hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Seattle: Lacking in-depth coverage in secondary sources.  Sources at the article are mostly irrelevant, such as an opinion piece in a newspaper about Taiwan and China and a transcript of President Carter's address about recognition of China.  AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Organizations , Taiwan ,  and United States of America .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 07:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Delete nothing to suggest notability for this topic.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/redirect to Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States#Consular districts by missions , where the subject is already mentioned, per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion .   I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article.  A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future.  Cunard ( talk ) 08:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a defacto consulate which is less notable than an embassy.  Fails GNG.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States#Consular districts by missions per Cunard as WP:ATD .  Redirects are cheap.  Jumpytoo Talk 04:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Cunard a# ATD.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you for supporting a redirect as an alternative to deletion!  Cunard ( talk ) 11:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Gulzoda Amirova: I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG .  Passing mentions such as 1 , 2 and 3 was all that came up in searches.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Uzbekistan .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 04:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Battle Cry: Worship from the Frontlines: Seems non-notable Charsaddian ( talk ) 10:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 10:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Teen Mania Ministries - No evidence of notability, nor any evidence that it meets any WP:NALBUM criteria.  WJ94 ( talk ) 11:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Teen Mania Ministries per nom and WJ94.  ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 18:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as there is a lack of coverage in multiple reliable sources so that WP:GNG is not passed.  A redirect does not seem useful as I can't see it mentioned on the target page, imv Atlantic306 ( talk ) 19:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rex Baculfo: Sources used in the article are all mostly youtube or clips form the network.  I can't any news sources discussing this individual.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Honestly I agree with this, considering that I originally created the article as a redirect.  Yes, Rex has recently won in The Clash (season 5) , but each better sources takes long to be released.  PJ Santos ( talk ) 04:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Philippines .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect to The Clash (season 5) as WP:TOOSOON .  It can be restored once there's enough coverage about him aside from winning the recent season of The Clash.  SBKSPP ( talk ) 02:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect to The Clash (season 5) for the reasons above.  It's too soon to be a stand-alone bio article.  If that ever changes, then a page can be created at that point.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 05:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  Too early for a solo article.  Let it wait out for six months at the earliest, two years at most.  --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 05:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Clash (season 5) : per above.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 07:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to The Clash (season 5) .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 20:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Dojeon: The entire article appears to be sourced from https://en.dojeon.org Additionally, I am also nominating the following articles for deletion because they are all Jeung San Do ideas that are not covered by sources independent from the Jeung San Do movement: Sangsaeng ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Haewon ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Wonsibanbon ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Gaebyeok ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Cosmic year (Chinese astrology) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Tae eul ju ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Dojang (temple) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Boeun (Jeungsando) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Wpstatus ( talk ) 23:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions .  Wpstatus ( talk ) 23:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge .  I agree that it belongs in the main article as there is too much good info here to throw out.  However, a merge without inline cites is bad form.  I added a plea to the Talk and pinged editors of this article or the primary to see if anything can be salvaged.  Cheers, Last1in ( talk ) 18:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Jeung San Do .  The entire article is unreferenced and seems based on primary material so it should not be merged unless other reliable sources can be found.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 23:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as I think a bundled nomination like this needs more input from editors.  My question, is it being suggested to Merge all of these articles to a target article?  Because that would be a huge addition to a target article.  And is that target article Jeung San Do as was offered in the suggestion to Redirect or was a different target article envisioned here?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  22:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Reviewed the other articles listed, they should all just be redirected to Jeung San Do in my opinion unless more sources can be found as they are basically unreferenced.  - Indefensible ( talk ) 22:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Palo-Alto: Unsourced barangay (administrative ward/village) article.  Also, it is similar to both the problematic cases of Milagrosa and Paciano Rizal : it only serves as a directory: a breach of WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  See also Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive 47#Are barangays notable?  (can we please have a consensus now?) .  At the most closest alternative, redirect to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays .  AfD is created to provide a strong basis for redirection.  JWilz12345 ( Talk | Contrib's. ) 02:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Found nothing about this besides a google map location and this Wikipedia article, not notable.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 08:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] One of these utterly impossible Philippines articles.  It had 195 people living there in the 1903 census.  Lots of historical results in English including mentions in parliament and legal matters, and the establishment of a co-operative in 1991, but can only find real estate listings.  I haven't searched in local newspapers, though, but I'm making the assumption this needs to pass GNG and not GEOLAND, and I can't quite get there yet.  SportingFlyer T · C 10:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Palo Alto (disambiguation) .  Palo Alto, Calamba already redirects to Calamba, Laguna#Barangays and I'll add an entry for it at Palo Alto (disambiguation) .  There are insufficient reliable sources to say the hyphenated version of this name should only refer to this barangay, and some evidence ( [47] , [48] ) that this barangay is also known as "Palo Alto" without the hyphen.  Either way, there's no evidence of standalone notability.  Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 15:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree that this is the best solution.  — seav ( talk ) 18:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have no opposition to this.  Traumnovelle ( talk ) 21:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Palo Alto (disambiguation) per Dclemens1971's suggestion.  HueMan1 ( talk ) 03:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Palo Alto (disambiguation) per Dclemens1971 and WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per Dclemens1971.   It's not impossible that an article could be written about the barangay, but it would require sources that haven't been demonstrated and would need to be at a different title.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
On the Rocks (XM): Perhaps redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Defunct channels ?  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio .  Let'srun ( talk ) 15:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Defunct channels , where it is mentioned; this is the logical alternative to deletion for otherwise non-notable pre-Sirius merger XM channels (if not associated with another notable parent entity).  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as an ATD.  ArcAngel (talk) 20:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
WYGN-LD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Michigan .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 05:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Three Angels Broadcasting Network affiliates : this seems like the logical alternative to deletion for a not-separately-notable 3ABN affiliate.  (Its pre-3ABN history of carrying various Weigel stations does not net separate notability either as it was just retransmitting other stations, and in any event even that era is as much a precursor to WCWW-LD as it is the early days of this license — WYGN and what was then WRDY-LP essentially swapped licenses/facilities in 2002.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this article should have never been created to begin with and this television station was sold by Three Angels Broadcasting Network.  Catfurball ( talk ) 16:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting to continue to evaluate whether or not this page title should be redirected.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Three Angels Broadcasting Network affiliates per WCQ; also note Catfurball that the list is for affiliates , whether they're 3ABN-owned or not, which this certainly is.  Nate • ( chatter ) 17:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Daniel Kutner: Fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 11:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Israel , Andorra , Spain ,  and Argentina .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:BIO .  Google News yields very little.  Ambassadors are not inherently notable.  LibStar ( talk ) 01:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Agree.  Not enough here to justify the article.  Fails WP:GNG .  MaskedSinger ( talk ) 07:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of ambassadors of Israel to Spain per ATD and CHEAP.  gidonb ( talk ) 01:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Oz (comics): – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions .  – Laundry Pizza 03 ( d c̄ ) 15:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Issues not addressed for between 6 and 15 years; nothing to suggest notability, only external link is dead, lots of OR/NPOV, possible out-of-date information.  Either Delete or if some sources can be found possibly Merge with Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 16:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Caliber Comics#Selected titles , where it is already listed.  I am finding pretty much nothing regarding this comic, let alone coverage in reliable sources.  I would not be in favor in a merge to Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz , as this just does not appear to be a notable enough adaptation to be mentioned there.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 01:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Caliber Comics#Selected titles .  Hiding T 12:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Changed vote for consensus - Redirect to Caliber Comics#Selected titles .  BoomboxTestarossa ( talk ) 15:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Pacific Southwest Baseball League: There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage.  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Baseball and United States of America .  – Aidan721 ( talk ) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 17:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails GNG.  Wizardman 13:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Collegiate summer baseball .  Spanneraol ( talk ) 21:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Yap football team: Let's ask some questions.  Question 1: Notability policies and guidelines have changed since then, haven't they?  Question 2: has this particular Association Football team may have gathered some WP:SIGCOV since 2011?  My answers are to these questions Answer 1: Yes, they have changed, and are adverse to the retention of this article.  this would appear to me strongly supportive of a "delete" outcome here Answer 2: Nope, not as far as I can see Despite or possibly because Wikipedia:AFDISNOTCLEANUP I'm fine with any alternate outcome Shirt58 ( talk ) 🦘 09:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Football ,  and Oceania .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete the participation in Football at the Micronesian Games is not sufficient for an article on its own; and there is nothing else to base an article on.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 20:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I am neutral regarding whether to retain this title as a redirect.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 19:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or redirect to Football at the Micronesian Games .  Everything one could want to know about the team is located there.  Very far from notability.  Geschichte ( talk ) 20:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sadly there's nothing really wrong with this article apart from the fact it's for a very dusty far away area of the football world where the team isn't consistently active and where most news gets posted on Facebook instead in newspapers.  I think deleting this makes our encyclopaedia worse as it's correct and reliably sourced, but I can't make a good solid argument to keep this, nor is any coverage from the tournament they participated readily available online which could rebut the #2 argument for deletion.  So IAR keep from me, which will be discarded, but still, I object.  I am sure the competitions they participated in received at least some coverage somewhere, though, similar to the 2023 futsal tournament which was meant to create interest in the sport.  SportingFlyer T · C 06:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above.  Cos ( X + Z ) 18:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above.  Giant Snowman 19:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or merge to Football at the Micronesian Games per above.  Possibly a section like "participating teams" could be made on that page, containing a small summary of each team participating?  Just a suggestion VojvodaStranih ( talk ) 18:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Football at the Micronesian Games : As a WP:ATD .  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 09:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Intrinsic flame instabilities: at the very least, draftify Drowssap SMM ( say hello ) 18:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions .  Drowssap SMM ( say hello ) 18:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to flame .   The topic does seem borderline notable as the topic of a review or two (one linked in the article), but is a hyper-niche subject that probably is not well served by its own article.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 21:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Combustion instability , deleting current content.  That seems to cover the topic far better.  I suggest a redirect to the full article rather than a subsection, although the latter would also work.  Ldm1954 ( talk ) 08:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Combustion instability , per Ldm.  Article content is virtually duplicated from what is already there.  Fermiboson ( talk ) 11:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect