hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
May 2024 Massachusetts stabbings : There are possible issues with WP:SUSPECT and outside of the area it occurred, coverage seems limited (in a brief search just now all of the coverage I've found was already a month old, back to the week the event took place, and nothing since).  I would also be in favor of this going back to the drafts until further information is released.  Lindsey40186 (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conspiracy theories , Crime , Events , Connecticut ,  and Massachusetts .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Tragic, but doesn't seem to meet NEVENT , as there doesn't seem to be continued coverage .  Pi.1415926535 ( talk ) 23:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  may have jumped the gun a bit describes 95% of current events articles that are created.  Only a brief burst of news coverage, and Wikipedia is not a collection of news stories .  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 05:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Doesn't seem to be enough lasting significance for NEVENT.  will also drop a pet essay, WP:LASTINGCRIME .  — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : While this is certainly sad, the coverage seems limited and short-lived.  Wikipedia focuses on topics with enduring significance, and this doesn't appear to meet that criteria.  Waqar 💬 17:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pacific Century Regional Developments : Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect or redirect to Richard Li , though it might unbalance that article.  This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 15:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Singapore .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 16:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - this is just a corporate fact sheet.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohammed Al-Omran : I can't find any significant coverage at all when searching in Arabic and the foreign language Wikipedia articles about him also contain no meaningful coverage.  Seems to fail WP:SPORTBASIC #5 by some way.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Saudi Arabia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No games, no sources, no substance.  Geschichte ( talk ) 22:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the failure of WP:SPORTBASIC .  Playing 1.5 games does not qualify one for a Wikipedia article.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 03:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 23:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mathematical challenges : Now (following an apparent copyvio of some encyclopedia.com article), it's sourced, but just barely.  However, this isn't my main concern.  Rather, I'm concerned that the article is quite unfocused and off-topic .  It veers between math problems given in school, math competitions, and open conjectures, with no particular attention given to each.  Since these topics are quite disparate and have little in common, I don't think there's any way to make this into a proper article, so I suggest deletion .  However, I'd be open to replacing this article with a disambiguation page or setindex, or redirecting it somewhere.  Duckmather ( talk ) 19:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions .  Duckmather ( talk ) 19:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unsourced, rambling essay that conflates various unrelated topics.   Nothing could really be written about this subject without either violating WP:NOTDICT or duplicating the content of other articles.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disambig , there are a number of notable mathematical challenges as linked in the article.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 23:49, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Disambig (preferred, if possible) or Delete ... the article is really quite disjointed.  Not sure there's much saveable other than the list of challenges.  ++ Lar : t / c 14:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Would anyone volunteer to turn this article into a disambiguation page?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : it's too ambiguous a term for a disambiguation page.  A mathematical "challenge" could be a competition, an unsolved problem or a solved problem.  In other words, a mathematical challenge is maths.  — Bilorv ( talk ) 23:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non of the two references makes the case for the article.  Cinadon 36 00:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adidas Oceaunz : signed, Rosguill talk 01:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Football .  signed, Rosguill talk 01:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 01:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO, outside of FIFA and the FIFA store, it's all press releases or blogs.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 01:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Control Tower Team: Creating and Maintaining Confluence Pages : Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 20:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 20:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , for the reasons given above.  Also, it seems to me that the article is essentially promotional.  JBW ( talk ) 21:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE , which is policy Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Monolithic (band) : They have a generic name which makes it difficult, but even including the band members name brings up nothing.  The sole claim to fame is winning an "American Synthpop Award", which does not seem like a notable or legitimate award.  Most of the article is dedicated to the career of its solo member outside of the band.  Additionally there might be a COI here.  InDimensional ( talk ) 21:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music ,  and United States of America .  InDimensional ( talk ) 21:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CM Elangovan : DareshMohan ( talk ) 16:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep have done 3 more films and have realible links.  Comment Entire article relies entirely on one interview.  Passing mentions add no notability.  Rule Result The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or No The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; or No The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.  In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series); or No The person's work (or works) has:  (a) become a significant monument,  (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition,  (c) won significant critical attention, or  (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.  No DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Please sign comments in deletion discussions.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - very, very low-key films + limited sourcing on wide coverage.  Neutral Fan ( talk ) 14:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  WP:TOOSOON .  May be notable in the future, but not now.  ~ Anachronist ( talk ) 00:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
NicheStack TCP/IPv4 : This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.  Boleyn ( talk ) 05:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sath (Student Organisation) : Contested draftification, so we're here.  Insufficient sourcing, likely TOOSOON, but creator objects to draftspace.  They're active in multiple colleges, so no obvious merger target.  Star Mississippi 23:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Education .  Star Mississippi 23:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Does not satisfy organizational notability or general notability .   There is nothing in the article that explains to a reader why the organization is notable.   An article should speak for itself , and it should not be necessary for a reader to look at the references, although the references are required.   (I have not checked the references.)  The article also contains soapboxing (apparently anti-Modi) that would need to be trimmed if the organization were notable, but the organization is not notable.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 00:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agrees with the nominator and Robert McClenon.  -| Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi ( talk ) 12:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC) | [ reply ] Comment full disclosure, I just blocked page creator 31 hours for continuing to spam the article across the project.  Star Mississippi 12:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have alerted the (blocked) page creator of India-Pakistan sanctions for when they come off block.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 15:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 10:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 06:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bill Troiano : If you go through the edit history it looks like the page was written by the subject, so might also be WP:PROMO .  InDimensional ( talk ) 22:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - He is mentioned in this Windsor Star article on Guy Lombardi.   The "Quartet moves tuba to center stage" item which is paywalled  looked like it might have some coverage.   I was able to see the full article via Wikipedia Library access and it turns out to be part of a community events type of article.   I am unable to find any coverage in reliable sources to establish notability; only more announcements about playing at local libraries and such.  -- Whpq ( talk ) 12:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Autobiographical page of a local community musician/school teacher without any significant RS coverage.  My search found him mentioned in some articles in the Suffolk County, NY editions of Newsday, but only in association with the Long Island Tuba Quartet or local community events -- nothing in depth about him. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article should be deleted for all the reasons stayed above. Go4thProsper ( talk ) 01:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per specifically WP:NBAND and generally WP:SIGCOV . There is scant coverage in the current version of the page, and almost nothing in Google News . He has virtually no social media presence, outside of YouTube. That's surprising. Bearian ( talk ) 19:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom etc   -- Devoke water 20:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hymn of Valledupar : It doesn't even have a corresponding Spanish article.  Maybe some of this could go to Wikisource?  I don't know.  No sign of notability in any way.  Heck it's entry on Wikisource got deleted due to WP:COPYVIO concerns.  Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 23:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Colombia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : as a long-time resident of Colombia, I know that every departamento (state), every city, and even some towns have their own local "national anthem", which is what this is.. .  for those outside of the country, it's just something Colombian mayors and governors feel very passionately about, that every place needs its own anthem.  But the notability outside of the city or departamento is zero.  The nominator is a Colombian himself, so he will know just how little notability these anthems have outside of annual parades.  Richard3120 ( talk ) 00:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Beside being unable to verify much of the information , and a potential copyright violation , this is a local political song, which like local officials, we almost always delete.  Bearian ( talk ) 17:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sundance Air Venezuela : A Google search finds no coverage what so ever.  Kaseng55 ( talk ) 20:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Aviation ,  and Venezuela .  Kaseng55 ( talk ) 20:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Meets WP:GNG : [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] .  -- NoonIcarus ( talk ) 00:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  El Carabobeno repeats information provided in a radio interview by the president of the company and has no other information, has no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND.  Also insufficient in-depth information, fails CORPDEPTH Sumarium article discusses the exact same radio interview and this article fails NCORP criteria for the same reason as above El Diario article - same radio interview, same failure.  It is also only 2 sentences and the second sentence is devoted to a quote from the president.  Banca y Negocios article - same as above.  Fails CORPDEPTH/ORGIND.  800 Noticias same failures as above.  Notable that all of these articles report on the same interview, most received the information from the radio broadcaster, all are dated within a day of each other, all fail ORGIND/CORPDEPTH.  I am unable to locate any sources that meet our criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 13:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Additional analysis of the proposed source material would be very helpful.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hiroko Tsuji (musician) : It appears that all the claims of importance are dubious or promotional (e.g. Global Music Awards) and I'm unaware of independent reliable sources.  See also the corresponding Japanese AFD ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/辻寛子 (deleted based on editors evaluating awards/honours and looking for other sources in Japanese).  All content was contributed in 2016 by User:Orugoro 's multiple accounts plus an IP 198.24.221.114.  Adumbrativus ( talk ) 09:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan and Bands and musicians .  Adumbrativus ( talk ) 09:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : the relationship with the Kento Masuda ( AfD ) article is not very clear (they certainly appeared together at some point), but the content and style is extremely similar, and as for KM, none of the references withstand scrutiny.  @ Michitaro , Nuraa.sinora , Loriendrew , Kaori Muraji ,  and Tal Essen : Pinging other editors who have made significant edits to either of these articles.  Imaginatorium ( talk ) 05:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The Japanese AFD was based on very careful and considered investigation of her recordings and awards.  The conclusion should be the same here.  Michitaro ( talk ) 17:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet notability standards of WP:MUSICBIO or even GNG.  Even after article overhall, all that is left is promotional grasping. -- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏ (ring-ring) 15:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete