hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
What's Your Rupture?: The notable recordings do not establish notability ( WP:Wikipedia:INHERIT ).  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  Questions?  four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the best sources I can find are this 2005 article in the Columbia Spectator, and this 2016 overview of some of their acts.  I don't think this is enough for WP:GNG , and pretty well all other reliable coverage is of the releases, not of the label.  Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 16:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of 2023 MNL statistics: It doesn't even link to Myanmar National League or explain that it is about association football in Myanmar .   It was draftified once, and so should not be draftified unilaterally a second time.   The only reference is a sports database, which would not establish notability for a player, or for a team, or for a list.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 00:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Lists ,  and Myanmar .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 00:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Stop messaging me about this page.  I have no interest.  I moved this content out of 2023 Myanmar National League to mirror how the 2022 season and its pages were set up when I came to fix an issue on the 2023 Myanmar National League page.  List of 2022 MNL statistics is identically set up to this one, and likely previous years as well.  Please direct any messages about this page to @ Vilnae867 , NOT me.  They are the major contributor to this page, and I have not touched the page after the move/creation.  If there is a way to relinquish whatever "creatorship/ownership" of this page to them, I'm happy to do so.  Thank you.  Zinnober9 ( talk ) 00:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Notification of the article creator is standard and required with a nomination discussion; you can simply remove the notice and move on if you have no objection.  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - pure NOTSTATS.  Giant Snowman 20:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no indication that this topic needs a separate article.  This already overlaps very heavily with 2023 Myanmar National League , which has more than enough stats already.  Editors can continue to update the main league article with the stats as the season progresses but this separate stats article can just be removed.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a WP:NOTSTATS violation.  And delete the 2022 season stats article too.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ukiah area: What happened was this: several information-less stubs on nonexistent "unincorporated communities" such as Largo, California and El Roble, California were proposed for deletion, and it was suggested they all be redirected here rather than deleted outright, since documentation exists that these were actual stops on the Northwestern Pacific Railroad .   But in most cases that's all they were, non-notable sidings or flag stops, not "communities", and as a result this article on the "Ukiah area" is essentially just a list of non-notable railroad points; i.e. a WP:COATRACK (and an off-topic one at that).   We already have a good article on Ukiah, California and Ukiah Valley ; I don't see this as a sufficiently distinct topic to merit an article (the hand-drawn map does not impress me).   The original stubs should have just been deleted, and so should this article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 16:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Pinging unblocked participants from the related 2021 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Largo, California : @ Mangoe , JPxG , Uncle G , Pontificalibus , David Eppstein , Aymatth2 , Hog Farm , MrsSnoozyTurtle ,  and Eggishorn czar 04:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The sourcing does not convince me that this is a topic independently notable from Ukiah, California , Ukiah Valley , and Mendocino County , and even if we had such an article, the content as a catch-all for would-have-been-deleted railway stubs is not an important and encyclopedic aspect of this topic.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 07:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Noise: Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Surprising lack of coverage in third-party sources.  One thing to note that it was most recently positioning itself as a "magazine" rather than a "newspaper" – but searching for it as a magazine hasn't turned up much else either.  Searched ProQuest, Wikipedia Library (general EBSCOHost), Internet Archive, and Google with multiple search string variants.  Does not meet WP:GNG and OK to delete.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 05:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nikesh Singh Sidhu: This Football Association of Singapore article is the best that I could find and it merely lists him as an unused sub.  A Singaporean source search yielded mostly database sources.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Singapore .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG ; only match reports and database entries are available online.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of top earning travel companies in the United States: If the Travel Weekly list was in itself notable, that would call for not a list article, but an article discussing the history and impact of their list (such as done for The Black List (survey) . ) Note that Travel Weekly is just a redirect to the company that publishes it, and even that page is tagged for notability issues.  Nat Gertler ( talk ) 15:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – arbitrary inclusion criteria, US-centric, depends on a single source which is not itself notable.  Stifle ( talk ) 16:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Odd combination of either OR or straight copyvio, the list seem to have odd parameters as described also.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Lists ,  and United States of America .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lack of multiple independent sources means this is basically plagiarism Dronebogus ( talk ) 00:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Appears to be original research/copyvio, plus probably doesn't pass WP:LISTN anyhow.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I’m not sure you can copyright data.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 23:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You can in some contexts, though it's not relevant here.  Stifle ( talk ) 09:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 16:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brenda Lindiwe Mabaso: – Jonesey95 ( talk ) 13:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women .  – Jonesey95 ( talk ) 13:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks the in-depth needed coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – No evidence of notability.  Jlalbion ( talk ) 12:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – existing citations do not contribute to notability.  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 19:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Durhamtown Plantation: The only accessible source in the article is an archive of the resort's own website.  My searches haven't found any significant coverage of the farm or the resort.  John of Reading ( talk ) 10:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There's definitely some coverage, mostly about a "wrongful death" case against them that they lost.  [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] - Asheiou (they/them • talk) 13:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete appears to have been transformed into a non-notable off-road park/track.  Still a Delete.  The wrongful death case isn't helping notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Appears that isn't notable.  CastJared ( talk ) 15:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Green star (astronomy): There is some coverage online on the topic, but I don't believe it's notable enough for its own article.  Besides that, the article covers what "green stars" are in a couple lines in the lead and then talks about background information in depth but with few citations and language that doesn't follow MOS.  Merging to Spectral classification could also work.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 19:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 19:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm not entirely convinced that this needs an article of its own; however, the tone problems seem fixable (I made a few edits in that regard), and I'm not sure what the best merge target would be.  An article like Stellar classification is pretty intense, whereas this is the kind of topic that might have more casually curious readers.  (There's a Feynman story where he uses a math book talking about "green stars" as an example of how all the books he read for the California textbook commission were written by people who didn't know what they were talking about. That seems almost too much like 2004 "In popular culture" Wikipedia to include here, though.)  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion.  Additional discussion on notability and/or potential merge targets would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not appear to be notable.  If someone can show multiple secondary sources with significant coverage I will of course retract this.  If delete does win then perhaps it is worth a mention in a more general article such as the visual presentation section in Night sky the part on the "Planckian Locus and its effect on the perceived color of stars" would make for a good part of a  section relating to appearance in the more general star article.  As for the list of things that are not green stars these would perhaps be best included in appearance section for the relevant pages.  I would stress the notability of a topic is not impacted by the current state of the article.  EvilxFish ( talk ) 07:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gladerberg: Orphan.  No references.  The creator was banned with their talk page cluttered with deleted articles they made.  No evidence for the mountain existing (all sources I found are clearly "sourced from Wikipedia"; including Google Maps, which is semi-user generated).  No official mapping or biodiversity agency has ever covered it.  The coordinates provided are to a slightly elevated hill in Naturpark Reinhardswald, and the official website yields no results when "Gladerberg" is searched   ( https://www.naturpark-reinhardswald.de/content/search?SearchText=Gladerberg ).  I'm new here and assuming a "speedy delete" is reserved for emergencies?  If so, this is not an emergency.  BlueSharkLagoon ( talk ) 16:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Germany .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It doesn't quite meet the case for speedy deletion , which is reserved for blatant cases, but it could pass proposed deletion .  Delete unless sourcing can be improved.  PatGallacher ( talk ) 18:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  There is a hill called Gahrenberg 12 miles away from the coordinates provided, which the park's official website does confirm exists [30] .  For those who don't speak German, the source reads The second highest elevation of the Reinhardswald's forest is the Gahrenberg with 472 m.  I think the proposed article is likely a mistranslation/spelling mistake.  BlueSharkLagoon ( talk ) 19:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete - Not losing a thing by deleting this one.  The creator was blocked as a suspect sock puppet account.   Online English mentions of Gladerberg refer to this Wikipedia page.  — Maile ( talk ) 20:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rayoe: New sources don't adequately add to/address the issues raised at the AfD either, and I can find no evidence he meets N:MUSIC.  Star Mississippi 11:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and Ghana .  Star Mississippi 11:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I checked google and the newspaper archives and was unable to find anything that would establish notability.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] quick question is how many newspaper archieves do talk about ghana hiphop?  if you checked google you would have noticed Rayoe's song miracle road released in 2023 went viral in ghana this year racking up 500,000+ views on youtube.  Bismark S. Sosu ( talk ) 19:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing to establish WP:NMUSICIAN here.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 21:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's unfair to say there is nothing to establish WP:NMUSICIAN for Rayoe.  Rayoe meets lots of these criterias in ghana.  he has been placed in rotation nationally, his song miracle road, by a major radio station such as 4styetv in ghana , adom fm, peace fm in ghana and his song miracle road went viral in ghana racking up 500,000 plus views on youtube Bismark S. Sosu ( talk ) 19:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] — Bismark S. Sosu ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Star Mississippi 19:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nqubeko Zulu: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Verulam Secondary: Disclaimer: I removed the unsourced material in the article before nominating it.  I hadn't planned on nominating it at that point, but I won't restore it, either.  Bbb23 ( talk ) 16:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and South Africa .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 1 line unreferenced article that fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Insufficient coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL.  No appropriate list or article for redirection either.  MaxnaCarta ( talk ) 02:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dante Roberson: May also be a COI issue given the page creator's username .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 08:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 08:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - There is some odd ancient history here.  The user Dante Roberson appeared on WP for just one single day: April 1, 2006, during which he created this article in a single edit, meaning that he probably copy/pasted the text from his own promo sites elsewhere.  A few minutes later, a different user tied his article to the surname article Roberson , leading to this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberson , which in turn resulted in no consensus and allowed this Dante Roberson article to survive.  It has been sitting here ever since, and with no significant updates to anything that he has done since 2006.  It could/should have been deleted at any time during this history.  Roberson clearly is/was a trusty studio hand and go-to drummer for musicians in need of assistance and he has a lot of credits, but he has not achieved any reliable media coverage of his career in his own right.  This is the state of affairs both in 2006 and in 2023.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 00:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously had an AFD a few minutes after creation so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Googling the name gives startling results- about fifth or sixth hit was an article on knife crime published by the Bristol Cable and all but one of the previous hits were unrelated.  There are hits, but none of sufficient quality to establish notability.  TheLongTone ( talk ) 10:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete