hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Shadi Farajpour: lots of incorrect information.  this lady never won a "World Championship medal", I added more pages created by the same user, all of them fail notability in different levels.  I can see there are lots of wrong categories for each of them, intentionally (to make them look notable) or just from a copy/paste.  for example Hossein Rahmati never played a single minute for the Iran national basketball team but he is listed as someone who played at the Asian Games and FIBA World Cup here , he apparently plays for a club in Sweden which is not in the highest level.  I can give examples about others too.  the last two pages may be considered as notable.  the futsal guy played at the World Cup and Mehran Feyz won some junior volleyball medals but I listed them to see what other people think.  Sports2021 ( talk ) 19:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Sports2021 ( talk ) 19:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am also nominating the following related pages: Hossein Rahmati ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Omid Fouladivanda ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Ali Akbarpour (athlete) ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Bagher Mohammadi ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Mehran Feyz ( edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views ) Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Iran .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 19:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: I'd like to see more participation on a bundled nomination.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  20:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Bundle delete all the nominated articles.  All fails WP:ATHLETE / WP:SPORTSPERSON and also WP:GNG .  Lethweimaster ( talk ) 14:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Golf Australia Magazine: Sources provided are primary/promotional in nature.  Most substantial source I have been able to locate is this brief fluff interview with the editor .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 04:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Golf ,  and Australia .  Triptothecottage ( talk ) 04:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I have performed some searches earlier with the same result.  It is very strange that one of the few remaining golf magazines in a large country does not appear to generate much in terms of independent sources describing it (I even checked press in the National Library).  -- Викидим ( talk ) 00:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of J-pop concerts held outside Asia: ― Justin ( ko a v f ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 19:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Lists ,  and Japan .  ― Justin ( ko a v f ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 09:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Wow... that's a huge body of work.  The list feels strongly in WP:NOT territory.  The lede is irrelevant to the topic of concerts, and the list thus lacks an explanation of why this is a relevant list.  It's certainly not because such concerts are rare.  The listed concerts are certainly vastly different in size too.  Also, if the idea is to handle Japanese penetration of other music markets, why limit it to J-pop and exclude J-rock, metal etc.?  Why even limit it to non-Asian countries, seeing as a concert in Lebanon would be just as "exotic" as one in Cyprus?  Geschichte ( talk ) 14:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, guys!  Just to point out that, although the name of the list "List of J-pop concerts held outside Asia", it lists concerts by bands of any music style, such as j-rock and metal.  As to why limit to non-Asian countries, I do not know why, but I did contribute substantially to the article and I feel it is important to have records of the outreach of these bands.  Maybe it's just the fan in me and I'm overstepping WP boundaries.  Macacaosapao ( talk ) 01:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  I'm indifferent to whether the article should be kept or deleted (though the latter would save me a buttload of work), but I'd like to point out there is a similar article titled List of K-pop concerts held outside Asia , for which this discussion should also apply.  DragonFury ( talk ) 15:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Also generally unsure because essentially this is genuinely useful information somebody might choose to look up, and policy sometimes doesn't cover that.  At the same time, while the older data is useful, the globalisation of music and the fact it's seemingly becoming a list of Babymetal dates makes it feel less important now.  The information should at the very minimum be preserved.  KaisaL ( talk ) Delete - a WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of WP:ROUTINE events.  J-pop etc. is global enough that not every instance of it outside of Asia is notable.  Jonathan Deamer ( talk ) 21:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom and Jonathan Deamer too.  SpacedFarmer ( talk ) 07:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unnecessary trivia.  Plenty of bands perform outside of their home country.  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , far-fetched topic by my and others' reasoning above.  Geschichte ( talk ) 06:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Jan Schweiterman: Article is largely unsourced except for an IMDb link and a Palm Beach Post reference.  Fails WP:NACTOR .  CycloneYoris talk!  00:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Film .  CycloneYoris talk!  00:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I can find two short paragraphs in a "where are they now" article about the cast , and in a dubious source, and a couple of mentions in four or five not-very-strong sources.  Nothing substantial.  Does not meet GNG.  Lamona ( talk ) 15:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak keep : Just enough coverage of his character...  There's a sequel coming out, talk of him having a cameo, so there is some recent coverage as well.  [37] , [38] , [39] .  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this person does not seem independently notable.  Brad ( talk ) 00:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no independent detailed coverage.  - Altenmann >talk 02:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no significant coverage Mr Vili talk 04:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ed Forest: I'm not seeing refs to consider but perhaps they exist in languages I can't read.  JMWt ( talk ) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Norway and Sweden .  JMWt ( talk ) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Geography .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I think this is just an old mis-translation.  Eidskog (described in this article as a town near there) translates roughly as "Ed Forest".   Google just returns people of this name, and ChatGPT refers to the "Eidskog forest" in the area instead.  Walsh90210 ( talk ) 00:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : I found what seems like a relevant reference: an article in Svensk geografisk årsbok from 1951 [35] (not available digitally).  I found a web page that discusses thar article, which confirms that it's the right forest [36] .  Andejons ( talk ) 10:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ok, I can't get that to load but I'm going to assume good faith.  As you can see it, would you think it meets the criteria of substantial coverage in a RS?  JMWt ( talk ) 10:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It seems to have a 15-page article devoted to it published in a scholarly annual.  I'm not sure if that is usually seen as enough for notability.  Andejons ( talk ) 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Right.  I don't usually consider references that nobody has read, but that does sound quite long JMWt ( talk ) 12:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  104.7.152.180 ( talk ) 14:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tomlab: A record label is a business/company, therefore it's expected to pass NCORP for it to kept.  Graywalls ( talk ) 18:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Germany .  Graywalls ( talk ) 18:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I hate to say it because I'm a fan of some of their artists, but I can't find anything other than sites selling records and completely unrelated hits for a Matlab package.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per above TheWikiToby ( talk ) 18:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Nighat Abbass: Routine coverage of plea by the subject on the Uniform Civil Code in India and other slams to other notable subject like Kangana Ranaut , see [5] and Arvind Kejriwal , see [6] -- QuadriSyed Sahab ( T · C 15:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Women , India ,  and Delhi .  QuadriSyed Sahab ( T · C 15:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Non-notable "activist".  I can't see them passing NPOL either, minimal coverage and "media panelist" is not NPOL-worthy.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ghanim Alsheikh: BEFORE shows a number of publications talking to the subject's associations with these institutions, all of which appear to be authored by one G. Al Sheikh.  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Iraq .  Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  Seems to have a fair amount of citations on Google scholar spanning medical, medical education, and public health work [32] , suggesting WP:ACADEMIC .1.  Additionally I would suppose "Founding Dean" holds up to WP:ACADEMIC .5/6 in the countries he's held that title in.  — siro χ o 09:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Although a borderline case but appears to pass SNG for Professor.  Okoslavia ( talk ) 05:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The subject does not meet NPROF C5/6 (dean of a medical school is never enough), and citation numbers are very far from satisfying C1 in this field.  JoelleJay ( talk ) 22:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 07:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Shravan Kushwaha: Being a candidate in the imminent general election isn't a pass for WP:NPOL .  Getting his wife elected to whatever position isn't a pass either.  Subject was never elected for any political position and the general election is yet to happen.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 00:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Bihar .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep Mukhia is a constitutional post in India.  This is head of local government and this person has serves in this office for years and now aiming for higher office.  We have Ritu Jaiswal who also remained mukhia.  So I don't think it violates any policy.  Admantine123 ( talk ) 01:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Admantine123 No, local government heads are not considered inherently notable under WP:NPOL regardless of how many years they spent serving, AFAIK.  So, that doesn’t count for this subject.  Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 06:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  He doesn't seem to have significant coverage in reliable sources per GNG.  According to WP:NPOL , "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability".  I think this says it all!  The sources cited don't even give enough proof of notability.  They only give a mere "trivial" mention of his candidacy.  That's clearly not enough!  ZyphorianNexus ( talk ) 01:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Subject fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG . — TheWikiholic ( talk ) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as noted above, per NPOL and GNG, and also WP:NOTINHERITED .  Being a member of a political dynasty does not guarantee a Wikipedia article.  Finally, the three sources do not prove WP:SIGCOV for this member of that family.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lana Harrison: Has not won any major tournaments and has a relatively low highest ranking.  LibStar ( talk ) 00:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women ,  and New Zealand .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This person is a long way from meeting GNG.  LibStar , this should have been PRODDED rather than going straight to AfD.  Schwede 66 08:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  I can't find any coverage of her in reliable secondary sources, apart from passing mentions in routine squash game coverage.  Unlike Abbie Palmer , where I just objected to the decision to PROD (although interestingly their highest rankings aren't that far apart!).  Cheers, Chocmilk03 ( talk ) 00:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete sorry to squash the hopes of those wanting this page to stay but it goes nowhere near satisfying WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk ) 06:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rudhraksh J: There has already been a deletion discussion using his full name; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudhraksh Jaiswal , and Rudhraksh Jaiswal is a redirect.   This article has an abbreviated form of his name as a novel method of gaming of article titles .   The AFD was tainted by sockpuppetry by both the Keep and the Delete voters, but that does not warrant trying to evade the name.   The redirect is not locked, so the originator could have expanded the redirect, or asked for Deletion Review .   A review of the article shows that this article also  does not establish acting notability or general notability .   A review of the references shows that they are not about the actor, but about films about the Mahabharata , an interview with an actress, and an interview with the subject.  Reference Number Reference Comments Independent Significant Reliable Secondary 1 indiatoday.in Not about the actor but about Indian mythological films Yes No Yes No 2 archive.org from Times of India About the Mahabharata Yes No Sometimes No 3 Times of India Another article about the Mahabharata Yes No Sometimes No 4 Times of India Appears to be about someone else and other films Yes No Sometimes No 5 Times of India An interview with the leading lady in a film in which he had a minor role Yes No Sometimes No 6 Indiatoday.in An interview about why he isnt in a film due to covid No Yes Yes No There is also a draft, Draft:Rudhraksh Jaiswal .   It should be left so that it can be expanded if he has another major role.   This title should be deleted because it is not a plausible search term and is an article about a non-notable person.  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 23:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Film ,  and India .  Robert McClenon ( talk ) 23:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.   I'd typically support a WP:ATD-R alternative, but I agree with the nom that it seems an implausible search term, which would become a WP:R3 redirect to delete.  Options to expand the draft or re-edit the redirect at the appropriate time when additional roles/coverage can be added should be utilized, as also stated by nom.  - 2pou ( talk ) 16:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Relisting as I believe Soft Deletion is not possible due to the previous AFD under a different article title.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  23:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete seems the best course, sources are a no-go, search term is too broad so that I find anyone with this name.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 23:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brieana Hallo: I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Women , Football , Dominican Republic , Delaware ,  and Hawaii .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:41, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A bit of coverage from WDEL here .  BeanieFan11 ( talk ) 19:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not enough significant coverage to justify GNG being passed.  Paul Vaurie ( talk ) 16:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stanislas Branicki: I found a few quotes here from Le Parisien and not much else.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and France .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 00:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment in French the article has already existed for a year+, however it is also a stub.  It is possible this article does not meet WP:GNG.  However, I think it best wait for a comment by the creator of the article, perhaps if more sources are brought than GNG can be met.  Homerethegreat ( talk ) 15:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete