hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
İbrahim Kavrakoğlu: I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 14 .   — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 11:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Authors , Engineering , Turkey ,  and England .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Ganesha811 ( talk ) 21:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nothing in the article can be verified, so we can delete per WP:V without even considering notability.  But considering notability anyway: nothing in the article rises to a claim of notability through WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR ; in particular, publishing many things is not notability.  We need evidence of impact through e.g. high citation counts or published book reviews and we have none of those.  Provost of Boğaziçi University is not head of the university (it has apparently always been headed by a rector) and none of his other academic positions is high enough.  He did not win the 1988 Franz Edelman Award for Achievement in Operations Research and the Management Sciences ; he was merely one of five members in one of six also-ran teams.  If he has headed important Turkish government development work, we need published reliable sources with in-depth content about his role in that work to pass WP:GNG , and we don't have those either.  — David Eppstein ( talk ) 08:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Griffin Colby: JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and South Africa .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 18:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG .  No suitable redirect per WP:ATD .  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 18:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Fakt Marathi Cine Sanman: No notability through WP:GNG .  §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ { Talk / Edits } 06:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film , India ,  and Maharashtra .  §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ { Talk / Edits } 06:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep : four source ABP Majha [42] , Loksatta [43] , Sakal [44] and News18 India [45] .  WP:GNG pass ~ ‪AShiv1212‬ ( talk ) 08:0, 5 April 2023 (UTC) An award function; which is hopefully planned to be conducted annually (?!), should be considered notable if it has at least happened twice.  One time event cant win notability.  Also, presence of notable personalities is bound to get media coverage.  But non of the 4 3 sources mention anything about the awards.  Like for example are the awards annual?!  What is the entry criteria?!  What is the actual nature of award (like trophy, cash, etc.)?  Is it popular choice award or critic award?  How neutral are they?  etc. (The two sources of ABP Majha & Loksatta are verbatim same; except that Loksatta forgot to scroll till the end and hence didn't paste the last para.)  §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ { Talk / Edits } 09:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I'd prefer to wait to see if there is a second awards ceremony (with coverage) this year before deleting.   So either keep or draft-ify.  Walt Yoder ( talk ) 17:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rukmini Devi Public School: Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 12:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  RPSkokie ( talk ) 12:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Qualifies speedy deletion under WP:A7 .  User4edits ( talk ) 10:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Educational institutions are excluded from A7.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Delhi .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Uncited and fails WP:NSCHOOL .  LibStar ( talk ) 00:37, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above and my own long-standing standards.  Absolutely run-of-the-mill school.  Bearian ( talk ) 18:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eric Freeman (actor): Needs two or more significant roles in order to be eligible.   None of his other roles are significant enough.  The Film Creator ( talk ) 16:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 16:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions .  Hey man im josh ( talk ) 16:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Rim Chol-min: Simione001 ( talk ) 03:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions .  Simione001 ( talk ) 03:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 19:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
List of Mutants in The Hills Have Eyes: Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Entertainment .  Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Lists .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Standards were much laxer back in 2011.  Clarityfiend ( talk ) 00:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment There are two original films, and two remakes, that use these characters.   Is there any reason not to just list them in the articles for those films?  D r e a m Focus 02:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or revise to make shorter.  Much of it is original research with no citations.  Movie plots can be referenced to the movie itself, but this is not a movie plot so we needed sources.  Hkkingg ( talk ) 20:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Move or revise into a general list of character for the franchise like List of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (franchise) characters , List of Scream (film series) characters , List of Friday the 13th characters and similar.  ★Trekker ( talk ) 20:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think what @ Dream Focus was getting at is that this is not an expansive film franchise like the ones you've listed.  if someone feels a listing or whatever of the characters in either movie is warranted, then include it in that movie's particular article.  Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I don't think the Hills have Eyes verse is expansive enough to warrant a list of characters.  Any lists of mutants can be merged back to their respective films -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not enough WP:SIGCOV to support an article.  This is an unlikely search term and won't make sense for a redirect.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 20:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Each of the movies have the characters in the cast list, and their role in the plot in the summary of each movie.   There are no sources I can find that discuss the concept of mutants in the franchise as a group that would justify a specific article on them.  Rorshacma ( talk ) 18:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , without prejudice against restoration to draft if substantial sources for coverage meeting WP:LISTN can be provided.  BD2412 T 02:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  This is a great example of the sort of article we do not need.  Jacona ( talk ) 16:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Top Shelf Coffee: Fails NCORP Graywalls ( talk ) 19:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Business , Companies ,  and Ohio .  Graywalls ( talk ) 19:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The original creator appears to have been an owner advertising the shop.  Regardless, there are not any reliable sources that show noteworthiness here.  Conyo14 ( talk ) 21:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I cannot find any source that meets WP:ORGCRIT .  -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 06:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Nearly being selected by the NBA does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV .  Also fails WP:ORG overall.  — Hello Annyong (say whaaat?!) 01:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
KKPM-CD: Let'srun ( talk ) 02:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California .  Let'srun ( talk ) 02:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : There is clearly not enough independent coverage to meet WP:SIGCOV or WP:GNG.  1keyhole ( talk ) 03:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Ustin Cerga: The best sources that I can find are IPN , a trivial mention, Sports.md 1 , a basic Q&A with no independent analysis at all, and Sports.md 2 , which also has no significant independent analysis of his responses to constitute significant coverage of Cerga.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Moldova .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Eljan Mehmetaj: The subject made five appearances in Kategoria e Parë , the Albanian second tier, then disappeared from professional football.  [66] mentions a hospitalisation as a 17-year-old.  It's not enough for WP:SIGCOV .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 01:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football .  Robby.is.on ( talk ) 01:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 09:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per above.  Svartner ( talk ) 13:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 20:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not encyclopedic.  On a related note, Albania's second tier was not professional despite claims of the opposite, having crowd attendances in the hundreds.  Mehmetaj actually played 3 times in the first tier, but with attendances floating around 300 people .  No professional sports operation can be upheld with such a major lack of income from tickets, and when few people care about something, the media coverage is equally diminutive.  Geschichte ( talk ) 11:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Brian Delate: None of his roles are significant enough (I will admit his role as Truman Burbank’s “father” in The Truman Show was a crucial role in his career).  The Film Creator ( talk ) 15:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions .  The Film Creator ( talk ) 15:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New Jersey and Pennsylvania .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  08:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NACTOR - he was in one big film.  He has virtually zero social media presence.  Bearian ( talk ) 21:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Genital mutilation (disambiguation): It is, rather, merely a list of instances of conduct that could be characterized as mutilation of the genitals.  BD2412 T 19:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions .  BD2412 T 19:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Medicine .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete because, as the nominator says, this is not a disambiguation page, but is more or less a heading summary of the main article Genital modification and mutilation .  Sionk ( talk ) 20:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - WP:DABDICT "A disambiguation page is not a list of dictionary definitions".  — Maile ( talk ) 20:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  The above arguments seem reasonable to me.  AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk ) 00:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep and Revert to Special:Permalink/555992761 , the last good version from 20 May 2013.  This was first written as a dab page by SlimVirgin in 2011, but in 2013 revised to its current state by

Discussion outcome: delete
Rishan Ahanthem: He played 81 mins of football back in January 2021 but doesn't seem to have played any football since so I'm not seeing any guarantee of future notability here either.  My WP:BEFORE only returned database sources, which SPORTBASIC explicitly states as not being enough for notability.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Manipur .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 13:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis.  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
California Congress of Republicans: It doesn't seem like their initial split from the party was very widely-covered, and they certainly haven't gotten much news coverage in the last decade .  It seems like they're basically just a minor Republican club, and those don't automatically get Wikipedia pages.  Also, appropos of nothing, this article is written like a press release.  I'd support either a delete or a redirect to California Republican Party .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 01:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Please see Republican Party (United States) organizations and Category:Political advocacy groups in the United States by political party - I don't think these are split from the overall national party, or even state party, as much as they are local groups of the same party.   They cater to the local area Republicans, much like fan clubs.   The ultimate goal would be to boost the overall state and national parties, but focusing on local politics — Maile ( talk ) 03:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] True.  I misread the article and thought they split from the CAGOP when in reality they split from the California Republican Assembly.  That actually strengthens the case to delete this page, as the California Republican Assembly doesn't even have a Wikipedia page.  I certainly don't see any indication that the California Congress of Republicans is as notable as other groups on that page like Log Cabin Republicans or the Freedom Caucus .  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 21:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - is this related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Republican Assembly ?  — Maile ( talk ) 22:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Not to my knowledge.  BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk ) 23:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete