hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Naked Truth (band): Revirvlkodlaku ( talk ) 13:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The two previous AfD discussions refer to sources named in the first deletion discussion.  One source mentioned is the Guinness Encyclopedia of Popular Musi c.  However, a search on Google Books suggests that the bands only has a single throwaway mention in the entire book.  Also mentioned is the Encyclopedia of Popular Music , which mentions the band a single times in what again appears to be a throwaway mentioning without significant coverage of the band.  There are three additions mentions of "Naked Truth" or "The Naked Truth", but those appear to be two films from 1957 and 1992, not the band.  A user also brought up that the band apparently has released two albums with Sony Records, but I couldn't find any reliable secondary sources confirming that, or indicating notability of those albums.  Kerrang, a magazine, apparently covered the band, but I was unable to find the respective article and/or confirm that their coverage there is significant.  The article received a refimprove tag in 2012, and in that decade, editors have failed to bring up sources that significantly cover the band.  This article only seems to be around because of some single-line mentions in two books and .  WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES Cortador ( talk ) 08:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I looked offline since coverage would predate the internet and found only a Melody Maker review.  JSFarman ( talk ) 17:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jason Keyser: No coverage widespread coverage in WP:RS .  This article was created by a WP:SPA .  GuardianH ( talk ) 19:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kelly Rattigan: Most of the sources provided are architectural press, I could not find any coverage in more independent mainstream press.  A search came up with a softball player of the same name.  Fails WP:ARCHITECT and WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Architecture ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aydoh8 ( talk ) 04:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Reads very promotionally, with a quite a few of the references being to the subjects own firm.  Notability is not established by the article itself.  A Google search does not establish anything beyond what's already found in the article.  TarnishedPath talk 08:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PerfectDraft: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Products .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO.  Sourcing used is primary.  What I find are press-releases.  this is the best coverage in a RS [32] , basically a guide to the thing being on sale for Black Friday and having a limited description of the product.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per G-11 Promotion/ advertising.  Banks Irk ( talk ) 17:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Boss Creator: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - music festivals are not inherently notable; there are few sources.  I would not oppose a redirect to its parent corp, of IDN Media .  Bearian ( talk ) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kristbergs IF: Modest history peaking on the 5th tier.  (They are now on the 8th.)  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gary Fox (badminton): Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources.  zoglophie •talk• 19:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and England .  zoglophie •talk• 19:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject fails WP:GNG along with WP:NSPORT .  User:Let'srun 02:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Isdory Tarimo: It’s all coming to me till the end of time 17:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Environment ,  and Tanzania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I find no sources talking about this person, all Gnews hits on are two items from IPPMEDIA, appearing to be PR.  One brief mention here [4] as a thank you from the author of the paper.  Not meeting BIO or GNG even.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:47, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Reviewed this when it was listed for PROD.  No indication of notability via WP:NPOL , and fails GNG as a search returned no reliable sources providing SIGCOV.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:36, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tracey Milburn: Sources I could find include this , which offers some coverage, but is partly a primary source with a lot of the content being straight quotes, and this , which just states that she committed to Pepperdine back when she was in high school, and does not offer significant coverage.  The rest of the sources on the article itself are just passing mentions, except this , which is a primary source from UCLA itself.  Overall, does not pass GNG and does not warrant an individual article.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 06:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and California .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 06:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 06:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agree to above.  Sources do not offer significant coverage or are primary.  IcanandIwillwatchme ( talk ) 07:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  While the LA Times piece on her UCLA and high school career is useful, I don't see consistent coverage that would allow a GNG pass.  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Riaan Engelbrecht: Not to be confused with the author of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby league ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amature player with minimal coverage.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 18:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mount Pleasant, Cass County, Indiana: This is the kind of place that gives WP:GEOLAND a bad name, because even though one can use the two sources to give a location and something of a history, there's no way this place passess any real notability standard, and so I predict we will be left arguing whether this was a real unincorporated community town or not.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The history of Cass County, Indiana [112] has one mention of a Mount Pleasant, and it's Mount Pleasant, Ohio.   If that source doesn't have anything we don't have much to go by.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , WP:GEOLAND doesn't apply to communities that possibly don't even exist.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I still fine with deleting because, it's no notable, but should point out that the 3 reference page 482 describes it as a paper town.  It had a stored whose primary clientele were native americans buying firewater, several people lived there, and it was platted.  It subsisted off of traffic along the the road prior to building of a railway when it died forgood.  So it sorta existed, 1836-mid1850s but the source does call it a "paper town" which I assume means they considered it a failed venture.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not notable Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cary Brown: In addition, this article has in the past been suspected of WP:COI editing and no changes or improvements to the article have been made since the COI tag was placed on the article.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 21:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Discussion page was created without the {{ afd2 }} template, was not transcluded to a daily log, and created under an incorrect title.  @ Go4thProsper : For future nominations, please fully follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO .   As for my own view, the subject appears to clearly fail WP:NPOL , but I haven’t researched enough yet for a more formal ! vote.   -- Finngall talk 23:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , Law , Education ,  and Vermont .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable local official.  Sources cited are all routine coverage except for the NYT article, which mentions her exactly once.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  and BottleOfChocolateMilk.  Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 16:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find the requisite WP:SIGCOV for this BLP to meet the WP:GNG .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
.NET Bio: Of the four sources on the page, two don't mention the library by name, and the other two are from Microsoft.  This apparently had a PROD within an hour of the article's creation in 2013 which is kind of silly, but I'm sending this to AfD just to be safe.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Also cannot find any independent sources to establish notability.  Quuxbazbarfoo ( talk ) 17:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It's given a small amount of coverage in one book but other than that there's nothing I could find for sourcing.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Serapis Bey: The only sources mentioned on the article are Theosophist writers, Alice Bailey, Elizabeth Clare Prophet and Charles Leadbeater etc, these all fail WP:Fringe and WP:RS and are not independent neutral sources.  Academic historians have not specifically covered Serapis Bey.  It is impossible to have a decent article with good academic sources because none exist on this topic from independent reliable secondary sources.  It is a non-notable subject that should be deleted per lack of academic historical coverage.  Psychologist Guy ( talk ) 15:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete An in universe character who isn't covered by reliable independent sources.  They are only mentioned in-universe, and thus are unlikely to be notable for a standalone article Big Money Threepwood ( talk ) 00:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 16:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The first two links you cite are a PhD Doctorate, this isn't a reliable source.  Psychologist Guy ( talk ) 22:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of alternative names for oceans: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 15:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete like most exonym lists.  An article about different etymologies of names for the respective oceans could be interesting.  —Tamfang ( talk ) 20:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mujibul Hussain: only statistical and passing mention.  Unable to find a single notable and reliable source that majorly discusses him, with substantial content (in English at least) Fails to meet GNG or any specific biographical guidelines.  Created by User:Lugnuts who seems to have created a lot of these nonnotable articles.  This is my 3rd AFD of their articles X ( talk ) 18:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  X ( talk ) 18:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete in absence of suitable redirect Fails WP:GNG , and given there isn't a suitable list to redirect to here per WP:ATD , delete.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No WP:SIGCOV , fails WP:NBIO .  ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 12:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Dmello: The list includes articles from India Today , Outlook India , and ANI .  Additionally, sources like The New Indian Express and Financial Express are suspected to be sponsored due to lack of authorship.  This article was previously soft-deleted via AfD.  Grabup ( talk ) 10:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  Grabup ( talk ) 10:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Goa-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Being an organic farmer in the 21st Century doesn't get you notability.  The sourcing reads as PR for the company, which isn't useful here.  I don't see any sources we can use, nor do I find any that aren't PR'ish.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @

Discussion outcome: delete
Patrick Gatonga: There is only one possible RS in this piece for to establish notability, a profile in the Standard , and many editors may consider it to be disqualified as an interview.  All other sources, here and in BEFORE search, are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS , WP:INTERVIEWS , WP:PRESSRELEASE S or other primary sources.  Not enough significant coverage in secondary, independent, reliable sources to clear notability thresholds.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Kenya .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 02:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete