hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Nux (Mad Max) : The sources in the Equipment section are about the vehicles in the movie in general, while the character creation section is just two bullet points trivia.  In other words, no substantial information to warrant an article.  He's just a supporting character after all.  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 09:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Film .  Neocorelight ( Talk ) 09:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Even if the article does not seem to show notability, we need to practice WP:BEFORE to see if this character has coverage by reliable sources.  Sometimes enough details exist to warrant a standalone article.  If not, then it could be possible to have a List of Mad Max characters that would have sections for all characters; summary sections for those with their own articles, and full sections for characters that don't have their own article.  See List of Smallville characters as an example.  I know there's a book out there called Mad Max and Philosophy , and "Nux" is mentioned in it 37 times, which seems like a lot to just be happenstance from reciting the film's events.  In the book Trauma and Disability in Mad Max: Beyond the Road Warrior’s Fury , "Nux" is mentioned 12 times.  There seem to be more possible results in Google Books/Scholar to at least warrant a section on a list of characters, which I'm a little surprised we don't have, considering some characters that seem reasonably iconic (to me, at least).  Erik ( talk | contrib ) ( ping me ) 21:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mad Max: Fury Road .  Right now the article fails WP:GNG , SIGCOV is not shown.  Nobody seems to have done WP:BEFORE , but we also cannot assume that WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES .  Soft deletion by redirecting, with no prejduce to this being restored if someone cares to find good sources, is likely best.  Ping if such sources are found while this discussion is ongoing and I'll reconsider my vote.  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Piotrus.  WP:SIGCOV could not be found with WP:BEFORE .  Redirect is a good WP:ATD and allows a brief summary at the main film article.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 18:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per above.  The character fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 05:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
All TV News : Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  Unsourced except for Facebook page.  // Timothy :: talk 17:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect until such time as there is sufficient need for a standalone article.  When All TV starts a news service, it can be a subsection of our article on it.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 17:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify for now, move to draft until proper sources are added.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 10:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sufiyan Muqeem : No in-depth coverage to be found.  Played T20Is for Pakistan but in a tournament in which the top sides fielded development squads.  Bs1jac ( talk ) 20:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers Does look to currently be a WP:GNG fail, perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON .  However, suitable redirect exits per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 19:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Awaken (The Blood Divine album) : Anyone got any old issues of Kerrang! that might help?  pinktoebeans (talk) 13:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United Kingdom .  pinktoebeans (talk) 13:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to the Blood Divine : Couldn't find any coverage myself in online archives/searches (though I don't have any print copies of any relevant magazines so I can't speak to that option).  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 16:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] FYI I'm also struggling to find evidence The Blood Divine passes WP:GNG based off of online sources, and the few offline sources I've seen mention them only briefly or as a side mention alongside Cradle of Filth .  pinktoebeans (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Bredell Wessels : JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 17:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Namibian first-class cricketers Coverage for non-international Namibian cricketers is always difficult, redirect is suitable WP:ATD and preserves the history if anything found.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Malyagiri : WP:REFBOMB'd with film blog posts announcing its release, but none of them seems to know what the film is about.  Proposed deletion contested without comment.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Odisha .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , I see one review in English and some coverage and the film is rather recent.  If that is judged really insufficient, at the very least redirect to List of Odia films of 2023 . - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi @ Mushy Yank : I can see blog posts that have "review" in the title, but have you found an actual review in English?  Can you post the link here please?  Wikishovel ( talk ) 09:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I was talking about the (not great) review at Information Bapa, currently in the refs.  Again, if it’s judged too weak, at least a redirect should be considered for now.  Best, - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 09:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Random dungeon : There isn't even a page for procedural generation in video games, which is what this is a subset of, just a video game section in Procedural generation .  Most of the results I got in searches for "random dungeon" contradict the article's assertion that this is primarily a video game phenomenon - outside sources mostly mentioned Dungeons & Dragons - but more importantly, the results were all for dungeon generation tools, not for anyone discussing the subject in and of itself.  Random dungeons could be covered elsewhere, possibly roguelike if people want, but I don't think anything would be lost by deleting this page.  Moonreach ( talk ) 18:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to procedural generation#Video games per WP:ATD .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I considered this, but the problem is that the concept of "random dungeon" also extends to tabletop games.  I don't think there's a good, single redirection target for this.  Moonreach ( talk ) 19:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The same article also has a subsection on tabletop games .  XOR'easter ( talk ) 19:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'd feel okay with a redirect to the procedural generation page without the piped link; then the reader could decide what they're looking for.  Part of me still thinks the whole subject of "random dungeon" is too obscure to even warrant a redirect, though.  Moonreach ( talk ) 19:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think a redirect to procedural generation would be the best approach.  Cowgod14 ( talk ) 01:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to procedural generation .  Borders on a neologism, as extant usages of the term are as far as I can find just a way of describing dungeons that are randomised, not a standalone concept.  ― novov (t c) 07:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KMMD-CD : Let'srun ( talk ) 20:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of television stations in California#LPTV stations : I can't imagine a low-power station that, its Class A television service status notwithstanding (which requires some local programming), is only known to have carried national services could ever get the required significant coverage to merit being anything more than an {{ R to list entry }} .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Run-of-the-mill TV station which is now defunct.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Atletico Orlando : No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   The only reference is a short article about expansion of the franchise via them joining it.  Also found nothing suitable in a search.  North8000 ( talk ) 22:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Florida .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The Major Arena Soccer League 2 already has uncertain notability.  Svartner ( talk ) 03:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 14:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Major Arena Soccer League 2 as possible search term.  Giant Snowman 15:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Major Arena Soccer League 2 .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WUDZ-LD : Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.  : Another DTV America/HC2/Innovate station started in the 2010s with no significant coverage or any reason there could be any.  (When the source for the station's move to Indianapolis is a forum , that does not bode well for notability.)  Another nominal survivor of last year's bulk nomination .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sun Java System Access Manager : I don't think it merits dedicated article.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 20:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge what little information exists into Sun Java System and redirect to Sun Java System#Sun Java Enterprise System .  DigitalIceAge ( talk ) 19:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Supreme Blue Dream : I can't find any in-depth coverage or reviews about this album in reliable and independent sources.  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 02:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Brazil .  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 02:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Winter (indie rock band) : Nothing additional turned up in my search either.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 04:53, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Saker man ser : BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject (the single) directly and indepth.  No objection to a consensus redirect to the album Isola , similar redirects have been rv'd so establishing CONSENSUS needed.  // Timothy :: talk 01:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Sweden .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It reached #22 in the Swedish charts, according to Swedish wiki, which doesn't make it sound terribly notable.  I think a redirect with merge of anything rescuable from the article would make sense.  Chiswick Chap ( talk ) 10:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This article contains information that cannot be found on Isola and the song reached #22 in the Swedish charts.  If the problem is that is reached #22, how about, for example, this R.E.M. single " Oh My Heart " which reached #37 as the highest.  Slagmannen924 ( talk ) 13:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Funnily enough, despite it being a blatant WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, it is possible that you have a point and " Oh My Heart " is also non-notable despite charting in multiple countries.  Someone should look into that.  The problem, though, is that the closest thing to valuable information here which isn't charting is that Hayley Williams likes the song.  That's pretty trivial all told, but if you really want to then that can easily be added to Isola , as can the chart.  This song, on the other hand, seems very limited in coverage.  Unless any of these four sources [27] [28] [29] [30] (all behind paywalls) contain more than passing mentions then I can't find anything and this is an easy redirect to Isola .  I've asked on WP:DISCORD for assistance and will update if anything comes through, but in the meantime this can be redirected anyway and restored later if anything else comes up.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 12:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] To say that the closest thing to valuable information are that Hayley Williams likes the song is not very serious.  One have the track listing both of the Swedish and English version, information about b-sides, the song charted at number 22 in Sweden, pic of the cover, link to the music video and more.  Slagmannen924 ( talk ) 15:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] More sources added to the article.  Slagmannen924 ( talk ) 16:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: to discuss the added sources Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] 5 out of 7 of the sources are independent/reliable in my opinion.  Keep .  Slagmannen924 ( talk ) 02:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Battle of Lankaran : There was certainly fighting in the area and the Russian civil war impacted all of Azerbaijan, including Lankaran, but I cannot find anything that is called the Battle of Lankaran .  Author also created Lankaran operation , I think this is an unneeded CFORK of this article, as it stands the main section of the article is a duplicate of Lankaran operation#Overthrow of Bolshevik power with the background and conclusion points covered in other areas of the article.  Article is based on a single source, Süleymanov, Mehman (1998).  Azərbacan Ordusu (1918–1920).  Baku: hərbi Nəşriyyatı.  I can find no information on the publisher other than it is the ""Military Publishing House" of the Ministry of Defense and is described as "one of the ideological branches". " [15] .  Based on this I think this fails WP:IS.  Lankaran operation has significant problems of its own, and is based on the single source, but it summarizes the period in Lankaran operation#Overthrow of Bolshevik power .  No objection to a redirect to this target.  The content is already in this target and there is nothing else for a merge.  // Timothy :: talk 04:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Azerbaijan ,  and Russia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Lankaran Operation per nom.  Nominator makes strong case.  Llajwa ( talk ) 23:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Quintin Esterhuizen : JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union , Africa ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Namibia national rugby union players There is some coverage out there on this player, but I don't think any of it reaches what's needed for a WP:GNG pass.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 09:52, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  03:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No coverage to support GNG in a PQ search of The Namibian and AllAfrica.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 21:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect