hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Navy Joan Roberts: She is known only as the out of wedlock daughter of the then drug addicted son of the US president.  This article’s purpose appears to be an effort to somehow embarrass her father and grandfather, with her as collateral damage.  The subject matter is already covered in the Hunter Biden article and need not be covered in an additional article about the young child.  Fails WP:G10 WP:A7 WP:NBIO WP:GNG .  O3000, Ret.  ( talk ) 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politics .  O3000, Ret.  ( talk ) 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  So a four-year-old child is suddenly notable and shamed because of the circumstances of her birth?  WP:BLP1E applies here.  This is borderline child abuse.  WWGB ( talk ) 14:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is an appalling attack on a child with her entire life ahead of her.  Needs to be deleted right now.  SPECIFICO talk 14:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Quick delete Utterly inappropriate BLP, and coverage would only be appropriate within her father's article.  Reywas92 Talk 14:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Could be a brief mention in a Hunter Biden biography here, not needing a whole article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED , almost all coverage of her is in relation to Hunter Biden or Joe Biden.  WikiVirus C (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ASAP - whether you like or dislike Hunter and Joe Biden, don't drag a little girl into this.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 16:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NBASIC and INVALIDBIO .  The subject is a minor who has received coverage as a subject to a parental dispute.  There's no relevant content that couldn't theoretically be mentioned in father's bio instead.  Trout to the nominator for assuming bad faith about the article's purpose and for invoking G10 and A7.  Politrukki ( talk ) 16:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete - and a trout to whoever created this page.  This is totally inappropriate.  What the fuck? — Isaidnoway (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Chef Chioma: Being a wife of a notable person doesn't mean the wife should be notable.  No!  It's WP:INHERITED .  Besides, celebrities can be influential but not notable.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Women , Africa ,  and Nigeria .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  09:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] del - thoroughly nonnotable.  - Altenmann >talk 09:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I've reviewed the article and understand the nominee's concerns.  While Chef Chioma may be a notable figure in Nigeria, the article lacks sufficient reliable sources to establish their notability on a national or international level.  The content is also quite brief and doesn't provide enough context or depth to meet Wikipedia's standards.  Based on these factors, I support the deletion of the article.  - 2RDD Talk🔊 10:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable individual.  Article was previously deleted via an AFD discussion in May 2024.  Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ?  14:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Sunnydale School: Not enough in-depth coverage about this school to show notability.  Fails WP:GNG .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 11:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  PROMO, non-notable school.  The name is too common to try and find stuff about the school.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , no references cited in the article and the tone is blatantly promotional.  I had difficulties finding significant coverage .  Merko ( talk ) 18:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as blatant advertising.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 20:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete this is just an ad for the school and there are no references.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Article seems to be an NOR promotional essay.  I've placed a g11 speedy delete template on the article   but if that's denied it's a pretty clear delete per all the reasons cited here.  69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 15:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Non-notable school, and article is transparently promotional.  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 10:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Emir Uyar: Under these circumstances, can we get a G4 check?   -- Finngall talk 20:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Turkey .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and salt , WP:G4 , looks like a promotional piece to me, drawing on from the content and persistent recreation.  Aintabli ( talk ) 00:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As pointed out below, "Emir Uyar" has already been salted, but I intended to support salting the title with the disambiguation, "Emir Uyar (businessman)", which was the initial name of this entry (used to circumvent salt).  Aintabli ( talk ) 00:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and salt , WP:G4 , bare notability and promotional piece.  Infestor ( talk ) 08:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete but not salt – I don't think this article is promotional, and there is a hint of potential notability, but not just yet.  G4 is not right here.  There is a lot more coverage since 2017, and the past AfD had very little participation.  TLA tlak 03:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and salt , G4, no notability, it's PR.  Tehonk ( talk ) 01:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: As noted above, it’s already salted, so calling for that is redundant—it may simply be that the admin who moved the article to the salted title didn’t check that the create-protection was in place prior to doing so.   -- Finngall talk 05:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] well it should be taken as "keep salting" then :) Tehonk ( talk ) 08:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as G4 and salting of the disambiguation. Killarnee ( talk ) 01:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 22:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
The Nile Fc: I can't find any evidence of WP:GNG being met and WP:V might even be a concern.  Contrary to what the article says, they did not win the Egypt Cup in 2019.  That would be quite remarkable if a team formed in 2015 and playing in the 4th tier did.  I don't think that they even played in the qualifying rounds .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Egypt .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article was previously tagged for speedy delete as the article was an exact copy and paste from an article about a different club so it's irrelevant.  I don't follow sports but there aren't any sources referenced so it's highly possible that the information is incorrect.  -- Cosmic6811 🍁 ( T · C ) 16:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Sagwal: I cannot move this back to draft without the AfD process.  I am easy with returning this to draft, or with deleting it.  However, the creating editor has now moved it twice to mainspace.  There is a difficulty with the referencing: first they go Google Books.  They ought, if independent and reliable, be found on one of many sales sites.  I am having difficulty seeing how s the references used verify the claims made 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gollen unrelated except for the broad topic of the Ror,  Same creating editor 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Seunzzy Sax: The artist has little notability and the sources are poor at best.  333fortheain ( talk ) 12:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Suyash Kumar: Gaismagorm ( talk ) 17:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Travel and tourism ,  and India .  Gaismagorm ( talk ) 17:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Will Trafford: Sources 1 and 2 mention him and his resignation statement, but are largely about the resignation events and not him.  3 is a primary source summarizing his work, and 4 through 6 are articles he contributed to.  Source 7 is a duplicate of 1 and 8 makes no mention of him.  His resignation may merit a mention in the article on Whakaata Māori , but not a standalone BLP.  Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 09:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and New Zealand .  Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 09:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  The promotional tone of the article and the fact that its creator made only 20 edits, 8 of which is related to this article, calls for WP:G11 .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Muhammad Asyrof Al-Ghifari: Their sole accomplishment includes winning a local English-speaking competition and participating in a minor film project.  Additionally, the article's existence is partly attributed to their relation to Zakaria, which is another reason for considering its removal under WP:BIOFAMILY .  Ckfasdf ( talk ) 01:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Law ,  and Indonesia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 02:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Bacon Cajun Ranch McCrispy: A BEFORE has shown no sources that establish it.  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions .  —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts!  18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_McDonald's_products#Bacon_Cajun_Ranch_McCrispy .  Reywas92 Talk 19:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete a limited time fast food item has no place as a standalone article.  -1ctinus📝 🗨 23:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete or Redirect Limited time item with no analysis of cultural impact.  Article is not ready.  Evident to me that the user is currently just messing around on Wikipedia given edit summaries and uploads of images.  -- Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me .  05:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per 1ctinus and Classicwiki.  Doubtful that the article creator's account will be around much longer.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And now the article's been speedy deleted G5.  "I guess that concludes negotiations."  Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
LNER Class A3 2506 Salmon Trout: The locomotive was not preserved and has no claim to notability in the article.  This was created by a community-banned editor and is also eligible for deletion on that basis, see [46] .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to LNER Gresley Classes A1 and A3#Preservation .  Regardless of notability, this is a short article and LNER Gresley Classes A1 and A3 can use the additional information.  In other words, the AfDd article is an unjustified SPINOFF.  gidonb ( talk ) 16:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Kerry Xuefeng Chen: 虹易 ( talk ) 15:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Environment , Technology , Internet ,  and China .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ 虹易 Do you have any further arguments towards deletion besides association?  While it certainly needs work, the article seems okay at a glance from an inclusion standpoint.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 21:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : The article has been moved to draft space deleted per G5 .  @ 虹易 : The nominator may consider withdrawing and speedy keeping this discussion per WP:CSK #1, as the subject article no longer exists.  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 18:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Prince of Erebor Was it moved to draftspace or entirely deleted?  I wanted to look at it more...  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 22:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aaron Liu : Ah, my mistake.  The page has already been deleted by CactusWriter, instead of being moved to draftspace.  I guess you have to request for undeletion if you would like to continue working on the page.  — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 04:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Michael Quatrini: I find no sourcing for this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Florida .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Bridge India: Can't find any reliable or independent sources.  Page was previously deleted as well.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
DJ D. Pewee: Unknown-Tree🌲?  ( talk ) 02:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and Liberia .  Unknown-Tree🌲?  ( talk ) 02:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete , did not win awards claimed, nothing popping up for this guy at all.  Mach61 05:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not to be confused with Anderson . Paak's alter-ego, DJ Pee . Wee, this fellow has nothing for him.  Could not verify that he won the awards listed.  Why?  I Ask ( talk ) 09:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DDP DJ Dominic Pewe€ DJ D P and other discussions.  Long-term abuse.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Bir Uttam Shaheed Samad School and College: Appears to be a promo article for a secondary school for children of military personnel, mainly unsourced.  BEFORE found promo, listings, routine mill news, nothing that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth // Timothy :: talk 05:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] AfD from May 2023: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bir Uttam Shaheed Samad School and College , I can't see the original, but it may meet G4, based on the below, I've have G11'd it.  This is a official paid work by the institution and I have made by the institution order and this article represents a college in bangladesh.  It is not a fake article.  If anyone has trouble to believe it then you can visit the official website of the college and you can also check the Bengali Wikipedia, the college also has an article in the Bengali Wikipedia.  The institution offered me to make an English article of it.  So I think It should not be deleted from wikipedia.  This article is made with real sources.  -Thank you Ahsan26 ( talk ) 05:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
2024 North Las Vegas shooting: Given the number of fatalities, it could be notable if there was sustained coverage, but I don't see evidence of this.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 21:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Firearms ,  and Nevada .  Pbritti ( talk ) 21:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Pinging Johannes Maximilian as the editor who declined the draft.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 21:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It was.  I did it because of the number of fatalities and because it expanded beyond a domestic violence shooting, which aren't exactly uncommon in the United States.  Raskuly ( talk ) 22:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, there's no coverage in Gnews, at all.  I don't even see what's in the article online, meaning it's been buried by other sources...  This is not a notable event with no lasting notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fine, can I just have my article deleted already?  Raskuly ( talk ) 02:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS .  Mass shootings are awful but are an everyday occurrence, and not every one automatically warrants an article.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 01:09, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fine, can I just have my article deleted already?  Raskuly ( talk ) 02:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete