hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Dancing on Ice: The Tour: PROD was removed.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Sports .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just a note that WP:FANCRUFT is an essay and in the essay it states, regarding the use of the term in AFD deletion rationale, However, this usage is not a substitute for a well-reasoned argument based on existing Wikipedia policies.  L iz Read!  Talk!  00:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Dancing on Ice should be given consideration as a merge or redirect target.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Honest question: What elements from this article should be merged over to the Dancing on Ice main article?  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The lead and General section can be moved to Dancing_on_Ice#Dancing_on_Ice:_The_Tour .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 21:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Done.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:19, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So now we just need to close this discussion with proposed outcome of WP:REDIRECT Dancing on Ice: The Tour to Dancing on Ice .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 20:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can redirect an article; I do not know how to close one of these.  It was also brought to my attention after I transferred the lede and first paragraph over to Dancing on Ice that it was all unsourced.  In fact, this entire article is unsourced.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Discussions at AFD can be closed by and administrator or uninvolved editor.  Neither of us qualify.  Also, it is considered disruptive do any structural changes such as redirecting before the discussion is closed.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I have not done anything beyond transfer the text you recommended over to the Dancing on Ice main article, and clean up the grammar.  I will not do anything else to this AFD beyond dealing with my stalker below.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Dancing on Ice .  It's all unsourced, so not currently worth merging any content there.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 14:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rosehill metro station: No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.   Regarding SNG, rail stations are not presumed wp:notable .   Further this one does not exist, it is just planned.  Coverage regarding the station is just that one is planned.  Material could be a paragraph in the   Sydney Metro West rail line article.  North8000 ( talk ) 14:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations , Transportation ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This station has not been officially confirmed to be included in the Sydney Metro West project yet, and may never be built.  It is only a proposal at this stage.  As such, there is very little in the way of sources.  Steelkamp ( talk ) 15:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect per nom.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 12:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sydney Metro West , entirely too soon for this article to exist, the line's planned opening date is 2032.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Sydney Metro West , agreed as it was only announced and planned given the opening date is quite a while away.  GarbageKarate ( talk ) 02:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
JD Meeboer: Fails WP:SIGCOV , WP:BIO .  scope_creep Talk 07:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Television , Internet ,  and Canada .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 09:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Next Star .  Original creator of the article here, I say redirect to The Next Star , as he was one of the contestants of the show.  You make a good point on the subject's notability.  This one is on me for adding the article too soon or was not notable enough to have its own article.  Shout4Serenity ( talk ) 14:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Kim Il-nam (footballer): Simione001 ( talk ) 00:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 00:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and North Korea .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – to Football at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads#North Korea as WP:AtD .  Svartner ( talk ) 23:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to 76' squads article per above.  Not enough individual coverage to warrant an article.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 17:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as a valid WP:ATD , which is what we have also done for tonnes of non-notable Olympians.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Adams County Industrial Development Authority: AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Pennsylvania .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Business .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] DELETE - WP:NOTADVERT — Maile ( talk ) 02:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Adams County, Pennsylvania as new Business section or subsection under Government as WP:ATD .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and Move .  The organization, together with some other related organizations, has rebranded as Adams Economic Alliance .  I added some references for the new name.  I suggest moving the article to Adams Economic Alliance .  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 18:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete So what its rebranded.  Its a business accelerator.  No indication of signifance, and importantly the refs are WP:PRIMARY failing WP:ORGIND , no coverage fails WP:NCORP .  scope_creep Talk 13:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Vandals / Assorted Jelly Beans: toweli ( talk ) 23:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs , Music ,  and California .  toweli ( talk ) 23:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Vandals discography#Extended plays : found no reliable coverage in digital archives.  Assorted Jelly Beans is a redirect to a band member's article which doesn't even mention this split, and the target I chose appears to be the only place which does.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 23:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Vandals discography#Extended plays .  I couldn't find reliable sources to pass WP:GNG .  Suonii180 ( talk ) 22:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Thrasam: Film doesn't seem to pass WP:NFILM , though sources may be available in a different language.  There's a contested PROD earlier this month.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 03:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 03:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Malayalam films of 1981 , where the film is mentioned, and add there 1, 2  or all of the 3  sources that are currently mentioned, for verification. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank) 06:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
News 23: No notable hits in GBooks, GNews Archives, and GNews.  Be prepared for a lot of false positives in your search due to how common "News 23" is as a phrase.  Redirect to List of programs broadcast by Studio 23 as plausible target per WP:ATD .  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Television ,  and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 00:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of programs broadcast by Studio 23 Yet another rebadged ABS-CBN newscast whose only difference was its demographic.  Nate • ( chatter ) 02:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Venture One diving accident: The cited sources are the report about the accident and a book listing people who died of diving accidents in 20th century.  The only other coverage of the incident that I found is this site that lists the event among other diving accidents.  Found no suitable place to redirect this article to.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 14:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Scotland .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 14:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No historical coverage of the event, nothing in Gbooks or scholar.  Sourcing is almost entirely from a tech report on the accident; doesn't make it notable, it's an accident investigation required by law.  I can't find any sort of lasting effect of the event.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I agree that it is concerning that the article is almost entirely sourced from the fatal accident report.  I had a quick look to see if I could find newspaper coverage and the incident was reported in The Glasgow Herald (11 May 1977) the day after it occurred , largely focusing on the fact that it was unclear why Craig Hoffman had collapsed, though this was a relatively small story on p.3.  This on its own is unlikely to be enough to satisfy notability requirements, but I do wonder if there was significant coverage in other news material or anything in any histories of the North Sea Oil industry.  Dunarc ( talk ) 20:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This isn't listed at Cormorant oilfield#Accidents .  If this activity were related to that field, then it should be briefly included there, and would be a redirect target given apparent lack of sigcov and WP:SUSTAINED .  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 05:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Redirect is a potential AtD, but it needs to be added at the targt to be suitable.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 18:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 02:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect and add a brief mention to Cormorant oilfield per above.  PARAKANYAA ( talk ) 04:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Cormorant oilfield#Accidents and add a mention there.  No significant coverage, and the article is essentially a regurgitation of the official report.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 19:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of educational organisations in North Paravur: WP:DIRECTORY applies too with no WP:SIGCOV.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , Lists , India ,  and Kerala .  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge Redirect to North_Paravur#Educational_organisations .  Changed my vote to redirect because I do not think it makes any better to merge the list that fails significant coverage with no reliable secondary independent sources and fails WP:NLIST .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to North Paravur : As nominator, I won't mind a redirect to the parent town article either.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 12:56, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dirk B. Paloutzian: Let'srun ( talk ) 00:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 00:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BLP1E , no other secondary/independent/reliable/sigcov sources.  — siro χ o 01:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BLP1E .  I don't see any coverage other than the nomination accouncement.  APK whisper in my ear 06:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 06:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Fails WP:BLP1E ; no coverage in reliable sources beyond WP:ROUTINE .  WJ94 ( talk ) 12:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Alternative proposal : Merge all otherwise non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees into a single article along the lines of Unsuccessful Donald Trump judicial nominations .  We can preserve a truncated form of the data in one place, without reaching individual notability concerns.  BD2412 T 21:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Presuming there is SIGCOV of that topic I'm fine with that (i.e. as long as it meets something like WP:NLIST .  Closing admin might consider draftifying/userfying such articles to that end.  There is a similar article at Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies but I think it serves a different purpose, but it may fit.  — siro χ o 21:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think a redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies makes more sense, seeing as there is already a description of the WP:BLP1E for this nominee and the other non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees, along with details about specific dates regarding the nomination process.  As it is, the list of otherwise non-notable judicial nominees for Trump is fairly small and I don't think there is the needed SIGCOV.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm fine with a redirect as well.  — siro χ o 19:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Ifor Fielding: Redirect to Football at the 1936 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads#_Great_Britain as an ATD.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Olympics ,  and Wales .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  I think a WP:BLAR would have been fine here.  Clearly doesn't meet the NOLY part of WP:ATHLETE , and that is all that is asserted for notability.  Not seeing any other sources such that it would pass under other criteria.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 07:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 13:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - As per proposal.  Shazback ( talk ) 04:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Alternative versions of the Hulk: References are 100% comic books (primary fiction sources).  The topic fails WP:GNG and is nothing but a plot summary.  At best, we can consider SOFTDELETE by redirecting this to Hulk (no objection to merging a bit of plot summary if anyone think it is relevant).  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Comics and animation .  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 09:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hulk#Alternative versions of Hulk as a soft delete.  I can see this possibly being a notable article, but it is currently entirely plot summary.  It needs a rewrite.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 09:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hulk#Alternative versions of Hulk .  It currently falls short of NOTPLOT, and is not shown to meet LISTN.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 13:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hulk#Alternative versions of Hulk in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE .  -- Rtkat3 ( talk ) 14:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Hulk#Alternative versions of Hulk per Rtkat3.  Looks to be a non-notable fork, but this is an WP:ATD .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 00:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to aforementioned page.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 04:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Georgians in Spain: Small group in a country of 47 million.  Wikipedia is not for every intersection of nationalities that exists on the planet.  Geschichte ( talk ) 10:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Georgia (country) ,  and Spain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Georgian diaspora There are a lot of articles on ethnic groups in Spain , but others contain significantly more information about history of immigration, organisations, culture, etc.  -- Random person no 362478479 ( talk ) 11:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : As opposed to the other Iberia , Georgians in this one are just not notable.  No reliable sources seem to exist on this group, thus there is no significant coverage Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect