hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Claudio Poppen: Unable to find sufficient coverage from independent sources, if it even exists.  Fails WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Aruba international footballers - probably just about plausible as a search term but there's no evidence of GNG here Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gakuen Toshi Vara Noir: GamerPro64 06:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  GamerPro64 06:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Idea Factory#Games published , searches under its Japanese-language title, as well as under both "Gakuen Toshi Vara Noir" and "Kingdom of Chaos The Universe" turned up no reviews, though apparently the game had a (bad) spin-off anime that itself has received no attention other than being trashed by a couple anime blogs.  Devonian Wombat ( talk ) 22:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Arie van Bennekum: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Agile software development#History .  While Van Bennekum is not individually notable, the Manifesto for Agile Software Development is.  In this context, Van Bennekum is mentioned at WP and his entry ought to be redirected.  WP:NOTINHERETED , WP:CHEAP , WP:ATD , and WP:PRESERVE apply.  gidonb ( talk ) 23:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024 Futsal Week U-19 Summer Cup: Owen× ☎ 10:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Europe .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Youth futsal doesn't really get coverage, message me if any is found.  Geschichte ( talk ) 13:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as author per possible sources.  Polish Football Almanac , and these tournaments generally get more coverage on Futsal Planet .  Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 13:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] These are mostly results listings and stats rather than in-depth prose coverage.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Follow up, pinging @ Geschichte and @ GiantSnowman Italian FA , DFB , DFB 2 , Polish futsal , Polish futsal 2 , Ekstraklasa futsal , Czech FA , Czech FA 2 Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 19:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nothing independent/detailed.  Where is the in-depth media coverage?  Giant Snowman 19:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GiantSnowman please let me know if these are better (all Italian) [16] , [17] Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 18:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Match reports, really.  Nothing in-depth!  Giant Snowman 18:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The two linked ones cover the tournament, not a match Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 18:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Post-voting comment, (if deleted) would this be fit for inclusion in the Futsal Week page under the men's U-19 section?  Yoblyblob ( Talk ) :) 19:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – To Futsal Week .  Fails in WP:GNG to a separate article.  Svartner ( talk ) 12:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – To Futsal Week .  Mohammed07102007 ( talk ) 12:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Wipeout (season 1): Absolutely unsourced WP:FANCRUFT .  The title of the article does not match the content.  A redirect that has been in place is constantly being reverted.  This needs to be given the Old Yeller treatment.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment if we ! vote to keep, we'd need to discuss the article title.  Obviously, it's not just season one.  Beyond that, the Wipeout show has numerous iterations, so we'd do something like 'List of Wipeout (2008) episodes'.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 03:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as redirect or Delete : As per previous discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Archive 35#Wipeout season articles .  Might be a wise idea to indefinitely protect all the season articles along with Wipeout Australia and List of Wipeout Canada episodes to prevent IPs continuing on with this nonsense any longer.  This has been going on the past 2-3 years with all these articles and is the same FANCRUFT/unsourced/INDISCRIMINATE/NOTPLOT/etc.  every single time the redirect(s) are removed.  Magitroopa ( talk ) 04:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and protect , per Magitroopa.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 05:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect as per the previous two users...this is an indiscriminate list and users continually expanding it means the article as it is cannot stand.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 13:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unsourced and I wouldn't know where to look to find this much information on each episode, short of sitting with a notepad and writing it down as they aired, which makes this OR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You know that’s exactly how this information was compiled… Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to season articles.  Survivor:_Borneo#Season_summary shows how a show like Survivor list who was voted out each episode in a chart in the main article for each season along with with summaries per episode afterwards.  D r e a m Focus 21:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even if this was sourced then its still just WP:FANCRUFT .  The whole thing could be sumarized into a singular table but its still unsourced WP:OR .  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Im Shung-hwi: Simione001 ( talk ) 01:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 01:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I see the documentary film The Game of Their Lives is cited several times.  That could be potential significant coverage, no?  We should check to see which ones are covered there; otherwise I worry that the majority – or even whole(?) – of the historic 1966 North Korean World Cup team could be deleted.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1966 FIFA World Cup squads#North Korea as we have with recent similar AFDs.  Giant Snowman 18:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 1966 FIFA World Cup squads#North Korea – Per Giant Snowman .  Svartner ( talk ) 20:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Unless the article was improved to show something, which I doubt that will happen, also suggest to go with the redirect.  Govvy ( talk ) 19:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per above.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
George N. Stearns: Sources are woefully lacking.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 09:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Stearns company article seems like a good choice.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 11:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Redirect Some sympathy with the idea of a redirect, but I'd worry that the Stearns Company itself, while a fascinating footnote, is hardly notable in its own right.  Meanwhile, we're left with WP:NOTMEMORIAL .  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 16:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, Alexandermcnabb .  I thought this discussion looked familiar.  I just closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avis Stearns Van Wagenen with a closure of redirecting to the company.  I guess Clarityfiend was working through the Stearns relatives.  L iz Read!  Talk!  21:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hey @ Liz I changed my vote to support the redirect close - as I said, I worry about the notability of the redirect target, is all...  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 05:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A redirect would make sense if there were sources for the article being redirected to, and if the information here could be added to that article, but the article on E. C. Stearns & Company is one bare paragraph, and some copies of newspapers ads that are most likely original research.  The creator is permanently blocked for copyright violations, so whatever interest there was in this company and its owners is probably over.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Las Cuentas Claras: Compilation album without IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject (Compilation album) directly and in-depth.  BEFORE showed mentions in articles about the artist and promo, but nothing with SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk 23:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Mexico .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I searched on a few music sites, and while there were a number of songs and albums with the same name, this specific albun did not show up.  Did not find any other worthwhile coverage  as well.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 22:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jenni Rivera discography#Compilations albums as {{ R from album }} as an alternative to deletion , where it is mentioned.  ✗ plicit 23:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Explicit as an ATD, and tag as an {{ R from album }} .  CycloneYoris talk!  00:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Skirmish of Chenab (1739): Singh does briefly mention an attack, but gives it no name and there is not enough here for WP:N .  asilvering ( talk ) 02:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and India .  asilvering ( talk ) 02:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military ,  and Iran .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Many incoming links through Battle of Chenab (1739) which may or may not be confusion with Battle of Chenab .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks like those are coming mostly from Template:Campaignbox Nader .  -- asilvering ( talk ) 04:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Can we get some more opinions here on this article?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - This obviously needs work and may be flat out wrong but I don't see a good case for WP:TNT so let's put some maintenance tags on it and keep it for now per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NODEADLINES .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 15:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you find evidence that it is notable, and that it's called "skirmish of chenab"?  -- asilvering ( talk ) 17:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to Nader Shah's invasion of India per nomination.  And on reading Singh's (very brief) account of the event, it seems that characterizing it as a single skirmish, rather than the series of hit-and-run raids on the retreating Persians is rather misleading.  Parsecboy ( talk ) 18:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge An apparent historically unnamed event that should be merged into Nader Shah's invasion of India as an "Afterward'. G en Q uest "scribble" 19:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect I agree with Parsecboy and GenQuest.  It seems to be worth a mention but without further verification, it doesn't make much of an article.  If more sources can be found, it can be split back off in the future.  Donner60 ( talk ) 23:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Nader Shah's invasion of India per above.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 07:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Raja Ki Chandni: All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this and this .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 17:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Pakistan .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 17:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Hum_TV#Telefilms : is mentioned there.  There are currently SO MANY Pakistan-related ongoing Afds including a lot concerning films or series that I would like to suggest redirects for all them, including potential future ones.  I am therefore inviting future nominators of such pages to consider redirects, in the future, for the pages they find non-notable, without initiating AfDs, whenever they think redirects could be appropriate and if that seems possible.  It is almost impossible for interested and willing users to verify and improve all of them at the same time, and even to take the time to check sources and content in order to ! vote.  This might become an issue.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Mushy Yank , I don't mind redirects, but the problem is the page keeps getting recreated.  I have seen that if we revert and redirect, it turns into an edit war.  It's better to just delete the page.  If the subject is notable, someone can always create a draft and submit it for the main namespace.  I know redirects are "cheap," but they're WP:COSTLY too and lead to unwanted edit wars.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 12:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It is as easy to ask for page protection of the Redirected page through the rpp script as it is to XFd/PROD/tag a page for notability via TWINKLE, if potential (or real) edit war is really you concern.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Poetic Justice (Porridge): No reliable reviews found.  Previously redirected, but was reverted.  Would be open to a redirect if that were the consensus, but supporting a deletion at the moment.  Donald D23 talk to me 22:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Telangana and United Kingdom .  Donald D23 talk to me 22:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Porridge episodes .  One of the most non-notable episode articles I've seen on the site.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 22:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Porridge episodes .  // Timothy :: talk 19:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Leg (rallying): Why does rallying deserve a separate article on this?  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Rallying as WP:ATD-M .  Side note, we could probably one day have a broad concept article about the concept of "legs" in various games, sporting events, travel, etc.  — siro χ o 17:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 20:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There's nothing of value on the article, there is already enough on both rallying and glossary of motorsport terms .  This article is getting 0-2 readers a day.  Rally Wonk ( talk ) 21:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023 Valletta Cup: ESPN is a database, not a sign of notability.  This event has pages from previous years, but all of those have at least some coverage in local media from one or more competing nations.  Unfortunately this one does not (as yet) have any and hence fails WP:N and WP:RS .  Bs1jac ( talk ) 15:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note, as it stands, I believe the redirect to Associate international cricket in 2023 should be restored until such time that notable sources are available.  I did this earlier as a non-controversial change but the redirect was removed again (in good faith ) and I don't want an edit war, hence the AfD.  Bs1jac ( talk ) 15:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Associate international cricket in 2023#2023 Valletta Cup .  As there's some precedent of having articles for this event, some notable local coverage might actually pop up in the near future.  Not suitable to have the article at this moment of course, but I suggest to keep the redirect.  মাশ্‌ফী※Mashfi ( ETP ) 15:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Cricket , France , Luxembourg , Malta , Romania ,  and Switzerland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Associate international cricket in 2023#2023 Valletta Cup .  Not every cricket competition between 2 or more countries should have an article, even if they're all officially T20 International matches.  This one doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Associate international cricket in 2023#2023 Valletta Cup A per comments by nom and Joseph2302.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Associate international cricket in 2023#2023 Valletta Cup .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect