hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
LayerX: Gsearch is straight into their company's website, nothing in Gnews Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Israel .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I removed a pile of promotional links, self-links, links that didn't back the claims, non-RS links and one that I think was AI-generated.  No evidence this company passes WP:NCORP - David Gerard ( talk ) 17:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NCORP.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 18:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article on a start-up company with a similarly-named browser security product.  Considered as a company, the available coverage concerns funding and a recent survey sponsored by the firm [11] , both of which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH .  Considered as a product, the brief coverage in overviews of new browser security products seems some way short of demonstrating attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:TOOSOON .  (If this company achieves notability in the future, however, then the page could be recreated.)  TH1980 ( talk ) 04:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NCORP .  Mooonswimmer 02:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Usually startups fail NCORP.  Usually implies that exceptions exist.  Occasionally there is a startup that is the talk of all media.  I do not see that here.  gidonb ( talk ) 15:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails GNG and SIGCOV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TandyTRS80 ( talk • contribs ) 08:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete None of the sources meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability and I am unable to locate any that does.  HighKing ++ 14:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jessica Ruffner: – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Comics and animation .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NO sources for this person found.  The name is too common.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - sadly no evidence Ms. Ruffner is notable even within the undercovered field of comic colourists.  Not even really a standout association to redirect to IMHO.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 16:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Third battle of Anandpur (1704): User has a history of making poorly sourced articles, sometimes with copyright violations, that aggrandize the Sikh side in armed conflicts.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 20:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Analysing references from a version before cleanup, the first source is a no-byline compilation from the religious portal allaboutsikhs.com , the second source is self-published and the third source from a self-published novel-author is "historical fiction" .  Unless WP:HISTRS sources are provided to determine notability WP:NEVENT , fiction has no place here.  — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 10:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources before cleanup were all unreliable.  This is one of those many articles where the editor has no WP:COMPETENCE that could result in any benefaction.  This article has no significant notability with no coverage from scholarly sources.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mozilla localizations: Greatder ( talk ) 17:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Greatder ( talk ) 17:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:NOTCHANGELOG StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero point in having this article.  Srijanx22 ( talk ) 18:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ben Azura ( talk ) 22:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Equatorial College School: Nothing much found to consider against the WP:GNG JMWt ( talk ) 09:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Uganda .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not seeing any notability here either.  Only thing remotely notable is the other places it has ties with.  Procyon117 ( talk ) 14:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Melih Sezgin: -Lemonaka‎ 02:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I don't read Turkish, and I have difficulty understanding some machine translations from Turkish.  I am struggling with this one, because there's more than one person with this name.  I can find one RS about him being a producer: Here is an article about him taking over as producer of tr:Sungurlar .  Some of the IMDb credits may be for someone else with the same name.  The corresponding article in Turkish has been deleted three times as not notable.  Still, I would expect someone who was producer of two successful television series to have generated coverage to show notability.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 07:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails WP:GNG. -- Kadı Message 18:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I agree with the comment above about the Turkish translations of sources using Gsearch.  Could be notable, but I'm not confident enough to ! vote.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
FK Kozara (Sweden): Modest history peaking on the 6th tier.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WhatJobs: Sources cited are mostly primary, along with a few unreliable secondary sources that look like paid placement.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Nothing significant (at least) in the UK publications.  Geeraarts ( talk ) 00:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with the above assessments of the given sources, which are trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH ; searches find routine listings and a brief Q&A with the founder but not the coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 07:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Profiteering: * Pppery * it has begun... 13:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete to make way for move per nom.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   It wasn't needed anyway.  Profiteering is inherently related to business.  -- Bejnar ( talk ) 20:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bitter Sweet (Majeeed EP): However, it notably fails to meet WP:NALBUM or any of the applicable subsections due to a lack of sources establishing its notability.  The content primarily consists of music releases, alongside interviews and passing mentions, none of which sufficiently establish notability on any grounds.  For reference, you may review archived copies of links from The PGM Club and The Guardian Nigeria here: [18] [19] These archives provide accessible evidence regarding the sources mentioned.  I am also very much skeptical about the notability of the musician himself.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 14:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and Nigeria .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 14:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  12:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : all this album has is a few chart rankings, which may indicate notability but do not confer it, and apart from that there's no WP:SIGCOV , so it fails WP:GNG .  — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong ) 17:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chin Jong-gil: Simione001 ( talk ) 23:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 23:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 14:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Without additional WP:SIGCOV , this subject fails all notability guidelines, including WP:ATHLETE .  User:Let'srun 00:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rykard Jenkins: Anonposeidon ( talk ) 23:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Anonposeidon ( talk ) 23:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:ENT #1: The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions , i.e., for IbizaWeekenderand Love Island.  Both are notable - not classy, but notable.  Healso has coverage in numerous newspapers, as shown in this article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A couple of weeks on two reality shows (with no content or references mentioning film, TV, state or other productions) does not make a person notable.  David notMD ( talk ) 21:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete probably not enough here to justify a standalone article IMO.  For reality TV shows/competitions, we generally look for those who are finalists - and Rykard doesn't meet that threshold.  Also, the media coverage is mostly tabloid fodder. - KH-1 ( talk ) 05:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dameon Venter: The closes to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this piece.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Probably was a case of WP:TOOSOON on creation, while the guidelines were in process of being changed also.  There's lots of coverage, but I don't think any of it reaches WP:GNG levels if I'm honest, and his career hasn't really kicked on, so delete as there's no redirect.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agreeing with other votes - does not meet WP:GNG - insufficiently notable.  WmLawson ( talk ) 00:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lucas Rodriguez (entrepreneur): There is no independent information anywhere about the subject of this article outside of press releases.  Exemplo347 ( talk ) 06:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Business ,  and Texas .  Exemplo347 ( talk ) 06:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BIO .  I don't see coverage in RS that's about him specifically.  APK whisper in my ear 07:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per WP:BIO .  Most sources and online are about the companies rather than Rodriguez.  Lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Grahaml35 ( talk ) 20:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage in third party sources fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barbie Fashion Model Collection: QuietCicada - Talk 23:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Products .  QuietCicada - Talk 23:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This really shouldn't have been created without any secondary sourcing.  Fails WP:GNG evidently.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 01:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Government Mamit College: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] pls do not delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolcolney ( talk • contribs ) 05:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Short question, why ?  If you want the page to be kept, you need to prove that the page is notable and that requires you to show that atleast three reliable, independent third-party sources have covered the subject in-depth.  Sohom ( talk ) 13:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Coolcolney ^^ Sohom ( talk ) 13:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sohom I will update with more source Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relisting.  We still need some more opinions here.  There hasn't been much participation in this discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find any sources that confirm independent notability for this school.  Cortador ( talk ) 09:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Capture of Kabbaldurga: Cited with poor non WP:RS and WP:RAJ sources which give passing mentions of this event, doesn't deserve a standalone article.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 05:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , India ,  and Karnataka .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Again a WP:SYNTH made up battle page.  Poor sources that fail verification and coverage.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable event written up as vaguely as possible in an attempt to hide the lack of sources.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 20:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CMH Masjid Jhelum: Lacks WP:SIGCOV .  BookishReader ( talk ) 00:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Pakistan .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 01:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and the fact that the only somewhat valid source is primary.  Cannot find any sources documenting the mosque in more than passing context or beyond WP:USERG blog posts and videos.  WhichUser AmI 15:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete