hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Andrea Gabriel : As always, an actress's notability doesn't hinge on just listing acting roles per se, it hinges on the extent to which the article can or can't be referenced to media coverage about her and her performances: articles about her, reviews of her films or TV shows which single her performance out for dedicated attention, properly sourced evidence that she won or was nominated for a major acting award, and on and so forth.  But the sole footnote here is a short blurb which glancingly namechecks Andrea Gabriel's existence without being about Andrea Gabriel in any non-trivial sense, which isn't enough to get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only source she's got.  Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be the subject of a lot more coverage than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United States of America .  Bearcat ( talk ) 21:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't find coverage in RS, this is typical [2] , simple photo essay with a few words on her new role.  We'd need extensive coverage, this just isn't enough.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I could not find anything in industry publications (Variety, Deadline Hollywood) announcing new and additional roles except for one extremely-brief TV guide article for the Gossip Girl role [3] .  While it is clear she has a robust television resume, there is simply not enough coverage at this time.  Trainsskyscrapers ( talk ) 2:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Delete : There are more to notability as Wikipedia is based in sources cited in articles.  I can't find SIGCOV or any award & nom.  for her achievements in the film industry.  I wonder how the subject had portrayed roles in TV shows yet not even two sources had cited her (in exception even interviews) Otuọcha ( talk ) 05:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
River Road Estates, California : Reywas92 Talk 21:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Why everyone over at RfD wanted to restore this non-article is a mystery to me.   Completely non-notable subdivision; nothing to be said about it; article is a waste of space.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 00:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the GNG.  Let'srun ( talk ) 16:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  Agree, just a subdivision.   I checked newspapers.com, newspaperarchive.com, and California Digital Newspaper Collection and didn't find any unique coverage. -- Milowent • has spoken 14:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subdivision with no coverage to suggest it passes WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG .  InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs ) 18:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Portello (Swedish soft drink) : — Karnataka talk 12:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Portello (soft drink) states it is unrelated, anyway criticism is welcome. -- Carnby ( talk ) 12:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What I was trying to say is that the sources I found were of the British version and not the Swedish drink, sorry for the confusion.  @ Carnby — Karnataka talk 09:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Senya Son : Compliance with WP:MUSIC has not been demonstrated.  Some of it looks like a hoax.  The article was deleted in Russian Wikipedia [32] . -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk ) 13:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Russia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Law of Cyber-Space : Any verifiable information could be a simple mention within Ahmad Kamal .  Zim Zala Bim talk 19:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Law ,  and Internet .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  Individual legal monographs are rarely notable, because they don't get a lot of reviews or citations.  Bearian ( talk ) 16:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
N'Diaye Djiby : [9] He therefore fails WP:GNG .  Angelo ( talk ) 10:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Angelo ( talk ) 10:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Senegal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Signing to Chievo Verona can be notable, I am unclear how much coverage he had, I really am not sure, but the nominator has a strong point again lack of SIGNOV etc, if people find good sources please ping me, thanks.  Govvy ( talk ) 16:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 15:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rob DesLauriers : 🍪 Cookie Monster 01:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Sportspeople ,  and Vermont .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found this coverage in ESPN, but it is primarily about his wife, and I cannot find any other significant, reliable and independent coverage.  Another option might be Redirect to Kit DesLauriers .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 09:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG and WP:TNT .  We need citations, not wild claims.  You don't inherit notability from your wife .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of NFC Championship Game broadcasters : Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans.  Fails WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced, the majority of those are sources are from forums.  The reliable sources are about the announcers, not much else, not helping this list to assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , American football , Lists ,  and United States of America .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per failing WP:LISTN as a WP:LISTCRUFT that would only be used for trivia purposes.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 17:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:LISTN is not met due to a lack of RS.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Azeez Issa Adesiji : Also, I think this page should be deleted because it is an orphan, I can't find any links using https://edwardbetts.com/find_link/Azeez_Issa_Adesiji .  History6042 ( talk ) 16:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nigeria .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article clearly fails WP:BIO .  🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！ ) 20:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baloch in heroic Shahnameh : Sourcing seems to be of insufficient quality for mainspace.  Alternatively, a merger to Shahnameh could work.  Star Mississippi 16:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Iran .  Star Mississippi 16:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , agree with nom.  I came across this page because I noticed its creator making a disruptive edit on my watchlist .  Graham87 ( talk ) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Second to that.  Listed sources are of low quality.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 22:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Catalina Larranaga : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women , Sexuality and gender ,  and Texas .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as its current state does not meet WP:BIO ; its sole source does not seem reliable and does not establish notability.  SunTunnels ( talk ) 22:28, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find book reviews, nor any sourcing the acting career.  Plenty of sites selling the books though...  Not passing ACTOR or AUTHOR notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG , WP:NACTRESS , and WP:AUTHOR .  — Young Forever (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
William R. McGuiness : No indication that this meets WP:NPOL , and this has been a one-line stub referenced for many years solely to the subject's non-independent state biography.  BD2412 T 13:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  BD2412 T 13:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2015–16 Manchester Phoenix season : I'm also nominating the other team-season articles, as they all fail the same criteria.  Kaiser matias ( talk ) 01:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 2006–07 Manchester Phoenix season ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) 2008–09 Manchester Phoenix season ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) 2012–13 Manchester Phoenix season ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) 2014–15 Manchester Phoenix season ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) 1999–2000 EPIHL season ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) 2014–15 EPIHL season ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Kaiser matias : , please be aware that the English Premier Ice Hockey League has two season articles at 1999–2000 EPIHL season and 2014–15 EPIHL season ; and a mostly disused Template:English Premier Ice Hockey League .  Best wishes.  Flibirigit ( talk ) 10:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks, I've added those two articles to this AfD as well.  Kaiser matias ( talk ) 15:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all : Each article fails to meet WP:NSEASONS .  Flibirigit ( talk ) 11:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all no evidence any of them pass WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
February 2021 Israeli missile strikes in Syria : Ecrusized ( talk ) 13:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military , Israel ,  and Syria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oleksandr Dovhyi : This is the bare minimum threshold and, in reality, we need more than just the one good reference.  Despite that, I can't seem to find even one good source about Dovhyi and the creator has only used RSSSF and Soccerway, neither of which are of any use whatsoever.  In Lithuanian sources, the best that I can find are Muge and Atvira Klaipeda , neither of which are even close to being good.  A Ukrainian search only seems to give results about Ukrainian military rather than anything about this footballer.  This article is not even remotely suitable to remain in mainspace.  I considered sending to draft but the creator has been reverting such moves anyway so that seemed redundant.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No evidence of notability or valid coverage.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 18:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions .  Respublik ( talk ) 22:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 21:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aise : Largely unsourced.  Problems date back to well more than a decade ago.  Aintabli ( talk ) 02:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance , Music , Greece ,  and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 02:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough as per user Aintabli.  Lacks references as well.  killer bee 07:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Praxis: Journal of Gender and Cultural Critiques : I created this article in 2016, and tried to PROD it shortly afterwards when it became apparent there were no more sources available to expand it.  Someone reverted the PROD, but seven years later there's still no more sources available.  Furthermore, the official website has shut down and it appears the journal is defunct, but I can't even find any sources to support that it shut down.  Damien Linnane ( talk ) 05:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , seems to have disappeared without leaving mucg trace showing notability.  Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG .  -- Randykitty ( talk ) 11:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG/NJOURNALS.  It does not appear to be listed in any selective databases and I can't find coverage in reliable sources.  WJ94 ( talk ) 11:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as it's gone, there aren't any sources discussing it and I can't find any.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per article creator/AfD nominator and others who search refs.  Thanks for your work.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Forum (Dubai) : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not look notable Vyvagaba ( talk ) 21:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of pubs in Norwich : The inclusion criteria is not given and is not obvious.  Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY and attracts clutter (people may add their own favourite pub, or start their own local directory).  Mostly unsourced.  Wikipedia is not a directory of non-notable local businesses.  Notable pubs, such as Fat Cat, Norwich and Adam and Eve, Norwich , will have their own articles and may be included on List of pubs in the United Kingdom .  SilkTork ( talk ) 12:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; it's easy to find sources stating that Norwich is notable for once having had (allegedly) a pub for every day of the year (and a church for every Sunday).  This fact is already in the article about Norwich.  Otherwise, the current list of pubs is arbitrary (for both Norwich and pubs: this is the only pub-fact that potentially makes Norwich a special case, and there's nothing special about pubs compared to restaurants, takeaways or nightclubs), the list is not navigational (only a handful have articles), and it's a violation of not-directory.  Elemimele ( talk ) 12:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk ) 17:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It is a nice discussion with some good images, but it is not notable.  Bduke ( talk ) 05:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per WP:NOTYELLOW .  It's not the job of Wikipedia to inform of every single pub in a particular town/city.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete