hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
December 2009 Lower Dir mosque bombing: No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 14:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism , Islam ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 14:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009 .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 19:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  16:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009 .  It's depressing that these are almost routine, but there it is.  Mangoe ( talk ) 19:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge as suggested.  Sadly, like shootings since 2012 in the United States, terrorist attacks in Pakistan around 2009 were all too common and part of a pattern.  Bearian ( talk ) 14:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of NBC Sports golf commentators: Let'srun ( talk ) 19:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Television ,  and Golf .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Golf on NBC#Commentators .  It's trivial, but still somewhat useful.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 16:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 04:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Golf on NBC#Commentators per Conyo14 's good idea.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 18:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Doctor Thirteen: Fails WP:GNG , my before gave my nothing.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Comics and animation .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of DC Comics characters: D in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 17:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I would be willing to accept a merge.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If the article is not kept, we likely need a disambiguation page.  Thirteenth Doctor and Thirteen (House) are currently linked in hatnotes from this page.  TompaDompa ( talk ) 19:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Brevard County Social Services: Sources are primary sources or passing mentions.  Z1720 ( talk ) 20:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions .  Z1720 ( talk ) 20:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Organizations , Education ,  and Social science .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect into Brevard County, Florida .  Appears to have been spun off from that article back when it was pretty bloated.  It would benefit from unsourced statements and WP:FARTs being removed in the process.  Zsinj Talk 00:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
International Project Space: It does not seem to have been incorporated or had staff beyond an exhibition curator.  Rather, it seems to have been a venue, an art gallery run by Birmingham City University's Birmingham Institute of Art and Design (Q22661578) and located in the Ruskin Hall (Q26340863) building.  No sources found in cursory search.  Daask ( talk ) 11:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts , Organizations ,  and England .  Daask ( talk ) 11:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - A suitable target article to redirect this to would be Bournville Centre for Visual Arts .  Netherzone ( talk ) 14:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Bournville Centre for Visual Arts seems best as the information is verifiable — siro χ o 19:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2022 Galicia bus crash: The crash received a brief spike of coverage at the time but neither the sources in the article nor a search for other coverage finds any indication that it had lasting notability.  BilledMammal ( talk ) 00:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Spain .  BilledMammal ( talk ) 00:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe it should stay as the accident happened in a country that normally does not get mass casualty incidents like this and when they do should be documented as such Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This does not have the massive societal ramifications or long-term retrospective coverage necessary to meet WP:NEVENTS .  Wikipedia is not a collection of news stories.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 04:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (selectively and without prejudice) into List of traffic collisions (2000–present)#2022 .  Yet another case of bizarre fragmentation!  The topic may be notable or not.  The answer DOES NOT MATTER as, regardless of the answer, this is an improper WP:SPINOFF from its parent that has just the listing and one short sentence on the accident and could use ALL OF THE SOURCES! gidonb ( talk ) 20:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : We have continuing coverage through at least March 2023 in national as well as local media.  The investigation is apparently still ongoing.  It's not clear to me that there is persistent coverage, but it's also not entirely clear that there isn't, or won't be.  That said, I don't see any compelling reason not to merge.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 03:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Cervantes de Leon: It is therefore not notable.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Video games ,  and Japan .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 15:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge With List of Soulcalibur characters#Cervantes , I couldn't find WP:SIGCOV of him.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Fails WP:GNG .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 21:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge is a reasonable outcome.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Soulcalibur characters#Cervantes .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Phú Diễn station (Hanoi Metro): The best I could find is an article about an inebriated train driver at a different station .  [35] Toadspike [Talk] 15:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If closed as delete, please redirect to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) .  Same for all the others.  Toadspike [Talk] 15:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete SNG says that these are not presumed wp:notable and therefore must meet GNG.    Clearly does not even 1/4 meet GNG.  Sincerely, North8000 ( talk ) 17:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations , Transportation ,  and Vietnam .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the position data, etc. to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) and redirect there if sources cannot be found (they're most likely to be in Vietnamese, so do check in that language).  There is no reason to delete the information present in the article which will be useful if it is expanded in future.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 18:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge there isn't enough coverage (or content) for a separate article from Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) yet, but there might be in the future.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Embassy of Sudan, London: Fails WP:GNG .  Only sources are a government list of diplomatic missions and a source purportedly about a protest at the embassy more than a decade ago but which appears unrelated.
 Previously subject of contested PROD and contested merge/redirect.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Organizations , Sudan ,  and United Kingdom .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect Merge to Sudan–United Kingdom relations#Diplomatic_missions as is typical for cases where the building is not itself notable.  Mangoe ( talk ) 20:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Assuming the protests aren't mentioned in the main article, there's now something to merge, but the protests were about relations, not buildings.  Mangoe ( talk ) 13:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pedantically protests can be about buildings (e.g. [14] ), but these ones were not.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 16:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have revised the comment, pedantically.  Mangoe ( talk ) 21:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've found the source for the protests and fixed the article, so that information is now verified.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 09:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge 48JCL ( talk ) 17:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Meta Knight: The only usable sources were about him being banned at Smash Bros, nothing else.  Also, I'm more concerned that most people cared about the GAR situation (another guy at the talk page, like can we end this?) at the past unlike its notability, hence I decided to afd the page.  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 13:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Characters of the Kirby series .  I think some of the most decent sources include This and this and there is also a mention here , but it doesn't strike me as a character who is known very well outside of being banned in Smash.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 15:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above...as much as one would think Meta Knight would be notable, it does make sense he's not: what can really be said about the character?  The Smash Bros. stuff only goes so far, and even in the original AfD, there was great difficulty in finding sources with most asserting "there had to be some" for a character that was already 15 years old at that point. -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 09:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Characters of the Kirby series .  The current sources do not demonstrate notability of the character and a Google search yields no significant coverage as far as I can see.  Fieryninja ( talk ) 14:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per all.  Coverage doesn't pass the WP:SIGCOV needed for a separate article, but there is a good target to WP:PRESERVE some of the content.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 15:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Has a good bit of coverage mainly for being banned in tournaments.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 15:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Gagauzia–Turkey relations: This, however, seems like a WP:COATRACK WP:POV article for grievances about Moldovan policy towards Gagauzia, where the actual substance on relations with Turkey is razor thin.  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Moldova ,  and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Err, to be fair, unlike most of the Turkey—*Random African country* relations I'm seeing at AfD these days, the two sides are actually pretty close to each other, literally and figuratively.  The two leaders, especially the Gagauz one, regulary speak positively about the other side, a Turkish search reveals: [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] .  There is this journal article on economic relations of Turkey—Moldova, which also covers Gagauzia.  The Turkish WP article has some other sources as well.  Someone who has the time could likely be able to improve the article.  Styyx ( talk ) 12:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per my sources above and lack of any refutal.  Styyx ( talk ) 09:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with all that, especially that Gagauzia and Turkey have a lot more reason to have relations than many of the Random 1 - Random 2 relation articles proposed for deletion, most of which are worthless.  I'm not sure about keep , however: the information should certainly be kept, but better as a section of the Gagauzia article.  So I'm tending more to Merge .  Athel cb ( talk ) 12:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (at best) into Foreign relations of Gagauzia and Foreign relations of Turkey .  There is nothing uniquely notable about the intersection of the two.  If a merge is not viable, I could easily be convinced by deletionist arguments.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 16:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
2019 Makran massacre: No lasting effects to meet WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Terrorism ,  and Pakistan .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a (heavily abridged version, probably a paragraph) to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019 , where it is mentioned with no detail.  Seems a relevant note given their security situation.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 00:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There are some sources, but that are RS.-- Ameen Akbar ( talk ) 19:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The sources are all from April 2019.  Needs WP:LASTING coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have cited a source published in 2023.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 22:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2019 .  No evidence of sustained significant coverage.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 18:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Night Hawk (comics): To give further details on my WP:BEFORE results, the only results I was able to find in actual reliable sources were extremely brief, usually just a sentence or two stating "An early example of this kind of character was Night Hawk" and that's about it, such as these two books.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Comics and animation ,  and United Kingdom .  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A redirect/merge to the The Nelson Lee Library seems more sensible than deletion.  I'm assuming you've checked the physical media covering British story papers, like Book & Magazine Collector, Boys Will Be Boys, etc., etc. rather than just using Google.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 21:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Couldn't find WP:SIGCOV .  Would support a redirect if people can agree on a valid target.  But it's an unlikely search term and deletion is also fine.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 01:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to The Nelson Lee Library , agreeing with BoomboxTestarossa .  We do have the mentioned secondary sources, which should count for something, but does not seem enough to be to establish stand-alone notability (I cannot see The British Superhero , p. 41, myself).  So merge as WP:AtD .  Daranios ( talk ) Merge to The Nelson Lee Library as preferred WP:ATD .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Nelson Lee Library absolutely Sansbarry ( talk ) 01:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Nelson Lee Library .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge