hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Ankush Anami : References on the page are about the World Designing Forum and also fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA (same as the ones I found in a WP:BEFORE .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Fashion ,  and India .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 02:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Muhammad Luqman : DreamRimmer ( talk ) 04:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Although it's likely that this article is going to be speedily deleted, I've noticed that the page creator has a history of creating micronation articles that are speedily deleted.  Is it worth reporting at AN/I or leaving a warning on their talk page?  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 04:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7.  Mccapra ( talk ) 05:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
2024 J.League & North American Cup : As the AFC reviewer said, "None of the sources indicate that Miami and Fukuoka will play each other on the stated date."  Possible hoax.  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 06:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  – Novem Linguae ( talk ) 06:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan and Florida .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 15:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 15:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence that this is scheduled or expected to take place.  Pure WP:CRYSTAL or a hoax.  Sounder Bruce 03:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5 - article creator blocked as sock.  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 18:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Codex coemeterium : Original PROD reason, by Pallidus-leo : This codex almost certainly does not exist.  No evidence for it's existence predate this wikipedia page and none of this pages sources refer to it in any way.  I seconded the PROD: The manuscript index catalogue of the Czech national library is here: https://www.en.nkp.cz/collections/by-document-type/historical-book-collection/manuscripts-and-incunabula/rukopisy-en .  There is no "sb" shelfmark.  Declined by Kvng , reason: Deletion contested, PROD is for uncontroversial deletions asilvering ( talk ) 06:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions .  asilvering ( talk ) 06:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  I suspect the other creation by User:Lucien Astor , Ordo Secreta Sapientiae , is a hoax as well.  Jfire ( talk ) 06:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Checking out the sources in the article, it turns out that they only support the parts of their respective sentences that are not about this subject.   Neither of them say anything about the claimed subject.  But what stopped me looking for serious sources was turning up

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Democratic Republic of the Yoruba : A lot.  Give it a year and see what happens.  Redirect is theoretically possible, but there is nothing in the article that hints clearly where to.  It's impressive that despite this thing being a week old, WP/Commons already have access to it's flag and coat of arms.  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 07:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Africa .  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 07:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : This article should be left.  What I implore editors to do is to help expand with the multiple RS references retrieved.  I view the article as a current event that will be robust in the future.  It's worth a stand alone article.  No redirect!  Caleb Ndu ( talk ) 10:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Hi @ Caleb Ndu : I've helped by bolding your keep vote.  Whilse there are plenty of reliable sources [16] , maybe it is Wikipedia:Too soon to have a stand-alone article for now.  Mabye if we give it a year, the article might meet the sustainability guideline which is the nominator's argument.  I see you are a new editor.  Welcome to Wiki.  Please don't be discouraged just in case this article ends up being deleted.  I know it can be frustrating as a new editor when an article you've created and source ends up being deleted, but don't be discouraged.  Read those two guidelines to help you understand.  You did an amazing job on the article, but Wiki has its policies for article inclusion.  So whatever happens, just keep up the good job and read the links to Wikipedia's policies posted on your talk page by an editor when they first welcomed you to Wiki.  In the meantime, you can transfer the content on your own WP:Sandbox for example User:Caleb Ndu/sandbox whilst you give it time to see if it meets the sustainability guideline.  If it ends up being deleted, at least you have it in your sandbox.  I believe that is allowed.  Tamsier ( talk ) 12:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Article deleted by admin as WP:G5 .  Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 14:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Schirin Thoma : Acting roles are all bit parts, not meeting ACTOR.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Beauty pageants , Fashion , Germany ,  and Switzerland .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as not-yet - this appears to be paid promotional spam (I blocked the creator, who appears to be a long-running promotional sockpuppet); zero news coverage that I could find.  Good luck to Ms Thoma on her future, but it's not the present - David Gerard ( talk ) 17:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Tagged as G5.  The page is created by a sockpuppet.  Fancy Refrigerator ( talk ) 00:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Emirate Of IbraheemLand : Zero reliable, in-depth sources on this topic.  FatCat96 ( talk ) 18:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Middle East and Yemen .  FatCat96 ( talk ) 18:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is wild , there's so much stuff in here and zero corroboration for any of it.  Top search results are this and other wiki pages.  Moonreach ( talk ) 18:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11 as rather clearly made up by the editor who created the article.  So tagged.  -- Kinu t / c 19:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I have blocked the article creator as a rather-obvious single-purpose account whose only substantive edits have been to create a walled garden related to this non-notable micronation.  -- Kinu t / c 21:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete.  Crazy dedication to a fake article.  Jebiguess ( talk ) 22:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] this article was deleting without a consesus PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk ) 01:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
PRINCE ADEKUNLE AYORINDE EBENEZER : It doesn't have reliable sources that shows its notability.  It fails to meet WP:N and WP:GNG , and does not need an article.  ZyphorianNexus ( talk ) 16:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  ZyphorianNexus ( talk ) 16:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Qaiser Baryar : -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Politicians ,  and Pakistan .  Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete G5, sockpuppet of Sazmancrpo.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Sukanya Barua : Of the six sourced referenced in the article, the first is a website called Wikiwiki which mirrors Wikipedia formatting and structure; the second source is an interview granted by the subject, and the third source is simply a plot of a film the subject starred in and received only single mention in the list of characters.  The remaining sources do not establish notability Noneate ( talk ) 15:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and India .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Raisul Islam Ador : None establish his Wikipedia:Notability .  The first reference is almost identical in wording to his official web site.  CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 20:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , if not a CSD under G11.  Creator states they're a paid editor and it's pure propaganda.  Kazamzam ( talk ) 20:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete .  I've nominated for CSD; it's clearly advertising and there is nothing encyclopedic worth keeping.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 20:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And... it's gone.  Ready for a admin or non-admin closure by any uninvolved editor.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 21:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Sultanpur (2023 film) : Onel 5969 TT me 13:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment :it is sad and unfortunate WP's existing policies are unable to accommodate articles such as this Jack4576 ( talk ) 14:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relevant link: WP:NFILM .  -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 22:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 15:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : sources doesn't meet WP:GNG .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monhiroe ( talk • contribs ) 11:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Article in the The Daily Star [2] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 02:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ A. B. : Your link doesn't go to an article about Sultanpur ; can you clarify? -- Worldbruce ( talk ) 05:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Worldbruce : These are the links.  [3] [4] DareshMohan ( talk ) 05:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ooops.  DareshMohan got it right.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 20:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Young Entrepreneur Success : I haven't been able to find any non-bookstore or non-author-written sources about the book.  AriTheHorse 04:13 (Updated 04:15), 19 December 2023 (UTC) Delete per OP and WP:PROMO .  Also can't find any sources.  The creator of the page also seems to be a WP:SPA with a draft for the subject of this book.  Their user page also seems to be AI generated with a section that says "My editing contributions cover a wide array of topics, including [insert specific interests or subjects you've worked on].".  – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 06:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Business .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per above; really fails WP:NBOOK , no reliable source found.  Toadette ( Happy holiday! ) 07:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this is very nearly a speedy as blatantly promotional.  "Each chapter of Young Entrepreneur Success offers a practical roadmap for those aspiring to translate their passions into successful ventures. ...."Young Entrepreneur Success" extends an invitation for readers to accompany Felipe Vasquez on a journey that delves not only into the realms of business but also into the profound influence that an individual can exert on industries and communities."  Inappropriate material about a book that doesn't even hint at a pass in any category of NBOOK.  Elemimele ( talk ) 08:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've just tagged it under WP:G11 .  Why wait a week to remove this completely promotional article from Wikipedia?  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 09:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As others have already stated, the article is obviously promotional and doesn't have sufficient independent coverage.  Cortador ( talk ) 09:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Arab-Chalukya conflict : Article is built on WP:OR , no sources either calls this by the name as seen in the title.  Imperial [AFCND] 10:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military .  Imperial [AFCND] 10:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Article with sources supporting these major events, namely the Siege of Thana and Battle of Navsari, the depiction of these major militiary conflicts can be included in Wikipedia and has no wiki violation in it Sathyashraya ( talk ) 11:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Gujarat .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: : The creator is now blocked for sockpuppetry.  The two earlier articles were created by the sockmaster.  So it is an attempt of the sockmaster to revive the two of his deleted articles with a new name. -- Imperial [AFCND] 06:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Created by a blocked sock, combining other deleted articles.  I have also nominated it for wp:speedy deletion .  So this AfD might be moot.  -- Kautilya3 ( talk ) 21:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Little Bricks Charity : Per BEFORE search, almost all of the sources are (1) routine , trivial coverage of the organization donating legos to a hospital; (2) interviews with the organization's founder; or (3) fluff pieces about the founder's setting a Guinness World Record .  I have not uncovered any independent sources covering the organization in-depth.  Upworthy , cited in the article, is definitely not an RS .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 18:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Toys , Medicine ,  and Virginia .  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 18:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Shree Hindu Temple and community centre : Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Rajveer Deol : Only in september did  Deol make his debut.  Fails WP:SIGCOV .  scope_creep Talk 17:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Maharashtra .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Correctional pedagogy : No sources.  Possibly WP:DRAFTIFY , but I don't know what someone could do to fix this.  Asparagusus (interaction) 13:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  My analysis: - The article itself is unsourced and badly formatted.  An argument of WP:TNT could apply.  - I did a google search on "correctional pedagogy".  My search results were full of "prison pedagogy" or something similar.  However, this article talks about a pedagogy for children with developmental disabilities .  The article thus fails notability.  -- TheLonelyPather ( talk ) 15:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete As per original.  Essay (rather literally: seems to read like a school essay being copy and pasted) regarding phrase with seemingly no significant/real use in the world.  A MINOTAUR ( talk ) 16:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete bordering on SPEEDY A11.  Unsourced, NN, likely OR if not A11, and horribly written.  Quick search yields nothing that could reasonably be used to recreate or improve this article.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 14:18, 16 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : I'll be bold and tag this with A11.  BangJan1999 01:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete
Battle of Bukhara (999) : Thats literally the only mention of the battle itself in the article "Battle of Bukhara (999)".  Fails WP:NHISTORY and WP:GNG .  Created by the same user who made this [5] .  And like that article, this one too suffers from WP:CITATION issues and thus WP:VER .  HistoryofIran ( talk ) 20:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military ,  and Uzbekistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: speedy delete