hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Gyan Prakash Upadhyaya : Also, the individual clearly does not meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I would imagine the more significant role would be his position as member of his nation’s cabinet rather than merely an IAS officer.  I know US cabinet members pass WP:NPOL , and I can’t see a reason why cabinet members from other nations shouldn’t either.  4meter4 ( talk ) 19:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep meets WP:NPOL Lightburst ( talk ) 16:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep .  I'm not sure this meets the letter of NPOL: this individual is a bureaucrat, not a politician in the conventional sense of a holder of elected office.  However, his position appears to be that of the highest-ranking bureaucrat in a state government, if I understand the minutiae correctly, and as such he is holding a statewide office: so I think he meets the spirit of NPOL.  The coverage is very sparse, so this is a "weak" keep only.  Vanamonde ( Talk ) 03:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails in WP:NPOL , Indian Administrative Service officer is just a job not a notablity criteria Worldiswide ( talk ) 05:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: An analysis of available reference material may be more helpful than a debate over the specifics of the job.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 15:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sourcing used is simply confirmation of the appointment to the job.  Nothing for sourcing we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Aamna Malick : A significant portion of the sources referenced lack reliability .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and Television .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - per WP:BASIC , [102] , [103] , [104] [105] , [106] Otbest ( talk ) 18:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Otbest , I'm curious how a user who just began editing 2 days ago is already participating in AfDs.  BTW, the references you provided aren't even RS.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 19:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment sourcing seems to be weak (mainly tabloids), but it looks like she may have some notable television credits? - KH-1 ( talk ) 01:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] KH-1 , No.  Only minor roles.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 08:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : some of her numerous roles in notable productions look significant enough for her to pass WP:NACTOR - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 12:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But I don't see any.  If that had been the case, she would have definitely received some press coverage, at least some ROTM coverage at a minimum.  — Saqib ( talk I contribs ) 18:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Coverage consists either of tabloid coverage (see WP:SBST ) or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs ; no significant coverage.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 11:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Kauvaka Kaivelata : JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and New Zealand .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep There's a few bits in the article and in a search to suggest coverage is increasing, especially with the players career just starting to kick off.  I'd imagine there will be a couple more bits coming in the near future, so perhaps could be draftifyed, but I think worth keeping and expanding as likely the draft will just be deleted.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Shadow311 ( talk ) 18:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 00:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Saraswat Vidyalaya : I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 2 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Offline 00:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools ,  and Goa .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment , in the past, schools in India have had a fair amount of coverage discovered in ProQuest, which is down for TWL right now, so we might want to take this one slowly.  — siro χ o 04:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mapusa#Education if insufficient coverage to establish notability.  The college and high school exists.  Rupples ( talk ) 01:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Redirect.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source.  Found this [9] .  Snippet view.  Can't track the whole book to see if additional content but have added to article.  Rupples ( talk ) 03:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  There is indeed a lot of coverage on ProQuest.  Eg.  A protest: [10] .  Sports [11] [12] etc.  Other local coverage: [13] [14] .  There's a lot more there to sort through as well.   — siro χ o 04:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes.  Also moving towards a keep, but the article needs a bit more usable sourcing.  As of now, it's not quite there.  Rupples ( talk ) 05:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: A second opinion on these newly located sources would be helpful as well as an assessment if they provide adequate SIGCOV.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: third relist in hopes of more discussion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 20:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Mapusa#Education .  Routine news any school would receive does not establish notability.  Fails GNG and NORG, nothing found from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimothyBlue ( talk • contribs ) 22:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Teymur Hajiyev : — Toghrul R ( t ) 16:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Though I am the author, I have no connection to the guy.  But I am inside Azerbaijani filmmaking circles and work for an art magazine, therefore notice novelties.  The article provides basic information.  Cavidaga ( talk ) 07:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Teymur is a well-known film director and producer, and the article has enough sources to confirm this.  But at the same time, the article needs to be edited to make it look more neutral.  The article needs to be edited but not deleted.  RufatM ( talk ) 12:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Passes WP:GNG , WP:BASIC and WP:FILMMAKER .  Strong evidence for a promising career and is well known by the international film festival circuit and European Film Academy professionals.  ContributorMix ( talk ) 11:45, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails GNG and WP:BLP.  Sources in article do not meet WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth .  Interviews, mentions, promo for films do not show notability for an individual, even if that individual is mentioned or listed.  BEFORE found nothing but more promo and mentions and keep votes above provide no sources.  // Timothy :: talk 19:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Jennifer Santiago : Sources seem to be mostly interviews, blogs, or glancing mentions.  According to her personal website, she joined the State Department after the material covered here, but I'm not sure if this helps with notability either: I joined the Department of State in 2011.  I am a Public Diplomacy Coned Officer who served in Brazil, Belize, Cuba, Jordan and Tel Aviv.  I currently work in Islamabad, Pakistan, managing the largest alumni portfolio in the world.  I will join US Embassy Warsaw as the Cultural Attache in 2022, after a year of Polish language training.  I speak Spanish, Portuguese, Hebrew and Arabic.  Note: Emmy awards mentioned here are regional, not national, and do not confer notability.  This is typical in broadcast journalism.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Journalism , Television ,  and Florida .  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 06:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Leaning keep , weakly In addition to the Emmy (which seems uncited) she has another award.  She co-produced a film, there is more than glancing mentions, arguably significant coverage: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2001-08-28-0108280021-story.html I think maybe enough to satisfy WP:BASIC CT55555 ( talk ) 11:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep per #1 of WP:ANYBIO and #1 of WP:ENT .  Some references (like #15) IMO do not satisfy WP:RS (per WP:UGC ).  A09 ( talk ) 12:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 12:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Appears she won a local Emmy, which we don't count for notability.  Rest appears routine coverage/confirmation of where she works or by-lines on stories she's reported.  All routine.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Alien Skin : Does not appear to have met any criteria for musical artists.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - it appears to be a musical artist who at the very least has been mentioned in the media in Uganda.  Needs strengthening, and the discography section needs completely redoing as per WP:NOTDIR . .  4theloveofallthings ( talk ) 4theloveofallthings ( talk ) 00:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, D u s t i *Let's talk! * 13:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:GNG pretty clearly as the subject of opinion pieces and is frequently covered by Ugandan media.  SportingFlyer T · C 16:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Renná Bruce : As always, neither writers nor artists are "inherently" notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because their work exists -- notability has to be supported by evidence that the person has received external coverage and analysis to validate their significance, such as major literary or arts awards and/or the reception of enough media coverage about them and their work to pass WP:GNG .  But there are just three footnotes here, of which two are online bookstores that are not support for notability at all, and the third comes from a minor niche publication that would be fine for use if there were better sources alongside it, but is not significant enough to singlehandedly get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only secondary source on the table.  Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have considerably better sourcing than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Authors ,  and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Have added another couple of reviews.  There is also this which I cannot access from UK, title being "Latest Jazlyn J book takes on green scene".  Pam D 07:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The poor sourcing of both this and Robert Mark Carpenter has led me to ask the creating editor whether they have a COI.  Pam D 07:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I had the same impression.  Thanks for asking.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 14:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete' I am not finding any reliable sourcing for the biographical information presented in the article.  Additionally, the books are published by Jazlyn J Books, which seems to be partially owned by Renná Bruce, so essentially self-published.   All signs point to the editor as starting a "career" as an editor.  WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 20:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete :my WP:AGF has expired, as the creating editor has not replied to my enquiry on their talk page about a possible COI although they have created two drafts and one new article since I posted there.  The new article includes date of birth info etc which does not seem to appear in any of the sources provided.  It appears that this editor probably has a COI with the subjects of their articles.  Pam D 07:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The available sourcing isn't enough to indicate that the Jazlyn J series is a "well-known body of work".  Moreover, COI editing needs to be nipped in the bud.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 21:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Dakshayani Velayudhan Award : Not yet achieved notability.  Fails WP:INDEPTH .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 12:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards , India ,  and Kerala .  The Doom Patrol ( talk ) 12:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep This is not an event so WP:INDEPTH does not apply.  Announcements of an award in honour of the first Dalit woman in constituent assembly is hardly routine.  Existence of other sources from quick google search results suggests WP:BEFORE has not been followed.  Jagmanst ( talk ) 06:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 13:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOM, fails WP:INDEPTH .  A mention in the person's articles would be enough. -- SM7 --talk-- 14:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Jagmanst added references.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk ) 19:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Hayley Anne Sacks : PROD removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Israel ,  and New York .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unable to find more than some trivial mentions, and as such, this subject does not meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Please ping me if any significant coverage can be found.  Let'srun ( talk ) 14:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Skating-related deletion discussions .  Owen× ☎ 12:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 2008 World Figure Skating Championships per ATD and CHEAP.  Let'srun and Bgsu98 , can you get behind this?  gidonb ( talk ) 18:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I think it may be a WP:SURPRISE and as such I do not support.  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree with Let'srun .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just me or are there a disproportionate amount of articles here about ice skaters?  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] MaskedSinger , the nominator PROD'd a lot of these articles, other editors thought it was rash and de-PROD'd them and now they have would up at AFD, all at the same time.  L iz Read!  Talk!  02:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ok. thanks for explaining.  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 04:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus
Avalum Naanum : - UtherSRG (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India .  UtherSRG (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The series had more than 300 episodes on Star Vijay.  At the very least a redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Star_Vijay#Fiction , where it is listed, should be warranted in my opinion.  Not strongly opposed to Keep, as content is verifiable. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 11:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 19:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 21:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 21:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: no consensus