hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Comrat Wine Region: It originally was longer but that was just information on Gagauzia rather than the wine region.  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 13:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wine and Moldova .  Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk ) 13:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep : I found a couple of sources that look reliable [11] [12] , however none of those are especially in-depth and tend to focus more on one large winery than the region as a whole.   Maybe some sources in Moldovan or Russian would establish more notability.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep because of "Diversitatea regiunilor vitivinicole în Republica Moldova" .  ibn.idsi.md .  Retrieved 2023-07-27 .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 17:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:43, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Actualcpscm ( talk ) 19:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Alphacaine: [19] and [20] state it is 20% benzocaine .  Cannot find any newsworthy coverage about the brand name itself.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 09:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Medicine .  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 09:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There was a contested WP:PROD on 2019, but I cannot find google scholar sources to establish WP:GNG , hence my nomination.  Darcy isvery cute ( talk ) 09:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Benzocaine if a source can be found, otherwise delete.  jp × g 🗯️ 20:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Kar Kachhe Koi Moner Kotha: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -I have improved this page a lot.  Reliable sources are also given on this page [1] [2] .  Besides the show has now charted in Top 10 BARC Viewership of TRP (rank 4 for week no 43) [3] and clearly passes WP:NTV and WP:GNG with sufficient WP:RS .  Nilpriyo ( talk ) 8:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC) References ^ "Kar Kachhe Koi Moner Katha Serial Zee Bangla Starring Manali Manisha Dey, Basabdatta Chatterjee in Lead" .  Indian TV News .  ^ "Manali Manisha Dey, Basabdatta Chatterjee starrer 'Kar Kache Koi Moner Kotha' to bring back nostalgia of 'Para culture' " .  The Times of India .  ^ "TRP List Bangla Serial: বড় অঘটন! প্রথম তিনে নেই 'অনুরাগের ছোঁয়া', বাজিমাত কোন মেগার?" .  Aaj Tak Bangla .  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have grave doubts about the the Times of India reporting due to their history of doing paid for reporting (notice how non-Zee Bangla shows do not feature), the TRP list is just that, a list of Bengali serials ordered by TRP with no mention of their actual ratings or any other significant coverage.  Indian TV News is a promo peice for Zee Bangla that does not confer any notability.  Sohom ( talk ) 16:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  Coverage seems to demonstrate a kind of notability.  Note about the Times of India : Sources noticeboard says not to use it for political subject matters for example, which the Indian task force clarifies: "Uncontroversial content such as film reviews are usable".  At the very least a redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Bangla is warranted in my view.  - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 15:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No issues with a redirect , I am still unconvinced of the notability of this specific page Sohom ( talk ) 15:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Jorge Calvo (baseball): A Google search yields no results outside of Baseball-Reference.  Dennis C. Abrams ( talk ) 03:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Baseball ,  and Mexico .  Dennis C. Abrams ( talk ) 03:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Found some brief mentions on newspapers.com such as [ [3] ] and [ [4] ], but not enough there to meet the GNG.  I'd guess there is probably enough coverage in Mexico to meet the notability guidelines, though.  Let'srun ( talk ) 11:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  05:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Northumberland Zoo: 🌺 Cremastra ( talk ) 13:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Very well, I have added other sources. -- Roadrunnerfromhell ( talk ) 15:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organizations ,  and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , plenty of mentions in the news around their breeding programmes, plus WP:ITSACASTLE .  CoconutOctopus talk 09:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
St. Mary's College, Thoothukudi: The College may have relatively poor rankings (151/200 according to Collegedunia.com).   No indication of interesting history or connections Newhaven lad ( talk ) 19:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:NEXIST 75 year old college founded in 1948 added references there bound to be offline sources in English and  Tamil.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 23:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Jan Vrba (bobsledder): Google search results mix him with the late politician of the same name , but nothing much to say about this bobsleigh athlete.  Corresponding articles in other languages are mostly poorly-sourced and a stub (I checked and translated them), especially Czech Wikipedia , which would help copy over to the English article otherwise.  Even as a legit adult, we probably have to let him figure out what he wants to do with his life, then create a full biography if he receives significant coverage in reliable sources .  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 09:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Czech Republic .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The guy competed in, not one Olympic Games as the article suggests; but three, in addition to at least 7 World Championships.  I certainly think it's important that all these incoming links point somewhere, which would indicate a redirect if coverage cannot be found.  He also competed at the 1999 World Youth Championships in Athletics and the 2001 European Athletics Junior Championships [14] , although age-specific sports is more of a curiosity.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can almost guarantee there will be coverage on a three-time Olympian and seven-time world champion participant in a sport like this.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looking for coverage... so far there's this 400 word piece about him, although there are a lot of quotes.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Some more coverage here , though its admittedly difficult to look when I don't know a word of the language!  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  Three-time Olympic participant and certainly one of the most important representatives of the sport in the country (even if the bar is low).  Compared to Vacek it is possible to find something in the media, although I don't know if enough.  FromCzech ( talk ) 06:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above.  Sources exist, so meets both WP:V and WP:SPORTCRIT as a somewhat major figure in his sport.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
New Capital Sports Hall: Mccapra ( talk ) 07:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Egypt .  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep What do you mean with small sports?  Handball is the second biggest team sport after football in the world.  For your information the WC 2019 which was played in this hall hat at cumulative TV audience of 1.2 billion .  Now to the hall if you google the Arabic name "الصالة الرياضية بالعاصمة الإدارية الجديدة" there are some stories like: [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 ( talk ) 09:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I mean that the hall itself is small, not that the sports it hosts are small.  As to the sources you’ve provided above, none of them offers in depth coverage of this particular hall.  They just confirm it exists, that it seats 7500-8000 people and it’s part of the larger Olympic complex.  They are either about the handball matches or about the Olympic city.  The sports complex as a whole looks notable and therefore potentially a redirect target, but it doesn’t seem to have been written yet.  Mccapra ( talk ) 14:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I think the sports hall is good enough with sourcing and notability to be kept here.  While Arabic sources may not be the best, they do help fill the gap in sourcing.  Old-AgedKid ( talk ) 10:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , If the article stays, it should be on the proviso of improving it and adding a lot more to it.  Shouldn't stay as 2 lines.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] There isn’t really anything to add though, that’s the problem.  It’s not an expandable stub.  Mccapra ( talk ) 15:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] nothing at all?  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 16:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  19:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting once more.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Embassy of India, Moscow: Efforts to redirect this have failed.  Chris Troutman ( talk ) 04:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Smokescreen (Transformers): Grandmaster Huon ( talk ) 15:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Toys .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Procedural Keep due to questionable motives of nominator and flood of similar nominations leaving no time for anyone to do non-Google research.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 19:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete covered by zero RS's.  InfiniteNexus ( talk ) 00:51, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to List of The Transformers (TV series) characters unless more sources are found.  BOZ ( talk ) 17:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I appreciate the discussion must still run its course but it is worth noting that the nominator has been blocked for persistent bad faith actions.  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 19:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on a few dedicated toy reviews, but article could use some clean up.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 22:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Sam Taylor (producer): Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians ,  and United States of America .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep as well as the AllMusic staff bio referenced in the article the HoustonPress piece archived here is significant coverage imv, Atlantic306 ( talk ) 21:32, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Baker Ninan Fenn: Half of the hits I get from searching for sources (string:"baker ninan fenn") are non-responsive ; the other half are useless as sources for Fenn.  — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Christianity ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Diocesan bishops of major denominations have generally been held to be notable.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you point me to a specific policy or discussion that supports that position? Bear in mind WP:BLP also applies here! — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES illustrates the consensus. BLP is irrelevant as to his notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 03:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This is the third time of thereabout.  Please look at WP:BISHOPS .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  06:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Hotel Dili: Insufficient independent significant coverage.  Uhooep ( talk ) 09:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Notable historic hotel in East Timor. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Asia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Desertarun ( talk ) 08:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Tarn Willers: After searching, I have not been able to find significant coverage in reliable sources .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 02:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Poland ,  and England .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 02:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  He won a BAFTA Award and he is currently being nominated for an Oscar .  He also won and was nominated for other awards [72] and I'm sure there are other sources about him around [73] .  Only one criteria has to be met according to WP:NOTABILITY , "It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG)", so it passes WP:SNG and it meets WP:ANYBIO #1.  MoviesandTelevisionFan ( talk ) 03:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that WP:N does say that; that means we look to see what NBIO says.  NBIO, in the lead paragraph for the "Additional criteria" section (directly above ANYBIO), states: "People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included ."  Unlike NCREATIVE , which explicitly states that "a person is notable if" they meet the criteria, ANYBIO#1 does not confer presumptive notability; it only indicates that SIGCOV is likely to exist.  See this discussion in the NBIO talk archives , particularly the points made by

Discussion outcome: no consensus