hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Mumtaz Mustafa : HistoriesUnveiler ( talk ) 22:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Looks like we're cleaning up non-notable members of the Punjab Bar Council today.  MNewnham ( talk ) 19:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Pakistan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lacks significant coverage.  41.99.221.13 ( talk ) 20:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] keep : He is a prominent lawyer leader since long and he is now elected member of National Assembly of Pakistan in february 2024.  see https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php? StoryImage=12_02_2024_002_005 175.107.24.65 ( talk ) 06:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom.  Not notable.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN as an MP.  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 11:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep One newspaper article in Urdu language has already been translated into English.  Has 4 references from major newspapers of Pakistan, they all seem to work now.  In my view, meets WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG ...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 01:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep -- Ridiculous nomination. Meets WP:NPOL as a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan : Politicians ... who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. Central and Adams ( talk ) 03:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I also agree to keep , since after nomination he was elected as new MP on 2024 elections, we can now keep the article, attest update on the infobox is required. CSMention269 ( talk ) 06:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In fact he was elected before the nomination. Central and Adams ( talk ) 01:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment @ Liz : asked to revert my closure, have done so . Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 01:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Satisfies WP:NPOL , member of national parliament, overwhelming community consesus that presumed notability applies.  Regards, -- Goldsztajn ( talk ) 01:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Goldsztajn.  103.65.140.93 ( talk ) 11:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep MNA.  Panam2014 ( talk ) 15:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Agustín Fiorilli : The proposed garden covers all Argentine olympians.  Competing and nothing more does not earn you a pass on the GNG.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 17:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Olympics ,  and Argentina .  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 17:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not saying he's notable, but User:InvadingInvader deserves a WP:TROUT for trying to A7 speedy this two-time Olympian .  Someone with your experience should know better...  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 17:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I deserve it  – I should have prodded or AfD'd first.  Invading Invader ( userpage , talk ) 17:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A Darius Dhlomo article.  Had forgot about him.  Darius Dhlomo, Sander.v. Ginkel and Lugnuts - there's a trio for the history books.  That being said I found this good piece as well as this interview-heavy piece , this more-than-passing report on a swimming event and this report on a relay record ( that has since been beat ).  We get several details, such as Fiorilli's nickname being Rana, he was offered a berth at CA River Plate , etc.  Also, Pablo Abal told about being offered scholarships in the US .  For a 1996 swimmer, coverage would have been off the (current) internet.  Geschichte ( talk ) 18:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Since I think it should not be soft deleted, weak keep per above.  Geschichte ( talk ) 08:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Per the sources found above.  Seacactus 13 ( talk ) 15:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - good sourcing from User:Geschichte .  Llajwa ( talk ) 18:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  It's much better sourced than many similar articles here.  Also, some kind of a record could be taken in account.  Better Nuncio ( talk ) 08:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Dwayne Li : No indication of notability under SNG or GNG.   Of the sources, one has a few sentences on him winning Bronze in the ISU Junior Grand Prix and the others are databases on websites.  North8000 ( talk ) 17:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , China ,  and New Zealand .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : He's been selected to compete at the Olympics, so that has coverage [16] , [17] Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  In addition to the news items cited in the response above, here is the announcement from the 2024 New Zealand Olympic Committee [18] .  While he has yet to compete, given that he is the first New Zealander to compete in figure-skating at the Olympics, there will undoubtedly be significant coverage.  It is premature to delete.  Marshelec ( talk ) 19:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Here are some selected independent and reliable sources that each provide significant coverage of the subject: A (14 Oct 23): [19] .  B.  (6 Dec  23) [20] .  C. (30 Jan  24) [21] .  There are multiple other additional news items that provide a range of coverage.  In my view, the coverage of this subject meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV .  The coverage describes a sporting career, and is not limited to just a single event.  Marshelec ( talk ) 03:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep . He is the first New Zealander to medal in a JGP event and the winter youth olympics, he should be viewed as remarkable enough Sharontse121 ( talk ) 10:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep .  In ways of notability he certainly meets criteria, especially with recent Youth Olympic win but has very little articles on his page.  The page needs a massive upgrade.  All the 8 news articles that are on google added as references to the page would be a good start.  [22] -- Bennyaha ( talk ) 09:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify . Right now the coverage is solidly in ONEEVENT territory. Predictions about coverage during the Olympics are CRYSTAL--plenty of athletes have qualified and then never competed--and he does not meet the NSPORT criteria for figure skating.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 18:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Extensive coverage across all national media outlets in New Zealand following bronze medal at Youth Olympics.  Paora ( talk ) 10:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Jim Traue : Most of the sources are either self-published or include a passing mention of the subject.  ONZM is a relatively low-ranking national award.  The article fails WP:GNG .  WWGB ( talk ) 02:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and New Zealand .  WWGB ( talk ) 02:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Was chief librarian at Turnbull (1973–1990) and that gives a high enough profile that he'll get over the GNG bar.  Those chief librarians get an entry (usually, at least – haven't checked them all) in the Who's Who in New Zealand (e.g. his predecessor is included in the 10th edition), and that inclusion is generally considered enough to meet GNG.  Traue is listed in the 11th edition of this work, but interestingly, he was the editor for that edition, hence this aspect isn't quite as clear cut.  Either way, The Press is now online until 1989 and that'll provide some online sources for Traue.  Schwede 66 02:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  As suggested by Schwede66 , I've done an initial search of the Papers Past records under both Jim Traue and James Traue.  Most of the hits for Traue are him speaking on behalf of the library, e.g. to talk about library acquisitions , rather than coverage about him as the subject.  However, there are some relevant sources, which I've added to the article.  Chief librarian of the Turnbull is a notable position, given that it was in effect the national research library of New Zealand for many years (and still is today, as part of the National Library of New Zealand ), and to have held that position from 1973 to 1990 is impressive.  I'd expect that he is covered extensively in the 1995 book Turnbull, A Library and Its World by Rachel Barrowman ; although I don't have access to this source at the moment, this Evening Post review accessible via Proquest notes that Barrowman covers three phases of the library's development: "The third [phase] saw Jim Traue fight hard to transform the Turnbull into a research institution and to stave off the worst excesses of the National Library, to which the Turnbull had undergone a shotgun wedding."  I can see why it was nominated for deletion in the present state, but do think the subject is notable.  I've done a little bit of work on the article and hope to do more.  Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 22:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - listed in Who's Who in New Zealand , recipient of ONZM, so meets WP:ANYBIO criteria 1 and 3.  IdiotSavant ( talk ) 09:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Benjamin Tucker (civil servant) : RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 04:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Military , United Kingdom ,  and England .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 04:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : For those without Oxford DNB access, I believe this is more-or-less the same entry.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 05:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Have you considered WP:ANYBIO #3 @ RadioactiveBoulevardier ?  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 06:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Per there, conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 07:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's a good sign people might expect more than 4 words on why you may think it not likely to satisfy GNG though.  Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 07:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Easily meets WP:BASIC and possibly WP:GNG .  Added a couple of books as sources.  This is a historical biography (18th–19th century), so library books are your best bet for WP:BEFORE .  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 11:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  With an entry in the DNB, clearly meets WP:ANYBIO #3.  Since this was already cited in the article before it was nominated, WP:BEFORE applies.  -- Necrothesp ( talk ) 13:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:ANYBIO #3.  Mztourist ( talk ) 06:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per WP:ANYBIO #3.  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Cielquiparle.  Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 16:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Cielquiparle and WP:ANYBIO #3.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 19:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
The Mooknayak : If we searched " Mooknayak ", we get the Marathi newspaper Mooknayak, started by Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar in the year 1920.  But, there is name at some places but in-depth articles.  I think it is not suitable for Main space right now.  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 09:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  Youknowwhoistheman ( talk ) 09:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT 1(b) or 3, or keep per WP:GNG and sources in the article at the time of nomination, e.g. ‘Leading the voiceless’ - how low-caste Indian journalists are crowdfunding their own newsrooms ( Al Jazeera Journalism Review , February 2023), With Stories of Her Oppressed Community, a Journalist Takes Aim at the Walls of Caste ( New York Times , March 2023), and from a search: India: Dalit journalists give a voice to the marginalized ( DW , June 2023), In India, News Outlet Gives Voice to Low Castes , ( VOA , December 2023).  Beccaynr ( talk ) 10:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy keep per Beccaynr clearly passes WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 10:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep well sourced article meets GNG.  Tame Rhino ( talk ) 00:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Along the Way (Colbie Caillat album) : Beyond that, there are no reviews, and the only other coverage I've seen so far are interviews.  This was draftified while it was upcoming, and (possibly copy-paste) moved without getting the draft approved for mainspace, and I doubt it would've been.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 01:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions .  North America 1000 06:45, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - It's a surprise that a new album by such a big-name artist has so few reviews so far, but it has only been five days since the release date.  There is already a citation to American Songwriter which is reliable and probably enough to carry the article itself.  The album has also been profiled by Broadway World [32] , Atwood Magazine [33] , and NPR [34] (though that one is only an interview).  It has also been noticed by some segments of the Country community, such as [35] ].  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk ) 01:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Album has charted.  Noboyo ( talk | contributions ) 14:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Passes WP:SIGCOV per sources identified above.  4meter4 ( talk ) 23:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Van Powell : Although clearly pre-internet, and so harder to source, the presumption of notability is nevertheless absent - a minor figure with a minor role in minor productions.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature , Film , United States of America ,  and Georgia (U.S. state) .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Though the life details of Powell are scarce, his contributions in the early film industry and the popular genre of youth adventure books make him an important figure (and one previously almost forgotten).  Let us hope that others will contribute more (and perhaps other sources) to this article.  There are many pages with fewer sources and less information that remain on Wikipedia.  Strong keep.  Jcholaday ( talk ) 11:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Very Strong Keep .  Firstly, the page is not "almost entirely unsourced", only the citation style is unclear.  Secondly, I am not certain what "minor role" means in the current nomination, but Van Powell is a screenplay writer and I don't call this minor at all, personally.  Finally, Van Powell is a very notable personality in at least two domains, cinema and literature: Ardon Van Buren Powell, frequently credited as A. Van Buren Powell, for The Marriage Speculation for example; his contributions are verifiable; for most films credited for screenplay or story, for other for "picturizing" a story (or this kind of catalogues for a 1st check of his 47 film works); he is also a very notable young adult fiction author: easily verifiable ; example or here or here .  Last but not least, his Photoplay Synopsis (1919) is also an important book . - MY, OH MY!  (mushy yank) 09:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Agreed!  Jcholaday ( talk ) 12:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Donbas separatism : See ru:Википедия:К удалению/25 ноября 2015#Донбасский сепаратизм .  Aldij ( talk ) 12:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions .  Aldij ( talk ) 12:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The topic in itself is definitely notable.  And as far as I can see we don't have an article that would describe this phenomenon holistically.  Marcelus ( talk ) 09:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Disagree : Article can definitely be improved and expanded (especially the 21st century section) to make it of higher quality, but should not be deleted because it clearly discusses a note-worthy subject.  TeddyRoosevelt1912 ( talk ) 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
Irish Eyes : JJLiu112 ( talk ) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  JJLiu112 ( talk ) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Meets WP:NBOOK .  Reviewed in Kirkus , Publishers Weekly , The LA Times (via TWL) and Booklist (via TWL/Proquest) ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  16:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep based on the book reviews given above, which could be used to beef up the article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per above sources and lack of WP:BEFORE .  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - the article needs work but it meets notability standards per the sources given above.  DaniloDaysOfOurLives ( talk ) 05:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep
David R. Inglis : Andre 🚐 08:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Social science ,  and England .  Andre 🚐 08:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  The article was in terrible shape (I have trimmed a lot of unsourced and unverifiable information), and there were fewer reviews of his books than I might have expected.  But I think there's still a case for WP:AUTHOR , WP:PROF#C1 (citation counts 304 for Culture and everyday life , 292 for An invitation to social theory , 207 for "The body in sociology", and 164 for The uses of sport ) and maybe for WP:PROF#C8 (supposed founder of a notable journal).  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 22:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist, I think it would be helpful if the nominator reviewed the article since it's been improved.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep – Per David Eppstein improvements.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : greatly improved since the nomination.  Owen× ☎ 00:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep