hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Fireworks (2000 TV series) : Tagged for notability since 2015.  PROD removed because one of the other languages has citations, but looking at them they are either primary or mention the show in passing.  Donald D23 talk to me 13:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and South Korea .  Donald D23 talk to me 13:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  I found multiple reliable sources, albeit written in Korean, to support the keeping of this article.  They're all in-depth (not passing mentions) and not routine coverage, as they cover the show in detail.  드라마 '불꽃', 뒤집기 성공할까 [Will the drama ‘Fireworks’ succeed in turning its fate around?] ( Chosun Ilbo ) Dong-a Ilbo : [7] , [8] , [9] (this one is about an actor who played in Fireworks, but it has information about the show - also consult this article from the Maeil Business Newspaper ) A source from Maeil about its music Joongang Ilbo : [10] , [11] (this one is linked in the kowiki version, though there it's broken), [12] There's more I didn't link, but I feel this is enough to support its notability.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wuju Daisuki ( talk • contribs ) 16:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry for not signing my comment, I was on mobile web and the site was acting real wonky.  Today I expanded the article from a stub and (hopefully) made its notability apparent.  Wuju Daisuki ( talk ) 01:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Wuju Daisuki's comment.  toobigtokale ( talk ) 08:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Another review of the recently found sources would be helpful.  Has the nominator looked them over?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw per sources listed above.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Ahmad Yar Gharany : WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Being a hoax and promotion at the same time sounds like nonsense.  Geschichte ( talk ) 12:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - There's a source cited from Khaama Press , the largest news agency in the country.  Why do you think it's a hoax?  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Created by a sockpuppet of User:Abbasshaikh124 but I think other editors have done enough work on it that it's not eligible for CSD G5.  L iz Read!  Talk!  04:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Courtney Woods : While it may have a shot at passing GNG, it definitely doesn't pass SIGCOV, and given that she hasn't appeared or been referenced since 2014, I doubt that's changing anytime soon.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Television .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 00:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Nara Bahadur Bista : Shivangi1738 ( talk ) 07:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 May 18 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 07:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Nepal .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The Constituent Assembly is the equivalent of a national parliament.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 08:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Eastmain and tag for more sources.  Mccapra ( talk ) 10:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Constituent assemblies are not always WP:NPOL conferring (such as in a constitutional convention, where they have no legislative powers); however, in the case of Nepal, the Constituent Assembly was the national legislature, thus conferring WP:NPOL .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 15:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - why, as article creator, wasn't I notified about this AfD?  Easy keep per NPOL as CA member.  -- Soman ( talk ) 18:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The AfD was created manually rather than with the tool.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 19:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Charlize Mörz : Broc ( talk ) 16:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Austria .  Broc ( talk ) 16:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 16:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep : Some coverage in Austrian media [18] , [19] were the first two I pulled up.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The gymnast recently won a bronze medal at an FIG World Cup event.  She won this on the floor exercise which had a field of 56 gymnasts in qualification .  The gymnast is also leading the women's rankings on the event .  The 2024 FIG World Apparatus Cup series allows two gymnasts per event to qualify to the 2024 Summer Olympics , so she is in contention of gaining this nominative spot for herself.  theworldgymnast1 ( talk ) 20:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Bhima Kheda : It is missing information to show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria.  The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth.  Created on 20 November 2013.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 12:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Madhya Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 04:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I've added a ref and it now passes WP:GEOLAND .  - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 04:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep passes WP:GEOLAND .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 12:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Stefan G. Rasmussen : Anything notable in this article is contained in SAS Flight 751 .  C apital S asha ~ t alk 19:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Aviation ,  and Denmark .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .   I'm not familiar with the Danish system of government, but the fact that this person served in the national parliament for four years appears to meet WP:NPOL .  RecycledPixels ( talk ) 20:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Passes WP:NPOL as a member of the Danish parliament.  Here are additional sources which should be added to the article: [5] [6] .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 02:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Josephine Piyo : Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women ,  and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - She meet WP:NPOL as a member of the Plateau State House of Assembly , a state-wide elected office.   She is also the incoming Deputy governor of the state.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 15:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Article is poor quality, but notable nonetheless.  Nigerian state legislators pass WP:NPOL .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets both WP:NPOL and the WP:GNG .  Can someone speedy close?  gidonb ( talk ) 21:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Grandadbob : Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 04:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator - looks like I need to get better at finding music sources, and I'm happy that the citations added support their notability.  I'm glad that the nomination at least brought some attention to an article that needed it, if nothing else.  Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 02:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England .  Suntooooth , it/he ( talk / contribs ) 04:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning Keep on this one as there is evidence of meeting WP:NMUSIC , including: secondary album reviews in allmusic , Resident Advisor , and musicOMH , an allmusic staff bio, charting evidence from the Official Charts Company , and significant coverage on national radio BBC Radio 6 .  WP:V citations have been added to the article for all of these.  Resonant Dis tor tion 13:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
July 2024 global IT outages : No reason by the nominator was given and this is a serious and global issue which is being reported by the media worldwide.  We can decide later on if we need to delete it if it is not notable (see WP:RUSHDELETE ).  ― Panamitsu (talk) 08:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose As long as the article's subject is notable, and the content is fine, there is no reason to delete the article.  Gust Justice ( talk ) 08:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose As it is a current ongoing event, it is better to keep the article while simultaneously updating the article.  Note that I will also support this argument on every future ongoing events, whether it’s an assassination attempt, terrorist event, or even massive global affecting IT outage.  SymphonyWizard72 ( talk ) 08:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong keep .  Clearly a major, global story.  Why on earth has this been nominated for deletion?  I'm tired of people constantly nominating stuff that's obviously notable!  Wjfox2005 ( talk ) 08:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose A major event caused by CrowdStrike, just like the assassination attempt days ago.  AnimMouse ( talk ) 08:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CptViraj ( talk ) 08:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Moving to draft would likely lead to the contents being added to CrowdStrike's corporate profile so reducing its effectiveness.  Thincat ( talk ) 08:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose .  Clearly a major global event, where many countries were affected.  This should remain in article space.  Procyon117 ( talk ) 09:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Moderator Mayhem : They are at the very least press releases and raise doubt on their sponsored/pay to play nature.  This browser game does not seem to be notable for anything in particular and the coverage died down right after its release.  Kate the mochii ( talk ) 03:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Websites .  Kate the mochii ( talk ) 03:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is linked from the front page right now.  Would you be willing to withdraw and renominate at a later time.  — siro χ o 03:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Keep currently linked on the main page ( WP:CSK #6) Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits ) 03:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Soccer Mania : I have not found any reliable sources for this video game, and most searches come back with Football Mania (known as Soccer Mania outside Europe) which released at a later date in 2002.  Please let me know if anyone has more luck than me when looking for a reliable source.  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 20:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Football .  Fats40boy11 ( talk ) 20:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - This game was released in the early 1990s.  It may have coverage locked away in hard copy magazines...  Sergecross73 msg me 23:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Mobygames test comes up with a lot of print magazine reviews.  It's usually the case that most retro games released in physical form are somehow notable simply due to the lower volume of game releases back then.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 01:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
International Wood Products Journal : This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 17:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Long-established journal, indexed in Scopus amongst others.  Easy pass of WP:NJOURNALS .  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 01:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 02:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think there's both a long-enough history, and enough secondary-source coverage.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 06:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Indexed in Scopus, easy pass of WP:NJournals .  -- Randykitty ( talk ) 09:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination per excellent ponits above.  Boleyn ( talk ) 13:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Dinosaur Safari : Possible redirect to List of Windows 3.x games , where it is listed.  Has been in CAT:NN for over 13 years and it doesn't appear to be neglect.  Boleyn ( talk ) 08:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Education ,  and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Got WP:OFFLINE reviews in Wired Magazine , CD-ROMs Rated , CD-ROM Today , and The Multimedia Home Companion amongst others.  It seems the WP:BEFORE was largely just for online sources, which indeed don't exist for it.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 17:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination per above.  Boleyn ( talk ) 21:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
Posy (given name) : Everything in the article is sourced and there are several articles about people with these names listed.  There is absolutely no reason to delete it.  Vehemently oppose.  Bookworm857158367 ( talk ) 05:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep
IGDB : Was a draft that has been moved by creator.  Recommend redirecting to Twitch (service) .  IgelRM ( talk ) 01:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games , Companies , Websites ,  and Sweden .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:54, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Databas för spel tar in miljoner , 13 February 2018, in Dagens Industri , is a 500-word article in the dominating Swedish finance newspaper.  There's a couple of paragraphs in "Mycket på spel i snabbväxande bransch", Göteborgs-Posten 24 January 2019 (pages 16–17), online as " Mycket på spel i snabbväxande Göteborgsbransch ".  There's also " Blev rik på sin galna get – nu investerar han i 'IMDB för spel' " in the Swedish news site Breakit, probably the dominating source of journalism aboout finance news about the tech sector in Sweden.  I'm leaning towards keep, based on this and the sources already available in the article.  / Julle ( talk ) 16:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for the Swedish sources.  Somewhat local startup coverage, but some details.  Perhaps a merger with Twitch service would still make sense, but otherwise leaning keep.  Dagens Industri says "world's largest database for computer games", I think MobyGames would claim that.  "rawg.io" etc don't get that much local press, right?  IgelRM ( talk ) 03:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I can't confirm if Göteborgs-Posten article is WP:SIGCOV but even without it, there's just enough with the 2 other Swedish sources and Twitch acquisition articles.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 18:33, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mika1h : I realize this is the AFD venue, but may I ask your opinion about a merge after my above comment. I will withdraw the AFD if someone wants to switch to the article talk page. @ Sulfurboy : (AFC reviewer in 2020), do the sources change your notability concern? IgelRM ( talk ) 09:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm fine with a merge. -- Mika1h ( talk ) 09:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: User:IgelRM , you are the nominator and you say you are now leaning Keep.  Do you want to withdraw this nomination?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I think the facts of the size of content of the database and the usage by Twitch and Amazon alone justify it for a article.  If you insist that it fits better there, you could merge it as a section in " Twitch (service) ".  UnkreativeFrog ( talk ) 02:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC) (writer of " IGDB ") [ reply ] Keep - size of content and usage of Twitch etc do jusrify this article being kept.  BabbaQ ( talk ) 22:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy keep