hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Commandery of fezzan: Nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject (the administration) directly and indepth.  Even if minimal sourcing could be found this is a CFORK with no legitimate rationale for spliting content.  No objection if there is a consensus for a redirect to Karamanli dynasty , but there is no properly sourced material to merge.  Drafting was rejected.  // Timothy :: talk 23:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Africa ,  and Libya .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The article is some kind of SYNTH.  Mccapra ( talk ) 08:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing to meet WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 09:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Fezzan or Fezzan Province , under history.  Or delete.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet WP:GNG I believe.  Equine-man ( talk ) 14:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge (possibly just redirect) probably to Fezzan Province .   That is not the ideal solution, but there is too little content to merit keeping, unless rapidly expanded.   The present text does not even give a date for Ottoman conquest.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 18:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - We do not have enough existing in-depth RS.  Lightburst ( talk ) 18:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Today's Update: Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Lots of promo, database listings.  Bringing it to AfD only because of the number of previously contested CSDs and PRODs.  // Timothy :: talk 12:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mike Harper (journalist): Joeykai ( talk ) 22:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Internet , Michigan ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] O Delete Promotional; no sourcing for notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and @ Llajwa .  RegalZ8790 ( talk ) 22:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly promotional and not notable.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 09:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Specdo: At present, notability guidelines likely have not been met given that the sources seem to be primary.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 02:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : article feels rather promotional and the sourcing is fairly poor; sources used in the article seem to be literally the only sources that exist on him.  Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 14:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion due to previous AfDs Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No variety in sources.  I agree with user Darling about the article being promotional only.  killer bee 05:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Koustav Bagchi: Coverage relates to his switch from one party to another.  Article does not detail any other claim to notability.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and India .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Politician left one party and joined another.  This is all we know about him.  Politician is not notable, significant, who has received any great attention to be recorded.  Fails WP:NPOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I added that he served as a congress leader.  More of him is known apart from the recent switch, for instance that he was arrested previous year.  I added it to the article and a bit more.  More information could be found.  82.174.61.58 ( talk ) 16:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak keep due to the edits that 82.174.61.58 ( talk ) made I believe it might make sense to keep, but it still seems like the person might not be quite notable.  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 17:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Failed WP:NPOL , i searched a lot, but found nothing special.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 15:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to assess changes to article since its nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A quick Google search shows entirely nothing from Independent sources, apart from press releases.  Does not convince much of WP:NPOL .  -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 09:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, NN politician, fails WP:NPOL.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Miss Kentucky Teen America Organization: Sources in the article are either primary or are about individuals competing in beauty pageants, not the organization itself.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Beauty pageants ,  and Kentucky .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator.  To add to that, I didn't find any RS by a search on the internet.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 07:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hayleigh Bell: Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Canada .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  The CBC source gives examples of skaters struggling with finances, and maybe counts as half a reliable source.  Golden Skate is probably unreliable because it has no editors.  The other sources are just scores and do not provide notability.  EternalNub ( talk ) 01:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of programs broadcast by GameTV: Fram ( talk ) 18:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Lists .  Fram ( talk ) 18:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  A BEFORE search only showed primary sources.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 19:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete An all-repeat channel (outside fad distractions and oddball deals); we don't usually do lists articles (much less lists) for networks not made up of any original content.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not only this article fails for notability, most of the sources are poorly sourced.  🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！ ) 08:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTN .  We should only show programming listings for channels with original content, none of this is.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Table Mountain Challenge: SL93 ( talk ) 22:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and South Africa .  SL93 ( talk ) 22:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only helpful source is this one , which is still not enough to establish WP:GNG .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 22:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Sport of athletics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Princess Augusta of Solms-Braunfels: Apart from her marriage the article is entirely about her relations.  Sourced only to one directory and three self-published genealogical websites.  DrKay ( talk ) 07:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and Germany .  DrKay ( talk ) 07:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very little is actually about her.  98.228.137.44 ( talk ) 17:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harendra Chitra Junior College, Bhaktardoba: Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  The sources that i could find are either primary, or school/college databases.  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 13:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , India ,  and Assam .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 13:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  Page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organization.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Rodriguez (politician): Previously nomination in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California .  Shaws username .  talk .  04:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all of the secondary sources I could find are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN .  Shaws username .  talk .  04:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination (changed from "redirect").  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 23:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ BottleOfChocolateMilk : I think you're confusing this with the City of Bell scandal , which Rodriguez was not involved in.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 00:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My bad.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 03:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Imperial Family Mausoleum in Vassouras: The only source that mentions it in passing is a blog hosted on blogspot, and even then, there's no WP:SIGCOV .  Rkieferbaum ( talk ) 20:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Royalty and nobility ,  and Brazil .  Rkieferbaum ( talk ) 20:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 20:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'll see if I can find any sources that actually mention the Mausoleum, but haven't found anything yet after a few quick searches.  That being said though, I have removed the unrealiable sources.  BaduFerreira ( talk ) 13:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately, I couldn't find any sources about this mausoleum which means that this article does not pass WP:GNG .  BaduFerreira ( talk ) 13:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Third Harvest: Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Northern Ireland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unless better sources are out there.  I couldn't really find any independent evidence of their existance with a couple searches.  WilsonP NYC ( talk ) 20:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no sources found other than agricultural use of the term.Nothing in Irish sources either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am unable to find Third Harvest on discogs , musicbrainz nor on allmusic - which is not a good sign.    Difficult subject to search for due to the farming references.   At most I have found this BBC blog proves they played Rock the Lough , but that is nowhere near sufficient notability for inclusion.  Resonant Dis tor tion 12:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pauline Ovalle: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , El Salvador ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the soccer massacre continues...  Anyway, the article fails WP:GNG , and after looking at references, we have a birth index and a stat site.  After a quick search, we find more stat sites.  Neato.  IncompA 20:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A search found some sources about a Pauline Ovalle from San Francisco in the US Army (e.g. [10] ) who also plays soccer. .  Is this the same person?  – [[User:Dudhhr|dudhhr]]<small><sup>&nbsp;[[User talk:Dudhhr|talk]]</sup>&nbsp;<sub>[[Special:Contribs/Dudhhr|contribs]]</sub></small>&nbsp; ( talk ) 01:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I did some searches.  It seems that there is nothing about her.  129.222.136.103 ( talk ) 19:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  Fails GNG.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yana Berlin: Non-notable entrepreneur.  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women ,  and Russia .  Pepper Beast (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - New account skirting AfC by making 10 edits and then moving directly to main?  Check.  All coverage in author's voice?  Check.  Promotional tone throughout?  Check!  WP:PROMO verging on WP:G11 BrigadierG ( talk ) 14:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very PROMO.  Several hits in Turkish language media, none for this individual though.  Sourcing used in the article now isn't RS or is a primary source.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vinay Sapru: Refs are clickbait and PR.  scope_creep Talk 11:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Sources are useless.  BD2412 T 23:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and SALT spammy advert article with previous deletion history.  Fails WP:NBIO .  Graywalls ( talk ) 14:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Unless we are considering his arrest as a notability claim which I would not. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 02:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I think based on his work as a WP:DIRECTOR of multiple notable films, notability could be supported, but this article appears to need WP:TNT due to the vast amount of promotional content and poor-quality sourcing.  Beccaynr ( talk ) 18:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with nom Worldiswide ( talk ) 06:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KDUO-LP: Let'srun ( talk ) 20:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An 11-year low-power station that only seemed to carry national networks rarely if ever gets the significant coverage we require.  Definitely a product of the looser "notability guidelines" we had in 2008; I can't imagine how it could meet 2024's GNG .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sadly the station just never really got off the ground (especially when Viacom pulled the rug out from out of them and stopped renewing Tres OTA affiliations), and there's not much to be found about it outside regulatory listings of its existence.  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per all of the above.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete