List of Monday Night Football results (1970–1989) : Fails WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides being mostly unsourced; both sources are about the game and nothing to do with the TV coverage or just a mere mention and another is a redirect link; not doing anything to help this list to assert notability.  An WP:ATD will be to trim and merge it into Monday Night Football .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural close , all three deletion attempts of the lists of Monday Night Football games should be in a single nomination (three bites at the apple?).  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 13:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural close , I agree with Randy Kryn .  These nominations would be better done together, probably along with List of NFL on ABC results .  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 21:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTSTATS and failing WP:LISTN as the topic of Monday Night Football results falls under WP:ROUTINE coverage of the NFL.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 14:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Merging multiple deletion discussions into a single AfD is a nomination choice, not a valid reason for procedural close, unless another AfD for the same page is already in progress.  Please address the specific article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep a sensible way of organizing this data.   As far as WP:NLIST , CBS Sports organizes information this way [5] , as do teams such as the Dallas Cowboys [6] .   As far as WP:ROUTINE , that is an argument against articles for individual games, Routine events such as sports matches ... may be better covered as part of another article .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The first source is pretty good.  Are there more from the time period that's mentioned?  The 2nd is considered WP:PRIMARY .  Conyo14 ( talk ) 01:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Would it be considered primary?  A football team is not the broadcaster or the television network, they just run onto the field and play, so I'm missing what's primary about it.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 04:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Dallas Cowboys website (owned by the NFL) producing something about themselves would not be independent, thus WP:PRIMARY per their results of the team they play on the field.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 06:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:NLIST which states "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list."  Monday Night Football was a notable TV show, looked forward to every week in the era of three or four networks.  It was a national event, only the best games were slated for Monday night.  And it made stars of its announcers.  Then per Walsh90210, who presents a good case.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 03:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus