hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Wars of the Deccan Sultanates: The only source Jaques Tony cited for this title and its prolonged duration does not support the timeline mentioned in the lead and infobox (note that timeline in lead and infobox aren't aligned).  This discrepancy creates confusion and suggests a lack of notability.  Additionally, the article seems to rely heavily on WP:SYNTH and WP:POVFORK , which is concerning.  I hope we don't get to see another non notable 'wars' article spanning centuries or even millennia.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 06:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Karnataka ,  and Kerala .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am confused as to why this article has been nominated for deletion.  The article adheres to Wikipedia's standards for reliability and notability.  The nominator mentioned WP:SYNTH , so they should identify all the self-published sources and unreliable citations in the article that they believe should be removed.Please all those sources here so that we can talk on that easily.  Additionally, the nominator has raised concerns regarding the accuracy of the names and timelines of the wars mentioned in the article.I have already provided a citation for the nomenclature used in the article's headings.Since the article is heavily reliant on multiple sources, it should include references for the commencement and conclusion of the war, forming the timeline of the conflict.Here I have already cited the sources for the timeline too.I can cite the source with quotation to get easily identify the timeline.  Suggestion :-Nominator as well as the reviewers must thoroughly check all the sources.If there is any problem regarding any reference or source or any paragraph requires more Citation,you may assist by adding tags of [ citation needed ] for further editing.  Please refer the source "History of the Qutb Shahi Dynasty" authored by H.K. Sherwani. -This source have mentioned the Kemilliogolgi ( talk ) 07:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC) —

Discussion outcome: delete
W18DQ-D: Since TV Red Puerto Rico no longer owns this station, a redirect there no longer seems valid — and barring some form of protection having anything at this title will only continue to lead to more unsourced/poorly-sourced IP edits.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Station has no schedule presence at all, the website doesn't have anything outside a default template (I can't find any evidence of the claimed Facebook or Roku TV channel), and the only hits for the station otherwise are its FCC presences and the usual assortment of bad Wikimirrors.  Whatever the case, the station's history is only translating other stations and nothing else, and it's probably just carrying public domain filler to keep the lights on for the license.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Beyond confirmation of existing, there's no sourcing for this.  Wiki mirrors don't count for RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete (or possibly redirect).  A post-2010 LPTV with a nondescript history in Puerto Rico, where sourcing is already a challenge.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 00:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : There was a call sign change to WSTN-LD effective today .  I note this for completeness and out of an abundance of caution; in and of itself it has no bearing as to the merits (or lack thereof) of retaining this article.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asan Memorial Senior Secondary School: Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 11:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Tamil Nadu .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete gets passing mentions in gnews.  Article mainly based on primary sources.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Max Wirth (cyclist): fails notability guidelines for cyclists .  ltb d l ( talk ) 09:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cycling ,  and Switzerland .  ltb d l ( talk ) 09:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] According to the German Wikipedia, he was a Swiss national champion in cycling and there's several offline sources which are referenced.  Those should be checked, and also one should check Swiss newspaper archives, as it seems quite likely a nation's national cycling champion would be covered there.  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 16:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure if the Swiss Cycling Association is independent though?  Let'srun ( talk ) 12:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hmmm... true.  I was also just able to find what appears to be an online Swiss newspaper archive -- see here .  I can't figure out how to get it to work, though...  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 15:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I narrowed down the search for you: { "Max Wirth" AND (Rad OR Velo) } and a little wither search: { "Max Wirth" AND (Rad* OR Velo*) } Maybe you'll find a good source.  I have no time to do the search.  🤾‍♂️ Malo95 ( talk ) 19:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 03:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
PaizaCloud Cloud IDE: Found two posts that look like ads and that’s it.  NM 01:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  NM 01:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Haven't found good sources either.  And none of the ones we currently cite support notability.  DFlhb ( talk ) 09:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Africa Report: Fails WP:GNG .  WP:BEFORE failed to find any useful sources.   Current references are from the org itself, a one para "description' of the item, and a 404/server failure error.   Puff piece.  Note that the item is stated to have won the 'Diageo Africa Business Reporting Award', an award by a drinks manufacturer about which I can find no significant coverage, thus have concluded that it is a 'Marketing Award' for Diageo (to sell more drinks?), and does not confer notability.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism , News media , Organizations , Business , Advertising , Companies ,  and Africa .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Morakot Sriswasdi: Appears to fail WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 09:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge It might be more relevant to create a section for Thai ambassadors in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Foreign_Affairs_(Thailand) Individual ambassadors might not merit a stand alone page.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 11:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Bilateral relations , Laos ,  and Thailand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Austria , Slovakia ,  and Slovenia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Thailand) per nomination.  Clara A. Djalim ( talk ) 10:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The merge suggestion was made by the first commenter, not the nominator.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 05:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect . Does not meet the notability criteria. -- TadejM my talk 12:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'm not sure why we would redirect to Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Thailand) .  If there is no "List of Thai Ambassadors to Laos" or "List of Thai Ambassadors to Austria" then I would just delete without any redirect needed.  Uhooep ( talk ) 17:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Agreed.  -- TadejM my talk 09:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't merge/redirect . Not mentioned at target, and it wouldn't be appropriate to do so. -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 05:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: There are plenty of news mentions, but virtually all of it is in the context of her official capacity.  She was featured in The Cloud's "Talk With Ambassadors" podcast [2] , but that's also mostly about her work.  -- Paul_012 ( talk ) 03:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO .  Oppose redirect to Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  LibStar ( talk ) 15:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is absolutely nothing to merge.  it is far more when we consider pages per WP:ATD , hence this article doesnt meet minimal inclusion as if doesnt meet WP:SNG .  Please deletion will save us those time.  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  08:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Central Sierra Arts Council: The article cites no sources other than its own website.  DirtyHarry991 ( talk ) 04:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Organizations ,  and California .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Institute for Computer Science and Control: Most references seem to be to the entity itself.  My BEFORE doesn't help much, although sources might exist in Hungarian.  The article has a big list of external links, in Hungarian, for anyone who cares to review them (they don't have English titles or publisher information or such).  Hungarian wiki article seems to have more content but even fewer references than we do :( Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Hungary .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 10:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  11:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Article seems promotional, many of the sources link back to the institute's own website, and I'm unable to find articles online to be used as additional sources.  Ternera ( talk ) 15:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eye, West Virginia: Probably was a couple of buildings or a railroad siding.  If someone in this discussion can find on topo, let me know.  Source is not valid.  Either way, not really notable at all.  Cutlass Ciera 14:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  Cutlass Ciera 14:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and West Virginia .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment.  This appears to be another case of what the USGS called a " locale ."  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coal, West Virginia .   A locale was a named place with permanent human-made buildings or structures, distinguished from a populated place.  These entries have all disappeared from the GNIS database.   No evidence that Eye, West Virginia was a settlement even from the USGS.  • Gene93k ( talk ) 16:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Anything made by User:Vanished user 7b1215e7ef746ac20682e3dbe03f5b84 is inherently suspect and unreliable.  He had an extensive history of bulk-creating articles from the GNIS with disregard to the places' legitimacy as actual communities or notability (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey Box, Florida , among many others).  Reywas92 Talk 18:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : according to U.S. Appointments of Postmasters, 1832–1971 , there was an Eye post office from September 11, 1889 to March 15, 1904, with postmaster David Amick.   When it was discontinued (February 24, 1904) the mail was redirected to Snow Hill.   I searched for an Eye on several old topographical maps in the neighborhood of Snow Hill (useful resource, the USGS map locator will list maps including or near any point you pin on a map, some around, or even before 1900, others mid-century, and up to the present), and did not find it.   It should have been somewhere nearby, if the mail was redirected to Snow Hill; since it is not shown on any of the maps of this period, it must have been very ephemeral—perhaps just the name of the post office.   Often post offices are named for the postmaster or a member of his family, but "Eye" doesn't sound like someone's name.   So not much help here!  P Aculeius ( talk ) 13:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No indication of notability.  The fact that there might be sources that might indicate that there was a locale of that name at some point in history does not establish notability.  Actualcpscm ( talk ) 08:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2022 European League of Football rosters and staff: Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Europe .  Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also including the following similar page: 2023 European League of Football rosters and staff ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Please explain why it fails WP:LISTN.  What is the difference to List of current NFC team rosters (with exception of division in seasons)?  Dopeious ( talk ) 10:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Don't personally see why we need those articles either, since for each NFC team, they'd be covered in the team's season article e.g. 2023 Dallas Cowboys season .  Although the European League of Football lists have the added issue of being long lists of mostly non-notable people too.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete long lists of mostly non-notable people, which don't add encyclopedic value, or meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : These each fail WP:GNG and WP:LISTN per the nom.  Readers can find this information, sourced completely to primary sources, at the websites for the respective teams.  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dan Sobovitz: - Rich T | C | E-Mail 11:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Israel ,  and Europe .  - Rich T | C | E-Mail 11:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Why not remove the problematic references and keep the other ones?  Many of them are from independent media sources (Brussels Times, Times of Israel, Politico, Al Jazeera, etc.).  2A02:2788:224:538:311F:AC6C:14C6:4B14 ( talk ) 13:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Because they're written by Sobovitz; you can't use articles by the subject, those are primary sources.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nomination, can confirm that this is un-disclosed COI as dislosed on IRC in #wikipedia-en-help, and the sourcing is insufficient to establish WP:NBIO .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If it's a paid job, I won't even bother delving into whether it meets the GNG or not.  I've also nominated for deletion an article closely related to Dan Sobovitz, which was also created by the same author as this one.  -- Saqib ( talk ) 16:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment can this not be speedy deleted, as it was created by/for UPE?  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If not speedy deleted, I'd delete for lack of sourcing.  The Brussels Post and one Haretz article are written by the subject.  Others are trivial coverage.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Naples Invitational: Let'srun ( talk ) 01:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Basketball .  Let'srun ( talk ) 01:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No significant, independent coverage of the tournament itself.  Mooonswimmer 14:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alley of the Dolls (band): Sourcing does not establish WP:GNG being met.  WP:BEFORE brings up only a couple of brief reviews of their EP.  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 22:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  – Muboshgu ( talk ) 22:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: England and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Happy to add additional citations to the EP as many exist MusicForeverYours ( talk ) 01:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Added citations to additional reviews, more are available but not always in English as the band has a lot of support in none English speaking countries so reviews are not in English as is requested by Wikipedia.  MusicForeverYours ( talk ) 15:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Source 18 is a RS for the album review; the rest used now in the article is primary or non-RS.  I can only find the Spill Magazine review, so without any other sources, the band is not at notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : If more citations for this article exist, they should absolutely be added.  it's free realist 9 16:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Two additional reviews and citations added to establish bands obvious notability.  More available but dont want the article to just be a list of magazine reviews.  Happy to add more if this view isnt shared.  MusicForeverYours ( talk ) 15:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG as of now formed in 2023 is upcoming not notable at this point.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete