hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Inphonex: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , Internet ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Investors Mutual Limited: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Management ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Michael Connely: As always, unelected candidates for political office do not get articles on that basis per se -- the notability test at NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while candidates qualify for articles only if either  (a) they already had some other basis for notability that would already have gotten them an article anyway, or  (b) they can show credible grounds for why their candidacy should be seen as a special case of significantly greater and more enduring notability than most other people's candidacies.  But this is written more like a campaign brochure than an encyclopedia article, and is referenced to two primary sources that aren't support for notability at all and two hits of purely run of the mill campaign coverage, which is not enough to establish that he would satisfy either of the conditions for the permanent notability of an unelected candidate.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat, but nothing here is already grounds for an article now.  Note as well that this title previously existed as a redirect to the first election that he already ran in and lost, until being turned into a standalone article within the past two days on the basis of his new candidacy — so restoring the original redirect, or repointing it to the current election, would also be options.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nebraska .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom; very fluffy piece with little to no evidence of notability currently.  No objection to draftifying if consensus is that it is just a case of WP:TOOSOON .  But it would need to be edited and sourced before publishing.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 16:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is nothing more than a 2021 electioneering bio for "an unknown political newcomer"  He didn't win, so this article has no real purpose on Wikipedia.  — Maile ( talk ) 18:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] To be fair, the attempted basis for creation was that he's running again in another election now.  That, of course, isn't grounds for an article to exist any more than his failure to win a previous election is, but still should be clarified nonetheless.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Military .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO for a political candidate.  Selling seeds as a youth isn't notable, rest is simply a retelling of his life story.  This isn't suitable for wikipedia.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Shervin Mirhashemi: A separate page is unwarranted, especially when there are concerns of conflicts of interest: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheWikiholic .  US-Verified ( talk ) 16:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Certainly unfortunate on AfC review, but I think it was the correct review.  My thorough WP:BEFORE analysis suggests that there is in-depth coverage of him in multiple publications.  This coverage includes his current role , as well as his work with Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG) as its head ( [11] , [12] ).  Interestingly, there is also more in-depth coverage about his legal issues , including a major lawsuit filed against him by the AEG.  So, clearly a separate article is warranted and this meets WP:GNG .  NP Hatfield ( talk ) 19:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the lawsuit was a high-profile case filed by Anschutz Entertainment Group against Shervin Mirhashemi.  It was covered by Law 360 , Lexology, and other media publications [13] , [14] .  His tenure as the president and CEO of Anschutz Entertainment Group is enough to prove his notability.  Most CEOs of Fortune 500 companies survive AfD, and anything related to the NFL is incredibly noteworthy.  Another in-depth article about him: [15] .  Passes WP:BASIC .  192.222.232.88 ( talk ) 20:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Thank you for digging into his previous role with AEG and the subsequent lawsuit.  I believe we can now write a balanced biography without it sounding too promotional.  Thus, I am happy to withdraw this nomination to avoid any further waste of time.  US-Verified ( talk ) 18:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Johnson Keland Management: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  Suggest merging any useful info.  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Management ,  and Wisconsin .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
RIXC: There is barely any coverage.  Likewise, the article stayed unsourced for 16 years!  Aintabli ( talk ) 05:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator as several sources have been found.  I did try for Latvian sources, however, it was to no success.  Likewise, the "duck duck go" search (link below) barely returns anything in my case.  Aintabli ( talk ) 16:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions .  Aintabli ( talk ) 05:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment a search in Latvian (a language I unfortunately cannot read) brings up: a review of the RIXC Festival of Arts and Sciences , including articles for the 2023 , 2021 and 2018 editions an interview to the founders And several more results (here's what I searched for ).  Aintabli did you search in Latvian as part of WP:BEFORE ?  Broc ( talk ) 20:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This book ISBN 978-3-86588-253-0 has seemingly a 2-pages description of the RIXC (per table of content ), but I have no access to it.  Broc ( talk ) 20:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Moving to a full Keep after finding mentions of RIXC projects even in English books, such as [12] Broc ( talk ) 21:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Then again, it seems the foundational edit was a copyvio, see this book from 2003 at page 277 (probably not the original source) [13] Broc ( talk ) 21:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Otto von Helldorff: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL .  Jalen Folf (talk) 19:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Germany .  Jalen Folf (talk) 19:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: Are you sure he doesn't meet WP:NPOL as a member of the Reichstag (German Empire) for what looks like 16 years?  That looks like an NPOL position to me.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 19:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Beyond the clear NPOL pass, the article also contains sources providing WP:SIGCOV , most clearly this entry in Deutsche Biographie , with sources like [8] and [9] providing pretty good supplementary coverage as well.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 19:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He also appears to have an entry in the book Biographisches Handbuch der Abgeordneten des Norddeutschen Reichstages, des Zollparlaments und der Deutschen Reichstage 1867-1918 (Biographical Handbook of the Members of the North German Reichstag, the Customs Parliament and the German Reichstag 1867-1918) by Heinrich Best [ de ] , but the book does not appear to be digitized and the weblink for his entry is a permanent dead link.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 19:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The references already in the article constitute WP:SIGCOV .  As TulsaPoliticsFan pointed out, as a member of the German Empire's parliament, he passes WP:NPOL .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also, the German Wikipedia lists several people at de:Heinrich_von_Helldorff who probably pass the English Wikipedia's notability standards.  One is Otto's father, I think.  Those German articles are probably worth translating, although I'm not volunteering to do the translations.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Institute for the Study and Integration of Graphical Heritage Techniques: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Organizations , Education , Archaeology , Technology , Computing ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Hyperoptic: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Internet ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Matt Underwood: Found many others sharing the name, including a professor and a fictional character, but no significant coverage of this individual.  Fails WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball ,  and United States of America .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It wasn't hard to find reliable sources about him .  - Eureka Lott 17:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per the SIGCOV identified by Eureka Lott.  Please perform WP:BEFORE more thoroughly prior to AfD nominations Jack4576 ( talk ) 17:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per EurekaLott.  I have since cleaned up the article, and if needed I found a few more references I can sprinkle in.  Wizardman 19:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep - reliable and in-depth sources exist per Eureka Lott's findings.  Meets WP:GNG .  - Skipple ☎ 20:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Should conduct BEFORE more carefully if it was actually done.  Timothytyy ( talk ) 09:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nom withdrawn .  Sorry, my bad.  I'll be more careful while searching for sources in AfD discussions and nominations.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 16:16, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
The Pot Bears a Son: Boleyn ( talk ) 09:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  @ User:Boleyn : The feeling is correct.  It is a tale found in textbooks (for instance here ), and the researcher Haim Schwarzbaum [ de ] talks about it in his Studies in Jewish and world folklore on page 104 that it is a motif that has innumerable variants.  Based on this perfunctory search I believe the article should be kept and warrants expansion.  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 10:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment to comment. Added reference and removed single source tag. -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 11:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination thanks, Ouro .  Boleyn ( talk ) 12:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
2022 Turkey bus crashes: Aintabli ( talk ) 01:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator.  Changed my mind.  Aintabli ( talk ) 22:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  Aintabli ( talk ) 01:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:Notability (events) , but also borders on WP:SYNTH between two "reportedly unlinked" topics.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 04:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This was a big story in Turkey last year and resulted in a large death toll.  And this article was then translated into four other languages.  Moondragon21 ( talk ) 10:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Transportation .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Notable and well-covered events, both in the Turkish and international press, with high numbers of casualties.  It's perfectly alright for someone not to like that these events were tied together in the press but that does not make it into WP:SYNTH or anything near to that!  If events were COMMONLY tied together then this is NOT OR.  We absolutely should, as done right here, follow in the footsteps of others.  gidonb ( talk ) 23:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  01:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 06:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Well-sourced, plenty of coverage to pass WP:GNG .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 12:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] GNG requires sustained coverage per WP:NSUSTAINED .  News events do not qualify for GNG simply because they were covered, even if it was by several news outlets.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 17:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
The Light Bearer: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Was AfD'd in 2006 and kept, but standards were then significantly lower.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and History .  Owen× ☎ 16:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete did not find any refs -- PeaceNT ( talk ) 02:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Changed to keep per below. I was concerned about the Publishers Weekly source as it is a trade magazine, but not a big issue, and the new added sources look great. Meet notability. -- PeaceNT ( talk ) 04:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Why are you not counting the two existing independent reviews already present as citations in the article?  Publisher's Weekly has one; this syndicated review originating in the Washington Post is another.  Doesn't that meet WP:NBOOK ?  Toughpigs ( talk ) 04:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I also added a third review from Kirkus Reviews.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 04:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for fixing dead link and adding refs! -- PeaceNT ( talk ) 04:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination per excellent points above. Thanks for your work on this, Boleyn ( talk ) 08:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment. Was tempted to close but there is still an entire section that is unreferenced or at least it is unclear where these things come from. -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 12:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ouro : Having unreferenced material on a page doesn't matter for notability, see WP:SURMOUNTABLE .  The only thing that matters for AfD is whether enough sources exist to indicate whether the subject is notable or not.  It doesn't actually make a difference in this case because the OP withdrew the nomination, just FYI for future cases.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 17:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Toughpigs : Thank You for this information.  I kinda suspected as much, but erred on the side of caution.  Cheers and thanks!  -- Ouro ( blah blah ) 19:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
JSM Group: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 06:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Engineering .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Family Plan (1997 film): All the references in the article are mere mentions about this film.   I did a WP:BEFORE and found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes .   I also found nothing suitable, reliable and in-depth enough to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 20:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 20:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Added a few reviews to the page.  Keep .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 23:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , newly added sources pass WP:NFILM Donald D23 talk to me 02:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per added sources.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 17:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , easily sourceable, blatant lack of WP:BEFORE.  -- C avarrone 23:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I withdraw this nomination.   Apparently, I need to practice WP:BEFORE more carefully.   I vow not to nominate any film articles for the rest of 2024.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 02:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Barwar (caste): It needs to be deleted as the content of another article Baruwar (Rajput clan) will be possibly merged into Rajput clans . - Admantine123 ( talk ) 03:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 03:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hey @ Admantine123 .  Any chance you might want to withdraw this nomination?  Then when the other AFD closes as redirect, we can just WP:BLAR Barwar (caste) to Rajput clans without all the paperwork.  This AFD is essentially a duplicate of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baruwar (Rajput clan) .  If not no worries.  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 04:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok sure, i was not clear that what is going to happen with this article after the Speedy delition was rejected.  Hence, i nominated it.  You may do what you have suggested. - Admantine123 ( talk ) 05:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Organizations , Education , Technology , Computing ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn