hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Stilt-Man: Industrial Insect (talk) 01:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 01:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to a relevsant list of characters, nothing here suggests WP:GNG is met.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: S in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE , but send Lady Stilt-Man's information to List of Marvel Comics characters: L .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 16:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: S in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 20:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Death-Throws: ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  To the closer if this outcome ends in merge, I ask that any redirects of it's members be transferred to their respectful List of Marvel Comics characters pages.  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 01:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Jothefiredragon ( talk ) 04:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations - There is only a single non-primary source being used in the article, and searches only turned up one other viable source with this entry in a book, which does not really go into much analysis or anything beyond simply summarizing their fictional history.  As a very minor fictional group, there is not enough coverage in reliable sources to support an independent article, but probably is enough that a merge would be warranted.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 16:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge for reasons given above.  Bduke ( talk ) 23:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Rorshacma.  There isn't enough for WP:SIGCOV but there is an WP:ATD here.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 05:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep if more sources are found, or merge with List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations as per above.  BOZ ( talk ) 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Softcoding: Nearly unsourced neologism.  Fails WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge to hard coding .  This is a real topic likely notable, as evidenced by RS articles [4] and [5] and a chapter in an O'Reilly book [6] .  hard coding is an obvious merge/redirect target.  I don't see why this was posted to AfD; there is no solid rationale for deletion.  -- {{u| Mark viking }} { Talk } 17:36, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Hard coding .  That is the actual notable concept, softcoding is a little-known neologism always defined in opposition to hardcoding.  Tercer ( talk ) 12:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Blockade of Azovstal: This has even less material in it, and isn’t any more notable than it was a year ago.  It makes more sense to cover it in the larger article.  HappyWith ( talk ) 02:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Russia ,  and Ukraine .  HappyWith ( talk ) 02:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Siege of Mariupol as per the nomination.  I'm surprised this article was missed after all this time.  IncompA 03:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Siege of Mariupol as per the nomination.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect we already discussed this.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 10:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom - Too much good info for a simple Redir, but no SIGCOV or GNG as a standalone article.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 03:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Warsaw bid for the 2036 Summer Olympics: In general, cities that have official bids for the 2036 Summer Olympics should get articles, and none of the 3 officially bidding cities currently do.  Georgia guy ( talk ) 14:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Poland .  Shellwood ( talk ) 15:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or redirect to Bids for the 2036 Summer Olympics § Europe as WP:ATD .  — siro χ o 02:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  I don't see what confirmed status would change given this is effectively a reprint of a press release.  GNG fail.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 03:49, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This was draftified during this AfD.  I have reverted.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE 12:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Burma National Revolutionary Army: If this rename becomes the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC , can move the other page title accordingly- no RS showing any significant differences.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 12:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions .  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 12:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 13:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Pinging @ Espresso Addict as someone involved in prior WP:PROD for thoughts.  Additional comment: it is a direct fork (i.e. someone created this article by copying content from the other) so content should already be in the other article.  EmeraldRange ( talk / contribs ) 15:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Myanmar Royal Dragon Army - there's no rationale for the two articles.  Probably it should go under the current name.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of Wipeout obstacles: Magitroopa ( talk ) 03:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Games , Lists ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and massively, massively shorten into Wipeout (2008 game show) and Wipeout (2021 game show) BrigadierG ( talk ) 04:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Partial merge to Wipeout (2008 game show) , with any reboot specific stuff being ok to go to Wipeout (2021 game show) .  Most of this is verifiable to primary sources so such a merge is fine.  ATD seems important here because a future transwiki is possible.  — siro χ o 04:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per other's.  This list will never fulfill WP:NLIST , but the show(s) should already cover it quite well.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 06:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Selective merge to Wipeout (2008 game show) and Wipeout (2021 game show) .  This list itself is WP:INDISCRIMINATE and thus not needed, but some text in sections in the parent articles about some of the major/most common obstacles would be fine.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 09:34, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
List of Bahraini films of 2014: Standard practice of WikiProject Film is that a country gets one base list of its films first, with individual by-year lists spun off only once the base list has become large enough to need that for size management purposes -- but specifically in 2014, one user went around indiscriminately creating "List of [Country] films of 2014" for every single country where they could find even one film to list, which isn't the established practice and has not been continued for any other year in the past decade.  Bahrain, however, doesn't even have its own standalone list at all yet, and instead List of Bahraini films just exists as a redirect to Bahrain's subsection in the continent-wide List of Asian films , where there are just eight films listed including both of these, and I had to add four of those eight to that list myself just now.  So no prejudice against the creation of one base list of Bahraini films if somebody wants to take on the job of looking for additional films that are still missing from that section, but there would need to be a hell of a lot more than just eight Bahraini films to list before spinning out separate by-year lists would be necessary.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Lists , and Bahrain .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nom (I suppose this is technically a merge but...) don't see any need for this list as of right now.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 18:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or merge as suggested.  A list of only 2 films, when we're now 10 years out, shows me there aren't likely going to be more added, so the list isn't needed.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge These two films should be listed at Cinema of Bahrain and List of Asian films .  D r e a m Focus 02:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
April 2012 Idlib bombings: No retrospective coverage or major societal effects to meet WP:NEVENT .  Too short to warrant a merge.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 02:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Events , Terrorism ,  and Syria .  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 02:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge into Timeline of the Syrian Civil War per WP:NEVENT and WP:NOTNEWS .  No WP:SIGCOV either.  Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 04:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge: I agree with @ Aydoh8 's suggestion.  Article was created just a few days after the event it covers happened, and only includes one source and is a WP:STUB .  This article doesn't include any information that would be negatively affected by merging.  Mjks28 ( talk ) 05:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per above.  Tiny event in a big war.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 12:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Joel Segal: No WP:SIGCOV by independent RS that justify an article in the 15 years that this article has existed.  Per a WP:BEFORE , the only thing resembling any sort of coverage is this profile on an activist group's website.  Longhornsg ( talk ) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Progressive Democrats of America .  Florificapis ( talk ) 02:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not finding any useful secondary sources.  Nothing to merge that I can see.  If article is deleted Joel Segal (sports agent) can be moved to remove the disambiguator.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 20:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Progressive Democrats of America#History , where he is presently mentioned.  Per Longhornsg and AusLondonder, not notable enough to warrant a standalone page.  Fails WP:GNG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 17:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Hitomi (Dead or Alive): No signs of SIGCOV, and no real commentary about her as a character.  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 01:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 01:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 01:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters .  There are quite a few video game articles like this, fairly indepth WP:FANCRUFT with questionable sourcing (some highlights in this one include Top 10 Sexiest Female Video Game Characters and Top 10 Babes in Games ).  Decently written, but just no real WP:SIGCOV .  ULPS ( talk ) 03:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters .  Niemti created numerous articles solely due to sex appeal of characters and this one is no exception, there's no evidence is notable or passes WP:INDISCRIMINATE .  Stuff like "sexiest character" should not indicate importance without a really good justification like it being integral to their character.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 04:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - No SIGCOV, just a ton of vapid, cherry-picked cruft about sex appeal.  Sergecross73 msg me 12:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per nom.  GlatorNator ( ᴛ ) 12:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Another character that pretends to have reception.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge I stand by my statement that boobs are not notable.  All the women in DoA are hot, okay?  Nobody cares.  This is practically WP:ROUTINE coverage of the franchise.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Even calling it ROUTINE is generous.  It reads more like someone just searched for every passing mention on the internet and forced it into the article without regard for importance or significance...  Sergecross73 msg me 01:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  The reception is mainly one-off comments about the character without any depth.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 03:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Passing comments about the character… ‘s breasts .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 06:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  Lacking sigcov.  Too bad, I like her design.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 18:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Bloodshed (character): Industrial Insect (talk) 01:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Comics and animation .  Industrial Insect (talk) 01:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to appropriate list of characters, plot summary and nothing else, fails GNG.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 11:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: B in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 19:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: B in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 20:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as we have two different Merge target articles proposed.  We have to get that down to one.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:03, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep or merge with List of Marvel Comics characters: B per WP:PRESERVE .  BOZ ( talk ) 03:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - @ User:Liz , I think the M is a typo by @ User:Rtkat3 rather than a different merge target as as far as I can tell the character has no aliases that begin with M BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 17:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The typo has been taken care of.  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 17:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This appears to be one of those characters that are just so minor and non-notable, that I don't believe are even notable enough to include in one of the character lists.  There are no sources currently in the article that are not just issues of comics, and I have not actually found any sources at all that discuss the character outside of an official Marvel page and fanwikis.  And if I am understanding those fan wikis correctly, this character has only had a grand total of nine appearances.  For all of the "Keep or Merge" votes above, I would honestly like to know what possible rationale is being used for the "Keep" portion of the vote.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 22:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge
Impact of Falsettos on the United States: The article itself seems to be largely an essay, and doesn't appear to be particularly necessary to exist in its own right DeputyBeagle ( talk ) 13:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre , Sexuality and gender ,  and Judaism .  DeputyBeagle ( talk ) 13:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with the Falsettos article.  -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 17:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge per Ssilvers. A lot of the information in this article already appears in the main article about the musical, so not that much would need to be added in case of a merge. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge - I see no valid reason to have two articles on this topic.  Rogermx ( talk ) 01:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note - The article was created by Meghane2 as one of the Wiki Education student editors of Brighan Young University for the Fall of 2020.   They have not edited Wikipedia since.  — Maile ( talk ) 23:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge yet more student essay cruft.  We really need to somehow find a way to both get student editors to write properly and speedy-cull essay hosting.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 11:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: merge