hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
A Wanderer in the Spirit Lands : Fails both WP:NBOOK and GNG.  I have failed to find a second review despite searching on Newspapers.com, Google News, etc.  It is an old book so stuff might be out there that I can't find.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 01:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 01:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Forgot to mention I did find this one thing .  But I'm honestly not sure what it is.  It is in Icelandic (?) And might be referring to this book.  It is in the newspaper "Heimskringla" from 7 April 1926, page 2.  I can't tell how in depth it addresses it either way.  If it is a review/analysis/discussion of this and is more than a few sentences I can withdraw this.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 01:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ PARAKANYAA : Well putting it through Google Translate does seem to show it's somewhat about the book, but Google Translate isn't exactly the best.  Interestingly, it gives an alternate name, simply "The Spirit Lands", though searching this also gives little results.  This book, however, is for some reason mentioned in one of Arthur Conan Doyle 's works ( The Edge of the Unknown ), though it doesn't exactly go in-depth: In a remarkable book, A Wanderer in the Spirit Lands, published in 1896, the author, Mr. Farnese, under inspiration, gives an account of many mysteries including that of fairies.  What he says fits in very clearly with the facts that have been put forward, and goes beyond them.  He says, speaking of elementals, "Some are in appearance like the gnomes and elves who are said to inhabit mountain caverns. Such, too, are the fairies whom men have seen in lonely and secluded places. Some of these beings are of a very low order of life, almost like the higher order of plants, save that they possess independent motion. Others are very lively and full of grotesque unmeaning tricks... As nations advance these lower forms of life die out from the astral plane of that earth's sphere and succeeding generations begin at first to doubt and then to deny that they ever had any existence."  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  01:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There's also some fairly decent length coverage in Borderland (magazine) (p.241-242, not sure abt reliability) and some short coverage (p. 385) in The Bookseller .  A case could also be made for WP:OLDBOOK since it's been mentioned a few times in the 20th/21st century.  Based on this and the above, it's probably best to keep .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  02:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with that, I'll withdraw this.  I just couldn't find anything minus the one review, and we've found more than that through this AfD so all is well.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 02:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
War in Abkhazia : Per WP:TWODABS as well, the DAB is not needed.  Yorkporter ( talk ) 21:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Yorkporter ( talk ) 21:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Georgia (country) .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Improper venue -The correct venue is WP:RM .  Schierbecker ( talk ) 01:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed with Schierbecker.  AfD is at least not the first step.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 00:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: Nominator has been locked as a sockpuppet of a globally banned user.  1234qwer 1234qwer 4 17:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Pheia pyrama : Aydoh8 ( talk ) 04:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and South America .  Aydoh8 ( talk ) 04:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:NSPECIES .  Jfire ( talk ) 04:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:NSPECIES .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 04:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Please have a look at the responses to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clivina jodasi and desist from any more of these nominations. (Also note that there is always at least an original description ) -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 07:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep as no valid deletion rationale has been advanced.  Wikipedia is not merely a recapitulation of things that are easy to Google anyway.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 17:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep WP:CSK#3 — siro χ o 06:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Andy Barclay : The character fails WP:GNG and the article is currently full of plot summaries.  Attempted to boldly blank and redirect but was reverted, seeing if a consensus can be formed here.  0x Deadbeef →∞ ( talk to me ) 03:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Film ,  and United States of America .  0x Deadbeef →∞ ( talk to me ) 03:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Child's Play (franchise) .  I think some of the reception section can be merged to Child's Play (1988 film) as well.  — siro χ o 05:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hm, I may have been a bit too fast on the draw on this one.  I am surprised to see a fair amount of SIGCOV of the character in [93] , [94] and [95] — siro χ o 05:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per above sources.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 14:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Formalizing my rec after reviewing the sources above a second time.  — siro χ o 03:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Shackleton Fracture Zone : Unlikely that anyone would search for this title, seems like it can be deleted with no loss of information on en.wiki JMWt ( talk ) 10:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oof I meant to nominate Natural delimitation between the Pacific and South Atlantic oceans by the Shackleton Fracture Zone rather than Shackleton Fracture Zone .  Sorry. .  JMWt ( talk ) 10:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
SpaceX ambition of colonizing Mars : Originally, back in 2013, this is a place SpaceX Mars vehicle proposal named "Mars Colonial Transporter" ( [38] ).  After that, there are multiple iterations of this concept which is best described at SpaceX Starship design history .  Later on, around 2020 ( [39] ), this article list all SpaceX mars mission proposals and vehicles to go along with it.  But by 2024, I've rewritten this article to try to emphasize about the relationship between SpaceX and Mars, because the launch vehicles have already being written about at SpaceX Starship and SpaceX Red Dragon , but I stopped doing so when I realized that this article will be filled with original research and press releases information.  I think this article should be redirected or at the very least refactored in some way.  CactiStaccingCrane ( talk ) 06:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism , Astronomy , Spaceflight ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural close per the nominator removing the lead sentence and then nominating the page, which may stretch good faith enough to end this deletion discussion of a notable topic and a very well-sourced and long-term article.  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 12:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think you are the one that is stretching people's good faith.  CactiStaccingCrane ( talk ) 12:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Maybe both or neither of us is doing so, but the fact remains that you removed the lead summary sentence before nominating (even though you wrote the good summary sentence in good faith).  Randy Kryn ( talk ) 12:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think I need to go out and touch grass a bit.  CactiStaccingCrane ( talk ) 12:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't bogart (per WP:IAR).  Just trying to save a nice page with 58 sources that you helped improve Randy Kryn ( talk ) 12:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, I think I would agree to close this AFD too.  Initially I think that this article will duplicate the scope of History of SpaceX and SpaceX Starship design history , but I think that this article could talk more about how SpaceX has popularized the ethos of colonizing Mars after decades of stagnation.  I will try to find as many sources as possible before writing this article again to make sure it won't become another op-ed piece.  CactiStaccingCrane ( talk ) 12:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Shenandoah Valley Governor's School : Elvisisalive95 ( talk ) 21:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - There is a lot for this one.  Some key publications might be this: [10] an academic paper specifically about the school.  Also this on specialised STEM schools: [11] .  Then there is this book on engineering education: [12] .  It doesn't stop there either.  Loads of mentions in the Virginia Junior Academy Science awards, newspapers, school directories etc.  These are all primary but sustained coverage.  There are mentions in other books too.  Some passing (like the eductaor who wrote a book but discusses this as his former school).  But the academic papers above alone are a GNG pass.  Significant mentions in multiple reliable independent secondary sources.  This is a very clear keep.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 15:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello @ Sirfurboy , thank you for the time you took out to search and find these sources.  I didn’t see ‘Sage Journals’ on this list of approved sources by Wikipedia.  Nor did I see a need for 1/18 magnet schools in this specific geographical location to have its own dedicated page.  Aside from that i respect your 18+ years experience here on the encyclopedia & i value your opinion and factual bases for your Keep vote.  Thank you again .  Elvisisalive95 ( talk ) 16:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks.  Which list were you looking on?  This page is a bit out of date but see Sage Publishing on there: Rankings of academic publishers .  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 16:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I use this list > WP:RSPSOURCES I wasn’t aware of the list you linked above when i was doing my credible source search.  I will refer to it from here on out.  Thank you again.  Elvisisalive95 ( talk ) 16:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah, that is a useful but (as it says) non exhaustive list of sources that come up frequently.  Most academic journals and publishers are not on that list, because there is never much debate over them.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 16:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Makes complete sense, honestly i appreciate you linking it because i love to learn more and more about editing on here.  I hope you have an amazing week!  Elvisisalive95 ( talk ) 17:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets the general notability guideline with the sources in the article and provided by Sirfurboy🏄 .  Jacona ( talk ) 17:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Piranha Brothers : While sources confirm this sketch exists, I can't find anything showing this specific sketch, out of tons and tons in Monty Python's prolific career, has individual notability.  Possibly redirect to the list of episodes?  Not sure, though, since it's a sketch not an episode.  Previously survived an AfD, but this was was a mass AfD of many sketches, several of which were notable.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 13:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I can find a number of sources specifically discussing this sketch.  It's discussed in this book on Monty Python in great detail, talking about how the sketch was based on the gangsters known as the Kray twins .  Death of a Pirate and Bloody London: Shocking Tales from London's Gruesome Past also discuss the sketch as commentary on the Kray twins' career.  It's also used in Juvenal and the Satiric Emotions as an example of satiric rhetoric.  There are a lot more of these if you look on Google Books.  Toughpigs ( talk ) 17:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah, there's a lot of short mentions, but I don't think any of the examples you gave constitute significant coverage, except the first one which seems to be fine.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 20:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep it is a notable sketch as evidenced by the amount of sources that reference it.  I'm still working on the article.  Isaidnoway (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Undergoing expansion.  Need more consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 04:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - expansion completed and article is now sourced.  Isaidnoway (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yeah my concerns are addressed.  Seems fine to keep now.  Withdraw.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 13:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
International Movement for Monetary Reform: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Organizations , Economics ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Blue Rose (band): If you go on JSTOR, it is only mentioned in passing.  This article should be deleted due to the lack of notability.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 15:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 15:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Basic facts verified by Allmusic entry .  Full news page in Oakland Tribune Nov 06, 1988.  [15] .  Review in Richmond Times-Dispatch Dec 25, 1988 [16] .  Short reviews in Walnut Valley Occasional Dec 01, 1988 [17] Oakland Tribune Dec 25, 1988 [18] Daily News Jan 15, 1989 [19] .  Remembered many years later in lists such as this .  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United States of America .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Geschichte's found features and reviews.  There's also [20] which is a review of a performance.  Also used as a touch point for comparing other groups against in books about bluegrass: [21] "this followup just doesn’t have the legs that made Blue Rose (Sugar Hill SH-3768), a Fink-Marxer collaboration with other sisters of the folk-grass sorority (Laurie Lewis, Sally Van Meter, and Molly Mason), such a strong pacer from the gate."; [22] "the way contemporary performers like Cathy Fink, Mike Cross, Blue Rose, and John McCutcheon bring an intimate knowledge of tradition into contemporary professional usage.".  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - meets WP:MUSICBIO criterion 6, "Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians."  Also the new citations provided by above editors helps.  Maxcreator ( talk ) 21:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw - Thank you for providing the citations.  I ask that anyone with the authority to do so to please cancel or assist me in withdrawing this AfD.  WizardGamer775 ( talk ) 00:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
International Christian Medical and Dental Association: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity , Medicine ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
List of multinational companies with research and development centres in Israel: There isn't any RS coverage of "multinational companies with research and development centres in Israel", or any other country for that matter.  This kind of list would serve better as a category.  – Howard 🌽33 15:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  – Howard 🌽33 15:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I apologise, I have now found out that there is indeed mainstream coverage of R&D centres in Israel.  [1] [2] – Howard 🌽33 15:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I withdraw this nomination, if that wasn't clear.  – Howard 🌽33 15:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have now also found out that Forbes contributors are not RS.  So I withdraw that one as a source for my claim.  However, I have found a passing mention by an additional RS here.  [3] – Howard 🌽33 15:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] References ^ Mizroch, Amir.  "530 multinationals from 35 countries innovating in Israel" .  Forbes .  Retrieved 2024-02-14 .  ^ "Multinationals Open More Than 20 R&D Centers a Year in Israel" .  Haaretz .  Retrieved 2024-02-14 .  ^ Shamah, David (2013-04-16).  "65 years on, Israel is top choice for tech by multinationals" .  The Times of Israel .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Alastor (Hazbin Hotel): per WP:BEFORE , only this source could be useful [11] , but nothing else.  What we have sources now at the reception were just the reviews of the film itself and listicles/rankings only.  Greenish Pickle!  ( 🔔 ) 22:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Comics and animation ,  and Webcomics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: WP:SIGCOV of Alastor the Radio Demon does exist in spades [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] ; the article is restricted to autoconfirmed or confirmed editors until 03:42, 16 May 2024, so those references cannot be added yet.  A deletion discussion is premature until the article is open to be edited again.  2001:BB6:3A30:D700:5195:FE6F:1E81:6F85 ( talk ) 23:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Idiotlamp Productions: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television , Companies ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn