hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Will and testament of clerics : The article is only three sentences long and consists mostly of vague assertions which are not supported by the only cited source, the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia .  "The will and testament of clerics is a controversial issue for a number of Christian denominations"?  There is no evidence given of any controversy nor any explanation of what that controversy is, nor is any specific denomination mentioned in this article.  "Many churches have rules on the way in which property that is owned by a cleric can be distributed on death"?  That would seem to be primarily an issue for churches whose clergy have taken a vow of poverty and/or are celibate, as I would expect that churches with married clergy would allow the clergy to leave their property upon death to their spouse and/or children.  If churches with married clergy do have such rules, no evidence has been provided of such rules.  And with regard to the Catholic Church, which does have rules about the wills and testaments of clerics, there is no indication in this article of what those rules are.  Since there was no attempt to improve the article after the last AfD, I believe it would be best to delete this article altogether, with the opportunity to re-create it if substantive, sourced content can be found later.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, and like a comment in the last nomination said, this is essentially a non-subject of relevancy to nothing.  It doesn't help that the closer simply gave the reason of: "The result was keep." to an outcome of obviously weak consensus.  We do not create articles based on vaguely supported subjects mentioned a few times in various references (like this one) which is why there is no article for say " sharpness of knives " - Ap m h 05:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I remember this from last year.  Still nothing terribly notable has been added to the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:43, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can imagine a decent article named "Clerical property in the Catholic Church" considering the plethora of sources on that , but the current article is not about a subject worthy of its own article per rationales stated above.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 15:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's not very often that I vote delete, but there isn't really anything here to save.   If somebody wants to write a proper article at some point, all power to them.  Noel S McFerran ( talk ) 22:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Anthem of South Ossetia : After fourteen years, the article’s references are the subject’s own “official” website, videos and lyrics from user-generated-content sites, and a “patriotic” website.   — Michael Z .  03:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions .   — Michael Z .  03:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Second trip to AFD so Soft Deletion isn't an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there clearly isn't enough independent coverage of this topic.  Cortador ( talk ) 12:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WOH S281 : The article only relies on a single source (excluding its SIMBAD entry), that itself is a large-scale survey and does not establish notability.  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 19:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom: no hits on Google Scholar ( [6] , [7] ), cited journal article ( [8] ) doesn't appear to even mention it, based on my control-f search, other coverage is in routine databases/surveys or in mirrors/forks of Wikipedia.  Fails WP:NASTRO .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 15:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Article briefly PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, I guess.  Seems a pity, but as noted above there just isn't much to work with here.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 23:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sergei Svechkar : signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  signed, Rosguill talk 23:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Noting that additional sources were added but that they do little to establish a case for notability: [5] is a social media post, [6] is a local news source reporting that a seminar given by Svechkar was presented by Dynamo Vologda, his team, and provides no further analysis of Svechkar's biography or career.  [7] is the same source, interviewing Svechkar for a brief comment on Dynamo Vologda's  success, and [8] is an unbylined press release of Svechkar being hired at Dynamo Vologda.  We are still entirely lacking independent coverage discussing Svechkar's life, play style, coaching style, or other biographic information that would justify an article.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:58, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree with Rosguill's assessment of the available sourcing and agree that this is some way short of WP:GNG .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per Rosguill's eval.  // Timothy :: talk 14:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexandra Bokyun Chun : Shellwood ( talk ) 15:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brenda M. Saiz : Perhaps redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and New Mexico .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NJUDGE .  Would not redirect because her failed nomination wasn't a controversy.  Otherwise, there would be some reporting on her.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 07:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I could find three non-govermental sources: Albuquerque Journal , CDLife , Law and Crime .  I'd describe all three of these sources as borderline - reputable-looking local paper, trade press, and a kind of sensationalist-looking crime-focused newspaper.  Rusalkii ( talk ) 04:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Saikai Pearl Sea Resort : uncited and written like an ad.  ltb d l ( talk ) 04:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks and Japan .  ltb d l ( talk ) 04:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Travel and tourism .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jaime Stein : Hirolovesswords ( talk ) 14:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism ,  and Canada .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and American football .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Stein meets the WP:GNG with significant coverage from reliable sources such as [ [22] ], [ [23] ] and [ [24] ].  This is also WP:SIGCOV but is not independent: [ [25] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 10:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: We need more people to participate in AfD discussions.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The "oursportscentral" article is a rather typical "new job announcement" and doesn't do much to support GNG.  The Vancouver Sun 2004 article is a single sentence.  The Rotman article is not independent, it's one of those alumnus blurbs.  While it might provide some facts it is a good bet that they come directly from the subject.  The only possible significant article I see is the Vancouver Sun 2005 one.  It talks about the subject as beginning a career, and given that was in 2005 I would expect to have seen later articles about a career, but I don't.  Lamona ( talk ) 22:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Still no consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Even in . ca sources, there is hardly anything.  I agree with the nom's review of the sources, most aren't helpful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rishi Khurana : Furthermore, there is a lack of in-depth coverage WP:SIGCOV.  DSN18 ( talk ) 22:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  DSN18 ( talk ) 22:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sheikh Umar Arshad : — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 19:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  It literally says, "local politician", without any allegation of notability based on the position .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Touro University Rainbow Health Coalition : Some of the sources provided are local as per WP:AUD .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sexuality and gender ,  and California .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael J. Nicholson : Subject isn’t inherently notable based on NPOL nor passes any of the other basic and general criteria.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 15:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Massachusetts .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 15:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is essentially "he is a mayor who exists, the end" — but mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to pass WP:NPOL #2 on WP:GNG -worthy media coverage analyzing their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.  But there's no content like that here, and the article is "referenced" entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, with not even one bit of GNG-worthy coverage about him shown whatsoever.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Primary sourcing from the town's website says he's the first Hispanic individual and the city's youngest mayor, which suggest notability.  I can't find sourcing about this person, other than being appointed to a position in the fashion industry.  Nothing for notability that I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article that doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article has been updated to cite non-government sources, and explains some aspects of his notability such as his age at election and ethnic background both being historic in the city.  -Joseph A. Rinaldi ( talk ) 03:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "First member of [underrepresented minority group] to do a not-inherently notable thing in one specific local area" is not an instant notability freebie.  The notability test for mayors hinges on having a significant volume of media coverage that enables us to write a substantial article about his political impact , and identity criteria such as age or ethnic background (or gender or sexual orientation, where those are applicable) don't exempt a mayor from having to pass that test all by themselves.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southern Collegiate Baseball League : There is no indication of independent coverage beyond routine game coverage.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball , United States of America ,  and North Carolina .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and South Carolina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of secondary sourcing.  User:Let'srun 01:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails GNG.  Wizardman 13:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rabbi Doug : There is one book cited, where he appears to be mentioned once along with a number of other religious TV programs in Chicago.  A google search for "Rabbi Doug" or "Taped with... Rabbi Doug" or "Taped with Rabbi Doug do not come up with significant discussion of the person or the show in reliable sources, the results are social media and notes that such-and-such has appeared on the show.  Perhaps it is notable within the Chicago area but I can't see it for a Wikipedia article.  ... disco spinster talk 15:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Judaism ,  and United States of America .  ... disco spinster talk 15:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Does Rabbi Doug have a last name?  There are too many rabbis named Doug listed in Google to be of help here...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] His full name is Douglas Howard Zelden (see also this edit from the SPA article creator).  Stony Brook babble 13:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The show's host Doug Zelden is an unremarkable pulpit rabbi whose congregation Or Menorah was evicted from a temple building that was sold to another party.  Coverage not significant in any way.  Stony Brook babble 14:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of genuine notability or in-depth coverage.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 15:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ivan Bjelobradić : To see whether this meets WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC , I did a Croatian source search and found nothing better than Index , which is a news story about drink driving.  It's more than a passing mention but I'm hesitant to call someone notable just because of a news report about driving under the influence on its own.  Other sources found include Jutarnji , Sportnet and Dnevnik .  All of those mentions are trivial and the last one is a blog so probably isn't WP:RS anyway.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Croatia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no GNG-passing sources to be found.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dave Gibson (voice actor) : The only SIGCOV here is dedicated to Doug Mulray, not Gibson.  BEFORE shows nothing beyond a number of extra/minor roles for one of at least two Dave Gibsons associated with acting/voice over work.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Australia .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete