hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Somnath Khara: My own searches yielded nothing better than Telegraph India , which mentions him in the title and an image caption but only once in the main article prose (so it's not WP:SIGCOV ), and TOI , another match report that mentions him, this time his performance wasn't so good and the article mentions some mistakes he made but doesn't go into any depth about him as an individual.  From the second article, we can perhaps make a presumption as to why his career was so short (although this would be WP:OR ) but having a bad game, on its own, is not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG and I don't see any actual direct significant coverage of Khara.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per nom.  One poor source with stats and no coverage on the subject.  Fails notability and WP:BIO .  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 17:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with above—one poor source, no other coverage, and no trackable stats over a four-year career certainly fails WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom   -- Devoke water 21:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2008 Roasso Kumamoto season: People looking for information about this club or season can easily find it at 2008 J.League Division 2 or Roasso Kumamoto .  I can't find any indication that this season is sufficiently notable enough on its own to require a separate article.  The copyright infringement case that occurred this season is already mentioned in the main article and, in fact, is not even covered in this sub-article.  In my view, this shell of an 'article' should be deleted with no prejudice against creating again in the future if anyone can prove that it has WP:SIGCOV and requires being split from the parent article.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Japan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – For the similars AfD. Svartner ( talk ) 02:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article is a mess, WP:TNT it. Govvy ( talk ) 19:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tayler Kane: Pre-wiki coverage was hard to find, even a cursory Google search today shows nothing.  Although the actor seems to have played several minor roles in notable shows, there's no significant coverage of him that I could find.  If printed sources exist, one may list them.  X ( talk ) 09:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers .  X ( talk ) 09:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  09:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Turtletennisfogwheat ( talk ) 09:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cloudreach: Probably conflict of interest.  No substance.  However, since Cloudreach was discussed at AfD before, PROD cannot be used.  I have converted this to an AfD for them.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 18:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Computing .  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 18:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This was previously deleted and for good reasons.  Most reliable sources are not about the company but about bigger companies who bought the business, and even those are flimsy and don't justify an article about this.  Additionally the company website doesn't even exist anymore which is another reason to think this doesn't pass WP:N .  2A02:6B6B:58:0:F935:2F9:817C:F0F4 ( talk ) 18:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Are you the same person who proposed deletion?  (The first two segments of the IPv6 addresses are identical.)  If so, you need to disclose this fact, to avoid creating an illusion of support ( WP:BADSOCK ).  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 22:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes I am.  Didn't mean to trick anybody (IP was changed by ISP) but indeed I should have mentioned it in my response.  2A02:6B6B:58:0:F935:2F9:817C:F0F4 ( talk ) 10:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks, and sorry if I came across as too confrontational.  jlwoodwa ( talk ) 23:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete - insufficient sources to merit inclusion.  WmLawson ( talk ) 00:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as one Delete vote is from the nominator and this article is not eligible for Soft Deletion due to earlier AFD.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge with Atos : Seems to be fine to incorporate a small section into the Atos article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Or ! delete if not merging, I'm ok with that as well.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merger is possible but all the sources are WP:ORGTRIV so I'm not even sure it's worth that or a redirect.  Based on the thinness of the available sourcing, delete .  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 07:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Basin Radio Network: Tagged as unsourced since 2017, it's hard to imagine this meeting NCORP .  The parent company of this group has two other clusters in Wyoming that also have articles, and are included in this nomination for similar reasons (though one has no tags at all, and the other has been tagged as unsourced since 2009 ): Big Horn Mountain Radio Network ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) (

Discussion outcome: delete
P Kalyanasundaram: Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources are about his charitable donation, with nothing otherwise.  I'm not seeing a notable career.  Nothing for GNG.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non notable career beyond his donations.  Fails WP:GNG .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iñaki Quintana: Joeykai ( talk ) 22:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete simply being a footballer is not enough to be notable.  OsmiumGuard ( talk ) 22:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 07:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No WP:SIGCOV and a very bad article to boot.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 04:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The Spanish Wikipedia article of this person has been deleted in 2015 due to lack of encyclopedic relevance.  However, I'm not sure what kind of person was he.  Under the name "Iñaki Quintana", search engines mostly find other men with this name instead of the Mexican soccer player, failing WP:V .  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 15:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 12:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources I could locate on the internet refer to a different person of the same name 🍪 Cookie Monster 15:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David McGarry: Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 01:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Video games ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk ) 04:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as per nomination.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as an unsourced BLP .  Bearian ( talk ) 20:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eurasia Insurance Company: There are not a lot of sources for the amount of content.  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  10:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Kazakhstan .  🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link !  10:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All I can find is confirmation of their AM Best rating, which isn't really notable.  Rest is routine business matters.  Article is PROMO.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Digital Group Audio: WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  20:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and California .  WikiDan61 ChatMe!  ReadMe!!  20:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't find much for the company past the announcements in 2008ish.  Even what's used in the article isn't helpful for notability.  Might not even be in business anymore.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails NCORP by the looks of it. - KH-1 ( talk ) 10:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pete Rodriguez (fighter): TestingBoy ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : the mmafighting.com article read in conjunction with the rest of the sources amounts to SIGCOV Jack4576 ( talk ) 13:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I provide enough source for page to be okay for mainspace as well provding his backround etc.. Pete is more notable then some other mma fighters that already have page but didnt fight in notable promotion unlike him.  He is still active and signed with UFC .  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 15:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The bigger MMA Fighting article is routine pre-match hype and anyway only contains 2.5 sentences on him.  None of the other sources amount to SIGCOV.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 20:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete Draftify classic case of WP:TOOSOON .  Ammending to draftify, as fighter will meet notability eventually.  Nswix ( talk ) 02:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -  Fails GNG and NMMA.  Sources mainly on routine reports - TOOSOON.  Cassiopeia talk 04:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Drafity He will soon meet NMMA, so no reason to delete when the article may well be recreated fairly soon.  Seacactus 13 ( talk ) 17:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question Why do several of you think he will soon meet WP:NMMA ?   That requires a top 10 world ranking and fightmatrix currently has him at #555.  Papaursa ( talk ) 03:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in the article and BEFORE show primary, promo and stats, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 06:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete MMAJunkie and Yahoo Sports all have some mentions of this person, but that's all, mentions only.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As I mentioned above, his ranking doesn't get him anywhere near WP notability.   Fight results and announcements, along with appearances in MMA databases, also doesn't put him close to meeting WP:GNG .  Papaursa ( talk ) 00:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  The person who loves reading ( talk ) 02:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 10:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2024 Selma-Winchester tornado: WP:NOTNEWS, WP:LASTING, WP:EVENT.  Wikiwillz ( talk ) 02:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions .  Wikiwillz ( talk ) 02:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It will be expanded in the future.  More information will come out in the following weeks Iamakid836e5 ( talk ) 02:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Would like to let everyone know this user is most likely a sockpuppet , and I have opened a discussion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lokicat3345 Wikiwillz ( talk ) 02:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: There were multiple more notable and and deadlier tornadoes than this one, such as the Lakeview tornado (which in itself doesn't even necessarily qualify for an article) ( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°)͡°) ( talk ) 02:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – No lasting impacts proven.  This is a similar case to the 2023 Clarksville tornado .  Individual tornadoes in an outbreak shouldn't be given an article until months afterward, so WP:LASTING can be satisfied.  The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 02:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Environment ,  and Ohio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Alvin and the Chipmunks specials and home video releases: Ajf773 ( talk ) 09:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTCATALOGUE pure and simple.  Dronebogus ( talk ) 09:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is not a catalogue for home media releases.  CastJared ( talk ) 11:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete NOTCAT filler that belongs on Fandom, not here; anything that was sketched or moved on TV in the 1980s for kids got multiple home video releases and this just seems to be a catch-all for any Alvin series and film rather than the 1980s series which should be the sole focus, along with OR regarding 'syndication cuts' from bored editors.  Nate • ( chatter ) 00:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gergő Máté: I can't even find evidence of any statistical coverage of an amateur career.  The best that I could find were Nemzeti Sport and Rangadó , both being trivial mentions and far from WP:SIGCOV .  Also per WP:SPORTBASIC , Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Hungary .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 22:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 02:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Couldn't agree more with what's written already MaskedSinger ( talk ) 08:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Preeti Gandwani: Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please don't delete the article Preeti Gandwani as it is posted from reliable sources. .  I have added many other sources as references that I could found.  Please improve the article, don't delete it.  116.206.202.14 ( talk ) 10:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting because of low participation.  Remember IP editor, articles on living people require reliable sources demonstrating significant coverage .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBIO .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please don't delete the article.  Instead modify it.  116.206.202.59 ( talk ) 15:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Han Yong-gi: Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete