The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health : Article dePRODded by article creator who added several sources to the article, as well as links to the GScholar profiles of the editors.  Unfortunately, none of the references are in-depth discussions of this journal and most are not independent either.  The GScholar profiles strongly suggest that none of the editors are notable themselves, with the possible exception of one, but in any case, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED .  PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete .  Randykitty ( talk ) 09:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals , Law ,  and Medicine .  Randykitty ( talk ) 09:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Saudi Arabia and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am writing to contest the proposed deletion of the Wikipedia page for "The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health."  My argument rests on several pillars of Wikipedia's notability guidelines, specifically those related to academic journals ( WP:NJournals ) and the general notability guideline ( WP:GNG ).  Here are the key points supporting the retention of this page:  1. Significant Contribution and Scope: The journal was established during the critical period of the COVID-19 pandemic with the aim to inform policymakers and appraise best research practices in the fields of medicine, law, and public health.  Its interdisciplinary focus spans crucial areas such as epidemiology, mental health, emergency medicine, and medical ethics, underscoring its broad academic and practical relevance.  2. Indexing and Accessibility: "The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health" is indexed in WorldCat (OCLC No. 1427524091), affirming its accessibility and presence in significant academic repositories.  This indexing supports the journal's credibility and accessibility to researchers globally, an important criterion under WP:NJournals  .  3. Editorial Credibility: The editorial board comprises scholars who are actively contributing to their respective fields, as evidenced by their profiles on Google Scholar.  This not only demonstrates the journal's commitment to high academic standards but also enriches its contributions to the academic community.  4. Publication of Notable Research: The journal has published significant research studies, such as those assessing patient satisfaction during COVID-19 and evaluating temperature measurement methods during the pandemic.  These publications are indicative of the journal's active role in addressing timely and impactful health issues, aligning with WP:NJournals emphasis on the journal's influence in its field.  5. Adherence to Rigorous Academic Standards: It adheres to a stringent double-blind peer-review process, ensuring the integrity and quality of published research.  This process is a cornerstone of scholarly publishing and supports the journal's standing in the academic community.  6. Future Directions and Potential for Growth: Plans to expand into cutting-edge areas such as artificial intelligence in healthcare and the legal implications of emerging medical technologies signal the journal's forward-thinking approach and potential for future impact on interdisciplinary research, fulfilling aspects of WP:GNG .  In light of the above points, it is clear that "The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health" meets both the specific notability standards set forth for academic journals and the general criteria under WP:GNG .  The journal's contributions to its fields, its accessibility, and its rigorous editorial standards all argue against its deletion and for its further development and recognition on Wikipedia.hence: Keep .  Andrewjenner75 ( talk ) 12:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'm appreciative of your devotion to this subject but unfortunately, none of the above shows any notability and misses WP:NJournals and WP:GNG by a mile.  -- Randykitty ( talk ) 16:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for acknowledging the efforts to improve the article.  I understand your concerns regarding the notability standards as per WP:NJournals and WP:GNG .  However, I would like to further substantiate the journal's significance by presenting detailed evidence, particularly focusing on the impact and recognition of its editorial board, which indirectly enhances the journal’s credibility: Editorial Board’s Scholarly Impact: The editors of "The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health" are not only experts in their fields but also highly cited scholars.  For example, Sharafaldeen Bin Nafisah, the editor-in-chief, is well-recognized for his contributions to medical law and public health, with a substantial citation count reflecting his extensive influence.  Similarly, Abdulaziz Boker, known for his work in medical education and ethics, and Jameel Abualenain, focused on emergency medicine and public health policy, have publications that are widely cited, indicating their prominent roles in shaping academic discourse.  Other editors like Bandr Mzahim, Abdulrahman Ahmad Alzahrani, and Khaled Al-Surimi bring significant insights from emergency medicine, health informatics, and public health advancements, respectively, each with a strong citation record that underscores their scholarly impact.  Almost all of the editors of this journal have more than 200+ citations individually.  Independent Citations of Published Articles: Several articles published in the journal have been independently cited in other scholarly works, demonstrating the journal's role in contributing valuable knowledge to the field.  For instance, studies on patient satisfaction during COVID-19 and the effectiveness of temperature measurements during the pandemic have been cited multiple times according to Google Scholar, indicating their impact on related research areas.  Indexing and Academic Usage: Beyond just being listed in WorldCat, the journal's articles are referenced and used by academics and professionals, affirming its utility and relevance in the fields of medicine, law, and public health.  Broad Academic Discourse and Future Directions: The journal’s commitment to expanding into interdisciplinary research involving emerging technologies like AI in healthcare represents its potential to influence future academic and practical applications, aligning with the WP:GNG which requires potential for significant coverage.  A book called "The Art of Emergency Medicine: A Practical Approach for Emergency Physicians" has been published in 2021.This resource is crucial for assisting emergency healthcare practitioners in navigating the complex treatment of both adult and pediatric emergency cases.  In light of this additional information, I urge the community to reconsider the notability of the journal.  The citation metrics and scholarly influence of its editorial board, combined with the independent citations of its articles, substantiate the journal's impact and relevance in its academic field, thus meeting the criteria set out in WP:NJournals and WP:GNG .  Their collective contributions ensure that the journal remains a critical resource in the fields of medicine, law, and public health, enhancing its notability and justifying its presence on Wikipedia.  Andrewjenner75 ( talk ) 20:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indication that this journal has gotten any significant coverage.  Nothing other than the creating editor's opinion of its importance suggest it meets WP:NJournals .  Getting an OCLC number is no criterion at all, that just means that at least one library somewhere has it in its holdings; it's no more a sign of notability than an individual in the US having a social security number.  The potential notability of some of its contributors in no way suggests that the journal has inherited that notability; see WP:NOTINHERITED .  TJRC ( talk ) 19:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clear fail of WP:NJOURNALS , per RK and per TJRC.  Headbomb (alt) ( talk ) 16:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete