hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Battle of Fuente del Rodeo: Could not find any concrete sources that this battle ever happened, and the sourcing in the article  on both Spanish and English Wikipedia does not appear to directly refer to the battle.  Furthermore, the only actions that seem to have occurred as part of the war between the 13th and 18th March 1844 was the battle/skirmish of 'Cabeza de Las Marías y Las Hicotecas', which was a Haitian victory.  ASmallMapleLeaf ( talk ) 22:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions .  ASmallMapleLeaf ( talk ) 22:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , History , Dominican Republic ,  and Haiti .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Does not appear to be a hoax, as it looks like there was some kind of skirmish on 13 March [1] , though "Batalla [de] Fuente del Rodeo" appears a modern name given the lack of books with it [2] (sidenote: there are three other "Battles" listed at Dominican War of Independence#Battles and the associated navbox where casualties are nil to minimal).  Am amenable to a redirect to Dominican War of Independence#1844: First campaign per NOPAGE as it doesn't look like there's much to be said about the incident (taking the es-wiki article into account) that can't be covered by tweaking the current text.  ~ Hydronium ~ Hydroxide ~ (Talk) ~ 02:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Not found any WP:RS citing "Battle of Fuente del Rodeo" verbatim, nor any historians calling it by the name.  As we are not inventing names for battles such as '"Battle of X", and the article fails WP:GNG . -- Imperial [AFCND] 18:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Tommy e Oscar: Previously deleted per prod and undelete with the mess left on mainspace.
 Previous message is still valid.
 Appears to fail WP:NTV , nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to establish notability which is has been tagged for since 2020 scope_creep Talk 11:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  As a cartoon series of 52 episodes that aired nationally (edit: internationally actually) one would think that this should be notable, but since yesterday I've been trying really hard to find some actual sources on this, and couldn't.  Information in the article is unverifiable. — Alalch E. 11:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I mean there are some tv-guide sources like [14] and [15] — Alalch E. 11:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Also the series is noteworthy as the first cartoon of Rainbow S.p.A. which subsequently created the mega popular Winx franchise — Alalch E. 11:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television , Comics and animation ,  and Italy .  Shellwood ( talk ) 11:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG Donald D23 talk to me 13:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: here are 4 refs behind a paywall; I can only see summaries: [16] Corriere della Sera (via the Wikipedia Library) has something at [17] but I can't get it to load.  One of the article's  refs [18] is from Film.it .  which redirects to La Stampa .  Film.it is also connected to Il Secolo XIX Another Italian ref: [19] it.wikipedia uses La Folla del XXI Secolo as a ref for several articles; we don't.  Article is comprehensive and bylined.  Editorial oversight uncertain.  Independent, not churnalism.  There's more to check at the Google.it search for Italian-only URLs: [20] -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 21:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I did do a search on search on several Italian sites, but it was a mixed back of mostly profile and short descriptions. Nothing of depth. There is 52 episodes on it, so there should writeups, reviews that sort of thing, but I couldn't see much. It seems to be all listing sites. scope_creep Talk 22:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I've seen all of those articles I think while searching for sources after the article was restored. La Folla del XXI Secolo doesn't have editorial oversight. — Alalch E. 22:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The programmme was created at the turn of the century. If there is anything, it will mentioned in Google Books, perhaps a review of the work, if it has lasting impact. scope_creep Talk 07:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Rainbow S.p.A. § Television series as an inevitable last resort. -- Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw? ) 22:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Derek Brison: One appearance for the Aruba national football team .  Played in the Aruban league before playing in the 6th, 7th, and 8th tiers of Dutch football.  I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage on the subject from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football , Netherlands ,  and Caribbean .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect .  No SIGCOV.  〜 Festucalex • talk 07:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  Giant Snowman 18:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
FC Oțelul II Galați: A short-lived reserve team that never achieved notability on its own.  Geschichte ( talk ) 07:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Romania .  Shellwood ( talk ) 09:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nom.  By the way you don’t need an AfD discussion for a redirect.  Mccapra ( talk ) 11:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I would like to port some of the information from this article to the future 'parent' article.  Do we have an example of how a 2nd team is described as part of the main article of a team?  LaUr3nTiU ( talk ) 13:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just include a sub-heading with the information and make sure to source it.  SportingFlyer T · C 17:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 15:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as above. Giant Snowman 15:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Indian Journal of Law and Technology: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to its publishing institution, National Law School of India University .  The most significant claim of notability, as I read it, is that it is "one of top ranked law journals in India", but checking the cited reference shows that there are only 13 such journals.  Mathematically, almost all of them are in the top ten!  IJLT is squarely in the middle at number 6.  TJRC ( talk ) 19:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect' per TJRC .  BD2412 T 01:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
List of people in Playboy 1960–1969: There is significant concern that this list violates WP:BLP as well; see WP:DEL-REASON 7 and 9.  Related lists for other decades have been redirected to List of Playboy Playmates of the Month , which seems like a good solution to me.  The exception to that is List of people in Playboy 1970–1979 , where the BLAR was reverted (just as it was here).  Consider this a WP:BUNDLE nom, as the exact same concerns apply.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 11:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Popular culture .  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 11:48, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Sexuality and gender .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 17:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions .  • Gene93k ( talk ) 17:46, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I think sourcing may be hard for this since no pornographic sites will be seen as good sources or will be allowed to be linked to.  KatoKungLee ( talk ) 01:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect or delete' .  Unreferenced semi-fork of List of Playboy Playmates of the Month .  And realistically, while broader, this is just a selective list of contents of the magazine.  This is about as encyclopedic as a list of topics of The Economist (1960–1969) or such.  A form of fancruft, I fear,  not encyclopedic material. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 06:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] While I disagree that the list requires OR or is unsourced (it's all implicitly cited to the publication).  I agree that this is basically a WP:CONTENTFORK as well as violating WP:NOTDIRECTORY .  It may be possible that the destination article could be further expanded in some way, but a full directory of everyone to appear in a publication isn't the way to do that.  merge both to above suggestion.  — siro χ o 02:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I’m not sure that the names of the models appear in the publications.  Do they?  As you mention, even if they do, there are plenty of issues with these articles.  Actualcpscm scrutinize , talk 07:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Estádio Arena do Município Verde: Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports , Football ,  and Brazil .  Nagol0929 ( talk ) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Paragominas Futebol Clube .  Svartner ( talk ) 16:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 09:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Paragominas Futebol Clube .  Giant Snowman 09:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It does pass GNG, as you'd expect from a 10.000 seat stadium, but the article needs to be improved.  See Portuguese page and [105] [106] [107] SportingFlyer T · C 20:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk ) 12:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Suraj Hua Maddham: Shellwood ( talk ) 10:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : This would need evidence of specific notability if the prior AfD decision is to be set aside.   The present text lists awards but without references, and particularly without demonstrating that these were specifically about this song; the pre-redirect version was no better.  An archived Planet Bollywood review of the film soundtrack album is complimentary ( "Melody, singing, meaningful lyrics, sweet music that just makes you want to pump up the volume. That is an understatement when describing, Suraj Hua Maddham... As if the song wasn’t good enough just imagine what the Egypt locales will do in making this a treat! The instrumentalism... is just proof that this is the best song on the soundtrack" [28] ), but I am unconvinced that is enough to demonstrate specific notability.  AllyD ( talk ) 06:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 06:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Restore redirect : Unless someone finds evidence of specific WP:NSONG notability (for which the source I discussed above is insufficient), the redirect consensus of the 2012 AfD should stand.  AllyD ( talk ) 06:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
King College of Technology: Looks promotional i.e advertising (may be by the college).  Clearly not notable.  Article on Anna University already exists.  TheProEditor11 ( talk ) 16:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India .  TheProEditor11 ( talk ) 16:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , or redirect to List of colleges and institutions affiliated to Anna University#Coimbatore Region where it's listed, should sources not be located.  Despite longstanding tags no suitable references have been added and there's been reversions in the article history for promotional content.  Rupples ( talk ) 21:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
World Affairs Council of Dallas/Fort Worth: Not a single secondary source.  PROD tag placed by @ ArchCardinal : and removed by @ Kvng : .  Another PROD tag placed by @ FactFindersEnigma : but removed as PROD is once-only.  Article was created by COI SPA DFW WAC .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 09:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United States of America .  AusLondonder ( talk ) 09:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] SPEEDY DELETE - WP:NOR , WP:RSSELF self published by the World Affairs Council of Dallas/Fort Worth.  — Maile ( talk ) 15:17, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to World_Affairs_Councils_of_America#Individual_councils as preferred WP:ATD .  Already listed there.  No reliably sourced content to merge.  Kvngr ( talk } ☎ ]] 00:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, ✗ plicit 13:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to World_Affairs_Councils_of_America#Individual_councils : As a valid WP:ATD .  StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Rana Walker: There was a flurry of repetitive articles when the show was launched, which all gave the same basic 1-2 sentence descriptions of her.  I cannot find any significant coverage to support notability .  Schazjmd (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect No coverage for the person, could redirect to the show I suppose.  This is all I find [9] , a one line mention of her in a paragraph about the show.  I don't think she meets ACTOR, but I'm not sure if her role in the show counts as a major part or not.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 19:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I see a few mentions of her in the Starting Over (TV series) article, so you're right, could be a redirect.  Schazjmd (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I could not find much reliable, independent sources with significant coverage, aside from a few print newspapers.  Multi7001 ( talk ) 05:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : BLP, fails GNG and BIO.  Sources in article and BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS.  WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"' ; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy ( WP:V and WP:BLP ) and guidelines ( WP:BIO and WP:IS , WP:RS , WP:SIGCOV ).  There does not seem to be a good redirect target.  // Timothy :: talk 10:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Weak redirect to Starting Over (TV series) where the subject is mentioned, though I wouldn't completely oppose deletion if consensus leads to that.  CycloneYoris talk!  23:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Marcos Chamyan: JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Rugby union ,  and Uruguay .  JTtheOG ( talk ) 19:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 08:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Uruguay national rugby union players Struggling to find significant coverage in a search.  Think he has a nickname that he's known by which may lead to coverage, but can't find it currently.  Redirect a suitable WP:ATD and saves the history.  Rugbyfan22 ( talk ) 08:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect per nomination.  - The Gnome ( talk ) 14:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Syd Ward (footballer): IncompA 19:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Football ,  and United Kingdom .  IncompA 19:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 20:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List of Bradford City A.F.C. players (1–49 league appearances) - there is likely old newspaper coverage out there, the issue is finding it.  Giant Snowman 20:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect as WP:ATD per GiantSnowman above.  A standalone article doesn't satisfy WP:GNG .  Jogurney ( talk ) 02:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect
Meaning (House): This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid.  In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show.  Donald D23 talk to me 01:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America .  Donald D23 talk to me 01:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to House (season 3) , where the episode is listed and there's a brief description of the plot.  CycloneYoris talk!  23:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: redirect