hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Presbyterian Reformed Church (North America): All sources in article are primary sources direct to the subject's own webpage.  WP:BEFORE search is tricky because of the common name (similarly named churches in Cuba, Africa, etc.) but turns up nothing to validate notability under WP:NORG Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 17:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I'm away from my copy of the Handbook of Denominations for a bit, but if someone else has access, indexing and description in there is generally sufficient to establish notability.  Otherwise, I'd lean towards deletion.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 18:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It is not listed in the 11th edition .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 19:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per research by Dclemens1971 determining that they were not listed in the most comprehensive compilation on the subject.  Since the denomination is not listed there, GNG is the best standard to apply and the subject fails on that count.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 19:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non notable.  Desertarun ( talk ) 19:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jafarabad High School: // Timothy :: talk 20:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The only potentially notable coverage could be in this book (preview not working), but that alone wouldn't be enough to pass GNG.  Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 20:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable Lightburst ( talk ) 21:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Bangladesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the only sources I could find were mostly on Facebook (in which FB is considered unreliable), and I'm assuming this is a non-notable high school which is improperly sourced.  Signed, 64andtim ( any problems? ) 14:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oliver Hughes (banker): Related companies are not notable.  Seaweed ( talk ) 15:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some coverage around the time he moved to a Russian bank [13] but I don't see extensive coverage of this person.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  In addition to the above, it also seems to fail WP:NBLP .  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 03:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mike Robinson (environmentalist): As always, people are not automatically entitled to have articles just because they have jobs, and have to show third-party coverage and analysis about their work to establish that it's been externally validated as significant -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, such as his staff or contributor profiles on the self-published websites of organizations he's been directly affiliated with, and even the very few citations that lead to real WP:GNG -worthy media are not coverage about Mike Robinson, but just briefly namecheck Mike Robinson as a provider of soundbite in an article about something else.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be the subject of sufficient media coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Also there's a likely conflict of interest , as the creator's username has the initials of an organization the subject is closely associated with in it.  To be fair, they complied with COI rules by creating it in draft, but then somebody else perfunctorily submitted it to the AFC queue two days ago, and then almost immediately moved it into mainspace themselves without waiting for a proper AFC review — but the fact that the COI existed in the first place still means the draft required heightened analysis by an established AFC reviewer, which can't just be bypassed like that.  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Scotland .  Bearcat ( talk ) 14:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources are mostly primary or non-RS.  I can't find anything either.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Explored sources but they seem primary or primary-inspired (largely sourced from organisations to which he is affiliated).  Not finding any significant coverage (more than routine or passing mentions) in reliable independent sources.  Paul W ( talk ) 20:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
EnergyMap.dk: Shellwood ( talk ) 16:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : After a short time as a site in its own right, this seems to have become simply a redirect to www.stateofgreen.com (a company portal rebrand of Climate Consortium Denmark ) over 10 years ago, and then not even that.  I am not seeing evidence that it attained WP:NWEB / WP:GNG notability.  AllyD ( talk ) 07:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cativa Natureza: In addition, the article has been deleted and salted on Portugese Wikipedia given WP:PROMO concerns.  It is highly unlikely this company is notable and a search has returned little.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 00:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Products ,  and Fashion .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 00:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Binary priority list: Orphaned for a decade.  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Pepper Beast (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG .  Additionally, the topic of using X method of sorting to manage backlog in industry Y would likely be a case of WP:CROSSCAT .  PaulT2022 ( talk ) 17:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion as previously PROD'd.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No indication of passing GNG.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sendy Santamaria: Edwardx ( talk ) 21:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Artists .  Edwardx ( talk ) 21:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I think it is WP:TOOSOON .  She had a children's book published this year " Yenebi's Drive to School " by Chronicle Books, but I don't see a way to bring this up to notable, yet.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mecha Love: Reaching number 20 on a non-notable chart and some coverage doesn't quite make it.  Suitable WP:ATD could be merge/redirect to album or artist, but I am not sure if the title is unambiguous enough.  Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  09:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Synoptic Office: An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company going about its business.  Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is WP:SPIP or passing mentions.  Created by Special:Contributions/Bautista.elishamarie98 with no other contributions beyond this topic.  -- K.e.coffman ( talk ) 01:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Completely agree with previous argument.  Endersslay ( talk ) 16:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  K.e.coffman ( talk ) 01:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Apart from the likely WP:COI , passing mentions.  TLA (talk) 04:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alessandro Mordacci: Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of independent coverage available online.  The few third-party sources that do cover him directly are not in-depth ( 1 , 2 ).  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Italy .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A few transactional announcements, but not really enough to suggest a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  06:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chaitanya Kanhai: Doesn't meet WP:ENT yet.  Can go for soft-deletion.  Sources are poor.  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 08:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 08:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:TOOSOON , WP:GNG , and WP:MILL .  Hr has not have much of a career to show so far.  There is no allegation of notability.  Assistant directors and music video makers are run of the mill.  Come on, folks.  In 2024 everyone knows we have very minima standards, and this is below that.  Bearian ( talk ) 12:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Doña Lourdes Institute of Technology: Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 13:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Philippines .  Sanglahi86 ( talk ) 13:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no reliable ref hits on GSearch, GNews and GNews Archives.  Alternatively, redirect to General_Santos#Education per WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cabinet selection: MicrobiologyMarcus ( talk ) 20:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete "Cabinet selection" has multiple definitions including politics and construction, as well as marketing cigars.  At best, this would  be a dictionary definition , and Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 20:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete "A term used in the sale of cigars which can mean whatever the seller wishes it to"?   WP is not a dictionary, and this article isn't even a dictionary definition.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 01:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Almost nonsensical content, attempting to be a dictionary which is inappropriate for Wikipedia.  Possibly could be merged to a cigar-related page, but seems a highly obscure concept regardless.  GraziePrego ( talk ) 04:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It is not even clear to me that there is anything suitable for merger to cigar .  BD2412 T 02:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
W05DK-D: Let'srun ( talk ) 21:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico .  Let'srun ( talk ) 21:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The claimed RabbitEars source for the (numerous national) networks carried does not actually mention any of those — or any other — network.  FCC records seem to suggest this has, at most, ever only been a construction permit .  We've been purging low-power stations that do at least somewhat verifiably exist but merely lack significant coverage (many of them stations from a 2009–2010 window only coming on the air in the 2010s or 2020s with nothing but national programming — and this article does claim to be one of those) — this station does not appear to meet even that .  (CPs like these are almost more like the TV station equivalent to the GNIS-sourced non-places that have also seen a parade of AfDs lately.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Perth Corporate Rumble: Only 1 article links to this.  Full of non notable participants and just a results listing.  Only coverage seems to be in Perthnow.  but fails WP:SPORTSEVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Boxing ,  and Australia .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional article on a non-notable event sourced with only local coverage.  💥 Casualty • Hop along.  • 20:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability for this event and I don't believe the coverage is enough to meet WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 12:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Do Not Delete The event is a highly notable event in a major Australian city, it has 1 main contributor, as no one else is willing or able to contribute.  Additional information and links will be added in the coming weeks as to comply to all Wiki requirements.  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
People Like Us (band): Billboard magazine includes the song in an advertisement in November 1986, [45] but the song is never mentioned again in Billboard .  It did not chart in the US or UK.  There is no in-depth biography of the band.  The song "Deliverance" appears on some compilation albums, for instance Passion Records 12" Collection in 1995 and Gay Classics, Vol. 11: Hangin' Out in 1996. I could not find anyone writing about the song or the group to give details or context. Binksternet ( talk ) 18:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions . Binksternet ( talk ) 18:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions . Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - haven't been able to find any RS evidence of notability. Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 20:07, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unsourced, non-notable article fails WP:NBAND . I cannot find any WP:SIGCOV regarding the band. HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 14:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . If band isn't notable, why so many contextual "what links here" mentions?  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 13:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Trump, Ohio: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's hard to do a before on this for obvious reasons.  I found a few Ohio place name books, and Stark county history books.  This is the only way to quickly tackle the problem, and at the end of the day Unincorporated places are not legally recognized and need secondary source for notability.  The Trump family were early settlers in stark county, but I find no mention of any place called trump in the books I could find.  My carefully considered opinion is this is just a neighborhood in Canton, Ohio.  We delete neighborhoods all the time.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  Stark County!   Famous for Phil Davison .   The "Trump" location is now in Canton, but no one calls it "Trump".    Trump appears on the 1901/03 USGS 1:62500 maps as a place name, though not with any noticeable development aside from residences along the road leading to Canton.  [10] .   The next more detailed map in 1958 (1:24000) doesn't list it anymore. -- Milowent • has spoken 14:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete