hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Tibai family: Shaws username .  talk .  23:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Per nom.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 23:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:11, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I will expand the article in days.  I don't know why you have to nominate an article for deletion after an hour (!) instead of using the talkpage.  -- Norden1990 ( talk ) 08:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I see Norden1990 already did hundred of well sourced Hungarian medieval articles, just recently: Kaplon_(genus) , John Tibai , Urgesta , I think it is just matter of time, and he will finish it properly.  OrionNimrod ( talk ) 17:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Changing ! vote to keep per Norden1990 and OrionNimrod: I didn't check to see when this article was created before not voting, but we shouldn't be quick to AfD a just-created page that is being worked on by an active editor.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 00:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep as nom, although I would add @ Norden1990 : that this could be avoided by using the sandbox or draft space instead of placing in progress articles in the mainspace.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 20:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ma Chu Ka: Only things found were film database sites, promotional material and articles about the actresses appearance in the film but nothing about the film itself.  Deleted in PROD, but restored.  Nothing new added except a "nowrunning" review, but per this Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_118#Nowrunning , that does not appear notable.  Donald D23 talk to me 23:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Donald D23 talk to me 23:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Kerala and Tamil Nadu .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 23:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Keep .  There is also a review by Santhosh Aechikkanam .  The film only has 2 characters, so I don't see any problem with sources talking about one of them.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 01:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Two reviews exist, passes WP:NFILM .  Kailash29792 (talk) 02:26, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article has been improved by DareshMohan since nomination.  Even if Nowrunning is not the best of sites, coverage of the production and of the film's particularities in reliable sources seem to make it notable enough. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 10:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw per concensus.  Donald D23 talk to me 14:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Sandeep Kshirsagar: Maliner ( talk ) 16:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: They meet WP:NPOL as an elected member of a state/province legislature in Indian.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 01:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Indian state legislators pass WP:NPOL .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 02:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:NPOL .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes NPOL.  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - as legislators pass WP:NPOL 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 09:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clearly passes NPOL.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  06:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Passes WP:NPOL as a member of a state legislature.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Mansi Sharma: Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:BLP1E as model.  Fails notability .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellore Aarathi ( talk • contribs ) 16:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability and no prominent roles in shows.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellore Aarathi ( talk • contribs ) 16:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 27 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 16:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Surely WP:NACTOR is the relevant standard? — Moriwen ( talk ) 17:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -  The actress doesn't play any crucial role in shows, she only received slight attention in Mahabharat however she also played a small role in that.  Overall fails WP:NACTOR .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.189.11.78 ( talk ) 01:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very minor roles which is not recognisable.  Fails WP:NACTOR .  (nominator voting several times here and might be the IP editor L iz Read!  Talk!  06:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Speedy keep : Looks like WP:BEFORE search was not done.  The subject passes WP:NACTOR as she has had significant roles in Choti Sarrdaarni and Acha Dhin .  Also passes WP:NBASIC as these are not from trivial coverage .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 08:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I want to see if there is more support for a Keep.  Though why the nominator is citing WP:NPOL is beyond me.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete : No sources of her in recent times, truely unaware if she is even in the entertainment industry anymore.  Delete this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isha.Narain ( talk • contribs ) 05:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock puppet.  PhilKnight ( talk ) 11:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have blocked the nominator for sock puppetry.  PhilKnight ( talk ) 11:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep - the only delete is from an IP which doesn't count, and the nom is void, so this should be kept.  PhilKnight ( talk ) 14:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Epeli Saukuru: I was able to find this and this , which doesn't seem to be enough.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - refs added.  There are plenty of refs on the Fiji Sun ; I've added a few, and its just a matter of picking out the good ones from the usual coverage. -- IdiotSavant ( talk ) 03:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Radhika Rao: References are clickbait, interviews, PR and profiles.  No secondary sourcing.  scope_creep Talk 10:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I reviewed some film reviews in linked articles for films she has directed, e.g. for Sanam Teri Kasam The Hindu , IANS in the Hindustan Times , in this article, there is also The Indian Express ; for Lucky: No Time for Love , BBC , India Today ; for I Love New Year , Filmfare , NDTV ; for Yaariyan 2 , Firstpost , TimesNow .  I think with multiple reviews for multiple films, WP:DIRECTOR notability has support, and this article could be updated to include secondary coverage, and to remove the unreliable sources and promotional content.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 05:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Have you considered WP:NEWSORGINDIA Looks like The Indian Express is problematic, especially when we're talking about establishing notability.  Graywalls ( talk ) 03:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am aware of these concerns generally, but for the Indian Express review in this article, this is bylined, not "Brand Solutions" content, and it is a 1-star review.  I also removed many sources from this article that appeared to be promotional press-release style coverage, and have not considered them as support for notability.  Also, the Firstpost review was not glowing, to say the least, but did speak to Rao's other work in addition to the reviewed film.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 03:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ' Comment The article seems to have some merit. Nomination Withdrawn scope_creep Talk 08:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] you sure? Graywalls ( talk ) 03:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I'm prettty confident in Beccaynr's ability to analyse an article for notability. scope_creep Talk 11:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - While I think there is more work that can be done, I have made updates to the article to incorporate reviews, including with an assist from WP:ICTFSOURCES , and to remove non-RS and what appears to be promotional content. I think keep is supported per WP:DIRECTOR #3 per multiple notable works with multiple reviews, including secondary coverage of her collective body of work. Beccaynr ( talk ) 03:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ahmad Irandoost: No WP:SIGCOV .  Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator - UtherSRG (talk) 12:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Wrestling ,  and Iran .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Basic Shape: Boleyn ( talk ) 16:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:NBAND.  I've added content and references.  Subject had album reviews, they toured Australia and their music was played on national radio.  shaidar cuebiyar ( talk ) 06:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , is now properly referenced and satisfies the requirements of WP:NBAND .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 08:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination I am happy to be proved wrong, and have removed the notability tag too.  Thanks for your hard work.  Boleyn ( talk ) 09:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Al-Shifa Hospital siege: Article was previously merged into the siege of Gaza City article, with nearly the whole article (all 242 words) merged into the article.  This merge was rapidly challenged by a user saying it is independently notable.  My argument for merging was CONTENTFORK as well as how the siege of Azovstal steel plant during last year's Siege of Mariupol doesn't have a split article, why should a small siege amid the larger parent ( consensus confirmed ) notable topic of the Siege of Gaza City .  Again, a CONTENTFORK of 242 words is what this siege article is.  The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 21:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , Israel ,  and Palestine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'd be inclined to 'Keep' the article but rename it.  There doesn't seem a lot at the moment to warrant describing it as a siege within a siege, but the hospital is clearly a key focus of the IDF during this war.  The Siege of Gaza City article seems to be in the form of a timeline, with spin-off articles about key events, of which Al-Shifa Hospital is becoming a major part.  Sionk ( talk ) 22:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep To clarify, the blockade on Al-Shifa Hospital is distinct from the one imposed on the Gaza Strip.  The Gaza Strip blockade entails restricting the entry of food, beverages, diesel, and petroleum derivatives throughout the military operation, while the blockade on Al-Shifa Hospital occurred after ground forces entered.  It's essential to highlight that the siege on Al-Shifa Hospital commenced specifically on November 10, making it a singular and distinct event from the Gaza Strip blockade. --— Osama Eid ( talk ) 22:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as there isn't an issue with having a military operation within a military operation as an article, the hospital is very notable, and the content is well sourced and independently notable.  LegalSmeagolian ( talk ) 23:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn AfD - Initial AfD reasoning resolved as it is no longer a direct copy/paste WP:CONTENTFORK .  The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 23:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Mazhar Ali Khan (journalist): Just one source refers to the subject in detail.  The other two are about his wife and only mention him in passing.  Codenamewolf ( talk ) 14:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator as another book reference has now added to article.  Codenamewolf ( talk ) 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Pakistan .  GSS 💬 15:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Mazhar Ali Khan (1917 - 1993) was and still is known to be a pioneering journalist in Pakistan.  He had a long distinguished career in journalism.  There should be no doubt and none exists about his notability in Pakistan among the people who know history of journalism in Pakistan.  He was a long-time editor of a major English-language newspaper, Pakistan Times in the 1950s.  Dawn newspaper reference, as the above nominator himself says has in-depth significant coverage about his career and life.  So in my view, this article meets WP:SIGCOV on that basis alone...  The second reference is from the UK newspaper The Independent that talks about both his wife and him.  It's very relevant because she was a liberated lady for those old days and highly active in his day-to-day affairs including his jounalistic career.  I will soon replace the third newspaper reference from the The Friday Times .  That newspaper apparently has developed some business problems very recently and possibly will change only to be an on-line newspaper.  As we all know, these things sometimes happen in the business world.  That's why I will be replacing that reference soon.  Please allow me some time...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 18:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Article meets WP:SIGCOV based on one good quality source, but multiple such sources (atleast 3) are expected to meet WP:GNG standards per WP:SIRS , and based on a quick Google search, I'm not able to find them.  Codenamewolf ( talk ) 18:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Control-\: I don't think so.  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 12:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
National Lampoon's Golf Punks: I found no reviews in Rotten Tomatoes and only listings in Newspapers.com .   I did a WP:BEFORE and found nothing suitable or reliable enough to pass WP:NEXIST .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 10:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 10:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 11:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The film is analysed/reviewed at least in: The Video Movie Guide The Buzz on Golf TV Guide FIlm-Dienst International distribution.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 19:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm not going to withdraw yet, but I will accept the TV Guide review as one of the suitable and reliable reviews.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 17:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources .  The sources listed by Mushy Yank ( talk · contribs ).  "Tom Arnold takes to the links in this movie premiere" .  Sunday News .  1998-09-06.  Archived from the original on 2023-10-17 .  Retrieved 2023-10-17 – via Newspapers.com .  The article notes: "Tom Arnold stars as a hapless, ex-golf pro hired to teach the sport to a gawky group of kids in Fox Family Channel's world premiere movie "National Lampoon's Golf Punks. " The family comedy premiere tonight (Sept. 6) at 8 p.m. Down-on-his-luck, Al Oliver (Arnold) is out of work and constantly harassed by two thugs who are sent to collect on a betting debt. Desperate to find a solution to his financial problems, he reluctantly agrees to take a job his brother finds for him at a public golf course, teaching a misfit group of kids how to play the game. Bitter about an incident that cost him a professional golf career, Al hasn't played in years. His work is cut out for him when he meets the unruly and uncoordinated kids he is assigned to teach."  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow National Lampoon's Golf Punks to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline , which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  Cunard ( talk ) 06:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I withdraw this nomination per consensus.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 10:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Manouche: Source 1 provides a lot of coverage in the context of jazz; more on that below.  Source 2 doesn't mention the term "Manouche", and source 3 provides only passing mentions.  There are two plausible redirect targets here, Gypsy jazz and Romani people in France , though I lean toward the latter.  I would blank and redirect , but the recent creation of this article indicates that this would be contentious.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 12:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and France .  Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 12:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and expand.  There are sources in French [44] an ethnological review, [45] disease history in the population and [46] study of the grammar/language syntax used.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:21, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep