Chargrill Charlie's: Noting the company’s website is a primary source and not independent.  Previous PROD removed by anon IP, possible WP:SOCKPUPPET , without addressing the issue of notability.  The article’s creator is currently blocked for disrupting other articles.  Anon IP is potentially working around current block.  Dan arndt ( talk ) 13:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies ,  and Australia .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 13:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Most of the issues raised in the nom are not themselves justification for deleting the article.  The current sourcing is poor but I have been able to find quite a bit of decent coverage such as this from the Financial Review , Mosman Living , Hospitality magazine , and the Sydney Morning Herald .  This was from a fairly quick search.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 18:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep : The article needs improving but a Google search found a number of sources that can contribute towards establishing notability under WP:NCORP .  GMH Melbourne ( talk ) 15:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Conducted a BEFORE and found some useful sources.  X ( talk ) 18:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to PAG Asia Capital .  This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .  "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  In plain English, this means that references cannot rely *only* on information provided by the company - such as what seems to be the case here where most of the references rely entirely on information from the execs or the company.  The references included above are thinly disguised promos or regurgitated company announcements or PR - I mean the articles in hospitality magazine (almost entirely consiste of quotes from company exec) and Goodfood (7 sentences, 2 of which are direct quotes) both use the same (PR supplied) pic even though they're written 3 years apart and neither of them come anywhere close to meeting ORGIND and CORPDEPTH.  None of the references come close and I cannot locate anything on this company that meets GNG/NCORP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HighKing ( talk • contribs ) 18:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: An analysis of the sources presented in this AfD would be helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Owen× ☎ 11:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Source assessment table: Source Independent?  Reliable?  Significant coverage?  Count source toward GNG ?  https://chargrillcharlies.com/about-us ✘ No https://www.businessnewsaustralia.com/articles/chargrill-charlie-s-acquired-by-owner-of-red-rooster--oporto.html ?  ?  Unknown https://www.afr.com/companies/retail/from-one-chicken-shop-to-a-private-equity-buyout-20230509-p5d6vb (not in article) ✔ Yes https://www.hospitalitymagazine.com.au/achieving-sustainable-growth-slow-steady-expansion/ (not in article) ?  ?  Unknown https://mosmanliving.com.au/chargrill-charlies-is-on-the-move/ (not in article) ?  ?  Unknown https://www.smh.com.au/goodfood/eating-out/chargrill-charlies-expands-across-sydneys-eastern-suburbs-20200731-h1ppoi.html (not in article) ✔ Yes https://www.broadsheet.com.au/melbourne/event/free-chicken-chargrill-charlies (not in article) ✔ Yes https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confidential/more-chicks-for-justin-bieber-in-sydney-and-this-time-hes-eating-em/news-story/a00718e1e33d00d58b7895bbe6415594 (not in article) ✔ Yes https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/dataroom/craveable-brands-sale-cooking-after-pag-buys-chargrill-charlies/news-story/cb9cb29ab2eec4c7561e91d9ad491440 (not in article) ✔ Yes https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confidential/push-to-get-chargrill-charlies-infamous-black-vip-card-extended-to-punters-not-just-vip/news-story/9bf04192df1beaa3e1371671c73f14d2 (not in article) ✔ Yes This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.  Created using {{ source assess table }} .  The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep