hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
David Lanre Messan : Look at this --if The Nation is reliable in the first place, maybe--but this is a highly promotional interview.  This --well it starts with "David Lanre Messan, by the insignia (DLM) is a serial entrepreneur, idea strategist and multiple award winning global leader."  That's not journalism, that's puffery, and these are the best sources.  The man was CEO of the year?  Well, according to CEO Review , a website owned by a marketing team.  No, not notable, unless skydiving supports that claim.  Drmies ( talk ) 20:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  While The Nation source seems likely reliable, it's almost entirely attributed to the subject, and indeed it seems to be the best source.  This article itself is basically written as a professional profile , WP:NOTLINKEDIN .  — siro χ o 03:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nomination, can't find any meaningful sources out there.  Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, i'm A friendly user.  Learning as coding is a hobby.  Please, how can i contribute.  I want to improve this.  That's if its improvable 155.245.23.33 ( talk ) 15:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nagarvala Day School : LibStar ( talk ) 11:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and India .  DreamRimmer ( talk ) 12:43, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , with no reliable sources coming up online.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 23:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It fails the General Notability Guidelines, WP:GNG .  Yasal Shahid ( talk ) 05:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Romil Chaudhary : Thank you Anuj Choudhary Ror ( talk ) 08:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep Although he has very few credits, there are a few articles about him such as in India Today and India Express to meet the requirements of WP:GNG .  Naomijeans ( talk ) 02:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment May pass WP:GNG , few good notable references given.  I feel the article can be improved and can to be moved to draft in worst case rather than deletion.  DSN18 ( talk ) 17:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  10:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clear failure of WP:GNG, briefly a reality show contestant, no enduring record of work/impact as an actor or indeed for any other reason, so we don't pass WP:NACTOR, either.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 14:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect Could perhaps redirect to the Big Boss show, but I don't think his impact was much.  It says he's known for MasterMind in the infobox, with no further details given.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete He played a minor role in the sitcom Kahaan Hum Kahaan Tum , and his presence in Big Boss did not establish him as a notable actor.  This article should be deleted per WP:BIO1E .  𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 17:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Spotify Global 200 number ones of 2022 : And, as opposed to Billboard and other national or global charts, there is also a concern of these being supplied by a single vendor rather that a true amalgamation.  An account of streaming activity on Spotify is better served by List of most-streamed songs on Spotify .  Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and Lists .  Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Probably wanna bundle in List of Spotify Global 200 number ones of 2023 while you're at it.  That one has more sources that the 2022 list but those sources don't look particularly reliable at a brief glance, and even so it recreates the same single vendor issue.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the single vendor problem.  You could add as a chart in a more general page, like the years in music pages Carolina Heart ( talk ) 19:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vogue Institute of Art and Design : The currently cited sources are either passing mentions, school profiles, press releases, or paid brand posts, including a few unreliable ones.  A Google News search for "Vogue Institute of Art and Design" and "Vogue Institute of Fashion Technology" yields nothing useful either.  Therefore, it fails to meet WP:CORPDEPTH imo.  GSS 💬 15:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion , Education , Schools ,  and India .  GSS 💬 15:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per my check, I also can’t find any reliable sources with in-depth covarage which can establish notability to this school.  The subject fails WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  Grab Up - Talk 16:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete searches by the nom provide that GNG is not met.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor sources and per nom, page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations.  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
National-revolutionary movement : I can't find academic sources in English (it's an impossible thing to google) and after I removed the uncited content there wasn't much left.  See also the comments at Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#National-revolutionary_movement .  Prezbo ( talk ) 16:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Prezbo ( talk ) 16:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as rambling nonsense.  Mccapra ( talk ) 20:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Poorly constructed OR from someone who seems to have taken a mundane term “revolutionary nationalists”, meaning nationalists who happen to seek major changes in government and society, to be some form of distinct phenomenon.  It does not appear to be a notable topic but rather a tangential connection between two topics: nationalism, and people who support revolutions.  - Indy beetle ( talk ) 04:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Blatant violation of WP:SYNTH .  Partofthemachine ( talk ) 22:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Iran at the 2026 Asian Games : This article was created by the same user who created Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games and Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games .  As was said by CycloneYoris , it is still too early for this article and the accompanying articles to exist.  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Iran .  Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk ) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and WP:TOOSOON.  Author has been warned numerous times, but they're clearly ignoring and not heeding any of these warnings.  CycloneYoris talk!  01:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this and all other 2026 Asian Games articles created by author per nom and TOOSOON .  Rusty4321 talk contribs 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and oppose draftspace, as way WP:TOOSOON and will still be too soon for a year or more.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly way WP:TOOSOON for the article to exist.  Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 11:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per comments on the Singapore one.  Geschichte ( talk ) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abilene Christian University College of Arts and Sciences : Wozal ( talk ) 16:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , United States of America ,  and Texas .  Wozal ( talk ) 16:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 17:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge back (selectively) to the parent article on the whole university.   This college has 2000 students, when the whole university has 6000.   I note a lot of redlinks, which in turn suggests that it is not separately notable.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 22:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question: Is there anything to really merge though?  Abilene Christian University College of Arts and Sciences (as an article name) is already significantly longer than Abilene Christian University.  People linked don't seem to be notable; the only remaining person that isn't redlinked is questionable on whether they even have a connection to Abilene or if it's a different individual with the same name.  Arts & Sciences are commonly amongst the largest schools at a university but there's nothing to suggest that the 2,000 number is of any importance to the main article.  Wozal ( talk ) 15:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I would have said merge but what is there to merge like non notable faculty members.  Does not merit a standalone article.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per others, noting that it is currently not even mentioned at Abilene Christian University and that a redirect to there would thus not be helpful to readers.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - agree with above comments, does not merit standalone article and merging into parent article would add little value.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 18:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sudhir Ahuja : Royal88888 ( talk ) 21:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators ,  and Businesspeople .  Royal88888 ( talk ) 21:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering , Technology , Maharashtra , New Jersey ,  and Texas .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not satisfy WP:PROF for sure.  Don't see WP:ANYBIO either.  Qflib ( talk ) 17:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet PROF. Tame Rhino ( talk ) 14:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:PROF , WP:NOTWEBHOST .  SVP's in industry are the equivalent of associate professors in academia; they are rarely notable.  This reads like a resume, and we have never been a LinkedIn-style free web host.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yatra: A Musical Vlog : GSS 💬 15:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Nepal .  GSS 💬 15:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 09:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG .  A search found only blurbs and mentions -- no significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Veniana Ranadi : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  List of Fiji women's international footballers does not yet exist, so a redirect is not yet possible.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Oceania .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 22:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Midhilesh Sunder : The sourcing requirements says that to meet the respective guideline, subject needs to have WP:SIGCOV in multiple reliable sources.  Besides this source, there is nothing much available for the subject.  Moreover the badminton guideline WP:NBAD which clearly says that a podium finish in world tour tournaments is required to meet it, this subject has had achievements limited to district and zonal level competitions, not even in national level.
 This raises the question of merit of keeping an article like this, and it's value to this encyclopaedia.   Thankyou.  zoglophie 09:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Badminton , India ,  and Kerala .  zoglophie 09:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete can't seem to find any significant coverage online.  Fails to meet WP:NBLP or WP:NBAD .  Article cites 4 sources total, all of which fail WP:NBASIC .  One is just a profile, one leads to nothing, one is just a page of results of matches, and one seems to be an interview.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) 06:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:NBAD and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 07:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indu Shahani : Article reads like a resume, only has one source etc.  A search for sources turned up primary and unreliable sources.  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 10:23, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India .  Lavalizard101 ( talk ) 10:23, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Due to RS Worldiswide ( talk ) 03:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  are Sheriff of Mumbai generally notable?  It seems like a prominent position in one of the largest cities of the world, representing the city itself.  Or did I misunderstand the position?  -- hroest 20:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hannes Röst , it seems like an honourary position given for one year (typically) per the article.  I guess if someone gets the position it may imply local notability but it seems purely perfunctory.  HickoryOughtShirt? 4 ( talk ) 21:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree with the above comment about reliable sources.  When I did a Google search, I found numerous promotional type-profiles (like one would write on a website/to introduce a person) but nothing substantial.  Maybe there are some in a language other than English.  HickoryOughtShirt? 4 ( talk ) 21:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CannaCruz : Newhaven lad ( talk ) 09:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Non-notable local business and fails WP:NCOMPANY .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 21:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  Source coverage is trivial and fails WP:NCOMPANY .  Bgv.  ( talk ) 04:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stage Front : Existing sources are autobigraphical, trade publications (where the presumption is against their use in establishing notability), press releases, or churnalism.  Jfire ( talk ) 02:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Organizations ,  and Maryland .  Jfire ( talk ) 02:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Sports .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails NCORP.  References are passing mentions, routine announcements, or otherwise unreliable sources.  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 06:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP .  References are routine business news, annoucements and some PR.  scope_creep Talk 08:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] There is a page for Stage Front Stadium but the business the stadium is named after is not notable enough for a page?  Stravensky ( talk ) 13:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The stadium was recently renamed as the Stage Front Stadium after a sponsorship deal, that doesn't contribute towards WP:NCORP .  Mooonswimmer 14:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mooonswimmer I looked through the other companies listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Ticket_sales_companies before submitting this.  Stage Front has more news references and exclusive partnerships and sponsorships than half of them.  We can try to find more in depth profiles, but it feels arbitrary to just go after this one especially if you compare it to any on that list aside from the big 3.  Like Brown Paper Tickets and Bookitbee are the first two I clicked on and have nowhere near the notability as Stage Front.  Stravensky ( talk ) 23:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Other stuff exists" is an argument to avoid at AfD.  The relative notability of these companies is debatable, and even if Stage Front is the most notable of the three, that needs to be demonstrated with sources showing that it meets the standards set by WP:NCORP .  Jfire ( talk ) 02:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The organization is “notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.”  This article does not meet any of these criteria: not multiple, not reliable, no significant coverage.  Topjur01 ( talk ) 16:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete