hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Timemaster (film) : However, I couldn't find a source for the Saturn Award nomination (and I don't know that one nomination is as valuable as a win would be given the language of NFILM) and I don't think the TV Guide review alone saves it.  If more coverage can be found then this is safe, but as is I would still delete it.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Film .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Other subtantial coverage exists (among other things).  Added some to the page.  Best. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 10:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : There are reviews in Sight & Sound , The Houston Chronicle and the Manchester Evening News .  Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk ) 14:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per multiple reviews cited above.  Passes WP:NFILM Donald D23 talk to me 16:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per added sources, but should "Chuck'sConnection" be included as a WP:RS ?  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:NFILM ] Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 09:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kristjan Kangro : Nothing substantive for sourcing beyond routine business items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Estonia .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep For most of you this source may be behind a paywall, but it's a long article of the person - in Estonia's (probably) most respected newspaper, atleast in investigative journalism.  I Googled and found plenty of other sources.  Passes WP:GNG .  Pelmeen10 ( talk ) 07:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as the person has significant media coverage in reputable Estonian media and rather good, not very routine coverage in international outlets like CNBC connected to person's fintech activity with sustainable amounts raised in crowdfunding campaigns.  George Greyson ( talk ) 14:36, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Has a good number of decent in-depth articles that could be used as sources: Eesti Ekspress , Äripäev , Äripäev , Ärileht , Ärileht , Ärileht , Majandus Postimees , etc.  Meets the criteria of WP:BIO .  ExRat ( talk ) 00:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per notability and deep coverage in multiple reliable sources.  I have also found and added to the page another in-depth reportage on the person's biography from Äripäev .  Additionally, I've included a source discussing Kangro's SOCKme venture, which was recognized as the best student startup in the Nordics at one point.  BoraVoro ( talk ) 14:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Asteria Limai : Unable to find SIGCOV and so a GNG fail in spite of a medal win which could pass for NATH.  All sources found on Google with Cyrillic name (Астэрыя Лімай) provide mentions only in passing as part of a list.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 18:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Olympics ,  and Belarus .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 18:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  A few more-than-passing mentions: A short news piece entirely about Limai's reaction to the 2020 Olympics (and the poor performance of the relay team she participated in): [30] Interview of Limai by the Belarus Athletic Federation, with significant biographical detail (but maybe not considered sufficiently independent): [31] Newspaper profile of Belarusian track and field athletes with a photo and paragraph on Limai: [32] — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] She won a silver medal at a major tournament and was in the Olympics.  To me, this one seems to be a borderline keep er.  Jeanette The kisser Martin ( si?  08:45, January 11, 2024 (UTC) Keep as she passes notability (just) due to the silver medal and the sources provided above.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 14:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please see WP:NATH – it only says that sigcov is likely to exist .  It doesn't flat out say notability is granted.  Notability is granted with SIGCOV independent of the subject.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 17:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please read more carefully the comment you are replying to, which explicitly refers to sources and not merely athletic results.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 18:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on above references meeting WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:NATH .  I think that the Belarus Athletic Federation piece is sufficiently independent in the same sense that any Belarusian newspaper is "independent" even if they primarily cover Belarusian topics.  In addition, she is still in active competition (6 major results from 2023) so there is the possibility of future coverage.  I also added her Belarusian Athletics Championships finals performances to her infobox.  -- Habst ( talk ) 16:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Guy Protheroe : I'm surprised to find so little, especially for an article this extensive, but I do not see evidence of notability here.  The removal suggests sources in Google Scholar which may be of use here, but I could only find passing mentions in there as well so I'm doubtful.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 03:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There are bios available, [14] and [15] , and some coverage in the NY Times [16] .   He appears to have a chapter in this 1975 book but I can't access the text: [17] .    Judging by his AllMusic credits, link , Protheroe appears to have an extensive career.    Given this I have a suspicion that Protheroe may prove notable - but further work, potentially with offline sources, is needed to find the evidence.   If kept, the article really does need an ounce or two of WP:TNT .  Resonant Dis tor tion 20:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Internet Archive has British Music Now .  Protheroe contributed a chapter (on Alexander Goehr ) to the book; except for a short "contributor" bio (likely autobiographical) he's not profiled in it.  Jfire ( talk ) 03:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Clearly a notable (GNG) individual who is featured in multiple publications.  Google Books , Google Ngram and Google Scholar .  For these reasons, the article should be kept.  Aye, the article clearly requires a clean up and referencing, but that's not a reason to delete the article.  IJA ( talk ) 22:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 11:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : though simply pointing to google books and google scholar results is insufficient to demonstrate notability, I think the Milken Archive bio and couple of paragraphs in the NYT pointed to by ResonantDistortion are just about sufficient on their own to demonstrate a GNG pass.  (The English Chamber Choir bio isn't helpful, as it is not independent, and as Jfire says Protheroe is a contributor to, not a subject of, British Music Now ).  Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk ) 14:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
D'Arcy Keating : And that's obvious, because, there's only one source (which isn't in-depth, but rather statistics only).  Also, upon Google search , not much comes up other than stats.  No real in-depth coverage.  Only analytical.  Does statistical coverage establish notability?  X ( talk ) 07:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Ice hockey ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: A Dolovis article; why am I not surprised at who created an unsourced article on a completely unremarkable player whose career consisted of a handful of seasons in the low minors?   Complete failure of the GNG, of course.  Ravenswing 09:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ravenswing , Is this Dolovis user infamous for creating such baseless pages?  If so, then that's surprising how this article has been standing there for 10 years.  X ( talk ) 12:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He was ultimately tbanned from new article creation, among other sanctions, but the problem was that he created thousands of such articles.   Anyone familiar with XfD/prods knows how much resistance is out there to cleaning up such torrents.  Ravenswing 15:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Ravenswing , I've gone through some of their articles, and have found so many that easily don't fit for mainspace.  It'd be so tedious to go and tag each of them, but nonetheless, someone's gotta do it.  We can't keep their unfit/bogus articles aflot like this one for 10+ years.  X ( talk ) 16:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I AfDed a bunch in the wake of the ban, but obviously there's so much more to go.  Ravenswing 18:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've come up with a couple of sources that discuss him in detail.  [14] [15] I'm going to see if I can dig more up.  Alvaldi ( talk ) 09:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Article meets WP:GNG as per WP:HEY .  Flibirigit ( talk ) 09:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - there are several sources (in the article and Alvadi's) that provide significant coverage of Keating, so he passes GNG.   In fairness to Dolovis, when this article was created 10 years ago, I believe that having playing more than 300 games in the IHL would have met NHOCKEY.  Rlendog ( talk ) 14:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
1st Special Forces Brigade (South Korea) : Blethering Scot 15:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions .  Blethering Scot 15:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please use search term "제1공수특전여단".  1st Special Forces Brigade meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations.  Footwiks ( talk ) 16:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , The Brigade has a lot of sources in korean related with its military achievements.  The sources Jungang ilbo and Gukbangilbo(Defense times)  are notable newspapers in South korea, with Gukbang Ilbo specializing in Defense technology matters.  Even if the sources are not in english, it definitely fits into the category of significant coverage for said brigade, as it addresses the brigade in different news outlets.  Waltzingmogumogupeach ( talk ) 16:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep for now , this article meets the criteria of WP:N and the sources are ok but it needs to be further expanded.  If the creator of the article does not expand it for several months, then it should be merged into the Republic of Korea Army .  Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk ) 20:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  PROD reason was "Article does not prove notability with independent sources."  Ample independent sources have now been provided.  Whether the sources are in Korean or English does not matter.  Buckshot06 (talk) 21:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The nominator apparently can't be bothered to provide any rationale for deletion (not even repeating the prod rationale).  Brigades are clearly notable and there are enough sources to prove this one's notability in any case.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
2006 Minato Ward elevator accident : This article seems to be a summary of news events rather than an encyclopedic article.  I don't think this topic is encyclopedic, WP:N gives a presumption of notability, not a guarantee.  Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 23:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:PERSISTENCE , the most applicable notability guideline for this type of thing.  Coverage more than 5 years after event: [24] [25] , ~9 years after [26] , coverage ~10 years after [27] .  Current consensus allows for events to be covered by Wikipedia articles.  Beyond WP:N , WP:V (and WP:NOT ), all of which this article meets, we don't treat topics as encyclopedic or otherwise.  If you think the article can be improved, either do so, tag it, or discuss it in the talk page.   — siro χ o 02:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Japan .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  My first instinct was that this is just another random non-notable news story that someone made an article for, and that's probably what it was when the article was created.  But the sources provided by Siroxo suggest that this has since had long term effects in Japan and has become a regular subject of study.  I wouldn't object to a merge if there's an appropriate target, but I don't see Elevators in Japan being a viable article any time soon.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 19:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We could merge the information into List of elevator accidents , because while almost no single accident might be notable enough for expansion into its own article, the whole collection and how safety practices changed in the elevator industry might be worth noting.  Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 13:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 01:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  08:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
TJ Storment : Fails the general and biographical notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , American football , United States of America ,  and North Carolina .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't know .  The article is in really poor shape, which was the reason I didn't accept his submission at AFC - but Storment does appear to pass GNG with plenty of coverage: Fort Worth Star Telegram ( p2 ) - again ( p2 ) - again ( p2 ); Statesville Record and Courier ( again ); Lubbock Avalanche-Journal ; Dallas News , etc.  – I know WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP but this article is really in poor shape.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd easily accept draftificaiton as an WP:ATC .  I just didn't want to take that unilateral action as it was already a draft.  I also believe the primary author of the article is either Storment's wife, or Storment himself.  - UtherSRG (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He played college football for five teams in five years.  I didn't think that was possible.  Cbl62 ( talk ) 23:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] TJ Storment has had a significant football career in different leagues, like the NFL and XFL.  His journey from being undrafted to playing for various teams is noteworthy.  He also played for 5 university teams which is interesting to readers and fans.  His achievements are also diverse as a football player, poker player, and in Christian ministry.  I'd like to clarify that my contributions to the Wikipedia article about him are based solely on publicly available information from reputable sources.  If you have any concerns or suggestions regarding the article's content, please feel free to share them, I am still learning how to create on this platform and am planning on more pages for athletes from leagues like the XFL.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Takswupdate2 ( talk • contribs ) 23:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:SIGCOV Lightburst ( talk ) 00:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:SIGCOV Themanwithnowifi ( talk ) 22:20, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep interesting career Patsfan1988 ( talk ) 18:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Khuwabzaadi: — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_TV_One_(Pakistan)#Drama_series - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KAJL-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 18:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Arkansas .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 18:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : in theory, one might expect a station that was a Telemundo affiliate ( they appear to no longer be one ) to garner at least some coverage, but outside of that it's another 2010s-launched DTV America/HC2/Innovate LPTV with much national programming, little local, and probably lacking in significant coverage .  Another technical survivor of a bulk nomination from last year .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  No longer a Telemundo affiliate (replaced with Shop LC ), so outside its time as a Telemundo affiliate, the rest of its notability is thin.  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp. would, as with the previous station above, be the best solution indeed.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gupteswor Cave, Parbat: Fails WP:GNG .  Mia Mahey ( talk ) 01:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions .  Mia Mahey ( talk ) 01:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Topics that meet WP:GEONATURAL , verifiable here , are usually kept.  Deletion is out of question.  Question is, how/where should it be included in the encyclopedia?  Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Let'srun ( talk ) 01:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge There is another article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gupteshwor_Mahadev_Cave which seems to be covering the same cave.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 03:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No, that's a different cave.  It just happens to be a name that Shaivite Hindus are likely to independently come up with when they find a cave that they're surprised they didn't find earlier and/or houses a notable rock formation that can be declared a Shiva Lingam .  It could mean Cave of Lord Shiva in his form as the god of things that are hidden (or perhaps, Cave of the hidden Lord Shiva).  — Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of caves in Nepal for now, and mark as {{ RWP }} .  Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  As per Usedtobecool.  Fade258 ( talk ) 04:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect