hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sri Yala Batik : The sources found so far only briefly mention it, and checking WP:BEFORE reveals the same pattern of passing mentions.  Fails WP:CORPDEPTH .  GSS 💬 19:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Thailand .  GSS 💬 19:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Significant coverage in third-party reliable sources, including the online arms of Kom Chad Luek (2011) [9] , Manager (2018) [10] , Matichon (2022) [11] , and a documentary broadcast on PPTV (2023) [12] .  The last two are already cited in the article.  There's room to discuss adjusting the article scope to cover the textile itself rather than the group (which is its only producer), but that's a matter for the article talk page.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 23:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As previously mentioned, these are merely passing mentions and do not meet the requirements of WP:CORPDEPTH .  All three sources you mentioned rely solely on statements made by its founder, as indicated by the phrase "Piya said" throughout the articles.  GSS 💬 04:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Those articles are entirely about the group's textile making, and are certainly not mere passing mentions.  A news source reporting information from subject is still independent if such information has been vetted and fact-checked by the reporter.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 09:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – fails notability guidelines; I can only find this that can pass but not enough to establish notability other than mentions.  Toadette ( Let's discuss together! ) 06:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I am confident in the sources provided above by editor Paul.  180.183.224.201 ( talk ) 19:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 06:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing significant presented; merely passing mentions.  Fails CORPDEPTH.  BusterD ( talk ) 15:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jerry Newton : WP:NOTINHERITED applies.  Checking the references is challenging.  Jerry does appear, generally with reference to the sibling, and as a passing reference to Jerry.  The article seems to be more a tribute ( WP:NOTMEMORIAL applies) than anything else.  Jerry was obviously notable to those who loved and respected him, but the references do not show a pass of any of WP:BIO , WP:NMUSICIAN , nor WP:NACTOR .  Releasing records does not mean notability, nor does a bit part in an episode of Bonanza where he is listed as a cast member, but his part was not a named character.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians ,  and United States of America .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I agree with the nominator, as Jerry had a minor career as an entertainer but with no achievements on his own that satisfy our notability requirements.  He is only mentioned briefly in sources about his much more famous brother.  This article is probably an attempted memorial .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:NOTMEMORIAL certainly and his career is alongside his brother, then minor bit parts and a lawsuit...— Iadmc ♫ talk 20:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Jerry is mentioned in Wayne Newton § Early years , but that doesn't really look promising as a redirect target. Maybe a suitable Fandom/Miraheze site can accept what currently passes for this brother's article? (Disclaimer: A recent Teahouse thread brought me here.) -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 08:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Wayne Newton.  There's potential for five extra articles that can have him as a redirect.  Simple solution and we can also preserve the history as well.  Cheers Karl Twist ( talk ) 03:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is additional support for a redirect.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Radio , Television , Nevada ,  and Tennessee .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Imperial Beach Eagle & Times : I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 04:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and California .  I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 04:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eeramana Rojave 2 (TV series) : Tirishan ( talk ) 22:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Delete or Keep Official Disney+ Hotstar Ott Website [3] and more coverage in Tamil language, show is still airing.  There may be important updates in the future. -- P.Karthik.95 ( talk ) 09:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Like above, AfD, there is little coverage, and this article extensively relies on routine promotional coverage.  Source 1 is promotional coverage which only describes the promotional video posted on YouTube Source 2 is routine tabloid promotional coverage on the first season ending, and just contains various frames of this as well as a sentence with one screenshot of the new season Source 3 is routine tabloid coverage that only summarises the promotional video posted on YouTube Source 4 is a timeline of Bigg Boss events, only connection is that ER2's cast participated in this Source 5 is a link to the promo on YouTube Source 6 is on Bigg Boss's ending, and does not mention ER2 in any way This reply links to the show's page on Hotstar, which is not a source and none of this proves how ER2 is notable for Wikipedia.  Karnataka ( talk ) 15:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Soft Delete - there is somewhat significant coverage about the show, however most of it is just gossip i'm afraid - @ P.Karthik.95 look up eeramana rojavey 2 in tamil, see what you can find but i only found one article that bears relevance.  @ Karnataka - Disney+ Hotstar is primary sourcing, that's only one source though so your point stands.  Would consider changing my vote to Keep if you can find sufficient sourcing, i've tried but only found one source.  Aspiringeditor1 ( talk ) 21:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aspiringeditor1 my point is to find notability for the topic.  The Hotstar page will not prove notability because every show produced by Hotstar will be there, and it is a primary source so will not fit the notability guideline anyways.  I put it in tamil and switched to news section [4] , the top results are news on the cast and routine updates on 'today episodes'.  Karnataka ( talk ) 21:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Qatar Scientific Club : Thenightaway ( talk ) 01:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The only sources I could find provide trivial coverage of the club's participation in events.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 01:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Science ,  and Qatar .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , a search for النادي العلمي القطري (Arabic transliteration of the club's name) on Google News turns up coverage, including this article by Al Sharq and this article by Al Arab .  Left guide ( talk ) 06:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Those are not independent reliable sources.  These are government outlets reporting on the activities on a government organization in a country with no press freedom.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 10:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no in-depth, significant coverage in independent sources.  Neutrality talk 00:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mark Hurst : A random spot check reveals the independent sources such as BusinessInsider and American Libraries briefly mention him, once, not satisfying in-depth coverage.  There are also many unreliable citations to blogs, and the article seems promotional.  Furthermore, the article currently has enough unimportant detail that WP:BLOWITUP applies.  Bremps ... 23:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Businesspeople , Journalism , Radio ,  and Virginia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability.  Fails to meet criteria of WP:GNG .  Not enough sources to confirm intrinsic value of an article.  What makes this person outstanding and deserving a Wikipedia article?  ContributorMix ( talk ) 21:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Mark Hurst is an obscure consultant who hosts a programme on a New Jersey-based radio station.   He appears to be non-notable.  The article brings out that various notable people have made presentations at one or another annual Gel conference, and Mark Hurst founded Gel.   But that does not make Mark Hurst notable.  -- Toddy1 (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Without seemingly any WP:SIGCOV , this subject currently fails all notability guidelines.  If reliable independent sources can be found, I'd be happy to reconsider my vote.  User:Let'srun 03:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Centre for Social Research (Azerbaijan) : There is nothing that indicates that this is a notable research institution.  Thenightaway ( talk ) 13:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Azerbaijan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mehdi Tehrani : References are not reliable (I couldn't check the Hebrew reference but it definitely need a double check that it actually mentions his name).  Written by one user in twenty different languages.  Ladsgroup overleg 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Ladsgroup overleg 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Journalism ,  and Iran .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 14:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ana Paola Andía : All I found were passing mentions ( 1 , 2 , 3 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Bolivia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 16:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 16:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 21:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mike Baur : BD2412 T 00:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 00:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Switzerland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no other sources other than the Wall Street Journal source stated above that offers significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources.  There's apparently some that cover a different businessman of the same name, which isn't him.  Tails Wx 02:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment A number of the citation links seem to be dead.  But it seems like if there is a notable subject here, it may be the company, not its co-founder.  Llajwa ( talk ) 22:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marzieh Sotoudeh : The attempted notability claim here, that she won a literary award, would be fine if the article were sourced properly, but is not "inherently" notable without sourcing -- an award has to itself be a notable award in the first place before it can make its winners notable for winning it, so an award claim cannot clinch inclusion without sourcing for it.  But I had to remove the citation that was present here as it led to a squatted page that tried to make me download a virus rather than anything that verified any literary awards, and that left the article completely unsourced — and going by its URL it looks to have been a primary source , not a reliable or GNG-building one, even before it got squatted.  Meanwhile, the award she purportedly won does not have a Wikipedia article at all, and instead substitutes a link to the biography of the other unrelated writer the award was named for , which is not in and of itself proof that the award is a notable one.  On a WP:BEFORE search, meanwhile, the closest thing to an acceptable source I found was one book review on a WordPress blog -- and even if I were to overlook the fact that it's WordPress, I just can't overlook the even bigger issue with it: this article was created in 2011 by an editor with the username Mohammad Rajabpur, while that WordPress review was written in 2020 with a bylined author credit of Mohammad Rajabpur, strongly implying the possibility of conflict of interest editing by a friend or colleague.  And I can otherwise confirm that she's never had any WP:GNG -worthy coverage in Canada at all, as her name brings up absolutely nothing in either ProQuest or Newspapers.com.  Since I cannot read Farsi, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to Iranian media than I've got can find evidence that she's had GNG-worthy coverage in Iran, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have any sources.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Iran ,  and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Amazon sales listings, and many other sales listings, are what come up.  This [1] appears to be a review in a RS, but I'm not sure.  I don't find anything in Scholar or Jstor.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per the thorough analysis carried out by Bearcat .  Owen× ☎ 22:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Black Panther Hotline : QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Texas .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I find no substantive coverage in reliable sources.  Fails WP:MUSICBIO .  -- Kinu t / c 16:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - RS neither provided nor found to meet WP:NMUSICIAN .  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 14:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] BTW, QuietHere .  This could have been nommed for speedy deletion WP:A7 -- see {{ Db-band }} .  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 14:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Reinhardt Erwee : Pretty much all trivial mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 23:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fair amount of coverage, but not sure any of it suggests a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 15:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Beachhead Solutions : However, I found enough sources for PROD to perhaps not be warranted: brief mention in WSJ A short mention in a 2006 piece from The Mercury News : Beachhead Solutions in Santa Clara sells a $129-a-year service, Lost Data Destruction, which enables an administrator to send a command to destroy data on a laptop that has been stolen.  If the thief tries to hook the laptop up to the Internet, it will send a message to the administrator and trigger the data destruction.  – Tera tix ₵ 12:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and California .  – Tera tix ₵ 12:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 14:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ' Delete as article doesn't even attempt to establish notability. Brandon ( talk ) 00:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:ORGCRIT . The funny part is that I can't find secondary sources to verify the articles content. The already existing sources, unfortunately are primary sources/nearly connected sources that doesn't even order any solution to WP:N and WP:V . Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of fictional Azerbaijanis : Dronebogus ( talk ) 08:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Only 5 character articles in Category:Fictional Azerbaijani people , of which 4 are in a subcategory for a single work.  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 06:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nom.  - K evo 3 2 7 ( talk ) 10:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete