hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Cal Smid: JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Again looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON on my part, when the guidelines were in the process of being changed.  There is this but another source or two would still be required, again player hasn't really kicked on to create more coverage, and no suitable redirect.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The First Tour of the Angels: The tour is in small detail in the band's autobiography Once Upon a Nightwish , but however is not enough.  I cannot find there to be any more sources, as most of them other sources are about the band members, so I don't see this being a standalone article, as with the other first few tours that were redirected so I would say it would be for deletion.  I will also be restoring the following related articles to nominate them for the same reason of not meeting notability as the article mentioned: Oceanborn Europe Tour ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Wishmaster World Tour ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) World Tour of the Century ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 15:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 15:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Finland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:13, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable, undersourced concert tours fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that were tagged as using primary references for five years when it was first redirected back in October 2020.  Aspects ( talk ) 17:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All - none of them pass GNG or TOURS.  Onel 5969 TT me 12:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National Agency Check with Local Agency Check and Credit Check: It's a credit check that lacks WP:GNG .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Politics ,  and United States of America .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 20:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY .  Thoroughly fails WP:GNG .  Sal2100 ( talk ) 19:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jo Hye-hyok: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 22:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Nothing here.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 21:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lal Tanwani: .  not exactly reputable, I don't see a strong case for this being a notable individual.  Sadads ( talk ) 00:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 00:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - All of the press falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA so not reliable for notability.  Bylines of "Brand Media" and "HT BRand Studio" are clearly paid-for promotional pieces. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 01:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors ,  and Maharashtra . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . I can't see notability here, even with 11 degrees. Xxanthippe ( talk ) 03:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC) . [ reply ] Delete per above lacks notability. Tame Rhino ( talk ) 05:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All these sources are Sponsored and I think these are published to create Wikipedia article. Grabup ( talk ) 15:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Per nom. Fails notability. I think this is publicity stunt. RangersRus ( talk ) 11:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete on WP:PROF criteria, definitely no pass.  Investigated GNG based on "most degrees" but even the records page does not state that this is the case (11 degrees, but not most) and as Sadads notes, the notability of the awarding organization is quite suspect in itself.  I don't see anything else passing.  I'm not sure it's a publicity stunt -- earning 11 degrees is objectively pretty amazing and I could understand a writer or the subject thinking it would qualify for notability by someone who did not know WP's guidelines.   -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fail GNG.  Entirely promotional material.   Fake record reference book award.  Non-notable.  RationalPuff ( talk ) 22:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of diplomatic missions of the Luhansk People's Republic: Aldij ( talk ) 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions .  Aldij ( talk ) 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Lists .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Already covered elsewhere.  Does not need an article.  Abhishek0831996 ( talk ) 12:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indo-Greek wars: Alexander's campaigns take up half the article, but the other conflicts, which took place decades or centuries later, are dealt with far too briefly, and no attempt is made to weave all of this into a coherent narrative (which in itself is evidence this is an artificial topic).  THe very name itself is scarcely used anywhere (cf. Gbooks ).  Constantine ✍ 11:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Pakistan , India , Punjab ,  and Greece .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Problematic editor who created a number of very poorly written articles.  Qcne (talk) 12:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete pointless content fork.  Mccapra ( talk ) 12:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete On its face, it appears to both duplicate other article content and be an inappropriate synthesis.  And, on the offchance it is notable and just not written about in English language sources, WP:TNT GreenLipstickLesbian ( talk ) 16:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete' - Not in line with Wikipedia's standards and policies.  Sameeerrr ( talk ) 21:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOV , this article contains a biased perspective, focusing solely on Indian victories while neglecting Greek achievements.  The article's content consists of copied material from various unrelated articles, defying Wikipedia's standards against Original Research WP:OR and Synthesis Content WP:SYNTH .  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 07:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor page with implication of a conclusion that is not explicitly stated by the source.  The creator of the page inserted opinion in a circular bit of logic.  RangersRus ( talk ) 11:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sure is Indo and Greek, but scarcely a combined thing.  Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sreejith Mohandas: The award received by Food on the Road is not notable.  Sources one and three are about the film 'E Valayam' and two is the short film directed by the subject.  Unable to find anything on WP:Before .  Looks like the career and Personal life sections are original research .  Fails GNG.  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 20:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Film , Entertainment ,  and India .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 20:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Kerala .  Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 20:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per well articulated nomination.   I might have gone Draftify, but at the rate films get made, it would probably G13.   If the creator wants to hold onto the work, it could be sent to user space.   As it stands, though, I concur with the nom, and meeting WP:NFILMMAKER seems to be a long way off as well without having established clear notability of the films to make up a body of work.  - 2pou ( talk ) 21:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have received the award for my short movie.  I have added the image to my Wikipedia.   But the news is not available on the internet.  The news was published in the newspaper.  I have the image of that news.  But that image is not in good quality to publish in Wikipedia.  The Indian Cinema ( talk ) 11:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination: not yet notable per WP:NFILMMAKER , and from the reply by creator above, evidently an autobiograpy.  I can only find passing mentions of him online in articles about films he's worked on.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:SPA article creator says at their user talk page that they are indeed Sreejith Mohandas, an associate director of E valayam , and that Wikipedia is " one of the perfect tool for the public relation ", so draw your own conclusions.  See also WP:Articles for deletion/E valayam .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 18:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per nomination, not yet notable per WP:NFILMMAKER , also failed wikipedia general notability guidelines, no in-depth articles.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 18:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Svetoslav Ivanov: Fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bulgaria .  UtherSRG (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cairo ICT: While it receives some media coverage, it is not easy to find non-promotional information online in order to justify WP:IMPACT , WP:INDEPTH .  Lacks of the most criteria of WP:EVENT .  Chiserc ( talk ) 09:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Egypt .  Chiserc ( talk ) 09:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , there is no coverage in press, just announcements of the event.  Maybe there are non-English sources, but I can't check that.  Artem.G ( talk ) 14:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , Per nominator.  Zero sources and coverage.  DarkHorseMayhem ( talk ) 22:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and above Karnataka ( talk ) 10:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Greer Barnes (soccer): I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  This and this is not enough, and I believe this local piece fails WP:YOUNGATH .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and New York .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : In addition to the sources found above, there is also significant coverage here , here , and here excluding the overwhelming amount of lesser WP:ROUTINE mentions from major publications like NY Times , LA Times , ESPN , etc.  GauchoDude ( talk ) 15:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per sources provided by GauchoDude, enough to meet WP:GNG .  S.A. Julio ( talk ) 20:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  The Dominion Post articles are local coverage (WVU is located in Morgantown) similar to any collegiate athlete (I don't think her Big East conference season awards are significant enough to bypass the GNG).  The Queens Chronicle article leans heavily on an interview with the subject's grandmother and reads like a fluff piece.  I just don't see any secondary coverage on Barnes that is in-depth and not routine.  Jogurney ( talk ) 17:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The Queens Chronicle source is one hyper-local-interest piece with only ~4 sentences of possibly encyclopedic info that don't come from the subject/her grandmother.  The two Old Dominion articles are hyper-local news by a WVU alumnus (who even funds a scholarship there), so their coverage of WVU-related topics such as WVU players is not sufficiently independent.  Where is the evidence Barnes has been covered significantly outside her local community?  JoelleJay ( talk ) 23:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deokota Memorial School: My searches in English and Nepali (देवकोटा मेमोरियल स्कूल) did not yield anything that counts towards WP:GNG or WP:NORG .  The best that I can find is a trivial mention in Pokhara Post (see translated version ).  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Nepal .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no indication of notability and entirely without supporting references.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 01:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  Maliner ( talk ) Delete Unreferenced and no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Accesswire: Theroadislong ( talk ) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They claim to lead the industry but according to customers they just spam press releases to some obscure websites.  Polygnotus ( talk ) 06:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Would need a major overhaul with proper sourcing to meet GNG. -- ♦Ian Ma c M♦ (talk to me) 07:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This is one of the largest press release companies, it is well-known, so it's very very hard to find coverage that is independent from Accesswire.  I've spent 15 minutes looking and I can't see anything.  If someone can find and send over a few links that are, I am quite willing to change my vote to keep.  Cleo Cooper ( talk ) 07:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment as creator : Echoing Cleo .  I created this page as it is a widely known company in the PR world, and ( referenced quite extensively ).  I started this article as stub, to eventually work on it, but I never had the time.  If someone can save it, please do.  But as the creator, I remain neutral.  Cheers, Reh man 10:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and North Carolina .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looked for sources in several places that discuss the firm, but found nothing of use.  yes, they are cited widely but to my knowledge that itself doesn't warrant notability without any sort of sig coverage of themselves.  X ( talk ) 05:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - @ Rehman : , I looked hard for sources but unfortunately am only finding websites that write content based on releases they have made.  Nothing in-depth about the company which would be a requirement of WP:ORGCRIT .  It is unfortunate as it is one of the more well-known press release distribution platforms.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 00:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Puertocito, Arizona: Google search and Google Newspaper Archive searches turned empty.  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 01:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 01:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly non-notable; only sources are GNIS and a site that mirrors GNIS, possibly also fails WP:V as no information could be found.   Satellite view of coordinates shows empty desert with a road maybe a mile to the west.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Literally nothing on satellite besides desert and such for miles in almost any direction.  Definitely not a "populated place".  Typical WP:GNIS fail.  Streetlampguy301 ( talk ) 03:17, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Another Wikipedia lie.   The GNIS never said that this was a populated place in the first place.   The feature code was "locale", not "ppl".   Yet this article said "populated place" in its first revision.   Given the proximity of the letter "P" of "Puertocito Wash" (the head end of the Altar Wash) on some maps, I suspect yet another GNIS comedy of errors that got the a separate "locale" in addition to the record for the Wash itself.   Certainly there's no Puertocito nor Puertecito in any Pima history that I can find.  Uncle G ( talk ) 03:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I searched the newspaper archives, google, and google scholar.  This is not a populated area.  There was some survey work done around the area but that doesn't make it notable and the survey work does not note a population.  Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:39, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's a wash, or dry creekbed.  Possibly notable under GEOFEAT if there's anything on the wash but unlikely given the other source searches here - I didn't look.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete All that has been said here is true.  James.folsom ( talk ) 01:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Rising (professional wrestling): No notable, no in-deep coverage of the subject, just WP:ROUTINE results.  HHH Pedrigree ( talk ) 09:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Zero coverage for this trio found.  All about Vince McMahon retiring.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete