Liam Naylor : JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Redirect.  I'd also classify it as WP:TOOSOON , as the article only lists minimal play.  Also, he's 22.  Nobody expects the UnexpectedSmoreInquisition ( talk )!  03:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Scotland ODI cricketers Doesn't seem to be enough coverage currently for a WP:GNG pass, however their is a suitable redirect here per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  International cricketer for a leading associate, in the nascent stage of his career.  More sources likely to become available.  StickyWicket aka AA ( talk ) 11:07, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Respectfully, the article needs to prove notability at the time of it's inception.  I think @ Rugbyfan22 's redirect suggestion is best.  Nobody expects the UnexpectedSmoreInquisition ( talk )!  22:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  03:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : notable per independent, reliable 2 refs added since the deletion nomination; both are from the Liverpool Echo [23] [24] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 16:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment -- GNG states that "a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source."  JTtheOG ( talk ) 21:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] JTtheOG , thanks for pointing that out -- I'd never noticed that footnote ( Wikipedia:Notability#Notes , footnote 4) .  My interpretation is that "a series of publications" does not refer to 2 or more unconnected articles.  I suspect footnote 4 probably refers to serialized content (for example, a 3-day, 3-part series on a given topic).  If that's correct, I don't think the footnote applies to this subject.  Over the course of 100s of AfDs [25] [26] , I've never seen this footnote invoked before -- this makes me think this is a narrow rule. Otherwise, we'd be tossing articles just because a subject's multiple references are only to New York Times articles or to Economist articles. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 23:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is humbling.  After saying I've never seen footnote 4 come up before, this was just raised 4 hours ago at Articles for deletion/Sangramsingh Thakur .  That said, I still think this refers to serialized content.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your response.  I think that this is a very reasonable interpretation of the excerpt.  I can't say that I've seen this exact quote used in an AfD before, although I've seen the principal applied in a couple of sportspeople AfDs.  Cheers, JTtheOG Redirect per

Discussion outcome: redirect