hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kenan Arayıcı: Source in article is stats, BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 02:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 01:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Although Arayıcı played in more than 100 Süper Lig matches, I can't find any German- or Turkish-language coverage that is better than a match report or contract announcement. He has been interviewed in the German media since becoming a manager, but I can't find any independent sources that provide significant coverage. Article comprehensively fails WP:GNG . Jogurney ( talk ) 17:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete. A good part of the Turkish sports coverage from the era is offline, but I would expect at least pointers that suggest there is SIGCOV out there about him, and there are none. Only coverage I was able to find were [25] and [26] , which leave a lot to be desired. -- GGT ( talk ) 21:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
British School of Brasília: Redirect to British Schools foundation may be on the cards, but that article has notability concerns as well.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 14:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Brazil .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Doesn't have relevance or significant coverage.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KMJC-LD: Let'srun ( talk ) 16:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kansas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 20:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  It's a textbook diginet coatrack with no notability of its own.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 18:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Orange Moldova: UtherSRG (talk) 11:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Internet ,  and Moldova .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gerardo Hernández: I can't find anything better than his Transfermarkt profile and a bunch of hits about the unrelated Illian Hernández .  No sign of WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Mexico .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing in this article to judge.  Open and shut in my view.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV by miles.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  The keyword "Gerardo Hernández" on internet finds other men of the same name instead of this Mexican soccer player, failing WP:V too.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 14:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Laiken Lockley: Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Sports .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Illinois and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - I looked at hers and one of her partner's pages, and I am confused.  Apparently she has competed different years with different guys, thrice getting to the top 3 in junior teams, but she is not automatically notable .  I don't see enough coverage , but if I missed something, please ping me.  This might be a case of WP:TOOSOON .  Bearian ( talk ) 21:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:NSKATE doesn't provide an automatic notability anyway, it says Significant coverage is likely to exist , which means that it might not exist.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify , seems like she may become notable in the future BrigadierG ( talk ) 18:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:TOOSOON , she hasn't yet made enough coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Given this article has had very few substantial updates since 2020, I don't see a reason to move it to draftspace, as draftspace is not an indefinite holding space.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Red Square (band): Most of the content was a copyvio.   Searches provide nothing beyond blogs and gig listings.  Nthep ( talk ) 12:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find mentions of the Square in Russia, nothing for this band.  Delete for a lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Can't find any sources for UK music band.  There is a russian band with the same name, but it was formed in 1990 or 1988, and it's a completely different band thus.  Maybe the names of the singles could help to go deeper into the search.  Roxy177 ( talk ) 08:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I can find some album listings for the 'Thirty Three' album but mostly on user-generated sites like discogs (the entry was created by one of the band members listed in the article so not reliable).  Also clearly fails notability as per WP:BAND so a clear delete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by InDimensional ( talk • contribs ) 13:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Englandia: Most external links in this article (which I believe acts as references) point to Google searches, and the rest point to topics, not articles, on The Times of India , which has no bearing on notability per WP:TOI .  Jurta talk / he/they 18:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Entertainment ,  and India .  Jurta talk / he/they 18:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NFILM .  Article is apparently by the film's director.  None of the ToI tag clouds used as references mention the film, and I can't find anything about it online in RS.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 19:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jenma Films International: No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.    The source cited as being the source for the entire text portion of the article is an obituary which makes only a brief mention of the company.   And so the text of the article is about the person who died, not the company.   The other refs are about films, not the company.  North8000 ( talk ) 19:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Companies ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 19:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NCORP : No significant coverage about the company.  Sources are mostly about the films they have produced which fall under routine coverage.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 10:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sematary: The article uses Discogs, Reddit, SoundCloud, X, Instagram, and Genius (see WP:RSDISCOGS , WP:RSREDDIT , WP:GENIUS ) as main sources.  Two interviews that were published by other, non-verifiable sources are also included, and for the hell of it I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.  This makes Sematary ineligible for a Wikipedia article according to WP:MUSICBIO .  He is not the subject of any, let alone multiple non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are notable.  He hasn't charted, he hasn't been certified gold or higher, as much as I love the guy there's nothing notable about him in Wikipedia standards.  Locust member ( talk ) 13:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of coverage.  Nothing for this person found, Gsearch is straight to social media and download sites.  Gnews talks about the Pet Sematary novel/film.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete , I hella love his music, but theres almost zero sources/coverage about the dude.  Fanbase is growing extensively so it's kind of odd no big publications ever seem to write about him.  More than likely not ready for Wikipedia yet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Second Skin ( talk • contribs ) 12 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rollin Jarrett: PROD tag removed by subject himself (proof: [19] ) talking in the third person, with the rationale: "This individual meets all general notability guidelines (GNG) as a simple Google search will illustrate. He is also known as Rollin Jewett. He is an actor and screenwriter with notable IMDB credits, a multi-published author and poet, an award winning singer-songwriter and has notable off-Broadway playwright credits. Suggest improving and updating page rather than deletion."  This is false.  Google search of either version of the name brings up either social media pages, routine entries on databases (Imdb, mubi etc) or other routine coverage.  In truth, none of the achievements listed in this article convey notability, or are covered in independent secondary sources.  The article was created by the subject himself; clear self-promo.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 09:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and North Carolina .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've always countered with "Yes, the person does likely meet notability guidelines, but we need sourcing in RS that prove that. Being well-known doesn't mean you'll have article written about you, it's the latter that we look at."  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there's pretty clearly no GNG here and none of his roles are sufficiently prominent to meet WP:NACTOR BrigadierG ( talk ) 11:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I would have also PROD, there just isn't sourcing to be found about this person.  Three whole hits in gnews, in non-RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, the first two hits are Linked in, then the Miami Vice wiki, so we're off to a rocky start.  Then imdb and a Rotten Tomatoes list...  Unless his Google search is vastly different than mine, or it has somehow changed since the comment was made, Google is a bust.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There appears to be much more listed under his given name Rollin Jewett (Jarrett is a stage name).  Perhaps the search should include those credits as well, or the page be renamed Rollin Jewett.  2603:6080:D03:5900:24DA:33E5:1719:5B89 ( talk ) 22:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suditi Global Academy: Created by a single purpose editor and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Uttar Pradesh .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no references to support quality or notability standards.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Did a quick search and can't seem to find anything independent that covers subject significantly.  Keep in mind article has been deleted before.  - Imcdc Contact 05:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yannick Vero: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , France ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luka Jarčov: Joeykai ( talk ) 00:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per A7 : Fails WP:NHOCKEY .  Not enough evidence of significant notability.  AaronWikia ( talk ) 06:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NHOCKEY .  Not enough evidence of significant notability.  AaronWikia ( talk ) 06:51, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Gardens Park: The article was created in four edits by a new account that never did anything else - draw whatever conclusions you like from that.  The article is supported by two sources: the website of the company that ran the campaign, and a rehashed press release on a local press site (replete with a link to the company website encouraging readers to find out more or sign up).  I searched for better sources online but just got more churnalism and press releases.  There are potentially notable subjects that could exist at this title - there apparently public gardens of this name in Athens and in Florida - but this particular subject isn't notable.  Girth Summit (blether) 14:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom .  Girth Summit (blether) 14:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable marketing campaing.  -- Broc ( talk ) 20:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rigdzin Namkha Gyatso Rinpoche: I have carried out WP:BEFORE and added a reference.  I have seen some other coverage of him at the European Academy on Religion and Society and News in France , but I'm not sure that either are WP:RS , and in any case neither is more than a mention.  I also found mentions in two books, here and here , but again this does not look like significant coverage.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding that it has been tagged for notability since 2013.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Buddhism , Lithuania ,  and Switzerland .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 22:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete : It looks like he's commonly named as "[Terton] Namkha Rinpoche" [1] [2] - not to be confused with "Namkha [Drimed] Rinpoche".  He's probably at least marginally notable, and there may well be Tibetan/Nepali/Indian language sources, but determining which (if any) of the more in-depth English-language sources are sufficiently reliable is beyond me, and the better sourced fr-wiki article does not really establish that GNG is met; the potential negative BLP issues appear to remain inconclusive.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 08:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Niikura Parking Area: Fram ( talk ) 15:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Transportation ,  and Japan .  Fram ( talk ) 15:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see why a highway rest area would be notable, we have loads of them around here.  The rest of Category:Rest areas in Japan doesn't seem notable either.  Reywas92 Talk 19:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG and WP:MILL There's not enough coverage to prove general notability, and there are hundreds around the world.  Maybe the first one ever in Japan, or the largest in Europe, or the truck stop that  was the site of serial murders, or a historic rest stop built by Lyndon B. Johnson when he was state director of the National Youth Administration might be notable, but that's all I can think of.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete