hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Avetec: Newystats ( talk ) 11:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  Newystats ( talk ) 11:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not notable, no longer active.   Looking back at the active dates of this organisation, I couldn't find any references in news.   There are references like https://www.businessinsider.com/peter-thiel-invested-300000-in-man-made-tornados-2012-12 in 2012, which appears to be an unrelated company.   Looking through the history of the page, there are references, but are for things like the definition of STEM, not the organisation Newystats ( talk ) 11:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NCORP .  Mel ma nn 07:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Defunct website, no coverage in American media.  I get a few hits in Canadian media [48] for a different entity.  Nothing found for sourcing, what's used in the article is primary.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iain MacKintosh: Boleyn ( talk ) 20:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Scotland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of NK Krško players: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a directory, so random lists like that are pointless.  Snowflake91 ( talk ) 13:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Slovenia .  Owen× ☎ 14:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no added value in the list as such.  If the list had some chronology, number of goals, selection of players with at least some caps, etc., that would be another story.  But still it is not the top-tier club, so the notability is lower.  -- Tone 16:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no demonstrated value over Category:NK Krško Posavje players – red links could have its justification if the club weren't somewhat fringe in the football world.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to NK Krško Posavje once trimmed and sourced.  Giant Snowman 18:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The list does not contain any statistical information and the club is completely irrelevant even in Slovenian football, failing in WP:NLIST .  A category for the club's players already is sufficient to coverage.  Svartner ( talk ) 21:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Archi Fataki: Fataki has never played football at a high-level; stints in the Belgian Second Division and Albanian Kategoria Superiore represent the "peaks" of his career.  As a journeyman who has played for many clubs throughout Europe and Africa, there is a lot of routine coverage available (almost all of it consisting of match reports and transfer news/speculation).  However, I cannot locate in-depth coverage in reliable sources that is independent of the subject; the best source I could find is an ADIAC transfer news piece that contains a paragraph recap of his career.  Unfortunately, none of the sources included in the article now or that I found in my WP:BEFORE search could be paired with it to satisfy the GNG.  References 1-13 are either not independent (his employers Balma SC, MDA Foot, FC Rouen), not reliable (Walfoot, Footpy) or routine (Le Foot, Gazeta Panorama x2, ADIAC, Gazeta Gerçek).  External links 1, 2, 4 and 5 are not independent (Balma SC and FC Rouen again), not reliable (Walfoot again) or are interviews that contain almost zero secondary coverage (Actufoot).  External link 3 (Paris-Normandie) is an interview with some secondary coverage but no byline.  It mentions his performance in a trial friendly match (hardly notable) and the briefest of mentions of his footballing origins.  I found plenty of other match reports, transfer news and interviews (Sud-Ouest, Footdrc.com) that are not SIGCOV, so I just can't see how this article meets our guidelines.  If we think this sort of low-quality coverage is sufficient, the result will be that almost every semi-pro or amateur footballer with a lengthy or journeyman career can have an article.  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and France .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - comprehensive source assessment done by the nominator seems accurate to me Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Romeo Sukhlian: Does not look to even pass WP:SPORTBASIC #5, which is the minimum standard.  An Indian source search yields only Wikipedia mirrors.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nagaland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Benjamín Benítez: The acting career is also quite lackluster.  Tryvix1509 Let me know if I made a mistake 14:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KCKS-LD: The only sources currently cited are either primary or lack independence from the source.  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Kansas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 23:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's a diginet coatrack put on the air in the last 10 years.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 20:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Here's the Reason: Even though it a station where I live, I don't see that much sources about it, so it makes sense, you can say that it's sister stations like WROB-LD in Topeka are also included in that.  I also can't get it, even with an antenna.  Also, there's no sources.  Mer764Wiki ( talk ) 21:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Perhaps a decent demonstration of how our interpretation of the notability of broadcast stations has changed over the years is that, back in 2016, TV25.tv was deemed to not be independently notable from this station at AfD and was redirected.  Even then, I questioned whether we really needed four articles related to that network of all-diginet LPTVs — but we hadn't quite reached the point where the correct number was/is/should be zero .  Seven years later, it has become more accepted that this simply isn't the type of station that gets the requisite significant coverage to meet the GNG — FCC records and network announcements of their new affiliate just won't do.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Figure/Ground: Literally a random website that won a cool award once.  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 20:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 20:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Plenty of mentions of the phrase, no sources found that talk about a website with this name, the award could be notable, but we have no sourcing that isn't primary, so I don't know where else to look.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 05:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Couldn't find any non-primary sources online that can confirm the award or notability of the article.  Lewcm Talk to me!  20:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 10:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peter Wuteh Vakunta: I can't find a Google Scholar for him; ResearchGate indicates he's only been cited 22 times (which seems too low to meet WP:NPROF ).  A search for sources only turns up profiles for him and sites hawking his books.  — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Language , Poetry ,  and Cameroon .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  Although he does not seem to satisfy WP:NPROF , subject may possibly satisfy WP:AUTHOR (C3).  I do see a few reviews of published works; not sure if there is enough, though.  Qflib ( talk ) 00:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete : I am certain the article meets WP:AUTHOR but that isn't enough when they aren't verifiable.  This can still be notable in the future.  For now, WP:NPROF and WP:SIGCOV issue.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  17:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article does not meet WP:NPROF .  Article's only use seems to be listing subject's various publications.  Boredintheevening ( talk ) 15:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Md Sameen Rahman: Note, this has been G11d many times in draftspace - Rich T | C | E-Mail 16:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Bangladesh .  - Rich T | C | E-Mail 16:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article seems fine to me as he is an entrepreneur and his news articles are quite heavy, and I think he is notable as I can see his company getting featured in some of the biggest journals, and they are pointing him out as an entrepreneur.  And speaking of world record it was edited and fixed.  Thank you Caspter ( talk ) 20:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Appears to be entirely promotional, and there is an evident lack of reliable sourcing to back it up.  I honestly would've tagged it as WP:G11 if it hadn't been nominated here.  CycloneYoris talk!  01:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Crampcomes ( talk ) 21:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I don't think the articles appears to be a promotional.  I have gone through all the news articles of this individual, and it seems fine to me as all the news is from the respected news desk, so keeping the article would be a wise decision.  Forhad alavi ( talk ) 11:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My nom is to delete... so how can you ! vote "Keep per nom" - Rich T | C | E-Mail 18:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] More interested to know how an account with seven contributions that hasn't edited in a half-dozen years showed up on an AfD.  Also perhaps why @ Caspter : above has tried multiple times to create an article for @ Forhad alavi : .  I guess we could do an SPI, or we could probably just DUCK discount their contributions as an obvious WP:DUCK .  Seems someone here may have a farm or a friend.  G M G talk 15:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The subject's "projects" appear to be simply unfishished websites.  The Grow More site has exactly one "course" which appears to be a YouTube video, and a couple dozen courses "coming soon".  UPGRADE is basically empty aside from the landing page and a bunch of "under construction".  These don't seem to be bona fide projects, but rather attempts to pad their resume for anyone who doesn't look too closely.  The world record for [insert thing nobody cares about] is neither here nor there.  The article here is likely just another attempt at paper-thin self promotion.  G M G talk 12:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and per User:GreenMeansGo.  Also clearly COI .  -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 20:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the Windsor tie world record is pretty cool, but there's no claim to notability in this article.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rodney Stepp: Once played in The Spinners backing band, but none of his primary projects seem to pass WP:NMUSIC .  No independent sigcov to establish notability apart from that, just his own website and some blogposts.  Jdcooper ( talk ) 15:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Indiana .  Jdcooper ( talk ) 15:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Actualcpscm ( talk ) 16:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - only one article detailing his recovery from COVID-19 is not enough to establish notability.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 17:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC .  Per WP:BANDMEMBER I wouldn't be opposed to a redirect to The Spinners (American group) , although he isn't even named in that article currently, so perhaps not.  Uhai ( talk ) 22:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Simon Wilkinson (composer): Of the 11 sources used, 3 merely mention Wilkinson without significant coverage.  The other 8 do not even refer to him.  I couldn't immediately find any sources with significant coverage.  Large parts of the article fail verification or are completely unsourced.  IceWelder [ ✉ ] 09:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  IceWelder [ ✉ ] 09:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Have tidied up and removed outdated links and added more relevant citations and sources.  Heliwig1 ( talk ) 16:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry, but what you added are again just trivial mentions.  Please see WP:SIGCOV .  IceWelder [ ✉ ] 20:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Sources and references to work created and published by the composer now direct to articles at Yahoo! News, Wired, National Geographic, Rotten Tomatoes and more which are all listed here as Reliable/Perennial sources for Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources Heliwig1 ( talk ) 07:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Heliwig1 needs to read SIGCOV, because none of the sources in the article qualify.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 09:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Notemaker: toweli ( talk ) 21:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  toweli ( talk ) 21:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only links I find are the Clairefontaine Notemaker notebook, nothing for this C64 software.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As a general term, notemaker is closer to a dictionary entry rather to an encyclopedia subject.  There is not enough informations to identify the hinted C64 applications (search in C64 magazines online left no clues).  Articles may be created for respective applications later (eg. DocViewer may be notable).  We simply do not have any sources for an article about the "Notemaker" subject.  Pavlor ( talk ) 05:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is written in an advertising and promotional style.  There are evaluative judgments without confirmation of this evaluation-- Saul McGill ( talk ) 15:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mutta (tribe): Boleyn ( talk ) 09:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Pakistan , India ,  and Punjab .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : 5 results show up if you search "Mutta people" on Google Books.  [17] They do exist, but maybe they are a small community (I don't know) and not much has been written about them.  However, I found 5 results on Google books alone.  I haven't checked other venues like Scholar etc.  If this is a keep, maybe changing it to Mutta people .  Tamsier ( talk ) 11:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Toadette Edit!  18:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , the Mutta tribe definitely exists, i've been able to find some mentions of them on JSTOR and Google Scholar.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 23:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 05:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources on the page and a simple search did not show result on a Mutta tribe.  I did find a Google book that talks about Muttadari System of Bhagatha tribe but that is different than the tribe on the page.  Some more sources about Muttas in Australia.  I did not find any source that would give an option to draftify the page for improvement.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete doesn't pass general notability guidelines.  Based Kashmiri TALK 10:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete