hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ross Lazaroo-Hood : No WP:SIGCOV .  Uhooep ( talk ) 12:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just noting for the record that this page was "moved" by Rusty Soto from the draft space via copy/paste ( diff ).  While I have no opinion on the page itself (as I have not looked back) re-draftification may be more appropriate given the unilateral non-AFC manner in which this was moved to the Article space.  Primefac ( talk ) 13:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Promo.  Most coverage of the dapper-looking fellow is about the Clear Water group, I'd perhaps redirect there.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : , FYI, looks like Clear Water is heading the way of deletion as well.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ANYBIO .  My own WP:BEFORE has returned only a small number of ROTM pieces in which the subject is mentioned in articles/coverage which are substantively about something else.  The same thing is evident in the sources within the article (effectively all of which are news/press-releases about the subject's company or the events that company sponsors).  While a redirect might sometimes be appropriate, I personally question whether the company is notable either.  That all of these related articles (the subject here, his company, and the event his company sponsors) were created by the same (SPA/PAID/COI?) contributor does very little to help...  Guliolopez ( talk ) 12:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: 3rd and final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Standard professional profile.  If sources are found, delete per TNT.  I do not think redirect is appropriate for such blatant NPOV violation, as even WP:ATD suggests NPOV is a valid reason for deletion at AFD.   — siro χ o 03:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Some passing mentions exists, but I don't see full articles about him.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 19:12, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barry Lewis (politician) : Even Ruth Dombey who occupied the seat before Lewis was and isn't inherently notable under NPOL.  There's no WP:GNG pass either as there are no sources that are independent or provide significant coverage of the subject.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 20:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non notable subject as the nominator describes.  Mccapra ( talk ) 22:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Politicians at the borough council level are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show a credible reason to consider them a special case of significantly greater notability than the norm for that level of office — but this is basically "he is a councillor who exists", referenced almost entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , This politician isn't really relevant outside of local politics in Sutton .  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Apart from fact that this article doesn't meet WP:GNG , I am particularly seeking being a leader of London Borough of Sutton .  But while u was checking whether there can be a possible redirect, I saw leader is usually a "Mayor", thus, this individual doesn't meet WP:NPOL .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  08:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Editors here are correct and in agreement.  This is an easy delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 19:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Will Bunker : Only sources provided are routine/promotional coverage.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 20:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Management , Internet ,  and California .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hits are for LNG barge bunkers in Gnews; this person's Gsearch is straight to social media, linkedin, then not much of anything.  No sourcing we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete : Searched a bit (not exhaustive) on newspapers.com and Google and only found one article that's not already used.  Doesn't help that this Wikipedia article was created by Ryanckulp , blocked in 2018 because "10 out of 16 of his creations have been deleted for advertising and/or suspected UPE."  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Doctor Television Channel : Let'srun ( talk ) 13:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Let'srun ( talk ) 13:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Network's entire purpose was as non-notable filler while the owner waited for someone to buy a channel slot.  I would weakly support a redirect, but I just can't see this really meriting an article.  Nate • ( chatter ) 16:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It's hard to imagine a small television network like this, distributed via stations that, for the most part, have questionable notability themselves (if even that), getting the requisite significant coverage to merit an article.  (To be sure, I don't think non-notability can be automatically assumed by association, much as actual notability is never inherited ; all that matters is any coverage of a given topic.)  When the "sourcing" for the network's demise is its silence on social media and an error message on its live stream… WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karl Paul Kristian Gylche : Geschichte ( talk ) 09:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Denmark .  CptViraj ( talk ) 09:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , seems entirely non-notable.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 11:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WEBU-LD : Most recent edits were by User:Whcq , which proves WP:COI .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Mississippi .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Many of the same ( GNG and COI ) issues with the articles for co-owned WPRQ-LD and WHCQ-LD apply here too.  (Indeed, "most recent edits" is a bit of an understatement — other than my addition of categories formerly on the WEBU-LP redirect, and a few maintenance revisions, all the substantial contributions are by Whcq ( talk · contribs ). ) There is a license history going back to 1988 here, but that doesn't mean much without sufficient sourcing to verify anything beyond existence, much less notability.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Yoku : Searches of "James Yoku" and "Jemes Yoku" failed to yield anything close to significant coverage for me.  He only played one professional game according to Football Database .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Powerpuff Girls (disambiguation) : kpgamingz ( rant me ) 16:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It seems this should be kept due to Wikipedia:Disambiguation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's still not ambiguous enough for a disambiguation page.  It's only for a single topic/franchise.  kpgamingz ( rant me ) 21:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Disambiguations .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , but remove everything except the franchise page and The Powerpuff Girls (2016 TV series) , due to WP:PTM .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 06:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, kpgamingz ( rant me ) 20:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 22:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Add link to franchise page to the top of the TV series page.  Having disambiguation for this is excessive and unnecessary: They ALL relate to the same franchise.  WikiMane11 ( talk ) 01:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I cleaned it up.  There are 5 relevant links to similar named articles, there is no delete here.  Desertarun ( talk ) 19:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please review changes made to disambiguation page.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Powerpuff Girls (franchise) , which features all of these things sufficiently.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 01:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Disambiguation pages are for listing unrelated topics.  All of these are related to each other and hence this is not a valid dab.  * Pppery * it has begun... 03:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , precisely per Pppery .  Leaving a redirect at this title would falsely imply that there are multiple unrelated topics sharing the name.  BD2412 T 02:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and since the target is not a disambiguation per se.  Seems confusing and misleading for readers to leave this as a redirect.  CycloneYoris talk!  01:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Powerpuff Girls (franchise) : Information is in infobox.  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 06:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KDEO-LD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Colorado .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Non-notable TV station.  TH1980 ( talk ) 03:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom, fails GNG and NCORP.  No WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 17:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akshay Akkineni (filmmaker) : Since the last AFD (and subsequent salting of Akshay Akkineni ), he was assistant director on another film.  Article also says that he has notable relatives, but notability is not inherited on Wikipedia.  In a WP:BEFORE search, the best I can find in RS is gossipy reports about his wedding.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Telangana .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep :Notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fostera12 ( talk • contribs ) — Note to closing admin : Fostera12 ( talk • contribs )  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD .  Delete : He has directed only one feature film.  The rest are as ADs, and one is a short film.  Also, no career section.  Kailash29792 (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : failed in WP:ENT also WP:GNG .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 11:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to A. Sreekar Prasad#Early and personal life , where he is mentioned, for now.  Not opposed to keep as he is director of at least one notable film; opposed to deletion. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] similar to Babil Khan only 1-2 films Fostera12 ( talk ) 13:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry but I don't understand your comment.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 21:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : GNG and SIGCOV not met.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Callum O'Brien : Only primary sources supplied.  A career high ranking of 61.  No inherent notability in attending Commonwealth Games (like with the Olympic Games).  LibStar ( talk ) 01:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New Zealand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 03:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of archaeology and history books : WP:NOTEVERYTHING and not needed - for navigation purposes there are relevant categories JMWt ( talk ) 11:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Archaeology .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Rename to bibliography of archaeology or merge to Bibliography of anthropology#Archaeology per WP:ATD .  Personally I agree that bibliographic lists tend to devolve into indiscriminate collections of information, but like it or not they are a thing .  This a decent start on a bibliography for archaeology and absent a consensus against bibliographies as a whole, I don't think we can start selectively deleting them.  I suggest renaming for consistency with other bibliographies and because the it only lists archaeology titles.  – Joe ( talk ) 11:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/merge Overly broad topic, no need to merely name unrelated books on an expansive field like this.  Respective subtopics could include biblographies, no need for one on archaeology and history as a whole.  Reywas92 Talk 14:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails WP:SALAT as an overly broad list that can be either woefully incomplete or extensive to the point of uselessness.  Owen× ☎ 23:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Youprayteas ( talk to me? | contribs ) 15:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fulvio Caldini : Google books has some passing mentions, but nothing significant.  Out of existing citations none are any good.  The first one is dead.  Also as an Italian musician, he doesn't even have an Italian Wiki, so it just shows that his not that notable.  Freezejunk ( talk ) 23:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians .  Freezejunk ( talk ) 23:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete under criterion A7 .  The only even remotely possible claim I can see in the article is has created a large body of works , which isn't really a claim of significance.  I am also unable to find any significant coverage of the subject.  Tollens ( talk ) 08:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  Non notable composer.  ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 15:30, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dalma Llinás : Fails WP:SIGCOV .  US-Verified ( talk ) 20:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Colombia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 21:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Esteban Aracama : jlwoodwa ( talk ) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Spain .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Olympics database entry which fails WP:GNG .  SportingFlyer T · C 20:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alisha Rai : KH-1 ( talk ) 10:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nepal .  KH-1 ( talk ) 10:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Women .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was not able to find RS SIGCOV that was not about the author.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant coverage anywhere even after a lot of searching.  MaxxyOswald ( talk ) 20:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC) — MaxxyOswald ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] Delete not notable.  DIVINE ( talk ) 13:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete