hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
International Humic Substances Society: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Science , Environment ,  and Colorado .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Information Security Forum: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 03:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Organizations , Technology ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability , Organizations , Education ,  and Maryland .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Wilson the Volleyball: This is unsourced, and while I know of the ball, this was never seen before the Tom Hanks movie.  Some strange OR/hoax article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Oaktree b Someone else has restored the page to its proper form.  I will be withdrawing.  For future reference to those who are seeing this later, the page was confusing, unsourced, un-notable/important nonsense full of OR/hoax nonsense.  thetechie@enwiki : ~/talk/ $ 01:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Perfect.  No issues then.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Northern Traders Company: As always, companies are not "inherently" entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they existed, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH -- but the only source cited here is a single book in which this company gets mentioned but is not the principal subject, which is not enough all by itself, and the article has existed in this state since 2013, and been tagged as single-sourced since 2018, without ever having a second source added.  And on a WP:BEFORE search, I found a few brief glancing namechecks of its existence in The Globe , but nothing substantive or detailed enough to make up the difference: mostly what I found was coverage about sick or dead people who had been employees of the company, not coverage about the company.  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 02:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Per the included source, the company seems to have been more commonly called Northern Trading Company .   I got some more hits, especially newspaper hits, under this name.  Ravendrop 05:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fair enough.  Nice catch, and I can corroborate that the sourcing indeed improves if I search for "trading" instead of "traders".  Consider this withdrawn.  Bearcat ( talk ) 17:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Rob Yang: His acting is not significantly covered to support an encyclopedic biography.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 04:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 10:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep his leading role in American Rust plus starring roles in Succession and Rabbit Hole , along with the totality of his other guest/recurring roles in other notable TV shows and movies seem to meet WP:NACTOR #1.  For reliable stories, I've found these that aren't in the article: Rob Yang Boards Paramount+’s Espionage Drama ‘Rabbit Hole’ (Exclusive) , ‘Succession’ Star Rob Yang Joins BBC Spy Drama ‘The Capture’, Filming On Second Season Underway , TV Talk at TCA: ‘American Rust’ actor talks season 2 , 'It Was Like A Master Class Watching Jeff Daniels & Maura Tierney: Rob Yang On Showtime's 'American Rust' , 'Rabbit Hole:' Rob Yang & Enid Graham on Throwing Out Your Theories & Working With Kiefer Sutherland, the Genre Master , 'Rabbit Hole' Star Rob Yang Teases What to Expect From Season Finale (Exclusive) , Rabbit Hole's Cast Dishes on Crafting Their Complex Ensemble .  Some of them are primarily interviews but together with meeting NACTOR they can help build a full article.  Skynxnex ( talk ) 14:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks great.  I'll withdraw this nomination.  Thank you, Skynxnex !  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 23:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Database Nation: Merge/redirect or redirect to author is a possible WP:ATD .  This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 10:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  This book does not have anything to do with music, not sure why the nominator mentions WP:MUSICBIO .  This book satisfies WP:NBOOK .  From Google Scholar, I found this , this , this , there are more.  These sources are independent and are sufficient to establish the notability.  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 11:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdraw nomination per Deltaspace's comments - my error.  Thanks, Boleyn ( talk ) 15:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Marmara Park: Current sources are primary; WP:BEFORE search is complicated by the Marmara Park Avenue Hotel, but nothing that meets GNG comes up.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Turkey .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Here are the links of WP:GNG and WP:NCORP [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] QalasQalas ( talk ) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks for sharing these.  Withdrawn Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 11:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
CoRoT-15b: So less!  So I think it should be deleted or put into a draft.  117daveawesome ( talk ) 08:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 26 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : there appears to be enough sources to build out an article on this topic.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I recently added some more content and sources to the article, suggesting it be moved to CoRoT-15 if kept since it's now about the binary system and not just the brown dwarf.  User:117daveawesome then moved the article to this title and removed the AfD template , so the nomination could be considered withdrawn.  SevenSpheres ( talk ) 15:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : A useful article with a detailed infobox with enough sources even though it's just a stub.  Je Bon Ser ( talk | sign ) 15:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
J.P. Turner & Company: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance , Companies ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Jamaicans of English descent: Omnis Scientia ( talk ) 19:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment What is going on here, Omnis Scientia , why are you moving the article and AFD page?  This should have been done before putting together an AFD, not during an AFD.  Now, this AFD page title includes an article title that is different from the article named in nomination.  I think this should be procedurally closed and a new AFD filed.  L iz Read!  Talk!  00:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Liz , I'll be honest, I have no idea what I was thinking when I did that.  Will open a new AFD.  Omnis Scientia ( talk ) 09:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect both titles ( Jamaicans of English descent and English Jamaicans ) to British Jamaicans .  BD2412 T 00:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Hiltz Squared Media Group: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  This article has been here since 2007.  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 02:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , Television , Companies ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Innovate BC: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Business ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Yorkville University: I can’t find any RS for this except some PR pieces.  Some articles have a passing mention of the existence of the university but that’s it.  NM 01:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Update: I found one .  Is that enough?  NM 01:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  NM 01:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Steve Williams (rugby union, born 1970): Primefac ( talk ) 12:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Sports , Rugby union ,  and Wales .  Primefac ( talk ) 12:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep A 28-match international career usually brings coverage, and there is sourcing in this , this and others.  With the majority of his career played when online sourcing was limited, it's likely there will be more offline.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep.  As said above, probably more offline, but there’s some content that can be used to expand beyond stub article.  RodneyParadeWanderer ( talk ) 09:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just to follow up, added significant number of sources from his playing and coaching career.  Should be enough to meet notability requirements.  RodneyParadeWanderer ( talk ) 18:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Ghanchi (Muslim): Has been unsourced for long.  Should be deleted and content, if anything appears useful, should be moved to Ghanchi.  Admantine123 ( talk ) 05:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India .  Admantine123 ( talk ) 05:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] After I reverted it to last best version, i realised that it holds some importance to be included in Wikipedia.  I want to withdraw this nomination.  Tagging admin Novem Linguae . - Admantine123 ( talk ) 05:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please bold your ! vote of nom withdrawn PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 18:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Pakistan , Gujarat ,  and Rajasthan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Nomination withdrawn : It was a two line article when i nominated it for delition.  But, when i went through its past.  The older version when it was just created, i found it in good state then.  Actually, many articles like this were disrupted over the time by vandals.  Hence, I don't think delition is required. - Admantine123 ( talk ) 19:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
International Business Initiatives: Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , Management ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Intrafish: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , News media , Companies , Environment , Singapore , Norway , England , Chile , New York ,  and Washington .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Great British Nuclear: I've proposed the BNFL page is moved to here, until then this article should probably be deleted.  Find out more: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/great-british-nuclear Dreichh ( talk ) 11:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Withdrawn by nominator - page made into redirect whilst parallel move discussion.  Dreichh ( talk ) 08:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC) continues on BNFL page [ reply ] Redirect As creator, I wasn't aware of the tangled histories of Britain's nuclear projects when I created the page.  No Swan So Fine ( talk ) 11:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Dreichh : This should solve the issue (and allow the move discussion to continue).  I suggest withdrawing ( WP:WDAFD ) this deletion request and just changing Great British Nuclear to a redirect for now.  {{replyto| SilverLocust }} ( talk ) 23:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm inclined to agree, will do that for now.  Dreichh ( talk ) 08:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Unbeatable (game show): with no sources, and no significant coverage of the article.  Jeffhardyfan08 ( talk ) 21:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Entertainment ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is a quiz show on BBC One, the most popular television channel in the UK.  I am RedoStone ( talk ) 21:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Article has had sources added to it that I think more than adequately establishes WP:GNG .  Seems likes there are plenty of more sources out there that can be used to expand and improve the article.  - Navarre0107 ( talk ) 22:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - as is, article currently has sources that meet GNG.  matt91486 ( talk ) 12:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
Hoyland Fox: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 04:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn
International Association for the Study of Silk Road Textiles: No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 05:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Organizations ,  and Archaeology .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: withdrawn