hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Joe Carter (reporter): Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 02:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , Television , Colorado ,  and Florida .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 02:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Steakvault who created the article, and nothing else, was immediately blocked as a Spam-advertising only account.  — Maile ( talk ) 02:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Advertising , Sports , Georgia (U.S. state) , Illinois ,  and South Carolina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
QUEST Honors Fellows Program: Appears to be an ad.  AviationFreak 💬 02:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business ,  and Education .  AviationFreak 💬 02:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails the GNG, article is promo as it stands.  User:Let'srun 20:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bezel Engine: Most of the sources I could find were primary sources from Nintendo, blogs, or press releases.  A quick search through Japanese sources provided nothing of use.  Sparkl talk 01:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software .  Sparkl talk 01:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear notable.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 06:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tanner Stransky: Boleyn ( talk ) 15:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Journalism ,  and New York .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST .  - UtherSRG (talk) 17:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2020 Women's Bandy World Championship squads: PROD would likely be contested based on some similar PRODs that I've done recently.  I oppose merging to 2020 Women's Bandy World Championship on the basis that the article is completely unsourced.  I can't think of any good reason to keep this.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and Lists of people .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan , Estonia , Finland , Norway , Russia , Sweden , Switzerland ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete only 1 notable entry.  Fails WP:NLIST .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator.  It fails WP:NLIST and I also don’t think a merge is suitable.  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 18:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2021 Mumbai hospital fire: Only a brief burst of breaking news coverage that does not fulfill WP:GNG or WP:SUSTAINED .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 02:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and India .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 02:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Next Manipur Legislative Assembly election: Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it.  Should be recreated closer to the election, once actual sources start discussing it.  For similar recent AfDs, see - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Next_Goa_Legislative_Assembly_election (July 2022), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Goa Legislative Assembly election (2nd nomination) (2 April), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Goa Legislative Assembly election (19 May), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election (19 May) Soni ( talk ) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India .  Soni ( talk ) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  I saw this long ago and lost track of it, cuz I was going to nom if for same reason.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 13:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Manipur-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Next elections pass WP:CRYSTAL .  I'm not sure what makes this one different.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There will be a number of duplicate comments on this given how 5 different AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read).  So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation of NCRYSTAL and similar on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Assam Legislative Assembly election instead of replying the same things 5x.  I'll keep finding sources or replying about sources in each specific AFD.  Soni ( talk ) 23:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Same here too.  WP:TOOSOON .  Way down in the future and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it a collection of unverifiable content.  RangersRus ( talk ) 11:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2027 Goa Legislative Assembly election: Nothing about the election has been declared yet, no WP:RS are currently talking about it.  Should be recreated closer to 2027 when we have actual sources discussing the election.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Democratic Party presidential primaries for a similar recent AFD Soni ( talk ) 07:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , India ,  and Goa .  Soni ( talk ) 07:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have now noticed a series of articles under the Template:Next Indian elections .  I was not aware of the remaining articles, and the standard to call them "Next".  I'm not now unsure if there's a broader consensus at play; if not, one should be established.  Either will make deleting all early "Next articles" easier, or we could add talk page notes to not nominate any of them for deletion.  Soni ( talk ) 07:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Since the template also got tagged for deletion separately, here's all the next election articles from the template; these may need revisiting if this AFD closes as Delete - Next Assam Legislative Assembly election , Next Kerala Legislative Assembly election , Next Manipur Legislative Assembly election , Next Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election , Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election The articles this probably does not affect are - Next Bihar Legislative Assembly election and Next Delhi Legislative Assembly election (probably in 2025), Next Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election (probably in 2026).  All of them already have RS discussing them Soni ( talk ) 12:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:ATD-R: Goa Legislative Assembly .  Too early!  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 08:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Goa Legislative Assembly : Too Early, if opinion polls would begin, then it would be ok else Redirect for now.  ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️ ( 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔 ) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Same here.  WP:TOOSOON .  Way down in the future for year 2027 and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it a collection of unverifiable content.  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Another WP:TOOSOON article.  Clearly not ready for mainspace.  Based Kashmiri TALK 10:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Minha vida de trás pra frente: This is a case of WP:SPAM and WP:PAID .  None of the sources in the article are reliable or " significant coverage " of the book.  This is simply another attempt to use Wikipedia as a means for promotion.  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 01:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Brazil .  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 01:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Source 5 looks promising, but the book's title doesn't appear in the pdf of the article at all, nor does the author's name; something looks fishy here.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete appears to be HOAX or using sources that don't mention the book as some sort of PROMO.  Not cool.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Other sources are an Amazon listing for the book, a personal website, a youtube interview, and it goes downhill from there.  Using self-authored sources and a sales site don't contribute to notability, source 5 is just not mentioning the book.  I gave up after that.  HOAX PROMO appears to be a thing now.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Kacamata : Considering Luciareis' continued conflict of interest violations, you may want to file a report of Luciareis at WP:COIN .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Golden State Collegiate Baseball League: There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Baseball , United States of America ,  and California .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 13:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  My searches did not turn up WP:SIGCOV of the type needed to satisfy WP:GNG .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 16:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find any WP:GNG level coverage for this subject.  Let'srun ( talk ) 22:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kataxenna Kova: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject fails WP:GNG .  She doesn’t seem to be notable.  -- Meligirl5 ( talk ) 09:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Despite the WP:OVERKILL of citations, there is actually little of merit , if at all.  We have one kamikaze account creating this purely promotional text and another one "curating" it.  Such shenanigans rarely help.  Forensics without pain: promotional interviews such as this or this ; advertorials , such as this ; typical listings in models' listings, e.g. this one (all this bandwidth crop amounts to is to verify our subject is indeed a model); a news item, from a website called BLURB, about a book that, among many other models contains pics of our subject; typical announcements of events in local media, e.g. here ; and so much more of the same.  There is truly nothing out there.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christopher Olsen: The only sources cited here that mention him are listings of his entries into school science fairs.  Can't find anything about his company, or that he appeared on Fox & Friends .  Falls well short of WP:BIO and WP:GNG .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Health and fitness , Engineering , Technology ,  and New York .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage of this person.  Lots of obituaries, one local article about a student with the same name who was sent home to change over supposed "offensive" wording on a shirt, which wouldn't help with notability even if it was this individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – It appears this person is referred to Chris Olsen.  Found this from Times Herald-Record, though I'm not sure if it is independent enough.  TLA tlak 13:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktreee b BrigadierG ( talk ) 18:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jean-Paul Adela: The best sources that I can find are Nation 1 and Nation 2 , both from the same newspaper and both only mentioning Adela once in passing.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  There are 250 million other footballers like him, I don't see how he stands out.  Obviously we can't have 250 million articles about each of them.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 23:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Billy Sánchez: The two government positions he held do not confer notability, nor does the scandal.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 10:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Puerto Rico .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The subject, Billy Sánchez, does not appear to meet the notability criteria outlined in WP:GNG due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.  The references provided do not establish the depth of coverage necessary for notability.  The incident of alleged domestic abuse, while potentially notable, does not in itself confer notability on the biography subject per WP:BLP1E, unless it resulted in significant coverage about him beyond the incident.  The article may fail WP:POLITICIAN as the role of Sergeant-at-Arms, without additional significant coverage, may not be enough to establish notability...  Cray04 ( talk ) 11:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: The one commenter so far, Cray04, has been checkuser-blocked.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Sandstein 13:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : name is too common to find anything about this person, what's used in the article now is primary sourcing and one article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :Could not find independent, in-depth sources.  At best a very marginally notable individual.  As such, given that the main coverage is negative, I think it best to delete per WP:BLPREMOVE and WP:NPF.  78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 17:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Solidarity Party Youth League: AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Sweden .  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - we almost always delete the stubs of youth arms of minor parties.  Bearian ( talk ) 13:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fawn Rogers: Can find virtually no coverage by reliable sources, seems to exist only to promote the subject F ASTILY 07:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women , Photography ,  and Oregon .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding significant coverage or evidence that this artist is in any collections.  The "Publications" section of the article is particularly puffy.  It is basically a listing of press releases.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 17:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  promo cv.  128.252.210.1 ( talk ) 19:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete