hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Brandon Stickney: Fails the general and author-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Journalism , United States of America ,  and New York .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment leaning Keep .  The book on McVeigh seems likely to be notable; at least one review of this book on Proquest search, plus the Time article and multiple other news/magazine articles which I can't access.  There also seems to be some fuss over another author allegedly plagiarising the book (Letters.  Columbia Journalism Review.  Vol.  38, Iss.  1,  (May/Jun 1999): 8.) referencing an article in Columbia Journalism Review that compared the two books.  Also possibly local newspaper reviews of The Amazing Seven Sutherland Sisters (LOCKPORT AUTHOR FINDS STORY OF VICTORIAN SISTERS COMPELLING. Fischer, Nancy A.  Buffalo News; Buffalo, N.Y.. 28 Mar 2004: NC8. & Recounting a hair-raising story: Sutherland Sisters subject of new book. Fischer, Nancy A.  Buffalo News; Buffalo, N.Y.. 11 Mar 2012: NC.5.) and an interview (Biographer of McVeigh has moved on from dark era. Continelli, Louise. McClatchy - Tribune Business News. 19 Apr 2009.).  There's also a review of his recent memoir which contains some biographical material (including noting the above plagiarism) ( Kirkus Reviews . 8/1/2020, Vol. 88 Issue 15, pN).  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 23:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 13:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  One possibility that could be considered would be repurposing the article to discuss the notable book on McVeigh, and having a brief author section that name checks Stickney's later less-notable works.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 01:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
List of programs broadcast by WAPA-TV: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Lists ,  and Puerto Rico .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Noting previous AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of programs broadcast by networks .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Thenkaraikottai: Fails WP:GNG .  scope_creep Talk 11:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Tamil Nadu .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Tangrakottai , after retitling that article to the village name of Thenkaraikottai .  This church is in the adjoining settlement of Fathima Nagar .  The census village is Thenkaraikottai (spelled without the 'h' in the 2011 Tamil Nadu census handbook) [66] Tangrakottai article covers both the fort and the Kalyana Ramaswamy temple, both accessed from Thenkaraikottai.  The current redirect from Thenkaraikottai to Tangrakottai looks to be the wrong way round — Tangrakottai has few Google hits, most of which appear to be Wikipedia mirrors, so that article may be wrongly titled.  Rupples ( talk ) 01:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 15:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 02:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  There are a few sources in the stub.  It fails my own standards at User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_historic_churches .  Plus: the building is more than 100 years old (pre-1921).  Minus: everything else.  It's not on any register of Historic Places.  It as neither designed by a notable architect, nor is notable for its architecture.  It has not been notorious nor notable in any way.  I would not oppose a redirect one way or the other.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Phaitoon Phonbun: My WP:BEFORE search found only routine coverage of results and ranking positions.  There may be good sources in other languages that I've failed to uncover.  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 12:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cue sports ,  and Thailand .  BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 12:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd be inclined toward keep ing this, since a national champion is usually notable, and this person is an international regional champion (Asian Games).  Maybe someone from WikiProject Thailand would have more luck finding sources using the subject's native-script name.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: A notice of this discussion has been delivered to WT:WikiProject Thailand .  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Searching with his snooker nickname, ตัวเล็ก สำโรง (Tualek Samrong), turns up a lot of results, mostly match reports and videos.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
What Do I Have to Do? (Stabbing Westward song): Although it charted and was a break-out hit for Stabbing Westward , the single did not receive any significant coverage independent of the album or band that I could find.  Jfire ( talk ) 21:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - I know charting isn't everything but this song charted on multiple charts, including hitting #7 on one of them.  It's one of those songs where, logistically speaking, it's pretty much a given that there's sources locked away in print media because the song was released in the 1990s.  Sergecross73 msg me 02:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply - WP:BURDEN .  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 12:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Your approach lacks common sense.  How does a song reach the top ten of two separate genre charts, crossover into the all-genre chart, and not get any third party coverage?  It's an exceedingly unlikely scenario.  The song still gets played on the radio today, decades after its release.  It's hit radio syndication.  This is absolutely not the sort of mundane, every day song NSONGS was created to prevent from having its own article.  And while we're on the topic of BURDEN, what about you ?  Your nomination itself is nothing more than an argument to avoid at AFD .  I have serious doubts about your BEFORE search.  Especially considering your entire nomination was simply three words.  Sergecross73 msg me 19:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Reply - WP:BURDEN .  -- Jax 0677 ( talk ) 13:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Incredibly disappointing (and telling) response to be questioned about WP:ATA , WP:BEFORE , and the general implausibility of what you're suggesting.  Sergecross73 msg me 18:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 09:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The song at least got coverage here .  Rlendog ( talk ) 16:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Very good find!  This is the sort of thing I'm talking about above.  This sort of coverage was commonplace in print media back then, in the same way Loudwire and Blabbermouth.net would write an article about it if they had broken out with a popular rock single in 2023.  Sergecross73 msg me 17:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - This physical Billboard magazine article indicates that this song was the 29th popular  rock song of all of 1996 in the US.  That's a big feat.  Sergecross73 msg me 13:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Pierre-Loup Bouquet: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and France .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
DarwinHealth: I searched for sources using all alternatives: "DarwinHealth" but couldn't find anything that satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH .  Sure there are mentions of DarwinHealth in articles about targeted medicine but this article isn't based on those mentions it's fluffed up from the organization's first-hand research and press releases because there are no independent peer reviews of this company's work yet.  One of the sources that looks like it might support notability, the WSJ article is, upon closer inspection an essay written by none other than the company's CEO then we have a load more primary sources like this listings site https://www.nature.com/nature-index/institution-outputs/united-states-of-america-usa/darwinhealth/59f35838b615d2287807e4cd a press release in PharmaBiz https://www.pharmabiz.com/PrintArticle.aspx? aid=138344&sid=2 and the mother of all primary, promotional, PR puffery the organization's about us page https://darwinhealth.com/about/ this article fails WP:NCORP fails WP:CORPDEPTH fails WP:N and should be deleted.  Dafydd y Corach ( talk ) 17:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Mathematics , Medicine ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Joy Junction: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New Mexico .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 04:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- First of all nom doesn't offer a valid reason for deletion.  As is well known the quality of the prose is irrelevant and if nom doesn't like it they're free to edit it, as are we all.  Secondly, this org clearly meets the GNG, let alone NORG.  Here are some sources: [23] [24] [25] [26] .  Central and Adams ( talk ) 17:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 10:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Maybe needs some updating.   I've noted and sourced that founder Dr. Jeremy Reynalds died in 2018.  I've also added that Joy Junction opened a thrift shop this year.  Also added the 2023 Halloween “Trick-or-Treat So Others May Eat” event.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
All Seasons Place, Penang: One source merely confirms a bus runs to the centre, another source confirms the statement "a flea market opens within the mall every weekend, offering apparel at discounted prices".  LibStar ( talk ) 00:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Malaysia .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article from The Star is the best source.  The Time Out article is short, but talks both about the mall and the flea market.  Size seems to be a factor in the notability of shopping malls, and this one is fairly large.  The corresponding article in Malay seems top be based on this one (or vice versa), but the list of tenants at ms:All_Seasons_Place may be more current.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 02:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 01:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Tamil Maanila Kamraj Congress: Fails to meet WP:GNG , as I was unable to find any reliable sources covering this party in the WP:BEFORE stage.  Cheers!  Fake scientist 8000 13:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  Cheers!  Fake scientist 8000 13:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - whilst the party folded a while ago, and not much online trace, it was represented in the Tamil Nadu legislature, see https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/itll-be-cong-aiadmk-face-off-in-sattankulam-by-poll/articleshow/36102246.cms , https://www.rediff.com/news/report/tn/20030110.htm , https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/dmk-mla-held-for-threatening-to-kill-tmkc-leader/articleshow/36050406.cms , https://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030124/nation.htm#2 , https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/House-supports-filing-case-against-Ilamvazhuthy/articleshow/35961270.cms? from=mdr , https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/20030217-dmk-mla-ilamvazhuthi-allegedly-threatens-to-kill-jayalalithaa-supporter-793312-2003-02-16 ,  -- Soman ( talk ) 13:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Political parties must still meet WP:NORG ; simply having a small handful of members in a subnational legislature is typically not sufficient.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 05:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question : Fake scientist 8000 in your BEFORE process did you search for local / print sources ?  Jack4576 ( talk ) 05:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Cullen Large: Joeykai ( talk ) 00:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A very easy keep .  This biography clears GNG and NSPORTS by more than a lot of sports bios I've seen here.  There is WP:SIGCOV in The Province , Baseball America , and Sportsnet , all of which are WP:SIRS .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that Sportsnet is owned by Rogers Communications , which also owns the Toronto Blue Jays , the organization that had Large at the time that article was written.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The subject meets WP:GNG with WP:SIGCOV from multiple reliable sources.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I created this article as a redirect to Toronto Blue Jays minor league players , but I don't think Large is notable enough for a standalone article.  The Baseball America reference is a general stat page that all minor league prospects have.  In my opinion we only have 2 refs contributing towards notability in terms of SIGCOV ( The Province & Sportsnet ).  If more SIGCOV is found I do think that the article should probably be kept.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 14:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The Baseball America link is an article, not a stats page.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 16:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This subject meets the WP:GNG because of independent WP:SIGCOV from Baseball America and The Province, which each provides in-depth coverage of the subject.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete never made the majors, coverage is sparse and routine.  Non-notable minor league baseball player.  SportingFlyer T · C 02:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 20:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The three sources given by

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Leander Kills: - Pottyantós WC ( talk ) 14:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 22 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:04, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Hungary .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] COMMENT Nominating editor has been indefinitely blocked on 23 December.  David notMD ( talk ) 19:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Rheji Burrell: At any rate, the article discusses a non-notable production team(?) whose own discography hasn't seen them ever having charted; and the list of albums that they supposedly produced for other artists isn't sourced.  It doesn't help that the article reads like the brothers themselves wrote it.  Erpert blah, blah, blah... 04:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Music ,  and New Jersey .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already at AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In 2012, the article looked pretty much the same as now .  It still needs work, obviously, but WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP .  I see no reason to disagree with the earlier consensus on notability, which is not lost, and the adequate sourcing turned up in WP:BEFORE searches done during the first AfD.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 04:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Beyond this [50] , I don't find anything about this person or the pair of them.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep exercising WP:AGF as in the first AfD linked at the top left of this discussion a respected editor Michig identified a number of book sources that convinced him it passed WP:GNG although a number of the links no longer work, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus