S. Cofré: The three conditions set out in WP:BLP1E are not met: RSs cover the subject only in the context of that single event, she is likely to remain an WP:LPI , and the event and her role in it did not get persistent coverage in RSs.  Gitz ( talk ) ( contribs ) 02:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Gitz ( talk ) ( contribs ) 02:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Chile .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is not enough here to justify calling it notable.  Even the Spanish version of the article is vague about most things.  It says "es o fue" (is or was), making it clear that there is no (or insufficient) information about whether S. Cofré is still alive.  I also wonder where the "her" came from: the Spanish article says nothing to indicate whether S. Cofré is a man or a woman.  Athel cb ( talk ) 10:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] As to whether she is (or was) indeed a woman, I managed to find this: Como particularidad cabe señalar que otra mujer, S.Cofre, es co-descubridora del planetoide ("Notably, another woman, S. Cofre, is a co-discoverer of the planetoid.", DeepL translation) [43] .  Gitz ( talk ) ( contribs ) 13:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Good for you.  I did some searching, both for her name on the web and on the Universidad de Chile website, but I didn't find that.  On the other hand, something I failed to notice earlier, is that the Spanish article says "un astrónomo" suggesting a man, but although a woman biochemist would always be una bioquímica, not un bioquímico, I don't know if the same practice applies in astronomy.  Athel cb ( talk ) 14:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : if the decision is to delete, then I recommend a redirect to List of minor planet discoverers where this person is already listed.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 16:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect seems fine.  Perhaps adding the name to the Women in Red list for the country would help, I've seen some pretty amazing stuff happen when people get digging for sources there...  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree an ATD should be used.  Redirect could suffice.  It's also quite possible to rename this to Minor planets discovered by S. Cofré with a slight restructure, as an informational list.  — siro χ o 03:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to List of minor planet discoverers .  Cofre is mentioned in directory books like this , but this seems to fail WP:GNG .  Zenomonoz ( talk ) 03:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] imho Keep : as itwiki, to avoid losing this minimum information GiovanniPen ( talk ) 15:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of minor planet discoverers .  Nothing significant to be said about this person.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 20:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect