hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ken Smollen : Irish Democratic Party , the microparty he was chairman of, it barely notable, but we can leave for a separate discussion.  Having been elected only at council level, and not having received significant more than incidental press coverage, I don't think he satisfies WP:POLITICIAN .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 10:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Ireland .  Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 10:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:POLITICIAN , not a notable local councillor.  Spleodrach ( talk ) 11:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Per nom and the reasons set-out when tagging this for NBIO/NPOL reasons some time ago , I don't see how NPOL or SIGCOV are met.  Local politician (who unsuccessfully contested national election) has had only the same level of incidental/passing coverage we might expect for any similar such candidate.  Perhaps even less.  If not deleted, at the very least title should be redirected to Irish Democratic Party (as founding this small group seems to be only claim to notability beyond any other local office holder).  Guliolopez ( talk ) 11:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing here is "inherently" notable under WP:NPOL at all — county councillors aren't inherently notable just for existing, unsuccessful national election candidates aren't inherently notable just for existing, founders of minor political parties aren't inherently notable just for existing, and on and so forth — but the volume and depth of referencing here is not sufficient to earn him any special "more notable than the norm for those levels of political activity" pass either.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NRDS Dhamdhama : Sources are primary.  No significant coverage.  It includes very promotional content.  Saurabh Saha 01:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Assam .  Saurabh Saha 01:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not seeing any supporting references.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 05:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per @ Indefensible .  Okoslavia ( talk ) 12:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks supporting references.  Divesome ( talk ) 14:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ChainGPT : A WP:before search on gnews and DDG found only press releases and dubious crypto websites, with passing mentions scattered about.  Ca talk to me!  10:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions .  Ca talk to me!  10:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCRYPTO , per nom.  Coverage consists of press releases and articles/mentions solely in crypto-centric news organizations.  Mooonswimmer 12:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - on the rationale clearly expressed by

Discussion outcome: delete
Ganj Konar : Hongsy ( talk ) 14:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Reference #1 is the official Census of Iran .  If a town is listed on their spreadsheet for this region (#08 in this case), then it's officially recognized per WP:GEOLAND and therefore notable.  @ Hongsy , is Ganj Konar listed?  Checking references is part of WP:BEFORE .  Thanks, -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ A. B. - same comment as elsewhere regarding the history of creation of these articles and abadi being explicitly excluded from GEOLAND.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails WP:V .  There is simply no way of verifying the existence of this "village" provided in the article.  This is listed in the census as a abadi , which Carlossuarez46 negligently interpreted as "village", when in reality abadi are often just named location around which Iranian census takers count the census, meaning that many of them are actually bridges, pumps, factories, etc.  FOARP ( talk ) 10:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  FOARP , thanks for letting me straight about abadis and Hongsy , thanks for your work cleaning up this mess.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete easy call for all the reasons others have mentioned above.  Delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 20:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of tallest buildings in Visakhapatnam : The entire list is non notable entries and is poorly sourced with only 2 sources.  LibStar ( talk ) 03:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture , Lists ,  and Andhra Pradesh .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak delete .  This one does not have any coverage in English, so as far as I can tell and does not meet NLIST.  My Telugu is nonexistant though, so I'm not confident — siro χ o 09:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Myth of superabundance : I believe that the content that remains would find a better home on the Stewart Udall page itself as a subsection or as a brief mention beside his published works.  Iljhgtn ( talk ) 04:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.  Samoht27 ( talk ) 05:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination, WP:ONESOURCE .  Orange sticker ( talk ) 10:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete One source is original research.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Maltas : Media coverage reads like paid PR.  KH-1 ( talk ) 02:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  KH-1 ( talk ) 02:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers .  Heart (talk) 02:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete under G3.  I'm pretty confident that this is—at least partially—a hoax.  His roles are only found on IMDb, which is unreliable.  Per IMDb, this guy played a vizier in Fetih 1453 (2012).  Obviously super realistic that a 12 year-old plays a high ranking minister in a movie, right?  Anyway, I still went through the end credits of the movie and, you know it, no one is credited as "vezier" and he's not mentioned in another role either.  In Aile Arasında (2017) he played as the head of the neighbourhood, also an implausible role for his age.  Sources in the article have multiple red flags that give away their true side (paid-for nonsense).  I know for a fact that Sabah and Takvim (both a part of Turkuvaz Media Group ) do promotional sources.  Ref 6 from Timeturk is a "Kimdir?" source which are considered to be unreliable on the Turkish Wikipedia.  ~Styyx Talk ?  13:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per Styyx. -- Kadı Message 08:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Battle of Nirmohgarh (1702) : Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 13:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The Encyclopedia of Sikhism mentions a battle at Nirmohgarh , though apparently in 1700 rather than 1702.  We don't appear to have an article on Nirmohgarh at all, though clearly it is a place that existed, of some significance.  Also mentioned in this book , and here , apparently again at a somewhat earlier date.  BD2412 T 14:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete the place may well have existed, there may have been a battle there, but this article does not seem to be about those, and is thus OR.  Slatersteven ( talk ) 14:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , as per Slatersteven-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk ) 16:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 14:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as lacking proper sourcing to be verifiable, Mccapra ( talk ) 18:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per previous.  A battle may have occurred at this location but sources don't back it being this one at this date.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 11:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Reviewed the sources in the version before all were removed and I could not verify them.  The year and location of the battle is also questionable given from the search by editor BD2412.  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Vincinni : Draft contested on my talk page.  If anybody wishes to skip this, it likely qualifies for WP:A7 deletion, but I wasn't sure if that was appropriate since this was moved to draft and back.  ASUKITE 12:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and North Macedonia .  ASUKITE 12:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , if not speedy, per nom.  This is the only (even partly) sigcov I found (appears to be made in collaboration with Vincinni though), failing WP:GNG .  NotAGenious ( talk ) 14:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The company does verify see here , but it fails WP:COMPANY for lack of substantive coverage.   Apparently their biscuits (cookies) are imported to the US, among other countries.  -- Bejnar ( talk ) 14:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sandeep Chatterjee : However, despite my efforts, I couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources.  As a result, the article doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR , suggesting that it may be too soon to have an article about them.  GSS 💬 16:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  GSS 💬 16:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify and WP:WAIT for them to have a break, methinks.  There's a good chance of him eventually being notable, so, it should be left as a draft until (if) it happens.  DarmaniLink ( talk ) 16:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable secondary parts in a few films, not meeting ACTOR.  I wouldn't bother sending this to draft, nothing to indicate this is a rising star.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Jharkhand-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : could be speedy deleted as A7 Tehonk ( talk ) 23:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Sources aren't enough to show WP:NACTOR being met Ravensfire ( talk ) 22:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Krankschaft : Being the backing band of someone with a Wikipedia page and having members with Wikipedia pages does not make this band notable as notability is not inherited.  A look online for significant coverage doesn't yield much - a post on jericsmith.com is a self-published blog, and I'm unable to find anything else substantial.  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and England .  InDimensional ( talk ) 11:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : without sources.  Nothing came up in Google.  RolandSimon ( talk ) 21:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Dastak Welfare and Development Organization : Fails WP:GNG as well.  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 19:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions .  — Saqib ( talk | contribs ) 19:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Politics , Education ,  and Environment .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article that doesn't meet WP:NCORP .  The problem of WP:SIGCOV is alarming and I may be justified to say WP:MILL .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  11:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Embassy of the United States, Vientiane : Instead, they deal with bilateral relations, and articles covering that phenomenon already exist.  I am also nominating the following related pages: Embassy of the United States, Majuro ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Riga ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, La Paz ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Embassy of the United States, Djibouti City ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) — Biruitorul Talk 19:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Africa , Laos , Latvia , Bolivia ,  and United States of America .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete all most of the content in these articles is actually about the bilateral relations not the actual embassy itself.  LibStar ( talk ) 22:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
IC 3441 : C messier ( talk ) 10:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : not notable.  Praemonitus ( talk ) 13:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠 ) 00:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mbalano : It is not a "town"; at most it is a few houses.  The author's obsession with climate does not help.  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 08:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Africa and Nigeria .  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 08:36, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep a WP:POPULATED town that seems to have a postal code [38] [39] — siro χ o 10:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Siroxo are those links reliable sources, and do they constitute legal recognition?  The second one seems to be a list of unofficial neighbourhoods that fall into a certain postal code.  Per WP:POPULATED , "populated places without legal recognition" should have "non-trivial coverage by their name in multiple, independent reliable sources".  ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk ) 10:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - listed at List of villages in Abia State in the Imenyi district within the Isuikwuato local government area.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 14:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] at this point, delete without prejudice to recreation if actual reliable sources are provided.  Frankly, a quick sampling of other Nigerian towns/villages doesn't show any that don't have sourcing problems, but this is assembled entirely out of clickbait.  Looking at GMaps is not encouraging: there is a group of buildings here, but it is not isolated enough from its surroundings to convince me that it is a distinct settlement.  Mangoe ( talk ) 16:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 10:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The thresholds for populated places are low, but it needs to be verifiably shown that this place  1. exists and  2. has some legal recognition, and neither of those has been done here; accordingly, this fails WP:GEOLAND .  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 20:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rabija Dervishi : All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1 , 2 , and 3 .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and North Macedonia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 20:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- per above. - Tumbuka Arch ( talk ) 08:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Southern Artery : The state highways that use this road have their own articles.  Rs chen 7754 02:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Massachusetts .  Rs chen 7754 02:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Convert to set index page pointing to the Massachusetts Route 3A and Massachusetts Route 53 articles.  The Southern Artery itself isn’t notable for an individual article but a set index page linking to the state highways that follow the road is fine.  Dough 4872 02:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 02:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as explained above seems fine.  This road doesn't seem notable, no sources found for GNG, other than mentions of things along this road.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 17:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete