hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Yechiel (Eli) Shainblum : Absolutely does not pass WP:CREATIVE .  A lot of the language is biased and speaks on a personal level about Shainblum rather than an overview of any specific accomplishments.  A lot of this article talks about art, and yet he's never sold a painting, been in a gallery, nothing.  The teaching piece isn't notable either.  OsmiumGuard ( talk ) 15:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Language , Visual arts , Judaism ,  and Canada .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - The article itself basically says he wasn't notable.  It is likely that Shainblum would be better known nationally and internationally if his work had been more widely seen during his lifetime.  It seems he wasn't even locally well-known, I can't find any references to him outside of some suspect blogs.  grungaloo ( talk ) 00:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] • Comment It's worth noting that there's a similar page for one Mark Shainblum that was initially created and maintained by the same exact account.  OsmiumGuard ( talk ) 16:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I am not finding any RS for the biographical information presented in this article.  -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 00:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sentences like " His family reports that Shainblum derived great joy from teaching, and he put much more emphasis on pedagogy and his students than he did on promoting his artistic career " make this read like a tribute written by a family member or a former student.  It sounds like they were well-loved by students and family, but there are not sources to show they meet the WP:CREATIVE guidelines for encyclopedia articles, like having "been a substantial part of a significant exhibition" or "won significant critical attention."  Elspea756 ( talk ) 14:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Sources could be secondary but not exactly reliable.  Per Elspea756, content of them is not persuasive either.  🍪 Cookie Monster 15:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
DJ Manzee : TLA (talk) 09:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Maharashtra .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023–24 French Rugby League season : Mn1548 ( talk ) 11:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 19 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 12:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league and France .  Shellwood ( talk ) 12:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Sources are available and subject is notable enough, but needs a full rewrite.  An article with this title would be better if it contained a brief description of the current national league structure, noting any changes and major events, and with a list of winners for each competition – none of which is in the current article.   Rather than entirely rewriting what is here, a new summary style article could be created (preferably after the season is complete – so it would not be incomplete/need updating).  If wanting to list full details for each competition, these can be covered in separate articles as done for Elite 1, 2 and Lord Derby, and for that it would be easier to delete what is currently here and start fresh (using conventional formatting and full referencing) rather than clean up the content of this article and then split it off into ND 1&2, ND 3&4 and National Cup articles.  EdwardUK ( talk ) 17:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – As above.  Case for WP:TNT .  Svartner ( talk ) 22:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Scottish Renewables : JMWt ( talk ) 09:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business ,  and Environment .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : There are sources which provide basic verification of this industry body, for example the text of the First Minister's speech at their conference (Scottish Govt 25/1/23) , quotes and advocacy by the organisation's officials BBC 17/10/23 , Insider 19/10/23 .  What I'd like to see, though, is assessment coverage about Scottish Renewables itself.  AllyD ( talk ) 17:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ken Mellor : Can verify he is the writer of books, but there is no significant coverage of him.  CNMall41 ( talk ) 08:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 08:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreferenced BLP for over 12 years.  Possible promotional.  No coverage to meet WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 09:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete While lack of references is not a reason to delete (it is a reason to find RS and expand the article), searching Newsbank database I found 7 articles mentioning Mellor from 2000-2004, mostly in Sunday newspapers.  None of these are sufficiently substantial to reach reliable source status in my view.  Fails WP:GNG .  Cabrils ( talk ) 03:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pascal Hakizimana : Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mikhail Tsaturian : The sourcing is very weak, and most sources do not mention him at all or fail verification with the exception of one that mentions an NFT he made, and another which is a sponsored project he did for an alcoholic beverage company.  A BEFORE search using his name as well as his pseudonym only reveals social media and user-submitted content.  No evidence of important exhibitions at museums or national galleries, no museum collections.  Possibly TOOSOON?  Netherzone ( talk ) 23:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists , Visual arts , Technology ,  and Russia .  Netherzone ( talk ) 23:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nominator makes a strong case.  I am not finding any usable references to show the subject's notability.  WP:TOOSOON .  - WomenArtistUpdates ( talk ) 01:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree entirely, the existing sourcing is poor and I can't find any better sources supporting notability.  JaggedHamster ( talk ) 15:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I just deleted this article on the Russian-language Wikipedia.  I could not find weighty art awards and prizes, no quality independent reviews of his work, and no reviews of his creative path.  -- Khinkali ( talk ) 15:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article infobox contains a link to his site which is cited as a source for many claims in the article body.  The site itself is offline (whois reports it as not being registered).  Internet Archive does have a copy of the site from 2022, which gives an impression of a freelance designer who also occasionally displays his works at places without any curation, likely to promote his professional services.  The the article mentions a few works, but none of them appears to have any third-party coverage at all.  Anton.bersh ( talk ) 10:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bruce Ellis : Hardyplants ( talk ) 11:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Hardyplants ( talk ) 11:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing that adds up to notability.  Athel cb ( talk ) 11:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:NOTRESUME Written like a personal web page.  — Maile ( talk ) 12:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails notability guidelines as per WP:NBASIC .  Redtree21 ( talk ) 12:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment the article is pretty rubbish and resumé-like, and the subject suffers from the usual problem of being an academic working in industry just at the point when computer science was moving so fast that no one was writing about what people like him were doing.  But is there any mileage in a redirect to Mark V. Shaney which is notable, and in which he seems to have played a major role?  I think this would be more helpful to our readers than complete deletion.  Elemimele ( talk ) 13:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing , Australia ,  and New Jersey .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 15:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ben Rhodes (footballer) : Unable to find more sources for this article.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 13:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and England .  Shellwood ( talk ) 17:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I did find one article , but I believe it is mostly an interview.  It wouldn't be enough on its own anyway and I see no evidence of notability.  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 20:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kit Bigelow : Eddie891 Talk Work 02:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Religion .  Eddie891 Talk Work 02:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:45, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Scattered mentions in media [98] , [99] but there are no substantial coverages of her.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:18, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Bitter Dawn : Article was created on 23 September 2007; Prod on 12 October 2007; then first AfD on 28 August 2010 here along with a group of additional articles.  JoeNMLC ( talk ) 20:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 21 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 20:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television ,  and Iran .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No sources available whatsoever, in English anyway, to establish WP:GNG or WP:NFILM .  (If Persian sources are found ping me.)  The 2010 AfD was a significantly flawed discussion not driven by policy-related arguments.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 12:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Doesn't meet WP:GNG .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  00:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Infinity (database) : No evidence of notability.  There are some links to Github but as that is the databses own page they don't caount as references.  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not sure what "notability" means.  The project was open sourced on gitHub last December and has gathered 1.1K stars ever since.  What else evidances should we provide?  Could you provide some suggestions?  Vissidarte24 ( talk ) 08:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Does https://medium.com/@infiniflowai/ai-native-database-powering-the-next-gen-rag-for-llm-da70cabcac1a count as a reference?  Vissidarte24 ( talk ) 08:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] https://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2024/01/07/news/modelli_di_linguaggio_cosa_sono_perche_se_ne_parla_tanto_e_che_futuro_avranno-421823928/ This report also counts for a reference.  Vissidarte24 ( talk ) 08:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This reference is helpful, but I think it's still only a passing mention , so not enough to establish notability .  StereoFolic ( talk ) 13:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, I've updated the external references in an attempt to solve the notability issue.  Vissidarte24 ( talk ) 09:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Note also that the author added this to Vector_database#List_of_vector_databases ; if deleted here I recommend also deleting its mention there.  StereoFolic ( talk ) 13:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : a promotional page about a non-notable product from a non-notable company, written by a SPA and likely COI.  Owen× ☎ 15:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
John Leech (DJ) : Unsourced BLP but with ELs, so not CSD eligible.  UtherSRG (talk) 11:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Radio ,  and United Kingdom .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for lack of sourcing.  Gnewspapers hits on the name from the 1880's to the 1930s.  This is the only ref to this person I could find [30] , basically confirming he was hired for a new job.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Lack of sources, promotional tone, and searches of the usual places reveal only passing mentions of him moving around between radio stations, with this Radio Today story the most significant coverage (and this article consists almost solely of quotes from the presenter and his employer).  Flip Format ( talk ) 16:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BlinqIO : TLA tlak 07:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  TLA tlak 07:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Just launched in Sep. 2023.  I cannot find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and none of the cited sources contribute to notability.  Fails to meet WP:NCORP .  Schazjmd (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Delaware .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Angel Film Festival : Can't find anything online, thus does not meet WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 10:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Events ,  and England .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rahul Bhandari : Also, the individual clearly does not meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:BIO .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 18:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete there is absolutely no assertion of any kind of significant notability in this article - as the nominator said, this is a normal government job.  This is the third nomination of the same article so I'd suggest SALTing also.  None of the sources are both independent and have significant coverage.  Daniel ( talk ) 22:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Graduated third in his class, then got a functionary job, is his claim to notability?  I can't find any sources from the last 12 years since the last AfD that make this individual more notable now.  SALT is required.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This could be about the person [3] but I don't think it helps notability; the name is too common to be able to find much.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete