hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Thomas Mansfield: Very limited sources.  Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 08:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United Kingdom .  Pepper Beast (talk) 08:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Junk article that is fueled by primary sources, is promotional in tone, and contains no links to any other articles.  Has a whopping eight edits in the past two years.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 18:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Previous instances were deleted after AfD decision in 2013, before the present instance was created by a WP:SPA .  I have had a look for any sources to revise my "delete" opinion in the first AfD, but I am seeing no better than occasional items about research by the company and short articles by company employees, which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH .  I am not seeing the evidence needed to overturn the previous consensus that the firm has not attained notability here.  AllyD ( talk ) 10:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karenth Zabala: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  I want to say Draftify because MonFrontieres does such a good job on these articles, and it's not inconceivable that she continue to earn caps in the future.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't find significant coverage of her in Bolivian, American, English-language or Spanish-language sources, only trivial mentions in national team selections and match reports.  The general lack of content around the Bolivia women's national football team prevents redirects or other WP:ATD to capture anything about the goal or caps.  If this is WP:TOOSOON , I also can't find even trivial coverage suggesting the player has been active anywhere since 2021, when she was rostered with Nova FC of United Women's Soccer ( 1 ; she's not on its USL W League roster in 2022 ).  - Socccc ( talk ) 00:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Makase: I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Contested PROD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I procedural removed the PROD on this to allow more time to search for sourcing, given there were 23 PRODs to look through in less than a 48 hour period, and a simple search was bringing up potential sourcing.  However, although there is this and a large number of team announcements, there probably isn't enough here to pass WP:GNG , and no suitable redirect per WP:ATD either.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : problem of WP:SIGCOV and slight meeting of WP:SPORTSBIO .  I am not convinced of this article being notable but sure it can in the future.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  08:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Ferenzik: Appears to lack WP:SIGCOV and fails to meet the WP:MUSICBIO criteria.  All solo albums are through a non-notable label, while his "collaborations" are minor roles where he was not significantly involved.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 05:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 05:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete some mentions of performances in the Delco Times and Detroit newspapers, but nothing for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No sourcing could be found for this individual beyond their personal website and social media accounts.  Also agree with original notice.  Additionally, @ Ferenzik did not adequately comply with WP:COI in disclosing their affiliation to their own article.  Sad to say it, but this article is 15 years overdue for a deletion.  — That Coptic Guy ping me!  ( talk ) ( contribs ) 08:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ChilOut: Fails WP:ORG .  Source 1 doesn't link to actual report, source 2 appears dead Source 3 doesn't mention this organisation and source 4 is a self published source.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shastri Nagar, Goregaon: There is no evidence that this place is legally recognized or defined.  Hence, WP:NPLACE does not apply, and this fails WP:GNG .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yang Xian (chess player): UtherSRG (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 21:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Google Books returns some results in Chinese, but I'm not sure there's enough to meet GNG.  Cobblet ( talk ) 19:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 16:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, —⁠Scotty Wong ⁠— 05:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oxaï Roura: popo dameron ⁠ talk 20:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NN per nom MNewnham ( talk ) 20:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and France .  popo dameron ⁠ talk 20:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barpathar High School: There may be sources in Assamese or other languages.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Assam .  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect .  In the absence of sources conferring notability I would normally support a redirect to the locality the school serves — presumably in this case the Nilabari area of Bongaigaon — but there's no article.  Could feasibly add its name to the list of schools in Bongaigaon#education and redirect there, otherwise delete.  Rupples ( talk ) 10:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Notability of schools, particularly in areas where sources may not be in English, can be a vexing issue.  Sources don't have to be in English to demonstrate notability, and they don't even have to be online.  But at this stage there is not a single source in this article, which doesn't even properly describe where this school is.  Searches do find some primary sources, showing it exists, but we don't have an article and we don't have sifficient material to write an article.  The state of this one, 10 years on from its creation, is so poor that WP:TNT applies.  If someone wants to write about this school in the future, having found some secondary sources showing notability, they won't need to begin from here.  As it stands, no evidence that it passes GNG.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 12:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Remy Shittu Remy: Being a council leader does not automatically confer notability on the subject.  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 12:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Nigeria .  Jamiebuba ( talk ) 12:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Favourdare123 ( talk ) 13:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC) I did my best to seeing that every previous error that was mentioned about this article was Attended to.  i don't expect the article to be deleted.  [ reply ] Delete Council leaders are not notable and nothing else here would make him so.  Mccapra ( talk ) 14:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment — If the bases of notability is girded on being a council chairman, then it blatantly failed the notability guideline for politicians and thus should be deleted .  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 19:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
K. K. Kabobo: The only reason this musician got coverage from the media (both RS and non-RS) is because of his death, which falls between WP:BLP1E (recently died) or WP:BIO1E .  It’s all about his death and nothing else.  Nothing to establish notability on this one.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 05:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Kindly keep this article.The reason is because this person was very notable when he was living, its unfortunate that little information has been written about him in the internet era, but he is really notable in Ghana, his death is not the reason why we have much publication about him, but rather it's his contributions he made to the Ghanaian music industry,kindly keep the article as we continue to make improvement to the article.08:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Jwale2 ( talk ) 08:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Ghana .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC .  This was another article hastily created postmortem without seeing if subject even passed notability standards.  While the editor voting keep above says "as we continue to make improvements to the article", they haven't edited it since the end of March.  There's still virtually no content with nothing about his career and just an unsourced list of songs.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 08:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sorry, couldn't a good source per BEFORE.   🍕 Boneless Pizza!  🍕 ( 🔔 ) 11:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emeka Okwuosa: The entry itself, is written as an advertisement.  Also, Ajifohils and Hilspress seems to be the same person.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 06:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BIO .  ProQuest search gives me puff pieces galore.  In case both users vote to keep the article, I think @ Reading Beans : may be correct .  They both edited the page when it was in userspace.  APK whisper in my ear 07:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —pure puff piece.  〜 Festucalex • talk 10:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  The best I could find was an interview [40] , rest is pure PR fluff.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete You had me at 'serial businessman'.  Puff, fluff and stuff.  Mildly interested in the "24 heart surgeries successfully conducted on 23 Nigerians" - wondering what one poor person did to get two surgeries.  Everything else is humdrum with a strong whiff of UPE & fails WP:GNG...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 15:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move to draft Please I understand that the article lacks proper structure and sources, so I am requesting that the article be moved to draft in other to resolve the issueS.  The subject is a notable topic, and I have no relationship of whatever with the subject only for the sake of contributing on wikipedia.  I am new to wikipedia and only ask other experience editors from the same Wikimedia Fan club to assist me when I need help.  Thank you.  Ajifohils ( talk ) 07:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sunlight Solar Energy: Non-notable solar contractor.  Fails WP:CORPDEPTH .  WP:NCORP .  Coverage is trivial and routine like . .  "Tim Moore, supervising electrician for Sunlight Solar Energy, Inc., who oversaw the panels’ installation at the aquatics center."  Graywalls ( talk ) 00:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Oregon .  Graywalls ( talk ) 00:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Coverage is typical of this [63] , mentions, but not extensive.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Not notable.  It's also puffed up with fake refs that don't support the material.  I removed some of these a few years ago but some still remain.  GA-RT-22 ( talk ) 00:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Seems like a clear case of WP:NOTPROMO , very few reliable sources exist, and the couple that do are just quotes from someone from the company.  — siro χ o 02:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 07:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not able to see passes WP:NCORP .  Meegvun ( talk ) 17:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of extensive sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Luka Zdenjak: My own searches yield La Rep , Quartier Croix Rouge and Badmania , all of which are only trivial mentions of Zdenjak.  I can't find any significant coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Badminton ,  and Croatia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The currently cited sources are entry on sport sites and basic announcements of game results.  Did not manage to find any suitable coverage about the individual, seems to fail WP:NATHLETE .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Frederick F. Cornell: Book source seems to say about as much as an obituary would about each person described there.  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 20:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Religion ,  and New Jersey .  Flounder fillet ( talk ) 20:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- a Newspapers.com search finds only passing mentions (generally as an officiant at a wedding or in ads for a school he assisted at.) -- Nat Gertler ( talk ) 17:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , what there is are simply run of the mill mentions.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 14:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - two directory listings does not constitute significant coverage .  Bearian ( talk ) 13:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since there are only passing mentions Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Armenta: The vast majority of secondary sources are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  While there are allegations made, all I can find is the allegations and nothing definitive, certainly not enough to meet WP:CRIME Shaws username .  talk .  22:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and California .  Shaws username .  talk .  22:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cheyyar Polytechnic College: Appears to be one of a large number of colleges in the area with no particular distinguishing features Newhaven lad ( talk ) 18:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There is no source at all on the page.  Simple search does not bring up reliable sources that can be used to even contemplate to Draftify this page.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 19:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete