Erum Akhtar: Furthermore, majority of cited sources fails WP:RS.  No evidence indicating significant involvement in notable films, TV dramas, etc.   being in a film or TV drama  does not make one WP:Inherent notability.  Previously deleted as per AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erum Akhtar — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 16:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  She is a well known actress.  She started working in 1990 and she has portrayed leading roles in dramas now she does supporting roles as well sometimes lead roles.  [1] ( BeauSuzanne ( talk ) 05:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] References ^ "معروف اداکارہ ارم اختر کی بیٹے کیساتھ تصاویر وائرل" .  Jang News .  Fyi, the comment above was made by the creator of the BLP.  The reference they provided to establish WP:N is merely a sensational news story.  --— Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 17:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Seems to meet WP:NACTOR with various significant roles in notable productions.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But I was unable to verify if she had significant roles.  As I said in my nom, merely being in a film or TV drama does not make one inherent notable.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 15:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NACTOR clearly.  TheChronikler7 ( talk ) 16:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note The creator of this BLP has peculiar editing history.  I've raised concerns about it on WP:ANI .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 17:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : She has appeared in numerous notable dramas.  I remember her in  leading PTV dramas roles.  She was a model as well. ( 2400:ADCC:160:1F00:C166:DEA8:28EC:A094 ( talk ) 10:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC) ) [ reply ] Not enough! you've to provide references to support claims made about her significant roles — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 11:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep - meets WP:NACTOR , rationale provided for deletion is weak.  182.182.97.3 ( talk ) 14:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is akin to WP:JUSTAPOLICY — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 18:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] IP blocked.  --— Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 21:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: For further review of the sources, and to allow for further discussion within this debate.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO.  nothing found in article or BEFORE that meets WP:SIRS.  Article has a lot of refspam, but none or it meets WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Keep votes provide no sources other than a promotion photo spread.  BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk 13:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources provided to show notability, no reason to keep the article.  Niafied ( talk ) 04:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete