hsuvaskakoty/wide_analysis huggingface dataset:
Moolatrilo: Only used by Malkani.  No secondary sources.  Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 18:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal , Organisms ,  and Pakistan .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, L iz Read!  Talk!  18:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Lythronaxargestes ( talk | contribs ) 21:11, 20 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Lanser Broadcasting: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio , Companies ,  and Michigan .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Except for some passing mentions, I could not find any results about this subject, which as a result is nowhere close to meeting either WP:NCORP or WP:GNG .  User:Let'srun 14:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Anti-Taiwan independence sentiment: Shellwood ( talk ) 14:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Unsourced, and it's hard to see how an article about a sentiment (that is, a feeling) toward a particular subject could be the subject of SIGCOV.   We already have articles on the Taiwan independence movement and the Anti-secession law , making this topic superfluous and self-explanatory.  WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 15:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete The article is completely unsourced, and I too could find no sources, which means this article fails to establish that this subject is valid, much less notable.  TH1980 ( talk ) 01:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Oliver Bogner: The sources given are merely quick mentions of him, and the one with the most information is a university newsletter talking about another article published about him.  Google search comes up with fewer than 100 results, mainly entries in directories and social media, and those "get in touch with us and we will interview you" type of sites.  ... disco spinster talk 16:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Television ,  and United States of America .  ... disco spinster talk 16:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete non-notable television executive.  The "30 under 30" nomination isn't notable, rest is routine career information.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete not a single GNG-passing source here.  SportingFlyer T · C 21:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG .  Charsaddian ( talk ) 19:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
WWJS-CD: Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana .  Mvcg66b3r ( talk ) 21:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'd have thought a local newscast would be enough to get multiple pieces of coverage.  I appear to be wrong, because I only found one article.  Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c ) 01:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : If Sammi Brie can't find sufficient significant coverage to merit retaining and beefing up this article, despite there having actually been local programming/news, it's probably safe to deem this a remnant of the looser inclusion standards of 2009 that doesn't really have a place in the Wikipedia in 2024.  (That it has been tagged for notability concerns—albeit as a WP:CORP failure rather than GNG —since 2018—three years before the 2021 RfC that affirmed that GNG is the minimum standard in this topic area—probably should have been an early indicator that this article needed to go.)  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Steffen Handschuh: Unfortunately, that fact is not quite interesting enough to get a lot of press attention: Here's an interview with 11 Freunde magazine, here's the solution to Stuttgarter Zeitung 's question of week 47/2012, and that's the extent of what I could dig up.  Fails WP:SPORTCRIT .  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 10:07, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Germany .  Dr. Duh 🩺 ( talk ) 10:07, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 19:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
João Castro Neves: No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG.  Content is basically resume content written in a resume way.   Nothing approaching even 1 GNG source.   At first blush econoTimes looks lengthy but it has no author and a disclaimer by EconoTimes and appears to be flowerly self-written bio.    Some concern that the creator has a total of 39 edits, nearly all on this person, the company they work for (3G capital) and articles on two other employees of 3G capital.  North8000 ( talk ) 21:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Food and drink , Architecture , Finance , Brazil ,  and Illinois .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete successful career but nothing to indicate encyclopedic notability.  Mccapra ( talk ) 00:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SIGCOV .  There is literally one reliable source - Wall Street Journal .  That goes nowhere close to meeting WP:BLP .  In 2024, everyone knows that we are not a free web host for one's resume .  For the record, he has fewer than half of my connections on LinkedIn.  Bearian ( talk ) 21:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Spartans Futsal Club: Unable to locate independent reliable sources which discuss the subject in detail.  C 679 07:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and England .  C 679 07:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 14:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete – Per nom.  Svartner ( talk ) 22:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Giant Snowman 10:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me.  Giant Snowman 10:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Mougnini Tape: Geschichte ( talk ) 09:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Football ,  and Africa .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability.  If sources are found please ping me.  Giant Snowman 12:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Ivory Coast-related deletion discussions .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Tetsuo Shimada: It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this.  Boleyn ( talk ) 19:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions .  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I did a Google search in Japanese for news and came up with nothing that would show notability.  If there are decent reviews of his books in Japanese he might be notable as an author, but I could only see book selling sites and UGC.  Mccapra ( talk ) 02:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Did a search on . jp websites, there are a few scientists with a similar name, but nothing for a sports personality.  Delete for lack of sourcing.  Oaktree b ( talk ) 00:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete.  Fails to justify itself biographical vailidity, usefulness to Wikipedia as an encyclopedic-nature overview, or via notability or language-specified citation checks - not even the linked Shimada Corporation notation on the page provides even remotely enough information to justify this page's existence.  Furthermore, none of the subject's publications, affiliations or contributions to his field suggest that this page provides meaningful or useful information from which readers can benefit.  As such, all the evidence points to the deletion of this page; I can't see how it could be improved in the foreseeable future, nor does it seem worth scraping together reviews of the subject's generally insignificant output of work.  TheMysteriousShadeheart ( talk ) 18:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Judoscript: The first reason is that it fails WP: N .  A PROD on this article failed, but neither of the sources suggested when dePRODing covers the subject in-depth.  The second reason is that this article is almost entirely (>80%) written by a user named JianboHuang, a single-purpose editor whose name closely matches that of the creator of the language.  While AfD is not a venue to determine whether a COI has occurred, the edits made by this user cover the subject in excessive detail and in a tone that isn't really appropriate for an encyclopedia.  At this point, I think WP: STARTOVER applies here.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 22:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom.  Aaron Liu ( talk ) 02:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:GNG and WP:NOTWEBHOST .  In 2024, everyone knows that we are not a free web host for one's computer thing.  The vast majority of content has been created by two SPAs, who might be sockpuppets .  Bearian ( talk ) 16:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - Please look at the potential sources I added to Talk:Judoscript .  ~ Kvng ( talk ) 16:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's already addressed in the AfD.  A PROD on this article failed, but neither of the sources suggested when dePRODing covers the subject in-depth.  Even if these sources can actually establish notability, this article almost entirely contains content that isn't fit for an encyclopedia.  Removing that content would essentially amount to blanking the page.  HyperAccelerated ( talk ) 17:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Harry Brighton: An article with almost no reliable sources on a minor character.  I couldn't find many reliable sources on "Harry Brighton".  JooneBug37 ( talk ) 21:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions .  JooneBug37 ( talk ) 21:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions .  JooneBug37 ( talk ) 21:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge/rename to Fictional characters in Lawrence of Arabia per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Bentley .  The sources here are borderline for WP:SIGCOV .  But there is enough reliable coverage to write something about how the filmmakers adapted real life people into composite characters .  It's a rare niche where there is no real life person to merge these characters to, but there are multiple real life people who inspired these characters, and that is reliable information we should WP:PRESERVE .  A list of characters is normal for fiction like this.  Shooterwalker ( talk ) 19:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails GNG, fancruft, Nothing properly sourced for a merge, article is mainly WP:OR/SYNTH.  // Timothy :: talk 08:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Zero Film Festival: Tons of unsourced statements, likely a WP:COI .  Can't find anything online, thus does not meet WP:GNG .  TLA (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Events .  Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: England , Canada , California , Florida ,  and New York .  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  Article is completely unsourced and somewhat advertorialized, and says nothing that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to pass WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT .  Bearcat ( talk ) 16:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Persecution of Christians by Christians: Also allegations of WP:OR and cherrypicking .  Only conversation on Talk has been people calling for deletion.  Ultimately, I feel any of this information can be included elsewhere (such as Sectarian violence among Christians ).  Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk ) 00:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ User:Tomorrow and tomorrow , don't forget to notify the article's creator and any other major contributors.  You can use this template: Template:Afd notice .  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Done .  Thanks for the reminder.  Notified creator, only other major contributor is indefinitely blocked.  Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk ) 01:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , Religion , History ,  and Military .  A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 00:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  The topic is notable, but the article is at Sectarian violence among Christians .  This is just an unsourced, unsystematic list.  Even if re-titled as a list, TNT applies.  Srnec ( talk ) 03:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions .  Kpg jhp jm 06:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Srnec.  Mccapra ( talk ) 06:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Srnec.  St Anselm ( talk ) 14:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete .  POVfork of Sectarian violence among Christians .  My very best wishes ( talk ) 22:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : if there's any redeemable content not duplicated at Sectarian violence among Christians , it can be merged in, but my sense from a quick read is that there's unlikely to be much.  UndercoverClassicist ( talk ) 17:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Srnec and there is article about Sectarian violence among Christians .  Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 17:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as POV fork.  Place Clichy ( talk ) 15:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a fork.  -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 17:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and redirect to Sectarian violence among Christians . Stuartyeates ( talk ) 09:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom  -- Devoke water 10:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:SNOWBALL .  Khwiser ( talk ) 13:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Darryl D'Bonneau: There are a few paragraphs of seemingly independent reporting at the top of that article so it could be a good source, but if it's the only one that's getting found then this still isn't showing notability.  As I said in the PROD, one #1 hit on (what looks to be unless I'm mistaken) a minor Billboard chart isn't promising, and though this is no longer totally unsourced, there are still no other apparent points of notability.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Carolina .  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question : Doesn't he pass the WP:MUSICBIO SNG criterion #2 virtue of his #1 hit on the Billboard Dance chart?  I disagree that Billboard dance is a minor chart, for the era, (~2000s) that was the most important chart for Dance music.  By any standard within his genre that is a major chart, and Dance music is not a minor genre.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 14:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It appears my first mistake was assuming that Dance/Electronic Songs was older than 2013.  I suppose that means this would've been the biggest chart at the time, though for a genre which wasn't particularly major at the time so that could go any way.  Doesn't matter though, my main point was that without anything else to support notability this is still too barebones.  Do keep in mind that MUSICBIO specifies that " may be notable if they meet at least one" criterion (emphasis mine), but not necessarily that just meeting one is a guarantee.  Having just one hit song at a time when the genre wasn't particularly successful in general doesn't feel like a strong enough claim to me.  Our best bet would be more reliable sources, and my not finding any is how we got here in the first place.  QuietHere ( talk | contributions ) 14:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I strongly disagree that the ~2000s were an unsuccessful period for dance music, arguably some would regard it as a silver age of sorts.  Wonder if any domain experts would be able to weigh in here for comment?  I still think the entry is fine as is, am leaning Keep.  Jack4576 ( talk ) 15:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm not finding anything but the single 2014 piece in Dance Mogul Magazine , and honestly it reads like it was written by his publicist.  Do we have another source for this claimed #1 hit?  Google on "darryl d'bonneau" billboard brings up a single #48 and nothing else.  Searching billboard for d'bonneau ditto.  Valereee ( talk ) 16:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.  Please add new comments below this notice.  Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk ) 07:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete
Karuna Trust (Sri Lanka): GTrang ( talk ) 04:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note:  This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Sri Lanka .  WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , agree with nom.  clearly fails the requirements of WP:NORG .  Dan arndt ( talk ) 04:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Discussion outcome: delete