hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Humaira Kazi: Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 12:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Cricket , India ,  and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:TOOSOON .  Not enough coverage exists currently for her, given that she hasn't played a single notable match yet.  However coverage may well exist in the future when she starts playing matches.  So currently fails WP:GNG , and not worth draftifying as will likely be over 6 months before sourcing begins to exist.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DON'T DELETE WPL is already a big tournament in women's cricket and she has already played 10 WPL matches in the inaugral edition.  As on today, some information is avaialable from reliable sources, which is being gradually moved to her Wikipedia page.  Kindly let the page stay.  Thanks, Vikram Maingi ( talk ) 05:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A lot of details have been added on this page and it is certainly worth retaining.  Kindly review and share updates.  Thanks, Vikram Maingi ( talk ) 12:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This page can be expanded upon.  Abstrakt ( talk ) 15:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP Waiting for more inputs so that the discussion can be closed.  Thanks, Vikram Maingi ( talk ) 13:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Neither of these are valid reasons to keep an article.  Zaathras ( talk ) 14:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  My own BEFORE returned routine match reports and interviews, nothing approaching SIGCOV in SIRS.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 23:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  07:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per WP:TOOSOON and I would not oppose draftifying however it would probably be a long time before WP:RS appears.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Extra scrutiny of keep votes will be needed here, as there is off-wiki canvassing going on, per this tweet .  Zaathras ( talk ) 14:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only two articles are on the page which would count to SPORTBASIC, and even then it's not SIGCOV to warrant a biography.  SWinxy ( talk ) 20:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benjamin Maio Mackay: It was written by a sockpuppet account (more accurately a group of them).  All articles linking to this page were also created by those accounts or are previous discussions of the issues regarding this page.  The subject of the article does not meet verifiability .  The creation of this article by the subject is also a violation of WP:COI .  The subject is not notable ; the only web results yielded by a search are local announcements of events and facebook pages, which were originally used as sources in this article.  Other, more recent sources are all reviews and brief descriptions which do not meet reliability guidelines.  Am nominating for AfD after PROD nomination from other users last year, as article breaches wiki guidelines on notability and biography of a living persons.  This is a self-created profile .  Ilovedalone ( talk ) 04:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 12 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 05:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There are numerous problems with this article, ranging from notability issues to claims that completely unfounded.  The reader is left wondering if the article is basically made up.  If this guy becomes notable in the future, then the article could be recreated.  Missjaenna ( talk ) 09:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, PROD'd several times so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 08:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  JM ( talk ) 09:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brez dlake na jeziku: Seems non-notable Charsaddian ( talk ) 16:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 16:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Paltry sourcing in the Slovenian wiki article, I can't find much either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Greatest Hits Radio UK: The "Greatest Hits Radio UK" station originates no programming and (as the article states) simply relays another station's programming.  Suggest a redirect to Greatest Hits Radio , the network being relayed .  Flip Format ( talk ) 12:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United Kingdom .  Flip Format ( talk ) 12:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's only one so-named network in the world so there's no redirect need, and this seemed to be an article created by someone who didn't know how to search, as the national launch is mentioned in the GHR article already.  No difference between local and national versions at this point outside local inserts and adverts.  Nate • ( chatter ) 19:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Changing my ! vote to delete per Nate.  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Let search steer people to Greatest Hits Radio where this information can easily be retained.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 00:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Greatest Hits Radio , do not delete.  Fails WP:GNG per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 03:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Greatest Hits Radio .  Rillington ( talk ) 23:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J O Hambro Capital Management: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Management , Singapore , England , Massachusetts ,  and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sheila Courage: WP:BEFORE shows little apart from gossip columns to do with said ex-spouse.  Black Kite (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Fails WP:GNG Searches find only social media, gossip and stuff related to her ex and their break-up.  No significant coverage of her in reliable sources.  Neiltonks ( talk ) 20:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article is a pack of rumor mongering based on the worst kind of tabloid journalism.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 01:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG or any applicable SNG.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 12:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP .  Totally non-notable ex-spouse of a non-notable person.  Sourced to tabloids and blogs .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ario Eslamshahr: If sources are found, please ping me.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football ,  and Iran .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  22:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete it does not provide sufficient notability, offering limited and generic information about the sports club that does not set it apart from numerous other local clubs.  Moreover, it lacks independent, reliable sources to verify its significance or impact. -- Improvised but so real unicorn ( talk ) 11:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2018 Caloocan Supremos season: No evidence of notability under SNG or GNG.  The SNG explicitly says that these are not presumed notable and thus require GNG sources.     Misses that by several levels.  The one source that the article has is about the league.  "Stats" only article also relates to wp:not.  Tagged for sources since January.    Previously deleted.  North8000 ( talk ) 15:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Have you noticed that all the teams from 2018 have season entries?  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No, but now I looked.... at just the ones in the NPP que.    It is then further multiplied by articles on pairs of those teams.  Titled as rivalry articles, where (per a quick preliminary look) the sources don't describe them as rivalries.  North8000 ( talk ) 20:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment as it stands, fails GNG on its face, but I'm not sure how to conduct a BEFORE search for this.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] IMO the ones excluded by the SNG have a near-zero chance of having GNG level sources.  North8000 ( talk ) 19:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already deleted by PROD so a Soft Deletion is not an option here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in the Republic of Ireland: The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Ireland .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , I found [24] , [25] , and [26] which may be helpful in determining notability.  Esolo5002 ( talk ) 23:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: It would be nice to hear a review of newly found sources.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails NLIST no indication this has been discussed as a group, meets LISTCRUFT, there is nothing encyclopedic here.  // Timothy :: talk 22:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Matt Hannaford: much of the article seems to be either original research, or things Matt has been only involved with tangentially (like stars his coworkers at the company represented).  this could be improved if the article met WP:BIO , but even that seems doubtful.  Free Realist 9 ( talk ) 13:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Sportspeople .  Free Realist 9 ( talk ) 13:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions .  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PabloDraw: Previous AfDs didn't reach a consensus, but not a single one of the Keep votes in any of those AfDs actually cites any notability guidelines.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 21:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Unfortunately, it seems this may be yet another WP:BFDI situation.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 01:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Searching on Google, DDG, and Kagi, and archive.org texts turned up no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS .  Also the article has been unreferenced since 2004.  Previous keep votes weren't based on guidelines.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't find coverage for this software package, so not meeting requirements.  The other AfD votes don't seen to hold much weight with current guidelines, regardless, there isn't enough coverage to keep this.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Golden Scythe Horror Awards: GRINCHIDICAE🎄 01:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Awards , Canada ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can only find Instagram and The Movie Blog posts about this award, not seeing notability.  No coverage outside of these sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a quick look tells me it's some kind of elaborated hoax.  No serious sources at all, don't think there's any event or any awards at all.  Tehonk ( talk ) 06:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I doubt it's a hoax in the strictest sense, and more likely a thing Caillou Pettis invented by himself and announces "winners" of by himself.  The dude's been such a relentlessly self-promoting and self-Wikipedia-inserting wannabe in the past that this is probably just his latest "get myself into Wikipedia by any means possible" scheme.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Christmas crackers, not this Caillou Pettis dude again .  As always, awards are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on reliable source coverage about them in real media, not self-promotion on social networking or blogs.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
VH1's Top 40 Videos of the Year: Binksternet ( talk ) 01:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)  Also, the problematic Chilean IP range Special:Contributions/186.105.96.0/19 has been putting false entries into this list for almost a year.  Binksternet ( talk ) 01:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Lists .  Binksternet ( talk ) 01:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This is analogous to a newspaper's list of best-selling books.  Here, a cable channel, which arguably is among the best in a position to judge music videos, has selected the year's 40 best, and broadcasts them to a comparatively large audience.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  I also found no reliable secondary coverage.  Considered suggesting a merge to VH1 , but the page is much too large.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 04:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to VH1 Top 20 Video Countdown#Special editions as a compromise.  The target article is not overly large and can absorb a truncated chart such as can be found at KROQ Top 106.7 Countdowns#Countdowns by year , where only the top video by year is organized together in one chart.  As much as I would have liked to keep this, per WP:NOTEVERYTHING I don't think it is practical or necessary to have the full yearly countdown for every music station that ever existed.  Also, it is difficult to source this kind information without using unreliable sources such as YouTube .  Stony Brook babble 05:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No evidence of notability.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, also to consider suggested Merge target article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Unnotable and unnoticed honor.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 05:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Waléra Kanischtscheff: Entirely unsourced blps are a problem, even for people who are not notable Very Average Editor ( talk ) 08:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Germany , Russia ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not seem to be a notable actor.  - GizzyCatBella 🍁 23:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Courcelles ( talk ) 13:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Beyond credits for the various episodes, I can't see coverage for this person in RS Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE are promo, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  // Timothy :: talk 13:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete