hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2022 Asian Para Games closing ceremony: Previously PRODed, controversial page (see the edit history) but does not provide any sources.  Restore the redirect to 2022 Asian Para Games#Closing ceremony per Special:PermanentLink/1182487023 .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 15:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Asia .  microbiology Marcus ( petri dish · growths ) 15:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Events ,  and China .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to 2022 Asian Para Games#Closing ceremony ; there's some coverage , but likely fails to satisfy WP:NEVENT criteria for its own article, particularly on the grounds of WP:LASTING , WP:PERSISTENCE , and WP:DIVERSE .  Left guide ( talk ) 00:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – Per Left guide .  Svartner ( talk ) 12:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge – Per Left guide .  Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 13:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2022 Asian Para Games#Closing ceremony , which already covers this ceremony.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 13:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Lincoln Mystery Plays: Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.  Prod removal mentions two sources [9] [10] but these are purely local, containing identical quotes and are comprised primarily of quotes from the director and publicity material.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 13:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Lincoln Cathedral : Not notable alone, could be merged with the cathedral article, all coverage found relates to it anyway Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively with Lincoln Cathedral as not independently notable fir a standalone article, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 20:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Humanix Books: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Conservatism , Health and fitness , Politics , Companies , Education ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Newsmax , where it does not currently appear to be mentioned... but it probably should be.  Jclemens ( talk ) 05:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Seafair (Richmond): As always, city neighbourhoods are not automatically entitled to have standalone articles as separate topics from the city just because they exist: it has to be possible to write something substantial about the neighbourhood, referenced to a significant volume of coverage in reliable sources.  But this is literally just "it exists, the end", referenced entirely to content self-published by the city government and a shopping mall (i.e. not independent third-party sources), which simply isn't good enough.  At this level of depth, it only warrants a mention in the city's article rather than qualifying to have its own.  Bearcat ( talk ) 22:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Bearcat ( talk ) 22:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Richmond, British Columbia as WP:ATD-M — siro χ o 04:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Kompressor (musician): DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 02:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with content from Married to the Sea#Drew in current redirect article Drew (webcomic artist) , which itself might need to be renamed.  I think there's enough between all his activities for Drew himself to be notable.  I've found a couple more sources discussing him: "Drew Fairweather, the Funniest Man Who Does Nothing For a Living" Molempire and "Drew 'Multifaceted' Fairweather" Rise Comedy .  — Torchiest talk edits 05:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - as per above comment, or delete.  Was unable to find significant coverage, especially for an obscure parody artist of an already obscure genre.  In addition to the sources on this page I was only able to find a last.fm profile which is just a repost of this article and an interview that was clearly just a joke.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 20:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Mister Maker Around the World: I am also nominating the previous spin-off, Mister Maker Comes to Town .  The article has much more content, and 2 citations.  The first citation is just an official Mister Maker flash game irrelevant to the lead where it is cited (and doesnt seem to be about this specific spin-off at all), and the other citation is likely much more relevant but hidden behind a paywall.  Mister Maker Comes to Town ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) There doesn't seem to be any good sources for either article, I don't beleive either article is notable.  Most of the content from both these articles, especially Mister Maker Around the World , can be added to Mister_Maker#Spin-Offs , and don't require their own articles.  Theooolone ─ ( Talk - Contribs ) 05:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Mister Maker as per nom.  Matt's talk 10:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
1925 Humboldt State Lumberjacks football team: Let'srun ( talk ) 21:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football ,  and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Humboldt State Lumberjacks football, 1924–1929 a la similar action for Delaware State Hornets football, 1924–1929 , Temple Owls football, 1894–1899 , and Henry Kendall Orange and Black football, 1895–1899 .  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 23:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm fine with that, but the closer can't merge unless someone cares enough to create the target article before the AfD closes.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 23:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] From page creator: I created these pages to provide a complete record of every football season played by all of the Cal State schools.  I have zero objection to merging the 1924-1929 seasons into one page if that's the consensus.  ocfootballknut ( talk ) Delete per WP:NSEASONS .  This wasn't even intercollegiate football, as all the games were played against high school teams.  -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note I have created Humboldt State Lumberjacks football, 1924–1929 and redirected 1927 Humboldt State Lumberjacks football team , 1928 Humboldt State Lumberjacks football team , and 1929 Humboldt State Lumberjacks football team there.  Jweiss11 ( talk ) 03:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC) a [ reply ] Merge , per Jweiss.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 03:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per @ Jweiss11 ' Cray04 ( talk ) 04:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
The Dalek Generation: four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Literature ,  and England .  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I see no reason why not Sansbarry ( talk ) 01:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How bout the fact that almost everything is unsourced?  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively to New Series Adventures#List of New Series Adventures .  So far I have seen only the one review by Starburst linked in the article, so I agree that this fails WP:NBOOK .  No reason to loose the link to that one review, though, so this reference plus a brief plot summary should be merged to the parent topic as WP:Alternative to deletion .  Daranios ( talk ) 11:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Daranios.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 03:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Democratic Progressive Azad Party: This regional political organization, founded just a year ago, has not made significant contributions to regional political developments.  The provided sources primarily revolve around breaking news related to a leader resigning from their former party to establish a new one.  Moreover, there is no evidence indicating the party's participation in any elections, and no sources affirm its status as a noteworthy political entity. – Owais Al Qarni ( talk ) 21:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , India ,  and Jammu and Kashmir .  – Owais Al Qarni ( talk ) 21:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ghulam_Nabi_Azad#Democratic Azad Party : If this were a recognised political party it would meet one or more criteria and should likely be kept.  It is instead one of 3000+ registered unrecognized political parties (RUPPs) and appears yet to achieve GNG in its own right.  Azad is unquestionably notable, however, and the formation of this party belongs in his bio regardless of current or future status.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 03:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Any further opinions about a possible Redirect vs. Deletion?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Ghulam Nabi Azad#Democratic Azad Party : Fails WP:NSUSTAINED , all the sources are about Azad leaving the INC to form his own party.  Queen of Hearts 04:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Ghulam Nabi Azad#Democratic Azad Party : if in the future sources show this merits a stand alone article it can become a properly wp:summarystyle fork.  As it stands this is completely tied to Ghulam Nabi Azad and doesn't have stand alone notability.  // Timothy :: talk 05:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Nhổn station: Sources naming it simply mention it as one terminus of the Nhon – Hanoi Station line and give no additional detail about this station.  Even the Vietnamese Wikipedia article's sources have no significant coverage.  This article should be redirected to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) .  Toadspike [Talk] 14:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography , Transportation ,  and Vietnam .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) needs a table of stations with their locations and a map, but otherwise redirect if there is no content.  Reywas92 Talk 15:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge the position data, etc. to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) and redirect there if sources cannot be found (they're most likely to be in Vietnamese, so do check in that language).  There is no reason to delete the information present in the article which will be useful if it is expanded in future.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 18:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge there isn't enough coverage (or content) for a separate article from Line 3 (Hanoi Metro) yet, but there might be in the future.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 23:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Crisis States Research Centre: A possible ATD is merge/redirect to London School of Economics , but it could unbalance that article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and England .  Owen× ☎ 18:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 16:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 21:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Eligible for soft deletion, though I'd like to see some discussion on the ATDs that were floated by nom before closing that way.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to James Putzel .  Stuartyeates ( talk ) 04:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a brief properly sourced summary into James Putzel .  This may very well develop into a full article one day, this will be a good place for it to be developed.  Currently it fails GNG and NORG.  // Timothy :: talk 07:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Georgia–Kiribati relations: The interactions are minor, one meeting of the President and minister at the side of a UN meeting, one minor memorandum of understanding agreement.  Lacks aspects that would make these relations notable like significant trade or migration, resident embassies and state visits.  Fails GNG as most sources are primary.  LibStar ( talk ) 02:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Georgia (country) .  Kpg jhp jm 04:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions .  LibStar ( talk ) 05:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete with partial merges.  Some information can be comfortably merged into Foreign relations of Georgia and Foreign relations of Kiribati .  It's likely that there are more non-English sources out there, so I am willing to be swayed, but as it stands now does not meet GNG on its own.  — siro χ o 04:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge any useful content.  Doesn't appear to have any major relationship.  APK whisper in my ear 06:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the table cell in Foreign relations of Georgia that currently links to this article (as the substantive information here is Georgia-centric, which makes sense given the historical context).  There is an interesting story to be told about Georgia's 2012 diplomatic push in Oceania after Nauru recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia, which led to diplomatic relations with a number of countries, but we don't quite seem to have the sources to support this level of coverage.  (It's discussed a bit here but without much info on Kiribati.)  I wonder if there might be Georgian-language sources that would have better detail on the topic, but for now there's probably not enough to be useful.  -- Visviva ( talk ) 03:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Star City (comics): We have here just a plot summary + listing of apperancees, i.e. pure WP:FANCRUFT .  My BEFORE fails to show anything better than [31] , which seems to be a student paper (not a thesis - the best I can figure out it was just a course paper related to a blog - PopMeC Research Blog , since it is also part of the suggested citation in the pdf).  I suggest redirecting either to Green Arrow or to the List of DC comics locations per WP:ATD-R .  PS.  Interested editors may want to know I also prodded an even worse IMHO article, Coast City .  A redirect is always fine as I noted there, or we can have another AFD is someone thinks it merits it.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I have been slowly improving the page, and have added a variaty of sources.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ OlifanofmrTennant I assume you refer to this .  Which of the sources you added go beyond plot summary/mentions of the fact that this entity appeared in media x ( WP:NOTPLOT ), and their treatment of this location meets WP:SIGCOV ?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect/Merge to Arrowverse .  It seems to go against WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  I have no opposition to draftification to improve the article either, but it needs context and reception.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of DC Universe locations .  I agree this does not pass GNG and the list is probably the best target as its a setting both in comics and the tv show.  Rhino131 ( talk ) 14:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect due to insufficient coverage.  Does not pass WP:GNG and should be deleted, but redirects are cheap.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 16:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of DC Universe locations in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 19:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge