Omar Jamal Al-Omar: I don't find any additional information we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If it's substantially identical to the version that was speedily deleted, this could just be speedied under WP:G4 .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 00:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is completely false, never mind.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 00:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Promotional vanity page.  All refs appear to either not be independent or reliable.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 12:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for your feedback.  We understand your desire to see this article on Wikipedia.  Updated Reliable Sources: We've incorporated, reliable sources to support the information in the article.  These sources should meet Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources, such as published news articles, or independent biographies.  Notability: We understand Omar Jamal Al-Omar is a well-known businessman in Kuwait City.  To ensure the article's inclusion, Wikipedia requires evidence of this notability through significant coverage in reliable sources beyond just press releases.  Khushboojain191 ( talk ) 13:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Who is "we"?  If you are working on behalf of an individual, you must declare a conflict of interest.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You're absolutely right.  I apologize for using 'we' in a way that could be misconstrued.  Since We represent Mr. Omar Jamal Al-Omar as his social media team, we have a conflict of interest in editing his Wikipedia article directly.  please gudie us to how can we declare a conflict of interest.  Khushboojain191 ( talk ) 18:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is the second time they have referred to themselves as "we" and in a tone indicating that they represent the subject.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 13:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think they're using an AI to write this.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 18:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Probably.  It also matches the writing style of the PR branch of the subject's company, which usually indicates that the claims made in the article and refs are likely not even accurate.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 18:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for clarifying.   A close match between the article's style and the subject's PR materials can raise concerns about neutrality, regardless of who wrote it.  Khushboojain191 ( talk ) 18:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No, we are not using the AI to write up.  Khushboojain191 ( talk ) 18:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Khushboojain191 has now been blocked after admitting to being a shared account for use by the subject's PR Team.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Is that a reason to speedy the article?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A CSD was already declined, so deletion via AfD is probably the best option.  Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 16:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I see nothing outside of promotional links; when the PR team (as "we") comes out to play, that's generally a red flag here, that the article isn't notable.  I don't see any RS in the current list, nor do I find any.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and WP:SALT .  This is an obvious  case of WP:NOTRESUME ; all of the sources are PR type websites, none are reliable .  In 2024, everyone knows, or should well know, that Wikipedia is a private charity, not a place for cyber-squatting.  Bearian ( talk ) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete