hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ian Miles Cheong: His only fame is for race-baiting engagement on Twitter and has no other impactful notability.  Toadboy123 ( talk ) 12:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism , Conspiracy theories ,  and Malaysia .  Toadboy123 ( talk ) 12:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] keep Not a fan, but there seem to be ample sources to support notability.  Daily Dot , thetigernews , Newsweek , WaPo , Medium etc.  Kleuske ( talk ) 12:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The Newsweek media coverage is about PragerU Presenter Karlyn Borysenko .  -- 2003:E0:F713:C000:10C1:F60F:F858:5F88 ( talk ) 06:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There are RS's proving his existence, but none proving his notability.  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 12:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Coverage is all about this event [12] .  Nothing notable for wiki.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  SportingFlyer T · C 17:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I fear what might come if news of this AFD discussion hits Reddit.  But then, I was around for the Gamergate years.  Glad that is history now.  L iz Read!  Talk!  08:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Are you kiddin me?  The German Wikipedia waved it through.  Much more restrictive.  A Dutch guy User:Kleuske helped me out  and you think he is not notable Fossa ?!  22:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Twitter guy with little media coverage, only two times in 2020.  Not notability proved by this.  -- 2003:E0:F713:C000:942C:2B13:F455:A0D9 ( talk ) 18:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not notable at all.  Nothing significant and not unique enough to have its own article written.  There are so many other similar Internet celebrity with such similar background.  It fails WP:GNG .  Chongkian ( talk ) 16:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
MassTransit Enterprise: Page creator's only contributions are to products by this specific company.  Dawnbails ( talk ) 16:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Dawnbails ( talk ) 16:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No usable secondary sources found on Google.  2001:48F8:3004:FC4:D480:5FD5:9310:3BA4 ( talk ) 15:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghoda: Although the article seems to have a copious amount of sources movie trailer related.  Searching for turned up no critical reviews AShiv1212 ( talk ) 04:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Maharashtra .  AShiv1212 ( talk ) 04:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marc Cintron: Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  I found negligible coverage like this and this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Puerto Rico ,  and New Jersey .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scottish Constitutional Commission: SoThisIsPeter ( talk ) 15:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] When searching, keep in mind that a lot of the results are for a completely different Scottish Constitutional Constitution set up by the Scottish Parliament, which is far more notable than this one.  This potential confusion is another reason why this article should be deleted.  SoThisIsPeter ( talk ) 15:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Afd is not cleanup and the fact it has no reference is not a reason to sent it to Afd.  It is established structural legal body in Scotland and is completely notable.  scope_creep Talk 15:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This article does not refer to the legal body, just a non-notable think tank!  SoThisIsPeter ( talk ) 16:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Think-tanks tend to be notable and Afd is not cleanup.  scope_creep Talk 16:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But this one isn't notable?  The problem with the lack of any references here is that there are no reliable, independent sources to be found to demonstrate notability, and the content is not otherwise useful.  It is not an article that can be cleaned up without using primary sources.  SoThisIsPeter ( talk ) 16:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Right-oh.   I will take a look and see if ferret out WP:THREE references for it.  So far its been assumptions and actual fact-facting has been missing.  It could be dross.  It is on my watchlist now.  scope_creep Talk 17:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law , Organizations , Politics ,  and Scotland .  Owen× ☎ 18:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: More discussion on the extent of coverage by extant sources would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - the generic name does make searching difficult, but I was unable to find any independent in-depth coverage in Scottish or UK sources.  A couple of passing mentions, but nothing more.  — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 16:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Samuel Biscaia: I'm not seeing any coverage sufficient to pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC in my searches.  I found a Wordpress blog which is not WP:RS .  In reliable sources, the best seem to be Terranova , a contract renewal announcement which claims to copy a quote from Biscaia from the club's website, so is lacking significant, independent coverage.  I also found Ovar News , a quote from Biscaia with no third party analysis, and Radio AVFM , which mentions him twice in passing.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Portugal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Regrettably, 'SIGCOV' leaves us no choice but to erase this Beira-Mar star.  Bias taints our quest for knowledge, favoring the Anglosphere, and thus strays from our global mission.  With reluctance, I concur with the nomination, yet I grieve for the knowledge sacrificed on the altar of policy.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 19:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sattai Duraimurugan: - SUN EYE 1 16:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Internet ,  and Tamil Nadu .  - SUN EYE 1 16:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The creator

Discussion outcome: delete
Lenny Massey: This BLP was created by a user who might have a COI.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 20:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 20:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The references are not even pinging.  Some are "not found," one website (with the majority of the references) is down, and one goes right to the homepage and not an article about the subject.  Everything I find online is either NEWSORGINDIA or otherwise unreliable.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 03:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The sources are almost exclusively promotional press releases.  There is a cite to Dawn , but it's just a name mention.  Article does not meet WP:GNG .  SilkTork ( talk ) 09:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rufai Waris: Yet moved back to main space without addressing citation needed tags and notability.  Clearly fails WP:GNG .  A thorough name of the artist cannot be seen on google /bing search before talking about references.  The article cited sources which seems to be obvious blog and non of them is reliable.  Otuọcha ( talk ) 10:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Otuọcha ( talk ) 10:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I firmly believe that article is justified and should not be deleted.  It can be strengthened.  I have already added two additional sources which I believe are stronger than what is cited above.  The number of links to the page should not be a criteria for deletion.  ‪Pfomma‬ ( talk ) 5:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 00:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : sources are press releases or promotional puff pieces by dubious publications that have no indication they meet WP:RS .  S0091 ( talk ) 18:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I have thoroughly researched about the subject of the article and must say there was no sign of notability.  Failed WP: ANYBIO , WP: SIGCOV .  Otuọcha ( talk ) 11:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG or WP:NSINGER .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete subject has not been discussed in reliable sources to establish notability.  Best, Reading Beans 17:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Flexcon: -- Beland ( talk ) 17:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions .  Beland ( talk ) 17:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 15:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NCORP or WP:GNG .  Ednabrenze ( talk ) 19:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  L iz Read!  Talk!  03:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as notability for a company can’t be demonstrated by a few pieces of coverage in niche trade press.  Mccapra ( talk ) 05:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Handball at the 2015 African Games – Men's tournament squads: Relisting to gain some sort of consensus.  Fails WP:NLIST .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Africa .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN , lacks secondary sourcing.  Let'srun ( talk ) 04:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bee Ridge, Indiana: It then goes on at some length concerning the founding of the church, leaving the other two points unaddressed except for the origin of the place's name.  I can verify the school, which the topos show as sitting in isolation about 1/3 mile away from the spot they label.  But I can find no sign that there was ever a town here, and the history treats it as an area rather than as a specific settlement.  I don't think it provides enough info for an article on that area.  Mangoe ( talk ) 22:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dick Johnson Township, Clay County, Indiana .  Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 23:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Why?  Mangoe ( talk ) 11:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (don't redirect): No information available, so a redirect accomplishes nothing other than stating which township this place was in.   Unlikely search term, also.   Fails WP:GEOLAND if there are no sources other than GNIS and census.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It is is mentioned in "From Needmore to Prosperity : Hoosier place names in folklore and history [1] ".  As one of the oldest settlements in the county.  Also listed as a town serviced by Taxi, but alot things on this list seem suspect so... [2] .  Thoughts?  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Forgot to mention that Buchanan corner is not mentioned on that taxi list.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The article now refers to Bee Ridge as a locality.  There is probably also a ridge nearby named Bee Ridge.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 12:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, I'd like to hear more opinion about a possible Redirct Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete other than the few things I found, there is nothing to be found.  Earliest settlement in the county as claimed could just be a group of farmers, and there is no proof positive of any of the claimed details about the place.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southern cone music: Virtually WP:UNSOURCED except 1 dead link since creation in 2008.  (Edit: the archived link only mentions Argentina and provides no WP:SIGCOV .)  It amounts to little more than Music of Argentina + Music of Chile + Music of Uruguay , with every example being country-specific rather than cross-border between the 3 countries.  WP:BEFORE done: no single book on Google Books mentions it.  NLeeuw ( talk ) 00:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and South America .  NLeeuw ( talk ) 00:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Argentina , Chile ,  and Uruguay .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Mongolian films of 1936: Owen× ☎ 16:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 16:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and Mongolia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Listed at Lists of Mongolian films , baffled why this would need to be a separate page.  Reywas92 Talk 20:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 14:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The standard process here is that a country gets one base List of Mongolian films first, and separate lists by year get spun off only when the omnibus list has come to contain hundreds or thousands of films that need to be chunked out for size management purposes.  The base list already exists, however, and it isn't nearly long enough yet to need splitouts.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Mongolian films , per WP:ATD-R .  BD2412 T 13:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jen Dodds: The only sources are a pair of interviews with some routine coverage interspersed, as well as the BBC piece with two sentences of independent coverage.  My searches did not yield much else.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Scotland .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 17:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Panorays: Even then a significant amount of coverage is related to fundraising events.  Brandon ( talk ) 05:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Computing ,  and Israel .  Brandon ( talk ) 05:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no evidence of notability.  Sources in the article mentioned the subject in passing, some are PR materials except one that give significant coverage and seems reliable.  Ednabrenze ( talk ) 07:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Confused by Delete argument that states a source provides significant coverage.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NCORP , much of the article reeks of WP:PROMO as well.  ADifferentMan ( talk ) 08:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete