hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
James Thomas (Swansea): A WP:BEFORE search did not return any sources, let alone a source providing WP:SIGCOV.  PROD was contested by an IP on the bogus rationale won his election 5 times , as if that means anything.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , History ,  and Wales .  Curbon7 ( talk ) 17:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Probably delete -- as a local politician/official he is inherently NN, unless he did something that was notable.   At this period, such people were not paid, so that he must have had some other means of support.   It is possible that he did something that would make him notable, but at present the article does not say so.   Until it does, he must be regarded as NN.  Peterkingiron ( talk ) 17:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Given his dates (18th c) he would have to be VERY famous for info about him to be found in our standard sources.  I wish we knew where the creator got their info - clearly there was something somewhere.  Lamona ( talk ) 01:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Likely either a plaque (such as the one's on this website for this particular church) or the local sexton 's logbook, as the article does note that.  Even then, an entry in a logbook that likely has thousands of other entries is certainly not demonstrative.  Curbon7 ( talk ) 03:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Chikau Mansale: Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 06:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Oceania .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 06:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  There should be something out there given his international career, but I can't find it.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This reference appears in the existing article this article .  I believe it won't count towards notability as it's from his federation.  However, it does tell us he played international-level beach soccer and was "twice voted OFC Beach Soccer Goalkeeper of the Tournament", though I can find no other source for this.  It's possible there is more out there, perhaps in local Queensland-based media, where he played with Logan United?  MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk ) 18:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
David Moran (diplomat): Appears to fail WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 07:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Kazakhstan , Kyrgyzstan , Uzbekistan , Switzerland , United Kingdom , England ,  and Oregon .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete appears to fail GNG after a search, previous AfD is not helpful in this regard.  SportingFlyer T · C 13:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete coverage is routine and what is supplied is primary sources.  Last AfD, people were arguing inherent notability, which is not the case.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 22:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am David Moran.  It’s for others to decide about notability but I’d like to say that the article is years out of date.  My Gov.uk page (the link is on the current page) includes my assignments to Armenia and as Regional Climate Ambassador to Europe and Central Asia covering more than 50 countries.  Djm64 ( talk ) 10:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Steven Johnson (filmmaker): Refs are cast lists and passing mentions.  scope_creep Talk 08:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , in addition to falling short of GNG, it's worth noting that the claims of having won awards (or even of being a filmmaker) appear to be a bit of an exaggeration, as Johnson's role in Lady Gaga's work was that of a producer (i.e. a finance role, not a creative one, unless otherwise indicated), and he is not listed as a prize recipient for the music video in the cited writeup of the award in question [21] .  signed, Rosguill talk 14:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Francis George Wall: I was able to find an except from an autobiography of his reprinted in "Salt Lake City: Daughters of Utah Pioneers, 1964" here , but other than that and an nomination for a place on the NRHP that originally was partially built by Francis George Wall (that place being Glenwood Mill in Glendwood, UT).  It did make it on to the NRHP, but there it is called Joseph Wall Grist Mill (after his brother Joseph).  While the NRHP listing page for it here does list Francis as a builder, I don't think these two combined are enough to pass WP:GNG , but there also might be better sources to find notability for this individual that I cannot find due to not knowing where to look.  Tartar Torte 13:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Utah .  Tartar Torte 13:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Li Wenliang (disambiguation): Already taken care of by a hatnote.  PROD removed due to it having been PRODed in the past.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 06:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people , Disambiguations ,  and China .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ONEOTHER , specifically: If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed .  I don't see a need to have this DAB page, when the hatnote serves appropriately.  Bungle ( talk • contribs ) 19:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : per nom; WP:ONEOTHER .  Queen of Hearts ( talk • stalk • she/they) 22:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mfanufikile Ndzimande: No indication of notability.  Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Redirect to Swaziland national football team , fails WP:GNG .  Brachy 08 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:GNG and no mention of it outside other articles Brachy 08 (Talk) (Contribs) 06:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 01:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : By virtue of the fact that he has played for a nation’s national team.  I believe if he was an English player, we won’t be having this conversation right now.  Amaekuma ( talk ) 19:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] We can’t find any sources about this player though.  Brachy 08 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy ping to @ Amaekuma Brachy 08 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand you 100%.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a social media platform.  Which means that some of the data it contains would not be as a result of the popularity of the subject, but to make the encyclopedia as extensive and encompassing as possible.  A stub on the subject is more than sufficient.  Amaekuma ( talk ) 09:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The information on the subject that is encyclopedic is already contained on other pages of Wikipedia.  A standalone article is of no value.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 03:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Stub or not, it fails WP:GNG , and all stubs on Wikipedia either has all its sources cited or they are out there somewhere .  Brachy 08 (Talk) (Contribs) 09:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I found Limpopo Mirror but it's only a trivial mention.  I don't believe that it is written anywhere that all footballers must meet WP:GNG except those with an international cap and would challenge people making such a claim to link me to the relevant notability guideline.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
M2001: Helpful Raccoon ( talk ) 21:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The original paper from 1998 (a "technical notice" in a special-interest-group newsletter) has no citations in Google Scholar.  This appears to have had no traction and we have no coverage at all (let alone SIGCOV) in sources independent from its author.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 22:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Mathematics .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG , I could find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  - Aoidh ( talk ) 03:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : This article relies solely on a 1998 paper that doesn't have any citations or independent coverage.  It looks like the only source is the original paper itself, which clearly isn't enough.  Waqar 💬 15:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Džuljeta Tamsone: All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2013 , 2015 , 2016 , 2020 , 2021 , etc.) JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Latvia .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 08:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amy Howorth: Being a one-term mayor of Manhattan Beach, California , (pop. c. 35K) isn't sufficient.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 08:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , California ,  and Ohio .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Manhattan Beach isn't large enough that its mayors would earn an automatic presumption of notability just because they exist, and the article is sourced nowhere near well enough to actually earn true passage of WP:NPOL #2.  Bearcat ( talk ) 20:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Kisna Diamond Jewellery: TLA (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: – this was previously speedy deleted for blatant advertising.  TLA (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 01:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Looks like promotional article with many sources showing 404 errors and others might consider unreliable.  This article does not have any beneficial contribution and does not warrant significant notability.  RangersRus ( talk ) 02:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Maharashtra .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : They opened a store in Rajput and the like, are about all I find for the company.  Sourcing used now in the article is trade magazines/websites, not an acceptable source.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 21:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NCORP Devokewater | (tαlk) 11:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of races at the Nürburgring: Unnecessary WP:FANCRUFT list that is only good for the most obsessive motorsport fans, also WP:LC and WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 16:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Germany .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 16:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Events .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Yes, looking like a fancruft.  Azuredivay ( talk ) 05:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia completely.  Make them happy.  Matthead ( talk ) 17:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Izudin Čavrković: Fails WP:MUSICBIO , WP:NPROF , and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Academics and educators , Bands and musicians , Bosnia and Herzegovina ,  and Serbia .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] delete per nom, nothing here seems notable.  -- hroest 18:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Very irrelevant stub with very few pieces of information Боки ✉ 00:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Max Weismann: None of the organizations he was affiliated with seem to be accredited in any way.  Psychastes ( talk ) 21:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found only a paid obituary .  Reviews for How To Think About the Great Ideas exist but are credited to Mortimer J. Adler rather than Weismann.  Jfire ( talk ) 02:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Philosophy , Architecture ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak/Lean Delete (Awaiting more information) -- looking at Google Scholar I immediately came to the conclusion that there was enough to mount a keep argument.   But looking more closely, it's tough.   He has a complete tribute obituary in Studia Gilsoniana, a philosophy journal held in 188 libraries, which is generally enough for a WP:PROF :C1 evidence for impact in the world of scholarship.   But as an e-journal, it is hard to tell if this is because of overzealous librarians who like to catalog (or subscribe to catalogs of) e-journals.   "Music Theory Online," which is one of the top 3 journals of my field, but is free and (as the name says) online only, is in 1180 libraries -- none of the libraries actually "own" either of the journals.   It's enough to contribute to notability, but not sure it's sufficient on its own.   Then there are tons of tributes in less reputable sources all found on thegreatideas.org.   Clearly Adler and A Syntopicon are notable, given the large amount of coverage, but I don't see Weismann's impact in any of the coverage.   It could go either way, but my spidey-sense from participating in a lot of these is that it doesn't add up to enough for WP:PROF or GNG notability, and the fact that none of the articles that seem like a place to direct to mention Weismann helps my conclusion.  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete At this stage, doesn't satisfy WP:GNG .  If there are more sources, will be a different story MaskedSinger ( talk ) 05:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Teen Scene (magazine): Created by a user with an obvious conflict of interest third party coverage seems extremely limited.  Of the external coverage mentioned in the article entrepreneur.com doesn’t really talk about the website but instead the guy’s family.  amazing-kids.org talk about it a bit but seems to be a pure puff piece Ypulse is a single paragraph that doesn’t really provide any specifics The website wasn’t absolutely nothing and if anyone ever writes a major work on music websites in the early 2000s it could become notable but I don’t see it being notable at this point (although there seems to have been a relaunch attempt about 12 years ago when they got their hands on the teenscene.com domain).  ©Geni ( talk ) 20:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment , Websites , Illinois ,  and Indiana .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination.   The article reads like a promo rather than an encyclopedic entry too.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete