hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of Jade Cargo International destinations: Per the subsequent AN discussion these should be nominated for deletion in orderly fashion.  I think the WP:NOT argument here is clear: this is essentially just a catalogue-listing of all of the services offered by a commerical enterprise.  In this case, the article is listing the services of a cargo-shipping operation and not even a passenger airline per se.  Even if the WP:NOT issues could be dealt with somehow (and they are enough to warrant the deletion of this article), the article would remain a failure of WP:CORP since there are no sources at all cited in it.  A BEFORE search is not necessary in a case like this, but for the avoidance of doubt I performed one and did not find anything that could rescue it - only fan-sites, specialist press, etc., none of which would pass the audience requirements of WP:CORP ( this piece in Airways Magazine was possibly the best, but that's specialist press/a fan site).  Not bundling at present as bundling seems likely to be challenged.  Bundling should only be proposed where unbundling is unlikely to be requested.  FOARP ( talk ) 13:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Lists ,  and China .  FOARP ( talk ) 13:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator, also the fact that the entire article is unsourced and sources to verify all of this content would prove difficult to find.  I can see some merit in having lists of airline destinations for commercial passenger flights (so long as these are sourceable - and a lot indeed are), however not for cargo flights.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the nominator and per WP:IINFO .  Nythar ( 💬 - 🍀 ) 01:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pacific Gateway: I see various governmental documents but not enough independent secondary sources to show that could be added to the page to show how it meets the inclusion criteria JMWt ( talk ) 11:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada .  JMWt ( talk ) 11:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per JMWt points- no references used at all, and doesn't have the potential sources to be deemed notable.  Editing84 ( talk ) 11:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ri Hyok-chol (footballer, born 1991): Simione001 ( talk ) 04:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 04:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comments Seems like an important member of the North Korean squad, I prefer to keep players who play at this international level who are current.  However, there are limited sources for him and 99% of English named hits just seem to be football databases.  He is not currently listed at North Korea national football team , nor is there a current squad list there.  So I can't see how a redirect can work.  Govvy ( talk ) 11:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The article needs improvements and additional sources, but the athlete in question competed in official competitions for North Korea, I believe that deleting it in this case would be inappropriate.  Svartner ( talk ) 15:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   No sources posted in article.  NYC Guru ( talk ) 04:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sacix: I am nominating this article again for further discussion.  The project is no longer active.   References do not provide any significant independent coverage.  Imcdc Contact 12:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  Imcdc Contact 12:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I cannot find significant coverage of this project, fails WP:GNG .  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing found, sources in German are the only hits I get.  The project does not appear in internet searches either, there appear to be streamers or social media users with this name.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Girls, Girls, Girls Tour: I am also nominating the following related article for also failing notability: Theatre of Pain Tour ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 22:05, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Music .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 22:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Both tours fail both WP:GNG and WP:NTOUR .  Aspects ( talk ) 16:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I first thought the pages could be merged with the album or band, but there doesn't seem to be any valuable information here.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 18:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  As this was in 1987 it would be hard to find much coverage, but I would imagine that at the time it probably had some descent coverage as they were one of the biggest metal bands of the times.  I have managed to find some coverage in Google Books.  Check 1 , 2 .  I also found some further coverage in Google Newspapers Archive 3 , 4 .  Royal88888 ( talk ) 01:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Cape Verde: The article is comprised of mostly LLM slop, and extrapolates fake/conflicting info from a real but minor skirmish (mentioned on page 159 of the source listed).  – Hilst [talk] 20:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military .  – Hilst [talk] 20:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Africa , Algeria ,  and Portugal .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Clear LLM work which is mostly nonsense .  It contains nationalist neutral point of view violations (states that the battle "highlights the bravery and resilience of those involved in defending against piracy", the article also claims that the battle is "a testament to the challenges faced by maritime trade during the early 18th century.").  While the discussed battle happened, its almost certainly unnotable.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 16:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sheikh Hussain Abdul Rahman: No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG.    Previously deleted.    Regarding real world notability the strongest two things are that he was the father of the President of the Maldives and he won a "National Award of Honor" for"  for "contribution in the area of religious awareness and religious education".   Of the references, two are short obit descriptions,  one lists the award recipients (with no other text) and the rest don't cover him.  North8000 ( talk ) 14:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:BIORELATED .  Noorullah ( talk ) 00:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Basepoint Centres: HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?  14:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies ,  and United Kingdom .  Owen× ☎ 14:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:PROMOTION , not for promoting businesses.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 16:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as no reliable or any semi-reliable sources may be found or added.  -- Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 16:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Annie Andrews (physician): Not notable as either a physician or a politician, and all the coverage is routine for a candidate.  St Anselm ( talk ) 21:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and South Carolina .  St Anselm ( talk ) 21:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Women , Indiana ,  and Kentucky .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails the GNG, political candidates aren't inherently notable User:Let'srun 02:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per the nomination rationale.  MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a failed political candidate and not notable otherwise.  -- Mvqr ( talk ) 10:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they lost — the notability test for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while candidates get articles only if either  (a) they can properly demonstrate that they already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have secured their inclusion in Wikipedia anyway, or  (b) they can demonstrate a reason why their candidacy should be seen as a special case of significantly greater and more enduring notability than everybody else's candidacies.  This demonstrates neither of those things, however, and since every candidate in every election always gets campaign coverage during the election, such coverage is not the stuff of a permanent WP:GNG pass in and of itself either.  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:38, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kyle Prior: He played 8 minutes in the Scottish Championship and spent some time on loan but he has not had a club for five years and appears to have fallen out of football.  I can't see anything in the way of substantial coverage to show the subject meets GNG, only routine announcements and stuff from his club.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 13:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Football ,  and Scotland .  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 13:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with the nominators assessment, doesn't cut it.  Fails BASIC/GNG.  Govvy ( talk ) 21:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't appear to satisfy the relevant notability criteria of GNG or BASIC.  The references in the article are a single source, not independent of the subject.  The only other mentions I've found are on Facebook and database listings.  Rupples ( talk ) 21:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Sher Hyderi: .  the references cited only mention about this death... nom it for deletion per WP:BIO1E Saqib ( talk ) 08:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Islam ,  and Pakistan .  CptViraj ( talk ) 09:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG .  41.99.221.13 ( talk ) 20:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Najiballah Karimi: I found Shahidvaez1384 , but the coverage is not significant and it's an official website for a sports club, so it won't be WP:RS or independent in any case.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:21, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:19, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Clermont Sans Fil: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 22:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 22:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and France .  Owen× ☎ 23:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : It is not correct to suggest that this is completely unsourced.  It has no citations but the references section has four references 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I mean, the citations are WP:ABOUTSELF so, I didn't really count them.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 15:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is only one source that could potentially be considered reliable for WP:NORG , but at this point it fails both WP:NORG and WP:GNG .  No reliable hits online either.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per Cocobb8 's rationale.  Though there is a list of four references, all four appear to come from the organization's own site and therefore cannot be considered RS's.  ArkHyena ( talk ) 22:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 09:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 20:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Various websites mention Clermont-Ferrand, but nothing found about this wifi initiative.  What's used for sourcing isn't enough, basically profiles of the org.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] "sources" listed as references appear to be republished pr items by the group itself, or various blog items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Neeraj Gupta: WP:SIGCOV is not established and does not pass WP:NACTOR by my research.  Tar nis hed Path talk 11:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers ,  and India .  Tar nis hed Path talk 11:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , please note this is a different subject matter than previous nominations as consequence of a recent page move.  Tar nis hed Path talk 11:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom, the subject does not meet WP:NACTOR .  And lacks WP:SIGCOV .  Macbeejack ☎ 08:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I would have seriously considered to Draftify this page so that the creator could add on more reliable sources but a simple search myself could not find much on the subject.  Neeraj Gupta is an actor who acted in his first film Jaggu Ki Lalten but this is his only known work.  The reliable sources on the page are about the film and shows him as one of the cast.  Unreliable source neerajkgupta.com is his own personal website.  He is not notable enough to have any significant coverage in media publications or to warrant a page on himself.  RangersRus ( talk ) 20:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails the relevant notability policies required.  UtherSRG (talk) 19:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per RangerRus, I'd also tried for draftify, but almost no sources with SIGCOV and no GNG.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 12:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete