Pszczółki, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship: It is not a settlement, the Polish regulation on place-names simply says it is "part of Woźnice " ( część wsi Woźnice ) - if it were a settlement it would be described as an osada .  Looking at the location , it is palpably just an individual warehouse site with no evidence of ever having been populated.  Presently it is the site of an agricultural supplies wholesaler.  This cannot pass WP:GEOLAND as there is no evidence of it ever being inhabited.  Since it is just a building/business, the appropriate notability standard is anyway WP:NBUILDING / WP:NCORP , neither of which it can pass.  Redirecting to Woźnice is not appropriate as this is just the word for "bees" and anyone searching it in combination with "Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship" is highly unlikely to be looking for Woźnice, which will anyway have nothing to say about it.  If anything, they are more likely to be looking for information about wildlife!  We anyway do not redirect the names of individual buildings to the settlement they are in.  FOARP ( talk ) 15:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  FOARP ( talk ) 15:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The warehouse site seems to have a house attached to it (number 83), there is also number 82 nearby.  Pszczółki is a disambiguation page in English and Polish with no mention of bees, and the singular, pl:Pszczółka , seems to be a magazine published in Austria-Hungary.  The bee-related articles are at Pszczóła/Pszczóły.  There's also the fact that this is already disambiguated, similar to Church, Lancashire and River, Kent .  Deletion wouldn't be useful to anyone looking for information about bees, it would just mean they would find information about another place with this name - you're unlikely to achieve consensus for deleting Pszczółki, Pomeranian Voivodeship , or adding all different forms of foreign words to the English articles about things such as bees.  Peter James ( talk ) 20:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Peter, those addresses are all in Woźnice, and are part of the same compound.  You can actually even look at this place in Google Street-view - there is no mention of the supposed title anywhere.  This is a place that exists independently only on Wikipedia and nowhere else.  FOARP ( talk ) 06:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's an official name according to the place name register.  The addresses are Pszczółki 81, 82 and 83.  Number 83 includes the compound (Google street view shows signs with the number 83 at the entrances), 82 is the other side of the road junction, and 81 is further north.  Peter James ( talk ) 11:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The address of the company is listed here: https://mapa.targeo.pl/biofol-sp-z-o-o-pszczolki-11-730-woznice~22100811/sklep/adres It’s in Woźnice.  Pszczolki is the street name - nowhere treats it as an actual community.  FOARP ( talk ) 14:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC) FOARP ( talk ) 14:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Street names are not in the register of place names, and 81 and 83 are not on the same street.  There are similar addresses in some rural settlements in the UK, house number followed by a place name (or two) and a post town.  Pszczółki is the "street name" but it also says "Dzielnica: Pszczółki".  I was using geoportal.gov.pl for the addresses, which has "Pszczółki" where other addresses in the village have "Woźnice"; The "Miejscowość" field contains "Pszczółki (0762388)" and the "Ulica" (street) field is empty.  Peter James ( talk ) 14:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Miejscowość means locality.  If you're going to argue that this isn't part of Woźnice then you're going to run up against the Polish regulation on place-names explicitly stating that this is exactly what it is.  Or that these sources are unreliable for the purpose which Kotbot/Kotniski tried to use them for.  FOARP ( talk ) 18:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not arguing that it isn't part of Woźnice.  A settlement can be part of another settlement.  Peter James ( talk ) 19:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] OK, then let's just redirect to Woźnice per WP:NOPAGE ?  Seems pretty straight forward given we've got nothing but a name.  FOARP ( talk ) 19:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to Woźnice , which according to pl wiki this is a part of.  Not seeing how this needs a stand-alone article.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect