hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Madhu Verma (politician): Also, he hasn't won an election for the 2023 Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly election yet because it is scheduled to be held on 17 November 2023.  This page is only appropriate if he wins that election.  Charlie ( talk ) 03:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India .  Charlie ( talk ) 03:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Seems to fail WP:NPOL to me and it looks like the article may have been created because they're running for office again.  TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk ) 19:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He had hold the executive positions of chairman and director in Indore Development Authority.  He was also in the advisory committee of Narmada Valley Devlopment Authority.  Jatin S. Sharma ( talk ) 08:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as of now fails WP:NPOL . - Admantine123 ( talk ) 16:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak Keep fails WP:NPOL , but may meet WP:GNG , at least these 2 articles are good 1 and 2 .  Upper Deck Guy ( talk ) 18:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It takes a lot more than just two hits of run of the mill campaign coverage to make an unelected candidate "notable because GNG" in lieu of having to win an NPOL-passing office.  Bearcat ( talk ) 23:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Candidates don't get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, but nothing else here constitutes a valid claim of preexisting notability for other reasons independently of a candidacy.  Obviously no prejudice against recreation next month if he wins, but nothing here is already enough as of now.  Bearcat ( talk ) 23:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Katherine Y. Qiu: I’m very grateful to User:Folly Mox for their source analysis which I won’t repeat but can be seen at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China#Katherine Y. Qiu .  This article is likely to be a hoax, or at best a completely garbled account, possibly of more than one person.  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Literature , Politics ,  and China .  Mccapra ( talk ) 18:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] My thanks in return for Mccapra surfacing this hoax article.  In brief, all the sources fail verification.  What should be the strongest source does not exist.  The article makes a number of highly dubious claims, including what might be a BLP violation against Qin Hui (historian) .  The early article history displays signs of deliberate manufacture prior to spurious sourcing, including modifying and removing claims.  WP:BEFORE did find a person by this name roughly contemporaneous with the purported subject, who published on a similar topic to the final source in the article, which is spuriously misattributed.  None of the biographical details in the article match the real person.  There's nothing worth salvaging here since everything is made up.  Probably qualifies for CSD G3 , see linked discussion for full thoughts.  Folly Mox ( talk ) 18:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Many thanks for discovering this.  ARandomName123 ( talk ) Ping me!  19:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a hoax per Folly Mox's thorough investigation.  Kanguole 20:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per linked source analysis from

Discussion outcome: delete
Gem Television Tamil: It was sent to draft once, then moved back to main space the following day with only a Google search cited as a reference.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  Wikishovel ( talk ) 15:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment article creator has been blocked indefinitely as a spam/advertising-only account.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No references apart from the article's own website, and looks promotional.  HarukaAmaranth 春 香 08:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Francois Hanekom: Not to be confused with the Namibian golfer of the same name.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robert Moritz: I'm unable to find significant coverage.  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 19:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Businesspeople ,  and Journalism .  Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 19:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV , WP:CREATIVE , WP:NBAND , and WP:NOTINHERITED .  There is not sufficient coverage about this person, rather than his work.  The consensus has been that editors and reporters of ordinary publications, and musicians, do not automatically inherit notability from what they write or where they write, or even with which bands they perform.  I would not oppose an appropriate redirect.  Bearian ( talk ) 19:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Bearian fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 08:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
8 (upcoming film): Will never release and is only notable if released.  Should have included it in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puthiya Mugam (unreleased film) .  Same reasons for deletion as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aayiram Porkasugal .  DareshMohan ( talk ) 17:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because unreleased since 2020.  [ reply ] Sumo (film) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete both, fails WP:NFILM for future films, and isn't being updated- for 2nd article 2022 has passed Karnataka ( talk ) 19:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete agree with what was said above.  - OtharLuin ( talk ) 09:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Normally once a film has entered principal production it might be notable, but it looks like production stalled five years ago and there isn't enough press to make its development notable.  If it ever was released, it might warrant an article.  Delete - This article is prove to fails WP:NF and WP:NFP ; so, it has no right kept on Wikipedia.Kind regards ––– Àvî Râm7 (talk) 15:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ellembelle: Thus this page is incorrect in stating Ellembelle is capital of Ellembelle district.   There is nothing online about Ellembelle the town (which according to Google maps is approx 20 km away from Nkroful - so not an alternative name).   Suggest delete.  Newhaven lad ( talk ) 18:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete contradicts sources.  - Altenmann >talk 19:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete if no source found confirming Ellembelle is a town.  The 2010 census report for Ellembelle District lists the 20 most populated towns and Ellembelle is not among them.  [14] (page 76) Could feasibly be a 'new' town or outside the 'top 20' but searches come up with the district, not a town, and sources in the article do not support the content.  Rupples ( talk ) 23:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete couldn't find sources that say this town is the capital.  TheTankman ( talk ) 16:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Yuuguu: The Telegraph article is about Powwownow and just mentions why they are acquiring Yuuguu.  The TechCrunch articles are PR articles.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 14:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Software ,  and United Kingdom .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the header that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amina Said Ali: I've done a quick Google and Google Scholar search but haven't been able to find more suitable sources to see if Ali meets WP:POET or WP:NPROF .  More sources may be available in Swahili, Somali, or Arabic.  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 21:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions .  Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk ) 21:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Women ,  and Somalia .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NPOET .  Nothing in the article, or in a Google search, describes why this poet is notable.  SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 14:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tom Vitoin: Last AfD by Wgolf was only closed as no consensus because no one commented.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements , Comics and animation ,  and Portugal .  Owen× ☎ 19:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not finding any sourcing about this character, this is all I pull up [8] , a site to read the comics.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting, Soft Deletion is not an option.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete WP:BEFORE didn't uncover WP:SIGCOV .  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 15:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Daria Zueva: Typically, articles in other language sections were made by the same participant with the only interest in Wikipedia in the form of creating articles about this person. -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk ) 01:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ).  I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 16 .  — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 01:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Bands and musicians , Women , Television , Theatre , Netherlands ,  and Russia . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  In addition to the apparent COI, all the film and TV roles appear to be bit parts, except for the short film.  I'd say WP:TOOSOON . -- Ssilvers ( talk ) 05:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No news coverage about the subject. -- Meligirl5 ( talk ) 10:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .   After my own research, I second Ssilvers 's analysis.  Can add that there are some sources [61] [62] but not independent enough for the GNG.  The professional guideline isn't met either.  gidonb ( talk ) 17:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I think the the sources identified by Gidonb are valid and establish notability through GNG.  Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 07:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Quick Delete .  Typical cross-wiki advertising/spam, fake sources (paid articles), does not match WP:BIO .  On ru.wiki same article deleted, creator became the subject of a request to CU .  Кронас ( talk ) 19:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alvin T. Onaka: Partofthemachine ( talk ) 17:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable civil servant.  The birth certificate thing is neither here nor there.  No references found otherwise.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Hawaii .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 18:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Retain Dr. Onaka was the recipient of a prestigious national award, the Halbert L. Dunn award, and served as president of a national vital records trade association.  These accomplishments made the newspapers in Hawaii.  Wikipedia would better served by more content about NAPHSIS and its role in setting the policies that the United States uses to maintain the integrity of its vital records.  Of course the Obama birth certificate mess got him some national attention, a number of times, as his certifications became the basis fore state decisions to allow Obama on the Ballot, and as evidence in lawsuits such as Taitz v. Mississippi .  I would also point out that Wikipedia, at the time this entry was created, was looking for more content about notable Hawaiians.  Dr. Conspiracy ( talk ) 20:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nomination, this article is a pretty clear-cut case of WP:BLP1E .  The only notable thing this man has done is verify Obama's birth certificate.  IncompA 21:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I found nothing usable on Newspapers.com, and the only stuff I could find on plain Google was trivial mentions about Obama's birth certificate, and a book he wrote for the Hawaiian state government.  (Also, apparently he was involved in a gay rights lawsuit, but that was just more trivial mentions of "the state registrar in Hawaii did so-and-so".)  Nothing I saw seemed GNG-usable - all mentions of him are only about what he does as part of his job.  casualdejekyll 23:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Don Fort: Small coverage solely from his government role (WP:NOTINHERITED), and not WP:SIGCOV that would inherently give him WP:GNG .  Longhornsg ( talk ) 17:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Pennsylvania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:08, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  — Karnataka talk 19:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Campaign for Safe Cosmetics: An earlier PROD was removed because of "many search hits" --well, there may be many hits, but the ones that might look helpful are just really short mentions ( [21] , [22] , [23] ), besides a ton of just websites and non-neutral outfits.  Here is the book listed in the article: a single mention; here is the LA Times article: a single mention with a brief appositive.  There is no proper coverage for notability.  The article itself--well, there's a ton of name dropping, a bunch of organizational links, and an audacious claims, "CSC helped pass two new laws in California," linked to their own website.  The subject does not meet our standards.  Drmies ( talk ) 14:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Mentioned here [24] , not really helping notability.  Rest are PR links or primary sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 16:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations ,  and Environment .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article itself is too promotional.  Agletarang ( talk ) 08:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - pure self-promotion.  Llajwa ( talk ) 21:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stacey Daniella Gabriel: She is not notable enough for inclusion, she is the runner-up of Miss Universe Philippines 2024.  She is not the winner of the competition.  Google search turn up results about her in the competition, but it is not notable enough.  Thank you.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Beauty pageants ,  and Philippines .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non notable pageant titleholder { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 15:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe she is notable enough through her career as an actress as well as her previous stints in other beauty pageants such as Binibining Pilipinas, not to mention she has a large fan base and can easily be notable as an influencer.  NathalieMendoza ( talk ) 06:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: While this article had a BLPPROD, not a PROD, I'm stating that this article is not eligible for Soft Deletion due to the unbolded Keep statement in this discussion.  Also, "notability" can't just be claimed, it has to be demonstrated through significant coverage in independent, secondary, reliable sources.  Do those exist?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] weak delete : Some critical notice of her advocacy [2] , but that's about all I can find.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Joe Franco (soccer): Joeykai ( talk ) 03:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete