hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nigar Malikova: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uzbekistan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 07:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 14:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Aadat: — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Aliya_Bukhari#Dramas : listed there (just added it) (WRITER) - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  This time, though, I'm adding the observation that I'm already tired of my own copy/paste and wish we'd noticed this the day these nominations were made to consider speedy close.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Doczilla , But what's wrong with nomination reason being the same?  And I'm aware of the backlog, so I've stopped from making nominations for quite some time.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 07:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Copying and pasting the nominating rationale over and over gives the impression that the nominator is not studying each article on its own merit well before putting it on the chopping block.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Doczilla , I understand your concerns, but that's not the case.  I'm fully aware of the potential negative consequences of intentionally making such disruptive nominations.  My nominations are legit.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 07:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per [18] i am doubting WP:Before is done or not.  Why a series broadcasted in 2017 need nomination discussion now as many Pakistani websites remove old coverage from their websites and if its the case then all the old films/television related articles should be removed from wikipidea.  Libraa2019 ( talk ) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Libraa2019 , This is a WP:ATA.  Unless the source is unreliable or dubious, old archives can always be found.  And if you doubt that I haven't done WP:BEFORE, why don't you provide some solid coverage (not some Google searches or even ROTM coverage) from RS that help establish WP:GNG, instead of doubting my intentions?  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 09:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nike Total 90: 2) Fails WP:GNG with 5 out of 6 references being unreliable.  Soccer Cleats, where one citation is from is a blog.  Footy-Boots.com, where 4 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public.  The final reference literally details the history of the brand and equipment through Nike adverts.  A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS .  Pure garbage.  TarnishedPath talk 02:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Football .  TarnishedPath talk 02:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a new article on Nike football boots or similar, which would be a notable general topic.  Giant Snowman 10:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Are you suggesting redirecting an article to another redirect, GiantSnowman ?  I haven't encountered that option before.  Or are you going to write this Currently nonexistent article?  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It was an article - redirected - now restored.  Giant Snowman 07:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sleepycat License: I'm not sure about the notability of Sleepycat Software, which is the company that created the license, but I've found very little about the license itself, and notability isn't inherited from the company that created it.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 02:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Computing ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sleepycat Software , and optionally merge in some discussion of the license at that article.  Sources from the early 2000s talk about Sleepycat Software as an example of the " dual-licensing " business model where developers use both an open-source and a proprietary license.  [38] However, these place almost no weight on the Sleepycat License.  This book contains an entire chapter from Sleepycat's CEO, Michael Olson, where he writes about dual-licensing, without discussing the Sleepycat License: https://ia600907.us.archive.org/1/items/opensources2.000diborich/opensources2.000diborich.pdf Olson advises, " Academic licenses are poorly suited to dual-licensing businesses, but reciprocal licenses generally work well. [...] Choosing the GPL gives you the benefit of the work already done by the Free Software Foundation, or FSF, in drafting the license and defining the key terms. [...] It is almost certainly a mistake to try to draft your own open source license for a dual-licensing business. " Even their CEO did not seem to place much weight on it.  Rjj iii ( talk ) 19:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Not notable enough for independent article.  LizardJr8 ( talk ) 18:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of football clubs in Montserrat: Duplicates content at Montserrat Championship .  Arguably fails WP:NOT DIRECTORY as "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Lists ,  and Caribbean .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Montserrat Championship – Unnecessary fork.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think it very likely this is a conceivable search term for someone looking for information about the Montserrat Championship nor does it meet the criteria at WP:RPURPOSE .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Consider that the Montserrat league is a tiny championship, and redirecting to the session with participating clubs avoids recreating the article.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Pointless redirecting if you ask me.  Govvy ( talk ) 17:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You really don't have to bring others into something this obvious, just be WP:BOLD and redirect it, redirects don't hurt Reywas92 Talk 18:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect to Montserrat Championship#Current clubs .  fails WP:NLIST as teams do not have SIGCOV as a group.  Frank Anchor 19:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NLIST .  There's not many teams listed, none of them are very notable, and they all play in an obscure league.  None of which helps this list pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 19:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Montserrat Championship - the 'football clubs in X' is an established series, so it is a possible search term and it being red might lead to re-creation attempts.  Giant Snowman 09:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Montserrat Championship per above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is a valid list, and part of a larger established structure of List of teams in jurisdiction.  No real reason to delete.  The WP:NOTDIRECTORY argument doesn't really exist here since the list necessarily contains the context.  SportingFlyer T · C 20:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Simply because other lists of potentially notable teams in other jurisdictions exist does not mean this list is appropriate, particularly given the complete absence of sources.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 03:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's a fair point, SportingFlyer.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 15:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
David Atkins (businessman): 2 of the 5 sources are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom .  AllyD ( talk ) 05:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The available coverage of this person relates to his former company role, for example "ISS said Hammerson had not considered the company’s declining share price – down 40% in the past year – when making share award decisions for the chief executive, David Atkins, and other senior executives." ( Guardian,2019 ) and 2020 commentary "Hammerson allows chief a long goodbye despite big wrong calls" .  Nor does his role at a trade association (no longer listed at their site ) appear distinctly notable.  A redirect to Hammerson might be plausible though he is no longer named in that article, but deletion seems more appropriate in the absense of clear individual notability.  AllyD ( talk ) 05:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Additional thoughts on redirecting?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hammerson .  Most of the source I've found online mention him in the context of Hammerson.  I can't seem to find sources that would indicate he alone passes the GNG, so redirecting seems to be the best option.  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 04:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment would someone search the term "David Atkins (businessman)"?  also there are other Davids on WP: David_Atkins_(disambiguation) .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:18, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Amader Choto Russel Shona: - AlbeitPK ( talk ) 17:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh .  AlbeitPK ( talk ) 17:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sheikh_Russel#In_Popular_Culture : as alternative to deletion if coverage seems insufficient.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 08:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Angela Montenegro: There are no good sources for the character.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 03:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Fictional elements ,  and Sexuality and gender .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 03:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bones_(TV_series)#Main_cast .  Fictional character lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bones_(TV_series)#Main_cast .  There are a couple of pages on the character and actress in Bones : the official companion, series 1 & 2 (2007) but overall I didn't find enough coverage to argue that WP:GNG is met.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 09:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Doesn't have coverage in independent sources to pass WP:GNG .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 01:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bones_(TV_series)#Main_cast .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chris Gaylor: jlwoodwa ( talk ) 20:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Music .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 20:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The All-American Rejects .  Any reliable source in which Gaylor is mentioned describes him merely as a member of the band and his accomplishments outside of them (if any) have gone unreported.  I can find nothing useful or reliable about his 2020 Hushmoney project and their single EP is only visible in the usual streaming services.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The All-American Rejects .  Agree with User:doomsdayer520.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 08:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The All-American Rejects .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
DXFA-TV: MarioGom ( talk ) 18:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  MarioGom ( talk ) 18:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Global Satellite Technology Services per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 11:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Global Satellite Technology Services .  Fails GNG and NCORP.  // Timothy :: talk 05:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Marian Gaston: Failed judicial nominees aren't inherently notable, WP:BIO1E applies.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Law ,  and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify until renomination.  I don't understand what makes her a "failed" nominee all of a sudden.  So she hasn't been renominated within the first five days of her nomination being sent back, and.... ?  Snickers2686 ( talk ) 03:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify per the above.  BD2412 T 04:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep in keeping with the spirit of Wikipedia:WOMRED , let's see if her nomination regains traction.  Wl219 ( talk ) 01:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Appears that her nomination has been withdrawn at her request.  I'd be fine with redirecting this to Joe Biden judicial appointment controversies as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect the page "Marian Gatson" to Joe Biden judicial appointment controversies , as her litigation record and opposition to her nomination are substantive, while the fact she withdrew herself means she's no longer a nominee and not notable enough to merit her own article.  JohnAdams1800 ( talk ) 04:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lamelas halt: The first source is just an entry in a list, and the second only supports the line the station is on being closed.  There is nothing of substance provided about the station itself.  Could potentially be redirected to Sabor line .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 21:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations , Transportation ,  and Portugal .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 21:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sabor line .  No evidence that this stop meets GNG.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 21:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sabor line as suggested.  There is no evidence this was ever more than a whistle stop .  Bearian ( talk ) 23:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sabor line .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Noah (The Walking Dead): The biography is just WP:fancruft , the devolopement section is just episode reviews which I feel is boarderline WP:REFBOMBING , I went looking for sources to add and all I found was casting news, interviews, and things reiterating said interveiws.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  NYC Guru ( talk ) 20:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep if more sources are found, otherwise merge to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters .  BOZ ( talk ) 22:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list would be much better due to there really isnt anything on the page that we would need.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
ESPN NBA Sunday: Could find nothing independent that talks about this brand other than in passing.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 05:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Basketball ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The problem with this is, unlike NBA Wednesday and Friday (Sunday primetime games are considered special editions of NBA on ESPN) separate from the ABC telecasts and it only airs like 3-6 weeks max per season (unlike NBA Monday which only airs once)and that’s likely why we may not have separate sources that has that as a indicator (but each time the schedule has been released it uses this brand to brand these Sunday primetime games and have it separate from the ABC Sunday afternoon games and thus we need a separate area so we don’t get confused on the topic Hoopstercat ( talk ) 15:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : possible merge/redirect targets include NBA Sunday Showcase and NBA on ESPN .  Left guide ( talk ) 22:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe NBA on ESPN is the Better way to redirect this, that I would agree but NBA Sunday showcase (ABC series) has nothing to do with this topic Hoopstercat ( talk ) 01:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to NBA on ESPN : Subject does not appear to have the requisite sourcing needed to meet the WP:GNG .  Best to redirect to NBA on ESPN as a WP:ATD .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to NBA on ESPN per Let'srun.  Natg 19 ( talk ) 03:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect