial and prolonged).  I'd be interested to know what others think.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  One source on its own not enough.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —There's nothing here.  Played for an academy and then disappeared.  No WP:SIGCOV shown at all.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  The Voice of America article fails WP:YOUNGATH and I don't see anything else besides primary sources and passing mentions.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kevin Murai: WP:PRIMARY .  Fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:BIO .  scope_creep Talk 09:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree on a lack of significant coverage.  Mostly business press releases and the like on searching.  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 23:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Endri Shabani: Local-government level politicians are not inherently notable under NPOL, and subject fails GNG too.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 17:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Albania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete