United Airlines Flight 35: The incident doesn't have major consequences and coverage stopped 5 days ago with barely any major news websites talking about the incident.  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 13:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per WP:NOTNEWS etc.  Mangoe ( talk ) 13:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator RandomInfinity17 ( talk - contributions ) 14:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  Happens all the time.  CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine ( talk ) 14:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Tire falling off an airplane and no deaths, isn't notable.  Routine news coverage, nothing lasting I'm afraid.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Wikipedia page is not really notable, since whenever has a part not fallen off an United aircraft?  - UAL328 . .  But no seriously, a tire burst of a big aircraft like a Boeing 777 didn't really impact the plane too much.  The only form of damage were the cars with no injuries.  There isn't any problem with the article, it's just that there's nothing to add onto.  After all of the "landing gear fell off the airplane" talk, what more information is there to add?  The article is all filler based off an article released one day after the incident, a very brand new incident.  - And the only reason the news isn't talking about this incident anymore, is because the aircraft wasn't in massive danger.  It was just a simple maintenance issue (the news article sourced in the Wikipedia article doesn't specify if the maintenance was at fault by United technicians or Boeing technicians) as stated.  - Some positives although, the incident has been reported by Fox Business , CBS News , NBC Bay News , ABC7 San Franscisco , New York Post and so many other news articles.  Although they may be not credited since they were made March 7/8th so we may further wait or delete if the article quickly fades into obscurity and it is immortalized as a small part of United Airlines#Accidents and incidents .  70.167.194.163 ( talk ) 22:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not worthy of a whole page.  Plane'n Boom1 ( talk ) 23:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, minor incident with no encyclopedic value.  Rosbif73 ( talk ) 15:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Relatively routine and very likely will not be WP:SUSTAINED .  Not news.  TLA tlak 15:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  This is a relatively minor incident, no one was hurt, and as others have said, mainstream news coverage has ceased after only a few days.  Trainsskyscrapers ( talk ) 18:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly not lasting coverage.  SportingFlyer T · C 18:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is small and non-notable.  Incidents like this one happens all the time.  PatrickChiao ( talk ) 00:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : non-notable GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 02:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : small incident.  ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 19:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , the sources do not indicate that the incident would be notable Killarnee ( talk ) 16:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – it happens all the time.  PlaneCrashKing1264 ( talk ) 14:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete