Duncan Turnbull: It appears as though he never actually played a professional match, which might be a failure of WP:SPORTBASIC .  The only thing of basic substance I found was this , which is local and behind a paywall.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , England ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 16:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 16:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Transfermrkt has him playing in one professional match in the EFL Trophy for Portsmouth vs Peterborough ( source ). Same matched that was referenced in the paywalled article. Tpd13 ( talk ) 11:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Transfermarkt is not a reliable source, but one EFL Cup match still doesn't make up for the lack of WP:SIGCOV . Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ GiantSnowman and Anwegmann : Some coverage: Shaw Network , Daily Herald ( 2 ), Portsmouth News ( 2 ). Thoughts? BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 22:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for posting these. I saw the first three when I was initially nominating the article. The problem with these is that they are focused almost entirely on his signing a professional contract and are very much local coverage—his hometown newspaper(s). This is hardly sustained coverage or, in my view at least, significant, meaningful coverage. The fact that the event these article cover happened, but then he went on to have a very brief career with no league appearances and no coverage at all makes me feel like it doesn’t/shouldn’t suffice for WP:SIGCOV . That said, I’m certainly open to other opinions on this. Thanks, again. Anwegmann ( talk ) 03:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No issues with 'local' news per se - but to analyse the sources: Shaw Network is paywalled but what is available is a bit routine; DH 1 looks OK; DH2 is routine; Portsmouth News 1 and 2 routine.  It's essentially all 'look at this American who signed for an English soccer team'.  Giant Snowman 17:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  05:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify: Since article isn't a WP:STUB , and isn't completely lacking sources, I suggest turning the article into a draft, so that it can be updated, and later apply to be published again.  - Mjks28 ( talk ) 14:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete