hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Birchfield, Washington : I don't think there's anything controversial in saying this is a non-notable and not generally recognized location.   Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article.   Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: [5] , as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings.   There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was for the road, not any "community".   Fails WP:GEOLAND .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Washington .  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment one of the references is just left over from the hasty copy of Ashue.  James.folsom ( talk ) 20:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I hate not knowing what it was, but there is not a trace of it's existence.  James.folsom ( talk ) 21:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Birchfield, Yethonat, Farron, Holt, Moxee, and Gleed were freight stations on the Northern Pacific Railway.   Compare Farron, Washington ( AfD discussion ).  Uncle G ( talk ) 03:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Thanks Uncle G. I couldn't figure out what Yethonat was either.  It had zero mentions in the paper.  So I prodded it.  James.folsom ( talk ) 22:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete The oldest topo I found lists this as "Birchfield Sta" and I was able to get to the station listing page via Wayback, where it claims it to be a town but gives no justification for that statement.  Certainly the oldest aerial I found doesn't support this.  Mangoe ( talk ) 04:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darbar-e-Sadria : Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep : I disagree that the WP:OR policy has any relevance to this article.  Sources appear to be reliable for bare facts asserted in this entry Jack4576 ( talk ) 06:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] What about the fact it's unsourced?  JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs ) 07:00, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It is sourced with a primary source i.e. its website (claiming to be the official website).  Per your criteria: I can create a similar website about my place and claim notability?  BookishReader ( talk ) 11:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Completely fails WP:GNG .  Insight 3 ( talk ) 08:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  01:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  I couldn't find any sources to add and seems to based on original research.  JML1148 ( talk | contribs ) 01:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Intensified submarine warfare : No clear agreed upon meaning (googling finds authors using it in the plain english sense to refer to the 1915 campaign and the proposed 1917 campaign, not the period the article talks about), and not apparently used except by those authors.  Also the article is currently factually problematic, as many writers consider prize rules to be essentially in place in this period and certainly do not agree that submarines were "virtually ineffective".  Fangz ( talk ) 17:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] In fact might be only used in a single history book, the second source listed on the page finds no reference to the term in google books.  Fangz ( talk ) 17:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions .  Fangz ( talk ) 18:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Germany .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete , can't find any good sources using this name, just few passing mentions.  Artem.G ( talk ) 19:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete If you can enumerate only a couple of books that use the term in isolation, it is not a suitable article topic.  Compare to Unrestricted submarine warfare as an actual, solidly documented concept.  -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs ) 06:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Alexander Peters (footballer) : Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Belize .  Sportsfan 1234 ( talk ) 16:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 21:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : No sources with SIGCOV found.  The Herald (Benison) ( talk ) 18:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Soh Ohba : My BEFORE search found nothing of substance in English.  Searches in Japanese seemed much of the same, but I had to use Google translate so could have missed some strong sources.  Looks like an attempt at self-promotion by the subject (who has apparently created or substantially edited the article), failing GNG.  – 2 .  O .  Boxing 11:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics , Boxing ,  and Japan .  2 .  O .  Boxing 11:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Conservatism .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete There definitely appears to be COI issues with this article.   More important, however, are the facts that he appears to fail both WP:NBOX and WP:GNG .   Rankings by any of the many minor boxing organizations fail to show WP notability.   Articles about these rankings, visiting his uncle's grave, database entries, or his personal blog do not show the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG .   He also inherits no WP notability for his uncle having been a notable boxer.  Papaursa ( talk ) 19:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Major SPA , COI issues, dubious notability, it has been edited by bad faith/unsourced/COI editors so much that its honestly hard to know where to start when removing bad content.  — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) ( talk ) 20:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Colours of One : This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Wales .  Owen× ☎ 19:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete From what I can see at WP:NBAND , the only criteria this article would be going for would be the first one - unfortunately, I just don't think that the short mention in a BBC article and the Room Thirteen references (potentially self-published sources ) club together to show notability.  Internet searches don't throw up any missing coverage either, so not even much potential for me to quickly improve it.  Gazamp ( talk ) 23:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of current yeomanry units of the British Army : PercyPigUK ( talk ) 11:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom .  PercyPigUK ( talk ) 11:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  05:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect - unnecessary and duplicates content.  Not actually even sure the R is needed.  JMWt ( talk ) 07:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not even merging is an option as it's just a copy of Yeomanry .  Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 08:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Content fork, and repetition, of Yeomanry but with 45x less average views.  Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 19:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Julie Tilsner : Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG .  - UtherSRG (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Authors , Women ,  and Journalism .  UtherSRG (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Lacks coverage in independent sources to meet WP:NBASIC .  MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
New Technology Management : TLA (talk) 02:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military , Companies , Technology ,  and Virginia .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  00:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  An excerpt: "The company has a team of experienced professionals who are experts in a wide range of IT disciplines. NTMI is committed to providing its clients with the highest quality of service and delivering innovative solutions that meet their business needs."  Wow, you don't say.  This really doesn't look great.  I couldn't find any reffies.  jp × g 🗯️ 21:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Big Ben Phonogram : The About section in the website listed in References - https://www.bigben.se/phonogram/about draws a blank.  Wikilover3509 ( talk ) 10:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music , Companies , Sweden ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time.  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 23:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Bojan Đorđević : The only secondary sources I found are a report of him returning from injury in January and July transfer news , both from mentioned year.  I'll admit that I don't know enough Serbian media to know if said sources are reliable, but neither of those pass WP:GNG in my opinion.  Corresponding article on Serbian Wikipedia is likewise a stub; neither of the two sources listed there show in-depth coverage.  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Serbia .  ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment .  Catania had a player Stefan Đorđević (footballer, born 1991) from 2016.  Geschichte ( talk ) 17:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] If my grandmother had wheels she'd be a bicycle.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No need to be snappy.  My comment was a reply to a part found in the original AFD: " Possible dubious story of Đorđević being a former footballer of Italian club Catania, for which he has played 32 games since 2016. However, I can't find anything to verify it".  This comment was removed some 8 hours before you entered the discussion.  Geschichte ( talk ) 15:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 18:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 18:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Stun Siva : Fails WP:SIRS and so fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO .  - UtherSRG (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , India ,  and Tamil Nadu .  UtherSRG (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : The subject fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG , as no reliable sources were found after my investigation.  The Times of India cannot establish notability according to WP:TOI .  Additionally, citing YouTube in the article is entirely pointless when it comes to establishing notability.  Grab Up - Talk 12:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Poor and unreliable sources that do not have coverage on the subject's biography.  Few words on turning from stuntman to director to getting opportunities to movies he is associated with.  Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG .  RangersRus ( talk ) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article fails WP:GNG & WP:NBIO and is full of unreliable sources.  Based Kashmiri ( talk ) 06:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep .  I have included the early life, personal life & carrer as part of Stun Siva's biography WP:BIO in the page: Stun Siva and WP:SIRS along with including articles from The Hindu & The New Indian Express newspapers & Google Books WP:SIRS , WP:THEHINDU and WP:INDIANEXP as evidences for Stun Siva's life, career and achievements.  Please kindly consider my points to retain the page: Stun Siva — Preceding signed comment added by Ratheef Ahammed Refuon ( talk 14:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] contribs ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of countries by spoken languages : It is completely arbitrary to create a list of countries by languages spoken, because 1 person not speaking the majority language is already a "minority".  A single city like Brussels already has inhabitants speaking about 100 different native languages, and there's no point in marking these all as "minorities".  In addition, CfDs dating as far back as 2019, recently repeatedly confirmed that language family is WP:NONDEFINING .  Finally, if the topic of the list is spoken languages (a demographic question), why bother mentioning which languages are official, recognised or protected (a legal question)?  This list has no clear topic, tries to be/do multiple things at once, and fails at all of them.  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 19:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language , Geography ,  and Lists .  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 19:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete let’s just say that basically every language is probably spoken by someone in the US, and it’s impossible to count every language spoken everywhere else because there’s always one random person (or a lot of random people) who speak Splotsylvanian in Florbistan even if it’s not even a top-10 language in Florbistan.  Countries by majority languages maybe, but not literally every language spoken by at least x persons .  Dronebogus ( talk ) 21:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] My thoughts exactly.  (Well, admittedly I wasn't thinking about Splotsylvanian in Florbistan. But I put the question to a friend of mine: "Should we include "Karakalpakstani" in "Netherlands" if one inhabitant of Amsterdam spoke it?"  She: "No. It has to be significant."  I: "Ah, but how many people is "significant"?"  She: "I don't know."  It's just arbitrary.).  Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk ) 21:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Each respective language should have a list of places where it's spoken, like Greek_language#Geographic_distribution .  With the US listed for 74 languages ( https://language.mki.wisc.edu/essays/letzebuergesch-and-swiss-german-in-wisconsin/ was interesting to look up), I don't think this is a meaningful or useful list or any more useful than various other places.  Reywas92 Talk 17:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This appears to be mostly original research and there are far too many unknowns about which minority languages are used in certain countries.  Ajf773 ( talk ) 22:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is really the most linguistically weird page I have ever seen on WP.  Suitskvarts ( talk ) 08:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete a list can never be made based on spoken languages, there will always be one not included.  Karnataka ( talk ) 09:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harbour Honey : Not seeing any WP:SIGCOV on a WP:BEFORE .  WikiOriginal-9 ( talk ) 00:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Companies , Environment ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nomination.  Sourced mostly by the company blog (which was up yesterday, but is down today), and two government websites with reports of Asian hornet sightings in Eastbourne, but without mentioning the company.  I can find nothing at all about them online, which is unsurprising as the article says the company was only formed in June.  There are companies with this name in Canada and New Zealand, which appear to be unrelated.  We currently have no verification that this company actually exists.  Wikishovel ( talk ) 10:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks like a lovely local business - but the most I can find is an Instagram account of a similar named company which is, indeed, in Canada.  Delete .  Resonant Dis tor tion 18:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : An article on a recently-established small business.  The firm have been alert in identifying invading hornets but this does not contribute to demonstrating notability for the firm.  AllyD ( talk ) 08:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Omani Leacock : The one reference currently in the article was the only thing close to meeting GNG that I found.  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Barbados .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 05:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete