Andrew O'Connor (writer) : It has zero sources, and that it hasn't been really expanded that much.  JuniperChill ( talk ) 16:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Australia .  JuniperChill ( talk ) 16:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep .  Nom is based purely on the current stage of the article and not on the notability of the subject.  If a basic BEFORE had been done the Sydney Morning Herald linked in the Tuvalu (novel) page would have been seen demonstrating that the subject does not have zero sources.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 00:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Duffbeerforme : that is still only one source that goes towards establishing notability.  A Google search I did found a bunch of references to 'Andrew O'Connor' but I suspect that none of them are this Andrew O'Connor.  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 07:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I actually did say about the notability in the first sentence.  Maybe I forgot to say that my Google search mostly returns the actor .  Also, Google seems to no longer return the number of results I have been getting (in the form of about 1,000,000 results (0.10 seconds)).  We have many pages without sources but I think due to the new rules, any articles created today without sources will almost certainly result in an AFD, merge, redirect or drafts.  JuniperChill ( talk ) 10:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If you are only finding hits for others then refine your search.  This man wrote a book called Tuvalu so search for "Andrew O'Connor" Tuvalu and you may get better results, such as [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] .  Simple really.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 07:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and NBIO.  Single EL source in article does  not meet WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth , nothing found in BEFORE that has SIGCOV from independent sources.  Info from sources found related to Awards and nominations does not meet SIGCOV and would fail WP:IS.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 15:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Austlit lists 17 works about his works.  Below are from some of the better known publications listed.  Info from sources found related to Awards and nominations does meet SIGCOV and would pass WP:IS.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 07:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pierce, Peter (23 September 2006), "Gaining in translation", The Age Full length review of Tuvalu .  (Peter Pierce is professor of Australian literature at James Cook University.)  Stubbings, Diane (19 August 2006), "All-absorbing look at search for an elusive dream", The Canberra Times Full length review of Tuvalu .  Ley, James (19 August 2006), "The island in the mind" , The Sydney Morning Herald Full length review of Tuvalu .  Tucker, Genevieve (6 September 2006), "Fraught between two worlds", The Australian Full length review of Tuvalu .  The Sydney Morning Herald Article about O'Connor.  Keep : this is a classic case of an editor equating a lack of references with notability.  It has needed, and has now received, an edit that includes a number of references.  The author's novel, Tuvalu , is an Australian prize-winner, which makes it notable.  To delete the page of the author of that novel would diminish the encyclopedia.  The page still needs more work rather than a deletion.  Perry Middlemiss ( talk ) 22:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : With the book awards and these critical reviews of Tuvalu [12] , [13] , passes AUTHOR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : And this discussion [14] of his work.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep