hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Tricycle Driver, Kasangga Mo: QuicoleJR ( talk ) 17:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Philippines .  QuicoleJR ( talk ) 17:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete no reliable source hits on Google and no hits on Google News Archives.  Google News turns out three potential references but all just provides passing mentions of the film -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NFILM , a WP:BEFORE search nothing to pass the guideline.  ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 09:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
CodeRush: I don't think this is true.  The sources are all primary (both now and at the time of the PROD), and the secondary sources I could find online were self-published blogs that do not meet the standard for reliability.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 02:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Did not find sources that are independent and reliable for the subject.  Fails WP:GNG .  0x Deadbeef →∞ ( talk to me ) 04:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not seeing any WP:SIGCOV for this.  Some mentions in . NET tutorial books but those are limited to "you can use this, moving on."  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
The Natural History of Fear: There is a lack of reliable sources for this article online, and it only contains an external link to the production company's website.  List reference to this article is at Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures .  Currently, this article does little more than serve as an external link an online store to purchase the release.  This article have existed for over a decade with no improvement to satisfy notability.  Torpedoi ( talk ) 08:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Radio .  Torpedoi ( talk ) 08:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I agree I couldnt find sufficent coverage.  Questions?  four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Asd Hockey Marzotto Valdagno: Aydoh8 ( talk ) 02:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Andrew Garth: Fails WP:GNG .  Uhooep ( talk ) 23:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations , Slovakia ,  and United Kingdom .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete 3 of the 4 sources are primary.  Fails WP:BIO .  LibStar ( talk ) 01:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Woodie Blackman: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 18:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , sadly.  I can find passing mentions of his books, and brief obituaries, but not the in-depth coverage of him or his works needed for WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR .  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 23:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Islamic front in aleppo: Originally I moved to draft to give the author time to fix the problems but they simply recreated in it mainspace.  (See Draft talk:Islamic front in aleppo ) // Timothy :: talk 00:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Organizations , Religion , Islam ,  and Syria .  Skynxnex ( talk ) 01:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Is an absolute trainwreck.  Even if there was a shred of notability, it would have to be blown up .  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 10:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , normally I would recommend draftifying as deletion is not cleanup but since this is just a copy and paste move they can continue working on the draft that already exists.  This will give the creator plenty of time to cite their sources and have experienced editors point out whats wrong with it when they submit it.  FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 17:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete given the same arguments provided above.  Creator has made other articles with copy-paste moves and has been informed about the proper way to publish articles.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 18:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Upon further review, it looks like this article may have been recreated following a speedy delete, making it eligible for G4.  On July 30, 2A00:23EE:15F8:8B21:AC2B:E4FF:FEA3:551E proposed the article for speedy deletion because an article already existed for the topic (see: User talk:Libya345433#Your contributed article, Islamic front in aleppo .  Three hours later, Libya re-created the page with the edit summary "Right leave alone 😔".  As such, this should be CSD G4.  Further, Libya has received a vandalism warning.  Significa liberdade ( talk ) 18:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] i forgot to be honest about the jabhat Ansar Al Sham deletion Libya345433 ( talk ) 21:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
First American Scientific Corp.: scope_creep Talk 15:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Routine filings and press releases; nothing else found that was independent of the company itself.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete citations are SEC filing and financial info.  Nothing can be found in a google search.  Fbiagent010 ( talk ) 06:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  All I see is WP:ROUTINE coverage, nothing that would pass WP:NCORP .  Jacona ( talk ) 00:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Gabriel Billington: The only article that comes close to WP:SIGCOV is [17] .  The article fails WP:GNG .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 08:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 09:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep - Professional footballer with news reports from five different news websites. -- Echetus X e 12:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] All articles are routine transfer or match reports, no WP:SIGCOV . Robby.is.on ( talk ) 12:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftfy , the player will likely pass GNG soon as they just made their pro debut in a highly covered league.-- Ortizesp ( talk ) 05:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, CycloneYoris talk!  20:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify - player likely to become notable in near future, however not notable as not enough significant coverage to pass WP:GNG at the moment.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 00:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Hram Hall: Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs ) 13:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No coverage found in newspapers or in books.  Fails WP:NBUILD as there is no coverage to indicate the importance of that building in any way.  We don't need an article on every single building out there.  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 19:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Article fails WP:OR , and is a WP:STUB despite being 9 years old.  Overall, article seems to not be WP:N .  -- Mjks28 ( talk ) 05:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Mjks28 , just to note that being a WP:STUB by itself is not a reason for deletion.  It's more about failing notability .  Cheers!  Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 18:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I understand being a WP:STUB isn't alone a reason for deletion.  It is just part of my overall profile on the article, though my main reasons are that the article doesn't appear to pass WP:N , and is WP:OR .  Mjks28 ( talk ) 23:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I can't find any coverage beyond trivial mentions that RK Jugović plays there.   Perhaps that could be a redirect target?  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 18:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 14:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom and comments above.  M S Hassan ( talk ) 14:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
World Designing Forum: CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Fashion , India ,  and Uttar Pradesh .  CNMall41 ( talk ) 19:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  I cleaned up the worst of the advertising, but can't find any significant independent coverage, just a ton of paid placement and press releases.  It also doesn't seem to operate outside of India, despite its grand-sounding name.  Declined three times at draft, two of which were after this article was created.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Tendentious AfC resubmissions followed by mainspace creation to bypass AfC altogether.  Not notable per above editors.  Uhai ( talk ) 05:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NCORP .  It is a brochure advertising article.  No redeeming features.  scope_creep Talk 17:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Creator looks like they were on a paid-editing tear.  ☆ Bri ( talk ) 20:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Malgosia Majewska: The primary notability claim here is that she won Miss World Canada and then went on to compete but not win in the international Miss World finals -- which would be fine if the article were properly sourced, but is not "inherently" notable enough to constitute an automatic inclusion freebie without WP:GNG -worthy sourcing to support it.  Most Miss World Canada winners, in fact, do not have articles at all, and neither do many of the contestants listed in Miss World 2006 .  So nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have proper reliable source coverage about her in real media.  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Canada .  Bearcat ( talk ) 18:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Lacks sufficient citations to meet WP:V and WP:BLP .  -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 02:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Julia Williams (academic): BrigadierG ( talk ) 11:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Health and fitness , Medicine ,  and United Kingdom .  Owen× ☎ 13:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  It's really scraping the bottom of the barrel when you list getting a PhD as an "award"!  Athel cb ( talk ) 14:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I went through the page and tried to improve it, but it wasn't worth the time - does not satisfy WP:PROF .  Qflib ( talk ) 17:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Scopus profile shows c.  850 citations, I don't know if that is high or low for the field: [21] .  Resonant Dis tor tion 19:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rainwave: QuietCicada - Talk 01:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Websites .  QuietCicada - Talk 01:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Video games .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails GNG.  No hits at all in WP:VG/S 's search.  A broader Google News search finds a couple of mentions on unreliable sites for an Android app to listen to the streams, which may not be official and simply says "There's an app for this".  Most other results are for an unrelated product.  -- ferret ( talk ) 06:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
ST Mary's School Chattogram: It does, however fail WP:GNG / WP:ORG .  Kleuske ( talk ) 17:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I don't see the slightest hint of notability here, and there's a severe lack of any useful information at all.  signed , Willondon ( talk ) 18:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non notable elementary school.  2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk ) 04:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Sophia Mendonça: In fact, all the articles related to this person, their mother and their work are spams.  It's goes way beyond en.WP.  It started in the pt.WP (this article "home wiki") where this article was deleted, along several others related to it, via AfD and salted.  The same account who created this article here also created this same article in the pt.WP, along with several other articles related to this same person.  They also, created many of these same articles here.  They also created and maintained items related to this person on Wikidata and uploaded several, now-deleted, images related to it, in WikiCommons.  This is a coordinated attempt to use WMF projects to promote someone who is not notable per our criteria.  None of the sources in the article have " significant coverage " and addresses the topic directly and in detail.  Most of the source are not even reliable and several of them are primary/self-published.  I strongly suggest that this article is deleted and salted.  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 01:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Brazil .  Kacamata!  Dimmi!!! 01:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 01:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment on author: Last December they were asked to credit the original source for translated articles, and in March they were asked if they had an external connection with Sophia Mendonça.  There has been no communication from the user so far.  The Draft:Sophia Silva de Mendonça which was being edited in parallel by the same author, and which I have just BLARd, was tagged as undisclosed paid.  Jay 💬 05:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As per the detailed nomination.  BoyTheKingCanDance ( talk ) 06:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and Salt per nom.  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 06:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete