hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of current Indoor Football League team rosters: Let'srun ( talk ) 19:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and American football .  Let'srun ( talk ) 19:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
London Film Awards: Can't find anything online.  Be careful not to mistake this for the more general phrase "London film awards" TLA (talk) 10:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events ,  and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NAVCO Business Security Services: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 20:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Owen× ☎ 20:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or even speedy delete.  Absolutely nothing in my searches.  Geeraarts ( talk ) 00:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Kablammo ( talk ) 09:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology , Connecticut , Florida , Massachusetts , Minnesota , Missouri , New Jersey , New York ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's nothing in the article that would constitute a meaningful claim of notability, there are no sources in the article to support such a claim, nor could I find anything more useful in a Google search.  The article is in its 14th year and there appear to be no other articles linking to this one, which doesn't help build a case for notability.  Alansohn ( talk ) 14:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - very weak coverage, does not meets GNG.  Bikerose ( talk ) 20:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Seydanil (Belarusian singer): Still likely to fail WP:MUSICBIO /WP:GNG KH-1 ( talk ) 05:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Belarus .  Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 06:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Russian news portals are used.  Wikipedia marks about the festival are indicated.  Information taken from real sources from interviews.  There are no newspapers on the Internet.  They were on the air of Belarusian television, but they are not on the Internet.  IVAN1203 ( talk ) 21:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - In the AfD of the previous article under his real name Daniil Rzhevsky , some evidence was offered of an attempted promotion.  Nothing has changed now that he has the stage name Seydanil.  His music is self-released and has not yet gained any reliable notice from the professional music media.  Many of the sites referenced in the article, and mentioned by the commenter above, are either retail operations in which Seydanil is selling pictures to try to launch a modeling career, or typical social media-style sites that allow uploads of one's own work and softball introductory interviews.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That is, the mention of the Ural night of music in Russia on your site does not matter? The agency is invited to magazines in America. Magazines also talk about the new video clip. IVAN1203 ( talk ) 23:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] How is it myself? The artist does not own the label! IVAN1203 ( talk ) 23:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above user has done nothing on Wikipedia outside of the Seydanil article and this debate: [34] . For more experienced users and admins, I shouldn't have to explain that a music festival might be notable but that does not extend to every single person who ever appeared there, while any magazine can be paid to talk about a new video. --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 19:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] rave.  you are talking nonsense now!  IVAN1203 ( talk ) 22:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Evidence that the artist bought the magazines?  And he is not embarrassed that everyone and most of the performers buy covers!  Why don't you write to them?  IVAN1203 ( talk ) 23:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I insist on leaving the article!  IVAN1203 ( talk ) 22:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Renegades RFC: Broc ( talk ) 13:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Rugby union ,  and Caribbean .  Broc ( talk ) 13:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , and there doesn't appear to be a suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hennadiy Gufman: Member of local council is not notable.  The Ukrainian Wikipedia is absent (I think because he is not notable there either).  Edit.pdf ( talk ) 14:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Politician not meeting NPOL, rest of mentions are basically things he's done while in government, so routine descriptions of his job.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I agree that the subject does not pass WP:NPOL, but can the nominator explain why, given the existing sources, the subject isn’t a GNG pass?  Mccapra ( talk ) 01:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Beyond describing his political career, he hasn't done anything notable that they talk about.  Being influential in Dnipro isn't GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on the above discussion.  I'll add in (1) fringe candidates and ideas are not automatically notable , (2) which is well settled , (3) he is not notable as an attorney , and (4) he has literally done nothing outside of his local sphere, as it says in the article , making him run of the mill .  Bearian ( talk ) 13:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Golden Kids English High School: The WP:NSCHOOL criteria have been made much stricter since the previous deletion discussion.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 07:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Maharashtra .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 07:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - best I can find is Justdial .  Schools should pass WP:GNG , WP:NORG or both but this doesn't pass either.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rohit Mehta: Google reveals various hits on another person of the same name who is a crypto CEO of some sort, and various other actors with the same first name, before this person even shows up (and it's a passing mention in a gossip rag).  Sources in the article are gossip or primary.  Previously deleted as A7 and G5, though I of course can't see why that is.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and India .  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, you beat me to it, thanks.  All I can find about him is a few gossip pages about his wedding, and obvious paid placement.  In case you're still wondering about the G5 deletion from the last AFD, it was User:Abh01 , a sockpuppet of User:Amansharma111 , and this one will probably be flushed down the same pipe.  Note that it was originally created as Rohit (Indian Actor) before I moved it to his actual name.  Two weeks ago it was Rohit (Indian actor) .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Himachal Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This doesn’t even need a nomination.  Creator is a sockpuppet per G5 .  Nonetheless, it is wholly promotional with only a few sources that do not make it notable enough.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 14:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt - non-notable actor; page repeatedly recreated by likely undisclosed paid sockpuppets.  This version was also created by a sockpuppet and is similar enough to the most recent deleted version (there are several) that it would qualify for G4 deletion had there been a complete deletion discussion, and would be eligible for G5 deletion if not for subsequent substantive editing.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 14:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Seconding suggestion to salt, if that matters.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 03:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - References are mainly tabloid type references and nothing that shows either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR .  I would say leave the AfD open instead of a G5 so we can discuss support for SALTING the page due to the WP:TENDENTIOUS attempts to re-create the page.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 21:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mainly junk, tabloid references, created by a sock, name-dropping - strike three, page is out.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per above.  -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 08:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Skelton (artist): No obvious good WP:ATD .  Boleyn ( talk ) 09:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Ireland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Noticed the article seems to be a copyvio of this website page: [49] or that is a mirror of his WP article.  Netherzone ( talk ) 01:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:BEFORE doesn't turn up any RS to add to this article's claims.  All seem to be gallery or auction house promotional material. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Beerwinkel: I found three sentences of coverage here .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lots of team announcements etc, but struggling to see anything else to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : He helped people or did something which leads to an award isn't notability.  Though there are WP:LOTSOFSOURCES , they don't independently and significantly cover him.  However, there is still clue for notability maybe in the future.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tiyamiyu: It has been over 7 years and no significant improvements have been made.  There is no evidence that this name is notable; it fails WP:NNAME .  It is poorly written, poorly sourced and goes into excessive detail about familial members.  Being "unique" is not grounds for notability, as the author argued in the first nomination, and their argument seems to oppose WP:NOTDICT .  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 23:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 23:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Geschichte ( talk ) 05:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The history and usage of a name is notable in and of itself.  Add references and improve as necessary; do not delete.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 18:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A name is not inherently notable, and as noted above, the article fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTDICT .  I can't seem to find any reliable sources establishing notability, either.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 19:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Clarityfiend , any thoughts on this?  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 01:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NNAME (if there are no notable bearers of the name, it doesn't merit an article) or at the very least WP:TNT .  The only people I can find who are even remotely close to notability are Tiyamiyu Oluwagbemiga, mentioned in passing as the predecessor of Ibrahim Lamorde as Director of Operations and Strategy of the Nigerian Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and Tiyamiyu Kazeem, a footballer formerly with Remo Stars F.C. [2] Also, nothing of any use is properly sourced.  The etymology is unsourced; in fact, the Media Trust reference gives a different one: "'Tiyamiyu' is from the name a town 'Tihamah' in Arabia."  All in all, a big eyesore.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 02:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anthony Marquez: Tagged for notability since 2015.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 07:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Illinois .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Zero WP:SIGCOV .  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 10:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no WP:RS WP:SIGCOV of the subject that I could find.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 13:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My search did not find the significant independent coverage I believe is required to meet WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 11:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gerald C. Olesen: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 08:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , United States of America ,  and Wisconsin .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  A member of the military reserves may also be notable for what they accomplished in civilian line.  In this case, I wasn't able to find anything non-military that he did, apart from graduating from [Upper Iowa University]].  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  Mztourist ( talk ) 10:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Brigadier generals are usually on the borderline of notability.  There is an image and more details but he seems to have spent his whole career with a unit of the Wisconsin National Guard.  No credible claim of significance .  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Framework7: Northern Moonlight 00:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Total lack of secondary coverage — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I'm afraid this fails WP: GNG .  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 02:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There doesn't appear to be enough independent coverage of this topic.  Waqar 💬 15:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Dragon Ball Z home video releases: Comprehensive list of media available for purchase.  Serves as a huge linkfarm for Amazon rather than an encyclopedia.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists , Television , Comics and animation ,  and Anime and manga .  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Straightforward WP:NOTCATALOGUE -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 10:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Has no encyclopedic value.  The list is not notable.  Carpimaps talk to me!  11:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Orientls ( talk ) 18:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Dragon Ball Z episodes , and incorporate what content can be salvaged into that article.  While it's clear that there is a lot of information here that may be useful, I don't see a case for standalone notability.  jp × g 20:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there is nothing to salvage from a link farm of WP:NOTDATA cruft Dronebogus ( talk ) 10:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zeher-e-Ishq: Cannot find sources for it after 2017 and anything that exists do not show how this meets WP:GNG .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 03:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Pakistan .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 03:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete