hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Flybe destinations (1979–2020): Additionally per the 2018 RFC which was followed by AN discussion that concluded that these articles should be AFD'd in an orderly manner with a link to the original RFC discussion and that it should be taken into account in any close .  This is simply an exhaustive listing of all services provided by a commercial enterprise, and not encyclopaedic content which is supposed to be a summary of what is said in secondary sources.  It differs in no substantial regard to a complete listing of locations run by Burger King .  Even if the RFC were over-turned, and the WP:NOT issues removed somehow, the article would still need to pass WP:CORP (particularly WP:AUD ), which would basically be impossible in this case.  The article is supported only by Flybe's website, and a 404 page on the non-RS routesonline.com website.  My WP:BEFORE search found nothing relevant.  FOARP ( talk ) 14:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and United Kingdom .  FOARP ( talk ) 14:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Friends, in the shadow of WP:NOT's stern decree, I sorrowfully support this deletion.  Wikipedia, our digital sentinel, guards notable facts, not trifles.  Regrettably, we must cull the insignificant.  We champion quality, a task demanding both delicacy and ruthlessness.  Thus, I echo the somber call for deletion.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 14:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Delete (but bundle henceforth): I fail to see why this particular airline destination list (or the other two listed in RfD today) is any more or less notable and encyclopedic than any of the numerous other airline destination lists that still exist despite that 2018 RfC, including many for defunct airlines.  If the intention is really to delete all airline destination lists, then let's do it in a single RfD.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 15:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS .  FOARP ( talk ) 19:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per FOARP, and especially per the RfC outcome.  -- Tserton ( talk ) 20:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Since there are simultanoeus RfDs involving different lists of airline destinations I propose to center the discussion in a single page.-- Jetstreamer Talk 21:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator.  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 23:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Midwest Social Forum: Drowssap SMM 17:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Organizations .  Drowssap SMM 17:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is no sourcing in the article aside from one inline external link to the organisations "about" page but it is no longer there as the site appears to have been taken over.   I can find no sources to establish notability.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 22:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ally Ridgers: No evidence of significant coverage - the two references are to an article about his brother, in which he gets a passing mention, and a match report of a Highland League game.  I have been unable to find much else other than this BBC article [ [16] ] about him joining Inverness Caledonian Thistle as loan back-up; he was a substitute for them
 in the SPL, but made no appearances.  Jellyman ( talk ) 19:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Scotland .  Jellyman ( talk ) 19:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Villa Flora Artist in Residency Program: It's difficult enough to find out what Villa Flora is - a search online only brings up a hotel.  Article has been tagged as lacking notability since 2014, with no improvement.  Sionk ( talk ) 19:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions .  Sionk ( talk ) 19:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Tjaša Iris .  A09 | (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It has not been adequately covered in available reliable sources (fails WP:GNG ) and is too long to be merged.  -- TadejM my talk 11:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Witness (French band): InDimensional ( talk ) 13:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I've also been unable to find notable coverage for this Witness.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 13:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Doesn't even have a a Wikipedia page in French.  Not a good sign.  GamerPro64 04:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Master Piano Technicians of America: Star Mississippi 02:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not seeing enough to support inclusion.  Might want to look at Piano Technicians Guild too.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 02:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nothing in gnews, passing mentions in gbooks.  Fails WP:ORG .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olga Bolbukh: Nothing online can be found to indicate this person is a notable actresses.  Entire articles is largely unsourced and written like a resume and as a magazine article instead of an encyclopedic one.  All links in the references section are 99% dead links and IMDB doesn't count as a reliable source.  No inline citations are used anywhere to back up anything in the article.  WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 19:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and Women .  WikiCleanerMan ( talk ) 19:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources found, like ZERO in Gnews.  Nothing beyond SEO or spam sites in Gsearch results.  Even what's used now is database sites, imbd and other non-useful resources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Acoustic Station: While there may be coverage in RS like this , this , this , and this , but these all seem to ROTM coverage - most probably paid / PR-related articles without any by-lines, which isn't sufficient to meet WP:SIRS.  While this coverage could contribute to establishing GNG, it alone isn't enough.  Anyone who wants to argue for keeping this page should provide at least three best examples of coverage from RS to help establish WP:N.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 11:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 11:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Television ,  and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rider deaths in British motorcycle racing series: We have the main list of those who died globally, so how necessary is a list like this?  Since the last nomination in 2012, I doubt anything has been addressed.  Many of those listed are from club championships.
 I cannot see this unnecessary WP:FANCRUFT list of mostly non-notable riders dying, appealing to those but to the most obsessive motorsport fans.  Also, not notable enough to pass WP:LISTN .  In short, Wikipedia is neither Motorsport Memorial (whom most are sourced from per WP:1R , albeit poorly) nor is WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists of people , Motorsport ,  and United Kingdom .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 15:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nominator's rationale EnthusiastWorld37 ( talk ) 08:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Non-notable sub-list, identical reasoning to a similar recently-deleted article .  5225 C ( talk • contributions ) 09:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Grampian Flyers B.C.: My research showed they are trivially mention in news articles and those, doesn't seem to be notability.  Per SE, doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT .  Redirect can also be better if there is any.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  23:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Sports , Basketball ,  and Scotland .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  23:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Any potential redirects?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patrizia Sanvitale: Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism ,  and Italy .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning delete .  The Italian newspapers and magazines where we could check for reviews are behind paywalls so it's very hard to find sources.  I looked on Italian Amazon but did not find published reviews (nor mention of the award).  I can say that the creator of the article has the same name as her collaborator on most of her books, User:Castellacci .  That user name conflicted with another when user names were normalized across wikis.  Another SPA User:PuzzleInk comes in later and that name is also the name of the publisher of one of her supposed works.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Gliding aside the COI or UPE, the subject doesn't seemingly have significant coverage, at least online.  I've dug in Italian as well (cursory), but was unable to find anything of use.  Printed sig coverage is unlikely, and is pretty hard to find in a foreign language which I don't speak myself.  X ( talk ) 11:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:SIGCOV failure.  Right now, it's basically a mixture of WP:OR and WP:RESUME .  Bearian ( talk ) 23:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Gruen: Theroadislong ( talk ) 14:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 14:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete vanity spam, most sources are PR-ish or mention this person in passing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP:He is properly sourced and has notability in various industries 2601:582:8101:12C0:F851:9D55:56D:D578 ( talk ) 22:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Consider tagging this for a speedy, completely promotional for a non-notable person.  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I just noticed that this was their 2nd AFD.  It might have been eligible for CSD G4, too.  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP: Mike is very well known in the upper echeolon of the tech and content creator world.  He is currently working with many notable individuals and has conducted notable business.  https://www.thethings.com/who-is-josh-richards-22-year-old-manager-michael-gruen/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/people/michaelgruen/? sh=32456ee572c6 https://www.forbes.com/pictures/61a658957d8a73f982166967/josh-richards-19-michael/? sh=60f579701405 Gptjoe ( talk ) 20:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Sources found are all typical of those above.  All the Forbes links listed up there are from the Business Council, or a photo.  Very much PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Spam.  And nothing changed since the first nomination (the result was: delete).  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 21:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Israel: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, entirely unsourced.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Israel .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 08:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTTVGUIDE covers this explicitly BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Further comment I wish to close this nomination to repackage them into a single nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Serbia to make it convient for editors.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTTVGUIDE par excellance.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – as per above.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 20:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, I see no value in this type of content.  Govvy ( talk ) 09:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KBSC-LP: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 20:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oregon .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 20:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject lacks the necessary WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources.  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Suicide, it's a suicide: Source predominantly used is an answer to a reader submitted question to The A.V. Club , while others reference that KRS-ONE is "socially and politically conscious" and that a song appeared on a soundtrack.  Suitable for Genius.com soetermans .  ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  There's not enough sourcing or content to even write a decent "impact" section in the article for the song it originated from, let alone to warrant an outright article split.  Sergecross73 msg me 20:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Theoretically, this sort of thing can be notable, but there are no good sources here.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 07:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hassan Basri Ridzuan: The best sources found were HMetro and Bharian , neither of which address the subject in any detail.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Malaysia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No notability here or anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ujjawal Trivedi: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO, sources found match those normally for a journalist, but nothing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  BEFORE found mentions, interviews, promos, but nothing from WP:IS with WP:SIGCOV.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  Title should be SALTed due to history.  // Timothy :: talk 03:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete & SALT – Only two sources found doesn't establishes notability.  Toad ette ( Merry Christmas, and a happy new year ) 07:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism , Television , Internet , Madhya Pradesh ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some coverage about a viral video, this is typical coverage [32] , but I'm not sure that's notable.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom Jeraxmoira ( talk ) 09:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete