hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
WQFL-CA : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 20:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Christianity ,  and Illinois .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 20:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Insufficient SIGCOV for an article in Rockford paper.  The station operated as "WOCM", a FamilyNet affiliate with some non-FN programming, when it went on in 1992.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 16:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eli Stefansky : Onel 5969 TT me 12:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Judaism , Internet , Israel ,  and New York .  North America 1000 12:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not meeting the WP:GNG .  gidonb ( talk ) 02:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:V - not a single reliable source .  Bearian ( talk ) 19:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fatoumata Sanou : Not to be confused with the pollitician of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Basketball ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no evidence of WP:SIGCOV .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributor892z ( talk • contribs ) 13:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WesBank Raceway : It has been in CAT:NN for 12 years now, so hopefully we can decide now one way or the other.  Boleyn ( talk ) 07:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and South Africa .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Reading articles at news24 and IOL , I'm able to gather that the race track existed for four years before the land was sold.  There's a throwaway line of " so many records were broken here " but nothing specific.  I don't see that any notable races happened here, that notable racers racers there.  Or any SIGCOV while it was operating.  -- D'n'B - t -- 18:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Denis Majstorović : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT .  Primefac ( talk ) 12:05, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Rugby union , Croatia ,  and Italy .  Primefac ( talk ) 12:05, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete I am seeing some coverage here, however I'm not sure there's enough I'm seeing to suggest a GNG pass.  There may be more coverage in Italian sources that I'm not seeing though.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The Italian coverage of the subject that I managed to find are either routine coverage (transfers to other teams) or passing mentions.  There does not seem to be sufficient sources to pass WP:BIO .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 21:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gareth Armstrong (footballer) : A Google search found no sigcov just mentions in match reports.  Dougal18 ( talk ) 14:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] del no sigcov.  - Altenmann >talk 17:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Scotland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can only really see primary sources, and even so, with very little depth.  C 679 08:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sandy Grigsby : Most sources present aren't reliable or independent, and those that are do not provide significant coverage: LA Times only features one of her photos, no coverage on her The Mercury News is just an interview and more about a website she launched than her The Citizen is just a passing mention The Guardian is also just a passing mention Elli ( talk | contribs ) 19:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women .  Elli ( talk | contribs ) 19:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography , Technology , Internet , Switzerland ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: i agree with the above - i first noticed this article was mostly written like marketing copy, almost certainly written by the subject or an associate, and she doesn't seem particularly notable in any of the sources Locust Valley ( talk ) 01:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PR items are all I find, rest of the links are as explained in the nomination.  Not meeting GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet general notability requirements based on the sources used, or elsewhere- I couldn't find anything better.  I couldn't open the Mercury News one but note what has already been highlighted- that it's not about her.  Editing84 ( talk ) 12:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alex Dyke : Links and references are generic Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs ) 10:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just another person whose claim to "notability" is that they have had a few jobs on the radio and a bit of local media coverage.  Nothing of note appearing in a search outside of routine mentions of the presenter moving around between radio stations and a brief controversy over comments made on air in 2015 [40] .  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christophe Pratiffi : Not a single source has been added since its creation in 2006, and my search didn't suggest that there are any to add yet.  ~ T P W 13:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  ~ T P W 13:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and France .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Gsearch is instagram, FAMEQ (?), facebook, linkedin, then into the weeds.  Nothing for this fellow found.  Nothing in Gnews.  Appears a poor attempt back in the day at PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree there seem to be no sources to cite (and certainly nothing in the article).  Oblivy ( talk ) 22:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shyamantak Ganguly : Fifth place in a tournament is hardly wiki-worthy, outside of any other sourcing.  Gsearch is straight to social media or interviews.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Martial arts .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per nom.  Subject doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSPERSON .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 10:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found no mention of him at any Kyokushin websites.   This is the style he learned from his father and is typically thought of when full contact karate is mentioned.   I found no mentions of the tournament in Hungary in any sources except for those mentioning the subject's success.   The remaining coverage consists of some personal interviews and some mentions about events related to his father's organization and/or dojo.  There's no evidence of him competing at any world championship.   He appears to fail WP:GNG , WP:NSPORT , and WP:MANOTE .  Papaursa ( talk ) 17:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Square 9 Softworks : Recreated by the company's marketing officer.  Still fails the notability guidelines for companies .  – Tera tix ₵ 12:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and Connecticut .  – Tera tix ₵ 12:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Cannot find any notability of it.  Only article I can find that even mentions it is this which I doubt is reliable enough for inclusion.  Half the websites I find upon Googling it are just review websites.  Procyon117 ( talk ) 14:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That article is a WP:PRESSRELEASE and thus ineligible as a primary source.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 21:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NCORP .  All sources are WP:TRADES , WP:PRIMARYSOURCES , or otherwise fail the tests of eligibility under WP:ORGTRIV .  Nothing comes up in WP:BEFORE search.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 21:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olivia Trujillo : No sourcing found.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NACTOR .  I see mentions in outlets like EFE and Infobae , but no WP:SIGCOV .  APK whisper in my ear 05:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Return on event : Of the two sources in the article, one's a marketing white paper, while it's just a passing reference in the other.   I cannot find any sources that aren't marketing tools themselves.  ~ T P W 15:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  ~ T P W 15:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence found that this is a concept sufficiently distinct from return on investment to warrant an article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 18:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources are lacking and the topic hasn't received enough independent coverage to justify an article.  Cortador ( talk ) 11:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing here, or from an internet search, to suggest 'Return on Event' is notable.  Appears to be an idea put forward by a small number of agencies and if it warrants mention on Wikipedia at all I'd suggest that would be as part of a wider article on event management and not a standalone article.  I note also that the article appears to have been created by an SPA with almost no other contributions and who was blocked shortly after creating this article.  Hmee2 ( talk ) 16:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sky Hawk Times : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - In India, any newspaper having Registrar of Newspapers for India (RNI) is a enough to be included in Wikipedia.  This (page no 292) says this newspaper's RNI is 71814.  We can consider to keep for time being.  Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 07:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The guidelines of the English Wikipedia only require the inclusion of several trustworthy sources.  No mention of having Registrar of Newspapers for India (RNI).  Sorry BoraVoro ( talk ) 07:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AccuSystems : Nigel757 ( talk ) 17:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Software ,  and Colorado .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 17:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Borderline A7, does not really make any recognisable CCS.  Also WP:BROCHURE as of current version, but the pre-UPE edited versions available in the article history are better in that regard.  I cannot find anything beyond name checks, not even passing mentions really.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 07:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 18:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Once I removed the spammy promo links, the article was even shorter.  Nothing to suggest this company met GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 17:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kim Myong-chol (footballer) : Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
City Cruises : Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 18:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 18:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Search shows this may have been renamed "City Experiences" but even under that search term I cannot find enough to meet WP:NCORP .  Was going to suggest a merge to Hornblower Cruises but I also cannot find a reliable source to confirm that company purchased this one.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 18:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It seems unlikely that enough notable sources can be found to bring this article up to NCORP viability.  Royal Autumn Crest ( talk ) 19:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There does not seem to be enough sources to meet WP:NCORP and it reads like an advertisement.  Flutter Dash 344 ( talk ) 21:31, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Apoorwa Ashawari : -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 10:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Sri Lanka .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 10:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , couldn't find significant coverage for WP:ENT , just passing mentions about her coming third place in the reality show.  No prejudice against recreation if her career takes off later, as sometimes happens.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NMUSICIAN / WP:ANYBIO .  At this stage in her career, she is not notable enought for inclusion on Wikipedia.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 04:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete