hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Luiz Carlos (footballer, born 1988) : Fails WP:GNG .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 14:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – The athlete competed in youth competitions for the Brazil national team [33] , and in Primeira Liga for UD Leiria [34] .  There are also articles covering the athlete's career until around 2011 [35] .  Svartner ( talk ) 07:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Of these, only one is a source that may.. .  and let me emphasize, may count towards notability depending on how your read WP:DEPTH .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 14:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It's enough coverage in my opinion, considering that the athlete recently retired.  Svartner ( talk ) 15:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One article is generally not considered enough coverage per WP:GNG .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources above which show notability.  Giant Snowman 14:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The problem here is that only one of the three sources above is an actual source.  The other two are literally just a list of the games the player played in.  I repeat myself here a bit, but I want to make it clear, only one of these is an actual source counting towards WP:GNG .  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 12:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources and per an extensive professional career.  Clearly notable.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Avula Parthasarathy : The four existing citations are all to a commercial site connected to this person, vedantaworld.  I don't think he meets WP:GNG .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 08:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and India .  Tacyarg ( talk ) 08:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep but trim out all the guff.  It took a few moments to find an article about him in the New Yorker , I suspect there are a bunch of other RS if one looked a bit harder.  JMWt ( talk ) 08:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per JMWt .  A few more sources: [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] .  WJ94 ( talk ) 09:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn (as nom).  Thank you for finding the New Yorker article.  Tacyarg ( talk ) 09:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Dan Kovacs : Holding powerlifting record would not make him notable... and currently he does not hold the record anymore, and in fact does not even appear in the entire list cited.  This implies that these records do not stand for very long.  In any case, fails GNG ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  If he was once notable as a record-holder, no longer being a record-holder does not make him non-notable.  Once notable, always notable.  Is he also known for something else?  A Google search brings up several people with that name, but I don't know if any of them is the powerlifter.  Sometimes combining an athlete's name and city in a search will find references from non-sports sources.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No, holding a world record is seen as falling under WP:ONEEVENT and does not establish notability, then or now.  This is especially true for a record which in and of itself is not notable, like a powerlifting records which regularly changes hands.  If we had pages for every lifter who ever held a power-lifting record, WP would soon be full of people who were otherwise entirely non-notable.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 12:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Spartaz Humbug!  05:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Appears to meet WP:BASIC / WP:SPORTSBASIC .  Given the era, there's going to be more in paper, but for now we should have plenty [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] .  There's also db coverage which helps with verifiability.  [22] — siro χ o 08:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've expanded the article a bit with a few of these sources.  There's likely more to find from the 2000s and 2010s as well, as he was still competing.  — siro χ o 08:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Based on the new paper sources found, appears ok.  First few are local, but the last are more wide-spread.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn - based upon the new sources found.  They aren't overwhelming but enough imo to survive the chopping block.  ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 15:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Tarang Jain : Bakhtar40 ( talk ) 07:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and India .  Bakhtar40 ( talk ) 07:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as meeting GNG and please read WP:BEFORE Me Da Wikipedian ( talk ) 10:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Bakhtar40 , as a fairly inexperienced editor (131 edits), you need to read WP:BEFORE , "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources".  It is not just the sources actually used in the article that count.  A simple Google search for Tarang Jain Varroc (he owns 86%) gives us: https://www.forbes.com/profile/tarang-jain/? sh=5a0e545f2676 https://www.forbesindia.com/article/big-bet/twinwin-venture-how-tarang-jain-built-a-global-automotive-business/49915/1 https://www.forbesindia.com/article/leaderhip-awards-2013/tarang-jain-taking-risks-to-derisk-varroc/36383/1 https://www.autocarpro.in/feature/varroc-tarang-jain-autocar-professional-3428 https://www.themachinist.in/interviews/2333/investments-help-companies-stay-competitive https://www.cnbctv18.com/business/companies/varroc-engineering-striving-for-double-digit-margin-by-end-of-fy24-says-cmd-17046041.htm There are plenty more.  And who knows what else in Hindi, etc?  Edwardx ( talk ) 09:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Very reliable sources like forbes have enough coverage on the well known billionaire from India.  Google search will also display results with many reliable sources on the subject.  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  based on presented citations above this person will meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Hkkingg ( talk ) 15:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Colonel By Classic : Sources seem to either be non-independent (from the schools) or be WP:CRYSTAL ("still has a long ways to go", source #4 says).  A BEFORE check didn't come up with much else, just some routine game previews and recaps confirming there are some games by this title, but nothing approaching WP:SIGCOV .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Ice hockey ,  and Canada .  Let'srun ( talk ) 18:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There does appear to be some significant coverage in my mind, outside of just the schools and student papers.  [7] [8] [9] [10] -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is an event game, not just a rivalry.  Cmm3 ( talk ) 19:04, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : as per WP:SIGCOV provided by EarlAndrew.  Flibirigit ( talk ) 12:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Rasen (TV series) : Tagged for notability since 2022 Donald D23 talk to me 12:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Japan .  Donald D23 talk to me 12:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It's a sequel to Ring: The Final Chapter , so it's obviously notable and I'm sure sources will be found; this isn't going to be deleted, at worst a merge should be considered.  Nate • ( chatter ) 16:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , nationally-televised series with double-digit viewership percentages, and the novel the series is based upon is likely notable as well.  The Japanese article is at ja:らせん (鈴木光司の小説) .  Most sources from the 1990s will not be online in Japanese, but the first Google Books hit I see is the national magazine Shūkan Shinchō talking about how the series was a hit across Asia and contributed to a boom in Japanese horror.  Dekimasu よ!  11:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Alliance for Democracy and Development (Cameroon) : Has has no secondary sources since creation nearly two decades ago.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics ,  and Cameroon .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 10:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - The party was represented in the national government in 1991 (this is referenced in the Garga Haman Adji article).  ( Here it says ADD later changed name to ANDP, albeit I don't see this backed up elsewhere for now.) -- Soman ( talk ) 23:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep as the party has been represented in the national parliament, it is generally notable. -- 扱.  し.  侍.  ( talk ) 13:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's not right.  Garga Haman Adji was a member of the party for one year while a minister during a transition from dictatorship.  He was never elected to parliament.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 14:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well, a political party represented in national government.  That should be an easy pass.  -- Soman ( talk ) 23:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : As long as the party was once represented in the national government, it's an easy pass.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 21:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you point me to where it says that in WP:NORG ?  Thanks AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  Skål, 2A01:799:2E3:C500:556:815E:86C2:7DB1 ( talk ) 15:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Having representative in the national parliament means that the party has a national outlook and eligible for an entry into Wikipedia.  Lokotim ( talk ) 17:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Lokotim : No they weren't represented in parliament at any time.  Please see above.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 11:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Notable political party once were in Cameroon national govt.  DI V I N E 04:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Khutbat-e-madras : –MinisterOfReligion (Talk) 08:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] unsure - I don't read Urdu/Arabic but it seems some scholars hold this in high esteem, no?  For example 1 JMWt ( talk ) 10:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Islam .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to author, Sulaiman Nadvi .  No need to delete this outright.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 17:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is a pretty much notable book, and is subject of books, for instance, this 1978 work , consider this more than a paragraph, this as well - and I believe there is more.  ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep: per WP:SUSTAINED .  The book is of sufficient esteem and merit to be the subject of a fresh 2017 translation and revision into English , demonstrating the sustained notability of the work over time.  The work is also widely cited on Google Books.  Muslimnews International , in its 1970 volume 9, page 11, called it a "celebrated" work - again evidence of sustained interest over the intervening decades, now tallying up to nearly a century.  Iskandar323 ( talk ) 16:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Kris Deschouwer : Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Politics ,  and Belgium .  UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Both the Chaire d'honneur de la Ville de Lausanne and the Binnenlandse Francqui Leerstoel aan de ULB [9] might plausibly pass WP:PROF#C5 , and I found maybe five published reviews of three of his books on JSTOR and Google Scholar, enough for a weak pass of WP:AUTHOR .  Article needs updating (he is emeritus professor now) but WP:DINC .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 19:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Both of those are listed as "prizes" here: https://researchportal.vub.be/en/persons/kris-deschouwer .  So I think you're right about the C5.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 20:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep also passes C#8 as editor of the European Journal of Political Research between 2003 and 2009. Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 08:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Superbase (database) : There are no independent sources Mdggdj ( talk ) 16:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - @ Mdggdj : This is the fourth such nomination in about as many hours with the same rationale verbatim, and as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linux for PlayStation 2 not only are independent sources easy to find, such as GBooks having several reviews in InfoWorld and an entire book about the subject called Superbase Revealed , there are newspaper reviews and more books on archive.org such as Using Superbase and Superbase the Book .  The nomination is also inaccurate as there is an independent source already present in the article, and that with what can be found in a couple of minutes online is more than enough to show notability.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 04:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per Aoidh above.  Pavlor ( talk ) 08:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per Aoidh above.  Lionel Cristiano ?  19:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Per Aoidh.  ~ Dictionary ( chat ) 07:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Alistair Sylvester : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Canada .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural keep -- Nominator regularly bypasses WP:BEFORE searches and 50 AfDs in 30 minutes is wholly inappropriate.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Nominator comment: You're the one who de-prodded all of my nominations, so you don't get to complain now that they're at AFD, which is where nominations go when the PROD has been removed.  Add to that your bad faith aspersions.  A disagreement as to what qualifies as "significant coverage" is not evidence of bypassing anything.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Subject meets the WP:GNG with sources such as [ [52] ] and [ [53] ].  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: A comment to "procedural keep" is not an argument on why an article should be Kept.  I'm relisting this discussion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources found above.   Hopefully someone takes the time to add them, but they have been verified to WP:NEXIST .  - 2pou ( talk ) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Charles Yriarte : While his list of works is not unimpressive, he still fails to pass the general and author-specific notability policies.  - UtherSRG (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Architecture ,  and France .  UtherSRG (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Looks to be notable to me.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep seems notable, furthermore, author appears to have written a large number of works and meriting of a page.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 11:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: WP:ITSNOTABLE is not a sufficient argument to keep an article.  More discussion required.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : These can help [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] .  This [30] .  He was a member of the Academie francaise [31] and his record in the Getty ULAN, bibliography at the bottom/sources [32] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Critical study/biography here [33] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In addition to the sources found above, there's a brief entry in Benezit Dictionary of Artists , as well as mentions as a biographer in entries in Grove/Benezit for 3 artists.  Espresso Addict ( talk ) 23:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep