hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of programmes broadcast by Green Entertainment: List was split from main article without discussion on Aug 30, 2023.  This is an unneeded CFORK, much of the content violates WP:NOTTVGUIDE.  No objection to restoring properly sourced material to main article.  // Timothy :: talk 17:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and Pakistan .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 17:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is indeed a superfluous CFORK.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete CFORK created without any consensus.  Lorstaking ( talk ) 15:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Green Entertainment .   The main article is so short, this will fit it in just fine.  D r e a m Focus 07:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Over the past two days, an IP address did the merge, so everything is there now.  D r e a m Focus 22:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't think that there is anything to merge, and I'm not sure if the redirect would be useful, but I'm not against it per WP:CHEAP .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , there is nothing to merge that isn't already on the main article and a redirect would serve no useful purpose.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 18:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jalaj Kumar Anupam: — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , India ,  and Bihar .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 18:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nominator - several sources are paid/sponsored articles, this feels like there's some UPE happening here.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 07:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ravensfire : , You are correct.  All related to this .  At SPI now and requesting block through AIV due to them removing AfD notices on another page.  Pinging you since I see you dealing with some of this long term abuse as well.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 09:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 15:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - WP:UPE involved.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 15:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aimetis: The article seems to have been created as an advertisement for it.  -- Beland ( talk ) 20:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Canada .  Beland ( talk ) 20:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : News articles I find are just PR items, what's used in the article now are pretty much of the same quality.  Nothing in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree, can only find press releases, and companies that put every damn listicle they're mentioned in in their Wikipedia article grind my gears.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 01:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Feras Bugnah: WP:ONEEVENT , WP:NOTNEWS .  Nswix ( talk ) 02:01, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions .  Nswix ( talk ) 02:01, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable blogger.  Outside of being arrested, appears simply a working journalist.  I only find mentions of his legal troubles, nothing about the individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Internet .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete His YouTube work doesn't make him notable.  His arrest as reported is clear WP:BLP1E .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nomination.  Not a notable YouTuber/blogger/filmmaker.  109.169.34.46 ( talk ) 16:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Liliana Graves: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Puerto Rico .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 06:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
RScheme: Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , cannot find independent sources with reliable coverage either.  Here is what I did find: Maybe significant coverage: [34] Non-significant coverage that may be useful for adding facts to the article: [35] [36] [37] [38] Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 11:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christopher Caldwell (government official): Of the third party sources used in the article: This is a thinly rewritten press release and isn't independent This is also a press release This is easily the most significant coverage I can find, which isn't saying much, but per RSN I'm inclined to think Allgov isn't reliable Ed [talk] [OMT] 04:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Alabama ,  and Arkansas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom - basically a CV.  SportingFlyer T · C 18:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bill Jackson (photographer): Has been in CAT:NN for over 13 years.  Boleyn ( talk ) 21:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Photography ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC .  I couldn't find any sources to establish notability of the subject.  The closest I could get is a NB Magazine profile of the subject, but that's not going to establish notability.  Ping me if notability guideline-worthy sources are found.  Tails Wx 03:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Still ineligible for Soft Deletion.  Some more participation here would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  The PROD nom and contention were from 2008 and the article has remained poorly sourced since then (and since its creation), due to a dearth of available coverage that a search confirms.  Uhai ( talk ) 06:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New Horizons (strategy): Governments come up with many such schemes/"strategies"/campaigns all the time, does not make them automatically notable.  Other than the publication of the strategy in 2009 here , I cannot find much external coverage.  Search results include this unrelated charity .  Overall poor-quality article on non-notable topic.  Elshad ( talk ) 21:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Psychiatry ,  and England .  Elshad ( talk ) 21:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- No indication in the article or WP:BEFORE searches of WP:GNG .  No WP:PERSISTENCE or WP:DEPTH and sources are WP:PRIMARY .  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 15:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hollywood Science Fiction Museum: Valereee ( talk ) 20:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Valereee ( talk ) 20:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy , Museums and libraries ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for multiple reasons: Created by a now-blocked sock - same sock that created Huston Huddleston .  Museum was proposed 11 years ago, and article written 8 years ago, but doesn't look like the museum was never built.  The bottom paragraph says it was re-named in 2019, but never built.  — Maile ( talk ) 22:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a proposed museum that does not appear to have gained physical or news media traction.  Star Mississippi 01:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : see also this and this , this and this , or even this or this in case a redirect or a move is appropriate but I would not find it shocking if this is kept.   - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Georges Klenkle: Cited sources largely just describe FreemiumPlay , a business the subject founded, which might be notable; if an article can be created for that subject, it would make sense to redirect there, but until then I don't see a basis for a page at this title.  signed, Rosguill talk 14:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  signed, Rosguill talk 14:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTRESUME .  I don't know who wrote this, but the use of bare links to his own website(s) and a head shot are red flags.  In 2024, everyone knows, or should know, that we are not your free web host .  WP:SALT .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alina Dikhtiar: Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Ukraine .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NSKATE #2 requires gold in national championship.  My deprod was in error.  Apologies.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 19:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There are a whole bunch of similarly deficient nominations.  Really, such blanket nominations without evidence of WP:BEFORE and consideration of WP:ATD should be all procedurally kept as WP:SKCRIT#3 given lack of a valid deletion rationale as WP:NSKATE is indicative that sigcov is likely, and is not presumptive/determinative, so someone could meet none of the NSKATE criteria but still meet WP:SPORTCRIT for some reason.   And ! votes relying only on NSKATE are likewise invalid.  That said, it's quite possible that most of these should be delete or redirect results.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 01:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources in the article.  No GNG sources found - only sports databases.  Fails WP:NSKATE .  -- Enos733 ( talk ) 15:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Commodore Books: Found mentions, but couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  01:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Companies .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  01:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unable to find any references that meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 11:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bon Echo hut: Merge into Bon Echo Provincial Park .  MicrobiologyMarcus ( talk ) 16:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a cabin people can use in a provincial park here in Ontario.  Not sure why it's notable, more so than any other cabin in a provincial park.  This appears as a PROMO (it has a fireplace for drying clothes!).  You can reach it by boat!  Wonderful stuff, but not wikipedia material.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article cites no references and it doesn't look like there are any independent sources discussing the topic.  -- Primium ( talk ) 19:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of NASCAR drivers: In general, lists of "current" things are of dubious notability, because they will, in all likelihood, become empty at some point in the future (see the recent USFL AfD , for example).  This is a largely unreferenced list of living people which is terminally out of date.  Some of the sublists haven't been updated since 2015.  The page is a collection of career statistics which lack context, and it's unclear how the numbers are derived (e.g. do they include stats from multiple NASCAR series?) They may even be original calculations.  Even if the list were well-referenced and updated regularly, it's unclear why the career statistics of this WP:CROSSCAT of drivers (i.e. currently active in any NASCAR series) are notable.  Actually current and verifiable information about the current roster of NASCAR drivers can be found on the per-season pages, such as 2023 NASCAR Cup Series .  Because these pages refer to specific years, we can be assured that notability will persist indefinitely.  No consensus to delete last summer, but no compelling arguments to keep, either.  pburka ( talk ) 00:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Motorsport .  pburka ( talk ) 00:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 00:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Just one long, long, long list, with only one entry having a source.  — Maile ( talk ) 04:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tentative Keep : needs to trim off some trivia columns and a big update, but is otherwise a valid list concept.  See List of Major League Baseball players (A) , which is also a very long list of people from a specific league that contains notable biographical info.  I don't know if the nominated article needs a WP:TNT or just some love.  Wizmut ( talk ) 18:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that there could be a legitimate list with this title, but I do believe this is a case of TNT.  The baseball list you linked isn't limited to active players and isn't providing detailed career statistics.  That's the right way to do it.  While this page purports to be a "list of NASCAR drivers", it's more accurately an (out of date) "list of career achievements of current NASCAR drivers".  pburka ( talk ) 20:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  RegalZ8790 ( talk ) 03:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Notcoin: – Hilst [talk] 16:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions .  – Hilst [talk] 16:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Huh.  I guess A7 doesn't cover crypto stuff.  E: Oh well, may as well pile on another delete , I really think crypto stuff should be included in A7.  Maybe I should start a discussion on getting it added.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 16:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC) (E: 14:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)) [ reply ] Delete .  Concur with nominator as failing WP:NCRYPTO without independent source interest.  • Gene93k ( talk ) 17:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NCRYPTO .  Not notable, one sentence of content, and an orphan.  The page creator also seemed to have foreseen this outcome in the edit summary for its creation here , justifying the article's existence using wishful thinking .  Thanks, Neuropol Talk 18:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : if not A1.  thetechie@enwiki : ~/talk/ $ 00:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete