hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Criticism of eBay: The sourcing, meanwhile, shows examples of individual instances of criticism, bu does not cohesively discuss "criticism of eBay" as a topic.  This should redirect to eBay#Criticism , as already previously proposed by way of WP:BLAR .  signed, Rosguill talk 13:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  signed, Rosguill talk 13:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Mostly it's crap, and the small non-crap part belongs in the main article.  --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect per nomination, topic doesn't need a separate article.  Artem.G ( talk ) 15:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  DigitalIceAge ( talk ) 00:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to eBay#Criticism per nom.  and others.  Sal2100 ( talk ) 22:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Emely Obregón: This was the most I found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Nicaragua ,  and California .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 03:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Nicaragua women's international footballers .  - Socccc ( talk ) 23:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Southern Pacific 1298: The source used for basically the entire article is a self-published website.  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and California .  Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  If this is not independently notable (I haven't looked for sources) it should be redirected to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock#Preserved steam locomotives .  If verifiable, the information in the article could be used to expand the entry there to a full sentence as that seems DUE based on other entries.  I don't see any benefit in deletion over this course of action.  Thryduulf ( talk ) 21:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete .  Per nom.  124.148.210.252 ( talk ) 21:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE – dudhhr talk contribs she her 22:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Thryduulf.  News search found nothing and book search found self-published sources (and a few books with "Southern Pacific" on page 1298).  – dudhhr talk contribs she her 22:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as per Thryduulf would indeed be the best choice.  TH1980 ( talk ) 02:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Exercise Purple Storm: Stub with no unique substantial content.  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 05:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Panama ,  and United States of America .  RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk ) 05:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge and redirect to List of U.S. Department of Defense and partner code names .  Buckshot06 (talk) 05:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] However I will copy the information over there unless there is any objection.  Buckshot06 (talk) 03:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This should be merged with United_States_invasion_of_Panama instead of List of U.S. Department of Defense and partner code names .  killer bee 06:04, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to United_States_invasion_of_Panama .  I think this is a better place for this article as Operation Just Cause also has a section there.  I don't think it should be merged and redirected to List of U.S. Department of Defense and partner code names as suggested by Buckshot06 .  killer bee 06:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to United States invasion of Panama -- I don't see anything here to merge as the sources are primary and the subject is a minor part of the invasion.  I think BLAR is the only reasonable action here.  I agree with K6bee9 that the codenames article is a poor choice.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 19:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gan Wikipedia: Fram ( talk ) 20:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions .  Fram ( talk ) 20:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt.  CSD G4.  Kinopiko talk 01:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Wikipedias per previous nomination.  Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Waddles, I thing redirect is good for keeping the article redirect to releated topics.  Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm | (tαlk) 16:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pearl Fey: I'd suggest she be merged to the character list, but she is not sufficiently notable to merit a standalone article at this time and is only a minor character who pops up in select games, compared to Maya.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 11:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games .  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 11:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect for now.  I agree that is a good source, but there should be more.  Babarylon ( talk ) 14:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE .  ✗ plicit 12:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect This character article is written by TotalTruthTeller24 and edited by several of their socks, including the ! vote just above.  -- ferret ( talk ) 19:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect Per above.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk ) 03:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  The Game Informer source is a good start, but there has to be a goalpost here, and having researched the topic myself, I found little.  - Cukie Gherkin ( talk ) 06:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
FIU Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - to Florida International University per longstanding practice as outlined at SCHOOLOUTCOMES .  4.37.252.50 ( talk ) 19:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Florida International University as preferred WP:ATD and as suggested in my deprod comment.  There doesn't appear to be any reliably sourced information to merge.  I see some coverage of the school but not enough to clearly justify a standalone article.  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Florida International University as preferred WP:ATD .  Dowrylauds ( talk ) 21:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
IDBI Capital: BrigadierG ( talk ) 11:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Searches about this subsidiary operation find little beyond announcement coverage [21] which is insufficient to establish specific notability .  A redirect to the article on the IDBI Bank parent might be an alterative to deletion ?  AllyD ( talk ) 10:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  07:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to IDBI Bank : I suggested above that this subsidiary lacks evidence of specific notability .  Despite coverage in recent days of a case settlement with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (e.g. "IDBI Capital Markets & Securities Settle Case With Sebi; Pays Rs 13 Lakh As Settlement Fee" ), I don't see that as amounting to substantial coverage .  A redirect to the parent seems the best outcome.  AllyD ( talk ) 08:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 10:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Jon Katchen: A redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies seems to make sense here.  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Law ,  and Alaska .  Let'srun ( talk ) 03:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect : Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL per never being elected.  C LYDE TALK TO ME / STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 05:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom and Clyde .  No combination of reliable sources appears to treat this subject to in-depth coverage upon which to base an encyclopedic biography.  JFHJr ( ㊟ ) 05:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pilipinas News: WP:Articles for deletion/Aksyon JournalisMO (2nd nomination) was closed as delete, so nominating later program.  IgelRM ( talk ) 00:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines .  IgelRM ( talk ) 00:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG .  Donald D23 talk to me 02:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to News5 per ATD.  Nate • ( chatter ) 23:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect (per Nate's alternative suggestion).  We don't need more low-quality or stubbish articles of minor newscasts of the Philippines.  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 08:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming per nomination.  - Ian Lopez @ 14:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as there are now two separate Redirect target articles suggested.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting again for a redirect target.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 03:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As nominator, I support the redirect to List of TV5 (Philippine TV network) original programming .  Donald D23 talk to me 21:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
The Beatles Experience: UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Visual arts ,  and Comics and animation .  UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rock N’ Roll Comics Dronebogus ( talk ) 11:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Consulate General of the United States, Naha: Most of the article is just a list of former consults.  In fact 21 of the 24 sources merely confirm  previous consuls.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 23:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Japan ,  and United States of America .  LibStar ( talk ) 23:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nominator — no credible evidence of notability.  — Biruitorul Talk 06:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of diplomatic missions of the United States as no GNG, but an important target nonetheless.  Belichickoverbrady ( talk ) 04:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
2024–25 National Cricket League: No coverage about the announcement of fixtures/dates of the competition, clearly fails WP:GNG , WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NEVENT .  Robo Cric Let's chat 15:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Cricket ,  and Bangladesh .  Robo Cric Let's chat 15:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to National Cricket League WP:TOOSOON .  Redirect to parent article until there is enough coverage to warrant a season article.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 10:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to National Cricket League That is WP:TOOSOON by a long shot as we haven't even completed the 2023-24 season yet to think of actually starting the following season.  HawkAussie ( talk ) 23:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as WP:TOOSOON , the current information on this page is speculation or WP:OR .  Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 10:12, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to National Cricket League as WP:TOOSOON .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 14:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
KPCE-LD: A 2019 AfD closed as no consensus, but that was under the old presumption that all licenced television stations are notable, which is no longer the case.  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Arizona .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Daystar Television Network stations : it appears to have never actually carried anything other than Daystar, even before its parent entity acquired the station.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] A little reply: Are we going to put AfD requests to (most) low-power stations?  Because I don't really see a lot of AfD requests on Full-Power stations meaning I think that Wikipedia doesn't want Low-Power Stations anymore since a lot of them are often stubs.  Just sayin'... mer764 KC TV ( Talk ) 19:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The moment the 2021 NMEDIA RfC returned the result it did, this was the likely result.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 23:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It makes sense, but I'm seeing a lot of Low-Power Stations getting put with AfDs and its starting to confuse and slightly frighten me. mer764 KC TV ( Talk ) 00:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 04:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Sabbath (Doctor Who): A search for sources yields nothing, and the article currently functions off of one primary source.  Article currently does not meet GNG or SIGCOV.  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy ,  and Literature .  Pokelego999 ( talk ) 15:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge to List of Doctor Who villains Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete/redirect per nom.  Does not meet WP:GNG without third-party sources.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 22:43, 2 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Wishmastour 2000: HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 11:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No hits in Google at all.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 11:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree.  The band's autobiography also mentions the compilation in its discography section in the book - but it is not enough as there would have to be more detail than just a mention.  HorrorLover555 ( talk ) 14:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nightwish per above.  Found no additional coverage.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 13:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable compilation album.  Cullen328 ( talk ) 18:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Nightwish discography#Compilation albums , where it is mentioned.  This is a plausible search term and should be tagged as {{ R from album }} .  ✗ plicit 12:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Development zones of Shenyang: Unfortunately, as a non Chinese speaker have not been able to find reliable sources so it remains largely uncited and verifiable .  I don't think there is value merging back into the original article due to these reasons.  LibStar ( talk ) 05:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and China .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Condense significantly and Merge .  I think it's worth mentioning it a short paragraph with the existing source retained.  Unless someone can find Chinese-language sources, there isn't a point to keep this article.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Seconded Jack4576 ( talk ) 09:08, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, North America 1000 10:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 08:41, 24 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Oppose merge/redirect as this is an unlikely search term.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak redirect to Shenyang#Economy where there's a segment describing Shenyang's three development zones.  The page has received low but consistent traffic over the past year, so it does appear to be of some use.  But noting as well that this page arguably qualifies for WP:G7 deletion at LibStar's discretion, as no other editor has made anything other than trivial edits to it.  signed, Rosguill talk 02:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect