Psychedelic Sexfunk Live from Heaven: no indication of notability.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 18:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I agree that this seems non-notable, but my sense is that the de facto norm is for every album by a band such as this one to have its own article?  If so, deleting all the minor ones might seem to be fighting against the sea.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is my understanding as well; at least for any releases by a major label.  RF23 ( talk ) 16:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Red Hot Chili Peppers discography#Video albums - WP:UNRELEASED "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings, and related items) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources." — Maile ( talk ) 01:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Red Hot Chili Peppers discography#Video albums : While it is definitely worth noting that, as the discography page shows, this video album does have a Gold certification from the RIAA, that's the only sign of notability I could see.  It gets mentioned in print directories of the band's discography, but not in any valuable prose.  And to @ Llajwa 's comment, no, that is the complete opposite of Wikipedia norms.  Notability is not inherited , so just because this is a release from a very famous band doesn't automatically guarantee its notability.  WP:NALBUM also specifies this point: "An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article."  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Gold certified release by a major label from a major artist; artilce needs sourcing work but the subject is notable enough.  RF23 ( talk ) 16:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Per WP:NALBUM , I'm not sure the sourcing exists to take this beyond a stub.  Perhaps someone else can access publications that I can't find.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 20:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment WP:NALBUM states an article is notable if it meets one of the following requirements and lists: 3.The recording has been certified gold or higher in at least one country.  This article should be a speedy keep, as it satisfies that requirement for notability.  RF23 ( talk ) 22:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you scroll down on that same WP, it states "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography.".  Mbdfar ( talk ) 22:47, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Further, it states the article "should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."  I find no sources that provide significant coverage.  I would be very happy to see any.  Mbdfar ( talk ) 22:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Allmusic rated it (although did not provide a blurb) this has been used in AfD arguments as a point of notability before.  this Chili Peppers fansite shows two newspaper clippings that review it (from unknown sources sadly).  I Think it falls into that wonderful little pre-internet hole where reviews and coverage are not indexed well or at all.  RF23 ( talk ) 07:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Red Hot Chili Peppers discography#Video albums - per WP:UNRELEASED , fails GNG.  // Timothy :: talk 10:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect