hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Junior Fisher: 4 international caps for the Cayman Islands national football team .  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, cursory search does not reveal anything more promising.  — siro χ o 23:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the same reason, the two sources cited are databases and textbook examples of "trivial" sources as per WP:SPORTCRIT Bwmdjeff ( talk ) 23:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ashutosh (spiritual leader): Coverage primarily revolves around the individual's sudden death from cardiac arrest and controversial remarks regarding Sikhism and Sikh gurus, which sparked violent clashes between his followers and certain Sikh groups resulting in fatalities.  this incident garnered media attention, but it does not inherently confer notability.  Media often sensationalize and report on contentious events.  Nearly all the sources in this article zero in on this event, with no secondary, independent, reliable sources found that delve into the subject beyond this incident.  The first reference, a YouTube video posted by Divya Jyoti Jagrati Sansthan, an organization founded by the subject, is a primary source and lacks independence from the subject.  Furthermore, the article has been subject to persistent conflicts of interest, disruptive editing, and repeated attempts by parties with vested interests to shape its content to fit a particular agenda.  Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS or a platform for advancing personal agendas.  and claims like "His followers believe him to be alive and in a state of samadhi or deep meditation. Since January 2014, his body has been kept in a freezer by the management of DJJS, with a firm belief that he will come out of meditation", referenced to their own official YouTube channel do not meet the GNG standards.  No GNG worthy sources found & individual fails the stringent criteria of WP:GNG & WP:BLP1E.  Nitish shetty ( talk ) 11:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Nitish shetty ( talk ) 11:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Spirituality , Bihar ,  and Punjab .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  also Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 14:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per nom & Youknowwhoistheman, Wikipedia is not a news site.  Also sources like YouTube  and the ZEE articles aren't reliable and independent.  The Zee News article is a straight press release posted by IANS, which is a PR distribution agency.  Abualsarmad ( talk ) 17:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nominator and comments above.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 11:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arrey Bate Arrey: Suggest that once those claims are removed, there is nothing notable left OwainDavies ( about ) ( talk ) edited at 10:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism ,  and Cameroon .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Tom Morris ( talk ) 12:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Priest's Passion: Although it could redirect to Matthew Dewey , I think the title might be too ambiguous.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I could find hardly any sources.  I am not opposed to a redirect to Matthew Dewey , but a Google search shows that it is not an unambiguous term.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 22:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no independent coverage.  - Altenmann >talk 22:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
T. Surendra Reddy: No sources found of interest in WP:Before .  Article is entirely original research.  If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 04:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Andhra Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unsourced.  Kailash29792 (talk) 08:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per above 456legend talk 11:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom.  27.4.112.164 ( talk ) 07:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trupti Toradmal: She has not played any significant roles.  The provided sources consist mainly of gossip and interviews.  I couldn't find any GNG-worthy sources in BEFORE search.   – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 11:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Thee seems to be more than a few passing mentions about this person [24] and [25] for example.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b The first source, published by the DNA WebTeam, doesn't have any specific author mentioned.  Given that articles from Desk Teams are often part of press releases, it should not be considered a reliable source.  The second source is an interview, which is a primary source.  – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 16:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete She's not yet notable in her industry - she has a long career ahead of her and can be written up when she makes her mark.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 01:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As above.  Not yet notable.  IMDB can track her if she ever makes a mark.  MisterWizzy ( talk ) 04:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Inge Roecker: I checked Google Scholar for publications, and also searched for reviews of Roecker's book, Urban acupuncture , but did not find anything that would make a compelling case for WP:NACADEMIC .  signed, Rosguill talk 20:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Architecture ,  and Canada .  signed, Rosguill talk 20:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I had the same results as NOM - the only award I can find is one where her work came in as an honorable mention, and it wasn't a major award AFAICT.  I find some listings for her architecture businesses, both in Germany and the US, but only names and addresses, no further info.  I'm not totally surprised that an architect doesn't have a lot of publications, but G-Scholar only shows one.  Lamona ( talk ) 05:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ben Obese-Jecty: Similarly, writing a few newspaper articles also does not confer notability.  Propose deleting and if he is successful in his campaign, it would be appropriate to make a page once he is elected.  Drerac ( talk ) 17:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Journalism ,  and United Kingdom .  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 18:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not pass WP:GNG , vast majority of sources cited in article are written by article subject.  J2m5 ( talk ) 02:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as the number of sources appears to indicate notability for journalism purposes as well as his political career.  If the decision is not made to keep the article, moving to draft space would make more sense than deletion, which would only mean a well-written article most likely having to be recreated from scratch after the election if he wins.  Chessrat ( talk , contributions ) 07:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete looking at the history, was clearly created as a campaign ad.  SportingFlyer T · C 04:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , per WP:POLOUTCOMES .  We have deleted literally hundreds of such articles, for all parties across all spectra and countries, in the past 17 years.  Bearian ( talk ) 13:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Connect (users group): Searches did not find any significant coverage of the subject.  Was proded in December 2022 but deproded at the last second.  Does not seem to pass WP:ORG or WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Technology .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nondescript name makes it hard to search for other sources, but there does not appear to be any WP:SIGCOV of this user group except for sites affiliated with HP.   It therefore seems to lack secondary coverage.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jamie Lim: The article is not written neutrally and the only source on the article (not counting the dead link) is just a passing mention.  Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women ,  and Canada .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  At the time this was first created (2005), the notability standard for mayors was "any city of regional prominence gets an automatic inclusion freebie for its mayors regardless of the state of sourcing" — but that's long since been kiboshed, and replaced with having to get the mayor over WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis of her mayoralty.  But that's lacking, and this more or less elides any real substance about her mayoralty itself and instead slides into advertorializing ("Where Timmins may have lost out on a very astute, forward-thinking leader, the OFIA benefitted greatly from Ms. Lim's transformational leadership") her later work as CEO of a regional industry organization — but CEOs of organizations also aren't "inherently" notable just for existing either , and still have to show a lot more RS coverage and analysis of their work than has been brought to the table here.  This just isn't cutting it at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 13:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notability thresholds regarding mayors have changed in the meantime, resulting in this article no longer meeting WP:NPOL .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sasquatched! The Musical: Not clear the topic passes WP:GNG due to lack of independent sources.  4meter4 ( talk ) 21:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO I can only find various sites to buy the play, or license a performance, or primary sourcing.  This is all I could find otherwise [4] Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Theatre .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Musical by non-notable playwright, produced only at a festival and by non-notable theatre companies.   Then, of course, there is no interest from independent sources.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 01:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chronos (pretrained model): MarkTechPost that is linked in the article is a AI media platform which would land it squarely in unreliability land.  Sohom ( talk ) 11:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Filled with techno-words, I'm still not sure what this is or what it does.  Regardless, there are two hits, the one used in the article and another PR item.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Owen× ☎ 12:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Completely promotional, lacking sources, and manages to still be pretty vague despite an impressive amount of jargon.  No RS to be seen.  Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs ) 12:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 01:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , no need for a promo page.  Artem.G ( talk ) 11:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Be Ugly: Boleyn ( talk ) 20:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Health and fitness , Advertising ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 23:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I couldn't find anything on this.  Redirecting the two words, are just redirecting a negative, and probably would be better deleted entirely.  — Maile ( talk ) 04:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
White Rock, Maine: Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions .  Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article itself says that it is a neighborhood in a city.  This book says it's a neighborhood [33] .  Even a plain google search get as many hits for gorham as white rock, and those tend to indicate its a neighborhood in Gorham.  We generally delete these.  James.folsom ( talk ) 20:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paula Liniņa: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2020 , 2023 , 2024 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No reliable sources found on her, no news articles with SIGCOV, and those examples you gave are passing mentions.  ‍ Relativity 01:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SoonFasting: Assirian cat ( talk ) 12:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clear cut COI PROMO issue 87.74.193.124 ( talk ) 13:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Software .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No neutral WP:RS sources and clear advertising, WP:PROMO .  Zefr ( talk ) 13:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Komba Malukutila: Doesn't meet our WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO .  Sources are but trivial mentions of the subject, maybe a case of WP:TOOSOON .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 18:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Africa .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 18:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTLINKEDIN , this is a relatively standard professional profile .  — siro χ o 20:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin Mccapra ( talk ) 22:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete