hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Wrightspeed X1 : This one has been edited periodically, but not improved.  It has a single source, and does not pass WP:GNG .  It is interesting, but gives undue weight to the vehicle, which is only notable for its power train, not for anything else about it.  There is thus no objection to merge and redirect as an outcome to this discussion, with the merge target being the source of the powertrain, or with the manufacturer of the chassis.   There appears to be no individual article on the designer himself, or that might be a valid target.   I am thus asking for consensus  not only on the fate of the article, but on any merge target as well.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete I've found a few sources for this [51] , [52] (Old CNET, so still good), [53] , [54] but I feel they don't really have the WP:DEPTH here to satisfty WP:GNG , so I'm gonna second the nom here.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 01:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Allan Nonymous By seconding the nomination please be aware that merge and redirect to a so far undetermined target is a suitable outcome.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Some coverage found, [55] and [56] .  Merge to Wrightspeed or the Ariel Atom?  I'm not sure.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b Given that choice, I think it is more relevant to Wrightspeed than the Aerial Atom.  However, Wrightspeed ends up at an article of a different name, but mainly about Wrightspeed.  I think there needs to be some background work here by someone who can rationalise what is what.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I see some support for redirect, but no consensus as to a target.  We shouldn't need another full week to settle on a target.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 00:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "Wrightspeed" seems like a good redirect choice.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Revo Powertrains which is the powertrain company founded by Mr. Wright (under the Wrightspeed name?).   Redirect doesn't make sense to me as Revo doesn't include anything about this car.  Oblivy ( talk ) 02:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Earthly Delights (record label) : The only citation is for the unreliable Discogs.  UtherSRG (talk) 18:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Possible Delete .  Lack of reliability pushes me towards delete, unless someone can find at least one reliable source from somewhere, should any exist.  -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 20:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Another clear Merge since the label's founder has an article.  These types of cases can be handled without further burdening AfD.  Chubbles ( talk ) 06:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A plain merge is different than a merge/delete/redirect.  Just merging would leave the history intact for any editor to restore, while a delete & redirect would prevent most users from doing that.  And that action requires AfD.  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But why would we do that, in this case?  Chubbles ( talk ) 05:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:31, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - I second the merge into Nocturnal Emissions ; don't care what mechanism is used, just that the content is maintained.  -- t_kiehne ( talk ) 18:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Shakira impersonator : Everm4e ( talk ) 22:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Shakira fandom .  The case for stand-alone GNG is weak, but there is some content that would belong there in a dedicated section.  Alternative redirect target to consider: Cultural impact of Shakira . -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Colombia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the present article appears to be biased towards promoting the viewpoint of AlexanderShakifan29, who seems to harbor a vested interest in producing content that accentuates the importance of Shakira.  A orish sentence within the article "In general, imitating Shakira is a fairly common practice in mostly Latino and Hispanic countries." lacks a proper citation, and the subsequent reference provided is merely a blog post pertaining to a drag performance.  The content of the article seems to rely heavily on anecdotal accounts, tabloid publications, and unverifiable sources as a means of establishing Shakira's significance.  In essence, the article appears to have scoured the depths of the internet to cobble together any semblance of information that would support AlexanderShakifan29's agenda of constructing an article dedicated to Shakira.  Best – jona ✉ 14:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Note that Shakira Wannabe created by the same user was redirected after an AfD.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 19:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Shakira fandom per above.  // Timothy :: talk 09:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Murder of Lisa Dmytrieva : Eddie891 Talk Work 19:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  FWIW, I think in terms of notability this would fall under WP:NEVENT - someone's murder is more an event than a biography, though people tend to organize them in an in between way.  There is some later coverage - it was mostly spelled "Liza Dmitrieva", and after the guy who ordered the attack died in 2023 it got brought up again - though I'm not sure "significantly".  I don't really have any strong opinions on keep or delete but people can judge for themselves.  Not sure if it's enough to pass NEVENT.  Also in either case the name of this article runs afoul of guidelines because there was no murder conviction in any case.  This could probably be merged to a section in the missile strikes article if it doesn't.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 20:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok, Merge to Vinnytsia missile strikes .  Not all of it, just the more relevant part, but it really is just a subset of the strikes anyway.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 18:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would be fine with that.  Eddie891 Talk Work 16:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Mission Vao : I'm also having hard time of finding sources at google search that mainly talks about the character.  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 12:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Video games .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Characters of the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic series .  I am not seeing sufficient significant coverage for an article.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 14:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Borderline.  A bit of sigcov in a couple books: [24] [25] Combining with the Eurogamer source in the article [26] this probably can meet GNG, but it's borderline especially for a fictional element.  A merge will make it one of the larger entries on the list, but that's probably fine.  — siro χ o 18:22, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Comment Looking over the sources, unless I'm missing something I'm not seeing any real talk in a large amount as to why this character is important outside of KOTOR, or any in depth examination.  I'll still trying to figure out what the "baseline" for notability is, but this doesn't appear to meet that. -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 15:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The first two sources both discuss the character in context of gender representation, and other related aspects.  Note that the second source draws conclusions independent from Eurogamer but also goes on to reference that article as well.  The Eurogamer source itself discusses the character's reception in the context of the characterization of a 14-year-old girl.  Overall, it's not so much that it couldn't be effectively covered in a merged entry, but it is indeed SIGCOV across multiple independent sources.  — siro χ o 19:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ siro I think what really hurts the perception of things is that big mass of "top X lists" that aren't being cited to say anything.  A character's rating on a list matters a lot less than what's being said on it, and some like Den of Geek are giving her a paragraph of coverage but not cited as such.  I'm switching my vote to a neutral comment for now, but I really feel if it's going to survive it needs those sources to be gone through and rewritten with the weaker ones tossed, you know? -- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 02:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak merge per Kung Fu Man.  A lot of these are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs .  A rewrite might allow an editor to highlight the WP:SIGCOV instead of a WP:REFBOMB .  But I don't see enough worth keeping here.  Merge is a good WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 03:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Adobe Illustrator Artwork : This is effectively a documentation cobbled from primary sources and mentions in passing.  Not sure what is the best redirect target - some Adobe's software of some list of file extensions?  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Software .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 04:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to : Adobe Illustrator PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 16:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively to Adobe_Illustrator#File_formats , where it is mentioned.  A quick WP:BEFORE -style search found several secondary sources that I consider reliable for basic information about the file format: [31] , [32] , and [33] .  I'm not sure if the content has enough depth to meet GNG, but the basic information about the . ai format is verifiable in secondary RS.  WP Policies ( WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE ) state that we should preserve verifiable information rather than delete it when it is reasonable to do so.  Here we have a natural target for a selective merge in the section Adobe_Illustrator#File_formats .  I'd recommend merging the lead of the article into that section along with supporting refs.  -- {{u| Mark viking }} { Talk } 18:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Per Mark viking.  Pavlor ( talk ) 12:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Tina Wesson : However, some certain others may have been redirected to their winning seasons.  I have doubts about this person's notability other than for winning only Survivor: The Australian Outback , despite appearing in two other seasons that she lost... and The Price Is Right once... and writing an book (if not an autobiography)... and multiple third-party sources naming her the Australian Outback winner.  I even doubt that bringing her daughter along makes her notable either.  If WP:BLP1E doesn't apply, how about WP:BIO1E or WP:PAGEDECIDE then?  Preferably, the article should be redirected to The Australian Outback one, but I don't mind it being alternatively redirected to the list of Survivor (American TV series) contestants .  George Ho ( talk ) 03:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Television ,  and Tennessee .  George Ho ( talk ) 03:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Survivor: The Australian Outback .  She renames a searchable term, but this probably is where BLP1E applies (to her win there).  -- M asem ( t ) 12:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep article Won the most-watched season of Survivor and in general reality TV history, she's also one of its earliest winners.  She plays again in Blood vs Water and gets to the top 4.  There is no reason to delete after being in TWO finales of the biggest reality show of all time, bfr.  Thecheeseistalking99 ( talk ) 18:25, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Survivor: The Australian Outback , fails WP:ENTERTAINER : "significant roles in multiple notable productions", in this case two roles is not enough to satisfy the criteria.  Also fails WP:GNG .  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 15:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Maximo Suniel : Presumed to be notable, per WP:NPOL , are "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage."  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 11:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines .  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 11:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Cagayan de Oro or Mayor of Cagayan de Oro - my best attempts at searches in Filipino sources have turned up next to nothing beyond listings of mayors with no in-depth coverage.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 15:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Retarget to Cagayan_de_Oro#Postwar_era .  I've added two cites about the mayor and his role on the creation of the city there.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Gibbon (character) : Primarily a plot summary, and it's only non-primary source is a top 10 list where it is not spoken about in detail.  Industrial Insect (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: G - Extremely minor character that honestly only had a handful of non-cameo appearances in a fifty year period.  Pretty much the only kind of "coverage" of the character comes in the same form as the one source being used in the article currently - short entries in various churnalism "Top Ten Dumbest Spider-Man Characters!" type articles.  I'm honestly not a fan of merging every non-notable character into the massive "List of Comic Characters" lists, especially from articles that rely pretty much entirely on primary sources, but since the character has an entry there already, I suppose it wouldn't hurt to move over a few sentences worth of description to that list.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 23:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: G in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 19:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: G in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 20:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 5) : No indication this particular season was notable, and no clear sourcing found.  Star Mississippi 03:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom .  Star Mississippi 03:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Draftify - Does not satisfy television notability .   There is only one reference, and it is not significant coverage about the show because it is primarily about a person.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 04:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep or as WP:ATD , Merge with main article The Great Pottery Throw Down .  Here are some reviews of the fifth season: [54] [55] [56] .  Deleting the content would result in a loss of valuable material for the main page, which would have no information related to season 5.  -- Broc ( talk ) 11:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a properly sourced summary into the main The Great Pottery Throw Down , season does not have WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 17:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
The Rural Museum - A Collection of Traditional Farming Tools : No citations, no secondary web presence.  Maint tags since 2017.  Qcne (talk) 19:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions .  Qcne (talk) 19:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Palau-sator .  There appears to be sourcing in the Catalan article with which to add a sentence or two about the museum.  Star Mississippi 02:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd like to see if there is additional support for a Merge.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I'll ! vote for merge .  The Palau-sator article is a stub and this could be a first entry in a sub-heading "Cultural organizations" or such.  The target article is both in need of content and references.  Hopefully this afd has prompted some interested editors.  Lamona ( talk ) 22:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Haeundae Tourism High School : I believe it would fail WP:SIGCOV and fails to meet the standards set in WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG 1keyhole ( talk ) 23:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  1keyhole ( talk ) 23:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  [1] [2] ( Busan Ilbo ) [3] ( The Hankyoreh ) [4] [5] toobigtokale ( talk ) 11:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge a properly sourced summary to Haeundae District#Education , using the above sources.  Source do not show SIRS, except for one they are mill news.  The target is under developed and this material will benefit the target and improve visibility of the content.  // Timothy :: talk 04:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I switch my vote; merge per this rationale.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 07:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge