hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
List of unusual drainage systems: "Unusual" is not well-defined and so there isn't any particular inclusion criteria.  Jasper Deng (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No real list criteria as to what an 'unusual' system is, and no references to provide notability for the list.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Geography .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subjective.  Crouch, Swale ( talk ) 18:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Explain: From 22oct23 Casiquiare canal , Echimamish River and Manych River were deleted and moved to River bifurcation .  Some others were moved to Lake bifurcation or deleted.  This made the remaining list useless and deletible.The original reason for the list was that, given something like the Casiquiare canal, the reader would want to know if there were similar oddities.  Benjamin Trovato ( talk ) 02:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CoachRun: Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [ User ] [ Talk ] [ Contributions ] 18:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:CORP .  Google News search only turns up one passing mention of the company, not even the focus of the article.  Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 18:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Transportation , Florida , Georgia (U.S. state) , Maryland , Massachusetts , New York , North Carolina , South Carolina , Virginia ,  and Washington, D.C. .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rhonda Vetere: PR-based coverage, nothing reliable found.  US-Verified ( talk ) 18:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Women , Virginia ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This Forbes article is a contributor piece [2] , this CNBC article looks ok [3] , but everything else I find is a PR piece.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As for the two sources mentioned by Oaktree b, everything is clear on Forbes, while the second one, in my opinion, is not far off the interview and in any case cannot back up much of the information on the page.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 08:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete seems to be ref-bombed with PR coverage like what nom stated, agree with what nom stated.  Karnataka ( talk ) 09:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Paul Giovanopoulos: After 11 years of waiting for improvement on the situation, I think it's time for this article to go.  Sionk ( talk ) 16:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions .  Sionk ( talk ) 16:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Greece ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find anything WP:GNG -wise to rescue the article.  (If kept needs to be checked for a copyvio - probably a false positive mirror due to how long it's been up, but still needs to be done.)  SportingFlyer T · C 22:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST .  He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums.  I am not finding any RS for information.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom.  ǁ ǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 ( talk ) 10:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Georgia–Saint Vincent and the Grenadines relations: The 3 sources cited from Ministry of Foreign affairs are all dead and in any case primary.  This source , this one and this one all mention St Vincent and Grenadines in 1 line and do not constitute indepth coverage.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Georgia (country) ,  and Caribbean .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Yet another in the fad of making a standalone article for every combination of two countries.  There is no coverage of this relationship as a relationship , only casual mentions of potential interactions between the two nations.  All sources are WP:PRIMARY .  Cheers, Delete per nom.  AryKun ( talk ) 14:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Circular RNA databases and resources: At best a WP:MADRENAME to a new external links section in circular RNA , but this would be a WP:COSTLY redirect per WP:PANDORA : we shouldn't have the expectation that REPOSITORY-esque redirects exist to the "external links" section of a given article.  House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions .  House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Chenab: Hari Ram Gupta doesn't even say he was defeated at all (which the page misleads you by citing it did), removed if you check now on my newest revision.  Noorullah ( talk ) 22:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hari Ram Gupta being the only reliable source on the page shows that the Afghans had instead routed and pursued the Sikhs.  [2] Noorullah ( talk ) 22:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also had to remove numerous unreliable sources, including one of them being a near copy paste.  [3] Noorullah ( talk ) 23:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Pakistan ,  and Punjab .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Barely notable and fails GNG.  There are several similar articles cited with religious texts with authors having no historical background-- Imperial [AFCND] 06:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom and above.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 12:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sunshine Radio Network: There are no incoming links and only 49 pageviews in the last year.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Disambiguations .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 05:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As mentioned above, Sunshine Radio created in 2006 is a sourced and better inclusive dab than this 2010 version.  — Maile ( talk ) 01:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per WP:CHEAP .  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:58, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Baral Agreement: If you actually read the article, it does not significantly cover the agreement at all, except in one unsourced section.  For the most part, it duplicates the content of 1955 Poonch uprising .  The sources in the article do not verify statements made within, and searches for "Baral agreement" come up empty.  There are serious WP:competence is required issues with the article creator and I will probably file an WP:ANI report soon Mach61 21:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Politics ,  and Jammu and Kashmir .  Mach61 21:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pinging users who participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Soudhan Wars and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhanoti , also by this user: Fram , Svartner , TimothyBlue , HistoriesUnveiler , Xymmax , Rosguill .  I believe this falls under WP:APPNOTE Mach61 04:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, and seconding the apparent CIR issues.  The citations for this article read like the editor simply searched "Sudhan" in Google Scholar and added a citation to every result, regardless of content.  Searching myself for terms like "Baral" 1956 , "Baral Agreement" , etc on Google Scholar and Google Books returned nothing useful.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 17:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Publishers like Oxford University Press and Springer are not samizdat they are very respected publishers, article just needs a little bit of editing that's all. -- TheQirim ( talk ) 18:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you demonstrate that any of the cited sources actually mention a "Baral Agreement" or otherwise address this topic?  signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This might be notable, but right now, it's a farrago of original research and random books .  Even if cited in a few pages in two reliable sources, that's not significant coverage Bearian ( talk ) 19:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   I couldn't find any sources using this name.   Those in the article are, as far as I can tell, about the 1955 Poonch uprising or the History of Azad Kashmir more broadly and only mention this agreement in passing, if at all.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per the comment by Rosguill .  Lagdo22 ( talk ) 06:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battles of Inje and Qalaburun: Nothing comes up when searching "Battles of Inje and Qalaburun", which makes me fail to see how it meets the notable criteria.  And the most cited sources here (5 out of 6 citations) is by a genocide denier [4] Jamil Hasanli , who is also closely connected to the Aliyev-ruled Azerbaijani government, notorious for its historical negationism/revisionism [5] [6] [7] and anti-Iranian sentiments [8] , which is not really ideal for an article about the history of Iran.  HistoryofIran ( talk ) 23:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Iran ,  and Azerbaijan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Wesea (Western SouthEast Asia): Kautilya3 ( talk ) 17:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Geography , Asia , India ,  and Manipur .  Kautilya3 ( talk ) 17:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Draftify The sources here don't really talk about ""Wesea"". For example, the page  uses a lot of content broadly about Zomia , which passes WP:GNG . I can assume good faith on some of the paper sources, but I know a few of them don't mention "Wesea" at all.  There needs to be a lot more work to make a page about the idea of Wesea using reliable sources and this article just isn't ready for wikipedia mainspace yet.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 18:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If kept, it should be moved to Wesea , as the base title does not exist and the current title misuses the parenthetical for an acronym.  Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_June_21#Category:Wesean_National_Leaders is related to this AfD.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 19:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see any evidence that any of the sources use this term.   It is not made up by the article creator, but all the sources I can find are referring to rebel militant groups ( Times of India discussing a group).  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can not find Wesea and any significant coverage in reliable secondary independent sources.  Sources are poor to unreliable on the page.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Serbia: Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together.  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Europe .  BrigadierG ( talk ) 16:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Serbia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per my rationale in my previous nomination, literally irredeemable list.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 22:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia isn't a TV guide, fails to meet the WP:LISTN .  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yoko Matsugane: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : A7 and G11 speedy deletion.  No claim to notability and this article is very promotional.  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose Speedy, but still Delete : IMO this would not qualify for A7 as "has appeared on several TV shows" is a credible claim to significance, because if it turned out those roles were significant and that this could be sourced, notability would be established.  However, a review of the Japanese article (via google translate), which has a list of the roles, reveals that none of them were in fact significant, so I would say that this should still be deleted for lack of notability.  In regards to the G11, I don't feel that the article is unambiguously promotional as it does have a mostly encyclopedic tone.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Afarin Kids TV: Same sources, still no case for WP:GNG .  Since the last deletion was soft, G4 doesn't apply, although Shahrwzi should be admonished for ignoring the AfD and instead just recreating the same article.  signed, Rosguill talk 14:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Iraq .  signed, Rosguill talk 14:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello Rosguill، Thanks for your warning, but I don't think this article is worth deleting and contains the necessary sources for what was written.  For example, the source is cited in the About section, the source is cited in the Frequency section, the source is cited in the Products section.  What else do you want?  Shahrwzi ( talk ) 08:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You need to familiarize yourself with our notability guidelines .  signed, Rosguill talk 13:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt .  Clearly YouTube and Spotify are not RS.  Aintabli ( talk ) 03:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am now also suspicious of PROMO.  Aintabli ( talk ) 03:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per reasons provided by nom Llajwa ( talk ) 13:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
TB8Cs3H1 snoRNA: No source besides one paper.  Hongsy ( talk ) 04:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 04:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See my comment on TB10Cs1H3 snoRNA where I also ! voted delete ; we are here to summarise multiple sources for the benefit of our readers.  Where there is only one (primary) source, there's no point in trying to create an overview.  A good indication of notability for a biomolecule is probably when it's appeared in review articles (or other general sources).  Elemimele ( talk ) 18:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , unless a secondary source can be found.  Owen× ☎ 14:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Air Force School, Kanpur: Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 14:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete after a pretty thorough search, failed to find any coverage that would push this past GNG.  AryKun ( talk ) 14:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no significant sources or coverage.  Salsakesh ( talk ) 22:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gloria Najjuka: Best sources found were New Vision , a very brief news article about her intention to win an under-18 school tournament, and Uganda Radio Network , which briefly mentions her losing in a second round match.  None of this is significant, detailed coverage of her as an individual.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Badminton ,  and Uganda .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete