Tradgeo : Outside of press releases, it doesn't look like there are any reliable sources from which to build an article.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 05:56, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The sources I have used to create are all reliable.  If we search "Tradgeo" on Google.  These sources appears.  Please consider this article North West Trading Company .  No external links introduced in this article.  This article has only three references, these references are type of the references that I have used in Tradgeo .  I will improve the article more.  Mukarram ( talk ) 06:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi @ Mukarram0126 : Just because the sources appear in Google doesn't mean that they meet Wikipedia's requirements.  In this case, they're press releases written by the company which means they're not independent.  Also, just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS doesn't mean this page will be kept.  BuySomeApples ( talk ) 21:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Give me time to improve article.  Mukarram ( talk ) 21:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] An article can be pushed back to what is known as draftspace.  In other words, a draft before becoming an article.  There's never a strict deadline to improve an article so there's always flexibility.  – The Grid ( talk ) 14:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Finance , Companies ,  and Florida .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "Outside of press releases, it doesn't look like there are any reliable sources from which to build an article" Regarding this, the article includes, for example, the SunBiz page, which is the state division where Florida (USA) companies are registered.  This is a government reference from the United States of America, where the company is registered.  Using this reference, the existence of the company, and data such as its address and manager, can be validated.  186.1.186.51 ( talk ) 18:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The external links I have used are more reliable.  Mukarram ( talk ) 21:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article has links to other existing articles that describe companies and have similar references.  How is this article different enough to require deletion?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lear419 ( talk • contribs ) 21:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I agreed.  Mukarram ( talk ) 21:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - Sumanuil .  (talk to me)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  04:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – entirely WP:SELFPUB profiles and Press releases, thus not WP:INDEPENDENT .  TLA (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Final relist.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Daniel ( talk ) 23:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No independent sources to be seen.  Also, read Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS .  Industrial Insect (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep The article have reference from Sunbiz.  Through this reference, the existence of company should be validated.  Needs improvements.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by User0451 ( talk • contribs ) 09:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Very odd that a new editor with just this single edit appears to ! vote at this AfD, especially in light of the previous paid editing.  HighKing ++ 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* .   "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject .  I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing ++ 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete