hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dobrolet (cargo airline) : This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment -- This was possibly Aeroflot 's name when it was first founded. No relation to this Dobrolet. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - - Not too much coverage to meet notability.  Royal88888 ( talk ) 22:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dabney Crossroads, Mississippi : The only modern coverage I can turn up for this is use of this place as a waypoint or the fact that a USGS quadrangle map was named for this site.  Newspapers.com does not catch any coverage of this either except for an appearance in a listing of places served in a county supervisor's district either.  Admittedly, the standard methods do not always do a good job of turning up coverage for older extinct places.  However, the lack of any mention in Ed Bearss 's gigantic trilogy on the Vicksburg campaign suggests this place was either not known by this name or was not significant at the time, as Bearss' work is very detailed in mentioning the minor place names of the area and the Vicksburg campaign raged right through Hinds County.  I haven't seen anything that would indicate a WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG pass here.  Hog Farm Talk 03:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Mississippi .  Hog Farm Talk 03:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agreed, the quadrangle thing is annoying, and I'm not even sure it contains this "place".  Nothing in newspapers, books, or google.  Well there is stuff, but it is just repeaters of WP and GNIS.  James.folsom ( talk ) 21:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oleksandr Rudenko : This article was draftified once, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement.   An article should speak for itself , but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject.   The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Ukraine .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 20:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - creator has WP:REFBOMBed 18 refs from stats sites and non-independent sources and 5 ELs to try to give an illusion that the subject is notable but he still fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG as he did last time we discussed him.  Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - creator WP:REFBOMBing the article with sources that do not meet IS RS SIGCOV demonstrates the lack of sources showing notability for subject.  // Timothy :: talk 06:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - significant use of WP:REFBOMBing from non-reliable stats sites.  141 Pr { contribs } 19:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cecilio Ynares : There is no evidence of WP:SIGCOV contributing to WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] He is a mayor of a small town or municipality in a province, not a city.  AtorniYormeJKLlamera ( talk ) 12:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The subject person of the article is a mayor of a small town or municipality in a province, not a city.  A municipality can be elevated into a city once the minimum population for a city has been met by a municipality.  AtorniYormeJKLlamera ( talk ) 12:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 23:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Updated the nomination accordingly.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as politician seems to be not notable -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 11:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL per nom. Not as notable as his siblings. SBKSPP ( talk ) 01:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maratha-Rajput conflict (1800-1820) : Creator was recently  blocked for socking.  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 03:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , India ,  and Rajasthan .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 03:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This article doesn't pass WP:GNG .  I nowhere read about a topic called Maratha-Rajput conflict (1800-1820).  Nothing of significance happened in 1800 or 1820 which can start or end any such conflicts.  There were many conflicts in present day Rajasthan around that time like kingdoms of Marwar, Mewar, Jaipur, Scindhia, Holkar, Pindari etc all fighting with one another, Marwar-Jaipur conflicts, Holkar-Scindhia conflicts, pindari helping one kingdom abandoning them and helping other, all of these happened simultaneously, so it can not be said that Rajputs like Mewar, Marwar, Jaipur etc were fighting unitedly against United Maratha forces of Holkar, Scindhia and pindaris.  I seriously think the article is more like generalization of almost a century long warfare in this period of anarchy which also had other players like Mughals and many more new entrants like Sikhs, British, and many soldiers of fortunes working under some powers and later switching sides.  In my opinion this article doesn't pass notability issue.  Just show some references or citations where this particular topic is mentioned separately, or even just mentioned.  This article is nothing but a rubbish page made by a abusive account.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4052:91F:698F:5590:CBF8:CC1B:D8BB ( talk ) 18:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. -- Imperial [AFCND] 10:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abdollah (Khosrow) Samiei : And his so-called research involves at least one article ( http://nexusacademicpublishers.com/table_contents_detail/4/500/html ) in a "predatory" publisher (Nexus Academic Publishers) listed on Beall's List ( https://beallslist.net/ ).  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 16:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Malaysia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello, I hope you are well.  You got issues from Abdollah (Khosrow) Samiei 's Wikipedia article.  As you said, I will try to improve this article.  At first, this article was uncategorized, but now this article is in the category of person and academic.  After that, there was no link to this article on any Wikipedia page and the article was orphaned, but now it exists this article is not orphaned.  Also, this article had fewer sources for notability, but now various references have been added to it, and I am adding more references to prove notability.  I hope I was able to change your mind and agree with me that this article has the potential to stay on Wikipedia.  Please refer to this link in Google Scholar and you will come across various articles from Dr. Samiei's.  https://scholar.google.com/scholar? hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=abdollah+samiei&btnG= I think this can also help to convince you that this page should stay in Wikipedia.  Amisiy Amisiy ( talk ) 13:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable, very low citation count Hadal1337 ( talk ) 16:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:40, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Fails notability.  Alex-h ( talk ) 16:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Citation record too low to pass WP:PROF and no other form of notability visible.  The article was a little longer before being cut down to the nominated version but the extra length just listed more low-visibility publications, not helpful for establishing notability.  I'm not putting much weight in the "he published in a predatory journal" argument, though: anyone might do that for any number of reasons, including not realizing it was predatory.  Those publications can't be used as reliable sources on Wikipedia, and we might discount them as counting towards scholarly notability even if they were heavily cited, but that doesn't seem to be an issue here.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:52, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Masjid Eid Gah : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  WP:TOOSOON .  103.151.0.166 ( talk ) 00:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 19:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete: per A7: among other deficiencies, such as complete failure of the GNG, the article makes no claim of notability.  Ravenswing 02:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Al Basil High School for Superiors : Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Bassel High School for Outstanding Students Quick-ease2020 ( talk ) 18:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Syria .  Owen× ☎ 00:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clearly non-notable.  Astaire ( talk ) 21:28, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Alread PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Obviously not notable , very clearly written in a biased and impartial tone, and has no sources ( WP:OR ).  Also, what does a "superior student" even mean?  — Mjks28 ( talk ) 11:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Almohad conquest of Tripoli : The Almohads didn't "conquer" Tripoli as its citizens rebelled against the Normans when the Almohad reached Ifriqiya (this is what the sources say in passing).  M.Bitton ( talk ) 18:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Libya .  M.Bitton ( talk ) 18:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  It is an unreliable article which, if retained, would need a full rewrite with closer attention paid to actual sources.  Personally, I don't think it warrants even that as we have articles on Ifriqiya and the Almohads.  I think those should cover events in Tripoli which, as you say, are not significant enough for a standalone article.  PearlyGigs ( talk ) 22:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as redundant to Almohad conquest of Norman Africa .  This reduplication of material is getting absurd.  Srnec ( talk ) 23:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Major League Hockey : The only reliable source I can find is this , but all the rest are just unreliable outlets.  Toadette Edit!  06:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination, all I could find online about this proposed league is social media and blogs posts.  This source , the only inline reference in the article at the moment, is a press release posted to Mega Marine Ship Machinery Parts in Gujarat, India, suggesting undisclosed paid editing.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 07:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey , Canada ,  and United States of America .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is about all there is in a semi-RS [59] , otherwise all I find is PR items.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] According to WP:SPORTSKEEDA , that's "generally unreliable".  Wikishovel ( talk ) 14:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This has been reported by many reputable sources in the hockey community, including Steve Dangle and Allan Walsh.  https://twitter.com/walsha/status/1788751235085996514 Ericringo ( talk ) 14:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Mmhmm.   For my part, any claim that some fly-by-night startup league could conceivably contemplate a salary cap of $30 million, or to pay each player an average of $2.1 m, not only makes this a GNG violation but bumps up hard against WP:BULLSHIT .   This is just not credible, and I want a lot better proof of notice by "reputable sources in the hockey community" than a broken Twitter link.  Ravenswing 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the subject does not meet the notability criteria; the amount of coverage isn't "significant".  There's a single full-fledged report on the topic (the Dangle video, which has since been retracted); everything else is tweets by journalists.  Furthermore, a claim as big as this warrants more reliable sources than a single report made by someone who is, respectfully, not a seasoned journalist.  This plainly doesn't warrant an article.  I don't think one can even recommend "draftify"; considering the paucity of sources, even the claim "not notable yet, but likely to become so in the near future" is generous.  HeyArtemis ( talk ) 12:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per HeyArtemis - the Dangle video was the primary source of information, and he's since retracted it, suggesting doubt as to the legitimacy of the league.  The Kip 15:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Issam Eid : The existing references are poor (primary / self-published).  I don't think he meets WP:GNG or WP:JOURNALIST .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 08:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Journalism , Lebanon ,  and Canada .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 08:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete orphan article that does not meet WP:JOURNALIST .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per LibStar.  Reads like a PR vanity page.  Llajwa ( talk ) 16:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MonkeySports : All the coverage I find is WP:ROUTINE and doesn't meet WP:ORGCRIT .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Sports ,  and Texas .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball , Ice hockey , Softball ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't see sources out there.  This article reads as WP:PROMO .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 22:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:CORPDEPTH .  The only sources I see do not provide significant coverage.  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 18:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Toby Britton : — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrug02 ( talk • contribs ) 12:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header.   Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 27 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 13:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Shrug02 you're the only author of this article so if you want it deleted, you can probably use {{ Db-author }} on the article itself.  Or maybe confirm here since I don't quite understand your deletion rationale.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 13:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Skynxnex Thanks.  I just discovered the author option you mentioned.  Will use in future.  Deletion rational is that several of my other articles on cricketers from Jersey are being deemed non-notable so I figured they all are.  Thanks again.  Best wishes.  Shrug02 ( talk ) 13:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Jersey .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ben Phillips (rugby union) : Of course, he might be getting drowned out by a (popular?) YouTuber of the same name, from the same damn city... which is why I'm going with AFD instead of PROD to get some more eyes on it.  Primefac ( talk ) 13:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Rugby union , United Kingdom ,  and Wales .  Primefac ( talk ) 13:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Doesn't seem to be enough here for a GNG pass.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - also not seeing enough for GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not enough coverage.  RodneyParadeWanderer ( talk ) 16:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aditi Vats : Has had no significant roles in the mentioned films.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 05:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Television , Fashion , India ,  and Rajasthan .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 05:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no major roles in films.  Fails WP:GNG and none of the cited sources cover the subject in depth.  I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. -- Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 13:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor and unreliable sources.  Fails WP:NACTOR .  The actress is not well-known who has played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work that has been the primary subject of multiple independent articles and reviews.  Fails notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete