hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Vladimíra Krčková: I found 3.  One of them is good and can be used (but one source is not enough for notability - "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself")( https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/archiv/vladimira-krckova-je-veru-renesancni-umelkyne-proc-se-nikdo-neujal-jejiho-alba.A120807_123120_kavarna_chu ), one is an interview and therefore cannot be used to establish her notability ( https://english.radio.cz/vladimira-krckova-a-young-jazz-singer-who-lives-prague-8576387 ), and one barely covers her at all ( https://jazz.rozhlas.cz/jazzova-zpevacka-vladimira-krckova-pokrti-album-5178528?mob=1&print=1 ).  The page has no other sources, and is just written like an advertisement.  I tried working on the article myself but I don't believe it can be saved.  It's also strange to me that she is a Czech singer and yet has no Czech Wikipedia page.  Jaguarnik ( talk ) 04:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Barely any references, stuff like decided to travel around the world and release all the memories and conditioning that were preventing her from creating as well as living her life is not written in encyclopaedia language, in general the article feels promotional.  Especially with its undue focus on her personal life or health, which is also completely unsourced.  Ratnahastin ( talk ) 06:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Women ,  and Czech Republic .  Kpg jhp jm 07:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for PROMO with flowery language and not much of anything in RS.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I can find nothing reliable beyond what the nominator found.  Note that those articles are not only promotional but they're all from 2012, meaning that the singer and her management did a little promotional rush at that time and then nothing much happened.  The article's prose is clearly a repeat of a self-written biography that was meant for potential fans and it is not encyclopedic.  And forgive me, but recovering from depression doesn't make someone notable or even interesting when millions of other humble people have done the same.  --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 14:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete No indication of notability and agree with the reasons provided by DOOMSDAYER.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 08:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no WP:SIGCOV .  I removed the entirely unsourced "health" section as a serious BLP violation.  – filelakeshoe ( t / c ) 🐱 08:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above fails WP:SINGER and WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 18:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Adolph Weber: Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 17:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Olympics .  Paradise Chronicle ( talk ) 17:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions .  Shellwood ( talk ) 18:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note .  If the consensus is that this Weber is not notable, his page should not redirect; there is a murderer who is notable (see an entire book on him - plus a possibly notable legal scholar and politician ).  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 23:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Even Olympedia says there is nothing known about him... although other notable people with the name probably doesn't help in finding sources via internet.  Kingsif ( talk ) 21:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jim Hoffmann: References in article are routine mentions and a brief death notice; a search does not provide any indication of meeting WP:GNG .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 01:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Ice hockey , Germany ,  and Canada .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 01:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rasheda Abdul-Rahman: According to a Google search she existed, but there is no significant coverage about her.  References used in this article didn't show any notability.  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football ,  and Ghana .  ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 13:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Completely fails in WP:GNG .  Svartner ( talk ) 19:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Subject appears to only be mentioned in trivial wide-sweeping database sources, which do not generally confer notability per WP:SPORTCRIT .  Bsoyka ( talk ) 21:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Clearly fails WP: GNG .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 19:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Amanda Paris: Therefore, the article fails to meet the criteria.  GSS 💬 15:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women ,  and United States of America .  GSS 💬 15:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Microsoft ION: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 16:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : looks like a dead project to me, with no continuing presence and no notable impact on its launch.  Update: according to the ION Github, Microsoft is only a sustaining sponsor, and this is not a Microsoft product, so even the title "Microsoft ION" is a misnomer; it's actually developed by the Decentralized Identity Foundation , who are themselves a redlink -- I've reflected the article to reflect this.  Still a definite delete.   — The Anome ( talk ) 16:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : It had enough time to expand I don't see that it can be improved and its notability is very poor I'm sorry this is not a paper project nor a mirror.  Acartonadooopo ( talk ) 16:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There do exist various scattered writings about it online, but I haven't been able to find any RS .  While the name misnomer is easily fixed with a page move, there's ultimately nothing out there to establish notability (which is of course, the issue).  WhoAteMyButter ( 🌷 talk │ 🌻 contribs ) 19:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : is Microsoft still working on it?  I guess they dont after one google search.  Or maybe in fiture for now DELETE AnkkAnkur ( talk ) 21:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) — AnkkAnkur ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Revera (event): Google search returned no reliable independent coverage on the event.  Promotional tone with no denotable notability.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 16:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , India ,  and Kerala .  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 16:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I couldn't find anything about it on the web except for Facebook posts.  This topic doesn't seem notable at all; it appears to be promotional and fails to meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline ( WP:GNG ).  Grabup ( talk ) 16:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : it appears to be promotional, fails WP:GNG or WP:N(E) ~~ User:Spworld2 ( talk ) 2:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Delete .  No sources on the page and this page seems like promotion of an event held by student union of a college.  WP:PROMO .  Fails WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 15:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  No reliable sources are provided, event do look like some promotion.  Hookiq ( talk ) 15:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete lacks sources fails WP:GNG .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 19:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mystro Sugar: A lot of poor sources here, Complex doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV .  Also may be WP:UPE .  TLA (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NSINGER , subject is clearly not notable .  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 16:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lefter Koxhaj: There has been no evolution in the subject's notability since then.  Delete and WP:SALT .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Albania ,  and Kosovo .  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 17:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I see no improvement.  None of the issues that were raised at the previous deletion discussion were addressed.  The currently cited sources (which also includes one unreliable forum source) do not really give an in-depth coverage about him.  His death at the 2001 Skopje police raid is the only thing that he's notable for.  StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 18:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] That's not even a valid argument,last time you said it was a useless page,you clearly you knew it wasn't useless still wanted to delete it now your using this Argument,this is vandalizing AcEagle12 ( talk ) 20:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] He is the only commander of NLA who didn't have a wiki page so I created it deleting it is a mistake,and the reason why it got deleted last time is because it had no sources and I added 4 sources so it shouldn't be deleted AcEagle12 ( talk ) 20:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete completely and utterly ridiculous - this isn't a notable person.  Being a commander doesn't make anyone notable, and the lack of other coverage indicates that, again, this person doesn't meet GNG much less any more specific criteria.  PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] hes not just a normal commander he's the founder of the Skanderbeg Special Unit which is one of the most famous units of the 2001 insurgency,if this page gets deleted then by your logic you must delete every single 2001 insurgency commander page and this guy is one of the most important commanders he's very notable AcEagle12 ( talk ) 22:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
BHG Financial: Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.  Nothing clearing WP:CORPDEPTH .  Massively bombarded with routine announcements, regurgitated PR, listings and trivial "best" type pieces.  duffbeerforme ( talk ) 12:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Florida .  Owen× ☎ 14:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 20:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per reasons provided by nom Llajwa ( talk ) 13:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lewpotdeniya: Hongsy ( talk ) 14:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions .  Hongsy ( talk ) 14:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Effectively unsourced, nothing with this name at the location given in the article, fails WP:V .  FOARP ( talk ) 11:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mohsin Shafi: Several of the citations are name checks only, not sure about the reliability of the others.  An online BEFORE search reveals social media and primary sources.  Bringing it here for the community to decide.  Netherzone ( talk ) 22:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Pakistan .  Netherzone ( talk ) 22:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Some passing mention in reliable and unreliable sources, fails to meet WP:ARTIST .  M.Ashraf333 ( talk ) 11:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This has all the hallmarks of a WP:SPA -created promo.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 17:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Circle Club: Article has been an orphan since creation in 2007 and its references are thin.  WP:BEFORE reveals only basic local press coverage of this venue, mostly related to its closure.  Flip Format ( talk ) 14:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , United Kingdom ,  and England .  Flip Format ( talk ) 14:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Apparently it was so secretive, no one bothered to join.  Note: It wasn't a "night club" but rather a "private members' club", like the clubs on this list List of members' clubs in London , except in Manchester.  Cielquiparle ( talk ) 03:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete It's closed now.  It seems like it was important locally, but I will treat it as though it was a restaurant.  I saw no evidence that it had made any impact outside of Manchester.  Though, it did apparently attract some famous people when it was open.  I'm open to any arguments somebody wants to make around that.  James.folsom ( talk ) 23:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
East Los Angeles College Alumni Association: Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  17:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails NCORP as well.  voorts ( talk / contributions ) 18:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Marc Roca Barceló: Black Kite (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople .  Black Kite (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Spain .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete does not meet WP:SPORTCRIT / WP:NOLYMPICS .  I am unable to find coverage.  Lightburst ( talk ) 00:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  A text posted up right after the player participated in the 2016 Olympics , an admirable feat for any athlete but one that does not convey instant Wiki-notability .  Fails WP:GNG trivially, but also WP:WPOLO/N .  - The Gnome ( talk ) 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The article does not meet the standard set forth in WP:SPORTSCRIT #5.  Also, no SIGCOV is presented to show qualification under WP:GNG .  Cbl62 ( talk ) 13:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Robin Hood's Quest: OceanHok ( talk ) 17:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions .  OceanHok ( talk ) 17:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment The game has an unmentioned review from Igromania , so there could be more out there.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - game has reviews on various notable sources including IGN Cabe 6403 ( Talk • Sign ) 18:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Uh, no.  That's not an IGN review, just a directory page.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 18:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I will note that IGN hasn't written about it (or reviewed it).  The IGN link is a database entry, with the only text there, what appears to be, the publishers blurb.  certainly not SIGCOV that contributes to N .  In fact, the only review from a notable source (i.e. one with an article), that's currently in the article, is Jeuxvideo 's.  Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 18:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Cakelot1 : It has a review from Jeuxvideo?  It seems like a very short news post to me.  The Igromania one is the only review I could  track down from a reliable source.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 20:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I found this Igromania review, but that's it.  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 23:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Fails GNG, was able to find a review from Absolute Games , the game could meet GNG if another review is found - I scoured Google and Archive.org and found nothing else.  Waxworker ( talk ) 02:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Here's a link to the Strategy Informer review: [8] , probably not a reliable source.  -- Mika1h ( talk ) 09:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep by reviews from Igromania, Absolute Games and Strategy Informer already mentioned in the discussion.  Merko ( talk ) 21:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's unclear and probably doubtful that Strategy Informer is a reliable source.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete With only 2 reviews in RS that could be found, the game doesn't seem to possess the depth of coverage a notable game requires.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ ) 21:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete