hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Vênus : Been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years and never been updated.  Refs are really poor.  No social media or streaming coverage.  Potentially notable right enough.  scope_creep Talk 21:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Brazil .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails notability per nom, though I think this should've been prodded first.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 20:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete clearly fails WP:GNG , although I am in agreement with Aaron Liu that this should have gone to PROD.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 08:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNGGNG and WP:NBAND .  Source eval: Comments Source Fails IS RS  1.  "Resenha: Vênus – Vênus (1986)".  4 July 2017.  Brief entry, no SIGCOV about subject  2. ^ DOLABELA, Marcelo.  ABZ do rock brasileiro.  São Paulo: Estrela do Sul, 1987, p. 162.  Portal page  3. ^ Portal SCUD http://www.scudband.com/index2008_eng.html Archived 27 March 2010 at the Wayback Machine promotional, including contact information  4. ^ Radiofônicos : Bandas Archived 21 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine.  Rockwave.  Retrieved 21 October 2011.  Failed V, 404  5. ^ Rede Música Piauí – Soluções criativas de sustentabilidade para produção musical do estado do Piauí[permanent dead link].  Redemusicapiaui.ning.com.  Retrieved 21 October 2011.  Failed V, 404  6. ^ http://www.icoalmendra.com/ico_orange_002.htm [permanent dead link] Myspace Gratis muziek, tourneedata, foto's, video's.  Myspace.com.  Retrieved 21 October 2011.  Failed V, 404  8. ^ Avalon.  Metaleros.de.  Retrieved 21 October 2011.  Failed V, 404  9. ^ CD Full Bloom http://www.tratore.com.br/cd.asp? id=7898369065760 Nothing about subject  10. ^ Olivia (cantora e compositora) » Visão Geral – Conexão Vivo Archived 9 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine.  Olivia-cantora.conexaovivo.com.br (23 May 2009).  Retrieved 21 October 2011.  Promo flyer  11. ^ Dynamite – Conheça os indicados do Prêmio Dynamite de Música Independente Archived 23 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine Myspace Gratis muziek, tourneedata, foto's, video's.  Myspace.com.  Retrieved 21 October 2011.  Show dates  13. ^ "Frank Almendra – Music & More".  Archived from the original on 1 August 2017.  Retrieved 1 August 2017.  Nothing about subject  14. ^ "Erisvaldo Borges".  Archived from the original on 7 April 2011.  Retrieved 4 August 2010.  Failed V, 404  15. ^ VI FENAVIPI – Programação[dead link] BEFORE showed promo but nothing that meets SIGCOV.  There is a substantial amount of unsourced content about BLPs in the article, if kept this needs to be removed.  // Timothy :: talk 20:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Semi-fascism : Carpimaps talk to me!  10:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per OP. I considered bringing this to AfD when it was created, as it appears to be more of a passing descriptor rather than an ideological position.  As far as I can see none of the sources actually say it is a thing and instead are just using the term to describe various parties.  — Czello ( music ) 12:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As previously marked, this is an essay-like entry entirely consisting of original research on the part of the original editor. --Asqueladd ( talk ) 12:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ; this is not just a dictionary definition, but an imprecise and unhelpful one.  Basically, a list of times that someone has said that something was "semi-fascist", but without any evidence that someone's tried to systematically define what this label means, or even claimed that it was a distinct category unto itself.  jp × g 17:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I would like to note that this appears to be synonymous with Para-fascism .  You might have better luck finding literature on "para-fascism" than "semi-fascism".  ~Cherri of Arctic Circle System ( talk ) 07:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Gscholar returned some results.  However, they appear to never give a specific definition of the term, and are only included as labels.  Maybe a mention at fascism could exist, but not as a standalone article Same goes for quasi-facism.  Carpimaps talk to me!  07:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thierry Sacco : Article needs reliable source citations to establish notability .  After searching, found several social media and one personal fan-based website, but no in-depth content about the person.  Article was created on 10 November 2006 JoeNMLC ( talk ) 21:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  ~ ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 22:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 05:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  21:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Even in . fr sources, it's simply match reports.  [3] .  Delete for no sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as I do not see compliance with NSOFT.  With regards, Oleg Y. ( talk ) 00:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment If compliance with WP:NSOFT was a deletion criterion for articles generally then the denizens of AFD would have realised by now and mass nominations would have reduced Wikipedia to a rump.  This will now probably have to wait until next year.  Thincat ( talk ) 09:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – The article summarizes showing that the athlete in question was 12th in the 2006 ranking.  Frankly...  Svartner ( talk ) 19:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mirosław Modzelewski : No news hit on Google news except sports database—lacks SIGCOV!  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Sportspeople , Football ,  and Poland .  Safari Scribe Edits!  Talk!  19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not a robust enough professional career to supersede lack of WP:SIGCOV .  Anwegmann ( talk ) 00:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 09:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – I couldn't find any significant coverage of him on Polish news websites. CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 12:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Substub, fails GNG. Just kicking a ball does not make one notable. Need to be noticed. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete' Wikipedia is not a database.  If there was a list of all Legia players that would be better, as there is no coverage of him as a person to justify a page.  Unknown Temptation ( talk ) 18:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Patrick Mataix : All of the sources in the article are either passing mentions, are too short, or are written by him.  I couldn't find any reliable sources for the article.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople ,  and Business .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 07:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom after reviewing sources.  — siro χ o 10:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cape Verdeans in Canada : The group is unusually small at 500 people to a few thousand, not surprising since Cape Verde is a small nation.  The article is one of many iterations of former attempts to create "foreign relations" pages between every conceiveable combinations of countries, as well as ethnicity pages intersecting every nation on earth.  Geschichte ( talk ) 09:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups , Africa ,  and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stand up for us : Of the two references provided, first one makes no mention of "Stand up for us" and second one is dead.  Google search for "Stand up for us" does not produce many relevant results.  Only real evidence I have found for this campaign is this but one publication clearly does not warrant an article.  Completely non-notable and does not deserve an article.  Elshad ( talk ) 12:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions .  Elshad ( talk ) 12:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender , Education ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources found, the two used now as sources aren't terribly useful.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – I found a decent number of sources citing this campaign, and even a few news articles ostensibly about it, but which limited their descriptions thereof to a single sentence.  The only thing you could call significant coverage is a food journalist for The Times rallying for his right to use "gay" as an insult.  [9] The more things change, the more they stay the same, I suppose.  -- Maddy from Celeste ( WAVEDASH ) 17:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Walsall Hospital Radio : I'm unable to find any meaningful coverage of this radio station to source the article - it looks like mostly WP:OR .  Flip Format ( talk ) 21:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Flip Format ( talk ) 21:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Charity profiles on the government's website, are about all there is.  No decent sourcing used in the article either and no inline citations.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sports broadcasting contracts in Spain : The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Also, sources are primary sources, are nothing but announcements and does not assert notability.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Sports ,  and Spain .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 09:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTTVGUIDE covers this explicitly BrigadierG ( talk ) 12:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Further comment PI wish to close this nomination to repackage them into a single nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Serbia to make it convient for editors.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 21:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTTVGUIDE pas excellence.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, I see no value in this type of content.  Govvy ( talk ) 09:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Leyte Progressive High School : Verifiability challenged since 2019.  Google News Archives turns out they attended English seminars at Leyte and that's it.  Current references in the article are either internal or directories.  Lenticel ( talk ) 07:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Philippines .  Lenticel ( talk ) 07:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:NSCHOOL .  HueMan1 ( talk ) 02:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Great Fridays : Fails GNG.  Creator likely had an undisclosed COI.  — Compassionate727 ( T · C ) 14:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and United Kingdom .  — Compassionate727 ( T · C ) 14:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to the EPAM Systems article.  We can incorporate some notable items into that article.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] In principle, I have no objection to mergers, but exactly what content from the Great Fridays article do you think is worth merging?  — Compassionate727 ( T · C ) 13:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  22:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to EPAM Systems or weak delete if it can't be merged.  Article reads a lot like an advertisement and would probably be best suited as a mention on EPAM.  Dawnbails ( talk ) 12:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Billy Hui : Having received a British Empire Medal does not appear to be a strong case for WP:ANYBIO , particularly in the absence of any independent biographical coverage.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Entertainment ,  and England .  signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Radio .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I would love for this article to be kept, I think he's an important figure in radio in that particular region, but I just can't find anything out there in the world (including in the subscriber-only archives of the radio/TV trade press) to make this article pass GNG.  Billy Hui just hasn't had enough coverage.  Flip Format ( talk ) 13:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
2023 Lakki Marwat operation : Eddie891 Talk Work 16:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Pakistan .  Eddie891 Talk Work 16:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Many other pages are about just an event.  There are some RS about this one. -- Ameen Akbar ( talk ) 18:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a reason for keeping.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Fails WP:EVENT and WP:NOTNEWS .  Only contemporary news coverage, no sources that provide sustained coverage or demonstrate notability.  The big ugly alien ( talk ) 19:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] KEEP I fail to understand why this can be called an isolated event.  We all know, this event is part of Global war on terrorism which has been going on for decades and decades now.  There is ABSOLUTELY sustained coverage almost every day in all the Pakistani newspapers about the Pakistan Armed Forces 's ongoing campaign against terrorism in Pakistan, specifically against this above terrorist group called Pakistani Taliban , also called Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan . This '2023 Lakki Marwat operation' was, no doubt, part of that ONGOING WAR ON TERRORISM!!! Also, this article already has many references from  major newspapers of Pakistan and India and a book reference...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 20:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] nobody has said this is an isolated event, or that the broader campaign is not notable, just that this specific operation has not received lasting coverage.  Do you have coverage demonstrating otherwise?  Also, the book is from 2014, so can't possibly establish the notability of a 2023 event.  Eddie891 Talk Work 20:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The 2014 book reference was cited correctly NOT to talk about this operation in 2023 in particular, but is already  given in the article under the title of 'Background' to this 2023 operation and connects it to the ongoing campaign to " combat terrorism in the region , which had been plagued by frequent attacks"...  Ngrewal1 ( talk ) 22:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  19:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not WP:SUSTAINED .  The coverage here is all from the time of the event.  -- asilvering ( talk ) 03:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:NOTNEWS , no evidence of lasting notability.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 09:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete