hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Angela Rawlings: None of the sources in the article are independent of the subject, or SIGCOV for that matter, and I was unable to find any SIGCOV during a search.  The best that I could find was an interview from 2018 that didn't contain any independent prose from the author, who also states that she has collaborated with the subject in the past.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists , Iceland ,  and Canada .  Alvaldi ( talk ) 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Language ,  and Poetry .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : sources seem to support established notability, and she has a new area of  notability as the nominated candidate for 2024 Icelandic presidential election on behalf of a glacier.  Pam D 09:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ PamD I might be missing something as I'm not seeing significant and independent sources in the article.  Could you please link to what you beleive are the WP:THREE best significant sources about the subject?  Note that being a candidate in itself is not enough to pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 10:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've added one scholarly paper for a start, 20 pages analysing her major poem.  Works based on that same poem have appeared in various festivals.  The 2012 Poet-in-Residence post is notability in itself: there will be extensive coverage, possibly in offline sources, in Australian media.  Pam D 12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And added a review in The Antigonish Review , not open-access but available online via Wikipedia Library.  Pam D 14:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I have added some more reviews of the Wide slumber for lepidopterists .   Perhaps too many.   But these seem to me to help establish notability (subject of multiple independent reviews).  ( Msrasnw ( talk ) 15:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Humpty Dumpty (magazine): Dronebogus ( talk ) 03:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Children's magazine published since 1952, with Wikipedia article since 2010 (it was briefly redirected to Saturday Evening Post, but was a separate article most of the time).  Magazine has a history under other owners.  *Dan T. * ( talk ) 04:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some references, including two academic references that didn't speak highly of the 1980s version of the magazine.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 05:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Indiana .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 05:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep There are a number of mentions of it in scholarly articles over the years which would support an article - more than just the criticism section of the page - and possibly more mentions in newspapers.  It's not the most notable thing in the world but I think there's just enough for an article.  I've cleaned up some of the promotional wording in the article as well.  SportingFlyer T · C 09:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  this is a well-read children's magazine in the US.   I read this when I was a little kid.  This is sold all over the United States.  Worldcat listings .  — Maile ( talk ) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That vote rationale sounds like WP:ITSPOPULAR mixed with WP:ILIKEIT Dronebogus ( talk ) 08:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Cdrdao: Not notable.  Changed my opinion after the major work done by StreetcarEnjoyer (thank you!), now I don't think it should be deleted.  I believe I have the right to withdraw the nomination since both people here are leaning towards keeping .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep or merge and redirect into Optical disc recording modes#CD Disc-At-Once .  Significant coverage in multiple books from reputable publishers ( example 1 , 2 , 3 ), but very little in the trades or news sites.  DigitalIceAge ( talk ) 20:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - If you give me a day or two I could try and clean this article up.  Might not save it, but I'll try and help.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 01:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Did what I could.  Hope this helps.  It was mentioned in enough books and articles that makes me think it's notable.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 23:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Anthony D'Amato: It's WP:REFBOMB , with every single mention and review they could find.  Also possible COI/vanity page.  Nswix ( talk ) 23:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Nswix ( talk ) 23:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The NYT, Billboard and NPR articles all seem to satisfy 'In-depth coverage', am I missing something?  Jeff UK 20:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as AllMusic staff written bio here where there is also a staff album review, The New York Times here , NPR here , there is a dedicated article in the WSJ but its paywalled here , Billboard here and Rolling Stone here .  In my view there is enough significant coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 23:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above, passes WP:THREE and thats all it needs, NYT, NPR, RS.  // Timothy :: talk 10:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tom Carter (diplomat): Fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 04:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Thailand , France , Germany , United Kingdom , England ,  and Guatemala .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment redirect to List of ambassadors of the United Kingdom to Guatemala .  Moondragon21 ( talk ) 12:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete Ambassadors are not inherently notable and this one fails WP:BIO .  Oppose redirect as a very common name.  LibStar ( talk ) 10:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep change to keep based on sources found below.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep along with spouse: from Embassy magazine : "For the first time in the history of the Foreign Office, a husband and wife team will be joint heads of a British diplomatic mission".  Coverage also in the Financial Times, An innovative model of leadership ; The Times, Secret of a double life ; The Guardian, Mr and Mrs Ambassador Piecesofuk ( talk ) 09:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to review recent sources found.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep career diplomat.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Whilst I support keep there is no inherent notability in being a career diplomat.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Enough here for me to satisfy notability.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 11:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Azadi Cinema Complex: This article has existed since 2011, and nobody appears to have found sources showing its notability.  My city has movie theaters too, but they are not notable.  – Jonesey95 ( talk ) 16:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Iran .  – Jonesey95 ( talk ) 16:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Notable film theater, from a historical and architectural point a view (and in the history of both Iranian film and Tehran society).  Someone appears to have found sources showing it is notable and added them to the page today.  See for yourself.  Film theaters in the city where the nominator lives may not be notable but this one is.  :D.  So, Keep ! - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 17:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The quote from The Politics of Iranian Cinema is evidence of notability.  I also found a mention in a Boston Globe article about a politician: "He reopened Azadi cinema, a famous theater which had been burned down by hard-liners and closed for over a decade."  That quote backs up the claim that the theater is "famous", and that there's a political story that may be documented in other sources we haven't found yet.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 18:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Toughpigs above.  Llajwa ( talk ) 18:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Radhika Piramal: Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T ) 07:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Women , India ,  and United Kingdom . Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T ) 07:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:GNG and is the Vice Chairperson of VIP Industries s India's largest luggage manufacturing company.  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 19:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  Appears to have sustained significant coverage, like this Forbes India (staff writer) bio, this in the Economic Times, this in the Business Standard, and so forth.  Admittedly many Indian news sites are sometimes dubious, but this much coverage across lots of different major news sources still seems like enough for notability. — Moriwen ( talk ) 15:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:GNG .  Subject was on Forbes list and had coverage in sources like Bloomberg.  Per Moriwen , much coverage in reliable news sources.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Andrew Hignell: Article was previously deleted in 2007, but there is still no evidence of the subject's notability.  – Pee Jay 11:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Cricket ,  and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Previous AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Ledbetter .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 14:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Based on a quick search, doesn't seem to meet WP:NAUTHOR .  I found this review of one of his books .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 14:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Radio , History , England ,  and Wales .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Suriname0 found a review of A 'Favourit' Game , reviewed by Jack Williams.  I'll add to that a review of Rain stops play , reviewed by Robert Thorpe, doi : 10.1256/wea.112.02 .  But I'm doubtful that [25] is sufficiently reliable, so that gives us only two reviews.  I'd want more than that for WP:AUTHOR .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 04:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  His books are reviewed in serious publications and he is generally considered the pre-eminent historian of Welsh cricket.  Sammyrice ( talk ) 04:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Surprised to see this nom.  Hignell is one of the best known and pre-eminent living cricket historians.  Meets WP:GNG .  AA ( talk ) 09:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi User:AssociateAffiliate , it would be very helpful for me and for other voters if you could clarify which 2-3 sources best demonstrate that Hignell meets WP:GNG .  I couldn't find any when I looked, and the current article doesn't cite any that contain SIGCOV in my opinion!  Thanks!  Suriname0 ( talk ) 21:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Now up to six reliably published book reviews (of six different books, not counting reviews in specialist cricket web sites), enough for WP:AUTHOR for me.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 17:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Hermie and Friends: I found no secondary sources or SIGCOV.  One site called it an "award-winning" show but I never could locate what that award was.  Given the detail of content about the characters, I think this article mainly serves as a nostalgia page for IP editors to write about a series they might have watched when they were younger.  Dare I say it?  I don't think it is notable or encyclopedic.  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Christianity .  L iz Read!  Talk!  22:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : So far I've found one review in the Wichita Falls Times Record News: " DVD hangs on wing, prayer and a caterpillar ", which has eight brief paragraphs.  I'll see if I can find anything else.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 23:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, Toughpigs , I'm impressed by your diligence.  We have so many articles on marginal children's television series.  I guess this one did have some coverage, at least in Wichita.  L iz Read!  Talk!  05:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep this UT Daily Beacon review is independent, extensive, and as RS as any college student publication would be.  In combination with the above, that would be a notability pass.  Jclemens ( talk ) 05:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Of note but not contributing to notability, Tim Conway's obituaries do seem to mention this series (he voiced the main character) among his other clearly more well-known roles.  Jclemens ( talk ) 05:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The sources presented above might show this is notable enough.  If a redirect target can be found, not opposed to the idea.  Needs a bit of trimming....  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Besides the reviews listed above, there is also this and this from The Dove Foundation and this from the School Library Journal .  Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk ) 07:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
The ClueFinders Search and Solve Adventures: Article does not have enough sources to support notability.  I checked Google and the Newspaper archives and was unable to find any notable sources.  Has been tagged for needing sources since 2012.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep found reviews that were archived and added them to the article.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 22:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep MobyGames lists 4 reviews.  Unless they can be proven to be unreliable, the article seems notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 05:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Catch! Teenieping: When you click on a page, there are also invalid pages.  Guidelines have not been significantly addressed in reliable secondary sources.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability Hkm5420 ( talk ) 05:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Hkm5420 ( talk ) 05:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and South Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The secondary sources for the show seems to be mainly available on the South Korean news websites.  Here.  -- 린눈라단 ( talk ) 19:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Apart from this, we need to fill in secondary sources of the article. -- 린눈라단 ( talk ) 20:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Added a couple of things.  Various sources attest of the notability of this series, including some in English ( The Korea Herald , among other).  The page needs trimming and probably some cuts and removal of some primary sources that are perhaps unnecessary but notability and popularity seem established.  Not sure there is a valid reason for deletion in the nominator's rationale: Afds are for deletion not cleanup.   - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 22:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Mushy Yank's improvements.  The Korea Herald article is strong, and the Busan.com article is good as well.  There's enough here to indicate notability.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 16:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I can see some coverage on the subject.  I would like to add The Korea Herald, JoongAng Daily etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hkkingg ( talk • contribs ) 11:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Rick Dyer: I propose deleting it and moving one of the two Rick Dyers (probably the game designer ) to this title as the primary topic , while leaving a hatnote that directs to the other Rick Dyer, and a different disambiguation page for the various Richard Dyers.  silviaASH ( inquire within ) 00:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Disambiguations .  silviaASH ( inquire within ) 00:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : no obvious primary topic.  Page views favour the videogame designer but not overwhelmingly, and even the nominator says "probably".  Just leave it as is.  Pam D 07:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] https://wikinav.toolforge.org/? language=en&title=Rick_Dyer shows that in March, 43 people saw the list and 24 went to the first entry (55%).  I don't think this is quite sufficient to prove WP:PTOPIC status.  As for the Richards, it is curious that the only outgoing link that registers at https://wikinav.toolforge.org/? language=en&title=Richard_Dyer is one of the hatnotes, so we might want to try to disambiguate that fully as well.  -- Joy ( talk ) 14:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep 2 valid entries, no evidence put forwardof a clear primary topic.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  No evidence of a clear primary topic, so maintaining the DAB page seems best for now.  CycloneYoris talk!  04:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep