hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mayoralty of John Moran: Most of it is copied without attribution from other pages across Wikipedia (in violation of WP:CWW ).  The page for John Moran himself was created just yesterday, if that ever gets too long, per WP:SIZE guidelines, we can consider a split.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 13:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Ireland .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 13:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, WP:SIGCOV and WP:TOOSOON .  The titular subject (the "Mayoralty of John Moran") has not yet commenced/occurred.  And there has been zero coverage of that topic as a subject in its own right.  As noted, if Moran's future activities (and coverage of those activities) becomes too much to be covered in the biographical article, then we can split it.  Otherwise it is far (far far) WP:TOOSOON to have a standalone title like this.  WP:ATDs (like incubation as draft or redirection to the brand new bio article) seem unnecessary and less-than-appropriate.  Guliolopez ( talk ) 13:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and per Guliolopez.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 13:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - The editing of this new user - Chancellorship - seems to be very similar to that of the blocked user - Quayshires/Cartoons2022/BreadSuperFan36/WeenieSquirrel61 - I wonder if it is worth opening an SPI?  Spleodrach ( talk ) 14:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I’m working off my mobile, and was planning to do so when I was on my laptop later.  I was suspicious of that before this new article creation, I’m convinced of it now.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 14:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I opened a sockpuppet investigation yesterday on this.  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 19:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Useless fork and the position has not even started yet.  Barring anything out of the ordinary, give the fellow a chance to actually do something in the position before creating an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete an unnecessary creation by a new editor.   This title shouldn't even be a redirect to John Moran (Mayor of Limerick) .  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and others.  WP:TOOSOON and WP:SIGCOV .  Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!  11:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Steven P. Mullins: Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 09:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Virginia ,  and Washington, D.C. .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete, SEC filings and PR news don't help with RS, rest are passing mentions.  I find pretty much the same level of coverage about him.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very little that is in the article is verifiable in the sources.  There are a lot of statements like: "Held many positions" that are sourced to one article that confirms that he held one position.  I find no significant independent sources about him that would support notability, although there are a few local sources with "local boy did good" stories.  I note that the article was created by an SPA who joined only in the last few weeks.  Lamona ( talk ) 03:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ssoftoons: Previously deleted.  IMO misses GNG and N:Corp by a mile.    Has only one reference and that is to a web site, a piece that appears to be a self-written press release/ self description North8000 ( talk ) 19:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation , Companies ,  and West Bengal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete : Most of what I could find was either routine listings or paid promotions.   There is this article: [13] , but it might also be a paid piece, hard to tell.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 18:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sensitivity priority: Chidgk1 ( talk ) 17:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:19, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerry Slavonia: Walsh90210 ( talk ) 22:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Internet ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ricardo Tejedo: Boleyn ( talk ) 21:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Mexico .  Owen× ☎ 21:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruce Case: Onel 5969 TT me 11:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Creator should be blocked for disruptive editing.  Deb ( talk ) 11:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Crime ,  and Brazil .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article is highly misleading and accuses a living person of a crime (murder).  This is not compliant with WP:BLP .  Best regards, -- Johannes ( Talk ) ( Contribs ) ( Articles ) 13:27, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete if nothing else on TNT grounds; the article is written with such emotion and sense of righting wrongs that it would have to be rewritten from scratch if the incident were proven notable.  The key thing for notability is the claim that this incident led to a change in the law (which would give the event lasting meaning) but so far as I can make out, the source used to support this claim doesn't refer to this specific incident.  The final citation about the law doesn't refer to animal cruelty at all (it's about mining and indigenous lands).  I would say speedy, but the article (fortunately) fails to identify the person who killed the dog.  Elemimele ( talk ) 15:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of motorcycle suspension manufacturers: Article was tagged by another user without proper followup but after having a look I'm taking it upon myself to complete the nomination.  @ Cowinatree : For future AfD nominations, please fully follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO .   Thank you.  -- Finngall talk 17:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you, sorry I didn’t follow through.  I’m pretty new to this.  Cowinatree ( talk ) 08:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This isn't even an article, really, it's a couple bullet points.  It would also appear to run afoul of WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 21:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  If urgent, the content can be placed on Motorcycle suspension with sources.  REDISCOVERBHARAT ( talk ) 04:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A category would be more appropriate.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 12:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Unsourced WP:LISTCRUFT .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 12:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Olivier Chavy: Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - only finding press releases and a couple of extremely passing mentions in questionable sources, in addition to those in the article.  No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or any other notability standard that I can find.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 13:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Priyagold: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 09:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 09:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Companies .  North America 1000 10:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as per sources and company revenue, this article is enough notable as per wikipedia guidelines [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ss6644 ( talk • contribs ) 18:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC) — Ss6644 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] References ^ https://www.dnaindia.com/business/report-meet-ballabh-prasad-agarwal-who-quit-family-business-built-rs-3000-crore-firm-priyagold-which-is-challenging-3080038 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  Despite the number of sources in the article, most simply regurgitate information provided by the company and/or execs and I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 20:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note I'll let the AfD play out, but note that this article was created by a WP:UPE sock. -- Ponyo bons mots 20:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per HighKing lacks indepth coverage fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Martha O'Kennon: All sources are by her or from her employer, inadequate for WP:GNG .  This was already draftified and restored to article space (by copy & paste) without any significant improvement; for draft history see [65] .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 00:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Mathematics , Computing , China , Michigan , New York ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   Record looks far short of WP:NPROF , and no other notability is apparent.  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 09:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  She also does not meet WP:BASIC .  I found one news article talking about art pieces she makes, and nothing more.  DaffodilOcean ( talk ) 10:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Search turned up nothing to meet notability on any standard.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 13:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing came up in a search that would indicate any sort of notability.  Also of note, the article creator Davidpgca ( talk · contribs ) appears to be a WP:SPA dedicated to writing articles on Albion College related people and topics, including a number that may or may not meet notability standards.  nf utvol ( talk ) 15:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment that, looking through images contributed by Davidpgca [66] , all the images appear to be tagged as "own work".   That appears to be true for very few of them (in particular, not for the ones that are 80 years old).   Anyone know how to report at Commons?  Russ Woodroofe ( talk ) 20:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I noticed that myself.  I have gone in and tagged the items that are not clearly in the public domain for removal on the basis that this user is not the owner of the works.  nf utvol ( talk ) 01:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  She seems to have led a neat life, but not one that rises quite to the level of encyclopedic notability.  BD2412 T 16:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per the arguments above.  - Samoht27 ( talk ) 17:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The citability data is quite low, and there is nothing else to indicate passing WP:PROF on other grounds.  Nsk92 ( talk ) 17:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC by a cricket yard.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 13:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Odaliana Gómez: The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches was this ; everything else was passing mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Dominican Republic ,  and New Jersey .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 06:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gurdip Ram Bungar: The first time was in the AFC, while the second time was moved from Mainspace to the draft.  Fails WP:NPOL .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 04:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 04:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 04:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Mayor of Gravesham is not a role that confers notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I agree with Mccapra.  Does not appear to pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
YARP: PROD reasoning was " Appears to fail to have been the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. " It was removed with the edit sumarry " sources exist, see talk ".  Those sources seem fine for verification , but they do nothing to establish notability .  Just Step Sideways from this world .... .  today 15:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Software .  Just Step Sideways from this world .... .  today 15:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT / WP:PRODUCT .  I couldn't find independent reliable sources that would show notability which includes the sources on the article itself and the talk page.  I didn't check each author for each paper, but there are four references on the article's talk page, and three of them are non-independent even without considering the reliability of the publishers: Giorgio Metta of the Sage reference is scientific director of the Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (the same Metta, G. as in the article's references) and Lorenzo Natale of the 2016 Springer reference is a tenured senior scientist at the same institution, which is an institution that develops the program and owns the copyright for some of the material in the program.  One of the authors of the 2014 Springer reference is Silvio Traversaro, who is one of the primary maintainers of the program's GitHub.  The fourth reference is the Frontiers reference which appears to be independent, though confidence in the publisher isn't high due to considerations like the WikiProject Academic Journals assessment and an RSN disucssion (as well as non-robotics discussions including Public Health , Neurology , Genetics ).  The last potential reference in the article itself is this , which is not significant coverage.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 02:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , like Aoidh and JSS above, I can't find reliable secondary sources.  The sources that pop up when searching are connected to the project.  Rjj iii ( talk ) 02:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Esteban Abada High School: UtherSRG (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Did WP:BEFORE and was unable to find any sources that were not passing mentions or Facebook posts.  I searched scholar and there are a couple mentions about how the school was the site of some earthquake improvements but nothing in de[th enough to establish notability. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete My searches could not find significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Redirecting to Division of City Schools – Manila could have been an alternative per WP:ATD but that also has no supporting cites.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . While some sources are available, they do not meet WP:SIGCOV . Fails WP:NSCHOOL . 33ABGirl ( talk ) 14:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:SIGCOV . The person who loves reading ( talk ) 00:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Sampaloc, Manila#Education : as WP:ATD . ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 06:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To the delete voters @ Dr vulpes : , @ LibStar : , @ Lenticel : , @ 33ABGirl : and @ The person who loves reading : : is it okay with you guys to merge this on the target I mentioned? ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 06:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you can find a cite for that section then I'm okay with the merge per WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah that sounds fine, if there's anything you want me to do just ping me and I'll do my best to give you a hand.  Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge proposal Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Nothing useful to merge.  — hueman1 ( talk • contributions ) 01:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sampaloc, Manila#Education , do not delete or merge since there's nothing worth merging.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL per nom.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 05:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ SBKSPP : Why redirect it to a page where it's not even mentioned?  — hueman1 ( talk • contributions ) 08:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete