hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Shawna Stoltenberg : All coverage is routine, nothing of significance.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Minnesota .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks independent coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sierra Academy of Aeronautics : This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, but I couldn't verify that it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG .  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I stubbed this as it had more issues than usable content, but couldn't find enough with which to build it back up.  Star Mississippi 04:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: This article had a declined WP:PROD , so is ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Complex / Rational 22:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Run of the mill training school .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Lithuania : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but announcements and none of those assert notability.  Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL .  I also advise Fandom for them if they want to save it so much.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports , Lists ,  and Lithuania .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No merit under WP:NLIST BrigadierG ( talk ) 10:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia isn't a TV guide.  This doesn't pass the criteria established by the WP:NLIST .  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kushk-e Fashapuyeh : Abadi are not notable.  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bradford and Airedale Teaching Primary Care Trust : Shellwood ( talk ) 11:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CDA Public School and College : All sources seem to be either too short, passing mentions or related to the subject.  I couldn't find any suitable sources for the article.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Bangladesh .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL .  33ABGirl ( talk ) 16:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources are not indepth and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 02:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Senn (video game designer) : OceanHok ( talk ) 17:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  16:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I know his involvement with Sonic Xtreme is heavily documented in reliable sources in a general sense, but it would take reviewing to verify that the coverage is truly about him - much of it may be more in the context of the game rather than him.  Sergecross73 msg me 19:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The current sources in the article are not suitable for establishing notability, and searches did not really turn up any coverage on Senn.  There were some books and articles that have quotes from him, in regards to his work on Sonic Xtreme, but like Sergecross73 suggested, this kind of coverage is really on Sonic Xtreme , and not actual coverage about Senn, himself.   I also took a quick look around for sources on his current company, Senntertain, and similarly did not find much coverage in reliable sources on it.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 19:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Booting process of Windows NT Setup before Vista : This topic has a very dubious notability .  Perhaps some redirect/merger with Booting process of Windows NT might help both but... the connection here is not clear (redirect?).  PS.  Last year there was an AfD for this where there were promises of improvement and that WP:THEREMAYBESOURCES .  Nothing has improved since, and the cited sources are how-to manuals - those are very poor indicators of notability.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , still a WP:NOTHOWTO article, lacks (to use an analogy) "out-of-universe" information, history, evolution, ...  It just describes the process from inside.  Fram ( talk ) 13:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for all the reasons above.  microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 15:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Greg Castiglioni : Fails WP:SIGCOV .  4meter4 ( talk ) 03:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Theatre , Italy ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Unable to find significant coverage in independent sources. — Moriwen ( talk ) 15:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Janaratna : No evidence of any usage beyond a single conference presentation.  WP:BEFORE reveals no potential sources.  Tagged for notability for a decade.  Jfire ( talk ) 22:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India .  Jfire ( talk ) 22:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Per nominator this is a newly invented term with no record of coverage or even usage outside the article now under discussion.  Central and Adams ( talk ) 15:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Invented term with zero records anywhere.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 11:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No records found.  Grabup ( talk ) 03:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
G.B.S.S. School No.1, Shakti Nagar : No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 04:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Delhi .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom, this school article fails WP:GNG and is written like an advertisement.  🛧 Midori No Sora♪ 🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈ ) 00:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dr. Gaur Hari Singhania Institute of Management and Research : Published years ago, but IMO should never have got through AfC (accepted by a since-blocked sock).  Cites only primary sources, and BEFORE finds nothing beyond the usual rankings, directory listings, sponsored content and social media.  Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT by some margin.  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 08:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Education ,  and India .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 08:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the reasons stated in the nomination.  Also, not only does this article heavily rely on primary sources, it doesn't even use them correctly e.g. the section about collaborations only links to the sites of other institutes, and not even to pages where said supposedly collaborations are confirmed, effectively artificially expanding the sources section.  Cortador ( talk ) 11:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 13:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Relies excessively on primary sources and 25 out of the 26 references are not used properly.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 19:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not just those e.g. reference 13 claims that the school got an award from the Times Group, but the reference just links to the main page of the Times Group website, not to any subpage about the award.  Half the references are like that.  Cortador ( talk ) 20:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based in what I can see in English.  Prepared to reconsider if there are good sources in Hindi.  Mccapra ( talk ) 19:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Peter Law (actor) : However, my point still stands that the source is about his son and daughter, Jude Law and Natasha Law , more than him, if not then it's just one source.  A Google search gives no sources that prove notability to this person, many are about his son.  Thus, this article fails WP:SIGCOV .  I doubt that the information already in the article needs a separate one, it can be merged to the Natasha Law and Jude Law articles.  Spinixster (trout me!) 02:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Actors and filmmakers .  Spinixster (trout me!) 02:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE - WP:BIOFAMILY "Being related to a notable person in itself confers no degree of notability upon that person." — Maile ( talk ) 13:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment -This was distributed to Academics and educators, so I'll just point out that the article (currently a stub) gives no indication that WP:NPROF is satisfied.  Qflib ( talk ) 17:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agree with

Discussion outcome: delete
Incognito (operating system) : The article is paywalled, so it's impossible for me to tell whether it is, as is common for such things, simply a reiteration of the product announcement, at least not without summoning up $7 of caring which I do not have (the latter, that is), but at any rate this is obviously not meeting WP:GNG standards of extensive coverage.  Mangoe ( talk ) 21:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , not every attempt at an OS needs it’s own page.  Hyperbolick ( talk ) 06:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable Linux distro.  Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bagsar Samachar : The article has three references.  The first one (in the Historical Journal ) is just an in-passing mention, giving the start and end date of the publication.  The other two don't even seem to mention the magazine.  Does not meet WP:GNG , hence: delete .  Randykitty ( talk ) 08:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Randykitty ( talk ) 08:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous WP:PROD .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, RL0919 ( talk ) 23:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  Being the first periodical published in the Bhojpuri language is historically significant enough to warrant encyclopedic inclusion.  The periodical also appears to have changed names (or rather the script changed), so I am not confident the other sources "don't mention" the periodical.   Given the language challenges involved I am uncertain that a proper WP:BEFORE search could be done by someone other than a language specialist in Bhojpuri and Devanagari.  For this reason, I'm inclined to lean keep even without SIGCOV proved for certain.  4meter4 ( talk ) 15:52, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG.  Sources in article and BEFORE do not show WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  // Timothy :: talk 22:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Prabath Ruwan : This player made a single international appearance and played domestically in Sri Lanka.  The article is sourced only to a database.  I can find some articles mentioning his name in passing but I see no significant coverage.  March OfThe Greyhounds 13:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Football , Asia ,  and Sri Lanka .  March OfThe Greyhounds 13:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm seeing four caps for Sri Lanka, but nonetheless, there very little happening in this article, and this player clearly fails WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 16:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 11:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:GNG .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 23:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per npm -- Devoke water 19:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sergei Barsukov : No significant coverage in RS and sourced only to databases.  Outside of routine transfer announcements like this , only able to find this non-independent press release and a namecheck in a local news article .  Kges1901 ( talk ) 13:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Russia .  Kges1901 ( talk ) 13:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article about footballer who only played a few seasons in the Russian second level; and only one season where he played more than half of the matches.  I agree with the nominator's source anaylsis; I checked the local newspapers where Barsukov played the most at the second level (Samarskaya Gazeta and Samarskoe Obozrenie - FC Lada; Tikhookeanskaya Gazeta - SKA Khabarovsk) and found nothing (I don't know any local newspapers for Orenburg or Saratov oblasts).  More general searches of Russian-language turned up only routine coverage.  Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aridon Bllaca : The closest thing I found was this and this , which does not suffice.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Kosovo .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per all forementioned reasons above.  Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG . -- 12:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) Soft Delete - only statistics sources , I found from my search on Google Wasilatlovekesy ( talk ) 06:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete