hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Haqeeqat (2019 TV series): Donald D23 talk to me 00:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage.   — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 10:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep While assessing the referencing of Pakistani dramas/series, the dynamics of Pakistani media industry should be considered wherein media groups have their own news and entertainment channels.  Normally a news channel from one media group doesn't give coverage to a project of a rival channel unless it's a big hit.  So for other dramas we have to rely on websites and links which otherwise may not be good sources but are good enough for a Pakistani drama.  Muneebll ( talk ) 19:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Muneebll , But still you have to demonstrate that this TV dramas meet GNG.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That assessment is not based on Wikipedia policy or guidance.  In order for an article to be kept it must be demonstrated that it meets WP:GNG at a minimum.  Saying that one media group doesn't cover another one is not a reason to keep an article.  Donald D23 talk to me 22:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to A-Plus_TV#Anthology_series - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Teresa Jacobo: Does not appear to pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG .  She does have some media coverage related to her role in the City of Bell scandal , though her individual role does not seem to pass WP:NCRIME .  Could be merged or redirected to City of Bell scandal as an WP:ATD .  Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas , closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 05:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , Crime , Mexico ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to City of Bell scandal , a much more detailed account of what happened.  Jacobo is only notable for being one of many people involved in that scandal.  — Maile ( talk ) 13:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per previous vote.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 20:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to City of Bell scandal , most  of the secondary sources I could find are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN and the involvement in the scandal isn't enough to pass WP:CRIME enough to merit her own article,  so a redirect sounds good to me.  Shaws username .  talk .  04:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023 Manang Air helicopter crash: No evidence of lasting effects and fails WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE .  Aviationwikiflight ( talk ) 10:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Aviation ,  and Nepal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of airplane accidents in Nepal .  nirmal ( talk ) 07:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect to link as above.  Desertarun ( talk ) 07:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Julia DeMato: Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Television ,  and Connecticut .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , this is the fourth nomination, all of which have been keep.  However, this page does not get many page hits, Google Trends shows barely any searches for her.  Sources for her are very trivial, I don't think feeding the homeless, hosting a local event at a pub, and going to drug rehab over fifteen years ago is very notable.  Although she has placed in the top twelve in a reality television show, she has not had a notable music career, covering only two songs and recording one song of a nonnotable music company.  The only criterion I could see her keeping is criterion four, and upon searching, the tour she went also does not seem notable.  I would support redirecting to the American Idol season that she was on.  Heart (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to American Idol (season 2) .  The previous nominations had hilariously bad arguments, such as "the article gets 1,000 views a month!" and "the second season of American Idol was its breakthrough season!"  It is almost hilariously bad that in the past 3 AfDs not a single person identified a single instance of significant coverage of this person.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 11:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to American Idol (season 2) per above.  XtraJovial ( talk • contribs ) 14:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Amit Kumar (Bangladeshi cricketer): fails GNG.  Non-notable cricketer stub X ( talk ) 15:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  X ( talk ) 15:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 16:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Rangpur Riders cricketers Fails WP:GNG , however he has played his most notable cricket for this side, so a suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Princess Marie Melita of Hohenlohe-Langenburg: I can find nothing about her other than whom she married and gave birth to.  Wikipedia is not a genealogy website.  Surtsicna ( talk ) 22:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Royalty and nobility ,  and Germany .  Surtsicna ( talk ) 22:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to either the mother or father's page ( WP:ATD-R ) EmilySarah99 ( talk ) 13:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect , but I think Wilhelm Friedrich, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein , her husband, is the better target than picking one of the parents arbitrarily.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 00:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Galaxy Communications (comics): Pure plot summary + list of media it appears in, mostly unreferenced (one passing mention in a minor media article, few footnotes to comics and one to YouTube).  WP:FANCRUFT that fails WP:GNG , my BEFORE fails to show anything useful.  Best ATD is to redirect this to List of teams and organizations in DC Comics .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , News media ,  and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 05:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have altered the nominator's rationale to fix a formatting / layout error (i.e. an incomplete link syntax) that was causing {{subst: afd2 }} to not do anything.  I have no opinion with regard to the article itself.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As said, the sources are primary and a youtube video (not reliable sources.).  Obvious WP:FANCRUFT .  Industrial Insect (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Rather than closing this as a Soft Delete, please consider nominator's suggestion to redirect this article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of teams and organizations in DC Comics .  I found nothing to suggest that the subject is independently notable.  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 13:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as unreliable.  I wouldn't object to a redirect but there is nothing to WP:PRESERVE .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lawnridge, Kansas: .... The nearby cemetery may or may not be named "Lawn Ridge", and who knows, the post office may have been named after it.  Mangoe ( talk ) 18:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Kansas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yet again no town nor village, and another ghost town lie.  Lawn Ridge ; township in Cheyenne County; area, 72 square miles; population 171.  — Gannett 1898 , p. 129 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFGannett1898 ( help ) It is the only Lawn Ridge there.   The GNIS sourcing is false.   The GNIS record that used to exist had this as a "locale" and "(historical)".   That is because Lawn Ridge Township, name-checked at Blackmar 1912a , p. 327 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFBlackmar1912a ( help ) , has since been consolidated into Wano Township, Cheyenne County, Kansas .  Uncle G ( talk ) 19:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] references Gannett, Henry (1898).  A Gazetteer of Kansas .  Bulletin.  Vol.  154.  United States Geological Survey .  OL 20596112M .  Blackmar, Frank Wilson (1912).  Kansas: A Cyclopedia of State History .  Vol.  1.  Chicago: Standard publishing Company.  LCCN 12015729 .  OL 13489994M .  ( Kansas: A Cyclopedia of State History at the Internet Archive )  Redirect to Wano Township, Cheyenne County, Kansas Somebody might wonder about the old township that no longer exists.  I affirm Uncle G as the The local paper has articles stating this is a township, and the township had a post office.  James.folsom ( talk ) 22:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Again, I'm going to object to the redirect as they are not the same place and don't even vaguely share a name.  Mangoe ( talk ) 20:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and mention the township merge on the Wano Township page as this is encyclopedic information.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per the wise posters above.  jp × g 🗯️ 03:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Philip Pilkington: There is no substantive coverage of the subject in reliable sources.  There are a total of three reliable sources that have covered the subject in some way: (1) A Financial Times column that reviews several books and spends one paragraph on Pilkington's book [9] , (2) An Irish Times review [10] of the book, and (3) an American Affairs (a magazine founded in 2017) review [11] of the book.  While these reviews are on the border of satisfying WP:AUTHOR , they don't seem sufficient.  There's nothing in the coverage on which to build an encyclopedic article.  As it stands, the Wikipedia article appears intended to promote the subject (all the sources in the article are self-authored at the moment).  Thenightaway ( talk ) 22:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Ireland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Economics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Reformation in Economics , our usual solution for people who do not have independent notability (whether GNG, PROF, or AUTHOR-based, none of which he appears to pass) but who have a book that is notable enough to support its own article.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 08:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Reformation in Economics makes a lot of sense.  I've been troubled by this article in the past and couldn't work out whether it should be deleted or not.  Doesn't seem notable enough to me.  Seaweed ( talk ) 14:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - as I've said before in such situations one way or the other, in past examples of marginal notability of writers.  Usually the books(s) are merged into the writer's article, which is what I recommend in this place.  So long story short, there is usually not enough coverage of either writer and book(s), but there is enough for both when considered in totality .  Bearian ( talk ) 17:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect — I believe there’s simply nothing to gain from merging because there appears to be almost no credible new information in the article that isn’t in the book article.  I’d also point out that the book article reads like a sales pitch for a textbook, not an article capable of informing anyone interested in info about the book.  ☲Fireyair☲ ( talk ) 10:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Selective TV, Inc.: A 2010 AfD closed as no consensus but notability thresholds have changed significantly in the past 14 years.  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Companies ,  and Minnesota .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Alexandria, Minnesota#Television : this is probably the best available alternative to deletion here (the most substantive content, the table of stations, is basically already there), though given that this article is about a non-profit corporation and not necessarily the stations themselves I do not oppose outright deletion as a NCORP failure either.  Even the long-abolished separate and looser inclusion standards for broadcast stations eventually frowned upon giving relays of other stations or national services (which is all Selective TV's stations do) articles for lack of separate notability.  The "keep"s from 2010 don't appear to be what would be considered as "policy-guideline based" today, largely relying on the "FCC-licensed broadcast stations are presumed notable" stance that was finally put to bed after this 2021 RfC that pivoted to requiring significant coverage — but as this article really falls under NCORP rather than GNG , it falls under stricter standards that don't count purely-local or most trade coverage toward notability (and the lone "delete" from the 2010 nomination, noting the lack of SIGCOV, does express a view that is more in line with 2024 standards than was usually seen in the broadcasting topic area 14 years ago).  In the end, this is a remnant of the looser standards of 2010 — and the "no consensus" suggests that any perceived "notability" was the bare minimum at most .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Natacha Boyengwa: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Democratic Republic of the Congo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Democratic Republic of the Congo women's international footballers .  killer bee 09:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above as WP:ATD — siro χ o 09:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Democratic Republic of the Congo women's international footballers : Currently doesn't warrant a standalone page.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Democratic Republic of the Congo women's international footballers .  If they become notable later then restoring the page isn't a big deal.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2023–24 Dhaka Premier Division Cricket League: No coverage about the announcement of fixtures/dates of the competition, clearly fails WP:GNG , WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NEVENT .  Robo Cric Let's chat 15:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  Robo Cric Let's chat 15:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dhaka Premier Division Cricket League WP:TOOSOON .  Redirect to the parent article until there is suitable coverage for a season article.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ethereality: I can't find any in-depth coverage or reviews about this album in reliable and independent sources.  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 02:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 02:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Ethereality to Ethereal and Ethereality (album) to Winter (indie rock band) : Found no additional coverage.  Not notable enough to be PTOPIC for the current title.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 04:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 04:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as the redirect proposal involves an article not originally included in this nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Radiation Roy: Non-notable character.  SL93 ( talk ) 08:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  SL93 ( talk ) 08:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Legion of Super-Villains - Minor character without any significant coverage in reliable sources that I have been able to find.  There is already coverage of him on the article for the team he was primarily associated with, so this can Redirect to there.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 01:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect per Rorschacma.  I can't find enough WP:SIGCOV .  But redirects are cheap, and there is an appropriate target.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect