Orkhan Mammadov: It was subsequently recreated and it still fails notability requirements.  There is no independent reliable sourcing of the subject.  All the sourcing is by Azerbaijani government outlets.  The subject heads the Small and Medium Business Development Agency (Azerbaijan) which is not a notable entity either (it's one of countless state initiatives created by the authoritarian regime in Azerbaijan).  Thenightaway ( talk ) 18:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:53, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT - what has changed since the last AFD?  Giant Snowman 13:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Still sourced to government press releases, nothing otherwise about this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet GNG.  -- DonCalo ( talk ) 21:09, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:NOP from my prospective.  I don't know why you would want to SALT a government officials name.  I've seen far worse off articles on American representation get kept for less.  I don't believe Azerbaijan sources have really been looked into.  :/ Govvy ( talk ) 16:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Govvy , did you mean to link NPOL?  Where are you seeing that he would meet that?  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ JoelleJay : Yep, I meant to link to WP:NPOL , but alas, I find it odd behaviour at AfD by the delete voters, there are citations on the article, but has anyone actually analysed them?  From what I see, not all the sources are government branches or press releases.  I don't know about the independency of the sources, but I see a bit of a mix of primary and secondary.  But at the end of the day, and often enough no one really looks at what a source is doing.  From my prospective, a source is about verifying the text on the article, is the text correct?  Is the content right?  Is the content source?  From that prospective, it all looks correct to me.  So what do the deletionists want?  I don't understand whats wrong here.  I don't get the argument for a deletion.  Govvy ( talk ) 13:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But...what makes him meet NPOL?  And you know articles need to meet much more than just V to exist...  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - all citations are mentions or not independent, so there is no proper coverage.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 07:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete