Lee Sung-wook : A quick search shows that all of the subject's roles are either supporting or guest which are rarely reported by South Korean media hence making reliable sourcing even harder.  The sourcing included are mostly passing mentions with no WP:SIGCOV .  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 05:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Korea ,  and South Korea .  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 05:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : for having significant roles in multiple television shows per NACTOR Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jack4576 Any reliable sources to support " having significant roles in multiple television shows " as I don't find any of such.  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 06:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] the sources (such as HanCinema) are reliable enough to support the bare fact that they had the roles in the shows that they did; I think they're unreliable for anything beyond that bare fact, as they're not independent sources Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jack4576 If so, where is the WP:SIGCOV as part of WP:GNG to justify Keep?  Clearly, HanCinema and any database websites alikely (e.g. and/or i.e. WP:IMDB , in fact you can't use IMDB in BLP per WP:IMDB/BLP ) is not enough to justify it's has SIGCOV hence I asked for reliable sources to prove SIGCOV because you stated " having significant roles in multiple television shows ".  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 06:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Your nomination didn't mention SIGCOV, I'd agree SIGCOV has not been met here.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Jack4576 SIGCOV is part of WP:GNG btw.  Regardless, I don't see that you want to answer my initial reply hence we'll just keep it at that unless you would like to otherwise.  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 06:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Its OK I withdraw my keep vote.  You have a better understanding of the depth of coverage in the sources.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep WP:SIGCOV met, searched and found multiple reliable sources.  33ABGirl ( talk ) 08:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ 33ABGirl Care to provide the " multiple reliable sources " you found?  As I couldn't find any showing WP:SIGCOV other than WP:PASSINGMENTIONS hence I'm curious how you manage to find it, if any to begin with.  — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝 ) 09:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions ) 14:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTOR .  -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 07:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Bold third relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 07:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus