hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Norman, California: This location is just a named railway point with no population.   One of dozens of stubs on nonexistent or non-notable California locations created in a short period by the same user, based on nothing but GNIS coordinates (which do not establish notability).   The fact that there was once a post office does not contribute to notability, since pre-1900 rural post offices in the US were often nothing more than private residences.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 18:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 18:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete This shows yet another limitation of the GNIS methodology, which is that they located the place by the label's location on the map, which is naturally in wherever there is a convenient blank spot on the map.  The actual Norman, the topos made clear, was a siding on the west side of the tracks, and all the buildings indicated (except one latecomer) were on the west side of the road.  Naturally the label ended up in the field east of all this.  The oldest aerial shows a few buildings along the E-W road, all of them wiped out by construction of the exit ramps when the road was relocated.  I don't see enough here to suggest this was an actual town.  Mangoe ( talk ) 19:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep due to having a post office in the 19th century.  (Durham, David L. (1998).  California's Geographic Names: A Gazetteer of Historic and Modern Names of the State.  Clovis, Calif.: Word Dancer Press.  p. 285.) बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 01:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Did you read the nomination statement?  US post offices back in the day were not necessarily in settlements.  Mangoe ( talk ) 03:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence that this was actually a settlement, much less a notable one.  Sources only describe a post office and railway station.  – dlthewave ☎ 11:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Post offices could be (and actually may still be) temporary facilities established in stores or even individual homes, and are not evidence of legal recognition.  GNIS does not prove legal recognition per WP:GEOLAND .  Maps also can't be used to show legal recognition - they just indicate a point on the map.  People who lived near this point on the map also do not show notability.  It goes without saying that a phot of an eclipse proves nothing about the site.  FOARP ( talk ) 13:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mayyank Sharrma: No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability per WP:GNG or WP:NBIO , neither does with WP:NDIRECTOR .  Also, created by an WP:UPE sockfarm — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 14:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , India , Haryana ,  and Punjab .  — DaxServer ( t · m · e · c ) 14:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A mediocre filmography without much notability does not make the filmmaker notable in the first place, especially when none of which link to an existing article.  HarukaAmaranth ( 話 ) 21:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sharon Teterai: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Zimbabwe .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 08:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wendy Corcho: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination, the article fails WP:GNG .  As per my research, it also seems to be a case of WP:BLP1E .  She seems to only be notable because of her one appearance for the Cuba women's national football team .  IncompA 21:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdulrazak Yusuf: More importantly, I can't find any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC .  According to Livesport he played for Niger Tornadoes F.C. for a short while but I can't find anything close to significant coverage and it doesn't look like he got much playing time with them either.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  The lack of coverage makes it impossible to establish basic information.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no basis for an article per the mentioned guidelines.  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of NBA Sunday Showcase on ABC results: Nor does this list serve a valid navigational purpose; the individual games are not notable.  Wikipedia is WP:NOT a collection of (even interesting) information.  Obviously a lot of work went into this page, but unfortunately I don't see any notability interest that warrants keeping it.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Basketball , Lists ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Contains barely anything else other than WP:PRIMARY .  A list that can be useful as a seasonal page but that already exists.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT that fails WP:LISTN .  It's not even useful as trivia.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 16:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources discussing these results are lacking here.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
StarGames: Paradoctor ( talk ) 20:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Paradoctor ( talk ) 20:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Finland ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : It appears that this article is somehow about three entities with this name, none of which appear to be related to each other.  While I don't have any real opinion at this time, this is probably one of those titles where it may be little surprise that this is a magnet for such swerving between multiple questionably (if at all) notable topics, at least some of which is promotional.  There may well be relatively little here that's actually worth keeping.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah, thanks, that didn't register with me. I had assumed the equipment and event business was a precursor to the sports marketer, and the casino site a side business.  I stand corrected.  Paradoctor ( talk ) 21:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I think this is a WP:TNT case, basically per Wcquidditch.  Maybe even worth salting to prevent more recreation and hijacking.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 20:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the original article was about the sports marketing company sourced with press releases and non-RS.  Later is was hijacked (2018?) and proceeded to get worse from there.  WP:TNT is best option.  S0091 ( talk ) 16:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hiral Radadiya: I cannot find significant coverage to show how this person meets WP:GNG .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 22:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Gujarat .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No significant coverage , fails WP:GNG .  GAGIWOR ( talk ) 04:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete B-grade adult actress with coverage in questionable sources.  Sk1728 ( talk ) 10:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per NACTOR.  Bhivuti45 ( talk ) 18:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no coverage by reliable sources.  Contributor892z ( talk ) 19:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Auslogics BoostSpeed: StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and as marginally WP:SPAM .  There are little more than press releases and industry media as unreliable sources .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Previous instances were deleted at AfD before the present instance was created (via AfC) in 2012.  The given sources appear to have been announcement-based, mostly now gone.  In the present article, there is a mix of content about the company (insufficient for WP:NCORP ), this product's features, and concerns about this type of product; none of these nor anything found in searches provides evidence that the previous AfD decisions should be set aside.  AllyD ( talk ) 14:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
London Film Week: Can't seem to find much online either.  Fails WP:GNG from what I see.  TLA (talk) 10:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It has no sources and I also can't find any other reliable sources online, only mentions on unsuitable websites.  Thebookstamper ( talk ) 12:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events ,  and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Villawood East Public School: Primary schools are rarely notable.  Sources provided are all primary.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 11:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] At the moment Targetinmotion ( talk ) 11:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing to suggest notability.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 13:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The only recent coverage I could find was of some kid who was bullied, which unfortunately happens all the time.  Agree that it fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Deauthorized .  ( talk ) 14:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found stories about a bullying incident, a donation of books and an industrial action.  Nothing that's specifically about the school in and of its self as a topic of discussion.  TarnishedPath talk 22:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
St. Louis Metro Collegiate Baseball League: There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Illinois ,  and Missouri .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject fails WP:GNG due to a lack of secondary coverage.  User:Let'srun 02:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails GNG.  Wizardman 13:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joerg Stadler: (VRT Ticket 2024051410010337)  Geoff | Who, me?  13:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Appears to have been a prolific character actor, his most well-known role is likely the "Saving Private Ryan" appearance.  I don't find any sourcing about him, appears marginally notable.  I'm ok with the subject's request for deletion, there isn't a strong case to ! keep.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Germany ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Michael Malatin: Batmanthe8th ( talk ) 17:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Hospital parking executives are not notable, even what's used for sourcing now is simple confirmation of employment.  I don't find anything about this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  There were attempts to speedy delete this article in 2012 when it was created.  It has not improved.  I don't know why it was retained at that time but it is clearly promotional and does not meet GNG.  Lamona ( talk ) 15:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:MILL and WP:SIGCOV .  There are just no sources that show this person is notable.  A CEO is never notable per se - there are tens of thousands of similarly situated persons.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Young (political operative): All of the relevant information in this article is present in John Edwards extramarital affair already.  Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Politics ,  and North Carolina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Notable for only one scandal involving a political candidate.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 00:53, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Impericon: Found no independent sources online.  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 10:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Germany .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 10:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP:NWEB as there is no independent coverage about it.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete the page Impericon because does not claim notability and not any significant coverage found.  𝑆𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 ( talk ) 15:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdullah Majrashi (footballer, born 1990): My Arabic searches are yielding coverage about Abdullah Majrashi (footballer, born 1997) and Ali Majrashi but nothing about the one born in 1990.  No evidence that this footballer complies with WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC #5.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chuck Merriman: Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 15:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Martial arts ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails GNG, notability for martial artists and coaches.  Nswix ( talk ) 17:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since our subject does not meet the basic notability criteria or even the criteria for MMA athletes .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 20:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails notability.  As per nom.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 12:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hotel Burgas Beach: Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG , WP:NCORP or WP:NBUILD .  Not every 4 star hotel is automatically notable (in fact, this source says that it's only a 3 star).  I can't find any evidence of historical, architectural or cultural significance to warrant an entire article of its own here.  It is listed in all of the usual hotel booking websites but I can't find any independent journalism.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Travel and tourism ,  and Bulgaria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete