hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
John Dmello: This bio fails WP:GNG .  Aronitz ( talk ) 13:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India .  CptViraj ( talk ) 13:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Goa-related deletion discussions .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 13:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There is nothing in this article that indicates notability or justification for the article.  I vote delete.  Go4thProsper ( talk ) 18:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Escouade de contre-terrorisme et de libération d'otages: Maybe someone with more language skill than me can tell whether it is notable Chidgk1 ( talk ) 20:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions .  Chidgk1 ( talk ) 20:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Terrorism .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non.  Mccapra ( talk ) 00:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The only sources provided by the Wikipedia Library for ECLOT's native title is Pascal Le Pautremat's " Eau et stratégie militaire " (2007), which describes it in a paragraph, and Jérôme Brisebourg, Christophe Hannezo, Thierry Picq's " Forces spéciales: passer en mode commando pour cultiver l’excellence collective " (2021) in a footnote.  Unless French media has further coverage, ECLOT does not have WP:SIGCOV .  However, ProQuest returned no results and Google News articles seem unrelated.  XxTechnicianxX ( talk ) 15:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
3Roam: KH-1 ( talk ) 06:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  KH-1 ( talk ) 06:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and France .  ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 06:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Insufficient coverage, clearly fails WP:NCORP .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 13:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no!  07:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Possible COI editing, given that the initial draft of the article was just a copy-paste of press release.  See the initial version and look at the last paragraph here .  Also, their about page actually links to the Wikipedia article to "learn more", which is unlikely if they didn't write it themselves.  However, someone does actually have to do the WP:NCORP checking.  If anyone is trying to figure out what this company actually is the archived version of their website is much more helpful than the current one.  It appears they've now become a mass-article publishing website trying to do tech support.  The article is out of date.  Mrfoogles ( talk ) 20:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unless anyone is able to find reliable sources, which I am not Mrfoogles ( talk ) 20:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 18:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Western Canada Youth Parliament: Nothing in Google news or books.  Nothing when searching in cbc.ca.  Only primary sources in plain Google search.  LibStar ( talk ) 04:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics ,  and Canada .  LibStar ( talk ) 04:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  03:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
HiDE Kawada: Given the tagging and the time given to improve this and the deletion history, I'm nominating for deletion as not notable either as a musician/producer or as a business person.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Bands and musicians , Businesspeople , Music ,  and Japan .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 08:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom—I also noticed a possible COI: check out the username on the image uploader .  〜 Festucalex • talk 10:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I was the nominator for the previous AfD, and I stand by my rationale from that nomination.  I've searched thoroughly for sources, including with the subject's name written in Kanji form (河田秀樹), and haven't found any independent sources that satisfy SIGCOV.  This article seems to be the target of an SPA who repeatedly re-creates it whenever it is deleted, so it's unfortunately necessary to put this to bed with consensus here at AfD.  — SamX [ talk · contribs ] 16:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as unrectifiably promotional in its current iteration.  I note that there is no equivalent article on the Japanese Wikipedia, but the first line of ja:FUTURE UNISON (created by the SPA under discussion above) links to the English version of this article as the primary justification of its notability, which probably explains the recreation here.  Dekimasu よ!  02:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , I don't see how he is notable.  Fulmard ( talk ) 19:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cheryl Epple: All references are based on death/obituary.  Don't think she meets the threshold for WP:NPOL or wp:anybio .  Notability is not inherited through marriage.  Doesn't make any mention of business accomplishments.  Internet search results are sparse.  I suggest deletion or move to draft at minimum.  Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me .  18:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Politicians , Politics ,  and California .  Classicwiki ( talk ) 18:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree that college board member is not a notability-bearing position and the coverage is not significant enough.  Reywas92 Talk 15:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Notability is not inherited , so she isn't automatically entitled to have an article just because her husband has one — but the article is not demonstrating or properly sourcing that she has any meaningful claim of standalone notability in her own right.  There also appears to be a bit of a pattern here, as this was created by the same editor who created Patti Garamendi , which I put up for AFD last week for virtually identical reasons.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Notability is determined not by the perceived prestige of a position but by coverage in sources.  The article cites coverage in the Long Beach Press-Telegram and the Cerritos College newspaper Talon Marks .  There is also coverage in Insurance Journal , the periodical of record of the American Agents Alliance .  Another periodical, the Downey Patriot , reports that she is the namesake of a memorial scholarship.  Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits ) 08:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  Even assuming that everything is true, the depth and reliability of the sourcing in questionable.  Two local sources do not constitute significant coverage.  A board member can be notable; for example, Lewis Powell, Jr. made national headlines as an education board member well before he was appointed to SCOTUS.  This is not the situation for this subject.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no significant coverage here - the college newspaper is obviously not independent, and other mentions seem trivial.  SportingFlyer T · C 04:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Abduraouf Hussain: No significant coverage found in an Arabic search.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Qatar .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer.  Ping me if sources are found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 20:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete —Nothing here.  Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG by miles.  Anwegmann ( talk ) 20:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Smile Kids Jr. with TeenNick: Previously draftified and PRODded, but creating editor didn't like any of it, so here we are.  Fails WP:GNG .  -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 19:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 19:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : no evidence of satisfying basic notability, either with BEFORE or not.  Looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON , assuming it will be notable in the future.  Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 20:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is not enough evidence for it's notability.  Agreed by Schminnte.  CastJared ( talk ) 00:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Found no significant coverage of the subject.  The creator and the major contributors ( Qu22zz , 63.238.58.110 and 96.249.248.109 ) dedicated most, if not all, of their contributions to the article.  Clearly created for promotional reason.  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 00:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - With no references, fails verifiability as well as notability .   As a planned television show rather than an actual television show, too soon applies.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 07:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 11:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete A. As an avid Nickelodeon editor, can confirm it is entirely fake, and B. Clearly more socking of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremiah Caquias .  Magitroopa ( talk ) 09:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage , no existence , pretty much all the major contributors are socks — no reason to keep this in any namespace.  Frankly, this could easily fall under at least G3 , and probably G5 as well (I'd be surprised if creator 8.48.253.121

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Big 12 men's basketball tournament finals broadcasters: Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans.  The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN .  Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE .  Of the sources per WP:RS ; besides unsourced, a majority of those are WP:PRIMARY , some including primary sources are dead links.  one that isn't offering much isn't offering much to assert notability.  Besides being by a banned sock.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Basketball ,  and Lists .  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 13:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT , failing WP:LISTN with mainly WP:ROUTINE , WP:PRIMARY , WP:TERTIARY sources such as YouTube or Tweets, or WP:OR making a list of trivia only suitable for the fandom wiki.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 14:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters .  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject does not meet the WP:GNG and WP:NLIST due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV from IRS.  Sources are either press releases, internet forums, or are originating from the competing schools and are WP:PRIMARY .  Let'srun ( talk ) 20:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Major achievements in Olympic team ball sports by nation: I'm a bit confused by the article because each sport has achievements for both the Olympics and other world championships, which furthers the oddity of combining ice hockey and water polo in one list.  Moreover, it's largely duplicative of pages like Major achievements in basketball by nation and Major achievements in baseball and softball by nation , so there's no need to combine these tables here.  Reywas92 Talk 22:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions .  Reywas92 Talk 22:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Rewrite into a list of articles.  The scope of this article seems weird, as there doesn't seem to be many instances where different countries' achievements in all ball sports are being discussed and compared together.  Nevertheless, I think it might have some value as a directory to articles like Major achievements in baseball and softball by nation and Major achievements in basketball by nation .  Tutwakhamoe ( talk ) 20:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Tutwakhamoe Already exists at List of major achievements in sports by nation .  Reywas92 Talk 22:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's not much of a guide to interpreting the tables, and once you've worked it out, it's clear this is basically a content fork as described in the nom - lists of major achievements that don't relate to a single sport of country are generally dubious, but being so specific here is just strange.  Perhaps ping the main editors and offer draftification in case they want to make something useful from the data?  ( edit conflict )  Or per the above suggestion.  Kingsif ( talk ) 20:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A strange cross-categorisation for an article and as noted above similar content already exists elsewhere.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 02:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete if there's encyclopedic content for specific sports, then articles for those sports can be created.  But this catch all article for "ball sports" is not needed.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 08:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
JENESYS U-17 Women's Football Memorial Cup: The cited writeup from the Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs further seems to suggest that this tournament only comprises friendly matches, raising questions about whether it would be WP:DUE to merge to Japan Football Association 's list of tournaments.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Japan .  signed, Rosguill talk 15:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Zero relevance.  Just a friendly U17 competition without established notability.  Svartner ( talk ) 23:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unsurprisingly, an under-17s friendly tournament doesn't garner enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 11:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – very clearly irrelevant.  Idiosincrático ( talk ) 15:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : One of many competitions of this type with a lack of sourcing to show this meets the WP:GNG or any other notability guideline.  Let'srun ( talk ) 17:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : trivial independent sourcing.  there are a few blogs, though they aren't reliable and sports organizations have a bar.  Password (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hüseyin Baş: Never elected to any political office that makes one inherently notable, not enough source to establish GNG too.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 21:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This article appears to be a direct translation of tr:Hüseyin Baş .  I tried to move some of the sources from there to here after it was translated without the references intact.  There is one additional source used on that language wiki here but I don't know if it's of any use.  (After review I can see that a user script marks that link as unreliable - this one has low hopes but I don't think I will be weighing in as someone with no context otherwise.)  Recon rabbit 23:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians ,  and Turkey .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 00:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 13:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Except for offices within the party proper, the person in question does not seem to have been elected to or held any public regional or national offices in Turkey.  Fails NPOL, ANYBIO, and GNG as Vanderwaalforces points out.  The article may be relevant for Turkish WP, but it is not (yet) relevant for English WP.  -- Konanen ( talk ) 18:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Cigniti Technologies Limited: BoraVoro ( talk ) 13:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Telangana .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not seeing any depth of coverage out there, lots of company listing stuff.  In any case, fails WP:NCORP and we have WP:NOTCRUNCHBASE, of which this article is pretty much an exemplar.  Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 09:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete