hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Narmin Knyaz : Redivy ( talk ) 00:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources found.  Brachy 08 (Talk) 00:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Radio , Television ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Irattachankan : No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.  I generally set a lower bar on movies but there's no source that even comes close and for a modern date.  Two of the 4 references are just saying "in production" months before the 2023 release and the other two are database entries.  North8000 ( talk ) 18:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Owen× ☎ 19:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Copied by North8000 from creator's talk page North8000 ( talk ) 21:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC) : [ reply ] @ North8000 It's a very famous film that meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and provides valuable information to users.  Online Gabbar ( talk ) 18:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What you need to do is find 1-2 references which discuss it in depth and add them and content from them into the article.   Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 19:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - A claim that it is famous doesn't seem supported by the sourcing...   I honestly can't even tell if this was actually released or not.  This says it comes out April 2024.   Not that I trust that to be 100% accurate, but it seems as likely as the others that appear editable databases.   Maybe it comes out next month and some reviews come, but if not, the draft can reach a deleted state via G13.   If it gets published again without improvement, I would ! vote delete in a subsequent AfD.  - 2pou ( talk ) 18:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ 2pou I stumbled upon this public response video that was posted just a day after the film came out, so yes, there's clear evidence that the film was indeed released.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 11:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - It does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for films.  Yolandagonzales ( talk ) 18:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NN film, no reviews received.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article about a film that is not notable per WP:NFILM .  Few casts that haven't been on set most probably a film skeptically rejected since I can't find any review per BEFORE except databases like AB club, filmibeat and mirror sites.  This is a valid lack of SIGCOV!  All the Best!  Otuọcha ( talk ) 00:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
İsmail Erkan Çelik : Had previous review and tagging with no disposition.   No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Author has a lifetime of 10 edits, their edit #1 was a full creation of this article.  Two of the references (which I removed) just said "Google Scholar" (nothing else).   Most of material is uncited because there is practically nothing in the references.  North8000 ( talk ) 22:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Turkey .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , looks like WP:RESUME .  Aintabli ( talk ) 03:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as spam.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 09:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NeST (Nepalese Society in Trondheim) : Tagged as such since creation without improvement.  * Pppery * it has begun... 02:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Nepal ,  and Norway .  Shellwood ( talk ) 05:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete , I added some more references but I couldn't find anything past mirror sites and promotional websites.  Per nominator, not notable.  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 14:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If consensus turns out to be that this should be kept then the article title should be changed to the non-abbreviated name.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 21:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NORG by the looks of it. - KH-1 ( talk ) 05:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Agri-Fab : No SIGCOV Gavrover ( talk ) 20:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on the article I expected more coverage to exist, but after checking news and books I'm Just Not Seeing It.  Disappointing, as it is quite a well constructed article with nice prose and structure and pictures.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Can't find sigcov sufficient to meet WP:NCORP (and even reviews of its products are relatively thin -- though perhaps more likely in specialty publications).  Could in theory be redirected to Sullivan,_Illinois#Economy to preserve cats, but it doesn't appear to be a significant enough company for that middle-ground to be needed.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 14:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG ,lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anass Maksi (Business executive) : Fails WP:NBIO - barely any coverage in reliable secondary sources.  Kk.urban ( talk ) 17:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Morocco ,  and Colorado .  Kk.urban ( talk ) 17:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero media coverage.  Being a hard-working individual isn't helping notability and withdrawing from an election isn't notable either.  This is PROMO.  Heck, it's sourced to the Better Business Bureau, a patents database and government websites, none of which help notability.   Could have almost speedied this.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sourced entirely by non- WP:RS sources.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and title blacklist Sock repost: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anass Maksi (businessman) , etc.  * Pppery * it has begun... 17:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would prefer this not get speedied, just so we have a deletion discussion to point to for G4.  * Pppery * it has begun... 20:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per others as well as a clear sock of Zimidar, same UPE.  Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 13:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete Couldn't find any news coverage anywhere It appears like that  most of the sources are given from our own website.  Shabh ( talk ) 3:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom and above lacks in depth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Safwan Al-Mowallad : Vyvagaba ( talk ) 11:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Saudi Arabia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Willem Barnard : Boleyn ( talk ) 20:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Photography , Environment , Aviation ,  and South Africa .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just can't find adequate sourcing.  Tone is pretty promotional too.  Delete Does not pass WP:NBASIC and does not meet the bar for WP:ANYBIO or any other additional criteria of notability for people .  I searched the web but did not find independent reliable sources.  Parts of the article read like an advertisement and goes on at length to associate the subject with family members.  I found this interview (which does not count toward notability).  I removed a number of WP:REFSPAM sources and all other included sources really scraped the barrel; I removed all bar one.  - Lopifalko ( talk ) 08:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : NN individual, fails all cited notability policies.  UtherSRG (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Uffermann : There are no articles on English Wikipedia for a person with this surname (or variant thereof), and only one article on German Wikipedia for a person with a variant of this surname ( de:Laura Ufermann ).  toweli ( talk ) 12:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Germany .  toweli ( talk ) 12:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , WP:NOTDIRECTORY of surnames.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There are several potentially notable people with this surname, such as Brian Ufferman , a Ph.D. research engineer who works on laser cladding (see LinkedIn biography), the German badminton player with the article in German Wikipedia, and Robert C. Ufferman , a nephrologist active in the 1970s at University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York with several articles in Google Scholar, as well as the Ufferman Site and the person it was named after.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 00:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also consider the spelling variation Auffermann .  See de:Auffermann .  Here's a search for the surname on Wikipedia.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 01:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Completely fails WP:NNAME , no sources found to indicate that it's not a WP:NOTDICT fail as well.  It also goes into overt detail of family history and looks somewhat like original research.  Not saying it is but it's unsourced and doesn't look great.  And the concept of "notability" above seems rather arbitrarily applied.  I don't have enough expertise to judge the notability of Brian and Robert C. (though they personally don't look very notable at a glance to me), but "the person that the Ufferman Site was named after"?  Who would that be, and why would one assume they would be notable?  I can't find their name.  Even if they are notable, it doesn't much matter when they have no article.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 22:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 20:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I don't see why Auffermann would belong in that page or even in this discussion.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I'm not sure what the potentially notable people have to do with anything - if we end up with articles on them and need to make a dab page, we can do that once we have those articles.  We don't presently have sourcing to show a WP:GNG pass for the name itself, and none has been brought forward in this discussion, either.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 23:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Meredith Molinari : Doesn't cite any RS and couldn't find any myself.  WP scatter t / c 15:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Women .  WP scatter t / c 15:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Google returns 42 hits.  Only one of them looked like it could be relevant before I clicked it, but it was only a brief wrapper over a press release about the return of the Tester series, and only mentioned Molinari in passing.  Largoplazo ( talk ) 16:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Play Station Network?  Some mention of the show in Wired [10] , but nothing I'd use for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's no mention of Molinari or Tester at Play Station Network , so why?  It would leave a reader in the dark.  Largoplazo ( talk ) 21:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG . Lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Moisés Espírito Santo Bagagem : * Pppery * it has begun... 18:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Religion , Social science ,  and Portugal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - normally I'm a quick "delete it again!" for recreation of salted material, but in this case the author has waited 16 years since the last delete and 18 since the original AfD, which is more than enough time for a subject's actual notability and our community consensus to change (and though I cannot access the deleted version, the writer seems to have taken to heart the comments from the 2006 AfD).   So I'll urge ! voters to give this a fresh look, ignoring the previous salt.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nobody other than me waited 16 years - this was created in 2010 and flew under the radar for those years.  * Pppery * it has begun... 00:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 12:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails the WP:GNG criteria and is not saved by WP:NACADEMIC .  And the fact that this brochure has been created by one kamikaze account and curated by a couple of "others", does not help.  Ignore the advice of cardiologists and salt generously.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shady Lane, Indiana : Supposedly they used excessively green sycamore logs to make a stretch of corduroy road , and the ends sprouted and produced a line of sycamores on either side of the road.  YMMV, as they say, but at any rate he says nothing about "tree-lined streets" or about streets at all.  And he certainly doesn't identify it as a settlement in any way.  The maps are of no particular help since I couldn't find one that had the name on it until it was back-added from GNIS, so it's hard to say where exactly this was supposed to have been.  The one dominant feature on all maps and aerials I saw was a substantial factory complex south of the area; it's now a bulldozed ruin, so I have no idea what it was.  Searching hits lots of other Shady Lanes but although there's a geological reference to it,  there's no such road name in the vicinity that I can find.  So I don't think this is a real place.  Mangoe ( talk ) 02:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No information found, other than the cited source, which is completely misrepresented by saying this is a community.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] General note: I've noticed a lot of these settlements I created ages ago coming up for deletion.  I believe at the time I was just creating articles for red links in the county-level "Municipalities and communities" templates.  I have no opinion on whether they are notable or not (or whether they get deleted or not); I assume you all are already removing the communities from the templates when these items are deleted.  Thanks!  Sweet kate ( talk ) 17:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The tree story is plausible, I've seen fence lines that grew a tree from the posts.  Presumably for the same reason.  And while Shady lane locale may be notable its not a community of any kind as is made clear in "From Needmore to Prosperity : Hoosier place names in folklore and history" page 298-299 [77] James.folsom ( talk ) 21:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samir Aghayev : Given that he has only played 8 mins of professional league football, this might be WP:TOOSOON , then again, I don't see any guarantee that he will be notable in the very near future.  TFF is the best source that I found but it's a squad list mention only and playing in U19 football matches doesn't make you automatically notable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP. No evidence of notability, fails GNG and BIO. My before search resulted in nothing that meets SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth. Ping me if multiple IS RS SIGCOV sources are added to the article. : WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 20:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete