hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Chile Unido IF: Geschichte ( talk ) 11:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Owen× ☎ 12:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Similar case than Srbija FF.  The citations show that the club existed until 2011, making it impossible to determine its notability.  Svartner ( talk ) 17:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The club existed until 2021 .  A defunct club can absolutely still be determined to be notable.  I'll have a look around for references later today.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 08:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed, but it's not a good argument.  if you can find more sources, I'll change the vote.  Svartner ( talk ) 19:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Supplemental Result: One suggestion was to add content about the subject at the Google (I assume Google Search) article.  Jay 💬 05:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology , Computing , Internet , Software ,  and Websites .  Jay 💬 05:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure but page looks to me to've been AI-written.  Hyperbolick ( talk ) 05:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I doubt.  The article was created in 2007 and BLARd in 2017.  Jay 💬 06:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah.  Prob not then.  Hyperbolick ( talk ) 19:31, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 10:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the title is a mess.   There isn't any useful content here, which is why it was deleted in 2017.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't seem to be a notable concept.  I couldn't find any adequate sources discussing it and apparently it hasn't been used since 2010 anyways.  Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bae Jong-min: Lack of WP:SIGCOV Simione001 ( talk ) 22:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A database entry, nothing to indicate notability.  Avilich ( talk ) 18:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sara Kolarovska: All I found were passing mentions in match reports ( 1 , 2 ) and squad lists ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and North Macedonia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the best that I can find are squad list mentions like Ekipa .  Some of the Macedonian articles that I created at the same time might well fail GNG as well.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above reasons.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 10:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ahsan Boxer: This BLP is relying on unreliable sources and I haven't found much in RS either about this subject that could help establish GNG.   The BLP primarily focuses on the subject's 2013 arrest but WP:NOTNEWS.  Saqib ( talk ) 10:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The creator of this BLP ProudRafidi also seems to have COI .  — Saqib ( talk ) 10:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  Saqib ( talk ) 10:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , Ahsan Boxer is as famous as Muhammad Ali Mirza .  If the latter article can stay on Wikipedia, then why not this one?  Ahsan was involved in a popular blasphemy case and is currently arrested so he is pretty famous here in Pakistan, especially among the Barelvis and Shia Muslims for a number of controversies.  ) 21:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ProudRafidi , WP:ATA.  — Saqib ( talk ) 11:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I was not aware of that, thanks for telling!  I added several WP:RS sources just a few minutes ago such as the Iran-based ABNA , official press of Majlis Wahdat-e-Muslimeen and Islam Times etc. to the article.  The subject is quite notable in Pakistani religious circles and i'm hoping to add more WP:RS here.  Thanks!  ) 21:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ProudRafidi , Thanks but to make things easier for me and others, why don't you provide some coverage here that you believe sufficiently establishes GNG?  — Saqib ( talk ) 22:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Islam ,  and Martial arts .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article is created by LTA Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SheryOfficial , who has been at this for 5 years.  -- HistoryofIran ( talk ) 20:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:G5 .  ) 21:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as author is CU blocked as a sock so G5 applies here.  Toadette Edit!  17:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per WP:G5 , also failed WP:GNG .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 15:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Neil Bourguiba: doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Password (talk) (contribs) 08:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Sweden .  CptViraj ( talk ) 09:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tunisia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joel L. Malter: There are plenty of auction listings and blog posts, but nothing substantial I could see to base an article on.  S am W alton ( talk ) 08:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America .  S am W alton ( talk ) 08:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not terribly well-sourced, not much turns up in Gsearch either [15] , [16] .  Those are about all there is, simple confirmation of existence.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Arshi shopping mall fire: Thanks to the creator for their work but IMO this pretty clearly fails the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (events) and also wp:not news North8000 ( talk ) 16:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls , Events ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Run-of-the-mill structure fire with no lasting societal effects or analytic coverage.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 19:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No evidence of meeting WP:EVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emma McCagg: Let'srun ( talk ) 04:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Women .  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Massachusetts ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the article lacks sufficient references; have struggled to find meaningful coverage in reliable secondary sources to add that would satisfy WP:BASIC .  Not finding much in ProQuest except for a 2001 mention of her oil paintings being exhibited at the Schoolhouse Galleries in Croton Falls, plus a photograph credit in Oprah magazine.  Her work Baby Paintings is discussed briefly in this art exhibit description .  If the article creator's objective is to promote the artist and her work, there are other websites and blogs that are more appropriate for that than Wikipedia.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 13:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find any RS to bring this up to notable.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  poorly-sourced fanpage.  128.252.154.9 ( talk ) 18:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Exchange (Dubai): Another.  Non-Notable.  Unfinished.  Building.  * Pppery * it has begun... 01:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and United Arab Emirates .  AllyD ( talk ) 04:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Creator has been blocked since 2012 and appears to have gone on a tower article creating spree before then so I do wonder how many more of these 'ghost towers' there are out there.  Some will undoubtedly be under construction post-bust by now, but in any case, simply 'being a tower' doesn't, last time I looked, confer notability.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Alexandermcnabb.  There seems to be an endless about of unsources non-notable tower articles.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 06:46, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Web pages by a glassware supplier [35] and one covering properties for rent [36] confirm this building was completed (though differing on the number of floors), existence is not notability, and neither these nor anything else was found to indicate attained notability .  AllyD ( talk ) 06:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 09:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dwaraka Creations: No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG.    None of the references writes about the subject of the article.  This article has had a rough history.   Appears that it was declined at AFC about 4 times and then later moved to mainspace 2-3 times bypassing AFC (after draftifying by others).   Article was tagged as having paid contributions and now the creator is indeffed for multiple account abuse.  Apart from the reason described with my AFD nomination, I am also doing it out of caution of not overriding the large amount of work and decisions others have already done with handling all of this.  North8000 ( talk ) 20:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Companies , Andhra Pradesh ,  and Telangana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : after a search, topic appears to fail WP:NCORP .  –– Formal Dude (talk) 03:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
FC Giffarna: Modest history peaking on the 6th tier.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Becky Minger: Let'srun ( talk ) 01:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Ohio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems to be a case of WP:BIO1E .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hannah Bayman: Appears to be largely a resume, LinkedIn post or the like.  No sources found Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and News media .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No sources found?  BBC, Chronicle Live, Hexham Courant, Northern Echo are all valid sources.  J97736 ( talk ) 17:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article for Hannah Bayman should not be deleted.  it has valid sources and she is a notable broadcaster.  J97736 ( talk ) 20:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Someone added sources yesterday.  BBC articles are not independent (her employer).  Other articles are mostly insignificant.  "Hannah Bayman was spotted in public yesterday. Just thought you would want to know!"  From this I can conclude that she is well known to a select audience, but these sources don't do much for the rest of us.  BruceThomson ( talk ) 02:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in the article are either promo or primary (or both).  Nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  BEFORE showed more promo.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability: ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 01:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Article lacks Reliable Sources, fails Wp:GNG .  Alex-h ( talk ) 11:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Overall fails WP:GNG and secondary sources are missing NP83 ( talk ) 20:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Charles Buell Anderson: Err... look at it.   A previous AfD in 2006 prevented me from using PROD in this case.  — S Marshall T / C 08:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  — S Marshall T / C 08:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BIO .  (not sure which specific section of that guideline to mention since there isn't much to go on)  I found his obituary and a brief mention covering the academy.  APK whisper in my ear 08:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —fails WP:GNG .  〜 Festucalex • talk 10:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Wisconsin .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 2005?  Good grief!!! Unequivocally fails WP:GNG.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I only get hits on anyone with the Anderson family name, but it was good to see what Pammy's been up to.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vitaliy Arinin: Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source.   Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 12:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is nothing in the article that establishes general notability because nothing in the article refers to what third parties have written.   I have not checked the references, but they appear to be database entries, and an article should speak for itself , without requiring the reader to check the references.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Agreed.  No evidence of notability and seemingly no valid sources/coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 18:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete