Yuno Miles: OJSimpsonLover ( talk ) 03:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't think that this page should be entirely erased.  It has a good structure, some notability, and there's other pages that should probably be deleted.  I vote no for this page deletion.  Also why did that OJSimpsonLover fella get blocked??? It says for vandalism but he was just giving his opinion.  TheEpicApartmentLord ( talk ) 16:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] (insert reminder of WP:NOTAVOTE and to actually provide links or a reference to someone else's comment here instead of just saying "some notability") OJSimpsonLover was blocked for vandalizing articles .  That said, @ Air on White , I'm not sure that means why their comment should be discarded.  Only sockpuppets have a strike-comments policy .  Or was there something I've missed?  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 19:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I've removed the striking of the comment.  L iz Read!  Talk!  01:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] OJSimpsonLover was blocked for vandalism and his inappropriate username.  However, he was not just a blatant vandal, but also a subtler troll: some of his comments appear to be in good faith and were aimed at confusing other users and administrators, making his block less likely.  I also believe he was a sockpuppet for his demonstrated familiarity with the customs and policies of Wikipedia and his technical proficiency in areas such as wikitext and referencing.  I therefore believe it was reasonable for me to assume that his comment was intended to disrupt the Wikipedia project and should have been struck through.  Air on White ( talk ) 04:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They have not made any comments that I find questionable and do not seem to be familiar with Wikipedia at all.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 22:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This isn't the place to discuss vandalism or sockpuppetry, so I'll end this discussion here.  But I'm willing to continue this discussion (at another page) if anyone is interested, particularly if someone is making an SPI case.  Air on White ( talk ) 01:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC) edited Air on White ( talk ) 01:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is a RS per Project Album [9] , but that's all I can find for this person.  No interviews or articles about him, was hoping something would show up.  A lack of sourcing means ! delete.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have found a few sources - maybe look a little harder 2601:449:4100:DA80:E549:EA16:3F2E:1D57 ( talk ) 04:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] So... could you link them here?  Tollens ( talk ) 05:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I did, they don't exist.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Internet ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails notability guidelines.  Plus, there’s already a draft article for him at draft:Yuno Miles .  ( Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!! ) 00:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom Okmrman ( talk ) 04:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC) user indef-blocked for disruption on AFD — python coder ( talk | contribs ) 02:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC) }} [ reply ] Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/music/news-who-yuno-miles-fans-react-youtuber-releases-hilarious-drake-diss-response-metro-boomin-s-challenge WP:RSP : user-generated ✘ No https://www.rapreviews.com/2023/11/yuno-miles-yuno-i-cant-rap/ ✔ Yes https://www.sescoops.com/wwe/rapper-yuno-miles-releases-wwe-diss-track-im-beefing-with-the-wwe Probably, website has multiple writers and this one has a degree ✔ Yes https://pitchfork.com/features/article/the-age-of-shitpost-modernism/ ~ One example with only one mention ~ Partial https://gizmodo.com/saga-bbl-drizzy-drake-kendrick-lamar-metro-boomin-1851470820 ~ Only one mention as "The Meme Diss Track"; in the article's slides.  ~ Partial This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Here's a table.  I don't think two is enough, is it?  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe most editors would consider two enough.  Air on White ( talk ) 20:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SE Scoops is two videos and two quotes of his, with about 5 lines of text otherwise, might be a RS but that's hardly extensive coverage.  Maybe 1/2 a source, being generous.  I'd still like to see more than these two sources, neither of which is extensive.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What do you mean?  The entire article is about a diss track he released.  I do agree that two sources is a bit far from keeping, though.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 00:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Now that pythoncoder has provided a video reference with The Tonight Show, I think that tips the scales towards a weak keep .  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 19:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep - he appears in two articles that count towards GNG, but there isn't enough notable articles at the moment for a stronger keep.  Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 04:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Uh, speedy  per what?  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 11:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] AskeeaeWiki , is this even a vote?  Per what?  dxneo ( talk ) 13:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Seems like he passes GNG based on the sources so far.  Other stuff that may or may not count, some from the draft version: [10] from Ones to Watch : Site with music industry backing ( Live Nation Entertainment ).  Not sure about their editorial standards — couldn't find anything about it on RSN or RSP .  [11] from TheNeedleDrop : may or may not count based on your reading of RSP [12] : got played on the nationally-televised The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon — python coder ( talk | contribs ) 02:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] From WP:THENEEDLEDROP : ... per Wikipedia policy regarding self-published sources, these reviews should never be used as third-party sources about living people .  Granted, what you linked isn't a review, it's an interview.  But given the discussion is about what third-party sources could be used to justify keeping an article about Yuno Miles, I think this still fairly doesn't fit.  It also doesn't help that Fantano isn't a journalist, let alone the fact that using YouTube links (of which this article currently uses two, both linking to Yuno Miles' own songs) is already considered generally unreliable per WP:RSPYT .  Cadenrock1 ( talk ) 03:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I think this discussion needs more time so I'm relisting it.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete coverage seems weak, fails WP:NMUSIC . - KH-1 ( talk ) 02:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak keep , I personally think Miles is a notable but unreported figure, having a large following but lacking news coverage.  This means has and will continue to have his page created many times before being locked.  ( Discuss Roastedbeanz1 contribs ) 17:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Roastedbeanz1 , why is your signature bearing @ Not0nshoree .  Also, I didn't get your argument here.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Yuno Miles is very much notable.  I know there's a stigma against making pages for every insignificant "soundcloud rapper", but rest assured, Yuno Miles is not one of them.  ☞ Rim < Talk | Edits > 18:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with keeping Yuno Miles on Wikipedia.  He is already a popular rapper no matter if its meme rap such as "4 Wheeler" or the "BBL Drizzy Freestyle."  I think it way to late to make that happen.  Diamondpro114 ( talk ) 23:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Show evidence using sources that meets WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I can't believe I have to say this but Wikipedia doesn't care that you personally think this article subject is notable.  Our subjective judgments are irrelevant to AFD decisions.  The question is, are there sufficient reliable sources to establish notability?  Are the sources located by User:pythoncoder and any other editors adequate to demonstrate GNG?  That's the important question here.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't believe I have to say this but I don't care what you have to say either ☞ Rim < Talk | Edits > 20:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] relax bro we all have to follow wikipedia's notability rules and not our own.  but ye i think yuno miles is notable, also due to the sources in that chart above, or at least surely will be soon because i have no doubt yuno will get more news coverage.  Freedun ( yap ) 20:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yea you right bro mb.  I just be insulted when I'm just tryna throw in my two cents n somebody sayin they speakin on "behalf" of wikipedia and that my opinion doesn't matter, just rude and insulting u know?  but yea the sources are kinda scarce, i think his page might get deleted for now, but u right we'll def get more news coverage soon ☞ Rim < Talk | Edits > 20:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, the truth is, on Wikipedia, opinions are weighted based on relation to policy.  Arguments with actual basis in policy has more weight.  You'd have to be really convincing to make a non−policy based argument.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 20:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] yea its kinda weird and ik wikipedia doesn't have a lot of rapper articles even for example f1lthy (i just made it last night).  anyone who watches tiktok knows these people but whatever.  if it gets deleted ill remake it after there's more news coverage Freedun ( yap ) 20:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article doesn't meet GNG, source analysis lacks WP:SIGCOV and intentionally, I don't succumbed with the rationales of being "a fan of a certain musician."  Per the state of the article, I was checking redirect to see if the "Hood Rejects" do exist but not.  At this point, when sources of an article is not enough to establish notability, it becomes deletion or redirecting.  However, there is no room for redirecting and mostly, delete.  I have critically accessed the sources presently in the article and some doesn't relate to WP:RS .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  01:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ SafariScribe Could you explain how the two sources I've assessed and the OnesToWatch source from pythoncoder don't meet GNG?  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 03:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aaron Liu , two sources aren't enough for me to justify whether an article is notable.  There isn't any significant coverage of this individual as a musician whatsoever.  Also remember that "celebrities" may be famous but not notable.  One may have millions of followers, yet neither has he/her been covered in multiple news source.  Per my experience so far, they are usually appearing in interviews, some which are not reliable or secondary per WP:RS .  While being regarding ! voting is not deletion, I am talking about the pure simple fact here and that the truth of the matter.  Should I analyse the arguments too to see the argument coming from keep if not most, "he is notable, I have heard the song", "he is famous, I am a fan", etc.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In analysis, for example, no weight will be given to "He is notable in my opinion; while I am not a fan of his music he does have almost 1 million followers on spotify and has been drawn even further into the public eye by his Drake diss."  Notability is not ones opinion.  If that, then, my father is notable in my mind.  The second was I don't think that this page should be entirely erased.  It has a good structure, some notability, and there's other pages that should probably be deleted.  I vote no for this page deletion.  Also why did that OJSimpsonLover fella get blocked??? It says for vandalism but he was just giving his opinion.  Here, we don't believe in WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST .  If the editor thinks the other articles like that merits deletion, so be it, nominate it or leave it.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oaktree b and Not0nshoree argued the article lacking sources and not meeting GNG.  Then the source analysis table generated also good.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  03:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You don't seem to understand.  I assessed four sources above .  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 11:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Yuno Miles' music is unique.  Also his song was trending on YouTube and hit music charts.  Also he will hit 1m subs soon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedun ( talk • contribs ) User:Freedun , I want to know how you know about anything called AFD when you literally joined some minutes ago.  What was your previous account?  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  04:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] what is AFD?  I dont think i had an account from the past but i edited my schools wikipedia page in the past so maybe i did but im not sure Freedun ( talk ) 04:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Freedun , that is my point.  What is the school and your former name.  It might help us know how to analyse your argument as it may lay on "a new user".  Tell me the account and why you left after writing your schools page.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  05:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] uh sorry dude I'm not comfortable telling you what high school i went to...  Freedun ( talk ) 05:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It is unusual a new editor coming to ! vote in an AFD.  There is something going on.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  05:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] uh ok?  Freedun ( talk ) 06:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] actually imma say weak keep like Roasted beanz Freedun ( talk ) 06:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Miles has fans and they saw the article's deletion notice and came here, duh.  It's not unusual but unfortunate.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 11:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  http://www.onestowatch.com/en/blog/meet-yuno-miles-the-internets-favorite-rapper Was about the rapper Ones to watch is a music blog and by the virtue of looking at the written content, it made me feel to notify people of a notable blog it is.  Another example Bella Naija .  Blog, equally advertorial.  ✘ No https://www.theneedledrop.com/interviews/2023/11/a-conversation-with-yuno-miles An interview should always be independent as the person interviewed always say about him; those which aren't verifiable at most times.  Per WP:THENEEDLEDROP .  Its an interview per WP:INTERVIEW or related.  ✘ No https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=XrJWNQSIoNE Clip of played music.  The full show should have contained other stuffs.  The show is reliable and notable as well.  In the context, the music was played within any discussion of it's nature, etc. I could have taken it as a review but no!  ✘ No This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  04:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't see why writing styles disqualify reliability, not to mention the ridiculous notion that that affects the SIGCOV part of the criteria.  As said above, the site is ran by writers of an industry giant.  This makes it highly likely that they are reliable (reputation, libel & stuff), and I can't find any incidences of false reporting.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 11:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Show me their editorial guideline for publication and team.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  12:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Couldn't find any so far, but it seems to be the same people, so I'm asking this at RSN .  Also, I feel like the two sources above and mentions add up to give this borderline notability.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 20:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] also I looked closer into the requirements for Wikipedia musicians and Yuno Miles "has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability" because they are highly known for meme rap Freedun ( yap ) 19:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] You need sources that claim that.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 20:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] tbh its just well known but this article looks applicable: [13] Freedun ( yap ) 04:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it's a bit of a stretch to call that genre-representing, but while it's not significant coverage, it is more than a passing mention, and as said above, I feel like that, other non-trivial mentions, and the two sources I've found above confer notability.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 13:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ye i agree.  Freedun ( yippity yap ) 07:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   Good sources are pretty scarce right now, but he did get reviewed on RapReviews and namechecked on Pitchfork .  Close enough.  162 etc. ( talk ) 19:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E .  If the biography of living person has reliable sources and news, then, the draft shall be created (it already started the draft , so what else?).  Qadri223 Talk or discuss only my contributions to the Wikipedia 03:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Qadri223 Yes, the article meets the draft criteria, but how the heck does that mean it should be deleted?  There is more history here than the Drake event as seen in the Pitchfork and RapReviews coverage above.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 03:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:BLP1E says only event but yuno miles has multiple songs in multiple sources so i dont think that makes sense at all.  also that draft is way worse so why would we want to use that over this Freedun ( yippity yap ) 11:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete