hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
OpenUP: Boleyn ( talk ) 17:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG .  At best some content could be merged into Eclipse process framework , but there doesn't seem to be much verifiable content anyway.  — xDanielx T / C \ R 19:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 19:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Thomas van Straubenzee: Clearly does not meet WP:NBIO or specifically WP:BASIC namely having not "received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject".  Having looked through the sourcing I'm struggling to identify even a single suitable source meeting the criteria of significant coverage.
 Cannot inherit notability by connection with the British royal family.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per well-defined nom.  "Property advisor of the year"  MNewnham ( talk ) 19:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 23:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions .  Necrothesp ( talk ) 15:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : coverage is routine things, marriage announcement and having a kid, seemingly hanging on to his connection to the royal family.  Non-notable otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Very much celebrity fluff articles [7] is typical Oaktree b ( talk ) 20:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Maritime Page: It is used as a source in the RUSI and Bellingcat pages cited, but not actually mentioned.  In a WP:BEFORE search I could only find passing mentions of the site in three BusinessWorld articles , citing it for the number of shipyards in the Philippines in 2021: [15] [16] [17] .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 09:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation , Websites ,  and Norway .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 09:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  The page claims that "Maritime Page has been acknowledged in publications by the Royal United Services Institute[1] and Bellingcat[2] for its contributions to maritime discussions." -- well, that's a bit misleading; neither source cited actually mentions Maritime Page, they just link it.  And those are the only sources in the article. — Moriwen ( talk ) 16:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Barsame: No evidence of WP:Notability under SNG or GNG.   Further than that, I could not find any evidence that it even exists.  I'm no expert at searching in Somali but I could not find where it is even mentioned n any of the sources.   The same for an internet search.   There is a person by that name (which already has an article) and it appears that there is a location by that name.   But no coverage about a Barsame clan.  North8000 ( talk ) 18:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Seems to me to be fictional, a simple look through the sources in the article, (using cmd +F) found nothing.  The article is also shorter than this sentence, so there is not really much there; no assertion of notability anyways.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 18:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok, it seems to me if I look for "Barsane" or "Barame" something picks up, I need to look into this more.  One of the google books links to Barsane Galigal (spelling I know).  I am going to run it through google translate.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 18:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Ok, after some digging, it exists, and falls under NGEO now as a populated place, as it refers to the area as well.  This is so complicated sorry for all of the strikethroughs.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 18:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] But right now it says that the article is about a CLAN.  It sound like you are saying to convert it to a place/geo article.  North8000 ( talk ) 19:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The google translate from the italian is severely broken, so I only get some of it, but it seems to imply that they are one in the same.  It would need to be converted to an article about the place to survive.  Let me do yet more digging.  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 20:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Ok, it is not a place per say, but the source claims it is part of the Gogondovò (Darandolle) group, as a sub group, and thats it, the group refers to both the land and the people, and this sub-group refers to a subset of people.  Since it is mentioned one time in the document, I support deletion (final vote sorry).  Geardona ( talk to me? ) 20:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete So the entire article as it reads now: "Barsame is a Somali clan.".  Barely even a DICDEF at this point.  If you want an article about a geographical place fine.  Five words does not make an article though.  TNT this.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Deng (company): Charlie ( talk ) 07:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ghana .  Charlie ( talk ) 07:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Denmark .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  06:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:ORGCRIT .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 11:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No claim to notability.  Llajwa ( talk ) 14:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:CORP .  LibStar ( talk ) 03:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Miroslav Cingel: Sources found are routine sport reports (announcement or results) which can NOT contribute to the notability for GNG and not ranking world top 10 in mixed martial arts WP:NMMA or world top-10 in K-1 or Glory (kickboxing) or Lumpinee or Rajadamnern champion.  Cassiopeia talk 00:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Martial arts ,  and Slovakia .  Cassiopeia talk 00:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There's no evidence he meets the notability criteria for kickboxers ( WP:NKICK ).  I also didn't see significant independent coverage that would show WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO is met.   Databases and fight results are normal for any fighter and his gym's website is certainly not independent.   The article is also misleading when it talks about his WKF world championships, since the link is to the World Karate Federation, but his titles were from the World Kickboxing Federation--same initials but two completely different organizations.  There's no evidence of him even being a karateka.   It was probably used because the World Kickboxing Federation doesn't have a WP entry.  Papaursa ( talk ) 02:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – Some sources I found regarding this person so far, all from 2014: April , November , and December .  If those are not enough to meet GNG, I would consider delete instead.  CuteDolphin712 ( talk ) 09:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: Source-1 and Source-2 does not meet the requirement as the subject only mentioned in passing mentioned (fight results are considered routine sport reports and can NOT be use to contribute to the GNG requirements).  Source-3 does cover the subject in length but part of the article is not independent for it is partially an interview piece.  I will leave source-3 to other editor editor to decide if the source could be contributed to GNG guidelines.  To say that, if the source -3 is accepted but only only one source, it does not meet the requirment of significant coverage that the GNG requirements thus it still fails GNG.  Cassiopeia talk 09:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete -- Aside from failing WP:NKICK , I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT .  There are a few other routine fight results, but not much else.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sani Bello Science College Dawakin Kudu, Kano: Fails WP:GNG .  No notability asserted, nor verified, nor can I find any with WP:BEFORE .  Needs to be deleted to save the creating editor from expending further time upon it.  If it gains notability then an article may be reconsidered, but I do not recommend a soft delete because of the GNG failure.  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Nigeria .  🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as nommed; I couldn't find anything either that would come even close to meeting GNG.  (Cases like this really make you wonder why educational institutions aren't speediable!) -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 12:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Can't meet WP:GNG.  Lorstaking ( talk ) 05:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Regrettably, this topic needs to deleted for lack of coverage from reliable sources.  The lack of reliable source for this topic is largely due to the lack of coverage in Northern Nigeria .  Best, Reading Beans ( talk ) 08:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ambivu 3D Workstation: toweli ( talk ) 08:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  toweli ( talk ) 08:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I agree that this fails WP: GNG .  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 02:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
AI-Native Database: Online search indicates a handful of other vector database projects use the term, but no coverage by secondary reliable sources .  The concept may find enduring use outside buzzwords in time, but at least for now this appears premature.  StereoFolic ( talk ) 13:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  StereoFolic ( talk ) 13:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : there are a few dozen mentions of the term in academic literature.  But the current article is a promotion piece for a single non-notable product, written by a SPA and likely COI.  Owen× ☎ 15:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:ESSAY .   While I could find a few scholarly articles using the term ( [12] , [13] ), these don't seem independent of the subject.  WP:TNT at the very least to cut out the promotional tone and buzzwordy prose.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 14:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Janaki Ram: Has a written a book on illustrious grand uncle V. K. Krishna Menon .  She does not seem to have achieved any notability for it - the only reference on the page is a Page 3 news on an auction and searching does not provide anything better.  Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR .  Has written 3 books, all of which have received 0 ratings on Goodreads - [45] .  Created by an editor with a probable WP:COI who has been editing articles on her family and her uncle.  Jupitus Smart 02:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women , India , Kerala ,  and United States of America .  Jupitus Smart 02:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no coverage found online beyond the single book review referenced in the article, fails WP:GNG .  Sgubaldo ( talk ) 10:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Balvinder Kumar: Created by a user currently indeffed for sockpuppetry.  Callmemirela 🍁 talk 19:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Callmemirela 🍁 talk 19:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - while the article makes the claim that he was vice-chancellor of an educational institution, the only reference to that is a self-bio, I can find no other sourcing which validates that claim.   Fails WP:GNG .  Onel 5969 TT me 19:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Phil Bridger ( talk ) 19:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 20:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note This article was written by the sock of a blocked user, and would likely be eligible for G5 deletion.  Since we're having this discussion however - put me down for delete , this is UPE spam.  Girth Summit (blether) 16:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Pointe at North Fayette: Only one source from a newspaper story from 1960, which briefly mentions the mall by a former name in passing within a story about another entity.  The balance of the article is nothing more than a collection of links to commercial websites for the what purports to be the mall occupant stores.  Geoff | Who, me?  14:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:NOTPRICE This "retail development " is in reality a shopping complex, and lists every retailer and service therein,  with individual article links to each.  And those individual articles have a link to their own websites.   The few that do not have a Wikipedia article, have direct links to their own web sites.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep , after removing the WP:ELNO , WP:CRYSTAL , redlinks, and WP:TENANTS dreck, there is the bones of a salvageable stub here.  Cabayi ( talk ) 16:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Non-notable retail development.  Dough 4872 17:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Incredibly generic edge city power center with the expected stores you'd expect to find at one named Mad Libs-style.  Nate • ( chatter ) 21:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Pakiwheel: Only used by Malkani.  No secondary sources.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lythronaxargestes ( talk | contribs ) 21:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hadarou Sare: I could not find any reliable sources containing significant coverage of the subject.  None of the sources currently cited in the article establish notability: [23] and [24] are interviews in trade publications that read like puff pieces .  [25] does not have any clear editorial standards, is based on an interview, and also reads like a puff piece.  [26] is a bio and abstract for a talk he gave at a seminar.  [27] is an interview with the organizers of the same seminar.  [28] is the subject's company's website.  [29] is an advertising website.  [30] is a slideshow about a project that the subject worked on.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Astronomy , Engineering , Spaceflight , Africa , Ivory Coast , Maryland , New Jersey ,  and New York .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 03:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.  Mccapra ( talk ) 04:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Agree with the deletion discussion above, most links given are primary or simple confirmation of employment/biographical info.  The sourcing doesn't pass RS guidelines and there isn't much else I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This should be speedy deleted per G5 as the article creator has been blocked as a sock of User:Daniel Martin77 .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 02:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Wikipedia is not a blog post or LinkedIn.  Haruka Amaranth 03:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jamharian Perfumes: Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 16:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 16:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It also seems to just be at least in part a rewording of their own website.  AlexandraAVX ( talk ) 18:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no good cites found on GSearch (which are mostly social media and blogs), GNews and GNews Archives.  -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete unfortunately, there are no good, reliable, or secondary sources. -- BoraVoro ( talk ) 14:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gaan Baksho: Sionk ( talk ) 15:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and Australia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Non- WP:INDEPENDENT sources.  TLA (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you elaborate, Desher Barta looks independent?  IgelRM ( talk ) 04:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete