hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sherry Finzer : I can't find a single reliable secondary source independent of the subject covering her in detail.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 13:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women , Spirituality , United States of America ,  and Arizona .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 13:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not sure the multiple Zone awards count for notability.  The Rochester club award surely isn't.  I don't see coverage beyond confirmation of various performances in my searches.  What's used is largely red or yellow links per Source Highlighter.  PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet criterion WP:GNG . -- Bexaendos ( talk ) 18:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Threshold (Doctor Who) : Doesn't seem to meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Some behind the scenes information may exist in physical sources, but I doubt that would be enough to justify the existence of this article.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 21:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Quick Quokka [⁠ talk • contribs ] 00:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unsourced text slab for totally non-notable entity.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 12:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources, and none have been found to prove notability.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough coverage can be found to pass the WP:GNG .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found no evidence that WP:GNG is met.  Please ping me if good sources are identified.  Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk ) 21:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom – zmbro ( talk ) ( cont ) 18:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Basen Murmu : The previous AfD was closed as a soft delete.  I searched for reliable, independent sources with significant information but found nothing to establish the subject as notable.  Grab Up - Talk 07:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , India ,  and Odisha .  Grab Up - Talk 07:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A quick search does not bring any reliable sources, and the sources in the article also does not pass the WP:DEPTH requirement.  Ferdinand Marcos's dead (and weird) soul ( talk ) 07:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I agree: no evidence of notability.  Despite that, I have made a couple of corrections to overcome the absurdies about his age.  Athel cb ( talk ) 08:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have added the reference which mentions his age.  ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ ( talk ) 08:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There's coverage from a newspaper and a television station.  That probably adds up to notability.  Лисан аль-Гаиб ( talk ) 09:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hardly any coverage for this fellow.  Few reports of his death, but that's not notable.  I don't see much we can use here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor unreliable sources on the page.  Nothing notable on the page to warrant an article on this subject.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I searched a lot for WP:RS independent sources with WP:SIGCOV information but found nothing.  Youknow?  ( talk ) 15:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ITKO : Orange Mike | Talk 03:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Aside from routine company inception and takeover information, the article text at outset and now is largely about iTKO's LISA testing product, which, following a series of acquisitions, is now part of Broadcom 's DevTest Portfolio [40] .  Searches are not finding evidence of attained notability for the former firm or for the product.  AllyD ( talk ) 11:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't seem to find anything useful on the company, but the product may be notable: MacVittie, Lori.   Lisa: More Than a Pretty Face.  Network Computing .  2006;17(22):36–38.  (I don't have access to this but according to the abstract, it's a full-length review.)  Cithan, Rick.   LISA Smiles on J2EE App Testers.  InfoWorld .  2005;27(2):25–26.  (This one is available via EBSCOhost.)  Pollice, Gary.   LISA 2.5.  Software Development .  2005;13(6):44.  ISSN 1070-8588 (Couldn't find this online either, the journal's title is hardly helpful in that.) Maybe this could be spun off into an article on that, but that would require someone who could get the sources.  Failing that, my ! vote is delete .  -- Maddy from Celeste ( WAVEDASH ) 16:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Xavier Dupré : The sources I've found through searching and looking at the English, Arabic, and German wikis appear to mostly be commercial websites selling fonts (including his own), about the font rather than him, or dead and unarchived websites.  The most promising site, the TDC's, seems to offer coverage for paying members.  He seems to have won awards, but I can't find information about the notability of those awards.  Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk ) 03:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk ) 03:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk ) 03:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I am not finding independent reliable sourcing on the web for this article.  The improperly embedded links in the article are to sites selling the fonts, not a discussion of the fonts.  The improperly embedded links to awards are dead.  Fails WP:ARTIST .  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 02:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Antonio Telari : C 679 04:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Italy .  C 679 04:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  C 679 05:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – With only database sources listed, this article is certainly not notable.  He only played one match at senior level before playing in lower leagues then disappeared.  All I could find were a passing mention and unrelated politician named Michele Telari .  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Formally passes WP:FOOTYN after playing one match in Serie A, but there are no secondary sources that would help pass WP:SIGCOV .  I only found statistics.  Tau Corvi ( talk ) 14:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
I'm Twenty Something : In any case, it's not enough for WP:GNG or WP:NFILM - "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." or indeed any other WP:NFILM criterion.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 13:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film ,  and Lithuania .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 13:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:17, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete - to me this is borderline.  There ARE citations, but I'm doubtful that most could pass muster as reliable secondary sources, and none of them indicate sustained notability.  Of note: references 1 and 10 are the same web page.  Moonreach ( talk ) 20:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mirela Sula : SmartSE ( talk ) 15:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United Kingdom .  SmartSE ( talk ) 15:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople ,  and Women .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ramaiah Institute of Management Studies : Rejected at AfC but moved into main space regardless.  No point in moving back, as already rejected, and BEFORE came up with nothing that would establish notability.  (If doing a search, note that this is different from Ramaiah Institute of Management despite the similar name.)  Fails WP:GNG / WP:NSCHOOL .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 09:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management , Education , India ,  and Karnataka . DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 09:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt The article has been repeatedly created many previous times, at AfC and otherwise. The editor in question has attempted to falsify a record of AfC acceptance. There's a lot of sockpuppetry and WP:NOTHERE going on and wider administrator attention is probably warranted. Fermiboson ( talk ) 13:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Updating that the author has been blocked for spam and sock. Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Its been edited now and removed all promotional aspects. It is one of the premier colleges in Bangalore Bharathrajanna ( talk ) 06:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Bharathrajanna : , please review the notices on your talk page. A response is appreciated. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete at this time because I have not reviewed the article in depth, but can see that its originators are attempting to bulldoze it into article space.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 15:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Advert, fails WP:NCORP .   COI or UPE?  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NCORP .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as per nom K-Pop contributor ( ✍️ • 📚 ) 09:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Certainly promotional and/or non-notable.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 20:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Welp, noting the keep argument felt a little spammy to me.  Their effort to despamiate was not wholly successful.  Does not meet WP:NCORP .  FWIW, subject does not meet WP:GNG .  COI/UPE?  COI admitted but UPE denied by one sock.  Had they not created WP:ARTSPAM , would we care?  Noting for transparency that I came here from the unblock request of the afore mentioned  sock puppet.  --  Deepfriedokra ( talk ) 15:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Annalena Ley : I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG ; this is what I did come across.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Chile .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not enough coverage of this individual, outside of the Olympics website.  [2] .  I don't see enough sourcing to build an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I vote to delete this article for now due to the lack of reliable sources.  However, if more information becomes available in the future, the article could be recreated.  Waqar 💬 17:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Municipal elections in Ababuj : Electoral record for a single-person council in a place with a current population of seventy-seven.  We can debate how big or notable a place has to be to have a spin-off article about its politics (1M? 100K? 10K?), but it's probably not a place as populated as a rather busy subway carriage.  No opposition to putting this material on the main village article, with sources of course, or simply just the list of mayors if it's overkill to consider the entire voting history of this little place Unknown Temptation ( talk ) 15:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Spain .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karl Solomon : This is the best I could find.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , United Kingdom ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bubai Singh : The best sources found were Indian Sports News and an unreliable Blogspot page .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom.  ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 15:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Northeast Alliance : Fails WP:GNG , WP:NOTNEWS // Timothy :: talk 02:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation , Massachusetts ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete information can be added to American Airlines and JetBlue .  seperate page is unnecessary SurferSquall ( talk ) 22:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Briden : A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to East Providence, Rhode Island .  toweli ( talk ) 13:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Law , United States of America ,  and Rhode Island .  toweli ( talk ) 13:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Can't find any non-independent sourcing showing that either his legal or political career was notable, and East Providence is not large enough to give inherited notability to mayors.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 04:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears to be little coverage of him beyond the routine and local.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage beyond local newspapers.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 12:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all of the above , and for two additional reasons.  As a mayor of a city of 47,139 , he fails my standards for mayor , and also my standards for attorneys .  Bearian ( talk ) 21:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Phocas Software : Looks like an advert, and the sourcing I found is mainly PR like stories.  The industry recognition hardly adds to notability.  Fails WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software , England ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep I cleaned up the article a bit, removed unsourced sections and primary sources.  Company is covered by Gartner .  The sources is a press release as Gartner reports are only available for a fee, but the fact that Gartner had covered them should be considered as one good citation.  The company was also in Deloitte Technology Fast 50.  In addition, The Australian Financial Review has 2 articles on them.  Any COI issues should be addressed outside AFD.  Bikerose ( talk ) — Preceding undated comment added 02:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the AFR coverage is actually OK, but it's just one source – we need multiple sources to satisfy NCORP.  Apart from the AFR, there are a few promising pieces ( SmartCompany being a representative example) but they're all ultimately too reliant on information from company spokespeople to be properly independent.  There's a bit of coverage in region-specific sources (e.g. New Zealand, Orange, and Coventry newspapers) that take the angle "company brings jobs to region", but again these reports rely too heavily on these spokespeople and don't provide independent analysis.  I don't necessarily agree Gartner coverage contributes to notability; I would need to see what specific coverage is relied upon.  Deloitte Fast 50 is a clearly trivial source .  It's closer than many businesses to passing NCORP, but it's not yet there.  In the end, the version of this article put up for deletion was so grossly promotional and undersourced that we're not losing much by deleting it.  – Tera tix ₵ 14:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , although the company has been mentioned by analyst firms, for example Gartner (Magic Quadrant for BI and Analytics Platforms 2015 - company only gets a mere mention in the "Other Modern" category) and Forrester Wave Enterprise Business Intelligence Platforms 2015, neither conducted an in-depth review of the company nor their product, so those reports fail the criteria for establisting notability.  HighKing ++ 10:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete