hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Keith Wayne : He’s only had one role as Tom in Night of the Living Dead.   Unless he’s Peter Ostrum , the article fails NACTOR.   Unless he’s Ian Michael Smith , Besedka Johnson or Jocelyne LaGarde , the article fails ANYBIO.   I don’t object to a redirect to Night of the Living Dead.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 00:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 00:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect is probably best here, subject doesn't meet NACTOR, and is borderline for BASIC.  NOPAGE probably applies.   — siro χ o 03:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Night_of_the_Living_Dead#Cast .  Fails WP:NACTOR , as his single role isn't particularly notable.  Mooonswimmer 15:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: If not kept, consider Night_of_the_Living_Dead#Keith_Wayne or Night_of_the_Living_Dead#Cast for redirect targets.  Rjj iii ( talk ) 06:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Core (album) : Secondary coverage appears to consist of 3 reviews, only one of which (from All About Jazz ) exceeds a paragraph in length.  StereoFolic ( talk ) 02:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music .  StereoFolic ( talk ) 02:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Bob van Luijt : Found no additional material.  Artist's notability (assuming he is notable which I find questionable from a brief look at his article) appears to primarily be in the technology field rather than music so the likelihood of finding more on the latter seems unlikely.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 09:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think the artist is likely notable today due to his involvement with Weaviate, but I do think closer scrutiny is warranted because I have a suspicion some undisclosed WP:COI has occurred in articles relating to him.  This AfD comes out of an examination of related pages after I reverted a suspicious IP edit .  See also this AfD on another project of the artist's, mostly written by the same account as this one.  StereoFolic ( talk ) 13:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as suggested above.  Not sure the musician passes the GNG.  The album doesn't.  Van Luijt has not been nominated so redirecting is the right course of action, given that there is sufficient coverage for a redirect.  gidonb ( talk ) 19:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] gidonb , I don't think the artist passes notability , the article doesn't cite anything on him climbing the charts or any kind of certification, and there are couple of primary sources like Github, the article mostly cites that he went to school.  shelovesneo ( talk ) 20:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] shelovesneo , between the lines, you could have read that this is also my concern.  But I haven't done the research yet to say anything with certainty.  I'll cross that bridge when I come to it!  Right now: not nominated.  gidonb ( talk ) 20:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] If you or anyone has the time to research further and determines the artist page warrants nomination, I would be interested to review and weigh in.  I'm on the fence at the moment.  StereoFolic ( talk ) 23:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He is the focus of articles in De Telegraaf, FD, and Volkskrant, and passing mentions in the NRC and AD.  gidonb ( talk ) 03:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rarities (The Presidents of the United States of America album) : I suggest it be deleted.  Losipov ( talk ) 02:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to The Presidents of the United States of America discography as an ATD — siro χ o 04:24, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music , Japan ,  and United States of America .  — Karnataka talk 07:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Presidents of the United States of America discography#Compilation albums : Found no additional coverage.  Disagree with merging as prose here is both unsourced and outside the scope of a discography page, and target already has all the essential info it needs.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 12:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Presidents of the United States of America discography for the reasons given above.  I also second the concern about merge recommendations, because you must imagine what the target article would look like after the merge.  A general list and description of all the band's albums, supplemented by a couple of paragraphs solely about this one?  Consider readability .  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 17:56, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Scenes on Mr. Smit's Ostrich Farm : No obvious redirect target found, if there is one then redirecting is of course acceptable.  Fram ( talk ) 07:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , South Africa ,  and United Kingdom .  Fram ( talk ) 07:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Joseph Rosenthal (camera operator) : Which is an obvious R target, as I mentioned in my ES when DPD the page and on creator's TP.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Joseph Rosenthal (camera operator) : I am not seeing much coverage.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 14:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
AK the Savior : Seems quite likely to fail GNG.  DemonDays64 ( talk • contribs ) 05:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  DemonDays64 ( talk • contribs ) 05:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the musical group, seems notable, I don't see much for this person alone for notability in sourcing.  The group has had some chart success and seems to be covered in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Underachievers . -- Gen. Quon [Talk] 14:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Siva Sthalam : Covered in List of Shiva temples in India Redtigerxyz Talk 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion , Hinduism ,  and India .  Redtigerxyz Talk 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Seep (TV series) : All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this and this .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 16:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_TV_One_(Pakistan)#Drama_series - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 14:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Lester B. Pearson School for the Arts : History6042 ( talk ) 00:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Education , Schools ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - to the school board article per ATD and SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 16:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A better redirect target than the school board article would be List of schools in London, Ontario#Thames Valley District School Board .  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 04:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Free State Intelligence Department – Oriel House : I'd just redirect it, but its an improbable redirect.  There doesn't seem to be any content worth saving, since its basically all original research.  CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!  ⚓ 20:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions .  CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!  ⚓ 20:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Criminal Investigation Department (Ireland) .  I've long had concerns with the tone/referencing/OR/NPOV/essay-style of this "article".  However, and while I understand the nom's concern about the plausibility of the redirect title, I'd recommend redirecting.  On the basis that deletion isn't cleanup, redirects are (relatively) cheap, and someone (though goodness knows who and heaven knows [based on the impenetrable "referencing"] how anyone would do so) might be able to rescue at least some of the original content.  If deleted, that won't be as readily achieved....  Guliolopez ( talk ) 20:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - per Guliolopez.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 11:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Mélanie Thomas : All claimed awards are for the connected group Now United and a majority of those awards don't have their own Wiki articles.  Fails WP:MUSICBIO independently.  Jalen Folf (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Ivory Coast .  Jalen Folf (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia is the first thing Google brings up, then Famous Birthdays, then it's downhill from there.  Long way from notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps redirect to Now United, the musical group.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Now United , because fans are likely to search for her name regardless of whether she qualifies for her own article.  I have run across the Now United mob before, as fans have insisted that every single one of the dozens of members should have separate articles for their run-of-the-mill personal biographies.  Some of those actually survived because the singer has done things outside of Now United, but Ms. Thomas has not.  Until she goes solo and finds her own success, her personal background is non-notable for our purposes.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 15:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Now United .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 22:33, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dangerous Power : Should be absolutely uncontroversial given the lack of sources online and the fact that notability isn't inherited, but I have to start this discussion per WP policy so here we go.  Anonymous 03:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : found no additional coverage.  Chart is a small one in the grand scheme of all of Billboard ' s coverage, so the number one placement doesn't mean as much as it may seem to. Gabriel & Dresden (album) would be the best target, but I suspect that's also non-notable and will be starting an AfD for it as well momentarily. If it does go down then redirect this to the band page instead. QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 11:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Gabriel & Dresden . Darling ☔ ( talk · contribs ) 01:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
NYU Catherine B. Reynolds Program for Social Entrepreneurship : Webpage is a deadlink, so it is likely over with no notability established.  Emir of Wikipedia ( talk ) 22:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , United States of America ,  and New York .  Emir of Wikipedia ( talk ) 22:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Catherine B. Reynolds Foundation .  The website appears to have simply moved here , but unless someone steps in to save this page I think merging is best for now.  pburka ( talk ) 23:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to EduCap#Catherine B. Reynolds Foundation .  I found the archived link for the sole citation , and honestly it doesn't look like independent coverage to me.  Without sufficient coverage I doubt if any of the information on the current article is worth merging.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 04:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Although (1) its plausible this entry is or may one day be of value to (some) Wikipedians ... ... the lack of coverage, both in-depth, and assessed collectively means that this entry doesn't meet SIGCOV requirements of GNG or an SNG.  I can see that the users above have made reasonable WP:BEFORE searches yet none were found Sadly, this is an instance where applying guidelines requires destruction of a knowledge source, irrespective of other considerations; including collateral damage to this website's wider mission and purpose Jack4576 ( talk ) 07:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
CMS Yorkshire league : Can't seem to find any sources for this or relevant information elsewhere on Wikipedia.  Article unreferenced and unvarifyable, WP:TNT may apply.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 19:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 19:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and England .  Owen× ☎ 00:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Yorkshire Men's League , which is effectively the successor competition to this league.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 21:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Yorkshire Men's League appers to be the successor of the RLC Yorkshire Premier from what is written on the pages.  Mn1548 ( talk ) 15:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Update after 1 week : Can't find any sources nor establish how it fits into the British rugby league system - Delete .  Mn1548 ( talk ) 16:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  21:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
So Friday Night, So Friday Tight : I haven't been able to find any coverage of this EP, secondary or otherwise, and the little content the page contains is completely unreferenced.  It didn't chart either.  I propose that it be redirected to The Friday Night Boys#Extended plays .  Supreme Lord Bagel ( talk to me ) 09:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources found are just lyrics websites or wiki mirrors.  I don't see charted singles or any type of reviews for notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Friday Night Boys as there does not appear to be significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources.  I think a redirect would be preferable over outright deletion as this is a viable search term with a viable redirect target.  Aoba47 ( talk ) 17:54, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tampa Bay Hawks : Found no significant coverage of the subject to pass WP:GNG .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football , United States of America ,  and Florida .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 18:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:41, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of USL League Two teams as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 21:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect seems the best choice.  Minimal coverage, not enough for an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of USL League Two teams .  This article here failed GNG.  CastJared ( talk ) 15:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the suggested list, per GiantSnowman.  As a mild alternative to removal.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 05:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kyra Montes : Former college soccer player who made at least one appearance for the Nicaragua women's national football team .  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  I found this and this .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Nicaragua , California ,  and Louisiana .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 02:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:47, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' as above.  Giant Snowman 09:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , found additional sources here , here , that seem to confer notability. -- Ortizesp ( talk ) 02:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Does not have sufficient coverage.  The sources above are routine local announcements about her high school achievements and decidedly fail YOUNGATH, GNG, and SUSTAINED.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 23:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect