Sarah Rose Karr : Done very little.  True CRaysball | #RaysUp 16:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  True CRaysball | #RaysUp 16:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Done enough to meet WP:NACTOR, though, with significant roles in notable films.  Keep . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 18:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps done very little but I knew I'd seen her somewhere else when watching kindergarten cop.  2601:5CF:4200:9340:FC10:5F8C:63A2:40BF ( talk ) 01:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Her filmography probably satisfies WP:NACTOR , however, all the sources I've found about her are primarily about those films she was in (with Sarah being more of a footnote in them), and she appears to have completely avoided the public eye for the past ~29 years (since the end of her child acting career).  Refraining from voting either way because not sure what the policy is in these situations.  🔥HOT m̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃ 🔥 ( talk ・ edits ) 18:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The policy is that "notability is not temporary" . ... If she was notable enough for a Wikipedia article at any point during her career, she'll be notable enough forever.  T1980 ( talk ) 15:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some coverage here, but not enough for our purposes.  [18] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is about typical of the coverage in newspapers from the time [19] Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep Meets  WP:NACTOR and she received considerable media coverage during her acting career.  Under Wikipedia rules Notability is NOT Temporary (emphasis mine) -- T1980 ( talk ) 15:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find any in-depth coverage about her which is not surprising for a child actor.   Everything is brief mentions including the cited source so we have no material with which to write a biography.   As noted above, she has "pretty much disappeared" according to this article and "has stayed firmly away from he limelight, with little reference to her career or any of her personal endeavours online" per this one (neither are great sources but all I could find).   Given this is a WP:BLP that does not meet WP:GNG , I think we should follow her lead.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete