85th Plenary Session of the Indian National Congress : — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 17:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).   I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 23 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 18:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics , India ,  and Chhattisgarh .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete : Based on my check, I searched for in-depth coverage from multiple independent, reliable sources to establish notability, but I couldn’t find any.  The sources I found were just passing mentions and cannot meet WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 18:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC) * Delete .  3 sources on the page and none have significant coverage to warrant a full fledged page on the subject.  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 14:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article needs substantial cleanup but as the second-largest political party by membership in the democratic world a meeting like this is likely to be notable, in a similar sense to 2024 Democratic National Convention .  We even have an article for the tiny 2024 Libertarian National Convention .  The US Libertarian Party has less than 1 million members, the Indian National Congress has 95 million.  I've conducted a few quick searches and located quite a bit of coverage from national newspapers in India such as this from The Hindu and this from the Times of India .  Google News searches produce a lot of results , too.  It appears the conference was quite significant for the party based on the coverage.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 16:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : The Times of India can’t establish notability at all as per WP:TOI Grab Up - Talk 16:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep , from a quick glance there is ample in-depth coverage in English media outlets.  There is scope to expand the article, and outline the policy shifts that materialized in or through the event.  It's worth noting that this is the national convention of a party that pulled 119 million votes in the last national election.  -- Soman ( talk ) 11:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - examples of in-depth coverage at India Today , NDTV , National Herald , The Wire , Business Standard , Business Standard , The Hindu , Hindustan Times .  -- Soman ( talk ) 11:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : Thanks for sharing these sources, Maybe my BEFORE was not great enought like you.  I am convinced that the article meets WP:GNG .  Grab Up - Talk 11:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I too changed vote but to Draftify as the page needs major work with all reliable sources given by Soman and AusLondonder.  If we just vote for Keep, then no guarantee if anyone will improve the page.  Creator of the page can take the feedback from here, improve the page and republish it.  RangersRus ( talk ) 19:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] National Herald is a Congress Party linked Newspaper.  Does it qualify for a neutral, Independent reference source?  — H e m a n t D a b r a l ( 📞 • ✒ ) 12:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify .  After looking at search work by AusLondonder and Soman , page has potential to pass WP:GNG with some cleanup and expansion with reliable sources.  Voting for page to Draftify for creator and other interested editors to improve the page and then submit for review to be published.  RangersRus ( talk ) 19:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Draftify is not intended as incubation for expansions.  This article is a mini-stub, but a perfectly legitimate stub.  There is no material in the current version of the article that warrants it to be draftified.  See Wikipedia:Drafts#Moving_articles_to_draftspace .  -- Soman ( talk ) 11:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Keep or draftify?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  04:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per AusLondonder and Soman.  Draftifying here is unnecessary, the article has no serious content issues (other than being too short).  Toadspike [Talk] 10:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: keep