hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kingsgate, British Columbia : NoobThreePointOh ( talk ) 03:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  NoobThreePointOh ( talk ) 03:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Eastport–Kingsgate Border Crossing .  Reywas92 Talk 03:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/do-rb/offices-bureaux/536-eng.html Would the Canadian Border Control as a source do the trick?   It may be a small article but if you could find a source, it might not be worth deleting.  JustAPoliticsNerd ( talk ) 03:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sourcing doesn't really matter as long as the content can be easily merged to the border crossing article: there's no reason to split it into one article for each side of the crossing, and another for the crossing itself.  It just splits the sources.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 07:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect . The article says nothing of significance that can't be included as a sentence or two in Eastport–Kingsgate Border Crossing .  Athel cb ( talk ) 07:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per prior comment.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 07:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added some content.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 12:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm glad you also included the information at Moyie River , but I don't think this should be included here or that it justifies this article.  This is not significant coverage, it just identifies the place, which is the border crossing area.  They have 199 locations where water was tested, and this primary source data isn't the sort of thing that belongs in the articles of each sampling site.  The border crossing article should certainly mention it's along the river though.  Reywas92 Talk 15:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yves Madjilom : Three official appearances for the Chad national football team .  No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nominator.  Jogurney ( talk ) 16:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2000 in Kosovo : Not only does the leadership section list the president as the President of Serbia and Montenegro , but Kosovo only declared independence in 2008, so any [year] in Kosovo pages from before this time shouldn't exist either.  At least it's not standard procedure, as for example there's not a 1775 in the United States article: since the United States, like Kosovo, had not declared independence as a nation yet, and was only fighting for it.  These protests should instead be placed on the page 2000 in Serbia and Montenegro where they were officially taking place.  Cheers!  Johnson 524 12:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 9 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , subnational entities have their own year pages (see 2024 in California ).  – Illegitimate Barrister ( talk • contribs ), 00:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The information in this article is very sparse.  If not entirely deleted, I still see no reason it shouldn't be merged into the parent countries article.  Johnson 524 02:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As nom Johnson 524 02:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Johnson524 : I encourage you to strike this vote, as the discussion being created is considered a vote towards deletion by the nominator themselves, making this a duplicate vote.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Hey man im josh : Oops, thanks for letting me know, I haven't really done many AFDs before 😅 Johnson 524 20:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the unrest and redirect to 2000 in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia .  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  04:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - the article 2000 unrest in Kosovo discusses events in more detail, that might be a better target than 2000 in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia .   But a redirect to either is better than this stand-alone article.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 01:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arnot station : Literally just a post along the tracks with no significant coverage to establish notability.  – dlthewave ☎ 03:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  – dlthewave ☎ 03:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winnipeg–Churchill train as WP:ATD Jumpytoo Talk 04:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Like other flag stop stations that are today only a signpost, this was probably a staffed building 90 years ago in an era when more people were needed to run a railway.  I can't easily confirm this, but I suspect that this is a case of "Once notable, always notable".  Even if the present-day appearance is unimpressive, it probably was once notable.  Googling Arnot station is difficult because there's an Arnot Power Station in South Africa.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Some VIA Rail stops are notable so all of them should be blue links, with those that aren't individually notable being redirects to a list or some other appropriate target.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 08:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - please see the very lengthy station-by-station analysis of stations on this line that I posted previously at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Silcox station .  I spent hours researching this line.  This location is a signpost in the middle of deep boreal forest.  It’s many kilometers from any settlement.  It serves the occasional hunter or trapper.  Look at it on satellite imagery and you can see there was never anything there.  — A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 13:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kremena Prodanova : All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2008 , 2009 , 2012 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bulgaria .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 12:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 12:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 15:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I tried looking for sources in Cyrillic, too, and got nothing, too.   It was somewhat telling that even the sport statistics WWW sites had dashes in some of their fields indicating missing statistics.   There's just not anywhere near enough recorded knowledge to be had for a biography.  Uncle G ( talk ) 07:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Nike Tiempo : 2) Fails WP:GNG with 4 out of 5 references being unreliable.  Footy-Boots.com, where 2 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public.  The Instep, where one of the reference is from, is a blog.  Unisportstore.com, where one of the reference is from lists the author as "anonymous" and is also a site which sells the products its reviewing which is a slight conflict of interest.  A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS .  Pure garbage.  TarnishedPath talk 02:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Football .  TarnishedPath talk 02:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 04:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a new article on Nike football boots or similar, which would be a notable general topic.  Giant Snowman 10:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, please select an existing target article to Redirect to.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is now an article again.  Another user had boldly redirected.  That redirect has been reverted.  TarnishedPath talk 09:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Altyntau Kokshetau : (There may be notable sources in languages other than English but I am not able to find these.)  Nerd1a4i (they/them) ( talk ) 01:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  Nerd1a4i (they/them) ( talk ) 01:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Kazzinc , the parent company, where it is already mentioned.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Kazakhstan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Opinions on NCORP and the redirect option are welcome.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Timothytyy ( talk ) 09:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 07:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : There is a summary paragraph about this plant at Kokshetau#Industry .  I don't think there is enough independent coverage of this plant to sustain an article in itself; I am not sure that the Kazzinc article is a durable target, as a substantial proportion of the venture's financial backing appears to involve a Dutch holding company ("Floodgate Holdings B.V."),  so the article about Kokshetau may be a better redirect target.  AllyD ( talk ) 15:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pinky Ka Dulha : All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this and this which isn't sufficient to establish GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 15:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Television .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Angeline_Malik#As_a_director : listed there (just added it with a ref).  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 20:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Angeline_Malik#As_a_director : per Mushy.   Does not meet GNG but redirect is sensible ATD option.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Chaparral Ice : Boleyn ( talk ) 21:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Texas_Longhorns#Facilities .  OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Texas_Longhorns#Facilities .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Language speaks : Content only ever developed by one editor in March 2011.  Does not explain the meaning of the phrase, which, to my non-specialist (but grad-level) knowledge is not considered especially important among Heidegger scholars.  Patrick J. Welsh ( talk ) 20:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions .  Patrick J. Welsh ( talk ) 20:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (

Discussion outcome: redirect
Students' Society of McGill University : Most sources are primary or exclusively local, with a direct connection to the subject.  A previous AfD done back in 2004 kept the article.  It has no notability outside of McGill University, and is no different from other student organizations like that of other universities which don't have respective articles.  GuardianH ( talk ) 01:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Found some articles: 1 , 2 , 3 .  Think probably merging back into McGill University#Student life is best, there is a lot there already though.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to McGill University#Student organizations as a GNG failure.  The references cited in the article consist of a bunch of primary sources as well as some passing mentions in relation to a brief culture war slapping contest.  The main article already contains plenty of information on this body, so there's no need for any information to be merged.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 13:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mario movie : This is improper use of the page.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 16:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Video games ,  and Disambiguations .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 16:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Split Between the Super Mario movies and the other non-Super Mario related films.  Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 17:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mario (disambiguation)#Film and television : And include List of non-video game media featuring Mario in the "See also" of that page.  silviaASH ( inquire within ) 20:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy merge and redirect to Mario (disambiguation)#Film and television per Silvia.  This did not need an AFD to accomplish.  Axem Titanium ( talk ) 16:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm confused, are we trying to delete the old mario movie, the new mario movie or the disambiguation page?  Blitzfan51 ( talk ) 17:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Mario movie , the article listed in the nomination.  Axem Titanium ( talk ) 20:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK thank you.  We should Speedy merge and redirect.  Blitzfan51 ( talk ) 13:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mario (disambiguation)#Film and television per above.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 03:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mario (disambiguation)#Film and television per above.  No sources showing notability for a stand alone article.  // Timothy :: talk 07:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jeremy B. Rosen : Perhaps redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 06:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 06:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , New Hampshire , New York ,  and North Carolina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Failed federal nominee does not qualify as WP:BLP or WP:GNG .  Easy call to delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 17:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Note previous AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Marie Sweet .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Agree on easy call - fails WP:NPOL and there it is.  However, we have Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies as a redirect target and AtD...  Best The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rosemary Willis (Miss Virginia) : WP:BLP1E applies.  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Virginia .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per prior AfD verdicts for state beauty pageant winners without subsequent achievements.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 15:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment per nom. -- Whosethose ( talk ) 05:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Whosethose , comment?  or Delete?  — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Miss Virginia#winners — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect