Neal Potter : The notability claim here is that he was a county executive, which is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees a Wikipedia article -- it's a role where he would have to pass the second clause of NPOL ("local political figures"), where the inclusion test hinges on the depth and volume of reliable source coverage about him that can be shown to support an article with.  But except for one obituary upon his death, this is otherwise referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, with no other reliable or GNG-building sources shown.  As his career was several decades ago and thus might not Google well, I'd be perfectly happy to withdraw this if somebody with much better access to archived Arlington-area media coverage from the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s than I've got can find enough to salvage it -- but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 11:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Virginia .  Bearcat ( talk ) 11:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bearcat :  Try https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/ > https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/partners/27/ > his name in Maryland newspapers.   The Frederick News-Post seems to carry the most coverage, with hundreds of articles.  WhatamIdoing ( talk ) 18:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Economics , Illinois , Maryland , Minnesota , Pennsylvania ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- based on his position as a county executive, I expected to give a delete opinion as that's the normal outcome for such roles.   But a staff-written obituary in the Washington Post suggests he was considered notable beyond the typical holder of such a position.   The other details (Plaza named for him) wouldn't generally be enough on their own, but together with the obit pushes above the bar for GNG keep.  (would not pass WP:PROF on its own).  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Arlington County is literally suburbs of Washington DC, so the existence of a staff-written obituary in the Washington Post just suggests the exact same purely local notability that any county executive in any county could always show, and is not in and of itself enough to singlehandedly determine that he's more notable than the norm.  So we would need to see a hell of a lot more than just that alone.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Indeed I thought of that, but the Washington Post is not a local newspaper in the same way that say that Arlington Sun-Gazzette is.   It was written by their same obituary staff as their other obituaries.   I think that a look at their current obituaries will show that obituaries in the paper are dedicated to people whom they believe have more than local notability.   I don't see, for instance, other local officials or former high school sports coaches there, except in the paid death notices section.   -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 22:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  04:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete I live in the county, and I only recognized the name on a "that rings a bell" basis.  He lived, he was county executive, he did county exec things, he retired, and he died.  I just don't see the notability; I'm sure he was competent (or else he surely would have an article!) but the language of his term is that of press releases, which argues he did nothing that attracted greater notice.  Mangoe ( talk ) 10:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would also point out that the Post and the Times are the de facto local papers of the area given the demise of almost all the county level papers, but in any case they would report such an obituary as a matter of record.  Mangoe ( talk ) 10:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as non-notable.  Those obituaries are not sufficient to establish encyclopedia value.  Otherwise, every single person who ever had an obituary in those would get their own Wikipedia article.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Doczilla.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 20:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete