hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
2022 Liga 1 U-16 : Quoting from there: "Football tournament for children supported by a couple of primary sources. Utterly insignificant within the football world, fails WP:SIGCOV".  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – And delete for 2018 Liga 1 U-16 , 2019 Liga 1 U-20 , 2019 Liga 1 U-18 , 2019 Liga 1 U-16 , 2022 Liga 1 U-18 .  All fail flagrantly in WP:GNG , as they are editions of a youth competition with no relevance.  Svartner ( talk ) 07:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 08:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NSEASONS , we should avoid low level youth football.  Govvy ( talk ) 07:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:NSEASONS or WP:GNG because of a lack of significant, independent coverage from RS.  Instagram posts don't cut it for notability.  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Obviously fails WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 22:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sparkling Generation Valkyrie Yuuki : It was mentioned by Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards , but notability isn't inherited.  There's an interview by ComixTalk, but that seems to be a blog.  After twenty years, you'd think there would be some coverage in reliable sources, that when I google the name of the webcomic, I'd get some results beyond Reddit posts, this very Wiki page, and the TVTropes article, but there aren't any except decades-old sources of questionable usability mentioning the comic in WP:PASSING .  I don't see how this remotely passes WP:GNG , and I'm kind of confused how previous AfDs haven't been successful.  HappyWith ( talk ) 04:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions .  HappyWith ( talk ) 04:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Alas, no mention of it in my books.  Looks like all we have is the WCCA win, the Comixtalk interview , and the Sequential Tart review .  The only other thing listed in the article is this podcast , which doesn't come across as usable for notability.  I have pretty low standards, but this is sadly not quite enough.  ~ Maplestrip/Mable ( chat ) 10:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I thought there might be two claims of notability in the lead paragraph, but upon further reading it turns out that "is a member of the Create a Comic Project " just means the comics were used in a "Free Public Library as an after-school program".  And then "won a Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards " just means this won a web poll where "Winners of awards receive an individualized web banner".  There is no significant coverage in reliable sources for any of this, and it is unbelievable that the highest achievement this has reached is "won a web banner in an online poll" and "was used in an after-school drawing program at a local library" and we have have articles on these things.  I am in agreement with the editors above that this does not meet even the lowest standards and it is crazy to think, after some of the far better sourced articles I've seen deleted, that this article has existed for twenty years and three deletion discussions.  It is amazing that articles this bad have existed this long.  Elspea756 ( talk ) 06:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dell monitors : It's probably not hard to find capsule reviews for these products, but they're largely not notable.  Also, WP:NOTCATALOG ; the list is just a summary of features and specifications with no establishment of notability for individual items.  Mikeblas ( talk ) 04:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products , Technology , Computing ,  and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  While Dell monitors are undoubtedly notable, this runs into multiple WP:NOT problems.  It's a brochure-style advertisement (NOTADVERT).  And this is a true violation of NOTDIRECTORY.  I don't see a path to an article without TNT.  — siro χ o 08:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE and there is nothing that indicates this particular brand of computer equipment is notable in its own right.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , agree with TNT arguments under WP:NOTCATALOGUE .  This article also doesn't serve a navigational purpose, since the monitors it lists don't have individual articles.  DFlhb ( talk ) 10:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] DFlhb , listed items are not required to have articles nor are they required to meet the same notability requirements as standalone articles.  See WP:NLIST ( Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists ) and WP:SELCRIT ( Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Selection criteria ).  The listed items just have to be verifiable by reliable sources as qualifying for the list.  I find list articles great alternative to lots of individual articles.  Dell comes out with a new monitor, the Dell Acme 3240, so you add it to the list (with a citations to a reliable sources).  Someone wants to add a marginally acceptable article about the particular monitor - you just redirect it to the list.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 01:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Naturally they're not required to have articles.  I was addressing the non-notability, non-WP:NOT reason to keep: WP:SAL : Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability and WP:N : these requirements [...] do not, however, apply to pages whose primary purpose is navigation (e.g. all disambiguation pages and some lists) .  "Product catalogue"-type articles that just contain notable entries are typically safe from deletion for those reasons, but that's not the case here.  DFlhb ( talk ) 02:06, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
James Clark (Politician) : As usual, unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates -- the notability test at NPOL is winning the election and thereby holding the office, while a candidate gets to have an article in advance of the election only if he can credibly claim to have already established permanent notability for other reasons besides the mere fact of being a candidate per se. But this makes no such claim, and is not referenced anywhere near well enough to claim that he would somehow pass WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL. Obviously no prejudice against recreation after July 4 if he wins the seat, but nothing here is grounds for him to already have an article now. Bearcat ( talk ) 17:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and England . Bearcat ( talk ) 17:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Besides being a political candidate, I don't see notability. This reads as a biography, likely to help the political aspirations. I'm not finding anything beyond routine coverage of a political candidate, which helps inform the local populace, but not really helpful for Wikipedia. Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : the page is less than 90 days old and the subject might meet WP:NPOL if he wins the seat in the upcoming election. Notability criteria are not met yet, neither per WP:GNG nor WP:NPOL . Broc ( talk ) 19:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Bearcat. We generally do not want to keep drafts of political candidates as they could become a repository for campaign material. -- Enos733 ( talk ) 02:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or draftify.  I really think there should be a policy for candidates in the general election, as it feels like WP:PROMO regardless of the author.  Orange sticker ( talk ) 09:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Christoforos Kourtis : The best that I can find are Sigma Live , a copy of a press release from AEK, Sigma Live 2 , which only mentions him twice along with other players, and Kerkida , another copy of an AEK press release.  There does not appear to be any worthwhile independent coverage that would justify a stand-alone article in a global encyclopaedia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Cyprus .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 22:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carbon Trade Exchange : No real evidence of notability - none of the sources provide in-depth, independent coverage * Pppery * it has begun... 19:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies , Environment ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 20:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP / WP:SIRS .  On WP:LIBRARY all available sources are press releases, like those already representing most of the sources in the article.  Jfire ( talk ) 21:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pezhman Noor : Some sources contain brief trivial mentions and some are paid articles/reportages (like Jamejamonline and Isna).  Possible paid editing (per article creator's other articles) Arian ( talk ) 18:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Iran .  Arian ( talk ) 18:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:GNG as no reliable sources appear to cover the subject at all.  -- estar8806 ( talk ) ★ 18:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Nothing found for sourcing we can use.  Sourcebot only "hits" on the second citation, with a yellow, so iffy.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PAC chart : Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can't find a single reference to this usage - while I DID find usages as polynomial adjustment cost , pregnancy-associated cancer , and project accountability chart .  So yeah, if anything, this should be a disambiguation.  IF the target articles existed.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 12:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rassul Mamand : Non-elected politician.  Fails WP:NPOL .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Iraq .  UtherSRG (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep Well, doing a google search turned up his Kurdistan Parliament biographical page which is sparse, but seems to indicate WP:NPOL as a member of a regional legislature.  This article needs major revisions and some serious sourcing work, but I think he may meet WP:NPOL .  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 19:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] TulsaPoliticsFan , while members of the Kurdistan Region Parliament do pass NPOL, that is a different person from the subject; the subject was born in 1944 while that person was born in 1974.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 18:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If that's the case, then I'll strike my keep vote.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 18:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article does not describe any activity that would get an "inherent" notability pass under WP:NPOL , but this isn't reliably sourced anywhere near well enough to get him over WP:GNG for it.  As noted above,  this also appears to be interfering with another person who has a stronger notability claim, and should probably be deleted so that the other person can be started.  Bearcat ( talk ) 15:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tertius Maarman : JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 16:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
İttifaQ : Josh Milburn ( talk ) 22:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Russia .  Shellwood ( talk ) 22:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Did a quick search and no RS.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 13:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG .  NotAGenious ( talk ) 17:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cloud Constellation : References almost exclusively covers planned partnerships with more notable companies.  Brandon ( talk ) 02:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency , Companies ,  and Spaceflight .  Brandon ( talk ) 02:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
17:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC) : Plus, none of the author's works have an article, so I don't see a particular reason to keep the article.  Xexerss ( talk ) 06:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan .  Xexerss ( talk ) 06:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 08:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and add the references from the corresponding article in the Japanese Wikipedia at ja:星里もちる .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 10:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no indication of importance.  Bensci54 ( talk ) 16:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete ; I'm not sure this person does not meet WP:NAUTHOR since they have no notable works (at least in English; their only work with an article was redirected here at AfD ), though one of their works did get a TV drama adaptation in 2019, this work does not have an article.  As far as WP:GNG is concerned, the Japanese article has only one source and it's a primary source and a WP:BEFORE search in Japanese only found coverage of his manga.  Link20XX ( talk ) 14:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : If it's decided to delete this article, please userfy it for me.  Thanks.  ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan !  19:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Liz : Please go ahead and close this discussion.  There's only one ! vote to keep it, and the article's really not in a good state, and I don't think keeping the discussion going is going to change anything.  Please userfy it for me, too.  Thanks!  ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan !  16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Awn Hussain Al Khashlok : - UtherSRG (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Television , Iraq ,  and Greece .  UtherSRG (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Ready to change the ! vote if more sources are discovered.  Abhishek0831996 ( talk ) 05:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBIO .  I did not find any secondary sources to support this article.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 12:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naveen Rajasekar : All refs appear to be same article.  Entire career is unreferenced.  Valereee ( talk ) 17:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  Valereee ( talk ) 17:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can't find any claim to notability and the one 'source' used is pure spam Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The sources added have the exact same title and text, contributing nothing to notability.  Does not meet WP:NBIO .  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  19:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a professional profile .  I don't see a way for this to meet N. If it does so eventually, REFUND is available but there's not much here that could go toward an article. — siro χ o 02:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 01:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - does not meet notability threshold.  This is an advertisement at best.  Madeinlondon2023 ( talk ) 02:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Akira Saitō (actress) : Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Japan .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination.  Man, you're really finding all of these shitty articles?  Good job mate.  IncompA 18:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Only minor roles, no other indication of notability.  Dekimasu よ!  20:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Only played 2 bit roles, nothing substantial, Fails NACTOR and GNG.  – Davey 2010 Talk 16:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination Mason ( talk ) 13:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete