hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
KSPJ-LP : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 03:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While the nominator omitted any nomination reason, it's not hard to figure out it's probably the usual GNG failure for lack of significant coverage .  I don't think the non-FCC sourcing for this stations goes far beyond this listing of the station's 2005 license-only sale , which wouldn't exactly fall under SIGCOV.  Another remnant of the looser "standards" of 2007, and to an extent pre- 2021 in general.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Mainly as the actual programming the station aired can't be ascertained as TBN sold it to someone else and they never really got it truly on the air.  Nate • ( chatter ) 01:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sign of notability and the existing links are dead.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Descending solid coalitions : The article refers to a single source that is also missing the term .  PROD was reverted.  The alternate name, "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions", apparently has no independent WP:SIGCOV , see discussion at Talk:Descending solid coalitions#Proposed deletion .  Викидим ( talk ) 07:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 08:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  As I noted, additional sources use many closely-related terms, like "Solid coalitions", "Proportionality for Solid Coalitions", etc.  The article is useful in general discussions of voting systems because it has a fairly unique set of properties like later-no-harm and participation , which makes it useful pedagogically (in articles discussing these criteria).  –Sincerely, A Lime 21:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Have to agree with the reasons given here.  I also cannot find any notable mentions except for some niche forums of this method, so deletions seems like the right step.  Jannikp97 ( talk ) 19:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This pretty clearly fails WP:GNG .  There's some discussion of it on web forums, but it doesn't appear to have garnered any sort of significant attention in reliable sources at this point.  SportingFlyer T · C 23:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Metalbilly : also none of the sources present in the article uses the term FMSky ( talk ) 04:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  FMSky ( talk ) 04:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Richard Lewington (diplomat) : Routine coverage here fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 20:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete References do not support notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 20:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Bilateral relations , Kazakhstan , Kyrgyzstan , United Kingdom ,  and Ecuador .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO for lack of significant coverage.  Coverage is routine.  LibStar ( talk ) 13:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Rahul Jogi : Having reviewed the sources in this current version, I can't see that any of the previous problems have been addressed at all, not to mention that 'The Rahul Jogi' is not an appropriate title and only seems to have been used to bypass the WP:SALT applied.  I also can't see any real improvement from the draftified version at Draft:Rahul Jogi Rahul Jogi other than the addition of sources that fail to confer notability.  I'm not convinced that Kabir Kranti is WP:RS and I seem to remember this being in the article before and it didn't persuade anyone at the time that Jogi is notable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Haryana , Madhya Pradesh , Rajasthan ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Seems like a possible G4 per nom.  Also, it's a professional profile, WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  Even if notability is established, this is not an encyclopedia article and we should delete for TNT.  — siro χ o 09:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination ‘ Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi ( talk ) 03:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC) ’ [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yaremis Fuentes : I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2012 , 2018 , 2023 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Cuba .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 14:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Retwa : Owen× ☎ 23:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Military ,  and Ethiopia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What ?  Richard Pankhurst clearly talks about it drawing from the primary source which is Al-Makrizi, I linked both secondary AND primary sources, we both know how under-researched Adalite history is, only Richard Pankhurst really adresses these battles of Sabr ad-Din that Al makrizi reports, I asked other wikipedia editors to review all the articles you reported for deletion they said its decent, I really can't see where I failed or did a mistake.  Yubudirsi ( talk ) 06:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You cited one source, which just briefly mentions it.  Please read WP:GNG before making anymore articles.  Socialwave597 ( talk ) 09:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete we need to stop creating battle articles based on passing mentions.  Adalite history may be under-researched but we have to base our articles on what sources say.  I would support merger of this and other similar articles into a broader general article covering Battles of the Abyssinian–Adal war if anyone wanted to create and develop that.  Mccapra ( talk ) 02:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Just not enough coverage of the event, the article largely relies on one source.  Lack of sourcing is not enough to keep the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sirje Tamul : Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Women , History ,  and Estonia .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  The article also fails WP:NPROF .  IncompA 21:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. -- Estopedist1 ( talk ) 05:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Myriad Sun : There are some brief concert reviews and there has been one single released under the project, with no reviews, all of which is insufficient for WP:NBAND .  ( WP:GNG is a higher bar and it also isn't met.) — Alalch E. 18:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia .  — Alalch E. 18:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Falls short of WP:GNG .  Doctorhawkes ( talk ) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Would need coverage in independent sources to meet WP:BAND , nor has the band charted or received a major award.  LibStar ( talk ) 06:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gordon McComb : Mach61 ( talk ) 21:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Basketball and Illinois .  Mach61 ( talk ) 21:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – if this should end up being deleted, my request (as author) is to have it be redirected to Hammond Ciesar All-Americans while keeping the redirect in some of the current categories.  Specifically: 1917 births, 2007 deaths, Chattanooga Mocs men's basketball players, and Hammond Ciesar All-Americans players.  We don't want to lose all history of this player's tenure in the NBL, and I think it'd be a fair compromise to allow the redirect to populate the applicable categories.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 22:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Eh.  Seems arbitrary to redirect there, rather than to Chattanooga Mocs men's basketball .  Mach61 ( talk ) 22:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He was more known for being a professional player than a college one, not particularly arbitrary.  SportsGuy789 ( talk ) 23:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 22:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment He seems to have also played college football for Chattanooga per " McComb, coming U.C. ace, skipped high school grids " Alvaldi ( talk ) 23:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  When no sources have been uncovered to meet SPORTSCRIT, the article should be deleted.  Does not appear to meet GNG.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 01:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ JoelleJay : What's wrong with this source to qualify for SPORTCRIT?  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 01:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What encyclopedic info do we gain from that?  The only material would be this particular reporter's very subjective personal opinions on his candidacy for a spot on the team.  We can't write an article entirely around quotes.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 02:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per Mach61.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 03:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gavin Nolan : Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Artists , United Kingdom ,  and Wales .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , considering I tried to speedy delete the article a couple of years ago, which was only reverted on the basis the article had been around a while.  Time for the article to go, no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST Sionk ( talk ) 15:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I added a couple of citations, but this is still some pretty thin stuff.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 00:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete .   Seems to be a popular contemporary artist but I was able to find very little coverage.   A couple of intervierws [14] [15] , and some coverage of a family tragedy [16] [17] but not enough for a BLP, IMHO.  Eluchil404 ( talk ) 23:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Santiago Bedoya Pardo : 3 of them are pieces by the journalist and 3 are genealogy websites demonstrating his relationship with notorious people.  Rkieferbaum ( talk ) 19:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Journalism ,  and Peru .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability is not inherited , so people do not get Wikipedia articles just for being related to other people who have Wikipedia articles — but the article is documenting absolutely nothing that would be "inherently" notable in the absence of WP:GNG -worthy sourcing for it, and the sourcing isn't even starting to get him over GNG: three of the six footnotes are just supporting his genealogy; he's the bylined author , not the subject, of two of them; and the only one that comes from an independent third party source is a WordPress blog just embedding one of his tweets (I will not call them Xs), which means absolutely none of them are notability-building sources at all.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Operation True Promise (disambiguation) : It would be best to just add a hatnote on both articles.  CycloneYoris talk!  09:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Disambiguations , Iran ,  and Israel .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with you.  The problem is that both articles are called by names that are not the official name of the operation.  That's why I thought it would be more correct to establish this page.  Galamore ( talk ) 09:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per " WP:NONEOTHER ".  Only one of the two entries is called True Promise.  The other is called Truthful Promise.  (Then redirect Operation True Promise , not this page, to 2024 Iranian strikes in Israel .)  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and per WP:ONEOTHER .  thetechie@enwiki : ~/talk/ $ 15:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aziz Rohallah : Article sourced only to a database source, which is not enough for notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Afghanistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no GNG-passing sources to be found.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Surya Manthena : GSS 💬 13:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions .  GSS 💬 13:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No evidence of notability.  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 08:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] Delete .  Subject fsails WP:NPROF and shows no other evidence of notability.  Qflib ( talk ) 19:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Outstraight deletion as subject fails notability guidelines; and that there are no reliable sources to establish the claims as well as the sources in the article which mentions the subject only with no indepth coverage.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Outright non-notable *living* person with no reliable sourcing.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 14:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] NOTE - Creator is now blocked as a SOCK.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 23:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They have other BIO creations that need to be looked at: Paid editor?  Xxanthippe ( talk ) 23:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC) .  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mila (Doctor Who) : I also cannot find any SIGCOV for the character, and thus it seems as though Mila doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Given that she is a companion, albeit brief, it might be worth adding a mention of her to either the supporting characters list or Companions article as an alternative to straight deletion.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 19:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 19:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into the relevant audio drama articles or into an appropriate list as described in the nomination.  There's no practical reason (like ease of navigation) that such an insignificant character needs their own article, and GNG is clearly not met here.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 20:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Television ,  and United Kingdom .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 21:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete minor character in three very minor spin-offs I assume have zero notability of their own as they have absolutely no sources.  No one is going to search for this; if they really want information on such an obscure topic Tardis Data Core exists.  Case of “It’s doctor who so it simply IS notable”.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 09:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No sources for notability.  Not everything in the Whoniverse needs an article.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 16:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough reliable coverage to pass WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nakhalpara Hossain Ali High School : Fails WP:GNG .  আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 00:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Bangladesh .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 01:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete