hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Scarlet Carmina : Both references in the article are from very local news sources, and an online search brings up no additional coverage.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and England .  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Only 2 sources present.  We would need a few more to show that they are notable.  Nothing else came up in Google.  RolandSimon ( talk ) 21:49, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I checked Newspapers.com and Internet Archive but didn't find anything.  S0091 ( talk ) 14:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sion Wiggin : Only primary sources provided.  A low career high ranking of 210.  LibStar ( talk ) 09:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Wales ,  and New Zealand .  North America 1000 10:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom and no in-depth significant coverage found.  Dank Jae 10:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Calligra Flow : All I could find was an article at a tech blog named ghacks.net.  -- Crystallizedcarbon ( talk ) 19:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CoFluent Design : It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can resolve it now.  Boleyn ( talk ) 11:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and France .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] EE Times says it was reported by Intel in 2011, so it should be mention somewhere on the Intel articles.  (Also mentioned on List of EDA companies )  IgelRM ( talk ) 15:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The best source the article has is eeTimes , but even if that meets GNG we need more than one.  Google news, web, and web archive are barren.  Same goes for the Wikipedia Library.  We don't have enough sources to establish notability.  — Sirdog ( talk ) 03:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a mere 2 gnews hits.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Showcase (Firefox extension) : It says it earned the "Best Use of New Firefox 1.5 Features" award for the Extend Firefox contest , but I don't believe that it merits notability.  I couldn't even find the sources which support this claim.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Internet ,  and Software .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 18:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Source: https://blog.mozilla.org/press/2006/03/mozilla-announces-winners-of-extend-firefox-competition/ That contest had a lot of media coverage; that extension also had tens of millions of installs, and was consistently one of the top Firefox extensions.  79.155.41.229 ( talk ) 22:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Delete as notability is not inherited from winning a Firefox contest and more importantly fail to meet WP:NSOFT .  बिनोद थारू ( talk ) 03:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Does not meet notability guidelines.  Unable to find sources.  StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk ) 23:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WAYV (disambiguation) : RM X Y ( talk ) 00:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 23 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 00:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note this nomination is not being properly listed on the AFD log page because of some formatting conflict with the nomination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Renata_Christian_(2nd_nomination) before it.  (Oh, the bot already caught that.)  Fixed by Liz.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 03:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  An earlier version of the disambiguation page also included a television station, WAVY-TV , which might be searched as WAYV.  I recommend restoring the television station to the list and keeping the disambiguation page.  Delete .  The television station wasn't the same call sign.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 04:30, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I don't understand what the last sentence means.  WAYV redirects to one of the meanings, [57] was the edit to remove the TV station from the list, yet the hatnotes still do mention the TV station.  It's either appropriate in hatnotes and/or a disambiguation page, or it's not, we can't have it both ways :) -- Joy ( talk ) 15:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The hatnote fails WP:NAMB due to the "(FM)" disambiguation, and I have removed it.  WAYV in caps currently redirects to the radio station, but the station should be moved to just WAYV.  Optional to add a hatnote afterward to the boy band.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 01:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Again, if WAYV redirects to one page, and WAVY to another, and these things are presumably pronounced the same, why shouldn't the hatnotes exist?  Why is it implausible that readers might confuse these?  -- Joy ( talk ) 08:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rob MacIsaac : Neither mayors nor CEOs of hospitals are "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to have sufficient reliable source coverage and analysis about their work to pass WP:GNG for it -- but the referencing here is not adequate, consisting of two primary sources that are not support for notability at all, alongside a tiny smattering of "former mayor announced as appointee to hospital job" in the local media, with absolutely no coverage analyzing his mayoralty itself, or his work in the hospital job, shown at all.  The article further makes a considerable number of completely unsourced claims that were added by an editor with an apparent conflict of interest as their username is highly suggestive of being one of the subject's daughters.  Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced considerably better than this.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NPOL #2 and reads like a resume.  As Bearcat mentioned, there's not really a significant claim to notability here except for just being a mayor of a city.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jordan Orru : The interview cited in the article is published by Dunfermline Athletic , his employer at the time, so is clearly not independent.  In my WP:BEFORE , I found Daily Record 1 and Daily Record 2 , both of which are trivial mentions.  This player is an internet-era footballer in a developed country.  If significant coverage is not found online then I highly doubt that he is notable.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Scotland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As far as I can see does not meet notability.  The highest level he played at was the lowest tier of the Scottish League system and he does not seem to have generated significant coverage then or at any other point in his career as a footballer.  Dunarc ( talk ) 20:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 14:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article on a journeyman around the SPFL semi-pro basement league and beneath.  (I watched at least one game in which the subject played in SPFL League Two.)  As others have said above, the given sources are a brief Q&A apprenticeship piece on a club site and passing mentions.  Nothing in the article text or elsewhere indicates attained biographical notability here.  AllyD ( talk ) 20:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 21:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Othman Al-Othman : JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 06:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 06:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 11:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found an image caption in Arriyadiyah and SA24 , which is a basic contract renewal announcement, much like one of the sources already in the article.  I'm not seeing how this guy is any more notable than the last time the article got deleted.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Aaron Krohn : I believe this is a controversial nomination owing to the passion that some editors might have over the work of this voice actor.   I believe there is sufficient information to support some of the voice acting instances, but these should be placed in the respective work articles and do not contribute to notability of this voice actor in the context of Wikipedia.   I am further feeling pressure to nominate this as a part of reducing the overall heft of the thousands of un-referenced living person biographies.   I hope editors can find material to be able to retain the article.   Regards.  User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Generally speaking, i don't consider somewhat prolific voice actors/ charactor actors like Aaron Krohn to be particularly notable.  While Krohn actually has a ton of dubbing roles from his days at ADV Films, with more than a few being lead roles; he's left behind dubbing for a couple decades and isn't well-remembered by the English-speaking anime community today.  I do have arguments against this page's deletion, but if they're rejected i still understand.  The main thing is there is a lot of incorrect/ misleading/ unverified/ biased info floating around online for public figures, especially on IMDb.  I figure a Wikipedia article could provide a place to put accurate sources for his career and the careers of others.  As a side note, is there a place on this website to post ideas for Wikimedia Foundation features and similar things?  Starbeam2 ( talk ) 02:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All I managed to find about the subject were trivial mentions.  While he has been involved in the production of many shows, there does not seem to be much in-depth coverage of him.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 20:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Theatre , New York ,  and Texas .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 03:43, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : per multiple significant roles per NACTOR Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Jack4576 : WP:NACTOR starts with the premise that the actor meets the general notability guideline ; it supplements but does not supplant, unfortunately.   --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 12:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Noted, changing vote Jack4576 ( talk ) 13:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:GNG .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 23:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
An Ji-hyok : Lack of WP:SIGCOV Simione001 ( talk ) 22:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 22:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A database entry, nothing to indicate notability.  Avilich ( talk ) 18:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
International Conference on Clifford Algebras : The only reference appears to be a biography of William Kingdon Clifford , the developer of Clifford algebras .   The book is probably evidence of the notability of its subject, William Kingdon Clifford , and of his main work, Clifford algebras , and the articles about them are not being questioned.   This conference may be run-of-the-mill , in that there are many annual or triennial academic conferences, some of which are notable, and this article does not say why this one is.  There is also a draft, which appears to be identical to this article.   This article cannot be moved unilaterally to draft space because there is already a draft.   So this article should be deleted while the draft is retained for possible expansion as to why this conference is notable.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 22:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Mathematics ,  and United Kingdom .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 22:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Per WP:GNG .  Really finding it difficult it prove any notability for this at all.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 10:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's not often that an academic conference, or even a series of academic conferences, is worth having an article about.  What is there to say, really?  People meet, drink coffee, sit in bad chairs, tolerate the talks for the sake of the conversations, hit the pub, and hop on a plane to burn carbon on the way home.  Per Earwig , the opening lines of this article are copyvio anyway.  XOR'easter ( talk ) 14:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I wouldn't be comfortable voting to delete this article without access to a copy of the book, which includes a chapter called "The Clifford Heritage".  Unfortunately, I wasn't able to access the book online.  Suriname0 ( talk ) 00:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 09:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : fails WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT .  Maliner ( talk ) 15:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
SPINE (software) : Survived PROD (courtesy @ Explicit : as the only still active editor from PROD discussions) so we're here Star Mississippi 17:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  Star Mississippi 17:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - As this is the only secondary source I've been able to find, and I don't think it alone is sufficient for WP:SIGCOV .  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 19:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT .  On the sourceforge page it says that last update was in 2007, so this project is both dead and non-notable.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 09:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chaney Willemse : JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete There's this and a couple of other bits, but one more good source would be nice for a keep.  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, C avarrone 15:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No SIGCOV.  I'd have leaned for a ! keep if WP:THREE was met, but I couldn't find any RS with significant coverage.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 17:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hong Dae-hwa : Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete