List of honorary citizens of Schleswig-Holstein: Precedents: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of honorary citizens of Lubbock Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of honorary citizens of Templin See also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 1#Category:Honorary citizens , and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of honorary citizens of Zwolle .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 21:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 21:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment it is concerning that these categories have been deleted with reference to past decisions to listify the categories and then a proponent of deleting the categories is proposing to delete the lists.  Jahaza ( talk ) 22:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Which past decisions to listify?  I am unaware of any.  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 23:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This one [15] you linked to on Categories for Discussion [16] .  Jahaza ( talk ) 03:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oh, I didn't see that because The result of the discussion was: Delete .  עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:05, 24 June 2010 .  It didn't say "listify".  Thanks for pointing it out.  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 07:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:GNG , multiple sources discussing award are now added to article.  Side note, this region is much larger than the ones listed as precedents.   — siro χ o 07:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Followup note, forgot to mention that it meets WP:NLIST as the group is discussed as such in those sources as well.  — siro χ o 22:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Why don't we move this to Schleswig-Holstein as a section?  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 06:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That would be acceptable for me.  It is no longer unsourced, but I don't think it's enough for a standalone article.  @ Siroxo : What do you think about merging to Schleswig-Holstein ?  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 16:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This would be an acceptable outcome, as the main article is around 5000 words or so, still "readable prose size".  That article has a lot of links out to sub-articles already, so it may also not be necessary to merge.   — siro χ o 06:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Update Category:Honorary citizens closed as Delete (all) .  List of honorary citizens of Zwolle closed as Redirect to Zwolle .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 16:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nederlandse Leeuw , it's not clear to me what you are advising be done with this particular article.  L iz Read!  Talk!  04:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz I advise a merger to Schleswig-Holstein (per Suitskvarts and with the consent of Siroxo), making this page a redirect to a section in that article (per the Zwolle precedent).  Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 11:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Terrible choice.  No really, how is being an honorary citizen less defining or notable for a person than recieving an award (which we have tons of categories for)?  ★Trekker ( talk ) 19:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It depends what kinds of awards.  Some awards are WP:NONDEFINING per WP:OCAWARD .  Category:Honorary citizens and its various subcategories have been deleted again and again because they are not considered defining enough.  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 03:28, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  09:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge