hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Jacob Bredesen: Sources are primary, local news or trivial/passing mentions, political achievements are in a tiny municipality.  Geschichte ( talk ) 05:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Politicians , Video games , Norway ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Several of the sources are the Norwegian national broadcaster NRK, where he is not just trivially mentioned / passing.  There are more sources and articles online not referenced in the article.  Political work also not really in the local municipal level, but rather the county level, there is among other things debates with parliamentarians and criticism of cabinet policies, and most of the sources I at least find cover non local issues.  However I do agree that the wording and structure suffers from puffery.  I am trying to create articles and content that cover this area, as Wiki was previously missing a lot of content from it.  Tried to understand the notability guidelines, but perhaps they are stricter than I was aware.  There are several more individuals I was planning to do biographies of, that have made an impact in the Nordfjord region, so it would be good to understand how high the bar is before I continue this work.  A lot of those have a few national articles (such as the case here) and a large amount of local and regional coverage.  I was under the assumption that a few national + lots of local / regional would be enough, assuming they are not passing mentions / minor comments in larger articles.  Nordfjording ( talk ) 10:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 03:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Zahedan Stadium: Should be included in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zahedan#Sports Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 15:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the header that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Iran .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep AfD is not for merge requests, and I think both of the sources in the article demonstrate notability when translated.  I just don't know how to do a WP:BEFORE search for this one, but stadiums of this capacity are generally notable.  SportingFlyer T · C 18:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to Zahedan#Sports no coverage for its own article.  Giant Snowman 16:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Keep or merge?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  01:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I added translations of both reference titles.  I think the article is notable because it has good multiple references, even though it is a stub.  I also moved the coordinates into the infobox.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 03:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
White House debate competition hoax: Some kid made a hoax that got a little press coverage.  WP:ONEEVENT definitely applies here.  Angryapathy ( talk ) 16:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Seems well-sourced.  Neutral in tone, I think it's ok.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Events ,  and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge selectively to Mass media in Bangladesh .  There's no reason why this one-off event with no lasting effects should have its own article.  The target article, on the other hand, could benefit from a few sentences about this as part of a broader coverage of the topic's history.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 19:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Candice Towler-Green: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and United Kingdom .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:SKATER.  -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 15:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: A WP:BEFORE came up with the following sources: [ [42] ][ [43] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Kaatrukkenna Veli (TV series): Tirishan ( talk ) 22:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the article is well sourced.  DareshMohan ( talk ) 02:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I disagree: Source 1's inline citation is incorrect and only is routine coverage about the serial's plot on the first episode Source 2 is a mention of the serial's actors only, and does say anything other than it is a remake Source 3 is only a trivial mention of the serial, with the same coverage as source 2 Source 4 is primary, the serial's page on Hotstar Source 5 is routine coverage about time change Source 6 is routine coverage about an actress leaving the serial, and is mainly a POV of her about this Source 7 is routine coverage about an actor leaving the serial to act in a movie Source 8 is about an actor's death Source 9 is routine update on the serial's story Source 10 is repeat of source 8 Source 11 is routine coverage of actor change Source 12 is about an actress getting vaccinated Source 13 is only a trivial mention of the serial, like source 2 Karnataka ( talk ) 19:25, 9 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 00:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : there’s a source from The Times of India [35] and News18 India .  There may be important updates in the future because the show is still airing.  -- P.Karthik.95 ( talk ) 09:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The source linked here is Source 2 on the eval.  Please explain these "important updates", as there have currently been none so far in it's airing period.  Until then, this is WP:TOOSOON for an article.  Karnataka ( talk ) 23:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Aleksandr Anichenko: PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Azerbaijan .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - She has participated in more than 3 Olympic [44] while presenting her country, She ought to be notable.  Otbest ( talk ) 18:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSKATE and WP:NOLY .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Ted Tracey: DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 05:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - [9] is all I can find from a search and it does not mention the subject.  Possible hoax?  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 04:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly not a hoax; multiple national titles and long racing career, as covered in The Press newspaper between 1978 and 1988 at PapersPast .  The Press is the only NZ newspaper currently with full online coverage from this period.  Given that Tracey was from Auckland, and The Press is a Christchurch newspaper, it is safe to assume that there would be even fuller and more extensive coverage in the New Zealand Herald and Auckland Star newspapers during that period.  Paora ( talk ) 09:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was hoping to find more... [10] is a mention by another individual.  Was hoping Trove from Australia's national library would have something [11] , they don't; I wonder if he's too modern to be in there.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Even in the Wikipedia Library link there isn't much to be found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : Did you look at the PapersPast search results ?  Paora ( talk ) 11:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] First one's the best, rest are trivial mentions, still not enough to build an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : Tracey was inducted into the New Zealand Speedway Hall of Fame in 2012 [12] .  Article here on Tracey from Speedway Racing , November 1984.  Paora ( talk ) 00:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b : Here's an article profiling Tracey in the Indianapolis Star of 25 September 1983.  Paora ( talk ) 01:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I've struck my vote, now Neutral .  The IndyStar article is good.  The other sourcing isn't enough for me to ! vote keep but I recognize the WP:POTENTIAL for further offline articles to exist for a subject whose activities far predated mass use of the internet.  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 02:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Pavleen Gujral: Web series, non-speaking/small parts - the actors and actresses she has worked with do not confer notability.  Fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Delhi .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep the actor has played lead starring roles in Angry Indian Goddesses , Bhor (film) and Sukhee and major roles in Marzi (TV series) , City of Dreams (TV series) , Gehraiyaan and notable roles in many other and There are also independent coverages of the person on web.  I strongly believe that the person is notable and passes WP:NACTOR.  Shivangi1738 ( talk ) 07:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Notable person.  Citadeol (talk) 10:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please offer more thoughtful rationales than merely "Keep" with no further explanation.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, Has played major and notable roles in movies and television.  Supercat9906 ( talk ) 06:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Doms (company): Charlie ( talk ) 12:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Charlie ( talk ) 12:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Gujarat .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It is notable enough to have an article बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 01:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:GNG . -- Dwaipayan ( talk ) 16:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - The sourcing on this article is very (very) substandard, with most sources just being a copy and paste of previous press releases.  There is one specific article, the one published by Outlook Magazine which seems to a semi interview which disqualifies it as a non third-party source.  The livemint.com article does seem promising, but that was the only reliable source I could find.  However, one good source does not satisfy the 'multiple' clause of NCORP making this a delete in my opinion.  -- Sohom ( talk ) 22:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 05:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Asiricomedy: RATIONALE: The article is filled with interviews from different reliable sources making them non-independent and thus failing the general notability guidelines.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 02:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Authors ,  and Nigeria .  Reading Beans ( talk ) 02:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I think this one is quite hard.  I agree with the nom that the sources on the page are generally weak and many/most appear to be interviews in the Nigerian press.  On the other hand, I don't have full access to the Nigerian press at it seems to me at least possible that he is a well-known and noted comedian there.  The guff on a deleted-and-recreated page makes me wonder about COI issues.  I'm not sure how to untangle these thoughts.  JMWt ( talk ) 16:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, Nigerian sources are to taken with a pinch of salt.  As a Nigerian I know when something is done for promo.  I can bet on that.  Also, I have never heard of this comedian (which is not why I nominated it), so, he is not well known or noted here.  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 19:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural keep .  No vaild deletion rationale was brought forward.  The intro is focused on the references, rather than the sources out there.  It is also focused on references that are not good, and it is unclear if a serious search for good sources was conducted.  Nothing is clear from this nomination.  gidonb ( talk ) 18:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Godswill Obinna Ejianya: As always, businesspeople are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourcing -- but of the six footnotes here, two of them (actually one, reduplicated as two distinct footnotes for no obvious reason) are just "covering" him in the context of turning 50, which is not a notability claim in and of itself, and the other four are all covering him in the context of receiving a local "man of the year" award that isn't highly prominent enough to be a notability-making award.  And even more interestingly, those four sources are all virtually identical in wording despite seemingly coming from four different media outlets, meaning that it's really either a wire service article or a self-published press release from the subject.  But four media outlets reprinting the same article adds up to one GNG point, not four — we're counting the number of distinct articles , not the number of newspapers that reprint the same article — which means he hasn't actually been shown to pass GNG.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have more sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Bearcat ( talk ) 12:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7 and/or G11.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus