hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Irish Town, California : The location is non-notable, does not have anything approaching WP:SIGCOV , and since there is another, better-documented California ghost town called Irishtown this article should be deleted to avoid confusion.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 19:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 19:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 19:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  We don't want to cause confusion between Irishtown and Irish Town.  TH1980 ( talk ) 23:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Viola M. Woods : There is another Viola M. Woods but with a different birth date who is deceased.  The sources are dubious, the first one points to a non-existent journal article, and I can't find anything on the journal name.  The second one (Forever Free) I was able to download but it does not mention her at all.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST .  It seems it has been moved multiple times to different namespaces (according to the creator's talk page).  Bringing it here to the community to see if other editors have better luck finding sources on this person and to decide if it should be retained in the encyclopedia.  Netherzone ( talk ) 03:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Women , Arts , Visual arts ,  and Tennessee .  Netherzone ( talk ) 03:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:ARTIST the only citation is a dead link.  This is another article from the class Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Hunter College CUNY/20th Century African American Art (Spring 2023) , where student re required to place article in main space.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 20:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Another non-N bio brought to you by yet another Wiki Ed .  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Wilkins from the same student.  128.252.154.1 ( talk ) 21:37, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nino Kochlamazashvili : All that comes up are trivial mentions.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Georgia (country) .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 16:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WLNN-CD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and North Carolina .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 01:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mollie Green (broadcaster) : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The only two sources I could find are the two already linked in the article - one is a mention of the presenter taking part in wider industrial action, the other is a piece about her being a victim of a crime, neither is an adequate assertion of notability.  Flip Format ( talk ) 15:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Apollonia Vanova : UtherSRG (talk) 19:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - She has acting credits in several fairly important movies, but always as minor characters.  Under both spellings of her name I can find little except basic listings in the credits of those movies, and her music has even less visibility and is only self-promoted in the usual social media and streaming sites.  It looks like she's making an honest living in entertainment but she has not received significant and reliable coverage from journalists.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I was planning to send to Afd out the cat:nn.  Its had a note tag for a decade.  Non-notable.  Never been updated.  scope_creep Talk 22:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Golf Course News International : Basically all of the coverage of the publication revolves around its disastrous raunchy 2006 rebrand.  The only mainstream source I can find covering the publication in any detail is an article in the Independent from 2006 covering the rebrand, along with a very brief article in Press Gazette covering a hiring decision the same year, with other coverage of the rebrand in the niche Golf Business News also in 2006.  There's also a 2006 public statement by ex publication head Trevor Ledger in Pitchcare regarding the rebrand.  Either way, even if these niche golf sources counted, it still wouldn't pass WP:SUSTAINED due to all the sources being from 2006.  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 20:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Sports , Golf , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Hemiauchenia ( talk ) 20:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't find anything about event for recent news.  104.7.152.180 ( talk ) 03:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sewa Sadan English Boarding School : Mero Sewa is written in a promotional tone and doesn't appear to be WP:RS nor is the depth substantial enough.  Jimdofree also doesn't seem to be independent of the subject as it asks for financial contributions to help rebuild the school towards the end of the text.  I found no decent sources in Nepali either (सेवा सदन अंग्रेजी बोर्डिङ स्कूल) not that we would expect any for an English medium school.  Article created by an WP:SPA .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Nepal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 10:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Bobherry Talk My Edits 00:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ESC Reporter : ser!  ( chat to me - see my edits ) 14:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Music .  ser!  ( chat to me - see my edits ) 14:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not notable — IмSтevan talk 16:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The subject of the article fails on several notability counts, including WP:GNG , WP:SIGCOV and WP:NWEB .  The site's "achievements" are not particularly notable, given that Eurovision accreditation for fan media can be applied for by anyone and that interviews held with artists are common across a large swathe of media organisations, many of which do not satisfy Wikipedia notability policies.  Sims2aholic8 ( talk ) 16:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites , Europe , Denmark ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- article by COI editor about a glorified (now defunct) blog without any independent significant coverage.  — Cactus Writer (talk) 21:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - as explained by Sims2aholic8, does not satisfy the notability policies of Wikipedia.  Ktkvtsh ( talk ) 15:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tamale-Louisville Sister City Relationship : But it is just a fact, not a topic for an encyclopedia article.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 01:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ghana and Kentucky .  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 01:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Most of the article consists of just empty words.  Not enough content to justify a separate article.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 02:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Tutwakhamoe.  The article barely talks about what the cities have done together!  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 04:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Walt Yoder The article is relevant.  The cities have done quite a lot together, and @ JML1148 is right that the article has not said much about what the cities have done together.  So, more content shuld be added, so that the deletion notice is revoked.  This particular sister city relationship has built infrastructure, offered scholarships, undertook yearly exchange programs and regular visits.  @ Tutwakhamoe has a point that more content should be added.  So let's add more content and remove it from the delete notice.  This sister city relationship has stood for nearly 50 years.  I think it is quite relevant.  Let's allow a few weeks for more content to be added.  Ihikky ( talk ) 12:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Building infrastructure, offering scholarships, participating in student exchanges and having foreign visits are ALL WP:ROUTINE event, there is not much things about the sister city relationship between Tamale and Louisville that sets them apart from the sister city relationship between other cities.  Considering sister city relationship between even larger cities don't even have their articles, I'm not so optimistic about how this one is somehow notable enough in source coverage to pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 14:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I concur.  The sources and detail is just WP:ROUTINE , and there doesn't seem to be anything notable about the relationship @ Ihikky : If you have anything else that can be added, please do so in the next few days.  AfD notices also cannot be removed until the discussion has ended.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 06:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daniel Lowery : - UtherSRG (talk) 12:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , United States of America ,  and Arizona .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nom.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with nominator.  The references are not independent reliable significant secondary coverage, and a search for other sources turns up virtually nothing, and certainly nothing better.  Banks Irk ( talk ) 15:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources found, all links are to Pokerweb, which isn't enough for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gayla Leigh Shoemake : Is a case of WP:BLP1E .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Kansas .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Week keep There are four links found in Gnewspapers using the "find sources" option above, this is the best [50] .  I'd say it's a weak pass.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  No followup coverage to speak of.  Oaktree b's best source is a routine newspaper article announcing her pageant win.  I've also nominated fellow Miss Kansas winners Alyssa George and Hannah Wagner .  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 11:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Also an environmental activist in recent years.  See https://myedmondsnews.com/2021/04/earth-day-boosters-share-their-message-with-i-5-commuters/ The references about her environmental work aren't enough to establish notability on their own, but they do serve as a reminder that pageant contestants can be notable for other things they do, even if the pageant participation isn't enough.  It helps that she has a uncommon surname.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 13:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This together with the earlier coverage adds up to a keep.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 14:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] An article about local environmental workshops in the Edmonds Beacon ?  That's not significant coverage.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 02:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Willian Forte : There appears to be a spell at SE Palmeiras but I didn't find anything.  Fails in WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Svartner ( talk ) 08:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football , Brazil ,  and Sportspeople .  Svartner ( talk ) 08:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable topic due to a lack of significant coverage of the subject. — Alalch E. 10:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No evidence of notability with almost no sourcing.  Haruka Amaranth 13:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Nothing here.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robyn Moore Gibson : As always, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED , so people don't get articles just because of who they were married to -- but there isn't really any other strong notability claim being made here at all, and the only other attempt at one (board member of a charity) is referenced to a primary source rather than any evidence of media coverage about her work in that role to establish any notability for it.  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Women ,  and Australia .  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think her principle notability is not as the wife but as the recipient of the largest divorce settlement in Hollywood history.  Parsons nose ( talk ) 10:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per WP:NOTINHERITED .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chilean Uruguayans : The group is tiny at 1,682 people.  Two or three "notable people" are footballers who happened to play a couple of years in another country, which does not contribute to the constitution of a diaspora.  The article is one of many offshoots of former attempts to create "foreign relations" pages between every conceiveable combinations of countries, and ethnicity pages intersecting every nation on earth.  Geschichte ( talk ) 12:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Chile and Uruguay .  Owen× ☎ 12:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I have added further notable Chilean Uruguayans who have lived most or the whole of their careers in Uruguay, including references. -- Fadesga ( talk ) 10:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Notability as a group is WP:NOTINHERITED from individuals Geschichte ( talk ) 17:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, NotAGenious ( talk ) 10:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I find it impossible to regard this as a notable topic.  (I say this as someone married to a Chilean and with Uruguayan friends.)  Athel cb ( talk ) 18:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  None of the secondary sources given are actually centered on this group.  If it numbers less than 2,000 people, it is probable that there's not much to say about it.  Place Clichy ( talk ) 20:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Non-encyclopedic cross-categorization - see WP:CROSSCAT .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete