hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Kępniak, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship: More details at pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2024:04:07:Kępniak (osada) but TL;DR - former settlement that nothing is known about except that it existed c.  1921, we don't even know exactly where (somewhere in a particular county, probably).  No evidence that it was ever permanently inhabited, it could have been a single house or business or who knows what.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Poland .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Pinging editors interested in this in past similar discussions: User:FOARP , User:Ilawa-Kataka .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 01:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Another example of why just having been an Osada or similar at some point doesn't mean anything, since these can be individual buildings that may never have been inhabited, including foresters lodges, farms, railway stations, etc.  In this case the only source given in the article is TERYT but I don't find anything on TERYT corresponding to this under the SIMC number given on PL Wiki (1036879).  Possibly there is other information out there about this place but nothing that indicates notability.  FOARP ( talk ) 19:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
People's Progressive Movement (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines): Clearly fails WP:ORGCRIT as not having been the subject of "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Caribbean .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Didn't find WP:SIGCOV , too.  Better Nuncio ( talk ) 07:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:ORGCRIT .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails SIGCOV clause CSMention269 ( talk ) 16:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shreya Verma: Fails WP:NPOL and GNG as BLP is contesting in the 2024 Indian general election and has not been elected to any office positions yet.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 07:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 07:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I don't know how these people create an article about a politician without reading Guidelines.  Clearly fails WP:NPOL .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 08:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL , same like previous AFDs Kompella Madhavi Latha , Neeraj Tripathi .  No in-depth coverage of the Subject and not yet elected as MP or MLA to pass WP:NPOL , If she wins the election and elected as a MP then he will automatically pass WP:NPOL .  Grabup ( talk ) 08:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they have not yet won already — but this makes no claim that the subject has preexisting notability for any other reason.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation after election day if she wins, but just standing as a candidate is not in and of itself grounds for an article now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not notable enough.  Can't find much about her on Google.  Fails WP:NPOL Rustypenguin ( talk ) 17:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as failing GNG and NPOL Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 12:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Identification of trees of the northeastern United States: dePRODed in 2018 with the rationale "valid information".  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 06:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology , Organisms ,  and United States of America .  Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 06:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete — Who thought that Wikipedia was the proper venue for something like this?  9t5 ( talk ) 22:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is an unvarnished field guide key, not an encyclopedic article.  NOTGUIDE indeed.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 07:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per User:Elmidae 's statement and WP:NOTGUIDE Lord serious pig 07:54, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per WP:NOTGUIDE .  ADifferentMan ( talk ) 08:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can be copied to Wikiguide if someone cares to do so.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 08:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There is a Wikiguide?  SEWilco ( talk ) 22:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I thought there was.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 23:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE .  Procyon117 ( talk ) 19:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Bduke ( talk ) 00:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment & weak delete - I believe that this article could be converted from a Guide to a description of the characteristics that distinguish the trees from one another.   That would be encyclopedic, I believe.   However, it should not be a synthetic derivative from the sources, but derived directly from sources.  --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ganapathikurichi: MicrobiologyMarcus ( talk ) 23:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the place exists, but I can't find any sources that talk about it.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It's a bad article, but it appears to be a genuine settlement, so meets WP:GEOLAND .  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources, fails GNG.  Per NGEO, "populated places without legal recognition" must meet GNG.  BEFORE did not show any WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth .  // Timothy :: talk 19:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Can't even be sure it exists.  Hence the exit.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Derik Pretorius: I found this interview and not much else.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Other than the interview provided, struggling to find anything more than passing mentions (although a lot of them).  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Skylar Kergil: As of 2023, Kergil is a YouTuber with 110,000 subscribers on Youtube.  This article was created by a WP:SPA in 2014, and the case for notability at its creation was essentially nil, with him having an even smaller platform then.  Not much has evolved since its creation.  This article is saturated with unsourced material and possible WP:NOR ; it reads as a WP:PROMOTION .  Outside of one Boston Globe article, it relies entirely on primary sources/sources that are exclusively local.  A search does not reveal any widespread coverage in WP:RS .  GuardianH ( talk ) 19:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Sexuality and gender , Internet ,  and Massachusetts .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cheng Yong: It fails WP:ARTIST and I can't find any significant coverage online, this is not notable enough to be kept.  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 20:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and China .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 20:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I can't find any critical notice of this person; the last AfD discussion in 2012 posted a link to an artnet bio (which is now a 404), and while they do have a list of paintings at artnet using the link now given in wiki, there is nothing else.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There's not nothing , but I'm not finding coverage that would meet NARTIST.  I get a lot of hits for his 2019 solo exhibition (the most complete of which is this one ), a full length critical essay about his works ( here , unsure about RS status: this site appears self-published, but it could easily have been lifted from a real source), and his CV .  Meanwhile reference two in the article is bogus, not about the subject at all, but doesn't support any prose.  And I get that deletion isn't cleanup, but this article needs a fundamental rewrite not to read like an advertisement.  Mainly though I'm not seeing NARTIST being met with the sources I've found, so Delete .  Folly Mox ( talk ) 15:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - No reliable sources found on the internet.  I would not be able to create a passable stub on this artist.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 02:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruce Wayne Hawkins: Tagged for notability issues since 2011.  Geoff | Who, me?  12:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Psychology ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  The subject's 1984 work, The semantics of English spatial prepositions has 263 citations in GS, although it appears to be a PhD thesis, and so presumably won't have received book reviews.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 03:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I don't think a well-cited doctoral dissertation is enough by itself for academic notability and there doesn't seem to be much else.  Even this puff piece from his alma mater thanking him for a donation (unusable as a reliable source, I think) doesn't have much to say about the rest of his academic career except that he took a position at a place where his administrative and teaching duties prevented him from doing much else.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree with the comments above.  The doctoral dissertation does not qualify one for notability.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 21:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohamed Aït Kaci: No independent sources showing significant coverage are in the article and I could not find any in my searches in Latin script, Kabyle and Arabic (محمد آيت كاسي).  No evidence of passing WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Algeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, Fails GNG and BIO, BEFORE showed ROUTINE news articles and stats, nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk 12:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Emilio Cordero: Does not appear to have continued playing after his college career.  No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Puerto Rico .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nnaemeka Clinton: Thilsebatti ( talk ) 06:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Thilsebatti ( talk ) 06:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 24 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 10:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete PR bizcruft is all I find.  Nothing for sourcing we can use, PROMO is likely.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable.  No WP:SIGCOV .  Uhooep ( talk ) 12:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Just noting for the record that this page was "moved" by Rusty Soto from the draft space via copy/paste ( diff ).  While I have no opinion on the page itself (as I have not looked back) re-draftification may be more appropriate given the unilateral non-AFC manner in which this was moved to the Article space.  Primefac ( talk ) 13:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
1974 Wills Cup: Mn1548 ( talk ) 18:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 15 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Rugby league ,  and Australia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , doesn't have the WP:SUSTAINED coverage to warrant inclusion as a standalone match.  Contents are mentioned at 1974 Eastern Suburbs season Geschichte ( talk ) 20:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not opposed to a redirect to 1974 Eastern Suburbs season per Gsch.  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 15:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Our Lady of Peace and Good Voyage of Noveleta: The citation to The Inquirer is decent, although academic sources should be preferred for religion topics.  Otherwise, I can find no coverage of this subject outside the publications of the Philippine Independent Church itself, which are not independent of the subject, having searched in English, Spanish and Filipino on Google Scholar, Books, and the internet, having also searched for plausible colloquialisations of the name, such as "Mahal na Birhen ng Noveleta", "Nanay Paz de Noveleta", etc. signed, Rosguill talk 16:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Christianity ,  and Philippines .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete confirming nom's findings.  My search didn't turn up reliable sources as well.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jordan Koop: Gsearch is straight to social media links, no mentions in RS, no awards won.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Almost all of the cited sources are just trivial mentions, YouTube video, and promotional content.  The last cited article almost reads like an RS, if not for the link to the subject's fundraiser at the very bottom.  Found no significant coverge to satisfy WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 00:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AMFJ: InDimensional ( talk ) 22:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Did you conduct a WP:BEFORE in Icelandic sources?  I get quite a few hits about him in Icelandic sources on both Google and the Icelandic newspaper archives, Tímarit.is , which at least indicates that he has a bit more than "Zero notability whatsoever".  Alvaldi ( talk ) 23:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I couldn't find much beyond concert announcements.  If I missed any coverage (I might've done) please share the links.  InDimensional ( talk ) 15:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Delete : There are a few sources but I don't think it is enough to meet notability.  RolandSimon ( talk ) 22:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete