hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Supreet Bedi: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello Lulakayd.  If you see closely, most of the references are 'direct references' about the subject.  Only a few are indirect references but do talk about the subject.  Also, the subject is not insignificant by any means but a well-known anchor and trainer.  Besides this, she has also acted in movies and there are references to back all the content.  Achujabal ( talk ) 16:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I don't seem article following WP:GNG and WP:BLP guidelines.  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 15:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:GNG .  DJ InstaMalik ( talk ) 00:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marchex: Star Mississippi 18:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Companies , Computing ,  and Washington .  Star Mississippi 18:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Tagged for notability since 2013, only survived its first nom because no one commented properly.  Fails guidelines per nom.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 01:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The strongest coverage is the 2008 Bits blog piece quoting company reps on their former Cybersquatting business model, but I don't see that as sufficient to demonstrate notability ; nor does their more recent focus on AI analytics appear to have demonstrable notability.  AllyD ( talk ) 11:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lyn Parker: Routine coverage here fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 19:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No SIGCOV.  All sources in the article are unsuitable: source 1 is Who's Who , which is unreliable , source 2 is basically a CV, and source 3 is a Downing Street memo.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per source assessment above.  Lacking independent sources to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 08:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG with no secondary sources.  User:Let'srun 21:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I wonder if a redirect to List of ambassadors of the United Kingdom to the Netherlands would be worthwhile as it is conceivable people might search for the subject in connection with that post.  Dunarc ( talk ) 21:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Amended by Dunarc ( talk ) 21:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But that is not the only thing s he is known for.  S he's also been high commissioner to Cyprus.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair point - he did hold both roles and it is not clear one is more important than the other (and also his position at the ICC would also be a conceivable reason for searching).  Given the importance of all 3 roles and is odd that there are not more sources covering him, though this can sometimes happen with diplomats.  Dunarc ( talk ) 20:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The nominator lays out a good case, so I won’t repeat, but this article does not meet WP:GNG criterion and should be deleted unless more substantial RS news coverage can be found.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nelson Poket: UtherSRG (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Dominican Republic .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Li'l Missy Beaded Dolls: detria skies 17:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks like a cut-paste of a product list MNewnham ( talk ) 01:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Products .  detria skies 17:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Concur that what we have is not good enough for mainspace; fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 07:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lash, Ontario: – dlthewave ☎ 04:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Canada .  – dlthewave ☎ 04:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  This locale is notable only in relation to the railway that goes through this point.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Albert Louton: Many of the sources are family tree/ genealogy sources which attest to facts but not notabiity.  He gets a mention in source 4 as a young man with an eye to an attractive daughter of a missionary family but nothing here speaks of notability and the source is highly affiliated.  Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 18:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , South Africa ,  and United States of America .  Velella Velella Talk 18:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources are, except one, either self-published obituaries in newspapers or on funeral home websites, or otherwise Ancestry or Geni family trees (also self-published), as well as a gravestone and some US General Land Office Records (primary), plus a self-published biography of him on someone's blog.  The only possible good source in this is the book, "Stewards of Grace," which was written by his grandson.  Google searches and google books searches give no results, so delete.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 20:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The article was created entirely by one account, @ RogerNotable , who's currently blocked for undisclosed paid editing.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 20:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
YouTube Spammer Purge: Of the existing references, one only briefly mentions the subject, two are user-generated content, and one is a walkthrough of using the software.  Plus I can't seem to find any reliable in-depth coverage about the topic.  Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 23:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 23:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - subject does not meet notability requirements - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources .   The best attestation to notability is a passing mention in The Verge which falls well short of what is needed.   Note that A7 specifically excludes software which is why the A7 was declined.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 00:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I read the A7 page before tagging and still somehow missed that....  Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 15:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What about https://lifehacker.com/how-to-stop-annoying-youtube-bots-from-spamming-everyon-1848924366 ?  ChippyTechGH ( talk ) 15:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The coverage is not significant.   The article is about youtube spam, and just mentions this program.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 15:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as non-notable since there is no significant coverage per the notability guideline .  2NumForIce ( speak | edits ) 22:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only coverage is from The Verge .  SWinxy ( talk ) 15:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  per nom  -- Devoke water 20:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete nonnotable software Karnataka ( talk ) 20:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brad Tapp: The best that I can find is Football NSW , Coast Community News and The Football Sack , all of which are trivial mentions.  Please note that Central Coast Mariners FC is his employer so any sources hosted on their website would not be independent of the subject.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 01:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete has not played top professional level.  Maybe create an article when gets an A League career.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:26, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Turboraketti: The internet verifies it exists, but that's about all.  Drmies ( talk ) 20:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Finland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:GNG - all I was able to find on Archive.org was a brief review in Amiga Magazin February 1994 p.80, and short coverage of Turboraketti II in Skrolli's April 2014 issue p.46-47, no substantial coverage.  Waxworker ( talk ) 00:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Weak delete - Substantial review in Pelit magazine and a section in a retrospective (also Pelit) but it's still not enough to pass GNG.  MikroBitti could have coverage around 1992-93 but didn't find scans online from that period.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 09:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Found this fairly short review by Mikrobitti . -- Mika1h ( talk ) 15:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There's also some coverage in the book Sinivalkoinen pelikirja [ fi ] .  (bottom left of the page, a bit cropped) toweli ( talk ) 09:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That uses in parts identical text as the Pelit retrospective (same writer).  Also there's this brief thing by Vapriikki Museum Centre : [4] .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 14:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bloodrocuted: Searches found little to nothing.   v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 04:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Belgium .   v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 04:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : does not meet WP:NBAND.  No sources.  Prose is a little weird (maybe original author had a COI?).  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  16:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing the GNG.  Coverage is either niche or not SIGCOV, for example when an ex-drummer died in a motorcycle accident.  gidonb ( talk ) 05:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aigerim Alimbozova: The best sources found were Vecher , which mentions her twice in a match report, Kaz Football , which is just a squad listing, and Sports Arena , another squad list.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Kazakhstan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KUDA (Shoshoni, Wyoming): Fails WP:GNG .  Redirect is unnecessary as the disambiguator of (Shoshoni, Wyoming) makes it an implausibly specific search term.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and Wyoming .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is one I'm okay with.  I checked for sources (like you're supposed to ), and couldn't locate anything notable.  Plus, the station signed back on as KUDA on a different frequency.  ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun!  22:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I did check for sources, as you're supposed to do when creating an article , and found absolutely nothing.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 22:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hence I'm fine with it.  All I ask is due diligence before pushing the AfD button.  I would appreciate a template first, so that the article can be improved.  If no sources can be found, so be it, it can be deleted.  I just hope there isn't a vendetta here.  I've put in many hours trying to beef up sources in radio station articles, and I'm just hoping they don't go to waste for nefarious reasons.  As I've said many times before, I don't own these articles, but I will defend any licensed broadcast station where legitimate third-party sources can be found.  See KCUW-LP and KBGN for examples.  A lot of work went into those.  ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun!  22:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not have the sourcing to meet the WP:GNG .  Implausible search term for a redirect.  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An obvious remnant article of the looser inclusion "standards" that this topic area had prior to 2021, which were largely based more on existence (which neither proves nor is notability) than on sourcing, much less the clearly-lacking-here significant coverage .  The disambiguator makes any redirect impractical, particularly when there isn't much reason to retain the article history anyway.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of radio stations in Wyoming as WP:ATD .  Why would KUDA be an unlikely search term?  Also there are 57 incoming links.  I assume most of these are from templates, but who's going to check for real ones.  Wouldn't it be WP:CHEAP ER to redirect?  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , no reliable sources on the article and no hits online, FCC source is not great for demonstrating notability.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not only is the article poorly sourced, the subject itself lack sources.  It clearly doesn't meet WP:GNG .  ZyphorianNexus ( talk ) 01:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of events commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the September 11 attacks: I also don't believe that this is a notable list (ie people often refer to the list as a whole).  — Panamitsu (talk) 22:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Lists .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Terrorism ,  and New York .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 01:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notable subject but still a listcruft.  Orientls ( talk ) 06:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject is WP:LISTCRUFT with a lack of coverage covering these events as a group.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- This would be LISTCRUFT if there was any sort of sourcing (or any sort of list).  Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST for lack of sources that consider the concept as a group as opposed to individual events/items.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 17:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Queen Hirai Atram: Only mention in a handful news sources like the one sourced in the article.  News sources are not enough for articles pertaining to history, let alone the WP:Notability of the subject.  Fylindfotberserk ( talk ) 14:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and History .  Fylindfotberserk ( talk ) 14:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and India .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Could be yet another fabrication.  Will look for the sources but voting for delete for now.  Georgethedragonslayer ( talk ) 08:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , indistinguishable from a hoax.  - 🐲 Jo the fire dragon 🐉 ( talk | contributions ) 14:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete if not a hoax, it's worth TNTing.  Jebiguess ( talk ) 21:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor page which clearly is self opinionated, without any references.  One and only reference on the article ends with 404 error.  RangersRus ( talk ) 17:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ RangersRus : The article creator apparently had a problem linking the reference.  The correct URL → [12] does mention the subject, but this is a news article, and I wasn't able to find much about her in RS, let alone WP:HISTRS.  - Fylindfotberserk ( talk ) 11:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the correct URL and after going through it, vote still remains the same as I am with you that this subject's sources needs to be backed by reliable scholarly research.  The News article is not reliable enough to base the article on.  RangersRus ( talk ) 16:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] After being rejected for mainspace for lack of sourcing and moved to draft space by Liz , the creator Yamanhunyaar simply recreated the article again in mainspace.  That is disruptive, and I have speedy deleted it and blocked the creator, who has done more disruption than just this (compare this ANI thread ).  Bishonen | tålk 01:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete