hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Chacha Chaudhary (2002 TV series) : It only has two ref.  M S Hassan ( talk ) 15:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ... and bioth are dead links to TV listings.  - Altenmann >talk 16:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Chacha Chaudhary ] - Altenmann >talk 16:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chacha_Chaudhary#Adaptation .  Poor sources with no indepth coverage and reviews.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Chacha_Chaudhary#Adaptation.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 13:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Peach Boxing : No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.  A boxing gym business.  Zero references on the gym/business.   All of them are about events related to boxers.  North8000 ( talk ) 15:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  Choucas Bleu ( T · C ) 15:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Boxing ,  and New Zealand .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Isaac Peach Traumnovelle ( talk ) 06:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Isaac Peach.   There's a lack of coverage about the gym itself.   The three New Zealand boxing gym of the year awards were given by a blogger, so it shows no significance to me.   It seems like Isaac Peach is the most significant part of the gym and much of the two articles seem to overlap about fighters he has trained.   It's possible that the individual article may not be WP notable either, but that's a discussion for another time.  Papaursa ( talk ) 14:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Isaac Peach.  I wrote this article because of the Boxing Alley .  But yeah you both make a point.  -- Bennyaha ( talk ) 02:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tara Chambler : The biography is just WP:fancruft, the devolopement section is just episode reviews which I feel is boarderline WP:REFBOMBING, I went looking for sources to add and all I found was casting news, interviews, and things reiterating said interveiws Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep if more sources are found, otherwise merge to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters .  BOZ ( talk ) 22:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the list, while deletion would be my prefered outcome, I see that due to this characters role in the series her name would be a valid serch term.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Reception seems built from mentions in passing ( WP:SIGCOV failure).  It's telling she is not named in a single reference's heading.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge with her actual article Alanna Masterson .  Micheal Kaluba ( talk ) 15:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Why should the page redirect to the actress's page and not the cahracter list?  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Redirect to the character article, per WP:ATD .  It doesn't make sense to combine fiction with the real actress.  Those topics overlap, but are clearly different.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 02:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
IBC News 5:30 Report : Recommend Redirect to List of programs previously broadcast by Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation .  Am happy to change my vote if local/other sources can be found to show that this meets GNG.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 04:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Philippines .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 04:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No sources in article.  Google News and Google Books search not turning up anything promising.  Not enough content in article to justify a merge.  Does not appear to pass WP:GNG .  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 06:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Support per nom.  It does not cite any sources.  CastJared ( talk ) 12:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Black Heart (video game) : article is entirely gameplay.  no secondary sources.  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish ) 16:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Arcade Archives or NMK (company) per WP:ATD as a believable search.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 22:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's best to keep that article intact.  TheAnaheimDude ( talk ) 00:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC) — Note to closing admin : TheAnaheimDude ( talk • contribs )  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD .  [ reply ] Delete Article was sent to draft space for improvement but was revert back to main space without improvements.  Fails WP:GNG .  Maliner ( talk ) 09:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It can always be sent back to draftspace with either the article move locked for new users (only E+C users and above can perform the move) or in more drastic situations the user can be blocked from editing mainspace altogether.  – The Grid ( talk ) 13:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 17:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - Its a plausible search term, but does not appear to have enough coverage in reliable sources to support its own article.  Both of the targets proposed by Zxcvbnm would work, though perhaps redirecting to Arcade Archives might make a bit more sense, as that article is currently a lot more developed than the NMK (company) article, and actually already has more information on this game included.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 17:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Hot Jamz : Perhaps redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels.  ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels , where it is mentioned; this is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable Sirius XM channels (if not associated with another notable parent entity).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Finer redirection to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Hip hop , where it's mentioned under The Heat, which also redirects here specifically.  Nate • ( chatter ) 22:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Eysey Footbridge : I don't see anything else which could be used as a RS.  It's a footbridge.  That doesn't make it notable.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 08:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete First source has only a photo, the others are just maps.  Unclear why this would possibly be notable.  Reywas92 Talk 14:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of crossings of the River Thames .  No evidence of notability, but a useful redirect especially for navigation templates.  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 17:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Eysey or Redirect to List of crossings of the River Thames .  No evidence of independent notability, but as a member of a notable set (crossings of the River Thames) it should be mentioned somewhere and the title should be a blue link.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 18:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sampie Mastriet : The most I found were a few sentences here .  Possible redirect targets include List of South Africa national rugby sevens players and List of South Africa national under-20 rugby union team players .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of South Africa national rugby sevens players A fair bit of coverage, a lot that actually names him, but probably not enough for a WP:GNG pass.  Suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Supremes In The Orient : Should be redirected, but I didn’t see it mentioned on the Supremes ' page so I'm not sure where the most appropriate target is. QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 09:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Music . QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 09:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Supremes#Filmography .- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That works for me. QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 17:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Supremes#Filmography (with the history preserved under the redirect) , where the short documentary film, is already mentioned, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion . A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard ( talk ) 12:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Supremes#Filmography per Cunard above. Eluchil404 ( talk ) 23:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mash It Up : Jax 0677 ( talk ) 23:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Karl Wolf ; couldn't find any sources establishing notability.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 21:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Cinnamon (song) : Possible redirect to album, though I am not sure song title is unambiguous.  Boleyn ( talk ) 21:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NSONG and a check of the usual databases didn't turn up anything to counter that.  No comment on redirecting.  — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 21:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Stone Temple Pilots (2010 album) : A late-era band's promotional single which didn't chart at all would probably not be getting any more coverage than some brief mentions in album reviews and other album coverage.  Completely unsurprisingly, that was all I found, and that does not confirm a song's notability.  Redirecting songs to their album is standard and should be the default so long as said album has an article to send to.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 00:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Found this from RS and this about the song's leaked music video and another official release which might arguably sum up SIGCOV with other passing mentions through album reviews.  Leaning towards redirect or possibly merge, please ping me if more sources are presented.  dxneo ( talk ) 12:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
And Then There Were 10 : Donald D23 talk to me 20:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment not seeing a whole lot but I at least found [1] and [2] .  Jclemens ( talk ) 21:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ben 10 .  Not seeing sourcing to show WP:GNG is met, and no sourced content to merge.  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 01:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Ben 10 (2005 TV series) episodes#ep1 , fails WP:NEPISODE and no sources.  2600:1700:9BF3:220:79CC:BBFB:97C6:9626 ( talk ) 03:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Ben 10 (2005 TV series) episodes#ep1 , does not seem notable and fails WP:NTVEP .  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 16:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Ben 10 (2005 TV series) episodes#ep1 per above.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WTBI-FM : Beyond what Tabernacle Baptist Church says about their own broadcasting, I only found ROUTINE listings that you'd find about a radio station.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Christianity ,  and South Carolina .  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose : Per BURDEN.   OP says they found "routine listings that you'd find about a radio station".... then add them.  - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in South Carolina : it appears to have ended up here because of an objection to a previous redirect to WBPB , a station this station was previously a simulcast of but continued its previous programming after WBPB was sold.  In the absence of any evidence of independent notability (at least on the surface, this seems to be a relatively run-of-the-mill religious station), the correct solution would have been to retarget as an {{ R to list entry }} .  (This is a clear case where an article would have been more likely to persist under the looser "guidelines" of 15 years ago that declared all FCC-licensed stations "notable", but a 2021 RfC revealed there was no consensus for media entities having any looser guidelines than GNG (much less NCORP). ) WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in South Carolina : per Wcquidditch .  Drowssap SMM 19:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Completely fails WP:ORGCRIT , lacking any claim to notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 14:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Miss Nicaragua 2022 : Actualcpscm ( talk ) 17:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Beauty pageants and Nicaragua .  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 17:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Miss Nicaragua may be appropriate given that it was an actual instance of that — siro χ o 21:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There's plenty of sources - NBC , MSN , Swiss Info , LaPrensani , Vostv , LaPrensani , Ipnicaragua , ElHeraldo , 20Minutos 100Noticias KatoKungLee ( talk ) 17:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  05:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , sources exist but do not establish notability, but I've also seen so many other non-notable pageant winners so many there is some policy that pageant winners are auto-notable that I'm missing.  Chamaemelum ( talk ) 08:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just to be clear, this appears to be an article about the pageant, not the pageant winner .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 21:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Chamaemelum - "sources exist but do not establish notability" - What?  Why would it have these sources if it wasn't notable?  These aren't database entries.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 16:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I PRODded this before, but I guess we have to do it this way.  Obviously I agree with the nomination.  ☆ Bri ( talk ) 17:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Bri - Have you checked through the sources in the article between nominations?  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 16:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you mean the sources added in this delta there aren't any.  If you mean the sources subsequent to the AfD nom, I just had a look, I'd say they boost the notability of Norma Huembes more than the pageant.  Maybe they should be merged to the bio article.  In summary the pageant still looks nn from here, specifically to the requirements for source depth and sustained sources.  A couple of mentions of the venue and (maybe) a list of contestants doesn't cut it.  ☆ Bri ( talk ) 15:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No reason not to maintain as a redirect (to Miss Nicaragua ), with no prejudice against future expansion.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 21:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with that, a redirect would be perfectly fine.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 21:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Southern Chinese wedding : I would not be surprised if sources existed in Chinese, but the linked zh article is even worse than ours, and what we have is an unreferenced WP:OR with a single EL to a defunct website that does not look reliable.  There is something a bit better at Chinese pre-wedding customs , where a talk discussion suggests a merge of this was proposed a while back.  Lack of references prevents us from doing any merge, so redirecting is the least destructive option if anyone thinks this should be preserved.  Anyway, to summarize, notability is not proven and the article fails OR and WP:V .  PS.  Another valid redirect target would be Traditional Chinese marriage where Chinese wedding redirects currently.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Social science ,  and China .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:V .  It's very interesting, and it might be all true, but there are zero citations.  Please ping e if you find anything.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect