hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Sensorica: Article lacks sourcing and I was unable to find significant coverage via research.  Brandon ( talk ) 01:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Computing ,  and Canada .  Brandon ( talk ) 01:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Moch. Bahrudin: I can find no evidence that this footballer meets this requirement and even an Indonesian source search yields no sources that could be used to expand the article on this footballer.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Indonesia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I couldn't find any more sources about the Player.  Crainsaw ( talk ) 14:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 19:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 15:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Indian Chimney Falls: Eddie891 Talk Work 15:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's rather sad how well-intentioned cleanup of external link spam for a farm business gave us rubbish for 19 years.   This would have qualified as speedily deleteable and caught by New Pages patrol the following year .   Anyway, there's not enough context from the original to know where these waterfalls are.   They almost certainly aren't called this, and there are several possibilities.   Our article on Salmon Creek (Cayuga Lake) needs improvement, but this is zero use to us in that regard.   We might as well improve the right article(s) directly.  Delete .  Uncle G ( talk ) 20:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Reputation Poll International: Searches are not finding evidence that this firm has attained notability in its own right.  AllyD ( talk ) 11:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  AllyD ( talk ) 11:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep I saw you first reviewed the page, i dont know why you then tagged for deletation.  However, i think Reputation Poll has decent coverage if you can search it and it has been featured on key platforms.  Nenerue ( talk ) 10:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article was marked as reviewed by Twinkle when this AfD discussion was opened.  It would be helpful for this discussion if you can point to substantial coverage about the company?  AllyD ( talk ) 12:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, – DreamRimmer ( talk ) 12:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 16:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : A PR organization doing PR stuff [3] , [4] .  Nothing we can use for GNG.  We need things ABOUT the company, not lists BY the company.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hennig Wichmann: The sources that the German wiki cite, at least for the English language book, Piracy, does not seem to mention Hennig, or at least I could not find it.  Even if there are one or two sources that mention him, he seems to fail notability generally.  If anyone can find sources for this pirate, I would be willing to withdraw my nomination.  Tooncool64 ( talk ) 07:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , History ,  and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 12:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete .  This is scary.  An IP created the de.wiki article with no sources.  Sources were added later and the article translated into other languages.  From Wikipedia this content has jumped from book to book published in the years since, often repeating verbatim what the article says.  As Tooncool64 says there is nothing to support the existence of this subject, let alone its notability, before 2007.  Mccapra ( talk ) 13:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If true then this needs to be reported to Wikidata and other projects.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 14:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and Redirect to Victual Brothers#Likedeelers .  It's certainly not a hoax as there are pre-2007 sources that mention Wichmann in connection with the Likedeelers or Störtebeker, e.g. [36] , [37] , and [38] .  For an English source, see [39] .  However this particular individual seems to be of marginal notability, so I think a redirect is warranted.  Jfire ( talk ) 17:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect per Jfire.  Well done for finding those sources.  That’s a relief!  Mccapra ( talk ) 07:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting.  I was all ready to close this with a Merge to Victual Brothers#Likedeelers but when I looked at that section, it was a lot of "citation needed" tags and almost completely unsourced.  So, I'm wondering if this is the best possible outcome for this article and I'm extending the discussion for a little while longer.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I'm not entirely clear if the mentions detailed above (and a few others I've seen) even refer to the same person, so in my view the best thing to do is to improve another page and then if/when sufficient sources are found expand into an article.  There's just not enough sourced to merge here and we might just be encouraging misinformation.  JMWt ( talk ) 14:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cyrus Poonawalla Group: All google hits are trivial mention (hiring and departure of personnel).  See also draft at the same name, which was created when someone moved the article to draft, and the article author recreated an unlinked identical article.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 05:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and India .  Fermiboson ( talk ) 05:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Doesn’t pass GNG either (obviously).  NM 03:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There are articles on the founder and his son , and their companies Serum Institute of India and, since acquisition in 2021, Poonawalla Fincorp .  From one perspective, perhaps the present article "binds" these, but from another perspective, it is only a corporate instrument, without specific notability independent of the founding family and their businesses.  AllyD ( talk ) 17:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zenith Energy: MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tunisia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Democratic Republic of the Congo-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:31, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:31, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG and CORP.  Source eval: Primary 1.   "About".  Zenith Energy Ltd.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  Stock exchange listing London Stock Exchange". www.londonstockexchange.com. Retrieved 2023-02-10. Stock exchange listing Euronext exchange Live quotes".  live.euronext.com.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  Stock exchange listing  4. ^ "Zenith Energy (CA) Share Price - LON:ZEN Stock Research".  Stockopedia.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  Primary  5. ^ "Our Team".  Zenith Energy Ltd.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  Industry promo  6. ^ "Zenith Energy - The Energy Year".  2021-11-03.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  Annual report, primary  7. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Energy, Zenith (March 31, 2021).  "Zenith Energy Ltd. Annual Report and Financial Statements" (PDF) – via annualreports.  Routine news sourced from company  8. ^ "Tunisia: Zenith Energy to restart ROB-1 oil well on June 8".  African Manager.  2022-06-02.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  Rountine morning star report  9. ^ "IN BRIEF: Zenith Energy gets payment for oil production in Congo".  MorningstarUK.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  Failed V, 404  10. ^ News, Alliance (2022-12-02).  "Zenith Energy progresses Italian concessions on bureaucratic approval".  MorningstarUK.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help) Routine industry news  11. ^ "Zenith Energy submits offer for biggest oilfield in Benin".  intellinews.com.  2022-09-26.  Retrieved 2023-02-10.  BEFORE showed more of the same, nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS.  // Timothy :: talk 17:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Routine coverage of an obscure, run of the mill company does not mean it passes WP:NCORP .  Bearian ( talk ) 15:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Swedistan: Most of the references in the article don't even use the term "Swedistan".  As the term is not commonly used, it has not been the object of significant coverage.  Pichpich ( talk ) 16:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam , Internet ,  and Sweden .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 16:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS , and anyway the references barely support the claims made, as nom points out.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete part of internet culture, but not notable by our standards.  Draken Bowser ( talk ) 09:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  Yes, there are a couple of good sources, but as a whole are not significant coverage.  Bearian ( talk ) 20:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Routofy: Charlie ( talk ) 17:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 17:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Delhi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
OptaPlanner: Theroadislong ( talk ) 13:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Theroadislong ( talk ) 13:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Courcelles ( talk ) 13:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No software reviews found, only download links or various PR blogs.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there is nothing notable about the article, just a bunch of statistics.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 14:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jennifer Gliere: It still fails to show notability, and searches don't find anything beyond what was there in May.   The only reference is the subject's own we site.  Gronk Oz ( talk ) 18:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  Gronk Oz ( talk ) 18:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Obviously fails WP:NMUSIC with no viable independent coverage.  Article is also purely promotional if the only source cited therein wasn't enough of an indication.  Her infobox consists of one whole word.  External links (since removed) had zero connection to the subject, and then the nonsense content about prized possessions.  Should probably be salted since article was recreated following first clear delete consensus.  sixty nine • whaddya want?  • 19:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : She sings at a benefit for Ukraine, and two other PR items are all I find about this individual.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NMUSIC and WP:NMUSICOTHER .  — CurryTime7-24 ( talk ) 23:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2010 Dally M Awards: It doesn't seem to have a suitable WP:ATD - although it could merge/redirect to Dally M Awards , it could cause confusion or unbalance that article.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards , Rugby league ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is pretty much a duplication of what is already on the List of Dally M Awards winners page.  If the page is becoming too large, it would make much more sense to split the article by award than by year.  J Mo 101 ( talk ) 09:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Minnesota State High School Mathematics League: A WP:BEFORE search found primarily trivial mentions in local news.  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 16:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Mathematics ,  and Minnesota .  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 16:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The only sources are self-published except for a book where the results are listed (not notable), and like said, only passing mentions in the news.  Kline | let me clear my throat!  | (contribs) 20:46, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no reliable secondary sources beyond MILL competition results found.  Listing of winners isn't appropriate as discussion of non-notable minors is something to be avoided here.  There's nothing here that wouldn't be better contained in the organization website.  Fails NORG ; likely fails NOT .  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 21:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG due to a lack of independent and secondary coverage.  Trivial mentions regarding results don't contribute to notability.  User:Let'srun 03:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daroga Prasad Rai College: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Billy Flynn Gadbois: Further, this article is essentially about one event and fails notability for that reason.  Geoff | Who, me?  13:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete "Man brings flowers to ex-wife" is not at GNG.  Beyond the few sources mentioning his one post, he's not notable as a lawyer, I don't find anything else we can use.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Law ,  and Massachusetts .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Very clearly fails GNG.  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 17:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete really only notable from one event.  best, GPL93 ( talk ) 22:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Dozens of people per day get their viral 15 seconds of fame, and no one ever hears of them -- or thinks of them -- again.   This is why we have WP:ONEEVENT .  Ravenswing 00:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Oaktree b.  Fails WP:GNG lacks indepth coverage.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 06:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
J. Greg Miller: Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG .  Google search finds a few limited mentions but without significant coverage.  Only this bio from his college quintet provides some coverage for a career that does not appear to pass the notability standard.  — Cactus Writer (talk) 00:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  — Cactus Writer (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Arizona , California , Colorado , New York ,  and Pennsylvania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I did not find any significant sources.  I also checked on the Brandon P. Merle award, which should be related to the USC school of music, where Merle was a professor, but searching the school's pages I found no mention, so I can't find proof that it exists.  Lamona ( talk ) 05:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO , WP:COMPOSER , and WP:ANYBIO — CurryTime7-24 ( talk ) 04:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete