Challenge Cup semi final : However it is currently incomplete, unreferenced, and is not fit for the mainspace.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 15:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 26 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 15:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Rugby league ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This page has been unreferenced since its creation in 2016.  It's more likely that, if sent to draft space, it ends up being G13 deleted in 6 months time anyways.  I'd prefer the matter of this get addressed here instead of being draftified and deleted in 6 months.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That is a fair point.  Another user has suggested deletion in a previous discussion .  My preference is to move article to draft but I'm also not opposed to deletion as article can always be remade at a later date.  My main issue with the article currently is not that it is unreferenced but rather is is incomplete in the sense that the list is missing everything from 1898 to 1979.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 11:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Semi finals are not notable enough for a stand-alone article.  I PROD'd this a while ago, but it was contested with an WP:OSE argument (i.e. FA Cup semi-finals exists, so this article should too).  Even if the article were improved, I'm not convinced it is notable enough to pass WP:LISTN .  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 21:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agree with this point.  While I think this article could be made to the standard of the FA Cup article, the reality is football will always have more coverage than rugby league, so finding enough secondary sources might be problematic for it to pass as a stand alone list.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 18:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  But the nominator is suggesting draftification, is that option acceptable?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Once again, this AFD needs more participation from editors, weighing in with their assessments of this article.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this sourceless set of tables with nearly no content to the actual article and no indication of notability for these particular semi finals.  Wikipedia is not the place for indiscriminate lists or trivia.  A good draftify argument might persuade me, but right now I see nothing to gain by sending it to draft space.  Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  22:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete