hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Stephen Jacob Jimbangan: Had fought election but didn't won.  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  04:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Politics ,  and Malaysia .  ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ Let's Talk !  04:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not pass NPOL and not otherwise notable.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLPDELETE , lacks substantive coverage about the subject with questionable notability.  Freedomfryff ( talk ) 08:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Has not held any office that would confer passage of WP:NPOL , but the article is essentially doing absolutely nothing to demonstrate that he could be seen as notable for other reasons (which is the bar that unelected candidates for political office have to pass.) Bearcat ( talk ) 22:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Table tennis at the 1984 Summer Olympics: Table tennis was not a demonstration sport at the 1984 Olympics.  All this content relates to the 1988 Games.  was the reasoning by User:Nthep .  The content is identical to Table tennis at the 1988 Summer Olympics , from the medal tables to the sources used.  I can't find any reliable source that says this event even took place, so we could even maybe make an argument that this could be deleted on hoax grounds.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Olympics ,  and California .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete someone’s having a laugh.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete - Complete lack of verifiability.  -- MuZemike 14:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Per above, LA84 produced a very long report and it only mentions table tennis as something in the residence halls and (as recreation) at a training facility.  Kingsif ( talk ) 15:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , hoax.  / Julle ( talk ) 23:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete just a copy of the 1988 article, and so not needed as it's misleading/a hoax (depending on whether there was actually an event in 1984).  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  〜 Festucalex • talk 06:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Enfant terrible: Graham ( talk ) 06:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A lot of things have been tried, looking at the edit history, from soft redirects to discussions of video game characters.   Looking for sourcing turns up nothing concrete to use, although the one thing that hasn't been thoroughly tried, I notice, is the cargo cult encyclopaedia writing way of grabbing every instance of anyone ever being called an enfant terrible and hoping that a discussion of a concept magically arises from the pile.   Of course, that ranges from Marlon Brando to Peter Sellers, and wouldn't work.  Uncle G ( talk ) 14:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] How about trying our hand at Enfant terrible in popular culture ?  Haha!  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The term is used [24] , but that's not helpful (I know it's a non-RS, but it's simply an example).  Use of a phrase isn't what makes notability here.  This is a DICDEF.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - If not kept, should be redirected to Les Enfants Terribles (disambiguation) .  Currently leaning keep, although discussion of the term is pretty scant.  The term is briefly theorized in this journal article.  Based on reviews, I suspect the term is discussed at length in this book , and that book may cite other sources (in French?) that we could use.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 21:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Literature .  Suriname0 ( talk ) 21:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Also leaning keep , although I admit it's difficult to winnow sources with significant coverage from the many simple usages of the expression.  The book ( available on archive.org ) located by

Discussion outcome: delete
Călin Chirilov: The best that I can find are Spoltore Notizie , a transfer announcement which lists his position, nationality, previous clubs and height - not enough on its own as GNG and SPORTBASIC need more than one decent source.  I also found Est-Curier but the mentions are way too brief for this to count at all towards GNG.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Moldova .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 21:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amir Ali Khan (subedar): Even looking up the naming of the road seems to have been done at the request of the foundation created by his immediate family.  The page has been consistently edited by members of the family and those admitting to clear COIs.  Article is an orphan as well.  Lindsey40186 ( talk ) 14:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Besides the coverage in the Indian times , I could not find any other coverage to justify inclusion per WP:NBIO .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 15:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No coverage to be found and the page has no sources with any indepth coverage.  Subject is not notable to warranted a page.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 13:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deris Benavides: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 03:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 07:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 07:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ali Akbarpour: also you can see lots of medals for him in the medal table template all of them listed in 2019 which can't be right!  I checked one of his achievements and he won a medal in "World Masters Championships" (competition for older guys) which is a complete different than a World Championship but the page creator failed to mention that (most probably intentionally) Sports2021 ( talk ) 18:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Iran .  Sports2021 ( talk ) 18:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:ATHLETE .  Non-notable BJJ championships.  Lethweimaster ( talk ) Delete He's definitely had success in JJIF tournaments.   However, his world title came in a masters (older) division with only 4 competitors [19] , which is not enough to show WP notability.   I've been going through the many references given, but they seem to be simply reporting results of the Iranian national team.   If someone can show there is significant independent coverage I'd be happy to vote to keep this article.  Papaursa ( talk ) 19:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IRAS 04509-6922: All mentions of it appear to be in obscure, large-scale surveys, therefore it does not meet WP:SIGCOV .  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer 18:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of largest known stars .  🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 19:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Carole Bienaimé: The article was created and primarily written by an apparent pair of sockpuppet COI editors: Shoushanne and Santa monique .  Santa monique also uploaded both photos of Bienaimé, claiming them as their own work.  Risedemise ( talk ) 11:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and France .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There was some controversy surrounding her nomination [57] , [58] , but I don't find enough about this person to create an article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not notable enough for an article and doesn't meet the notability  guidelines for  people.  EncyclopediaEditorXIV ( talk ) 19:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chris Ciamaga: A Google search only shows passing mentions in articles, no significant coverage.  He was mostly a minor league referee that officiated in a small handful of NHL games.  Not notable enough for an article.  My Pants Metal ( talk ) 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions .  My Pants Metal ( talk ) 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources to meet the WP:GNG .  All the sources in the article are either primary or social media posts and a BEFORE check doesn't come up with anything better.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Noting previous AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Furlatt .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Laksh Chadalavada: Fails WP:RS / WP:GNG .  Aronitz ( talk ) 12:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Andhra Pradesh .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 12:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Article is about 80% sourced to the Times of India, with no other RS found.  I'm not seeing notability.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 02:38, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ummeda Ram Beniwal: Maria Gemmi ( talk ) 09:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Maria Gemmi ( talk ) 09:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Although the article requires work and improvement, there are sources available that establish the politician's notability according to Wikipedia's guidelines.  While much of the coverage understandably focuses on his candidacy, there are still a few sources on his life and political endeavor.  With additional research, I think there is potential to expand the article further.  ZyphorianNexus ( talk ) 12:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources on the page.  I do not find reliable sources online with coverage on the politician himself.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't appear to pass WP:NPOL or have WP:SIGCOV outside of his political endeavor.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : WP:NPOL (not even WP:SIGCOV ). .  FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 12:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No, He is very famous in political & media sphere in India.He is contesting from most hot seat of North India.  Bajrang6691 ( talk ) 14:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Find us the reliable sources and I will the first to amend my vote FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 17:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :  with only 2 sources, I vote for deletion.  Rustypenguin ( talk ) 09:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - This article, like others recently created for candidates in the 2024 Indian General Election, utterly disregards WP:NPOL .  Editors should know that being announced as a candidate and receiving some media coverage does not automatically confer notability.  This echoes previous discussions in Afds regarding Kompella Madhavi Latha and Neeraj Tripathi .  Grabup ( talk ) 16:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dennis A. Cornell: BD2412 T 16:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  BD2412 T 16:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Bannu: Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 7 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 00:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Military , Afghanistan ,  and India .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor and unreliable sources.  Sources do not help with verification.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : The article is not well written at the moment, but it has potential for improvement; I've discovered  some other sources and am planning on fixing it up later.  Southasianhistorian8 ( talk ) 17:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A mess of a Wikipedia page.  Sources only have one or two sentences mentioning it.  Not worthy of staying up.  UnbiasedSN ( talk ) 02:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete another South Asian battle article which lacks notability and RS.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 09:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nebraska–Texas football rivalry: The two schools have a very limited history with each other (were only Big 12 conference for a little over a decade in separate divisions).  Cited sources also use the word "rivalry" hesitantly.  funplussmart ( talk ) 21:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , American football , Nebraska ,  and Texas .  funplussmart ( talk ) 21:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not finding the needed depth of coverage that we should have for a true rivalry.  Passing mentions not enough, especially since other factors weigh against this being a notable rivalry:  (i) semi-regular play limited to the period 1996-2010 (four earlier games, zero later games),  (ii) lack of trophy or named rivalry,  (iii) limited marquee match-ups (zero games with both teams ranked in top 10 and five games with both in top 20), and  (iv) lack of geographic proximity (not border states, 820 miles from Lincoln to Austin).  Cbl62 ( talk ) 01:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete largely per Cbl62’s argument above.   Fails GNG with very little SIGCOV of this meeting as a “rivalry” or notable series.   Though they have a handful of top-25 meetings and played in three Big 12 championships, two teams simultaneously being competitive for any stretch of time does not make them rivals.  Frank Anchor 05:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: This rivalry has had some occasional passing coverage over the years, but mere mentions and questioning whether the teams are even rivals at all does not lend to notability.  User:Let'srun 03:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: per forementioned reasons above.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 10:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails WP:NRIVALRY.  The only notable reference--the NYTimes article--doesn't even mention the word "rivalry".  Owen× ☎ 16:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Seshadripuram Public School: Only a primary source provided.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Karnataka .  LibStar ( talk ) 12:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] del nn.  - Altenmann >talk 21:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - online search pulls up some passing mentions and database listings, but no SIGCOV .  StereoFolic ( talk ) 13:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Monaco race results: Unnecessary list that is only good for the most obsessive motorsport fans.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 11:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 11:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Lists .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Don't need a separate page for results.  NavjotSR ( talk ) 08:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bahçevan: The sources are non-RS.  Aintabli ( talk ) 01:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music , Israel , Armenia ,  and Turkey .  Aintabli ( talk ) 01:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not notable enough.  killer bee 05:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete